Upload
sanura
View
45
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Dose Predictions for Moon Astronauts. Nicholas Bachmann, Ian Rittersdorf Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences University of Michigan. Image Source: www.astromax.com. Abstract. NASA has proposed a return to the moon within the next decade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Dose Predictions for Moon Dose Predictions for Moon AstronautsAstronauts
Image Source: www.astromax.com
Nicholas Bachmann, Ian RittersdorfDepartment of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences
University of Michigan
AbstractAbstractNASA has proposed a return to the moon NASA has proposed a return to the moon
within the next decadewithin the next decadeNew lunar missions will be longer than New lunar missions will be longer than
Apollo’s, and may lead to a permanent Apollo’s, and may lead to a permanent moon basemoon base
Effects of radiation on these missions will Effects of radiation on these missions will have to be planned for, but are have to be planned for, but are manageablemanageable
Main Dose SourcesMain Dose SourcesGalactic Cosmic Rays (GCR)Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR)
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP)Solar Energetic Particles (SEP)
Intrinsic Lunar Radiation (Soil)Intrinsic Lunar Radiation (Soil)
Image Source : www.archives.gov
Galactic Cosmic RaysGalactic Cosmic RaysComposition:Composition:
85% protons85% protons14% alpha particles14% alpha particles1% heavy nuclei1% heavy nuclei
Heavy nuclei are very dangerous because Heavy nuclei are very dangerous because of the energy they have of the energy they have (proportional to Z(proportional to Z22))
Hard to measure preciselyHard to measure preciselyCurrent Models are believed to be 25% Current Models are believed to be 25%
accurateaccurate
Solar Energetic ParticlesSolar Energetic ParticlesSEPs consist primarily of protons and SEPs consist primarily of protons and
alpha particlesalpha particles Formed on active Formed on active
surfaces of the sunsurfaces of the sun Lower energy Lower energy
particles than GCRsparticles than GCRs Higher flux of Higher flux of
particles than GCRsparticles than GCRs
Image Source: www.nrl.navy.mil
Solar FlaresSolar FlaresSolar flares emit considerable amounts of Solar flares emit considerable amounts of
radiation, up to tens of Gyradiation, up to tens of GyBetween Apollo 16 and 17 , one of the Between Apollo 16 and 17 , one of the
largest solar flares ever recorded largest solar flares ever recorded occurred. If the flare had occurred during a occurred. If the flare had occurred during a mission — even inside their shielded mission — even inside their shielded spacecraft, the astronauts would have spacecraft, the astronauts would have absorbed lethal doses within 10 hoursabsorbed lethal doses within 10 hours
Lunar Thorium HotspotsLunar Thorium Hotspots Because space suits Because space suits
protect well against protect well against αα and low energy and low energy gamma, Th in the soil gamma, Th in the soil is not a major concernis not a major concern
If any kind of space If any kind of space station were station were constructed on the constructed on the moon, radon would be moon, radon would be a major concern if lunar a major concern if lunar soil was used in soil was used in cementcement
Image Source: www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5357
Apollo Mission DosesApollo Mission Doses No significant No significant
difference between difference between doses of zero/high doses of zero/high time mission time mission implies surface implies surface Th/K is irrelevant Th/K is irrelevant
High Apollo 14 High Apollo 14 dose is due to path dose is due to path directly through directly through Van Allen beltVan Allen belt
Nuclear Radiation from a Planetary Nuclear Radiation from a Planetary SurfaceSurface
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~mcfadden/slides/2001_Mars_Odyssey/11.jpg
Effects on HealthEffects on HealthWorst-case scenario estimates an Worst-case scenario estimates an
increase in carcinogenic risk of 45% to increase in carcinogenic risk of 45% to interplanetary astronautsinterplanetary astronautsNASA/NCRP goal is 3%NASA/NCRP goal is 3%
Is difficult to quantify due to the uncertainty Is difficult to quantify due to the uncertainty in the knowledge of the biological in the knowledge of the biological response of to particles of various atomic response of to particles of various atomic numbers and energiesnumbers and energies
ConclusionsConclusionsElevated or even fatal does to astronauts Elevated or even fatal does to astronauts
are possible outside of Low Earth Orbit if are possible outside of Low Earth Orbit if proper planning is not doneproper planning is not done
Radionuclides may be a concern for lunar Radionuclides may be a concern for lunar bases that use soil for building materialsbases that use soil for building materials
Due to longer travel times, manned Due to longer travel times, manned missions beyond the moon would have to missions beyond the moon would have to have increased shielding in case of solar have increased shielding in case of solar flaresflares
Selected ReferencesSelected ReferencesBiomedical Results of ApolloBiomedical Results of Apollo, NASA, 1975, NASA, 1975Radiation Effects and Protection for Moon Radiation Effects and Protection for Moon
and Mars Missionsand Mars Missions, Parnell, Watts, and , Parnell, Watts, and Armstrong, 1998Armstrong, 1998
Seeing Lunar Thorium More ClearlySeeing Lunar Thorium More Clearly, , http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.asphttp://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=5357, Available 03/29/2007x?c=a&id=5357, Available 03/29/2007