Document: Site Investigation Report Yarmouth Road, Blofield · 2016. 4. 5. · SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR A SITE AT YARMOUTH ROAD, BLOFIELD 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE & INTRODUCTION

Document: Site Investigation Report

Project: Yarmouth Road, Blofield

Reference No.: GN18104_SI

Date: February 2014

Prepared for: AJ & R Smith

txgou

20160497 17th mar

Harrison Group Environmental Limited

Report No GN18104_SI

www.harrisongroupuk.com February 2014

HARRISON GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED

Document: Site Investigation Report

Project: Yarmouth Road, Blofield

Reference No.: GN18104_SI

Date: February 2014

Prepared For: A J & R Smith

REPORT STATUS:

Revision Comments Prepared By Approved By Issued By Audited By

0 First issue INIT SF

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE /02/14

INIT EO

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE /02/14

INIT JA

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE /02/14

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE

INIT

SIGN

COMMENTS

DATE




CONTENTS

FOREWORD

1 TERMS OF REFERENCE & INTRODUCTION 4

2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 4

2.1 Environmental Setting 4 2.2 Site History 5

3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT 5

4 SITE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS AND RESULTS 5

4.1 Fieldwork Findings 5 4.2 Soil Chemical Analysis and Assessment 6 4.3 Summary and Implications 7

REFERENCES

LIST OF APPENDICES



www.harrisongroupuk.com February 2014 3

FOREWORD

General Conditions Relating To Site Investigation

This investigation has been devised to generally comply with the relevant principles and requirements

of B.S.10175:2011+A1:2013 ‘Investigation of potentially contaminated sites - Code of practice’,

science report SC050021/SR3 ‘Updated Technical Background to the CLEA Model’ (Environment

Agency, 2008), and Contaminated Land Report 11 ‘Model procedures for the management of

contaminated land’ (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment

Agency, 2004). The recommendations made and opinions expressed in this report are based on the

information obtained from the sources described using a methodology intended to provide

reasonable consistency and robustness.

The opinions expressed in this report are based on the ground conditions revealed by the site works,

together with an assessment of the site and of laboratory test results. Whilst opinions may be

expressed relating to sub-soil conditions in parts of the site not investigated, for example between

exploratory positions, these are only for guidance and no liability can be accepted for their accuracy.

Boring and sampling procedures are undertaken in accordance with B.S.5930:1999+A2:2010 ‘Code

of Practice for Site Investigations’. Likewise in situ and laboratory testing complies with B.S.1377:1990

‘Methods of Tests for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes’, unless stated otherwise in the text.

Chemical Testing has been undertaken by UKAS accredited laboratory.

The groundwater conditions entered on the boring records are those observed at the time of

investigation. The normal rate of boring usually does not permit the recording of an equilibrium water

level for any one water strike. Moreover, groundwater levels are subject to seasonal variation or

changes in local drainage conditions.

Some items of the investigation have been provided by third parties and whilst Harrison Group have

no reason to doubt the accuracy, the items relied on have not been verified. No responsibility can be

accepted for errors within third party items presented in this report.

This report is produced for the benefit of the client alone. No responsibility can be accepted for any

consequences of this information being passed to a third party who may act upon its

contents/recommendations.




SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT

FOR A SITE AT

YARMOUTH ROAD, BLOFIELD

1 TERMS OF REFERENCE & INTRODUCTION

The work covered by this report was undertaken on behalf of A J & R Smith prior to the planned

residential development of the site, shown on appended drawing GN18104-DR001 and located off

Yarmouth Road, Blofield, Norfolk. The centre of the site can be identified by National Grid Reference

632890, 309560.

This report was designed to aid in the planning process, specifically to Broadland District Council

planning application 201111303.

An initial phase one desk study report (contaminated land investigation) has previously been undertaken

for this site by MLM Environmental (722770/R2 dated September 2010). This assessed a very low risk

from contamination although stated that the local authority may require some limited soil sampling and

testing to provide further assessment.

Broadland District Council had reviewed this report and subsequently requested that some further

intrusive investigation be undertaken for a small parcel of the site (southern site area) where it had been

previously used as a car parking area for a ‘pick-your-own’ site. This report refers only to this area

(shown within the red investigation boundary on the attached drawings) and encompasses the findings

of the ground investigation fieldwork, soil chemical testing and further assessment of the risk from

contamination.

The investigation is in accordance with Harrison Group Environmental Limited’s quotation dated 23rd

January 2014 with an emailed instruction from the client dated 24th

January 2014.

The investigation was carried out using available published documentation and MLM Environmental

Preliminary Contamination Assessment Report, in association with an in-situ investigation.

2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The environmental setting background information (geology, hydrology, hydrogeology and database

information) and site history have been researched as part of this report. A summary of the

environmental and geological setting is given in the following sections.

2.1 Environmental Setting

Table 1 below gives background information from mapping, online and literature sources.

Data Source Data Summary

To

po

grap

hy

Topographical plan supplied

by the client.

The site surface was anticipated as having an elevation of approximately

19-20maOD. The site was anticipated to be relatively flat with the

surrounding ground elevation falling gently from the west around to the

north.

Ge

olo

gy

1:50,000 BGS Digital

Mapping.

Due to historic use of the site a shallow depth of Made Ground soils

could exist.

Natural superficial deposits comprising the Happisburgh Glacigenic

Formation - Diamicton (clay).

The ‘solid’ geology was shown to comprise deposits of the Crag Group

(sand and gravel), overlying the Chalk at depth. Both these units are

found at considerable depth beneath the site.




Data Source Data Summary

Hyd

ro

ge

olo

gy

1:625,000 Hydrogeological

Map of England and Wales.

British Geological Survey

Borehole Ref: TG30NW16

Information from the hydrogeological map would indicate that the

groundwater is at approximately 0-5maOD (15-20mbgl - metres below

ground level).

Information from nearby published borehole data would suggest a

shallower groundwater level of around 12mbgl.

Hyd

ro

lo

gy

Environment Agency online

resource

The site is located within a groundwater source protection zone (SPZ) 3,

indicating it lies within the total catchment. An outer zone, SPZ 2, lies

approximately 1km to the south, and an SPZ 1 1.4km to the south,

indicating the direction of groundwater flow may be to the south.

The nearest surface water feature is the River Wensum flowing east,

located over 1.5km to the south. There are no significant surface water

features within 250m of the site.

The site is not considered to be at risk from flooding.

Table 1: Background Information

2.2 Site History

The history of the overall site has been previously summarised in the Preliminary Contamination

Assessment Report by MLM Environmental. The larger site area was summarised as being used as

arable farm land with no previous development within the time zone studied. A haulage depot and car

dealership was noted located immediately to the west of the site although were assessed to be of very

low contamination risk to the site.

Recent correspondence the local authority has revealed that the area to be investigated (a small portion

of the southern site) has more historically been used as a temporary car park for a ‘pick-your-own’ site.

3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT

Contamination hazard identification had been previously undertaken by MLM Environmental Preliminary

Contamination Assessment Report undertaken using source-pathway-receptor principles. The overall

risk to human health and other environmental receptors from the contamination sources identified

(fertilisers and pesticides from agricultural use and hydrocarbon compounds and organic vapours from

off-site sources) was considered very low.

The MLM report did not make mention of the potential contamination risk from the on-site car parking for

the former ‘pick-your-own’ activities. The associated contamination hazard from car-parking includes

hydrocarbons and organic vapours from fuel or oil leaks and spills from the parked cars. Although this

remains a low risk it was considered prudent to undertake some limited site investigation of this car

parking area to further assess this risk. This investigation is presented in the following section.

4 SITE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS AND RESULTS

4.1 Fieldwork Findings

Fieldwork was undertaken on 24th

January 2014 and included five hand augered boreholes (HA1-HA5),

the locations of which are identified on drawing GN18104-DR002. Hand auger records can be found

appended, which detail the soil profile encountered and the sampling regime.

It was initially proposed to undertake machine excavated trial pitting. However, upon commencement of

fieldwork, further information was provided detailing a future archaeological investigation at the site, and

therefore this necessitated replacing large scale pitting with hand augered boreholes.

In general, the site was underlain by made ground to approximately 0.8-1.0m, comprising dark brown

and dark grey gravelly sandy silty clay, with anthropogenic content including concrete and brick. This

corroborates the earlier suspicion that the site may include variable depths of made ground including

soils remaining from the disused car park. Natural soils were described as pale brown to brown silty clay




to termination depth of the boreholes between 1.5-1.9m, and are considered representative of the

Happisburgh Glacigenic Formation (Diamicton).

4.2 Soil Chemical Analysis and Assessment

Two samples of the made ground soils, HA1 ES2 (0.7-0.9m) and HA5 ES1 (0.0-0.2m), were submitted to

a UKAS/MCERTS accredited laboratory for a general suite of analytes including metals, PAH

compounds, hydrocarbons and an asbestos screen.

For an initial screening of soil chemical test results with regard to long-term human health risks, the

results have been compared to Site Assessment Criteria (SAC)/ Soil Guidance Value (SGV) as detailed in

table 2 below. Screening values have been published for a limited number of analytes by the EA for

standard land uses, including commercial and residential land use (with and without gardens). The

SGV/SAC for residential with plant uptake has been conservatively used.

Where contaminant concentrations are below the appropriate published figures, we can be confident

that no significant risk exists for the identified receptors. Where they exceed, a significant risk does not

necessarily exist, but more detailed assessment may be warranted to quantify the risk.

Determinant Maximum recorded

concentration (mg/kg)

SGV/SAC for a

residential use (mg/kg)

Exceeded?

Arsenic 8.2 32 No

Boron 0.6 291 No

Cadmium 0.17 3 No

Chromium (III) 15 627 No

Chromium (VI) <0.5 4.3 No

Copper 12 2330 No

Mercury <0.10 170 No

Nickel 16 130 No

Lead 24 450 No

Selenium <0.20 350 No

Zinc 56 3750 No

TPH C5-C6 <0.1 29 No

TPH C6-C7 <0.1 65 No

TPH C7-C8 <0.1 72 No

TPH C8-C10 <0.1 18 No

TPH C10-C12 <0.1 55 No

TPH C12-C16 <0.1 131 No

TPH C16-C21 0.72 249 No

TPH C21-C35 0.44 889 No

Acenaphthene <0.1 205 No

Acenaphthylene <0.1 168 No

Anthracene 0.17 2257 No

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.57 3.1 No

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.41 0.83 No

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.61 5.5 No

Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.51 43.9 No

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.69 8.5 No

Chrysene 0.69 15.9 No

Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.31 0.76 No

Fluoranthene 1.4 256 No

Fluorene <0.1 163 No




Determinant Maximum recorded

concentration (mg/kg)

SGV/SAC for a

residential use (mg/kg)

Exceeded?

Indeno(123-cd)pyrene 0.39 3.18 No

Naphthalene 0.1 1.5 No

Phenanthrene 0.1 91 No

Pyrene 0.1 563 No

Table 2: Contamination Test Result Summary

Chemical test results illustrated concentrations of contaminants to be well below the conservative

screening criteria employed. Asbestos fibres were not detected in the two samples analysed.

4.3 Summary and Implications

The basic requirement for redevelopment standards in the UK is that land should be ‘suitable for use’ or

‘fit for purpose’, rather than apply a blanket ‘clean’ or ‘all uses policy’. It is important to consider the

limited nature of this investigation, and the possibility of as yet unknown contaminant sources existing.

The nature of the site history and uses we are aware of from our desk-based assessment and the

Preliminary Contamination Assessment Report conducted by MLM Environmental led to the preliminary

risk assessment of a generally very low risk from historic contamination. We highlighted the limited

potential for leaks and spills of fuels and oils which may have resulted from parked cars on the site.

We were requested to undertake a limited amount of sampling and analysis by the client and the

detected concentrations of metals, hydrocarbons and PAH compounds were below the levels of

concern. Harrison Group Environmental consider the material encountered to be chemically suitable for

use in residential development setting, and therefore does not to present an unacceptable risk to human

health or groundwater.

Whilst the site was thought suitable for development from the perspective of the potential for

contaminated land, we encourage ground and construction workers to be vigilant for the possibility for

further contamination thus far unidentified. Should visual or olfactory evidence be encountered, the

advice of a suitably qualified geoenvironmental engineer should be sought to discuss the appropriate

action with the local authority.

We recommend that the view of the Regulator be sought on the findings of this report, as part of the

planning process.

Harrison group Environmental Limited would be pleased to offer further assistance with the

recommended woks if requested, and if the client or regulators have any comments or questions we

would be glad to discuss them.

Report prepared by: Report checked by:

Sam Fisher BEng/BBus Ed Orchin BSc(hons) FGS

Geotechnical Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer




REFERENCES

BSI British Standard, 1999. BS5930:1999+A2:2010, ‘Code of Practice for Site Investigations’.

BSI British Standard, 2001. BS10175:2011+A1:2013, ‘Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites –

Code of Practice’.

Construction Industry Research and information Association, 2006. C665, ‘Assessing the risks posed by

hazardous ground gases to buildings’.

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency, 2002. CLR8, ‘Potential

Contaminants for the Assessment of Land’.

MLM Environmental, September 2010, ‘Preliminary Contamination Assessment Report’.

LIST OF APPENDICES

Hand Auger Borehole Records: HA1-5

Soil Laboratory Analysis Report: 250081

Drawings: GN18104-DR001 – Location Plan

GN18104-DR002 – Annotated Site Plan

Hand Auger Record

FM-Hn-R-3025-REV CA

Contract No.

Location: Dates:

Client: Plant: Diameter: Coordinates:

Description Legend Remarks InstallationsDepth O.D. Sample Test

(m)Casing

Level Type Depth Depth

Water Level Observations

Date Time WaterStrike (m)

StandingLevel (m)

CasingDepth (m)

DepthSealed (m)

Remarks:

Drilled By: Logged By:

KEYD

BUWSCN=

Disturbed Sample

Bulk SampleUndisturbed Sample (102mm)Water SampleStandard Penetration TestCone Penetration TestNo of blows/300mmpenetration in SPT/CPT

Water StrikeStanding Water Level

(m) (m) (m)

In-situ Vane Test

Environmental SampleES

V

Checked By:

harrisongroup

A J & R Smith Hand Auger

Hand auger terminated at 0.9m due to large obstruction.1.2. Groundwater was not encountered.3. Backfill details: upon completion hand auger pit backfilled with

arisings to GL.

Yarmouth Road, Blofield

0.00

SF

GN18104

24/01/2014

632909.00E

309551.00N

EO

HA1

0.50

0.90

ES1

ES2

0.00-0.50

0.70-0.90

MADE GROUND (Firm to stiff dark brownslightly gravelly sandy silty CLAY. Gravel isfine to coarse subrounded to subangular flintand brick).

MADE GROUND (Firm brown to dark brownand dark grey sandy silty CLAY withoccassional fine subangular flint and brick).

Auger Complete at 0.90 m

Hand Auger Record

FM-Hn-R-3025-REV CA

Contract No.

Location: Dates:



(m)Casing




StandingLevel (m)

CasingDepth (m)

DepthSealed (m)

Remarks:


KEYD

BUWSCN=

Disturbed Sample



(m) (m) (m)

In-situ Vane Test


V

Checked By:

harrisongroup


Groundwater was not encountered.1.Backfill details: upon completion hand auger pit backfilled witharisings to GL.

2.


0.00

SF

GN18104

24/01/2014

632915.00E

309573.00N

EO

HA2

0.50

0.90

1.50

ES1

ES2

0.50-0.90

1.10-1.50

MADE GROUND (Firm to stiff dark brownslightly gravelly sandy silty CLAY. Gravel isfine to course subrounded to subangular flintand brick).

MADE GROUND (Firm brown to dark brownand dark grey sandy silty CLAY withoccassional fine subangular flint and brick).

Firm pale brown to brown mottled grey sandysilty CLAY.


Hand Auger Record

FM-Hn-R-3025-REV CA

Contract No.

Location: Dates:



(m)Casing




StandingLevel (m)

CasingDepth (m)

DepthSealed (m)

Remarks:


KEYD

BUWSCN=

Disturbed Sample



(m) (m) (m)

In-situ Vane Test


V

Checked By:

harrisongroup



2.


0.00

SF

GN18104

24/01/2014

632886.00E

309560.00N

EO

HA3

0.20

0.90

1.50

ES1

ES2

D1

D2

0.00-0.10

0.50-0.90

1.10-1.30

1.30-1.40

MADE GROUND (Firm to stiff dark brown anddark grey sandy very gravelly SILT/CLAY.Gravel is fine to coarse (up to 50mm)subrounded to subangular flint, brick andconcrete).

MADE GROUND (Soft to firm dark brown anddark grey gravelly sandy silty CLAY. Gravel isfine subangular to subrounded flint and brick).

Firm to stiff pale brown to brown mottled darkgrey sandy silty CLAY with occassional fineto medium subangular flint.

1.3m : Becoming pale brown


Hand Auger Record

FM-Hn-R-3025-REV CA

Contract No.

Location: Dates:



(m)Casing




StandingLevel (m)

CasingDepth (m)

DepthSealed (m)

Remarks:


KEYD

BUWSCN=

Disturbed Sample



(m) (m) (m)

In-situ Vane Test


V

Checked By:

harrisongroup



2.


0.00

SF

GN18104

24/01/2014

632854.00E

309572.00N

EO

HA4

1.00

1.90

ES1

ES2

ES3

0.20-0.50

0.70-1.00

1.10-1.30

MADE GROUND (Firm dark brown and darkgrey sandy silty CLAY with occassional finesubangular flint gravel).

0.7m : Becoming moist to wet and very soft tosoft

Very soft to soft pale brown to brown mottleddark grey sandy silty CLAY with occassionalfine to medium subangular flint.

1.2m : Becoming firm and pale brown


Hand Auger Record

FM-Hn-R-3025-REV CA

Contract No.

Location: Dates:



(m)Casing




StandingLevel (m)

CasingDepth (m)

DepthSealed (m)

Remarks:


KEYD

BUWSCN=

Disturbed Sample



(m) (m) (m)

In-situ Vane Test


V

Checked By:

harrisongroup



2.


0.00

SF

GN18104

24/01/2014

632858.00E

309552.00N

EO

HA5

0.30

0.80

1.40

1.60

ES1

ES2

ES3

0.00-0.20

0.40-0.70

0.90-1.10

MADE GROUND (Firm to stiff dark brown anddark grey sandy very gravelly SILT/CLAY.Gravel is fine to coarse subrounded tosubangular flint, brick and concrete).

MADE GROUND (Soft to firm dark grey sandysilty CLAY.

Firm pale brown to brown mottled dark greysandy silty CLAY with occassional fine tocoarse subangular flint.

Firm to stiff pale brown slightly gravellysandy silty CLAY. Gravel is fine to mediumsubangular to subrounded flint.


FAO Sam Fisher

05 February 2014

Kimberley Street

Norwich

Harrison Group Environmental Ltd

NR2 2RJ

Depot Road

Newmarket

CB8 0AL

Tel: 01638 606070

Dear Sam Fisher

Test Report Number 250081

Your Project Reference GN18104 - Yarmouth Road, Blofield

Please find enclosed the results of analysis for the samples received 28 January 2014.

All soil samples will be retained for a period of one month and all water samples will be retained for

7 days following the date of the test report. Should you require an extended retention period then

please detail your requirements in an email to [email protected]. Please be

aware that charges may be applicable for extended sample storage.

If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the Customer Services

team.

Yours sincerely

Keith Jones, Technical Manager

Notes to accompany report:

• The sign < means 'less than'

• Tests marked 'U' hold UKAS accreditation

• Tests marked 'M' hold MCertS (and UKAS) accreditation

• Tests marked 'N' do not currently hold UKAS accreditation

• Tests marked 'S' were subcontracted to an approved laboratory

• n/e means 'not evaluated'

• i/s means 'insufficient sample'

• u/s means 'unsuitable sample'

• Comments or interpretations are beyond the scope of UKAS accreditation

• The results relate only to the items tested

• All results are expressed on a dry weight basis

• The following tests were analysed on samples as received and the results subsequently

corrected to a dry weight basis TPH, BTEX, VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, phenols

• For all other tests the samples were dried at < 37°C prior to analysis

• Uncertainties of measurement for the determinands tested are available upon request

• None of the test results included in this report have been recovery corrected

2183

Registered in England & Wales - Registration Number 6511736 - Registered Office: 11 Depot Road Newmarket Suffolk CB8 0AL

Test Report Cover Sheet250081

LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples

received 28 January 2014

GN18104 - Yarmouth Road, BlofieldFAO


Sam Fisher

Kimberley Street

Norwich

NR2 2RJ Report Date

05 February 2014

250081AJ75803 AJ75804

HA1 HA5

24/1/2014 24/1/2014

0.70m - 0.90m 0.00m - 0.20m

SOIL SOIL

2010 pH M 8.1 8.42625 Total Organic Carbon % M 0.48 1.82120 Boron (hot water soluble) 7440428 mg kg-¹ M <0.4 0.62490 Chromium (hexavalent) 18540299 mg kg-¹ N <0.5 <0.52450 Arsenic 7440382 mg kg-¹ M 8.2 5.5

Cadmium 7440439 mg kg-¹ M 0.17 0.16Chromium 7440473 mg kg-¹ M 15 8.5Copper 7440508 mg kg-¹ M 12 12Mercury 7439976 mg kg-¹ M <0.10 <0.10Nickel 7440020 mg kg-¹ M 16 9.9Lead 7439921 mg kg-¹ M 20 24Selenium 7782492 mg kg-¹ M <0.20 <0.20Zinc 7440666 mg kg-¹ M 53 56

2670 TPH >C5-C6 mg kg-¹ U < 0.1 < 0.1TPH >C6-C7 mg kg-¹ U < 0.1 < 0.1TPH >C7-C8 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1TPH >C8-C10 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1TPH >C10-C12 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1TPH >C12-C16 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1TPH >C16-C21 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.72TPH >C21-C35 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.44Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg kg-¹ U < 10 < 10

2700 Naphthalene 91203 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1Acenaphthylene 208968 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1

*UnitsiCAS NoiDeterminandiSOPi

Matrix

Depth

Sample No

Sample ID

Chemtest LIMS ID

Login Batch No

Sampling Date

All tests undertaken between 28/01/2014 and 31/01/2014

* Accreditation status

This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.

Column page 1

Report page 1 of 2

LIMS sample ID range AJ75803 to AJ75804

LABORATORY TEST REPORTResults of analysis of 2 samples


GN18104 - Yarmouth Road, BlofieldFAO


Sam Fisher

Kimberley Street

Norwich

NR2 2RJ Report Date

05 February 2014

250081AJ75803 AJ75804

HA1 HA5

24/1/2014 24/1/2014

0.70m - 0.90m 0.00m - 0.20m

SOIL SOIL

2700 Acenaphthene 83329 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1Fluorene 86737 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 < 0.1Phenanthrene 85018 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.89Anthracene 120127 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.17Fluoranthene 206440 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 1.4Pyrene 129000 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 1.3Benzo[a]anthracene 56553 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.57Chrysene 218019 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.69Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205992 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 0.69Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207089 mg kg-¹ N < 0.1 0.61Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.41Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene 53703 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.31Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193395 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.39Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191242 mg kg-¹ M < 0.1 0.51Total (of 16) PAHs mg kg-¹ M < 2 7.9

All tests undertaken between 28/01/2014 and 31/01/2014

* Accreditation status

This report should be interpreted in conjunction with the notes on the accompanying cover page.

Column page 1

Report page 2 of 2


LABORATORY TEST REPORT

Report Date

05 February 2014

Results of analysis of 2 samples


GN18104 - Yarmouth Road, BlofieldFAO Sam Fisher

Kimberley Street

Norwich

NR2 2RJ


Asbestos in Soils

Login Batch No:

Chemtest ID Sample ID Sample Desc

SOP 2192

ACM Type Asbestos Identification

AJ75803 HA1 0.70 - 0.90 - No Asbestos DetectedAJ75804 HA5 0.00 - 0.20 - No Asbestos Detected

Depth (m)

250081

Qualitative Results

The detection limit for this method is 0.001%

Hollis Rosamond

Asbestos Analyst

Signed

All tests undertaken between 04-Feb-2014 and 4-Feb-2014 at our asbestos testing facility in

Coventry

Report page 1 of 1


Documents

Document: Site Investigation Report Yarmouth Road, Blofield · 2016. 4. 5. · SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR A SITE AT YARMOUTH ROAD, BLOFIELD 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE & INTRODUCTION