Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1
DORIS positioning: performance assessment from the last data processing at CNES/CLS
Analysis CenterL. Soudarin 1, H. Capdeville 1, J.-M. Lemoine 2 , P. Schaeffer 1
1 CLS, Collecte Localisation Satellites, Ramonville, France2 CNES, Toulouse, France
1. About the data processing
2. Positioning performances assessment
3. Contribution of each generation of instruments
Page 2
Overview
3. Contribution of each generation of instruments
4. Summary
Reprocessing :In the second half of 2011, the CNES/CLS Analysis C enter (LCA) has entirely re-processed the whole DORIS data set for orbit determination and tracking station coordinate estimation.
Motivations :-revised attitude laws for Topex/Jason-1/Jason-2, En visat and Cryosat-2-fixed bug related to the frequency bias
Current series: lcawd32Page 3
-fixed bug related to the frequency bias-new macro-model tuned by GRGS for Jason-2
Changes in standards (wrt previous processing set up for IDS-3): -DPOD2008 as a priori instead of DPOD2005-IERS EOP series aligned on ITRF2008-GMF/GPT tropospheric model instead ECMWF + Guo&Lang ley MF -EIGEN-6S gravity model instead of EIGEN-GL04S
New SINEX series:lcawd32 including Jason-2, Cryosat-2, HY-2A
Station position time seriesPage 4
Time series are availableon IDS web site:-files of data (STCD format) and plots (GIF format)
They can be displayed
Kokee Park : KOKA + KOLB
They can be displayedwith STCDtool
http://ids-doris.org/plottool/stcdtool.php
Comparison to DPOD2008Page 5
3D RMS of the weekly LCA solutions wrt DPOD2008 (1993 -2012)
•1008 weeks(1993/01/03 – 2012/06/02)•44 stations by weekly solutionon average
RMS average value (mm) �
3D N E Uwholeperiod 18,4 14,3 22,9 16,4
1993-2002 23,0 17,6 29,0 20,6
2002-2008 14,4 11,3 18,3 12,5
2008-2012 12,9 11,1 15,1 12,1
8
10
12
14
16
12
15
18
21
24
amou
nt o
f dat
a (y
ears
)
3D w
rms
(mm
)
3D WRMS (biais removed) and amount of data
Page 6
Repeatability of the time series
0
2
4
6
0
3
6
9
amou
nt o
f dat
a (y
ears
)
3D w
rms
(mm
)
3D wrms amount of data (years)
•1008 weeks (1993/01/03 – 2012/06/02)•148 stations: from 6.1 mm (ADFB, 2.7 yrs) to 21.2 mm (MORA, 4.9 yrs)
- 3D wrms: mean value 12.3 mm / median value 11.1 mm- amount of analyzed data: mean value 5.08 years / median values 4.69 years
Page 7
16
20
24
North residuals WRMS
Precision of the positioning
0
4
8
12mm
Page 8
24
28
32
36
40
East residuals wrms
Precision of the positioning
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
mm
Page 9
16
20
24
Up residuals WRMS
Precision of the positioning
0
4
8
12mm
2004
2007
2010
2013
15
18
21
24
yearmm 3D WRMS (biais removed) and installation time span
Page 10
Positioning precision and installation
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
0
3
6
9
12
3D wrms start epoch end epoch
20001 cm
Improvement of LCA time seriesPage 11
8
10
12
14
16
18
3D wrms (bias removed)Previous (lcawd24) vs Current processing (lcawd32)
0
2
4
6
BE
MB
SY
PB
RO
UB
AD
FB
RIQ
BK
ET
BM
AT
BC
RQ
BC
HA
BA
MV
BM
SP
BS
AN
BY
AS
BE
AS
BH
BM
BR
ILB
CA
DB
NO
WB
RE
UB
PA
TB
AR
FB
HE
MB
CID
BM
AH
BLI
CB
BE
TB
MA
LBK
RU
BD
JIB
MA
NB
SA
LBK
OLB
MIA
BE
VE
BJI
UB
GA
VB
PD
MB
DIO
BG
RE
BK
IUB
TLS
BS
TJB
BA
DB
KR
BB
ME
TB
YE
MB
RE
ZB
FA
IBT
HU
BS
PJB
lcawd24 lcawd32
unit: mm 3D North East Up
lcawd24 (1) 9,51 8,44 13,22 9,18
lcawd32 (2) 8,23 7,63 11,50 7,52
(2)-(1)/(1) -13,52% -9,66% -13,04% -18,11%
2009/01-2010/0750 stations
Decreasing of the residuals �
8
10
12
14
16
18
3D wrms (bias removed)
Page 12
1st & 2nd vs DGXX instruments
48 stations27 weeks2011/10/02 – 2012/04/07
0
2
4
6
BE
MB
SY
PB
RO
VB
AD
GB
RIQ
B
KE
TB
MA
TB
CR
QB
CH
AB
AM
VB
MS
PB
SA
NB
YA
SB
EA
SB
HB
MB
NO
XB
RE
UB
PA
UB
AR
FB
AS
EB
CID
B
MA
HB
LIC
B
BE
TB
MA
LB
KR
WB
DJI
B
MA
NB
SA
LB
KO
LB
MIA
B
EV
EB
JIU
B
PD
MB
DIO
B
GR
EB
KIU
B
TLS
B
ST
JB
BA
DB
CO
BB
KR
BB
ME
TB
YE
MB
RE
ZB
TH
UB
SP
JB
s4s5enj2c2h2 j2c2h2 s4s5en
unit: mm 3D North East Up
6 satellites 6,64 6,23 9,53 6,16
Spot4+ Spot5+Env = 1 st & 2nd Gen. 9,71 9,18 15,56 8,47
Jason2+Cryosat2+HY-2A = DGXX 7,45 6,75 10,74 7,33
Page 13
Contribution of DGXX instruments
01234
mm
3D wrms constellation 5 sat. -Jason-2 or -Cryosat-2 or -HY-2A compared to Spot-4+Spot-5+Jason-2+Cryosat-2+HY-2A
w/o Jason-2 w/o HY-2A w/o Cryosat-2
unit: mm 3D North East Up
5 sat. constellation 6,07 5,33 8,95 6,01
w/o Jason-2 6,51 5,64 10,31 6,62
w/o HY-2A 6,59 5,84 9,80 6,44
w/o Cryosat-2 6,80 5,98 9,98 6,66
Most important DGXX contributors: Cryosat-2 (717 km, 92°) for North and Up, Jason-2(130 0km, 66°) for East
-10
BE
MB
RO
VB
AD
GB
RIR
BK
ET
BM
AT
BC
RQ
BC
HA
BA
MV
BM
SP
BS
AN
BY
AS
BE
AS
BH
BM
BR
IMB
CA
DB
NO
XB
RE
UB
PA
UB
AR
FB
HE
MB
AS
EB
CID
BM
AH
BLI
CB
BE
TB
MA
LBK
RW
BD
JIB
MA
NB
KO
LBM
IAB
EV
EB
JIU
BP
DM
BD
IOB
KIU
BT
LSB
ST
JBB
AD
BC
OB
BK
RB
BM
ET
BY
EM
BR
EZ
BT
HU
BS
PJB
48 stations15 weeks2012/04 – 2012/07
Page 14
Current constellation without SPOT -4
0,5
1
1,5
mm
3D wrms Spot-4 contribution
48 stations15 weeks2012/04/08 – 2012/07/21
unit: mm 3D North East Up
with Spot4 6,07 5,33 8,95 6,01
w/o Spot4 6,31 5,57 9,14 6,29
(2)-(1)/(1) +3,92% +4,51% +2,16% +4,64%
Small increasing of the residuals �
-0,5
0
BE
MB
RO
VB
AD
GB
RIR
BK
ET
BM
AT
BC
RQ
BC
HA
BA
MV
BM
SP
BS
AN
BY
AS
BE
AS
BH
BM
BR
IMB
CA
DB
NO
XB
RE
UB
PA
UB
AR
FB
HE
MB
AS
EB
CID
BM
AH
BLI
CB
BE
TB
MA
LBK
RW
BD
JIB
MA
NB
KO
LBM
IAB
EV
EB
JIU
BP
DM
BD
IOB
KIU
BT
LSB
ST
JBB
AD
BC
OB
BK
RB
BM
ET
BY
EM
BR
EZ
BT
HU
BS
PJB
constellation w/o SPOT4 - constellation with SPOT4
• Current LCA positionning solutions better by 10 to 18%(up) wrt to processing for ITRF2008
• Positionning < 1cm since DGXX
• Time series improved by DGXX data and installation renovation
Page 15
Summary
• Time series improved by DGXX data and installation renovation
• Most important DGXX contributor: Cryosat-2 for North and Up, Jason-2 for East
• End of SPOT-4 mission will have a small impact. It will likely belargely balanced with SARAL (12/12/2012).