12
Sudhir Srinivasa et al. Slide 1 doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17 N am e A ffiliations A ddress Phone em ail SudhirSrinivasa M arvell 5488 M arvellLane,Santa C lara C A , 95054 sudhirs@ marvell.com H ongyuan Zhang M arvell 5488 M arvellLane,Santa C lara C A , 95054 +1-408-222- 1837 hongyuan@ marvell.com Raja Banerjea M arvell 5488 M arvellLane,Santa C lara C A , 95054 +1-408-222- 3713 [email protected] Eldad Perahia Intel 2111 N E 25 th Ave,H illsboro O R 97124,U SA [email protected] R ichard van N ee Qualcom m Netherlands rvannee@ qualcomm .com V K Jones Qualcom m Santa Clara vkjones@ qualcom m.com N ing Zhang A theros 5480 G reatA m erica Pkw y Santa C lara,CA 95054 +1-408-773- 5363 [email protected] V inko Erceg Broadcom San D iego,CA verceg@ broadcom .com U ikun Kw on Sam sung uikun.kwon@ samsung.co m

Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Slide 1

80MHz Tone Allocation

Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Name Affiliations Address Phone email

Sudhir Srinivasa Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara CA, 95054

[email protected]

Hongyuan Zhang Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara CA, 95054

+1-408-222-1837

[email protected]

Raja Banerjea Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara CA, 95054

+1-408-222-3713

[email protected]

Eldad Perahia Intel 2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA

[email protected]

Richard van Nee Qualcomm Netherlands [email protected]

VK Jones Qualcomm Santa Clara [email protected]

Ning Zhang Atheros 5480 Great America Pkwy Santa Clara, CA 95054

+1-408-773-5363

[email protected]

Vinko Erceg Broadcom San Diego, CA [email protected]

Uikun Kwon Samsung [email protected]

Page 2: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 2

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Introduction

• Functional requirements as per the spec framework document [1]:• R3.1.A (Channelization): The draft specification shall include

support for 80 MHz PHY transmission.

• Possible preambles for 80MHz OFDM have been discussed in [2, 3].

• This presentation will focus on a possible data and pilot tone mapping for 80MHz VHT data.

Page 3: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 3

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Tone Allocation

• Legacy preamble portion (LLTF/LSIG) needs to be repeated across each of the 20MHz sub-bands– (6+5) guard tones in each 20MHz legacy portion, therefore (6+5) guard

tones in 80MHz.

– Spectrum mask and filter design will have to conform to (6+5) guard tones anyway

• Propose to use (6 + 5) guard tones, 3 DC tones in 80MHz

-128127122

2-2-122

121 Data/Pilot Tones 121 Data/Pilot Tones6 Guard Tones 5 Guard Tones3 DC Tones

Freq

Subcarrier Index

Page 4: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 4

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Location of pilot subcarriers

• The 802.11n spec mandates that – LSIG of 20MHz packets have pilots at {±7, ±21} and

• Repetition of the LSIG sequence across 80MHz – LSIG in an 80MHz 11ac packet will have pilots at location pairs

belonging to {±11, ±25, ±39, ±53, ±75, ±89, ±103, ±117}.

• Not desirable to change pilot positions between the legacy (11a/n) and VHT parts of the packet.– Some implementers may average pilots across and legacy

preamble (SIG fields) and VHT data.

• For simple receiver design, better to pick 80MHz pilots among these 16 tones.

Page 5: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 5

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Number of pilot subcarriers

• Simulations show that the performance gap between using 8 and 10 pilots is small. (See backup slides)

• Reducing the number of pilots to 6, however, results in a ~1dB loss in performance in some scenarios (See backup slides)

• We propose that 11ac packets use 8 pilots during 80MHz VHT-DATA portion.– Can be chosen such that they are maximally separated, with

indices {±103, ±75, ±39, ±11}

Page 6: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 6

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

References

1. IEEE802.11-09/0992r3, R. Stacey et al., Proposed Specification Framework for TGac

2. IEEE802.11-10/0070r1, H. Zhang et al., 802.11ac Preamble

3. IEEE802.11-10-0130r0, Y. Tu et. Al., Proposed TGac Preamble

Page 7: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 7

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Simulation Results 1

Page 8: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 8

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Simulation Results 2

Page 9: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 9

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Strawpolls

Page 10: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 10

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Strawpoll #1:

• Do you support to add to the specification frame work document (IEEE 802.11-09/0992r9) – 3.x Data Formats

• 3.x.2 OFDM Modulation:  The draft specification shall have 3 DC tones at (0, ±1) in 80MHz VHT data field.

– Yes

– No

– Abstain

Page 11: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 11

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Strawpoll #2:

• Do you support to add to the specification frame work document (IEEE 802.11-09/0992r9) – 3.x Data Formats

• 3.x.2 OFDM Modulation:  The draft specification shall have 5 null tones at the upper tone edges (tone indices 123, 124, 125, 126, 127) and 6 null tones at the lower tone edges (tone indices -128, -127, -126, -125, -124, -123) of the 80MHz VHT data.

– Yes– No– Abstain

Page 12: Doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1 Submission May 17, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 80MHz Tone Allocation Authors: Date: 2010-05-17

Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 12

doc.:IEEE 802.11-10/0370r1

Submission

May 17, 2010

Strawpoll #3:

• Do you support to add to the specification frame work document (IEEE 802.11-09/0992r9)– 3.x Data Formats

• 3.x.1 Pilot Subcarriers:  The draft specification shall have 8 pilot tones, with the positions {±103, ±75, ±39, ±11}, for 80MHz VHT data.

– Yes

– No

– Abstain