Upload
maia
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Do the Splits: Can Patients Divide the Daily Workout?. Taryn Smith, PAS-3 Faculty Mentor: Daniel O’Donoghue, PA-C, PhD OU Health Science Center Oklahoma City, OK. Why Address Exercise?. Pts resistant to providers’ advice on matter Too little time Feel inadequate or fear injury - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Do the Splits:Can Patients Divide the Daily Workout?
Taryn Smith, PAS-3Faculty Mentor: Daniel O’Donoghue, PA-C, PhD
OU Health Science CenterOklahoma City, OK
Why Address Exercise?Pts resistant to providers’ advice on
matterToo little timeFeel inadequate or fear injuryVague idea of benefitsLack of motivation
What kills Americans?
Heart Disease33%
Cancer31%
Chronic Lower Respiratory
Disease7%
CVA7%
Accidents6%
Alzheimer's 4%Diabetes
4%
Flu/Pneumonia
3%Kidney Dz
3%Suicide
2%
What kills Americans?
Heart Disease33%
Cancer31%
Chronic Lower Respiratory
Disease7%
CVA7%
Accidental in-jury6%
Alzheimer's 4%
Diabetes4%
Flu/Pneumonia
3%Kidney Dz
3%Suicide
2%
Why Exercise?Improved moodRestful sleepGreater strengthPreserved learning/JudgmentLonger lifePhysical appearance
WeightBlood pressureStress & DepressionRates of CVD, malignancy, CVA, DMFall risk/hip fractures
Clinical QuestionIn adults with no history of coronary artery disease (CAD), is a summative 30 minutes of daily aerobic activity as effective at minimizing risk factors for CAD as a consecutive 30 minutes of daily aerobic activity?
Objectives•Consider why patients may desire an
alternative to “traditional” exercise•Define what constitutes a short-bout
workout•Evaluate the tangible benefits linked to
short-bout workouts•Examine the validity of the findings•Consider literature limitations and
avenues of future research
The Recommendation
2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
≥ 150 minutes/weekModerate intensity
•Anything less than the traditional 30+ minutes▫10, 15, 20, 30 minutes
Define Short-Bout Exercise
The Studies
Jakicic et al, 1995• N = 48• Obese women• 25 to 50 yoaSubjects• Any type of exercise; monitored by TriTrac
accelerometers• Increasing workout duration: 203040 min• 5 days/wk x 20 weeks• SB: 10 min intervals• LB: all at once
Specifics• SB> LB exercise adherence• SB = LB weight loss• SB = LB VO2max improvements• SB: 10 min + 5 min (p = 0.08)
Results
Murphy & Hardman, 1998• N = 34• Sedentary women• 36-53 yoaSubjects• “Brisk walking”• 30 min x 5 days/wk x 10 weeks• SB: 10 min intervals x 3• LB: all at once• Controls
Specifics• SB vs. Controls
• Weight loss• Waist circumference
• SB & LB vs. Controls• Improved VO2max
Results
Jakicic et al, 1999• N = 115• Overweight women• 25 to 45 yoaSubjects• Brisk walking or similar• Increasing workout duration: 203040 min• 5 days/wk x 18 months• SB• SB + home treadmills• LB
Specifics• SB(+) > SB: weight loss• SB (+) = LB: weight loss• All groups: decreased body fat• All groups: improved VO2max
Results
Schmidt et al, 2001• N = 26• Overweight/obese, sedentary
women• College students, 17-23 yoa
Subjects• Stationary cycling• Increasing from 3 5 d/wk x 12 weeks• SB – 10 min intervals x 3• SB – 15 min intervals x 2• LB – 30 min intervals• Controls
Specifics• All exercising groups:
• Weight loss, WC, BMI, skinfold thickness
• Improved VO2max
Results
The Payoff: SB vs. LB Increased workout
adherence
Equivalent weight loss
Similar VO2max increases
Equal reduction of body fat
%
Decreased waist
circumference
Lowered BMI in > 25
cohort
Decreased skinfold
thickness
Trusting the Science
•Designs of studies
•p values
•Varied subgroups within cohort
Literature Limitations
• Small sample sizes
• Self-reported data
• Confounding interventions
• Short study duration
• Decreased exercise over
time
• Older data
Future Research Improvements
•Larger sample sizes
•Different cohorts
•Longer study length
•Improved endpoints
•Eliminate confounders
References• 2008 Physical activity guidelines for Americans. US Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS), Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Washington: HHS; 2008. (Accessed March 14, 2012, at http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/pdf/paguide.pdf).
• Murphy MH, Hardman AE (1998) Training effects of short and long bouts of brisk walking in sedentary women, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 30: 152–15.
• Schmidt WD, Biwer CJ, Kalscheuer LK (2001) Effects of long versus short bout exercise on fitness and weight loss in overweight females, J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 20(5): 494-501.
• Jakicic JM, Wing RR, Butler BA, Robertson RJ (1995) Prescribing exercise in multiple short bouts versus one continuous bout: effects on adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness, and weight loss in overweight women, International Journal of Obesity, 19: 893-901.
• Jakicic JM, Winters C, Lang W, Wing RR (1999) Effects of intermittent exercise and use of home exercise equipment on adherence, weight loss, and fitness in overweight women: a randomized trial, JAMA, 282(16): 1554-1560.
References• Deaths and Mortality. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC). Atlanta, GA; March 2012. (Accessed 9/24/12 at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/deaths.html).
• Physical Activity and Health: The Benefits of Physical Activity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Atlanta, GA; February 2011. Accessed 9/24/12 at http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/health/index.html).
• Physical Activity: Measuring Physical Activity Intensity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. December 2011. Accessed 9/24/12 at http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/measuring/index.html).