Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dolphins and Cows
Neal Maskrey
Professor of Evidence-informed decision making, Keele University.
Consultant Clinical Adviser, Medicines and Prescribing Centre, NICE.
What I want to talk about:
How we all use information (or not) when making
decisions
And then 5 things to do differently to reduce errors
Information
"Thinking about the fact that we don't have a lot of
time, and this is the thing I feel really ashamed about,
I'm in a job where people's lives depend on the fact
that I make the right decision, and sometimes I feel
completely overwhelmed with the fact that I don't
know enough information about some critical
decisions that I make every day" GPST West Yorkshire 2010
Critical appraisal?
“I certainly don’t do any of it, you know – don’t remember the last
time I really looked at a paper. I have a pile of BMJs at home this
high [gesture] but I don’t ever read them. I sometimes carry them
around in my bag in case I kind of osmotically get the
information [ironic expression] but you know, time-wise it’s
easier to look on GP Notebook.”
GPST West Yorkshire 2010
What is evidence-based
medicine?
EBP is "the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of the individual patient. It means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research."
Sackett D, 1996
Evidence-based medicine Sackett D, et al. BMJ 1996;312:71-2
Best available evidence
Patient’s needs,
values and preferences
Expertise, experience,
skills and judgement
"We surveyed one acute medical take in our hospital. In a
relatively quiet take, we saw 18 patients with a total of 44
diagnoses. The guidelines that the on-call physician
should have read remembered and applied correctly for
those conditions came to 3,679 pages. This number
included only NICE, the Royal Colleges and major
societies from the last 3 years. If it takes 2 minutes to read
each page, the physician on call will have to spend 122
hours reading to keep abreast of the guidelines" (for one
24h on-call period).
Allen D, Harkins KJ. Lancet 2005; 365: 1768
What’s an expert?
• 25 400 journals in science, technology, and medicine,
and their number is increasing by 3.5% a year
• In 2009, they published 1.5 million articles.
• PubMed now cites more than 20 million papers.
• Assume a new entrant to the subspecialty can read five
papers an hour (one every 10 minutes, followed by a
break of 10 minutes) for eight hours a day, five days a
week, and 50 weeks a year; this gives a capacity of
10 000 papers in one year.
• Reading all papers referring to echocardiography would
take 11 years and 124 days, by which time at least
82 142 more papers would have been added,
accounting for another eight years and 78 days.
• Before our recruit could catch up and start to read new
manuscripts published the same day, he or she
would—if still alive and even remotely interested—have
read 408 049 papers and devoted (or served a
sentence of) 40 years and 295 days.
• On the positive side, our recruit would finish just in time
to retire.
The Golden Hour Sackett D et al BMJ 1996;312:71-72
“The difficulties that clinicians face in keeping abreast of all the medical advances reported in primary journals are obvious from a comparison of the time required for reading
for general medicine, enough to examine 19 articles per day, 365 days per year
with the time available
well under an hour a week by British medical consultants, even on self reports.”
- a list of words follows
look at them once, do not re-read them
- when you have read the list close your
eyes
Flange
Route master
Laggard
Sausages
Automaton
Approach
Antichrist
Research
Slipper
Haggle
Fridge
Locomotive
Bracket
Confused
Telesales
Professor
Stool pigeon
Hale
Banquet
Irrelevance
Flange
Routemaster
Laggard
Sausages
Automaton
Approach
Antichrist
Research
Slipper
Haggle
Fridge
Locomotive
Bracket
Confused
Telesales
Professor
Stool pigeon
Hale
Banquet
Irrelevance
A
B
C
D
E
How many words
that you remembered
are in each group?
Mindlines
“Clinicians rarely accessed, appraised, and used
explicit evidence directly from research or other
formal sources; rare exceptions were where they
might consult such sources after dealing with a
case that had particularly challenged them.”
Gabbay and le May. BMJ 2004; 329: 1013–1016
“Instead, they relied on what we have called "mindlines,“
collectively reinforced, internalised tacit guidelines,
which were informed by brief reading, but mainly by
their interactions with each other and with opinion
leaders, patients, and pharmaceutical representatives
and by other sources of largely tacit knowledge that
built on their early training and their own and their
colleagues' experience.”
• Imagine you are working as a doctor in a remote village.
It’s the weekend. There are no other health care
professionals around. But you do have a new piece of
technology called THE MARVELTRON
• The MARVELTRON will save the life of any patient you
are treating.
• But you have to answer correctly the question the
MARVELTRON asks of the attending doctor before it
works its magic.
• A young child is brought to you. She is seriously ill and will die imminently.
• You switch on the MARVELTRON and await the question.
• You must write down your answer immediately the question is asked, or the child will die.
• You will be blamed for the patient’s death only if you do not write down an answer. No blame will be attached to you if you get the answer wrong.
• ARE YOU READY?
• Have you got paper and something to write with?
What the Bible ACTUALLY says
• Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the
male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two,
the male and his female. Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the
male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the
earth.
Genesis. Ch 7
• Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is cloven-footed, and
cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat.
Leviticus Ch 11
Context Ambient conditions
Task difficulty
Task ambiguity
Affective state
Modular responsivity
Intellectual Ability Education
Training
Critical thinking
Logical competence
Rationality
Feedback
Pattern Recognition
Repetition
Rational
override
Dysrationalia
override
Calibration Diagnosis Patient
Presentation
Pattern
Processor
RECOGNIZED
TYPE
1 processes
TYPE
2 processes
NOT
RECOGNIZED
Consciously competent
Learn
Unconsciously competent
Practice Lapse
Unconsciously incompetent
Consciously incompetent
Assess System 2
System 1 System 1
System 2
Say OUT LOUD what you
see on the next slide
WITHOUT STANDING ON YOUR
HEAD
I MEAN IT!
BIG BREATH IN….and…….
>100 cognitive biases
• Anchoring bias – early salient feature
• Ascertainment bias – thinking shaped by prior expectation
• Availability bias – recent experience dominates evidence
• Bandwagon effect – we do it this way here
• Omission bias – natural disease progression preferred to those occurring due to action of physician
• Sutton’s slip – going for the obvious
• Gambler’s fallacy – I’ve seen 3 recently; this can’t be a fourth
• Search satisficing – found one thing, ignore others
• Vertical line failure – routine repetitive tasks leading to thinking in silo
• Blind spot bias – other people are susceptible to these biases but I am not
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%
Diclofenac prescribing as a percentage of total NSAIDs
EAST MIDLANDS
EAST OF ENGLAND
LONDON
NORTH EAST
NORTH WEST
SOUTH CENTRAL
SOUTH EAST COAST
SOUTH WEST
WEST MIDLANDS
YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER
ENGLAND
TRUE OR FALSE
Health care professionals over- or under-implement high
quality evidence in their own practice because they are:-
• Unintelligent
• Lazy
• Uncaring
• Uncommitted
What do we know about how people
make decisions?
• Behavioural economics and cognitive psychology:
– Bounded rationality (Herbert Simon 1978)
– Dual process theory (Daniel Kahneman 2002)
– Most decisions are informed by brief reading and
talking to other people
DECISION MAKERS (THAT’S ALL OF US) KNOWING
HOW THEY (YOU) MAKE DECISIONS HAS TO BE
BETTER THAN THEM (YOU!) NOT KNOWING
R N L I
Research National guidance
Local Care Pathway
Individual
bia
s
bias
bias
bias
bias
bia
s
bia
s
bia
s
74
1. Make realistic plans to keep up to
date and follow them:-
– Hunting: find the best possible answer to a specific
question and recognise it as such, quickly and efficiently.
– Foraging: be alerted to new, important, relevant, valid information that requires a change in practice
– Hot synching: update your brain once or twice a year on the (max) 30-40 conditions you see most frequently
• Apart from hunting, give up reading primary research – you have one golden hour a week (that’s all)
• HOT SYNCH
– Read or listen to summaries of evidence from trusted sources
– ONLY about conditions YOU see commonly
• Get a FORAGING service sorted
– 2 or 3 times a week, key new research, summarised for you and set in the context of the rest of the evidence
– E.g. Evidence Summaries
• HUNT when you’re stuck
– Information Mastery pyramid
76
• Finding the best answer, not just an
answer
• Finding it easily (and quickly) when
we need to
• Recognising it when we’ve found it
So……..for hunting……
Pre-digested sources of evidence
from trusted sources: Public-sector ethos
Published methodology of how produced
Translation of evidence into practice
Context of the rest of the evidence
Cochrane
NICE, SIGN
EBM DTB
“Ivy League” journals
Evidence Summaries
Clinical Evidence
CKS
Textbooks
Use
fuln
ess
Medline
Self-assembly, Essential Evidence Plus, Evidence Search
UptoDate, Dynamed?
Context Ambient conditions
Task difficulty
Task ambiguity
Affective state
Modular responsivity
Intellectual Ability Education
Training
Critical thinking
Logical competence
Rationality
Feedback
Pattern Recognition
Repetition
Rational
override
Dysrationalia
override
Calibration Diagnosis Patient
Presentation
Pattern
Processor
RECOGNIZED
TYPE
1 processes
TYPE
2 processes
NOT
RECOGNIZED
• Consider alternatives
Routinely think: “if I am wrong what else might this be”
ROWcS
• Seek incongruent data
Don’t be afraid to try and prove you are wrong
• Reframe when recording
Mentally reconsider meaning
Reassess the associations YOU have created
• Reconsider dissonant facts
Take a step back from the problem
Six Quick Questions
Please find a piece of paper and write down your
answers to each of these six questions
You have about 10 seconds for each response
On a fire engine, there are 2 drivers
up front, one at the rear and four
additional fire-fighters.
What is the total personnel required
for 5 standard trucks?
In 2008, the average time required to
complete a root cause analysis was
15½ hours, how much time should be
allowed for the three that are
expected next month?
A bat and a ball cost £1.10 in total.
The bat costs £1.00 more than the
ball.
How much does the ball cost?
If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to
make 5 widgets, how long would it
take 100 machines to make 100
widgets?
In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads.
Every day, the patch doubles in size.
If it takes 48 days for the patch to
cover the entire lake, how long would
it take for the patch to cover half the
lake?
Answers
A. 35
B. 2
C. 46½ hours
____________________________________
D. The ball costs 5p and the bat £1.05
E. 5 minutes
F. 47 days
Cognitive Reflective Test
• The test distinguishes intuitive (system 1) from analytical (system 2) processing….
• …….the ability to resist first response that comes to mind
• Of 3428 people tested only 17% got all 3 correct
• 33% answered all three incorrectly
Frederick 2002 (MIT)
3. Work on our own metacognition Personal strategies for improved performance
• Thinking about thinking (whilst its happening)
Right system at the right time
Reflect on the affective process
When do I need to slow down / be very careful
• Decrease reliance on memory
Use cognitive aids (but use them wisely):
Decision support, mnemonics, guidelines, algorithms etc.
• Try to make tasks easier
e.g. Calculate drug doses on paper (not in your head)
DECISION MAKING IS A BIG DEAL
Think kindly, say something nice, even
work with me and my colleagues as
we pilot some innovative stuff.
Summary
• Decision making
– Be aware of what system you are using (metacognition)
– Calibrate routinely
– Teach this to others (gently)
• Information Management
– Make a plan and stick to it
– Use predigested summaries (apart from hunting)
– Think relevance first, then validity
• Staying up to date
– Hot synching (most useful)
– Foraging (emotional need mostly, but do it)
– Hunting (still tricky; predigested summaries first)