74
1 Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.Method of Wind Tunnel Tests Wind Resistant Design of Long Span Bridges

Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

1

Dr. Tanaka Seminar

No.3

● Method of Wind Tunnel Tests

Wind Resistant Design

of

Long Span Bridges

Page 2: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

2

Introduction

• What is wind tunnel tests ?

• How to use them ?

• What the benefit of them ?

Page 3: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

3

Great Engineer of Suspension Bridges

Leon Moisseiff (1872-1943)

But he did not consider

aero dynamic forces

which act on suspension

bridges.

Therefore famous

tragedy attacked him

on10th November 1940

Page 4: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

4

Beginning of Wind Engineering

Tacoma Narrows Bridge 10th November 1940

Page 5: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

5

1) 2D Rigid Model Test

2) 3D Elastic Model Test

3) Static Coefficient Measurement

4) Unsteady Aerodynamic

5) Boundary Layer Test

6) Cable Vibration Test

7) etc.

Various Kind of Wind Tunnel Tests

Page 6: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

6

Theoretical classification of wind Tunnel Tests

Full Modeling of Bridge Prototype

Full Model Test

Tower Model in Erection

Response

Aero-dynamic force

Wind characteristics

Partial Modeling of Prototype

Section Model Test

Tower Model in Completion

Taut Strip Model Test

3 Static-coefficient Measurement

Unsteady Force Measurement

Topological Model Test(Measurement of Wind Velocity)

Page 7: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

7

How to choose wind tunnel?

Stiffness

Wind Flow

Measurement

Dynamics or statics

Wind Direction

Models

Wind Effect3 Dimension

Full Model

Elastic Model

Static

Un-steady Aero force

EX. 3-components

Cross Force

Vibration

Responses

Turbulence

Grid Turbulence

Un-Steady

Air Force

Smooth Flow

Angle of Attack

Dynamic

Rigid Model

Section Model

2 Dimension

Displacement

Topography

Boundary

turbulence

Yaw AngleRevival of surrounding

topography

Page 8: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

8

Concept of 2 D(Section) Model Test

Perpendicular Direction

2 Dimension

Along Wind

Structural Axis

Wind direction

Structural Axis

Page 9: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

9

Section Model Test

• Section Model Test

End Plate

WindModel

Spring

Support Bar

Wind Tunnel Wall

End Plate Model

(a) Concept of 2 D(Section Model) Test

(b) Mechanism of 2 D Test

partitionStopper for Drag Force

Support Spring

Displacement Gauge

Additional Weight

Wind Tunnel WallSupport Bar

Page 10: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

10

3 Dimensional Full Model Tests

3-D Wind Tunnel of University Tokyo Model: Meiko Nishi Bridge

Page 11: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

11

1.Wind Tunnel Simulation of Bridges

Design Wind Velocity

Selection of Bridge’s deck

Static stress Check

selection of Desk

Pass Design Condition

Dynamic Check

(completion · erection ·topography)

END

3 S

tatic-C

oefficie

nts

Unste

ady Fo

rce M

easu

rem

ent

static check(Lateral Buckling ・ Divergence)

Sectio

n m

odel T

est

Tow

er M

odel T

est

3 Static-coefficients

Full B

ridge T

est

3 S

tatic-C

oefficie

nt

Flutter Analysis

Guest Response Analysis

Page 12: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

12

2 D(section) Model Test Devise

Model

Stopper

Model Support Bar

Wind Direction

Cross SpringOptical- Non-Contact Displacement Gauge

Motor for Attack Angle

Spring Supporting ArmMotor

Piano Line

Magnetic Excitor & Damper

Page 13: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

13

What is a section model?

End Plate

Deck ModelDeck Axis

ThicknessThickness

Length

Page 14: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

14

2D (Section) Model Test

In Smooth Flow In Turbulent Flow

Grid Turbulent

Page 15: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

15

3-D (Full) Model Test

Incheon Bridge

Page 16: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

16

3D Full Model Test (by Dr.Tanaka)

Page 17: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

17

Mono Cable Suspension Bridge

Ref. pp.39 from Dr. Hiroshi TANAKA Doctor Dissertation for Kyoto Univ. in 1993

Page 18: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

18

Similarity Requirements

• Geometry Similarity

• Deck model tests require the following similarities

Polar Inertia, Mass , Wind Velocity , Damping

Page 19: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

19Ref. pp.45 from Dr. Hiroshi TANAKA Doctor Dissertation for Kyoto Univ. in 1993

Page 20: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

20

Inside of 3D-Model

External

Cover

Stiffened Bar

Additional

Weight

Connection

Member

Page 21: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

21

Full Model Assembling Work

Page 22: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

22

Geometric Measurement

Page 23: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

23

Completion of Full Model

Page 24: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

24Ref. pp.50 from Dr. Hiroshi TANAKA Doctor Dissertation for Kyoto Univ. in 1993

Page 25: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

25Ref. pp.54 from Dr. Hiroshi TANAKA Doctor Dissertation for Kyoto Univ. in 1993

Page 26: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

26Ref. pp.56 from Dr. Hiroshi TANAKA Doctor Dissertation for Kyoto Univ. in 1993

Page 27: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

27

3D Full Model Test with Water Tank

3-D Wind Tunnel of Hitachi Zosen Corporation

Page 28: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

28

Wave Generatior

Page 29: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

29

3-D Turbulent Flow (Spire)

Ref. PP.285 Simiu & Scanlan Wind Effects on Structures Third Edition

Page 30: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

30

3-D Turbulent Flow (Block)

Ref. PP.283 Simiu & Scanlan Wind Effects on Structures Third Edition

Page 31: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

31

3D Test of Floating Bridge

Page 32: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

32

Yume-Mai Floating Bridge

World Largest Floating Bridge in Osaka Japan 2000

Page 33: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

33

3D Tower Model Test(Erection)

3-D Wind Tunnel Tests for Incheon Bridge

Turbulent Flow

Page 34: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

34

Static Aero-Coefficients

Definition is as follows:

Measurement of PD, PL, M and V, ρ, A,B

Page 35: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

35

3-Static-Coefficients Measurement (CD,CL,CM)

Page 36: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

36Tapered Box Section Rectangular Box Section

Example CD CL CM

Page 37: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

37

Example of Drag Force

Page 38: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

38

Page 39: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

39

Rain-Wind Induced Vibration

Page 40: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

40

Cable Vibration Phenomina

Page 41: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

41

Wind Tunnel Devise

Cable

Spring

Water

Shower

Page 42: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

42

Test Setting(1)

Page 43: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

43

Test Setting(2)

Page 44: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

44

Water Quantity & Amplitude

Wind tunnel Velocity

Non-Dimensional wind velocity (V/fD)

Water

Water

Water

Non

-Dim

ensio

n

Page 45: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

45

V/(f・D) ~ δ

No Water

Water

Water

Water

Page 46: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

46

Cable Vibration Control

Incheon Bridge

Page 47: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

47

Effectiveness of Dimple

Page 48: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

48

KTX Arch Bridge

Helical Strakes by small cables

Page 49: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

49

Nak-Dong Bridge

Page 50: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

50

Disc Damper at Incheon Bridge

Concept of Disc Damper

Disc Pad

Disc

Cable

Anchor Pipe

Page 51: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

51

Disc Damper (Friction Damper)

Incheon Bridge Site

Page 52: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

52

Strouhal Number

Definition of Strouhal Number(St)

St = f D / V (1.1)

where, f : Vortex vibration frequency after body (Hz)

D : Referent height (m)

V : Wind Velocity (m/s)

Page 53: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

53

Strouhal Number Measurementf : Frequency of Vortex V: Wind Velocity

Page 54: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

54

Damping

Erection

Bending Vibration

Truss Desk

Box deck

Completion

Log.

Damping

1/200 Full Width of Deck

1/500 of Tower Height

Torsion Vibration

Log.

Damping

Referent Amplitude

(Taut Strip Model)

0.5° Degree

at Reference point

Referent Amplitude

(Taut Strip Model)

Page 55: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

55

Setting Conditions of Wind Tunnel

a) Wind Distribution

Deviation of wind is within in ±1% .

b) Time Deviation of Wind Velocity

Intensity of turbulence should be within 1% .

c) Static Pressure Distribution

Static pressure distribution should be within 5% of dynamic pressure on the working section.

Page 56: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

56

Scale of Model

• 模型の寸法は風洞測定部形式ㆍ特性に応じて表3.15を満たすように定めるものする。

Model Condition (2) Scale

Closing Type

Open Type

Scale of Model Should satisfy below.

Cord Length /

Height of Working SectionCord Length

Model Length /Blockade Rate

Below

Below

Below

Below

Page 57: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

57

Model Condition (1) Scale

- Scale is less than 1/ 100

- Small model is NG

- Details of prototype bridge must be reproduced

especially for the experiment of vortex induced

vibration and galloping.

Page 58: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

58

3-Static Coefficients: CD CL CM

a) Range of Attack Angle

Range: -15° ~ +15° at every 1°

b) Wind Velocity

10m/s and 20m/s

c) Preciseness

±0.1

Page 59: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

59

Allowable Deviation of Wind Tunnel Tests

Table 1.1 Allowable Deviation

Allowable Value

Mass Polar Moment Log. DampingFrequency RatioItems

Wind tunnel test must be precise within the deviations below.

Page 60: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

60

Method of Measurement (1)

a) Angle of Attack ( Flutter ,Vortex Induced Vibration)

Deck Model Tests: Range is ±3°. Each 1°.

If the site seems to have more angle, we should change the range.

b) Range of Wind Velocity

Deck Model Tests: Maximum is 1.2 x Design wind speed

c) Range of Amplitudes

Deck Model Tests: Torsion 0.5° ~ 5°、Bending 1/200~1/20 of Model Length

These amplitudes must be clarified.

Page 61: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

61

Method of Measurement (2)

d) Preciseness of measurement

Deck model tests must keep

the following preciseness.

Table3.19 Preciseness of Measurement

Items Torsion Bending

Preciseness Model L

Page 62: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

62

Format of test-results

• Torsion

- Wind Velocity & Amplitude & Damping ( V ~ θ ~ δ )

- Wind Velocity & Damping ( V ~ δ )

- Wind Velocity & Amplitude ( V ~ θ )

- Flutter Critical Velocity Vs. Angle of Attack (Vcr ~ α)

• Bending- Wind Velocity & Amplitude & Damping ( V ~ η ~ δ )

- Wind Velocity & Damping ( V ~ δ )

- Wind Velocity & Amplitude ( V ~ η )

Page 63: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

63

Turbulent Flow

Fig. Turbulence generator

How to make turbulent flow ??

Page 64: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

64

Power Spectrum Simulation

Page 65: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

65

Turbulence Simulation System

Potentiometer

X-Type HotwireWind

Target Power

Spectrum

Production

of

Time-

Series

Measured Power

SpectrumComparison of

Spectrum

AC Servo Motor

Page 66: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

66

Intensity of Turbulence (Iu) of Along Wind

Iu is small

Iu is large

Page 67: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

67

Gust Generator

Page 68: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

68

Plate Row Wing Row

Page 69: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

69

Servo Motor

Page 70: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

70

Measurement of Flutter Derivatives

Forced Vibration Method

Page 71: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

71

Forced Vibration Method

Page 72: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

72

Flutter Equation

Ref. H.Tanaka Flutter and Gust Response Analysis of the Messina Bridge –Benchmarking-

We can solve flutter equation using flutter derivatives.

Page 73: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

73

Vertical Torsional

Page 74: Dr. Tanaka Seminar No.3

74