39
1 Analysis of Defined Combinations of Monoclonal Antibodies in Anthrax Toxin 1 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 2 3 Miriam M. Ngundi 1 , Bruce D. Meade 2 , Stephen F. Little 3 , Conrad P. Quinn 4 , Cindi R. 4 Corbett 5 , Rebecca A. Brady 1 , and Drusilla L. Burns 1 5 6 Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, 7 MD 20892 1 , Meade Biologics, Hillsborough, NC 27278 2 , US Army Medical Research 8 Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 21702 3 , National Center for 9 Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 10 Atlanta, GA 30333 4 . National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of 11 Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada 5 . 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 * Corresponding Author 28 29 30 Drusilla Burns 31 CBER, FDA HFM-434 32 Building 29, Room 130 33 8800 Rockville Pike 34 Bethesda, MD 20892 35 Tel: 301-402-3553 36 Fax: 301-402-2776 37 e-mail: [email protected] 38 39 40 Running Title: Interplay Between Toxin Neutralizing Antibodies 41 42 43 Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.05714-11 CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 March 2012 on March 26, 2021 by guest http://cvi.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

1

Analysis of Defined Combinations of Monoclonal Antibodies in Anthrax Toxin 1 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 2

3 Miriam M. Ngundi1, Bruce D. Meade2, Stephen F. Little3, Conrad P. Quinn4, Cindi R. 4

Corbett5, Rebecca A. Brady1, and Drusilla L. Burns1 5 6

Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, 7 MD 208921, Meade Biologics, Hillsborough, NC 272782, US Army Medical Research 8

Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD 217023, National Center for 9 Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 10

Atlanta, GA 303334. National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of 11 Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada5. 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 *Corresponding Author 28 29 30 Drusilla Burns 31 CBER, FDA HFM-434 32 Building 29, Room 130 33 8800 Rockville Pike 34 Bethesda, MD 20892 35 Tel: 301-402-3553 36 Fax: 301-402-2776 37 e-mail: [email protected] 38 39 40 Running Title: Interplay Between Toxin Neutralizing Antibodies 41 42

43

Copyright © 2012, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.Clin. Vaccine Immunol. doi:10.1128/CVI.05714-11 CVI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 March 2012

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 2: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

2

44 Abstract 45 46

Antibodies against the protective antigen (PA) component of anthrax toxin play an 47

important role in protection against disease caused by Bacillus anthracis. In this study, 48

we examined defined combinations of PA-specific monoclonal antibodies for their ability 49

to neutralize anthrax toxin in cell culture assays. We observed additive, synergistic and 50

antagonistic effects of the antibodies depending on the specific antibody combination 51

examined and the specific assay used. Synergistic toxin neutralizing antibody 52

interactions were examined in more detail. We found that one mechanism that can lead 53

to antibody synergy is the bridging of PA monomers by one antibody with resultant 54

bivalent binding of the second antibody. These results may aid in optimal design of new 55

vaccines and antibody therapies against anthrax. 56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 3: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

3

Inhalation anthrax, caused by the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus anthracis, is a 68

disease that is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality if not treated early. 69

The potential use of B. anthracis spores as a biological warfare and bioterror agent has 70

spurred significant efforts towards the development of countermeasures for anthrax (16) 71

including new generation anthrax vaccines and therapeutics. Most anthrax vaccines and 72

therapeutic antibodies that are currently under development are designed to protect 73

against disease by targeting anthrax toxin, a major virulence factor of B. anthracis that is 74

believed to play a critical role in disease progression (27, 36). 75

Anthrax toxin is a tripartite toxin comprising protective antigen (PA), lethal factor 76

(LF) and edema factor (EF). PA combines with LF and EF to form lethal toxin (LT), 77

and edema toxin (ET), respectively (2, 8, 11, 17). Anthrax toxin is believed to be 78

important for outgrowth and trafficking of the bacteria during disease as well as the 79

progression and lethal nature of the disease (2, 10, 12, 19, 25, 27, 36). Because PA is a 80

common component of both ET and LT, most new anthrax vaccines and antibody 81

therapies target PA specifically (9, 14). Anti-PA antibodies have been shown to 82

neutralize anthrax toxin in vitro and confer protection in various animal models (13, 20, 83

21, 31, 41, 42) with levels of neutralizing antibodies correlating with protection (21, 35, 84

41). For this reason, assessment of toxin neutralization will likely play an important role 85

in the evaluation of new PA-based vaccines and therapeutic antibodies. 86

Evidence suggests that interplay can occur between antibodies against bacterial 87

toxins as they neutralize their target antigen. In a study of the neutralization of botulinum 88

toxin by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), Nowakowski and colleagues demonstrated that a 89

combination of mAbs resulted in synergistic neutralization of that toxin. In that study, 90

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 4: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

4

although no single mAb effectively neutralized the toxin, combinations of three mAbs 91

resulted in significant neutralization both in vivo and in vitro (30). Those results suggest 92

that a good understanding of the interplay that might occur between anti-PA antibodies as 93

they neutralize their target antigen could provide valuable information for optimal design 94

of antibody therapies and new vaccines against anthrax. 95

Toxin neutralization by a mixture of antibodies would be expected to be complex 96

in that neutralization depends, at least in part, on the array of epitopes recognized by the 97

antibodies, the binding affinities of the antibodies, the immunoglobulin classes present, 98

and any interactions that may occur between the antibodies and components of the 99

toxin’s target cell, e.g., Fcγ receptors (1, 7, 26, 34, 39, 40). While some anthrax toxin 100

neutralizing antibodies act exclusively by directly interfering with a critical aspect of 101

toxin action, other antibodies neutralize anthrax toxin by a mechanism that includes an 102

Fcγ receptor-mediated component (1, 28, 40). Another class of anti-PA antibody has 103

been described that enhances LT-mediated cytotoxicity through an Fcγ-receptor 104

dependent mechanism (24, 28). 105

Additive, synergistic, or even antagonist interactions might be expected to occur 106

between anti-PA antibodies present in a defined mixture of anti-PA monoclonal 107

antibodies or between antibodies induced by vaccination with PA-based vaccines. In 108

order to better understand the interplay that may occur between anti-PA antibodies, PA 109

and target cell components, we evaluated toxin neutralization using both individual anti-110

PA mAbs and combinations of those antibodies. In this study, we examined partially 111

neutralizing, fully neutralizing and toxicity-enhancing mAbs in cell culture assays, using 112

cell types that either do or do not express Fcγ receptors, to determine whether the 113

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 5: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

5

interplay between the antibodies, PA and the target cell can result in additive, synergistic 114

and/or antagonistic effects. 115

116

MATERIALS AND METHODS 117

Monoclonal Antibodies. AVR1046 was prepared in a similar manner to that previously 118

described by Boyer et al. (3). Briefly, 8-10 week old BALB/c mice were immunized 119

subcutaneously with 100 µg of anthrax recombinant PA adjuvanted with RIBI (Ribi 120

ImmunoChem Research, Inc., Hamilton, MT). Booster doses were given on days 21 and 121

35. On day 38, spleens were harvested and primary splenocytes isolated. Splenocytes 122

were fused with the mouse myeloma cell line SP 2/0 at a ratio of 1:5 123

(myeloma:splenocytes) in presence of PEG 4000 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and treated as 124

described previously (3). Cell culture supernatants were screened for anti-PA antibodies. 125

Anti-PA producing hybridomas were subcloned three times for isolation of antibody 126

producing cells. Generated mAbs were further screened for their ability to neutralize LT 127

activity in J774A.1 cell-based assay (18). F20G75 and 2F9 were prepared and 128

characterized as described by Gubbins et al. (15) and Little et al. (22), respectively. B. 129

anthracis Protective Antigen Antibody 18720 (C3), subsequently referred to in this report 130

as C3, was purchased from QED Bioscience, Inc. (San Diego, CA). 131

132

Reagents. Anthrax recombinant PA (NR-140 and NR-164), recombinant LF (NR-142), 133

recombinant EF (NR-2630) and murine macrophage-like J774A.1 cells (NR-28) were 134

from the NIH Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository, 135

NIAID, NIH (Bethesda, MD). The PA used in this study was verified by sodium 136

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 6: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

6

dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to be > 95% full length. Epithelial-137

like CHO-K1 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, 138

Manassas, VA). Rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 clone 2.4G2 was obtained from BD 139

Pharmingen (Franklin Lakes, NJ). 140

141

Toxin neutralizing antibody (TNA) assays. J774A.1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s 142

modified Eagle media (DMEM) containing 4.5 g/l D-glucose, 110 mg/l sodium pyruvate 143

and supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated bovine serum, 2mM L-glutamine, penicillin 144

(25 units/ml), streptomycin (25 µg/ml) and 10mM HEPES. The J774A.1 cell-based TNA 145

assay was performed as previously described (29). Briefly, cells were grown for 72 or 96 146

hours in culture flasks at 37oC, 5% CO2 and 95% relative humidity. The cells were 147

harvested, seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates (40,000 cells/well) and incubated for 148

17-19 hours. mAbs samples were prepared in a separate 96-well microtiter plate at two-149

fold dilutions and stored overnight at 4oC. For assays in which a combination of 150

antibodies was studied, one mAb was serially diluted starting with a concentration 151

approximately equal to its effective concentration at 50% inhibition (EC50), then the 152

second mAb, at a constant concentration, was spiked into each of the serial dilutions. 153

The spiking concentration was approximately equal to the EC50 of the second mAb. The 154

mAb samples were then incubated with a constant concentration of LT (50 ng/ml PA, 155

NR-140 and 40 ng/ml LF) for 30 minutes prior to adding to the cells. The cell-mAb-156

toxin mix was incubated for four hours after which 25 µl per well of 5 mg/ml tetrazolium 157

salt, 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were added. 158

After a two hour incubation, the cells were lysed using 100 µl per well of acidified 159

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 7: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

7

isopropanol [90% isopropanol, 0.5% SDS (w/v) and 38 mM HCl] and the optical density 160

(OD) determined at 570 nm, with 690 nm as a reference filter. For assays performed with 161

the Fcγ-receptor blocking mAb 2.4G2, cells were pre-incubated with 100 µl of 10 µg/ml 162

mAb 2.4G2 for 15 min prior to addition of the mAb-toxin mix. mAb 2.4G2 remained on 163

the cells during the intoxication step. 164

CHO cells were grown in Kaighn’s modified F-12 nutrient mixture containing L-165

glutamine and supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated bovine serum, 2mM L-166

glutamine, penicillin (25 units/ml) and streptomycin (25 µg/ml). The CHO cell-based 167

TNA assay was performed as previously described (29). Briefly, cells and mAb samples 168

were treated as in the J774A.1 cell-based assay, except that the plated cells were 169

incubated for approximately 22 hours before addition of the mAb-toxin mix and that ET 170

(50 ng/ml, PA NR-140 and 160 ng/ml EF) was used instead of LT. To prevent cAMP 171

degradation, the mAb-toxin mix contained 750 µM of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine. 172

After the four hour incubation, cells were washed three times with medium and cAMP 173

was estimated using the Tropix® chemiluminescent cAMP ELISA kit (Applied 174

Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The ELISA output 175

was measured as relative luminescence units (RLU) with one second integration. Since 176

this is a competitive assay, the measured RLU values are inversely proportional to the 177

amount of cAMP produced by the cells and therefore higher RLU values reflect greater 178

toxin neutralization. 179

180

Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay (ELISA). Ninety six-well 181

plates (Maxisorp, Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY) were coated with 1 µg/ml 182

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 8: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

8

PA (NR-164) in PBS at 100 µl/well, overnight at 4oC. Meanwhile, serial dilutions of PA 183

(NR-164) containing biotinylated mAb AVR1046-IgG (0.13 pmol/ml) or biotinylated 184

AVR1046 Fab fragments (3.4 pmol/ml) in the presence and absence of mAb 2F9 (0.73 185

pmol/ml) in diluent buffer (1X PBS, pH 7.4 containing 0.5% Tween-20 and 5% non-fat 186

dry milk) were prepared in a separate plate and stored overnight at 4oC. PA-coated plates 187

were washed three times with wash buffer (1X PBS, pH 7.4 containing 0.1% Tween-20, 188

v/v), 100 µl/well of the PA-antibody samples were transferred to the coated plates and 189

incubated for one hour at 37oC. The plates were washed three times with wash buffer 190

and 100 µl per well goat anti-biotin IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Cell 191

Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) were added. The plate was incubated for one hour 192

at 37oC, washed three times and 100 µl per well 2,2-azinobis(3-193

ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid (ABTS) (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) were added for color 194

development. After a 30 minute incubation at 37oC, 100 µl per well of ABTS® 195

Peroxidase Stop Solution (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) were added and the optical density 196

(OD) was read at 405 nm with 490 nm as a reference filter. 197

198

Mapping of mAb binding to PA. The individual protein domains of PA, which are 199

composed of amino acids 1-258 (Domain 1), 259-487 (Domain 2), 488-595 (Domain 3), 200

and 596-735 (Domain 4) were cloned into E. coli strain BL21, expressed, and purified as 201

described previously (4). Each recombinant domain was resolved by SDS-PAGE and 202

transferred to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting. The blots were blocked with 5% non-203

fat dry milk in 10mM TBS, pH 7.3 containing 0.1% Tween-20, v/v, and then probed with 204

each monoclonal antibody at an appropriate dilution. Sheep anti-mouse IgG-HRP (GE 205

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 9: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

9

Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) was utilized as a secondary antibody, and reactivity was 206

visualized using a chemiluminescent substrate (Amersham ECL; GE Healthcare). 207

208

Fab fragment preparation and biotinylation of IgGs and Fab fragments. AVR1046-209

Fab fragments were prepared from AVR1046-IgG using Pierce Mouse IgG1 Fab and 210

F(ab′)2 preparation kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer’s 211

instructions. Additional purification was performed using FPLC with a Superdex™ 200, 212

10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA). Purified Fab fragments 213

were concentrated and stored in 1X PBS at 4oC. 214

AVR1046-IgG and AVR1046-Fab fragments were biotinylated using EZ-Link® 215

NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The IgG or Fab samples were incubated with 216

five-fold molar excess biotin in 50 mM bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.5 for 30 minutes. 217

Labeled IgG was separated from unincorporated biotin by size-exclusion chromatography 218

using a BioGel P10 column (BioRad, Hercules, CA) with UV-Vis detection at 280 nm. 219

Labeled Fab fragments were purified using a desalting column (Pierce, Rockford, IL). 220

Biotinylated IgG and Fab fragments were concentrated to approximately 1 mg/ml and 221

stored in 1X PBS at 4oC. The concentrations of the biotinylated IgG and Fab fragments 222

were determined using UV-Vis absorbance at 280 nm, using extinction coefficients of 223

1.43 and 1.53, respectively. 224

225

Data and statistical analyses. For TNA assays, OD570 and RLU values for the cell-only 226

control, run on the same plate as the sample, were set to 100%. Percent viability and 227

RLU for samples were then calculated relative to the OD570 and RLU, respectively, for 228

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 10: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

10

the cell-only control. All data were plotted using GraphPad PRISM 5 software 229

(GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). The neutralizing activities of mAbs were 230

calculated using curve fitting analyses performed in GraphPad PRISM 5 software. 231

Specifically, a four-parameter logistic (4-PL) regression model was used to fit the percent 232

viability or percent RLU versus the concentration of the antibody. Reported EC50 is the 233

inflection point for each curve from this model that represents 50% inhibition for the 234

corresponding antibody. For data that did not exhibit a symmetrical sigmoidal shape, 235

bell-shaped dose response curves were used to draw a smooth curve through the data. 236

For data interpretation and discussion, synergistic neutralization was reported when 237

neutralization activity of a combination of two mAbs was greater than the sum of 238

neutralization activities of the individual mAbs at any given concentration. Similarly 239

additive neutralization was reported as the neutralization activity yielded by a 240

combination of two mAbs approximating the sum of the mAbs’ individual neutralization 241

activities at a given concentration. For competitive ELISA, OD405 readings for each 242

curve were normalized to the OD405 of its upper asymptote set as 100% and the curves 243

were then fitted using a non-linear 4-PL curve fit model. 244

245

RESULTS 246

Analysis of selected individual mAbs in TNA assays. Two TNA assay formats have 247

been widely used in both research and clinical studies to assess the ability of anti-PA 248

antibodies to neutralize anthrax toxin (1, 6, 15, 22-24, 28, 37, 40). The two formats are 249

the J774A.1 cell-based TNA assay and the Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell-based 250

TNA assay. These assays differ both in the cell substrate and in the particular toxin—LT 251

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 11: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

11

or ET—used to assess neutralization of PA action. J774A.1 cells are murine 252

macrophage-like cells that express Fcγ receptors (33, 39). The TNA assay based on these 253

cells measures neutralization of the cytocidal activity of LT. CHO cells are epithelial 254

cells that do not express Fcγ receptors (32). The TNA assay that utilizes CHO cells 255

measures the ability of antibodies to neutralize ET-induced increases in intracellular 256

cAMP levels. 257

For this study, we screened twenty five mAbs for toxin neutralization in both 258

assays. We identified three categories of mAbs based on their neutralization behaviors. 259

The first category was mAbs which were non-neutralizing in both assays, the second was 260

mAbs which neutralize toxin in both assays, and the third was mAbs which were non-261

neutralizing in the J774A.1 cell assay but neutralizing in the CHO cell assay. For further 262

studies, we chose two mAbs from each of the second and third categories. 263

Figure 1 shows the neutralization curves in the two assays for two neutralizing 264

mAbs, AVR1046 and F20G75. AVR1046 is a murine IgG1 (18). We mapped the 265

epitope for this mAb to domain 4 (amino acids 596-735) of PA, the receptor binding 266

domain, using purified PA domains and immunoblot analysis as described in the 267

Materials and Methods (data not shown). F20G75 is also a murine IgG1; this mAb binds 268

to a loop region extending from amino acids 304-319 found in domain 2 of PA that is 269

believed to be involved in pore formation (15). In the J774A.1 cell-based assay (Figure 270

1A), EC50 values for F20G75 and AVR1406 were 0.1 pmol/ml and 1.7 pmol/ml, 271

respectively (geometric mean of three independent assays), indicating that F20G75 was 272

significantly more neutralizing than AVR1046 on a molar basis (P = 0.0004; unpaired t-273

test) in that assay. In the CHO cell-based assay (Figure 1B), the EC50 values were 1.7 274

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 12: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

12

pmol/ml and 2.7 pmol/ml for AVR1046 and F20G75, respectively (geometric mean of 275

three independent assays). If one compares neutralization of the two mAbs in the 276

J774A.1 cell-based assay, F20G75 was 17 times more effective than AVR1046 on a 277

molar basis, but in the CHO cell assay, no significant difference in neutralization was 278

observed (P = 0.15; unpaired t-test). In order to determine whether Fcγ receptors, which 279

are present on J774A.1 cells but absent on CHO cells, may have played a role in the 280

striking difference in relative neutralization observed between the two antibodies in the 281

two different assays, we blocked the major Fcγ receptors (IIB and III) expressed by 282

J774A.1 cells using the Fcγ receptor-blocking antibody mAb 2.4G2 (38). As shown in 283

Figure 1C, when these Fcγ receptors were blocked, the EC50 value for AVR1046 was 1.7 284

pmol/ml (geometric mean of three independent assays) which was identical to the value 285

observed without blocking the same receptors, indicating that AVR1046 neutralization 286

has no Fcγ receptor-mediated component. In contrast, the EC50 value for F20G75 was 287

3.1 pmol/ml (geometric mean of two independent assays) which was significantly 288

different from the value obtained for the same mAb when the Fcγ receptors were not 289

blocked (P < 0.0001; unpaired t-test). This result indicates that Fcγ receptors play a 290

major role in the neutralization of toxin by F20G75 in the J774A.1 cell-based assay. 291

Figure 2 shows the neutralization curve for two mAbs, 2F9 and C3, belonging to 292

the category of mAbs that are non-neutralizing in our J774A.1 cell assay but partially 293

neutralizing in CHO cell assay. 2F9 is a murine IgG1 antibody (22), as is C3 294

(manufacturer’s literature). We have mapped binding of 2F9 to domain 3 (amino acids 295

488 to 595) of PA, which is involved in heptamerization, and binding of C3 to domain 4 296

of PA (amino acids 596-735) (data not shown). These mAbs (2F9 and C3) exhibited 297

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 13: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

13

non-neutralizing behavior in the J774A.1 cell-based assay using our routine assay 298

conditions that include fully cytotoxic concentrations of LT (Figure 2A). Of note, others 299

have previously shown that when 2F9 is used in a modified form of the J774 assay in 300

which sublethal concentrations of LT are used, 2F9 was observed to increase cytotoxicity 301

(24, 28). However, in our assay, since we are using fully lethal concentrations of LT, we 302

would not expect to be able to observe such an enhancement of cytoxicity. When we 303

examined 2F9 and C3 in the CHO-cell based assay, both mAbs exhibited some 304

neutralizing activity (Figure 2B) with EC50 values of 0.2 pmol/ml and 0.8 pmol/ml, 305

respectively (geometric mean of four independent assays). Of note, however, neither 306

mAb exhibited complete protection regardless of the amount of mAb used, as manifested 307

by an upper asymptote of the neutralization curve of less than 100% RLU. The 308

neutralizing capacity of C3 reached a plateau at a lower RLU value compared to that of 309

2F9. While 2F9 and C3 did not exhibit measurable neutralization in the J774A.1 based-310

assay, blocking Fcγ receptors of the cells renders the mAbs partially neutralizing (Figure 311

2C). The neutralization curves are not typical concentration-dependence curves, but 312

rather cell viability initially increased with increasing antibody concentration and then 313

decreased at higher antibody concentrations. While we do not know the reason for the 314

biphasic nature of the neutralization curves, one possibility is that Fcγ receptors I and IV 315

may play a role in the decrease in neutralization seen at the higher mAb levels, since 316

these Fcγ receptor types are not blocked by the Fcγ-receptor blocking antibody 317

mAb2.4G2 (38). Perhaps only at higher concentrations of 2F9 and C3 do sufficient 318

interactions between the mAbs and Fcγ receptors I and IV occur to lead to Fcγ receptor-319

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 14: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

14

dependent enhanced toxicity involving these receptor types, resulting in the observed 320

drop in neutralization. 321

322

Analysis of combinations of mAbs in TNA assays. The production of different types of 323

mAbs (neutralizing, non-neutralizing and cytotoxicity-enhancing) against PA suggests 324

the likely presence of these diverse Abs in any given polyclonal antibody preparation. 325

Here we investigate the resultant neutralization exhibited by pairwise combinations of 326

mAbs. In order to not saturate neutralization, one mAb was serially diluted starting at a 327

concentration approximately equal to its EC50. The second mAb was then added, at a 328

constant concentration also approximately equal to its EC50, to the serial dilutions of the 329

first mAb. For comparison purposes, serial dilutions of the first mAb alone were also 330

assayed. 331

Figure 3 shows the neutralization of toxin by a combination of AVR1046 with 332

F20G75 (both neutralizing individually). When a mixture of F20G75 at its EC50 (0.13 333

pmol/ml) and increasing concentrations of AVR1046 was used to neutralize LT in the 334

J774A.1 cell-based assay, a decrease in cell viability was initially observed. As more 335

AVR1046 was added, the initial decrease was followed by an increase in cell viability 336

(Figure 3A). The minimum cell viability (dip) was observed at an AVR1046 337

concentration of 0.13 pmol/ml, a concentration equivalent to that of added F20G75. 338

Toxin neutralization by either AVR1046 or F20G75 alone did not exhibit such a decrease 339

in cell viability. A partially additive effect of the mAbs was observed at the higher 340

concentrations of AVR1046. When Fcγ receptors IIB and III were blocked, synergistic 341

neutralization was observed with the antibody combination when compared to the 342

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 15: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

15

individual antibodies (Figure 3B), with no indication of the antagonistic effect that had 343

been observed when Fcγ receptors were not blocked. Please note, however, that because 344

the EC50 of F20G75 is greater when Fcγ receptors are blocked (3.1 pmol/ml; Figure 1), 345

F20G75 was used at a 10-fold higher concentration in this experiment than in the 346

experiment utilizing unblocked cells (0.1 pmol/ml; Figure 3A). 347

Combination studies of mAb (AVR1046) with mAb 2F9 were also conducted. 348

Synergistic toxin neutralization was observed in the J774A.1 cell assay for serial 349

dilutions of AVR1046 with a constant concentration of 2F9 (Figure 4A) or serial 350

dilutions of 2F9 with a constant concentration of AVR1046 (Figure 4B). Finally, we 351

examined the combination of mAbs 2F9 and C3. As described above, when assayed 352

individually in our J774A.1 cell-based assay, neither mAb exhibited neutralizing activity 353

(Figure 2A); however, in the CHO-cell based assay, they were both partially neutralizing 354

(Figure 2B). Surprisingly, the mAb combination showed a robust synergistic 355

neutralization of LT in the J774A.1 cell-based assay (Figures 5A and B). Synergy was 356

observed regardless of which mAb was serially diluted. In the CHO cell-based assay, 357

when the two mAbs were combined, neutralization appeared to be additive (Figures 5C 358

and D) regardless of which mAb was serially diluted. 359

360

Investigation of the mechanism underlying synergistic neutralization. Nowakowski 361

et al. (30) demonstrated that synergistic neutralization of botulinum toxin by multiple 362

antibodies was a result of an increase in functional binding affinity. Those investigators 363

suggested that an increase in functional binding affinity could be due to binding of one 364

IgG antibody to two toxin molecules, which could then favor bivalent binding of the 365

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 16: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

16

second antibody with a resultant increase in antibody avidity, with avidity being the 366

combined strength of multiple bond interactions. Alternatively, binding of the first 367

antibody might induce or stabilize a conformation of the toxin that favors the binding of 368

the second antibody. Those investigators did not further investigate which of these 369

mechanisms might underlie the increase in functional binding that they observed. 370

We reasoned that similar mechanisms might be the basis for the synergy that we 371

observed between the PA mAbs. To investigate whether binding of 2F9 to PA could 372

“convert” PA to a multivalent antigen by bridging PA monomers—thereby facilitating 373

bivalent binding of AVR1046—we utilized AVR1046 Fab fragments in a competitive 374

ELISA and compared the results to those obtained using AVR1046 IgG. While IgG can 375

bind bivalently, Fab fragments are limited to monovalent binding. By comparing the 376

binding properties of the AVR1046 IgG and its Fab fragments, we would be able to 377

evaluate whether 2F9 induces bivalent binding of AVR1046 to PA molecules. 378

Because we believe that soluble PA better represents the biologically relevant 379

form of PA, for these experiments we used a competitive ELISA format, instead of the 380

normal indirect ELISA, in order to measure binding to PA in solution rather than to PA 381

bound to the plastic plate. In this competitive ELISA, serial dilutions of PA were 382

incubated with constant amounts of antibodies or Fab fragments overnight at 4˚C to allow 383

binding to reach equilibrium. The PA-antibody mixtures were then added to 96-well 384

plates that had been coated with PA. In order to assess AVR1046 binding in a manner 385

that distinguishes it from that of 2F9, the AVR1046 IgG and Fab fragments used in the 386

assay were biotinylated and detected in the assay using an anti-biotin HRP conjugate. In 387

this competition assay, one would expect that, as the concentration of soluble PA is 388

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 17: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

17

increased, more of the AVR1046 would become bound to this species and therefore less 389

would be available for binding to the PA-coated plate. The IC50 (the concentration of 390

soluble PA that is required for 50% inhibition of AVR1046 binding to the PA coating the 391

plate) can be measured. If 2F9 increases the avidity of AVR1046 or AVR1046 Fab 392

fragments for the soluble PA, then the amount of soluble PA needed to prevent binding of 393

AVR1046 or AVR1046 Fab fragments to the PA-coated plate should decrease (i.e., the 394

IC50 for soluble PA would decrease). 395

Figure 6A shows that the concentration of soluble PA needed to prevent binding 396

of biotinylated AVR1046 IgG to the PA-coated plate was significantly less in the 397

presence of 2F9 than in its absence (i.e., the observed IC50 decreases in the presence of 398

2F9, reflective of an increase in the avidity of AVR1046 for soluble PA). In contrast 399

(Figure 6B), the amount of soluble PA needed to prevent binding of biotinylated 400

AVR1046 Fab fragments to the PA-coated plate was similar in the presence or absence of 401

2F9 (i.e., no change in IC50 for soluble PA, reflective of no change in the avidity of 402

AVR1046 Fab fragments for PA). Thus 2F9 increased the avidity of a form of AVR1046 403

that has two binding sites for PA but not a form that has only a single PA binding site. 404

This observation suggests that 2F9 can promote bivalent binding of AVR1046 IgG to PA, 405

presumably by bridging two PA monomers. 406

407

DISCUSSION 408

In the course of this study, two major findings emerged. First, assessment of the 409

neutralizing capacity of any particular antibody can be highly dependent on the TNA 410

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 18: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

18

assay used. Second, the interplay between antibodies, PA, and any Fcγ receptors that 411

may be present can result in additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions. 412

The first important aspect of this work is our finding that different TNA assays 413

can give strikingly different impressions of antibody neutralization. As seen in Figure 1, 414

mAb F20G75 was significantly more neutralizing than AVR1046 in the J774A.1 cell-415

based assay, but the two antibodies exhibited approximately the same neutralizing 416

capacity in the CHO cell-based assay. We found that this difference was likely due, at 417

least in part, to fact that neutralization by F20G75 is highly dependent on Fcγ receptors 418

(Figure 1C). Because of this Fcγ-receptor dependence, very different impressions of the 419

neutralizing capacity of this mAb are given by the two different assays. These results 420

raise the question of which assay more accurately reflects antibody neutralization of 421

anthrax toxin in vivo. Pertinent to this question are the recent findings of Abboud et al. 422

who reported that passive immunization with an anti-PA mAb protected wild-type mice, 423

but not FcγR-deficient mice, against B. anthracis infection (1), suggesting that Fcγ 424

receptors do play a role in toxin neutralization or toxin clearance in vivo. While more 425

work is needed to make definitive conclusions concerning which assay is more relevant 426

to antibody neutralization in vivo, our work suggests that careful thought should be given 427

the choice of the assay when assigning and/or comparing the neutralization activities of 428

mAbs. 429

A second aspect of our study demonstrates that the interplay between antibodies, 430

PA and any Fcγ receptors that may be present on target cells can result in several 431

different types of interactions. Additive interactions between antibodies, which have 432

been reported previously for antibody binding to PA (5), were found and would be 433

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 19: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

19

expected since PA is sufficiently large to bind to more than one antibody at a time. 434

While others have previously reported that one antibody directed to PA combined with 435

another directed to LF provided a synergistic protection in vivo (6), to our knowledge, 436

synergism between two PA antibodies has not been demonstrated previously. In our 437

study, we found several instances of synergy. 438

The combination of AVR1046 and 2F9 exhibited synergistic neutralization in the 439

J774A.1 cell assay (Figure 4). When we examined the molecular basis for the synergy 440

between these antibodies, we found that the binding of 2F9 promoted bivalent binding of 441

AVR1046 (Figure 6). Because full-length PA is normally found in the monomeric form 442

in solution, these results would suggest that each of these mAbs is capable of bridging PA 443

monomers. Bridging by one of the antibodies would promote bridging by the other. Any 444

transient dissociation of one antibody arm from the antigen would result in rapid 445

rebinding since the other antibody bridge would prevent the antigen from diffusing away. 446

This phenomenon would substantially increase antibody avidity resulting in synergistic 447

neutralization. 448

We also observed synergistic neutralization with the combination of AVR1046 449

and F20G75 in the J774A.1 cell assay (Figure 3), but only when the majority of Fcγ 450

receptors were blocked (i.e., in the presence of the Fcγ receptor-blocking antibody mAb 451

2.4G2). The neutralization pattern for this combination of antibodies in the presence of 452

Fcγ receptors was complex and will be discussed below. Because AVR1046 can bridge 453

two PA monomers, the mechanism underlying the synergy observed may be the same as 454

that discussed above for AVR1046 and 2F9, i.e., induction of bivalent binding. 455

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 20: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

20

The combination of mAbs 2F9 and C3 yielded what was perhaps the most 456

surprising result. While neither antibody exhibited any neutralization in our J774A.1 457

cell-based assay, when mixed together, significant neutralization was observed (Figures 458

5A and 5B). In contrast, this synergy was not observed in the CHO cell-based assay 459

(Figure 5C and 5D). The interactions between the two antibodies, PA, and possibly Fcγ 460

receptors that result in synergistic neutralization on J774A.1 cells remain to be 461

elucidated. 462

In our studies, we noted one instance of antagonistic interactions between 463

antibodies. When the combination of AVR1046 and F20G75 was examined in the 464

J774A.1 cell-based assay (Figure 3A), a complex pattern was noted, which was highly 465

dependent on Fcγ receptors. We observed that as the concentration of AVR1046 was 466

increased, an initial antagonism between AVR1046 and F20G75 was observed, as 467

manifested by a decrease in neutralization. As AVR1046 concentration was further 468

increased, neutralization gradually increased. Because neutralization by F20G75 is 469

highly dependent on Fcγ receptors, the initial dip in neutralization that was observed 470

could be explained if AVR1046 prevents the PA-F20G75 complex from binding to Fcγ 471

receptors. Such inhibition might be due to direct steric inhibition of the formation of a 472

F20G75-PA-Fcγ receptor complex by AVR1046. Alternatively, since AVR1046 binds to 473

the receptor binding domain of PA, this antibody may inhibit PA binding to its cell 474

surface receptor, thereby decreasing the effective concentration of PA at the cell surface. 475

This effective decrease in concentration would result in fewer opportunities for a PA-476

F20G75-Fcγ receptor complex to form. As the concentration of AVR1046 is further 477

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 21: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

21

increased, neutralization by AVR1046 would be expected to become dominant, 478

consistent with the recovery in neutralization that was observed. 479

From the results of our study, we can conclude that additive, synergistic, or 480

antagonistic interactions can occur among anti-PA antibodies, PA, and Fcγ receptors that 481

may be present on the cell surface. We have demonstrated that one mechanism that can 482

lead to antibody synergy is the bridging of PA monomers in solution by one antibody, 483

with resultant bivalent binding of the second antibody. Our demonstration of anti-PA 484

antibody synergy suggests that the design of new anthrax antibody therapies and vaccines 485

might be better optimized if these findings are taken into account. For example, 486

appropriate combinations of mAbs, rather than individual antibodies alone, might result 487

in more favorable therapeutic outcomes. Specifically tailoring new vaccines to modulate 488

the polyclonal response in such as way as to promote synergistic neutralization, while 489

admittedly challenging, might be set as a future goal. In this study, we examined the 490

interplay between anti-PA antibodies exclusively; however, we believe that our findings 491

may apply broadly to neutralizing antibodies against many bacterial toxins. 492

493

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 22: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

22

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 494

This work was supported in part by an interagency agreement between the 495

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, and the Food and Drug 496

Administration. 497

The following reagents were obtained from the NIH Biodefense and Emerging 498

Infections Research Resources Repository, NIAID, NIH: anthrax LF, recombinant from 499

Bacillus anthracis, NR-142; anthrax PA, recombinant from Bacillus anthracis, NR-140; 500

anthrax PA, recombinant from Bacillus anthracis, NR-164; anthrax EF, recombinant 501

from Bacillus anthracis, NR-2630; and J774A.1 monocyte/macrophage (mouse) Working 502

Cell Bank, NR-28.503

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 23: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

23

REFERENCES 504

505

1. Abboud, N., S. K. Chow, C. Saylor, A. Janda, J. V. Ravetch, M. D. Scharff, 506

and A. Casadevall. 2010. A requirement for FcgammaR in antibody-mediated 507

bacterial toxin neutralization. J. Exp. Med. 207:2395-405. 508

2. Baldari, C. T., F. Tonello, S. R. Paccani, and C. Montecucco. 2006. Anthrax 509

toxins: A paradigm of bacterial immune suppression. Trends Immunol. 27:434-510

440. 511

3. Boyer, A. E., C. P. Quinn, A. R. Woolfitt, J. L. Pirkle, L. G. McWilliams, K. 512

L. Stamey, D. A. Bagarozzi, J. C. Hart, Jr., and J. R. Barr. 2007. Detection 513

and quantification of anthrax lethal factor in serum by mass spectrometry. 514

Analytical Chemistry 79:8463-8470. 515

4. Brady, R. A., A. Verma, B. D. Meade, and D. L. Burns. 2010. Analysis of 516

antibody responses to protective antigen-based anthrax vaccines through use of 517

competitive assays. Clin. Vaccine Immun. 17:1390-1397. 518

5. Brossier, F., M. Levy, A. Landier, P. Lafaye, and M. Mock. 2004. Functional 519

analysis of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen by using neutralizing monoclonal 520

antibodies. Infect. Immun. 72:6313-7. 521

6. Chen, Z., M. Moayeri, D. Crown, S. Emerson, I. Gorshkova, P. Schuck, S. H. 522

Leppla, and R. H. Purcell. 2009. Novel chimpanzee/human monoclonal 523

antibodies that neutralize anthrax lethal factor, and evidence for possible synergy 524

with anti-protective antigen antibody. Infect. Immun. 77:3902-3908. 525

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 24: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

24

7. Clement, K. H., T. L. Rudge, Jr., H. J. Mayfield, L. A. Carlton, A. Hester, N. 526

A. Niemuth, C. L. Sabourin, A. M. Brys, and C. P. Quinn. 2010. Vaccination 527

of rhesus macaques with the anthrax vaccine adsorbed vaccine produces a serum 528

antibody response that effectively neutralizes receptor-bound protective antigen in 529

vitro. Clin. Vaccine Immun. 17:1753-62. 530

8. Collier, R. J., and J. A. Young. 2003. Anthrax toxin. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. 531

Biol. 19:45-70. 532

9. Cybulski, R. J., Jr., P. Sanz, and A. D. O'Brien. 2009. Anthrax vaccination 533

strategies. Mol. Aspects Med. 30:490-502. 534

10. Dang, O., L. Navarro, K. Anderson, and M. David. 2004. Cutting edge: 535

anthrax lethal toxin inhibits activation of IFN-regulatory factor 3 by 536

lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 172:747-751. 537

11. Duesbery, N. S., C. P. Webb, S. H. Leppla, V. M. Gordon, K. R. Klimpel, T. 538

D. Copeland, N. G. Ahn, M. K. Oskarsson, K. Fukasawa, K. D. Paull, and G. 539

F. Vande Woude. 1998. Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by 540

anthrax lethal factor. Science 280:734-737. 541

12. Ebrahimi, C. M., T. R. Sheen, C. W. Renken, R. A. Gottlieb, and K. S. 542

Doran. 2011. Contribution of lethal toxin and edema toxin to the pathogenesis of 543

anthrax meningitis. Infect. Immun. 79:2510-2518. 544

13. Fellows, P. F., M. K. Linscott, B. E. Ivins, M. L. Pitt, C. A. Rossi, P. H. Gibbs, 545

and A. M. Friedlander. 2001. Efficacy of a human anthrax vaccine in guinea 546

pigs, rabbits, and rhesus macaques against challenge by Bacillus anthracis isolates 547

of diverse geographical origin. Vaccine 19:3241-3247. 548

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 25: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

25

14. Friedlander, A. M., and S. F. Little. 2009. Advances in the development of 549

next-generation anthrax vaccines. Vaccine 27:D28-D32. 550

15. Gubbins, M. J., J. D. Berry, C. R. Corbett, J. Mogridge, X. Y. Yuan, L. 551

Schmidt, B. Nicolas, A. Kabani, and R. S. Tsang. 2006. Production and 552

characterization of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies that recognize an epitope 553

in domain 2 of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen. FEMS Immunol. Med. 554

Microbiol. 47:436-43. 555

16. Inglesby, T. V., D. A. Henderson, J. G. Bartlett, E. Eitzen, A. M. Friedlander, 556

J. Hauer, J. McDade, M. T. Osterholm, T. O'Toole, G. Parker, T. M. Perl, P. 557

K. Russel, and K. Tonat. 1999. Anthrax as a biological weapon. JAMA 558

281:1735-1745. 559

17. Leppla, S. H. 1982. Anthrax toxin edema factor: A bacterial adenylate cyclase 560

that increases cyclic AMP concentrations in eukaryotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. 561

Sci. USA 79:3162-3166. 562

18. Li, H., S. D. Soroka, T. H. Taylor, K. L. Stamey, K. W. Stinson, A. E. 563

Freeman, D. R. Abramson, R. Desai, L. X. Cronin, J. W. Oxford, J. Caba, C. 564

Pleatman, S. Pathak, D. S. Schmidt, V. A. Semenova, S. K. Martin, P. P. 565

Wilkins, and C. P. Quinn. 2008. Standardized, mathematical model-based and 566

validated in vitro analysis of anthrax lethal toxin neutralization. J. Immunol. 567

Methods 333:89-106. 568

19. Li, Y., K. Sherer, X. Cui, and P. Q. Eichacker. 2007. New insights into the 569

pathogenesis and treatment of anthrax toxin-induced shock. Expert Opin. Biol. 570

Ther. 7:843-854. 571

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 26: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

26

20. Little, S. F., B. E. Ivins, P. F. Fellows, and A. M. Friedlander. 1997. Passive 572

protection by polyclonal antibodies against Bacillus anthracis infection in guinea 573

pigs. Infect. Immun. 65:5171-5175. 574

21. Little, S. F., B. E. Ivins, P. F. Fellows, M. L. Pitt, S. L. Norris, and G. P. 575

Andrews. 2004. Defining a serological correlate of protection in rabbits for a 576

recombinant anthrax vaccine. Vaccine 22:422-430. 577

22. Little, S. F., S. H. Leppla, and E. Cora. 1988. Production and characterization 578

of monoclonal antibodies to the protective antigen component of Bacillus 579

anthracis toxin. Infect Immun 56:1807-13. 580

23. Little, S. F., J. M. Novak, J. R. Lowe, S. H. Leppla, Y. Singh, K. R. Klimpel, 581

B. C. Lidgerding, and A. M. Friedlander. 1996. Characterization of lethal 582

factor binding and cell receptor binding domains of protective antigen of Bacillus 583

anthracis using monoclonal antibodies. Microbiol. 142 ( Pt 3):707-15. 584

24. Little, S. F., W. M. Webster, and D. E. Fisher. 2011. Monoclonal antibodies 585

directed against protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis enhance lethal toxin 586

activity in vivo. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 62:11-22. 587

25. Loving, C. L., T. Khurana, M. Osorio, G. M. Lee, V. K. Kelly, S. Stibitz, and 588

T. J. Merkel. 2009. Role of anthrax toxins in dissemination, disease progression, 589

and induction of protective adaptive immunity in the mouse aerosol challenge 590

model. Infect Immun 77:255-65. 591

26. Maynard, J. A., C. B. Maassen, S. H. Leppla, K. Brasky, J. L. Patterson, B. 592

L. Iverson, and G. Georgiou. 2002. Protection against anthrax toxin by 593

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 27: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

27

recombinant antibody fragments correlates with antigen affinity. Nat. Biotechnol. 594

20:597-601. 595

27. Moayeri, M., and S. H. Leppla. 2004. The roles of anthrax toxin in 596

pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7:19-24. 597

28. Mohamed, N., J. Li, C. S. Ferreira, S. F. Little, A. M. Friedlander, G. L. 598

Spitalny, and L. S. Casey. 2004. Enhancement of anthrax lethal toxin 599

cytotoxicity: a subset of monoclonal antibodies against protective antigen 600

increases lethal toxin-mediated killing of murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 601

72:3276-3283. 602

29. Ngundi, M. M., B. D. Meade, T. L. Lin, W. J. Tang, and D. L. Burns. 2010. 603

Comparison of Three Anthrax Toxin Neutralization Assays. Clin. Vaccine 604

Immunol. 17:895-903. 605

30. Nowakowski, A., C. Wang, D. B. Powers, P. Amersdorfer, T. J. Smith, V. A. 606

Montgomery, R. Sheridan, R. Blake, L. A. Smith, and J. D. Marks. 2002. 607

Potent neutralization of botulinum neurotoxin by recombinant oligoclonal 608

antibody. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11346-11350. 609

31. Pitt, M. L., S. F. Little, B. E. Ivins, P. Fellows, J. Barth, J. Hewetson, P. 610

Gibbs, M. Dertzbaugh, and A. M. Friedlander. 2001. In vitro correlate of 611

immunity in a rabbit model of inhalational anthrax. Vaccine 19:4768-4773. 612

32. Quilliam, A. L., N. Osman, I. F. McKenzie, and P. M. Hogarth. 1993. 613

Biochemical characterization of murine Fc gamma RI. Immunol. 78:358-63. 614

33. Ravetch, J. V., A. D. Luster, Weinshank, R., J. Kochan, A. Pavlovec, D. A. 615

Portnoy, Hulmes, J., Y. E. Pan, and J. C. Unkeless. 1986. Structural 616

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 28: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

28

heterogeneity and functional domains of murine immunoglobulin G Fc receptors. 617

Science 234:718-725. 618

34. Reason, D., J. Liberato, J. Sun, W. Keitel, and J. Zhou. 2009. Frequency and 619

domain specificity of toxin-neutralizing paratopes in the human antibody response 620

to anthrax vaccine adsorbed. Infect Immun 77:2030-5. 621

35. Reuveny, S., M. D. White, Y. Y. Adar, Y. Kafri, Z. Altboum, Y. Gozes, D. 622

Kobiler, A. Shafferman, and B. Velan. 2001. Search for correlates of protective 623

immunity conferred by anthrax vaccine. Infect. Immun. 69:2888-2893. 624

36. Rossi Paccani, S., F. Tonello, L. Patrussi, N. Capitani, M. Simonato, C. 625

Montecucco, and C. T. Baldari. 2007. Anthrax toxins inhibit immune cell 626

chemotaxis by perturbing chemokine receptor signalling. Cell. Microbiol. 9:924-627

929. 628

37. Subramanian, G. M., P. W. Cronin, G. Poley, A. Weinstein, S. M. Stoughton, 629

J. Zhong, Y. Ou, J. F. Zmuda, B. L. Osborn, and W. W. Freimuth. 2005. A 630

phase 1 study of PAmAb, a fully human monoclonal antibody against Bacillus 631

anthracis protective antigen, in healthy volunteers. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:12-20. 632

38. Unkeless, J. C. 1979. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody directed against 633

mouse macrophage and lymphocyte Fc receptors. J. Exp. Med. 150:580-596. 634

39. Verma, A., M. M. Ngundi, B. D. Meade, R. De Pascalis, K. L. Elkins, and D. 635

L. Burns. 2009. Analysis of the Fc Gamma Receptor-Dependent Component of 636

Neutralization Measured by Anthrax Toxin Neutralization Assays. Clin. Vaccine 637

Immun. 16:1405-1412. 638

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 29: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

29

40. Vitale, L., D. Blanset, I. Lowy, T. O'Neill, J. Goldstein, S. Little, G. P. 639

Andrews, G. Dorough, R. K. Taylor, and T. Keler. 2006. Prophylaxis and 640

therapy of inhalational anthrax by a novel monoclonal antibody to protective 641

antigen that mimics vaccine-induced immunity. Infect. Immun. 74:5840-5847. 642

41. Weiss, S., D. Kobiler, H. Levy, H. Marcus, A. Pass, N. Rothschild, and Z. 643

Altboum. 2006. Immunological correlates of protection against intranasal 644

challenge of Bacillus anthracis spores conferred by a protective antigen-based 645

vaccine in rabbits. Infect. Immun. 74:394-398. 646

42. Welkos, S., S. Little, A. Friedlander, D. Fritz, and P. Fellows. 2001. The role 647

of antibodies to Bacillus anthracis and anthrax toxin components in inhibiting the 648

early stages of infection by anthrax spores. Microbiol. 147:1677-1685. 649

650 651

652

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 30: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

30

FIGURE LEGENDS 653

Figure 1. Concentration-dependence curves for the neutralization of protective antigen 654

by mAbs AVR1046 and F20G75 in the J774A.1 and CHO cell-based assays. The 655

indicated concentrations of mAb AVR1046 (●) and mAb F20G75 (■) were used to 656

neutralize a constant concentration of either LT in the J774A.1 cell-based assay (Panels A 657

and C) or ET in the CHO cell-based assay (Panel B). In Panel C, FcγRIIB/III receptors 658

were blocked by the addition of mAb 2.4G2 as described in Materials and Methods. 659

Each point corresponds to the mean of the values obtained for three independent sample 660

preparations, with the standard deviation (SD) indicated by the error bar. The samples 661

were run on duplicate plates for the J774.1A cell based assay and on a single plate for the 662

CHO cell-based assay. Each figure is representative of three independent assays run on 663

different days. 664

665

Figure 2. Concentration-dependence curves for the neutralization of protective antigen 666

by mAbs 2F9 and C3 in the J774A.1 and CHO cell-based assays. The indicated 667

concentrations of mAb 2F9 (●) and mAb C3 (■) were used to neutralize a constant 668

concentration of either LT in the J774A.1 cell-based assay (Panels A and C) or ET in the 669

CHO cell-based assay (Panel B). In Panel C, FcγRIIB/III receptors were blocked by the 670

addition of mAb 2.4G2 as described in Materials and Methods. Each point corresponds 671

to the mean of the values obtained for three independent sample preparations, with the 672

standard deviation (SD) indicated by the error bar. The samples were run on duplicate 673

plates for the J774.1A cell based assay and on a single plate for the CHO cell-based 674

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 31: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

31

assay. Each figure is representative of three independent assays each run on different 675

days. 676

677

Figure 3. Concentration-dependence curves for toxin neutralization by the combination 678

of mAbs AVR1046 and F20G75. The concentration of one antibody was varied in the 679

manner indicated on the x-axis while that of the other was held constant. Cell viability is 680

indicated for concentrations of the serially-diluted antibody assayed either individually 681

(●) or combined (■) with the other mAb held constant at the concentration indicated in 682

the panel. Neutralization obtained with the antibody that was held constant, in the 683

absence of the serially diluted antibody, is indicated on the y-axis (▲). In Panel B, 684

assays were conducted in the presence of the Fcγ receptor-blocking antibody mAb 2.4G2 685

as described in Materials and Methods. Each point corresponds to the mean of the values 686

obtained for three independent sample preparations run on the same plate, with the 687

standard deviation (SD) indicated by the error bar. For each independent assay, the 688

samples were run on duplicate plates. Each figure is representative of the independent 689

assays each run on at least three different days. 690

691

Figure 4. Concentration-dependence curves for toxin neutralization of protective antigen 692

by the combination of mAbs AVR1046 and 2F9. The concentration of one antibody was 693

varied in the manner indicated on the x-axis while that of the other was held constant. 694

Cell viability is indicated for concentrations of the serially-diluted antibody assayed 695

either individually (●) or combined (■) with the other mAb held constant at the 696

concentration indicated in the panel. Neutralization obtained with the antibody that was 697

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 32: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

32

held constant, in the absence of the serially diluted antibody, is indicated on the y-axis 698

(▲). Each point corresponds to the mean of the values obtained for three independent 699

sample preparations, with the standard deviation (SD) indicated by the error bar. For 700

each independent assay, samples were run on duplicate plates. Each figure is 701

representative of three independent assays each run on different days. 702

703

Figure 5. Concentration-dependence curves for toxin neutralization by the combination 704

of mAbs C3 and 2F9. The concentration of one antibody was varied in the manner 705

indicated on the x-axis while that of the other was held constant. Cell viability in the 706

J774A.1 cell-based assay (panels A and B) or % RLU in the CHO cell-based assay 707

(Panels C and D) is indicated for concentrations of the serially-diluted antibody assayed 708

either individually (●) or combined (■) with the other mAb held constant at the 709

concentration indicated in the panel. Neutralization obtained with the antibody that was 710

held constant, in the absence of the serially diluted antibody, is indicated on the y-axis 711

(▲). Each point corresponds to the mean of the values obtained for three independent 712

sample preparations, with the standard deviation (SD) indicated by the error bar. For 713

each independent assay, samples were run on duplicate plates. Each figure is 714

representative of three independent assays each run on different days. 715

716

Figure 6. Analysis of mAb AVR1046 binding in the presence or absence of mAb 2F9 717

using a competitive PA ELISA with soluble PA as the competitor. The indicated 718

concentrations of soluble PA mixed with either biotinylated AVR1046 IgG (B-719

AVR1046) in the absence (●) and presence (■) of 2F9 (Panel A) or B-AVR1046 Fab 720

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 33: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

33

fragments in the absence (●) and in the presence (■) of 2F9 (Panel B) were assayed for 721

binding using the competitive ELISA format described in Materials and Methods. The 722

ability of soluble PA to inhibit binding of B-AVR1046 or B-AVR1046 Fab fragments to 723

the PA coating the plate was determined. The OD405 readings for each competition curve 724

were normalized to the OD405 of its upper asymptote set as 100% and the curves were 725

then fitted to non-linear 4PL curve fit. Each point corresponds to the mean of the values 726

obtained for three independent sample preparations run on the same plate, with the 727

standard deviation (SD) indicated by the error bar. Each figure is representative of the 728

three independent assays each run on different days. 729

730

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 34: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

A J774 cells

Figure 1

J774 cells + 2 4G2C

80

100

120A J774 cells

ty 80

100

120J774 cells + 2.4G2C

ty80

100

120B CHO cells

40

60

% C

ell v

iabi

lit

40

60

80

% C

ell v

iabi

lit

40

60

80

% R

LU

0.01 0.1 1 100

20F20G75AVR1046

[mAb] pmol/ml0.1 1 10

0

20F20G75AVR1046

[mAb] pmol/ml0.1 1 10 100

0

20 F20G75AVR1046

[mAb] pmol/ml on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 35: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

Figure 2

80

100

C3

CHO cells

2F9

B

80

100

2F9C3

J774 cellsA

80

100

2F9C3

J774 cells + 2.4G2C

y

40

60

% R

LU

20

40

60

% C

ell v

iabi

lity

40

60

% C

ell v

iabi

lity

0.01 0.1 1 10 1000

20

[mAb] pmol/ml0.01 0.1 1 10 100 10000

20

[mAb] pmol/ml0.01 0.1 1 10 100 10000

20

[mAb] pmol/ml on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 36: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

Figure 3

120J774A.1 cells + 2.4G2B

120

J774 cellsA

80

100

iabi

lity

80

100

120

abili

ty

20

40

60

AVR1046 + F20G75 (1.3 pmol/ml)AVR1046

% C

ell v

i

20

40

60

AVR1046 + F20G75 (0.13pmol/ml)AVR1046

% C

ell v

ia

0.01 0.1 10

F20G75 (1.3 pmol/ml)

0//

[AVR1046] pmol/ml0.001 0.01 0.1 1

0

F20G75 (0.13pmol/ml)

0 //[AVR1046] pmol/ml

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 37: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

100

J774 cellsB

Figure 4

100

J774 cellsA

60

80

100

l via

bilit

y60

80

100

via

bilit

y

0

20

40

2F9 + AVR1046 (2 pmol/ml)AVR1046 (2 pmol/ml)

//

2F9% C

ell

0

20

40

AVR1046 + 2F9 (0.4 pmol/ml)2F9 (0.4 pmol/ml)

//

AVR1046% C

ell

0.01 0.1 10 //0

[2F9] pmol/ml0.01 0.1 1 10

0 //0

[AVR1046] pmol/ml

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 38: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

80

100J774 cellsB

Figure 5

80

100J774 cellsA

20

40

60

80

2F9 + C3 (0.67 pmol/ml)C3 (0 67 l/ l)

2F9

% C

ell v

iabi

lity

20

40

60

80

C3 + 2F9 (0.4 pmol/ml)2F9 (0 4 pmol/ml)

C3

% C

ell v

iabi

lity

0.01 0.1 10

C3 (0.67 pmol/ml)

//0[2F9] pmol/ml

0.01 0.1 1 100

2F9 (0.4 pmol/ml)

//0

[C3] pmol/ml

100CHO cellsD

100CHO cellsC

40

60

80

% R

LU

40

60

80

% R

LU

0.01 0.1 10

20 2F9 + C3 (0.67 pmol/ml)C3 (0.67 pmol/ml)

2F9

//0

[2F9] pmol/ml0.01 0.1 1 10

0

20C3 + 2F9 (0.4 pmol/ml)2F9 (0.4 pmol/ml)

C3

//0[C3] pmol/ml

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Page 39: Downloaded from on March 25, 2020 by guest · 15.03.2012  · 2 Neutralization Assays and Their Synergistic Action 3 4 Miriam M. Ngundi 1, Bruce D. Meade 2, Stephen F. Little 3,

AVR1046 F b / 2F9B

Figure 6

AVR1046 I G / 2F9A

100

120

B AVR1046 Fab

AVR1046 Fab +/- 2F9B

Fab100

120

B-AVR1046 IgG

AVR1046 IgG +/- 2F9A

IgG

60

80

B-AVR1046 FabB-AVR1046 Fab + 2F9

of B

-AVR

1046

F

60

80

B-AVR1046 IgGB-AVR1046 IgG + 2F9

of B

-AVR

1046

I

20

40

% B

indi

ng o

20

40

% B

indi

ng o

0.0001 0.01 1 100 100000

[PA83] pmol/ml0.0001 0.01 1 100 100000

[PA 83] pmol/ml

on March 26, 2021 by guest

http://cvi.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from