Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
July 29, 2016
Dr. John ScarbroughAssoc Dean
School of Nursing
Welcome!
School Location ADN BSN
UNM Albuquerque X
CNM Albuquerque X X
CNM-RR Rio Rancho X X
NMJC Hobbs X X
SJC Farmington X X
NMSU Las Cruces X
NMSU-A Alamogordo X
NMSU-G Grants X
SFCC Santa Fe X X
CCC Clovis X
WNMU Silver City X X
UNM-T Taos X Fall 2016 X Fall 2016
8 Schools/Programs 11 locations 8 offer ADN 11 offer BSN
School Location NMNEC Prereqs ADN/BSN
UNM-G Gallup Fall 2016 Fall 2017
Luna CC Las Vegas Fall 2016 Fall 2017
UNM-V Los Lunas Spr 2018 Fall 2018
ENMU-R Roswell Fall 2017 Fall 2018
NNMC Española Fall 2015 Fall 2018
NMSU-C Carlsbad Fall 2018 Fall 2019
Doña Ana CC Las Cruces Fall 2014 Consider after
Fall 2020
7 Schools/Programs
8:30 – 8:50 Leadership Council Updates
8:50 – 9:00 NMCNE Update
9:00 – 10:00 Dr. Marcy Stoll – “Changes w ACEN”
10:15 – 11:30 L3 “Care of Pts w Chronic Conditions”
11:30 – 1:00 Working LunchQ&A with Dr. Stoll OR ADN Capstone
1:00 – 3:00 Workshop: “How to Link Classroom Concepts to the Clinical Setting”
3:00 Evaluation and CEs
Reimbursement for
Mileage and Lodging*
Forms will be emailed on Monday
◦ *Refer to reverse side of agenda
5.50 FREE CEs thank you NMBON and APIN
1. Sign in for CEs at registration table
2. Attend FOUR sessions 9:00 “Changes with ACEN” 10:15 “NMNEC L3 Care of Pts w Chron Condt” 11:30 “Q&A w Dr. Stoll” OR “AND Capstone” 1:00 “How to Link Classrm Cncpts to Clinical Sttng”
3. Complete evaluation at 3:00
4. Turn in eval to registration table
5. Receive your CE Certificate (no partial CEs)
Learning Outcomes: 9am Dr. Marcy Stoll “Updates and Changes of
ACEN Standards and Criteria” The learner will gain an understanding of the recommended new standards and criteria pertaining to ACEN accreditation so they may build a process to be in compliance now, and into the future.
10:15 Session “NMNEC Level 3 Care of Patients with Chronic Conditions” The learner will, through examples of specific classroom set up, specific teaching strategies, and specific lessons learned, (specifically in the clinical setting) utilize the didactic and clinical concepts and exemplars specific to this course in the NMNEC curriculum.
Learning Outcomes: 11:30 Breakout Working Lunch Sessions ◦ “Q&A with Dr. Marsal Stoll” The learner will gain specific
insight into the recommended new standards and criteria pertaining to their specific ACEN accreditation to manage the process to be in compliance now, and into the future.
◦ “ADN Capstone” The learner will formulate recommendations for this course and specifically determine if standardization is necessary, as well as, determine a plan to move forward.
1pm Workshop “How to Link Classroom Concepts to the Clinical Setting” The learner will gain knowledge and experience in how to link classroom concepts to the clinical setting. They will learn how a concept informs an exemplar, specifically addressing the concept of metabolism/diabetes and how it is addressed in the clinical setting.
Approval Statement
This continuing nursing education activity was approved by New Mexico Nurses Association Accredited Approver Unit, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.
Conflicts of Interest:
Planners & Presenters of this CNE activity have no conflicts of interest
The following commercial entities are providing support:
None
The following governmental or non-profit entities are providing sponsorship support:
NMNEC grant funds:
New Mexico Board of Nursing NMNEC grant
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation APIN grant
Nisa Bruce, MS, BSN, RN, BASan Juan College
Diane Evans-Prior, MSN, RNCentral New Mexico Community College
Jenny Landen, MSN, RN, FNP-BCSanta Fe Community College
Judy Liesveld, PhD, PPCNP-BC, RN University of New Mexico
Terry Keller, PhD, RN, MPANew Mexico State University
Delores Thompson, MSN, RN, CNE, FNPNew Mexico Junior College
John Scarbrough, PhD, PT, RN, CNEWestern New Mexico University
Tricia Maule, MSN, RNSan Juan Regional Medical Center
Julia Vasquez, MSN, RNChristus St Vincent Regional Medical Center
Updates
How many first time attendees
do we have?
Have questions?
◦ See a Leadership Council member today
• Past Funding• FY9-10 $53,314 (Ridenour)
• FY10-11 $70,265 (BON)
• FY11-12 $128,624 (BON)
• FY12-13 $129,929 (BON) & $150,000 (APIN)
• FY13-14 $154,755 (BON) & $150,000 (APIN) & $15,000 (HED)
• FY14-15 $158,771 (BON) & $150,000 (APIN)
• FY15-16 $197,359 (BON) & $150,000 (APIN)
• Current Funding• FY 16-17 NMBON $74,000
• APIN extension (thru Nov 30) $72,000• Staff
• Becky .50• Mary .40• Admin .25• Graduate Assistant .25
Aug 11 Meeting – NMNEC Leadership
Statewide Meetings:
• July 29 (free CEs) – APIN funds
• Nov 4 (free CEs) - APIN funds
• February (free CEs) – BON funds
• Limited travel reimbursement
• Limited catering
• July & November ?
Leadership Meetings:
• No travel reimbursement
• Lunch
Website - $0
Office Supplies - $100qrtr
Printing - $250yr
Consulting - $0
Educator’s Conference - $0
What’s new with the Center for Nursing Excellence?
“Changes with ACEN”Updates on Standards and Criteria
Dr. Marcy Stoll, CEO
ADN and BSN handouts were emailed on Friday/Wednesday
NEXT: “L3 – Care of Patients with Chronic Conditions”
“Care of Patientswith
Chronic Conditions”Beverly Romero, SFCCLouise Cisneros, CNM
Clinical Course set up
Teaching and learning strategies in clinical
What works, what hasn’t
Challenges◦ Skills Intensive
◦ Clinically Intensive
◦ Graded on A, B, C scale, not pass/fail
Solutions◦ Front loading skills content
◦ Shared calendar
◦ Grading
◦ Rubrics
◦ Care plan swapping
◦ Weekly reporting
Methods of Evaluation and Grade Determination
Assignment Frequency Points per Assignment
Total PointsPossible
Graded careplans
1 each week10 100
Skills Testing During first two weeks
5 per skill 20
Simulation 6 sims over term 5 30
Nursing Article Once 10 10
Clinical Evaluation
Once at end of term
176 176
Total: 336
See handouts
Conceptually based
Allows for customization for patient care
Rubrics
Documentation of data Concept mapping – showing relationships Ease of readability Integration of client Nursing diagnosis Goals and outcomes Implementation Evaluation Evidence Potential complications
See handouts Conceptually based Higher quality nurse thinking (streamlined –
quality over quantity) Easier to see big picture (and to evaluate if
the student can see the big picture) Rubrics
Documentation
Showing relationships
Integration of client
Nursing diagnosis
Potential Complications
Medication completion
Careplan swapping
Weekly reporting
“Care of Patientswith
Chronic Conditions”Beverly Romero, SFCCLouise Cisneros, CNM
1. How this clinical course is set up
2. Teaching/Learning strategies used in the clinical setting
3. What has worked and what hasn’t
Concepts
Exemplars
Skills
Simulations
Hand out #1- Comprehensive Calendar
1st week of class Math Exam
Certifications
Fingerprinting
1st skill- Venipuncture (Safety)
Weeks 2-3
Skills: ◦ IV Medication administration (Safety)
◦ Urinary Catheter Care and Insertion (Elimination)
Week #3
First clinical
Hand out #2- Clinical Partner Information Sheet
Teach one week
Check off the next week
Open Lab for Practice
Venipuncture
IV Administration
Urinary Catheter Insertion and Care
Surgical Wound and Central Line Dressing
Blood Administration & PICC Line Blood Draw
Airway Suctioning and Trach Care
Dysrhythmias
Chest Tubes
Metabolic Regulation
Gas Exchange
6 Students at a time for 1 hour experiences
Skill Reinforcement
Level 1 skills
Due twice a semester
Clinical AssignmentHandout #3-6 SimChart/Clinical Floor Assignment
DURING CLINICAL DAY
◦ Patient Charting
◦ Conceptual Patient Care Assignment
◦ Medication sheet
◦ Charge Nurse Report
Post Clinical AssignmentSimChart Assignment
Diagnosis-Incorporating Primary and Interrelated
concepts and exemplars.
Lab Tests- Correlate with primary concept and
exemplar
Care Plan- Reflecting Primary and Interrelated concept and exemplar.
Handout #7-Critical Thinking Exercise
Pullouts
Clinical instructors take part in the didactic, skill and clinical components of the course.◦ Assists with reinforcing concepts and exemplars
◦ Students can learn from different instructors
◦ Team Oriented
Students have had Pharmacology
Skills◦ Lower Level Skills
◦ Front Loading
Clinical◦ Health Assessment in Level II
Dysrhythmias ◦ Higher level skill
1. BOXED LUNCH
2. “Q&A with Dr. Marcy Stoll”
OR
“ADN Capstone”
“How to Link Classroom Concepts to the
Clinical Setting”
Sue Koronkiewicz, UNMNancy Morton, UNM
Deborah Minke, UNMH
Change in healthcare
◦ Traditional clinical education hasn’t changed
Lack of /competition for clinical sites
Clinical opportunities not matching learning goals
Evidence
◦ Traditional clinical education models not accomplishing all clinical education goals
Ironside, P., McNelis, P., & Ebright, P. (2014).
◦ Concept based learning activities fosters synthesis and promotes clinical reasoning
Nielson, A. (2016).
Faculty goals for students◦ Knowledge synthesis, patient centered care,
synthesis of clinical situation
Requiring◦ Complex problem solving, clinical reasoning in
changing situations
Faculty spend almost all their time◦ Task completion, time management
◦ Med knowledge, lab values
What students do:◦ Task completion: Tasks = Learning
ADLs
Medication administration
Skills when the instructor was available
Waiting for the instructor
What students didn’t do◦ Clinical reasoning
Experienced nurses do this while completing tasks
Students are completely focused on tasks
Accomplishes deep learning, synthesis of knowledge and experience
Using various concept based teaching strategies supports deep learning
Deliberate focus of CBLs on theory to practice synthesis and clinical judgment
Preconditions for optimal learning with CBLs◦ Positive learning environment
◦ Faculty expertise in concept
◦ Student engagement and preparation
◦ Patient selection that exemplifies concept
New curriculum
IOM call for reform
Growth of stronger clinical partnerships
Deliberate collaboration of level faculty
Simulations
New curriculum
Student engagement
Clinical faculty ◦ Not well connected/supported
Lack of consistency/expertise in concept-based teaching
Competition with tasks
Clinical staff buy in
Connecting to the curriculum◦ Formal orientation to the curriculum
◦ Strong relationship with course coordinator
◦ Inclusion in level meetings
Collaboration◦ Process for timely feedback
◦ Formative and Summative Evaluations
◦ Clinical Toolbox
Study one concept per day/week without other responsibilities
Collaborative learning – pairing students by patient or concept
Time with educator while learning
Educator questioning
Immediate connection of theory and practice – in preconference or discussion
Assign a concept per day◦ Close to when concept taught in class◦ High incidence on clinical site
Alternative ways to explore concept◦ Pre-conference – review concept definition, signs &
symptoms, labs, expected therapies before clinicals◦ Post-conference – each student discusses their patient’s
status RE: concept Have format to give structure, follow
◦ Patient rounds – each student presents to rest of clinical group
Assign a few/half the students to do CBLAs, rest to do traditional clinical
Tanner’s Clinical Judgment Model◦ Integrate pre/post clinical experience◦ Tanner, C. (2006)
Conceptual Care Map Assignment◦ Combines elements of a traditional care plan with
concept mapping◦ Includes students’ responses to Tanner’s
questions
Clinical Concept Application Assignment◦ Promotes conceptual integration of patient
exemplars
DEFINITION: The ability of the physiological mechanisms of the body to maintain fluid and electrolyte homeostasis .
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The student will :
◦ Assess the ability of the child 's body to regulate and maintain fluid and electrolyte balance .
◦ Identify factors which influence the fluid and electrolyte balance/imbalance of the pediatric patient .
◦ Plan and implement nursing interventions which promote fluid and electrolyte balance.
◦ Evaluate the effectiveness of interventions by nurses and other health care providers aimed at promoting fluid and electrolyte homeostasis .
◦ This learning activity will assist you in achieving the following course objectives : (list relevant course objectives)
LEARNING ACTIVITIES:
◦ Assess pediatric patient for fluid and electrolyte status using an assessment tool.
◦ Presentation of patient during walking rounds.
EVALUATION :
◦ Assessment process and completion of assessment tool.
◦ Participation 1n rounds presentation .
◦ Integration of concept-related content into nursing process reports (written) and clinical practice.
REQUIRED READING:
(list references of choice)
Heims & Boyd (1990)
DEFINITION: Exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide at the cellular level must be efficient to support life. This process also required transport of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:◦ Assess the functional integrity and efficiency of the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary
system.◦ Plan and implement nursing measures which promote effective and efficient oxygen and
carbon dioxide exchange.◦ Evaluate the effectiveness of interventions utilized to promote oxygen and carbon dioxide
exchange in terms of patient response.◦ This learning activity will assist you in achieving the following course objectives: (list relevant
course objectives)
LEARNING ACTIVITIES:◦ Clinical conference on oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange: Date: .◦ Observe a patient using the client evaluation tool (provided).◦ Complete the client evaluation tool through observation, client and/or parent contact, and
chart review.◦ Participate in walking rounds of patients evaluated for oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange.
EVALUATION:◦ Completion of the focused client evaluation tool.◦ Participation in rounds presentation.◦ Integration of concept related content in nursing process reports (written) and clinical
practice.
REQUIRED READING:◦ (list references of choice)
Heims & Boyd (1990)
Working with CBLA’s◦ Instructor/Staff/Student Buy-in
What Works?
Are We Noticing a Difference?
‣ Identify a clinical course and type of experience
‣ Identify a concept taught concurrently in a didactic class
‣ Plan an overall clinical course, incorporating some CBLAs
‣ Construct a CBLA
‣ All Tables Share
Heims, M.L., & Boyd, S.T. (1990). Concept based learning activities in clinical nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 29, 249-254.
Ironside, P., McNelis, P., & Ebright, P. (2014). Clinical education in nursing: Rethinking learning in practice settings. Nursing Outlook, 62, 185-191.
Nielson, A. (2016). Concept-based learning in clinical experiences: Bringing theory to clinical education for deep learning. Journal of Nursing Education. 2016; 55(7), 365-371.
Tanner, C. (2006). Thinking like nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 45(6), 204-211.
July 29, 2016
Dr. John ScarbroughAssoc Dean
School of Nursing