Upload
deborah-meadors
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Clem Guthro, Director of the Colby College
LibrariesMSCS Project Co-PI
Maine Shared Collections Strategy: Print Archive Network Update
www.maineinfonet.net/mscs/
Academic LibrariesUniversity of Maine, University of
Southern Maine, and 5 small campusesColby, Bates and BowdoinUniversity of New England7 Community CollegesSmall private colleges (Unity, Thomas, St.
Josephs, College of the Atlantic, Maine Maritime Academy, Maine College of Art, Husson, Beal, Kaplan)
The Library Context in Maine
Public Libraries265 public libraries 2 flagship publics –Bangor and Portland150 with collections smaller than 20,000 vols
Maine State LibraryMaine Law and Legislative Reference
LibrarySpecial Libraries
23 hospital libraries2 Independent Labs (Jackson and Bigelow)
The Library Context in Maine
Maine InfoNetMaineCat – Statewide catalogMarvel – Statewide databases
Larger Libraries9 largest libraries in MaineDirectors meet twice a yearAnnual staff development day
CBB (Colby, Bates, Bowdoin)Cooperative collection developmentCommon loan periods & 6 day a week
deliveryState-wide delivery -1.25 million items/year
The Library Context in Maine
Larger Libraries Group- 9 largest collectionsLong tradition of collaboration and trust
(100 years)Most libraries were running out of space
and unlikely to get additional spaceThe collections of the Larger Libraries
Group represent ¾ of the print collections in Maine
Wanted a shared approach to managing legacy print collections for the long term
Looking to be leaders in the print collection space
IMLS Grant background
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
IMLS Grant & Project Partners2 public universities, 3 private colleges,
state library, 2 public libraries, 1 state-wide library consortium
$821,000 three year grant to create a shared print collections strategy
Create a collection analysis system to analyze the collections and assist in decision making
Examine the presence of large scale digital collections (Hathi Trust and Internet Archive) as a determiner of what to keep in print
Integrate Print on Demand for large scale digital collections where local print copies are unavailable
Integrate Electronic on Demand for large scale digital collections
IMLS Grant – The original
Focus is monographs and journals (Government document are excluded)
The goal is to determine which volumes should be retained long term and by whom
Develop a method to make retention decisions at scale
Libraries may discard materials or not once retention decisions are made (downsizing is not the predominant focus)
Provide a framework for other libraries to participate once the initial grant period is complete
Expose our retention decisions to the worldBe part of the emerging national conversation
Grant focus
Build on the collaboration that is a norm in Maine
Help faculty and the public to think of our libraries as collaborative partners in building and preserving collections
We wanted the emphasis to be on print retention and not on weeding. Our message to our community is that we are preserving the print heritage in Maine.
We wanted to capitalize on the robust physical delivery system and tradition of sharing to help us
Political Goals
Wanted a sustainable business modelWanted a formal Memorandum of
Understanding to guide the ongoing work.Wanted a governance and operational
structure that was “light weight” but workable
Governance and Business
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
Project ManagementProject TeamContracted Systems LibrarianDirector’s CouncilCollections CommitteeTechnical Services and Systems CommitteeNational Advisory Boardhttp://www.maineinfonet.net/mscs/about/pe
ople/
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
Data WranglingOCLC reclamationOCLC WorldCat Collection AnalysisSustainable Collections Services2.9 Million records
1 2 3+ -
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
295,425 208,430
393,391
341,231
232,054
403,284
374,062
204,219
267,658 Zero Circula-tions
1-3 Circula-tions
Number of MSCS Libraries Holding Title
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
Scenario 1- Commit to RetainHeld by 1 or 2 libraries (1,076,188
titles/1,258,195 items)Retain copies if any circulation or reserve
activityRetain “protected” category copies even if
no circulation (Maine and/or institution specific items)
Retain Special Collections/Archives copies even if no circulation
Retain unique in OCLC (only 0‐9 copies in OCLC) even if no circulation
Compare remaining 0 circulation copies with both HathiTrust and Internet Archive – “Needs further examination”
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
Scenario 1- Further refinements
Scenario 1 titles split into two groupsTitles with a single item record per bib
record approximately 900,000 items (about 91% of the titles and 78% of the items) (Commit to retain)
Titles with multiple item records per bib record approximately 100,000 items (about 9% of the titles and 22% of the items) – “Needs further examination”
Divide these further into multi‐volume sets and multiple copies and add to “Needs further examination”
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
Next StepsGet MOU’s signedAdd 583 Commitments in our local catalogs
and create LHRs to load these holdings to OCLC – about 900,000 titles ready to go.
Integrate retention commitments into MaineCat
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
http://www.maineinfonet.org/MSCS
Next Steps…Examine the “Needs further examination
group”Develop criteria for the remaining part of
the collection that has 3+ holdings.Join the Hathi TrustIntegrate Print on Demand and E on
DemandWork on journals
See how our project plays with the newly evolving North East Regional Print Library Management Project