Upload
harold-hutchinson
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Phase One - CFA Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results Each of the six proposed factors had a strong factor structure However, there was a discriminant validity problem (covariances >.90) for the presence, acceptance, and influence factors
Citation preview
Diversity and the God Image:
Louis Hoffman, Ph.D., COSPPJohn L. Hoffman, Ph.D., CSULB
Examining Ethnic Differences in the
Experience of God for a College-Age Population
Theoretical Foundation
Philibert (1985) on self-image: Belonging
Goodness
Control
Lawrence (1997) on God Image: Presence Challenge Acceptance Benevolence Influence Providence
Phase One - CFA
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results
Each of the six proposed factors had a strong factor structure
However, there was a discriminant validity problem (covariances > .90) for the presence, acceptance, and influence factors
Phase Two - EFA
Exploratory Factor Analysis Results Egocentric = presence + acceptance + influence Growth = challenge + providence Benevolence = benevolence
What does it mean?
The Egocentric Factor
Fowler Stage 2 – literal relationship
drawn from a singular external source (e.g. parent)
Stage 3 – largely literal relationship drawn from a social group
Both emphasize God conceptStudent Development
TheoryEthnic Development Theory
The Growth Factor
Challenge – In response to God’s presence, should I stay with God, or does she/he call me to interact with the world?
Providence – God’s freedom to influence Those who
perceived God as wanting them to grow (challenge) also gave God credit for that growth (providence)
The Benevolence Factor
Lawrence cautioned that the object-focus of God’s goodness often led to dogmatic answers (God concept)
Instead, we emphasized God’s willingness to love others
Phase Three - MIMIC
Religiosity and Spirituality
More integrated for people of color
Age/Class-Level Upper-level Whites
were more egocentric Lower-division
students of color were more egocentric
Racial identity?
Phase Three - MIMIC
Psychotherapy White participants
who had received therapy were less egocentric and less benevolent
Non-White participants who had received therapy were more egocentric
Discussion
What are your thoughts?
What does this mean for you personally?
What does all this mean for your work with clients?