20
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 Submission Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell) Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Yakun Sun Marvell Semiconductor 5488 Marvell Ln, Santa Clara, CA 95054 1-408-222- 3847 yakunsun@marvell .com

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1

PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference

Date: 2014-09-15

Authors:

Name Affiliations Address Phone email

Yakun Sun Marvell Semiconductor5488 Marvell Ln, Santa Clara, CA 95054

1-408-222-3847 [email protected]

Page 2: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Introduction

• Basic procedure of PHY abstraction has been accepted in evaluation methodology document [1] in the July meeting.

• The open issue is how to handle the interference varying across the transmission duration of a packet.– This happens due to asynchronous transmission of interfering

packets in OBSS.

• Here we studied this open problem and propose a block-wise PER prediction solution.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 2

Page 3: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Recap of PHY Abstraction Procedure in [1]

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 3

1. Generate (both desired and interfering) channels. 2. Calculate the equalizer-output SINR per spatial stream for the n-th tone/t-th OFDM symbol,

SINR(iss,n,t), iss=1…Nss, n=1…N, t=T0…T0+T. a. Equalizer is MRC if Nss=1, or MMSE if Nss>1. b. Definition of T0 and T are TBD.

3. Map N×T×Nss SINRs to 1 RBIR.

0

01 1

1, ;

ss

ss

N T T N

i t T nss

RBIR SINR n t MN T N

4. Reverse map 1 RBIR to 1 effective SNR.

1 ;effSNR RBIR M

5. Estimate PER for based on AWGN PER lookup table.

0

0

0

/

_ ; ,coding scheme, reference packet length

1 1

PL eff

PL PL

PL

PER PER LUT SNR MCS

PER PER

a. In case of BCC, PL0 = 32bytes if PL< 400bytes; or 1458bytes otherwise. b. In case of LDPC, PL0 = 1458bytes.

6. Determine if this PPDU is successfully received.

transmission success0,1

transmission fail

PERUniform

PER

Page 4: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Discussions

• Thorough studies on the basic procedure show good PER prediction.– PHY abstraction works well for frequency selective interference.

• However, the studies focuses on under the assumption of time-constant interference the interferers over the whole packet.– In such a case, the effective SNR based on one SINR vector over one

OFDM symbol is the same as that based on SINR vectors over the packet.

– (T0=1, T=0) = (T0=1, T=packet_len-1) in STEP2-3

• This is not the case if the interferers change over the packet.– How to select T0/T for time-selective interference?

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 4

Page 5: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Time Varying Interference

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 5

Frame

•In

terf

eren

ce L

evel

• Time• (unit: OFDM • symbols)

• L1• LN

• L2

• Interference Event N• Interference Event 1

• L

• T1=1 • T2• T3

• TN

Page 6: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Potential Solutions

• Whole packet average– T0=1, T=L-1

– May discount strong interference given a short interleaver for BCC.

• Weakest link– T0=argmin_t SINR(t), T=0

– May overestimate strong (but short) interference

• Block-wise PHY abstraction– Balance between the two method above.– For each event n, T0=Tn, T=0 PERn, n=1…N

– Final PER prediction:

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 6

1

1 1iN L

Li

i

PER PER

Page 7: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Case 1: 5dB Interference Rise x2

• 20MHz, 1x1, D_NLOS, ideal CE, 8000 bits packet• MCS 0/2/4/7/9• Interference rises 5dB every 1/3 of packet.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 7

Frame

Inte

rfer

ence

Lev

el

time

5dB

L/3 L/3

5dB

L/3

SNR

Page 8: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Predict: Whole Packet Avg

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 8

• Clearly discounted strong interference too much and underestimate PER

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, BCC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, pkt avg

Page 9: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Predict: Weakest Link

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 9

• Use the last interference level for PHY abstraction• Overweight strong interference and overestimate PER (but closer than whole

packet average)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, BCC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, weakest link

Page 10: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Prediction: Block-Wise

• Very accurately predicted PER performance for time-varying interference.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 10

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR of event 1 (dB)

PE

R

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, BCC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, block wise

Page 11: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Prediction: LDPC

• Weakest link and block-wise PHY abstraction provides close and accurate PER prediction.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 11

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR of event 1 (dB)

PE

R

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, LDPC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, block-wisePredicted PER, weakest link

Page 12: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Case 2: 10dB Rise

• 20MHz, 1x1, D_NLOS, ideal CE, 8000 bits packet• MCS 0/2/4/7/9• Interference rises 10dB for the last ¼ of the packet.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 12

Frame

Inte

rfer

ence

Lev

el

time

10dB

3L/4 L/4

Page 13: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Prediction: BCC

• Block-wise PHY abstraction still work well, while weakest link still overestimate PER.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 13

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR of event 1 (dB)

PE

R

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, BCC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, block-wise

Predicted PER, weakest link

Page 14: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Prediction: LDPC

• Again, weakest link ≈ block-wise ≈ true PER

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 14

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR of event 1 (dB)

PE

R

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, LDPC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, block-wise

Predicted PER, weakest link

Page 15: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Case 3: Short 15dB Rise

• 20MHz, 1x1, D_NLOS, ideal CE, 8000 bits packet• MCS 0/2/4/6/9• Interference rises 15dB for the last 6 OFDM symbols

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 15

Frame

Inte

rfer

ence

Lev

el

time

15dB

3L/4 6

Page 16: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

PER Prediction: BCC

• Same conclusion even for such a short interference pulse.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 16

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 6010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

SNR of event 1 (dB)

PE

R

20MHz, MCS0/2/4/7/9, BCC

Simulated PER

Predicted PER, block-wise

Predicted PER, weakest link

Page 17: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Discussions on Block-Wise PHY Abstraction

• It provides much better PER prediction than other methods.

• The additional complexity is minimal.– Post-equalization SINR calculation is anyway required for each

interference event, for all methods.– Effective SNR mapping and PER lookup for each event is trivial.

• If interferences are assumed to change significantly, block-wise can be related to weakest-link by:

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 17

1

1

1 1 1 min 1i iN L L

L Li ii N

i

PER PER PER

Page 18: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Conclusion

• Propose to update the basic PHY abstraction to block-wise PHY abstraction.

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 18

Page 19: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Proposed Text Change in [1]

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 19

Assume N interference events happen during the transmission, each starts from Tn and lasts Ln OFDM symbols.

For each interference event over [Tn, Tn+1), n=1…N:

1. Generate (both desired and interfering) channels. 2. Calculate the equalizer-output SINR per spatial stream for the n-th tone/t-th OFDM symbol,

SINR(iss,n,t), iss=1…Nss, n=1…N, t=Tn,T=0. a. Equalizer is MRC if Nss=1, or MMSE if Nss>1. b. Definition of T0 and T are TBD.

3. Map N×T×Nss SINRs to 1 RBIR.

0

01 1

1, ;

ss

ss

N T T N

i t T nss

RBIR SINR n t MN T N

4. Reverse map 1 RBIR to 1 effective SNR.

1 ;effSNR RBIR M

5. Estimate PER for based on AWGN PER lookup table.

0

_ ; ,coding scheme, reference packet lengthPL effPER n PER LUT SNR MCS

a. In case of BCC, PL0 = 32bytes if PL< 400bytes; or 1458bytes otherwise. b. In case of LDPC, PL0 = 1458bytes.

After iterated over all events,

6. Calculate the final PER

0 0

0

/

1

/

1 1

1 1

nN L L

PL PLn

PL PL

PL

PER PER n

PER PER

7. Determine if this PPDU is successfully received.

transmission success0,1

transmission fail

PERUniform

PER

Page 20: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0 SubmissionYakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 1 PHY Abstraction with Time Varying Interference Date: 2014-09-15 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneemail

doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1174r0

Submission

Reference

• [1] 11-14-0571-03-00ax-evaluation-methodology

Yakun Sun, et. al. (Marvell)Slide 20