Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Herwig Ott
University of Kaiserslautern
Driven-dissipative Bose-Einstein condensates
Outline
The quantum gas and its
environment
Experimental approach Quantum Zeno dynamics in a BEC
Negative differential conductivity
Bistable tunneling transport
The quantum gas and its environment
Quantum gases are typically well isloated from the environment => unitary dynamics
Residual photon scattering and trap shaking => heating
Background gas collisions => global losses
The master equation General interaction with the environment: Master equation in Lindblad form
System density operator unitary time evolution
non-unitary time evolution
Coupling rates Lindblad operators
Experimental platforms
Fluorescence measurement e.g. Quantum Zeno Effect Itano et al. PRA 41, 2295 (1990)
Coupling atoms to cavities e.g. atom laser in a cavity Öttl et al. PRL 94, 090404 (2005)
Coupling to other particles e.g. Digital Open-System Quantum Simulator with Ions Barreiro et al. Nature 470, 486 (2011)
Local losses and decoherence Dissipation in a many-body quantum system
Coupling photons to atoms e.g. Cavity field decay Brune et al. PRL 101, 240402
Coupling to solid state system e.g.in superconducting qubits Katz et al. Science 312, 1498 (2005)
Particle loss as dissipation
loss rate at each lattice site
A one dimensional system: leaky optical lattice
P. Barmettler and C. Kollath PRA 84, 041606 (2011)
D. Witthaut,…, S. Wimberger, PRA 83, 063608 (2011)
anihilation and creation operators at each lattice site
Continuous losses in a bulk system
Gross-Pitaevskii equation with imaginary potential
In mean field approximation for a BEC, the total master equation is equivalent to a time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation:
What is the generic effect of an imaginary potential?
Simple toy model in 1D: an imaginary potential barrier in one dimension
Increasing dissipation inhibits losses
The extreme limit
Misra and Sudarshan J. Math. Phys. 18, 756 (1977) Fachi et al. Phys. Lett. A 275, 12 (2000) Fachi and Pascazio J. Phys. A 41, 493001 (2008)
Projection to a unitary time evolution in the subspace with no losses:
x
0V0V
m
pH
2
2
Phase noise as decoherence
Fluctuating potential in a lattice site
number operator effective decoherence rate
V(t)
The working principle
2D imaging
Manipulation and preparation tool
Spatial resolution = Beam diameter > 100 nm
Single atom sensitivity
In situ technique
In vivo technique
Magneto-optical trap
MOT: 3s, 1 x 109 atoms
Optical dipole trap
CO2 Laser on
10 W CO2 laser
Weak probing limit
Small beam current and fast imaging sequence: In situ image of a Bose-Einstein condensate
High precision density probing
Increase statistics by many repetitions of the experiment
Gericke et al. Nat. Phys (2008) Würtz et al. PRL (2009)
Optical lattices
k k
keff keff
Image gallery
Local particle loss in a thermal gas
ultracold atoms
beam locally removes atoms, collect created ions
ion
s/µ
s
time (ms)
fast depletion
steady-state
generic behaviour: small beam current (I=15 nA)
Data acquisition and analysis
time
event Dt
Fluctuations
Electron beam locally probes quantum gas
Mean count rate 𝜂𝛾(𝑟 )𝑛(𝑟 )
𝛾(𝑟 ) =𝜎𝑡𝑜𝑡
𝑒
𝐼
2𝜋𝜔2 𝑒− 𝜚− 𝜚02/(2𝜔2)
𝑔 2 (𝜏) temporal pair correlation function
local loss rate atom density
detection efficiency
Gaussian beam profile
Temporal g(2) - correlations
thermal gas
T=120 nK
)2(Exp1)(2
2)2(
th
rrg
nm600200)/(2 B
2
th Tmk
Probability of finding two atoms at a distance r
Probability of finding two atoms at a distance r with time delay t
)/1
12(Exp
)/1(
11),(
222
2
2/322
)2(
cthc t
r
ttrg
Tkc
B
Thermal bunching
BEC
45 nK
100 nK
Guerrera et al. PRL (2012)
Dissipative defect in a BEC Time-dependent GPE with imaginary potential
),(2
)(),()()(
2),(
222
trr
itrtgNrVm
tri extt
Quantum Zeno dynamics I measurement protocol
Quantum Zeno dynamics II
Barontini et al PRL 110, 035302 (2013)
Numerical simulation via GPE
Imaginary potential is a good description for our loss processes
From unitary to non-unitary dynamics
Unitary dynamics dominate
Non-unitary dynamics dominate 𝜇𝐵𝐸𝐶
Hole drilling mechanism in a BEC
Image of the hole:
Linescan through the BEC after 1 ms if dissipatoin
Microscopic hole drilling Toy model: two atoms in double well potential:
Quantum jump: apply the anihilation operator to the left well, you get
Probability for a quantum jump in time intervall dt
L R
aL rate
0 2
Microscopic hole drilling Non-detection: no atom is detected in an infinite time intervall
Evolution for small dt
rate projective
measurement
Action of both mechanism together: Hole is made by the non-detection of an atom
Experimental signature
Measure the probability to detect one atom right after the detection of another one! = probe the system after a quantum jump
),()(ˆ)(ˆ)(ˆ)(ˆ21
)2(
1221 rrGrrrr
BEC thermal cloud
Negative differential conductivity
Superimpose a one-dimensional optical lattice along the BEC Lattice constant 600 nm Discretization of axial coordinate
Experimental settings:
Prepare initial non-equilibrium
One lattice site is emptied by electron beam axial motion is frozen (s=30)
Each lattice site is an independent 2D codensate with about 800 atoms Mean-field with chemical potential µ
minimum instance
Microscopic level structure
Dµ = h x 1500 Hz nr = 180 Hz
mean field ~ 800 atoms
radially excited single particle
states
Energy conservation requires tunneling into radially excited state!
Effective tunneling coupling
Renormalization of J upon refilling, the effective tunneling coupling recovers its normal value J
𝐽𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 𝜂 × 𝐽
𝜂 = 𝜓𝑒𝑥𝑝 𝜓𝑛 ≈ 0.14
Tunneling becomes density dependent mean field version of correlated hopping
𝐽 = 𝐽(Δ𝜇)
Refilling dynamics and NDC
No oscilllations visible Timescale depends on tunneling coupling Pronounced ‚s-shape‘ visible
1. take derivate of
experimental data current
2. convert atom number difference in difference in chemical potential voltage
Refilling dynamics and NDC
No oscilllations visible Timescale depends on tunneling coupling Pronounced ‚s-shape‘ visible
Microscopic modelling
Basic phenomenology can be understood from effective tunneling What happens in the central site?
Steady state Short after the beginning of tunneling
Conversion of interaction energy into thermal energy Joule-Thompson effect
𝜇 = 2𝑘𝐵𝑇
Collisions and thermalization!
Collisional decoherence
The collision rate in the central site can be estimated to a few hundred collisions per second.
Tunneling rate J/h is slower than collision rate incoherent dynamics
Transport is a true steady-state transport and we observe a DC current
𝜏 ∝ Γ𝑑𝑒𝑐/𝐽2
Quantum Zeno result
Theoretical modelling
Full problem not treatable due to many spatial modes
Use effective single particle mode with modified tunneling coupling at the central site and phase noise at the central site (phase noise is a fit parameter)
G
Jeff Jeff J J
Theoretical modelling
Master equation for one spatial mode
Effective model for reduced single particle density matrix
Theoretical modelling
Fits with theoretical model (decoherence rate is fit parameter)
Fitted decoherence rate is of similar magnitude as the collisional rate in the lattice site (few hundred Hz)
Incoherent hopping transport!
Remarks on NDC
NDC is the basis of tunneling diodes in electronics possible applications in atomtronics (sustained Josephson oscillations)
Single particle model works surprisingly well
Internal decoherence can be treated as Markovian, even though the whole system is closed
Strong influence of intrinsic dissipative channels on many-body dynamics
Future investigation of NDC in strongly correlated systems
Bistable tunneling transport
Same settings as before BUT: continuously probing with the electron beam for different starting conditions
Bistable tunneling transport
Electron beam is scanned over one lattice site with variable rate
Typical behaviour
Initial dynamics Stationary state
Stationary states
(iii) Site is almost empty
(ii) Two stable solutions depending on initial conditions
(i) Site is completely full
(i) Why is the site full?
Same current voltage characteristics as a superconductor!
(i) Why is the site full?
Consider Josephson junction array Meanfield treatment via discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation Losses appear as imaginary potential
Stationary state with unit filling and finite phase difference between adjacent site -> superfluid state
(ii) Why is there bistability?
Consider red points (initialy empty site)
Due to the nonlinear tunneling coupling J‘(N), the site is kept empty
Finite difference in chemical potential
Resistive transport!
Initial dynamics for resistive branch
Critical slowing down
Non-equilibrium phase transition?
Critical slowing down
In equilibrium: condensation happens already at a filling of 10 percent
Here: critical slowing down happens at a filling of 30 - 40 percent
Final phase diagram
Outlook
Dissipation and decoherence in strongly correlated systems
Atomtronics with dissipatively engineered quantum states Non-equilibrium phase transitions
Preparation of dissipative attractor states (dark soliton)
The team Andreas
Vogler Thorsten Manthey
Peter Würtz
Tobias Weber
Ralf Labouvie
Thomas Niederprüm
Former group members: Vera Guarrera, Giovanni Barontini, Matthias Scholl Arne Ewerbeck, Felix Stubenrauch, Philipp Langer, Tatjana Gericke
Oliver Thomas
Simon Heun
Bodhaditya Santra