38
Prepared by Professor Wei Wang Queen’s University © 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited 1 9 Dividends and Other Payouts Chapter Nineteen

Dividends and Other Payouts c19

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

finance122

Citation preview

Page 1: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

Prepared by

Professor Wei WangQueen’s University

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

19Dividends and Other Payouts

Chapter Nineteen

Page 2: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-2

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Chapter Outline

19.1 Different Types of Dividends19.2 Standard Method of Cash Dividend Payment19.3 The Benchmark Case: An Illustration of the Irrelevance

of Dividend Policy19.4 Repurchase of Stock19.5 Personal Taxes, Issuance Costs, and Dividends19.6 Expected Return, Dividends, and Personal Taxes19.7 Real-World Factors Favouring a High-Dividend Policy19.8 The Clientele Effect: A Resolution of Real-World

Factors19.9 What We Know and Do Not Know About Dividend

Policy19.10 Summary and Conclusions

Page 3: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-3

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Different Types of Dividends LO19.1

• Many companies pay a regular cash dividend.– Public companies often pay quarterly.– Sometimes firms will throw in an extra cash dividend.– The extreme case would be a liquidating dividend.

• Often companies will declare stock dividends.– No cash leaves the firm.– The firm increases the number of shares outstanding.

• Some companies declare a dividend in kind.– Wrigley’s Gum sends around a box of chewing gum.– Dundee Crematorium offers shareholders discounted

cremations.

Page 4: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-4

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Standard Method of Cash Dividend PaymentLO19.2

Record Date - Person who owns stock on this date received the dividend.

Ex-Dividend Date - Date that determines whether a stockholder is entitled to a dividend payment; anyone holding stock before this date is entitled to a dividend.

Cash Dividend - Payment of cash by the firm to its shareholders.

Page 5: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-5

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Procedure for Cash Dividend Payment LO19.2

25 Oct. 1 Nov. 2 Nov. 6 Nov. 7 Dec.

Declaration Date

Cum-dividend

Date

Ex-dividend

Date

Record Date

Payment Date

Declaration Date: The board of directors declares a payment of dividends.Cum-Dividend Date: The last day that the buyer of a stock is entitled to the dividend.Ex-Dividend Date: The first day that the seller of a stock is entitled to the dividend.Record Date: The corporation prepares a list of all individuals believed to be stockholders as of 6 November.

Page 6: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-6

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Price Behaviour around the Ex-Dividend Date LO19.2

• In a perfect world, the stock price will fall by the amount of the dividend on the ex-dividend date.

$P

$P - divEx-

dividend Date

The price drops by the amount of the cash dividend

-t … -2 -1 0 +1 +2 …

Taxes complicate things a bit. Empirically, the price drop is less than the dividend and occurs within the first few minutes of the ex-date.

Page 7: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-7

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

The Benchmark Case: An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy LO19.3

• A compelling case can be made that dividend policy is irrelevant.

• Since investors do not need dividends to convert shares to cash they will not pay higher prices for firms with higher dividend payouts.

• In other words, dividend policy will have no impact on the value of the firm because investors can create whatever income stream they prefer by using homemade dividends.

Page 8: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-8

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

The Benchmark Case: An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy LO19.3

Example: York Corporation , an all-equity firm• At date 0, the managers are able to forecast

cash flows perfectly.• The firm will receive a cashflow of $10,000

at date 0 and $10,000 at date 1• The firm will dissolve at date 1.• The firm has no additional positive NPV

projects

Page 9: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-9

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy (continued) LO19.3

I ) Current Policy:Dividends set equal to cashflow

• Dividends (Div.) at each date = $10000• The firm value will be :

srDIVDIVV

1

100

91.19090$1.1

10000$10000$0 V

Page 10: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-10

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy (continued) LO19.3

• Assume 1,000 shares are outstanding, then:

09.19$1.1

10$10$0 P

• After the imminent dividend is paid, the stock price will fall to $9.09 (19.09-10)

Page 11: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-11

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy (continued) LO19.3

I I) Alternative Policy: Initial dividend > cash flow

• Pay $11 per share immediately i.e., $11 X 1000 shares = $11,000 as total dividend.

• The extra $1,000 must be raised by issuing new stock. Date 0 Date1

Total dividends to old shareholders $11,000 $8,900Dividends per share $11 $8.9

Note: at date1, the new shareholders will get $1,100 of the total cash flow leaving only $8,900 to oldshareholders.

Page 12: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-12

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

An Illustration of the Irrelevance of Dividend Policy (continued) LO19.3

• The PV of dividends per share with the alternative policy:

09.19$1.19.8$11$0 P

• The indifference proposition:-The PV of the stock in both scenarios is the same.-The change in dividend policy did not affect the value of a share.

Page 13: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-13

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Modigliani and Miller (MM) proposition LO19.3

MM proposition: Investors are indifferent to dividend policy

Assumptions:1) No taxes, brokerage fees, etc.2) Homogeneous expectations3) The investment policy of the firm is set

ahead of time

Page 14: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-14

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Homemade Dividends LO19.3

• ABC Inc. is a $42 stock about to pay a $2 cash dividend.

• Bob Investor owns 80 shares and prefers $3 cash dividend.

• Bob’s homemade dividend strategy:– Sell two shares ex-dividend

homemade dividendsCash from dividend $160Cash from selling stock $80Total Cash $240Value of Stock Holdings $40 × 78 =

$3,120

$3 Dividend$240$0$240$39 × 80 =$3,120

Page 15: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-15

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Dividend Policy is Irrelevant LO19.3

• Since investors do not need dividends to convert shares to cash, dividend policy will have no impact on the value of the firm.

• In the above example, Bob Investor began with total wealth of $3,360:

share42$shares 80360,3$

240$share

39$shares 80360,3$

80$160$share

40$shares 78360,3$

· After a $3 dividend, his total wealth is still $3,360:

· After a $2 dividend, and sale of two ex-dividend shares,his total wealth is still $3,360:

Page 16: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-16

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Irrelevance of Stock Dividends: Example LO19.3

XYZ Inc. has two million shares currently outstanding at $15 per share. The company declares a 50% stock dividend. How many shares will be outstanding after the dividend is paid?

A 50% stock dividend will increase the number of shares by 50%:

2 million×1.5 = 3 million shares

After the stock dividend what is the new price per share and what is the new value of the firm?The value of the firm was $2m × $15 per share = $30 m. After the dividend, the value will remain the same.Price per share = $30m/ 3m shares = $10 per share

Page 17: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-17

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Dividends and Investment Policy LO19.3

• Firms should never forgo positive NPV projects to increase a dividend (or to pay a dividend for the first time).

• Recall that one of the assumptions underlying the dividend-irrelevance arguments was “The investment policy of the firm is set ahead of time and is not altered by changes in dividend policy.”

• A final note:-Dividends are relevant-Dividend policy is irrelevant

Page 18: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-18

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Repurchase of Stock LO19.4

• Instead of declaring cash dividends, firms can rid itself of excess cash through buying shares of their own stock.

• Recently share repurchase has become an important way of distributing earnings to shareholders.

• When tax avoidance is important, share repurchase is a potentially useful adjunct to dividend policy.

Page 19: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-19

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Stock Repurchase versus Dividend LO19.4

$10=/100,000$1,000,000=Price per share 100,000=outstanding Shares

1,000,000Value of Firm1,000,000Value of Firm1,000,000Equity850,000assetsOther

0Debt$150,000Cashsheet balance Original A.

Equity &Liabilities Assets

Consider a firm that wishes to distribute $100,000 to its shareholders.

Page 20: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-20

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Stock Repurchase versus Dividend LO19.4

$9=00,000$900,000/1 = shareper Price100,000=goutstandin Shares

900,000Firm of Value900,000Firm of Value900,000Equity850,000assetsOther

0Debt$50,000Cash

dividendcash shareper $1After B.Equity & sLiabilitie Assets

If they distribute the $100,000 as cash dividend, the balance sheet will look like this:

Page 21: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-21

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Stock Repurchase versus Dividend LO19.4

Assets Liabilities & EquityC. After stock repurchase

Cash $50,000 Debt 0Other assets 850,000 Equity 900,000Value of Firm 900,000 Value of Firm 900,000

Shares outstanding= 90,000Price per share = $900,000 / 90,000 = $10

If they distribute the $100,000 through a stock repurchase, the balance sheet will look like this:

Page 22: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-22

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Share Repurchase (Real-World Considerations) LO19.4

• Lower tax • Tender offers

– If offer price is set wrong, some stockholders lose.• Open-market repurchase• Targeted repurchase

– Greenmail– Gadflies

• Repurchase as investment– Recent studies have shown that the long-term stock price

performance of securities after a buyback is significantly better than the stock price performance of comparable companies that do not repurchase.

Page 23: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-23

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

• To get the result that dividend policy is irrelevant, we needed three assumptions:– No taxes– No transactions costs– No uncertainty

• In Canada, individual investors face a lower dividend tax rate due to the dividend tax credit.

• Capital gains for individuals are taxed at 50% of the marginal tax rate, and the effective tax rate on dividend income is higher than the tax rate on capital gains.

Personal Taxes, Issuance Costs, and Dividends LO19.5

Page 24: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-24

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Firms Without Sufficient Cash to Pay a Dividend LO19.5

In a world of personal taxes, firms should not issue stock to pay a dividend.

Firm Stock Holders

Cash: stock issue

Cash: dividends

Gov.

Taxes

Investment BankersThe direct costs of stock issuance will add to this effect.

Page 25: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-25

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Firms With Sufficient Cash to Pay a DividendLO19.5

• The above argument does not necessarily apply to firms with excess cash.

• Consider a firm that has $1 million in cash after selecting all available positive NPV projects.

• The firm has several options:– Select additional capital budgeting projects (by

assumption, these are negative NPV).– Acquire other companies– Purchase financial assets– Repurchase shares

Page 26: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-26

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

• In the presence of personal taxes:1. A firm should not issue stock to pay a dividend.2. Managers have an incentive to seek alternative

uses for funds to reduce dividends.3. Though personal taxes mitigate against the

payment of dividends, these taxes are not sufficient to lead firms to eliminate all dividends.

Personal Taxes, Issuance Costs, and Dividends LO19.5

Page 27: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-27

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Expected Return, Dividends, and Personal TaxesLO19.6

• What is the relationship between the expected return on the stock and its dividend yield?

• The expected pretax return on a security with a high dividend yield is greater than the expected pretax return on an otherwise-identical security with a low dividend yield.

• After tax is a different story; otherwise-identical securities should have the same return.

Page 28: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-28

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Evidence on Dividends and Taxes in Canada LO19.6

• Prior to 1972, capital gains were untaxed in Canada• In 1985, a life-time exemption on capital gains was

introduced.• Anticipation of the tax break on capital gains caused

investors to bid up prices of low-dividend yield stocks.

• Firms responded by lowering their dividend payouts.

• The dividend tax credit works to reduce taxes on dividends received from Canadian firms.

Page 29: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-29

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Real World Factors Favouring a High Dividend Policy LO19.7

• Desire for Current Income• Behavioral Finance• Agency Costs• Dividends Signalling

Page 30: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-30

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Desire for Current Income LO19.7

• The homemade dividend argument relies on no transactions costs.

• To put this in perspective, mutual funds can repackage securities for individuals at very low cost: they could buy low-dividend stocks and with a controlled policy of realizing gains, pay their investors at a specified rate.

Page 31: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-31

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Behavioral Finance LO19.7

• Investors deal with self-control in investing and consumption.

• Selling stocks to realize cash for consumption: may sell off too much.

• Holding high dividend paying stocks: sticking to a firm personal rule of never “dipping into principal.”

Page 32: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-32

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Agency Costs LO19.7

• Agency Cost of Debt– Firms in financial distress are reluctant to cut

dividends. To protect themselves, bondholders frequently create loan agreements stating dividends can only be paid if the firm has earnings, cash flow, and working capital above pre-specified levels.

• Agency Costs of Equity– Managers will find it easier to squander funds if

they have a low dividend payout.

Page 33: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-33

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Dividends Signalling LO19.7

• Stock price rises when a firm stats or resumes dividends, and falls following announcements of dividend omissions.

• Firms will raise the dividend only when future earnings and cash flows are expected to rise enough so that the dividend is not likely to be reduced later.

• The rise in the stock price following the dividend signal is called the information content effect of dividend.

Page 34: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-34

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

The Clientele Effect: A Resolution of Real-World Factors? LO19.8

• Reasons for Low Dividend– Personal Taxes– High Issuing Costs

• Reasons for High Dividend– Information Asymmetry

• Dividends as a signal about firm’s future performance– Lower Agency Costs

• capital market as a monitoring device• reduce free cash flow, and hence wasteful spending

– Bird-in-the-hand: Theory or Fallacy?• Uncertainty resolution

– Desire for Current Income• Clientele Effect

Page 35: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-35

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

The Clientele Effect: A Resolution of Real-World Factors? LO19.8

• Clienteles for various dividend payout policies are likely to form in the following way:

Group Stock

High Tax Bracket IndividualsLow Tax Bracket IndividualsTax-Free InstitutionsCorporations

Zero to Low payout stocksLow-to-Medium payoutMedium Payout StocksHigh Payout Stocks

Once the clienteles have been satisfied, a corporation is unlikely to create value by changing its dividend policy.

Page 36: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-36

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

What We Know and Do Not Know About Dividend Policy LO19.9

• Corporations “Smooth” Dividends.• Dividends Provide Information to the

Market.• Firms should follow a sensible dividend

policy:– Don’t forgo positive NPV projects just to pay a

dividend.– Avoid issuing stock to pay dividends.– Consider share repurchase when there are few

better uses for the cash.

Page 37: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-37

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Summary and Conclusions LO19.10

• The optimal payout ratio cannot be determined quantitatively.

• In a perfect capital market, dividend policy is irrelevant due to the homemade dividend concept.

• A firm should not reject positive NPV projects to pay a dividend.

• Personal taxes and issue costs are real-world considerations that favour low dividend payouts.

• Many firms appear to have a long-run target dividend-payout policy. There appears to be some value to dividend stability and smoothing.

• There appears to be some information content in dividend payments.

Page 38: Dividends and Other Payouts c19

19-38

© 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Quick Quiz• What are the different types of dividends, and

how is a dividend paid?• What is the clientele effect, and how does it

affect dividend policy irrelevance?• What is the information content of dividend

changes?• What are stock dividends, and how do they

differ from cash dividends?• How are share repurchases an alternative to

dividends, and why might investors prefer them?