DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001 1 US CMS US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001

1

US CMS US CMS

US CMS Detector Project Overview

Dan Green

US CMS Project Manager

DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001


2

OutlineOutline

• Project Status - Financial– FY98+99 Closeout, 1 year “rolling”

closeout

• Schedule Changes (V31)– Installation -and Commissioning

• Technical Progress


3

US CMS - DOE, NSF ProfileUS CMS - DOE, NSF Profile

US CMS balance between DOE and NSF funds is roughly correct. We have modified I&C planning to match the CMS V31 schedule. NSF ends in FY03.

US CMS DOE Funding and Commitments

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05

Fiscal Year

Am

ount (A

Y $

M)

DOE Funding

Commitments

US CMS NSF Funding and Commitments

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05

Fiscal Year

Am

ount (A

Y $

M)

NSF Funding

Commitments


4

US CMS Detector ProjectUS CMS Detector Project

No trends are evident. No “divergence”.

Monthly Tracking

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Jun

-98

Se

p-9

8

De

c-9

8

Ma

r-9

9

Jun

-99

Se

p-9

9

De

c-9

9

Ma

r-0

0

Jun

-00

Se

p-0

0

De

c-0

0

Ma

r-0

1

AY

M$ Cum BCWS

Cum BCWP

Cum Obl

Tracking Monthly Performance

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Jun

-98

Se

p-9

8

De

c-9

8

Ma

r-9

9

Jun

-99

Se

p-9

9

De

c-9

9

Ma

r-0

0

Jun

-00

Se

p-0

0

De

c-0

0

Ma

r-0

1

BCWP/BCWS

ACWP/BCWP

Obl/BCWS


5

Financial Overview - I Financial Overview - I

• BCWS 84.0 AYM$

• BCWP 74.1

• Obligations 80.6

• Paid Actuals 64.6

• Obligations/BCWS 96 %

• BCWP/BCWS 88 %

• Paid Actuals/BCWP 87 %

We are getting the funds out to groups and we are getting the jobs under contract. There is some lag in schedule/reporting and in invoicing.


6

% Complete at L2% Complete at L2

The CP is ~ completed up to progress payments. ECAL, EMU and HCAL are > 50% complete, while Tridas and FPIX are only ~ 25% complete

% Complete at L2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

EM

U

HC

AL

TRID

AS

EC

AL

FP

IX

CP

PO

SiT

rkr

% C

om

ple

te


7

CSC - Labor ExperienceCSC - Labor Experience

Early experience on

CSC assembly is

favorable. Now have ~ 35 of 148 CSC

Muon CMS Production Status at FNAL

Panels Production at Axxiom.

-100

400

900

1400

1900

2400

2900

1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177Week in production

Nu

mb

er

of

Pa

ne

ls

Shortage/surplus

DONE=1594

FY99 FY00 FY02FY01 FY03

Goal=2940 panels(420 chambers @ 7 panels/ch.)

Over 50% of Production Completed

Muon CMS Production Status at FNAL

Panels Production at GERBER

-100

400

900

1400

1900

2400

2900

1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177Week in production

Nu

mb

er

of

Pa

ne

ls

Shortage/surplus

DONE=1355

FY99 FY00 FY02FY01

Goal=2520 panels(420 chambers @ 6 panels/ch.)

Over 50% of Production Completed

CSC Production at MP9(ME234/2)

-40

0

40

80

120

Month in production

Nu

mb

er o

f Ch

amb

ers

Shortage

DONE

Goal = 148 Chambers

FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03


8

HCAL - M&S Cost ExperienceHCAL - M&S Cost Experience

HB-1 pre-assembled at Felguera. Shipped to CERN . Megatiles will be inserted in bldg # 186. The mating of optics to absorber will begin at CERN in CY 2001.


9

HB OPTICS - Labor ExperienceHB OPTICS - Labor Experience

Labor experience for CSC and for HCAL optics has been good. This is the bulk of US CMS labor costs.

M&S ~ OK, Labor ~ OK ==> worry about electronics (schedule) and installation (EDIA too).

CMS HCAL Production

01836547290

108126144162180198216234252270288306324342360378396414432450468486504522540558576594612630

week of

Me

ga

tile

s

Scintillator "Goal"

Final Assy. "Goal"

Covers "Goal"

Scintillator Machined

Covers Machined

Completed Megatiles

18 megatiles per layer

17 layers per wedge

18 wedges per HB

2 HB's

50% 306 tiles

60% 367 tiles

70% 428 tiles

80% 490 tiles

90% 551 tiles

100% 612 tiles

P r epar ed by: T odd Nebel week ending 4/28/01

( HB+ / HB-)Scint=507 82% (100% / 64%)Cover=540 87% (100% / 75%)Tile=478 77% (100% / 54%)


10

Closeout of Completed TasksCloseout of Completed Tasks

• FY96 - 99 completed tasks have been closed.

• The ACWP can be compared to the BCWS for CV on these tasks.

• In future tasks with end dates more than one year ago which are reported complete will be closed.


11

Contingency Usage and PerformanceContingency Usage and Performance

We have 34 months of monthly reporting. CR can be followed at any level of detail needed. We need to watch contingency following the SiTrkr baselineing.

Contingency/ETC vs Percent Complete

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Jun-

98

Oct

-98

Feb

-99

Jun-

99

Oct

-99

Feb

-00

Jun-

00

Oct

-00

Feb

-01

BCWP/BAC

Cont/(BAC-BCWP)


12

Financial Overview - IIFinancial Overview - II

• TPC = Constant 167.25 (AYM$)

• BAC 138.2

• Contingency = TPC - BAC 29.0

• ETC = BAC - BCWP 64.1

• BCWP/BAC 54 %

• Contingency/ETC 45 %

We have a fixed total cost. We are 54 % complete and retain 45% contingency on the estimated cost to complete.


13

US CMS Contingency UseUS CMS Contingency Use

We started with 48.7 M$ in contingency. We have used 19.7 M$, retain 29.0 M$, and we are 54% complete. Of the increase, ~ 7 M$ is due to scope increases, so we have used ~12.7 M$ on better estimates of > BCWP = 74.1 M$ tasks (<17 %).

US CMS Cost Increases

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

EM

U

HC

AL

TRID

AS

EC

AL

FP

IX

CP

PO

SiT

rkr

L2 Subsystem

AY

(M

$) Scope

EAC-Base


14

US CMS Revised ML1US CMS Revised ML1


15

LHC - V31LHC - V31

• Single beam in LHC 1/06

• 2 months LHC, then run 1 month

• shutdown - complete CMS 4/06

• start run at 10^33 for 10 fb-1 8/06

Planning for installation and commissioning uses V31 for scheduling and planning. Note that late B.O. in UX means increased US CMS costs.


W. Mason, F. Feyzi - UW/PSL

Test of CSC Installation fixture

Fully balanced chamber can rotate to any angle Counterweight

Balance limits w/ or w/o chamber

Installation of CSCInstallation of CSC


17

HCAL Critical Path - V31HCAL Critical Path - V31ID ML? Task Name Start Duration Finish Slack1 HCAL System (WBS 1.2) Jan 04 '99 1465 days Aug 16 '04 NA2 M L3 HB: Start Absorber and Optics Production Jan 04 '99 0 days Jan 04 '99 NA

3 HB-1 Absorber Production Jan 04 '99 400 days Jul 14 '00 536 days

4 HB+1 Absorber Production Sep 01 '00 260 days Aug 30 '01 536 days

5 HB-1 Optical Production Jan 04 '99 360 days M ay 19 '00 446 days

6 HB+1 Optical Production M ay 22 '00 385 days Nov 09 '01 446 days

7 Install Optics into HB-1 M ay 15 '01 115 days Oct 22 '01 549 days

8 Install Optics into HB+1 Jan 04 '02 50 days M ar 14 '02 446 days

9 HB-1, HB+1: ODU Installation on Absorber M ay 26 '03 30 days Jul 04 '03 135 days

10 HB-1, HB+1: System Integration Jul 07 '03 20 days Aug 01 '03 135 days

11 Trial Insertion of HB-1/HB+1 in Vacuum Tank Feb 09 '04 10 days Feb 20 '04 NA

12 Assemble HE-1 & Install HE-1 Optics Apr 15 '02 62 days Jul 09 '02 293 days

13 HE-1: ODU Installation on Absorber Aug 25 '03 30 days Oct 03 '03 70 days

14 HE-1: System Integration Oct 06 '03 20 days Oct 31 '03 70 days

15 Assemble HE+1 & Install HE+1 Optics Sep 09 '02 100 days Jan 24 '03 250 days

16 HE+1: ODU Installation on Absorber Apr 22 '03 30 days Jun 02 '03 159 days

17 HE+1: System Integration Jun 03 '03 20 days Jun 30 '03 159 days

18 M L2 HO Optics Installation on YB Completed Dec 15 '03 30 days Jan 23 '04 37 days

19 M L1 Close Yoke and Start M agnet Test in SX5 M ar 17 '04 0 days M ar 17 '04 NA

20 M L3 HCAL Readout Box Production Start Apr 16 '01 0 days Apr 16 '01 NA

21 HB Readout Box Production (+ integration tests) Apr 16 '01 550 days M ay 23 '03 135 days

22 HE Readout Box Production (+ integration tests) Sep 17 '01 505 days Aug 22 '03 70 days

23 HO Readout Box Production (+ integration tests) Apr 05 '02 441 days Dec 12 '03 37 days

24 M L3 HCAL HPD Procurement & Testing Start Jan 07 '02 0 days Jan 07 '02 NA

25 HCAL HPD Deliver & Test @ UM inn, Ship to FNAL Jan 07 '02 460 days Oct 10 '03 82 days

26 Front-End Electronics Production Jan 04 '99 926 days Jul 22 '02 139 days

27 Front-end Electronics (Explicit Slack) Jul 23 '02 70 days Oct 28 '02 139 days

28 M L2 Complete Front-end Electronics Production Oct 31 '02 0 days Oct 31 '02 NA

29 ASIC Packaging and Testing Oct 29 '02 60 days Jan 20 '03 139 days

30 M ount ASIC's on Boards, Checkout and Burn-In Dec 03 '02 60 days Feb 24 '03 139 days

31 Assemble and Test ODU's, Ship to CERN Dec 31 '02 80 days Apr 21 '03 139 days

32 M L3 Start HE Absorber and Optical Production Jan 31 '00 0 days Jan 31 '00 NA

33 HE Absorber and Optical Production Dubna/Protvino Jan 31 '00 530 days Feb 08 '02 338 days

34 M L2 Start HO Optics Production Oct 01 '99 0 days Oct 01 '99 NA

35 HO Optical Production TATA-(India) Oct 04 '99 500 days Aug 31 '01 632 days

36 M L3 HF Absorber Production Start M ay 31 '01 0 days M ay 31 '01 NA

37 HF Absorber Production (ITEP-Russia) M ay 31 '01 437 days Jan 31 '03 164 days

38 HF Optical Fiber Stuffing (KFKI-Hungary) Nov 30 '01 500 days Oct 30 '03 202 days

39 HF Readout Box Production Nov 30 '01 500 days Oct 30 '03 202 days

40 HF PM T Procurement and Testing Oct 31 '01 500 days Sep 30 '03 164 days

41 Assemble HF Sectors into HF- and HF+ Oct 01 '03 60 days Dec 23 '03 164 days

42 Lower HF-1 IN UX5 Aug 10 '04 0 days Aug 10 '04 NA

43 Lower HF+1 IN UX5 Aug 16 '04 0 days Aug 16 '04 NA

Oct Mar Aug Jan Jun Nov Apr Sep Feb Jul Dec May Oct Mar Aug Jan Jun

99 00 01 02 03 04 05


18

WBS 1 - Endcap MuonWBS 1 - Endcap MuonFinal or next-to final Prototype Boards for all on-chamber electronics produced and tested.

CSC

CFEBCFEBCFEB CFEB

ALCT

CFEB

LVDB


19

Off-Chamber ElectronicsOff-Chamber Electronics

MPC

CCB

DMB

CLCT

TMB

VME

Control

DDU-99

DMB-99CLCT-99TMB-99

CCB-99

First Prototype Boards produced and tested (8.99)


20

Location of Peripheral CratesLocation of Peripheral Crates

YE2 walkway showing 600 sector of ME2 and VME crate


21

• Over 20,000 scintillator tiles built and measured

• RMS of fibers = 4.4%• RMS of tiles = 6.5%• RMS of wire/coll =

1.2%• RMS of average layer

light yield = 4.6%

WBS 2 - HCALWBS 2 - HCAL

Optical Production


22

HF - EDIA, FNAL -> RDMSHF - EDIA, FNAL -> RDMS

0.5 cm spacing, packing fraction, source tubes, edge chamfer design complete.

Redesign was US scope increase.


23

HPD - Anti-ReflectionHPD - Anti-Reflection

Reflection at 510 nm

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

angle[deg]

R

Measured Reflectance of 14nm A-SiH on top of thin Al layer

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

400 450 500 550 600 650 700

Wavelength[nm]

Re

fle

cta

nc

e

Angular “acceptance” and numerical aperture. Wavelength “acceptance”

and photocathode response


24

QIE Status - OK QIE Status - OK

• Input Amplifiers/Splitters: design finished, layout done.

• Integrators: design finished, layout partially done.

• FADC: design finished, layout done

• Range comparators and ranging logic: not done

• Biasing network: not done

• State machine, timing: design being worked on now

• LVDS drivers, receivers: not done

• Other digital logic: not done

Total design submitted - on track so far - minor slippage.

Yarema group is on track with their schedule


25

WBS 3.1 TriggerWBS 3.1 Trigger

• TDR Finished and available as CERN/LHCC 2000-038, CMS TDR 6.1December 15, 2000

• Met Level 1 Milestone for submission to LHCC by end of 2000.

• Approved by LHCC, March, 2001


26

Calorimeter Trigger StatusCalorimeter Trigger Status(U. Wisconsin)(U. Wisconsin)

• Successful Prototyping Program– Crate, 160 MHz Backplane & Clock Card – Receiver & Electron Isolation Cards tested– Adder ASIC tested & production finished– 4 Gbit/sec Copper 20 m link system tested

• ASIC Prototypes– Tested* Phase & Boundary Scan delivered– Tested* Isolation & Sort delivered

• *Tested by Vitesse• Testing Program Plans

– Next generation Backplane finished– Next generation Receiver, Elect. Iso. Cards– Next generation Copper Link

• New Vitesse Chip (72147216)– Test delivered ASIC prototypes

• Simulation Program– New ORCA4 results verify performance


27

Muon Trigger System TestsMuon Trigger System Tests

• Muon Port Card (Rice) Sector Receiver (UCLA)– Data successfully sent from input of one MPC, through 100m of

optical cables, to output of SR• Sector Receiver Sector Processor (Florida)

– Data successfully sent from input of one SR, through custom backplane, into the SP

– Successfully sent data from three SRs connected to the SP to emulate an entire trigger sector

• Clock and Control Board prototype (Rice)– Distributed clock & control signals w/ programmable delays

• Port Card Sector Receiver Sector Processor– Successfully sent data from the input of two MPCs (representing

ME2 and ME3), through one SR, and reconstructed tracks correctly in the SP

– Complete chain test using simulated data from ORCA4


28

WBS 3.2 DAQWBS 3.2 DAQ

• The DAQ effort continues in an R&D phase - watching and evaluating commercial developments.

• The ML1 for DAQ is the TDR, due in 2002, postponed 1 year.

• Paris Sphicas is US CMS L2 DAQ manager and CMS L2 PRS manager. Much work on forming and launching the 4 PRS groups has been accomplished.


29

WBS 4 - ECALWBS 4 - ECAL• Avalanche Photodiodes

– final structure selected.– Neutron Source operational.

• Front-End Electronics– FPPA pilot wafers back and under test.– Honeywell Bit-serializer dropped, moved to

CERN group.

• Monitor Laser– Preparation for shipping laser to CERN.


30

FPPA2000 (UHF1x)FPPA2000 (UHF1x)

The FPPA is in final preproduction. The responsibility has shifted from Princeton to LBNL. Evaluation is in train.


31

1.E-07

1.E-06

1.E-05

1.E-04

1.E-03

0 100 200 300 400 500Reverse Bias (V)

Lea

kag

e C

urr

en t

(A) Pixel Current

Guard Ring Current

After = 1x1014 p/cm2

increase in current after 300V(2-8)% noisy channels (PSI)With = 6x1014 p/cm2

same I with pixels at -100C

FPix. Sensors, 1st Subm.

Sensor Submission

Before irradiation90% of pixels have Vbrkdwn >300V

WBS 5 - FPIXWBS 5 - FPIX


32

VHDI for Row of 5 ROCs

Test Station

VHDI - PrototypeVHDI - Prototype


33

Assembly of Detectors;NIKON coord. meas.Need 672 units

Assembly of Butterflies;OMIS II meas. coord.Need 96 units

SiDet Assembly R&DSiDet Assembly R&D


34

150 m

= 14 mover pixel

Pixels at 20o to beam

150 m / 12 = 43 m = 46 mover pixel

Charge sharing vs position

Charge sharing vs position

Pixels normal to beam

150 m

D:\LHM\2001\Presentations\Plenary Presentations\For Dan \Cern Test Result.ppt

CERN Test Beam CERN Test Beam


35

WBS 8 - SiTrkrWBS 8 - SiTrkr


36

Preparation for Pre-ProductionPreparation for Pre-Production

Mock-up frames for training gantries

KSU Probe Station


37

WBS 6 - Common ProjectsWBS 6 - Common Projects


38

Detector Project SummaryDetector Project Summary

• M&S cost experience has been good.• The labor for CSC and HCAL absorber has

been well estimated.• Contingency use has been good enough to allow

for modest scope increases - SiTrkr• Planning for I&C is in train, with cost increases

due to delay and re-estimations.

Documents

DOE/NSF Review May 8-10, 2001 1 US CMS US CMS Detector Project Overview Dan Green US CMS Project Manager DOE/NSF Lehman Review, May 8-10, 2001