15
Page 1 DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last data processing at CNES/CLS Analysis Center L. Soudarin 1 , H. Capdeville 1 , J.-M. Lemoine 2 , P. Schaeffer 1 1 CLS, Collecte Localisation Satellites, Ramonville, France 2 CNES, Toulouse, France

DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Page 1

DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last data processing at CNES/CLS

Analysis CenterL. Soudarin 1, H. Capdeville 1, J.-M. Lemoine 2 , P. Schaeffer 1

1 CLS, Collecte Localisation Satellites, Ramonville, France2 CNES, Toulouse, France

Page 2: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

1. About the data processing

2. Positioning performances assessment

3. Contribution of each generation of instruments

Page 2

Overview

3. Contribution of each generation of instruments

4. Summary

Page 3: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Reprocessing :In the second half of 2011, the CNES/CLS Analysis C enter (LCA) has entirely re-processed the whole DORIS data set for orbit determination and tracking station coordinate estimation.

Motivations :-revised attitude laws for Topex/Jason-1/Jason-2, En visat and Cryosat-2-fixed bug related to the frequency bias

Current series: lcawd32Page 3

-fixed bug related to the frequency bias-new macro-model tuned by GRGS for Jason-2

Changes in standards (wrt previous processing set up for IDS-3): -DPOD2008 as a priori instead of DPOD2005-IERS EOP series aligned on ITRF2008-GMF/GPT tropospheric model instead ECMWF + Guo&Lang ley MF -EIGEN-6S gravity model instead of EIGEN-GL04S

New SINEX series:lcawd32 including Jason-2, Cryosat-2, HY-2A

Page 4: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Station position time seriesPage 4

Time series are availableon IDS web site:-files of data (STCD format) and plots (GIF format)

They can be displayed

Kokee Park : KOKA + KOLB

They can be displayedwith STCDtool

http://ids-doris.org/plottool/stcdtool.php

Page 5: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Comparison to DPOD2008Page 5

3D RMS of the weekly LCA solutions wrt DPOD2008 (1993 -2012)

•1008 weeks(1993/01/03 – 2012/06/02)•44 stations by weekly solutionon average

RMS average value (mm) �

3D N E Uwholeperiod 18,4 14,3 22,9 16,4

1993-2002 23,0 17,6 29,0 20,6

2002-2008 14,4 11,3 18,3 12,5

2008-2012 12,9 11,1 15,1 12,1

Page 6: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

8

10

12

14

16

12

15

18

21

24

amou

nt o

f dat

a (y

ears

)

3D w

rms

(mm

)

3D WRMS (biais removed) and amount of data

Page 6

Repeatability of the time series

0

2

4

6

0

3

6

9

amou

nt o

f dat

a (y

ears

)

3D w

rms

(mm

)

3D wrms amount of data (years)

•1008 weeks (1993/01/03 – 2012/06/02)•148 stations: from 6.1 mm (ADFB, 2.7 yrs) to 21.2 mm (MORA, 4.9 yrs)

- 3D wrms: mean value 12.3 mm / median value 11.1 mm- amount of analyzed data: mean value 5.08 years / median values 4.69 years

Page 7: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Page 7

16

20

24

North residuals WRMS

Precision of the positioning

0

4

8

12mm

Page 8: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Page 8

24

28

32

36

40

East residuals wrms

Precision of the positioning

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

mm

Page 9: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Page 9

16

20

24

Up residuals WRMS

Precision of the positioning

0

4

8

12mm

Page 10: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

2004

2007

2010

2013

15

18

21

24

yearmm 3D WRMS (biais removed) and installation time span

Page 10

Positioning precision and installation

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

0

3

6

9

12

3D wrms start epoch end epoch

20001 cm

Page 11: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Improvement of LCA time seriesPage 11

8

10

12

14

16

18

3D wrms (bias removed)Previous (lcawd24) vs Current processing (lcawd32)

0

2

4

6

BE

MB

SY

PB

RO

UB

AD

FB

RIQ

BK

ET

BM

AT

BC

RQ

BC

HA

BA

MV

BM

SP

BS

AN

BY

AS

BE

AS

BH

BM

BR

ILB

CA

DB

NO

WB

RE

UB

PA

TB

AR

FB

HE

MB

CID

BM

AH

BLI

CB

BE

TB

MA

LBK

RU

BD

JIB

MA

NB

SA

LBK

OLB

MIA

BE

VE

BJI

UB

GA

VB

PD

MB

DIO

BG

RE

BK

IUB

TLS

BS

TJB

BA

DB

KR

BB

ME

TB

YE

MB

RE

ZB

FA

IBT

HU

BS

PJB

lcawd24 lcawd32

unit: mm 3D North East Up

lcawd24 (1) 9,51 8,44 13,22 9,18

lcawd32 (2) 8,23 7,63 11,50 7,52

(2)-(1)/(1) -13,52% -9,66% -13,04% -18,11%

2009/01-2010/0750 stations

Decreasing of the residuals �

Page 12: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

8

10

12

14

16

18

3D wrms (bias removed)

Page 12

1st & 2nd vs DGXX instruments

48 stations27 weeks2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

0

2

4

6

BE

MB

SY

PB

RO

VB

AD

GB

RIQ

B

KE

TB

MA

TB

CR

QB

CH

AB

AM

VB

MS

PB

SA

NB

YA

SB

EA

SB

HB

MB

NO

XB

RE

UB

PA

UB

AR

FB

AS

EB

CID

B

MA

HB

LIC

B

BE

TB

MA

LB

KR

WB

DJI

B

MA

NB

SA

LB

KO

LB

MIA

B

EV

EB

JIU

B

PD

MB

DIO

B

GR

EB

KIU

B

TLS

B

ST

JB

BA

DB

CO

BB

KR

BB

ME

TB

YE

MB

RE

ZB

TH

UB

SP

JB

s4s5enj2c2h2 j2c2h2 s4s5en

unit: mm 3D North East Up

6 satellites 6,64 6,23 9,53 6,16

Spot4+ Spot5+Env = 1 st & 2nd Gen. 9,71 9,18 15,56 8,47

Jason2+Cryosat2+HY-2A = DGXX 7,45 6,75 10,74 7,33

Page 13: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Page 13

Contribution of DGXX instruments

01234

mm

3D wrms constellation 5 sat. -Jason-2 or -Cryosat-2 or -HY-2A compared to Spot-4+Spot-5+Jason-2+Cryosat-2+HY-2A

w/o Jason-2 w/o HY-2A w/o Cryosat-2

unit: mm 3D North East Up

5 sat. constellation 6,07 5,33 8,95 6,01

w/o Jason-2 6,51 5,64 10,31 6,62

w/o HY-2A 6,59 5,84 9,80 6,44

w/o Cryosat-2 6,80 5,98 9,98 6,66

Most important DGXX contributors: Cryosat-2 (717 km, 92°) for North and Up, Jason-2(130 0km, 66°) for East

-10

BE

MB

RO

VB

AD

GB

RIR

BK

ET

BM

AT

BC

RQ

BC

HA

BA

MV

BM

SP

BS

AN

BY

AS

BE

AS

BH

BM

BR

IMB

CA

DB

NO

XB

RE

UB

PA

UB

AR

FB

HE

MB

AS

EB

CID

BM

AH

BLI

CB

BE

TB

MA

LBK

RW

BD

JIB

MA

NB

KO

LBM

IAB

EV

EB

JIU

BP

DM

BD

IOB

KIU

BT

LSB

ST

JBB

AD

BC

OB

BK

RB

BM

ET

BY

EM

BR

EZ

BT

HU

BS

PJB

48 stations15 weeks2012/04 – 2012/07

Page 14: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

Page 14

Current constellation without SPOT -4

0,5

1

1,5

mm

3D wrms Spot-4 contribution

48 stations15 weeks2012/04/08 – 2012/07/21

unit: mm 3D North East Up

with Spot4 6,07 5,33 8,95 6,01

w/o Spot4 6,31 5,57 9,14 6,29

(2)-(1)/(1) +3,92% +4,51% +2,16% +4,64%

Small increasing of the residuals �

-0,5

0

BE

MB

RO

VB

AD

GB

RIR

BK

ET

BM

AT

BC

RQ

BC

HA

BA

MV

BM

SP

BS

AN

BY

AS

BE

AS

BH

BM

BR

IMB

CA

DB

NO

XB

RE

UB

PA

UB

AR

FB

HE

MB

AS

EB

CID

BM

AH

BLI

CB

BE

TB

MA

LBK

RW

BD

JIB

MA

NB

KO

LBM

IAB

EV

EB

JIU

BP

DM

BD

IOB

KIU

BT

LSB

ST

JBB

AD

BC

OB

BK

RB

BM

ET

BY

EM

BR

EZ

BT

HU

BS

PJB

constellation w/o SPOT4 - constellation with SPOT4

Page 15: DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last ... · 8 10 12 14 16 18 3d wrms (bias removed) page 12 1st & 2 nd vs dgxx instruments 48 stations 27 weeks 2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07

• Current LCA positionning solutions better by 10 to 18%(up) wrt to processing for ITRF2008

• Positionning < 1cm since DGXX

• Time series improved by DGXX data and installation renovation

Page 15

Summary

• Time series improved by DGXX data and installation renovation

• Most important DGXX contributor: Cryosat-2 for North and Up, Jason-2 for East

• End of SPOT-4 mission will have a small impact. It will likely belargely balanced with SARAL (12/12/2012).