1
1010 ICOMS 2011—Abstracts: Invited Papers multidisciplinary pre-surgical examination for a well-established treatment planning. The primary curative intent of the onco- logical treatment and the prognosis for later prosthodontic rehabilitation have to be taken into account too. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.852 13 State of the art in implant anchored facial prosthesis V.S. Konstantinovic Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia The main problem in maxillofacial prosthodontic is retention of prosthesis. The introduction of implants improves prosthesis stability and therefore the qual- ity of the life of the patients. However there are certain problems in everyday practice. There are some specifics of maxillofacial implantology: explicit anatomical relation to the intracranial structures; less bone quality and quantity; more compact bone; irradiated tissues. Lack of the bone limits use of conven- tional screw like implants. Also, implant survival in irradiated tissues is much lower. Implantation during the primary surgical procedure is not recommended in patients who will undergo postoperative irradia- tion. According to the literature, there is no type of implant which could be considered as superior for the implanta- tion in the irradiated bone. Many studies shows, that the increasing of time inter- val between irradiation and implantation could be of great importance for implant survival. However, there are only few stud- ies performed in humans, so there is no unique protocol concerning to the time of implant placement. Basally oseointegrated implants (disk implants) present excellent alternative in irradiated patients. Patients with auricular, nasal and orbital implant anchored prosthesis will be presented. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.853 14 Does screening for oral cancer saves lives? P. Chaturvedi Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India Oral cancer is one of the commonest cancer in Indian men (12.6 per 100 000) and com- mon in women also. It is the leading cause of cancer related deaths in Indian men. Internationally it is the eighth most com- mon malignancy reported associated with high mortality rate. It is common among illiterates and those with low income, poor hygiene, poor nutrition and tobacco/areca nut users. Though Oral cancer is one of the best model of screening amongst all human cancers, most of the patients present at a late stage of disease and die in the same year as the year of diagnosis. A cluster ran- domized trial in south of India showed that screening of oral cancer reduced mortality due to oral cancer in high risk popula- tion. The screening test used in that trial was “visual examination by health work- ers”. Such an intervention is most suited for impoverished nations because it is cheap and reasonably accurate. The sensitivity and specificity are generally of a high order with the pooled average of six stud- ies have yielded a reasonable sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of the visual inspection can be improved by appropri- ate standardization and training of the screening individual. Needless to say that, research to develop non invasive diagnostic tools (spectroscopy, salivary test, etc.) that can not only improve but also expedite the diagnosis are need of the hour. It seems that screening and subsequent prompt diagno- sis may lead to significant reduction of oral cancer incidence and mortality rate. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.854 15 Contemporary management of paranasal sinus tumors R.A. Ord Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA This presentation will review the com- plex anatomy of the paranasal sinuses with emphasis on the maxillary sinus. The diverse nature of the tumours of this region, surgical approaches and classification is discussed. Specific areas of controversy to be examined are the management of the neck, management of the globe/orbit, and the role of craniofacial resection. The presentation will also discuss the current emergence of primary reconstruction of the maxillectomy defect utilizing microvascu- lar free flaps. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.855 16 Management of lip malignancies J.C. Roldán 1,2 1 Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Plastic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany 2 Facial Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Clinic for Facial Plastic Surgery, Hamburg, Germany Lips are commonly involved by non- melanoma skin cancer. Basal cell carci- noma (BCC) involves predominantly the upper lip (skin), whereas squamous cell carcinoma (SSC) the lower lip (vermil- ion). Lip cancer in the earlier stages has a good prognosis. Advanced stages of BCC with bone infiltration are surgically and oncologically very challenging. SCC of the lower lip with lymph node metastasis has a poor prognosis. Surgical techniques for tumour resection play a critical role on the functional and aesthetic outcome. The vermilionectomy, as a supplementary treat- ment of lower lip carcinoma in presence of actinic cheilitis, improves the oncological outcome. An algorithm for lip reconstruction will be presented. The concept is based on the length of the resulted lip defect. The authors choose a rectangular excision and a bilateral step stair technique according to Johanson for lower lip defects up to 2/3 of the lip length. For lower lip defects >2/3 an Abbe flap is supplemented with Johanson plasty. In subtotal lower lip defects a double Abbe flap and a Johanson plasty is the first choice. For an upper lip defect up to 1/3 of the lip a rectangular resection with inclu- sion of a crescentic peri-alar skin excision is recommended. Upper lip defects >than 1/3 of the lip are repaired with an Abbe flap and a Johanson plasty in the lower lip (donor area). Upper lip defects including more than 2/3 of the lip are reconstructed with the techniques mentioned before and supplemented by nasolabial flaps. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.856 17 Long-term outcomes in complete uclp and bclp U. Joos Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany Anyone who has treated CLP knows the problems associated with skeletal growth occurring during treatment. There were numerous attempts to find out the source of these problems to improve treatment. It was assumed that a growth deficit results

Does screening for oral cancer saves lives?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Does screening for oral cancer saves lives?

1 ape

mfTllb

d

1SaV

o

TpTpiaTitqi

tsIpwtictsvcsiuiiawa

d

1DsP

H

Oimo

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.855

010 ICOMS 2011—Abstracts: Invited P

ultidisciplinary pre-surgical examinationor a well-established treatment planning.he primary curative intent of the onco-

ogical treatment and the prognosis forater prosthodontic rehabilitation have toe taken into account too.

oi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.852

3tate of the art in implantnchored facial prosthesis.S. Konstantinovic

Clinic of Maxillofacial Surgery, Universityf Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

he main problem in maxillofacialrosthodontic is retention of prosthesis.he introduction of implants improvesrosthesis stability and therefore the qual-ty of the life of the patients. However therere certain problems in everyday practice.here are some specifics of maxillofacial

mplantology: explicit anatomical relationo the intracranial structures; less boneuality and quantity; more compact bone;rradiated tissues.

Lack of the bone limits use of conven-ional screw like implants. Also, implanturvival in irradiated tissues is much lower.mplantation during the primary surgicalrocedure is not recommended in patientsho will undergo postoperative irradia-

ion. According to the literature, theres no type of implant which could beonsidered as superior for the implanta-ion in the irradiated bone. Many studieshows, that the increasing of time inter-al between irradiation and implantationould be of great importance for implanturvival. However, there are only few stud-es performed in humans, so there is nonique protocol concerning to the time ofmplant placement. Basally oseointegratedmplants (disk implants) present excellentlternative in irradiated patients. Patientsith auricular, nasal and orbital implant

nchored prosthesis will be presented.

oi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.853

4oes screening for oral cancer

aves lives?. Chaturvedi

Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorialospital, Mumbai, India

ral cancer is one of the commonest cancern Indian men (12.6 per 100 000) and com-on in women also. It is the leading cause

f cancer related deaths in Indian men.

rs

Internationally it is the eighth most com-mon malignancy reported associated withhigh mortality rate. It is common amongilliterates and those with low income, poorhygiene, poor nutrition and tobacco/arecanut users. Though Oral cancer is one of thebest model of screening amongst all humancancers, most of the patients present at alate stage of disease and die in the sameyear as the year of diagnosis. A cluster ran-domized trial in south of India showed thatscreening of oral cancer reduced mortalitydue to oral cancer in high risk popula-tion. The screening test used in that trialwas “visual examination by health work-ers”. Such an intervention is most suited forimpoverished nations because it is cheapand reasonably accurate. The sensitivityand specificity are generally of a highorder with the pooled average of six stud-ies have yielded a reasonable sensitivityand specificity. The accuracy of the visualinspection can be improved by appropri-ate standardization and training of thescreening individual. Needless to say that,research to develop non invasive diagnostictools (spectroscopy, salivary test, etc.) thatcan not only improve but also expedite thediagnosis are need of the hour. It seems thatscreening and subsequent prompt diagno-sis may lead to significant reduction of oralcancer incidence and mortality rate.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.854

15Contemporary management ofparanasal sinus tumorsR.A. OrdOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universityof Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

This presentation will review the com-plex anatomy of the paranasal sinuseswith emphasis on the maxillary sinus. Thediverse nature of the tumours of this region,surgical approaches and classification isdiscussed. Specific areas of controversyto be examined are the management ofthe neck, management of the globe/orbit,and the role of craniofacial resection. Thepresentation will also discuss the currentemergence of primary reconstruction of themaxillectomy defect utilizing microvascu-lar free flaps.

16Management of lip malignancies

J.C. Roldán 1,2

1 Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Plastic Surgery,University of Regensburg, Regensburg,Germany2 Facial Plastic Reconstructive andAesthetic Surgery, Clinic for Facial PlasticSurgery, Hamburg, Germany

Lips are commonly involved by non-melanoma skin cancer. Basal cell carci-noma (BCC) involves predominantly theupper lip (skin), whereas squamous cellcarcinoma (SSC) the lower lip (vermil-ion). Lip cancer in the earlier stages has agood prognosis. Advanced stages of BCCwith bone infiltration are surgically andoncologically very challenging. SCC of thelower lip with lymph node metastasis hasa poor prognosis. Surgical techniques fortumour resection play a critical role onthe functional and aesthetic outcome. Thevermilionectomy, as a supplementary treat-ment of lower lip carcinoma in presence ofactinic cheilitis, improves the oncologicaloutcome.

An algorithm for lip reconstruction willbe presented. The concept is based onthe length of the resulted lip defect. Theauthors choose a rectangular excision anda bilateral step stair technique according toJohanson for lower lip defects up to 2/3 ofthe lip length. For lower lip defects >2/3 anAbbe flap is supplemented with Johansonplasty. In subtotal lower lip defects a doubleAbbe flap and a Johanson plasty is the firstchoice. For an upper lip defect up to 1/3 ofthe lip a rectangular resection with inclu-sion of a crescentic peri-alar skin excisionis recommended. Upper lip defects >than1/3 of the lip are repaired with an Abbeflap and a Johanson plasty in the lower lip(donor area). Upper lip defects includingmore than 2/3 of the lip are reconstructedwith the techniques mentioned before andsupplemented by nasolabial flaps.

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.856

17Long-term outcomes in completeuclp and bclpU. JoosCranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, MuensterUniversity Hospital, Muenster, Germany

Anyone who has treated CLP knows theproblems associated with skeletal growth

occurring during treatment. There werenumerous attempts to find out the sourceof these problems to improve treatment. Itwas assumed that a growth deficit results