Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Mary Lou SwiftField Crop Development Center, Lacombe AB
2
CommodityNot used by malting/food industryEnd users price as commodityenergy cost per kg product produced; Few wet chemistry laboratories Turnover time, cost, blendingBook values for nutritional composition
Helm et al., 2000
4
$40 per tonne
Hulled Barley Hulled Barley + Enzyme
*Scale 1.0 to 2.5
Feed Quality Evaluation/NIRS Project300 Samples each of 6 products
Animal (In-vivo) and In-vitro Measurements
BARLEY WHEAT PEASCANOLA
MEALDISTILLERS
GRAINSWHEAT
BYPRODUCT
•DE•NE
•Starch•Fiber
•AME •Proximates•AA•Physical
7
DEFINE FEED VALUE! Develop robust, timely, inexpensive ways to predict/estimate feed value
Work with industry leaders to use these predictors of feed value in formulation systems
Develop rapid method to “estimate the estimate”
M.L. Swift1*, L. Oatway1, R. T. Zilstra2, W. C. Sauer2,
and J. H. Helm1
1
Apparent Total Tract Digestibility (ATTD) Energy◦ 39 Hulled (+21)◦ 16 Hulless◦ Barrows (~33 kg)◦ 96% barley diet
In-vitro Assay◦ 3 step enzymatic◦ Pepsin 6 h◦ Pancreatin 18 h◦ Cellulase 24 h
Physical, Chemical◦ TW, KW, % Plump◦ CP, Starch, Lipid,
Ash, Dietary Fiber, B-Glucan, Pentosan
(Regmi et al., 2008. JAS 86:2619)
70
75
80
85
90
95
ATTD-H IVED-H IVEDC-H ATTD-HB IVED-HB IVEDC-HB
Perc
ent
Correction Y=1.23x-25.33 (x=In vitro value)
Physical◦BW, TW, Plumpness
ProximatesNutrient Degradation◦Dry Matter (DMD)◦Starch◦Fiber (ADF, NDF)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 4 8 14 24
Time (h)
6th Canadian Barley Symposium July 25-28, 2010 14
Whole plant barley NDF digestibility and its relationship with chemical constituents and DM yield
M.L. Swift*1, M. Oba2, P. E. Juskiw1 and J. H. Helm1
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
H2R H6R HB2R HB6R