33
doc.: IEEE 802.15- 00/112r1 Submiss ion Slide 1 Tom Siep, Texas Instruments May 2000 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Add name of submission] Date Submitted: [10 May 2000] Source: [Carl Panasik, Tom Siep] Company [Texas Instruments] Address [12500 TI Blvd, m/s 8723, Dallas, TX 75243, USA] Voice:[214.480.6786], FAX: [972.761.5581], E-Mail:[[email protected]] Re: [Original document.] Abstract: [Presentation made to Wireless LAN Forum in London.] Purpose: [Update on possible technologies, awareness of presentation in London.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

Doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1 Submission May 2000 Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Slide 1 Tom Siep, Texas Instruments

May 2000Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Submission Title: [Add name of submission]Date Submitted: [10 May 2000]Source: [Carl Panasik, Tom Siep] Company [Texas Instruments]Address [12500 TI Blvd, m/s 8723, Dallas, TX 75243, USA]Voice:[214.480.6786], FAX: [972.761.5581], E-Mail:[[email protected]]

Re: [Original document.]

Abstract: [Presentation made to Wireless LAN Forum in London.]

Purpose: [Update on possible technologies, awareness of presentation in London.]

Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

The Universal Radio1st International Wireless LAN Forum

10 May 2000

Carl Panasik and Tom Siep

Texas Instruments Wireless Business Unitwww.ti.com

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Agenda

• The Ideal Solution

• The Real World

• Wireless Data Standards

• The Universal Radio

• Technology Roadmap

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Agenda

• The Ideal Solution

• The Real World

• Wireless Data Standards

• The Universal Radio

• Technology Roadmap

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Desirable Wireless Access Attributes

• Always On, Always Available• First Choice for Network Access• Seamless Integration

– from Personal– to Local – to Metro Networks

• Frequency Reuse Factor = 1– Increases the aggregate data rate that the

user experiences

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

The Ideal Information Companion

U M TS

G S MD E C T

B luetooth

802.11

ONE phone for many StandardsONE PDA for many StandardsONE WLAN for many StandardsONE Information Appliance

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Agenda

• The Ideal Solution

• The Real World

• Wireless Data Standards

• The Universal Radio

• Technology Roadmap

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Year 2002Implemented Wireless Data Standards

HiperLAN/1HiperLAN/1

3G Cellular

3G Access Point3G Access Point3G Future3G Future

Home RF / 802.11Home RF / 802.11

BluetoothBluetooth

2G Cellular2G Cellular0.2

2.0

0.5

5.0

10.0

Log

Use

r D

ata

Rat

e (M

bps)

1.0

Log Range (m)

0.1 1.0 10 100 1000

TDD

TDD

TDD

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

World-Wide Spectrum for IMT-2000

1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250

1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250

NorthAmerica

MSSPCS

Reserve

Europe UMTSGSM 1800 DECT MSS

1880 MHz 1980 MHz

JapanKorea (w/o PHS)

MSSIMT 2000PHS MSSIMT 2000

2160 MHz1895 MHz

1918 MHz1885 MHz

ITU Allocations

1885 MHz 2025 MHz

IMT 2000

2010 MHz

2110 MHz 2170 MHz

China MSSIMT 2000IMT 2000

IMT 2000

MSSUMTS

2170 MHz

MSS

1885 MHz 1980 MHz

AA D B E F C AA D B E F C

MDS

GSM 1800

1850 MHz WLL WLL

Courtesy : UMTS Forum, Report # 5: “Minimum spectrum demand per public terrestrial UMTS operator in the initial phase”, 8 September, 1998

90 MHz Duplex

210 MHz Duplex

US Allocation differs from ROWUS Allocation differs from ROW

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Agenda

• The Ideal Solution

• The Real World

• Wireless Data Standards

• The Universal Radio

• Technology Roadmap

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Wireless Data Standards Info Appliance

1800 MHz 2100 MHz 2400 MHz 5200 MHz

GSM1800 UMTS 802.11/BT HIPERLAN/1

UMTS 802.11/BTGSM1800 HIPERLAN/1

TX

EDGEUMTS

BT / 802.11

HIPERLAN/2

Channel BandwidthData Rate

RX

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

0.2

2.0

0.5

5.0

10.0

Log

Use

r D

ata

Rat

e (M

bps)

Log Range (m)

0.1 1.0 10 100 1000

1.0

HiperLAN/1HiperLAN/1

3G Cellular

3G Access Point3G Access Point 3G Future3G Future

Home RF / 802.11Home RF / 802.11

BluetoothBluetooth

2G Cellular2G Cellular

Wireless Data Modulation / Bandwidth

M-CODEM-CODE

CDMACDMA

FH SSFH SS

GMSK+ nxFSK / 10 MHzGMSK+ nxFSK / 10 MHz

QPSK / 5-MHzQPSK / 5-MHz

FSK / 1-MHzFSK / 1-MHz

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

W-LAN (MS) PHY LayerParameter GSM 2G Cell W-CDMA 3G Cell W-CTDMA 3G IEEE 802.11 WLAN Bluetooth HomeRF

Operating Frequency

890-915 MHz (RX) 935-960 MHz (TX)

2110 - 2170 (RX) 1920 - 1980 (TX)

2110 - 2170 (RX) 1920 - 1980 (TX)

2400 - 2483.5 MHz ISM

2400 - 2483.5 MHz ISM

2400 - 2483.5 MHz ISM

Spread Spectrum Method

TDMA/FDMA/FDD CDMA/FDD CDMA/TDD FHSS None or FHSS FHSS, TDMA or CSMA/CA

Data Rate 9.6 - 64 kbps 32 kbps -384 kbps 256 kbps -4 Mbps 1 Mbps 2 Mbps

0.7 Mbps 2 Mbps (future)

1 Mbps 2 Mbps

Modulation Method (Index)

GMSK (BT=0.3) QPSK data modulation on up and dow n; Spreading is QPSK on up and BPSK on dow n.

QPSK data modulation on up and dow n; Spreading is QPSK. SF = 2-16

2-FSK (0.32) 4-FSK (0.16, optional)

2-FSK (0.32) TBD (TBD)

2-FSK 4-FSK (required)

Hop Rate opt, 21.66 Hz (1/4.615 ms)

na na 2.5 Hz 0 / 1600 Hz (max) 50 Hz

Channel Switching Time

na 224 msec 220 msec 300 msec

Rx/Tx Turnaround Time

half duplex full duplex half duplex 19 msec 220 msec 25 microsec

Antenna Diversity na Optional Optional Optional Not Required

Tx RF Power <1W 1.6W (384 kbps), 0.8W (128 kbps)

0.2W (2 Mbps), 0.1W (0.5 Mbps)

<1W (US) 100 mW (Europe & Japan)

0.001 / 0.100 W 0.1 W (N. America)

Rx Sensitivity -110 dBm -80 dBm @ 1 Mbps -75 dBm @ 2 Mbps

-70 dBm @ 1 Mbps -76 dBm @ 1 Mbps

Tx Stability +/- 9 Hz +/- 2 kHz +/- 2 kHz +/- 60 kHz ?Tx Spectrum Shape

-30 dBc, 1st Adj Ch -60 dBc, 2nd Adj Ch

-40 dBc, 1st Adj Ch -60 dBc, 2nd Adj Ch

-40 dBc, 1st Adj Ch -60 dBc, 2nd Adj Ch

-40 dBc, 2nd Adj Ch -60 dBc, 3rd Adj Ch

?

Hop Seqnce, # Ch. random, <124 na na random, 80 random, 79 or 23 random, 79 or 23

Power Consumption Standby / Max

2 ma RX Avg 120 ma TX Avg

fd fd 0.3 - 30 ma @ 5 vDC

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

The building of the tower of Babel by Pieter Bruegel, 1563, Oil on oak panel, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Agenda

• The Ideal Solution

• The Real World

• Wireless Data Standards

• The Universal Radio

• Technology Roadmap

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Solving the “Tower of Babel”

Solution is the Universal Radio:

– What is Software Defined Radio?

– How do you Design a Multi-Mode

Information Receiver?

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

What is Software Defined Radio?

• Technology to createMulti-Mode radioMulti-Band radiofor mobile multimedia platforms

• Radios that areflexibleeasily configurable by software

• Radios based onvirtual components (ie. system-on-a-chip)

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

SDR Evolution

• Current Wireless Data: 802.11, Bluetooth– TDMA– Frequency Domain Channelization– Narrow Band, Time-Shared Medium

– Friendly Interference Suppressed Via IF Filters

with 50-60 dB Skirts

– Hardware-centric, Fixed Channel Characteristics

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

SDR Evolution• Next Generation: HIPERLAN/2, 3G Cellular

– OFDM, CDMA

– Code Domain Channelization

– Wide Band, Frequency-Shared Medium

– Friendly Interference Suppressed Via Orthogonal

Chipping Codes with ~30 dB Processing Gain

– Software-centric, Can Vary Channel Characteristics

with Application and Environment

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

SDR EvolutionHeterodyne Receiver

A -> D

Present DayRadios

A -> D

FutureRadio Proposal

A -> D

Proposed SoftwareRadio

RF Im age Filter

Low NoiseA m plifierRF B and Filter

RF LocalOsc illa tor

RF M ixer IF F ilter

IFA m plifier

IFA m plifier IF M ixer

IF LocalOsc illa tor

2nd IFFilter

2nd IFA m plifier

Dem odulator

In-P haseData

Quad-P haseData

<--- 1800 to 5200 MHz ---> <--- 40 to 200 MHz ---> <--- 10 to 100 MHz --->

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Wireless Data Standards Info Appliance

1800 MHz 2100 MHz 2400 MHz 5200 MHz

GSM1800 UMTS 802.11 HIPERLAN/1

UMTS 802.11GSM1800 HIPERLAN/1

TX

RX

EDGE UMTSBT

802.11

HIPERLAN/1

Channel BandwidthData Rate

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Heterodyne Receivers?RF Im age Filter

Low NoiseA m plifierRF B and Filter

RF LocalOsc illa tor

RF M ixer IF F ilte r

IFA m plifier

IFA m plifier IF M ixer

IF Loca lOsc illa tor

2nd IFFilter

2nd IFA m plifier

Dem odulator

In-P haseData

Quad-P haseData

GSM 1800GSM 1800

RF Im age Filter

Low NoiseA m plifierRF B and Filter

RF LocalOsc illa tor

RF M ixer IF F ilte r

IFA m plifier

IFA m plifier IF M ixer

IF Loca lOsc illa tor

2nd IFFilter

2nd IFA m plifier

Dem odulator

In-P haseData

Quad-P haseData

UMTSUMTS

RF Im age Filter

Low NoiseA m plifierRF B and Filter

RF LocalOsc illa tor

RF M ixer IF F ilte r

IFA m plifier

IFA m plifier IF M ixer

IF Loca lOsc illa tor

2nd IFFilter

2nd IFA m plifier

Dem odulator

In-P haseData

Quad-P haseData

Bluetooth 2400Bluetooth 2400

RF Im age Filter

Low NoiseA m plifierRF B and Filter

RF LocalOsc illa tor

RF M ixer IF F ilte r

IFA m plifier

IFA m plifier IF M ixer

IF Loca lOsc illa tor

2nd IFFilter

2nd IFA m plifier

Dem odulator

In-P haseData

Quad-P haseData

HiperLANHiperLAN

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Multi-Mode Info ReceiverConventional Heterodyne

GSM 1800

BT / 802.11

UMTS

GSM 1800

BT / 802.11 LO1

UMTS

Legend

BT / 802.11

2G Cellular

3G Cellular

Low-Pass0.200-MHz BW

LO2

10-MHz Low-Pass

10-MHz Low-Pass

10-MHz Low-Pass

FDD Mode 1

FD

D M

od

e 2

LO4

LO5

LO6

5.0-MHz BW

1.25-MHz Ch l

1.25-MHz Ch 2

1.25-MHz Ch 3

LO3

10-MHz Low-Pass

1.0-MHz BW Low-Pass

LO7

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Programmable Channel Filter

I

Q

Multi-Mode Info Receiver Software Defined Radio

LO

A/D Converter

GSM 1800

BT / 802.11

UMTS

GSM 1800

BT / 802.11

UMTS

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Agenda

• The Ideal Solution

• The Real World

• Wireless Data Standards

• The Universal Radio

• Technology Roadmap

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

The Technology Race

Voltage range limited from KTB

to nearly the battery voltage

1.1-volt designs are several orders of magnitude above KTB*

Analog Digital

KTB = Thermal noise floor = Boltzman’s Constant * Temp (K) * Bandwidth

+10 dBm

- 80 dBm

- 20 dBm

0 dBm

- 60 dBm

- 100 dBm

- 120 dBm

- 40 dBm ** A

lready at Limit **

** Already at Limit **

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Technology RoadmapTo Developing the Universal Radio

• Move the Problem to the Digital Domain– Today’s GSM Phone uses 100 MIPs

– The GSM channel implemented in the digital domain requires over 500 MIPs without decimation techniques

– With appropriate pre-filtering, GSM channel filter can be only 5 MIPs… Not Applicable !

• No Talk-Time Degradation

• Battery Capacity Improved Barely 10% in 40 years!

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 30

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Battery ProgressSecondary Cells

0

2040

60

80

100120

140

160

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

First Commercial Use

Energy Density(Wh/kg)

Trend Line

N iC d SLA N iM H Li-Ion R eusableA lkaline

Li-Polymer

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 31

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Technology RoadmapTo Developing the Universal Radio

• Move the problem to the digital domain– Today’s GSM Phone uses 100 MIPs.

– The GSM channel implemented in the digital domain requires over 500 MIPs

• No Talk-Time Degradation

• Battery Capacity Improved 4x in past 10 years

• Multi-Band Software Radio Will Require an Order of Magnitude Increase in DSP Performance

But we have Moore’s Law on our side!

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 32

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Moore’s Law

The data used to construct this graph have been adapted from the Microprocessor Report 9(6),

May 1995 (as reported to me by Mark Seager). and the ChipList, by Aad Offerman.

In tel CPUs10000

1000

100000

100

10

1

Thou

sand

s of

Tra

nsis

tors

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000Year

4004

8086

80286

80386

80486 P5(Pentium)

P6(Pentium Pro)

P7(Merced)

Doubling time of fitted line is 2.0 years.

2.5 years.

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 33

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

TI Low-Power DSP RoadmapMIPs increase of 5X by 2001

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

600%

3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00 4Q00 1Q01

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 34

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission

Conclusion• Anywhere Anytime Information

• Many Standards, Many Wireless Sources

• Multi-Band RF is the Next Challenge

• Multi-Mode Receivers Enabled by DSPs

• DSP MIPs are Ever Increasing

May 2000

Tom Siep, Texas InstrumentsSlide 35

doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/112r1

Submission