6
wa #" -,.. { Y." q +--r^qU L-/W r. rNrRoDUCrroN to It's almost impossible to avoid local food culture, especially in an urban center like Charlotte. Co.fee shops market locally-roasted, fair-trade coff,ee; restaurants list the sources for '-- their meat products, alongside higher prices. Changes in culture and food preferences are -, driving this local food movement. Although many Americans continue to follow eating habits adopted by a prior generation - consuming large quantities of processed food - a counter movement is spreading in the United States. Young adults with higher expendable incomes are putting their dollars towards organic, locally-sourced, minimally-processed food. This paper explores the trend and what drives it. il. The Typical American Diet: A Diet of the Past? For decades America has led the way when it comes to heavily processed foods, for two two primary reasons. First, "Americans like things that are fast and easy, requiring minimal personal or economic sacrifice" (Ikerd). This has been the main selling point for the factory-to- ,table foods produced in the United States over the past few decades. Corporations have engineered their products to have near-addictive tastes, improved mouth-feels, enhanced appearances, and longer shelf lives. This was achieved by pumping foods full of salt, fat, and corn extracts in a bid to hook the consumer. Corporations had little regard for the nutritional value of their products. The [date] New York Times article The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Foodby Michael Moss publicizes engineering foods to appeal to consumers. The article opens with a discussion of James Behnke. Behnke is a scientist and former Pillsbury executive. He describes a meeting of top food industry scientists and executives to discuss the food industry's concern

Draft 2 Feedback

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

University Writing

Citation preview

  • wa

    #" -,..{ Y."q

    +--r^qUL-/Wr. rNrRoDUCrroN to

    It's almost impossible to avoid local food culture, especially in an urban center like

    Charlotte. Co.fee shops market locally-roasted, fair-trade coff,ee; restaurants list the sources for'--

    their meat products, alongside higher prices. Changes in culture and food preferences are

    -,

    driving this local food movement. Although many Americans continue to follow eating habits

    adopted by a prior generation -

    consuming large quantities of processed food -

    a counter

    movement is spreading in the United States. Young adults with higher expendable incomes are

    putting their dollars towards organic, locally-sourced, minimally-processed food. This paper

    explores the trend and what drives it.

    il. The Typical American Diet: A Diet of the Past?For decades America has led the way when it comes to heavily processed foods, for two

    two primary reasons. First, "Americans like things that are fast and easy, requiring minimal

    personal or economic sacrifice" (Ikerd). This has been the main selling point for the factory-to-

    ,table foods produced in the United States over the past few decades. Corporations have

    engineered their products to have near-addictive tastes, improved mouth-feels, enhanced

    appearances, and longer shelf lives. This was achieved by pumping foods full of salt, fat, and

    corn extracts in a bid to hook the consumer. Corporations had little regard for the nutritional

    value of their products.

    The [date] New York Times article The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Foodby

    Michael Moss publicizes engineering foods to appeal to consumers. The article opens with a

    discussion of James Behnke. Behnke is a scientist and former Pillsbury executive. He describes

    a meeting of top food industry scientists and executives to discuss the food industry's concern

  • over the American obesity crisis. A Kraft executive who presented at the meeting went so far as

    to compare marketing junk food to children as equivalent to marketing cigarettes. Another topexecutive at the meeting-the General Mills executive who invented sugary Yoplait and

    "Gogurt" for kids-reminded the group that consumers like what tastes good.

    Moss then discusses the science companies use to "get people hooked on foods that are

    convenient and inexpelslys"-66sugary, salty, fatty foods [that] are not good for us in thequantities that we consume them." (Cite.) He met with a o'food optimizer"

    - Howard

    Moskowitz -- who literally spends time combining taste, packaging, testing the

    combinations on consumers to find the match that will sell the most product. Moskowitz seeks to

    find the consumer "bliss point" -

    the point when there's just enough sugar or salt in a product but

    not too much. He researches a product's "sensory satiety" and "mouth feel" to determine how it

    will be received by-and craved by-consumers.

    The traditional American diet has led to rapid increase in heart disease and Type 2

    diabetes. Obesity is now at epidemic levels in the United States, where children are now three

    times more likely to be overweight or obese than the American youth a decade ago (Russo and

    'Smith). This is a direct result of the consumption of foods that are high-fat and low in nutritionalvalue. Many of these foods are developed and produced using corn and soy extracts. While corn

    or soy products are not necessarily harmful to our bodies, the sheer volume of these ingredients

    when considering our entire consumption of food is alarming. A [year] leading United States

    government health campaign advised Americans to "cut back on foods high in solid fats, added

    sugars, and salt. They include cakes, cookies, ice cream, candies, sweetened drinks, pizza, and

    faffy meats like ribs, sausages, bacon, and hot dogs" (choosemyplate.gov). +^/ b indr^rlc 7 Y\klnLL'However, at the same time, the United States government has heavily#Ur*U%*"r;U

    soy production in the United States since the mid-1990s. The production of corn sweeteners,

  • corn starch, and soy oils have cost American taxpayers as much as $19.2 billion in subsidies

    since 1995 (Russo and Crowe). This $19.2 billion figure is even more staggering consideringthat it does not include the additional amount the U.S. government has paid to keep corn feed-

    for large meat production facilities-cheap. (Cite). This is a colossal figure when compared tothe $689 million spent on the apple production subsidies over the past 18 years (Ibid). Suchstartling figures help to explain why "a growing number of Americans are expressing doubts and

    outright dissatisfaction with the current American food system" (Ikerd). At the same time, thesesubsidies in part explain why processed food remains cheaper in many cases than healthier

    options. (personal example).

    IIr. Local Food Culture: The New Diet?

    A local food system is defined as a "method of food production and distribution that is

    geographicallylocalized,,@).Theterm..1oca1food,,isshorthandforanumber of things. It can mean sustainably produced food, whole food

    - i.e. less processed food,

    and, of course, food sourced from local farms (and even within that there is an ongoing debate

    over the radius of local). (Ibid)The growth of the local food movement can be seen in the Charlotte area. This is evident

    through the growing number of farmer's markets, high quality supermarkets (Whole Foods),

    community-supported agriculture (CSA's), and organic restaurants throughout the area. With theaddition of Johnson & Wales culinary school in2004, the food "scane" has been slowly gaining

    momentum. As Kristie Greco, communications director for the Democratic National Convention

    Committee, stated in a2012 New York Times article, o'Irike mushrooms springing to life after a

    forest fire, it seems a serious food scene has emerged in Charlotte in the recovery from the

  • economic crisis" (Charlotte Wakes Up Bankers' Taste Buds, Kim Severson) (perhaps in part

    explaining why the Democratic National Convention was held in Charlotte).

    The article goes on to explain some of the rationale behind the movement. Charlotte was

    best known as a "moneymaking mecca", and the food industry played on that for many years,

    offering high-end chain steakhouses and barbecue for the financial elite. However, in the wake

    of the financial crisis coupled with the introduction of Johnson & Wales, amongst other factors,

    "[F]armers and cooks found each other, and the whole town just seemed to be interested inexpanding how it ate" (Ibid). [Additional sources on local food movement in Charlotte?]

    IV. What's Driving Local Food Culture?The energy behind Charlotte's local food movement is akin to that of the national food

    movement. The growing exposure of food production practices and the power that big food

    producers have over the market and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a one of themajor driving forces in the changing national food ethic. The work of author and food activistMichael Pollan has made a huge impression on many Americans, both from his books such as

    "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and "In Defense of Food" but also from his appearance in the

    documentary Food, Inc. The movie opens by telling the viewer that the food industry haschanged more in the last 50 years than in the previous 10,000 years. In particular, the rise of fast

    food -

    produced as if on an assembly line -

    has created a market for mass produced food. These

    fast food companies value consistency in their products -

    the same product for all customers.

    Because companies want the same product to sell across America, they have extraordinary

    market power (Food Inc.). .

    Young adults today are using their increased spending power and choosing "fast-casual"

    healthy options. Young adults are turning away from typical fast-food choices in recent years.

  • Instead, these individuals -

    many of whom are willing and able to pay a "premium" for healthier

    and seemingly more wholesome choices, are choosing such "fast-casual" options as Chipotle,

    Panera, and Subway. These chains -

    promising healthy options and more upscale atmosphere -

    have exploded in recent years, while traditional, low-priced fast food chains -

    like McDonald's -

    have remained stagnant (recent reports of McDonald's earnings dropping). The fact that fastfood chains attempt to incorporate "healthy" options (apple slices at McDonald's, forexample)shows that they are afiempting to capture a segment of the more health-conscious market.

    Increased exposure of mass food production tactics. The publication of such

    documentaries as Food Inc. has heightened the public's knowledge of the production practices

    used in the production of their food. Increasingly, companies are providing what consumers

    demand -

    a more transparent production process that is kinder to animals and the employees of

    the company.

    New trends in the food and drink industries with an emphasis on local ingredients. The

    increase in the number of farmer's markets and the rapid increase in coffee shops, restaurants,

    and breweries that offer locally roasted coffee beans, local meat and produce, and breweries

    claiming to use local ingredients.

    V. SECTION 4/CONCLUSION: Is it a sustainable trend or not?F Lih^h tJ i,rlo,r. nAoiT ^1or*^,$ )

    ,Alco flra p.rnotr o.r-r- ,rri1 1, 6*+ .,{ og o [",t food +".alr 1'EYGI."d."1 r^arL. f" y)o* Ut7 Ll,* *lw".l, knou tt t\)-Obviu"sq,

    ^ l-onvwd b|r\ /\r,t{ ft.^rf;,lNhir,h, t"Jhr*t

    u5"

    io

    wirilo*+

  • ,T1^/

    -'Lr lc

    ffir*ryhst'2 r't\+rx'Lco enga J.tnT

    )ot1,,rcc7Lsi\ (r.*-,*i.*ff-r)

    f

    {/Vit,, fu(;ryJt^dr"

    u{ifL 4v f.dk*1 a)ail trb)

    - OvXc,m\vc

    - L 1(tc

    - gnn"t'ricr'r

    i;

    ::

    .l ._ .,.j 1l