18
Diversification of genes encoding mei2-like RNA binding proteins in plants Garrett H. Anderson 1, , Nena D.G. Alvarez 2,3, , Carmel Gilman 2 , Daniel C. Jeffares 2,4 , Vernon C.W. Trainor 2,3 , Maureen R. Hanson 1 and Bruce Veit 3, * 1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA; 2 Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; 3 Plant Breeding and Genomics, AgResearch, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand (*author for correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]); 4 Current address: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Universitetsparken 15, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark;  These authors contributed equally to this work Received 28 January 2004; accepted in revised form 29 March 2004 Key words: apical meristem, cell differentiation, cell division, evolution, mei2, RNA binding protein Abstract A predominantly plant-based family of genes encoding RNA binding proteins is defined by the presence of a highly conserved RNA binding motif first described in the mei2 gene of the fission yeast Schizosaccha- romyces pombe. In silico analyses reveal nine mei2-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and six in Oryza sativa. These predicted genes group into four distinct clades, based on overall sequence similarity and subfamily- specific sequence elements. In situ analysis show that Arabidopsis genes from one of these clades, TEL1 and TEL2, are specifically expressed in central zone of the shoot apical meristem and the quiescent center of the root apical meristem, suggesting that they may somehow function to maintain indeterminacy in these tissues. By contrast, members of two sister clades, AML1 through AML5, are expressed more broadly, a trend that was confirmed by Q-PCR analysis. mei2-like transcripts with similar sequences showed similar expression patterns, suggesting functional redundancy within the four clades. Phenotypic analyses of lines that contain T-DNA insertions to individual mei2-like genes reveal no obvious phenotypes, further sug- gesting redundant activities for these gene products. Introduction Eukaryotes feature a variety of mechanisms which regulate the effective concentration of mRNA, including those that act at the level of synthesis, processing, localization and turnover (Burd and Dreyfuss, 1994; Guhaniyogi and Brewer, 2001; Mallory and Vaucheret, 2004). Recently, novel modes of RNA-focused regulation have emerged in which non-coding RNAs affect the stability or translation of specific mRNAs, and which may also act to direct chromatin remodeling (Hunter and Poethig, 2003; Volpe et al., 2003). Overall, it would appear that plants engage in a large variety of processes involving RNA. Over 200 Arabidopsis thaliana protein-encoding genes are currently annotated as having an RNA recognition motif (RRM) (Lorkovic´ and Barta, 2002) and with the inclusion of other putative RNA binding motifs – pentatricopeptide repeats, or PPRs, for example (Small and Peeters, 2000) – the number could easily approach 500 or higher. Although molecular stud- ies have clarified the function and mode of action for some of these proteins, for most little is known. One intriguing class of plant RNA binding protein genes can be identified by their similarity to Plant Molecular Biology 54: 653–670, 2004. ȑ 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 653

Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

Diversification of genes encoding mei2-like RNA binding proteinsin plants

Garrett H. Anderson1,�, Nena D.G. Alvarez2,3,�, Carmel Gilman2, Daniel C. Jeffares2,4,Vernon C.W. Trainor2,3, Maureen R. Hanson1 and Bruce Veit3,*1Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA; 2Institute ofMolecular BioSciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; 3Plant Breeding and Genomics,AgResearch, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand (*author for correspondence; e-mail:[email protected]); 4Current address: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Universitetsparken 15,University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; �These authors contributed equally to thiswork

Received 28 January 2004; accepted in revised form 29 March 2004

Key words: apical meristem, cell differentiation, cell division, evolution, mei2, RNA binding protein

Abstract

A predominantly plant-based family of genes encoding RNA binding proteins is defined by the presence ofa highly conserved RNA binding motif first described in the mei2 gene of the fission yeast Schizosaccha-romyces pombe. In silico analyses reveal nine mei2-like genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and six in Oryza sativa.These predicted genes group into four distinct clades, based on overall sequence similarity and subfamily-specific sequence elements. In situ analysis show that Arabidopsis genes from one of these clades, TEL1 andTEL2, are specifically expressed in central zone of the shoot apical meristem and the quiescent center of theroot apical meristem, suggesting that they may somehow function to maintain indeterminacy in thesetissues. By contrast, members of two sister clades, AML1 through AML5, are expressed more broadly, atrend that was confirmed by Q-PCR analysis. mei2-like transcripts with similar sequences showed similarexpression patterns, suggesting functional redundancy within the four clades. Phenotypic analyses of linesthat contain T-DNA insertions to individual mei2-like genes reveal no obvious phenotypes, further sug-gesting redundant activities for these gene products.

Introduction

Eukaryotes feature a variety of mechanisms whichregulate the effective concentration of mRNA,including those that act at the level of synthesis,processing, localization and turnover (Burd andDreyfuss, 1994; Guhaniyogi and Brewer, 2001;Mallory and Vaucheret, 2004). Recently, novelmodes of RNA-focused regulation have emerged inwhich non-coding RNAs affect the stability ortranslation of specific mRNAs, and which may alsoact to direct chromatin remodeling (Hunter andPoethig, 2003; Volpe et al., 2003). Overall, it would

appear that plants engage in a large variety ofprocesses involving RNA. Over 200 Arabidopsisthaliana protein-encoding genes are currentlyannotated as having an RNA recognition motif(RRM) (Lorkovic and Barta, 2002) and with theinclusion of other putative RNA binding motifs –pentatricopeptide repeats, or PPRs, for example(Small and Peeters, 2000) – the number could easilyapproach 500 or higher. Although molecular stud-ies have clarified the function and mode of actionfor some of these proteins, for most little is known.

One intriguing class of plant RNA bindingprotein genes can be identified by their similarity to

Plant Molecular Biology 54: 653–670, 2004.� 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

653

Page 2: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

the mei21 gene of the unicellular fungus Schizo-saccharomyces pombe (Watanabe et al., 1988; Wa-tanabe and Yamamoto, 1994; Lorkovic and Barta,2002). The protein encoded by mei2, Mei2p, ischaracterized by three RRMs (Birney et al., 1993).Genetic and biochemical analyses indicate that themost C-terminal of these, RRM3, is essential forthe normal meiosis-promoting activity of the pro-tein and also reveal a role in regulating the cellularlocalization of Mei2p. Under meiosis-inducingconditions, haploid S. pombe mei2 mutant linesundergo conjugation and karyogamy (nuclear fu-sion), but fail to initiate pre-meiotic DNA synthesisor meiosis I (Watanabe et al., 1988; Watanabe andYamamoto, 1994). In wt haploid cells, the mei2transcript accumulates in meiosis-inducing condi-tions, but its product, Mei2p, is maintained in aninactive state by phosphorylation at two sites be-tween RRM2 and the C-terminal RRM (Watanabeet al., 1997). Following conjugation, karyogamyand the formation of a compatible mating typecomplex, unphosphorylated Mei2p accumulatesand somehow triggers pre-meiotic DNA synthesis(McLeod and Beach, 1988; Watanabe et al., 1988;Watanabe and Yamamoto, 1994; Li and McLeod,1996; Watanabe et al., 1997) and chromatinremodelling (Mizuno et al., 2001). Unphosphory-lated Mei2p localizes to the nucleus (Watanabe etal., 1997; Yamashita et al., 1998), where it binds thenon-coding, polyadenylated mRNA-like moleculemeiRNA (Watanabe and Yamamoto, 1994;Yamashita et al., 1998). This binding of Mei2p tomeiRNA is mediated by the Mei2p C-terminalRRM (Watanabe et al., 1997) and occurs as themeiRNA is being transcribed (Shimada et al.,2003), resulting in the localization of Mei2p at a‘Mei2p dot’ at the locus that encodes meiRNA,sme2. Formation of this dot coincides with theonset of meiosis I (Watanabe and Yamamoto,1994; Watanabe et al., 1997; Yamashita et al.,1998).

In plants, mei2-like genes were first reportedwith the characterization of AML1 (Arabidopsismei2-like). This gene was first identified in a het-erologous screen for Arabidopsis cDNAs thatcould enable meiosis in an S. pombe line that wasdefective in mating and consequently blocked for

meiosis (Hirayama et al., 1997). Like mei2, AML1encodes 3 RRMs, with the third showing thehighest degree of conservation with Mei2p. Thethird RRM alone was sufficient for complemen-tation of the mating defect. However, AML1cannot rescue disruptions of mei2 itself, suggestingthat the two genes are not functionally equivalent.The ability of AML1 to overcome the mating typeblock, but not mutations to Mei2 itself is puzzling,but could reflect AML1 interfering with elementsthat negatively regulate Mei2p activity. In Ara-bidopsis, the function of AML1 has not beenpreviously addressed beyond expression analyses,which show accumulation of transcripts in roots,leaves, siliques and flowers (Hirayama et al., 1997).

To date, the terminal ear 1 (te1) mutant of Zeamays (Veit et al., 1998) offers the only functionalanalysis of a plant mei2-like gene. Like mei2 andAML1, te1 encodes two N-terminal RRMs and asingle, more highly conserved C-terminal RRM. Inloss of function mutants, the terminal and nor-mally free tassel becomes enclosed in a series ofhusk-like leaves, a change associated with alteredpatterns of leaf initiation in the shoot apical mer-istem (SAM). Leaves are initiated more frequently,often with abnormal phyllotaxy, and the normallylong vegetative internodes of the main shoot thatprecede the tassel are abnormally short. Molecularanalysis of te1 in wt plants show an accumulationof transcripts in a series of semi-circular rings inthe SAM that bracket sites of leaf initiation (Veitet al., 1998). This negative correlation between te1expression and sites of leaf initiation, the morefrequent and irregular initiation of leaves and thetruncated internode development in the mutantare consistent with a model in which te1 acts toprevent precocious differentiation events.

With respect to possible RNA targets of mei2-like proteins, no clear sme2 homologues in plantshave been detected by sequence similarity. Thereare however at least 18 polyadenylated RNAs thathave either no conserved ORF or only a very smallORF which may or may not be translated (Mac-Intosh et al., 2001). Characterized examples in-clude the CR20/GUT15 transcripts (Taylor andGreen, 1995; Teramoto et al., 1995, 1996; van Hoofet al., 1997), and ENOD40 (Crespi et al., 1994).

To gain additional insight into mei2-like genesin plants, we have undertaken a survey of addi-tional family members. Using the highly conservedC-terminal RRM as a family hallmark, we identify

1wt Schizosaccharomyces pombe genes are indicated in lower

case italics; wt S. pombe proteins are indicated in plain text

followed by a suffix ‘p’.

654

Page 3: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

nine Arabidopsis and six Oryza sativa mei2-likeloci. We describe how the plant based family ofmei2-like genes groups into four subfamilies bysequence and expression criteria. We observe thatthe Terminal Ear-like (TEL) subfamily expressionpattern is highly specific to groups of pluripotentcells (so-called stem cells) in both the root andshoot apical meristems, while the AML subfamilyis more broadly expressed. We conclude by dis-cussing how these genes may influence processesthat regulate tissue differentiation in plants.

Methods

RNA extraction

Tissues were collected, snap-frozen in liquid N2

and stored at )80 �C. Total RNA was extractedaccording to manufacturer’s instructions from0.3 g of tissue using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen).Resuspended RNA was thrice-treated with DNA-free� DNase treatment (Ambion). RNA wasquantified spectrophotometrically and 2 lg wererun on a 1 · TAE agarose gel to confirm thequantification. cDNA was generated from 2 lg oftotal RNA using Omniscript Reverse Transcrip-tase (Qiagen). Reverse-transcription reactionswere performed in triplicate for each tissue; threemock RT reactions lacking Reverse Transcriptasewere also performed for each tissue. Reactionswere RNase treated, diluted tenfold and stored at)20 �C until use.

Rapid amplification of 5¢ cDNA ends

RNA ligase-mediated RACE was performed ontotal RNA extracted from bulk shoot tissues usinga GeneRacerTM Kit (Invitrogen) according tomanufacturer’s instructions.

Alignment, phylogenetic analysis and genomeanalysis

Sequences were aligned using ClustalW (DNA-star) with default parameters. Cladograms wereconstructed and bootstrap values calculated usingPAUP*4.0b10 (Sinauer Associates, Inc.) withparsimony as the set criterion and sequences addedrandomly to a heuristic search. Analyses were re-peated with maximum likelihood as the set crite-rion; the results did not differ qualitatively from

those shown. Similarity plots were generated usingVector NTI Suite 8. Alignment images were gen-erated in GeneDoc (www.psc.edu/biomed/gene-doc) (Nicholas et al., 1997). Figure 2 wasgenerated using Treeview (Page, 1996). The MIPSInteractive Redundancy Viewer (http://mips.gsf.de/proj/thal/db/gv/rv/viewer.html; Martin Ruopp& Dirk Haase) was used to map loci to the Ara-bidopsis nuclear genome, and to identify loci thatmay have been recently duplicated.

Primer design

Primers were designed using PrimerExpress (ABIPrism). Primer annealing regions were selected tominimize the likelihood of paralog amplificationand to generate amplicon melting temperatures of75–80 �C. Primer specificity was confirmed in aPTC-200 thermocycler using a Quantitect SYBR-Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) on target template andnearest paralog clone templates. Primer sequencesand annealing temperatures were as follows:AML1 upper primer 5¢ gaccacaaaccttttacccaggtt3¢, lower primer 5¢ tagccagcaaagaagatgagtgta 3¢,63 �C; AML2 upper primer 5¢ gat-ggtcaagacgccaatgat 3¢, lower primer 5¢ gcag-cattcttggagttaccgt 3¢, 68 �C; AML3 upper primer5¢ ccaagaaggaagaaggtttagcca 3¢, lower primer 5¢aacgactgcggttgctgaaag 3¢, 64 �C; AML4 upperprimer 5¢ gtgccggaatctaatcggagtta 3¢, lower primer5¢ ttctgcttcctctgacggaca 3¢, 68 �C; AML5 upperprimer 5¢ ggcagagagagaagctgacacag 3¢, lower pri-mer 5¢ gcctttcaccaatatgtacggttaa 3¢, 64 �C; TEL1upper primer 5¢ gagtggatcatgttgtgacagtga 3¢, lowerprimer 5¢ atgtttctccttccacggtgata 3¢, 67 �C; TEL2upper primer 5¢ accattattatccaccgccacca 3¢, lowerprimer 5¢ tctgaactctccgccggtga 3¢, 68 �C; FAD2upper primer 5¢ ccgagtaccgcttctgatagtga 3¢, lowerprimer 5¢ cagtcccactctgatgaatcgtagt 3¢, 65 �C.

In situ RNA hybridization

The distribution of transcripts for specific mei2-like genes was determined by in situ RNAhybridization experiments. Digoxigenin-labelledprobes corresponding to the antisense strandcloned mei2-like genes of interest were hybridizedto paraffin-sectioned material. Tissue fixation,hybridization, washes and detection of hybridiza-tion were performed using previously describedmethods (Jackson et al., 1994). To confirm the

655

Page 4: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

specificity of the probes used, control hybridiza-tion experiments were performed in which indi-vidual probes were hybridized to membranes ontowhich a dilution series of synthetic sense tran-scripts for target transcripts had been fixed. In allcases, probes showed at least a tenfold highersignal with target transcripts compared to signalobtained for transcripts of other mei2-like genes.

Q-PCR

PCR reactions were performed in an ABI Prism7900 Sequence Detection system using a QuantitectSYBR-Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). For each tissue,three RT+ and three RT) template reactions wererun. Controls and standards, all performed intriplicate, include water as a template, a 10)9-folddilution series of the target template, and a 10)3-fold dilution series of the target’s nearest paralog.Thermocycling included 5 min at 95 �C; 94 �C for15 s, annealing for 30 s, and 72 �C for 1 min, 35cycles; and a final melting curve step of 50 to 95 �C.

Values for each reaction were obtained basicallyaccording to manufacturer’s instructions (ABIPrism Sequence Detection System User Bulletin#2, updated 10/2001). Briefly, a standard curve isconstructed using the log of the template standard(in moles of single-stranded template) plottedagainst the Threshold Cycle (CT) for a given reac-tion. A slope of�3.3 on this curve corresponds to adoubling of template every cycle; results of runswhose standard curve slopes were greater that 3.4or less than 3.0 were discarded as artifactual.

To control for variability in the quality oftemplate, values were normalized against those ofthe internal standard FATTY ACID DESATUR-ASE 2 (FAD2). FAD2 was used because its en-coded protein performs an essential function in allcell types, it is highly expressed in a broad range oftissues, and it is a single copy gene in Arabidopsis.

Results

Mei2p-like proteins are well-representedin the Viridiplantae

To identify Mei2p-like proteins in vascular plants,the essentially complete Arabidopsis and rice ge-nomes (AGI, 2000; Goff et al., 2002; Yu et al.,2002) were searched with tBlastn (Altschul et al.,1997) for sequences encoding the highly conserved

C-terminal RRM common to S. pombe Mei2p,Arabidopsis AML1 and maize te1. This searchyielded nine Arabidopsis and six rice loci. Twelveof these loci (seven Arabidopsis and five rice) en-code proteins with two N-terminal RRMs pre-ceding a C-terminal mei2-like RRM. cDNA fromArabidopsis loci were cloned to confirm or correctgene predictions and RACE was used to confirm 5¢ends. cDNAs for AML3 and AML5 differed fromtheir predicted ORFs: an AML5 3¢ exon wasmispredicted, and a coding AML3 exon wasskipped due to a single base error in the genomicsequence. Oryza gene predictions were confirmedby comparison to available rice (Kikuchi et al.,2003) or other monocot cDNA and EST se-quences. A further two Arabidopsis and one riceloci encode proteins which contain the C-terminalmei2-like RRM but no other mei2-like features. Asearch of the nearly complete nuclear genome ofChlamydomonas reinhardtii, a photosyntheticnonvascular alga, revealed one additional mei2-like locus. Table 1 lists Mei2p-like proteins inArabidopsis, rice and Chlamydomonas. An align-ment of the C-terminal RRMs of these sequencesis shown in Figure 1.

Comparisons of these clones emphasize thehigh degree of conservation of the third RRM,which was then used in a second round of searchesagainst ESTs and unfinished genomic sequencefrom other vascular plants. cDNAs correspondingto ESTs that appear to tag full-length or near full-length mei2-like ORFs were ordered and se-quenced. Genomic loci from Hordeum vulgare andMedicago truncatula were compared to availableESTs and cDNAs to assess the validity of pre-dicted ORFs. This analysis yielded a further 16 fullor near-full length Mei2p-like predicted proteins,which are listed in Table 2.

Phylogenetic analysis divides the plant mei2-likegene family into four clades

A phylogenetic analysis of the transcripts andputative ORFs from Arabidopsis, rice and Chla-mydomonas is shown in Figure 2. The vascularplant sequences fall into four distinct clades: twoArabidopsis mei2-like clades, named AML14 andAML235, a third TEL clade and a fourth mei2C-Terminal RRM only (MCT) clade. All fourclades have representatives from both Arabidopsisand rice. The Chlamydomonas ORF resolves as a

656

Page 5: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

sister to the two AML clades, but not as a sister toall vascular plant Mei2p-like proteins. The twoAML clades together form a larger clade with abootstrap value of 97. The TELs and MCTs forma larger clade with a bootstrap value of 100. TheMCTs do not form a clade with a bootstrap valueabove 55, and do not always resolve as distinctfrom the TELs. Their depiction as a distinct cladeis supported by the motif analysis below.

A second phylogenetic analysis (not shown) ofall sequences listed in Table 2 found the following:(i) all vascular plant mei2-like transcripts (includ-ing a single partial transcript from the gymno-sperm Pinus taeda) resolve into one of the fourclades of Figure 2; and, (ii) the two AML cladeswere well-represented from a variety of species, but

the TELs and MCTs were not. Only a single TELtranscript could be detected (inferred from a con-tig of 5 Glycine max ESTs out of 357,720 nucleo-tide sequences available). Similarly, the MCTclade is represented by only a single Triticum aes-tivum EST (found among 504,102 nucleotide se-quences available). This poor representationsuggests that both TEL and MCT gene classes areexpressed at very low levels, and/or have verylimited tissue distributions.

Sequence analysis reveals commonand clade-specific motifs

All of the Mei2p-like proteins in Table 2 share ahighly conserved C-terminal mei2-like RRM. At

Table 1. Mei2-like gene products in Arabidopsis, Rice and Chlamydomonas.

Transcript Gene structure Number

of exons

Protein length

– resides

Sequence

source

BAC/contig Chr Locus or

cDNA

AML1 14 915 cDNA K22G18 V AT5G61960

AML2 13 830 cDNA F14N22/F7D19 II AT2G42890

AML3 11 760 cDNA F15J5 IV AT4G18120

AML4 14 907 cDNA T28J14/T2I1 V AT5G07290

AML5 12 800 cDNA F15D2 I AT1G29400

TEL1 5 615 cDNA MJL14 III AT3G26120

TEL2 5 527 cDNA F12A21 I AT1G67770

MCT1 3p 233 genomic F28L22 I AT1G37140

MCT2 4p 282 genomic MXM12/F13G24 V AT5G07930

OML1 6p 672 genomic AAAA01003386 I no rice EST

OML2 13p 848 genomic AAAA01003321 II no rice EST

OML3 15 955 cDNA AAAA01005965 V AK074004

OML4 12p 933 genomic AAAA01004807 II AK062177n

OML5 15 811 cDNA AAAA01000531 II AK068695

OML6 4 242 cDNA AAAA01000466 IX AK064107

ChlMei2 6p 790 genomic scaffold 377 unk No EST

Explanations: Chr – Chromosome, p – predicted, unk – unknown, n – not full length. For gene structures, the midline represents the

genomic locus, solid blocks below the midline indicate untranslated regions (where known), while solid blocks spanning the midline

indicate coding exons.

657

Page 6: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

many sites in the C-terminal RRM, conservation isabsolute across all genes compared. The domain isfurther distinguished by a conserved extension atits C-terminus of about 50 amino acids which isnot associated with other RRMs (Birney et al.,1993; Burd and Dreyfuss, 1994). Like Mei2p itself,the TELs and AMLs (with exceptions to be dis-cussed below) also possess two N-terminal RRMs.By contrast, the MCTs show no recognizablemotifs beyond their single RRMs.

mei2-like genes belonging to the TEL and MCTclades can be distinguished from AML membersby the distance between two elements contained inRRM3, ribonucleoprotein consensus sequence 2(RNP 2) and RNP 1 (Birney et al., 1993; Burd andDreyfuss, 1994). In some characterized RRMs, theregion between RNP2 and RNP1 plays a role insequence recognition. In AMLs, this distance is

absolutely fixed at 32 highly conserved residues. Inthe TELs and MCTs, an additional 6–20 residueinsert separates the RNPs.

Members of both AML clades share the fol-lowing motifs: a small ‘Tri-Serine’ element; a re-gion rich in acidic residues containing anIGNLLPD consensus (absent from Chlamydo-monas); a second region rich in acidic residuescontaining a GGMELD consensus; two N-termi-nal RRMs, a variable region of 200–400 residuescontaining a double tryptophan element and anHIGSAP element (not recognized in Chlamydo-monas); and the C-terminal mei2-like RRM, withthe RNP 2 - RNP 1 distance fixed at 32 residues(Figures 1 and 3).

The location of the double tryptophan and theHIGSAP elements within the AML variableregion is similar to that of two critical sites in

Figure 1. The signature Mei2p-like C-terminal RNA recognition motifs of representative Arabidopsis and Chlamydomonas mei2-like

genes. Shown are the C-terminal RNA Recognition Motifs (RRMs) of S. pombe Mei2p, the single Chlamydomonas Mei2p-like RRM

and four representative Arabidopsis Mei2p-like proteins; a single RRM from Arabidopsis Poly(A) Bindong Prptein 2 (AtBABP2) is

included to illustrate that the high degree of sequence similarity among the Mei2p-like proteins is not a characteristic of RRMs

generally. RNA Recognition Motif Domains 2 and 1 (RNP2, RNP1) are underlined, as is the VLS separating RNP2 and RNP1 in the

TELs and MCTs.

658

Page 7: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

S. pombe Mei2p whose phosphorylation stateindirectly governs RNA binding, sub-cellularlocalization and activity of Mei2p (Watanabeet al., 1997).

Members of the TEL clade share a smallN-terminal GNL motif followed by a hydrophobicproline-rich stretch (26 of 53 residues are proline inTEL1; 11 of 14 in GmTEL, 21 of 32 in TEL2, 11 of22 in ZmTE1, and 17 of 27 in OML1), two RRMs,a variable region with no clear motifs, and aC-terminal RRM with a variable RNP2–RNP1distance (Figures 1 and 4).

Alternatively spliced AMLs and genomicallyencoded motif deletions are common in the vascularplants

Alternative splicing is commonly observed inplants (Simpson and Filipowicz, 1996). However,until recently there were relatively few exampleswith clear functional significance (Macknightet al., 1997; Lopato et al., 1999; Mano et al., 1999;Reddy, 2001; Jasinski et al., 2002; Macknightet al., 2002; de la Fuente van Bentem et al., 2003;Kazan, 2003; Quesada et al., 2003; Savaldi-Gold-

stein et al., 2003; Staiger et al., 2003; Zhang andGassmann, 2003). In the Arabidopsis mei2-likefamily, alternative splicing was observed in tran-scripts of two of the five AML loci and one of thetwo TEL loci. Splice variant AML3 and AML4transcripts were cloned from bulk shoot tissue.Only the AML3 variants alter the coding potentialof the transcript. One AML3 variant lacks aTri-Serine motif due to alternate intron 5¢ endselection; a second variant retains an intron,interrupting the open reading frame with a stopcodon. Retention of intron three in TEL1, con-taining a stop codon and polyadenylation signal,yields a transcript encoding a truncated openreading frame.

A bioinformatics-based approach was used todetect splice variants elsewhere in the availablevascular plant EST database. cDNA sequencesfrom Table 2 were used to query vascular plantESTs at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.gov). Splice vari-ants were identified when a given pair of near-identical sequences differed only by a gap orabrupt border containing one or more consensusintron border sequences. A full list of splice vari-ants detected is given in Table 3.

Table 2. Other full and near full length Mei2-like gene products in the Viridiplantae.

Species Order Transcript Protein

length

Clade Source Sequence ID

Pinus taeda Coniferales PtAML1n 632 AML235 cDNA NXCI_108_B01

Beta vulgaris Caryophyllales BvAML1 617i AML14 cDNA 23-E9135-006-006-M06-T3

Glycine max Fabales GmTEL1 529 TEL EST contig Gm-c1036-7660,

Gm-c1052-5123,

Gm-c1036-11113,

Gm-c1036-12445,

Gm-c1036-9961

Medicago truncatula Fabales MtAML1 856 AML235 cDNA NF012c12PH

Medicago truncatula Fabales MtAML5 865 AML235 cDNA NF028G07PH

Medicago truncatula Fabales MtAML2 961 AML14 genomic mtgsp_002h08

Aegyptes speltoides Poales AsAML1 869 AML235 cDNA WHE2239_F10_L19

Hordeum vulgare Poales HvAML6 919i AML14 cDNA HVSMEi0006M19f

Hordeum vulgare Poales HvAML3 921 AML14 genomic BAC011009

Sorghum bicolor Poales SbAML1 818i AML14 cDNA PI1_91_F03.b1_A002

Triticum aestivum Poales TaMCT1 223 MCT EST WHE3506_C01_E02

Triticum aestivum Poales TaAML15 870 AML235 cDNA TaLr1151E12R

Zea mays Poales TE1 656 TEL cDNA AF047852

Cirtus unshiu Sapindales CuAML1 858 AML235 cDNA pcMAlM1105-48

Lycopersicon

esculentum

Solanales LeAML1 971 AML14 cDNA cTOD20J23

Solanum tuberosum Solanales StAML1 843 AML235 cDNA cSTS5O17

Explanations: n – transcript is not full length; i – predicted protein lacks one or more adjacent internal motifs.

659

Page 8: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

In several cases, AML class cDNAs that lackone or more motifs can be attributed to genomi-cally encoded variants. The Hordeum vulgare locusencoding HvAML6 does not encode a Tri-Serinemotif. The Sorghum bicolor SbAML1 and the Betavulgaris BvAML1 loci have independently losttheir two N-terminal RRMs, but retain all otherclade-specific motifs.

One pair of Arabidopsis mei2-like genes is foundin a large genomic duplication

The nine Arabidopsis mei2-like genes are distrib-uted throughout the genome. AML1 and AML4,appear to be products of a recent gene duplication

of the region spanning At5G60990 (Replicationprotein A1-like) to At5G62230 (a putative pro-tein) at the north end of chromosome V andAt5G07170 (a putative protein) to At5G08020(Replication factor A-like) at the south end ofchromosome V. 14.5% of the annotated genes inthe northern block (18 of 124 genes in 300 kb)show significant similarity to 21.2% of the genes inthe southern block (18 of 85 genes in 240 kb). Theparalogous loci are colinear and span, but are notconfined to, two small duplicated clusters identi-fied by the MIPs Interactive Redundancy Viewer.No other mei2-like genes could be linked toidentified duplications within the Arabidopsisgenome.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships in the mei2-like gene family in Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Chlamydomonas. Also included are Zea

mays TE1, and S. pombe Mei2p. The parsimony tree was generated in PAUP*4.0b10 with sequences added randomly to a heuristic

search. Bootstrap values of 55 or greater are shown to the right of the clade they describe.

660

Page 9: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

Putative Mei2p-like proteins are not plant specific,but are absent from Metazoans and S. cerevisiae

tBlastn searches (Altschul et al., 1997) using theS. pombe Mei2p sequence and keyword searches

of annotated genomic sequence reveals a numberof Mei2p-like proteins within several eukaryoticgroups, but none within the Archaea or Eubac-teria. No examples of mei2-like loci could befound in metazoans, nor were any detected in

Figure 3. Conserved motifs and local alignments for Arabidopsis, Oryza and Chlamydomonas AML protein sequences. For the

similarity plot, the X-axis is residue number; the Y-axis is the index of similarity with 1 indicating complete similarity. Labeled regions

are shown below the plot as follows: (a) TriSer; (b) IGN; (c) GGMELD; (d1, d2) RRM tandem repeat; (e) VGSP; (f) LHPH; (g) WW-

motif; (h) HIGSAP; (i) Mei2p-like RRM (see Figure 1). The IGN motif, b, is absent from ChlMEI2.

661

Page 10: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

S. cerevisae, though examples were evident inother fungi.

Among unicellular eukaryotes, mei2-like C-ter-minal RRMs were detected in the genomicsequences of the Apicomplexan Alveolates Plas-modium falciparum, P. yoelii, and Toxoplasmagondii; and as ESTs in T. gondii (two paralogoustranscripts) and Neospora hughesi; and in the Cil-iophoran Alveolate Paramecium tetraurelia geno-mic survey sequence. At least one mei2-likeC-terminal RRM is present in the available gen-ome sequence of the Mycetozoan Dictyosteliumdiscoides. As previously mentioned, there is a sin-gle mei2-like locus in the Chlamydomonas rein-hardtii nuclear genome sequence.

Few of the ORFs encoding mei2-like RRMs inthese unicellular organisms are well resolved be-yond the motif itself, precluding any analysis ofthe overall structure of their encoded proteins.Within the RRMs, the RNP2–RNP1 linear dis-tance is absolutely conserved at 32 residues. Thissuggests that the variable-length sequence (VLS)separating the RNPs in the TEL clade of Mei2p-like proteins is unique to the vascular plants.

With respect to the expression of these uni-cellular genes, two examples suggest a meiotic

function. The Plasmodium falciparum mei2-likeorthologue MAL6P1.195 accumulates to signifi-cantly higher levels in the gametocyte comparedto other developmental stages (Bozdech et al.,2003; Le Roch et al., 2003). Similarly, the Chla-mydomonas mei2-like transcript is absent fromexisting EST collections, which are largely fo-cused on vegetatively growing cells under a vari-ety of environmental conditions and for which nomeiosis-specific EST collections have been re-ported (www.biology.duke.edu/chlamy_genome).This stands in sharp contrast to the vascularplant AML transcripts, which are highlyrepresented in EST collections from vegetativetissues.

Expression analysis shows clade specific patternsof transcript accumulation

To gain insight into the possible function ofmei2-like genes in Arabidopsis, we analyzed thetissue localization of mei2-like transcripts inembryos and SAMs by in situ hybridization.Earlier studies of the maize te1 gene had showna close correlation between its patterned expres-sion in the SAM and defects to this structure in

Figure 4. Conserved motifs and local alignments for TEL protein sequences. The similarity plot is as for Figure 3. Labeled regions are

shown below the plot as follows: (a) GNL motif; (b) fraction of the proline-rich region; (c1,c2) RRM tandem repeat; (i) Mei2p-like

RRM (see Figure 1). Glycine TEL and Zea TE1 were included to increase the resolution of the TEL similarity plot.

662

Page 11: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

Table

3.Alternativelysplicedandgenomicallyencoded

variantAML

transcripts.

Sequence

Pair

Organism

Event

EXON/intron…

intron/EXON

How

often?

EffectonORF

Location

AML3,variantAML3-2

Arabidopsis

Intron5¢e

nddefinition

ACA

274/guauversusCUA

325/guga

6/10

Tri-Serinedeleted

Tri-Serine

HvAML6,

Hordeum

genomic

locus

Hordeum

vulgare

Standard

splicingevent

ACC547/guga…

cag/C

GA

All

Tri-Serineabsent

Tri-Serine

SbAML1,Sorghum

genomic

locus

Sorghum

bicolor

Standard

splicingevent

GAG

1194/guaa…

uag/A

UC

All

RRM1,RRM2not

genomicallyencoded

RRM1,RRM2

BvAML1,Beta

genomic

locus

Betavulgaris

Standard

splicingevent

GCG

801/guaa…

cag/U

UU

All

RRM1,RRM2not

genomicallyencoded

RRM1,RRM2

AML3,variantAML3-3

Arabidopsis

Intronretained

GAG

1059/guga…

cag/A

UA

3/10

Premature

STOP

After

RRM2

MtA

ML1,BF645880

Medicagotruncatula

Intronretained

AGC493/guaa…

cag/U

AA

1/6

Premature

STOP

After

Tri-Serine

MtA

ML1,AW690292

Medicagotruncatula

Intron3¢e

nddefinition

…unknown/G

341UG

versus…

cag/G

350GC

1/6

Residues

AGG

deleted

N-terminus

BQ970227,BQ971840

Helianthusannuus

Intron3¢e

nddefinition

…cag/G

(+14)U

Aversus…

unknown/U

GU

1/8

Frameshift

RRM3

BQ968715,BU028561

Helianthusannuus

Intronretained

AAG/guau…

cag/A

AC

1/7

Premature

STOP

RRM3

HvAML6,CB880137

Hordeumvulgare

Intronexcised

CAA

2438/guac…gcu

n/G

UA

1/17

Premature

STOP

RRM3

AML4,AML4-2

Arabidopsis

Intronretained

AAG

3282/guaa…

cag/A

GG

2/3

None

3¢U

TR

LeA

ML1,BE354132

Lycopersiconesculentum

Intronexcised

GCC397/guaa…cag/A

AA

1/9

None

5¢U

TR

MtA

ML5,BG453336

Medicagotruncatula

Intron3¢e

nddefinition

…cag/A

149AA

versus…

unknown/U

(149-8)GC

1/2

None

5¢U

TR

CF051251,BU037082

Zea

mays

Intronexcised

CAA/guua…aag/A

CT

3/30

None

3¢U

TR

Explanations:n–non-canonicalintron3¢end.A

subscriptindicatesthebase

ofthecorrespondingsequencedclone,ifknown,ortheeff

ectofthealternativeintronendselectionon

oneEST

sequence

withrespectto

another.

663

Page 12: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

te1 loss of function mutants (Veit et al., 1998).TEL1 and TEL2 transcripts were localized pre-dominantly to apical meristems. Beginning with

relatively uniform expression throughout theglobular embryo, transcripts later resolved to theapical and basal regions of the heart stage em-

Figure 5. Patterns of transcript accumulation for Arabidopsis mei2-like genes in embryonic, vegetative and floral tissues. Accumu-

lation patterns of specific genes are shown in heart stage, torpedo stage, vegetative or floral tissue as indicated. Arrows along top row of

images show approximate locations of the SAM (black) and RAM (yellow) in each of the four stages.

664

Page 13: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

bryo (Figure 5). In the apical region, expressionincludes precursors of the cotyledons and SAM,while the basal region shows expression in thequiescent center and adjacent founder cells of thevascular system. Later, in the torpedo stageembryos, TEL1 signal becomes limited to theSAM and RAM (root apical meristem). TEL2transcripts exhibit a similar distribution, but aredetected at lower levels than their TEL1 coun-terparts and appear more focused over the SAMof heart and torpedo staged embryos. In contrastto TEL1, TEL2 accumulation is much more in-tense in the shoot than in the root of torpedostage embryos. Later in development, TEL2expression becomes confined to central regionsof the apical dome in both vegetative and floralshoot apices. By contrast, TEL1 transcripts showa broader and more patchy distribution withinthe meristem.

AML transcripts exhibit a variety of distribu-tions, which in general are less distinct than theirTEL counterparts. AML1 transcripts are relativelyuniformly distributed in the heart stage embryo,but become more focused in vascular precursortissue along the apical/basal axis in later stages.AML1 is expressed weakly throughout the vege-tative shoot apex, but is later focused in organo-genic regions of floral apices. AML2 shows awidely distributed but patchy accumulation in theheart stage embryo that later resolves to anAML1-like pattern in the torpedo stage embryo.Higher levels of transcripts are observedthroughout the vegetative embryo, while no sig-nificant accumulation is observed in floral apices.AML3 transcripts show a relatively uniform dis-tribution in the heart and torpedo stage embryos.Unlike other AML and TEL transcripts, AML3accumulation appears restricted primarily to nu-clei in these early stages, and was not detected inthe SAM during vegetative or floral development.Notably, AML3 is also the transcript with thehighest frequency of alternative splicing. AML4transcripts appear to be relatively uniformly dis-tributed throughout the meristem during embry-onic, and vegetative development; like AML1,AML4 transcripts accumulate in floral organo-genic regions. AML5 transcripts exhibited a simi-lar broad distribution, but showed higher levelsalong the apical/basal axis of the embryo, espe-cially in the SAM region of the heart staged em-bryo.

Q-PCR reveals AML expression across a broadrange of tissues

Using FAD2, a gene which is highly expressedacross a broad range of tissues, as an internalstandard, AML and TEL transcript accumulationwas observed among a panel of distinct tissues.TEL1 and TEL2 were found only in buds, flowers,and siliques, and never more than 10-fold higherthan background. No SAM- or RAM-enrichedtissues were used. This indicates that TEL1 andTEL2 are expressed at very low levels, in a verylimited set of cells, or both.

AML1 through AML5 were expressed ubiqui-tously at levels of 1000· or more than TEL1 orTEL2. Expression was generally high in leaves andlowest in seedlings, and was higher in activelygrowing leaf tissue (cauline leaves and leaves ofrosettes which had not yet bolted) than in moremature basal leaves of plants which had bolted(Figure 6).

A correlation test was performed on above-ground tissue AML transcript levels to assay forrelationships among AML accumulation patterns.Data sets which rise and fall in unison have acorrelation value of up to 1, unrelated data setshave a correlation of 0, and data sets which areinversely related have a correlation value of minus1. Results of this analysis (Table 4) show thattranscripts that encode similar proteins showsimilarly varying patterns of accumulation. Con-trol reactions confirmed that this correlation is notdue to non-specific amplification of nearest par-alog transcripts.

Functional analysis of the AMLs and TELs

Lines that contain T-DNA insertions in AML1through AML5, TEL1 and TEL2 have been iso-lated. Disruptions of single loci show no conspic-uous phenotypes (data not shown).

Discussion

Our survey of mei2-like genes in Arabidopsis, riceand other eukaryotes provides useful insights intothe origin and possible functions of this unusualfamily. As defined by the presence of an unusualRRM initially described in the Schizosaccharo-myces pombe mei2 gene, this family has undergone

665

Page 14: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

a dramatic expansion in the vascular plant lineage.Their ubiquity among all highly sequenced vas-cular plant species, as well as in the green algaeChlamydomonas, suggests mei2-like genes arepresent in all green plants.

The essentially complete genome sequences ofrice and Arabidopsis afford a consistent view ofthe mei2-like family in angiosperms. Four distinctclades are revealed, which can be grouped byabsolute sequence similarity as well as by cladespecific sequence motifs. By definition, all share amotif similar to the C-terminal RRM of mei2.Comparisons between these clades and mei2emphasize the highly conserved nature of thismotif. By contrast, RRM1 and RRM2, thoughsimilarly positioned to those of mei2, appear lesswell conserved and are entirely absent in the MCTclade and some AML clade members. The pres-ence of Arabidopsis and rice representatives in allfour clades suggests that these clades were an early

feature in the evolution of the Angiosperms.Looking back further, the closer affinity of Chl-MEI2 with the AML clades suggests the existenceof distinct TEL and AML clades prior to theevolution of vascular plants. An alternative sce-nario, that the TEL and AML clades divergedlater, can also be supported, but requires that theTEL clade in some way evolved more rapidly. Ouranalysis, which focuses on the diversification ofmei2-like genes in plants complements recent re-views that examine their relationship among othereukaryotic groups, as well as to other families ofRNA binding proteins (Lorkoviac and Barta,2002; Jeffares et al., 2004).

With respect to the biological functions medi-ated by mei2-like genes, data reported here sup-port roles other than the meiosis promotingactivity of mei2. Arabidopsis mei2-like genes showa diverse range of tissue specific expression pat-terns throughout the life of the sporophyte, sug-

Figure 6. Quantification of AML transcript levels by quantitative PCR. AML1, AML2 and AML5 transcript values are described by

the Y-axis. AML3 transcript values are 0.2x the values on the Y-axis. AML4 transcript values are 0.1x the values in the Y-axis. AML2

accounts for over 50% of total transcript accumulation; the AML235 clade accounts for 85% of total transcripts. All transcript values

were normalized using accumulation of the internal standard FAD2, a transcript highly expressed in all tissues.

Table 4. Correlation test for accumulation patterns of AML1 through AML5 above-ground tissue.

AML1 AML2 AML3 AML4 AML5

AML1 1

AML2 0.54 1

AML3 0.49 0.79 1

AML4 0.72 0.47 0.67 1

AML5 0.32 0.84 0.94 0.59 1

Cells with values above 0.7 are shaded. Members of a given clade show a high degree of correlation in their patterns of transcript

accumulation. Control reactions were run to confirm that this is not due to nonspecific amplification of nearest paralog transcripts.

666

Page 15: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

gesting these genes perform specialized functionsduring mitotic growth. Attempts to define thesefunctions by analysis of loss of function pheno-types reveal no obvious phenotypes, possibly dueto genetic redundancy as suggested by phyloge-netic and expression analyses of the gene family.However, the highly focused and apically limitedexpression of TEL1 and TEL2 would be consistentwith these genes acting as the maize te1 gene does,to somehow limit differentiation processes in theSAM. By contrast, the broader expression patternsseen for members of the AML clades suggest morediverse functions. The distinct character of theAML and TEL clades is further reinforced by thepresence of clade specific motifs which presumablymediate different sets of protein interactions.

The simultaneous and specific expression ofTEL1 and TEL2 genes in regions in both the shootand root deserves special comment given theuncommon nature of this pattern. Previousexamples of transcripts with a similar expressionpattern include the tomato defective embryo andmeristems (dem) mutant (Keddie et al., 1998), agene critical to both root and SAM development,and the FASCIATA 1 and 2 (FAS1 and FAS2),genes thought to encode chromatin assembly fac-tors, which are also essential for the normalmaintenance of the root and shoot (Kaya et al.,2001). In view of recent work that suggests theindeterminate growth of shoot and roots may relyon similar mechanisms, (Casamitjana-Martinezet al., 2003; Hobe et al., 2003; Kamiya et al., 2003;Veit, 2004), the expression of TEL1 and TEL2 inboth locations would be consistent with a role forthese genes in maintaining cells in an undeter-mined state.

At present, there is no direct evidence for howmei2-like genes might function at a molecular levelin plants. In fission yeast, however, the ability ofmei2 to promote meiosis depends critically on theRNA binding activity of RRM3, the most highlyconserved element of the gene family. More recentstudies by Shimada et al. (2003) reveal the locali-zation of Mei2p into an unusual electron densecomplex which is associated with the locusencoding meiRNA, the non-coding RNA to whichMei2p binds. The functional significance of thischromosomal association, though closely corre-lated with the onset of meiosis, remains unclear.Though mei2 appears to trigger chromatinremodelling associated with meiotic processes, this

activity could be mediated indirectly (Mizunoet al., 2001).

To reconcile the clearly defined meiotic activityof mei2 in yeast with what appear to be more di-verse roles of related genes in plants, two generalperspectives can be offered. The first would sup-pose that the molecular mechanism by which mei2-like genes act is well suited to certain processes.For example, a mei2 mediated chromatin remod-elling activity would have clear relevance to mei-osis, in which chromatids must replicate and pair.Similarly, the proposed role for TEL genes inmaintaining cells in an undetermined state mightalso reflect a chromatin-related activity. Theessential role of the chromatin assembly factorsFAS1 and FAS2 in roots and shoots suggestsregulation at this level may be an integral featureof stem cell maintenance.

A second and not mutually exclusive perspec-tive focuses on how cell division and growth mightbe linked to nutritional status. As a single cell, thenormal response of heterothallic S. pombe diploidcells to nutrient stress is to undergo meiosis, aprocess in which mei2 plays a pivitol role. Inmulticellular organisms, however, such a directcoupling of cellular behaviour and nutrient statusmight preclude more complex patterns of devel-opment. Perhaps the role of mei2-like genes reflectstheir ancestral role in coupling nutrient status andcell division which has been adapted to permitdifferent cellular responses in a multicellular con-text. Thus, the specific expression of TEL genes inboth the shoot and root might somehow conditionthe characteristically slow division of apical initialswithin these structures.

Conclusion

Our current analysis suggests mei2-like genes havefound several functional niches in the plant king-dom that extend beyond the meiotic signallingfunction of the fission yeast mei2 gene, and whichhave no parallel in metazoans. Phylogenetic anal-yses of this family in plants suggest they haddiversified in ancestor of the angiosperms, withfour distinct subfamilies found in both monocotsand dicots. Expression analyses support roles forthese genes throughout vegetative development.The expression of TEL genes in domains of boththe shoot and root which are thought to contain

667

Page 16: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

pluripotent stem cells is especially intriguing, andoffers support for models in which the uncom-mitted state of these cells in both apical meristemtypes is maintained by similar mechanisms.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a New ZealandMarsden Fund award to B. Veit, New ZealandFoundation for Research Science and Technologyfunding to AgResearch, a Massey Universitydoctoral scholarship to D. Jeffares, a NSF/DOE/USDA training grant award to G. Anderson andUSDA Hatch and DOE Energy funding to M.Hanson. The authors thank Masayuki Yamamotofor insightful discussions of mei2 gene functionand Igor Kardailsky and Derek White for helpfulcomments on the manuscript.

Acknowledgement of materials

Clones from EST collections were kindly madeavailable from the following sources: PtAML1 –Dr. Arthur Johnson, North Carolina StateUniversity; BvAML1 – Dr. Bernd Weisshaar,Max-Planck-Institute for Plant BreedingResearch; MtAML1, MtAML5 – Dr. Joe Clouse,Noble Foundation; AsAML1 – Dr. Olin Ander-son, US Department of Agriculture, AgricultureResearch Service, US Department of Agriculture,Albany, CA; HvAML6 – Dr. RA Wing, ClemsonUniversity Genomics Institute; SbAML1 – Dr.sL.H. Pratt and M.M. Cordonnier-Pratt, Univer-sity of Georgia; TaAML15 – Dr. Sylvie Cloutier,Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada; CuAML1 – Dr. Mitsuo Omura,National Institute of Fruit Tree Science, Oki-tsu,Japan; LeAML1 – Dr. Steven Tanksley, Cor-nell University via Clemson University GenomicsInstitute; StAML1 – Dr. Steven Tanksley, CornellUniversity and Dr. Robin Buell, TIGR, viaClemson University Genomics Institute. Hordeumvulgare cultivar Tadmore genomic DNA waskindly provided by Dr. Mark Sorrells, CornellUniversity; Sorghum bicolor genomic DNA waskindly provided by Caroline Kellogg, CornellUniversity; Beta vulgaris genomic DNA was ex-tracted by Jason Gillman, Cornell University.Unfinished Medicago genomic sequence was made

available by the Medicago truncatula GenomeSequencing Project at the Advanced Center forGenome Technology of the University of Okla-homa, Norman, Oklahoma and the Noble Foun-dation, Ardmore, Oklahoma. cDNA clones fromtable 2 have been submitted to genbank underaccession numbers AY579879-AY579889; partialgenomic fragments of variant transcripts havebeen submitted to genbank under accession num-bers AY579890-AY579892.

References

AGI. 2000. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering

plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408: 796–815.

Altschul, S., Madden, T., Schaffer, A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z.,

Miller, W. and Lipman, D. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-

BLAST: a new generation of protein database search

programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389–3402.

Birney, E., Kumar, S. and Krainer, A. 1993. Analysis of the

RNA-recognition motif and RS and RGG domains: conser-

vation in metazoan pre-mRNA splicing factors. Nucleic

Acids Res. 21: 5803–5816.

Bozdech, Z., Zhu, J., Joachimiak, M.P., Cohen, F.E., Pulliam,

B. and DeRisi, J.L. 2003. Expression profiling of the schizont

and trophozoite stages of Plasmodium falciparum with a long-

oligonucleotide microarray. Genome Biol. 4(2).

Burd, C. and Dreyfuss, G. 1994. Conserved structures and

diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins. Science 265:

615–621.

Casamitjana-Martinez, E., Hofhuis, H., Xu, J., Liu, C.,

Heidstra, R. and Scheres, B. 2003. Root-specific CLE19

overexpression and the sol1/2 suppressors implicate a CLV-

like pathway in the control of Arabidopsis root meristem

maintenance. Curr. Biol. 13: 1435–1441.

Crespi, M.D., Jurkevitch, E., Poiret, M., d’Aubenton-Carafa,

Y., Petrovics, G., Kondorosi, E. and Kondorosi, A. 1994.

enod40, a gene expressed during nodule organogenesis, codes

for a non-translatable RNA involved in plant growth. EMBO

13: 5099–5112.

de la Fuente van Bentem, S., Vossen, J.H., Vermeer, J.E., de

Vroomen, M.J., Gadella, T.W. Jr., Haring, M.A. and

Cornelissen, B.J. 2003. The subcellular localization of plant

protein phosphatase 5 isoforms is determined by alternative

splicing. Plant Physiol. 133: 702–712.

Goff, S.A., Ricke, D., Lan, T.H., Presting, G., Wang, R.,

Dunn, M., Glazebrook, J., Sessions, A., Oeller, P., Varma, H,

et al. 2002. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa

L. ssp. japonica). Science 296(5565): 92–100.

Guhaniyogi, J. and Brewer, G. 2001. Regulation of mRNA

stability in mammalian cells. Gene 265: 11–23.

Hirayama, T., Ishida, C., Kuromori, T., Obata, S., Shimoda,

C., Yamamoto, M., Shinozaki, K. and Ohto, C. 1997.

Functional cloning of a cDNA encoding Mei2-like protein

from Arabidopsis thaliana using a fission yeast pheromone

receptor deficient mutant. FEBS Lett. 413: 16–20.

668

Page 17: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

Hobe, M., Muller, R., Grunewald, M., Brand, U. and Simon,

R. 2003. Loss of CLE40, a protein functionally equivalent to

the stem cell restricting signal CLV3, enhances root waving in

Arabidopsis. Dev. Genes Evol. 213: 371–381.

Hunter, C. and Poethig, R.S. 2003. miSSING LINKS: miRNAs

and plant development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13: 372–378.

Jackson, D., Veit, B. and Hake, S. 1994. Expression of maize

KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical

meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative

shoot. Development 120: 405–413.

Jasinski, S., Perennes, C., Bergounioux, C. and Glab, N. 2002.

Comparative molecular and functional analyses of the

tobacco cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor NtKIS1a and its

spliced variant NtKIS1b. Plant Physiol. 130: 1871–1882.

Jeffares, D.C., Phillips, M.J., Moore, S. and Veit, B. 2004. A

description of the Mei2-like protein family; structure, phylo-

genetic distribution and biological context. Dev. Genes Evol.

214(3): 149–158.

Kamiya, N., Nagasaki, H., Morikami, A., Sato, Y. and

Matsuoka, M. 2003. Isolation and characterization of a rice

WUSCHEL-type homeobox gene that is specifically ex-

pressed in the central cells of a quiescent center in the root

apical meristem. Plant J. 35: 429–441.

Kaya, H., Shibahara, K.I., Taoka, K.I., Iwabuchi, M.,

Stillman, B. and Araki, T. 2001. FASCIATA genes for

Chromatin Assembly Factor-1 in arabidopsis maintain the

cellular organization of apical meristems. Cell 104: 131–142.

Kazan, K. 2003. Alternative splicing and proteome diversity in

plants: the tip of the iceberg has just emerged. Trends Plant

Sci. 8: 468–471.

Keddie, J.S., Carrol, B.J., Thomas, C., Reyes, M., Klimyuk, V.,

Holtan, H., Gruissem, W. and Jones, J.D. 1998. Transposon

tagging of the Defective embryo and meristems gene of

tomato. Plant Cell 10: 877–888.

Kikuchi, S., Satoh, K., Nagata, T., Kawagashira, N. Doi, K.,

Kishimoto, N., Yazaki, J., Ishikawa, M., Yamada, H., Ooka,

H., et al. 2003. Collection, mapping, and annotation of over

28,000 cDNA clones from japonica rice. Science 301: 376–379.

Le Roch, K.G., Zhou, Y., Blair, P.L., Grainger, M., Moch,

J.K., Haynes, J.D., De La Vega, P., Holder, A.A., Batalov,

S., Carucci, D.J., et al., 2003. Discovery of gene function by

expression profiling of the malaria parasite life cycle. Science

301: 1503–1508.

Li, P. and McLeod, M. 1996. Molecular mimicry in develop-

ment: identification of ste11+ as a substrate and mei3+ as a

pseudosubstrate inhibitor of ran1+ kinase. Cell 87: 869–880.

Lopato, S., Kalyna, M., Dorner, S., Kobayashi, R., Krainer, A.

R. and Barta, A. 1999. atSRp30, one of two SF2/ASF-like

proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana, regulates splicing of

specific plant genes. Genes Dev. 13: 987–1001.

Lorkovic, Z.J. and Barta, A. 2002. Genome analysis: RNA

recognition motif (RRM) and K homology (KH) domain

RNA-binding proteins from the flowering plant Arabidopsis

thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 623–635.

MacIntosh, G., Wilkerson, C. and Green, P. 2001. Identifica-

tion and analysis of Arabidopsis expressed sequence tags

characteristic of non-coding RNAs. Plant Physiol. 127: 765–

776.

Macknight, R., Bancroft, I., Page, T., Lister, C., Schmidt, R.,

Love, K., Westphal, L., Murphy, G., Sherson, S., Cobbett,

C., et al. 1997. FCA, a gene controlling flowering time in

Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA-binding

domains. Cell 89(5): 737–745.

Macknight, R., Duroux, M., Laurie, R., Dijkwel, P., Simpson,

G., Dean, C. 2002. Functional significance of the alternative

transcript processing of the Arabidopsis floral promoter

FCA. Plant Cell 14: 877–888.

Mallory, A.C. and Vaucheret, H. 2004. MicroRNAs: something

important between the genes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7: 120–

125.

Mano, S., Hayashi, M. and Nishimura, M. 1999. Light

regulates alternative splicing of hydroxypyruvate reductase

in pumpkin. Plant J. 17: 309–320.

McLeod, M. and Beach, D. 1988. A specific inhibitor of ran1+

protein kinase regulates entry into meiosis in Schizosaccha-

romyces pombe. Nature 322: 509–514.

Mizuno,K.,Hasemi,T.,Ubukata,T.,Yamada,T., Lehmann,E.,

Kohli, J., Watanabe, Y., Iino, Y., Yamamoto, M., Fox, M.E.,

et al. 2001. Counteracting regulation of chromatin remodeling

at a fission yeast cAMP response element-related recombina-

tion hotspot by stress-activated protein kinase, cAMP-depen-

dent kinase and meiosis regulators. Genetics 159: 1467–1478.

Nicholas, K.B., Nicholas, H.B.J. and Deerfield, D.W.I. 1997.

GeneDoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation.

EMBNEW.NEWS 4: 14.

Page, R.D. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phyloge-

netic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12:

357–358.

Quesada, V., Macknight, R., Dean, C. and Simpson, G.G.

2003. Autoregulation of FCA pre-mRNA processing controls

Arabidopsis flowering time. EMBO 22: 3142–3152.

Reddy, A.S.N. 2001. Nuclear pre-mRNA splicing in plants.

Criti. Rev. Plant Sci. 20: 523–571.

Savaldi-Goldstein, S., Aviv, D., Davydov, O. and Fluhr, R.

2003. Alternative splicing modulation by a LAMMER kinase

impinges on developmental and transcriptome expression.

Plant Cell 15: 926–938.

Shimada, T., Yamashita, A. and Yamamoto, M. 2003. The

fission yeast meiotic regulator Mei2p forms a dot structure in

the horse-tail nucleus in association with the sme2 locus on

chromosome II. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 2461–2469.

Simpson, G.G. and Filipowicz, W. 1996. Splicing of precursors

to mRNA in higher plants: mechanism, regulation and sub-

nuclear organisation of the spliceosomal machinery. Plant

Mol. Biol. 32: 1–41.

Small, I.D. and Peeters, N. 2000. The PPR motif – a TPR-

related motif prevalent in plant organellar proteins. Trends

Biochem. Sci. 25: 46–47.

Staiger, D., Zecca, L., Wieczorek Kirk, D.A., Apel, K. and

Eckstein, L. 2003. The circadian clock regulatedRNA-binding

protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing

alternative splicing of its ownpre-mRNA.Plant J. 33: 361–371.

Taylor, C. and Green, P. 1995. Identification and characteriza-

tion of genes with unstable transcripts (GUTs) in tobacco.

Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 27–38.

Teramoto, H., Toyama, T., Takeba, G. and Tsuji, H. 1995.

Changes in expression of two cytokinin-repressed genes, CR9

and CR20, in relation to aging, greening, and wounding in

cucumber. Planta 196: 387–395.

Teramoto, H., Toyama, T., Takeba, G. and Tsuji, H. 1996.

Noncoding RNA for CR20, a cytokinin-repressed gene of

cucumber. Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 797–808.

669

Page 18: Diversification of Genes Encoding Mei2-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Plants

van Hoof, A., J.P, K., C.B, T. and P.J, G. 1997. GUT15 cDNAs

from tobacco (accession no. U84972) and Arabidopsis

(accession no. U84973) correspond to transcripts with

unusual metabolism and a short conserved ORF. Plant

Physiol. 113: 1004.

Veit, B. 2004. Determination of cell fate in apical meristems.

Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7: 57–64.

Veit, B., Briggs, S., Schmidt, R., Yanofsky, M. and Hake, S.

1998. Regulation of leaf initiation by the terminal ear 1 gene

of maize. Nature 393: 166–168.

Volpe, T., Schramke, V., Hamilton, G.L., White, S.A., Teng,

G., Martienssen, R.A. and Allshire, R.C. 2003. RNA

interference is required for normal centromere function in

fission yeast. Chromosome Res. 11: 137–146.

Watanabe, Y., Iino, Y., Furuhata, K., Shimoda, C. and

Yamamoto, H. 1988. The S. pombe mei2+ gene encoding a

crucial molecule for commitment to meiosis is under the

regulation of cAMP. EMBO J. 7: 761–767.

Watanabe, Y., Shinozake-Yabana, S., Chikashige, Y., hiraoka,

Y. and Yamamoto, M. 1997. Phosphorylation of RNA-

binding protein controls cell cycle switch from mitotic to

meiotic in fission yeast. Nature 387: 187–190.

Watanabe, Y. and Yamamoto, M. 1994. S. pombe mei2+

encodes an RNA-binding protein essential for premeiotic

DNA synthesis and meiosis I, which cooperates with a novel

RNA species meiRNA. Cell 78: 487–498.

Yamashita, A., Watanabe, Y., Nulina, N. and Yamamoto, M.

1998. RNA-assisted nuclear transport of the meiotic regula-

tor Mei2p in fission yeast. Cell 95: 115–123.

Yu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., Wong, G.K., Li, S., Liu, B., Deng, Y.,

Dai,L.,Zhou,Y.,Zhang,X., et al. 2002.Adraft sequenceof the

rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Science 296: 79–92.

Zhang, X.C. and Gassmann, W. 2003. RPS4-mediated disease

resistance requires the combined presence of RPS4 tran-

scripts with full-length and truncated open reading frames.

Plant Cell 15: 2333–2342.

670