65

DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 2: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

1

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE TOWN OF CLARKDALE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 2016, AT 6:30 P.M. IN THE MEN’S LOUNGE OF THE CLARK MEMORIAL CLUBHOUSE, 19 N. NINTH STREET, CLARKDALE, AZ.

A Regular Meeting of the Design Review Board of the Town of Clarkdale was held on Wednesday, August 3, 2016, at 6:30 p.m. in the Men’s Lounge of the Clark Memorial Clubhouse, 19 N. Ninth Street,Clarkdale, AZ.

BOARD MEMBERS:Chairperson Laura Jones PresentVice Chairperson Robyn Prud’homme-Bauer PresentBoard Members Mike Garvey Excused

Aaron Midkiff Present

STAFF:GIS/Planner II Guss EspoltCommunity Development Technician Stephanie Vocca

Others in Attendance: None

1. AGENDA ITEM: CALL TO ORDER: The Chairperson called the meeting to order at 6:28 p.m.

2. AGENDA ITEM: ROLL CALL: The GIS/Planner II called roll.

3. AGENDA ITEM: PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is invited to provide comments at this time on items that are not on this agenda. Action taken as a result of public comment will be limited to directing staff to study the matter, or scheduling the matter for further consideration and decision on a later agenda, as required by the Arizona Open Meeting Law. Each speaker is asked to limit comments to FIVE minutes.

No public comment.

4. AGENDA ITEM: MINUTES: Consideration of the Regular Meeting Minutes of July 6,2016. Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer motioned to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of July 6,2016. Board Member Midkiff seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

5. AGENDA ITEM: REPORTS:

Chairperson and Member Report: Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer informed the Board and staff that there will be a Candidates Forum for the Clarkdale Town Council next Thursday at 6:30 p.m. at St. Thomas Episcopal Church.

Staff Report Updates: None

Page 3: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

2

6. NEW BUSINESS:

a. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION DRB #091305: Discussion/possible action regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall at Nate’s Cowboy Café & reJuice. The business is located at 1481 State Route 89A, further identified as parcel #406-26-344A.

STAFF REPORT

Background:

Mr. Nate Wagner has submitted an application to Design Review for wall sign alterations, new monument inserts and lighting for Nate’s Cowboy Café & reJuice, a business located at 1481 State Route 89A and further identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 406-26-344A. The property is zoned Commercial.

The following topics are presented from the application.

Sign:

The two proposed wall signs will be located as follows: one sign will be located on the outer patio wall, 3’ x 14’ facing State Route Highway 89A. The proposed wall sign alteration will be located on the south wall visible from State Route Highway 89A. This sign will be connected to the existing Cowboy Café sign. Two 4’ x 8’ monument inserts will replace the inserts on the existing monument adjacent to State Route Highway 89A.

Colors:

Page 4: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

3

Colored text consisting of “reJuice” will be black lettering in a lime green circle simulated lime. Text for “Coffee” “Smoothie” and “Juice” will be black in a white background. Text for “Gluten Free Eatery” will be black in the same white background. Text for “Nate’s” will be black and set in a white cut out of a pig. Text for “Cowboy Café” will be white with a brown background. A green arrow will be on the outer patio wall sign to direct traffic to the mobile unit.

Font:

“Nate's” font will be Papyrus. “reJuice, Coffee, Smoothies, Juice” font will be Strawberry Muffins. “&Gluten Free Eatery” will be Arial.

Materials and Attachment:

Sign material will be 18 oz. industrial vinyl with UV rated ink used on commercial billboards. Average life span of material is 5 to 7 years. Wall sign method of attachment will be 2” x ¼” lag bolts through brass grommets every 24” and will be attached directly to the building.

Lighting:

The proposed eight fully shielded down facing Gooseneck exterior light fixtures will be mounted from the eaves, at a distance of 5’ apart. Lights will be mounted so all light will reflect against the building and ground. Low 12-watt incandescent bulbs will be used.

Staff Analysis

Purpose and Applicability of Design Review

Zoning Code Chapter 11, Section 11-1 Purpose and Applicability of Design Review. A. This ordinance shall apply to new buildings and redevelopment as defined in this ordinance or the Town of Clarkdale Zoning Ordinance, except single family dwellings and accessory uses, and shall also apply to all public buildings and facilities. Structures (other than buildings), signs, landscaping, parking areas,public facilities and enclosures will be reviewed by the Design Review Board if a part of new building development or building redevelopment.

Code Review

Signs:

Zoning Code Chapter 7, Section 7-8 Permitted Signs. P. Wall Signs:

1. Maximum number equals one per approved wall area. An approved wall area, per Definitions, Chapter Two of the Town of Clarkdale Zoning Code is a wall facing a public street or containing

Page 5: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

4

the primary public access. The proposed wall signs will be visible from Paloma Way and State Route Highway 89A. Application complies.

2. Maximum height equals top of wall to which affixed. Application complies.

3. Maximum projection from wall surface equals 18 inches, with a minimum clearance of 9 vertical feet if located over a public right-of-way. The proposed signs do not project from the wall. Application complies.

Zoning Code Chapter 7, Section 7-9 Maximum Sign Square Footage for Commercial Uses: Zoning Code Chapter 7, Section 7-9 Maximum Sign Square Footage for Commercial Uses: The property’s linear street frontage is 500’ including the newly opened Paloma Way and street frontage on 89A. The size of the proposed signs per this application = 132 square feet.

Calculation of remaining allowed signage space:

500 total considered linear feet x 1.5 square feet allowed per linear foot = 750 total square feet of signage permitted.

750 permitted signage in square feet – 154 square feet of existing signage = 596 square feet.

596 square feet – 132 square feet of requested signage per this application = 464 square feet remaining for additional signage. Application complies

Zoning Code Chapter 7, Section 7-8 S. 1. Permitted Signs. 89A Overlay District:

1. Signage shall be minimal and shall consist of either wall signs or monument signs. Wall signs shall not exceed eight feet in height and monument signs shall be no greater than four feet in height. Proposed wall sign and monument sign comply.

Lighting:

Zoning Code Chapter 8 Outdoor Lighting Code Section 8-7 N Lighting Requirements: Proposed monument sign lighting and goose neck wall lighting complies with this code.

N. Lighting used for all externally illuminated signs shall conform to all restrictions of this ordinance, shall be fully shielded, and shall be turned off at 10:00 p.m. or at the close of business whichever is later. Applicant indicated intention to comply.

Pertinent Design Guidelines as reviewed by DRB on 02/06/2013

1. No more than three different fonts should be used in the text for the sign. The proposed sign has (3) fonts and does not exceed the suggested font counts. Application complies.

Page 6: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

5

2. Sign should have no more than 50 percent opacity. Dark background colors are preferred. The proposed sign complies with the new criteria. Application complies.

3. Signs should be non-reflective. The proposed sign has no reflectivity. Application complies.

4. Signs should be readable from the closest major road. The readability of the sign complies with the new criteria. Application complies.

Staff Detailed Recommendations:

Staff has determined the Application complies with all code requirements and recommends approval of DRB-091305 Nate’s Cowboy Café & reJuice signs with the following stipulations of approval:

1. All signage shall be installed as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board.

2. All contractors shall have a current business license with the Town of Clarkdale.

3. Any changes to the design approved by DRB shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to implementation who may determine the application needs to return to the Design Review Board for review and approval.

Possible Motions:

I move to approve application DRB-091305 with the stipulations proposed by staff.

I move to approve application DRB-091305 with the stipulations proposed by staff with the following changes/additions:

I move to postpone action on DRB-091305 until a specific date and direct staff and/or the applicant to provide the following:

I move to deny the application for DRB-091305 based on the following specific reasons:

END OF STAFF REPORT

Questions to Staff / Applicant: Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer asked if it would possible to ask the applicant not to use incandescent light bulbs. GIS/Planner II Espolt stated that he had talked to the applicant and they would not be using incandescent light bulbs. He also indicated that four years ago, the applicant was approved for four gooseneck lights but they were never installed so the project was brought back to Design Review Board with eight lights proposed. He also stated the applicant did receive a letter of approval from the property owner. Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer asked if the color of the fixture in the picture was the actual color and GIS/Planner II Espolt stated that it was. Board Member Midkiff pointed out that even a 60 watt incandescent light is pretty dim.

Page 7: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

6

Chair Jones asked to see the monument sign and GIS/Planner II Espolt pointed out the applicant had added a thick black line that was suggested to separate the two signs. Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer asked if the applicant was going to do anything with the base of the sign such as painting it because it looked like it could use a new coat of paint. Board Member Midkiff asked if the sign was the same color as the building. Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer stated even if the base has to be the same color of the building, it could use some sprucing up but other than that the sign and colors looked fine. She also stated the arrow was a great choice so customers know where to find the reJuice location. She suggested fencing be installed to shield the waste receptacle near the reJuice food truck to ensure the ambiance of the facility was not hindered by the view of the trash receptacle.

Public Comment: None

BOARD ACTION: Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer moved to approve the application for Nate’s Cowboy Café / reJuice with the following three recommendations by staff, plus one additional stipulation and one suggestion from the Board:

1. All signage shall be installed as review and approved by the Design Review Board.

2. All contractors shall have a current business license with the Town of Clarkdale.

3. Any changes to the design approved by DRB shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to implementation. The Director of Community Development shall determine if the application needs to return to the Design Review Board for review and approval.

Stipulation:

4. The applicant shall paint the base of the monument sign. The paint color shall match the color of the building.

Suggestion:

5. The Board suggests that the applicant install fencing to shield the waste receptacle located near the reJuice entrance.

Board Member Midkiff seconded the motion to approve. The motion passed unanimously.

7. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:

8. ADJOURNMENT: Vice Chair Prud’homme-Bauer motioned to adjourn the meeting. Board Member Midkiff seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m.

APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY:

Page 8: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAFT Design Review BoardAugust 3, 2016

7

_____________________________ ____________________________Chairperson GIS/Planner IILaura Jones Guss Espolt

Page 9: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

1DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

Agenda Item: DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus.Discussion/possible action regarding an application for design review of proposed Crossroads at Mingus Townhomes, located at 581 Mescal Spur Rd. Parcel #406-26-779 & 1679 Echo Canyon Dr. Parcel #406-26-780. The Property is zoned (PAD) Planned AreaDevelopment).

Staff Contact: Guss Espolt, GIS / Planner II

Submitted By: John Tobias / Owner PTM Enterprises / Crossroads at Mingus

Meeting Date: October 5, 2016

Background:

Mr. John Tobias has submitted an application to Design Review for proposed Crossroads at Mingus Townhomes, located at 581 Mescal Spur Rd. Parcel #406-26-779 & 1679 Echo Canyon Dr. Parcel #406-26-780. The property is zoned (PAD) Planned Area Development.

Page 10: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

2DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

The applicant is requesting design review approval for two common wall townhome units.All homes will be built on a pre-sold basis. These parcels are each .11 acres in size. The parcels are located in the Crossroads at Mingus Subdivision on the west side of Old Jerome Highway. All of the site work, utilities, grading and drainage for the lots were completed as a part of the subdivision final plat on May 12, 2011 as a whole and the lots are ready to use. The townhomes will be landscaped with native plants and trees from the Town-approved plant list. The lighting on all townhomes will be fully shielded per Town Code.One of the homes, to be built on 1679 Echo Canyon Dr. Parcel #406-26-780 is currently awaiting construction pending Design Review approval. Applicant will submit building exterior plans and colors for each new building, as they are sold, to the staff for confirmation of general compliance with the project’s design.

The following topics are presented from the application.

Landscaping Summary:

Landscaping includes 59 assorted trees, and 37 assorted shrubs. Landscaping will be used to screen the site from the nearby neighbors.

TREES: Twelve (12) Cupressus Arizonica –AZ Cypress. Twenty-seven (27) Gleditsia Sunburst – Honeylocust, thornless. Five (5) Chiliopsis Linearis – Desert Willow. Seven (7) Prosopis Chilensis – Mesquite. SHRUBS & BUSHES: Seven (7) Prosopis Chilensis – Mesquite. Twenty-six (26) Arctostaphylos Manzanita – Manzanita. Fourteen (14) Juniperus Sabina – Sabins Juniper. (See attached master planting plan DRB3 & DRB4and Plant List).

Page 11: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

3DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

Gravel:

The gravel will be ¾” minus granite, gold in color to be spread 1-1/2’ thick. (See attached master planting plan DRB3 & DRB4 and the Gravel example sheet).

Driveway and Walkway:

The driveways and walkways will vary in design from building to building: plain concrete for the drive and colored for the walks or stamped for the drive and exposed aggregate for the walks, colored for the drive and stamped for the walk, or exposed aggregate for the drive and skip troweled for the walk, pavers, bricks. (See attached master planting plan DRB2).

Paint Colors:

Duplex #1 Field colors: Sherwin-Williams Stone Lion, SW 7507. Trim Color: Sherwin-Williams Adaptive Shade, SW 7053. Duplex #2 Field colors: Sherwin-Williams Netsuke,SW 6134. Trim Color: Sherwin-Williams Well-Bread Brown, SW 7027. Duplex #3 Field colors: Sherwin-Williams Craftsman Brown, SW 2835. Trim Color: Sherwin-Williams Dover White, SW 6385. Duplex #4 Field colors: Sherwin-Williams Cascade Green, SW 0066. Trim Color: Sherwin-Williams Adaptive Shade, SW 7053. (See attached elevations and color palette #1, #2, #3, and #4).

Stone Veneer:

Duplex #1 Stone Veneer: Coronado Stone Quick Stack, Costal Brown. Duplex #2 Stone Veneer: Coronado Stone Eastern Mountain Ledge, Dakota Brown. Duplex #3 Stone Veneer: Coronado Stone Eastern Mountain, Chablis. Duplex #4 Stone Veneer: Coronado Stone Quick Stack, Aspen. (See attached elevations and color palette #1, #2, #3, and #4).

Roof:

Duplex #1 Roofing: Boral Saxony 900 Shake, Toffee. Duplex #2 Roofing: Boral Saxony 900 Shake, Brown Blend. Duplex #3 Roofing: Boral Saxony 900 Shake, Hickory. Duplex #4 Roofing: Boral Saxony 900 Shake, Charcoal Blend. (See attached elevations and color palette #1, #2, #3, and #4).

Lighting:

Each townhome will have 5 fully shielded fixtures. (See attached 04_Lighting and shielding cut sheets).

Staff Analysis

Purpose and Applicability of Design Review

Page 12: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

4DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

Zoning Code Chapter 11, Section 11-1 Purpose and Applicability of Design Review. A. This ordinance shall apply to new buildings and redevelopment as defined in this ordinance or the Town of Clarkdale Zoning Ordinance, except single family dwellings and accessory uses, and shall also apply to all public buildings and facilities. Structures (other than buildings), signs, landscaping, parking areas, public facilities and enclosures will be reviewed by the Design Review Board if a part of new building development or building redevelopment.

1. ARCHITECTURAL MERIT: The architecture and design shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures and places to which it is related.Application complies.

2. PROPORTION: The relationship of the width of the building or structures to its height shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures and places to which it is related or shall be maintained as original whenever feasible.Application complies.

3. OPENINGS: The relationship of the width of the windows and doors, to the height of windows and doors in the building shall be visually compatible with buildings, structures and places to which it is related. Application complies.

4. PATTERNS: The relationships of solids to voids in a facade of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with buildings, structures and places to which they are related. Application complies.

5. SPACING: The relationship of the building to the open space between it and the adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible to the buildings, structures and places to which it is related. Application complies.

6. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND PROJECTIONS: The height, projection, supports and relationship to streets and sidewalks, of entrances, porches, awnings, canopies and balconies of a building shall be visually compatible to the buildings, structures and places to which it is related. Application complies.

7. MATERIAL, TEXTURE AND COLOR: The materials, textures and colors of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials, textures and colors used in the buildings and structures to which they are related. The town homes are Craftsman style, painted stucco texture with various veneer and roofing colors. Application complies.

8. ROOFS: The roof shape and materials of a building shall be visually compatible with the buildings to which they are related. The proposed shake is a lightweight cement or clay manufactured roof tile. Application complies.

Page 13: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

5DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

9. ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL: Doors, windows, eaves, cornices and other architectural details of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with buildings and structures to which they are related. Application complies.

10. ACCESSORY FEATURES: Garages, carports, sheds, enclosures, walkways, stairways, and landings shall be visually compatible with buildings and structures to which they are related. Application complies.

11. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be visually compatible with the landscaping around the buildings, structures and places to which it is related.Landscaping includes 59 assorted trees, and 37 assorted shrubs. The proposed landscaping is in compliance with Landscape Design Standards, Chapter Nine of the Town of Clarkdale Zoning Code. TREES: Twelve (12) Cupressus Arizonica –AZ Cypress. Twenty-seven (27) Gleditsia Sunburst – Honeylocust, thornless. Five (5) Chiliopsis Linearis – Desert Willow. Seven (7) Prosopis Chilensis –Mesquite. SHRUBS & BUSHES: Seven (7) Prosopis Chilensis – Mesquite. Twenty-six (26) Arctostaphylos Manzanita – Manzanita. Fourteen (14) Juniperus Sabina – Sabins Juniper. Application complies.

12. LIGHTING: Any on-site illumination shall be architecturally compatible to the overall project and not create a negative or visually detrimental effect on the building or neighboring properties. Based on Town Zoning Code, this project qualifies for a total of 11,000 lumens per parcel. Lighting on each parcel will be minimal. Each townhome will have 5 fully shielded fixtures not to exceed 300watts total and 4,500 lumens. The 4,500 proposed lumens for each parcel leaves a total of 6,500 lumens unused on each .11 acre lot. Application complies.

Zoning Code Chapter 9, Section 9-5 Irrigation and Maintenance:

1. Irrigation and Maintenance: Landscape areas of 2,000 square or more shall have an irrigation system sufficient to irrigate all areas having live landscape plants.Each parcel equals 4,791.6 square feet each. Applicant has proposed a sprinkler system with 40’ of hard PVC pipe, 5” flex laterals, 1-3 emitters per plant. Applicant will place all valves in valve boxes at grade, including a 6” deep pea gravel sump below each valve. Applicant will also provide SCH.40 PVC 2-12” sleeves for both wire and pipe with extra at each pavement crossing, and will bury sleeves a least 24” B.F.G. (below finished grade). Applicant will also place emitters 1” above dirt grade, in planting wells. Application complies.

Page 14: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

6DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

Zoning Code Chapter 9, Section 9-6 Restricted Planting Areas:

2. At the intersection of a street and a driveway a triangle measuring twenty (20) feet along the curb line or roadway edge and the edge of the driveway from the point of intersection, and connecting diagonally, must be left unobstructed. Applicant has a proposed 30’ foot visual clearance. Application complies.

3. Landscape materials shall not exceed a height of thirty-six (36) inches above the grade of the roadway or driveway within the site distance triangle. Applicant has proposed no plants within the sight triangle. Application complies.

4. Trees in the site distance triangle shall have a minimum eight (8) feet of clearance between the lowest limbs of the tree and the roadway. Applicant has proposed no trees within the sight triangle. Application complies.

Staff Detailed Recommendations:

Staff has determined the Application complies with all code requirements and recommends approval of DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus with the following stipulations of approval:

1. The building shall be constructed and shall be installed as reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and as inspected by the Building Official.

2. All contractors shall have a current business license with the Town of Clarkdale.

3. Any changes to the design approved by DRB shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to implementation who may determine the application needs to return to the Design Review Board for review and approval.

Page 15: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

7DRB-091336 PTM Enterprises Crossroads at Mingus

4. All lighting, landscaping and related systems as installed shall comply with Town Code.

5. EPA Water Sense concepts shall be incorporated into the irrigation system. A plan for decommissioning of irrigation system after the drought tolerant landscaping has been established shall be submitted.

Possible Motions:

I move to approve application DRB-091336 with the stipulations proposed by staff.

I move to approve application DRB-091336 with the stipulations proposed by staff with the following changes/additions:

I move to postpone action on DRB-091336 until a specific date and direct staff and/or the applicant to provide the following:

I move to deny the application for DRB-091336 based on the following specific reasons:

Attachments: *Full size plans are available for review in the Community Development Office during regular business hours.1. Application 2. Letter of intent 3. Plot plan 4. Lighting and shielding cut sheets 5. Surrounding lot photos 6. Preliminary cut sheets for site plan, and Landscaping, 7. Roofing Materials, Textures colors, and Elevations 8. Approved Plant List

Page 16: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 17: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 18: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 19: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 20: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 21: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 22: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 23: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 24: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 25: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 26: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 27: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 28: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 29: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 30: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 31: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 32: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 33: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 34: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

8/29/16

1" = 20'-0"SJB

8/20/16 SJB

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

XRDS-MF

Page 35: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

8/29/16

1" = 8'-0"SJB

8/20/16 SJB

XRDS-MF

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

Page 36: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

9/5/16

1" = 20'-0"SJB

8/20/16 SJB

XRDS-MF

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

Page 37: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

9/5/16

1" = 8'-0"SJB

8/20/16 SJB

XRDS-MF

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

Page 38: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

8/29/16

1" = 4'-0"

XRDS-MF

SJB

8/20/16 SJB

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

Page 39: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

8/29/16

1"= 8'-0"

XRDS-MF

SJB

7/27/16 SJB7/28/16 SJB

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

Page 40: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

DRAWN:

SHEET NO.:

JOB: XRDS-MF

DATE:

SCALE:

8/29/16

REVISIONS BY

SJB

1/4" = 1'-0"

DRB7

ESTIMATING DRAWING ONLY, DO NOT BUILD FROM THESE PLANS, CHANGES WILL OCCUR!!

Page 41: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 1WITH COLOR PALETTE #1

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

P E R S P E C T I V E V I E W

Page 42: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 1WITH COLOR PALETTE #1

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 43: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 2WITH COLOR PALETTE #2

Page 44: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 2WITH COLOR PALETTE #2

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 45: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 3WITH COLOR PALETTE #3

Page 46: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 3WITH COLOR PALETTE #3

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 47: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 4WITH COLOR PALETTE #4

Page 48: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 4WITH COLOR PALETTE #4

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 49: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

Landscape will have 3/4" minus granite, gold in color spread 1-1/2' thick. Cinnamon Brown.

Gravel Example

See placement on Preliminary Cut Sheets DRB3 & DRB4

Page 50: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 51: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 52: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 53: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall
Page 54: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - COLOR PALETTE #1

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

FIELD COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSSTONE LIONSW 7507

TRIM COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSADAPTIVE SHADESW 7053

STONE VENEER:CORONADO STONEQUICK STACKCOSTAL BROWN

ROOFING:BORALSAXONY 900 SHAKETOFFEE

Page 55: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 1WITH COLOR PALETTE #1

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

P E R S P E C T I V E V I E W

Page 56: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 1WITH COLOR PALETTE #1

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 57: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - COLOR PALETTE #2

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

FIELD COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSNETSUKESW 6134

TRIM COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSWELL-BREAD BROWNSW 7027

STONE VENEER:CORONADO STONEEASTERN MOUNTAIN LEDGEDAKOTA BROWN

ROOFING:BORALSAXONY 900 SHAKEBROWN BLEND

Page 58: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 2WITH COLOR PALETTE #2

Page 59: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 2WITH COLOR PALETTE #2

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 60: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - COLOR PALETTE #3

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

FIELD COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSCRAFTSMAN BROWNSW 2835

TRIM COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSDOVER WHITESW 6385

STONE VENEER:CORONADO STONEEASTERN MOUNTAINCHABLIS

ROOFING:BORALSAXONY 900 SHAKEHICKORY

Page 61: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 3WITH COLOR PALETTE #3

Page 62: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 3WITH COLOR PALETTE #3

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N

Page 63: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - COLOR PALETTE #4

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

FIELD COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSCASCADE GREENSW 0066

TRIM COLOR:SHERWIN - WILLIAMSADAPTIVE SHADESW 7053

STONE VENEER:CORONADO STONEQUICK STACKASPEN

ROOFING:BORALSAXONY 900 SHAKECHARCOAL BLEND

Page 64: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 4WITH COLOR PALETTE #4

Page 65: DRAFT Design Review Board - Clarkdale · regarding an application for design review of proposed wall sign alterations, new monument inserts, and lighting for the south-facing wall

THE CROSSROADS AT MINGUSDUPLEX - ROOF OPTION 4WITH COLOR PALETTE #4

CLARKDALE, ARIZONA 86324

R E A R E L E V A T I O N

F R O N T E L E V A T I O N

L E F T E L E V A T I O N R I G H T E L E V A T I O N