Draft of PGA’s Framework, Structure and Flow of Indicator Measurement on REDD+ Implementation in Indonesia

PGA expert Panel Discussion Results, February 15, 2012-Novotel Hotel, Bogor West Java

Measurement Framework Forest

Management Issues

PillarsLaw and Policy

FrameworkActors’ Capacity

(Government, Civil Society, Adat and local Community , Business Entity )

Implementation

Spatial Planning Indicators Indicators IndicatorsRights Regulation Indicators Indicators IndicatorsForest Organization

Indicators Indicators Indicators

Forest Management

Indicators Indicators Indicators

Forest Control Indicators Indicators IndicatorsREDD+ Infrastructure

Indicators Indicators Indicators

1. The indicators in the above cells reflect good forest governance principles. 2. The term of measurement items proposed to replace “verifier” term in the existing concept ” and they will be included in data collection

instruments. 3. The meaning of law and policy framework here is the content of law and policy framework which want to be measured through the

assessment. In order to measure the content of law and policy framework, measurement items will assess whether the certain law or policy cover one or more good forest governance principles, clarity, harmony and comprehensive.

4. The meaning of actors’ capacity here is the capacity of actors to implement one or more good forest governance according to their respective actors’ tasks and functions related to tackling forest management issues

5. The meaning of implementation here is a process of tackling forest management issues as well as the results of forest management issues applying good governance principles.

Forest Governance

Actors’ Capacity

Implementation

Law & Policy

Spatial & Forest Planning

Rights Regulation

Forest Organization

Forest Management

Forest Control

REDD+ Infrastructure

Spatial & Forest Planning

Rights Regulation

Forest Organization

Forest Management

Forest Control

REDD+ Infrastructure

Spatial & Forest Planning

Rights Regulation

Forest Organization

Forest Management

Forest Control

REDD+ Infrastructure

Measurement Structure

Pillar

Issue

Pillars (3)

Forest Management Issues 6)

Indicators

Measurement Items

Data Collection

From Data Collection to Pillars

Note: This flow reflects the process of how data is collected and used to explain the pillars. Based on data collection for each measurement items, they will be used to examine the indicators. The aggregate of the examined indicators will measure the condition of forest management issues. The aggregate of forest management issues will measure the PGA pillars and the aggregate of Pillars will measure forest/REDD+ governance.

Measurement Measurement Flow Flow

Regulation Review

DocumentReview

In-depth Interview

Scoring(each

indicator)

Weighting for each

Indicator?

Aggregate

Level of Good Forest

Governance

5

FGD

Next Steps …Activities Schedule

1. Reviewing and agreeing the proposed framework, structure, measurement flow prepared by some of PGA expert panel members on Feb 14-15, 2012 in Novotel Hotel, Bogor

Feedback accepted February 20, 2012

2. PGA expert panel reviews the existing indicators by using the following criteria: whether the existing indicator is relevant, significant, discriminating power and data availability.

Draft revised indicators accepted February 27, 2012

3. Reviewing the revised indicators as stated in activity 2, applying the following criteria: linkage one to another indicator, comprehensiveness, relevance, significance and data availability.

Working Meeting to discuss the revised indicator together February 27, 2012

4. Reviewing and finalizing measurement items for each indicator

5. Reviewing and finalizing data collection instrument Working Meeting to discuss draft data collection instrument First week of March 2012