10
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors: N am e A ffiliations A ddress Phone em ail ZhanjiW u Beijing U niversity of Postand Telecom m unicat ion (BU PT) X itucheng Road 10, Haidian district, Beijing, China +86 13126589948 [email protected] Bin W u China A cadem y Microelectronics Institute +86 10 82995715 wubin@ ime.ac.cn Zhendong Luo China A cadem y of Telecom m unicat ion Research (CA TR) No.52 Hua Y uan BeiRd., Beijing, China +86 10 62300171 [email protected] Y unzhou Li Tsinghua U niversity Tsinghua Rd. Beijng, China +86 10 62773363 [email protected]

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1

Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS

Date: 2012-05-06Authors:

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Zhanji Wu Beijing

University of Post and Telecommunication (BUPT)

Xitucheng Road 10, Haidian district, Beijing, China

+86 13126589948

[email protected]

Bin Wu China Academy Microelectronics Institute

+86 10 82995715

[email protected]

Zhendong Luo China Academy of Telecommunication Research (CATR)

No.52 Hua Yuan Bei Rd., Beijing, China

+86 10 62300171 [email protected]

Yunzhou Li Tsinghua University

Tsinghua Rd. Beijng, China

+86 10 62773363 [email protected]

Page 2: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 2

Abstract

• We propose an efficient ¼-rate compatible binary convolutional code (BCC) for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS on the 1 MHz mode.

• It is compatible with the original half-rate BCC, and just introduces small complexity overhead.

• It is much better than the new MCS0- 2x Repetition mode, and then SNR gain is up to 0.85 dB at PER=0.1 .

.

Page 3: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

Overview• According to the document 1294r0[1], the group adopted the

following:– An 802.11ah STA shall support reception of 1 MHz and 2 MHz PHY transmissions.

• Subsequently, the document 1482r0[2] proposed that an MCS0-Rep2 mode in 1MHz is needed for good coverage.

• The document 1484r0[3] proposed the 11ah data transmission flow, both for regular MCS and for a new MCS0 2x Repetition mode .

• An improved ¼-rate BCC of the data transmission flow for 1 MHz mode is proposed, and obtains much better performance than the MCS0-2x Repetition mode with only small complexity overhead.

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 3

Page 4: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

MCS0 ¼-rate BCC Mode in 1MHz• We propose a ¼-rate BCC mode that just imposes minimal

Tx and Rx design change from regular MCSs.– The first two generator polynomials of the compatible ¼-rate BCC shall

use the original generator polynomials g0=1338 , g1=1718,

– The other two new generator polynomials are g2=1178 , g3=1658.

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 4

¼ -rate compatible Convolutional encoder

Input DataTb Tb Tb Tb TbTb

++

++

Output Data BOriginal g1

Output Data AOriginal g0

Output Data CNew g2

Output Data D

New g3

Page 5: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

MCS0 ¼-rate BCC Tx Flow

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 5

Scra

mb

ler

InterleaverBPSK

mapper

Sp

atia

l Map

pin

g

New ¼ rate BCC

FE

C

IFFT

::

IFFT

GI & Window

Analog & RF

GI & Window

Analog & RF

Interleaver parameters are the same as regular MCS0

Ncol = 8

Page 6: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

Performance in AWGN

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 6

• ¼-rate BCC obtains 0.7 dB SNR gain at PER=0.1 compared with Rep2x.

New ¼-rate BCC Parameters Value

Information bits 516

Code Rate 1/4

Modulation Type BPSK

Bandwidth 1.0 MHz

Number of OFDM 86

FFT 32number of data

subcarriers 24

Subcarrier Bandwidth 31.25 kHz

Page 7: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

Performance in SCM-UMa

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 7

• New ¼-rate BCC obtains 0.85 dB and 1.2 dB SNR gain at PER=0.1 compared with MRC and EGC Rep2x schemes, respectively.

New ¼-rate BCC Parameters Value

Information bits 516

Code Rate 1/4

Modulation Type BPSK

Bandwidth 1.0 MHz

Number of OFDM 86

FFT 32number of data

subcarriers 24

Subcarrier Bandwidth 31.25 kHz

Page 8: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 8

• BCC Viterbi decoder complexity depends mainly on the state number.– ¼ -rate BCC has the same state number 64 and Trellis diagram as the ½-rate

BCC, and the only difference lies in the branch probability computation.

• Number of additions and multiplications in different schemes.(assumptions: l information bits+Viterbi decoding)– For EGC Rep2x, 134*l additions– For MRC Rep2x,134*l additions and 4*l multiplications– For ¼-rate BCC, 176*l additions

Conclusion: The new complexity is almost the same as the MRC Rep2x

Complexity Discussions

Page 9: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 9

Conclusions

• An improved ¼-rate BCC data transmission flow for 1 MHz mode is proposed.

• It obtains much better performance than the MCS0-2x Repetition mode, which is up to 0.85 dB SNR gain at PER=0.1

• It is compatible with the original half-rate BCC, and just introduces small complexity overhead.

• It is suitable for the case where the transmit power is strictly restricted.

Page 10: Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE 802.11ah lowest MCS Date: 2012-05-06 Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/663r3

Submission

May 2012

Zhanji Wu, et. Al.

Slide 10

References

• [1] 11-11-1294-00-00ah-spec-framework-text-of-11ah- bw-modes

• [2] 11-11-1482-00-00ah-preamble-format-for-1-MHz• [3] 11-11-1484-00-00ah-11ah-phy-transmission-flow