Upload
cottonwood-creek-watershed
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
1/26
Dru iri d
r wri:cc, rr d fuur c
WMO - No. 1006
Weather and climate information for
sustainable agricultural development
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
2/26
WMO-No. 1006
2006, World Meteorological OrganizationISBN 92-63-11006-9
Cover illustration: Maasai tribesman walking through drought-stricken landscape, Kenya. Jonathan and Angela (Getty Images)
NOTE
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or
area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers or boundaries.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
3/26
Contents
Fwd . ....2
Itdcti . ....4
Dgt zd: ccpt d dfiti . ....6
Typ dgt . . ....8
Cctizig dgt d it vity . ..10
T cg dgt itig d y wig . ..11
Itgtd dgt itig d divy: t wy wd . ..12
Dgt itig ctiviti: c tdi . ..15
China . ..15
IGADClimatePredictionandApplicationsCentre(ICPAC). ..17
SouthArica. ..19
Portugal. ..
20
Australia . ..23
Cci . ..24
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
4/26
FoReWoRD
Throughoutthecourseohumanhistory,drought
hasbeenaproblemaectingourwelareandood
security.Oallhumanendeavours,agriculturewas
perhaps the rst sector or which humans recog-
nized the strongrelationships between cropsand
weather.Short-termrainalldecitspromptedearly
humans to nd alternative ood crops. However,
evenasingleyearwithaseveredroughtduringthe
rainyseasonresultedincropailures,whichmost
likelyledtohumansmigratingtootherareas.There-
ore,inearlyhumanhistory,evenlimiteddroughtshadlargeimpacts.
In recent times, short-term drought adaptation
mechanismshaveimproved,butextendedperiods
o drought are now the main concern or human
welareandoodsecurity.Theseperiodsodryness,
whencoupledwithotherclimaticactors,suchas
extremerainallandwindeventsorunsustainable
agricultural and development patterns, can result
inlanddegradationand,iunchecked,inincreases
in desert land areas or desertication. During the
1970s and 1980s, West Arica experienced anextendedperiododroughtthatledtowidespread
concernabouttheseissuesTheaggregateimpact
odroughtcanbequitenegativeontheeconomies
odevelopingcountries,inparticular.Forexample,
GDPellby8to9percentinZimbabweandZambia
in1992and4to6percentinNigeriaandNigerin
1984.Over250millionpeoplearedirectlyaected
bylanddegradationanddesertication.Inaddition,
someonebillionpeopleinover100countriesareat
risk.Theyincludemanyotheworldspoorestand
mostmarginalizedcitizens.Hence,combatingdeser-
ticationisanurgentpriorityintheglobaleor tsto
ensureoodsecurityandthelivelihoodsomillionsopeoplewhoinhabitthedrylands.
Asvulnerabilitytodroughthasincreasedglobally,
greaterattentionhasbeendirectedtoreducingthe
risks associated with its occurrence through the
introduction o planning to enhance operational
capabilities such as climate and water supply
monitoringandbuildinginstitutionalcapacity,and
mitigationmeasuresthatareaimedatreducingthe
impactsodrought.
Importantcomponentsoeectivedroughtmanage-ment are improved drought monitoring and early
warning systems. The ght against drought and
desertication receives a high priority in WMOs
Strategic Plan, particularly under the Agricultural
Meteorology Programme, the Hydrology and
Water Resources Programme and the TechnicalCooperation Programme. WMO actively involves
the National Meteorological and Hydrological
Services (NMHSs), the regional and sub-regional
meteorological centres and other bodies in the
improvement o hydrological and meteorological
networksorsystematicobservationsandexchange
and analysiso data.WMO also works closely with
other UN agencies and international organizations
to develop long-term strategies aimed at promot-
ing meteorological and hydrological activities that
contributetobetterdroughtmonitoringanduseo
medium- and long-range weather orecasts and to
assistinthetranseroknowledgeandtechnology.
Atits58thordinarysession,theUnitedNationsGeneral
Assemblydeclared2006tobetheInternationalYear
o Deserts and Desertication (IYDD). In doing so,
the General Assembly underlined its deep concern
or the exacerbation o desertication, particularly
in Arica, and noted its ar-reaching implications or
the implementation o the Millennium Development
Goals(MDGs),whicharetobemetbytheyear2015.
TheIYDDpresentsagoldenopportunitytoconveythe
message strongly and eectively in the sense that
issues o drought, land degradation and desertica-tion are global problems that must be addressed. It
also provides animpulseto strengthen the visibility
andimportanceothedrylandsissueontheinterna-
tionalenvironmentalagenda,whileprovidingatimely
M. Jarraud, Secretary-General
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
5/26
remindertotheinternationalcommunityothehuge
challengesthatstilllieahead.
TheUnited NationsConvention toCombat Deserti-
cation (UNCCD) and WMO have been longstanding
partners in developing and promoting the issues
related to drought monitoring, preparedness, miti-
gation, land degradation and desertication. As
partoitsimplementationactivitiesorIYDD,WMO
has prepared this brochure to explain the various
conceptsandchallengesodroughtmonitoringandearly warning systems. This brochure also details
the considerable progress that has been made on
theseissuesinsomedrought-pronecountriesbyhigh-
lightingseveralcasestudiesromaroundtheworld.
IwishtothankMrDonaldWilhite,DirectorotheNational
DroughtMitigationCenterandProessorotheSchool
o Natural Resources o the University o Nebraska
(USA),orpreparingthisinormativebrochure.Wehope
thatthisdocumentwillbeuseultocountrieslookingto
developorenhancetheirowndroughtmonitoringand
earlywarningcapabilities.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
6/26
IntRoDUCtIon
Droughtisaninsidiousnaturalhazardcharacterized
bylowerthanexpectedorlowerthannormalprecip-
itationthat,whenextendedoveraseasonorlonger
periodotime, isinsucient tomeetthedemands
o human activities and the environment. Drought
isatemporaryaberration,unlikearidity,whichisa
permanenteatureoclimate.Seasonalaridity,that
is,awell-deneddry season,alsoneedstobe dis-
tinguished rom drought, as these terms areoten
conusedorusedinterchangeably.Thedierences
needtobeunderstoodandproperlyincorporatedindroughtmonitoringandearlywarningsystemsand
preparednessplans.
Droughtmustbeconsideredarelative,ratherthan
an absolute, condition. It occurs in both high and
low rainallareas and virtually all climate regimes.
Droughtisotenassociatedonlywitharid,semi-arid
andsub-humidregionsbyscientists,policymakers
and the public. In reality, drought occurs in most
countries,inbothdryandhumidregions.Droughtis
anormalpartoclimate,althoughitsspatialextent
andseveritywillvaryonseasonalandannualtime-scales.Inmanycountries,suchasAustralia,China,
India and the United States o America, drought
occurs over a portion o the country each year.
Owingtotherequentoccurrenceodroughtandthe
proound impacts associated with it, governments
shoulddevotemoreattentiontothedevelopmento
anationalstrategyorpolicytoreduceitseconomic,
social and environmental consequences. A criti-
calcomponentothatstrategyisacomprehensive
drought monitoring system that can provide early
warning odroughts onset and end, determine its
severityanddeliverthatinormationtoabroadclien-
teleinmanyclimate-andwater-sensitivesectorsina
timelymanner.Withthisinormation,theimpactso
droughtcanbereducedoravoidedinmanycases.
Drought is a regional phenomenon and its charac-teristics dier rom one climate regime to another.
Aewexamplesothecontrastingtemperatureand
precipitationregimesovariousregionsareshownin
Figure1.Droughtoccursineachotheselocations,
but characteristics such as requency and duration
vary appreciably. New Delhis precipitation pattern
isdistinctlymonsoonal,withmaximumprecipitation
occurring rom June to October, with the greatest
concentrationinJuly,AugustandSeptember.Tunis
has a distinctly Mediterranean-type (dry summer)
climateregime.Nairobisprecipitationdistributionis
distinctlybi-modal,withpeakrainallexpectedromMarch through Mayanda second concentration in
November and December. Londons precipitation
is evenly distributed throughout the year. In each
example,asignicantdepartureromtheseregimes
oranextendedperiodotimewillresultinimpactsin
climate-andwater-sensitivesectors.Impactsarealso
PhIlIPPEChEvAlIEr(IrD)
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
7/26
regionalinnature,refectingexposuretothehazard
andthevulnerabilityosocietytoextendedperiods
oprecipitationdecits.Impactsareameasureovul-
nerability.Riskisaproductoexposuretothehazard
andsocietalvulnerability.
Droughtbyitselisnotadisaster.Whetheritbecomes
a disaster depends on its impact on local people,
economiesandtheenvironmentandtheirabilityto
copewithandrecoverromit.Thereore,thekeyto
understandingdroughtistograspitsnaturaland
socialdimensions. The goal odroughtrisk man-
agement is to increase societys coping capacity,
leading to greater resilience and a reduced need
orgovernmentordonorinterventionsintheorm
o disaster assistance. Drought monitoring and
early warning are major components o drought
riskmanagement.
Figure 1. Climographs illustrating monthly temperature and precipitation regimes or New Delhi, Tunis, Nairobi and London.
(Source: National Drought Mitigation Center, University o NebraskaLincoln, USA)
New Delhi
Prec
ipitation(mm) Te
mperature
(C)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
JAN FEB MAR A P R MA Y JUN JUL A UG S EP O CT N OV D EC
Tunis
Prec
ipitation(mm) Te
mperature
(C)
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-200
50
100
150
200
250
JAN FEB MAR A P R MAY JU N JUL A UG S EP O CT N OV D EC
Nairobi
Precipitation(mm) Te
mperature(C)
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-200
50
100
150
200
250
JAN FEB MAR A P R MA Y JUN JUL A UG S EP O CT N OV D EC
London
Precipitation(mm) Te
mperature(C)
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-200
50
100
150
200
250
JAN FEB MAR A P R MAY JU N JUL A UG S EP O CT N OV D EC
Temperature
Precipitation
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
8/26
Meteorological
drought
Economic impacts Social impacts
Soil water deficiency
Environmental impacts
Agricultural
drought
Hydrological
drought
Natural climate variability
Increased evaporation
and transpiration
Plant water stress, reduced
biomass and yield
Reduced infiltration, runoff,
deep percolation and
groundwater recharge
Reduced streamflow, inflow to
reservoirs, lakes, and ponds;
reduced wetlands,
wildlife habitat
High temperatures, high winds,
low relative humidity, greater
sunshine, less cloud cover
Precipition deficiency
(amount, intensity, timing)
Time(duration)
DRoUght as a hazaRD:
ConCepts anD DeFInItIons
Droughtdiersromothernaturalhazardsinvari-
ous ways. Drought is a slow-onset natural hazard
thatisotenreerredtoasacreepingphenomenon.
Itisacumulativedepartureromnormalorexpected
precipitation,thatis,along-termmeanoraverage.
This cumulative precipitation decit may build up
quicklyoveraperiodotime,oritmaytakemonths
beore the deciency begins to appear in reduced
streamfows,reservoirlevelsorincreaseddepthto
thegroundwatertable.Owingtothecreepingnature
odrought,itseectsotentakeweeksormonthstoappear(Figure2).Precipitationdecitsgenerally
appearinitiallyasadeciencyinsoilwater;thereore,
agricultureisotentherstsectortobeaected.
Itisotendiculttoknowwhenadroughtbegins.
Likewise, it is also dicult to determine when a
droughtisoverandaccordingtowhatcriteriathis
determinationshouldbemade.Isanendtodrought
heraldedbyareturntonormalprecipitationand,i
so,overwhatperiodotimedoesnormalorabove
normal precipitation need to be sustained or the
droughttobedeclaredociallyover?Sincedrought
represents a cumulative precipitation decit over
anextendedperiodotime,doestheprecipitation
decitneedtobeerasedortheeventtoend?Do
reservoirs and groundwater levels need to return
tonormaloraverageconditions?Impactslingeror
aconsiderableperiodotimeollowingthereturno
normalprecipitation.Thereore,istheendodrought
signalledbymeteorologicalorclimatologicalactors,
or by the diminishing negative impact on human
activitiesandtheenvironment?
Anotheractorthatdistinguishesdroughtromother
naturalhazardsistheabsenceoapreciseanduni-
versallyaccepteddenition.Therearehundredso
denitions,addingtotheconusionabouttheexist-
enceo drought and its degree o severity. Deni-
tions o drought should be region and application
specic or impact specic. Droughts are regional
inextentand,aspreviouslystated,eachregionhas
specicclimaticcharacteristics.Droughtsthatoccur
intheNorthAmericanGreat Plainswilldierrom
Figure 2. Sequence o drought occurrence and impacts or commonly accepted drought types.
All droughts originate rom a defciency o precipitation or meteorological drought but other types o drought and impacts
cascade rom this defciency. (Source: National Drought Mitigation Center, University o NebraskaLincoln, USA)
CArlOSChErEr
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
9/26
thoseinNortheastBrazil,southernArica,Western
Europe,easternAustraliaortheNorthChinaPlain.
Theamount, seasonality and orm o precipitationdierwidelybetweeneachotheselocations.
Temperature, wind and relative humidity are also
important actors to include in characterizing
drought rom one location to another. Denitions
alsoneedtobeapplicationspecicbecausedrought
impactswillvarybetweensectors.Droughtconjures
dierentmeaningsorwatermanagers,agricultural
producers,hydroelectricpowerplantoperatorsand
wildliebiologists.Evenwithinsectors,therearemany
dierentperspectivesodroughtbecauseimpactsmay
diermarkedly.Forexample,theeectsodroughton crop yield may vary considerably or maize,
wheat, soybeans and sorghum because they are
plantedat dierent times during thegrowingsea-
son and donothave thesamewater requirements
andsensitivitiestowaterandtemperaturestressat
variousgrowthstages.
Drought impacts are non-structural and extend
overalargergeographicalareathandamagesthat
result rom other natural hazards such as foods,
tropical storms and earthquakes. This, combined
withdroughtscreepingnature,makesitparticularly
challenging to quantiy impacts and even more
challenging to provide disaster relie or drought
thanor other natural hazards. These characteris-
tics have hindered the development o accurate,
reliable and timely estimates o the severity and
impacts, such as drought early warning systems
andultimately,theormulationodroughtprepar-edness plans. Similarly, it is dicult or disaster
ocialstaskedwithrespondingtodroughttodeal
withthelargespatialcoverageusuallyassociated
withitsoccurrence.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
10/26
types oF DRoUght
Droughtsarecommonlyclassiedbytypeasmeteo-
rological, agricultural, hydrological and socio-
economic.
Meteorological droughtisusuallydenedbyapre-
cipitationdeciencythresholdoverapredetermined
periodotime.Thethresholdchosen,suchas75per
centonormalprecipitation,anddurationperiod,or
example,sixmonths,willvarybylocationaccord-
ingtouserneedsorapplications.Figure3illustrates
threecharacterizationsodroughtorthreedierentcountries based on precipitation departures rom
normal, deciles and the Standardized Precipitation
Index (SPI). Meteorological drought is a natural
eventandresultsrommultiplecauses,whichdier
rom region to region. Agricultural, hydrological
andsocio-economicdrought,however,placegreater
emphasisonthehumanorsocialaspectsodrought,
highlightingtheinteractionorinterplaybetweenthe
natural characteristics o meteorological drought
and human activities that depend on precipitation
toprovideadequatewatersuppliestomeetsocietal
andenvironmentaldemands.
Agricultural droughtisdenedmorecommonlybytheavailabilityosoilwatertosupportcropandor-
age growth than by the departure o normal pre-
cipitationoversomespeciedperiodotime.There
Figure 3. Meteorological drought expressed as percentage departure rom normal precipitation or India, precipitation deciles or
Australia and the Standardized Precipitation Index or Canada. (Sources: Indian Meteorological Department, Australian Bureau o
Meteorology and Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration and Agriculture Canada, respectively)
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
11/26
Figure 4. Interrelationships between meteorological, agricultural,
hydrological and socio-economic drought. (Source: National
Drought Mitigation Center, University o NebraskaLincoln, USA)
Meteorological
Decreasing emphasis on the natural event
(precipitation deficiencies)
Increasing emphasis on water/natural resource managementIncreasing complexity of impacts and conflicts
Time/duration of the event
Agricultural Hydrological
Socio-economic
and political
isno direct relationship between precipitationand
inltration o precipitation into the soil. Inltra-
tionratesvary,dependingonantecedentmoisture
conditions,slope,soil typeandtheintensityo the
precipitation event. Soil characteristics also dier:
somesoilshaveahighwater-holdingcapacitywhile
othersdonot.Thelatteraremorepronetoagricul-
turaldrought.
Hydrological droughtisevenurtherremovedrom
the precipitation deciency since it is normallydened by the departure o surace and subsur-
acewatersuppliesromsomeaverageconditionat
various points in time. Like agricultural drought,
thereisnodirectrelationshipbetweenprecipitation
amountsandthestatusosuraceandsubsurace
watersuppliesinlakes,reservoirs,aquiersandstreams
becausethesehydrologicalsystemcomponentsare
usedormultipleandcompetingpurposes,suchas
irrigation, recreation, tourism, food control, trans-
portation,hydroelectricpowerproduction,domestic
watersupply,protectionoendangeredspeciesand
environmental and ecosystem management andpreservation.There isalsoa considerable time lag
betweendeparturesoprecipitationandthepointat
whichthesedecienciesbecomeevidentinsurace
andsubsuracecomponentsothehydrologicsys-
tem.Recoveryothesecomponentsisslowbecause
olongrechargeperiodsorsuraceandsubsurace
watersupplies.Insomedrought-proneareas,such
as the western United States, snow packaccumu-
latedduringthewintermonthsistheprimarysource
owaterduringthesummer.Reservoirsincreasethe
resilienceothisregiontodroughtbecauseotheir
abilitytostorelargeamountsowaterasabuer
duringsingle-ormulti-yeardroughtevents.
Socio-economic droughtdiersmarkedlyromthe
other types o drought because it refects the
relationship between the supply and demand or
somecommodityoreconomicgood,suchaswater,
livestock orage or hydroelectric power, that is
dependentonprecipitation.Supplyvariesannually
asaunctionoprecipitationorwateravailability.
Demandalsofuctuatesandisotenassociatedwith
apositivetrendasaresultoincreasingpopulation,
developmentorotheractors.
Theinterrelationshipbetweenthesetypesodrought
is illustrated in Figure 4. Agricultural, hydrological
and socio-economic drought occur less requently
thanmeteorologicaldroughtbecauseimpactsinthese
sectorsarerelatedtotheavailabilityosuraceand
subsuracewater supplies. It usually takes several
weeks beore precipitation deciencies begin to
producesoilmoisturedecienciesleadingtostress
on crops, pastures and rangeland. Continued dry
conditionsorseveralmonthsatatimebringabout
a decline in stream fow and reduced reservoir
and lake levels and, potentially, a lowering o the
groundwatertable.Whendroughtconditionspersist
or a period o time, agricultural, hydrological and
socio-economicdroughtoccur,producingassociatedimpacts. During drought, not only are infows to
rechargesurace and subsurace supplies reduced
butdemandortheseresourcesincreasesdramati-
callyaswell.AsshowninFigure4,thedirectlinkage
betweenthemaintypesodroughtandprecipitation
decienciesisreducedbecausewateravailabilityin
suraceandsubsuracesystemsisaectedbyhow
these systems aremanaged. Changes inthe man-
agementothesewatersupplies caneither reduce
oraggravate the impacts odrought.Forexample,
the adoption o appropriate tillage practices and
planting more drought-resistant crop varieties candiminishtheimpactodroughtsignicantlybycon-
servingsoilwaterandreducingtranspiration.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
12/26
0
ChaRaCteRIzIng DRoUght anD Its seveRIty
Droughts have three distinguishing eatures: inten-
sity, duration and spatial coverage. Intensity reers
tothedegreeotheprecipitationshortalland/orthe
severityoimpactsassociatedwiththeshortall.Itis
generallymeasuredbythedepartureromnormaloa
climaticparametersuchasprecipitation,anindicator
suchasthereservoirleveloranindexsuchasSPI.
Anotheressentialcharacteristicodroughtisitsdura-
tion.Droughtscan developquickly insomeclimatic
regimes,but usuallyrequire a minimum o two to
threemonthstobecomeestablished.Onceadrought
begins,itcanpersistormonthsoryears.Themag-
nitude odroughtimpacts is closelyrelatedto the
timingotheonsetotheprecipitationshortage,its
intensityandthedurationotheevent.Forexample,
adrywintermayhaveewimpactsinmanymiddle
latitude,temperateclimatesbecauseothereduced
demandorwaterduringthosemonths.Developinga better understanding o the requency, duration
andspatialextentodroughtromthepaleo-record,
or example, tree rings or lake sediments, can be
very instructive because it provides planners with
critically important inormation rom periods out-
sideotheinstrumentalperiodorecord.
Droughts also dierintheirspatial characteristics.
Theareasaectedbyseveredroughtevolvegradu-
ally,andregionsomaximumintensity,suchasepi-
centres,shitromseasontoseasonandyeartoyear
intheeventomulti-yeardroughts.Inlargercoun-tries,suchasBrazil,China,India,theUnitedStates
orAustralia,droughtwouldrarely,iever,aectthe
entirecountry.During1934,oneothemostsevere
droughtyearsinUnitedStateshistory,65percent
o the country was aected by severe or extreme
drought(Figure5).Thatwasthemaximumspatial
extentodroughtbetween1895and2005.
10
30
20
0
40
50
60
70
Figure 5. Percentage o the United States aected by severe to
extreme drought, January 1895 to May 2006.
(Source: National Drought Mitigation Center, University o
NebraskaLincoln, USA; based on data rom the National Climatic
Data Center/NOAA)
PIErrEGAzIN(Ir
D)
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
13/26
JEAN-PIErrEMO
NTOrOI(IrD)
the Challenges oF DRoUght monItoRIng anD
eaRly WaRnIng
Adroughtearlywarningsystemisdesignedtoiden-
tiy climate and water supply trends and thus to
detectthe emergence orprobability ooccurrence
andthelikelyseverityodrought.Thisinormation
canreduceimpactsideliveredtodecisionmakers
inatimelyandappropriateormatandimitigation
measures and preparedness plans are in place.
Understandingtheunderlyingcausesovulnerability
isalsoanessentialcomponentodroughtmanage-
mentbecausetheultimategoalistoreduceriskora
particularlocationandoraspecicgroupopeopleoreconomicsector.
There are numerous natural drought indicators
thatshouldbemonitoredroutinelytodeterminethe
onset and endo drought andits spatial character-
istics.Severity must also beevaluated on requent
time steps.Althoughalltypesodroughtsoriginate
romaprecipitationdeciency,itisinsucienttorely
solelyonthisclimateelementtoassessseverityand
resultant impacts because o actors identied
previously.Eectivedroughtearlywarningsystems
must integrate precipitation and other climatic
parameterswithwaterinormationsuchasstream
fow, snow pack, groundwater levels, reservoir
andlakelevels,andsoilmoistureintoacompre-
hensiveassessmentocurrentanduturedrought
andwatersupplyconditions.
Monitoring drought presents some unique chal-
lengesbecauseoitsdistinctivecharacteristics.Some
othemostprominentchallengesareasollows:
Meteorologicalandhydrologicaldatanetworks
areoteninadequateintermsothedensityo
stationsorallmajorclimateandwatersupply
parameters. Data quality is also a problem
becauseomissingdataoraninadequatelength
orecord;
Data sharing is inadequate between govern-
ment agencies and research institutions, and
thehighcostodatalimitstheirapplicationin
drought monitoring, preparedness, mitigationandresponse;
Inormation delivered through early warning
systemsisotentootechnicalanddetailed,lim-
itingitsusebydecisionmakers;
Forecastsareotenunreliableontheseasonal
timescale and lack specicity, reducing their
useulnessoragricultureandothersectors;
Droughtindicesaresometimesinadequateor
detectingtheearlyonsetandendodrought;
Drought monitoring systems should be inte-
grated, coupling multiple climate, water and
soilparametersandsocio-economicindicators
toullycharacterizedroughtmagnitude,spatial
extentandpotentialimpact;
Impact assessment methodologies, a critical
parto drought monitoring and early warning
systems,are not standardized orwidely avail-
able,hinderingimpactestimatesandthecrea-
tion o regionally appropriate mitigation and
responseprogrammes;
Deliverysystemsordisseminatingdatatousers
in a timely manner are not well developed,
limitingtheiruseulnessordecisionsupport.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
14/26
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
15/26
consistsoacolourmap,showingwhichpartsothe
UnitedStatesaresueringromvariousdegreeso
drought,andaccompanyingtext.Thetextdescribes
the droughts present impacts, uture threats and
prospectsorimprovement.USDMisbyarthemost
user riendly national drought monitoring product
availableintheUnitedStatestoday.TheInternetis
currentlytheprimarydistributionvehicle,although
themapalsoappearsinlocalandnationalnewspa-persandontelevision.Figure7illustratesthepat-
ternodroughtconditionsacrosstheUnitedStates
rom2002to2005.Asingleweeklymapillustrates
the drought pattern in each year. All USDM maps
since1999arearchivedonthewebsiteandavailable
tousersorcomparison.
Sincenosingledenitionodroughtisappropriate
inallsituations,agriculturalandwaterplannersand
othersmustrelyonavarietyodataorindicesthat
areexpressedinmaporgraphicorm.TheUSDM
authorsrely onseveral key indicators and indices,
suchasthePalmerDroughtSeverityIndex(PDSI),the Standardized Precipitation Index, stream fow,
vegetationhealth,soilmoistureandimpacts.Ancil-
lary indicators such as the Keetch-Byram Drought
Index,reservoirlevels,SuraceWaterSupplyIndex,
Figure 7. Spatial extent and severity o drought conditions in the United States, 2002 to 2005 , as per the US Drought Monitor.(Source: http://www.drought.unl.edu/dm)
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
16/26
riverbasinsnowwaterequivalent,andpastureand
range conditions rom dierent agencies are inte-
gratedtocreatethenalmap.Electronicdistribution
oearlydratsothemaptoeldexpertsthroughout
thecountryprovidesexcellentgroundtruthorthe
patterns and severity o drought illustrated onthe
mapeachweek.
USDMclassiesdroughtsonascaleromonetoour
(D1D4),withD4 refectinganexceptionaldrought
eventsuchasa1in50-yearevent.Athcategory,D0, indicates an abnormally dry area. The USDM
map and narrative identiy general drought areas,
labelling droughts by intensity rom least to most
intense.D0areasareeitherheadingintodroughtor
recovering rom drought but still experiencing lin-
geringimpacts.
USDMalsoshowswhichsectorsarepresentlyex-
periencing direct and indirect impacts, using the
labels A (agriculture:crops, livestock,pasture and
grasslands), and H (hydrological) and/or W (water
supplies).Forexample,anareashadedandlabelledasD2(A)isingeneralexperiencingseveredrought
conditionsthatareaectingtheagriculturalsector
moresignicantlythanthewatersupplysector.The
mapauthorsarecareulnottobringanareaintoor
out o drought too quickly, recognizing the slow-
onset characteristicso drought,the longrecovery
processandthepotentialorlingeringimpacts.
The methodology associated with USDM has now
beenappliedtotheproductionotheNorthAmerican
Drought Monitor (NADM), a collaborative project
between the United States, Mexico and Canada.
Thepartnershipbeganin2002inanattempttomapdrought severity and spatial patterns across the
North American continent. Figure 8 illustrates the
NADM or May 2006. Multiple indices and indica-
torsareusedtomapdroughtconditions,similarto
theprocedureusedtogeneratetheUSDM.Respon-
sibility or this product is shared between NOAAs
National Climatic Data Center, the US Department
o Agriculture andthe National Drought Mitigation
CenterattheUniversityoNebraskaLincolninthe
United States; the National Water Commission in
Mexico; and Environment Canada and Agriculture
andAgri-FoodCanada.Thisproductispreparedonamonthlybasisandisanexcellentexampleointer-
nationaldroughtmonitoringcooperation.
Figure 8. North American Drought Monitor, May 2006. (Source: North American Drought Monitor,
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/monitoring/drought/nadm/index.html)
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
17/26
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
18/26
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
19/26
IGaD ClImaTe PreDICTIon anD aPPlICaTIons
CenTre (ICPaC)
The Greater Horn o Arica, like many parts o the
tropics,isprone toextreme climateevents such as
droughts and foods. In an eort to minimize the
negative impacts o extreme climate events, WMOand the United Nations Development Programme
established theregionalDrought Monitoring Centre
(DMC)inNairobiandasub-centreinHararein1989
covering 24 countries in the eastern and southern
Aricansubregion.In2003,DMCNairobibecameaspe-
cializedinstitutionotheIntergovernmentalAuthority
onDevelopment(IGAD)andwasrenamedtheIGAD
ClimatePredictionand ApplicationsCentre( ICPAC).
The participating countries o ICPAC are Burundi,
Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya,Rwanda,Somalia,
Sudan,UgandaandUnitedRepublicoTanzania.The
Centreisresponsibleorclimatemonitoring,predic-
tion,earlywarningandapplicationsorthereductionoclimate-relatedrisksintheGreaterHornoArica.
ICPACsmainobjectiveistocontributetoclimatemoni-
toring and prediction services or early warning and
mitigation othe adverseimpactsoextremeclimate
eventsonvarioussocio-economicsectorsintheregion,
suchasagriculturalproductionandoodsecurity,water
resources,energyandhealth.Theearlywarningprod-
uctsenableuserstoputmechanismsinplaceorcoping
withextremeclimate-andweather-relatedrisksinthe
Greater Horn o Arica. The Centre also promotes
capacity-buildingorbothclimatescientistsandusers.
ICPACprovidesregularregionalclimateadvisories,
including10-day,monthlyandseasonalclimatebul-
letinsaswellastimelyearlywarninginormationon
evolvingclimateextremesandassociatedimpacts.
Regional Climate Outlook Forums are also being
heldbeoretheonsetothemajorrainallseasonsto
provideconsensusclimateoutlooksandtodevelop
mitigationstrategies.Belowaresomeotheactivi-
tiesundertakenbyICPAC:
Development and archiving o regional andnationalquality-controlledclimatedatabanks;
Data processing, including development o
basicclimatologicalstatistics;
Timelyacquisitiononearreal-timeclimateand
remotelysenseddata;
Monitoring space-time evolutions o weather
andclimateextremesovertheregion;
Generationoclimatepredictionandearlywarn-
ingproducts;
Delineation o risk zones o extreme climate-
relatedevents;
Timelydisseminationoearlywarningproducts;
Conducting capacity-building activities in the
generationandapplicationoclimateproducts;
Organizationoclimateoutlookorumsorthe
countriesintheGreaterHornoArica;
Enhancementointeractionswithusersthrough
userworkshopsandpilotapplicationprojects;
Climate change monitoring, detection and
attribution.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
20/26
Figures 12 to 14 illustrate a range o climate- and
drought-relatedproductsproducedbyICPAC(http://
www.icpac.net). The products depict cumulative
rainall deviations rom the mean or Marsabit,
Kenya;aregionalclimateoutlookmap;andamap
illustrating the ood security outlook or the coun-
triesintheGreaterHornoArica,respectively.
Mean
2005/2006
35
45
20
33
33
33
20
45
35
20
4535
35
45
20
33
33
33
35
45
20
I
II
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
III
Sudan
Rwanda
Uganda
Burundi
Ethopia
Somalia
Kenya
United Republicof Tanzania
Eritrea
Djibouti
Figure 12. Examples o cumulative decadal rainall over parts o Kenya rom June 2005 to early April 2006 . (Source: ICPAC)
Cumulativerainfall(mm)
Marsabit, Kenya
DecadsJUN1 JUN3 JUL2 AUG1 AUG3 SEP2 OCT1 OCT3 NOV2 DEC1 DEC3 JAN2 FEB1 FEB3 MAR2 APR1 APR3 MAY2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Figure 13. Climate outlook or the Greater Horn o Arica,
March to May 2006. (Source: ICPAC)
Figure 14. Food security outlook or the Greater Horn o Arica,
September to December 2005. ( ICPAC)
A Above normal
N Normal
B Below normal
Percentage probability
Extremely food insecure
Highly food insecure
Moderately food insecure
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
21/26
souTh aFrICa
Droughtisanormal,recurrenteatureotheSouth
Aricanclimate.Droughtshaveinthepastresulted
in signicant economic, environmental and social
impactsandhighlightthecountryscontinuingvul-
nerabilitywithregardtothisnaturalphenomenon.
During low rainall periods, policymakers, agricul-
turalists, businesses and the general public oten
requireadditionalrainalldataordecision-making
andplanning.
InresponsetorecurringdroughtinSouthArica,the
SouthAricanWeatherService(SAWS)establisheda
droughtmonitoringdeskwhereinormationregard-
ingobservedrainallandlong-rangeorecastscould
be presented in one place or easy access. It also
provides anopportunityor people to comparethe
current years rainall with amounts rom previous
dryperiodstoassistthemintheirdecisionandplan-
ningpractices.
Neither the percentage o normal nor the decile-
based drought indices can assist decision makers
with the assessment o the cumulative eect o
reducedrainall overvarious timeperiods.Neither
otheseindicescandescribe themagnitudeo thedrought compared with other drought events. SPI
can alleviate both o these principal shortcomings
while atthesametime being less complex to cal-
culatethansomeotheotherdroughtindicesnow
inuseattheSouthAricanWeather Service.SPIis
anindexbasedontheprobabilityorainallorany
timescale;itcanbeuseulinassessingtheseverity
o drought and can be calculated at various time-
scalesthatrefecttheimpactothedroughtonthe
availabilityowaterresources.TheSPIcalculationis
based onthedistributiono rainalloverlong time
periods, preerably more than 50 years. The long-termrainallrecordisttoaprobabilitydistribution,
whichisthennormalizedsothatthemeanSPIor
anyplaceandtimeperiodiszero.SPIvaluesabove
zero indicate wetter periods and values less than
zeroindicatedrierperiods.
On23November2005,theDepartmentoAgriculture
issuedareportindicatingthateightoSouthAricas
nine provinces were being severely aected by
drought,theexceptionbeingthedenselypopulated
Gautengprovince,aminorplayerinagriculture.At
thattime,thenorthernmostprovince,Limpopo,had
had districts fagged as disaster areas since 2003and2004,with27oits37municipalitiesaected.
Thedamsotheprovincewereattheirlowestlevels,
anaverageo36percentocapacity,comparedwith
64percentthepreviousyear.
Theseverityothesituationwasclearlyrefectedin
thedierenttimescalesotheSPImapsontheSAWS
Drought Monitoring Page (http://www.weathersa.
co.za/DroughtMonitor/DMDesk.jsp),updatedatthe
beginningoDecember2005.Averydrywinterand
the lack o good spring rains exacerbated the dry
conditionsinsomeareas.
ThemainrainalleaturesinNovember2005werenear
normalrainallovermostoSouthArica,butwetcondi-
tionsoverpartsotheWesternCape,theEasternCape,FElIxMASI/vO
ICElESSChIlDrEN,COurTESYOFPhOTOShArE
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
22/26
0
KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga (Figure 15, top).
Accordingto availabledata,nopart othecountry
received rainall much below the normalvalue or
themonth.
FromSeptembertoNovember2005,therewassome
alleviation o the dry conditions in the northern
provincesaswellasthearsouth(Figure15,middle).
However,somedrynessremainedinthenorthernmost
province,Limpopo.
Therainallorthesix-monthperiod,asshownby
theSPImaporJunetoNovember2005,showsnear
normal conditions over the largest part o South
Arica,butmoderatetoverydryconditionsinseveral
areas, most notably in the Southern Cape, southern
partsotheNorthernCapeandthearnorth(Figure15,
bottom).EventhoughsomepartsoLimpoporeceived
good rains during November 2005, there was still a
strainonwaterresources.
PorTuGal
ThePalmerDroughtSeverityIndexisusedtochar-
acterize drought in Portugal. This index has been
adaptedandcalibratedtothespecicclimaticcon-
ditions omainland Portugal.The PDSI perormsa
parameterizedcomputationothesoilwaterbalance
andcomparestheestimatedsoilmoisturecontent
withitsclimatologicalmean.
Evolving drought patternsare presented in monthly
PDSImapsthatshowthespatialdistributionodrought
in Portugal. These mapsare used tomonitor spatial
and temporal variations in droughtacross mainlandPortugal,whichishelpulindelineatingpotentialdis-
asterareasoragricultureandothersectors,allowing
orimprovedon-armdecisionstoreduceimpacts.
The20042005hydrologicalyearbeganwithavour-
ableamountsoprecipitationinOctober,exceptin
the southern region, where it was dry to normal.
The months that ollowed were dry to extremely
dry,resultinginthedevelopmentoaveryintense
drought. Figure 16 and Table 1 show the monthly
PDSI variations expressed as percentages o area
aected in mainland Portugal. In addition, theyrevealadeteriorationodroughtconditionsduring
thewintermonths,withsomeattenuationinMarch
because o the occurrence o precipitation in the
countrysnorthernandinnerregions.DuringJune,
Figure 15. Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) or South Arica,
November 2005 (top); September to November 2005 (middle); June to
November 2005 (bottom). (Source: South Arican Weather Service)
Extreme drought
Severe drought
Moderate drought
Mild drought
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
23/26
Palmer Drought
Severity Index
(PDSI)
a ctd by dgt i 20042005 (p ct)
2004 2005
31
Oct
30
Nov
31
Dec
31
Jan
28
Feb
31
March
30
April
31
May
30
June
31
July
31
Aug
30
Sept
31
Oct
30
Nov
31
Dec
mdty wt 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
sigty wt 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 5
n 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12 11
mid dgt 20 47 30 0 0 26 15 4 0 0 0 0 52 81 83
mdt dgt 5 47 48 25 23 22 22 28 3 0 0 3 36 2 1
sv dgt 1 5 20 53 44 28 20 20 33 27 29 36 0 0 0
ext dgt 0 0 2 22 33 24 43 48 64 73 71 61 0 0 0
July and August, the drought situation worsened.
Thesemonthsnormallycontribute,onaverage,only
6percentotheannualprecipitation.Precipitation
Table 1. Percentage o mainland Portugal aected by drought in 2004 and 2005 . (Source: Instituto de Meteorologia, I.P., Portugal)
Percentage
of
country
OCT-04
0
100
20
NOV-04 DEC-0 4 JAN-05 FEB-05 MAR- 05 APR- 05 MAY- 05 JUN-0 5 JUL-05 AUG-05 SEP-05 OCT-0 5 NOV- 05
40
60
80
DEC-05
Figure 16. Percentage o Portugal aected by drought, October 2004 to December 2005. ( Source: Instituto de Meteorologia, I.P., Portugal)
Extreme drought
Severe drought
Moderate drought
Mild drought
Normal
Slightly wet
Moderately wet
Very wet
Extremely wet
received during the rst 15 days o September
lessenedtheseverityodroughtinthenorthernand
centralregions.
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
24/26
Period
actd ppti
With
supplemented
water
With
cuts/reduction
insupply
1t api 14175 213
1t my 8395 2635
1t J 26500 26781
2d J 23440 25217
1t Jy 26004 26350
2d Jy 54831 53312
1t agt 48500 60061
2d agt 94372 100500
1t sptb 73097 66127
2d sptb 69588 39429
2d octb 48883 30083
2d nvb 11921 13354
2d Dcb 10238 13445
mxi 94 372 100 500
Table 2. Number o people aected directly or indirectly by drought
in Portugal, 2005. ( Source: Instituto de Meteorologia, I.P., Portugal)
Figure 18. Number o municipalities with supplemented water (blue) or cuts/reduction in household supply (red). (Source: Instituto de
Meteorologia, I.P., Portugal)
Figure 17. Spatial representation o consecutive months in severe
and extreme drought situations in Portugal, October 2004 to
September 2005 . (Source: Instituto de Meteorologia, I.P., Portugal)
Figure17showsthenumberoconsecutivemonths
insevereandextremedroughtthroughtheendo
September2005.
Theimpactsothedroughtonagriculture,energyand
urbanwatersupplywere signicant.Figure18illus-
tratestheseimpactsontheurbanwatersupply.The
numberopeopleaectedbydroughtromAprilto
December2005,asshowninTable2,isalsoagood
indicatorothewidespreadimpactsassociatedwith
thisdroughtevent.
Numberofmunicipalities
15 MAR
0
70
10
15 APR 15 MAY 15 JUN 30 JUN 15 JUL 31 JUL 15 AUG 31 AUG 15 SEP 30 SEP 31 OCT 30 NOV 31 DEC
20
30
40
50
60
Municipalities with supplemented water
Municipalities with cuts/reduction in water supply
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
25/26
Figure 19. The extent o serious or worst rainall defciencies at the
peak o the last El Nio-related drought in 2002 and 2003.
(Source: Australian Bureau o Meteorology)
thepeako the lastElNio-relateddrought during
20022003.
Althoughanextendedperiodorainalldeciencyin
anyareaisvirtuallyaprerequisiteordrought,there
iswidespreadrecognitioninAustraliathattheormal
declaration o a drought is a more complex issue.
It involves consideration not only o the rainwater
supplybutalsothesubsequentusesorthatrainall
onceithasallenontoarmlands,runsintostreams
andrivers,isstoredindams,isusedtodrivehydro-electricpowerstationsandissuppliedtocitiesand
townsacrossthenation.Furthermore,giventhesize
andgeographicallocationoAustralia,itisunusual
ortherenottobeoneormoreareasovaryingsize
at any given time experiencing serious or severe
rainalldeciencies.Whetherornotsuchareasare
declared drought stricken and then whether the
droughtisosucientintensity,durationandextent
orthoseaectedtobeeligibleorgovernmentrelie
involvesacomplexseriesoassessmentsbynational
andstateauthorities.
The recognition that drought is a normal eature
oAustraliasnatural,economic,andsocialenviron-
mentshasledthenationalandstategovernmentsto
agreethatclimate-sensitiveindustriesandenterpris-
esmustlearntomanagedroughtrisk,alongwithall
theotherattendantandongoingrisksthattheyace.
Nonetheless, the governments do recognize that,
romtimetotime,somedroughtsbecomesosevere,
chronicor widespread that thereis a need to oer
supporttothoseworstaected.Suchoccurrencesin
Australiaarecalledexceptionalcircumstances.
In 20022003 Australia experienced an especiallysevere and widespread drought, accompanied by
recordhightemperaturesinmanyregions.Atthepeak
othedrought,57percentotheAustralianmainland
hadregistered10monthsormoreoserioustosevere
cumulativerainalldecits,and90percent,belowthe
median(Figure19).Withtheexperienceothedrought
reshinmind,andalsorecognizingtheneedoramore
objective, airandtransparent processunderpinning
the declaration o exceptional circumstances, the
Primary IndustriesMinisterial Councilo Australiain
2005commissionedtheestablishmentotheNational
AgriculturalMonitoringSystem(NAMS).
NAMSwasdevelopedoverthenext12monthsunder
the leadership o the Bureau o Rural Sciences in
collaboration with the Bureau o Meteorology and
ausTralIa
TheislandcontinentoAustraliastraddlesthesouth-
ern subtropical zone, with its mainland extending
romaround11SacrosstheTopEndto39Sin
thesouth-east.Thenorthernregionsareseasonally
tropicalwhiletheeastern,south-easternandsouth-
westerncoastsandnearinlandregionsaregener-
allywellwateredbutpronetohighinterannualand
seasonalvariabilityintheirrainall.Themoreinland
regions range rom arid to semi-arid. Droughts,sometimes covering vast tracts o the continent,
arearecurringeatureoAustraliasclimate.Many
o the more severe and widespread droughts are
associatedwithElNioevents.
Given that rainall is by ar the dominant actor
determiningthesuccessorailureothegrowing
seasonacrossAustralia,droughtmonitoringhasor
many years been synonymous with the monitor-
ingorainalldeciencies.TheAustralianBureauo
MeteorologysDroughtWatchService,inoperation
since1965,hasusedaccumulatedrainallpercentilesoversuccessivemonthstoidentiyregionsorainall
decitandexcess.Areaswithrainallaccumulations
belowthe10thor5thpercentileorperiodsothree
monthsormorearereerredtoasbeingseriously
orseverelyindecit,respectively.Figure19shows
theextentoseriousorworserainalldecienciesat
ri dfcici: 10 t
1 api 2002 t 31 Jy 2003Distributionbasedongriddeddata
ProductotheNationalClimateCentre
Serious deficiency
Severe deficiency
Lowest on record
Rainfall percentile ranking
7/31/2019 Drought monitoring and early warning: concepts, progress and future challenges
26/26
Droughtaectsmorepeoplethananyothernatural
disasterandresultsinseriouseconomic,socialand
environmental costs. The development o eective
drought monitoring, early warning and delivery
systems has been a signicant challenge because
otheunique characteristics odrought. Signicant
strideshavebeenmadeinrecentyearstoimprovethe
eectivenessothesesystems.Withtheincreasing
requencyandseverityodroughtinmanyregionso
theworldandincreasedsocietalvulnerability,more
emphasisisnowbeingplacedonthedevelopmentodroughtpreparednessplansthatareproactiverather
thanreactiveandemphasizerisk-basedmanagement
measures. Improved drought monitoring is a key
component o a drought preparedness plan and a
nationaldrought policy. Early warning systems can
provide decision makers with timely and reliable
accesstoinormationonwhichmitigationmeasures
canbebased.Therearemanychallengestoimprov-
ing thesesystems, buta comprehensive,integrated
approachtoclimateandwatersupplymonitoring is
provingtobesuccessulinmanycountries.
theCommonwealthScienticandIndustrialResearch
Organization(CSIRO).Theoutcomeisareelyacces-
sible websitecontaining currentmaps, graphs and
reports on the state o the climate system across
Australia,andinormationonproductionormajor
drylandbroad-acreagriculturalsystems.Aswellas
currentdata,NAMSalsocontainshistoricalinorma-
tion onmeasuredand modelled production,nan-
cialimpacts,remote-sensingindicesandclimate.
TheNAMSwebsitepresentsinormationonscreenandintheormoprintablereports,providinggen-
eral background, current climatic conditions and
production and resource statistics or regions that
canbespeciedbytheuser.Regionscanrangein
sizeromtheentirecountrytoindividuallocalgov-
ernmentareasorthestatisticallocalareasusedor
summarizingAustraliancensusdata.
Collectively, NAMS inormation shows the status
o current conditions or the major agricultural
production systems and production prospects or
the upcoming growing season. NAMS is initiallydirectedatmonitoringandsupplyingdataordry-
landbroad-acreindustries,withplanstoextendthe
system to cover the extensive irrigated regions o
Australiaandalsoormoreintensiveindustriessuch
ashorticulture.
AsNAMSdrawsonacommoninormationdatabase
or theentirecountry, it will acilitatea more con-
sistentapproachtothedroughtdeclarationprocess
throughtheuseotheollowing:
Acommontemplateandlanguageordescrib-
ingdroughtintermsoprobabilities;
Acommonsetodeclarationcriteria;
A common process or the subjective on-
groundassessmentodroughtimpacts.
The NAMS website is at http://www.nams.gov.au.
DetailedinormationonAustraliasnationaldrought
assistance measures, including the declaration o
exceptional circumstances, can be ound at http://
www.da.gov.au/droughtassist, while inormation
ontherainalldeciencymonitoringsystemcanbeound at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/drought/
drought.shtml.
ConClUsIon