Upload
lykiet
View
218
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3 Page 1-Mar-13
AGENDA
• Drivers for Subsea condition monitoring
• Condition monitoring
• Overview of the failure modes
• Looking ahead
• Summary
4 Page 1-Mar-13
Drivers
• Philosophy “Design for life”:
Employs redundancy in design Simplicity in design No account taken for failure / scheduled replacement
• Improved understanding of materials and system functionality
Focus on cost and fast track schedule Verified by inspection (Ext) and Pigging / Analysis (Int)
5 Page 1-Mar-13
Drivers
• Requirement to continuously demonstrate “fitness for service” • Removal of deferred production costs associated with pigging • Improved understanding of condition thus improving decision making for de-rating, process optimisation and scheduling for remediation / rectification tasks • Evidence based knowledge to support Field Life Extension and Brown field tie in justifications • Ultimately improved understanding for decommissioning considerations
6 Page 1-Mar-13
Field of the Future
• Subsea Processing • Subsea Boosting • Downhole Separation • Downhole Boosting
Rotating and Reciprocating machinery with moving parts – dynamic machinery
7 Page 1-Mar-13
AGENDA
• Drivers for Subsea condition monitoring
• Condition monitoring
• Overview of the failure modes
• Looking ahead
• Summary
8 Page 1-Mar-13
Condition Monitoring; how does it differ from routine surveillance tasks?
• Basic need to control hazards to prevent failure and the consequences for
Safety Environment Financial loss
• Deployment of inspection and pigging campaigns will periodically confirm status – it will find faults/ anomalous conditions
• Passive monitoring provides alerts only when threat is truly a danger– it is a measure of health
9 Page 1-Mar-13
Bathtub curve - illustrating inspection points and pigging campaigns
Continue to monitor, stepping out the inspection interval to N+1, if no anomalies found
0 1 5 10 15 20 25
Deploy surveillance techniques that seek infant mortality
Monitor age related failures by increasing inspection frequency to ½ x (remaining life).
22.5 23.75
Pigging campaigns
10 Page 1-Mar-13
Marrying the Inspection technique to failure mode and characteristic
• Describe failure characteristic w.r.t time
– e.g.Totally random failure distribution bearing no relationship to either time or usage.
Random + Fatigue
Random failure rate Increasing failure rate w.r.t time
Tradition bathtub Early infant
mortality + fatigue
Early infant mortality +
random
Low early life failure rate + random failure rate
11 Page 1-Mar-13
AGENDA
• Drivers for Subsea condition monitoring
• Condition monitoring
• Overview of the failure modes
• Looking ahead
• Summary
12 Page 1-Mar-13
Failure Modes – Static Plant
• General Metal Loss • Mechanical Overstress • Impact • Over-Pressurisation • Fatigue
13 Page 1-Mar-13
General Metal Loss – “Internal Corrosion/Erosion”
∆ε
Grooving corrosion of a water injection pipeline
15 Page 1-Mar-13
Mechanical Overstress - “Upheaval/Lateral Buckling”
Lateral pipeline buckle
Lateral Buckling
∆ε
Y
X
Z
∆ε
x
Y
Z
Upheaval Buckling
Upheaval Buckling
16 Page 1-Mar-13
Impact – “Dropped Object”
∆ε
Pipeline impact damage
Gouge
The Sword fish spearing failure mode
17 Page 1-Mar-13
Over Pressurisation – “Blockage/Burst”
∆ε
Hydrate Flow
Removal of Hydrate blockage topside
19 Page 1-Mar-13
Risk
Risk = Probability of Failure x Consequence of Failure Risk rank Failure Modes in accordance with PoF Vs. CoF
• PoF - Statistical data on incidents reported in the North Sea (PARLOC 2001) • CoF – Consequence Matrices (DNV-RP-F116)
Failure Mode Risk
General Metal Loss High
Mechanical Overstress Low
Impact Medium
Over-Pressurisation Medium
Fatigue Low
Corrosion, 40%
Structural, 2%
Material, 15%
Other, 17%
Impact, 26%
20 Page 1-Mar-13
AGENDA
• Drivers for Subsea condition monitoring
• Condition monitoring
• Overview of the failure modes
• Looking ahead
• Summary
21 Page 1-Mar-13
Solution – Phase I - Greenfield Pipe-in-Pipe
Fibre Optic – Axial Stress Fibre Optic – Temperature Fibre Optic – Hoop Stress
Insulation Blanket
Sleeve Pipe Flowline
Annulus
23 Page 1-Mar-13
Goal
Sensors
Data Acquisition
“Pressure, Temperature
& Strain”
Data Cleansing &
Filtering
Algorithm
“Exceedence Criteria”
Storage
Transmission
“Acoustic, RF or Optical”
AIV Surface Desktop
HARDWARE
PROCESS
24 Page 1-Mar-13
Challenges
• Power • Data Acquisition
Hardwired Wireless
o Acoustic o RF o Optical
Standalone data logging ROV Stab
• Data Processing • Data Storage • Data Retrieval
25 Page 1-Mar-13
AGENDA
• Drivers for Subsea condition monitoring
• Condition monitoring
• Overview of the failure modes
• Looking ahead
• Summary