Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

September 2009

Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1

Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data

Date: 2009-09-21

Authors:Name Affiliations Address Phone email

Alexander Maltsev Intel Corporation Turgeneva str., 30, Nizhny Novgorod, 603024, Russia

+78314969461 [email protected]

Roman Maslennikov

University of Nizhny Novgorod

Gagarin ave., 23, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia


Artyom Lomayev Intel Corporation Turgeneva str., 30, Nizhny Novgorod, 603024, Russia


Alexey Sevastyanov

Intel Corporation Turgeneva str., 30, Nizhny Novgorod, 603024, Russia


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

September 2009


Abstract

• This contribution presents results of experimental verification of the polarization impact model proposed in [1] - [3]. Using measurements results presented in [4], it is demonstrated that the proposed polarization impact model is well matched to actual experimental data obtained in a conference room environment.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

September 2009


Introduction

• Accurate modeling of polarization characteristics is important for 60 GHz wireless systems where impact due to polarization mismatch can be very strong for both LOS and NLOS environments.

• Experimental data for the polarization impact was presented in [4] demonstrating that mismatch of polarization characteristics of the transmit and receive antennas can result in large degradations of the received signal power by 10-20 dB.

• The model for the polarization impact was proposed in [1] - [3].

• This contribution presents results of verification of the polarization model [1] - [3] with the experimental results from [4].

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Polarization Impact Model (1 of 3)

• Polarization impact model proposed in [1] takes into account polarization properties of antennas on both TX and RX parts and also polarization properties of propagation channel [2], [3].

• Antennas polarizations are described using Jones vector e, composed of two orthogonal components of the normalized electrical field vector E.

• Examples of antennas polarization description using the Jones vector are shown in the table below (for more details see [1], [2]).

Antenna polarization type Corresponding Jones vector

Vertical linear polarized (VLP)

Horizontal linear polarized (HLP)

Left hand circular polarized (LHCP)

Right hand circular polarized (RHCP)

0

1

1

0

j

1

21

j

1

21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Polarization Impact Model (2 of 3)• Polarization characteristics of each cluster of the propagation channel are

described by channel polarization matrix H. Polarization impact was modeled at the cluster level with all rays inside one cluster having the same polarization properties.

• For the LOS signal path, matrix H is close to the identity matrix (non-diagonal components responsible for depolarization may be non-zero but significantly smaller than diagonal elements).

• For NLOS clusters, the channel matrix H accounts for the reflection loss coefficients of the perpendicular and parallel components of the E vector and also two depolarization mechanisms (coupling between perpendicular and parallel polarization vector components due to reflection and due to geometrical depolarization).

• For NLOS first and second order reflected clusters statistical models were developed and corresponding distributions were obtained in [1], [2].

• Note that matrix H does not include the propagation loss along the corresponding signal path.

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Polarization Impact Model (3 of 3)

• For a fixed configuration of the polarizations for both TX and RX antennas (eTX, eRX) the matrix distribution of H is reduced to the distribution of complex scalar reflection coefficient R:

• The proposed verification procedure is based on the comparison experimentally measured samples of R and the distributions of R obtained from numerical simulations of the polarization impact model.

TXHRXR Hee

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Verification Procedure

• The verification was done in two ways:

– Direct comparison of the experimental points for R with the simulated distributions

– Application of the statistical hypotheses test – null hypotheses is considered that the mean evaluated for the sample of the experimental values of R is the same as for the parameter of the simulated distribution. Two-tailed test of the hypothesis is applied and it is assumed that the variance is known.

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Measurement Scenario• Verification procedure for the polarization impact model is applied for the

conference room (CR) environment scenario and the STA-STA sub-scenario. In this sub-scenario, the transmitter and receiver are placed on the table [2] in the middle of the conference room.

• The 60 GHz prototype [5] was used for performing experimental measurements of the polarization impact. Four different types of antenna polarizations could be set – HLP, VLP, LHCP, and RHCP on both TX and RX sides.

• Three different positions of the prototype in the conference room were tested. An example of the prototype position is shown in the next slide.

• The polarization impact was investigated for six different signal propagation paths in each position of the prototype. These are a LOS path and five reflected signal propagation paths: one first order reflection from ceiling, two first order reflections from walls, and two second order reflections from walls. (Note that other clusters exist for the used positions, but measurements were performed for the mentioned clusters only.)

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Conference Room Floor Plan and Example of Prototype Position

4.5 m

3.0 mm

door

RX

TX

window

AB

C

E

D

RXTX

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Calculation of Reflection Loss Using Measurements Data

• Measurements of the received baseband SNR characteristics were used in the experiments.

• Reflection loss coefficient RdB for each cluster can be evaluated from the experimental SNR data in accordance with the following equation:

• where SNRLOS is the received SNR for the LOS path and co-polarized antennas (HLP-HLP or LHCP-LHCP), SNRcluster is the received SNR for given cluster, PLLOS is the path loss for the LOS path, and PLcluster is the path loss for given cluster. All variables in the above equation are expressed in the decibel scale.

• Since spatial positions of TX and RX are known, the distances along the signal propagation paths can be evaluated. Estimated distances are substituted into the Friis equation to evaluate path loss values PLLOS and PLcluster.

September 2009


equationFriisfromevaluated

clusterLOS

datameasuredfromevaluated

LOSclusterdB PLPLSNRSNRR

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the First Order Clusters Reflected from

Ceiling

HLP-HLP LHCP-LHCP

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Reflection loss value, dB

STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Ceiling: HLP-HLP

Model distribution

Experimental points

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 00

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Ceiling: LHCP-LHCP

Model distribution

Experimental points

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission


Ceiling (Cont’d)

LHCP-RHCP LHCP-HLP

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

50

100

150

200

250

300

350


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Ceiling: LHCP-RHCP

Model distribution

Experimental points

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

50

100

150

200

250

300


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Ceiling: LHCP-HLP

Model distribution

Experimental points

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission


WallsHLP-HLP LHCP-LHCP

Polarization pair Null hypotheses for mean for significance level 5%

HLP-HLP accepted

LHCP-LHCP accepted

-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 100

500

1000

1500


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Walls: HLP-HLP

Model distribution

Experimental points

-120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 200

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Walls: LHCP-LHCP

Model distribution

Experimental points

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission


Walls (Cont’d)LHCP-RHCP LHCP-HLP


LHCP-RHCP accepted

LHCP-HLP accepted

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Walls: LHCP-RHCP

Model distribution

Experimental points

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400


STA-STA Sub-scenario, First Order Reflections From Walls: LHCP-HLP

Model distribution

Experimental points

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the Second Order Clusters Reflected

from WallsHLP-HLP LHCP-LHCP


HLP-HLP accepted

LHCP-LHCP accepted

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 100

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000


STA-STA Sub-scenario, Second Order Reflections From Walls: HLP-HLP

Model distribution

Experimental points

-80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 100

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000


STA-STA Sub-scenario, Second Order Reflections From Walls: LHCP-LHCP

Model distribution

Experimental points

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Comparison of Experimental Points with Simulated Distributions for the Second Order Clusters Reflected

from Walls (Cont’d)LHCP-RHCP LHCP-HLP


LHCP-RHCP accepted

LHCP-HLP accepted

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 100

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500


STA-STA Sub-scenario, Second Order Reflections From Walls: LHCP-RHCP

Model distribution

Experimental points

-45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 50

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500


STA-STA Sub-scenario, Second Order Reflections From Walls: LHCP-HLP

Model distribution

Experimental points

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

Conclusion

• The proposed polarization model for the CR environment was verified by direct comparison of the experimental results and the simulated distributions as well as by application of the statistical hypotheses tests.

• It was shown that the proposed polarization impact model is well matched to the experimental data and can be used in channel models for the 60 GHz WLAN systems.

September 2009


doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0

Submission

September 2009


References

1. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0431r0. Polarization model for 60 GHz, A. Maltsev et al, April 2, 2009.

2. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0334r3. Channel models for 60 GHz WLAN systems, A. Maltsev et al, July, 2009.

3. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0860r0. Update on “Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems” document, A. Maltsev et al, July, 2009.

4. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/0552r0. Experimental investigation of polarization impact on 60 GHz WLAN systems, A. Maltsev et al, May 11, 2009.

5. IEEE doc. 802.11-09/1044r0. 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations, A. Maltsev et al, Sept. 8, 2008.

Documents

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date: