Los Angeles City CollegeMartin Luther King, Jr. Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT

POLICY

Developed by

Dorothy FuhrmannRosalind GoddardAndrzej Mezynski

Analya SaterBarbara Vasquez

2006(Revised April 2011)

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Los Angeles City College Vision, Mission, Priorities 4

Los Angeles City College Library Mission Statement 6

Introduction 7Intellectual Freedom 7Collection and Policy Rationale 7Collection Philosophy 7Library Collection Mission/Goals/Objectives 8Guidelines for Selection and Evaluation of Materials 8Relationship to Other Libraries 10Responsibility for Selection 10

Books 12Selection Criteria for New Books 12Format 13Multiple Copies 13Out of Print Books 13Replacement of Books 13

Periodicals 14Selection Criteria for Serials/Periodicals 14Definitions 14Exclusions 16Replacement 16Discarding 16

Gifts 17Selection Criteria for Gifts 17

Electronic Resources 18Selection Criteria for Electronic Resources 18Online Databases 18Trials of Databases 18License Agreements 18

2

Continuations 18

Collection Maintenance and Evaluation 19Discarding/Weeding 19Criteria for Keeping Materials 19Criteria for Weeding 20

Appendices:

A – ALA Bill of Rights 21

B – ALA Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries 22

C – ALA Challenged Materials 24

D – ALA Diversity in Collection Development 25

E – ALA Conducting a Challenge Hearing 27

F – ALA The Freedom to Read Statement 31

G – ALA Labels and Rating Systems 35

H – ALA Access to Electronic Information, Services, 37And Networks

3

Los Angeles City College

VISION, MISSION, AND PRIORITIES

4

OUR VISION

Los Angeles City College is an urban oasis of learning that educates minds, opens hearts, and celebrates community. OUR MISSION

As a comprehensive community college, Los Angeles City College offers programs, course work, support, and guidance to developa community of learners--both near and far--with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for optimal growth and action in their personal and professional lives.  As its primary mission, Los Angeles City College offers post-secondary lower division arts and sciences, and vocational courses enabling the student to complete:•  a curriculum designed in preparation for transfer to a four-year university • an associate degree or certificate leading directly to entrance into the work force  The College affirms the essential role of remedial and basic skills instruction, English as a Second Language (ESL), and support services that are intrinsic to student success at the post-secondary level.  The College recognizes its responsibility to provide general education and occupational retraining activities to the community at large.  The College advances state, regional, and local economic growth, and global competitiveness, through education, training, and services that contribute to work force improvement.

The College commits to providing educational and cultural activities that contribute to the general well being of the community it serves.

Los Angeles City College

OUR PRIORITIES

1. Foster a culture of academic excellence by systematically strengthening the educational program and the quality of teaching that lead directly to greater student success.

2. Maintain and enhance a safe, aesthetically pleasing campus environment that encourages involvement, nurtures community, and leads to student success.

3. Expand and strengthen partnerships with business, industry, educational institutions, neighborhood groups, and regional associations.

4. Create a student-centered learning environment that focuses on students’ needs and reduces the barriers to their success.

5. Enhance the college’s visibility and reputation for quality.

6. Increase the resources available to the college through the state and district allocation processes and through extramural development efforts.

7. Develop and implement plans to enhance the efficient allocation of resources that support the college’s vision and priorities.

8. Collect and use data systematically to make informed decisions that lead to continuous organizational improvement.

5

Los Angeles City College Library

LIBRARY MISSION STATEMENT

The Los Angeles City College Library is committed to providing quality service and instruction, and an excellent collection of materials to support:

The mission and goals of the College,

The educational and research/information competency needs of students, faculty, staff, and administration,

and

The College’s curriculum and diverse campus population.

6

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

INTRODUCTION

INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM

The Los Angeles City College Martin Luther King, Jr. Library (MLK Library) strongly supports the American Library Association’s Bill of Rights (Appendix A), its statement of Intellectual Freedom Principles of Academic Libraries (Appendix B), its statement of Challenged Materials (Appendix C), and its statement of Diversity in Collection Development (Appendix D). The Library attempts to purchase materials that represent differing opinions and content format on controversial matters. Selection is without partisanship regarding matters of race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, religion, politics, or moral and artistic philosophy. Should the suitability of particular materials be questioned, the specific objections must be submitted in writing to the Library Department Chair who will follow the process outlined in Appendix E.

COLLECTION AND POLICY RATIONALE

The Library is committed to providing materials in different formats in support of the mission and goals of the College, the Library, and its users. The guidelines used by the MLK Library in its acquisition, maintenance, and de-selection of materials are presented in this policy. The Collection Development policy will be reviewed, evaluated, and revised as necessary by the Library faculty.

COLLECTION PHILOSOPHY

Collection development at the Los Angeles City College Library is an ongoing, fluid activity that evolves with the ever-changing needs of the Library and the College. Guided by the College’s Vision, Mission and Priorities, the Library’s Mission Statement, and such statements by the American Library Association which include the Library Bill of Rights (Appendix A); Diversity in Collection Development (Appendix D), Freedom to Read (Appendix H); Labels and Rating Systems (Appendix I); and Access to Electronic Information, Services and Networks (Appendix J), the Library selects and de-selects materials based on the Library’s assessment of the purposes the materials either serve, will serve, or no longer serve.

Controversial Issues: The Library asserts its duty to keep a representative selection of materials reflecting a variety of political, social, economic, religious, visual, and artistic viewpoints on subjects of interest to its users as appropriate with the library’s materials selection guidelines. It asserts this duty without any intention of becoming a proponent of a particular viewpoint.

7

LIBRARY COLLECTION MISSION/GOALS/OBJECTIVES

The major purpose of the library collection is to have a wide variety of materials.

The Library participates in the educational program of Los Angeles City College in a variety of ways. This policy sets forth certain goals. One is providing supplemental materials to augment the college curricula. The aim/goal of the Library collection is to have a wide variety of materials. Coverage of a field shall be of a general nature, not comprehensive, except as noted. To these ends, collection development objectives shall be:

To provide materials that will support the curriculum To provide materials needed to support college/instruction-related faculty,

staff, and administration needs To provide materials in various formats To provide materials representing all reasonable sides of issues To provide materials representative of subjects of interest to the College

community, including materials on all aspects of controversial matters. No material shall be excluded from the collection because of the race or nationality of the author, or the political, moral, social, or religious views expressed therein

To provide materials representative of many religious, ethnic, cultural, and other diverse groups

To provide materials at appropriate levels for each area of the collection To provide materials or services in all appropriate formats

The Library recognizes the importance of current interest materials as well as materials which have a basic and permanent value. The Library believes that the maintenance of a free society requires free access to all points of view on all public issues. To this end, the Library affirms its acceptance of the principles enumerated in the Library Bill of Rights as adopted by the American Library Association.

GUIDELINES FOR SELECTION AND EVALUATION OF MATERIALS

Collection Scope and Coverage

The Library supports the educational, research, and information needs of:

Los Angeles City College students Los Angeles City College faculty, staff, and administration

Materials for the Library will be selected in the following order of priority:

Curriculum support. The collection is developed to support the curricular needs of our students in a manner to make the best use possible of the funds allotted, with particular attention paid to appropriateness or lower-division college use.

8

o Primary consideration is given to the development and maintenance of subject collections to support the instructional programs at Los Angeles City College. Attention is also given to the changing emphasis of the curriculum and the development of new courses and programs. Materials that provide background and collateral information, as well as those that relate directly to assignments and term paper research topics are included.

o Materials will be selected if they contribute to the general education of the student and may be useful to students pursuing research topics not specifically mentioned in a course outline.

o High priority will be given to maintaining a strong and current reference collection in support of the curriculum and for general information.

o Materials chosen need to be relevant to current issues and problems. Both print and non-print materials are selected to present opposing sides on issues to encourage exploration, discovery, growth, and change.

o Materials are also chosen for personal enrichment and for instilling in the user an awareness of libraries and their potential as a lifelong source of information, recreation, and personal development.

o Materials are selected to assist faculty in preparation for teaching and for general research in their subject areas.

o Priority will be given to replacing basic materials missing from the collection as determined through inventory and overdue files.

o The following specific criteria are applied to the selection of individual titles:

Relevance of the subject matter to the above objectives Appropriateness to a community college collection in terms of

academic level Timeliness or permanence of the materials Reputation of the author or publisher Availability of material on the subject Inclusion of the title in recognized bibliographies and indexes Soundness of scholarship Cost

o The holdings of nearby libraries may also be considered in cases where items are expensive, may be used infrequently, and may be available at nearby libraries, including those in the Los Angeles Public Library system.

9

o The Library recognizes the importance of current interest materials as well as materials which have a basic and permanent value.

Materials for professional growth of faculty, staff, and administration.

Other materials as needed.

RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LIBRARIES

Although no library collection may be expected to meet all demands, the Library makes every effort to see that students should not have to go to other libraries for material that should be available in the College Library. When needs require resources beyond the scope of the Los Angeles City College Library, students are appropriately referred to other collections whenever possible.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR SELECTION

Library Staff

Selection of books and continuations is the responsibility of the Collection Development Librarian, with the participation of other Library faculty and classroom faculty actively encouraged. The Collection Development Librarian is responsible for general guidance on the selection of materials, the review of faculty recommendations, and designation of suggested areas needing special emphasis or development.

Selection of periodicals is the responsibility of the librarian assigned to this task by the Library Department Chair. Selection of electronic resources will be done collectively by the faculty librarians.

Final decisions on materials to be acquired and responsibility for the collection rests with the Library Department Chair. The Library Department Chair will be involved with challenges to the collection.

Faculty Recommendations

Primary consideration for the selection of library materials is given to the development and maintenance of subject collections to support the instructional programs at the College. Library materials primarily include books, periodicals, and subscription databases/electronic resources. To ensure a vital, active, and current collection, the Library encourages faculty recommendations in support of their curricular areas. Requests are reviewed to ascertain that they meet budget and collection development guidelines.

Recommendations by Non Library Staff

10

Faculty, administration, and staff recommendations are given consideration when they meet budget and curricular standards.

Any student may request materials to be considered for purchase.

Submission of recommendations does not bind the Library to acquiring them. In order for the Library to attempt to acquire recommended materials, the materials must meet guidelines for selection, appropriateness, relevance, and cost as determined by the Library.

DISCARDING

The removal of obsolete, irretrievably damaged, or inappropriate materials for the purpose of discarding shall be considered an integral part of the total organized effort to study and develop the collection. Discarding shall be done by the Library faculty, with

the advice of classroom faculty as necessary. De-selection criteria shall parallel the selection criteria.

11

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

BOOKS

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR NEW BOOKS

The Library collects books in three principal areas:

Main CollectionThe principal circulating collection. Consideration is given to authoritativeness, reading level, appropriateness for and support of curriculum, and faculty, staff and administration needs.

ReferenceIn addition to the standards for the Main Collection, reference resources are also acquired according to need and according to authority, scope, cost, treatment, arrangement, and format of the resources.

Reserve Materials/TextbooksThe Library does not generally purchase copies of the textbooks currently used in classes, since the primary purpose of the Library is to supplement and augment the College curricula. Exceptions may occur if the text is considered useful to the general College community, if the materials have already been acquired in the normal course of collecting for the Library, or there is an exceptional situation, such as the textbook not being available at the campus Bookstore and demand is great. When the Library discovers that a title in the Main Collection is currently being used as a textbook, the Library staff will place the item in Textbook Reserve.

Faculty, staff, or other College agents are currently the primary suppliers or donors of classroom or text materials. Suppliers and donors are responsible for making sure that applicable copyright laws are followed.

Faculty Reserve Materials are supplemental reading materials supplied by the instructor for use by the entire class.

Among the criteria to be considered in the purchase of books for the Library’s collections are

Relevance to the curricula Relevance to the College’s needs Authoritativeness Literary quality Availability of materials on the subject Reviews in the professional literature

12

Reputation of the author or publisher Inclusion in recognized bibliographies and indexes, including those of

accreditation agencies Cost

Books considered for addition to the collections will also be evaluated with attention given to

Written reviews by reputable library- or publishing-field reviewers Written reviews by reputable authors or other knowledgeable individuals Size and adequacy of the current collection Potential use of materials by students and faculty Appropriateness for lower-division college use Recency (current material is given high priority)

Format

In the acquisition of new book titles, selection of print format (hardcover vs. paperback) will be determined based on anticipated frequency of use, duration of usefulness, and price differential. In general, preference will be given to paperback books over hardcover format because of their cost.

Multiple Copies

The Library purchases multiple copies of a title only in cases of demonstrable need.

Out-of-Print Books

Efforts to obtain materials on the out-of-print market shall be made if it is decided that the materials are of enough importance to justify these efforts.

Replacement of Books

Lost or stolen books will be replaced on a case-by-case basis if their continued inclusion in the collection is warranted.

13

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

PERIODICALS

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR SERIALS/PERIODCICALS

Definitions

Serial—A publication in any medium issued in successive parts bearing numerical or chronological designations and intended to be continued indefinitely. Serials include periodicals (magazines, journals); newspapers; annuals (reports, yearbooks, etc.); the journals, memoirs, proceedings, transactions, etc., of societies; and numbered monographic series.

Periodicals—Publications issues in successive parts bearing numeric or chronological designations and intended to be published indefinitely. Generally, these are publications issued and received on a regular basis and placed into the periodical collection, including journals, magazines, and newspapers.

Continuations—Publications received on a regular basis that are classified and placed in collections other than the periodical collection.

Indexes—Regularly-published lists of periodical article citations.

The selection of periodicals requires a more specific selection process than for other media. When a periodical is selected, a continuing commitment has been made for the base cost of the title, including subscription maintenance, shelf integrity and storage. The rapidly expanding periodicals market requires that care needs to be exercised in reviewing periodical titles before purchase for the collection occurs. Online databases will be a factor in periodical selections.

Collection of serial publications to support the academic programs is important for providing current research information. Access to current and timely information is best accomplished with serial publications. Selection decisions for serials are made by these criteria:

Prioritieso Curriculum support for studentso General education and news coverageo Faculty support

14

Recommendations

Recommendations for the selection and review of the serial collection may be made by the following:

o Faculty and academic staffo Studentso Library faculty

General Selection Criteria

Periodicals are selected to support the continuing information needs of the college community. General factors to be considered are:

o Academic programso Mission relevanceo Majorso Certificate programso General education needo Undergraduate research level needso Enrollment size in programs or departmentso Student population needso Specific collection needs

Specific Criteria for Periodicals and Continuations

Selection of specific titles will include a careful evaluation of the following:

o Indexing—what indexes provide access to the contents of the periodical title? Does the Library own any of these indexes?

o Abstracts—does the Library own any of the abstracts that provide access?o Electronic Access—what is available in the Library or by remote access to

provide online access to the contents of the periodical?o Projected Use—for unindexed titles, will use of title be encouraged by

specific class assignments or research topics?o Review in the Literature—how is a title reviewed by a subject expert?o Cost—what is the specific cost of the subscription? What is the cost per

issue?o Frequency—does the periodical title meet stated research needs of

students or faculty?o Format—newsletter, newspaper, electronic journal?o Subject content of the periodical?o Subject coverage—how in-depth, scholarly, technical, etc., are the articles?o Audience—for what audience is this periodical intended?

15

General Newspapers

The Library acquires general newspapers on a current basis to meet the teaching and general information needs of the College community. In selecting new subscriptions, the relevance of the newspaper to courses, current coverage of local, national, and international geographical areas, and representation of diverse political and social viewpoints are considered.

Indexes

For print and electronic indexes, consideration will be made as to:

o Subject coverage in relation to the College’s programs and collectionso Currency—speed with which the index includes current articleso Frequency of publicationo Number of MLK Library periodicals indexed

Online Databases

In addition to the criteria for print indexes, the following is considered for online databases:

o Costo Database compatibility with existing hardwareo Reputation of database vendoro Estimated patron useo Duplication with print version

Exclusions

Titles requested by faculty for research not directly related to teaching, especially those that are highly specialized and of no continuing value to the collection will be discouraged. Titles related to an individual’s avocation or personal interest will not be purchased.

Replacement

The Periodicals staff will make every effort to obtain replacement pages and/or a replacement issue.

Discarding

The Library faculty, under the direction of the Library Department Chair, will regularly undertake a systematic review of the periodical collection, including the category of standing orders, to ensure that the present collection meets the standards set forth in this policy. Academic department heads and faculty are part of the process of review and their recommendations will be solicited.

16

Decisions for the ordering and cancellation of periodicals are made by the Periodicals librarian, with appropriate consultation/advice of faculty and head of the Library.

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

GIFTS

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR GIFTS

Gift material is accepted through MLK Library as appropriate. The Library acknowledges receipt of gifts by providing a letter with the number of items donated, but does not place a value on the material. The Collection Development librarian will help determine if materials donated meet the collection development criteria. Donors also agree that the items donated become the property of the Library, to be disposed of as the Library sees fit, including allocation to Library collections, to book sales, to other individuals or organizations, and/or to de-selection.

Materials received as gifts will be evaluated by the same criteria as those for new book or periodical purchases.

The Library at all times retains the right to dispose of gifts at any time and in any manner deemed appropriate.

The Library will accept those materials that contribute to its overall missions and objectives.

Materials received as gifts will be evaluated for condition (underlining, missing pages, yellowed pages, mold, etc.).

The Library retains the right to dispose of duplicate and other unneeded materials as it wishes.

17

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

ELECTRONIC RESOURCES

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ELECTRONIC RESOURCES

“Electronic resources” refers to categories of materials or services which require computer access. Examples include CD-ROM products, DVD products, interactive media, and online databases. The MLK Library generally does not purchase electronic resources other than online databases. CD-ROMs and DVDs may be packaged with other materials such as books, but are not purchased separately.

Online Databases

Among the criteria to be considered in the purchase of online databases are:

Relevance to the curricula Relevance to the College’s needs Accessibility User-friendliness Frequency of updates Availability of equipment and memory required to support the product Impact of the product on the Library system Degree of technical support required Product reliability Cost Number of simultaneous users allowed Campuses’ accessibility

Trials of Databases

The Library may decide, from time to time, to evaluate a new database on a trial basis prior to deciding whether or not to purchase. The presence or availability of a database does not necessarily mean that the Library will ultimately acquire the resource.

License Agreements

Copies of all licensing agreements will be maintained by the Library.

Continuations

The ever-changing technologies in the area of electronic resources demand an annual review of the appropriateness of the collection.

18

Los Angeles City College Library

COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

COLLECTION MAINTENANCE AND EVALUATION

The best utilization of Library space requires continuous evaluation of holdings. Evaluation shall be a continuous process involving considerations such as use and condition of material. Outdated materials shall be withdrawn from the collection unless there is some indication that they have historical significance or that they are needed for a particular and unique reason.

Withdrawal of obsolete materials shall be considered an integral part of the total effort to assess and develop the collection and shall reflect the Library’s selection policy. Faculty advice will be solicited when appropriate.

De-Selection

De-selection (weeding) is an important aspect of collection development. The same criteria for selection will be used for discarding materials. General criteria for de-selection include the following:

Value to the collection Physical condition Duplicates Coverage of the subject by other materials Age or obsolescence Use

Another way of thinking about de-selection is through the acronym MUSTIE:

M = Misleading—factually inaccurate

U = Ugly—worn beyond mending or rebinding

S = Superseded —by a new edition of by a much better book on the subject

T = Trivial—of no discernible literary or scientific merit

I = Irrelevant to the needs and interests of the library's community

E = Elsewhere —the material is easily obtainable from another library(coined by ALA in cooperation with the Texas State Library back in 1976)

De-selection is done by Library faculty, with appropriate input from other faculty as needed in their subject area. Systematic de-selection may take place concurrent with an

19

inventory of the entire collection, or on an ad-hoc basis in specific subject areas as gift or new material is added, or as space becomes limited.

CRITERIA FOR KEEPING MATERIALS

Typical criteria for keeping materials include:

Strong local interest. Many libraries keep materials that have a local interest. For example, libraries may keep books that are written by authors from their state, city or college, or they may keep materials that are about the local area, even though they do not keep these as a special collection.

Outstanding literary, historical, or scientific value. Some books or other materials may be kept because they are simply very important. Some of these books may have achieved classic status. An example might be Michael Faraday's Chemical History of a Candle or William James' Pragmatism. Other books, while not classics, appear in lists of recommended titles, which indicate that experts in the field feel that they are especially valuable.

Older edition of a current textbook. Students often check out older editions of current textbooks. If the older editions still contain correct information, they should be kept. If they are outdated and could cause a student difficulty in class, they should be discarded.

Special collections. If a library has a special collection in a specific subject area, materials that are part of this collection may be kept, even if they would otherwise be removed. The MLK Library does not have any special collections at this time.

20

APPENDIX A

American Library Association

Library Bill of Rights

The American Library Association affirms that all libraries are forums for information and ideas, and that the following basic policies should guide their services.

I. Books and other library resources should be provided for the interest, information, and enlightenment of all people of the community the library serves. Materials should not be excluded because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation.

II. Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues. Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.

III. Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.

IV. Libraries should cooperate with all persons and groups concerned with resisting abridgment of free expression and free access to ideas.

V. A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views.

VI. Libraries which make exhibit spaces and meeting rooms available to the public they serve should make such facilities available on an equitable basis, regardless of the beliefs or affiliations of individuals or groups requesting their use.

Adopted June 18, 1948, by the ALA Council; amended February 2, 1961; January 23, 1980; inclusion of “age” reaffirmed January 23, 1996.

21

APPENDIX B

American Library Association

Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries:

An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights

A strong intellectual freedom perspective is critical to the development of academic library collections and services that dispassionately meet the education and research needs of a college or university community. The purpose of this statement is to outline how and where intellectual freedom principles fit into an academic library setting, thereby raising consciousness of the intellectual freedom context within which academic librarians work. The following principles should be reflected in all relevant library policy documents.

1. The general principles set forth in the Library Bill of Rights form an indispensable framework for building collections, services, and policies that serve the entire academic community.

2. The privacy of library users is and must be inviolable. Policies should be in place that maintain confidentiality of library borrowing records and of other information relating to personal use of library information and services.

3. The development of library collections in support of an institution’s instruction and research programs should transcend the personal values of the selector. In the interests of research and learning, it is essential that collections contain materials representing a variety of perspectives on subjects that may be considered controversial.

4. Preservation and replacement efforts should ensure that balance in library materials is maintained and that controversial materials are not removed from the collections through theft, loss, mutilation, or normal wear and tear. There should be alertness to efforts by special interest groups to bias a collection though systematic theft or mutilation.

5. Licensing agreements should be consistent with the Library Bill of Rights, and should maximize access.

6. Open and unfiltered access to the Internet should be conveniently available to the academic community in a college or university library. Content filtering devices and content-based restrictions are a contradiction of the academic library mission to further research and learning through exposure to the broadest possible range of ideas and information. Such restrictions are a fundamental violation of intellectual freedom in academic libraries.

7. Freedom of information and of creative expression should be reflected in library exhibits and in all relevant library policy documents.

8. Library meeting rooms, research carrels, exhibit spaces, and other facilities should be available to the academic community regardless of research being pursued or subject being discussed. Any restrictions made necessary because of limited availability of space should be based on need, as reflected in library policy, rather than on content of research or discussion.

9. Whenever possible, library services should be available without charge in order to encourage inquiry. Where charges are necessary, a free or low-cost alternative (e.g., downloading to disc rather than printing) should be available when possible.

10. A service philosophy should be promoted that affords equal access to information for all in the academic community with no discrimination on the basis of race, values, gender, sexual orientation, cultural or ethnic background, physical or learning disability, economic status, religious beliefs, or views.

22

11. A procedure ensuring due process should be in place to deal with requests by those within and outside the academic community for removal or addition of library resources, exhibits, or services.

12. It is recommended that this statement of principle be endorsed by appropriate institutional governing bodies, including the faculty senate or similar instrument of faculty governance.

Approved by ACRL Board of Directors: June 29, 1999Adopted July 12, 2000, by the ALA Council.

from a letter dated November 15, 2000, to Judith F. Krug, director, Office for Intellectual Freedom, from the American Association of University Professors:

A copy of the new ACRL/ALA statement on Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries: An Interpretation of the ‘Library Bill of Rights’ was forwarded to one of our Council members and considered by the AAUP Council in its meeting on November 11, 2000.

The AAUP Council is pleased to endorse the statement, but wishes to preface that endorsement with the following language from the Joint Statement on Faculty Status of College and University Librarians, as contained in AAUP: Policy Documents and Reports, 1995 edition:

“College and university librarians share the professional concerns of faculty members. Academic freedom, for example, is indispensable to librarians, because they are trustees of knowledge with the responsibility of ensuring the availability of information and ideas, no matter how controversial, so that teachers may freely teach and students may freely learn. Moreover, as members of the academic community, librarians should have latitude in the exercise of their professional judgment within the library, a share in shaping policy within the institution, and adequate opportunities for professional development and appropriate reward.”

Please convey to the members of the ACRL Board and ALA Council our concern that college and university librarians are designated the same rights afforded to other faculty in regard to intellectual freedom.

23

APPENDIX C

American Library Association

Challenged Materials:

An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights

The American Library Association declares as a matter of firm principle that it is the responsibility of every library to have a clearly defined materials selection policy in written form that reflects the Library Bill of Rights, and that is approved by the appropriate governing authority.Challenged materials that meet the criteria for selection in the materials selection policy of the library should not be removed under any legal or extra-legal pressure. The Library Bill of Rights states in Article I that “Materials should not be excluded because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation,” and in Article II, that “Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.” Freedom of expression is protected by the Constitution of the United States, but constitutionally protected expression is often separated from unprotected expression only by a dim and uncertain line. The Constitution requires a procedure designed to focus searchingly on challenged expression before it can be suppressed. An adversary hearing is a part of this procedure.Therefore, any attempt, be it legal or extra-legal, to regulate or suppress materials in libraries must be closely scrutinized to the end that protected expression is not abridged.

Adopted June 25, 1971, by the ALA Council; amended July 1, 1981; January 10, 1990.

24

APPENDIX D

American Library Association

Diversity in Collection Development:

An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights

Throughout history, the focus of censorship has fluctuated from generation to generation. Books and other materials have not been selected or have been removed from library collections for many reasons, among which are prejudicial language and ideas, political content, economic theory, social philosophies, religious beliefs, sexual forms of expression, and other potentially controversial topics.Some examples of censorship may include removing or not selecting materials because they are considered by some as racist or sexist; not purchasing conservative religious materials; not selecting materials about or by minorities because it is thought these groups or interests are not represented in a community; or not providing information on or materials from non-mainstream political entities.Librarians may seek to increase user awareness of materials on various social concerns by many means, including, but not limited to, issuing bibliographies and presenting exhibits and programs. Librarians have a professional responsibility to be inclusive, not exclusive, in collection development and in the provision of interlibrary loan. Access to all materials legally obtainable should be assured to the user, and policies should not unjustly exclude materials even if they are offensive to the librarian or the user. Collection development should reflect the philosophy inherent in Article II of the Library Bill of Rights: “Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues. Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.” A balanced collection reflects a diversity of materials, not an equality of numbers. Collection development responsibilities include selecting materials in the languages in common use in the community the library serves. Collection development and the selection of materials should be done according to professional standards and established selection and review procedures.There are many complex facets to any issue, and variations of context in which issues may be expressed, discussed, or interpreted. Librarians have a professional responsibility to be fair, just, and equitable and to give all library users equal protection in guarding against violation of the library patron’s right to read, view, or listen to materials and resources protected by the First Amendment, no matter what the viewpoint of the author, creator, or selector. Librarians have an obligation to protect library collections from removal of materials based on personal bias or prejudice, and to select and support the access to materials on all subjects that meet, as closely as possible, the needs, interests, and abilities of all persons in the community the library serves. This includes materials that reflect political, economic, religious, social, minority, and sexual issues.Intellectual freedom, the essence of equitable library services, provides for free access to all expressions of ideas through which any and all sides of a question, cause, or movement may be explored. Toleration is meaningless without tolerance for what some may consider detestable. Librarians cannot justly permit their own preferences to limit their degree of tolerance in collection development, because freedom is indivisible.

Adopted July 14, 1982, by the ALA Council; amended January 10, 1990.

25

APPENDIX E

American Library Association

Conducting a Challenge Hearing

Challenges to materials only occasionally reach the stage of a full-blown administrative hearing; often they are resolved at an earlier step in the challenge resolution process. When a hearing is necessary, however, certain important do’s and don’ts should be observed. A number of battles have been lost because the challenge hearing has been poorly organized. Even though procedures have been followed to the letter up to this point, the handling of the challenge hearing may be the weak link in the process.

The challenge process begins when someone objects to materials in a library collection. At this point, providing an explanation of selection procedures, a copy of the selection policy, or a copy of the reconsideration or complaint form will often terminate the problem. Most complainants never return the reconsideration form because he or she sees the logic of the selection process which emphasizes intellectual freedom and due process. The complainant tends to be satisfied in registering a concern and knowing the library is taking the concern seriously.

There are a few, however, who wish to follow through on the procedures established in the selection policy for handling complaints and approved by the governing authority. To activate the reconsideration procedure, a complaint should be in writing. In fact, the written and approved selection policy should state that anonymous phone calls, rumors, or voiced concerns are not honored; action occurs only when the reconsideration or complaint form has been returned. The reconsideration committee, comprised of representatives of all library users and the librarian, should accomplish the following steps:

1. Read, view or listen to the challenged material in its entirety; 2. Review the selection process and the criteria for selection; 3. Check reviews and recommended lists to determine recommendations by the experts and

critics; 4. Meet to discuss the challenge; and 5. Make a recommendation to the administrator on removal, retention, or replacement.

The complainant should be notified of the committee’s decision. At the same time, the procedure for appealing the decision, if the complainant disagrees with it, also should be provided. The appeal level may be a school board, a board of trustees or a city or county board of commissioners or council. (The selection policy should clearly identify the chain of command.) The appeal also must be in writing in order for the chair of the governing authority to place it on the agenda for the next meeting. The librarian should follow up on this step to make certain the presiding officer is aware of the policies and procedures which should be followed, including open meetings law and the agenda. Normally, the board conducts a challenge hearing which provides the forum for the complainant to air his or her objections to the title in the collection and the recommendation of the reconsideration committee.

A hearing on challenged material is serious and often lengthy. Such a hearing may be the only item on the agenda; indeed, best results are most often achieved this

26

way.Never attempt to stage a hearing quietly. The entire community should be aware of the meeting and what has transpired up to this point. The hearing should be announced well in advance. Publicity is very important to assure good attendance at the meeting. Make the time and place very clear. Indicate in an announcement or news release that an open hearing is being held and that the public is invited. Try to obtain full coverage by the local press, radio and television. Prepare a news release for each of these groups to make certain they have the facts correct. Deliver copies of the media center or library’s selection policies to them, along with a copy of the Library Bill of Rights. These policies, of course, should include procedures for handling complaints.

Decide in advance on a length of time for the entire hearing. Have a definite beginning and ending time. Guard against overlong meetings when small groups may make decisions in the late hours. This has spelled disaster in some instances.Attempt to estimate in advance the size of the gathering for the hearing. Make certain the meeting place is large enough to prevent postponing the meeting or changing locations at the last minute. A late site change may result in losing part of the group attending. There have also been situations in which one faction arrived early, securing the choice front seats. To preclude this, the room can be divided, with people favoring retention of the material on one side, opponents of the material on the other.

Seek help and advice from your state intellectual freedom committee, local and state colleges and universities, educational groups, teachers’ professional organizations, coalitions, and the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom. Many of the non-library groups have committees on intellectual freedom, freedom of speech, and/or academic freedom. Even when representatives from these groups are not present at the hearing, solicited resolutions in written form sometimes help in supporting your philosophy.Make arrangements in advance to tape proceedings and keep minutes. Announce at the hearing where and when these will be available to the general public. They should be accessible as soon as possible after the hearing.

Solicit people who will be willing to speak in support of the freedom to read, view and listen. This pool of speakers should be contacted well in advance of the hearing. In fact, many librarians have lists of persons they have contacted previously and who are library supporters. The best spokespersons in hearings tend to be attorneys, ministers, people from the news media, educators, and, of course, librarians. Response to persons from the local community is usually more favorable than to people brought in from outside. Student speakers are also effective. They speak from the heart and do not have any vested interest other than maintaining their freedom of choice guaranteed by the Constitution.

As people arrive for the hearing, they should be given a copy of the selection policy. The policy should include the following elements, among others: a statement of the philosophy of materials selection, a statement that the governing board is legally responsible for selection of materials, a statement detailing the delegation of this responsibility to the professional library personnel, criteria for selection of materials, procedures for implementing the criteria, and a section on procedures for handling challenged materials. If the Library Bill of Rights is not a formal part of the policy, it should be duplicated and distributed as well.

One or more persons should be stationed at the entrance to sign in people wishing to speak. Request that they identify the side on which they will be speaking. If at all possible, attempt to have the same number of speakers on both sides. They should be allowed to speak in the order they signed in. Limit each speaker to a

27

specific amount of time, i.e., three or four minutes, and appoint a timekeeper in advance. No participant should be allowed to speak a second time until everyone registered has been heard once. It is extremely important to adhere strictly both to the time limits and to the order of the speakers.

All members of your advisory board, your reconsideration committee and governing board should already be well-schooled in intellectual freedom principles and procedures. It is the responsibility of the librarian to accomplish this to ensure their support when a challenge hearing is necessary. All those selected to testify should be reminded they are defending a principle more than an individual title. The actual title in question should play a secondary role. It is very difficult to disagree with the freedom to read, view and listen in a democratic society.

Begin the hearing on time. The chair of the governing board should preside as at any other business meeting. After calling the meeting to order, he or she should review the procedures to be followed at the meeting, even though the procedures for handling complaints are in the selection policy. The board should delay its decision until a later date and this should be announced at the beginning of the hearing. The meeting is simply to hear all sides of the issue.Through the whole process, it is crucial to follow the traditional advice of remaining calm. Remember to practice what you preach and ensure due process. Listen carefully and courteously to everyone. By using good communication skills, you will help people understand your logic in ensuring diversity in library collections.

Keep your governing authority up-to-date on all events and incidents. Examine your personal philosophy of intellectual freedom on a regular basis. Meet all negative pressure with positive pressures, such as emphasizing intellectual freedom rather than the perils of censorship.By following this advice, you will be able to conduct a successful challenge hearing and improve your image in the process.

Gene D. Lanier, the author, is a former faculty member of the Department of Library and Information Studies at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina.

  

28

APPENDIX F

American Library Association

The Freedom to Read Statement

The freedom to read is essential to our democracy. It is continuously under attack. Private groups and public authorities in various parts of the country are working to remove or limit access to reading materials, to censor content in schools, to label "controversial" views, to distribute lists of "objectionable" books or authors, and to purge libraries. These actions apparently rise from a view that our national tradition of free expression is no longer valid; that censorship and suppression are needed to counter threats to safety or national security, as well as to avoid the subversion of politics and the corruption of morals. We, as individuals devoted to reading and as librarians and publishers responsible for disseminating ideas, wish to assert the public interest in the preservation of the freedom to read.Most attempts at suppression rest on a denial of the fundamental premise of democracy: that the ordinary individual, by exercising critical judgment, will select the good and reject the bad. We trust Americans to recognize propaganda and misinformation, and to make their own decisions about what they read and believe. We do not believe they are prepared to sacrifice their heritage of a free press in order to be "protected" against what others think may be bad for them. We believe they still favor free enterprise in ideas and expression.These efforts at suppression are related to a larger pattern of pressures being brought against education, the press, art and images, films, broadcast media, and the Internet. The problem is not only one of actual censorship. The shadow of fear cast by these pressures leads, we suspect, to an even larger voluntary curtailment of expression by those who seek to avoid controversy or unwelcome scrutiny by government officials.Such pressure toward conformity is perhaps natural to a time of accelerated change. And yet suppression is never more dangerous than in such a time of social tension. Freedom has given the United States the elasticity to endure strain. Freedom keeps open the path of novel and creative solutions, and enables change to come by choice. Every silencing of a heresy, every enforcement of an orthodoxy, diminishes the toughness and resilience of our society and leaves it the less able to deal with controversy and difference.Now as always in our history, reading is among our greatest freedoms. The freedom to read and write is almost the only means for making generally available ideas or manners of expression that can initially command only a small audience. The written word is the natural medium for the new idea and the untried voice from which come the original contributions to social growth. It is essential to the extended discussion that serious thought requires, and to the accumulation of knowledge and ideas into organized collections.We believe that free communication is essential to the preservation of a free society and a creative culture. We believe that these pressures toward conformity present the danger of limiting the range and variety of inquiry and expression on which our democracy and our culture depend. We believe that every American community must jealously guard the freedom to publish and to circulate, in order to preserve its own freedom to read. We believe that publishers and librarians have a profound responsibility to give validity to that freedom to read by making it possible for the readers to choose freely from a variety of offerings.The freedom to read is guaranteed by the Constitution. Those with faith in free people will stand firm on these constitutional guarantees of essential rights and will exercise the responsibilities that accompany these rights.We therefore affirm these propositions:

29

1. It is in the public interest for publishers and librarians to make available the widest diversity of views and expressions, including those that are unorthodox, unpopular, or considered dangerous by the majority.

Creative thought is by definition new, and what is new is different. The bearer of every new thought is a rebel until that idea is refined and tested. Totalitarian systems attempt to maintain themselves in power by the ruthless suppression of any concept that challenges the established orthodoxy. The power of a democratic system to adapt to change is vastly strengthened by the freedom of its citizens to choose widely from among conflicting opinions offered freely to them. To stifle every nonconformist idea at birth would mark the end of the democratic process. Furthermore, only through the constant activity of weighing and selecting can the democratic mind attain the strength demanded by times like these. We need to know not only what we believe but why we believe it.

2. Publishers, librarians, and booksellers do not need to endorse every idea or presentation they make available. It would conflict with the public interest for them to establish their own political, moral, or aesthetic views as a standard for determining what should be published or circulated.

Publishers and librarians serve the educational process by helping to make available knowledge and ideas required for the growth of the mind and the increase of learning. They do not foster education by imposing as mentors the patterns of their own thought. The people should have the freedom to read and consider a broader range of ideas than those that may be held by any single librarian or publisher or government or church. It is wrong that what one can read should be confined to what another thinks proper.

3. It is contrary to the public interest for publishers or librarians to bar access to writings on the basis of the personal history or political affiliations of the author.

No art or literature can flourish if it is to be measured by the political views or private lives of its creators. No society of free people can flourish that draws up lists of writers to whom it will not listen, whatever they may have to say.

4. There is no place in our society for efforts to coerce the taste of others, to confine adults to the reading matter deemed suitable for adolescents, or to inhibit the efforts of writers to achieve artistic expression.

To some, much of modern expression is shocking. But is not much of life itself shocking? We cut off literature at the source if we prevent writers from dealing with the stuff of life. Parents and teachers have a responsibility to prepare the young to meet the diversity of experiences in life to which they will be exposed, as they have a responsibility to help them learn to think critically for themselves. These are affirmative responsibilities, not to be discharged simply by preventing them from reading works for which they are not yet prepared. In these matters values differ, and values cannot be legislated; nor can machinery be devised that will suit the demands of one group without limiting the freedom of others.

5. It is not in the public interest to force a reader to accept the prejudgment of a label characterizing any expression or its author as subversive or dangerous.

The ideal of labeling presupposes the existence of individuals or groups with wisdom to determine by authority what is good or bad for others. It

30

presupposes that individuals must be directed in making up their minds about the ideas they examine. But Americans do not need others to do their thinking for them.

6. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians, as guardians of the people's freedom to read, to contest encroachments upon that freedom by individuals or groups seeking to impose their own standards or tastes upon the community at large; and by the government whenever it seeks to reduce or deny public access to public information.

It is inevitable in the give and take of the democratic process that the political, the moral, or the aesthetic concepts of an individual or group will occasionally collide with those of another individual or group. In a free society individuals are free to determine for themselves what they wish to read, and each group is free to determine what it will recommend to its freely associated members. But no group has the right to take the law into its own hands, and to impose its own concept of politics or morality upon other members of a democratic society. Freedom is no freedom if it is accorded only to the accepted and the inoffensive. Further, democratic societies are more safe, free, and creative when the free flow of public information is not restricted by governmental prerogative or self-censorship.

7. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians to give full meaning to the freedom to read by providing books that enrich the quality and diversity of thought and expression. By the exercise of this affirmative responsibility, they can demonstrate that the answer to a "bad" book is a good one, the answer to a "bad" idea is a good one.

The freedom to read is of little consequence when the reader cannot obtain matter fit for that reader's purpose. What is needed is not only the absence of restraint, but the positive provision of opportunity for the people to read the best that has been thought and said. Books are the major channel by which the intellectual inheritance is handed down, and the principal means of its testing and growth. The defense of the freedom to read requires of all publishers and librarians the utmost of their faculties, and deserves of all Americans the fullest of their support.

We state these propositions neither lightly nor as easy generalizations. We here stake out a lofty claim for the value of the written word. We do so because we believe that it is possessed of enormous variety and usefulness, worthy of cherishing and keeping free. We realize that the application of these propositions may mean the dissemination of ideas and manners of expression that are repugnant to many persons. We do not state these propositions in the comfortable belief that what people read is unimportant. We believe rather that what people read is deeply important; that ideas can be dangerous; but that the suppression of ideas is fatal to a democratic society. Freedom itself is a dangerous way of life, but it is ours.

This statement was originally issued in May of 1953 by the Westchester Conference of the American Library Association and the American Book Publishers Council, which in 1970 consolidated with the American Educational Publishers Institute to become the Association of American Publishers.Adopted June 25, 1953, by the ALA Council and the AAP Freedom to Read Committee; amended January 28, 1972; January 16, 1991; July 12, 2000; June 30, 2004.A Joint Statement by:American Library AssociationAssociation of American PublishersSubsequently endorsed by:

31

American Booksellers Foundation for Free ExpressionThe Association of American University Presses, Inc.The Children's Book CouncilFreedom to Read FoundationNational Association of College StoresNational Coalition Against CensorshipNational Council of Teachers of EnglishThe Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression 

APPENDIX G

American Library Association

Labels and Rating Systems:

An Interpretation of the Library Bill of RightsLibraries do not advocate the ideas found in their collections or in resources accessible through the library. The presence of books and other resources in a library does not indicate endorsement of their contents by the library. Likewise, the ability for library users to access electronic information using library computers does not indicate endorsement or approval of that information by the library.

Labels

Labels on library materials may be viewpoint-neutral directional aids that save the time of users, or they may be attempts to prejudice or discourage users or restrict their access to materials. When labeling is an attempt to prejudice attitudes, it is a censor's tool. The American Library Association opposes labeling as a means of predisposing people's attitudes toward library materials.Prejudicial labels are designed to restrict access, based on a value judgment that the content, language or themes of the material, or the background or views of the creator(s) of the material, render it inappropriate or offensive for all or certain groups of users. The prejudicial label is used to warn, discourage or prohibit users or certain groups of users from accessing the material. Such labels may be used to remove materials from open shelves to restricted locations where access depends on staff intervention.Viewpoint-neutral directional aids facilitate access by making it easier for users to locate materials. The materials are housed on open shelves and are equally accessible to all users, who may choose to consult or ignore the directional aids at their own discretion.Directional aids can have the effect of prejudicial labels when their implementation becomes proscriptive rather than descriptive. When directional aids are used to forbid access or to suggest moral or doctrinal endorsement, the effect is the same as prejudicial labeling.

Rating Systems

A variety of organizations promulgate rating systems as a means of advising either their members or the general public concerning their opinions of the contents and suitability or appropriate age for use of certain books, films, recordings, Web sites, or other materials. The adoption, enforcement, or endorsement of any of these rating

32

systems by the library violates the Library Bill of Rights. Adopting such systems into law may be unconstitutional. If such legislation is passed, the library should seek legal advice regarding the law's applicability to library operations.Publishers, industry groups, and distributors sometimes add ratings to material or include them as part of their packaging. Librarians should not endorse such practices. However, removing or destroying such ratings—if placed there by, or with permission of, the copyright holder—could constitute expurgation (see Expurgation of Library Materials: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights).Some find it easy and even proper, according to their ethics, to establish criteria for judging materials as objectionable. However, injustice and ignorance, rather than justice and enlightenment, result from such practices. The American Library Association opposes any efforts that result in closing any path to knowledge.

Adopted July 13, 1951, by the ALA Council; amended June 25, 1971; July 1, 1981; June 26, 1990; January 19, 2005.[ISBN 8389-5226-7]

33

APPENDIX H

American Library Association

Access to Electronic Information, Services, and Networks:

An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights

Introduction

Freedom of expression is an inalienable human right and the foundation for self-government. Freedom of expression encompasses the freedom of speech and the corollary right to receive information.1 Libraries and librarians protect and promote these rights by selecting, producing, providing access to, identifying, retrieving, organizing, providing instruction in the use of, and preserving recorded expression regardless of the format or technology.The American Library Association expresses these basic principles of librarianship in its Code of Ethics and in the Library Bill of Rights and its Interpretations. These serve to guide librarians and library governing bodies in addressing issues of intellectual freedom that arise when the library provides access to electronic information, services, and networks.Libraries empower users by providing access to the broadest range of information. Electronic resources, including information available via the Internet, allow libraries to fulfill this responsibility better than ever before.Issues arising from digital generation, distribution, and retrieval of information need to be approached and regularly reviewed from a context of constitutional principles and ALA policies so that fundamental and traditional tenets of librarianship are not swept away.Electronic information flows across boundaries and barriers despite attempts by individuals, governments, and private entities to channel or control it. Even so, many people lack access or capability to use electronic information effectively.In making decisions about how to offer access to electronic information, each library should consider its mission, goals, objectives, cooperative agreements, and the needs of the entire community it serves.

The Rights of Users

All library system and network policies, procedures, or regulations relating to electronic information and services should be scrutinized for potential violation of user rights.User policies should be developed according to the policies and guidelines established by the American Library Association, including Guidelines for the Development and Implementation of Policies, Regulations and Procedures Affecting Access to Library Materials, Services and Facilities.Users' access should not be restricted or denied for expressing or receiving constitutionally protected speech. If access is restricted or denied for behavioral or other reasons, users should be provided due process, including, but not limited to, formal notice and a means of appeal.Information retrieved or utilized electronically is constitutionally protected unless determined otherwise by a court of law with appropriate jurisdiction. These rights extend to minors as well as adults (Free Access to Libraries for Minors; Access to

34

Resources and Services in the School Library Media Program; Access for Children and Young Adults to Nonprint Materials).2 Libraries should use technology to enhance, not deny, access to information. Users have the right to be free of unreasonable limitations or conditions set by libraries, librarians, system administrators, vendors, network service providers, or others. Contracts, agreements, and licenses entered into by libraries on behalf of their users should not violate this right. Libraries should provide library users the training and assistance necessary to find, evaluate, and use information effectively.Users have both the right of confidentiality and the right of privacy. The library should uphold these rights by policy, procedure, and practice in accordance with Privacy: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights.

Equity of Access

The Internet provides expanding opportunities for everyone to participate in the information society, but too many individuals face serious barriers to access. Libraries play a critical role in bridging information access gaps for these individuals. Libraries also ensure that the public can find content of interest and learn the necessary skills to use information successfully.Electronic information, services, and networks provided directly or indirectly by the library should be equally, readily and equitably accessible to all library users. American Library Association policies oppose the charging of user fees for the provision of information services by libraries that receive their major support from public funds (50.3 Free Access to Information; 53.1.14 Economic Barriers to Information Access; 60.1.1 Minority Concerns Policy Objectives; 61.1 Library Services for the Poor Policy Objectives). All libraries should develop policies concerning access to electronic information that are consistent with ALA's policy statements, including Economic Barriers to Information Access: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights, Guidelines for the Development and Implementation of Policies, Regulations and Procedures Affecting Access to Library Materials, Services and Facilities, and Resolution on Access to the Use of Libraries and Information by Individuals with Physical or Mental Impairment.

35

Information Resources and Access

Providing connections to global information, services, and networks is not the same as selecting and purchasing materials for a library collection. Determining the accuracy or authenticity of electronic information may present special problems. Some information accessed electronically may not meet a library's selection or collection development policy. It is, therefore, left to each user to determine what is appropriate. Parents and legal guardians who are concerned about their children's use of electronic resources should provide guidance to their own children.Libraries, acting within their mission and objectives, must support access to information on all subjects that serve the needs or interests of each user, regardless of the user's age or the content of the material. In order to preserve the cultural record and to prevent the loss of information, libraries may need to expand their selection or collection development policies to ensure preservation, in appropriate formats, of information obtained electronically. Libraries have an obligation to provide access to government information available in electronic format.Libraries and librarians should not deny or limit access to electronic information because of its allegedly controversial content or because of the librarian's personal beliefs or fear of confrontation. Furthermore, libraries and librarians should not deny access to electronic information solely on the grounds that it is perceived to lack value.Publicly funded libraries have a legal obligation to provide access to constitutionally protected information. Federal, state, county, municipal, local, or library governing bodies sometimes require the use of Internet filters or other technological measures that block access to constitutionally protected information, contrary to the Library Bill of Rights (ALA Policy Manual, 53.1.17, Resolution on the Use of Filtering Software in Libraries). If a library uses a technological measure that blocks access to information, it should be set at the least restrictive level in order to minimize the blocking of constitutionally protected speech. Adults retain the right to access all constitutionally protected information and to ask for the technological measure to be disabled in a timely manner. Minors also retain the right to access constitutionally protected information and, at the minimum, have the right to ask the library or librarian to provide access to erroneously blocked information in a timely manner. Libraries and librarians have an obligation to inform users of these rights and to provide the means to exercise these rights.3

Electronic resources provide unprecedented opportunities to expand the scope of information available to users. Libraries and librarians should provide access to information presenting all points of view. The provision of access does not imply sponsorship or endorsement. These principles pertain to electronic resources no less than they do to the more traditional sources of information in libraries (Diversity in Collection Development).1 Martin v. Struthers , 319 U.S. 141 (1943); Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301 (1965); Susan Nevelow Mart, The Right to Receive Information (PDF), 95 Law Library Journal 2 (2003).2 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District , 393 U.S. 503 (1969); Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, (1982); American Amusement Machine Association v. Teri Kendrick, 244 F.3d 954 (7th Cir. 2001); cert.denied, 534 U.S. 994 (2001)3"If some libraries do not have the capacity to unblock specific Web sites or to disable the filter or if it is shown that an adult user's election to view constitutionally protected Internet material is burdened in some other substantial way, that would be the subject for an as-applied challenge, not the facial challenge made in this case." United States, et al. v. American Library Association (PDF), 539 U.S. 194 (2003) (Justice Kennedy, concurring).See Also: Questions and Answers on Access to Electronic Information, Services and Networks: an Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights.

36

Adopted January 24, 1996, by the ALA Council; amended January 19, 2005.[ISBN: 8389-7830-4]

37