Upload
truongdieu
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Paul Gepts
Dept. of Plant Sciences
University of California, Davis
Journées 2017 Labex Agro
Agropolis Fondation
20 octobre, 2017
Domestication des plantes et biodiversitéC’est quoi?
Pour quoi l’étudier?
Application au theme de la journée: production agricole durable et transition agroécologique
La contribution des agriculteurs à la conservation de la biodiversitéPlusieurs examples de Mexique et de l’Ouganda
Conclusions
2
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Laidig et al. (2014) Genetic and non-geneticlong-term trends of 12 different crops in German official variety performance trials and on-farm yield trends. TAG
Cassman KG, Liska AJ (2007) Food and fuel for all: realistic or foolish? Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1: 18-23
3
Grain
maize
Forrage
maize
Oilseed
rape
Sugar
beet
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Evolutionary process: selection for adaptation to human-induced environmental conditions, standing or de novo variation
Cultivation is a necessary condition, but the selective environment in an agroecosystem can be quite different from that in a natural ecosystem: e.g., Pathogens, herbivores Abiotic factors: light, water, soil nutrients Reduced competition
More efficient production system: biomass per unit of surface and time: e.g., Loss of seed dormancy, shattering More compact growth habit Change in reproductive system: outcrossing selfing vegetative
propagation
Human consumption or utilization: selection for novelties Development: e.g., Brassica spp. Color, size, shape, and texture Reduction in toxic compounds
4
Gepts 2004, 2014, 2017; Meyer et al. 2012; Meyer and
Purugganan 2014; Larson et al. 2014
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Gepts 2014 Current Opinion Plant Biology 5
Wild ancestral types Primitive varieties Landraces Improved varieties
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
8
Haricots & maïs
Sauvages, MEX
Haricots & maïs
domestiqués,
en sympatrie avec
haricot sauvage, MEX
Haricots &
maïs
Domestiqués,
MEX
Haricots à rames, RWA
Haricots nains, CA, USA
10
Gepts 2017 Handbook Agric Biodiversity, modified from Burke et al. 2007
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Dérive génétique
Sélection
Étape majeure dans l’évolution humaine
Etudes génétiques, évolutionnaires, et du
development
11
Domestication is the outcome of a selection process that leads to increased adaptation of plant and animals to cultivation or rearing and utilization by humans, as part of the transition from hunting-gathering to agriculture until current times (Gepts 2004)
Application à la conservation et l’utilisation de la
biodiversité
Dom
est
icati
on
Genetic Diversity
Landraces
Advanced Cvs.
Wild
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Domestication
& Evolution under
Cultivation
HumansCultural development:
knowledge of plants, animals
technology
Population growth
Economic opportunities/constraints
Biocultural diversity
EnvironmentClimate change
Contrast between dry and
humid season, cold and warm
Contrast between wild and
domesticated env.
Diversity of niches
Plant or Animal Morphology
Behavior
Genetics
Physiology
Evolution
Gepts 2004, 2006
12
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
14
Exemple 1: Les
fermiers cultivant des
poivrons (Capsicum annuum), Etat
d’Aguascalientes,
México(photos: K. Kraft)(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Selon le type de poivron: Frais: Caloro, Jalapeño, Hungaro,
Serrano, Anaheim, Bell Sec: Pasilla, Guajillo, Ancho,
Mulato, Puya, Huacle
Poivrons frais: semences commerciales en F1 (22%)
Poivrons sec: semences récoltées par fermiers ou obtenues chez d’autres (78%)
Sélection des semences par fermiers: maintenir un idéotype, plutôt qu’une sélection directionnelle: maïs (Cleveland et al. 2000), haricots (Worthington et al. 2012)
15
Caloro Jalapeño Serrano Anaheim
Pasilla Guajillo Ancho Mulato
Kraig Kraft
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Selection mostly after harvest: Importance of LD and multi-locus associations with seed traits in a predominantly self-pollinated crop
a b
Payró de la Cruz et al. 2005
weedy
domesticated
EXAMPLE 2: ARE FARMERS AGENTS OF SELECTION
AND GENE FLOW? CENTRAL MEXICO: MICHOACÁN-GUANAJUATO
Photos: D. Zizumbo 16
Patricia Colunga, Daniel Zizumbo
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
FARMERS MAINTAIN WIDE RANGE OF DIVERSITY
INCLUDING IMPROVED CULTIVARS AND WILD BEANS
WITHIN FIELDS
Average
seed
weight
(g/100)
Wild 6
Weedy 20
Domesticated 39
17
Environs of Yuriria, Guanajuato, Mexico
Zizumbo-Villarreal et al. 2005
+ Flor de
Mayo
type
cultivar:
(c) Paul Gepts
2017
DIFFERENT GENETIC STRUCTURE IN W & D
Wild: less diversity within populations, more among populations compared toDomesticated
Higher gene flow in Domesticated: Diversity within landraces: outcrosses
Seed exchange among farmers
H h GST Nm
Wild 0.24 0.13-0.18 0.40 0.78
Landraces 0.26 0.22-0.29 0.26 1.40
Breeding
lines
-- 0.03-0.06 -- --
18
Zizumbo-Villarreal et al. 2005
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Example 3: Determinacy in PhaseolusBeans
• Function of the gene(s)?
o Gene for earliness bush growth habit
o Gene for meristem fate
• What is the origin of the alleles for
determinacy? How many alleles?
• Do different alleles have different value in
breeding? Phenotype, correlations, transmission
node
Indeterminate Determinate
P. vulgaris
P. lunatus
19
Tanaka & Fujita 1979
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF DETERMINACY
20
Frame shift
Deletion of
entire coding
region
Exon-intron splicing failure
Non-synonymous substitution
Retrotransposon insertion 4171-4174 bp
• Multiple geographic origins
of determinacy = repeated
selection of the determinate
phenotype by farmers
• Applications to conservation
and breeding: same
phenotype in different genetic
backgrounds?
Kwak M, Toro O, Debouck D, Gepts P (2012) Annals of Botany 110:1573-1580
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
EXAMPLE 4: INTRODUCTION OF MARKET-TYPE BEANS, OAXACA, MÉXICO
21
Worthington M, Soleri D,
Aragón-Cuevas F, Gepts P.
Crop Sci 2012
Soleri D, Worthington M,
Aragón-Cuevas F, Smith
SE, Gepts P. Econ Bot 2013
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Margaret Worthington,Daniela Soleri
23
THREE MAIN TAXA
Phaseolus coccineus & P. dumosus
Phaseolus vulgaris race Mesoamerica
Phaseolus vulgaris race Jalisco
M. W
ort
hin
gto
n, D
. S
ole
ri, &
P. G
ep
ts, C
rop
Sci
2012
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Farmers know the temperature adaptation of taxa and plant the three taxa accordingly: high, medium, and lower altitude
Farmers have very different opinions about varietal differences: “lumpers” vs. “splitters”
Farmers “creolize” introduced cultivars to match them to local domesticates by allowing unilateral cross-hybridization [Female Local x Male Introduced] but not the reverse
Ideotype selection instead of directional selection (See Cleveland, Soleri et al. 2000)
24
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
EXAMPLE 4: SEED ADOPTION AMONG FARMERS
IN WESTERN UGANDA (HOIMA DISTRICT)
Figure 1. A heuristic model of the formal (red), local (blue) and intermediate (green)
seed exchange networks.
25
Seed
Storage
Planting/multiplication
Genebanks
Community seed banks
Exchange with “nodal” farmers
Market
Neighboring farmer groups
Diversity fairs
Development organizationsNGOs
Participatory seed
dissemination
Micro, small and mediumenterprises (MSMEs)
National Seed Certification
Service (NSCS)
UNBP, NaCRRI
CIAT-PABRA
Privateseed
companies
Private sector wholesalers
Internationalmarkets
PVS
Certified seed
Quality declared seed (QDS)
Erin Wilkus
Integrated seed systems
Household type
Number of surveyed households
Number of seedcollection households
Breeding program-affiliated 72 41
Akumulikire Women Group
27 11
Kakindo Sustainable Group
20 13
Kyamaleera Handcraft Group
25 17
Breeding program-unaffiliated126 41
Total 198 82
Household surveys + Seed genotypingvia SNPs (m ~ 5,400)
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
Farmer group membership
Unaffiliated Akumulikire Kakindo
Mar
ket
All
sou
rces
House
ho
ld
Kyamaleera
Breeding-program affiliation
Affiliated
Org
aniz
atio
n
“SE” DJNG
Andean M
M
27
• Market-purchased seed • Consistently represented a significant
majority of seed in household seed stocks
• Organization-sourced seed • Supplied a larger proportion of
Mesoamerican seed than other seed sources
• Breeding program-affiliated households• More likely to adopt organization
sourced seed, especially Mesoamerican seed
• More likely to allocate Mesoamerican seeds to experimentation than breeding program–unaffiliated households
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
28
Adoption practices varied across farmer groups
Adoption-related outcomes varied
across farmer groups
Akumulikire was least likely to adopt
Akumulikire had the least diverse seed stock
Kyamaleera was more likely to adopt Andean varieties
Kyamaleera household-saved seed stock did not contain evidence of “Seed Engufu”
Kakindo was more likely to adopt Mesoamerican varieties and maintain household-saved Andean varieties
Kakindo was the only farmer group with “Seed Engufu” in household-saved seed stock and had highest overall genetic diversity
(c) Paul Gepts 2017
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
Knowledge of farmers Morphological & adaptation Maintain genetic diversity by
promoting gene flow (creolization) Dynamic system in response to
market demand
Repeated selection Spatially Probably also temporally
What type of selection? Stabilizing selection: Maintenance of
type Directional selection? Yield?
Role of Participatory Varietal Selection and farmer groups
Application to Conservation & Breeding
Local conservation See also e.g., Brush, Zimmerer,
etc.) is important and worth it
Keep farmers on the farm! Favor rural life and local
production
Participatory or distributed breeding How can farmers evolve from
ideotype maintenance to directional selection?
What is the role of farmers & scientists?
30(c) Paul Gepts 2017