Upload
kamran
View
44
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 6 Lecture 27. Mass Transport: Two-Phase Flow. Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras. CONVECTIVE MASS TRANSFER IN LAMINAR- AND TURBULENT-FLOW SYSTEMS. Analogies to Momentum Transfer: (High Sc Effects) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Dr. R. Nagarajan
Professor
Dept of Chemical Engineering
IIT Madras
Advanced Transport PhenomenaModule 6 Lecture 27
1
Mass Transport: Two-Phase Flow
Analogies to Momentum Transfer: (High Sc Effects)
Streamwise pressure gradient can break mass/
momentum transfer analogy (St & cf/2)
For laminar or turbulent flows with negligible pressure
gradient, Reynolds’- Chilton – Colburn analogy holds:
2
2/3.( )2f
m
cSt Sc
CONVECTIVE MASS TRANSFER IN LAMINAR- AND TURBULENT-FLOW SYSTEMS
Analogies to Momentum Transfer: (High Sc Effects)
For Sc ≈ 1 (e.g., solute gas diffusion through gaseous
solvents), Prandtl’s form of extended analogy holds:
In many mass-transfer applications (e.g., aerosols, ions in
aqueous solutions), Sc >>1 since D << Correlation would underestimate Stm for Sc > 102
3
1 1/22
12
1 5( ) Pr 1
f
hf
CSt
C
CONVECTIVE MASS TRANSFER IN LAMINAR- AND TURBULENT-FLOW SYSTEMS
Analogies to Momentum Transfer: (High Sc Effects)
For Sc >> 1: (Shaw and Hanratty, 1977)
Experimental: Stm ~ Sc(-2/3)
Surface roughness effect: when comparable to or greater in
height compared to viscous sublayer thickness (SL ≈ (cf/2)1/2
(5/U)) increases both cf/2 and St
Effect on St < on friction coeff (hence, pressure drop) 4
1/20.7040.08. .( )
2f
m
cSt Sc
CONVECTIVE MASS TRANSFER IN LAMINAR- AND TURBULENT-FLOW SYSTEMS
CHEMICAL NONEQUILIBRIUM (KINETIC) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
When dilute species A reacts only at fluid/ solid interface,
Stm(Re, Sc) still applies
Mass flux of species A at the wall
This flux appears in BC for species A at fluid/ surface
interface
5
'', , , ,Re, .A w m A A A A wj USt Sc
If species A is being consumed at a local rate given by
(irreversible, first-order) chemical reaction:
Surface BC (or jump condition, JC) takes the form:
6
''.A w A w
kinetic rate of consumptionr k
of A at surface
'' '',A w Aj r
CHEMICAL NONEQUILIBRIUM (KINETIC) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
JC provides algebraic equation for quasi-steady species A mass fraction, A,w, at surface, and:
and
transfer rate as a fraction of maximum (“diffusion-controlled”)
rate; C << 1 => fraction is small, rate approaches
“chemically controlled” value, kwA,∞7
,
,
Local reactant "starvation"11
A w
A C
'', , ,.
1A w m A ACj UStC
CHEMICAL NONEQUILIBRIUM (KINETIC) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
C surface Damkohler number; “catalytic parameter”; defined by:
Resistance additivity approach: adequate for engineering
purposes when applied locally along a surface with
slowly-varying x-dependences of Tw, kwA,w
8
,
w w m
m A A
k kC
USt D
CHEMICAL NONEQUILIBRIUM (KINETIC) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
If LTCE is achieved at station w due to rapid
heterogeneous chemical reactions, then:
i,w = i,eq(Tw,….;p) for all species i
Used to estimate chemical vapor deposition (CVD)
rates in multicomponent vapor systems with surface
equilibrium
9
CHEMICAL NONEQUILIBRIUM (KINETIC) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
In the presence of homogeneous reactions, similar
approach can be used to estimate element fluxes
Effective Fick diffusion flux of each element (k) estimated
via: (diffusion coefficients evaluated as weighted sums of
Di)
10
''( ) ( ) 1,2,...,k k elemk mixD k N j grad
CHEMICAL NONEQUILIBRIUM (KINETIC) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
COMBINED ENERGY & MASS TRANSPORT: RECOVERY OF MAINSTREAM CHEMICAL &
KINETIC ENERGY If a thermometer is placed in a hot stream with
considerable kinetic energy & chemical energy, what
temperature will it read?
Neglecting radiation loss, surface temperature will rise to
a SS-value at which rate of convective heat loss
(Tr gas-dynamic recovery temperature)11
'' . Re,Pr . .w h p w rconvq U St c T T
balances rate of energy transport associated with species A
mass transport:
(Q energy release per unit mass of A)
12
'',. Re, . w m A Adiff
q U St Sc Q
COMBINED ENERGY & MASS TRANSPORT: RECOVERY OF MAINSTREAM CHEMICAL &
KINETIC ENERGY
Adiabatic condition: = 0 (including both contributions)
=>
In forced-convection systems, (Stm/Sth) chemical-
energy recovery factor, rChE
13
2
Pr,Re .2r KE
p
UT T rc
2,Re,
Pr,Re . .2 Re,Pr
Am Aw KE
p h p
QSt ScUT T rc St c
COMBINED ENERGY & MASS TRANSPORT: RECOVERY OF MAINSTREAM CHEMICAL &
KINETIC ENERGY
''wq
For a laminar BL, rKE ≈ Pr1/2, rChE ≈ Le2/3, and
Tw can be higher or lower than corresponding thermodynamic (“total”) temperature:
(depending on Pr, Le)14
2
1/2 2/3 ,Pr .2
Aw
p p
QUT T Lec c
2,
0 2A
p p
QUT Tc c
COMBINED ENERGY & MASS TRANSPORT: RECOVERY OF MAINSTREAM CHEMICAL &
KINETIC ENERGY
In most gas mixtures, both rKE and rChE ≈ 1
Probe records temperature near T0, not T∞
rChE important in measuring temperatures of gas streams
that are out of chemical equilibrium
Tw >> T∞ or Tr can be recorded
15
COMBINED ENERGY & MASS TRANSPORT: RECOVERY OF MAINSTREAM CHEMICAL &
KINETIC ENERGY
For non-adiabatic surfaces:
Tr’ generalized recovery temperature
(Tw - Tr’) “overheat”
16
'' '. Re,Pr .w h p w rq U St c T T
COMBINED ENERGY & MASS TRANSPORT: RECOVERY OF MAINSTREAM CHEMICAL &
KINETIC ENERGY
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
When dynamic coupling between suspended particles (or
heavy solute molecules) & carrier fluid is weak consider
particles as distinct phase
Distinction between two-phase flow & flow of ordinary
mixtures
Quantified by Stokes’ number, Stk
Above critical value of Stk, 2nd phase can inertially
impact on target, even while host fluid is brought to rest17
18
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers: Cylinder in cross flow
Particle-laden steady carrier flow of mainstream velocity, U
Suspended particles assumed to be:
Spherical (diameter dp << L)
Negligible mass loading & volume fraction
Large enough to neglect Dp, small enough to neglect
gravitational sedimentation Captured on impact (no rebound) 19
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers:
Cylinder in cross flow
Each particle moves along trajectory determined by host-
fluid velocity field & its drag at prevailing Re (based on local
slip velocity)
Capture efficiency function
Calculated from limiting-particle trajectories (upstream
locations of particles whose trajectories become
tangent to target)20
,Re, ,capture Stk shape orientation
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers:
Cylinder in crossflow
capture = 0 for Stk < Stkcrit
Capture occurs only above a critical Stokes’ number
(for idealized model of particle capture from a two-
phase flow)
21
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers: Cylinder in cross flow
22
Particle capture fraction correlation for ideal ( ) flow past a transversecircular cylinder (Israel and Rosner (1983)). Here tflow=(d/2)/U.
Re
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers: Cylinder in crossflow In practice, some deposition occurs even at Stk < Stkcrit
Due to non-zero Brownian diffusivity, thermophoresis, etc.
Rates still influenced by Stk since particle fluid is compressible (even while host carrier is subsonic)
Inertial enrichment (pile-up) of particles in forward stagnation region, centrifugal depletion downstream
Net effect: can be a reduction below diffusional deposition rate
23
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers: Cylinder in crossflow
Combustion application: sampling of particle-laden (e.g., sooty) combustion gases using a small suction probe
Sampling rate too great => capture efficiency for host gas > that of particles => under-estimation; and vice versa
Sampling rate at which both are equal isokinetic condition (particle size dependent)
24
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Pure inertial impaction at supercritical Stokes’ numbers: Cylinder in cross flow
25
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Effect of probe sampling rate on capture of particles and their carrier fluid
Effective diffusivity of particles in turbulent flow Ability to follow local turbulence (despite their inertia)
governed by Stokes’ number, Stkt
Relevant local flow time = ratio of scale of turbulence, lt, to rms turbulent velocity
26
1/2/ '. ' p
t
t
tStk
l
Two-Phase Flow: Mass Transfer Effects of Inertial Slip & Isokinetic Sampling
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Effective diffusivity of particles in turbulent flowAlternative form of characteristic turbulent eddy time,
where kt turbulent kinetic energy per unit mass, and turbulent viscous dissipation rate per unit
mass
27
/eddy tt k :eddyt
Effective diffusivity of particles in turbulent flow
and
(for particles in fully turbulent flow, t >> )
Data: fct( ) >> 1 for
Alternative approach to turbulent particle dispersion:
stochastic particle-tracking (Monte Carlo technique)
28
1, / .p eff t t tD v Sc fct Stk
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
/ /t p tStk t k
tStk 110tStk
TWO-PHASE FLOW: MASS TRANSFER EFFECTS OF INERTIAL SLIP & ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
Eddy impaction:
When Stkt is sufficiently large, some eddies project
particles through viscous sublayer, significantly increasing the deposition rate
Represented by modified Stokes’ number:
Eddy-impaction augmentation of Stm negligible for Stkt,eff-values < 10-1
Below this value, turbulent particle-containing BL behaves like single-phase fluid 29
, / ( / )p
t eff pw
tStk t
v