View
1.012
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Jane Burke on library management systems.
Citation preview
Do You Need a New System? Why?Jane Burke | Senior Vice President | ProQuest
Two independent research studies85 academic libraries in North America60 academic libraries worldwide
Satisfaction with the LMS… such as it isSystems in place are old
Premise-deployed islandsWorkflows designed for print
Pain of changing is great
Are we ready?
Nature of the collection has changed50% collections electronic60+% materials budget
Today’s Reality
Managing today’s
collection with yesterday’s tools
60% expect to replace their LMS in the next 4 yearsReasons very common across respondents
Lack of interoperability with other systemsRedundant, inefficient workflowsAssessment capability and reporting that is either overly complex or non-existentAntiquated IT service and support modelDifficult in managing and maintaining metadata and the knowledgebases
We are ready !
Lack of Interoperability
LMSVendors
PDA
Campus
systems
Consortia
Discovery
Divided operationsPrint vs. electronicSelectors vs. acquisitionsCataloging into multiple systems
Manual workflowsLittle, if any, automation of routinesMany batch operations
Redundant, Inefficient Workflows
Proving the value of the library is more difficult than
ever!Reporting on collection ROI is extremely laborious
Not aided by current LMS
Libraries have old solutions (or none) to aid in assessing ROI
Spreadsheets!Old solutions specialize in format and do not provide a collection-wide solution
Assessment: Little to None
Locally installed hardwareLocally installed software – releases are hardIT costs
OperationsHardware upgrades
Antiquated IT model
It’s not “in the cloud”
Managing Metadata
60 libraries surveyed worldwide100% are trying to increase copy cataloging & use multiple sources for copy cataloging 79% are running a digitization project84% of libraries report authority control (very few can afford to keep it up to date)
Everybody is doing similar work
Redundancy across libraries
Library 1
• Monographs
• Serials• Authoriti
es• Licensing• Vendors
Library 2
• Monographs
• Serials• Authoriti
es• Licensing• Vendors
>>> Library n
• Monographs
• Serials• Authoriti
es• Licensing• Vendors
Authority control x 10,000 libraries= huge duplication of effort
Working with multiple vendors is challenging
Inconsistent qualityFormat variationsKeeping current with all sources
Updating the LMS, ERMS, linker and discovery tool is tedious and time-consumingManual entry of licensing dataNo time for authority updates & maintenance
Redundancy within the library
Fixes Total hoursMinutes/
fixExp needed
Title Split/title change/marc lookup 33.75 15 LibrarianCoverage Gaps 0.25 5 ParaprofessionalDate correction 9.75 5 ParaprofessionalISSN Correction 5.00 10 LibrarianDeletion 4.42 5 Student workerTitle cleanup 3.58 5 ParaprofessionalDifferent Type (deletion) 4.83 10 ParaprofessionalTitle added 3.00 10 Student workerURL correction 4.67 5 Student workerUpdate Time – Data collection and load
11.75 Paraprofessional
Totals HoursTotal hours of librarian work 38.75Total hours of paraprofessional 30.17Total hours of student work 12.08
Total hours / month
81
Total hours / year
972
E-Content changes
3 databases: LMS catalog, link resolver, ERMS
Top 10 databases x 3 knowledgebases80 hours per DB x 3 KB
And you need to update multiple knowledgebases…
= 240 hours per month
The medium-sized library spends 28 hours/week* on authority control
Loading weekly filesSending new record batches to vendorManual record creation
Then you spend time on authority control…
*Source: OUTSOURCING AUTHORITY WORK | 1998 by Amy Job http://frontpage.montclair.edu/salcc_nj/outsourcing_authority_work.html
= 1400 hours per year
Average is 1.5 records per hour*20 books/day100 books per week/1.5
Don’t forgetcopy cataloging…
*Source:Library Philosophy and Practice 2007LPP Special Issue on Libraries and GoogleISSN 1522-0222 A Rough Measure of Copy Cataloging Productivity in the Academic LibraryJohn Buschman Professor-Librarian and Chair F. William ChickeringDean of University Libraries Rider University Library2083 Lawrenceville Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
= 66 hours per week= 264 hours per month= 396 days each year
How much time is metadata management costing you?
Content Type Time
E-Content Changes 2880 hrs/year
Copy Cataloging 3168 hrs/year
Authority Control 1456 hrs/year
Total 7504 hrs/year
= 938 days per year!
Imagine!
What else could you be doing with all this time?
By automatically pulling from a single source shared data for:
Electronic packages, serials & e-booksBibliographic recordsAuthority recordsVendor recordsLicensing data… and anything else
Metadata: Imagine if you could share…
Same application to manage all collections
Web-basedEasy to trainStaffing flexibilityUnify technical services
Automate workflowsThrough details profilesDecision support engine
Workflows: Imagine Unified, Intelligent
Buy vs Borrow ruleIf requested item not owned by library andPublication date > (current year minus 5) andCost < $150 and Format = (allowed formats) andavailable from preferred vendor Then place order with vendor andNotify selector and patronElse borrow and notify ILL and patron
Data + Actions + Rules = Intelligent
Buy vs Borrow Workflow - Future
ILL Staff search ILS
Patron request
Owned?
Notify Patron (ILLiad)Borrow
YBP ebook?
Amazon book?
Meets Buy criteria?
YBP Purchase Process
Amazon Purchase Process
Receive ebook link and send
to ILL
Catalog Book and send to
ILLYes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
YesSystem receives
request and assesses buy
vs borrow
System acquires material,
mediated or unmediated
workflow
System adds to catalog;
interoperates with vendor
and ILL to fulfill patron
request
Benefits
Seamless & automatic copy cataloging without the headache of vendor data issuesLicensing data that just appearsVendor details that update automaticallyAuthority data that’s always current with almost no effortPackages that update themselvesYou save 1000’s of hours per month
New Systems = New Value Proposition
Unified, intelligent workflows
Knowledgebase
Interoperable
Assessment
Serials Solutions Intota™
Selection Acquisitions
Management
Discovery
Fulfillment
Inventory Managem
ent• User input• Selection
lists• PDA• Selection
tools• BIP• Ulrich’s• ILL• Others
• Fund accounting
• Electronic ordering
• Auto invoice building
• Auto copy cataloging
• AP updates
• PDA updates
• Marketing
• Cataloging
• Authority control
• Patron integration
• Reporting • Assessme
nt
• Summon • Circulation
• ILL• Electronic
delivery• Booking
• Assessment
• Preservation
• De-Acquisition
l Packagesl Monographs/
Serialsl Authorities
l Licensingl Vendor
information
Serials Solutions Knowledgebase
History of providing innovative solutions and delivery industry firsts:
A to Z listE-Resource knowledgebaseMARC record updating service for serialsResults clusteringWeb-scale discovery
We understand e-resourcesWe deliver what we promiseUnmatched customer service
Built and delivered by Serials Solutions and ProQuest