Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soft colloidal microgels as bio-functional materials: From mouth to gut
Dr. Anwesha SarkarAssociate Professor of Food Colloids
Soft colloidal microgels
Karg, Ritchering et al. (2019) Langmuir, Volume 35, Pages 6231-6255.
Thorne et al. (2011) Coloid Polm Sci Volume 289, Pages 625-646
Heyes & Brańka (2009). Soft Matter, Volume 5, Pages 2681-2685.
• Cross-linked polymeric discrete gel particle
• Diameter: nm to few μm
• Swollen by a solvent
• Physical nature fall between hard spheres and ultra-soft solids (dilute polymer solutions)
2
Soft colloidal microgels - applications
Andablo-Reyes, Sarkar et al. (2019), Soft Matter, Volume 15, Pages 9614-9624
Karg, Ritchering et al. (2019) Langmuir, Volume 35, Pages 6231-6255.
• Fat replacement – lubricants/ viscosity modifiers
• Saturated fat replacement
• Act as Pickering stabilizers
• Ability to delay fat digestion
nm to µm
Water
Biopolymer (protein, starch)
Microgel paticles in food applications
Emulsion droplets
Microgel particles
Emulsion microgel particles
3
Case studies on microgels: mouth to gut
Whey protein microgelparticles (WPM)
1
Emulsion microgelparticles (starch)
2
Fusion of WPM at the interface
3
4
Sarkar, Andablo-Reyes et al. (2019) Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, Volume 39, Pages 61-75.
Laguna and Sarkar (2017). Tribology – Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces, Volume 11, Pages 116-123.
Stokes et al. (2013). Current Opinion in Colloids and Interface Science, , Volume 18, Pages 349-359.
In mouth lubrication
TribologyRheology
Bulk property
Surface property
0.1-100 µm µm-nm>100 µm
5
Why oral lubrication?
• Oral lubrication (1/μ) has been linked to creamy, smooth, slippery perception
• μ has been linked to ‘rough’, astringent perception
6
How is oral lubrication measured?
Friction force (F) = μ × L Boundary
regimeFr
icti
on
co
effi
cien
t (μ
)
Viscosity (η) × Speed (V) × Load (L)
Stribeck curve
Hydrodynamic
regime
Mixed regime
regime
L
Disc
Ball
Tribometer (ball-on-disc)
Food
Upper palate
Tongue
Tongue-palate
V (Speed)
L (Load)
Sarkar, Andablo-Reyes et al. (2019) Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, Volume 39, Pages 61-75.
7
Bio-relevance in tribology?Dry tongue Wet tongue
Soft: PDMS surface
Wettability
8
PDMS – HB/ HL+M
HB = 108°
HL+M = 47°
HL = 63°(after O2 plasma treatment,
3 days)
PDMS ball
(Ra < 50 nm, E=2.4 MPa)
PDMS tribopairsBovine submaxillary
mucin
PDMS disc
Laguna and Sarkar, (2017). Food and Function; Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces, Volume 11, Pages 116-123
Sarkar et al., (2019). Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Volume 273, Article Number 101034
1
2
Designing bio-relevant surfaces
9
Torres … Sarkar (2018). ACS Applied materials & Interfaces, Volume 10, Pages 26893-26905
Sarkar et al. (2017). Langmuir, Volume 33, 51, Pages 14699-14708
Microgels: Oral Lubrication mechanism?
Whey protein microgelparticles (WPM)
1
Emulsion microgelparticles (starch)
2
10
shear rate/ s-1
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103
/ P
a s
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
Glycerol
f = 80 vol%, ▼ 25 ○C, ∆ 37 ○C
f = 10 vol%, + 25 ○C, × 37 ○C
Viscosity of WPMWPM EMP
Whey protein microgel particle (WPM)
(Dh ~ 365 nm, -36.5 mV, pH 7)
11
Shear rate increasing from 0.1 to 50 s-1
Shear rate decreasing from 50 to 0.1 s-1
• WPM particles - wide ranging h values as a function of shear history
• High values of h persist after subjection to fairly high shear rates (50 s-1)even though the systems are highly shear thinning
• Thus, the particles may aggregate or interpenetrate as a function of shearand volume fraction, but they are certainly not destroyed – high resilience
Viscosity of WPM
shear rate/ s-1
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103
/ P
a s
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
𝜂 = 𝐾𝑑𝛾
𝑑𝑡
𝑛−1
10 vol%, ×
20 vol%, ○
50 vol%, ∆
60 vol%, ◊
75 vol%, □
80 vol%, ∆
WPM EMP
12
f = 10 vol%
Smooth HB PDMS tribopairs (●)
HL+M-coated PDMS tribopairs (□)
Stribeck curve of phosphate buffer is represented by ▲
f = 80 vol%
Friction coefficients of WPMWPM EMP
13
Boundary, U=3 mm/s (●)
Mixed regime, U= 100 mm/s (○)
Friction force in HB surfaces
Upper palate
Tongue
• Spherical WPM particles - aqueous “ball bearings” similar to oil droplets
• Tribology - strongly dictated by the volume fraction entrained within contacts
Sarkar et al., (2017). Langmuir
Liu et al., (2016). Food Hydrocolloids
Gabriele et al. (2010). Soft Matter
WPM EMP
14
Boundary, U=3 mm/s (■)
Mixed regime, U= 100 mm/s (□)
Friction force in HL+M surfaces
30 μm 3 μm
Dh= 365 nm
After tribology
Dh= 380 nm
WPM EMP
15
• WPM particles shear thin and show good lubricating performance in the boundary as well as mixed lubrication regimes
• Hydrophobic moieties of WPM particles -effective adsorption to HB PDMS surfaces
• Hydrophilic moieties formed a true hydration layer i.e. “surface separators”.
• Potential Applications: Fat mimetics
f ≥ 65%
WPM
Hydrophobic
Hydrophobic
Hydrophilic
f ≈ 10%
f ≈ 10%
WPM as a potential fat replacerWPM EMP
16
Microgels: Oral Lubrication mechanism?
Whey protein microgelparticles (WPM)
1
Emulsion microgelparticles (starch)
2
Torres … Sarkar (2018). ACS Applied materials & Interfaces, Volume 10, Pages 26893-26905
Sarkar et al. (2017). Langmuir, Volume 33, 51, Pages 14699-14708
17
Torres … Sarkar (2018). ACS Applied materials & Interfaces, Volume 10, Pages 26893-26905
Torres……Sarkar et al., (2017). Carbohydrate Polymers, Volume 178, Pages 86-94
Torres……Sarkar et al., (2017). Food Hydrocolloids, Volume 71, Pages 47-59
Torres……Sarkar et al., (2016). Trends in Food Science and technology, Volume 55, Pages 98-108
EMP for fat reductionEmulsion microgel particles (EMP)
Oil droplets stabilised
by OSA starch
Starch gel particle
(Young modulus ~ 1 kPa)
Oil droplets
WPM EMP
18
Lubrication - emulsion dropletsArtificial saliva: salivary buffer (pH 6.8) + 75 U mL-1 α-amylase Time 0 s
Emulsion (20 wt%oil) Emulsion (20 wt% oil) + salivaoil
Emulsion + saliva
Emulsion
Larger extent of droplet coalescence
lower friction
Emulsion destabilisation
WPM EMP
19
EMP on amylase additionArtificial saliva: salivary buffer (pH 6.8) + 75 U mL-1 α-amylase Time 0 s
AA
BB
CC
DD
0 s α-amylase 60 s α-amylase
60 vol%
emulsion microgel particles
No free oil or cream layer
+buffer (30 vol%)
+ α-amylase
WPM EMP
20
Lubrication on shear & enzyme
Without saliva With saliva
0 wt% oil 10 wt% oil5 wt% oil 15 wt% oil
WPM EMP
21
Theory behind lubrication
+ α-amylase
𝛿
𝑅=
𝑎
𝑅
2−
4
3𝜋 1−𝜐2𝑎
𝑅
3𝑓
𝑎
𝑅with 𝑓
𝑎
𝑅=
2 1+𝜐
4+𝑎
𝑅
2 3/2 +1−𝜐2
4+𝑎
𝑅
2 1/2
Lubricant typeR
(μm)
WL
(%)
𝜹
𝑹∗
η at
0.01 s-1
(Pa s)
Wp
(N)
Fd
(N)
Emulsion + buffer
(20 wt% oil)0.08 86 0.72 0.1
1.3
10-8 9.1 10-9
15 wt% starch particles
(30 vol%)15 29 18.7 3.5
1.5
10-4 2.9 10-5
Emulsion microgel
particles (30 vol%)15 86 12.7 200
4.5
10-4 1.7 10-3
a : radius of contact
WL : normal force supported by the lubricant
R* : reduced radius
v : Poisson’s ratio
Wp : normal force per particle
Fd : drag force
η: viscosity
Relative indentation (𝛿
𝑅) in the contact zone at 3 mm s-1 – Hertz Theory
deformation factor
WPM EMP
22
EMP for fat reduction purposes
• Starch-based EMP provides excellent lubrication yet protectsthe oil droplets from complete coalescence (via shear and α-amylase).
• The EMPs can serve as unique delivery system for lipophilliccompounds/ saturated fat reduction
WPM EMP
23
Surface roughness: 3D Printing
Conclusions from mouth case studies
• Soft tribology offers a great opportunity to understand oral lubrication mechanisms of microgels and other fat mimetic particles
• Microgels shows promise for lowering friction coefficient in soft contacts, highly dependent upon volume fraction of microgels and oil content
• Lubrication is a systems property, so work is ongoing on designing bio-relevant surfaces to better replicate human tongue and palate with accurate surface roughness & modulus
24
Final case study on use of microgels - gut
Whey protein microgelparticles (WPM)
1
Emulsion microgelparticles (starch)
2
Fusion of WPM at the interface
3
25
Sarkar et al., (2019). Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Volume 263, Pages 195-211
Mackie et al. (2000), Langmuir, Volume 16, Pages 2242-2247
Orogenic displacement of interfacial film
Bile salts
pH 7
Lipase-colipase,
Trypsin,
Chymotrypsin
Intestine
Lipid digestion is an interfacial process
26
oil
water
E =r2 (1-cos)2
e.g. θ ~30○, r =10 nm, =32mN/m
Desorption energy ~ 10, 000kBT
Hypothesis: Microgel particles at O/W interface will not get displaced by bile salts and eventually delay lipid digestion
Binks, (2002). Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Volume 7, Pages 21-41.
Oil
θ
r
Hypothesis microgels at the interface
27
+ 20 wt% sunflower oil
WPM (1 wt%, pH 7.0,
20 mM PBS)
Heat 90○C
Scale 20 µm
Emulsions d43
(μm)
Adsorption
efficiency
(%)
Surface
coverage
(mg/ m2)
WPM 42.9 33 14.0
HT WPM 42.8 55 23.6
HT-WPM emulsion
Oil
HT-WPM emulsion (fused)2
Fused network
WPM emulsion
Oil
WPM emulsion (intact)1
WPM
Interfacial tuning
28
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
% F
FA
Digestion time (min)
Lipid
LipidWNaOHNaOH
W
MMVFFA
2100%
tdnd
Dk
dt
d
M
denMax
en
en
w
1
2
6
2
0
0
0
3
0
wenen
Max
en
MnkD
dt
62ln 0
2
021
Intestinal digestion
29
Interface k (μmol s-1 m-2) Φmax (%) t1/2
(min)
Protein 46 2.8
WPM 0.62 20 16.52
HT-WPM 0.18 16 44.44WPMBile
Lipase
Pickering emulsion
Oil
Heat treated (fused) Pickering emulsion
HT-WPM
Delaying lipid digestion - tuning interface
WPM: Gap dimension between the WPM particles, arranged on the
triangular lattice, is 3 − 1 𝑑0/2
≈ 110 nm, for particles of size d0 = 300 nm >>> 2.5 nm lipase/colipase
30
• Engineering O/W interface with microgel-based Pickering stabilizers and tuning them with thermal treatment has implications on delaying digestion if gastric digestion is bypassed.
• Use of non-proteinaceous biopolymeric particles or suitable coating at interface is needed to avoid digestion during gastric regime.
Conclusions from the gut case study
31
• Soft colloidal microgels are unique systems with fascinating bio-functionalities that distinguish them from classical colloids.
• Combination of deformability and penetrability – make them versatile in broad area of biological applications
• Shear thinning properties, lubrication aspects, performance at interface, encapsulating agent: key area for food applications
Overall summary: Microgel Bio-functionality
32
The European Research Council is acknowledged for its financial support (Funding scheme, ERC Starting Grant 2017, Project N○ 757993, LubSat) for this work
Acknowledgements
33