Upload
alexis-corcoran
View
217
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Doug WelchMcMaster University
Citizen Sky WorkshopAugust 2009
Image credit: Kerry Ann Lecky-HepburnImage credit: Kerry Ann Lecky-Hepburn
• Stars are not Stars are not created equal in the created equal in the information they information they provide to observersprovide to observers• eps Aur is a rare eps Aur is a rare combination of combination of extra observablesextra observables• This eclipse This eclipse isis at a at a tipping point in our tipping point in our ability to understand ability to understand it.it.
http://www.physics.howard.edu/students/beth/figure6.gifhttp://www.physics.howard.edu/students/beth/figure6.gif
Image credit: Hans Hillewaert (Image credit: Hans Hillewaert (Lycaon) )
• Rare massive star• Rare supergiant• Rare long-period• Rare orbital alignment• Rare opportunity
=?• Good observational constraint• Clearer understanding
http://media.nasm.si.edu/webimages/http://media.nasm.si.edu/webimages/640/2006-937_640.jpg640/2006-937_640.jpg
http://www.scienceinschool.org/2007/issue5/fusionhttp://www.scienceinschool.org/2007/issue5/fusion
2.035 day pulsation period2.035 day pulsation period
800.4 day orbital period800.4 day orbital period
D. Lepischak M.Sc. Thesis and papersD. Lepischak M.Sc. Thesis and papers
18 nights on 18 nights on the Mt the Mt Stromlo 74”Stromlo 74”
Complete Complete phase phase coverage in coverage in BVIBVI
Several
pulsational cycles within single eclipse.
CepheidCepheid CompanionCompanionRadiusRadius 0.0365 ± 0.0365 ±
0.00090.00090.047 ± 0.047 ± 0.0010.001
Radial Radial Ampl.Ampl.
0.0015 ± 0.0015 ± 0.00020.0002
<V> [mags]<V> [mags] 17.2 ± 0.217.2 ± 0.2 20.5 ± 0.620.5 ± 0.6 <R> <R> 16.5 ± 0.216.5 ± 0.2 19.0 ± 0.619.0 ± 0.6 <I><I> 15.9 ± 0.215.9 ± 0.2 17.7 ± 0.617.7 ± 0.6 <V-R><V-R> 0.63 ± 0.010.63 ± 0.01 1.4 ± 0.11.4 ± 0.1
Results:Results:
χχνν22 = 1.4 = 1.4
Relative to Relative to orbital orbital
separationseparation
Inconsistent with isolated single-star evolution?
Observed
Cepheid
Companion
De-reddened
M–type. Mass loss? M–type. Mass loss?
Image credit: Sky & TelescopeImage credit: Sky & Telescope
Watching the Detections Watching the Detections ……
“The Force has a strong effect on weak minds” – Obiwan Kenobi
OR (translated) Most of the previous interpretations are
wrong in one (or more!) important ways Look at the actual observational data with
fresh eyes Separate findings from suspicions Keep track of the dominant signals
Monoliths could reproduce the eclipse Monoliths could reproduce the eclipse lightcurve, too! lightcurve, too!
http://www.geektyrant.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2001-05.jpghttp://www.geektyrant.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2001-05.jpg
1. eps Aur has a “timescale”, not a period2. Nobody has factored in the effects of
radial pulsation of the supergiant during the eclipse
3. We have been blind to more common analogues.
Predictions1. There won’t be a central peak this eclipse2. The peaks in eclipse are due to the
primary, not details of the secondary
This eclipse and observing campaign will likely be definitive.
Outcome 1: The scales will fall from our eyes and we will extract new, important understanding from this system.
OR Outcome 2: It will become clear that this system
is too much of a mess to provide improvements in our understanding of evolutionary issues.
Part of the scientific process is knowing your efforts are providing diminishing returns!