8/12/2019 Does Talmud Teach Bestiality

1/6

Does Talmud Teach Bestiality,

Pedophilia, Incest?

March 24, 2014

Pedophiliaand Bestiality are seeping into popular culture.

Could the Talmud be the source?

Elizabeth Dilling (!"#$"%%& did more than anyone to e'pose the

true nature o one o )udaism*s holiest boo+s.

http://henrymakow.com/pedophiliathe_next_frontier.htmlhttp://henrymakow.com/2013/12/do-furry-people-have-minority-rights.htmlhttp://henrymakow.com/2014/03/Heroes%20Heroes-of-the-Resistance-Elizabeth-Dilling.htmlhttp://henrymakow.com/2013/12/do-furry-people-have-minority-rights.htmlhttp://henrymakow.com/2014/03/Heroes%20Heroes-of-the-Resistance-Elizabeth-Dilling.htmlhttp://henrymakow.com/pedophiliathe_next_frontier.html

8/12/2019 Does Talmud Teach Bestiality

2/6

By Elizabeth Dilling

(from The Jewish Religion:Its Influence Today, pp. 22-23)

St. Paul, who had been a Pharisee,often bores Christians

who do not know what he was arguing about, in his discourses

haranguing Pharisees. But one familiar with the Talmud can

appreciate his diatribe against the "uncleanness" of those, "Whochanged the truth of od into a lie" and! "Professing themseles

to be wise, the# became fools," until "od gae them oer to a

reprobate mind ... . Being filled with all unrighteousness,

fornication, wickedness ... ." ($omans %!&&, &', &).

f the "sacred" Talmudic teachings of the "*ages," presered

since '++ .-. and taught more widel# toda# than eer before

in TalmudTorah schools in the /.*.., perhaps nothing betterillustrates "fools" with "reprobate minds" than the teaching in

the Talmud book of Yebamoth.

lthough 0oses commanded that if a woman hae intercoursewith a beast, both should be killed (1eiticus &+!%2), and that a

priest must not marr# a harlot or woman who is profane (1e.&%!3), the Talmud teaches that "unnatural intercourse does not

cause a woman to be forbidden to marr# a 4igh Priest," sincethen "#ou will find no woman eligible ... ." (5olios '6a'6b)

$ulings of the "sages" follow! " woman who had intercourse

with a beast is eligible to marr# a priest een a 4igh

Priest." ... 7f she had intercourse with a dog while sweeping thefloor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure, and suitable. 5or,

"The result of such intercourse being regarded as a merewound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentall#

in8ured h#men as a dis9ualification does not regard such asintercourse either."

This alone gies a fair idea of the s#stematic deformation of

*cripture b# the Pharisees and the truthfulness of Christ:sdenunciations about their making od:s commandments of none

effect b# their Tradition. (0atthew %'!2)

BABIES

http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt05.htmlhttp://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt05.html

8/12/2019 Does Talmud Teach Bestiality

3/6

Bab# bo#s ma# alwa#s be used as sub8ects for sodom# b#

grown men, according to the Talmud. (The Pharisaic subterfuge

here is that until a child reaches se;ual maturit#, capable ofse;ual intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence

Biblical laws against sodom# (pederast#) do not appl#.Throughout the Talmud "nine #ears and one da#" is the fictitious

age of male maturit#.

1ikewise, under "nine #ears and one da#," the "first stage of

intercourse" of a bo# with the mother, or an# grown woman, is

harmless, Talmudicall#. hammai, to seem more "strict," lowersthe age to eight #ears in some cases. (*ee

8/12/2019 Does Talmud Teach Bestiality

4/6

Thus, once again do the Pharisees make the commandments of

od of "none effect" as Christ said. (0atthew %'!2, 0ark 3!%>)

INCEST

0oses ordered the priests that! "The# shall not take a wife thatis a whore, or profane ... for he is hol# unto his od." (1eiticus

&%!3) The laws against incest are most ehement! "The

nakedness of th# mother, shalt thou not uncoer! she is th#

mother ... (1eiticus %!3) nd in the Talmud the Pharisee"sages" reerse these Biblical in8unctions!

"7f a woman sported lewdl# with her #oung son, a minor and he

committed the first stage of cohabitation with her Beth*hammai sa#, he thereb# renders her unfit to the Priesthood."4ere a footnote e;plains that she could not marr# a priest, if

this made her profane and the aboe 1eiticus &%!3 is cited

precisel#. (*ee

8/12/2019 Does Talmud Teach Bestiality

5/6

that of intercourse with a dead woman D5ootnote %'E een

though she died as a married woman." Thus one is "e;onerated"

for, or permitted, intercourse with dead relaties or withrelaties, married or single, "with a rela;ed membrum," because

"no fertiliFation can possibl# result." (Talmud, ?ebamoth ''b,*ee )

7ntercourse with dead bodies was an old pagan practice. The

aboe is echoed with some ariation in "the chief repositor# of

the criminal law of the Talmud," the book of *anhedrin. (*ee

) ?et

some of 4is followers call these abominators of eer# decenc#

"od:s Chosen People" and "People of the Book"G

Sour'e(

8/12/2019 Does Talmud Teach Bestiality

6/6

That.s virtall+ all he has to sa+ in this tome concernin' $rthdodo )daism.s holiest

boo/ and the font of its halacha& Goldha'en is so slo%%+ he doesn.t even distin'ish

between the Talmd avli and the Talmd ershalmi !the former is athoritative, the

latter is not#& Nor does he dare to e%ond on the (alle'ed teachin's( of the (Talmd(

that have cased it to be (demoni*ed&(

This claim %resents a lo'ical challen'e: how does one demoni*e a boo/ that itself

demoni*es the New Testament, )ess hrist, "is Mother Mar+ and 'o+im in 'eneral3

an one accratel+ sa+ that Goldha'en has (demoni*ed( (Mein am%f(3 "ow does one

'o abot demoni*in' the Talmd avli, a boo/ of %orno'ra%hic lies, 'ro% defamation

and advocac+ of theft, mrder and deceit3

The ab+lonian !(avli(# Talmd is the sorce of mch of the informed %rotest a'ainst

$rthodo rabbinic do'ma, from eminent athorities sch as Dr& leander Mcal of

in'.s olle'e 5ondon& Goldha'en %refers to discss at len'th the cartoonish (6rotocols

of 7ion,( whose %rovenance is hi'hl+ 8estionable, rather than e%lain to his readers

how the docmented bi'otr+, racism and self-worshi% in the Talmd avli came to be

enshrined as the ot'rowth of 6harisaic !i&e& Mishnaic# %ost-Tem%le )daism and its

derivative tets: Mishneh Torah, 9hlchan rch, Mishnah errah, etc&

$n %& 2 Goldha'en ma/es risible com%arisons between the lrid, %robabl+ fa/ed

(6rotocols( and the well-researched writin' of two eminent critics of ;sraeli

colonialism, 6rofessors Mearsheimer and