Document of

The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Report No. 5028-IN

STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT

INDIA

GUJARAT HEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

May 18, 1984

Regional Projects DepartmentIrrigation II Division

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance oftheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

USS1.00 = Rupees (Rs) 10.8

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES (METRIC SYSTEM) 11

1 meter (m) = 3.28 feet (ft)1 kilometer (km) = 0.62 miles (mi)1 hectare (ha) 3 = 2.47 acres (ac)1 million cubic meters (Mm ) = 810 acre-feet (ac-ft) 31 cubic foot per second (cfs or cusec) = 0.028 cubic meters per second (m Isec)1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds (lb)1 metric ton (mt) = 2,205 pounds (lb)

FISCAL YEAR

GOI; GOG; April 1 - March 31

1/ The metric system has been used in most cases. However, India is stillin the process of transition to the metric system; non-metric units arestill widely used and have been used in this report where a conversionto the metric system may confuse the reader.

FOR OMCIAL USE ONLYINDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Credit and Project Summary

Borrower: India, acting by its President (GOI)

Beneficiarv: Goverment of Gujarat (GOG)

Amount: IDA Credit: SDR 164.3 M(US$172.0 M equivalent)

Terms: Standard

Re-Lending Terms: From GOI to GOG as part of central assistanceto states for development projects on terms andconditions applicable at the time. GOI would bearthe foreign exchange risk.

Proiect Description: The proposed project is a follow-on to the GujaratIrrigation Project (Credit No. 808-IN of July 17,1976). It would (i) complete construction of 27 outof 29 subprojects begun under the first time slice,and bring the remAining 2 to an advanced stage,including a lined canal system to the 8-ha subchaklevel and field channels to individual fields;(ii) introduce efficient, reliable, and equitablewater management systems in each subproject based onthe village service area; (iii) establish anappropriate institutional framevork for extendingimproved water management activities in the state;(iv) strengthen the project organization for qualitycontrol, monitoring and the design of minor networks;(v) provide mechanical skill training for about30 artisans; (vi) provide training for about 200professional, 400 subprofessional Irrigation Depart-ment staff and 8,800 progressive farmers; and(vii) provide vehicles, plant, and communicationsequipment for the construction, maintenance andoperation of the subprojects. The project wouldcreate about 241,000 ha of additional irrigated areaand provide a more reliable water supply for133,000 ha of existing irrigation. Possible risksunder the proposed project are those normallyassociated with irrigation projects in India.

ITis document has a restricted distrbution and may be used by recipients only in the performance oftheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

AC - Appraisal CommitteeARDC - Agricultural Refinance and Development CorporationCAD - Command Area DevelopmentCADA - Command Area Development AuthorityCCA - Cultivable Command AreaCRU - Chak Rotational UnitCWC - Central Water CommissionDAFP - Directorate of Agriculture and Food ProductionERR - Zconomic Rate of ReturnFSL - Full Supply LevelGOG - Government of GujaratGOI - Government of IndiaICB - International Competitive BiddingI&PD - Irrigation and Power DepartmentID - Irrigation DepartmentIDA - International Development AssociationLCB - Local Competitive BiddingM&E - Monitoring and EvaluationKIP - Medium Irrigation ProjectNABARD - National Bank for Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentOFD - On-Farm DevelopmentO&M - Operation and MaintenanceR&D - Research and DevelopmentRWS - Rotational Water SupplySCMC - State Coordinating and Monitoring CommitteeUNDP - United Nations Development ProgramVSA - Village Service AreaWMC - Water Management Committee

GLOSSARY

main, branch, - main conveyance channelsdistributary canals

minor - channel serving one or more villages

watercourse - small channel (lined) below the outlet serving aor subminor chak of 40-60 ha divided into 5-8 ha blocks

(subchaks), with capacity to taken full outletdischarge from head to tail

field channel - small channel (unlined) below the watercourseserving 5-8 ha block, down to farmers' fields, withcapacity to take full outlet discharge

adjustable - outlet structure that will give a discharge to aproportional minor or watercourse proportional to the flow in themodule (APH) parent canal. Not affected by conditions in the

minor or watercourse

outlet - structure discharging from watercourse to 5-8 hablock, designed to take full watercourse dischargeand be either open or shut

chak - watercourse CCA

subchak - watercourse CCA below the 5-ha turnout

varabandi - a rotational water supply (RWS) system of allocatingvater among farmers by fixed turns and time periods;flow rate is constant, and time periods areproportional to land holding size

on- farm - small works needed for efficient water control atdevelopment the chak level (e.g., watercourses and drains); most

such works are actually off-farm

village service area - a block of 200-500 ha served by a minor with thepreferably with the same boundaries as the villageadministrative area.

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Staff Appraisal Report

Table of Contents

Page No

I. BACKGROUND ...................- ............ . 1

Introduction.. .. 1Agriculture and Irrigation in Iudia...... 1The State of Gujarat .. ............ 1Performanoe Under Phase I ........ ... ... 3Rationale for Bank Involvement in Phase II .. 6

II. THE PROiE6T AREA. .. .. ............ 6

General .*oo.. .e............... . 6Climate.. ..... 7Topography and Soils. ..................... 7Land Use . ........ ...... ... 7Population and Land Tenure .......... 8Crops and Yields ...... 8Inputs Used. . .. 9

III. THE PROJECT ............................................ 10

General .............................................. 10

Objectives and Scope ............ ................... 10

Detailed Features .................................... 10

Construction Activities ............. ............... 10Training, Studies, Institutional Strengthening and

Introduction of RWS . ....................... 13

Design and Implementation Criteria ................... 15

General .................. 000.0.0 .... 9-0.....o 15Water Supply and Demand ............................ 15Design of Conveyance Network ....................... 16Design of the Minor (VSA) Network .................. 16Dam Safety. ........ .. 17Construction Methods .............. 17Status of Project Preparation ................. 18Implementation Schedule ............................ 18

Rehabilitation .................... 19

This report is based on the findings of an appraisal mission which visitedIndia in January/February 1984 and comprised of Messrs. C. Helman,B. Albinson, Y.K. Choi, Ms. G. Leithmann (Bank) and Mr. L. Shanan (Consultant).Word processing was done by Ms. S. Douglas with the assistance ofMmes. Kalinger and Bromley.

-11-

IV. COST ESTINATES AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS .............. 21

Cost Estimates ................... .................... 21Financing ..................... ....................... 22Procurement .......................................... 22Disbursements ................... ..................... 23Accounts and Audits . ....................... ...... .... 24

V. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT ............................ 25

The Irrigation Department (ID) ......... .. ............ 25The Central Water Commission (CWC) ................... 27Supporting Services .................................. 27Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) ........ .. ............ 29

VI. ORGANIZATION OF WATER SUPPLY ........... .. .............. 31

Present Situation ................. ................... 31Rotational Water Supply ............. .. ............... 32Water Allocation ....... ........... ................... 33Operation and Management of Subprojects ...... ........ 33Training in Rotational Water Supply ............... O.. 34Operation and Maintenance Cost ......... .. ............ 34Narmada and Gujarat Medium Irrigation II Project 35

VII. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. FARM INCOMES. AND COST RECOVERY 36

Agricultural Production ........... .. ................. 36Market Prospects and Prices .......... .. .............. 38Cost Recovery ................... ..................... 38

VIII. BENEFITS AND JUSTIFICATION ............................. 40

Project Impact ....... ............ .................... 40Economic Analysis ................. ................... 41Sensitivity Analysis and Risks ....... ................ 42Environmental Impact .............. .. ................. 43

IX. AGREEMENTS TO BE REACHED AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..... ...... 43

Schedule A: Rehabilitation .......................... 46Schedule B: Introduction of Rotational Water Supply.. 47

-iii-

TABLES

1 Status of MIPs at end of Phase I2a Quantities of Civil Works for the Canal System - Main System2b Quantities of Civil Works for the Canal System - Distribution System2c Target for Implementation of Rotational Water Supply3 Salient Features of MIPs4a Rehabilitation4b Progress of Land Acquisition5 Climatic Data6 Cultivable Comnand Area and Irrigability Class7 Land Use8 Distribution of Holdings by Size9a Cost Estimates - Summary Account Cost Summary9b Cost Estimates - Project Cost Summary9c Cost Estimates - Summary Account by Project Component9d Cost Estimates - Summary Account by Time9e Cost Estimates - Project Component by Time9f Cost Estimates - Water Management Training9g Cost Estimates - Mechanical Technician Training9h Cost Estimates - Farmers Training9i Cost Estimates - Vocational Training9j Cost Estimate - Monitoring/Development/Studies10 Estimated Schedule of Expenditures and Implementation11 Estimated Disbursement Schedule12 Credit Allocation13a Equipment Summary13b Equipment for Construction13c Equipment for O&M - Dams and Canals13d Equipment for O&M - Standby Generators for Spillway Gates13e Equipment for O&M - Telecommunications13f Equipment for Hydrology and Drafting13g Equipment for Construction14a Details of Organization set-up: Existing and Future Requirements14b Organization Set-up for a Typical 16000 Ha Irrigation Management Unit15a Farmers Training (Block Leaders)16a Crop Water Requirements by Zone16b Results of Water Simulation17 Present and Projected Cropping Patterns18 Area, Yields, and Production19 Incremental Crop Production and Value20 Summary of Prices for Economic and Financial Analysis21 Derivation of Economic P-ices for Major Crops and Inputs in Gujarat22 Crop Financial Budget23 Crop Economic Budget24 Estimated Financial Farm Budgets25 Estimated Farm Budgets and Project Rent at Full Development26 Estimated Project Rent and Cost Recovery

-iv-

TABLES (cont)Cost and Benefit Streams, Including Sunk Costs

27a Watrak27b Sukhi27c Und27d Zankhari

Cost and Benefit Streams, Excluding Sunk Costs28 Modernization Project (Shetrunji)

ANNEXES

1 Economic Analysis2 Documents in Project File

CHARTS

1 Implementation Schedule2a Irrigation Department2b Typical Irrigation Circle2c Typical Project Staff Chart3 Central Water Commission

MAPS AND DIAGRAMS

Index to Map 18107IBRD 18107 Major and Minor Irrigation SchemesIBRD 18109 Isohyets, Irrigation Needs and Tracks of StormsIBRD 18108 Agricultural ZonesIBRD 18182 Village Service Area (layout for Rotational Water Supply)

5 Precast Trough Construction6 Precast Tile Canal Lining

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA VOLUME I

ANNEXES

3 Design4 Agricultural Aspects of RWS5 Rehabilitation

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

I. BACKGROUND

Introduction

1.01 The Government of India (GOI) has requested Bank Group assistanceto finance a second timeslice of Gujarat's development program for mediumirrigation projects (MIP). The first timeslice has been assisted by IDAunder the ongoing Gujarat Irrigation Project (Credit No. 808-IN), which isnearing completion (referred to here as Phase I). The proposed GujaratMedium Irrigation II Project (referred to here as Phase II) would supportprimarily the completion of ongoing subprojects and the introduction of anefficient, reliable, and equitable water management system in each MIP. Itwas prepared by the Government of Gujarat (GOG) with the participation ofGOI's Central Water Commission (CWC).

Agriculture and Irrigation in India 1/

1.02 India has a population of about 750 M (mid-1984) that is growing atan annual rate of about 2.1Z. Agriculture, which is the dominant sector ofthe Indian economy, contributes about 40X of GNP and engages about 70X of thelabor force. GOI has devoted considerable resources to agricultural develop-ment, especially irrigation, which has accounted for at least three-quartersof the agricultural growth since 1960.

The State of Guiarat

1.03 General. The state of Gujarat covers an area of 18.8 M ha, and has apopulation of about 36 N (1983) that is growing at an annual rate of 2.5%.It is relatively urbanized and has a large and fast-growing manufacturingsector. Between 1960 and 1982 the state's income grew at an annual rate of3.7% and per capita income reached in 1983 a level of US$320, which is con-siderably higher than the all India level (US$260). Agriculture accounts formore than one third of the state's income and for more than 60% of the work-ing population (1981). Moreover, agriculture-based industries account formore than 50Z of all factory employment. Agricultural production largelydepends on weather conditions since much of Gujarat is characterized by lowand highly variable rainfall. This, and the limited irrigation facilities,have made the state susceptible to drought and famine. Since 1900, severefood shortages due to drought have been experienced at least 25 times. Con-sequently, GOG has given a high priority to irrigation development.

1.04 The Irrigation Subsector. The ultimate irrigation potential, andthe potential created and utilized are summarized below:

1/ A more dctailed review is incorporated in numerous SARs of Indian irriga-tion projects, of which the most receit one is the SAR for Periyar VaigaiIrrigation II Project (Report No. 4913-IN, April, 1984).

-2-

UltimateIrrisation Potential Potential Created Potential Utilized

…--------------------(million ha)-------------------------

Major andmedium projects 1.46 1.13 0.63Minor schemes 0.25 0.15 0.09Narmada basin 1.87 - -Groundwater 1.80 1.60 1.38

5.38 2.88 2.10

Source: Government of Gujarat, Draft Annual Plan 1984/85, p. 119(Data as of June 1983).

As can be seen, only about 54% of the ultimate potential has been developed,and about 75% of the undeveloped potential is located in the Narmada Basin.Consequently, irrigation development in the second half of the 1980s and inthe 1990s will focus on Narmada. However, GOG gives a high priority tocompletion of ongoing major and medium irrigation projects.

1.05 Utilization of the potential created in medium and major schemes hasbeen unsatisfactory and was estimated at only 56% in 1983. A special WorkingGroup was appointed by GOG to investigate the reasons for underutilization.Its main recommendations were:l/

(a) Planning of new projects should be improved and more realisticassessments should be made at the planning stage of the netirrigable area to be served under each project.

(b) Conveyance efficiency of canal systems in completed schemesshould be improved.

(c) Field channels should be constructed at government cost.

(d) Operation of e!xisting schemes should be improved.

These recommendations were taken into account in the design of this project.

1.06 Bank Group Support. The Bank Group has provided significant supportfor Gujarat's irrigation development. Its first loan/credit for irrigationfinanced the construction of Shetrunji's canal system (Credit No. 13-IN,1961, US$4.5 M). Like other Indian irrigation projects financed at about thesame time, the project failed to achieve its agricultural potential due toinadequate agricultural supporting services and lagging construction of fieldchannels and drains. The lesson learned was taken into account in thepreparation of the Kadana Irrigation Project (Credit No. 176-IN, 1970,

XJ Report of the Workinx Group appointed by High Power Committee for Maxi-mizing the Utilization of Created Irrigation Potential on Maior andMedium Irrigation Schemes of Guiarat State. April 1983.

-3-

US$35 M). In this project much greater emphasis was given to on-farmdevelopment and the agricultural support program. The project wah completedabout two years behind schedule due to two extreme floods that seriouslydisrupted dam construction and to other construction problems. Although theactual rate of return estimated in the project completion report was lowerthan anticipated at time of appraisal (12% vs. 14%), the project area is nowone of the most prosperous and productive areas in Gujarat.

1.07 Two credits are presently under implementation in the state: theGujarat Irrigation Project (Credit No. 808-IN, 1978, US$85.0 M)l/ and GujaratIrrigation II Project (Credit No. 1011-IN, 1980, US$175.0 M). Together, thesetwo credits finance about four-fifths of Gujarat's annual irrigation invest-ments outside the Narmada Development. Project components include, interalia: operational improvements and modernization of existing irrigationsystems, construction of new schemes, small scale watershed development,reclamation of saline coastal lands, and establishment of a water managementtraining institute. New planning procedures and improved standards fordesign and construiction of irrigation projects are introduced. Partly due tothe complex and innovative nature of many components, initial projectimplementation suffered from weak management and lower than expected qualityof design and construction. However, implementation performance is graduallyimproving and the expected results of the two credits is a significantstrengthening of Gujarat's ability to plan, design, construct, and operateirrigation projects that can deliver a timely and reliable water supply thatis a prerequisite for the cultivation of high-yielding, high-value crops.

1.08 Bank support of the Narmada River Development in Gujarat is presentlyunder consideration. The first phase will consist of two projects: {i)Sardar Sarovar Dam and Power Project will support the construction of theSardar Sarovar Dam, which will be a joint venture of Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh,and Maharashtra; (ii) Water Delivery and Drainage Project will support athree-year time slice construction of the main canal, branches, and distribu-tion network for which Rajasthan will share a small percentage of the maincanal costs.

Performance Under Phase I

1.09 Gujarat Irrigation Project (Credit No. 808-IN) was the second in aseries of three state-based timeslice/sector line of credit projects.2/ Thistype of project was to enable Bank involvement in the development of mediumirrigation projects that individually are too small to justify Bank par-ticipation.

1.10 The project was to finance the following: (i) construction of newMIPs; (ii) modernization of existing schemes; and (iii) a network ofautomatic discharge measuring stations. The SAR stipulated the criteria for

1/ The proposed project will be a follow-up (phase IT) to Credit No. 808-IN.

ZJ The first was Orissa Irrigation Project (Credit No. 740-IN) and the thirdwas the Madhya Pradesh Medium Irrigation Project (Credit No. 1108-IN).

-4-

preparation and appraisal of MIPs as well as design criteria. The distribu-tion system was to be designed for rotational water supply (RWS) and be linedto the 8-ha outlet. Appraisal and supervision of individual MIPs were to beundertaken by an Appraisal Committee (AC), especially established in the CWCfor appraisal of MIPs in Bank-financed line of credit projects. The AC wasauthorized to approve MIPs meeting the technical criteria, costing less thanRs 70 H (excluding price contingencies) and having a benefit/cost ratiohigher than 1.0. All other MIPs were to be approved by IDA.

1.11 The project cost was estimated at Rs 1,466 M (US$170.5 M atappraisal's time exchange rate) and IDA credit approved was US$85 M. InDecember 1978, the U.S. Government approved US$30 H of USAID funds for theproject. Consequently, the project scope was extended to cover anaccelerated MIP program and the project cost estimate was increased fromRs 1,466 M to Rs 1,849 M. USAID agreed to disburse against 17% of theeligible civil works while IDA disbursement for that category was reducedfrom 60% to 47%. Appraisal estimate of the cost of developing irrigationthrough MIP averaged about Rs 19,000/ha of CCA while the average cost basedon CWC appraisals of the MfIPs was about Rs 18,000/ha. The revised estimate(January 1984) is about Rs 25,000/ha (32% above appraisal estimate). Thehigher than estimated costs are mainly due to (i) revision of hydrology anddam design; (ii) increase in the cost of cement; and (iii) higher thanestimated cost of lining. IDA disbursements by mid-March 1984 amount toabout US$79 M (about 93% of the credit). GOG expects to complete by March1984 the works required to fully utilize both IDA and USAID funds.

1.12 Twenty-nine subprojects have been cleared by the AC (the 29th hasbeen approved subject to clearance by the Forestry Department of the GOI).In most of the MIPs, work concentrated on the headworks (dam, main canal)with the result that secondary canals in some of the MIPs and works on theminor distribution system in most of them are lagging behind. Constructionof the dams in some MIPs was delayed because the flood hydrology had to berevised following an unprecedented cyclonic storm in 1979 in the Saurashtra(Machhu-I) region. This revision resulted in provisions for larger floodways and higher freeboard to ensure the safety of the structures and hasdelayed the completion of many dams by about a year. The anticipated comple-tion of the various components by the end of Phase I is summarized below(details are in table 1):

Percentage Completed DistributionUD To 3/84 Dam Canal System Up To 8 ha

Nil - 1 20-10 1 - 4

10-25 - 2 625-50 2 9 1050-75 4 3 375-100 17 14 4

24a/ 29 29

a/ Five modernization projects have no dam construction works.

-5-

The network of automatic discharge measuring stations (para 1.10) has beenestablished.

1.13 The main problems encountered during implementation were related tostaffing, technical standards, cuality control, and management. During thefirst two to three years, the most serious constraint was shortage of staff.This was largely resolved at the beginning of calendar 1982 followingrecruitment of new staff by GOG. The technical standards, especially designand construction of minors and watercourses were initially inadequate, butimproved considerably following Bank intervention and through short trainingcourses in WALMI. Quality control and construction standards were alsoimproved folloving the issuance of new standards by GOG. The project hassuffered from poor management which was reflected especially by the fact thatwork programs were seldom implemented in accordance with the plans. Despitecontinuous revision of implementation schedules the revised targets havefrequently not been met. The assessment of Bank staff was that managementcould be improved considerably if systematic planning and monitoring areintroduced. In order to improve these points, a study aimed at improving theplanning through the use of a small computer has been undertaken by theOperations Research Group (consultancy group located at Baroda).

1.14 Water Management. The MIPs were to be designed to enable introduc-tion of RWS. The Bank has provided assistance (under UNDP Project8IND/78/047) with the design of the minor system through establishment ofpilot water management areas in the Panam MIP especially in the Sansolidistributary. Based on the experience gained, training courses for designengineers were conducted (about 30 have been trained). The design standardsdeveloped are being used in most of the project MIPs. Additionally, theWater Management Team (NDO) and GOG have initiated pilot RWS activities inthe Dantiwada (modernization subproject). A Water and Land ManagementInstitute (WALMI) has been established (under Credit No. 1011-IN) in tem-porary buildings and 530 trainees completed 18 training courses by the end ofJanuary 1984. Guest lecturers were drawn from local engineering and agricul-tural universities. The WALMI faculty will include 7 engineers and 10professors; a permanent campus is being constructed on 57 ha near theAgricultural University at Anand.

1.15 Rehabilitation. Under Phase I, about 8,500 displaced families wererehabilitated as of November 1983 and about 44% were compensated in land.There were considerable difficulties with land acquisition due to farmers'objections, until GOG introduced in 1979 improved rehabilitation standardsapplicable to all major and medium irrigation projects (para 3.30).

1.16 Conclusions. Overall, the project achieved most of its objectives.Subprojects were appraised in accordance with Bank guidelines. The MIPsapproved under the project cover a total area of 213,300 ha of CCA, and thosein which over 50% of the distribution system had been completed cover about72,800 ha. These compare favorably (on completed ha equivalent) with theappraisal target of completed 63,000 ha. The area in which modernizationworks have been completed is about 22,000 ha and such works are underway atvarious stages of completion on about 140,000 ha. This compares favorablywith the appraisal estimate of completed 55,000 ha. Finally, the water

-6-

management studies conducted under the project resulted in development ofdetailed design and operation criteria which were incorporated in Phase II.

Rationale for Bank Involvement in Phase II

1.17 The main rationale for Bank involvement in irrigation development inIndia is to assist with the establishment of reliable, equitable, and effi-cient irrigation systems that satisfy the requirements of modern agricultz;re.In the typical project this is achieved in two stages:

(a) Design and construction. During this stage the objective isto construct the project to standards that will enable efficientoperation and management.

(b) Operation. In this stage the objective is to introduce improvedwater management practices to ensure that each farmer will obtaina tinely and reliable water supply.

Both stages are important. Unless the system is constructed to standardsthat enable adequate controls, its operators would be unable to providereliable supplies. On the other hand, a good design does not fully guaranteean efficient operation, especially when water is in short supply, sincestrong farmers usually try to obtain more than their fair share of the water.Moreover, the investment in improved systems would not be fully justifiedif the operation is deficient.

1.18 Many of the project MIPs are now at an advanced construction stageand in some, water deliveries have already begun. By the end of Phase IIconstruction of all (except two) of the MIPs will have been completed, andthey will have progressed well into the operation stage. Although the MIPshave been designed for RWS mode of operation, this mode is considerablydifferent from the existing modes (see discussion in chapter 6), and islikely to require skillful, extended conmissioning actions. Consequently,Bank involvement and active support would be essential to ensure its success-ful adoption.

II. THE PROJECT AREA

General

2.01 Gujarat is divided into three geographical units: the Gujarat main-land, the Saurashtra peninsula and Kutch. Of the 29 MIPs under the project,17 are located in the Gujarat mainland and 12 are located in the Saurashtra.The project area totals about 375,000 ha (net CCA), of which about 135,000 ha(36Z) are commanded by modernization schemes. Throughout the project area,water is the major constraint to increased agricultural production andexperiences recurrent water shortages due to low and highly variable rain-fall. Access to most of the project areas is generally good through awell-developed road system of national highway, district, and village roads.

-7-

Climate

2.02 Gujarat has a tropical monsoon climate with temperatures suitable foryear-round cropping. Mean monthly temperatures ranges between 180C - 230C inJanuary and 320C - 340C in May. Annual rainfall ranges from less than 300 mmin the northwest to over 2,000 mm in a small area in the southeast. Mostparts of the state receive between 500 and 800 mm (map IBRD 18109). However,most of the inland area where the proposed MIPs would be constructed, therainfall ranges between about 580 mm in northern Gujarat and about 1,680 min southern Gujarat. About 95% of the rainfall occurs during theJune-September monsoon. Variations in amount and timeliness of rainfall aresubstantial, which makes supplementary irrigation during the kharif seasonnecessary for stable and high crop yields. Intensive cropping in the rabiand hot seasons (November - April) is not feasible without irrigation becauseof low and uncertain rainfall (table 16b).

Topography and Soils

2.03 Gujarat mainland comprises extensive alluvial plains flanked by hillterrain in the eastern fringe. The area is flat and forms a gently inclinedplain from west to south, with a land slope range between 0-3%. Most of thesouthern mainland has deep black soils. The soils in the northern mainlandare coarser in texture (loamy sand to sandy loam) and are comprised of deepalluvium. The central mainland is marked by nearly level lands (slope lessthan 1Z) and inadequate surface drainage. The soils vary from clay loam toclay in texture, and are mostly covered under single paddy cultivation in thekharif season. The central part of the Saurashtra is elevated and the landslopes gently towards the coast and the plains of the Guiarat mainland. Thearea has medium deep soils (1-2 m) with texture ranging from loamy to clayey.Most of the MIP areas are well provided with a network of large number ofnatural drains and the soils are underlain by porous disintegrated rocksubstratum and are thus well drained.

2.04 The soil surveys carried out in the 29 MIP areas indicate that mostof the areas have been classified by all India Soil and Land Use Standardsas I, II, and III for irrigation, indicating their suitability to variousintensities of irrigation (table 6). The soils are free from salinity andalkalinity problems and are suitable for cultivation of food and nonfoodcrops under irrigation.

Land Use

2.05 Of the 18.8 M ha of total geographical area in the state, about 9.6 Mha (51%) is under cultivation. The forest occupies about 2 M ha (11%) andcannot be reduced further for cultivation without disturbing the ecologicalbalance. About 3.5 M ha (18%) are either barren, uncultivable or put tononagricultural uses. Cultivable wasteland accounts for 2 M ha (11Z) butmost of this land is located in Kutch and has extremely low production poten-tial without irrigation. The remaining 1.7 M ha (9%) are either fallow orused as permanent pastures and grazing land. In practice, there is littlescope for increasing the net cultivated area in Gujarat. The cropping inten-sities between 1970 and 1980 were low, averaging about 109%. About 18Z of

-8-

this intensity is cultivated with two seasonal and perennial crops. Giventhe low and irratic rainfall pattern, the intensity of cultivation cannot beincreased without irrigation.

Population and Land Tenure

2.06 The farming population of the subprojects' areas is estimated atabout 866,000 (1981). The total number of housebolds is estimated at 112,000with an average family size of about 7.7 persons per household. The meanfarm size is 3.4 ha, varying from about 4.1 ha in Saurashtra areas to 3.0 hain the Gujarat mainland. In general, the farmers in the low rainfall areaspossess more land than in high rainfall areas. According to 1977 agricul-tural census, practically 100% of all holdings were fully owned andself-operated. The socioeconomic surveys conducted in the 29 NIP areas inthe course of preparation for CWC appraisal, indicate that about 55% of thefarmers, having less than 2.5 ha, operate 25% of the land in Gujarat main-land, and about 45% of the farmers operate nearly 15% in Saurashtra. Thedistribution of holdings by size is summarized in the folloving table.

MIPs in Guiarat Mainland MIPs in SaurashtraFarm Z of x of Z of Z of

Size (ha) Household Area Household Area

below 1.0 17.9 4.3 10.0 2.31.1 - 2.5 36.7 20.6 33.5 11.42.6 - 5.0 28.9 29.9 27.3 22.6above 5.0 16.5 45.2 29.2 63.7

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Average Farm

Size 3.0 4.1

Crops and Yields

2.07 Gujarat has three cropping seasons: kharif (June-October), rabi(November-February), and hot weather (March-May). Most of the cropping takesplace during the kharif season, utilizing the monsoon rainfall. In rabi,crops are grown on residual moisture or with pump irrigation. Excep. inlimited areas with perennial irrigation (wells and pumps), no cultivation ispracticed during the hot season. The project area can be broadly classifiedinto five crop zones: zone I - pearl millet, wheat, and castor bean; zone II- groundnut, wheat, and cotton; zone III - paddy/sorghum, grams, and cotton;zone IV - maize, cotton, and tobacco; and zone V - paddy/sorghum, wheat, andcotton. The weighted average cropping intensity of these zones is about109%, varying from 128% in northern Gujarat (zone I) to 103% in theSaurashtra area (zone II). Weighted average irrigation intensity of allzones is low at 21% (table 18).

-9-

2.08 The most widely grown cereals in the project area are pearl milletand sorghum. GHB-J-1399, CJ-104, and GHB-32 are the most popular pearlmillet varieties. Yields of the rainfed average about 0.6 t/ha and theirrigated about 1.8 t/ha. Sorghum varieties recommended for kharif includethe hybrids CSH-5, CSH-6, and the composites CSV-3 and G-108. Because of lowyields of fodder and poorer grain quality, only about 52 of the cropped areais covered with HYVa. Yields of sorghum average about 0.5 t/ha for rainfedand 0.9 t/ha for irrigated. About 8% of the total cropped area is grown withpaddy. Local early maturing varieties like Sathi and Sukhvel (100 days) aregrown under rainfed with a yield of about 1.1 t/ha. Ratna, GR-ll, Jaya, andMasuri are the most popular transplanted varieties and give yields of about2 tlha. About 50% of the cropped area in Saurashtra (zone II) is occupiedwith kharif groundnut. It is mostly grown under rainfed conditions and theyield averages 0.7 tlha. Some irrigated groundnut is grown in the hot seasonand becoming increasingly popular wherever water is available. Maize is animportant crop of tribal areas (zones IV and V) and is grown under rainfedconditions. The popular varieties grown under residual moisture are A-206and A-206-3-13 and yield about 0.6 t/ha. This low yield is constrained byavailable moisture. Kalyansona and Sonalika are the two major wheatvarieties grown for irrigated area, yielding about 2.1 t/ha. Yield can beimproved if wheat is sown around mid-November. Mustard is mainly grown inthe northern area (zone I). Irrigated mustard yields about 1.1 t/ha andresidual moisture about 0.8 t/ha. Pigeon pea (kharif) and chick pea (rabi)are the two major pulse crops grown under unirrigated conditions. Theaverage yield is low at 0.6 t/ha. There are varieties of vegetables grownunder irrigated conditions in both kharif and rabi seasons. As they aregrown under intensive cultivation, yields are relatively high. The yield ofctaili is about 0.7 t/ha and potato 20 t/ha.

2.09 About 18% of total cropped area (68,000 ha) is occupied with seasonalcash crops mainly cotton, tobacco, and castor bean, of which cotton occupiesabout 90%. The main rainfed cotton varieties are of medium staple andinclude Digvijay, V 797, and Sanjay (275-day varieties), yielding about0.6 t/ha of seed cotton. Hybrid 4 (long staple 210-day variety) is a popularvariety grown under irrigated conditions. Anand 2 and Anand 119 are the twomajor bidi tobacco varieties. Irrigated tobacco yield about 1.6 t;ha andrainfed about 0.9 t/ha. Castorbean is grown in the low rainfall area ofcommand (zone I). Hybrid varieties (GCH 3 and Gauch 1) with a duration ofabout 160 days are commonly grown. Yields under rainfed conditions average1.1 t/ha and under irrigation about 1.5 t/ha (table 18).

Inputs Used

2.10 In 1982/83, sales of fertilizers amounted to 234,000 tons ofnitrogen, 114,000 tons of phosphate and 33,700 tons of potash in nutrient,which corresponds to the use of about 22 kg of nitrogen, 11 kg of phosphateand 3 kg of potash per ha cropped. This is slightly more than the averagefertilizer usage in India (31 kg/ha in 1981). Most of the fertilizers areused on irrigated paddy, wheat, vegetables, and irrigated cash crops. Asmall amount of plant chemicals is applied to major crops grown in the area,but largely limited to cotton, sugarcane, and vegetables. In 1981/82, chemi-cals valued about Rs 309 M were sold to farmers, which amounts to about Rs 29

-10-

for each ha cropped. The farmers in Gujarat are well aware of the benefitsarising from the use of high-quality seeds. In 1980/81, about 77% of pearlmillet grown in the state consisted of high-yielding varieties, wheat 71%,paddy 612, castor 68%, and cotton 192. In general, for self-pollinatedcrops, the seeds were renewed every four years. The bullock populationdensity, estimated at 2.2 bullock per ha (4.4 M bullocks over a net area of9.6 H ha in 1981), is considered adequate for cultivation activities.

III. THE PROJECT

General

Obiectives and Scope

3.01 The main objectives would be to: (i) complete the construction ofthe subprojects to adequate standards; and (ii) adopt in the subprojects arotational water management system based on predetermined scheduling andequitable water allocation. The criterion for including subprojects inPhase II is approval by the AC prior to Bank appraisal of Phase II. Accord-ing to this criterion 29 subprojects would qualify. While constructionactivities would account for most of the costs, the focus of the project willbe on achievement of the latter objective. Consequently, the main criterionfor determining the success of each subproject and the project as a wholewould be implementation of system management satisfying the water managementobjective. Similarly, the main criteria for assessing success of the con-struction activities would be (i) design to standards that would facilitatesystem management and minimize operational costs; and (ii) high quality ofworks to ensure their durability and minimize maintenance costs. The mainexpenditures would be on the following:

(a) Construction activities - completion of dams; completion ofthe distribution netwoA'c to 8-ha outlet, field channels, anddrains in 29 subprojects.

(b) Introduction of RWS, training, studies, monitoring and evaluation,and institutional strengthening.

Detailed Features

Construction Activities

3.02 Medium IrriRation Projects. Each of the 23 MIPs include the follow-ing works:

(a) a storage dam, usually earthfill with a gated reinforced concretespillway and canal headworks;

-11-

(b) a fully lined canal network that delivers water through outletsserving 8-ha subchaks; and

(c) a drainage network connected to natural drains.

These works are at various stages of construction on all subprojects exceptZankhari, where only site investigation and construction of access roads havestarted (table 1).

3.03 Of the 23 dams, 16 have been completed and work on seven is inprogress. Work on all dams will be completed under the project except forZankhari and Sipu dams. Zankhari main works will start in 1987 and areexpected to be completed in 1992. 1/ Sipu dam is under construction butfoundation problems have caused delays. A concrete diaphragm cut-off wall isrequired and consequently the entire dam construction is expected to takefour more years. Guhai dam also has difficult foundation geology, a concretediaphragm cutoff is specified under the main embankment and a 6m thick rein-forced concrete raft is required over a fault zone on the left side of thespillway.

3.04 Modernization. Modernization works that are underway in six schemesinclude the lining of existing main and branch canals of the existing,unlined distribution system originally designed to serve 40-ha chaks. Thesystems are being extended with fully lined minors to supply regulated out-lets serving 8-ha subchaks. Improved control structures are included toallow better regulation. The modernization works include also a majormodification to the Dantiwada storage facilities involving the constructionof an auxilliary spillway. This work is in progress and will be completed by1989. All the modernization works will be completed during the project.

3.05 Summary of Canal Construction Works. The volume of the distributionsystem works is summarized in the following table:

Phase I Phase II Total

Main Canal System

Earthworks (M m 3) 13.3 4.6 17.9Lining (M m') 7.1 5.3 12.4Structures (no.) 1,812 1,429 3,241

Minor Distribution System

Earthvorks (M m3 ) 7.1 13.7 20.8Lining (M m2 ) 5.4 11.5 16.9Structures (no.) 17,032 54,394 71,426(including outlets)

1, This KIP has been approved by the AC of CWC, subject to a clearance bythe Forestry Department of GOI.

-12-

As can be seen, concentration during Phase I was on main canal works (anddams, see tables 2a, 2b). Under this project (Phase II), the emphasis willshift to the minor distribution system. The large number of small structureswill make standardization essential and precasting techniques will be usedwherever possible.

3.06 Field Channels and Field Drains. Unlined field channels linking the8-ha outlet in nonpaddy areas with each individual holding, or where theholding is smaller than l ha to groups of holdings averaging about 1 ha, willbe constructed as a part of this project. Field drains will also be providedwhere necessary. About 200,000 ha will be provided with these facilitiesfrom the credit at an average cost of Rs 1,000/ha for field channels and Rs600/ha for field drains. The balance of about 175,000 ha in Panam, Dan-tiwada, Bhadar (M), Shetrunji, Machhu and other subprojects will be financedunder ongoing GOG programs.

3.07 Main Drainage. In 23 of the subprojects, located north of the Nar-mada River and in Saurashtra, there are no widespread drainage problems,since the soils are light, the rainfall less than 600 mm and the land surfacehas sufficient slope to be largely self-draining.JI] Of the remaining sixsubprojects, Fatehwadi and Kharicut are mainly rice areas and requireimproved drainage and Amli, Jhuj, and Kelia, which have heavier soils and arelocated in the higher rainfall area to the south, will require more extensivedrainage works. The natural drainage channels (nullahs) are used extensivelyas farm-access tracks that before irrigation is provided are useable for ninemonths of the year. With the field drainage from irrigation turned into thenullahs, they will become impassable for most of the time, and an alternativetrack will have to be provided on a reserved strip of land. Provisions havebeen made under the project for drainage improvements over about 30,000 ha atan average cost of Rs 2,000/ha.

3.08 Roads. All weather-access roads will be provided along all main andsecondary canals down to the 40-ha chak outlet. Motorcycle access will beprovided to the 8-ha subehak outlet. No rural roads were included either inPhase I or in this project since the existing network is largelv adequate forthe initial stages of development. GOG has a program to construct 2,100 kmof rural roads in the 7th Plan periods and plans to give priority to roadsserving the project areas. An agreement was reached with GOG, that it wouldby March 31, 1985 Zurnish to IDA for comments a plan, including an implemen-tation schedule for construction of feeder road network in the project area.

3.09 Communications. Provision is included for a radio telephone networkfor each subproject. Communication within each project will be availablefrom the dam or diversion down to the 2,000-ha level. Professional advice

1/ However, localized pockets of poor drainage exist in every subprojectand will require attention.

-13-

from the Department of Posts and Telecommunications of GOI will be obtainedbefore purchasing the equipment. Agreement was reached with GOI that it willissue all the authorizations and permits required fcr improvement of thetelecommunication network not later than six months prior to the completionof each subproject.

3.10 Equipment and Vehicles. Equipment totalling about Rs 177 M(US$16.4 M) would be provided under the project. This includes heavy con-struction plant, small scale compaction machines that will be required forthe minor networks, O&M equipment for spillway standby diesel generators,general maintenance equipment, communications equipment, and equipment fortraining.

Training. Studies. Institutional Strengthening and Introduction of RWS

3.11 Training. Provisions have been made for the following trainingactivities:

(a) Mechanical Plant maintenance courses for about 26 mechanical tech-nicians (skilled fitters) in the maintenance of construction plant.The training would be practical shop floor instruction for three tosix months preferably conducted by the manufacturers of equipmentcurrently in use. The mechanical equipment organization now operatesand maintains about 750 items of heavy equipment valued at US$50 M,and this training will provide key maintenance personnel with directcontact with manufacturers approved maintenance, overhaul, and repairmethods. The cost is estimated at US$240,000 (table 9i).

(b) Training in Rotational Water Supply. Appropriate short trainingcourses will be arranged for all concerned with irrigated agriculturein the subprojects (paras 5.06, 6.11). About 200 professional level,400 field level, and 8,800 progressive farmers (subchak leaders) willbe trained. Study tours for six senior officers will be provided inIndia and abroad.

(c) Demonstration Farm. Provisions have been made for improving thefacilities of the demonstration farm at Thasta in order to make itsuitable for training farmers in RWS (para 6.11).

(d) Vocational training for displaced persons (para 3.32).

3.12 Studies. Provisions have been made for the following:

(a) Zankhari subproject--to study some alternative concepts, including:

- Linking the reservoir with the Doswada Reservoir;

- Omiting some marginal areas with shallow soils and slopesexceeding 32;

-14-

- Preparing detailed soil surveys; and

- Considering integration of high-value crops like sugarcaneand irrigated eucalyptus.

(b) Monitoring and evaluation studies:

- Farmers likely response to irrrigation (para 5.21);

- Interim evaluation surveys in MIPs (para 5.22);

- Evaluation of the rehabilitation process (para 5.23);

- Establishment and monitoring of water-users' associations(para 7.10);

- Effectiveness of RWS in at least three subprojects (para 5.21);

- Special studies (para 5.22).

Cc) Dam fisheries potential. A study will be done to determine thepotential of the reservoirs for supporting a fish capture industry.

3.13 Institutional Strengthening. Provisions have been made for thefollowing:

(a) Creation of a new minor system design cell (para 5.06);

Cb) Strengthening the Quality Control Unit of the ID in Gandhinagarto facilitate quality control of minor system works (para 5.07);

Cc) Creation of a Water Management Unit under the CE (CADA) (para 5.08);

'd) Strengthening of the Project Planning and Monitoring Cell of the IDto assist monitoring of rehabilitation (para 5.23); and

(e) Assistance with planning and monitoring of construction activities(para 3.29).

3.14 Technical Services. Provisions have been made for using the servicesof universities and other specialized institutions and groups, such as theORG and the National Informatic Center of GOI (NIC), for introduction ofcomputerized systems, data analysis, and other specialized tasks. In addi-tion, specialist technical services of individual short-term consultantswould be provided through GOI under the UNDP project titled "Advisory Serv-ices for Modernization of Land and Water Schemes" (8IND/78/047) or its followup .

3.15 Introduction of Rotational Water SuPPlY. Provisions of Rs 350/hawere made for introduction of rotational water supply in the project area.

-15-

Design and Implementation Criteria

General

3.16 The entire irrigation network consists of three main parts:

Ci) the conveyance network that consists of main canals, branches, anddistributaries and conveys the water from the headworks (dam) tovillage service areas (VSA) of 200-500 ha whose boundaries willconform to the extent feasible with village boundaries;

(ii) the service area (minor) network conveying the water from theVSA outlet to subchak (8 ha) outlets; and

(iii) field channels from subchak to individual holdings.

Both the conveyance and minor networks will be fully lined and sized from"head-to-tail" according to the areas served downstream with the layouttaking into account topographic conditions. The field channels will not belined.

3.17 The following is a brief description of the hierarchy of theirrigation network in a typical subproject (figures in brackets indicatetypical flows in cfs): water is delivered from the dam through maincanal (200), branch canals (100), and distributaries (50) leadingto VSA outlets. Within the VSA, water is delivered through minors (6) tochak outlets, from chak to subchak through watercourses (or subminors) (1)and from subchak to individual holdings through field channels. No directofftake from a main, branch or distributary canal will be permitted exceptthrough a VSA outlet. (Map IBRD 18182)

3.18 The irrigation system will operate as follows (more details are inchapter 6): water will be rotated between VSAs in turns of 7 days withintervals between turns predetermined according to anticipated crop waterrequirements. During the turn, the flow reaching the VSA will be subdividedautomatically into chak rotational units in an equitable manner and servesimultaneously all the chaks. Within the chak the entire flow will berotated during each turn between the subchaks. Within the subchak water willbe rotated equitably between the farm holdings. The timing of all the turns(down to individual holding) will be determined before the beginning of theseason and, for a given season, will be at same day(s) and hours. Conse-quently, water supply will be predictable and farmers will be able tooptimize production.

Water Supply and Demand

3.19 Long term monthly rainfall records are available for most of Gujarat.Using the available data weighted mean rainfalls for the dam catchment areaswere computed. This was then correlated with gauged runoffs to produce20-year runoff series. Where no stream gauging was available the nearest

-16-

gauged catchment in the same climatic zone was used. Water requirements werevorked out based on the Modified Penman method. Effective rainfall wascalculated using FAO Publication No. 24. Field application efficiency wasassumed at 90% for paddy and 70% for upland crops (both kharif and rabi).The conveyance loss was taken as 30% for kharif and 25% for rabi. A monthlyreservoir operation simulation study was done for each project using a com-puter and, by trial and error, a cropping pattern was found that could besatisfactorily irrigated for 15 out of the past 20 years. The results areshown in table 16b. Crop water requirements in the five crop zones are shownin table 16a. The conveyance and minor networks are designed to serve thepropsed cropping pattern. The improved hydrological network will permitrefinement of the design and enable operation to be planned with reliableflow data.

Design of Conveyance Network

3.20 The main canal, branch canals, and distributaries will be designedfor a minimum perimeter section and lined with precast tiles bedded in alayer of mortar over a polythene sheet. The minimum size of tile foundsatisfactory for local conditions is 50x25x5 cm. Embankments will beproperly machine compacted. (Diagram 6)

3.21 Canal Structures. Cross regulators and precalibrated structureswould be constructed to ensure full control of the flows at all take-offpoints and maintenance of full supply level (FSL) so that discharge at anytake-off would not vary more than + 10% from the design discharge. At alltake-off points FSL in the main system would be controlled by undershot oroverflow gates and the take-off flows by undershot gates. Overshot controlin the main channel together with undershot flow to the branch can bearranged to produce a better module than both using undershot flow.

Design of the Minor (VSA) Network

3.22 The layout will take into account topography, roads, tracks, villageboundaries, and specialized crop requirements (particularly paddy and sugar-cane). Existing village tanks will be integrated into the system wheneverpossible and the design will minimize multiple parallel channels. Minornetworks will drain directly to drains or be tailended through field channelsto drains so that surplus water will not be discharged into farmers' fields.Where field drains are constructed to discharge into nullahs alternativeaccess along reserved strips of land will be required.

3.23 Open watercourses (subminors) will be constructed from standardprecast lightly reinforced trough sections bedded on mortar laid over a100-micron polythene sheet (Diagram 5). Embankments will be machine com-pacted in one section and then reexcavated for the trough (pad construction).Structures will be precast. VSA outlets will have calibrated adjustable flowdevices lockable in a given setting and combined with an on/off gate. Chakrotational units will receive fixed and constant flow through adjustableproportional modules (APM) or proportional dividers. Subchaks will receive

-17-

full flovs through simple on/off field channel outlets. Earth fields chan-nels will deliver water from the subchak outlet to the farmgate. Wheregradients permit, underground vatercourses constructed from either concreteor plastic pipe will be used. Subchak inlets will be riser chambers withflanged open/shut outlets.

Dam Safety

3.24 The design of the 24 project dams vas done by the Central DesignOrganization (CDO) of GOG, and reviewed by the CWC. Since the dams consistof earthfill construction and overtopping could cause catasti,phic failures,special care has been taken in the design of spillways, especially since thefailure of Machhu II Dam (pot included in the project) in 1979 (para 1.12).Appropriate techniques are used to derive probable maximum precipitation andapply it to unit graph analysis. Acceptable methods are in use for founda-tion design and control of seepage. Embankment stability is checked andseismic factors considered. Reinforced concrete design is in accordance withestablished practice. The project will provide standby generators foroperating all major spillway gates.

3.25 To ensure that prescribed methods and criteria are being met duringconstruction and later in the operation stages, GOG will constitute a DamSafety Panel of independent experts. Agreements were reached with GOG thatit would: (i) by December 31, 1984 establish and thereafter maintain a panelof experts satisfactory to IDA, to review the plans and designs of the damsand related structures under the project and their adequacy; (ii) cause thepanel to conduct periodic reviews of dams and related structures duringdesign and construction to examine whether any new grounds for making changeshave become apparent; and (iii) cause dams and related structures constructedunder the project to be periodically inspected in accordance with soundengineering practice to determine if any deficiencies exist in their condi-tion or in the quality and adequacy of their maintenance or methods oi opera-tion which may endanger their safety.

Construction Kethods

3.26 Canal and dam foundation excavation and canal and road embankmentconstruction are implemented mostly by manual labor and these labor-intensivemethods vill continue under the project. However, it is anticipated thatan increasing share of the work will have to be carried out by machinery forthe following reasons: (i) the rapid urban development in southern Gujarat;(ii) the significant migration of skilled construction workers to the MiddleEast; and (iii) the anticipated heavy labor demand from the Narmada develop-ment works that is to start soon. Under the project, all compaction of dams,canal and road embankments, paving of roads, and some excavation--especiallyfor drains-and stone breaking operations would be done with mechanicalequipment. Large- and medium-sized contractors in Gujarat typically own mostof the equipment required, except heavy and specialized equipment, which isusually owned by the ID and leased to the contractors. Compaction of minorcanal earthworks is especially problematic since it is very difficult to

-18-

compact hand-placed earthworks to the desired technical specification. Thesmaller contractors who usually undertake this work will not have anymechanical equipment. To resolve this problem small mechanical tampers willbe provided under the project for lease to these small contractors.

Status of Proiect Preparation

3.27 The requirements of OMS 2.28 h.ve been fully met. For the dams about90% of the detailed design and 70% of the construction works have alreadyoeen completed. Canal design is 90% prepared and canal construction 40%finished. Sufficient work has been done on the distribution system design(10% complete) to r4liably estimate project cost. The ID has agreed tostrengthen the CDO (para 5.06) to ensure that detailed designs for the dis-tribution system will be avaiable to meet the implementation schedule.

Implementation Schedule

3.28 The project would be implemented over a five-year period, fromJuly 1, 1984 to June 30, 1989 (chart 1) in accordance with the followingguidelines:

(a) MIPs. Priority will be given to early completion of the MIPsdesigned using the "Sansoli Model" 1/ (see table 2c); andconstruction works in MIPs, which are at the initial stagesof implementation like Zankhari, will begin after at least8 MIPs had been completed in all respects and had RWS operatingfor at least one crop season.

(b) Modernization Subproiects. Works will progress from the head-reaches to tailends.

(c) The basic implementation unit for the minor system will be theVSA; to the extent feasible, works in a VSA will be completedbefore development of a new adjacent VSA is undertaken.

(d) ConstructioD of field channels and drains in each VSA will becompleted simultaneously with completion of the construction ofwatercourses leading to the 8-ha outlet.

3.29 To facilitate realistic planning detailed implementation scheduleswill be prepared using standard microcomputer based PERT techniques adaptedto local requirements. PERT will be used as a dynamic management tool withthe data base being updated as often as necessary. Agreements were reached

1/ Kelia, Kalubhar, Machhundri, Uben, Watrak, Guhai, Mazam, Aji II, Aji IIIand Sipu will be designed entirely on the Sansoli model.

-19-

with GOG that it would: (i) by October 1, 1984 base the management of onesubproject on PERT techniques; and (ii) by October 1, 1985 exchange viewswith IDA on the applicability of such management techniques to the remainingsubprojects. The guiding principle will be to minimize the time betweenconstruction of the irrigation network and the beginning of RWS (generationof project benefits).

Rehabilitation

3.30 Under phase I of the project (as of November 1983), about 8,500displaced families were rehabilitated and about 80% of the private landrequired for dams and 34% of the land required for the canal system had beenacquired. Of the 24 dams, land acquisition had been completed in 17, over70% completed in three, and up to 50% in four (including Zankhari where landacquisition has not yet begun). The number of families still requiringcompensation (as of November 1983) was estimated at 10,600. Negotiationswith many of these are at an advanced stage.

3.31 As indicated (para 1.15) GOG introduced in November 1979 improvedstandards for compensation of displaced persons. These are:

(a) preference is to be given to resettle village units jointly at a newsite and infrastructure is to be provided at no cost to resettlers;

(b) preference is to be given to land compensation if farmland isavailable. Where land is not available, cash compensation isto be paid as following:

Ci compensation level is based on current values of the laud andincreased by 15% to compensate for compulsory acquisition;

(ii) a consent award has been introduced consisting of an additionalpayment of 25% of the market value if the oustee agrees to thesuggested compensation; and

(iii) additiona'l payment of Rs 5,000/ha (maximum) is given if theoustee wishes to purchase land from private sources on their own.

(c) houses are compensated for in cash, and housing plots are providedat no cost to the ousted families;

(d) resettlement grants are provided to all displaced families; and

(e) grant-in-aid is provided for poor landless oustees.

3.32 GOG is determined to take all the necessary measures to ensure that,after a resonable transition period, the displaced persons regain at least

-20-

their previous standard of living. However, since practically all the cul-tivable land is occupied and there are strict restriction on conversion offorest lands, it will not be possible to provide direct land compensation inmany cases. It would be essential therefore to include in the compensationalternatives offered to oustees the following:

(a) Develop the fisheries potential in the reservoirs and allocate thefishing rights to oustees. It is estimated that 1,000-1,500 familiescan be rehabilitated this way;

(b) Allocate to oustees the right to cultivate the peripheral areas ofthe reservoirs (about 15,000 ha - 1,000-1,500 families), andpreferential employment in maintenance works on the subprojects;

(c) Give oustees the first right for participation in project construc-tion works executed departmentally (about 4 million mandays); and

(d) Establish programs for vocational training and small businesscredit for oustees who would like to be rehabilitated innon-agricultural sectors.

3.33 The scope of compensation will be expanded to include full compensa-tion to all landless oustees, including artisans, storekeepers, landlessvorkers, etc. Moreover, to the extent possible oustees who had already beencompensated will benefit from provisions (a) to (d) above (para 3.32).

3.34 To ensure that oustees who are allotted land have sufficient fundsfor investment in the land allotted, the down payment for the land would notexceed 50% of the compensation to which they are entitled. The balance wouldbe treated as an interest free loan repayable over 20 years.

3.35 GOG vill take all possible steps to guide oustees who are compensatedin cash in the use of the compensation to restore their earning capability.The main instrument would be a new Guidance Cell which will be establishedvithin each Rehabilitation Committee (para 3.39) by December 31, 1984. TheGuidance Cell will advise oustees on how to use the cash compensation inorder to create alternative source of income and employment.

3.36 The balance of outstanding debts will not be subtracted from theamount of compensation. If the land acquired had been used to secure anoutstanding loan or any other obligation, this function will be transferredto the new asset(s).

3.37 The project includes special provisions of Rs 54 M (US$5.0 M) for theconstruction of roads, water supply, waste disposal facilities, schools,community centers and other facilities where oustees are resettled in groups(para 3.30 (a)).

3.38 Under the project, the planning and monitoring of the rehabilitationprocess would be considerably improved. Rehabilitation Committees havealready been established in each subproject. Each committee will bestrengthened with a social worker and will establish a Guidance Cell (para3.35). The Project Planning and Monitoring cell (para 5.19) will have theresponsibility for: (i) preparation of an integrated overall plan for

-21-

rehabilitation and resettlement; (ii) preparation of detailed rehabilitationplans for each subproject in which the rehabilitation of more than 300families had not been completed by June 30, 1984; and (iii) monitoring therehabilitation process. A detailed rehabilitation plan will be prepared forZankhari KIP in which works and rehabilitation have not yet begun. Provi-sions have been made for the engagement of a social institute, like theCenter for Social Studies in Surat, on an advisory capacity for the planning,implementation and monitoring of rehabilitation. Finally the project wouldfinance evaluation studies of rehabilitation in five subprojects (para 5.23).

3.39 Agreements were reached with GOG, that it would: (i) maintain withineach subproject a Rehabilitation Committee; (ii) by December 31, 1984 preparean integrated overall plan, agreed with IDA for rehabilitation and resettle-ment of displaced persons, which will include, inter alia, development offisheries, cultivation of peripheral reservoir areas, participation of ous-tees in project construction works and plans for vocational training;(iii) prepare and adopt in consultation with IDA detailed rehabilitationplans for ongoing subprojects in which the rehabilitation of more than 300families had not been completed by June 30, 1984; (iv) prepare detailedrehabilitation plan agreed with IDA for Zankhari by December 31, 1985; and(v) rehabilitate displaced persons in accordance with the guidelines set upin schedule A.

IV. COST ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS

Cost Estimates

4.01 Estimated project costs would total Rs 3,716 M (US$344.1 M) includingtaxes and duties which are negligible. Cost estimates are based on expectedJune 1984 prices and include physical contingencies ranging from 152 to 202for major construction works in the subprojects and averaging 92 of the basecost. Detailed cost estimates are given in tables 9a to 9j and summarized inthe following table:

Proiect Cost Summary

Project Component Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total---- (Rs M)---- --- C(Us M) -

Construction ofMIPs (23) 1,811.7 266.3 2078.0 167.8 24.7 192.5

Modernization ofProjects (6) 672.2 107.5 779.7 62.2 10.0 72.2

Training 12.8 3.6 16.4 1.2 0.3 1.5Monitoring and studies 69.3 3.3 72.6 6.4 0.3 6.7Total base cost 2,566.0 380.7 2,946.7 237.6 35.3 272.9Physical contingencies 222.2 39.2 261.4 20.6 3.6 24.2Price contingencies 441.5 66.5 508.0 40.9 6.1 47.0Total project cost 3,229.6 486.4 3,716.0 299.1 45.0 344.1

-22-

4.02 Price contingencies which account for about 17% of total projectcosts were based on expected inflation rates of 8%, 7%, 7%, 7%, 6Z for1984/89 local expenditures and 3.5%, 8%, 9%, 9Z, 9% for foreign expenditures.

Financinz

4.03 The proposed credit of US$172 N would finance the foreign exchangecomponent (US$45 M) and about 42% of local costs. All expenditure' would bemet by COG from its development budget, which includes a GOI contribution.GOG has allocated adequate funds under the 7th Plan for this project andfinancial projections made indicate that it will be able to fulfill itsfinancial obligation under the project. The IDA credit would be made onstandard IDA terms. An agreement was reached with GOI that it would make theproceeds of the credit available to GOG on GOI's standard terms and arrange-ments for development assistance to the state. Agreements were reached withGOG that it vould (i) promptly provide resources and funds to execute theproject in accordance with the project implementation and expenditure programand (ii) complete unfinished subprojects as soon as technically and finan-cially feasible after the credit had been disbursed. To avoid interruptionin works between Phase I and II, retroactive finance not exceeding US$15.0 Mvould be provided for qualified expenditures incurred after February 1, 1984.

Procurement

4.04 Civil Works. Civil works financed under the project (about 78% ofthe total cost) would cost about Rs 2,909 M (US$269.4 M), including physicaland price contingencies, but excluding land, engineering, and administrationcosts. Although works would be packaged wherever practicable, none of theconstruction activities could be grouped into packages of a size that wouldinterest foreign bidders, and no procurement of civil works under ICB proce-dures is anticipated. Contracts for the dams, main and branch canal systemfor between US$0.3 M and US$5.0 M each are expected to total US$144 N andcontracts for between US$25,000 and US$0.3 M to total US$45 M. These workswill be procured under local competitive bidding (LCB) procedures satisfac-tory to IDA in which foreign bidders have the opportunity to participate.IDA reviewed and approved work-order type bidding procedures will be used onsmall contracts costing less than US$25,000 each, up to an aggregate of 10%of the disbursement for civil works. Some works would be done departmentallyup to an aggregate of 20% of the disbursement for civil works.

4.05 Eguipment and Vehicles. Equipment and vehicles totalling aboutRs 177 M (US$16.4 M), including physical and price contingencies are includedin the project. Items totalling about Rs 120 M (US$11.1 M) would be groupedin appropriate bidding packages and procured by international competitivebidding (ICB) in accordance with IDA guidelines. Qualified domestic manufac-turers would receive a preference in bid evaluation of 15%, or the prevailingcustoms duty if lower, and bid documentt would specify their eligibility andthe manner of application of the preference. Light equipment and vehiclesestimated to total about Rs 57 M (US$5.3 M) are readily available domesti-cally. Because of existing servicing and spare parts facilities, con-siderable advantages would be derived from procuring locally manufacturedlight equipment and vehicles. These goods would be procured under LCB proce-dures satisfactory to IDA.

-23-

(US$ millions)Procurement Method

Project Work TotalCategory ICB LCB Order /a Departmental /a NA Cost

Land acquisition 19.6 19.6(0) (0)

Civil works 0 188.7 26.9 53.8 269.4(0) (108.5) (15.5) (31.0) (155.0)

Equipment 11.1 5.3 0 0 16.4(9.5) (4.5) (0) (0) (14.0)

Training 1.7 1.7(1.5) (1.5)

Monitoring/ 1.6 1.6Development/ (1.5) (1.5)StudiesEngineering and 35.4 35.4administration (0) (0)

TOTAL 11.1 194.0 26.9 53.8 58.3 344.1(9.5) (113.0) (15.5) (31.0) (3.0) (172.0)

Note: Figures in parentheses are the respective amounts financed by the Credit./a Maximum permitted.

4.06 Contract Review. All bidding packages for works estimated to costRs 5.4 M (US$0.5 M) or more, and all ICB packages for goods, would be subjectto IDA's prior review of procurement procedures resulting in a coverage ofabout 50% of the total estimated value of works, and 70% of goods procure-ment. The balance of contracts would be subject to a random post review byIDA.

4.07 Standard Bid Documents and GOG Special Tender Committee. The CentralWater Commission of GOI has recently developed model ICB and LCB biddingdocuments and procedures for both works and goods procurement. The modeldocuments have been approved by IDA, and GOG would use them for procurementunder the project.

Disbursements

4.08 Disbursements would be made for:(a) Civil works - 50% of expenditures on dams, spillways, regulators,

major canals, main drainage, and the distributionnetwork to the 8-ha outlet

- 100% of expenditure on field channels and field drains- 100% for rehabilitation infrastructure up to a limit

of US$5.0 N(b) Equipment and vehicles - 100% of imported equipment and ex-factory

cost of local equipment- 70% for other locally procured equipment

-24-

(c) Introduction of rotational water supply management system -Rs 350/ha of incremental RWS area conforming to schedule B

(d) Training, pilot operations, monitoring, development and studies - 100X

Disbursements for works constructed by departmental forces and payments ofless than Rs 300,000 for works and Rs 150,000 for goods may be made againstcertificates of expenditures, itemized by subproject. Documentation forthese works would be retained by the government concerned and made availablefor inspection by IDA during review missions. Full documentation would berequired for all other disbursements.

4.09 Disbursement for the field channels and field drains will be forcompleted VSAs. COG would provide certificates of completion for the fieldchannels and drains for each subproject, certifying completion to full opera-tional status to the farm gate or 1-ha block. No disbursement for Zankharisubproject will be made before at least 8 subprojects are complete and havebeen operated successfully under RWS for at least one crop season. No disbur-sements will be made for subprojects having more than 300 families torehabilitate, before IDA approval of detailed rehabilitation and resettlementplans indicating the land areas to be offered as compensation.

4.10 The estimated schedule of expenditures, the semiannual disbursementschedule and the proposed allocation of the proceeds of the credit arepresented in tables 10, 11, and 12, respectively. It is expected that dis-bursements would be completed by December 31, 1989. As this project isphase II of an ongoing program, the disbursement profile follows the secondhalf of typical profiles for comparable work in this sector.

Accounts and Audits

4.11 The project would be subject to normal government control and audit-ing procedures that are satisfactory. A resident audit officer representingthe state accountant general, would audit the project accounts. Separateaccounts would be maintained for project expenditures. Although continuousand annual audits are carried out in a timely manner, their finalization is alengthy process in the Statutory Audit Report presented to the legislature.It would be essential, therefore, to have interim certified statements ofaccount including audited statements of expenditures. Such statements,certified by the accountant general or his designee and supported by anitemized account and summary of expenditures, would be submitted to IDA assoon as possible after the end of each fiscal year. Agreements were reachedwith GOG that it would: (i) maintain separate accounts for project expendi-tures; (ii) ensure that such project accounts are audited annually and thatcopies of sucb accounts, certified as to their accuracy by an independentauditor acceptable to IDA, are submitted to IDA not later than nine monthsafter the end of each fiscal year; (iii) have final audits prepared forproject accounts for each fiscal year by an auditor acceptable to IDA andforward such audit reports to IDA immediately after their finalization; and(iv) make complete accounts and financial statements available for inspectionduring IDA review missions.

-25-

V. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

The Irrigation Department (ID)

5.01 General. Primary responsibility for implementation of the projectrests with the ID. Subprojects would be planned, designed, and constructedby the ID, which also has responsibility for their operation and maintenance(O&M) after completion. The ID has an adequate cadre of well-trainedengineers already in post to meet the project work load. The administrativehead of department is the secretary of irrigation who directs the departmentthrough two special secretaries and six chief engineers. The ID has beenrecently divided into three wings:

(a) Irritation Projects (IP) - responsible for all design and construc-tion to the 8-ha outlet (under the direction of a secretary).

(b) Command Area Development (CAD) - responsible for CADAs and all CADworks as well as well as for O&M of all irrigation projects (underthe direction of a secretary).

(c) Narmada Development - under the direct control of the secretary ofirrigation.

The most important feature of the new organization is in the separationbetween O&M and construction functions.

5.02 Allocation of staff to construction activities is determined by thevolume and complexities of the works. The main units are the constructioncircles. Each circle is headed by a superintending engineer (SE) and handlesa work program of US$5-10 M annually. All designs of canals and minor canalstructures for the circle are prepared by a design office directly under theSE. To ensure adequate quality of the work there is a quality control unitunder each SE. Typically the circle consists of 4-6 divisions, headed byexecutive engineers (EEs), and about 25 subdivisions. In all 363 subdivi-sions (table 14a) are sanctioned for the project. Mechanical plant andequipment for construction and maintenance is under the direction of a chiefengineer (mechanical) with joint secretary status. There are two mechanicalcircles, one for south Gujarat and one for north Gujarat and Saurashtra. Themechanical plant organization owns and operates about 750 major items ofmechanical equipment, including crawler tractors, scrapers, dump trucks,excavators, and motor graders.

-26-

5.03 There are four CADAs in Gujarat: Ukai-Kakrapar; Mahi-Kadana; NorthGujarat; and Saurashtra. Each CADA is headed by an area development commis-sioner vho is assisted by an Advisory Committee. Presently, the main func-tions of the CADAs are to carry out works such as field channels, fielddrains, and land levelling. All the subprojects have already been assignedto a CADA.

5.04 The primary responsibility for O&M functions is with the EE in chargeof an O&M division. He has practically all powers regarding maintenancerepairs, management of works, distribution, and control of water in the areasallocated to his division. Normally, an irrigation division covers about60,000 ha to 80,000 ha of cultivable command area (CCA). A division consistof 4-5 subdivisions each headed by an assistant engineer and covers 16,000 hain respect of major and medium irrigation schemes and 10,000 ha in respectto minor irrigation schemes. The subdivision has 4-5 sections each headed bya section officer assisted by supporting staff of beat karkoons, chovkidors,and khalasies. A beat karkoon covers 600 to 800 ha of CCA and is responsiblefor distribution of water, measurement of cropped area, preparation of state-ments, and supervision of day-to-day maintenance of channels in his jurisdic-t ion.

5.05 Successful implementation of the project will require somestrengthening of the ID, especially the sections dealing with: design ofthe minor distribution system; quality control; and operation. Details arein the following paras.

5.06 Strengtheninu of the Central DesiRn Organization (CDO). The CDO(located in Gandhinagar) lays down design standards, provides typical designsfor minor distribution channels and structures, and prepares detailed designsfor major work such as dams and canal structures. In order to ensure a quickprojectwide adoption of the design standards developed in the Sansoli pilotproject (para 1.14), a new Minor System Design Cell will be created in theCDO. Its main functions will be to: establish uniform design standards forminor systems; monitor regularly the designs produced by the field designoffices; and conduct training workshops on the layout design of the minorsystems assisted by consultants where necessary. The staff required would be1 SE, 4 EEs, 8 AEs and support staff.

5.07 Strengtheninz of Quality Control. Quality control over the entirestate is undertaken by the central Quality Control Unit (QCU) atGandhinagar. Quality control of minor system works poses special difficul-ties because such works are spread over large areas. Under the project theQCU will develop a methodology for random checks of the quality of minorsystem works and conduct such checks through regular biweekly visits of eachsubproject. To enable such control levels, the QCO will be provided with 4additional EEs with support staff and vehicles.

5.08 Introduction of RWS. The RWS procedures introduced under theproject, which will be based on predetermined schedules, will differ sig-nificantly from the present "application and sanction" system. Successfulintroduction of RWS in each subproject will require strong support from IDheadquarters and close monitoring. To achieve this GOG will create a Water

-27-

Management Unit (WMU) under the chief engineer (CADA), consisting of one SEand 5 EEs assisted by support staff.

5.09 Agreements. Agreements were reached with GOG, that it would (i) bycreate a new minor system design cell and Water Management Unit in the ID;and (ii) strengthen the Quality Control Unit to facilitate quality control ofminor system works and follow quality control procedures agreed with IDA.

The Central Water Commission (CWC)

5.10 The CWC is the highest technical authority for water resourcesdevelopment in India. Its responsibilities include in particular technicalreview of all major and medium irrigation projects before they are submittedfor approval to the Planning Commission of GOI. CWC is a large and complexorganization with a staff of more than 1,000 engineers, many of whom are onrotation from the states. The Commission itself consists of a chairman andfour members.

5.11 The Appraisal Committee (AC) of CWC was established in 1977 in con-nection with the Orissa Irrigation I Project (Credit No. 740-IN) and hasundertaken appraisal and supervision function in three IDA supportedline-of-credit projects for medium irrigation development (para 1.10). Thequality of the CWC appraisal and supervision work has been satisfactory andhas consistently improved. The appraisal function will not be needed inPhase II since all the subprojects have already been appraised, but anexpanded role in supervision will be necessary. Under the project, the CWCwill increase the intensity of its supervisions and extend the duration ofsupervision visits to individual subproject to enable greater coverage of:minor system design and construction; and system operation and introductionof RWS.

Supporting Services

5.12 The Agricultural Department (AD). The AD would be responsible forextension work in the project areas. The AD would also have overall respon-sibility of training block leaders and operation of a Farmer's TrainingCenter to be constructed under the project by ID (para 5.14).

5.13 Agricultural Extension. The IDA-assisted "Training and Visit" (T&V)system of agricultural extension was introduced in Gujarat in 1979 under theComposite Agricultural Extension Project (Credit No. 862-IN). Under thisproject, regular demonstrations and up-to-date advice on farming practiceswas provided to the farmers through regular visits from trained villageextension workers (VEWs). The T&V system called for reorganization of theextension staff to work exclusively on extension in a single line of commandunder the director of agriculture (DA) and provided for facilities and equip-ment to support extension and training programs. It also provided forincreased staff to provide adequate field coverage aiming at one VEW servinga group of about 500-800 farm families. The progress with the extensionproject has generally been satisfactory. However, a number of subject matterspecialist (SMS) and VEW posts have not been filled. As the proposed projectis expected to benefit from improved extension services provided through theT&V system, the sanctioned staff posts should be filled without delay. Anagreement was reached with GOG that it would provide the required staff for

-28-

adequately carrying out the agricultural extension services under theproject.

5.14 Agricultural Research. The Gujarat Agricultural University (GAU) isresponsible for agricultural research through its four campuses at Anand,Dantivada, Junagadh, and Navsari. Each of these campuses represents fourbroad agroclimatic zones of the state. GAU maintains 13 main research sta-tions specializing in different crops. Their main works involve, amongothers, selection and testing of superior varieties, improved cultural prac-tices, and plant protection. Each campus conducts locality-specific researchto meet the needs of the farmers in the area and coordinates the researchactivities of these stations. Research findings of the main stations aretested through a network of 38 substations located throughout the statebefore dissemination to the farmers. The technical breakthrough achieved byGAU in pearl millet, cotton, and castor in particular has helped to improvethe productivity of these crops in the state and other parts of the country.GAU, since its inception in 1972, has released 77 improved varieties ofdifferent crops having better yield, potential, and quality characteristics.

5.15 Research on irrigated agriculture is carried out on 16trial-cum-demonstration farms. The main focus of this research has been todetermine water requirements in relation to soil types, climate and criticalstages of crop growth. So far, little attention has been given to irrigationpractices.

5.16 Agricultural Credit. The agricultural credit system in Gujaratfollows normal pattern of India. The cooperative banks, which provide shortand medium term credit to the farmers, are organized on a three tier basiswith the Gujarat State Cooperative Bank at the state level, 18 centralcooperative banks at the district level and 6,800 primary cooperative creditsocieties at the village level. There are about 1.9 H members of thecooperatives, of which about 0.7 M are borroving members. Presently the rateof interest charged is 12% per year. The State Laud Development Bank (SLDB)through its 182 branches provide long term loans at an average interest rateof about 11%. The commercial banks also provide all three types of credit.They now account for about 40% of institutional credit for agriculture.Recovery rates are low: 52% for the primary credit societies (1981) and 45%for the SLDB (1983).

5.17 Agricultural Inputs. Gujarat has a well-developed system for dis-tribution and sale of seeds, fertilizers, and plant protection chemicalsthroughout the state. The Gnjarat State Seeds Corporation and the GujaratState Cooperative Marketing Fe.eration (GSCMF) are two agencies engaged inproduction and distribution of improved seeds. The quality of seed is con-trolled by the Gujarat State Seeds Certification Agency. There are fourfertilizer companies in Gujarat producing nitrogenous, phosphatic and mixedfertilizers. The production of fertilizers from these companies in 1980-1981amounted to about 400,000 tons of nitrogen and 250,000 tons of phosphate,which corresponds to about 18% share of nitrogen production and 30% phosphatein all India. The distribution of fertilizers in the state is largelythrough the cooperative network. GSCNF handles about 70% of fertilizersales. The remaining are distributed by the fertilizer manufacturers them-selves at their local sale depots and by the Gujarat Agro-Industries Corpora-tion through their agrocenters. Out of about 6,000 distributors, over 80X

-29-

are cooperative units. There are about 9,600 agrochemical sale centers inthe state, mostly in the rural areas. About one-third of these centers areoperated through cooperative units. About 7,000 tons of chemicals are beingsold to the farmers annually. In general, agricultural inputs are usuallyavailable within easy reach of the farmers.

5.18 Marketing. Processing and Storage. Some 422 agricultural marketsoperate in Gujarat, of which 141 are regulated. As Gujarat has about half ofits cultivated area under cash crops like oilseeds, cotton, tobacco, andsugarcane, most of the trade of these crops is through regulated markets thatserve a specified area, usually within 10 km radius. There are about 114,000licensees, of which about 111,000 or 98% are traders, and the rest arecooperative societies. The traders obtain licences to operate inside theservice areas of the regulated markets. On account of well-developed systemof marketing in the state, the farmers get reasonable rates of their produce.Gujarat has a large number of processing facilities mainly for commercialcrops. There are over 800 private oil extraction units with monthly crushingcapacity of nearly 0.8 M ton of groundnut. In addition, there are 17 oilmills owned by cooperatives. All 15 sugar mills are in the cooperativesector with daily crushing capacity of about 2,000 ton. There are 970ginneries, 200 cotton presses and over 1,300 textile units in the state thatprocess lint into yarn. They employ about 0.25 M local workers. There arenearly 6,100 godowns operated by primary cooperatives that provide a storagecapacity of about 860,000 ton and the Gujarat State Warehousing CorporationCGSWC) maintains 74 storage centers in the state having a storage capacity ofabout 220,000 ton. In general, the present system for marketing, processingand storage, which is highly competitive, has responded quickly to increasedoutput of both foodgrains and cash crops.

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)

5.19 The ID would require the support of an effective Project Planningand Monitoring Cell (PPM) for the following purposes: (i) ensuring a reli-able assessment of progress and constraints in each subproject so that timelycorrective management actions can be undertaken; (ii) implementation and/orsupervision of studies and investigations; (iii) preparation of rehabilita-tion plans and monitoring of the rehabilitation process; (iv) preparation ofannual plans for the project; and (v) preparation of progress reports. Theexisting Project Preparation and Monitoring Cells will be merged into one PPMCell which would be strengthened with an economist and a sociologist toenable it to perform the above functions.

5.20 The main source of construction monitoring data would be periodicalprogress reports prepared by the SE responsible for each subproject. Currentdata on the quality of project works, especially minor system works, would beprovided by the QCU. Monitoring of water supply would be based on monthlyreports provided by the AE in charge of operating the project, and on specialcase studies (see below). The performance of water users' association willbe monitored by the PPM Cell (para 7.10).

5.21 A special Irrigation Intention Survey would be completed in each MIPat least six months before the beginning of irrigation. The survey wouldbe based on a random sample and its objectives would be to estimate: thepercentage of farmers who intend to use irrigation services; and those who do

-30-

not plan to irrigate - the main reasons. The respective CADA and the WaterManagement Committee (WMC) will then take immediate steps to remove theconstraints to full utilization of the irrigation services by all thefarmers. Special studies aimed evaluating the effectiveness of the RWS wouldbe conducted in at least three subprojects. The study would be carried outby an appropriate university.

5.22 Evaluation. Baseline socioeconomic surveys were conducted in eachsubproject during preparation. An interim evaluation survey would be con-ducted in each subproject two years after the beginning of irrigation. Thesesurveys will focus on: reliability and equity of water supply; the extent towhich irrigation potential had been utilized; and estimate of irrigationbenefits. The report summarizing the findings of each survey should includealso clear recommendations for corrective actions. The respective CADA andWMC would take corrective actions as soon as possible after the study hadbeen completed. In addition to the above, provisions have been made also forspecial studies (to be determined by the PPM) such as planning croppingpatterns under warabandi, etc.

5.23 Monitoring and evaluation of the rehabilitation process would also bethe responsibility of the PPM Cell. PPM staff will visit regularly thesubprojects having more than 300 families to rehabilitate, review progress,and interview oustees. The PPM will report to the Secretary Irrigation onany deviation from the approved compensation procedures. Evaluation wouldconsist of case studies in the following MIPs: Und, Watrak, Sipu, Deo andGuhai. The studies would review the rehabilitation process in each of theselected MIPs and analyze, on the basis of a random sample survey, theproportion of oustees whose standard of living was found to be higher, same,and lower than before rehabilitation. The adequacy of the compensationpackage would be analyzed, especially its adequacy for the purchase of alter-native land. The studies would be completed by December 31, 1986.

5.24 The evaluation studies (including rehabilitation) would be sub-contracted to universities or similar institutions, which would be guidedand supervised by the PPM Cell. Provisions have been made under the projectfor computerization of M&E activities. Assistance would be provided by theNIC or similar institutions. Agreements were reached with GOG that it would:(i) strengthen and maintain the PPM Cell wiLh staffing pattern and functionsagreed by IDA; and (ii) carry out a program of monitoring and evaluationagreed with IDA.

5.25 GOG would submit to IDA semiannual and annual progress reports,within three months after the end of each reporting period. The reportsshould: (i) compare plan and actual implementation in physical and financialterms; (ii) describe deviations from plans and explain the reasons; and (iii)provide a revised implementation schedule. In addition, GOG would submit toIDA quarterly reports on the progress of rehabilitation. An agreement wasreached with GOG that it vould submit to IDA a project completion report notlater than six months after the closing date.

-31-

VI. ORGANIZATION OF WATER SUPPLY

Present Situation

6.01 The organization of water distribution in outlet commands in Gujaratis based on application (by farmer) and sanction (by ID) and has the follow-ing main features:

(a) Farmers apply for water at or prior to the beginning of thecrop season: the application specifies both the crop(s)and area(s) to be irrigated.

(b) The applications are received by the ID and converted intovolumes of water required at various levels in the system(outlet, minor, distributary, etc.).

(c) Farmers receive "sanction" from the ID to irrigate eitherthe area applied for, or, if demand exceeds availablewater, some smaller area.

(d) A schedule of operation is drawn up, and publicized,indicating which channels will flow in which weeks of theseason.

(e) A schedule of irrigation at the farm level is drawn up,indicating the order in which farmers should draw waterwithin the chak.

The ID is then responsible to operate the system according to the scheduleand to ensure that the flow at the outlets (serving typically 40 ha), ismaintained constantly at 1 cfs. The farmers are responsible to take thewater in turn, irrigating only the sanctioned area, and when all the farmersin a chak have drawn sufficient water to irrigate the sanctioned area, theoutlet is closed until the next irrigation begins.

6.02 The system has several practical difficulties ae a basis for effi-cient irrigation.

(a) Outlets are generally gated pipes, capable of drawing 1 cfs vhen theparent channel is at half FSL. In fact, most gz es are broken, andregulation at the outlet, which is critical to tnie system, is at bestoff/on using mud or vegetation to plug the pipe. This leads tooverdrawing in head and outlets, and unreliable supply in the tails.

(b) Even where the outlet is opened on schedule, the time that farmersmay take to irrigate the sanctioned area may vary significantly ddeto variations in flow rate, the degree of levelness of the field, andsoil type (wastage of water by overirrigation is prohibited underrules but impossible to prevent).

-32-

(c) Farmers may miss their turn, or choose not to irrigate at night. Insuch cases, the ID will normally try to make up the turn.

(d) Sanctions are often delayed vell into the kharif season. The farmerdelays applying in the hope that rain vill make irrigation unneces-sary. Once sanctioned he has to pay. Any delay in the kharif cropleads to delay in the rabi and further loss of production.

These factors undermine the schedule of opez cion set by the ID, causingunreliability of flow at the outlet (in timing, qpantity, and duration),which further encourages lack of discipline because farmers tend to overir-rigate whenever water is available. The cumbersome application requirement(many farmers are illiterate) and the unreliable water supply (especially totail-enders) are among the primary reasons for the poor utilization of theirrigation potential in many irrigation projects.

Rotational Water Supply

6.03 RIS systems like the varabandi have operated successfully in Indiafor many years, especially in the North (the states of Punjab and Haryana,and in Rajasthan Canal) and are presently amongst the best managed systems inthe country. There is a general agreement in India that for the present,RWS is the most suitable organizational method for distributing limited waterresources among large number of farmers, reliably and equitably. While theorganizational details of warabandi are generally known, the underlyingprinciples and the built-in incentives for economically rational water useare not always clearly perceived and are summarized below:

(a) Efficient Water Use. Each farmer is allocated a fixed quota ofirrigation water (expressed in hours), which is insufficient forirrigating the entire holding, therefore, resulting in a waterconstraint. With water being the limiting factor, farmers tendto grow the crops that would maximize the return per unit ofwater. In addition the (usually high) opportunity cost of waterinduces the farmer to take actions to increase field irrigationefficiencies, such as field leveling and keeping the field channelsin good condition.

(b) Management. The predetermined water supply and associatedoperational criteria make the system easy to manage and tomonitor; any deviation from the principle of equity can beeasily detected by the farmers.

(c) Discipline. The entire water is allocated during each turn toan individual farmer through time-bound inflexible schedules;consequently, vater stealing is extremely difficult and thereforerare.

Despite its rigidity, RWS schedules can meet the requirement of most of thecrops grown in Gujarat (see SDV, annex 5).

6.04 Being aware of the deficiencies of the sanctioning system and thegreat advantages of RWS systems like the warabandi, GOG has promoted intro-duction of RWS in several subprojects. For the proposed Sardar Sarovar

-33-

Project (Narmada), GOG proposes system operation criteria that will notrequire sanctioning. Similar principles have been adopted under this (PhaseII) project.

Water Allocation

6.05 In every subproject water will be allocated to farmers in accordancewith the following principles: (i) supplies of available water will beallocated to farmers uniformly within each subproject in proportion to thenet CCA owned; however, to the extent possible small and marginal farmerswill be given a special preference; (ii) each farmer will be free to irrigatecrops of his choice, subject to some predefined restrictions and will not berequired to submit seasonal applications; and (iii) seasonal water alloca-tions would be delivered according to predetermined weekly schedules designedto meet water requirements of the predominant crops in the area.

Operation and Management of Subproiects

6.06 Determination of delivery schedules would involve an assessment ofwater availability and the cropping plans before the beginning of the rabiseason. During peak crop demand and land preparation periods, delivery toVSAs would be continuous for 2, 3, or 4 weeks and farmers would receiveirrigation turns at weekly intervals. During nonpeak periods, intervalsbetween irrigation would not exceed the following:

For the rabi season - 3 weeks

For the kharif season - 2 consecutive weeks in which no more than35 mm effective rainfall were recorded

The rotational schedule amongst the farmers would be fixed and published onvillage notice boards, so that every farmer would kuow in advance the hourand the day of each week he would receive water. Both the hour and day of afarmer's rotational turn would be fixed. Schedules would be advanced or setback by 12 hours every year, so that night irrigation turns would be rotatedannually amongst the farmers.

6.07 As indicated (para 5.04) subprojects would be managed by an assistantengineer (AE) and support staff who will be responsible for preparation ofthe delivery schedule. The AE and his staff would be assisted by a WMC,which would be established in each subproject and consist of the folloving:(i) farmer representatives elected by the Service Area Committees (seebelow); (ii) relevant GOG officers; and (iii) the chairman of the localelected body (Panchayat Samiti). The subproject AE would be the ex officiochairman of WNC. The WMC would supercede the Canal Advisory Committeespecified under Phase I. For efficient project operation an adequate com-munications system is a prerequisite and provision has been included for aradio telephone system in all subprojects.

6.08 Service Area Committees consisting of representatives of each chakwould be established in each VSA. Their main functiuns would be: (i) toresolve disputes between VSA farmers; (ii) check the consistency of the chakschedule with water allocation principles; (iii) warn violators of RWS dis-cipline; and (iv) organize maintenance of field channels.

-34-

6.09 Agreements were reached with GOG that it would: (i) provide andmaintain a suitably qualified officer at each subproject, with respon-sibilities and functions as needed for efficient management no later than 12months before the begining of irrigation, or if irrigation has already begunby September 30, 1984; (ii) establish and thereafter maintain at each sub-project a WMC, no later than 12 months before the beginning of irrigation, orif irrigation has already begun, by December 31, 1984; and (iii) establishand thereafter maintain a Service Area Committee in each VSA no later than 12months before the beginning of irrigation or if irrigation had already begun,by December 31, 1984.

6.10 Experience in India and elsewhere shows that it is easier to intro-duce new water management procedures like the warabandi from the beginning ofirrigation, before both farmers and operators adopt undesirable practices.Agreements were reached with GGG, that it would: (i) for MIPs, begin irriga-tion deliveries to any VSA and chak only after appropriate RWS procedureshave been established, and in chaks where water deliveries Mave alreadybegun, establish such procedures promptly after completing che constructionof field channels; (ii) for modernization subprojects, establish appropriateRWS procedures promptly after completion of any 2,000 ha portion of thesubproject; and (iii) in all subprojects follow RWS procedures as defined inSchedule B.

Traininz in Rotational Water Supplv

6.11 As indicated (para 1.17) equitable RWS based on predeterminedschedules will differ substantially from present water supply practices. Itssuccessful introduction will require a considerable amount of training in RWSat all levels, especially the following: Ci) Senior ID, CADA, Extension andAD staff; (ii) WMCs, AE I/C of operating subprojects and his support staff,VLW, and other government officers associated with irrigation; and (iii) VSAcommittees and farmers. Training of farmers, committee members, and govern-ment officers at subproject level, should be completed before the introduc-tion of RWS. A special emphasis would be given to train farmers in planningthe cultivation of irrigated crops under RWS. The facilities of theTrial-cum-Demonstration farm at Thasta would be improved so that it can serveas a Farmers' Training CenLer (para 3.11). Training in RWS would requiredevelopment of suitable training material. Agreements were reached with GOGthat it would Ci) by December 31, 1984 prepare a program agreed with IDA fortraining farmers, committee members, and government officials in RWS; (ii)commence such training program by April 1, 1985.

Operation and Maintenance Cost

6.12 The approximate O&M costs for existing MIPs in 1983 varied fromRs 102 to Rs 152/ha. The current standard budget allocation for 0&M by GOGexcluding allocation for special repairs is Rs 75/ha. This level is con-sidered inadequate as shown in the calculation below. An approximateestimate of the desirable maintenance requirement for civil works per yearnormally falls in the range of 0.5% to 1% for major civil works, 1.5% to 2%for lined conveyance system and 3Z-4% for earth canals. Taking the lowerrange:

-35-

Rs N

0.5% of major civil works (Rs 3,000 M) 151.5% of minor civil works (Rs 3,000 M) 45

(all lined canals)Total 60

This is equivalent to k; 160/ha, to which must be added the establishmentcharge of Rs 45/ha for a total of Rs 205/ha. Clearly, such an estimate thatis based on norms can be subject to a wide margin of error and, in order toderive a more precise one, it would be essential to study the O&M cost underGujarat conditions. GOG has already initiated a study to assess the realis-tic costs of proper operatin and maintenance of the irrigation systems inGujarat. The study consideres the impact of various factors on the operationand maintenance (O&M) cost, including inter alia the following: (a) thetotal cultivable comand area; (b) irrigation intensity; (c) whether thesystem provides irrigation water for one season, two seasons or for perennialcrops; (d) whether the system is lined or not lined; (e) whether the systemis serving outlet at 40 ha or 8 ha; and (f) whether the system is operatedunder RWS.

6.13 While it would be essential to increase O&M provisions for operatingirrigation projects, the allocation during the first 3 years appears adequateespecially were RWS is being introduced. Each completed section of theirrigation network is maintained during the first 1-2 years by the construc-tion wing of the ID which undertakes during that period any repairs, correc-tions of design and/or construction errors, etc. The funds available forthat purpose are provided from the development budget and are additional tothe standard maintenance budget of Rs 75/ha. For areas already transferredto the CAD wing of ID, there are in addition to the Rs 75/ha provisions forspecial repairs. In addition to the above, GOG provides a sum of Rs 350/haover a period of 2-3 years for introduction of RWS.

6.14 Agreements were reached with GOG, that it would: Ci) not later thanJune 30, 1985 furnish to IDA for its review and comments, the results andrecommendations of the ongoing study on 0O& costs; and (ii) based on theresults of such study, taking into accounts IDA's comments, if any, commenc-ing on April 1, 1986 and thereafter, make annual financial provisions asrequired to cover the total O&M costs of the subprojects.

Narmada and Guiarat Medium Irrigarion II Proiect

6.15 Under the proposed Narmada River Development Projects (para 1.08)irrigation water will be provided from a single reservoir (Sardar Sarovar) toan area of about 2 N ha. The design and operation principles of the minordistribution system in Narmada would be essentially the same as in GujaratMedium Irrigation II Project, with the VSA, chaks, and subchaks being theelementary planning units. To enable reliable delivery of water to Narmada's4,000 VSAs, and to minimize the negative impact of human errors, which couldhave devastating effects in a project of that magnitude, Narmada's conveyancesystem has been designed for remote monitoring and operation. This willenable the delivery of water to the VSA outlet at about the same reliabilityas in the MIPs. Within the Narmada VSAs the problems of delivering water

-36-

reliably and equi:ably to each field would be the same as in the MIPs. Con-sequently, RWS system as described above is considered presently the mostsuitable also for Narmada. By the time irrigation will begin in Narmada(about 1990), over 300,000 ha in subprojects completed under this projectwill have been irrigated under RWS, some of them for over five years.Experience will have been gained also in farmers' organizations especiallyestablisbment of water-users' associations. Thus, the development of Narmadawould benefit considerably from the experience gained under this project.

VII. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. FARM INCOMES. AND COST RECOVERY

Agricultural Production

7.01 Present crop production levels are low and reflect the limitations ofrainfed agriculture. Without irrigation, the present levels of crop yieldare likely to continue and cropping would be mostly limited to the kharifseason. Reliable and predetermined schedule of water supply down to thefarmer's field under the project is expected to bring substantial changes inthe present farming techniques. It will reduce farmer's risk and induceinvestment in cash inputs and land improvement. As a result, yields areexpected to increase considerably. At the completion of the subprojects, theirrigation intensity in the five zones would average about lllZ, ranging from91Z in zone II to 122Z in zone I. The present and projected cropping pat-terns are given in table 17, aud summarized in the following table:

Present & Future FutureWithout Proiect With Proiect

Cropping Irrigation Cropping IrrigationZone Intensity Intensity Intensity Intensity

------ _ ----- (Z of CCA)--

I 128 36 159 122II 103 19 126 91III 107 20 149 132IV 109 11 147 122V 108 24 134 109

Weightedaverage 110 21 140 111

-37-

7.02 The main changes in cropped area and yields expected at full develop-ment are given in table 18, and summarized as follows:

Present & Future FutureWithout Proiect With Proiect

Cropped Area ('000 ha)

Kharif 278.4 311.4Rabi 62.7 155.0Two seasonal 70.3 57-9

Total 411.4 524.3

Future without FutureProi cct With Proiect

Irrigated Yield (tIha)

Pearl millet 2.0 2.6Groundaut 1.4 1.9Wheat 2.3 3.3Cotton 1.3 1.9

In order to achieve the level of benefits assumed, the farmers must betrained in new methods of system operation (RWS). Provisions were made forsuch training activities under the project (paras 3.11 and 6.11).

7.03 Based on the projected cropping patterns and yields, the expectedannual incremental production and its value at full development msder theproject would be as followe (details are in table 18):

Future Future IncrementalWithout Proiect With Proiect Production Value cl--------------- ( '000 tons) - ---- (Rs H)

Foodgrains a/ 230.5 803.3 573.0 1,021

Oil crops b/ 89.5 190.8 101.3 338

Cash croRs

Cotton 49.8 87.0 37.2 190Tobacco 3.0 5.6 2.6 13Castor bean 4.4 5.6 1.2 6Sugarcane 135.5 179.8 42.3 8Vegetables 74.8 289.4 214.6 215

Total 1,791

a/ Includes paddy, wheat, sorghum, millet, maize, and gram.k/ Includes groundnut and mustard.vJ Based on financial prices.

-38-

Market Prospects and Prices

7.04 The increased production resulting from the project will consistmainly of foodgrains, cotton, and oilseeds. With respect to foodgrains,Gujarat is a net importer, while the country as a whole is at the margin ofself-sufficiency. Given the projected population increase, the increasedproduction will be absorbed in the local market without difficulties. Withrespect to cotton, Gujarat and India are net exporters. Bank projectionsindicate increasing world market demand and prices in the 1990s. However,domestic demand is likely to pick up with population growth, and supply anddemand projections for Indian cotton lint indicate that export and importwould be marginal. With respect to oilseeds, with India being a net importerof edible oils and fats, and with the expected growth in the domestic demand,Gujarat is likely to face a favorable market for its surplus production.Consequently, the incremental project production is not expected to createmarketing difficulties. With respect to producer prices, these are largelydetermined by supply and demand. Procurement prices for the main crops arefixed by the government but have been effective only in surplus markets,around harvest time.

7.05 Farm Incomes. Representative farm models have been used to calculatethe project impact on farm incomes. The main data sources weresocio-economic studies. Prevailing financial prices were used to valueoutputs and inputs. The results are summarized in the following table:

Net Farm IncomeFuture Without Future With Increase due

Farm Model Present Proiect Proiect to Proiect--- Rs)_____

Mainland Gujarat (2.5 ha) 3,100 3,810 14,400 342Saurashtra (4.5 ha) 5,680 7,170 25,110 316Modernization (5.0 ha) 9,730 11,380 23,480 124

Cost Recovery

7.06 Water CharRes. Water charges in Gujarat are among the highest inIndia. They are uniform throughout the state and vary by crop and seasonand currently range from Rs 120 per irrigated ha of paddy in Kharif toRe 1,250/ha of sugarcane. For the projected cropping patterns the averagewater charge per ha of CCA would range from Rs 137 to Rs 204. The level ofcharges is determined with consideration to the investment and operationalcosts, and the repayment capacity of the farmers. With respect to the lat-ter, GOG considers 5% to 12% of the gross value of produce per ha as thetarget level of charges (the lower percentage is for food crops and thehigher for cash crops). A standing Interdepartmental Water Rates ReviewBoard (IWRB) was constituted in 1976 to review the rate structure and makerecommendations to COG. The IWR conducts such reviews every two years. Inrecent years water charges were increased twice in 1981 and 1983. The per-centage increase ranged from 13Z (paddy) to 337% (cotton). It would be

-39-

desirable that in the future water charges be reviewed annually. Therecovery of water charges is generally satisfactory.

7.07 Other Agricultural Taxes. The rate of direct agricultural taxationis relatively modest. Land revenue tax and associated cesses vary with thedistrict and the quality of the land. On the average, farmers pay between10-25 Rs/ha of dryland of medium soil quality and double that amount forirrigated land. Indirect agricultural taxes, especially sales taxes, aremore important from a revenue viewpoint. Sales tax is levied at a rate of4.4% for cash crops such as cotton and oilseeds, and purchase tax of 6.6% forsugarcane.

7.08 Recovery Prospects. GOG is anxious to maximize cost recovery fromirrigation projects and is ready to experiment with alternative methods ofcharging for irrigation services such as volumetric charges and selling waterto water users' associations. There is a general agreement that farmers willbe willing to pay more for better irrigation services. This is demonstratedin areas irrigated from public tubewells, where farmers pay volumetric watercharges which are 3-4 times higher than in surface irrigation projects.Thus, the success of efforts to improve cost recovery are closely linked withthe improvement of water management-a main objective of this project. IfRWS will be successfully introduced and water supply will be reliable andequitable, GOG should be able to recover a substantial share of the projectincremental benefits. 1j The organization of waterusers proposed under theproject (paras 6.07, 6.08) could well develop into water-users' associationseither at the service area (VSA) level or at the subproject level. Suchassociations could purchase irrigation water from the ID on a volumetricbasis and on sell to farmers, thus undertaking the main water charge collec-tion burden. The associations may also undertake responsibility for O&M.However, it is recognized that presently, management capability is likely tobe the main constraint to large scale establishment of effective associa-tions.

7.09 If GOG is to recover a fair share of irrigation benefits, it willhave to establish higher water charges for projects like this and the Narmadaproject, in which both the costs and benefits per irrigated ha would beconsiderably higher than in the traditionally designed irrigation projects.Presently, GOG does not favor such multitier charge system, because ofadministrative and political difficulties and anticipated resistance by thefarmers. However, it is likely to change its attitude when sizable areasconstructed to higher standards had been completed, and the derivation ofconsiderably higher benefits had been proven on a large scale.

jj Although the present water charge system, which is based on areairrigated, could result in minor deviations from optical water use,changes in the method of charging are not anticipated following introduc-tion of RWS. It is anticipated that such changes will take place inconjunction with the structural changes described in para 7.08.

-40-

7.10 To accelerate the development of waterusers' associations and studythe problems involved in their successful establishment, provisions have beenmade under the project for the establishment of such associations in at leastthree subprojects. GOG will provide them with financial and managment sup-port during the initial years. The performance of the associations would beclosely monitored by the PPM Cell or through a study subcontracted to auniversity. Agreements were reached with GOG, that it would: (i) beginningMarch 1985, review and if required revise the level of water charges in thestate annually; (ii) maintain water charges at levels sufficient to cover theentire O&M cost and to recover to the extent possible the capital coststaking into account the farmers repayment capacity; (iii) by September 30,1985 take all actions as shall be required to promote establishment ofwaterusers' associations in three subprojects; and (iv) by September 30, 1987institute on an experimental basis the bulk sale of water through water usersassociations in the subprojects referred to above.

7.11 Estimated Cost and Rent Recovery. In estimating the level of costand rent recoveries, it has been assumed that GOG would maintain indirecttaxation at present levels (para 7.06) and water charges at 5% and 12% of thegross value of production per ha of food and cash crops, respectively. Fiftypercent of the construction costs for field channels would be recovered fromthe farmers. Based on these assumptions, the rent and cost recovery indicesare estimated at 21 and 30 percezt for the project (details are in annex 1,tables 25 and 26).

VIII. BENEFITS AID JUSTIFICATION

Proiect Impact

8.01 General. The completion of MIPs and the modernization of existingschemes would increase agricultural production through expanded area underirrigation and increased productivity of existing irrigated land. With itsfocus on upgrading the operation of irrigation systems through improveddesign and water management practices, the project would be a prime vehiclefor introducing reliable and equitable water delivery systems in Gujarat.Experience gained with rotational vater supply would not only be beneficialfor the operation of the Narmada and future medium irrigation projects, butis expected to enhance also operation performance and utilization of irriga-tion potential of existing schemes. The project would result in institu-tional strengthening and development in the irrigation sector.

8.02 The project impact in terms of increased production, employment, andfarm families benefiting is summarized below:

Benefiting farm families (no.) 94,200Increase in irrigated area (ha) 336,000Increased foodgrain production ('000 ton/year) 573.0Increased cotton production ('000 ton/year) 37.2Increased oilseed production ('000 ton/year) 101.3Value added to local economy (Rs M/year) 1,584.0Incremental farm employment (Man-days N) 18.6

-41-

8.03 Employment Impact. The increase in employment opportunities wouldcome from: construction works; and intensification of agricultural produc-tion. Project construction activities would generate about 3.7 M man-days ofconstruction employment. Farm labor requirement is expected to increase byabout 18.6 M man-days a year. It is estimated that about two-thirds of thisdemand will be supplied by landless workers.

8.04 Poverty Impact. At present, the average per capita income of projectfarmers in the KIP areas is only about 25Z of the average all India percapita income, and in modernization schemes it is almost 60% of that average.The project would significantly reduce the poverty incidence in the projectareas. Under the project net farm income per ha in KIP areas would increase,on the average by 180%, from the present 1,190 Rs/ha to about 3,370 Rs/ha atfull development. In modernization scheme3, the income would increase by123%, from an average of 1,820 Rs/ha at present to 4,060 Rs/ha at fulldevelopment. Consequently, about 54,300 farm families in the project areaswould move out of the poverty classification as officially defined.

Economic Analysis

8.05 Main Assumptions. The assumptions used in the economic analysis aredetailed in annex 1 and sumarized below:

(a) Prices and Conversion Factors. Traded agricultural output and inputswere valued on the basis of IBRD projected 1990/95 world marketprices, expressed in 1984 currency values with adjustments forfreight handling and processing. The financial prices of nontradedcost and benefit items, including labor have been adjusted byappropriate conversion factors to bring them to the same price basisas traded items.

(b) Without and With Project Situation. No substantial changes inproduction and income levels are expected in the area without theproject. The projections for the "without" and "with" project situa-tion were based on yield statistics, socioeconomic studies and exten-sion staff estimates.

(c) Capital Costs. In the case of MIPs, capital costs include sunk cost;for modernization subproject capital costs include costs incurredfrom the beginning of modernization. Sunk costs were brought to mid1984 price levels using the Indian Wholesale Price Index. Analysiswas done also without sunk costs.

(d) Buildup Rates. "Full development" stage is assumed to be reached inyear 3 for cropping patterns and in year 5 for yields after comple-tion of investments. Such rates appear realistic on the basis ofpast experience.

8.06 Economic Rate of Return. A sample of five representative subprojects(four IlIPs and one modernization) was selected for economic analysis. Based

-42-

on this analysis, the ERR is estimated at 13% for MIPs, over 50% for modern-ization schemes, and about 30% for the project as a whole. Without sunkcosts, the HIP sample ERR ranges from 17 to 48 percent and averages 35 per-cent, resulting in a weighted average for the project of about 43%.

ERRMIP s With Sunk Costs

…_____(z)… _

Und 12Sukhi 13Watrak 14Zankhari 16Average (veighted) 13

Modernization 53

Project (weighted) 30

Sensitivity Analysis and Risks

8.07 Sensitivity Analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to deter-mine how deviations from the main assumptions will effect the economicviability of the project. The tests included computation of "switchingvalues" for the sample of the subprojects which were selected for theeconomic analysis. The "switching value" is the value to which the variabletested will have to increase (or decrease) in order to reduce the discountedpresent vaLue of the subproject's net benefits to zero. The discount rateused was 12%, vhich is the estimated opportunity cost of capital in India.The results are summarized in the following table:

Variable Appraisal Switching PercentageTested Sub-Proiect Value Value Chanse ERR

-----(Rs Million)----

Net Incremental Und 118 120 + 2 11.90Benefits Zankhari 164 114 - 30 16.37

Watrak 248 193 - 22 14.26Sukhi 375 325 - 13 13.38Modernization 511 137 - 73 52.80

Details on the sensitivity analysis are in Annex 1.

8.08 Proiect Risk. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that onlylarge deviations from the basic project assumptions could turn most of thesubprojects economically unviable, especially if sunk costs are excluded.There is a risk that GOG vould prematurely divert financial and manpowerresources to the Narmada projects resulting in implementation delays.However, given the substantial sunk costs incurred in the subprojec.s, thepressure of project farmers and Gujarat's commitments under the credLt, GOG

-43-

is unlikely to follow such a course. Another risk is that GOG will continuethe present application and sanction water allocation system resulting ininequitable and reliable water supply and reducing considerably the level ofirrigation benefits. However, GOG's conviction of the advantages of RWS andits commitments under this credit make such deviation from the project designunlikely.

Environmental Impact

8.09 The project is not expected to have any negative environmentalimpact. The construction of drainage facilities in potentially waterloggedareas and the lining of canals in the new schemes, as well as in the modern-ization projects, would minimize the area under stagnating water that aresuitable breeding grounds for mosquitoes. Under these conditions, it is notexpected that the incidence of water-related diseases would increase due tothe construction of the new schemes. However, an agreement would be reachedwith GOG that it would take all necessary measures to minimize the hazards ofmalaria, schistosomiasis, and other water-related diseases in areas coveredby the credit.

IX. AGREEMENTS TO BE REACHED AND RECOMMENDATIONS

9.01 Agreements were reached with GOI that it would:

(a) issue all the authorizations and permits required for improvement ofthe telecommunication network not later than six months prior to thecompletion of each subproject (para 3.09); and

(b) make the proceeds of the credit available to GOG on GOI's standardterms and arrangement for development assistance to the states (para4.03).

9.02 Agreements were reached with GOG that it would:

(a) by March 31, 1985 furnish to IDA for comments a plan, including animplementation schedule for construct'on of feeder road networks inthe project area (para 3.08);

(b) (i) by December 31, 1984 establish and thereafter maintain a panelof experts satisfactory to IDA, to review the the plans and designsof the dams and related structures under the project and their ade-quacy; (ii) cause the panel to conduct periodic reviews of dams andrelated structures during design and construction to examine whetherany new grounds for making changes have become apparent; and(iii) cause dams and related structures constructed under the projectto be periodically inspected in accordance with sound engineeringpractice to determine if any deficiencies exist in their condition orin the quality and adequacy of their maintenance or methods of opera-tion which may endanger their safety (para 3.25);

-44-

(c) (i) by October 1, 1984 base the management of one subproject on PERTtechniques; and (ii) by October 1, 1985 exchange views with IDA onthe applicability of such management techniques for the remainingsubprojects (para 3.29);

(d) (i) maintain within each subproject a Rehabilitation Committee;(ii) by December 31, 1984 prepare an integrated overall plan, agreedwith IDA for rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced persons,which will include, inter alia, development of fisheries, cultivationof peripheral reservoir areas, participation of oustees in projectconstruction works and plans for vocational training; (iii) prepareand adopt in consultation with IDA detailed rehabilitation plans forongoing subprojects in which the rehabilitation of more than 300families had not been completed by June 30, 1984; (iv) preparedetailed rehabilitation plan agreed with IDA for Zankhari by December31, 1985; and (v) rehabilitate displaced persons in accordance withthe guidelines set up in schedule A (para 3.39);

Ce) Ci) promptly provide resource and funds to execute the project inaccordance with the five-year implementation and expenditure program;and (ii) complete unfinished subprojects as soon as technically andfinancially feasible after the credit had been disbursed (para 4.03);

(f) (i) maintain separate accounts for project expenditures; (ii) ensurethat such project accounts are audited annually and that copies ofsuch accounts, certified as to their accuracy by an independentauditor acceptable to IDA, are submitted to IDA not later than ninemonths after the end of each fiscal year; (iii) have final auditsprepared for project accounts for each fiscal year by an auditoracceptable to IDA and forward such audit reports to IDA immediatelyafter their finalization; and (iv) make complete accounts and finan-cial statements available for inspection during IDA review missions(para 4.11).

(g) (i) by December 31, 1984 create a new Minor System Design Cell and aWater Management Unit in the ID; and (ii) strengthen the QualityControl Unit to facilitate quality control of minor system works andinstitute quality control procedures agreed with IDA (para 5.09);

(h) provide the required staff for adequately carrying out the agricul-tural extension services under the project (para 5.13);

Ci) (i) strengthen and maintain the PPM Cell with staffing pattern andfunctions agreed by IDA; and (ii) carry out a program of monitoringand evaluation agreed with IDA (para 5.24);

(j) submit to IDA a Project Completion Report not later than six monthsafter its closing date (para 5.25).

-45-

(k) (i) provide and maintain a suitably qualified officer at each sub-project, with responsibilities and functions as needed for efficientmanagement no later than 12 months before the beginning of irriga-tion, of if irrigation has already begun, by September 30, 1984;(ii) establish and thereafter maintain at each subproject a WMC, nolater than 12 months before the beginning of irrigation, or ifirrigation has already begun, by December 31, 1984; and (iii) estab-lish and thereafter maintain a Service Area Committee in each VSA nolater than 12 months before the beginning of irrigation or if irriga-tion had already begun, by December 31, 1984 (para 6.09);

(1) (i) for MIPs, begin irrigation deliveries to any VSA and chak onlyafter appropriate warabandi rotational vater allocation procedures,have been established, and in chaks where water deliveries havealready begun, establish such procedures promptly after completingthe constru':tion of field channels; (ii) for modernization sub-projects, establish appropriate RWS procedures promptly after comple-tion of each 2,000 ha portion of the subproject; and (iii) in all thesubprojects base the rotational water supply on the guidelines set upin schedule B (para 6.10).

(m) (i) by December 31, 1984 prepare a program agreed with IDA for train-ing farmers, committee members and government officials in RWS; and(ii) commence such training program by April 1, 1985 (para 6.11);

(n) Agreements were reached with GOG, that it would: (i) not later thanJune 30, 1985 furnish to IDA for its review and comments, the resultsand recommendations of the ongoing study on O&M costs; and (ii) basedon the res-ILs of such study, taking into accounts IDA's comments, ifany, commencing on April 1, 1986 and thereafter, make annual finan-cial provisions as required to cover the total O&M costs of thesubprojects (para 6.14);

(o) (i) beginning March 1985, review and if required revise the level ofwater charges in the state annually; (ii) maintain water charges atlevels sufficient to cover the entire O&M costs and to recover to theextent possible the capital costs taking into account the farmersrepayment capacity; (iii) by September 30, 1985 take all actions asshall be required to prcmote establishment of water users' associa-tions in three subprojects; (iv) by September 30, 1987 institute onan experimental basis the bulk sale of water through water usersassociations (para 7.10); and

(p) take all necessary measures to minimize the hazards of malaria andother water-related diseases in areas covered by the credit (para8.09).

9.03 With the above agreements, the proposed project would be suitable fora credit of US$172.0 M on standard IDA terms. The borrower wouldbe the Government of India.

-46-Schedule A

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Rehabilitation

The oustees (displaced persons) will be rehabilitated in accordancewith the following provisions:

(a) To the extent possible: (i) displaced persons shall be compensatedwith land; and (ii) village units will be resettled jointly at a newsite.

(b) Infrastructure and housing plots shall be provided at no cost to theoustees.

(c) Adequate compensation facilities shall be provided to all landlessoustees.

(d) The level of compensation for land shall be based on current marketvalue of land of equivalent quality in adjacent areas, or onGujarat's current provisions for compensation, whichever is higher.

(e) Where land is allotted to a displaced person under the project inlieu of the land previously owned by such displaced person, 50% ofthe compensation to which such displaced person is entitled shall beapplied towards the cost of the allotted land, subject to a maximumof the value of land allotted, and the balance of the cost of suchallotted land shall be treated as an interest free loan repayableover 20 years. Where a displaced person is not allotted land in lieuof the land previously owned by such displaced person, and is insteadpaid cash compensation, and such displaced person wishes to buy land,such displaced person shall receive, in addition to the compensationto which he is entitled, a grant pursuant to Gujarat's current provi-sions.

(f) In respect of all those displaced persons to be exclusively compen-sated in cash, Gujarat shall take all such action as shall be neces-sary to advise those displaced persons to invest such compensation inacquiring alternative sources of income, which advice shall be givenbefore the compensation is paid.

(g) The balance of any oustanding debt owned by the displaced personunder the Project to Gujarat's departments or agencies, shall not besubtracted from the amount of the compensation.

47 Schedule B

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Introduction of Rotational Water Supply

The rotationa' water supply introduced in each subproject will bebased on the following principles:

(a) Supplies of available water shall be allocated to farmers within eachsubproject, in proportion to the CCA owned; provided, however, thatto the extent possible, small and marginal farmers shall be givenspecial preference in the allocation of water.

(b) Each farmer shall be free to irrigate crops of his choice, subjectto predefined restrictions, if any.

(c) Farmers shall not be required to submit seasonal applications forsupply of water.

'd) Seasonal water allocations shall be delivered according to predeter-mined weekly schedules designed to meet water requirements of thepredominant crops in the area served, and determined in consultationwith farmers' representatives.

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Project Status

Map CCA ~~~~~~~~~~Estimated Estimated I Coot to Est. I. Progress Project No.rf CodedI I 6/64~~~~~~~~~~~~t ot I 1 OPOO o68 Completion~ N Sncttongl Statue On

I MIPD INC I ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ 6 1 /84 I Dote0 Subdivisiians 3/84.m'! Ho R. I Rs M Rs m ~~~~~~~~I Rs H IDam Kain Diet Dam Main De

1. Pasm 1~~~~~~~ ~~~~32 111101 565.35 I 465.65 99.7 90 ~ 75 I60 I83184. 8/5 6~ 24A3.: Hedaf .l.12831 5,23`84 90.047 81.27 9.4 100 100 I70 82/83 82/83 I84/85 1 a 1

3. H:daf 11 28 5,238 126 04 89.24 36. 96 7 2 50 84/85 85/86 885/86 Ii C4. Shadar (P) 124 I8,000 206.20 162.00 I 44.2 I -90 9 2 750 84/85 85/86 85/86 12 S. Amll (Vat 1I) 153 364 107:84 93.44 14ii.4 to io I100 1 2 83/8. 83184 86/817 10 1 6. Jhiuj 163 34,1480 185.36 III.6 13.4 - 2 I 0 31. 0 5/86 85/86 I 6/87 I 17 B 7. Kalil 164 2,486 I 102.916 74.596 27.6 I -1 99 I 90 33 83/84 I85/866 85/8 6 I 10 B 8.Znkhari 1155 20,8 531 864.98 10.78 2638 590.4 o 0 j 0 0 911921 91/92191/921 4 C

9. Suh 161 120,660 I 709.30 I 170.00 I 239.3 I - I 70 I 96 57 85/56 85/86 I86187 44 Sukhi I B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 10. Deo 11251 7,207 215.19 I 203.89 I 71.9 1 -92 IO10 50 85/86 8S5/6 1 6/87 16 11: Kalubthar 9058301 139.39 68.09 701.3 -60 94120186/87 84/85 I87/88 I 10 I 12i hulbhadsar 158 '740 I 5.073:.10 80.4 I -61 71 36 87/88 87/8 I8789 I C 13. Machhundtl 106 8,9' 136.01 I 78.91 51.1 93 82 14 84/85 84/85186/871 8 C14 uben III 2,063 882 I 63.50 247 I99 I 73 32 I85186 85/86 I86/87 I 6 I 815. Vatrek 150 18,341 376.2 207.4L68.7 94 5 16I8/7 7/ 8891C16 Guhal 147 7,111 I 3300 10.70 221,1 II 49 I 22 10 Be88/8 88/89 88/89 16 C

17. Mazm 149 '4,717 170.20 107.05 62.7 Be 1 8 41121 86/87 86/87 86/87 I 14 18. Vernu 1I 146 5,253 164.63 75.83 88.8 -65 22 I14 87/8 88 8I87/88 9 1

1.Und 101 9,900 301.24 137.94 163.3 -72 ~ 44 2 86/87 816/187 I 87/8 1320 Dm I19I318 82.71 48.81 33.9 St8 5 12 58 8581/7 721. AjL 11 135 I2,384 101.89 52.49 I 49.4 -86 48 6 85/8 85/86 86/87 I 6 C22, Aji III 136 I6,615 234.99 104.99 I 130.0 so5 27 I 5 87/8 8s 6/8 88/89 I I I c 23. Sipu 79 16,000 700.38 121.38 372.0 I 207.0 25 I 36 I 0 I90/ 91 88/89 917/92 23 C24., Dantiwads (Hod) I7 44,517 31..2132.62 211.7 I - 68 I 65 I44 87/88 87/88 87/88 15 I C25. Fatehwadi (Had) I 129,792 325.22 97,32 227.9 -I 100 66 2 87/88 87/88 88/9 14. I C26, Rhar1cut (Hod) 2 114,619I 126.63 30.03 96.6 looI10 93 2l 83/84 87/88 87/88 6 I c27. Shadar (Mod) 50 126,5708 190.71 4 18.31 I 14.2.4 -I 100 75 4 I 3/84. 86/87 88/89 'IC28. Shactrnji CP)CM.d) 14 135,'7 50 282.98 I 49.78 I 233.2 10-0 5o 0 83/84. I 8/89 98/89 12 I c I I

29. MachhuI (Had) 56110,4.09 83.74 I 16.94 I 66.8 I -IDO 471 0 183/84 I86/87187/88 I 6 1w

Total 7567____27 ___3386 ___ 92___3382 _ _2____97 _ .4

j/Dae. functional 83/84.A-Completed, S-Distributary Syetem partially complete by June 1984, C-Early stages of conatructior,.

* ~~~~~~~~InUKA'

GUh,RAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION SI PtOJECT

C0APTITSIS OF CIVIL WOlKS [OR T1 CAI6AL flJM

Earthworke Li2.2g structures1000 m3 100 lfoPa

I" . 1 lULl "ti 1 L lAi KLIl HIP 11 hIi H'LL "1. hum 37U 374 346 - 1120 1312 a 301 308 -2. NaekmeW^la 718 M1 - 142 142 - 129 129 -3. SadiE 485 485 - 99 96 3 116 106 164. Uhada (P) 1012 0)9 34 311 302 9 157 140 17so Aslh 249 231 12 141 121 20 69 69 -G. Jhuj 554 341 207 105 99 6 57 40 117. tells 310 310 - i8 16 2 90 I3 1S. Zankhhgl Ia 998 - 998 689 - 659 182 - 1829. Uukhi 1495 1495 - 315 325 50 175 159 16IQ. DIO 61s 675 - 217 114 43 92 92 -11. elubbar 151 151 - 98 98 - 38 36 212. Iukbhadsr 131 124 7 101 98 3 51 49 213. HRachhundr* 210 18S 25 185 159 26 132 125 714. Ubea 208 85 23 49 39 I0 70 36 3415. Wstrk 941 916 31 533 226 301 125 91 3416, Cuhal 130 100 630 154 - 154 12 10 6221. Has.. 9O8 203 715 I11 40 131 91 47 50It. Yenu 11 62 12 .50 52 10 42 18 3 isI9. Und 420 400 20 298 40 258 113 35 i820. Deml 11 161 94 13 69 8 61 25 9 1621. Aji 11 285 129 156 101 I5 92 SO 21 2?22. Aji III 402 I1I 232 113 II 142 64 22 4223. Ipu 450 220 230 260 104 156 69 13 5624. Dantliwda (Ho) 43 38 5 124 110 14 23 I 2225. Fat.hwadl (Ha4) 1300 603 691 2607 1363 1244 I73 193 58026. Sharicut (Had) 195 195 - 505 505 - 52 I 5121. Shmdar (Had) 382 272 10 1023 631 386 36 - 3628. Ihetrunjl (r) (Had 410 l29 352 1726 761 965 25 - 2529. Hachhu-I (Had) 146 61 83 740 260 480 33 - 33

TOTAL 11946 13258 4688 12386 1019 5301 3241 1212 1429... ...... .... *U&*.. .. . . * fuf*S *.....

Ig lii Imated

-50-

Table 2b

CUJART MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

QUANTITIES OF CIVIL WORYS FOR THE C4RAL SYSTEM

Distribution System

Eartrworks Lining Structures lb1000 .3 1000 .2 l12p

Total HIP I HIP II Total HIP I NIP II Total HIP I HIP II

1. rana. 2029 1797 232 1745 1590 55 7000 6770 2302. Hachhanala 228 208 20 122 97 25 129 555 2743. Eadaf 557 299 258 227 87 140 1590 838 7524. Ubadar (P) 1137 845 292 346 206 140 1990 1160 830S. Ali 316 255 61 177 137 40 598 598 -6. Jbuj 1120 869 251 242 - 242 1315 502 8137. Kelia 367 320 47 191 - 191 1597 400 1197S. Zankhari fa 1153 - 1153 942 - 942 3915 - 39159. Sukbi 1325 575 750 850 450 400 5745 2845 2900

10. Deo 536 225 311 361 40 321 1801 880 92111. Kalubbar 630 151 479 210 50 160 1281 180 110112. Sukbhadar 730 195 535 215 57 158 127S 215 106013. Hacbhundri 1212 291 921 357 135 222 1605 179 142614. Uben 205 4 201 93 - 93 338 - 33815. Vatrak 517 79 438 173 - 173 2485 270 221516. Gubsi 965 - 965 431 - 431 1798 - 179817. Ham 243 80 163 46 - 46 930 140 7901s. Venu II. 457 62 395 199 - 199 874 25 84919. Und 890 60 830 340 - 340 750 102 64820. Demi 1I 413 45 368 165 - 165 41 10 47121. Aji II 230 22 208 131 - 131 400 - 40022. Aji III 850 60 790 313 6 307 1183 50 113323. Sipu 920 - 920 640 - 640 4400 - 440024. Dantivada (Mod) 1442 565 877 3070 2494 576 8471 1292 717925. Fatchvadi (Nod) 934 79 855 "40 8 832 5565 21 554426. tharicut (Nod) 354 15 339 736 20 716 1515 - 151527. Dhadar (Mod) 258 - 258 1450 - 1450 501S - 501528. Shetrunji (P) (Hod 655 - 655 1851 - 1851 4820 - 482029. Hachbu-I (Hod) 104 - 104 SOC - 508 1860 - 1860

TOTAL 20777 7101 13676 16971 5377 11594 71426 17032 54394

/AL Estimated

1k Includes outlets

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION It PROJECT

Target for Implementation of RWS

Rabi Rabi Rabi Rabi Rabi RabiProiect 84 85 86 87 88 89 Notes on Distribution Systems

1. Panam /a 700 4,000 15,000 20,000 30,000 41,120 2000 ha Sansoli under construction2. Kachhanala 500 2,000 3,084 3,084 3,0843. Hadaf 500 3,000 5,230 5,230 5,238 Partly designed with Sansoli type layout4. Bhadar (P) 500 3,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 Partly designed with Sansoli type layout5. Amli (Ver II) 500 2,000 3,644 3,644 3,6446. Jhuj 500 1,000 2,000 4,180 4,1807. Kelia 500 1,000 2,486 2,486 2,486 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively8. Zankhari - - - - -9. Bukhi 5,000 14,000 20,660 20,660 20,660 10,000 ha designed with Sansoli type layout10., Deo 500 3,000 7,200 7,200 7,207 Partly designed with Sansoli type layout11. Ralubhar 500 2,000 5,830 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively12. Sukhbhadar 500 3,000 7,40013. Machhundri 500 2,000 4,000 8,095 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively14. Uben 500 2,063 2,063 2,063 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively15. Watrak Ia 500 4,000 9,500 14,500 18,341 18,341 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively16. Guhai 2.000 7,111 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively ui

17. Hazam /a 500 3,000 4,700 4,700 4,717 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively18. Venu II 2,000 5,25319. Und 1,000 6,900 9,900 9,90020. Demi II 500 2,000 3,10821. Aj II /a 200 1,000 2,000 2,384 2,384 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively22. Aji III /a 400 2,000 5,000 6,615 6,615 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively23. Sipu - - - 1,000 3,000 Sansoli type layout to be used exclusively24. Dantivada (Mod) /a 1,000 6,000 15,000 25,000 44,517 Mixed Crops25. Fatehwadi (Mod) 2,000 4,000 7,000 15,000 29,79226. Kharicut (Hod) 1,000 4,000 8,000 11,000 14,619 Mainly Padi27. Bhadar (Mod) /a 2,000 4,000 7,000 14,000 26,57828. Shet unji (P)(Mod) 2,000 6,000 15,000 25,000 35,75029. Hachhu-I (Hod) 1.000 3.000 6.000 8.000 10.409

Total 1,200 26,600 88,500 167,967 242,487 341,101

/a High priority demonstration water management project.

N)I.

-52- TABLE 3

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Salient Features of MIPs

Total Dam Capacity Main Canal DistributionHap CCA Cost M3 x 106 Length Length

No. Name Ref.# Ha Rs M Live Storage Km Km

1. Panam 152 41120 565 679 110 10002. Mabbanala 131 3084 90 29 30 323. Hadaf 128 5238 126 25 21 NA4. Bhadar (P) 124 8000 206 37 41 1475. Amli (Ver II) 153 3644 108 35 34 396. Jhuj 163 4180 185 28 8 507. Kelia 164 2486 102 17 14 628. Zankhari 155 20853 865 162 21 6009. Sukhi 161 20660 709 167 32 65010. Deo 125 7207 276 76 17 4611. Kalubbar 90 5830 140 22 15 19212. Sukhbhadar 156 7400 154 37 16 8813. Machhundri 106 8095 136 26 31 8014. Uben 111 2063 88 15 16 4715. Watrak 150 18341 376 154 66 36016. Guhai 147 7111 331 82 20 15817. Mazam 149 4717 170 34 13 21018. Venu II 146 5253 165 19 10 NA19. Und 101 9900 301 65 29 13620. Demi II 139 3108 83 20 8 16021. Aji II 135 2384 102 20 10 9022. Aji III 136 6615 235 55 22 8023. Sipu 79 16000 700 144 23 40024. Dautiwada (H) 17 44517 344 408 77 171525. Fatehwadi (M) 1 29792 325 62 /1 31 36826. Kharicut (H) 12 14619 127 8 /2 44 37727. Bhadar (M) 50 26578 191 223 78 81628. Shetrunji (M) 14 35750 283 376 154 172329. Machhu I (1) 56 10409 84 71 66 327

374954 7567

/1 181 tanks/2 9 tanks

-53- Table 4a

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Rehabilitation

No. of FamiliesNo. of Families to Rehabilitated as No. of Families Not

Proiect be Rehabilitated of Nov. 30. 1983 Yet Rehabilitated

Panam 3,546 3,466 80Machhanala 350 350 0Hadaf 601 112 429Bhadar (P.) 59 18 41Amli (Ver II) 294 294 0Jhuj 227 175 52Kelia 149 149 0Sukhi 1,453 222 1,231Deo 1,120 151 969Kalubhar 1,147 386 761Sukhbhadar 317 317 0Hachundri NA NA NAUb-n 266 266 0Watrak 2,080 600 1,480Guhai 1,239 0 1,239Mazam 395 242 153Venu II 425 264 162Und 2,212 428 1,784Demi II 106 106 0Aji II 126 32 94Aji III 767 747 20Sipu 1,350 53 1,297

New Proiects

Zankari 575 0 575

Modernization

Dantiwada (Mod.) 401 55 346Fatehwadi (Mod.)Kharicut (Mod.)Bhadar (Mod.)Shetrunji (Prod.)Machhu I (Mod.)

TOTAL 19,205 8,493 10,712mm ==i e . .mm.

-54-

Table 4b

INDIA

CUJARAT IEDIUM IRRIGATION 11 PROJECT

Progress of Land Accuisition(in bectares)

Private Land AcquiredTotal Land Required Private Land Required As of Nov. 30. 1983(ha) (ha) (ha) (ha) (1) (:)Dam Canal System Dam Canal System Dam Canal Syster

Oneoint Proiects:

Panam 8,980 1,253 2.955 994 100 88

lmchhanala 796 182 599 160 100 98Radaf 792 288 698 262 100 57Ihadar (P.) 833 480 158 433 97 82Amli (Ver II) 682 160 90 148 100 100Jhuj 358 375 242 335 100 93Kelia 318 270 271 237 100 60

Sukbi 2,904 772 2,053 617 52 45Deo 1,892 330 1,551 281 77 96

Kalubbar 958 189 613 170 100 69Sirzhbbadar 838 342 789 287 100 43Hachundri 574 529 227 495 96 25Uben 560 280 500 280 100 32Jatrek 4,477 345 2,248 345 100 48Guhai 1,504 260 1,204 230 27 3Kazan 1.204 317 1,043 280 97 7venu II 548 219 397 216 96 0Und 2.346 goo 1.096 800 72 13De-i II 898 160 720 1"4 100 14Aji II 680 135 420 120 100 22Aji III 1,438 349 756 270 100 19

Sipu 2.586 738 1.730 738 44 12

11ew Proe

Zaukari 1,975 678 735 584 0 0

lodernization

Dantivada (Mod.) 29 610 23 610 78 0Fatebwadi (Mod.) - 163 - 163 - 0Kharicut (Mod.) - 476 - 476 - 0lhadar (Mod.) - 378 _ 378 - 0Shetruaji (Mod.) - 342 _ 342 - 0Machbu I (Mod.) - 130 - 130 - 0

Source: Govermeut of Gujarat

INDIA

GUJARAT KEDIUM IRRIGATION It PRoJECT

Climatic Data a/

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. fav Jun, Jul. Auit. Sent, Oct. Nov. LIc. TotalZone I (Siuu)

Temperature 18.1 21.0 26.2 30.2 32.1 32.0 29.7 28.5 28.7 28.6 24.0 19.6Relative Huuidity 35 35 43 40 50 61 71 71 66 45 41 41Rainfall - - - - 5 46 213 146 116 12 4 - 542Wind Speed 5.4 5.1 7.1 7.9 9.5 10.0 10.8 8.3 7.0 4.6 4.1 2.6Sunshine 9.0 10.0 10.3 11.3 11.3 8.7 4.3 4.3 8.0 10.0 9.8 9.0ETO 121 141 199 251 304 259 185 171 199 196 139 111

Zone II (Shetrunii)

Temperature 20.3 22.6 27.2 30.8 32.8 32.3 29.6 28.6 28.7 28.9 24.8 21.4Relative Humidity 37 32 35 36 46 56 71 70 61 47 41 40Rainfall - - - - - 157 168 144 134 - - - 603Wind Speed 4.8 5.4 5.9 6.7 8.0 9.0 8.4 7.1 5.9 4.4 4.3 4.0Sunshine 9.0 10.3 10.3 10.7 10.8 7.3 3.3 3.3 6.0 9.3 9.0 9.0ETO 131 149 210 242 277 232 163 154 157 178 144 121

Zone III (Zankhari)

Temperature 23.1 24.8 25.6 30.7 31.4 30.4 28.1 27.9 27.9 29.3 27.1 23.9Relative Humidity 52 49 48 52 63 74 84 83 79 59 50 51Rainfall - - - - 6 234 631 484 298 14 12 1 10680Wind Speed 4.1 4.2 4.5 5.2 7.5 8.3 8.0 7.3 5.0 8.2 4.2 4.1Sunshine 9.3 10.0 10.0 10.3 9.7 6.0 2.7 2.7 5.0 8.3 8.7 9.0ETO 125 139 191 212 226 171 124 122 130 163 138 123

Zone IV (Panam)

Temperature 19.5 22.3 27.1 31.2 32.7 30.8 27.2 26.0 26.5 26.7 25.4 20.9Relative Humidity 45 39 27 27 39 60 79 83 75 54 43 42Rainfall 3 2 2 2 8 160 287 202 140 31 11 1 849Wind Speed 8.9 10.0 13.3 17.2 26.1 29.6 29.1 22.4 16.8 8.7 6.7 6.8Sunshine 9.2 9.6 10.2 10.6 10.8 7.4 3.0 3.0 5.6 8.8 9.2 9.0ETO 99 151 225 280 365 269 155 134 158 175 133 117

Zone V (Watrek)

Tesperature 20.3 22.8 27.2 31.4 33.5 32.7 29.5 28.2 28.7 28.4 24.6 21.1Relative Humidity 42 38 34 34 45 59 77 77 70 50 41 43Rainfall 8 - 5 - 1 85 250 222 193 7 7 6 784 mWind Speed 5.4 5.1 7.1 7.8 9.5 10.0 10.8 8.3 7.0 4.6 4.1 2.6 LnSunsbine 9.0 9.3 10.0 10.3 11.0 7.0 3.3 3.3 6.3 9.3 9.3 9.0CTO 118 130 200 221 277 220 149 137 154 167 125 99

A/ Compiled from CWC'a sub-appraisal reports.

Mean monthly temperature (C); Mean Relative 11umidity (2); Rainfall (em);Wind *pted (km/hr); Sunshine (hr/day) and ETO (ur/month).

-56-

Table 6INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

CCA and Land Irrizabilitv Class

Agricultural Land Irrizability Class (X of CCA)Zone Name of HIP CCA (ha) I II III IV V

Dantivada (M) 44,517 29 68 2 1 -

Sipu 16.000 - 68 32 - -

60,517

II Shetrunji (H) 35,750 2 50 45 3 -

Und 93900 - 94 5 1 -

Machhundri 8,095 4 73 23 - -Shadar (H) 26,578 42 43 10 3 2Sukhbhadar 7,400 5 30 47 15 3Aji III 6,615 - 90 10 - -Ralubhar 5,830 89 11 - - -Venu II 5,253 4 88 B - -Demi II 3,108 - 93 7 - -Aji II 2,384 - 73 27 - -Uben 2,063 - 100 - - -Hachhu I (H) 10.409 7 76 1 15 1

123,385

III Jhuj 4,180 - 45 55 - -Amli 3,644 9 65 26 - -Kelia 2,486 - 40 60 - -Zankhari 20.853 a/ - 76 24 - -

31,163

IV Panam 41,120 14 56 27 3 -Sukhi 20,660 - 67 33 - -

Bhadar 8,000 9 88 3 - -

Deo 7,207 16 57 27 - -

Hadaf 5,238 12 73 15 - -Machhannala 3.084 - 9 52 16 23

85,309

V Fatevadi (H) 29,792 1 40 44 13 2Watrak 18,341 23 76 1 - -thaticut (H) 14,619 48 49 3 - -Guhai 7,111 21 76 3 - -azam 4.717 56 40 3 - -

74,580

Total 29 HIPs 374,954

Ji As presented by GOG. CCA vill be finalized after redelineation of theproject area based on semi-detailed soil survey.

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRICATION 11 PROJtCT

Land Use(000 ha)

1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 1973-14 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81

Total Area 18,817 18,816 18,812 IR,812 18.817 18,816 18,810 18,811 18,813 18,816 18,822

Land of Non-sgricultural use 771 1,034 1,046 1,094 1,059 1,064 1,055 1,057 1,059 1,064 1,067

Uncultivable &Marginal Land 5,046 4,942 4,908 4,854 4,640 4,575 4,499 4,489 4,486 4,493 4,489

Forest 1,573 1,576 1,567 1,568 1,828 1,889 1,959 1,969 1,974 1,953 1,966

Permanent Pasture4 Craning Land 949 858 855 856 857 853 852 850 849 846 848 'I

Land under Misc.Tree Crops 14 6 6 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4

Follow Land 751 638 828 675 2,223 784 917 900 870 882 871

Net Area ovwn 9,713 9,762 9,602 9,760 8,205 9,647 9,224 9,542 9,571 9,572 9,577

Cross Croged Areaof which 10.492 10.479 10.259 10.542 8.900 10.549 10.405 10.439 10.509 10.655 10.745

Area underfooderops 5,786 5,137 4,982 5,597 4,426 5,590 5,069 5,007 5,171 5,326 5,4U7

Area underNon-foodcrops 4,706 5,342 5,277 4,945 4,474 4,959 5,336 5,432 5,338 5,329 5,258

CroppingIntensity (Z) 108 107 108 108 109 113 109 110 109 111 112

Source: Bureau of Economics snd Statistics, Government of Gujarat,Soeio-Economic Review, 1982-83

F-,m--

INDIA

Guisrat Medium Irrixation 11 Proiect

Distribution of Holdines bT Size */

Belov I ha 1.1 - 2.5 he 2.5 - 5.,0 h 5.0 ha 4 AboveAgricultural Nase of Average Size 2 of 2 of 2 of 2 of 2 of 2 of 2 of 2 of

Zone Sub-oroiect CCA (ha) of Family Household Area Household Area Household Area Household Area

Dantiveds 44,517 6.5 8 1 32 18 30 20 30 61Sipu 16.000 8.8 7 1 33 13 27 25 33 61

60,517 7 1 33 17 28 21 32 61

II Shetrunji 35,750 7.0 12 3 32 7 24 21 32 69Und 9,900 7.3 2 - 38 17 34 27 26 56Kachhundri 8,095 6.5 8 2 45 23 28 27 19 48Shader 26,578 7.0 14 3 17 6 29 22 40 69Sukhbhadar 7,400 7.3 5 1 40 16 29 21 26 62Aji III 6,615 7.4 11 2 31 13 24 18 34 67Kalubhar 5,830 7.2 14 3 40 23 26 26 20 48Venu 11 5,253 7.7 16 3 30 14 24 22 30 61Demi 11 3,108 8.1 2 - 44 19 21 17 33 64Aji It 2,384 7.1 11 2 25 11 35 29 29 58Uben 2,063 7.4 19 3 24 10 29 26 28 61 I'Nachhu 1 10.409 7.5 6 1 43 12 23 25 28 62

123,385 10 2 34 11 27 24 29 63

III Jhuj 4,180 8.3 21 8 43 32 32 49 4 11Anoi 3,644 8.4 14 3 36 21 .5 43 15 33Kelis 2,486 8.4 19 5 29 16 35 39 17 40Zankhari 20,853 8.5 23 5 32 16 28 28 1!7 51

31,163 19 5 35 19 33 33 13 43

IV Panaw 41,120 8.5 16 4 36 23 38 48 10 25Sukhi 20,660 10.6 24 6 43 32 23 34 10 30Ihadar 8,000 8.6 16 5 46 31 29 39 9 25Deo 7,207 8.6 19 5 44 24 19 21 18 50H4def 5,238 9.8 21 6 38 30 34 45 7 19Machhannala _3_,n4 8.8 15 4 42 29 37 47 6 20

85,309 19 5 41 27 30 41 10 27

T Fatevadi 29,792 6.9 20 6 30 19 14 15 36 60Watrok 18,341 8.6 23 6 33 18 24 30 20 46Ihaticut 14,619 6.4 31 8 31 12 18 15 20 65Guhai 7,111 8.3 10 3 41 25 37 43 12 29was" 4.717 7.8 16 3 28 13 31 34 25 50

74,580 20 6 33 18 25 23 22 53

Total 29 HIPs 374,954C...... aurv ..o t r

j/ Co piled from the rooeio-econooic aurvey of the sub-projects.

-59-

Table 9aINDIA

GUJMRAT DEDIJU IRRIGATION II PROJECTSUNNR ACCOUTS COST SIHIRY

(RS Nillion) (USS '000) I TotalZ Foreign Base

Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Exchange Costs

1. IIN[STEN COSTS

A. LANS ACIOISITIOH 184.4 - 194.4 17,076.5 - 17P076.5 - 6is. CIIL MIRICS 19918.7 332.1 20250,8 177P655.5 30P753.4 208P408.9 15 76C. EOUIPIEIT 106.4 44.5 150.9 9,85S.3 4P120,2 13,973.5 29 5B. TRAINING 12.8 3.7 16.5 1,186.7 338.4 1,525.2 22 1E. NONITORING/IEUELOPNENT/STUDIES 14.2 0.4 14.7 1,317.8 38.9 1,356.6 3 0F. ENGINEERINS I ADNINISTRATION 329.4 - 329.4 30,499.5 - 30i 499.5 - 11

Total IJESTIET COSTS 2,566.0 380.7 2,946.7 237t589.3 4.Ci250.8 272,840.1 13 100Phvsical Contingecies 222.2 39.2 261.4 20,571.1 3,630.2 24,201.3 15 9Price Continoicies 441.5 66.5 508.0 40,881.2 6P153,4 47r034.7 13 17

Total INCLUDIN COUlTINMCIES 3,229.6 486.4 3,716.0 299,041.6 4r,034.4 344s076.1 13 126= 5=== ==== = =

Total 2,566.0 380.7 2P946.? 23765119.3 35P250.9 272s64@.1 13 100Phtsical Contingencies 222.2 39.2 261.4 20.571.1 3d5630,2 24,201.3 15 9Price Contingencies 441.5 66.5 508.0 40.W11.2 6,153.4 47P034.7 13 17

Total PROJECT COSTS 3,229.6 486.4 3716.0 299041.6 45034.4 344,076.1 13 126

-60-

Table 9bINDIA

GULMT MEDlUI IURICATIOlN II PROJECTPROJEC COST IIIARY

(RS lillion) (US§ million) Z TotalZ Foreic-m Base

Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Exdce Costs_ _ == = _= -

A. PAIW9 67.0 12.2 79.2 6.2 1.1 7.3 15 3B. MOIWIN.A 10.6 1.9 12.5 1.0 0.2 1.2 15 0C. HIAAF 32.5 5.6 38.1 3.0 0.5 3.5 15 1D. BRADM (P) 43.9 6.9 50.8 4.1 0.6 4.7 14 2E. AILI (UER II) 14.1 2.5 16.6 1.3 0.2 1.5 15 1F. JH1J 57.2 8.8 65.9 5.3 0.8 6.1 13 2S. KEIA 22.9 3.8 26.7 2.1 0.3 2.5 14 1H. ZRMGI 94.8 11.3 106.2 8.8 1.1 9.8 11 4I. SUHII 201.5 28.3 229.8 18.7 2.6 21.3 12 8J. DEO 63.8 B.1 71.9 5.9 0.7 6.7 11 2K. KAIU1U 57.4 8.7 66.1 5.3 0.8 6.1 13 2L. SlEHBHADAR 67.0 10.4 77.5 6.2 1.0 7.2 13 3M. I'AORI 51.6 9.0 59.6 4.8 0.7 5.5 13 2M. LIEIl 19.1 2.8 21.9 1.8 0.3 2.0 13 10. IMTRAK 145.1 20.9 166.0 13.4 1.9 15.4 13 6P. GUilI 156.5 22.4 178.9 14.5 2.1 16.6 13 6G. NAZA 50.0 7.4 57.3 4.6 0.7 5.3 13 2R. Will 11 69.1 10.5 79.6 6.4 1.0 7.' 13 3S. UPD 127.6 18.8 146.4 11.8 1.7 13.6 13 5T. DE1 II 29.0 4.4 33.3 2.7 0.4 3.1 13 1u. AJI II 41.0 4.9 45.8 3.8 0.5 4.2 11 2Y. AJI III 97.4 14.8 112.2 9.0 1.4 10.4 13 4V. SIPU 292.6 42.8 335.4 27,1 4.0 31.1 13 11X. DANTIMADA (NOD) 140.7 23.5 164,2 13.0 2.2 15.2 14 6Y. FATEHUADI (NOD) 160.3 25,4 185.7 14.8 2.4 17.2 14 6Z. KWICUT (NO) 83.0 13.0 96.0 77 1.2 8.9 14 3A. Emom (NOD) 94.1 14.9 109.0 8.7 1.4 10.1 14 4B. SHETRUOJI (NOD) 149.9 23.7 173.6 13.9 2.2 16.1 14 6C. NAOHM I (NOB) 44.2 7.0 51.2 4.1 0.6 4.7 14 2D. lATER MANAElEENT TRAINING 2.5 0.8 3.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 24 0E. NEIOWICAL TEDCIlClA TRAINING 0.0 2.4 2.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 98 0F. FARIERS TRAINING 5.1 0.4 5.5 0.5 0.0 015 8 06. voCATOIWL TRAINING 5.2 - 5.2 0.5 - 0.5 - 0H. NONITORINS J IEUELOPIEHN / STUDIES 69.3 3.3 72.6 6.4 0.3 6.7 5 2

Total 26566.0 380.7 2P946.7 23J.6 35.3 m.8 13 100Physsicil Contingeies 222.2 39.2 261.4 20.6 3.6 24.2 15 9Price Continkencies 441.5 66.5 506.0 40.? 6.2 47.0 13 17

Total PROJECT COSTS 3t229.6 486.4 3716.0 299m. 45.0 304.1 13 126___t__m= z;z

INDIACUJ.PRT llEDII IRRIGATIO34 11 PROACTSuuarw kccijit by ProJtMt Coupmnt

(RS million)

PMM MC8WAA L IP (P) IYER 11) JHUJ KELIA 2ANIAI SUIII NO KALUHN UHWI A NACHHIUNLIAI UIER WA1TRA 6UM1I WZM WENU 11 UNDI DENI 11 AJI 11::sr :=::z:::. *::::: -::::: :: : r::rrta :1rrr . Z:r *.n8.i. :,a*ESS*333 2886888*8 383t h38838 88181 US*88 3 8 23333 ::::r *:::

1. INYEST*JT £STS_ ,.-------------

A, LAND ACIJISITION 05 0.2 3.7 * 0,9 1.0 28.'5 22.1 14.2 3.4 1.8 1.9 2.0 1',.3 11.3 4.4 2.9 8.7 2.0 11.61, CIYIL MOS 58.3 9,6 29.7 37.2 12,6 55.1 20,2 61.3 374,4 47.4 51.7 62.9 47.8 16.4 124.7 143.0 43.7 63,9 115.4 25,8 27.6C. EIUIPfNT 11,7 3.5 3.5 4,3 2.1 1.6 2.4 7.2 7.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 2.9 1,0 7.3 3.2 2.7 3.2 5,0 1.7 2,4D. TRAININ - - -Es . IOIIIT0IN8 MDCW !4T/STU1 lES - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - -F. ENINEERING I AMI1NISTRAflON U.7 1.4 4.4 5.6 1.9 6.3 310 9.2 26.2 7.1 7,8 9.4 7.2 2.5 10. 23.4 6.6 9.6 17.3 3.9 4.1

........ .. . _...... ._ ... . .... ...... .. _. ..... ..... . ... .. ... ... ..... ..... ......... ............ ........ ... .... ...... ....... ... ... _.... .. ._.. . ... _ .__ ..... ..... _

Total IMMSTINT COSTS 79.2 12.5 3.3l 50.8 16.6 65.V 26.7 06s.2 WA9.8 IL19 66.3 77,5 59.6 21.9 166.0 373.9 57.3 79.6 13464 33.3 45.8Total 79,2 12.5 38.1 50,. 16,6 65iV 26,7 106.2 2294. 71.9 66.1 77.5 59,6 21.9 166.0 170,9 57,3 7e ,f 14!.' 33.: 4S,G

Piwical Contin.ncui 4.7 0.6 2.9 3.3 0,4 6,7 2.1 9.2 19.8 4,6 6.2 7.2 4.9 le9 12.5 IV.3 5.9 7,9 14,3 2.9 3.4Prico Contingmncis 9,0 0.8 3.9 4.2 l.S 6.8 13. 36,.4 21.3 8.7 9,6 11.6 9,4 2,6 28.4 3/.4 8,9 12.7 25.6 4.6 5.7

._ .... ~~~~~~~~~~~. ..... _ . . .. _ ....... _. ..... ..... _ ... ... . ... I----- ..... ...... .. .. . ..... ....... .... ...... ... ... S ... ....._. .. _. _._.

Total 0ECT COSTS 93.0 13.8 449 58,3 138.6 79.4 30,6 151,7 270.9 N5,3 61.9 96.3 73.9 26.3 206.9 235.7 72,1 100.3 186.4 40,9 54,9u:u3: ::s::as::: 33383 8388:8 83.3S8. "8:.1 38a8gs 1s181:1` *t28r rp: 3ua88ss13 .8:3..::rras 2:*tSai8 3:33 as::a 3 :8 ss a8 3 as328 81 Mass8 a3r7.113 ses...

Fornin Exchag 34.5 2,1 6.7 8.0 2.8 10.7 4.3 16,8 34.1 V.9 51.0 33. 30.0 3.4 26.4 30.2 9.5 13,5 24.4 5.4 6.1__. _ ............. .......... . ...... ._..._. ........ _...... .......... ......................... ........................ ........ ........... . ...... ............ . . _..... ...... _. _. _.. ..... ...... .... .... _...... _._ _._

INDIACUJRT llEDIUH IRRIBAIDI 11 PROACTSuarw Accouit bw ProJ,ct Couonnt

(IS milli)onPhwical

IMTER HECHMbICAL MONITORING ContitincisDAMTIID FATEHUADI IWAICUT NMD SHETRUNJI MMU I tMALtNT TECHNICIAN ROiES YWCTION& I1VLVfL(mT / -

JI 111 SINU (HOD) ODD) (HOD) (MOD) (wit) (MOD) TRAINING TRAIZINU 1R(.INIkO TKlAlINI STUDIES Total I Anomt=5332: 22222 ZasasjsA 2 ngz:u 223222tasmm ssss uNaXuaMX Xa88a:88 &u::r.r,:PP : :.sa.ax. mu: 4 arsmaatasmam t.m 'Aegt .:52W5I= .. 2_X2 I 9

I. IJEST*ENT COS4T..... ...... ....

A. LAND ACQUISITION 2.3 19.3 5.3 3.8 2.1 6.0 7.1 2.2 -I I;4.4 0.0 00I, CIVIL MtS 73'l 266.9 123.7 149.7 77.6 82.0 134,6 39.7 - - 54.9 2rtAi.G 1126 261,1C, EGUIPIIf 2.8 9.2 16.6 99 4,7 9.7 11.7 3.4 - - - 3,1 1I0,9 0,0 0,0D. TRAINING - -- - 33 2.5 5.5 5,2 16.5 2.7 0.3E. MNOITORING/DEOELOP?EKT/STUDIES - - - - - - - - - 14.7 14.7 0.0 0.0F. ENGIKERINGS I AINISTRATION 14, 0 40,0 1I66 22.4 11.6 12.3 20.2 6.0 - - - - 32V.4 0,0 0,0

_ _ . ___....... ........ ........ .... ..... ...... ......... ....... ....... ... ... _....... ........ ............ .. ............. ............... ...... ........ ......

Total IAIESTWF:f COSTS 112.2 335.4 164,2 185.7 96.0 109.0 173.6 51,2 3.3 2.5 5.5 5.2 72.6 2W946,7 8.9 261.4Total 122.2 335.4 264.2 185s7 96.0 10970 173,6 51.2 3.3 2.5 5.5 5.2 72.6 2i94607 P.9 261,4Pheical Contirsaecin 11.9 37,6 15.3 15.4 6.2 10.6 17.9 5.5 - - 0.3 - - 261.4 0.0 0,0Price Contlinscw in 20.9 79,6 25.6 37.6 17.2 19.6 36.6 6,6 0,5 0.2 0.7 1.0 10.9 506,0 7.9 39,9

- .. .-- --- -- -- - -- -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- -- -- --- -- -- - - - - -- -- -. .... ... . . .... .... ... _ ..... .. _..

Total JEICT COSTS 145.0 452.6 2051, 238.7 119.4 139.3 229,0 63.3 3,9 2.7 6.5 6.2 83,5 30716,0 8.l 301,3SD22 22233 22323-311 2332222 x82332as2 2322s 22 LX22228 iZZnsan 2f X2 2 8asm22 a zsinrnehzuerrns anna?m::. uuaaasuraar s,sa2 m vrrarm s.uussaa

Foruln Exchk 19.4 58.7 29.5 32.8 16.2 19.2 31.2 8.7 0.9 2.6 0.5 - 3,6 4I6.4 9.J 45.2

.-.

n

n

I-

-63-

INDIA Table 9dUJANT IEDIUN IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Smours Account be Time

Totals Including Continrgecies(RS tillion)

84/85 85/86 86/87 87/8 98/89 Total

I. INVESTMENT COSTS

A. LAND ACQIUISITION 67.9 59.2 29.1 29.8 25.4 211.3B. CIVIL VORKS 745.9 732.5 635.3 506.7 289.2 2,9MO,7C. E0IPNENT 66.5 6.8 24.2 45.0 34.0 176.5B. TRAINING 7.2 3.8 2.6 2.8 2.8 19,2E. MONITORIN6/DEVELOPIENT/STUDIES 3.2 3.9 3.5 3.3 '3.4 17.1F. ENGIIEERING I ADMIHISTRATION 97.2 94.5 83.9 67.9 38.3 381.

Total INESTNENT COSTS 988.0 900.8 778.7 655.5 3Y3.1 3,716.0

Total PROET COSTS 988.0 900.8 778.7 65.5 393.1 3,716.0

-64-

Tab le 9emna

LMAT IEDI IRRIGATIE1 II PROECTProJict C _au t by Time

(RS million)

TotalBase Costs -

(US$84/85 856 86/7 87/88 88/89 RS Million)

A. PMl 37.4 24.3 8.6 7.1 1.8 79.2 7.3B. NAIMAAM. 9.6 2.4 0.5 - - 12.5 1.2C. NW 17.5 17.9 0.3 1.2 1.3 38.1 3.5D. *VII"R (P) 31.5 16.9 0.3 1.1 1.0 50.8 4.7E. lLI (VER I1) 8.1 7.3 0.3 1.0 - 16.6 1.5F. JHU 29.2 27.5 8.3 0.2 0.6 65.9 6.16. KELIA 20.3 5.9 0.1 0.4 - 26.7 2.5H. ZMIRI 0.5 - 8.5 42.4 54,7 106.2 9.8I. SLIO 132.6 65.6 23.2 7.6 0.8 229.8 21,3J. IED 30.5 23.7 8.6 7.4 1.7 71. 6.7K. 1LUIM 21.1 19.? 17.2 6.4 1.6 66.1 6.1L. S(UOMN 25.0 19.1 22.1 10.7 t.6 77.5 7.2N*. 1A1UI 14.3 17.5 19.8 7.1 1.0 59.6 5.5N. mu19 10.4 6.4 1.3 3.8 - 21.9 2.00. ATRMt 42.6 40.4 43.5 31.7 7.8 166.0 15.4P. 6UMI 28.2 40.2 54.9 37.5 18.1 178.9 16.6Q. WM 14.4 18.7 1799 5.6 0.7 57. 5.3Re KMN II 26.8 20.2 14.9 1292 5.5 79.6 7.4s. UND 40.9 31.8 35.7 30*6 7.4 146.4 13.6T. DMII II 1294 9.3 6.2 5.5 - 33.3 3.1U. AI II 20.6 13.2 6*3 4.0 1.7 45.8 4.2U, AJI III 29.4 24.6 25.3 22.3 10.6 11292 1094U. SIPU 46.8 64.8 75.2 76.9 71.7 335.4 31.1X. DTIVADA (NOD) 52.9 41.8 40.5 26.0 3.1 164.2 15.2Y. FATEHMDI (NOD) 38.0 41.5 41.9 36.9 27.4 18957 17.2Z. KWNRIEDJ (NOD) 18.1 26.4 28.7 18.0 4,8 96.0 8.9A. lDRAW (MOD) 29.2 25.6 26.1 20.7 7.5 109.0 10.1D. SHETRUNJI (ON) 38.2 34.4 36.5 36.9 27.7 173.6 16.1C, Imm1I I (NOO) 192 18.0 10.0 4.1 - 51.2 4.73. ATTER IMIENWE#T TRAINING 1.3 0.5 0.5 °.5 0.5 3.3 0.3E. CEOMIICAL TECIUICIAN TRAINING 1.2 1.2 - - - 2.5 0.2F. FARIES TRAINING 3.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 5.5 0.56. IN3ATIONAI TRAINING 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5S2 0.5N. NONITOR1N / DEVELOPIENT / STUDIES 19.5 26.1 13.1 7.6 6.4 72.6 6.7

Total 871.3 734.7 597.9 475.1 267.7 2944.7 272.8Pwrnical Continuncies 79.0 71.2 53.3 37.2 2(.7 261.4 24.2Price Cooti nucins 37.6 94.9 127.5 143.2 104.8 508.0 47.0

Total PROET COSTS 988.0 900.8 778.7 655.5 393.1 30716.0 314.1F == == == = =0

horeis, Exdwnu 132.3 110.5 101.4 98.9 53.3 486.4 45.0

1U1AWU t I(IUM IMIIAIIU 1 311 PCT

Table a32. *TERt iWlIT TbMINIUbtailed Cost Table

3ridak^ ot Totls Ifel Cant(Us '$00 P trs

kw Costs Totals 1rnludinW CatirinUids Totals Irnldlin Catiencas--iRS Killion) (RS Nilliwi) W64 '000) locl Pt.

FOp. (Exel. mi" I Cant. For. Dmss SmearwNM/U U/55 6/A 67/U 896/89 Total /8f I/3d 86/37 87/8U 68/83 MO 64/rl f/S 6/7 87/8 86/9 Tbtul Exch. Taxs) Tax Total Rate W. Tax Rt. Acout

1. Dmnwu wo

A. TM!NIU 0.5 0.5 0,5 0.5 0.5 2.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0,7 0,7 3.1 49.6 536. 57.3 61,3 65.3 267.3 14.4 273.0 - 267.3 0 O.0S 0 TPA.11 TIES

TlWML COST 0.4 - - - - 0.4 0.4 - - - 0.4 41A4 - - - 41.4 37.3 4.1 - 41.4 0 0.9 0 T1AM SIEN 0.1 - - - - 0.3 0.3 - - - 0.3 30.6 - - - - 30. 27.7 3.1 - 30.3 0 0,9 0 TM

S-TotalSlU?TOlS 0.6 - - - - 0.6 0.6 - - - - Os ZP2-2 - 72..2 45.0 7.2 - 72,2

Tol IlST1Et CO5t 1.3 0.5 0,5 0.5 0,5 3.3 1.3 0.6 0,6 0.7 0.7 3,9 122.1 Xl.6 57.3 61.3 65.J 3A9,5 79.4 26002 -3595ma* m ----- m---- -- m mm,m wamas .ra a-Mrae 61- M rn_ mm amau anmma a = a s 1 mm1 MAm. MASM twanmm maa 10101"JOWLZRAN

Total 1.3 0,5 0.5 0.5 0.5 3 3 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 0e7 3. 122.1 53.6 57.3 61,3 5.3 A.M 79A4 60.2 -359.5_saa sam. _am munw tsm _a ma mai mamas Sma maza,.m..v .:z7 _E _UU mama aema. mamm mama a n m u _

. ._.__ ..................... _ . . . ___._ ._._._. ._ _ ._.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

I0

'0

lilaUJUWT DI1HU IMRUATION 11 PIJECT

Table 33. M UIDIM TEC JlMI TAININEIctiled C.t Table

Irfadown of Total. Intl. Cant(US '000) Parastrs

Bae Costs Totals Irnludins Conltinwucics Totals Ircluding Crntitincin --------------- …

(RS Mhillion) RS KNllion) (UtS '04) LocuIl P1- --- --------------------- ------- For. tExcl, &thusI Cnt. For, ross Swaev

84/fl fl/86 W6/37 87/NB N0/B9 Total 84/f5 f5/86 86/87 97/1 89/89 lotal 84/l f5/B6 86/97 7/I; 98/89 Totil Exch, Taxes) Taxes Total Rate xch, Tax RPte Acemt… s… 328 335x3 55X - sd51 nazi mans ama2313 sa 3 3 3as 3 mas 38s uzA rau J*333 t--15a ts233 5m*" 3 ns as= :5*3 aS . z M=r:t :2== 33333 -- a-s a. _:rz-

1. IMEBflEMT CU9TS

A. TPAININE

TRMA. COSTS 03 0.3 - - - 0.6 0.3 0.3 - - - 0.7 29.9 32.1 - - - 62,0 60. 1.2 - 62.0 0 O." 0 TWAPER CIEI 0,9 0.9 - - - 5,9 1.0 l.O - - - 2.0 89.7 96.4 - - - 16.1 192.4 3.7 - 196.1 0 O.99 0 IRA

Sub-Total TRAINI 1.2 . - - - 2.5 13 14 27 119,6 29. - - 248,1 2432 5.0 - 249.

Total IlMSTHIET LSTS 1,2 1.2 - - - 2.5 1.3 1,4 - - - 2.7 119.6 129.5 - - 24891 243.2 5,0 - 24.Imaas nax agusaRsgus ms a min;mmm2s6s am3 aamam na ram naa2aana aasraauc =.a 33

Total 1,2 1.2 - - - 2.5 1.3 21.4 - - - 2.7 119.6 1295 - - - 24t.1 243.2 5.0 - 249.aslt amass ma"a axamn ass.x nsa. tsar zaras mu-s xtG =xxz samn I 23333 ;3ss 3s3s8 muss z uw m Xmasa s si sn8 as s aaatnLat Ia

IIIDIAWJARAT IEDIUIN IRRIATION 11 P*ECT

Table 34. F?MS TRAININGDetaled Cost Tabil

lr#Adow of Tutals 1Il. Cant(Us$ '000) P ters

lne Coat, Totals IrncludivM Contingci. s Totals Im luding Conti ies ....------------------------ - -- ---------------(RS Million) (RS million) (UI '000) Local P.j,

__ - ----- -------------- ------ -_-__ ------------------------------------ Fut. (IEcl. Itin I Cont. For, Sioss Suarv84/85 i5/SM 86/87 87/89 88/89 Total 94185 85/86 w6/87 87/98 96/89 Total 84/B5 85/B6 B6/97 7/86 BY/89 Total Exch. Taxn) Taxns lotol Rate Exch. Tax Rate Acnvot221XSaga Sagas NOSI 8923 8929W 9222 9,3222 Isl=as 622A use-. ;Z:L- 2:2-4 :s U:z:.XS Irr.ZX .-- a :San sSSSX 2::ws 214482 NXII2.9 gUsaUS 2222::- SOUZA SM.-SRS2 =e:=a8Z

lo INHST.OfI COSTS

A, LAD AUISIT-I- - - - - - 0 0 0 LI. CIVIL Mg

0.8 - - - 0.9 1.0 - - - - 1.0 Y;!,8 - - - - 92,8 13.9 ,.9 - 92.8 0.15 0.15 0 TRTAINiZUI.LL 1.1 - - - - 11 1.3 - - - - 1,3 113,1 - - - - 119.1 17.7 10.3 - 118.1 0.15 0.15 0 IRA

Su-Total C18IL MS 1.9 - - - - 1.9 2.3 - - 2.3 210.9 - - - - 210.9 316 179.3 - 210.9C. EGUipENT

MIMEHIS 0.7 - - - - 0.7 0J7 - - 0,7 42.8 - - - - 62.8 12,6 50.2 - 62.8 0 0,2 0 TRAOFFICE EOJIPEll 0.4 - - - - 0,4 0,4 - - - - 0,4 36.9 - - - - 36.9 - 36.9 -36.9 0 0 0 TRA

._. __ .__ ... .. ____._ .. ... ._ . __ ... _ .... ..... ..... _...... ...... . .... . _. . ... .. .

S34-Total EJUIPNT 1.0 - I- - 1.0 11 - - - - 1.1 S9.7 - - - - 9S.7 12,6 87.1 - 99.7*. WrTION A MINTEAMf

0FbTIN9 COSTS 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 2.5 0.2 0.7 0.7 O,B 0.7 3.1 15,0 64.3 6. ?3.6 65.3 2U.9 - 2969 - 2866 0 0 0 TRA

Skr-Total WERTJW Ia MINTEIWIC 0.2 0.6 0.4 0,6 0,5 2,5 0,2 0.7 0.7 0.9 07 3,1 15.0 64.3 68.9 73.6 65,3 2U. 9 - 286.9 - 29.9

Total IISENTr COSTS 3.1 0,6 0.6 0.6 0,5 5.5 3.5 0.? 0.7 0.3 0.7 6.5 32$.5 64.3 68.8 73.6 65.3 597.4 44.2 W.2 - 597.4_~ sScz211 agaz 22*11 Blame=;USgss: sW111 ss5z %- mama 1219 BZ 4---P ='A;.^ 1143211s SssU W68 sag: -as *"t: -JS L=SMTIR X

Total 3.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 5.5 3.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 6.5 325.5 64.3 68.8 73.6 65.3 597.4 44.2 553.2 - 597,432332 33333 33333 32333 333 33333 23333 34333 3333 143 3332 Wz:3::::: L3333 34::J e:4333 3l=e3 31333 S-J3 583323 33333 ::YJJaJ43 J:JJJ

m

k0

UlAl6WVT IJItI I16ATION 11 FItC T

Table 36. HlTIOIW. TMAINIMbtailed Cost Table

twakdon of Totals Inol. Cot(USS '000) ,.Pa Ur u

lw Costs Totals Irtludird ContirfeWicFes Totals Irnludird Contineerices(As Killion) H Millini) (US$ '040t) Local P?Hw

- -- - ------ ------------------------ For. (Exel. ites I Cant. For. Bms Sumurv64/15 W/7 37/36 N/ Total 34/8 85/U6 16/37 37/U U/BY Total 04/85 85/186 56/37 37/33 M/ilotcl Exch. Taxeu) Tuen totel bte Exeh. Tai R1A Acmt

_,m, ~x 3somas3a ma ss 3-32 338aso33x=z1soms 3_*3 3a8 mim3e8s 3 333s31 2 --= 3 3838 383 3a3as33 : 2

1. I14NEUU CUTS

A. WCATIUWAL TMNIii 1.0 l0 5o,0 1,0 l.o 5,2 1,1 1,2 1J2 13 1.4 6.2 99.7 107.1 114M 122. 6130,6 574.7 - 574.7 - 574.7 0 0 0 TM

Totl DhREThIT COSTS 1.0 leo 1 1.0 lot 5,2 1fi 1.2 1.2 1*3 1A4 6.2 .7 107,1 114,6 1226 1304 574.7 - 574.7 - 5747

Total fit lot l. 1.0 1.0 5,2 1I1 1.2 12 2.3 1.4 6.2 A"7 107,1 114.4 122.6 130.6 574,7 - 574,7 - 574,7_33 _3 33W _ _3833 328_3 3_23 _a us ozone v .=r * 1zs s 8 33_ amass 13 L_x-x 332wx _3382 333

1616GUA' MUIWI 26164A12N It POOACT

Table 35. *ITM IN/PlTM E lOM /HSTWlt Shtaled Cost table

Irakdow of Totals lfcl Cult(UH '00} e_er

law Costs Totals 1rtlqlinr Contitsimin Totals Inclwirs CL.tiiaoils ... …

(As NIlln) (AS MIlllion) l(lS '0001 Local .For. (Excl. MAi.s I Cot. Fat. hms I_urv

5 3 7 il? 3X7 U/I Trusa 1M 3N/37 37/I 3 1SUI M / 66/37 WIlU UAN Total och. Taon) Tarn Total W Ech. Tax at Ammt- - - s - *a g-*-w a=s s anu ini _aa _m am sna urnS _u _au _nu _ms ma n

1. Dlo cml

Am.Po NIT1._,-

MI9 INUW IUTAYIN o0.2 9. 0.1 0.1 9.1 9.5 0.2 CI 9.1 0.2 O l 0.6 10.9 10,? 1l1. 12.3 131. 5.5 - 57.5 - .75 0 0 0IllE I "I ITT Ul , WIlT 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1W3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 e3 1.5 24.1 25.9 27.7 29.6 31.5 13.N - IS - 3S.U 9 0 0 11liUi RN WELL 0.2 0.2 9.2 0.2 0,2 1.0 0.2 0.2 .2 0.3 0.1 1.2 2.9 21.4 22.9 24.5 26.1 114.9 5-7 109.2 - 114.9 0 05 e a

-TeIUII TIE 0.6 9.6 0.6 0.6 O.6 2.3 9. 9.6 0.7 W.7 0. 3.4 54.0 50.0 62.1 66 70.7 311.2 .7 30s-s - 311.2l. KUJUN

MNLI AT M ITEJN U T eW M IATIu 0.7 0.7 0.9 o9 1.- 4,3 06 0.o l.l 2.2 I.t 5.3 69.6 75.0 103.2 110.4 130.6 40., 244 444.4 - .l 0 0Af 0 aWllITATIU IW UX1 W CWOCT IU 15.3 20.5 10.1 5.0 3.9 54,. 15.9 22.9 1221 6.4 5,4 62.7 194752.1 2210 1.122J,3 566.7 416.3 S.043 2.2 5.514.1 -,054.3 0 0.05 0 c

IEuOTT W U wI T 0.3 9.6 0.2 0.1 - 1.2 0.3 OJ O.l 0.1 - 1.3 2979 7 4.3 11.5 22.3 * 127.9 5.9 112.0 - 117,9 0 0.05 0 0ETNW m FM? 9W1W 1.0 2.1 - - - 3.1 1.1 2.3 - - - 3.4 99id 2113.3 - - 33,4 15.2 29.2 - 313.0 0 0.05 0 C113111 Tll K MlE CLL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.5 0.5 0.6 0,6 0.6 0.7 3.0 40. 51.1 55.4 59.? 63,1 277.6 - 277. * 277. 0 0 0 anmm 0611 1m1 0.4 0.4 ^.4 04 0.4 2.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.4 38. 41.4 44.3 47.4 50.5 222A - 222.1 - 22.1 0 0 0 o E

WT#Ul KNiL. lT 1t.3 24.3 12.1 6.9 5.9 67. 19.0 27.7 14.4 6t o.9 71.0 2761.0 2,567.3 1.337.6 311.0 740.4 7.224,2 MS.7 ? .6 S * 7.224.2C. ITUX

rF l TIEMI TO EK 166TION 0 .1 9.1 - - - 0.2 0. 2 .1 - * - 0.2 10.0 10.7 - - - 20.7 1.0 19.6 - 20.7 I 0.05 0 haIIImI CIMAI m T iUa IN KM 0.1 ol, - - - 0.2 0.1 0.1 - - - 0.2 19.9 10.7 - * * 20.7 2.0 19 - 20.7 0 0.05 0 NMlEW lU UrT1E lW L2tATI0TIl 0.1 o.l O. Ol * 0.4 0.2 O.l 0.1 0,. * 0.5 10.0 20.7 11.5 12.3 - 44.4 2.2 42.2 - 44.4 0 0.05 0 WW FIK193 MrTZu. 0.3 0.4 0.3 - - 2.0 0.3 0.5 9.4 - - 1.2 29.9 42.0 34.4 - - 107,1 5.4 101. - 107.1 0 9.05 0 Ng

MTsOaI hEl 0.6 0.7 0.4 0,2 - 1.9 0,6 0. 0S 0.1 - 2-1 59.1 75.0 45.3 12.3 - 192.9 9.6 113.3 - 2.9

t4l lEITIEiT el11 IA.5 2.1 131 7, 6,4 72s6 20.2 29. 15 1.7 6,3 33.5 27.7 2M,20 I0. 445.5 396.7 11.1 7,723.3 3 2.I 7.171,2 * 77n3uIM1 ulSus-- -usa - ---u s - -. "I mu -- --a --- Iu mu n m - -

Tsui 1*95 26.2 2l3l 7,6 . 7.6 20.2 29.2 156 *.7 3.3 0.5 11747 2.7003 r45.5 696.7 1.1 7726.3 351.17 7m72 71721.3- - - am _ sa .s . m i a _aa sw _s mu -_a u -m aa

-70-

Table 10

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Estimated Schedule of Expenditures and Implementation /a

(Rs M)

Component 1984185 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 Total

Construction of MIPs (23) 555.7 662.9 549.5 462.8 388.5 2,619.4Modernization projects (6) 164.8 227.9 237.8 209.6 153.7 993.8Training 5.4 4.7 2.9 2.7 3.5 19.2Monitoring and Studies 15.2 26.9 19.0 11.2 11.3 83.6

Total Project Cost (Rs M) 741.1 922.4 809.2 686.3 557.0 3,716.0

/a Based on April-March fiscal year.

-71-

Table 11

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Estimated Disbursement Schedule /a(US$ M)

IDA Fiscal Year Duringand Semester Semester Cumulative

1985

1st 16.8 16.82nd 18.6 35.4

1986

1st 20.6 56.02nd 20.3 76.3

1987

1st 18.4 94.72nd 16.6 111.3

1988

Ist 16.6 127.92nd 13.8 141.7

1989

ist 12.1 153.82nd 11.0 164.8

1990

1st 7.2 172.0

/a Based on last half of 8-year Indian irrigation sector disbursement profile.

-72-

Table 12

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Allocation of the Credit(US$ N)

Amount ofCategory credit allocated Z Financed

1. Civil Works(a) Civil works under Parts A /a 105,000,000 50Z

and B of the project(excluding field channelsand field drains)

(b) Civil works for field channels 30,000,000 100% of completedand field drains under Parts A worksand B of the project

(c) Civil works under Part I 53000,000 100%of the project

2. Equipment and vehicles 13,000,000 100% of foreignexpenditures,1001 of localexpenditures(ex-factory costs)and 70% of localexpenditures forother items producedlocally

3. Rotational water supply 6,000,000 Rs 3501ha formanagement system under incremental areasPart C of the project

4. Training, pilot operations, 3,000,000 100%studies, monitoring andevaluation, and salariesfor incremental staff underParts D, F, G, H, Iof the project

5. Unallocated 10.000.000

TOTAL 172,000,000

/a Project parts as defined in the Development Credit Agreement.

-73-

Table 13a

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Equipment Summary

LCB ICB Total…(----------(Rs M)-------

1. Construction equipment 32.47 29.22 61.692. O&M equipment

- dams and canals 0.99 31.20 32.19- standby generators - 36.7 36.70- telecommunicacions 8.71 - 8.71

3. Hydrology and drafting 3.02 5.18 8.20

4. PERT equipment 3.00 - 3.00

TOTAL 48.19 102.30 150.49

-74-

Table 13bUDIDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Rate AmountItem Description Quantity Rs M Rs M

ICB

1. Wheel type tractor (40HP) 89 0.102 9.0272. Generating set 125 KVA 2 0.750 1.5013. Vibratory roller 2T 172 0.109 18.692

Subtotal 29.220

LCB

4. Car 8 0.085 0.6795. Jeep 51 0.085 4.3356. Pick-up 4x4 21 0.100 2.1007. Concrete vibrators 51 0.012 0.6338. Plate type compactors 480 0.026 12.4209. Drawn tanker 5T 178 0.064 11.42210. Drawn trailer 3T 47 0.019 0.876

Subtotal 32.465

TOTAL 61.685

-75-

Table 13c

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

EQUIPMENT FOR O&M - DAM AND CANALS a/

Rate AmountItem Description Quantity Rs M Rs M

ICB

1. Wheel type tr:_tor (40 HP) 4 0.15 0.60

with trailers

2. Hydraulic excavators (0.9 cum) 5 0.80 4.00

3. Wheel type loaders (0.9 cum) 21 0.60 12.60

4. Dozers (90 HP) 20 0.60 12.00

5. Spare parts ____ 2.0

Subtotal 31.2

LCB

6. Siren with 10 KVA 39 0.025 0.99generator

Subtotal 0.99

TOTAL 32.19

a/ Extra over items expected to be available from construction.

-76-Table 13d

MDIA

GUJARAT HEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

EQUIPMENT FOR O&N - STANDBY GENERATORS FOR SPILLWAY GATES

Rate AmountItem Description Quantity Rs N Rs N

ICB

1. 160 XVA capacity asets as under.

Watrak 2 16 1.00 16.00Mazam 2Gubai 2Kalubbar 2Venu-IIAji-IIDeo 2Bhadar (P) 2

2. 250 KVA capacity A/sets as under

Sipu 2 10 1.20 12.00Und 2Sukhi 2Hadaf 2Panam 2

3. 100 KVA capacity a/sets as under

Sukhbhadar 2 8 0.60 4.80Bhadar (Mod) 2Ver II 2Dantiwada 2

4. 75 KVA capacity a/ 2 0.35 0.70sets for Shetrunji(Mod.)

5. Spare parts 3.2

TOTAL 36.70

a/ - Capacity matched to HP of motors and the number of gates to be openedat once. Not included in NIP 1.

-77-

Table 13e

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

EQUIPMENT FOR O&M - TELECOMMUNICATIONS

No. of No. ofstation No. of mobileper 2000 ha main station station(1-30 km (1-50 km (1-10 km

Item Name of Proiect range) range) range) Total

LCB

1. Panam 20 4 4 282. Sukhi 10 2 2 143. Deo 4 2 1 74. Hadaf 3 2 1 65. Machhanala 2 2 1 56. Sukhbhadar 4 2 1 77. Machhundri 4 2 1 78. Kalubhar 3 2 1 69. Venu II 3 2 1 610. Und 6 4 2 1211. Ver II 2 2 1 512. Watrak 10 2 2 1413. Jhuj 3 2 1 614. Kelia 2 2 1 515. Demi II 1 2 1 416. Guhai 4 2 1 717. Aji. III 1 2 1 418. Dantivada (Mod) 2 2 1 519. Bhadar (M'd) 2 2 1 520. Aji. III 4 2 1 721. Bhadar (P) 4 2 1 722. Sipu 12 4 2 1823. Mazam 3 2 1 624. Uben 1 2 1 425. Zankhari 12 4 2 1826. Shetrunji (P)(Mod) 18 4 2 2427. Fatehvadi (Mod) 19 4 2 2528. Kharicut (Mod) 7 2 1 1029. Machhu I (Mod) 5 2 1 8

Total Nos. 171 70 39 280

Rate Rs 0.03 0.04 0.02

Amount Rs N 5.13 2.80 0.78 8.71

-78-Table 13f

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

EQUIPMENT FOR HYDROLOGY AND DRAFTING

Rate AmountItem Descri-tion Quantity Rs M Rs M

ICB

1. Hydrology

29 Climate stations 29 0.070 2.03035 Recording rain gauges 35 .040 1.400

350 Manual rain gauges 350 .005 1.750Subtotal 5.18

LCB

2. Drawing Office (CADA Unit)

30 Drafting stations, complete 30 0.020 0.6008 Microcomputers, complete 8 0.200 1.6006 Jeeps 6 .082 0.492Miscellaneous small equipment _ 0.328

Subtotal 3.0'

TOTAL 8.20

-79-

Table 13g

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION 11 PROJECT

Equipment for Construction

gx 0a5. >. 0 L.5

C 4. U 0 l i Ce as

Sr. Name of Scheme a 5 0 n C c ua°*

No.~~~ ~ ~ _l I j I I I1. Panam I ! I I 1521 I 1 I 1151

2. Machhanala I I I I I 41 1| 2 I 14 i

3. Hadaf 7 t 2 2 1712121 I 141

4. Bhadar (P) I I I 1101 21 21 Il 1 41

5. Amli 1 I 1 4 1411 1 4

6. Jhuj I I I I 1 5 1 1 11 i 1 4

7. Kelia 3 I | I 131 6 11 i 141

B. Zankhari I 122 10 i5 1261 6 115 1 i11 7

9. Sukhi I I I I 126 2 1 2 111 16 1

10. Deo I | I 19 111 2 1 13

11. Kalubhar 7 I I I i 71 21 4 2 I i3 I

12. Sukbhadar I i 21 1 I 91 21 4 2 I 13

13. Machhundri 12 i | 12 1101 21 4 2 I 13 Ii I I I I I I I I I I

14. Uben I 3 i I 1 3 11211 I 1 2

15. Watrak I I 61 i10 1231 5 11 5 I 14 i

16. Guhai I Ill 110 9 1 2 11 12

17. Mazam i I I 16 111211 i 121

18. VenuI I I I I 1 7 1 2 1 5 2 F 13

19. Und | 131 | 113 1 2 11 131

20. DemiII 11121 I I 4 1 1 2 1 14

21. Aji-II i I | I 13111211 I 1 41

22. Aji-III i 131 2 i 1 8 1 2 1 5 1 2 13

23. Sipu 14 3 14 5 1281 4 119 16 7 1 I

24. Dantivada (Hod) I i 8 2 13 156 i 11 17 3 I 120

25. Fatehvadi (Mod) I I I 1 3 1 38 i 8 1 14 1 3 I i 14

26. Xharicut (Mod) | I i 1 3 1 18 1 4 1 5 1 7

27. Bhadar (Mod) I I i 1 3 1341 7 15 2 I 112

28. Shetrunji (P) (Mod) I I1 13 i 45 10 119 6 I 117 1

29. Machbu-I (Mod) I Il 1 3 1131 21 6 2 I 14 i

Total I 8 I 51 I 21 I 51 i 480 I 89 I 178 I 47 1 2 1172

Unit Cost (Re M) 10.082 10.082 10.097 10.012 10.025 10.098 10.062 10.018 10.725 i 0.1051I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I

Total Cost (RS M) 10.656 14.182 12.037 10.612 112.00018.722 111.036I0.846 11.450 118.0601I I I I I I P I I

INDIA

GUJARAT IEDIUN IRRICATION It PROJgCT

Details of Oraanisation aet-up: Existing and Future Reeuiraents

Eusting sub-divisions Futurf requirement of Sub-divisions during the yearSr. Name of sP QC Cooat Total 1984-85 1985-56 1956-87 1467-iU gI8-6

.0 Scheme Sub-Dn. SF OC Const Total SP OC Conal Total SP OC Coast Total Sf UC Coast Total IF OC Coast Total

3. Pangs - 3 19 22 - 1 7 a - I 8 9 - I 10 11 - 1 3 4 - - -2. Nachhnaala 2 I 5 8 - 1 3 4 - - I I - - - - - - - - - - -3. Hadcf 3 1 8 12 - 1 9 10 - I 9 10 - - - - - - - - - - - -4. hdder (P) 2 1 11 14 1 1 7 9 - I 8 95. Amli - 1 6 7 - 1 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -6. Jhuj 2 2 10 14 - 1 7 a - I IS 16 - - - - - - - - - - - -7. Keli - 1 9 10 - 1 7 8 - 1 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - -8 tZnkhari 4 I 1 6 4 1 1 6 3 I 5 9 3 2 10 15 3 3 17 23 2 3 IS 239. Sukhi 6 3 35 44 - 3 43 46 - 2 18 20 - - - - - - - - - - - -

10. De 3 2 14 19 - 2 12 14 - 2 9 11 - - - - - - - - - - - -11. elubhar 4 2 4 10 1 2 7 10 1 2 7 10 - 2 5 7 - - - - - - -

12. Sukbhadar 2 2 5 9 2 2 8 12 1 2 7 10 - I 7 a - - - - - - - -1I Nachhundri - I 7 a 2 2 4 8 1 I 9 11 - I 10 11 - - - - - - - -

14. Uben I 1 3 5 - 1 5 6 - I 4 S - - _ - -_ _ _ _ _ _15. Watrak - 3 is 21 6 3 12 21 - 3 18 21 - 3 17 20 - 2 12 14 - - - -16. Cuboi 3 2 11 16 4 2 10 16 3 2 11 16 2 2 11 IS - 2 13 IS _ 2 1017. Hasm - I 9 10 2 1 7 10 - I 9 10 - 1 9 10 - - _ _ _ _ _ _18. Venu. 11 I 1 6 S I 1 6 a - 1 7 B - I 7 a - I 2 3 _ _ _ _19. Und 2 1 7 10 3 1 8 12 1 1 10 12 - I IS 16 - I IS 16 - - - -20.DBei. 1II I I 5 7 I 1 5 7 - 1 6 7 - 1 3 5 - - - - - - - -

21. Aji. 1 1 2 3 6 1 2 3 6 - I 5 6 - I 5 6 - - - - - - - -22. Aji. 112 - 2 a 10 1 2 7 10 - 2 8 10 . 2 8 10 - 1 I 9 - 1 3 423. Sipu 3 4 16 23 7 4 12 23 7 4 12 23 4 3 16 23 2 3 19 24 1 3 20 2424. D.otiwada (Mod) - 3 12 15 - 3 12 15 - 3 14 37 - 3 13 16 - 2 14 16 - - - -25. Fatehwadi ("od) - 2 12 14 - 2 11 13 - 2 14 16 - 2 13 15 - 2 12 14 - 1 7 S26. Kharicut (Had) - I 5 6 - I 5 6 - 1 6 7 - 1 6 7 - I 6 7 - - - -

27. Uhadae (Mod) 3 1 5 11 3 2 6 11 3 2 8 13 3 2 a 13 1 1 I 10 - 1 4 5S28. Shetrunji.? 6 I 5 12 4 2 6 12 3 1 11 16 3 2 11 16 2 2 11 IS 2 2 10 1429. achhu.1 (H) 3 1 2 6 4 1 3 a 2 1 5 a 2 1 5 a - 1 4 5 - 1 2 3

TOtAL 54 48 261 363 47 48 236 331 25 43 250 318 17 33 189 239 8 23 144 175 5 14 72 91 iUS -S .. 55 . .. ... .. E m. ... urn .. n , . mm urn ... .r. .. . ... .~ 5._ - *5 5

F4

-81-

Table 14bINDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Organization Set-up for a Typical 16000 Ha Irrifation Management Unit

as aRproved under Irrigation Department G.R. No. ES-5 1177-5-G dated 1/15/80

Sr. Nos. ofNo. Name of Post Post. Remarks

1. Deputy Ex.Engineer 1

2. Assistant Engineer 1 For professional branchof sub-division

3. Additional Asst. Engineer 1 )3 ) Head of sections

4. Technical Assistant 2 For maintenance , repairsvorks and managements

5. Senior clerk 1 For assisting officers

6. Junior clerk 2

7. Tracer 1

8. Sectional (beat) karkoon 32 1 for 4 sections and1 for 20 beats and 2per section for miscella-neous work

9. Driver 1 If vehicle is given

10. Peons 2

11. Chowkidar 1 For office cbowki whererequired after office hours

12. Sectional (beat) chowkidar 24 4 for sections, 20 for beats

13. Chovkidar 12 For duties like C.R.S.vatch, and telephones, etc.

TOIAL 84

For a sub-division having 12 or less sections (beats) and for sections having3 or less beats, the posts will be reduced proportionately.

-82-

Table 15a

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Farmer's Trainins (Block Leaders)

1. Length of Training : 3 days

2. Place of Training Trial cum Demonstration Farm at Thasta

3. Trainers DA, AED and ID staff

4. Number of Trainees 1/ 8,750 Block leaders (one from each8 ha chak)

5. Preparation of coursematerials By trainers

6. Syllabus:Classroom Field(hours) (hours)

a. purpose and obligationof block committees 3 5

b. system operation andirrigation schedulingamong blocks 3 1

c. RWS within 8 ha blocks 3 2

d. Soil/water/plantrelationships 7 -

e. Cultural practices undercontrolled vater supply 2 2

f. Physiological cycle ofmajor field crops 2 _

Total 20 5

11 Block leaders from four MIPs covering about 70,000 ha CC& (Dantivada44,517 ha, Sansoli scheme in the Panam 2,000 ha, Watrak 18,341 ha andMazam 4,717 ha).

i ! - ftftf.ftsce s * 4f ft4re*°| *|IIRnsaS - I4g .S-OI^ cc^n '@' *5 50 ' R 5 2 rg n

.. i ' '.n 44 I * g^ . . . .-.. . -. .. r

... .. .t.s. ... gE *E.... .. ts .Eg gg . s 4 *5.c*R' ... .. ....

t1 1' l)l|||l ., . ,,, . . ,,,,,,,,,, .t . . .......... ...

-lEE? @ii' §|j' 0 'ig a g g' ' i1ls.. ' ' '' '~E E 't Es'.' ' -''' r

. ' .. .............. .44 E .Eg gg gg.Eg .gg .EIE E. .5 .' E gig..

la st # I g I tt5f t Ctttt tg f i'"tr'g5gf ft95 ftENA gt g 1 g

t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s .' Eg g E g g g g - * 'E g g

el I g g gg0i .g A g'E g 'gE

21 : $ , ...~~~~~......... ......

'' Eg gg gg g gE gg E go g Eg g gg g g ' o'S''EEE '2|n& ||&@| ||@| | f ti|

| | || o 1"& r. f J 4 J

#5g gf ' c ° ' Eggff '-2''r.r _5*' '' '''t'' m

o ''ge s'''"@

w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~wgg ge Egg R ° _ ^ RR R°__ R R RR RR E ,E , g IS '' gg Rg g, g ER ''f 0R- ,R,@ , RR,R ,, g R f

b~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ftiii ft 4!9oi *9!i '2'ltZoJt 3!!!i;it

g- tP Eg EVE o Wa11~ .' E.~ 5E E 44 4

EE EE ftEJ EE -. *ES4 l| ]}| t"

X :a.a:!.eu ^FueMS=J$d iSJe."a"wnif i:siXu~~~gEsftl.E aEggE9Eg

-84-

Table b6h

INDIA

CUJARAT MEDI!M IRR CATION II PROJECT

Results of Overation Simulation

Irrigation that could have been achieved in IS of the past 20 years.

CultivableNot TWO Total Co=snd

Proiect Nane P*44Y Kharif R!bi Wasther Season Annual Ares,

1. Panm 1b279 21791 21382 - - 53452 411202. Mahhanala 570 2110 1654 - - 4334 30843. Hadaf 1309 1938 1100 - 393 4740 5;384. Ehadar (P) 800 3600 1066 - 1080 6520 8C005. Anli (Ver II) 911 1821 2004 - 729 5465 65_6. Jhui 1672 627 2800 - 11 58.0 41807. Kelia - 1245 1740 - 485 3468 24868. Zankbari 6256 4171 12512 - 4587 27526 208539. Sukhi 4132 5682 5160 - 7231 25205 20660

10. Dec 2522 721 3242 - 2775 9620 7:0711. KAlubbar - 4488 - - 875 5363 583012. Sukhbhadar - 4958 - - 2072 7030 740013. Machbundri - 6800 - - 810 7610 809514. Uben - 1888 248 - 62 2198 206315. Watrak 734 8437 4585 - 3118 16874 1834116. Gihai 356 :418 1209 - 1849 5831 711117. Nazaz - :288 1462 - 1509 5259 471718. V nu II - 4360 525 - 394 5279 i:5319. Und - 9282 1365 - 546 11193 990020. Demi II - 1958 124 - 342 24.24 310821. Aji II - 1955 334 - 95 2384 238422. Aji IlI - 5027 1554 - 265 6837 661523. Sipu - 12139 8828 - 1104 22071 1600024. Dantivada (M) - 23960 21220 - - 45180 4451725. Factbwadi (m) - 25500 9170 _ 34670 2979226. Kharicut (x) 10500 - _ - - 10500 1461927. Bbadar (M) - 5317 7280 - 3988 16585 2657828. Shetrunji (M) - 9831 8590 4469 894 23774 3575029. Machbu I (M) - 3331 1646 - 1665 6642 10409

INDIA

GUJARA'i MEDIUM IRRICATION 11 PROJECT

Present and Pro;ected CroDpinh Patterns(I of CCA)

Present and Future Without Proiect future With PtO;ectZone I ZOne 11 Zone III Zone IV Zone V Al! ZOnee ZOne I Zone 11 Zone III Zone IV Zone V All Zonee

CCA (he) 60,517 123,385 31,163 85,309 74,580 374,954 60,517 123,385 31,163 85,309 74,580 374,954

irIf Lf- E rrf ird irlir rf ir f iL rf iLr d ir xL [ it rf L rf ir

Paddy - I- - 16 7 10 4 2 13 4.0 4.1 - - - - - 32 - 23 - 47 - 17.2Petrl illet 42 3 15 . - - 15 - 12 - 17.5 0.5 22 30 10 5 - - 2 12 9 - 9.2 9.2Sorghus 26 1 15 1 30 - 10 - 16 - 17.1 0.5 9 15 6 5 16 4 4 3 4 2 6.5 5.5GroundOut - - 45 1 9 3 12 - 12 - 20.7 0.6 - - 11 39 - 17 6 12 - 12 5.0 19.4maize I- - - - - 14 - 6 - 4.4 - - - - - - - - 11 -4 - 3.3

Pulses 12- 1 - 12 - 3 - 2 - 4.3 - 4 10 8 - I 10 - 1 3 - 4.0 2.7Vegetable- - - - 0.6 - - - 2 - 2 -- - 1 Wr

Sub-total 80 4 76 3 67 11 64 5 50 13 68.0 6.3 35 55 35 51 17 65 12 63 16 65 24.7 58.6

Nabi

Wheat - iS - 7 - 2 1 2 7 6 1.6 7.0 - 39 - 16 - 29 2 27 2 21 0.8 24.3Mustard 3 10 - - - - I - - - 0.7 1.6 - 15 - 2 - 5 1 3 - I 0.2 4.4

Grant 7 - - - 13 - 5 - I - 3.5 - - 7 - 2 - 19 5 6 2 6 1.5 5.9Groundnut - - - 4 - - . - - - - 1.3 - - - 4 - - - - - - - 1.3Vegetables _ 1 - I 2 - - - - 0.9 - 3 - 3 - 3 - 3 - 2 _ 2.8Sub-total 10 29 - 12 13 4 7 3 8 6 5.8 10.8 - 64 - 27 - 56 8 39 4 30 2.5 38.7

Two Seasonal

Cottoa - - 8 4 7 3 26 2 25 3 14.1 2.6 - - - 13 - 9 5 18 5 11 2.1 11.3Tobacco -_ I - 0.4 0.2 - - - - - - - 2 - I - 0.6Cstor 2 3 - _- - - - - - - 0.3 0.5 2 3 - - --.- - - -

Sub-total 2 3 8 4 7 3 27 3 26 3 14.8 3.3 2 3 - 13 - 9 5 20 5 12 2.1 12.7

PerOnnial

Sugarcane - 2 - - - 2 - 0.6 - - - 2 - - - 2 --. 6

Sub-total - - - 2 - - - 2 - 0.6 - - _ - _ 2 - - - 2 - 0.6

Total 92 36 84 19 87 20 98 11 84 24 88.6 21.0 37 122 35 91 17 132 25 122 25 109 29.3 110.6 cJ

128 103 107 109 108 109.6 159 126 149 147 134 139.9

rf - rainfedir - irrigated

CUIA!AT MIDIUM I11lUCOIAt I iI nonta

Areag Tipids ad Productios

_s- Fulcra Wibt h ri tal Ptar withSun Ant -- Lt tnt, hut _lull tub hes lull tub Las lull la. Ant Suit NUt. huh hiltglaUsiA ._ laxtb . is hi la b h hild To lab'hilu1

addy 1S,409 1.1 16,110 1),211 2.0 30O,51 20,397 3.8 12.088 15.009 l.2 18.011 15,218 2,2 22,301 30,391 2.1 10,316 - - - 64,64 3.4 219,796 14.44 2.4 219,796frail Millei 65,601 0.6 39.403 1611 1.6 3.619 67,411 0.6 42.612 61.971 0.7 41,949 1,616 2.0 3,932 61*,481 0. *9901 24,071 0.6 37,311 2141l 2.8 69,519 98,632 1., 111,119krjhqu 66,011 0.1 22.028 1,839 0.9 1,81) 95,694 0. 33,816 64,013 0.3 32,028 1339 3.3 2.022 61694 0.1 24.033 24,31 0.1 16,42 0,1544 .1 13,230 £4,11S 3.1 86,322Cr-,ndmat 11,5;5 0.1 54,761 2,79 193 2,320 19,804 0,7 57.051 17,515 02 69,743 2,369 1.4 3,036 39,6,b 0.9 I7 * 799 16,61 1.0 11,691 72,b0S 2.9 117,9S0 91t,96 1.7 154,841patse 19,116 1.0 1,8116 - - 18,416 1.0 18.411 16,818 1.1 11.080 - - - 16,416 1.1 116040 - - 122367 2. 22.2154 12.317 2.6 22.154ote1ra 136,23 0.6 9,77Z - - - 16,217 :. 9,772 18.287 O. 8,213 - - - 34,2Z7 0.1 8,212 14,641 0.6 11,673 10,020 1.3 63 ,26 24. 41 3.0 24 699Veg.table* I - - 7.L9T 0.1 3,619 7.11t 0.1 1,879 _ - - 21.,1 0.8 1,939 2..I1 0.0 1,111 - - - ... J.JJ 1.1 51715 *.111 17 33 1,714Subtotal 254,91S 23,511 276,46 251,91s 23,511 278,496 91,624 21,10 23112,174

iski

Wheat 8,076 0.6 3,64A 36,334 2.1 11,301 32,406 1.6 56,941 4,078 0.7 4,212 26,334 2.3 90,146 32,803 3. 960 218 06 2569.7 . 00.1I14694,27 23 203..109felward 2,7 0.6 2,335 6,050 I l 6 3.0 8 3,669 0.6 2,135 9,050 1.1 9,655 6,739 '1. 6,790 6tO 2. 813 159 01. I 22,t1973 3,6 14 3, T62r.* 13,296 0.9 10,43 - - - 13,266 0.6 10,636 12,298 07 9,309 - - 13,296 0.7 9,309 1,717 0.6 4,604 22,229 1.5 133329 27,978 2.4 17,931Cruun"dt - - 9931 1.1 7,903 9,935 I.) 7,803 - - ,9 1.6 7,6 4,9 1. 7,696 - - - 9,936 2.1 10,246 8,934 2.2 1030,4Vrgatablsao - .2.jL 20.0 66.300 ]JIj 20.0 49,300 .z - - .. I.L 22.0 72,930 .J..1L 22.0 72,930 1...... -,1 0J3 27.0 23,3600 26.108 27.6 282,606lSbtotal 22,043 40,634 82,815 :2.043 40,614 67,415 9,800 145,14 334,932

Twe $4.0oaI co

coltto 12,617 0.6 31,126 9,613 3 1.1 10,7- 62,9*0 0.7 42,120 ,6217 0,7 37,U1t 9,113 1.3 12,781 62,6K0 0.6 49,711 7,994 0.8 *,26S 42,405 13.9 0,170 4,1399 1.7 66,I41tobacco 1,S99 0.9 1.439 6351 J I .365 2,412 1.1 2,604 1,599 I,0 1,59 81) 3.7 2,4SO 2,451 I.3 3,049 - - - 2,451 2.3 51,60 2,412 2.3 1,84WCastor 1.LL1 1.1 1,221 1.045 3.1 3,728 j,34 3. 12 4,011 1,j10 1.2 3,9) 1..Li 1.6 2,90G .101k 1.4 4,2 [4 I 1. 317x3 1,11j 3.2 3,9915 JAiL 3,6 51,24slatisal 11,686 12,962 66,160 11,666 32,482 66,166 9,208 46,473 55.17

sInareee -J) --2.11, $.0 136,32) 2.11 11.0 31,1 - - --1 L S.1 30 1. 7,411 J"] *1.0 117,97) - - - l 8o 17.9,7715 Lt 1.0 179,7715ubtoal _ 2,1 12,11 - 2.231 21 ,115 _ 2,115 2,115Toal 3flj4 j11 hJjj W L24 332a8a n l,* I lOA 104a *1347t 524W l

tree az b.Vaid to Me/.lIeld it. tQ/i"a.fredwctia ai top.

I-;Mco

-87-

Table 14

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRPIGATION II PROJECT

Incremental Crop Production and Value

Future FuturePresent Without With Incremental Value a/(1) (2) (3) (4)-(3)-(2) Rs M

------------ -000 ton…------------

FoodRrains

Paddy 47.1 50.1 219.8 169.7 257.9Wheat 58.9 64.8 303.1 238.3 433.7Sorghum 33.7 34.1 68.3 34.2 53.7Millet 42.7 49.6 117.1 67.5 102.6Maize 16.4 18.1 32.2 14.1 21.2Gram 20.4 13.6 62.8 49.2 151.7Sub-total 219.2 230.3 803.3 573.0 1,020.8

Oil Crops

Groundnut 64.5 80.7 167.0 86.3 331.4Mustard 8.8 8.8 23.8 15.0 6.8Sub-total 73.3 89.5 190.8 101.3 338.2

Cash Crops

Cotton 42.5 49.8 87.0 37.2 190.2Tobacco .2.8 3.0 5.6 2.6 13.1Caster 4.1 4.4 5.6 1.2 5.5Sugarcane 116.3 137.5 179.8 42.3 8.0Vegetables 68.0 74.8 289.4 214.6 215.3Sub-total 432.1

Total 1,791.1

a/ Based on financial prices.

-88-

Table 20MDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT(in 1984 constant Rupees)

Summary of Prices for Economic and Financial Analysis

Economic Prices Financial PricesCrop (Rs/Ton) (Rs/Ton)

1984 1990 1995 1984

Cotton, medium staple 6950 7190 7300 5320

Cotton, short staple 4440 4600 4660 4040

Paddy 1590 2290 2260 1520

Sorghum (Local) 1780 2350 2330 1620

Sorghum (Hybrid) 1670 2200 2180 1520

Pearl millet 1670 2200 2:80 1520

Sugarcane 130 250 250 190

Maize 1620 1690 1690 1520

Wheat 1990 2210 2210 1820

Pigeon pea 3330 4400 4360 3030

Gram 3220 4250 4210 2920

Other Pulses 3660 4830 4780 3330

Grounduuts 3000 3050 3010 3840

Tobacco 4000 4000 4000 5050

Mustard 3110 3170 3130 4550

Castor beans 5300 5280 5280 4550

Potatoes 720 720 720 910

Chillies 5300 5300 5300 6600

Table 21

D;erivation of Economic Prices for Major Croe and mvnots in G4iarit(i 1984 constt prices)

Cotton Cotton Grondunit Wheat X!ifs Paddy 1 ij i10rt gt 5utr lflgggitr S Phosohat e je Po7t-ab I

Wlorld Market Price 1990 ISSton 187 139 416 2,019 2.019 503 365 260 191 107

Quality Adjusctent (:) - - 75 90 54 - 95 - - -

forld Market Equivalentrndian Product 055/tc-, 187 139 312 1.817 1.090 503 347 260 191 107

Freight. Inaurance US$/ton - - - -145 '-165 - - *50 *65 .65

Domestic Border Price 0S$/ton 187 139 312 1.672 945 503 347 310 256 1 2

Exchange Rate lsl10.8-ltS) Rsaton 2.020 1.500 3.370 18.060 10.210 5.430 3.750 3.350 2,770 1.860

Domescic Haodling Transport Ra/ton .220 *220 _260 -180 -180 -400 -215 21 *300 Z/ +300 3/ 300 (Sa 0.81

Wbolesale Price Ra/ton 2.240 1.720 3.630 17.880 A 10.030 i 5.030 3.535 3.650 3.070 2.160

Proessing (SCF 0.8) R/clon - - -110 -402 402 440 .400 - - -

Processing Ratio ( ) - - 66 33 33 68 10 46 _,' 48 fI 60 A/

Transport from Farsgste Ia/ton -30 -30 -30 -131 -131 -70 - - - -

Economic Farmgate Price s faton 2.210 1.690 2.290 7.190 4*.600 3.050 250 7.930 6.400 3.600

11 Source: IBID Co_odity Price Forecasts dated January 16. 19*4Pricing Basis:Wheat: Canadian No. 1. Wester rod Spring. 703 Thunder Day.Rice: Thai, Milled 51 Broken, FOB Bangkok.Cotton: Mexican Riddling. 1-3132'. CIJ N Erope.Ground-

Nuts: Shelled. any origin, CI? utropemaize: US No. 2. Yellow, FM3 Gulf PartsSugar: World. ISL Daily Price. Fo and stowed at Greater Csrribean ports

;/ ledia is at the margin of self-sufficieny in food grains.It is assumed that, depending on tbe harvst, importa of exports are likely to occurin the abort andt udium run. Therefore, interational transport costs hav beenomitted. India is a net exporter of cotton ad a not importer ofoilaceda. Gujarat is a net importer of food grains and a net exporter ofoilseeds ead cotton. It is assumed that interational transport coats to Europecorrespond to those to Indian ports in the case of groudnuts.

i/Rounded

if Ubolesale prices refers to lint values only which determine 33 per cent of the faregateprice of seed cotton. The value of cotton seed which smkes up for 67 percent of the farm-gate price of seed cotton has been derived from dometic wbolesale pricoe of cotton seedwhich hate been corrected by applying SCQ of 0.o. Wholesale prices of cotton sed areeased to follow the projected price development of oilseeds in tbe ptoject period.

E1 Economic price of s cotton.

if Source: IBD Cosodity Price Forecasts dated June 1093.Price Basis:Nitrogen: World Market priew of arw. eFOB urope. basedThosphate: World Market price for T.S.P. (Triple Superphoshate)* FOs DS Culfpotash: World Market price of Potassium chloride FOB Vancouver.

India and the State of GCjarat are expected to reasin net importers of fertilixerduring the project period.

/ Doomatic trsnsport and handling to farugate.

if Nutrient Ratio

*33l993 13 n - a !- -0J - a !P*'l _ 1i -

2a4fc 93.a *339 - a !$ 309 093J - f t - d

ffn Ic! 512 VK! 009 23C5 - - c1ia ci * 3Kt 1rot fiz "c o C 0OCt - - 099 r-i a AIOC 9t1O oie nf oc CmK - - coec 12 n a

r6n litc 999 919 9( oloot - - lo!0 PZ z a 2235 3cI ZW 919 009 03s1 - - aoU * 3 AOHS :9T 11 Ct9 261 SI39 - - I2I9 1:t 31 1 *_ *Oo->

cr9 ii 9Tr 91n ff3 OCDCc - - KOCc K-I a a! 99I 031 9Cc ac e oz suc - - Otf 0 1 3 3

uscr car, (CL in "ii K - - 1v59 6ro go a

LtLS 9631 9Ct o0 aict cSIIT - - stilt c-: ox cmtO nit of9 9 2tot coc - - I3t LI u Z0099 "IC 3991 9t1 SCOT O - 030K ri ax a .- RiL

OZOZ LilZ 3W9 OLE 99 LUCZ - - EZEZ rn- Ci aag11 330t a" oLe EU EU? - - 029? 10 JR a11(1 190! 519 o e zic 9292 - - ntc ra *3

E159 tIIl lt3 at9 WC ala! - - lDitC S 3 fttc91 11CC 1??? 901 091 9139 - - 9261 C't 0! A

socr ciO m 9r1 r sc I - -'CV i; oS i -atA

LIS 2Z39 ZeCC 0991 091 Oet1 - - ocTr C6 11 1OtE 3023 39 oI! 11 91 KCZI - - OCt2 59 Ii CZCC in* I i, "Il 10z2 OCtet - - KOI CC I* a -*-d

313n SZ 39I 92 9 O U Zt 2 t c-Z t II t Z

c , St c,n c 1 01591 - - 0159: -a *flu? 39c3 9109 n 3nc ozooz - - 0201 rz ii a9533 9923 91(3 151 39 C 00131 - - 0020 D xi js s . X

:Ltc 1961 129 in 9(1 9999 9" PE 0190 c'-I :I-,' VWn MIT m" KC t5 tt I n4 T-z 9 ' I I

UHs Vooc ozr nz onr to" ZEE f CI *'0, . ml

219 00 Ot gig V"2 3012r OLIVECC 3:0I A

Otr o113 ooc or ot 901! U O0 itt ro - A

3z20 229 0Z "I 002 09f - - 099 3 I ml A3t0 21 02, at Is o OHit - - 09I K 3 OIG

-9( C 21 919 St 211 0o (9 - - 01(9 rt fl ft03Z9 o13 (CC iTn OZG "WE - - sat r 3 A0

3-0 ti sr m ozi 0 C - - sac 1- 1i 1

: : la VKs DOC mIzCKVE OC 1

11s 101T LtI? 911Cc. ro icii rI II Aot 31 EEC "C 91B 41 2 C O I 92 1' 0 31 t0:4 113 EtC 919 an2 CiO O 9 O6 9I El P..

0:92 2(5 Wt 39, 90 ItlY 0(1 P2 rInc i: *; ^9112 *992 Cii n9 3ff 111 001 0': 019! 31 3: * *-_11

yoGi

1tCm £13 Slit: lit 0921 0 - - 0231 Z-l 31 033 30ne ticl 2C. 32 021 - - o 3c * ft

9z:2 CC:2 miii ZIC 901 0:9 - - 0299 CC 01 4 'iI'3

911 112 Ct91 C 9 C 9 1319 3X WI *'1 (9 C'l *1 A9931 091 301 n:1 301 Ot 09 BI 9KIT 30 S I

Isff tb Ao S t tZ b s

*CCI 249 WI KIt, 0 0Z1 rc i' 3D1 90 *e 4

all 9E9 051 in 2 C T.C K9i C l ! .119c r - 0 3*3t 5e3 cM: ,mL 9" El 992 2 1 ML 0 1 4 EASE 119 2vi 39 92 9o0t nl ri 01 3 A*

666 3991 116 Hi sr1 311 932z 9i 110!t °D tS t

-ZZI1 919 116 929 091 191 ffl P1 1 04 1Z S A l

5355 2122 EL~~il? et 21 =it1 9 ~ I 91 1I

9n11 3 no t C V1T Otec ax2 " 1 9,0t 32 Alinc [Loi not "C VA 1:2c 09 rI *T6? * t 1ml

:Lc 30 3 09c GO: lilt Dv aO 9T11 N A ft

Cc i9 n9 99 C I 016 012 ri e 2 PC 41e fDa

139 11 tt09 1 (92 rzt 1192 -C :t A

o9 9i9 9e 39 2 ict 12 "I 1 rt I I

195 959 01 I ILL 10:I1 EEi * : 1 1 A 0 a -

0001 191! 291 3O9 la( itit V.5 ri l 9 31S

6061 :,1 cc; v" 431 0(91 031 0 0 r: 31 A:t G Sfl CO3 i Ltt .-c m(? 3sr 01 m I90(G1c 1 73 ! 011 49 9r L19 ci s K5 *1 21 S *-11'-1

9O1E 196 121 OZC 309 O35 "n n: 119? :t 1 a921K 901 "a, 90" 3ix 0:2 n99 rc 2r 1 : 1l a] A

"C. au 2,o *D; CZ tZIG n VCT C: In *r

"C1 et: til, O9 0I 0GI rIT 1 3051 *31 A1 A

(iS 31t= 6001 099 3 0t90 921 31 .1C ri *1 1 P

I "990 ~ InI 1093 AI"l £099 a-l. 0190 *1 owl0 951 SC a-I4z

wur~~~~~~~~~rh

rai l it! s T Jaq t 1 TI ASi--

int CM 'Kc el? ZEC LOST ti V11 oiselx D'inAr-a.

"e C6 L! 4C f O- cv 9. "

-'I-

CUIAMT 111;GAT'lo tl yo

R__i. Cr. Sfl

03.43.4 102147W 1 P3j

Crap TE_CK *7-..i 714. 3.14. TIe 5.14, CI. borca. f 1 T3C V.15

C,51 T,_ ,11 41 1_ Lb-

- li 1.3 232 1.3 232 3114 532 320 145 2_I7 e37in 1.9 4234 1.9 244 4340 a" 520 1133 2332 2623

* ,, s.. SIX 3.4 ¶04 3 A4" 372 133 2740 390

3V 1.1 1749 2.2 305 2057 59 :40 193 2047 ±020V l2 1.2 2712 2.4 336 3045 401 240 224 IO9 1937

acIlco ! 10 1.5 3004 3.4 270 3276 373 238 So1 12:4 2042

T 10 2.0 43:0 4.0 300 *4 39e 34* 2439 344 3220u is .6 31 7 390 6038 4.20 34e 737 is"0 4357

a y 0.. 1002 1.3 90 1032 323 31: 10 473 41.9 31 0.7 152 1 103 1631 347 312 30 43 942

ID 07 0.8~~~~~- 1744 2.4 120 184 23a1"3 0 3164

4b ! 5 0 . 1303 1.5 lb: 12 44 325 3" 39 3064 58Lt 3. 1.1 299 2 m 2539 336 390 491 1217 Kll1 2.S 5340 2.5 225 5675 620 442 433 3517- 415

! Y 0 0 10 90 291 322 29 442 338V 5 0 214|5 10 1233 21 312 39 42

R V 0G1 1341 0.7 43 1494 302 312 39 43 1o..

C,.* !t F 1 3. 190 2.00 2 0 4140 420 3 90 1734 244V 13 3 4 2.3: 2:24446 437 39D 1015 Ji: 23i1

13 573 3.00 340 6079 50 414 3105 20 A--2. 4

P V7 0.7 2100 3.10 122 2232 353 33 37 130 724r 0 2 1.40 ela 2574 34 304 us 1413 945

RV 3. v 33 3.4o I9 3202 164 364 an 5414 15s

Pats. P 07 1.0 3420 1.3 117 17D3 353 332 272 937 DW*I 0 1.3 309 3. 135 ±9 3 312 34 1034 9

4 33 2.4 4394 3.3 315 470 431 34 5 873 143 3090

hIs.. P VI 0.4 2119 0.1 24 2220 23 0o 452 15 F s 0.7 1544 1.0 30 3344 :29 234 I 457 2719

J o 0.8 1324 3.0 30 3354 319 24 00 45 2149V 13 1.3 4214 1.7 St 4241 151 312 417 1310 4993

Cblil I 1n 0.7 3710 - - 37210 39 414 93 24 14423 0 4240 - - 240 92-4 410 1064 2424 1314

3 15 1.2 4160 - - 4340 1320 414 1348 2454 3G74

- !:II 1. 371 1.0 3 401 *.o 44 34 142 2215 1702

1 1 4441 2 244 4905 459 344 1732 2353 2350I 2.3 7"723 3.3 4:2 1155 50 414 1410 21350 525

am 0. 119 8.4 72 1246 291 330 2 319 337V - 0.7 13'7 0.7 4 1431 102 33 2300 O90 741

0 33 0.3 1743 3.8 94 30414 314 in8 250 902 1842

394.tat - Fs 1 1.1 3021 - 3421 3 312 2841 "2 24393 23 1.3 3442 - -33442 344 313 418 3094 23493 a3 1.4 4332 - - 4332 361 338 394 1314 3048

P - 0.3 2413 - - 2483 347 312 22 482 Is"3 - 3.1 2304 - - 230 347 312 22 682 1a22V - 1.0 3130 -D 3130 3-4 317 22 U 242

c- P 0.4 1l932 0.8 24 193 230 240 240 700 1171V 0.7 2 947 3. 30 21e77 291 260 240 793 2z18

V 06 0.3 334 33 3401 297 240 240 797 260V0 ±3 1.1 4313 2 347 312 433 12l2 3014

Fooa * 3a 20.00 t44 - - 14 772 236 4353 1842 4331a 22.00 15140 - 13340 739 312 T714 341 7423

3 27.00 19440 lD - - 14 715 333 7447 8s3 1080o

Ccb.-dt F 13 1.5 4300 2 3 274 4714 448 33 1250 2034 2740i3 1.4 4314 2.4 25 3104 439 344 1435 2151 .292

v 1 2.1 4321 3.2 334 47a0 33 344 1209 2111 4394

3^.rcaoa f in 33 7350 - - 7153 1372 934 3633 3943 1207w 13 42 14250 - 1425 1423 040 4334 402 44

in 3as 51210 - - 21230 359 110 3399 443 14355

Cctc- P 3 '. 7643 - - 7643 72 31Z2 1840 2800 4745. a3 1.3 49 - - 94" 154 332 1103 2849 4421

3 23 1.0 1370 - - 13373 34 312 2224 2378 10493

F 0. 2444 _ _ 244 383 340 361 1002 162

3 V 0.- 3220 - - 3220 292 260 43 I10 2113s r 0.o 3000 - - 340 4:20 240 477 lly7 2153

T.Oboc l3 It 40 -4,00 9 us 14-9 2111 343V I3 1.7 400 - - 50 941 333 1r3z2 3131 343V 13 2.3 9200 - - 9200 1092 390 14S5 2937 4263

V e7 0.9 3400 - _ o340 747 312 63 1727 1842* 1.0 4000e - - 4c0x 14 31Z2 966 203 194o r 1.1 4400 40- - 4 9 333 s4 200 2350

. 3 1.3 3533 _ - 3535 s0 33 532 1324 7141I 2.e 1 3 e - - 90 3 334 467 1530 7740

V II 2.2 12740 - - 12740 349 33 37 173 10994

5 3.1 1 29 - - 4259 465 312 173 "O 1709U r * 1.2 41 - -2940 416 312 234 1022 593w 1.3 134e n o 4 47 313 1013 4507

P - Fs_-C; V - 0r- U a lcajar o - lr. Milk 7r jac

11 - lrca.oj v - lf *.4 - ua1.t1 aratm

-92-

TABLE 24INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM LRIGATION II PROJECT

Estimated Financial Farm Budgets(Rs)

Farm ModelHedium Irrigation Gross Hired Other Total NetProjects Time Value Labour Inputs Inputs Value

2.5 ha Farm P 6,690 900 2,690 3,590 3,100Main and GujaraL

WO 7,470 920 2,740 3,660 3,810

W 22,070 1,970 5,700 7,670 14,400

4.5 ha Farm P 12,870 1,200 5,890 7,190 5,680

WO 14,560 1,360 6,030 7,390 7,170

v 37,000 2,620 9,270 11,890 25,110

Modernization Project P 18,940 1,590 4,620 9,210 9,730(Shetrunji)

5 ha FarmW 20,910 1,680 7,850 9,530 11,380

v 35,260 2,590 9,190 11,780 23,480

P = Present V Future Without Project

W = Future With Project

1/ Net Return to family labor and farm capital investmentbefore tax and water charge payments.

-93-

Table 25

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Estimated Farm Budaets and Proiect Rent at Full Development(Rs/Farm)

Medium Irrigation Projects Modernization Proiects2.5 ha Farm 4.5 ha Farm 5 ha Farm

Farm Budftet W U V W v

Gross Value ofProduction 7,470 22,070 14,560 37,000 20,910 35,260Total LaborCost 1,680 2,910 2,580 3,720 3,160 4,230Other Inputs 2,740 5,700 6,030 9,270 7,840 9,200Land Tax andWater Charges 1/ 350 1,950 680 3,760 1,840 3,200

Total Costs 4,770 10,560 9,290 16,750 12,840 16,630

Net Valueof Production 2,700 11,510 5,270 20,250 8,070 18,630Reward toFamily Labor 760 950 1,220 1,100 1,490 1,640Net FarmFamily Income 3,460 12,460 6,490 21,350 9,560 20,270

Proiect Rent

Net Returnto Farm + 2,700 11,510 5,270 20,250 8,060 18,630(Tax + WaterCharges) 350 1,950 680 3,760 1,840 3,200Net ReturnBefore Tax 3,050 13,460 5,950 24,010 9,900 21,830

- ManagementFee (10) 2/ 270 1,150 530 2,030 810 1,860

- RiskEquivalent 3/ 530 660 1,050 1,220 890 1,330

Implicit LandRent 2,250 11,640 4,370 20,760 8,200 18,640

Proiect Rent 4/ 3,760 3,640 2,090(Rs/ha) '

11 Land tax assumed as Rs 20/ha for unirrigated land and Rs 40/ha forirrigated land. Water charges assumed to equal 7 percent of grossvalue food crops and 12 percent of gross value for cash crops.

2/ Premium for management and entrepreneurial skills, assumed as10 percent of net return to the farms.

3/ Risk equivalent for uncertain availability of vater assumed as 10 percentof gross value under rainfed condition and as 2.5 percent under irrigatedconditions.

4/ Project rent is the incremental land rent due to the project.

-94-

TABLE 26

INDIA

Gujarat Medium Irrigation II Project

Estimated Project Rent and Cost Recovery I/

MIP Modernization(2.5 ha) (4.5 ha) (5 ha)

Project Rent (Rs/Farm)Gross Value of Production 9,830 14,840 9,790Production Cost 2/ 2,790 2,980 1,690

Net Income 7,040 11,860 8,100

LessManagement Fee 590 1,000 750Risk Equivalent 90 110 300

Project Rent 6,360 10,740 7,050ProjecL Rent as Xof Net Income 90 91 87

Cost Recovery (Rs/ha CCA/year)Direct:

Water Charges 420 450 180Land Tax 10 10 -Field Channels 45 45 45

Indirect:Agricultural Sales Tax 3/ 40 90 50

Total Cost Recovery 515 595 275Rent Recovery (as % ofProject Rent) 20 25 20

Average Annualized ProjectCost (Rs/ha CCA)Capital Cost (Ex. Field Channels) 2,770 520Capital Cost (Field Channels) 90 900 & M 160

Total 3,020 610

Cost Recovery (as Z ofProject Cost) - 17 20 45

1/ Expressed in incremental values over lifetime of typical MIP (Watrak)and typical modernization project (Shetrunji) discounted to present valuesand annualized at 12 percent interest over 50 years for the MIP and 30 yearsfor the modernization project.

2/ Includes cost of labor.

3/ Sales tax on cotton and oilseeds, purchase tax on sugarcane. Marketablesurplus of these crops is assumed to be 100 percent.

645.NAT 9EDILIM IRR1OATSOII PROACT 32

COI#CTIOJ OF PROJECT 8610*.

M90CY COST AND KMEVIT STREMS FOR ECONMIC ANALYSIS IN MILLIONI Rt'¶ES

3927 3978 399 2900 2902 592 3983 1984 2?95 2986 5I"7 1908 1909 599 5992 I992 2993 194 2995 296 2997 IM920~26

A. NET IKIIT ASICJtURL*M. IXXITION uilnir M101C1

ROM YAL3E AITDIT 990Cr 40.1 45.06 4/.1 50.09 53.00 55.86 59.24 59,6v 60,17 60.72 62.28 61.75 62.07 62.58 63.08

PRODUCTION COST WITHOUT P.WOACT - - - - - -26.21 26.4? 26.74 27.29 27.64 28.02 20,14 20,21 26.28 21.35 21.42 21.47 21.52 28,54 28.65

DV ouLii w11sm 9111 - - - 21.00 28.62 20.7i 22.80 25.44 2/.04 32.30 31.48 31.89 32.37 32.76 33.20 33.56 39.02 34.47

3. NET KMUII AGICULLft M.fOM7IUNWI 81M ECil

00M OWUE AIIHM 9051EC - - - 4/,21 50.93 96.35 124.45 140.43 173.49 193.32 196.93 163.63 296.70 596.37 596.46 194.37 196.3? 196.37TweuION COST SlIt P111 - -CT- 26.23 33.22 49,20 16.24 57,59 59.19 59.06 60.08 60.17 60.24 60.32 60.32 60.32 60.32 60.32

NET Y63L3E WINH P911 -O -CT 21.00 25.2 47.55 60.33 90.04 112.30 1333.46 336.85 103.44 536.46 536.05 536.34 136.05 236.05 536.05

INOIMENAL ICUITST- - - -- - 7,53 26.30 45.03 65.40 84.46 102.36 505.37 69.55 104.09 303.29 102.86 202.49 202.03 102.58

C. ucuuiw curst

m ~~~~~~~~36.67 6,75 6.76 16.05 3.2? 24.b1 2.9.76 6.89 6.38 7.44 - - - - - - - - - --

MIN8 CAW. 2.10 2.29 3.04 1.22 4.34 9.36 I,"0 4.05 3.24 4.25 1,1i6 - - - - -

8511813fl2N SISTER - - 020 2.67 4.14 5.17 54.50 10.91 19.76 2.21 0.86 - - - - - - --

WAIMM ~~~ - - - - - 0.10 3.73 5.79 4.36 - - - - - - - -

EWUIPIE No EJIUSEIRIN 1.49 5,50 2.02 2.97 2.38 9.73 3.14 3.25 4.40 6.36 6.24 5.92 0.36 - - - - - - --

IDTOTA. 40.44 50.54 52.62 19.24 20.27 46.b7 38.94 25.36 28.70 37.89 33.65 7.49 3.02 - - - - - - - --

METETLUEN 7.67 0.40 0.3/ 0.22 0. 2, 1.54 2o56 5.20 2.58 0.46 0.48 - - - -- - - - - - -W IUINIST COIT OF LAS /a -- - - - 0.03 4.02 4.33 4.24 4.34 4.45 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.10 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4,50 4.50

SUSIOTS. 7.87 0.40 0.37 0.22i 0.27 5.15/ 6.50 5.33 5,82 4.60 4.93 4. 50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50

OWMiJON MND MSINTE3WU -E - - 0.09 0.2? 0.54 1.2 13.96 2.43 2.43 2.43 2.43 2.43 2,43 2.43 2.43 2.43 2.43 2.43 2.43

TOIAL COST 48.33 10.94 22.9 29.46 50.54 48.23 45.79 27.2, 35.80 44.65 42.05 24.42 7.95 6.93 6.93 6.3 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.93 6.931838832222aswsa s 333322 333..* A.332233 8-1 ... 323338 7223333e 2232232 a44..2 N222es 3 22321 2122322a 3222382 3223333 32J22 ..... ... 3333332323322222232. 2233322 433223333.

NET IaINTMW. IE14ITI

MET WDITS -48.33 -10.94 -12.99 -19.46 -20.54 -41.23 -45.79 -27.23 -:4.69 -58.27 4.50 50.98 76.52 95.43 91.44 62.62 97.36 96.16 95.93 95.56 95.10 94.65

/a W TUTNITY COT W LAS IN AWIOLLTUMAL H TOStl

ERR - 14.262

LISA? 1(32184 IMRiSAiIWe PIOACI ii

CMIVETIWI OF PIOlCi MI~4

MAOCT COST AMM 8(2727ITUMTW F(*R ECCWNC 58Y.1IS IN MILLION RUPEES

3977 1970 2979 291 1982 312 IM1 291 IM 2986 2917I 1 19299 10 2993 199 1993 299 I9M 399 99 1"93-2026

A. MET ff3172 SISUTtf PROfUCION MlfH@fT PPOXCT

GM fttE viniw PWO.CT - - - - - - - 51.90 49.40 b0.74 53,21 55.e5 58.4 61.51 61.99 62,48 63,54 64.24 64.45 64.91 65.51 65.51PIITION CUT MiICTW MJE.Cr 26*0t' 26.22 26.46 26.93 27.22 27.55 27,64 27.70 V.77 27.83 21.89 27.93 27.97 28.01 21.05

KY ~WtE WTIUT MlOCT -- - - - 25.90 22.38 24.28 26.21 21.63 30,94 33.87 34.29 34,71 35. 71 36.25 36.52 37.03 37.50 37.46

S. NU KIWI? mzwIC.tw. M~UTIUN Will POCT

NM YUsa vimN FruoCi 53.90O 92.44 157.84 183.60 223.63 237.3 256.41 256.10 256.03 256.23 2Z. 94 256.34 255.9 255.95 255.95PIUITIU CUIVTH Pil IRd C--T 26.00 45.93 72.5 73.92 75.70 77.58 78.16 78.27 78.38 78.47 78.53 78.59 78.58 78.58 79.59

rI fUEn vimH PeoaCT- - - - - - 25.90 45.51 86.7 r 3 09.68 33.93 359.76 178.25 177,91 177.65 177.74 177.36 177.56 177.37 277,3? 177,37

1NCI1S. WIdCTi 23.33 61.97 83.40 303.30 328.82 244.38 343.62 142.94 142.03 141,32 241.04 140.36 139,87 239.911

C. icamic CUT$5 2.51 22.10 24.97 31.83 .76.50 27,39 27.60 11.n 2s5.5o rSIN CAR 0.42 2.06 5.94 2.86 25.7 11.65 17.23 12.91 - - - - - - -

BIIIMUIIIT ITE 619 0.94 2.71 0.40 8.35 23.35 31.24 39.43 21.09 14.12 3.52 - - - - - - - - - -

MWiE - 4.09 4.54 5.63 3.55 3 EMPlOY 51 F lIEMI 36.10 30.55 6.21 3. A 7.09 11.42 49.30 15.94 7.92 4.72 2.7n 0.92 - - - - - - - - --

MTITS. 29.12 25.37 39.90 38.59 449 80.61 115.17 126.09 59.04 24.47 9.79 0.92 - - - - - - - - --

E1E712EI 0.01 0.33 0.29 0.16 0.30 5.27 6.67 2.83 2.91 - - --"- - -

WUUIUNTY CUT W LAND /a - - - - 0.26 0.52 4.17 4.43 4.43 4,4 4.43 4.4s 4.43 4.43 4,43 4,43 4,43 4,43 4,43 4.43 4,43 4,43

MTSTSL 0.15 0.31 0.29 0.26 0.56 5.142 20.84 7.24 7.41 4.43 4.43 4,4 4.43 4,43 4.43 4,43 4,43 4.43 4.43 4,43 4.43 4,43

WMT1U AMR MIlTSfi- - - 0.68 2O 2.03 2, 79 2.7 9 2,79 2.79 2.79 2.79 2.79 2.79 2 .9279 2.79 2.79 2.79 2,7n

TOTS. COT 39.27 75.48 40.39 38.75 67.46 86.39 136.69 J23.35 69.24 32.69 17.01 8.14 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22 7.22

V1 iOWALTS 10171

X*88A8 us8a13 au*nar .. aSrs rG:: 3333333 2zn=:Z X;rnun: af33L 6'... gras t33 33338*3 .a8 . ..... *88 .. 83 r.tA, n:a A*3 8A.- 33**3 3

a

VT 101I11 -19.27 -25.68 -40.19 -23.75 -67.46 -86.2 -316.69 -135.35 -45.91 30.28 66.39 99.3 321.60 237.16 236.40 135.72 134.81 333.39 233.82 133.14 132.65 232.69

/a WUTtMIT7 CI Or LARD IN inicasTM FRMIOS2N

ERR a 13. 38%

2116

IU.1 UIUIW IM1IIATIS P9 t 11

t@ftEIOI OF MCT U1

PIDECT tO5T S W IT SUVA1iS FOR IMMI2C N51SIS IN 3JUl0N MMI

197l 1973 1979 IM1 1961 I9M IM3 2984 29! 2916 In?37 I93 299 291 2992 1992 2993 I994 2995 1996 IM9 1996-226

~~~~~~~~~~~~__....._... _.. ........ ._

A. NET KIUIT WIfOLTUWA PIMTIZON VITIUI PICECT

NOSS YALE VIfUTM PICT - - 25,42 72.44 23.46 243!5 24,46 27.2" 21.63 2W,.34 29.07 2934 29.U 29.73 30.00 30,26 USI5"011ICTIE CUT VITJne fowl - - - - 1 114.3 14.45 14,57 24.79 14.94 15.10 15.17 25.22 15,24 15.23 15.32 15.35 1537 5.40 15.43

NET VUM~E IIIITW PUECI I - - - 109 1.21 V.12 10.06 11.14 22.23 13.46 23.63 23,3 24.06 14.22 14.43 14.43 24.16 12546

to NT IIIPIT WfiW.l.t PSUTION VI12 PM T

am w.1 UITN PUECT - - 25.42 23.9" 43.20 50.55 6W.V 71,46 Ps, 92.26 91212 91,27 92.23 92,23 91,27 M2I2 92.217PS TI ? WiTH Pcr - - - * - - - 2.4.33 24.9 2V.4 26.4 264. 27.33 27.73 27a 5 27.N 21.90 27.94 27.94 27.94 27.94 27.94

UT III VI1T ""CaT * 1.03 .9 2.06 32.47 41.63 52.103 12. 63.42 63.33 63.37 63.24 63.24 61323 63.23 63.22

I2CT I. U W IT3 - - - - - - 1 0.73 21 Y.ll 22.41 30.49 A.9 47,74 491.3 49.50 49.31 49-02 43.3241 .60 14.37 U.15

Co XT C ConI3 sH

M ~~~~~~~~2.5!. 6.76 22.34 24.23 17,91 V1.2 2I.4 27.37 22.73 6.94 - - - - - - - - - --

Min C - -U- I 0.21 3.12 2.03 3,02 7.47 4t.4 1.41SISUIM SOI8t - - - - - - 00-1 1 3.3 24.50 22.77 3.? - - 2 8 z 2 2 . 2PAl WtU W.tt CT - - - - * - * II.OY 8.tt 01.06 32.47 4 1 U 51.13 Gl.- *3.41 U.33 U.P U.24 U.24 U.23 U3 .uIIrIMT u .011 - 1-43 2.32 - *1 2 -2- 3.69 2.33 5.22 2.33 3.34 5.36 2.90 - 1 4 - - 4 - -

IITOIL 2.55 3.19 5.26 25.91 234 P. L8 23.03 3.4?7 22.39 31.24 3213 .1

5TILIO T' -2. 0.34 0.3 0.06 0.06 0.20 1.02 0, 0.b2 - - - - - - - - . . .W TUhITY COST W LA /a - 0.03 0.Co/ l296 2.24 2.53 2.30 2,30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30 2360 2.10

9EU?TI6. 1.37 0.4 0.o3 0.06 0,06 0,13 1.09 2.92 2.#! 2o5Us 2 2.e 2.30 2300 2,30 2.00 7.30 2.00 230 2,80 2.30 230

WWi2mSMINIltI - - - - - - - - 0.45 0.93 1.34 2.4 2.34 2.34 2.34 1.34 1.3 1.34 2.34 2.34 1.34 1.34

TOTAL UST 2.55 9.56 26.00 24.74 24.00 14,89 23.96 32.56 26.26 34.92 36.00 22.30 4,14 4.24 4.24 4.14 4.24 4,24 4.24 4.24 4,24 4.24

UET l2Il TMu WITi

"*8aas383 n;r - 8*-88 5 38s* &gr53 fla#3 88-so 3.a.sn* a .3.. 3 L -83 .. N33w -1: *3ar33s - - -Wa35 m3 sma8s3s.... 3 3 =33 _ r

KY iEvIuu -2.55 -9.56 -16.00 -16.74 -24.00 -14.39 -23.96 -32.56 -25.4 -22n.9 -11.59 28.19 34,21 43.60 45.44 45.36 45.17 44.0 44.7 44.44 44.23 44.01 '

/a WINUITY COST W LAW IN MNIC UM POTIWE

ERR -I I . 90

PUAMRA MEDILIIINTW llA( POOM? If

CWSTAtC?JdNO PMOECT ZSOSI

M"CXC COST AND KECFIT STKMS FOREIC(W~IEAMALYSIS IN KILLION tIDES

I977 1978 1979 198 1981 192 1983 I98 15.KA 1.8 198 MS 1989 1990 19.91 15.92 193 1994 1995 196 I"?7 1.99-2026

A. NET NWIT MR1CItTLOAM. OXTION MIliIT IlACT

NMS VALUE WITIDT PEO..CT - - - 5. 2?Y 5 56.62 59.9i 6.3.76 67,24 71.66 72.10 12.54 73.1 73.56 74.64 75.21 75.77 75.71PROILTIWI COST WITIWTNE MACY.Yi V 25,9 9 24,2 29.67 30.15 30.41 30.5'l 30.64 £0.70 30.76 30.62 30816 30.90 3o. 94 3O.96

UEt 06(1E VIMtIC MACTY - 26.32 26,34 W1.20 60.10 13361 36,77 41.09 41.46 41.94 47.37 42.74 43,78 44,42 44.83 44,?9

6. NET hJEIT MEAICLLTUIAM.ROITIWN I 91M PROCT

- VALUE MITH StOIC? - 55.kY 655.3 56.62 59.91 63.16 61,24 91.74 114.,69 267.61 186.96 205.69 222-45 232.37 732.i2 232.32PIOKTIOE COST WITH PMACT -I YW.97 29.19 29.42 29.62? 340.5 £0.4. 34,79 47.61 66.37 66.91 67.59 68.06 68.33 68,33 66.33

MET VALUE WITH NOICT - 6. 42 26.34 7/.20 30.10 33.61 36,11 46.95 61,06 101,44 119.99 131.10 154.39 163.99 563.99 163,99

INKEKITI. KDEFITS - - - - - - - - 5.66 25.62 59.60 '7,62 fi. 36 110.61 119,61 119.16 119.20

C. ECOIWIIC COSTS

DAM 0,14 1.09 0.30 - 0.55 2.y5 9,6 2 3.03 31.41 41.06 59.51 42.18 0 MIN CAI.- - - - - - - 5.14 13.73 4.00 - - - -

DISTRIWIIOW SYSTEM 20.79 34.42 344,4 RAIMC- - - -E- - 0.45 8.45 - - - - -

EQUPIIFET An ENSINIERIII - - - l.' 2.53 0.42 - - 24!48 £6h56 v.52 16.24 12.5 -

SIJITOTI.L 0.14 9.04 0.10 - 2.06 5.52 1.79 - 37.51 69.97 76.51 132.35 101.61 - - - - --

PISETIEWENT 1 .2 2.66 7,58 2.56 2.29 - - - - - --WVtUNIITY COST OF LORD IA- - - - - - - - - - - 0.32 4,38 4,72 5.05 5.05 5.05 5.05 Sd'S 5.05 5.05

511610TAL - .32 2.66 e.90 6,94 7,01 5.0!5 5.05 5.05 5.05 s.c.., 5.05 5.0538883 3338338 8388383 Ba383 .... h 22-* j837388 a.... 88888 8883333. ..... 7 .. ass&¶3 ass3838 83883333 88r3833 388fl asj-8 88-A 2 .333 ..888888 .38.333 33333383..

OKIRAhIhI AND MINTEJWCE- - - - - - 0.09 0.2i 1.49 2.02 2.92 2.62 2.62 2.62 2.62 2,62

TOSTAL tOT - .94 1.09 0.10 - 2.09 5.52 1.7? - 39.63 72.63 19.50 139.56 110,31 7.67 7.67 7,67 7.67 7.67 7.87 7,97833.8 =38883 8888383 8:333822 33 i646Q a:, &t'883 4...83* 8833 33383382 334-M Lt-?, 33...83o 383838. 3888383 8833.38 838. Ba. 33338. 38*8* 3833338 3..38338 38833

MET 1~ASILTAL KWEITS '

NEI KNFITS - -0.14 -1.05. -p.10 - -2.06 -5. 52 -1,6 - - -3.63 -72.63 -79.50 -133.70 -94,49 61,73 69.75 67.49 102.74 111.91 111.29 111.33

/a OPORTUNITY COSt OF LMD IN A6RICtlTIMA AND FOREST FROWUCTION

ERR - 1 6. 37

INDIA

UJARAT IEDIUN IRRI6ATION PROJECT 11.....................................

ODERIIIZATION O PROJECT SHtlRUNJI

PROJECT COST AND PENEFIT STREAMS FOR ECUNOIC NLYSIS 1 MILLION RUPEES

3984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 I'96 1997 1995-2013................... . . ............................ .................................................................. . .... ... .. ........... ................ .......................................................

A. NET BENEFIT A'iRICULTURAL PRODUCTIl'l" IN 10T PROJECT~~~~~~~~~~~.................. ............................. .....

GROSS VALUE UIIHOUT PROICT 121.0S' 18.81 213.8'. 119.63 125.82 131.75 138,.59 139,29 140.13 141,11 141.87 142,73 143.75 144.77 105.79RRODUCTION COST WITHOUT IAJECT 40,77 61.34 61.93 63.01 637.7 64.52 64.85 65.04 65.23 65.41 65.60 65,75 65.89 66.03 66.18

NET VALUE WITHOUT PROJECT 60.32 V.4i 51.91 5S,62 62,10 67.23 /3.74 74.25! 74.90 75.76 76.27 76.99 77.86 78.74 79.61

I. NEI BENEFIT AG3RICULTURAL PRODUTION 1IIH OJECT

GROSS VALUE WITH PROJECT 121.09 125.94 149.96 176.89 206.64 221.71 239.53 245.39 252.43 255.01 2'j.42 257.44 258.06 258,06 258,06PRODXCTION COST WITH PROJECT 60.77 63.67 66.70 70;53 74.06 7!/2? 79.78 82.09 84.41 84.49 K4.59 84.59 84.60 84.60 84,60

NET VALUE WITH PROJECT 60.3? 62.27 83.26 106.36 132.58 144.44 158.75 163,30 I6H.02 170.52 171.63 172.95 173.46 173.46 173.46

INCRENENTAL 8ENEFITS - 14.80 3;.:5 49.74 70.48 7'.21 F5,01 8S.05 ;:.12 94,76 95.56 95.87 95.60 94.72 93.85

C. ECONOIIC COSTS.................

MAIN CM 7,35 6,38 6.38 5.49 2,48 - - - - - - - - - -DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 4.49 16.04 '.0.9/ 10.97 33.21 - - - - - - - - - -DRAINME - - 6.54 6.54 6.00 - - - - - - - - - -EQUIPENT Na ENINEERING 3.12 4.80 8.64 8.40 7,4' - - - - - - - - - -

SUBTOTAL 14.96 27,22 52.53 51.40 49,13 - - - - - - - -r=sss ass...: grass.. s:agass s:auns :...............uu:2zs:I a:::::S: tss. urSa :::::: ::: sara: gs ass ,:a:usss status: ==sa:: ean......

WPORTtIITY COST OF LAND /a 014 0.27 0.41 0,55 0.69 0,69 .9 0,6S 0.69 0,69 0,69 0.69 0,69 0,69 0.69........... ................. ......... -------..... ....... ...... -------............. ----- ---- ---- ------ ------- ----..------- ----

SUBTOTAL 0.14 0,27 0,41 0.55 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0,69 0,69 0,69 0,69 0,69 0,69r:::::: sass..: sass:: a::zz::: sass::: sass::. 2 sasars ast:: sar ss wra ::::::: rags a tassa-2 xsan: :_ a:-a tars; sass

TOTAL COST 15.10 27.49 52,94 51,95 49.82 0.69 0,69 0.69 0,69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0,69:a:::: ::: r::: as::sage aur:s:: a:::::: ;._;:r: *sasass :eatws as:22. nus.. sa :zzz asx::xz:::: z ttu:.Z sr33333 ::a::::::

NET INOENENTAL WNEFITS

::::::::::: ::.........__::ast s:a ::z_.-: :::: :: _.:55 rurssa r_: ::::awsaass a. rags ut:.::: ~. sassatsar::: sasas....................................................... .t.n s.straa

NET ENEFITS -15,10 -12.69 -21.59 -2,21 20.66 76.52 84.32 88.36 92.43 94.07 94.87 95.18 ?4.91 94.03 93.16

/a OPRORdUNITY COST OF LAND IN ARICULTLPAL PRODUCTION

ERR - 52.80%

-100-Annex 1Page 1

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Economic Analysis

Prices and Conversion Factors

1. General. The economic prices of major traded agricultural outputs(at farm gate) were derived from the IBRD projected 1990 and 1995 worldmarket prices expressed in 1984 currency value with appropriate adjustmentsfor freight, handling and processing. The projected economic prices fornon-traded foodgrains and oilseeds were derived by applying a foodgrain oroilseed conversion factor (FCF) to the financial prices. Non-traded goodsand services were brought to a common basis with the traded ones through theuse of conversion factors (explained in the folloving paras). A standardexchange rate of US$1 to Rs 10.00 was used to convert prices expressed in USdollars to local currency values. The assumptions used to derive theestimates are described below.

2. Standard Conversion Factor (SCF). For economic analysis purposesthe costs and benefits of the project have to be evaluated at world marketprices, in order to measure correctly India's net economic benefits from theproject. This requires certain adjustment since many items are not traded onthe world market and other are affected by tariffs and trade restrictions.In order to make them comparable, a SCF is applied to the price of non-tradedgoods. In the absence of trade restrictions, the SCF can be estimated byusing the following formula:

SCF X + MX + SX + M + Tm

where: X export value (f.o.b.);M - import value (c.i.f.);

Sx = subsidies on exports-Tm = taxes and duties on imports.

For the period since 1970, this calculation gives a SCF of 0.86. However,since this estimate does not take into consideration quantitative restric-tions on trade, it provides only an upper limit for the SCF. The IndianPlanning Commission recommends for the evaluation of industrial projects, theuse of conversion factors for foreign exchange and for untraded goods thatimplicitly give a SCF of about 0.75. Because of the approximate nature of

-101-

Annex 1Page 2

this estimate, a SCF of 0.8 has been used in the economic analysis. Specificconversion factors were calculated for construction costs and non-tradedfoodgrains.

3. Prices of Agricultural Outputs. The economic prices for traded goodssuch as rice, wheat, cotton and groundnuts and sugar were based on theirborder prices at the official exchange rate (OER). The domestic cost cor-ponents (i.e., local transport and marketing charges) were adjusted by theSCF of 0.80. The economic prices of non-traded foodgrains (sorghum, millet,pulses are assumed to be non-traded) were derived by applying a foodgrainconversion factor (FCF) to the financial price. The FCF of 1.11 was computedby using the following formula:

FCF = (Q rice x PE rice) + (Q wheat x PE wheat)(Q rice x PF rice) + (Q wheat x PF wheat)

Q: Weighing factor based on three year average of Indian production(1979/80 - 1981/82)

PE: Economic pricePF: Financial price

The financial and economic prices used cover the period from 1981 to 1983.The economic prices of non-traded oilseeds were derived from the economicprice of groundnuts by applying the ratio of economic to financial groundnutprices (0.69) to the financial prices of nontraded oilseeds. It has beenassumed that the price developments of nontraded food grains and oilseedswill follow those of traded ones over the project period. The weightedaverage price increases of traded food grains and oilseeds have been used forcalculating the 1990 economic prices of non-traded food grains and oilseeds.The economic prices of nontraded crops like vegetables, fruits, and Biditobacco have been derived by applying the SCF of 0.8 to their 1984 financialprices. It is assumed that these economic prices remain unchanged over theproject period.

4. Prices of Agricultural Inputs. Economic prices for fertilizernutrients have been derived from 1990 world market prices of representativefertilizers with appropriate adjustments for domestic handling. Economicprices of bullock labour were derived from average rental prices correctedwith the conversion factor of 0.8. Analysis of farm labour supply and demandin various Indian irrigation projects typically give an economic shadow wagerate for farm labour in the range of 1/2 to 2/3 of the average financial wagerate. The current average wage rate amounts to 8.5 Rs/day. At a conversionfactor of 0.66, the economic price of labour, has been assumed to amount toRs 5.6 per day. Given the high population growth rate, increases in thereal shadow wage rate have not been assumed to occur during the projectperiod. Financial market prices for agrochemicals and compost have beenconverted into economic prices by applying the SCF of 0.8.

-102-

Annex 1Page 3

5. Construction Conversion Factor (CCF). Project works would be con-structed using a mixture of equipment, skilled and unskilled labor, theproportions of which vary with the category of works. In the context of theNarmada Project, detailed analysis has been made to determine the conversionfactors for specific components and the mixture of components in differentcategories of works. Based on this analysis, the following CCF were used inthe economic analysis to convert the financial to economic prices:

Categroy of Works CCF

Civil WorksDam, Main Canal 0.77Distribution System 0.75Drainage 0.79

Equipment 0.80Engineering 0.80

Agricultural Benefits

6. Present Situation. The subprojects are spread over Gujarat andlocated in 5 different agroclimatic zones and the cropping patterns varyaccording to the zone. Present yield levels are low and productivityincreases have remained rather modest over the last decade. Assessment ofyields, input levels, and cropping patterns were based on (i) direct informa-tion in the field, (ii) district statistics, (iii) discussions with localagricultural staff and farmers and (iv) socio-economic surveys carried out ineach sub-project areas.

7. Future Without Project. No substantial changes from the presentsituation were assumed in the "future without project" cropping pattern.Yields "without" project based on present agricultural practices were in someinstances adjusted slightly upwards to take account of past rather modestproductivity increases.

8. Future with Project and Intermediate Development. Irrigation wouldnot commence at the same year in all the subprojects. For example, while inWatrak MIP about llX of the total CCA will be irrigated already in the firstyear, irrigation in Zankhari MIP is expected to commence only in 1990/91. Ithas been assumed that farmers would adopt the projected cropping pattern ofthe "with project" situation within three years of water availability. Thisis feasible since the anticipated changes in the cropping patterns are rela-tively small. In addition, many farmers are already familiar with wellirrigation practices. The currently observed cropping patterns in farmshaving well irrigation resemble the projected "with project" patterns. Withrespect to yields, it has been assumed that yield increases in the "withproject" situation will occur over a period of five years.

-103-

Annex 1Page 4

Costs

9. Land Acquisition ad Resettlement Costs. These consist of three maincomponents: (i) resettlement costs for property lost due to submergence inthe reservoir areas (total of 19,205 families in the ongoing project areas);(ii) compensation costs for areas submerged when reservoirs constructed underthe project are commissioned (about 21,095 ha in all ongoing projects); (iii)the compensation costs for land acquired for the construction of the canaldistribution systems (about 8,426 ha in the ongoing projects and about 2,099ha in the modernization projects).

10. It has been assumed that all cultivated land lost to cultivation as aresult of the project is and would have remained rainfed. The economic costof land submerged or used for construction of the distribution system wasderived from estimates of the economic value of the production foregone. Thenet return per ha in economic prices in the "future without project" situa-tion was assumed to provide an adequate estimate. The net return foregoneeach year was treated as a recurrent project cost. The economic cost ofresettlement was calculated by multiplying the financial cost by the SCF.

11. Operation and Maintenance Costs. At present, the financial cost ofO&M in completed MIP's in Guja.at range between 75 to 100 Rs per hectare.However, it is estimated that about Rs 205 per ha would be required to assureproper O&M of the distribution system. Since O&M involves mainly employmentof unskilled or semi-skilled labour, a conversion factor of 0.66 was used.

Sensitivity Tests

12. Analysis of Switching Values. The overall sensitivity of sampleMIP's and the sample modernization project to benefit and cost uncertaintieswas analyzed using switching values discounted over 50 years for MIP's andover 30 years for the modernization project. Details are in the main reportpara. 8.07. The analysis clearly depicts that the risk of additional costoverruns is significantly greater in projects in which the majority of theconstruction work falls into the second time slice credit. Projects withsubstantial sunk costs and with completion project for 1986/87 or 1988/89would only be economically unviable at very large and highly unprobabledeviations from the estimated construction costs. The viability of thesample modernization project would only be jeopardized by large and highlyunprobable decreases of expected benefits.

13. Analysis without Sunk Capital Costs. The MIP sample ERR would rangefrom 17 to 48 percent and average 35 percent if only investments made underthis credit were considered.

-104-

Annex 1Page 5

14. Analysis of Yield Decreases in the "With Project Situation" IncludingSunk Costs. Twenty percent lower than expected yields in the "with projectsituation" would entail a drop in the weighted ERR of sample MIP's to 10percent and of the sample modernization project to 24 percent, resulting inan overall ERR of 16 percent. The average ERR for sample MIP's would be at:26 percent if yields were 20 percent lower and sunk costs were not included.

15. Incremental Yield Increases After Full Development. Due to therelatively long gestation period of the sample MIPs, incremental yieldincreases (by 0.5 percent annually after full development stage has beenreached) would not significantly improve the economic viability and wouldleave the weighted ERR for sample HIP's at 14 percent.

16. Delay in Implementation Period. Delays in construction works wouldonly influence the viability of those MIPs in which the majority of worksfall under this credit. Delays in of construction works by two years and inthe completion of the distribution system by another year would reduce theERR by almost 3 percent to 13 percent in the one sample project (Zankhari).Delays in the construction and completion of modernization works by 3 yearswould reduce the ERR by 9 percent to 47 percent.

17. Reduction in the Overall Construction Period of SaMple MIP's. Giventhe relatively long overall construction period of the sample MIPs, a reduc-tion by two years of the past implementation period would have resulted onlyin a slightly increased weighted ERR of 14 percent for the ongoing MIPs.

18. The analysis depicts that MIP's on which the majority of constructionworks fall under this credit are sensitive to delays in implementation. Theanalysis shows that only relatively large deviations from the expected yieldsin the "With Project" situation and improbable increases in constructioncosts for the completion period under the second time slice credit would turnthe project economically unviable.

-105-ANNEX 2Page 1

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

List of Documents in this Project File

l. Identification Report, Gujarat Irrigation II Project(Repeater Project), CWC, October 1983

2. Panam Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, 19793. Machhanala Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, April 19794. Hadaf Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, May 19805. Bhadar (P) Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CUC, May 19816. Amli Dam Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, April 19797. Jhuj Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summmary, CWC, August 19808. Kelia Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, August 19809. Zankhari Reservoir Project - Appraisal Sumiary, CWC, June 198310. Sukhi Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, August 197911. Deo Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, 198012. Kalubhar Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, June 197913. Sukhbhadar Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, June 197914. Machhundri Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, June 197915. Uben Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, 198116. Watrak Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, March 198017. Guhai Reservoir - Appraisal Summary, CWC, 198118. Mazam Irrigation Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, November 198119. Venu II Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, Mav 198020. Und Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, May 198021. Demi II Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, January 198122. Aji II Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, May 198123. Aji III Irrigation Scheme - Appraisal Summary, CWC, March 198224. Sipu Reservoir Project - Appraisal Summary, CWC, March 198225. Modernization of Canal System of Dantiwada, Appraisal Summary,

CWC, May 198126. Modernization of Fatehwadi Canal Project - Appraisal Summary,

CWC, Sept 198127. Modernization of Kharicut Canal System - Appraisal Summary,

CWC, Jan 198328. Modernization of Bhadar Irrigation Project (Rajkot)- Appraisal Summary,

CWC, Mav 198129. Modernization of Shetrunji (P) Irrigation Project- Appraisal Summary,

CWC, June 198230. Modernization of Machhu I Irrigation Project - Appraisal Summary,

CWC, June 198231. Estimate of Gujarat Repeater Project Vol I, II, III, IV, GOG, Dec 198332. The Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 196033. The Bombay Irrigation Act

-106-ANNEX2Page 2

34. Soil Survey for Dantiwada Project, Soil Survey Division, Abmedabad,Nov 1979

35. WALMI Gandhinagar, GOG, Jan 198436. Guidelines for Project Preparation, CWC, 198037. Socio-economic Studies of 26 subprojects. Reports prepared for the

PPM Cell, Department of Irrigation, Gujarat,either by: Department of Economics, Sardar

Patel Universityor by: Operations Research Group Baroda

38. Government of Gujarat, Bureau of Economics and Statistics,Socio-economic Review, 1981-82Socio-economic Review, 1982-83

INDIA

CUJARAT MEDIUTH IRRICATION 11 PROJECT

ImPlementation ScbeduleStart Finish*1 _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989name of Project J F H A M J JA S 0 N D J FH AMH . J A S O ND .I FH A H J .1 A S O N D J F H A M J J A S O N D J F H A M .I J A S 0 N D.IF F tl A t .1 .1 A S INO n

Panam DD D D D D D DG C C C C C C C CC C CC C t H H H M H H H H H HMachanala M H H M H M M M M H t H H MH M tl MlHad4f DD D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D DnDBhadar (P) D D D D D D DDC C C C C C C C CC C CCAmli (Ver 11) (; C C C C C C C t M H H H H M H H H H .Jhuj D D D D D D 9 D O D C C C C C C C C C C C N H HH H H NH H M HM Kclia D D D D D D C C C C C C C C H H H H H HZnnkharl D DDD D D D D D D D D D D DD n n D D n D D D D D n n n D n D D U) 1i nSukhi D D D D D D D D D D D n D D D D D D D D D H H H tl H H H H H H H H H M H HDeo D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D C C C C C C H H H H H H 11 It H H H H HMH H H H H H HKatubhar D 0 D 0 D D 0D D 0 ii 0 0 D D D 0 00 0 D 0D 0 0 0 0 D D H H H H H H H H H M H H HSukhbhiaddir OD D D D D D DD D D D D D D D DD D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DMachhundri DD D D D D D DD H H H H H H H H M H H HH H H M HH M NH H H H H H H H H H H H H H MHUben DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD H HH H H H H H H H H HHWatrak DD D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D nD D C C C C C C C C C C C H MH HH2 M 21 .M M M 2HHHGuhai D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D n D D DnD n D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D n C C CC C C C C C C C C CHazam 0 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D O D D D D OD D O D D D D D D H PI H H H H H H H H H H HVenu II D D D 0 D D D D 0 D D D D D n n D D D D D D D D D D D 0 D D 0 D 0 D D0 0 D D D D D D D D H H H HM H H1 M M H H M HUnd D D D D D D D D D D D D D D n D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D C C C C C C C C C C C C C tH M M M HM M ! 2 21 Demi II 0 0 D 0 0 D D D D D D D D D D D D 0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C H H H H H H M H H H H H H H H M H H HAl II 0D D D 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 D D D D C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c C c H H H H H H H H H H M H P HMAjl III D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D ntl M M M M M H M M M MHtSipu D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D ) D D D ) D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D M tl H tl 21 ,M M12 H tl M 2 H M H H SI H H MDantiwada (Hod) D 0 D D D D D 0D D D D D D D D0 0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CFatehwadi (Hod) C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CKharicut (Hod) CCCC C C C C C C C C C C C C C CC C CC C C CCC C C C C C CC c C C C CCC CC CH HH H gH M M M 21 21 M M M M M 2HBhadar (Hod) CC CCC C C C C CC C C C C CC C CC C C C C C C C C C C C C M H H H H H H H H H M HShetrunji (Hod) C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 9Hachhu I (Hod) CCC C C CC C CCC C C C C C C C CC C CC C C C C C C C C C C C H H H H H H H H HH HM HH t H H M 2 H H H H MTraininA * * * * * * A *Vnitu poege/ * A * * * * * A

Notes Work in progress:

D - Dam, canal, minorsC - Canals, minors2* I inora* - Continuous

INDIAGUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION 11 PROJECT

IrTigation Department Organizatlon

SfrE c rrl I(PA riAJ)

(iV7 Ji F PASr7) r7VE A^il L

C I-If ifLAI _ _ C -A f El CH lin _F E_OG CH fg [l; 7 _ ci tt f E NEFtIf (_AA%LAA f .C W'Al' 1 _ l iA.AIi.F A *i .: V' _IP.' A:,fA At ti c'Ip'A(r&IAlJiA I?C'.Et!ar tLAYi 7A&4!'IA (ON.'A'*ALJ'iAL & liSAscrIit Al I'OAC T A..1G (PAIi!.AWA flfl PC C'.I.sAtN rT Y.ut'.A.I;,l i;4J",W'A P LA P r,,jt, ,<y Y..'IISEN STfAl1L ' *t.t.St) h A,!.! MCSiIlA.'T & .C'ir SECEAlY; FC_ CQJAi 't5 e'9. O1T'EJ .C7 CAT(YJlt.A!iLti.^ XS ,: C. )AA G4S .t.yU I (,A,A..,A ';t' tvA

ACA)ETCI,'fLAI.N i C. ICTC4j SE rIA.,IC ?Rt,,GAECfiR;kF CECERCIJCLA. CAiTY F ?AA5*:.-A~CrAFKACT 9(iTAA 5/A'S Mi A.'4'

(&Jrc, o A N,ioCA CIC'P I (P.",________________ if ?.'At9 -SGAVCl,C ilCi vi..A.t.,C Wd, 'ifi ., Al, S''*ld I____________ AN5W)Ars olEScuc'c t s f-rAlrsEta IC 'A'i f rt .. '4g P..IAA)A -s A- --- i' cs --CCAP.V.CAICE:.i)A F flAC I MCI (CT YA_i c I Ii

.ONE V.9C!C4V r!;hT,ht!lT CSfCl IE iS'OA.tCE rAjFA!A1'3t; _'EALA,tIt?w5 crca CAbA. tvSTThNflCl IA W IC' cr. SI * A !4 Fo C LI I

(sAPuAlce 5i 59 AVAULG&I St ht|0-r*+lM7Af7lA) S 91iA lxf iAj*WE-A Ai95&Ir, P'NIPc, EfidO'.NE'T *rit'GATWYE Pfif.tCIRCL 5 CA WA. V CM PC I- A9N Ey ?.V: ,A: (Tr

0CI.TAJ L(tS4 'iAEAtC SI P.ECI CS?E CAP4IAS C"i C tIn/CE CA'.'.

CliCA;At*J CC "'CIF SEI A%WGSAJCA .sE' 5.r 1e.SE (.CcXCSi CASE LAP.'.Ai . 's"C.! _.'L r

(CfI N"AL V(*EC SE r S CAtNAL CWkt I f 5 P.A WA f Ii' S A; AK`.AP ls AICf4)MM qNItril C,E'MLN F 11 ySE rhANOAC CECANP. WC& ' h "C!,, * *I

5{ (.hl:JiN XCY Y) I h~~~~~~~~~~~~ .01.! SICMt!AI!' 555'lP.IbC /CIIj YA.%A.lP.*iP.E1.5' '*I/ ||I N:1 i ., A~ ACYXA.VItAEC.YE COt PANA AP9l7 " , S!SAaJ'C, L (ALi/ N.). A'coI(CIPMASL HSV4i ey K7APjAh CV,| _ I i

D)A.':$tIy CELL 'ASStIACEC N IA , 'K.(ClP tlnAL MONS<' C RCLAC;rSA.'lAECti)

EL (CEN.TRAL DSGN DlSCGAMY4ClW LI I

St i;iSEFlSS) I P .ICEP$E?AL I SC(Wi~C!ON,'A'ClACi) | 0>i .11 iAl *NC NI' Cd IrA;1 .ir.h t v.0. 'A'?'.

(P9CKAAAII&, YACP.I'41 rA!S r;`,, Cr

(:f,.7CiATjCfj rM(CIS) (Mtiu..FEIR) | Ptt smcsc lI- .iT?ilCv Cr.vrG,T,O:A ,>l j

I bJC>NT SEiCI4lAR, A I Jh II SECrlf t7A I sf ean^ter nca | | h DNl iCliMile | I P~lru iVADP SEC/IA'A | i L -_I

SE Y 10vAI NAGARil tOPGiATlOtN 1 _ CsY.b _ | CN, itESiINOlCP' | |L C,OCJ .I PSLROCICct lt!.yWSlC*PAChG ttl a ME TOM

I w a Cctilfiotcmlt) SE I NARMADA hI:NIC I | Si flA ".)'IAi A'.

PPO3ACSI CIRCLE A 'I# LC.,OK IEflcArk W,IC I C b tACAL CIRCLE S!A i _ YA . C(WJ& T

SE #WATEn? RIESOLOIS | || FAc mors Cincii II | | GAP.(.4 P4AGA.7

I lMENST/OARAtC SGACLE 01 |NM'ASA | X>ESCrEAA PMdC?(AVAI,FE(CA!TCFROYCT C |CTiL |P.~AECfl& p CM ASIECK NICAL CIRCLE CIR CL C

|SE KADAKA 9MGtrsArst

l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~CECSCL)S I5RsDAfclUCQ0 I E AsY£JlDnCAMVdPE'OACI CItRE! SE rAML%AIJ1

IACI{AJ,CM 05CC! 51 ILAJSPMDA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ROCS CETALr

| VADCOAnA 0SEGATc* PCIrSWNl C ICnGANCtI f)"J

I ?cxcv CIRCLE S A A

| #SIJKt11Cl1hGAP(7N | | sE{SU 'tACfitAiEn | Alrihr^_.26~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SE(%fAF iAEqftj o-dt ' 0SE VA RA1ONICATciJ DE. c OAG*EI/A JIgACl ClACk! CI(SACWAEIA ACINr-.W

INDIAGUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION 11 PROJECT

Typical Irrigation CircleOrganizatlon Chart

LEVEL

CIRCLE SUJPEIINTENDINGENGINEER

DESIGN UNIT ESTIMATING UNIT

DMSION EXECUTIE ENGINEER EXECUTI ENGINEER EXECUTIV NEER EXECLv ENGSINEER EXECUTV ENGINEER(Mechanical) (Canal Construction) (Dom Construction)

L-ISION [ 2-4 ASSISTANT 2-4 ASSISTANT 1 2-4 ASSISTANT [ | 2-4 ASSISTANT 2ENGINEERS ENGINEERS j ENGINEERS ENGINEERS ENGINEERS

8-16JJNIOR 8-16 JUNIOR 8-16 JUNIOI? 8-16 JUNIOR 8-16JUNIORSKCTION ENGINEERS ENGINEERS ENGINEERS ENGINEERS ENGINEERS

For constnrction of a typical 10.000 ha project Investgationst On anOperation & MaIntenonce areaMinor Construction Works basIs

rtWoEddBank -26067

INDIAGUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Operation and Maintenance of Typical 16,000 Ha MIPOrganization Chart

EXECLJTWE ENGINEER

DMSION I

SUSDIMSION DERJTYEXECUIM ENGINEER

Roject Level

ASSSTANT ENGINEER ASSITANT ENGN E

(Neadveuks) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~(.tOln

SECTION ECON SECTION SECTN SETO ETO ETON SECTION

SECTON OFFICER OFFICER OFEICER ER OFF ER OFFK ER OFFCE1(ADDOUT LNAL (ADDTllONAL (ADDITKONAL (ADDI (ADD L

AE)A)AE E AE) AE) AE)A

(ISPlNIY Gates)

|KNALASrES |KNLASIES ||KHALASIES ||KH4&ASIES I KIA<RWON 1|KARKOON_ | AcO KARKOON KAL Mi°°O] KAR I(N1 SOON_ ICAKOO°N: KARKOON

I I I I I I | | KIALASIES | | KHALA9ES | | KHALA5IES | | KIALASES | L KItALAES || KNALASIES ! I KKALASIES b|KALA9ES

W dBar* -26066

1r

In

INDIAGUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION 11 PROJECT

Organizatlon of the Central Water Commisslon(in Relation to the Supervislon of Medium Irigotion Projects)

Ministry of ;rgatWon |GIvr,nmen(t of India

ChoirmonCentrol Woter Comission {

I Membcr } | Membeor l [ Member Men-ibel| (Dosiran Ressofch) | | (Floods) J| (Pltannng |og (Waler Reiwscis)

Nsi:chonical 1Organizoitan~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tf

~l -~ 1 1 a

Duisreosion d Medium

Gujarat IrrgtIon F'rojects Inoasthnan Modhya F'rdeshW

. aaahr W 'orld Bank-2W40

-112-

INDIA

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION II PROJECT

Index to HaP

CCAMIP No. Map Reference No. (ha)

1. Panam 132 41,1202. Machhanala 131 3,0843. Hadaf 128 5,2384. Bhadar (P) 124 8,0005. Amli (Ver II) 153 3,6446. Jhuj 163 4,1807. Kelia 164 2,4868. Zankhari 155 20,8539. Sukhi 16i 20,66010. Deo 125 7,20711. Kalubhar 90 5,83012. Sukhbhadar 156 7,40013. Machhundri 106 8,09514. Uben 111 2,06315. Watrak 150 18,34116. Guhai 147 7,11117. Mazam 149 4,71718. Venu II 146 5,25319. Und 101 9,90020. Demi II 139 3,10821. Aji II 135 2,38422. Aji III 136 6,61523. Sipu 79 16,00024. Dantiwada (Mod) 7 44,51725. Fatehwadi (Mod) 1 29,79226. Kharicut (Mod) 2 14,61977. Bhadar (Mod) 50 26,57828. Shetrunji (P)(Mod) 14 35,75029. Machhu-I (Mod) 56 10,409

Note: Map 18107 shows all the existing and planned major and mediumprojects in Gujarat. A complete index is available on file.

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION fl PROJECT .MAJOR AND MINOR IRRIGATION SCHEMES

t' ,, ,_~~~~~.- .Z- -. _- s -i 1 ' '_ '-'-'-'-'-'r i

, Z bAt,.1 '.mN JX x~~~~~~~P.1,11 k

1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -"' ,.', t

- f AGAR A A l

A41liA C-Al 1 - I---

M , 1-g n Schenes f- , -.

Mo ,ation, L,f

- ~~ I " 4 . 5 URF-JDR-1rtiA(/ut_4 \

PROJECT SCHEMSES *-L> 8 2gz- !) { \ /AWStG~tOP. .Maio, Ir9riaion Schemes. \ CXE/21 B.:S "I~f-3>

- Modermnzation9 _(' h , - _-_

Ono,\ng

Med,um 1,rig0t,on Schemes \N *AvtA'j

OTHER SCHEMES:> 2000 Hetacres \.- ~ 51n S \;

Mir Ior lrigation Schemes ° v f E - l vv Modern-zation S - , f

On-_ Ong Li

MedOum Irrigation Shemnes P /- Modernization*

o OngoingOTHER SCHEMES: <2000 Hectores : --

Medium Irrigation Schemes- Modernizonaon

Ongoing

FUTURE SCHEMES - Proposed Narmada Momr Canal Inon-prorect) A 1>,

Malor Imr,gotion Schemes Proposed Bronch Cancis (non- projecr) Nctional HighwaysMedium Irrigation Schemes Pw Pick-up Wers Selected State High-oys N

CCMIAIAND AREAS Reservoirs 0 District HeadquartersPrclect Rivers 18 Stote CapitolCcmoleted Schemes Marshes - D,strict BoundariesSchemees n Progress Salt Water 0 40 ec

____ Sardor Sarovar (Normoda) Prorect Fresh Water KILOMETERS

IBRD 18107

_ PR.' lb

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

->^ a.r , ;?.j t v._ -- ....... . . |~~~~~~ N D I A F-:

(

S (~~~~~S

S - [ / g-£ .f s- t e- ,PA ANII R

.>~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ -. -l! ;-I'-NA-. s

( R-i.45rHANV

OMNAA HIMAtNArjAR e-( / / -_ . . _ A I . ._'_( -.

GcAOJL'JN NArAR L kJx

{ ; ) °IVEFIS~~~~~ANAAE~B. ' /

/t l ,- - w - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~\ ) I Y;" - / / > X . U \ - - J~~~7 A.ELI

,Z, : .. :.s .. : .X*// x --- y KHEDA 1-2 __.11 \t. 't 1<uEvl^h G j -e ,i ''* | *-

SIAENDPANAGA A

/.~~~~~~~~~~~~~V

X - - #S / X F i n M-*fARASHrRA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~% ,

* L~~~~W (6 PRADES)w

.. i , ........ t,, , ,z',- \-)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L.NA_/HAR-JCL4c 1, , ,

H~O..g0 w ays N2, .; Sr

KILOMETERS -N102f , > r ..... w J g.<.--.i . JA - ." w.v,_ _, ;_-->; * J 6-E_- f t~~~~ .'.

R A

P A K I S T A Ni J 4

IIA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -

'0 40 so 12

L, t* 6 32 4p 64-; m

MILS 4 80 1 -.

,~~~~~~~~~~~~K'C . j

MILES~~~~~~~~~~~~

IBRD 18109MARCH 198A

INDIA

R A GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION ]IJ 4 ~~~~PROJECT

ISOHYETS, IRRIGATION NEEDS~~.,* - ~ ~ ~ ~ AND

TRACKS OF STORMS

- sP7~\ 500- ISOHYETS OF MEAN ANNUAL RAINFALL (in mm)

STATIO*S OF MEAN ANNUAL RAINFALL (In mm)

[2w4f/Cf7MA- *_~ s _ . OwHIGH NEED9. ~~~7

A.--. L'.% N~~~~~~~~~~~~~OWN EED

; \ P ==~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C0 RIVERS

/-,>! -, Q - DISTRICT BOUINDARIES

---- --- - - b2a T A 8- -

-\ . N - - /.m,e~mam .e4 V. P A K I N D I A e

G~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. ........ nDX"X^ -... . .. .... . e t -v . p

~~ I PAKISTAN,J 7~~~~~~~~~~D

DA MoA A4::: ..., NAUE OF PROJECT DESIGNTrORM , TRACKS OF STORMS

/. < 2i ~~~~~~~KAOANA PROJECT JULY 1913 \.tt8T- einSom_: -(Pr KtJ ti>WATRAK PROJECT JULY 1927 Point Location DotesWATRAK PROJECT JULY 1979 - ~~~Tracks of Storms

0HAROI PROJECT AUG. 1943 !0*

KARJAN PROJECT SEPT. 1945 ' I

DANTIRADA PROJECT SEPT. 1973 \ A

SCHEMES OF SAURASH- AUG. 1979 SRI'ThA REGION

SCHEMES OF SAURASH4- JUNE 1983 J.,.O., AKITRA REGIOIN I o

Ins I

S311W

1t9 St ZE 9 l 0 ooz-

4 OZ: t s08 * 0

/ ~Ivwva

* z- i/ H; V9VN

J~~~~Y

- ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ----------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 7 - -- D- - n ->r w - - ,- ,, g- - : -

- - -O -(- - - - -n - - - - - - -

( JV! 'VNV O- - - --N-- -- -- -- --- ---

- - .\ M/NS>t8 -===-- =- ________ _ _

I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> - -1V~NV -- t

r NV&) V ~~~~~~~ Ž1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s

IBRD 18108I MARCH 1984

INDIA

GUJARAT 25eR A MEDIUM IRRIGATION ]I

J A PROJECTAGRICULTURAL ZONES

: -N;H- J / Agricultural Zone Boundaries-'A TYHA :- -T J \ s E Deseut Sondy Soils

Alluvium Scrdy Soils

/ ./ / 1t E Alluvium Sandy Loom Soils

-mAHLcSANA -I/-A H- SA NA. Coastal Alluvium Sails

\ANDHIN R1 i*l SA8ARKANrE 'B) Medium Block Soils

n~ -~ - ' | > ODeep Block Soils

P -\ Gv ^^ -7N Greater Than 1500 PPM Of

C, / 972 Itv wX~ AJ_ 9>?2 ,.J~Totol Dissolved Salts- 3 '_-'~ \K .2 . . , -S _ Very High Solinity Areas

-~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~Riverstj -t- - District Boundaries

- - y _) c$ NCHMAHAL S

--A-

:AR 8H7AA'UCH

- ',/ -~ SURAT Q-

-z-

,A* ---- - -- BJPAKISTAN

VALSAD V~ *'

DAMA INN-DIA -

zP1/

200

SRI LANKA

I N DI A

GUJARAT MEDIUM IRRIGATION IH PROJECTTypical Village Service Area

I _- Village Service Area Boundary (200-500 ha) \ [ I Chk (30-60 hal )

I j 2Subchak (5-ho) / *ha

rizJi formLined Irrigation Canals,

Main/Branch/Distributory Canal /Minor Distributary Canals

Subminor Distribatory Canals/WAtercourses

Field and Form Channels I

DrainsI

@ Galt Control |

* Adjustable Proportionol Modules

5 Gate-Open or Shut | /

rr. cuW , dIg' IbI rd.OIcwh"-0w r0 c V. .loivD rft

aVWfdo do r W r%. adt

Wd of Pe rw0 "It /d t /Ia ~ V, W Ft brMct.Lcci rW iSif 0 bY rIz m\, t\/ e tI d CmC1bnh cr iraro r a W- 'd wa/

acedtbv of' \

I N / / A >~~, 11 /

sno onf -00d-1 RI LAN KA

co