3
Washington, DC | Brussels | London | Los Angeles | New York | Zurich 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 925 | Los Angeles, CA 90024 | 310.954.2980 www.optimityadvisors.com Don’t Cut the DAM Check Yet! Content and Metadata Analysis are Fundamental Requirements Before Selecting a DAM By Julia Goodwin There are a wide array of DAM vendors from on prem to cloud to hybrid that can provide a variety of asset management capabilities for your organization. They have a wide range of features and prices. Most are extremely slick looking and it’s easy to fall in love. Many times, companies go straight to the chase and purchase the DAM system they’re interested in. Worse, they make their decision with a list of requirements that may not adequately consider file formats, workflow, and logical and “physical” asset metadata. Before choosing a DAM system, don’t make the mistake of leaving holistic content and metadata analysis out of your requirements. Thorough analyses of content and metadata are important for defining DAM system requirements that capture a complete picture of an organization’s needs. Here are some important analyses to conduct when defining requirements for evaluating DAM systems. Without performing these, you may end up with a solution that does not fit your organization and may require costly enhancement charges. I have worked with companies in the past that bought a DAM system only to find out later that it could not accommodate their content relationships or their metadata requirements in the way their business needed. Content Analysis – This is best performed through a content audit addressing the considerations below and integrating the findings to your requirements list to make sure the DAM can handle it. Which of your assets are essential to store in the DAM? Can you phase their addition to the DAM system? Where are all the asset types currently stored? Flesh out and document file directories, personal hard drives, Cloud drives like Box or Dropbox, other repositories such as CMS, MAM’s or PAM’s. This list is something you will use again and again. It will also help you prioritize what goes into the DAM, who creates it, who approves it and where it needs to go. It will also tell you how much information (metadata) is known about that asset. Do the assets have relationships (ParentChild, or ChildCousin) that you need to maintain and track in the new DAM? Will you include asset versions or only final assets in the DAM? If you include versions, how will the system manage this? Do your assets have a Unique Identifier that you need to import? Or do you have to create one and have the DAM or staff link any asset relationships? Does this UID need to conform to an industry standard like EIDR?

Don't Cut the DAM Check Yet Blog

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Don't Cut the DAM Check Yet Blog

 

Washington,  DC  |  Brussels  |  London  |  Los  Angeles  |  New  York  |  Zurich  1100  Glendon  Avenue,  Suite  925  |  Los  Angeles,  CA  90024  |  310.954.2980  

www.optimityadvisors.com    

   

Don’t  Cut  the  DAM  Check  Yet!    Content  and  Metadata  Analysis  are  Fundamental  Requirements  Before  Selecting  a  DAM  By  Julia  Goodwin  

There  are  a  wide  array  of  DAM  vendors  from  on  prem  to  cloud  to  hybrid  that  can  provide  a  variety  of  asset  management  capabilities  for  your  organization.    They  have  a  wide  range  of  features  and  prices.    Most  are  extremely  slick  looking  and  it’s  easy  to  fall  in  love.    Many  times,  companies  go  straight  to  the  chase  and  purchase  the  DAM  system  they’re  interested  in.    Worse,  they  make  their  decision  with  a  list  of  requirements  that  may  not  adequately  consider  file  formats,  workflow,  and  logical  and  “physical”  asset  metadata.    Before  choosing  a  DAM  system,  don’t  make  the  mistake  of  leaving  holistic  content  and  metadata  analysis  out  of  your  requirements.        Thorough  analyses  of  content  and  metadata  are  important  for  defining  DAM  system  requirements  that  capture  a  complete  picture  of  an  organization’s  needs.  Here  are  some  important  analyses  to  conduct  when  defining  requirements  for  evaluating  DAM  systems.    Without  performing  these,  you  may  end  up  with  a  solution  that  does  not  fit  your  organization  and  may  require  costly  enhancement  charges.    I  have  worked  with  companies  in  the  past  that  bought  a  DAM  system  only  to  find  out  later  that  it  could  not  accommodate  their  content  relationships  or  their  metadata  requirements  in  the  way  their  business  needed.    Content  Analysis  –  This  is  best  performed  through  a  content  audit  addressing  the  considerations  below  and  integrating  the  findings  to  your  requirements  list  to  make  sure  the  DAM  can  handle  it.  

• Which  of  your  assets  are  essential  to  store  in  the  DAM?    Can  you  phase  their  addition  to  the  DAM  system?  

• Where  are  all  the  asset  types  currently  stored?    Flesh  out  and  document  file  directories,  personal  hard  drives,  Cloud  drives  like  Box  or  Dropbox,  other  repositories  such  as  CMS,  MAM’s  or  PAM’s.    This  list  is  something  you  will  use  again  and  again.    It  will  also  help  you  prioritize  what  goes  into  the  DAM,  who  creates  it,  who  approves  it  and  where  it  needs  to  go.    It  will  also  tell  you  how  much  information  (metadata)  is  known  about  that  asset.  

• Do  the  assets  have  relationships  (Parent-­‐Child,  or  Child-­‐Cousin)  that  you  need  to  maintain  and  track  in  the  new  DAM?  

• Will  you  include  asset  versions  or  only  final  assets  in  the  DAM?    If  you  include  versions,  how  will  the  system  manage  this?  

• Do  your  assets  have  a  Unique  Identifier  that  you  need  to  import?    Or  do  you  have  to  create  one  and  have  the  DAM  or  staff  link  any  asset  relationships?    Does  this  UID  need  to  conform  to  an  industry  standard  like  EIDR?  

 

Page 2: Don't Cut the DAM Check Yet Blog

 

Washington,  DC  |  Brussels  |  London  |  Los  Angeles  |  New  York  |  Zurich  1100  Glendon  Avenue,  Suite  925  |  Los  Angeles,  CA  90024  |  310.954.2980  

www.optimityadvisors.com    

Add  the  findings  from  the  analysis  above  to  your  DAM  System  Requirements  List.    Metadata  Analysis  –  One  common  failing  when  a  DAM  system  goes  live  is  that  the  information  users  need  is  not  where  they  need  it  or  further  investigation  outside  the  DAM  is  required  of  users  to  determine  if  they  have  found  the  right  assets.    This  is  how  Search  may  breakdown  in  a  beautiful  new  system.    Here  are  some  questions  to  ask  yourself  about  your  organization’s  metadata  needs  to  mitigate  this  outcome:  

• For  each  asset  type  you  have  determined  to  bring  into  your  DAM,  what  metadata  currently  exists?    File  name  only?    More  than  that?    Is  additional  metadata  needed,  if  so,  what?    Is  the  metadata  consistent  with  what  others  in  the  organization  use?    If  not,  you  may  need  to  collaborate  across  teams  to  accept  a  common  Taxonomy  and  Metadata  Model,  especially  if  you  are  planning  on  integrating  your  DAM  to  other  systems.    Don’t  forget  any  technical  metadata  (format,  resolution,  file  format,  file  size,  etc.)  or  administrative  data  (created  by,  last  changed  by,  last  updated  by,  etc.)  

• If  metadata  is  the  fields  of  information  you  will  use  to  describe  your  asset,  you  also  have  to  consider  if  those  fields  should  have  restricted  choices  on  data  entry  to  reduce  errors.    For  each  field,  list  these  restricted  values  and  get  approval  from  your  stakeholders.      

• Note  that  some  asset  types  may  have  different  metadata  fields  and  values.    Can  the  DAM  support  this  by  only  displaying  needed  fields  by  asset  type?    Can  the  system  accomodate  dropdown  lists  for  specific  fields?  

• Do  you  need  to  have  the  ability  to  select  one  value  from  a  field,  that  in  turn  determines  what  appears  in  the  next  field,  and  so  on?    This  is  called  cascading  metadata  and  when  it  exists,  it  greatly  reduces  input  errors.    If  so,  carefully  document  those  scenarios  that  exist.  

• Will  metadata  templates  be  needed?  For  some  assets,  data  entry  can  be  minimized  when  certain  fields  are  default-­‐entered  by  the  system  based  on  asset  type,  some  other  user  selection,  or  when  the  assets  are  coming  from  another  system.    Determine  if  this  is  needed  and  that  the  DAM  can  accommodate  it.  

• Where  do  the  assets  need  to  go  and  what  metadata  needs  to  go  with  them?    This  is  a  final  check  to  make  sure  you’re  not  forgetting  anyone  downstream  that  requires  certain  assets  and  their  metadata  for  specific  purposes.    

Workflow  Maps  While  not  always  required,  I’m  a  huge  fan  of  swim  lane  workflows  so  that  end  users  can  see  visually  the  interplay  of  assets  and  data  as  they  move  through  their  processes.    These  visual  workflows  may  also  tease  out  additional  requirements  or  “ah  ha!”  moments  and  also  confirm  that  your  understanding  of  their  asset  processes  are  accurate.    These  workflows  will  also  be  a  huge  help  to  your  selected  DAM  vendor,  along  with  the  analysis  described  above,  and  can  be  retooled  for  DAM  training  later.      

Page 3: Don't Cut the DAM Check Yet Blog

 

Washington,  DC  |  Brussels  |  London  |  Los  Angeles  |  New  York  |  Zurich  1100  Glendon  Avenue,  Suite  925  |  Los  Angeles,  CA  90024  |  310.954.2980  

www.optimityadvisors.com    

 Define  demo  scenarios  around  your  DAM  system  requirements  Finally,  when  it  comes  to  DAM  selection  time,  be  strict  about  asking  your  final  vendor  selections  to  demonstrate  YOUR  workflows  with  YOUR  data.    Give  them  enough  notice  to  do  this  properly.    If  the  vendor  tries  to  sidestep  this,  it  should  tell  you  something:    they’re  interested  in  selling  their  product,  not  demonstrating  that  their  product  will  be  a  success  for  YOU.    

Julia  Goodwin  is  a  Senior  Manager  within  the  Information  Management  practice  at  Optimity  Advisors.