44
Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division Historical Performance Automated Systems Measurement Accuracy The Future Board Meeting Agenda Item 27 May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division

  • Upload
    ojal

  • View
    48

  • Download
    8

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Board MeetingAgenda Item 27 May 13-14, 2003Presentation Revised. Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division. Historical Performance Automated Systems Measurement Accuracy The Future. Board MeetingAgenda Item 27 May 13-14, 2003Presentation Revised. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division

Historical PerformanceAutomated Systems

Measurement AccuracyThe Future

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Statewide We Are Almost There

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Mill

ion

s o

f T

on

s o

f W

as

te

WasteDiverted

WasteDisposed

TotalWasteGenerated

17% 21% 25% 31% 33%

42%

Figures in percent are the state-wide diversion rate.

44%

48%

37%32%28%10% 20% 24%

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Programs Implemented by Jurisdictions from 1990 to 2000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

1990 1995 2000

Year

Nu

mb

er

of

Pro

gra

ms

Composting

Education

Recycling

Source Reduction

Total Programs

Program Type

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

The Bottom Line:Yes We Are Making Progress

64 76 97 107 124

207

252258 233

252 231

61 42 32

41

87 8885

47

199

28

185918

33

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

1995 (464 Total) 1996 (464 Total) 1997 (447 total) 1998 (447 total) 1999 (445 total) 2000 (445 total)

50 % + 25 - 49 % < 25 % No Rate In Progress

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Southern California Jurisdictions Biennial Review Compliance for 2000

44%

14%

0%

40%

2%

0%

Board Approved

Board Approved Good Faith Effort

Board Approved Reduced DiversionRequirement

Board Approved Time Extension

Under Compliance

Under Review

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Northern California Jurisdictions Biennial Review Compliance for 2000

53%

14%

3%

28%

1%

1%

Board Approved

Board Approved Good Faith Effort

Board Approved Reduced DiversionRequirement

Board Approved Time Extension

Under Compliance

Under Review

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Reporting Success by:State Agencies/Facilities

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2000 2001 2002

Plans Submitted

Annual Report

Annual Report

ReportsOutstanding

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Trend for Number of Planning Documents submitted in from of the Board.

Planning Documents Reviewed by the Board from 1993 to 2002

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Siting ElementSummary Plan

HouseHold Hazardous Waste ElementSource Reduction and Recycling Element

Non-Disposal Facility Element0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Num

ber

of D

ocum

ents

Year

Siting Element Summary Plan HouseHold Hazardous Waste Element Source Reduction and Recycling Element Non-Disposal Facility Element

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Future Board Actions

20032004

20052006

2007

5 Year Plan Reviews

New Base Years

Time Extensions/ADRs

Biennial Reviews

State Agency Annual Reports

Annual Report Reviews

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Year

Count of Board Actions

5 Year Plan Reviews New Base Years Time Extensions/ADRsBiennial Reviews State Agency Annual Reports Annual Report Reviews

Type of Board Actions

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

In the Beginning There Was No Automation…

Diversion rate calculations were done by hand, a painstaking process.

There was no easy way for the public to view board data

There was no model annual report. Report formats varied widely.

Board staff spent enormous amounts of time reviewing and analyzing jurisdiction reports

Jurisdictions spenta lot of time and money reporting to the CIWMB.

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Today: Automated Systemsaid DPLA & Board Customers

Computer-based tools help optimize staff and stakeholders’ time

Save time on routine filings and data entry Cut costs for complying with mandates Analyze data, project trends and workloads Allow focus of resources on diversion

program implementation Provide easy web based access to critical

decision making data

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

What Automated Systems? Electronic Annual Report (EAR) and State

Organization and Agency Recycling Database(SOARD)

Electronic SB 1066 Diversion Program Updates (E-1066)

Databases: PARIS, DRS, Waste Characterization, Jurisdiction Goal Achievement and Progress System, Document Tracking, Geographical Information Systems

Jurisdiction Waste Stream Profiles Countywide, Regionwide, Jurisdiction Progress

Report Several other on-line web reports

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

The On-lineDiversion Rate Calculator

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

State AgencyAnnual Reports Fully Automated

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Jurisdiction Annual Reports Fully Automated

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Jurisdictions Embrace New Methods

Electronic vs Paper Annual Reports

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1995 2000 2001

Year

Nu

mb

er

of

Rep

ort

s

Paper

Electronic

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

State Agencies Embrace Electronic Filing

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2000 2001 2002

PaperElectronic

Outstanding

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Time to Complete Biennial Reviews

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1995-96 1999-2000

Biennial Review Cycle

Mo

nth

s

Biennial Reviews

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

DPLA Customers Weigh InCompleting the Electronic Annual Report was easy and the instructions were clear.

Strongly Agree36%

Agree54%

Neutral8%

Disagree2%

Strongly Disagree0%

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

DPLA Saving Customers’ Time

EAR took less time than the previous paper Annual Report

Strongly Agree47%

Agree27%

Neutral24%

Disagree0%

Strongly Disagree2%

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

New Tools Help DPLA Analyze

Jurisdiction-Submitted Diversion Rate Calculation Methods2000 vs. 2001

267294

77

94101

39

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2000 2001

Perc

en

t o

f Ju

risd

icti

on

s

Adjustment Method - Default Adjustment Method - Alternate Values

Generation-based

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Outflows for 2000

Disposal Outflows for 2000

Geographical Information Systems Present

Inflows for 2000Disposal Inflows for 2000

Geographical Information Systems Present (cont.)

Web Hits 1998-2003

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

January April June August October

Months

# o

f H

its

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003LG Central On-line

Jurisdiction Electronic Annual Report Used

LG Central Expanded

State Agency Electronic Annual Report Used

Tools for Schools

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Improving Measurement Accuracy 1995-1996 Biennial Reviews required many

jurisdictions to do new base years 1997 Accuracy Working Group 1999 Statewide Characterization of Waste

Disposed 1999-2000 Biennial Reviews included many

new base years and allowed time extensions 2001 SB 2202 required report to Legislature

with recommendations to improve diversion rate measurement

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

BY Changed vs. Not Changed

Jurisdictions that Changed vs. Did Not Change Base Years Since 1995

Did Not Change BaseYear61%

Changed Base Year39%

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Chart shows J’s that have changed their original base year by year.

Count of Jurisdictions that have Changed Their Original Base Year by

Year

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Year

Nu

mb

er

of

Ju

ris

dic

tio

ns

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

New Base Year Case Study: Diversion Breakdown for Jurisdiction

25%

38%

37%

Non Residential

Business Audits

Res/ADC/Landfill Salvage

Residential

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

New Base Year Case Study: Impact of the Largest Businesses (333) Audited Relative to the Total Business Audits (approx. 7,600)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

top 10 top 20 top 30

Business Generators

% o

f Div

ersi

on to

nnag

e fr

om B

usin

esse

s A

udits

New Base Years: Maximizing Efficiency Analyzed 35 studies to assess impact of

the top 10 businesses versus all audited businesses 33 out of 35 jurisdictions derived 50%

or more of diversion from top 10 businesses 21 out of 35 jurisdictions derived 80 %

or more of diversion from top 10 businesses 13 out of 35 jurisdictions derived over

90% of diversion from top 10 businesses Recommend jurisdictions audit their

largest businesses first

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Observations of Current Base Year Efforts

Quality of submitted studies appears to be improving

Use of Certification Form has: Improved the quality of data by tying

programs to diversion tonnages Provided jurisdictions with information

on potential gaps in program efforts Served as a useful tool in program

evaluation and planning

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Broad Themes in SB 2202 Report Recommendations

Potential for error in all components of diversion rate measurement system

Diversion rates are estimates/indicators

Small jurisdictions more likely to have inaccurate diversion rate

Need to focus on diversion program implementation

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Activities to Improve DRS Accuracy

DRS regulation revisions Focused training for all participants DRS web-based training modules

being developed Continue random facility visits Publish results of random visits in

InfoCycling

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Disposal Reporting Survey Week Site AuditsCompliance Rate by Region (2000-2002)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2000 2001 2002

Year

Perc

ent o

f Fac

ilities

Ask

ing

for

Juris

dict

ion-

of-O

rigin

Info

rmat

ion

Bay Area

Southern

Coastal &Mountain

CentralValley

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

What Guides Us? Implementing Statutes and Strategic Plan Saving our customers time and money Improving our information delivery

system Enhancing our tools and accuracy Leveraging tools and technology to

“create” staff time to assist an increased number of customers

Focusing on types of materials still left in the waste stream

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Per Capita Disposal Per Capita Disposal

0.0

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

800.0

900.0

Material

Po

un

ds

per

Yea

r

1990

1999

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

The Future• More effective process, and enhanced

tools and assistance • Streamline future Board Biennial Review

process for 2001-2002• Improve and streamline the diversion

program and new base year verification processes

• Automate new base year process (similar to EAR)

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

The Future…• Support local jurisdictions’ ability

to reach and maintain California’s waste diversion mandates.

• Work with other State agencies to promote zero-waste strategies that would ultimately put State agencies in a position to lead by example.

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

The Future… Encourage recycling activities and new technologies in all businesses and residences.

Promote new or existing technologies and processes to address existing or emerging waste streams.

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

The Future… Improve the exchange of and

access to information internally and externally.

Through consistent and effective enforcement or other appropriate measures, ensure compliance with federal and State waste management laws and regulations.

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised

Questions?

Board Meeting Agenda Item 27

May 13-14, 2003 Presentation Revised