DISTRICTS$COVERED$ THANJAVUR$ …rmsaindia.gov.in/administrator/components/com_monitoring/...6!! Consolidated Report/Executive Summary of RMSA Monitoring for the districts Thanjavur,

2ND HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF RMSA TAMIL NADU

2014

DISTRICTS COVERED

THANJAVUR

THIRUVARUR

NAGAPATTINAM

I N D I A N I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y M A D R A S

2

PARTICULARS

Preface and Acknowledgement Abbreviations General Information Consolidated Report for the Districts (Thanjavur, Thiruvarur and Nagapattinam) District wise Reports Thanjavur Thiruvarur Nagapattinam Annexures Annexure –I List of sample schools for RMSA Monitoring Thanjavur School list Thiruvarur School List Nagapattinam School list Annexure III – Welfare Schemes and Policies on Education in Tamil Nadu

3

PREFACE & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Institute has been assigned the task of carrying the Monitoring Work for Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha

Abhiyan in thirteen districts of Tamil Nadu.

We gratefully acknowledge the support received from the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) and

SPO Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, Tamil Nadu. This work would not have been completed without the

support of the district and school level officers who helped us by providing the requisite information.

We are thankful to the entire team who worked at the field and at office to successfully complete the field study and

in the compilation of report.

Milind Brahme & M. Suresh Babu

IIT Madras

4

General Information

1. 2nd Half Yearly Monitoring Report of (Monitoring Institution) on RMSA for

the State/UT of Tamil Nadufor the period of 1st January 2014 to 31st June 2014 1.1. General Information Sl. No. Subject Details

1. Name of the monitoring institution Indian Institute of Technology Madras

2. Period of the report 1st January 2014 to 31st June 2014 3. No. of Districts allocated 13 4. District names (write the districts names which the MI has

monitored) Thanjavur Thiruvarur Nagapattinam

5. Month of visit to the Districts /blocks (Information is to be given for district wise i.e District 1, District 2, District 3 etc)

District 1 (write the district name and month) District 2(write the district name and month) District3(write the district name and month)

6. MI selected the schools as per the criteria : Yes/No(Ref: As per the ToR 2013-15 point 4 (iii) under scale of work)

Yes

(i) Higher gender gap in enrolment Yes (ii) Higher population of SC/ST students, Yes (iii) Low retention rate and higher drop out rate Yes (iv) The School has a minimum of three CWSN Yes (v) The habitation where the school is located at has

sizeable number of OOSC Yes

(vi) The habitations where the school is located at witnesses in bound and out bound seasonal migration,

Yes

(vii) The ward/unit of planning where the school is located at is known to have sizeable number of urban deprived children

Yes

(viii) The school is located in a forest or far flung area Yes (ix) The habitation where the school is located at witnesses

recurrent floods or some other natural calamity Yes

(x) Pupil Teacher Ration (PTR) at school level Yes 7. Types of Schools visited as per the ToR 2013-15: Yes/No

(Ref: As per the ToR 2013-15 point 4(iv) under scale of work)

(i) 8 schools from urban areas visited Yes/No (ii) if yes write the number

Yes

(iii) 6 schools from Special Training Centers (3 residential and 3 non-residential) visited : Yes/No

(iv) if yes write the number

Yes

(v) 2 schools from civil works sanctioned Yes/No (vi) if yes write the number

Yes

5

(vii) 2 schools from NPEGEL blocks Yes/No (viii) if yes write the number

No (Not Applicable)

(ix) 3 schools from CWSN (priority to those having other than Orthopaedic Impairment (OI children) Yes/ No

(x) if yes write the number

Yes (12 schools)

(xi) 3 schools from Computer Aided Learning (CAL) and KGBV scheme Yes/No

(xii) if yes write the number

Yes (15 schools)

(xiii) 3 schools from KGBV scheme Yes/No (xiv) if yes write the number

No (Not Applicable)

8. The selection of schools (for all the districts to be monitored) shall be done on the basis of the latest school report card generated through DISE, HHS data and consultation with the district SSA functionaries: Yes/No Ref: TOR 2013-15 point 4(v) under scale of work (The procedure and criteria adopted, for the selection of schools shall from an essential part of the MIs report.)

Yes

9. Number of schools monitored (Information is to be given for district wise i.e. District 1, District 2, District 3 etc)

District 1 : (Write district name and also provide number of schools)

Thanjavur – 20

District 2 : (Write district name and also provide number of schools)

Thiruvarur – 20

District3:(Write district name and also provide number of schools)

Nagapattinam - 20

10 Whether the MI has sent their report to the SPO at the draft level : YES / NO (Ref: TOR 2013-15 point 5(i) under Reports)

11. After submission of the draft report to the SPO office whether the MI has received any comments from the SPO office : YES / NO (Ref: TOR 2013-15 point 5(ii) under Reports)

12. Before sending the reports to the GOI whether the MI has shared the report with SPO: YES /NO (Ref: TOR 2013-15 point 5(iii & iv) under Reports)

13.

Items to be attached with the report

a) List of Schools with DISE code visited by MI and list of schools visited by the Nodal Officer.- Annexure I

b) Any other relevant documents (only circulars/Amendments/Notices) – Annexure II

6

Consolidated Report/Executive Summary of RMSA Monitoring for the districts Thanjavur, Thiruvarur and

Nagapattinam

DISTRICT I DISTRICT II DISTRICT III

1. Planning and implementation

(I) At school level

1. Perspective plan has been prepared at the school level in all the schools in Thanjavur district

2. The SMDC members are made responsible in the preparation of school development plan

3. The planning strategy is common to all the students and not specific for disadvantaged groups. In the Perspective plan reports of few schools they have mentioned a statement that there are plans for disadvantaged groups. But there are no specific development plans conceived or mentioned in the plan document.

4. The SMDC General body meeting is held quarterly in Thanjavur district

1. Perspective plan has been prepared at the school level in all the schools in Thiruvarur district


3. The SMDC General body meeting is held quarterly in 15 schools and half yearly meetings conducted in 5 schools @Thiruvarur district

1. Perspective plan has been prepared at the school level in all the schools in Nagapattinam district


3. The SMDC General body meeting is held quarterly in 2 schools and half yearly meetings conducted in 18 schools @ Nagapattinam district

(II) At district level

1. District level plan was prepared

2. Regular monitoring of AWP&B is

being carried out through holding

meetings and workshops at nodal

school level and paying personal

visits to the schools

3. In Thanjavur, convergence approach

is followed with the following

departments. Water and Sanitation,

Minority department, Medical Health

and family department and Welfare

department.


2. Regular monitoring of AWP&B

is being carried out through

holding meetings and workshops

at nodal school level and paying

personal visits to the schools

3. The HM is made responsible to

prepare the school development

plan since he/she is part of

SMDC. Other members are not

actively participating in

preparation of School

Development Plan. Finally it is

being prepared and discussed in

the SMDC meeting for approval


2. Regular monitoring of AWP&B is

being carried out through holding

meetings and workshops at nodal

school level and paying personal

visits to the schools

7

(III) At state level

1. The SPD office conducts monthly

review meetings to review the

monitoring status of all districts.

ADPCs (Assistant District

Programme Coordinators) from all

the districts attend this review

meeting at the state office to update

the status of monitoring conducted at

the district level.

2. 2. The DPCs, ADPCs, Coordinators

at the district level have shared the

responsibility of monitoring the

RMSA implementation by making

personal visits to schools

1. The SPD office conducts monthly

review meetings to review the

monitoring status of all districts.

ADPCs (Assistant District

Programme Coordinators) from

all the districts attend this review

meeting at the state office to

update the status of monitoring

conducted at the district level.

1. The district level authorities are not

getting involved in the state level

planning team.

2. The state plan reflects the planning

needs of the district partially.

2. Physical Access

1. There are few schools in sensitive

area like flood prone /flood plain

area, drought prone area and also on

busy national /state highway that may

pose threat to the students.

2. Few schools are located near the state

and national highways which could

pose threat to the safety of children

3. No transportation facility is provided

by the schools.

4. There is no residential facility

available in any of the schools.

5. In the total survey of 20 schools in

Thanjavur district, most of the

children have access to upper primary

schools. There were 951 students

(45%) reside within 0-1 km distance,

553 children (26% )from the distance

of 1-2 km, 502 children (24%) from

2-3 km distance, 100 students (5%)

from 3-5 km distance. There are no

1. There are few schools in sensitive

area like flood prone /flood plain

area, drought prone area and also

on busy national /state highway

that may pose threat to the

students.

2. Few schools are located near the

state and national highways

which could pose threat to the

safety of children

3. No transportation facility is

provided by the schools.



5. In the total survey of 20 schools

in Thiruvarur district, most of the

children have access to upper

primary schools. There were 763

students (35%) reside within 0-1

km distance, 426 children (20%

)from the distance of 1-2 km, 237

1. There are 3 schools in storm

surge prone area and 1 school

in contaminated ground water

area and 8 schools in sensitive

area on busy national /state

highway that may pose threat to

the students

2. No transportation facility is

provided by the schools.



4. In the total survey of 20 schools

in Nagapattinam district, most

of the children have access to

upper primary schools. There

were 671 students (51%) reside

within 0-1 km distance, 323

children (24% ) from the

distance of 1-2 km, 191

children (14%) from 2-3 km

8

students who travel to school beyond

5 km distance.

children (11%) from 2-3 km

distance, 210 students (10%) from

3-5 km distance. 539 students

(25%) come from distance more

than 5 km.

distance, 104 students (8%)

from 3-5 km distance. 35

students (3%) come from

distance more than 5 km.

Social Access

1. There are no discriminatory practices

seen inside the school campus.

However, based on the discussion

with community members

discrimination prevails at the

habitation level.

2. In all the schools, students who

belong to all the communities

including SCs, STs, MBCs and also

minority were present.

3. The enrolment of SC and STs are in

proportion to the population at

habitation level.

1. There are no discriminatory

practices seen inside the school

campus. However, based on the

discussion with community

members discrimination prevails

at the habitation level.



including SCs, STs, MBCs and

also minority were present.

3. The enrolment of SC and STs are

in proportion to the population at

habitation level.

1. There are no discriminatory

practices seen inside the school

campus. However, based on the

discussion with community

members discrimination prevails at

the habitation level.



including SCs, STs, MBCs and also

minority were present.

3. The enrolment of SC and STs are in

proportion to the population at

habitation level.

3. Equity

1. There is no specific reason


highlighted by any teachers or


highlighted by any teachers or

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

0-‐1 km. 1-‐2 km. 2-‐3 km. 3-‐5 km. More than 5 km.

Nagapa`nam 51% 24% 14% 8% 3%

Thiruvarur 35% 20% 11% 10% 25%

Thanjavur 45% 26% 24% 5% 0%

Axis Title

Distance of school from habitaFon -‐ 3 districts

9

highlighted by any teachers or head

mistress for the gap in achievement

level of boys and girls.

2. It was stated as a general opinion that

the impact of poor economic status

reflects more on Girl children. The

Girl children also support the parents

in house hold activities and also they

were given lesser priority in terms of

education when compared to boys.

During the discussion the teachers

expressed these views regarding

education of girl children.

3. To prevent drop out of SC girl

students, the IX th standard SC girls

of age less than 16 years are provided

with fixed deposit certificate for Rs.

3000. This scheme is applicable for

ST children as well.

head mistress for the gap in

achievement level of boys and

girls.

2. It was stated as a general opinion

that the impact of poor economic

status reflects more on Girl

children. The Girl children also

support the parents in house hold

activities and also they were

given lesser priority in terms of

education when compared to

boys. During the discussion the

teachers expressed these views

regarding education of girl

children.

3. There is no separate scheme

announced for minority children

in any district.

head mistress for the gap in

achievement level of boys and

girls.

2. It was stated as a general opinion

that the impact of poor economic

status reflects more on Girl

children. The Girl children also

support the parents in house hold

activities and also they were given

lesser priority in terms of

education when compared to boys.

During the discussion the teachers

expressed these views regarding

education of girl children.

4. Guidance and Counseling

1. Cell for guidance and counselling is

constituted in 3 schools (15%) and

the remaining 85% schools have no

counselling cell in Thanjavur

district

2. There is no proper training

provided to the teachers in

counseling the students. Student

Counselor Ratio is 1:50 in the 3

schools where counseling cell is

constituted.

3. However, there is no active

counseling assistance happening

in the government schools of

Thanjavur district.

1. There is no guidance and

counseling cell constituted in

any of the schools in

Nagapattinam district.

2. There is no proper training

provided to the teachers in

counseling the students.

1. There is no guidance and

counseling cell constituted in any of

the schools in Nagapattinam

district.

2. There is no proper training provided

to the teachers in counseling the

students.

5. Quality

I. Enabling Conditions

10

1. 94% of total rooms across 20 schools

have natural light

2. 94% rooms are properly ventilated

3. Blackboards are appropriately located

in 84% schools

4. 100% schools have CFL bulbs and

proper lighting.

5. Teaching aids are available only in

10% of schools in Thanjavur district.

1. 99% of total rooms across 20

schools have natural light

2. 99% rooms are properly

ventilated

3. Blackboards are appropriately

located in 95% schools4.


proper lighting.

5. Fan is available in 98% schools.

6. The teaching aids are available in

90% schools in Thiruvarur

district.

1. 100% of total rooms across 20

schools have natural light

2. 100% rooms are properly ventilated

3. Blackboards are appropriately

located in 99% schools.


proper lighting.

5. Fan is available in 98% schools.

6. The teaching aids are available in

75% schools in Thiruvarur district.

Teachers training

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

100%

Natural light

Venclacon

Black Board

appropriately

located in classroom

Bulb/Tube light /CFL

Fan Teaching aids

Thanjavur 94% 94% 84% 100% 97% 10%

Thiruvarur 99% 99% 95% 89% 98% 90%

Nagapa`nam 100% 100% 99% 100% 98% 75%

Axis Title

Availability of Enabling CondiFons in 3 districts

11

1. Training has been provided under

RMSA in some of the schools.

Training has been conducted in 17

schools out of 20 schools.

2. The total number of teachers for class

9th and 10th placed in 20 schools

comes to 175 against 192 sanctioned

posts, the number of posts lying

vacant is 17 (8.85%).

3. 95% teachers were found present on

the day of field visit across 20

schools.



Training has been conducted in

15 schools out of 20 schools.

2. The total number of teachers for

class 9th and 10th placed in 20

schools comes to 172 against 190

sanctioned posts, the number of

posts lying vacant is 18 (9.47%).

3. 98% teachers were found present

on the day of field visit across 20

schools.



Training has been conducted in all

20 schools

2. The total number of teachers for

class 9th and 10th placed in 20

schools comes to 143 against 152

sanctioned posts; the number of

posts lying vacant is 9 (5.92%).

3. 99% teachers were found present

on the day of field visit across 20

schools.

6. Civil work

1. Civil work has been undergoing in 5

schools in Thanjavur district. GHS

Mohammed Bunder, GHS Inthalur,

GHS Naduvoor, GHS Mudukadu,

GHS Silathur (North).

2. The construction activity has been

discontinued in GHS Mohammed

Bunder and GHS Inthalur due to

insufficient funds.

3. Training has been conducted for

1. Civil work is undergoing in 2

schools in Thiruvarur district.

GHS Palayakottai and GHS

Pazhayavalam. The civil work is

at the final stage in both the

schools.

2. Training has been conducted for

SMDC members regarding civil

work activities

3. Engineer also makes visit at

1. Civil work has been

undergoing in 2 schools in

Nagapattinam district. GHS

Agaraperunthottam and GHS

Vellapallam Meenavar

Colony. The civil work

construction has been

completed in 2012-13 in

Agaraperunthottam and it is

ongoing in Vellapallam school.

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00%

Thanjavur Thiruvarur Nagapa`nam Teachers Placed 91.15% 90.53% 94.08%

Vacancy 8.85% 9.47% 5.92%

Axis Title

Teachers' Availability in 3 districts

12

SMDC members regarding civil work

activities

4. Engineer also makes visit at different

levels of construction

5. All branded paints and construction

materials are used in civil work

different levels of construction

4. All branded paints and

construction materials are used in

civil work

2. Training has been conducted

for SMDC members regarding

civil work activities

3. Engineer makes visit at

different levels of construction

4. All branded paints and

construction materials are used

in civil work

7. Community Mobilization/Participation

1. SMDC meetings are being held

quarterly in 100% schools in

Thanjavur district.

2. All the 100 SMDC members across

20 schools in Thanjavur district have

received training under RMSA and

the respondents found the training to

be useful.

3. There are 10 women representatives

and 7 SC members in the committee

across all the 20 schools in Thanjavur

district.

4. The level of participation is good in

Thanjavur district.


quarterly in 100% schools

2. All the 100 SMDC members

across 20 schools in Thiruvarur

district have received training

under RMSA

3. 15 schools conduct the SMDC

meetings quarterly and 5 schools

conduct the meeting half yearly in

Thiruvarur district. 10 women

members and 4 SC members are

found in committee across 20

schools in this district.

4. The schools that has civil work

construction going on conduct the

meetings frequently to discuss the

financial matters.


quarterly in 100% schools

2. All the 100 SMDC members across

20 schools in Nagapattinam district

have received training under RMSA

5. 2 schools conduct the SMDC

meetings quarterly and 18 schools

conduct the meeting half yearly in

Nagapattinam district. 10 women

members and 4 SC members are

found in committee across 20

schools in this district.

3. There is at least one woman

member in each school on an

average. SC member representation

is very minimal in SMDC. There

are no ST representatives in any of

the school.

8. MIS

1. Work on preparation of Master list of

all schools is being carried out by

SSA

2. The teachers of 20 schools have

received training in filling up of DCF

3. As per the information provided at

RMSA district office, DCFs have

been distributed to all government

and private schools.

4. Sample checks have been done by

RMSA officials periodically

1. Work on preparation of Master

list of all schools is being carried

out by SSA


received training in filling up of

DCF

3. As per the information provided

at RMSA district office, DCFs

have been distributed to all

government and private schools.


1. Work on preparation of Master

list of all schools is being carried

out by SSA


received training in filling up of

DCF

3. As per the information provided

at RMSA district office, DCFs

have been distributed to all

government and private schools.


13

5. School report cards also have been

generated and distributed


5. School report cards also have

been generated and distributed


5. School report cards also have

been generated and distributed

9. Financial management

1. All the schools have received the

School Annual Grant, Minor Repair

Grant and 5 schools have received

civil work grant.

2. In all the schools, financial

statements and records are

maintained properly

3. The 5 civil work schools have

received Rs. 50, 000, 00 towards

construction activities.

4. There is no audit being carried out at

the district or state level for civil

work and for other funds as well.

1. All the schools have received

the School Annual Grant, Minor

Repair Grant and 2 schools

have received civil work grant.



maintained properly.

3. The two schools where civil

work is going on had been

given Rs. 50, 000, 00 towards

construction expenditure.

1. All the schools have received the

School Annual Grant, Minor

Repair Grant and 2 schools have

received civil work grant.



maintained properly

10. SAG

1. School Annual Grant has been

received by all the 20 schools for the

financial year 2012-13 and spent

completely

2. The schools have also submitted the

utilization certificate for the financial

year 2013-14


received by all the 20 schools for

the financial year 2012-13 and

spent completely

3. The schools have also submitted

the utilization certificate for the

financial year 2013-14


received by all the 20 schools for

the financial year 2012-13 and

spent completely


utilization certificate for the

financial year 2013-14

11. Minor repair grant (MRG)

1. The District office has informed that

overall, minor repair grant has not

been received by 33 schools in

Thanjavur district. .

2. The remaining schools have received

Rs. 25,000 towards Minor repair

grant.


utilization certificate

1. Minor Repair Grant has been

received by all the 20 monitored

schools for the financial year

2012-13 and spent completely.

2. The schools have received Rs.

25,000 towards Minor repair

grant.


the utilization certificate.

1. Minor Repair Grant has been

received by all the 20 monitored

schools for the financial year

2012-13 and spent completely.

2. The schools have received Rs.

25,000 towards Minor repair grant.


the utilization certificate.

4. Overall, 8 RMSA schools in

14

4. Overall, 11 RMSA schools in

Thiruvarur district have not

received the MRG, as per

information received from the

district office.

Nagapattinam district have not

received the MRG, as per

information received from the

district office.

5. Innovations

1. There are no innovative proposals

submitted at the state or district level

for the academic year 2013-14

2. Steps are being taken to conduct

innovative research projects in the

coming year.


submitted at the state or district

level for the academic year 2013-

14



coming year.


submitted at the state or district

level for the academic year 2013-

14



coming year.

6. MMER

1. Information about number of schools

visited by SPO level officers has not

been furnished by SPO

2. GIS mapping has been completed at

State and District level

3. MIS at district level is in place

4. State level data base mechanism is in

place

5. There is no vacancy at the DPO level

1. Information about number of

schools visited by SPO level

officers has not been furnished by

SPO

2. GIS mapping has been completed

at State and District level


4. State level data base mechanism

is in place

5. There is no vacancy at the DPO

level

1. Information about number of

schools visited by SPO level

officers has not been furnished

by SPO

2. GIS mapping has been

completed at State and District

level


4. State level data base

mechanism is in place

5. There is no vacancy at the

DPO level

15

DISTRICT THANJAVUR

16

INDEX

S. No. Particulars Page no. 1. Planning & Implementation

1. At School level 2. At District level 3. At State level

17-22

2. Access I. Physical Access

II. Social Access III. Open Schooling IV. OoSC

22-32

3. Equity I. General Information

II. Girls Education

32-39

4. Guidance & Counselling At school level

39-40

5. Quality I. Enabling conditions

II. Teaching learning process III. Teachers’ training

40-52

6. Civil works I. General Information

II. Design III. Schools with ongoing construction activity

52-77

7. Community Mobilization/Participation At school level

78-80

8. MIS (Management Information System) At School, DPO, SPO level

80-83

9. Financial Management At SMDC, DPO, SPO level

83-93

10. School annual grant (SAG) At SMDC, DPO, SPO level

93-94

11. Minor Repair Grant At SMDC, DPO, SPO level

94-96

12. Innovations At DPO, SPO level

96-100

13. MMER (Management /Monitoring/Evaluation and Research) I. Staffing pattern

AtDPO, SPO level II. Monitoring strategy at DPO, SPO level

III. Management systems DIET, SCERT, DEO Office

IV. State Database V. Research

100-109

17

14. Any other issues 110

MONITORING OF RMSA IMPLEMENTATION IN THANJAVUR DISTRICT

1. Planning & Implementation –

At School Level

1. Perspective Plan for the School –

No. of Schools

Plan developed Not developed Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% If not reasons thereof Comments: Perspective plan has been developed in 100% schools in Thanjavur district. The perspective plan is

being submitted to the district RMSA office every year. There is a standard format used by all the schools

throughout the district to prepare the perspective plan. The school development plan includes demographic profile of

the area, data regarding nearby schools (including private and aided schools), children at school going age, school

mapping information, etc. The achievements of the school are also included in the perspective plan report.

2. Data base/sources adopted/taken for Planning and Plan preparation at School level other than SEMIS

No. of Schools

Other Data base/sourced adopted If yes names of other sources Yes No

0 20 - % 0% 100%

Comments: In most of the schools, SEMIS data is the only source for planning and plan preparation at the school

level, for some information they are using Census data. The Village Education Records (VER), School Mapping

information are also being used in the perspective plan report.

3. Whether disadvantaged groups have been appropriately factored in the Plan.

No. of Schools

Developed Planning strategy for disadvantaged groups

Yes No

0 20

% 0% 100%

If not reasons thereof

The planning strategy is common to all the students and not specific for disadvantaged groups. In the Perspective plan reports of few schools they have mentioned a statement that there are plans for disadvantaged groups. But there are no specific development plans conceived or mentioned in the

18

plan document.

No. of Schools

Convergence approach adopted Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% Convergence Approach Convergence not adopted

S. No.

Departments No. of Schools

% Reasons thereof

1 Water & Sanitation 20 100% There is no tribal community in Thanjavur district. There is no direct involvement of Rural and Urban development departments in school development. However, these departments work at the habitation level which indirectly contributes for school development. There is no coordination with PWD for any projects at the school level

2 Social Welfare 20 100% 3 Tribal Development 0 0% 4 Minority Department 1 5% 5 Rural Development 0 0% Urban Development 0 0% 6 Health, Medical and

Family welfare 20 100%

7 Electricity department 20 100% 8 Transport (Roadways) 18 90% 9 Public Works Department 0 0% Problem areas of restructuring on convergence and coordination

Comments: The convergence and coordination with other departments are not made consciously but water and

sanitation department for water needs, social welfare for mid day meal and scholarships, health department for

health check ups, electricity department for EB connections, transport department for free bus pass for students. In

this way, these departments

5. Incorporation of SMDC recommendations in the School Development Plan

No. of Schools

School Development Plan Prepared Recommendations incorporated in School Development Plan

Yes No Yes No

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%

If not reasons thereof If not reasons thereof

Recommendations given by the SMDC for school development plan.

Comments: There are recommendations documented in minutes of the weekly meeting conducted by SMDC.

19

6. Roles assigned to the SMDCs for implementing the scheme and to seek help & cooperation in ensuring the execution of following in sampled Schools :

S. No Roles Responses regarding assigning roles (No. of Schools)

%

1 Filling of DCF of U-DISE 20 100% 2 Preparation & Implementation of Annual Plan 20 100% 3 Admission of Students to Class-9 0 0% 4 Regular attendance and retention of students 0 0% 5 Regularity & Punctuality in teachers’

attendance 20 100%

6 Civil work 4 20% 7 Providing resources Physical 0 0%

Human 0 0% 8 Organizing cultural, sports events, functions 20 100% 9 Mid-day-meal 20 100%

10 Preparing annual accounts of income & expenditure of SMDC

20 100%

11 Any other 0 0% Comments: In all the 20 schools filling of DCF of U-DISE has been assigned and also preparation and

implementation of Annual Plan. The SMDCs were not assigned any role with respect to Admission of students to

Class – 9, Monitoring regular attendance and retention of students, providing resources, etc. The SMDC is involved

in Civil work in 4 schools, organizing cultural, sports, events and functions, Mid day meal to some extent and

preparation of annual accounts of income and expenditure.

7. Clarity amongst SMDC members about their roles. If yes, detail of steps taken by them accordingly.

No. of Schools

SMDC members are clear about their roles Not clear

20 0 % 100% 0%

S.N. Steps taken by SMDC members accordingly Number of

Schools %

1 Ensuring education facility to dropout Students 0 0% 2 Making society aware of child rights & duties of teachers& parents 0 0% 3 Organizing parents teachers meetings, distribution of report card and

reviewing C.W./H.W. 0 0%

4 Keeping check on private tuitions by teachers, paying attention to academic progress of students

0 0%

5 Identification of CWSN & taking care of availability of facilities to CWSN students

0 0%

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. 20 100% 7 Distribution of free text books 20 100% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 20 100%

20

9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan 20 100% 10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 0 0% 11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical

infrastructure 0 0%

12 Seeking knowledge and information about income and expenditure of SMDC and supervising the accounts thereof.

20 100%

Comments: In almost all the schools SMDC members have clarity on their roles and responsibilities. Though there

are no steps taken by SMDC members with respect to Ensuring education facility to dropout students, Making

society aware of child rights & duties of teachers & parents, organizing parents teachers meeting, distribution of

report cards and reviewing of CW and HW, keeping check on private tuitions by teachers and paying attention to

academic progress of students.

In most of the schools, SMDC involved in distribution of free text books, availability of scholarships on time to

students , Seeking knowledge and information about income and expenditure of SMDC and supervising the

accounts.

Reasons of ignorance of SMDC members regarding their roles: There is no ignorance of SMDC members but

not involved in activities. There lacks commitment of SMDC members on specific roles and activities.

8.1 Meetings of General Body of School Management and Development Committee-

Meetings of General body held

Number of Schools

Quarterly Half Yearly Annually No meeting held till date

20 0 0 0 % 100% 0% 0% 0%

Comments: The meetings of general body of school management and development committee have been held

quarterly in all the schools.

8.2 Reasons for not holding last meetings and whether the same has been recorded –

Comments:

Thanjavur 2. At District level – Name of District ………………………………………………………….

1. District level Plan has been prepared or not. Yes………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2(a) Whether District Plan adopted a convergence approach with following department.

21

(1. Yes 2. No)

a. Water & Sanitation

b. Social Welfare

c. Tribal Development

d. Minority department

e. Rural Development

f. Urban Development

g. Medical Health & Family

h. welfare

i. PWD

j. Transportation (Roadways)

Comments: As per the information provided by the CEO, they have adopted a convergence approach with other

departments such as water and sanitation, social welfare, health department and transportation.

2(b) any problem areas of restructuring on convergence and co-ordination

There are no problems mentioned by the district officials in areas of restructuring on convergence and coordination.

Comments

3. Methods adopted for regular monitoring of Perspective Plan and AWP&B

There is no clear method adopted for regular monitoring of Perspective Plan and AWP &B The school HM holds the responsibility to monitor the perspective plan. The RMSA officials often make Visit to schools to monitor the activities. _____________________________________________________________________________

At State level

1. Involvement of State Level Planning team in the preparation and finalization of District Level Plans1. Yes 2. No

2. Does the State Plan reflect the Planning needs at School and District Level?

1

2

0

1

2

2

1

1

2

-

2

22

Partially it reflects the planning needs.

3. Regular monitoring of Planning & implementation of the programme at State level, if not reasons thereof.

The SPD office conducts monthly review meetings to review the monitoring status of all districts.

ADPCs (Assistant District Programme Coordinators) from all the districts attend this review meeting

at the state office to update the status of monitoring conducted at the district level. The DPCs, ADPCs,

Coordinators at the district level have shared the responsibility of monitoring the RMSA

implementation by visiting the schools in person.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

4. Any separate strategies for naxalite/extremist affected districts prepared at the State/district level in consultation with the district authority?

2 1. Yes 2. No

If not, why? There are no naxalite/extremist affected districts.

2. ACCESS

I. Physical Access – At School and Habitation’s

1. Names Category of the Schools visited

S.N. Categories Number of Schools % 1 EBB 0 0% 2 Urban 1 5% 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 2 10% 4 Higher Gender gap 0 0% 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 6 30% 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 3 15% 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of Oosc 3 15% 8 Low academic achievements 2 10% 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants 1 5%

10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections 0 0% 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 2 5% 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area 5 25% 13 Ongoing civil work 4 20% 14 School with girls hostel 0 0% 15 None

Comments: *List of name of Schools is attached

The schools were selected in almost all the categories except few of the above mentioned list. There are no

Economically Backward Blocks (EBB) denoted in Thanjavur district. The was one school from urban area, 2

schools with minimum 3 CWSN (10%), 6 schools with higher proportion of SC/ST/Minority students (30%), 3

23

schools where there is low retention rate and higher dropout rate (15%), 3 schools situated in with large number of

out of school children (15%), 2 schools with low academic achievements (10%), 1 school situated in habitation of

seasonal migrants (5%), 2 schools from remote area (5%), 5 schools from flood natural calamity prone area (25%), 4

schools with ongoing civil work (20%). There are no schools in Thanjavur district with Girls’ hostel. There are no

schools in Urban area with most students of deprived sections.

2. Location of the School adjacent to or within any of the following sensitive areas.

S. N. Area Number of Schools Situated % 1 Protected area (National Park, Wild life sanctuary) 0 0% 2 Flood prone /flood plain area 3 5% 3 Earthquake prone zone 0 0% 4 Unstable slope 0 0% 5 Landslide prone Area 0 0% 6 Cyclone prone Area 0 0% 7 Storm surge prone Area 0 0% 8 Drought prone Area 2 10% 9 Polluting Industrial Area 0 0%

10 Mining Area 0 0% 11 Arsenic /fluoride contaminated ground water area 0 5% 12 Busy National/State Highway 2 10% 13 Congested urban/market/commercial area 0 0% 14 Any particular disturbance faced by School due to its location 3 0% 15 None 0 0%

Comments: There are few schools in sensitive area like flood prone /flood plain area, drought prone area and also

on busy national /state highway that may pose threat to the students.

3. Names and categories of the feeder primary and upper primary Schools in sampled district.

School Level No. of Schools managed by Govt. % Private %

PS 0 0% 0 0% UPS 20 100% 0 0% Total 20 100% 0 0%

*List of Schools is attached

Comments: The category of schools selected for monitoring is restricted only to Upper Primary Government

schools as per guidelines. No private schools have been included for monitoring.

4. Number of Students enrolled in School from habitations coming from a distance greater than what is prescribed for a neighborhood School.

S. N. Distance of School from habitation Number of students % 1 0-1 km. 951 45% 2 1-2 km. 553 26% 3 2-3 km. 502 24% 4 3-5 km. 100 5%

24

5 More than 5 km. 0 0% Total 2106 100% Comments: 6. In the total survey of 20 schools in Thanjavur district, most of the children have access to upper primary

schools. There were 951 students (45%) reside within 0-1 km distance, 553 children (26% )from the distance of

1-2 km, 502 children (24%) from 2-3 km distance, 100 students (5%) from 3-5 km distance. There are no

students who travel to school beyond 5 km distance.

7. The students commute to school in public transport and Tamil Nadu government has provided with free bus

pass.

8. The students depend only on public transport and there is no other mode of transport available or affordable for

children.

9. In few schools as mentioned in the below table, there is no bus frequency being a remote hilly region and there

is a river across a school and students have no ferry service.

5. Presence of any natural or man-made barrier that poses any problem for the Students in accessing the School.

No. of Schools

Yes No

9 11 % 45% 55%

If yes mention them

Three is a no bus, remote area, river nearby the schools, GHS Inthalur, Thukkachi and Vanniyadi There is a around river in village, no bus, very remote area Vanarankudi GHS There is a national high way in cholopuram, muthukadu, neerathanallur and vattathikottai GHS

There is a pond nearby the schools, neerathanallur, katathiunjiyaviduthy and sengamangalam

There is a railway crossing in vannakkudi GHS Comments: There are very few natural or man-made barriers seen in Thanjavur district such as National / State

Highways, Railway crossing and River.

6. Name and Distance of the nearest secondary School (Govt./Pvt.) from the habitation the School is located

at, and catchment area of the School.

Distance from School/Catchment area Total

No. of Schools Less than 1 km. 1-3 km. 3-5 km. More than 5 km.

5 7 8 0 20 % 25% 35% 40% 0% 100%


25

Comments: From the sampled schools, 5 schools have the proximity of reaching Higher secondary school at a

distance within 1 km (25%), 7 schools can access secondary school at a distance of 1-3 km (35%) where as 8

schools are situated with the nearest higher secondary school at a distance of 3-5 km.

7. Any special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for the benefit of

students.

Facility Provided by number of Schools %

Transport facility 0 0% Residential facility 0 0%

Comments:

Students are commuting to school in public transport only and they are distributed with free travel bus pass. No other

special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for students. There is no bus

service arunthavapuram, vanarankudi, inthalur,

II Social Access

1. Pattern of population of the habitation and enrollment in the School –

1. (A) Social category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years in the habitation.

Population Pattern of Habitation

Category 14-16 Age

Boys % Girls % Total %

SC

ST

Minority

General

Total

*There is no data available with the school or at the district office.

1. (b) If data of category-wise population of Students of age group 14-16 years is not available then approximation of families of various categories residing in habitation of Schools -

Category No. of Schools responded % SC 8 40% ST 0 0%

Minority 5 25% General 3 15%

All Categories 4 20%

26

Comments: The SMDC members and the school HM agreed in 8 schools (40%) that there are SC children in

abundance and they live with poor economic condition.

(c ) Share of SC,ST, Minority, and BPL families’ Girls-boys in enrollment is proportionate to their share in population of the habitation/neighborhood or not.

No. of Schools

Proportionate yes no 20 0

% 100% 0%

If not, reasons thereof ………………………………………………………………………

Comments:

.(a) Class wise, Social Category wise *B-Boy, G-Girl, E-enrolled, P-present

S C S T M i n o r it y O t h e r s T o t a l C W S N

B

G

T

B

G

T

B

G

T

B

G

T

B

G

T

B

G

T

E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P

I X

1 8 3 2 1 2 1 7 0 1 6 4 3 5 3 3 7 6 6 6 0 0 6 6 2 6 1 3 3 2 2 1 5 8 3 4 6 2 7 5 3 9 4 2 4 3 8 1 1 0 5 1 9 1 6 6 6 1 5 6 1 4 5 8 4 0 3 1 1 1 9 9 6 0 2 3 2 1 4 4

X

1 7 4 7 6 1 3 4 1 2 3 3 0 8 1 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 8 2 4 1 2 4 0 2 0 5 5 2 5 2 9 3 1 1 3 1 8 8 7 0 8 6 2 5 7 5 5 3 8 3 3 6 3 3 0 9 1 7 8 8 3 7 1 0 0 7 1

T o t a l 3 5 7 2 8 8 3 0 4 2 8 7 6 6 1 5 7 5 6 6 0 0 6 6 4 2 2 1 5 6 3 3 9 8 5 4 1 1 7 9 1 0 6 8 7 3 5 6 9 9 1 9 2 1 1 7 7 8 1 2 3 6 1 0 9 9 7 9 4 7 3 3 2 0 3 6 1 8 4 3 9 4 2 1 1 1 5

%

2 9 2 6 3 8 3 9 3 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 7 5 5 3 9 5 9 7 9 3 9 5 9 4 9 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

2(b) *Enrollment and attendance of students of economically backward background on the day of field visit

(based on BPL Card)

Cla

ss

SC

ST

Min

ority

Gen

&

Oth

ers

Tota

l

Tota

l

CW

SN

Boy

s

G

Tot

a l B

G

Tot

a l B

G

Tot

a l B

G

Tot

a l B

G

Tot

a l B

G

Tot

a l

E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P E

P

9

1

6

1

6

2

1

2

1

3

7

3

7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1

1

12 1

2

23 2

3

27 27

33 33

60 60

0 0 0 0 0 0

10 1

8

1

8

1

4

1

4

3

2

3

2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 6 10 1

0

22 22

20 20

42 42

0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota l

3

4

3

4

3

5

3

5

6

9

6

9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0 0 15 1

5

18 1

8

33 3

3

49 49

53 53

102 102

0 0 0 0 0 0

%

3

4

3

4

3

5

3

5

6

9

6

9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1

5

18 1

8

33 3

3

49 49

53 53

102 102

0 0 0 0 0 0

2 (c) Any major variations in the pattern of attendance in respect of SC, ST, Minority, Girl Students and Students from BPL background and reasons thereof

There is no major variation in the pattern of attendance in respect of SC 69, ST, Minority, Girl Students 18 and Students19 from BPL background.

27

Whether above schemes ensure convergence with provisions of RMSA?

1. Yes 2. No

Comments:

4. Any overt or covert, manifest or subtle discrimination against Students of any social group or community

by the teachers or peers is observed in School, and the efforts made to minimize it.

No. of Schools

Discrimination No discrimination By teachers By peers

No discriminatory practices seen inside the school campus however it exists in the community

No such practices seen

100%

Comments: There are no discriminatory practices seen inside the school premises however during discussion with

the community they shared discrimination exist in the community.

Efforts made to minimize discrimination

There are no discriminatory practices seen inside the school campus anywhere in Thanjavur district.

5. Do the overall conditions prevalent in Schools facilitating access of CWSN to secondary Schools. If not,

the details of obstructions and barriers.

Number of Schools providing following facilities for access of CWSN –

Facility Number of Schools %

Proper ramps with hand rail 20 100%

Western toilet seat 1 0%

Special furniture in classroom 0 0%

Tricycle 0 0%

Escort 0 0%

Other (Specify)

Obstructions ……………………………………………………………………………….

Barriers ……………………………………………………………………………………..

2

28

III. Open Schooling

Open Schooling System does not prevailing in the state of Tamil Nadu.

3. At State level

1. Whether the State open School is established at the State level? 1. Yes 2. No

2. Whether the State open School has its own district regional centres and study centres?

1. Yes 2. No

3(a) Admission and Re-admission procedure in the State open School.

________________________________________________________________________

(b) Examination & assessment pattern.

________________________________________________________________________

(c) Student support services.

________________________________________________________________________

Comments:

4. Advocacy programme for out of School Students for bringing them back to theSchool

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

Comments:

5. Methods for identification of the number of out of School Students in the State (household survey etc.)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Comments:

6. Identification procedure of out of School Students.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Comments:

29

IV. Out of School Students (OoSC)/Dropout Students of Age Group 14-16 years. (At School level)

1. The number, gender and category-wise (SC/ST/Minorities/CWSN) profile of out of School Students

(OoSC)/Dropout Students of age group 14-16 years in preceding session (2012-13).

Category Class OoSC/Dropout of age group 14-16 years Total drop out

%

Enrolled Boys

Boys drop out

% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

SC IX 183 17 9% 170 8 5% 353 25 7% X 174 11 6% 134 5 4% 308 16 5%

ST IX 6 0 0% 0 0 0% 6 0 0% X 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

Minority IX 26 1 4% 32 1 3% 58 2 3% X 16 1 6% 24 1 4% 40 2 5%

Gen & OBC

IX 444 10 2% 371 6 2% 815 16 2% X 261 1 0% 178 0 0% 439 1 0%

Total IX 659 28 15% 573 15 10% 1232 43 12% X 451 13 12% 336 6 8% 787 19 10%

CWSN IX 2 0 0% 2 0 0% 4 0 0% X 7 0 0% 0 0 0% 7 0 0%

2. The separate number of CWSN is included in all categories.

Name of category with higher dropout

The SC community drop outs comprise 7% in class 9 and 5% in class 10.

IX X IX X IX X IX X

SC SC ST ST Minority Minority Gen & OBC

Gen & OBC

353 308 6 0 58 40

815 439

25 16 0 0 2 2 16 1

OoSC Drop out age group of 14-‐16 years -‐ Thanjavur District

Total Enrolled Total drop out

30

Gender with higher dropout

In Gender perspective, drop out rate of boys looks to be little high when compared to Girls which is 4% boys in

class 9 and 3% of girls in class 10. Similarly, The drop out rate of Girls is 3% in class 9 and 2% in class 10.

Class with higher dropout

The drop out rate seems to be quite high in class 9 compared to class 10.

Reasons for dropout

• Economic condition

• Child labour

• Health condition

2(a) Efforts being made by School management to bring them back to School and, results thereof during the past one year.

Efforts made –

There are no personal efforts made by the school management to bring them back to School. In certain cases, the community identifies the drop outs and takes effort to enroll the children in school

Class-9 Class-10

No.of drop

out students

No.of drop out brought

back to School

% No.of drop

out students


back to School

%

51 0 0% 50 0 0%

Comments: In class 9 the total number of school drop out is 51 and in class 10 is 50. None of the drop out students

were brought back to school.

3. Arrangements made to hold back Students of seasonal migrant families in School.

Arrangement Number of Schools %

Seasonal Hostels 0 0%

Any other arrangement 0 0%

No arrangement 20 100%

Comments: There are no special arrangements made at the school level to hold back the students of seasonal migrant

families. The students who migrate also do not inform the school management before leaving the school. This is one

of the major hindrance for the school to trace the school drop outs.

31

4. If no such arrangement made, whether migration/transfer certificate is issued to such Students by the Schools?

No. of Schools issuing TC

No. of schools Yes No

11 9

% 55% 45%

Comments: There are 11 schools in Thanjavur district have issued Transfer Certificate to the students who migrate.

In 9 schools (45%) there was no instance of TC issued to the students who drop out from schools.

5. Information about any special training interventions meant for the OosC.

No. of Schools

Special trainings started Yes No 0 20

% 0% 100% Name of Trainings

1 2 3 4

5

5(a) Number of enrolled and present students in training programme on the day of visit

Boys Girls Total Enrolled Nil Nil Nil Present Nil Nil Nil

% Nil Nil Nil 5 (b) Training programme is imparted through –

Total No. of School conducting training

Trainers No. of School %

Regular teachers 0 0

NIOS 0 0 SIOS 0 0

32

(c ) Average duration of training programme in days and achievement level of students (on the basis of School

record)

Class Enrolled in Training

Programme

Appeared in Exam

Achievement level Above 60% 45-59% 33-44%

B G B G B G B G B G 9

10 Total

% Comments: There is no training programme conducted for out of school children

3. Equity

I. General Information

At School Level

Category-wise profile of attendance and achievement of students category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN)

Profiling of attendance and achievement (School result) of School Students in the age group of 14-16 years.

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Enrollment and Attendance on day of visit

SC ST MINO. CWSN SC ST MINO. CWSN SC ST MINO. CWSN

B G B G B G B G B G B G B G B G B G B G B G B G

Enrolled for 9th 110 129 0 0 30 32 0 1 120 164 0 0 21 33 3 2 143 136 0 0 28 34 2 2

Avg. % of Attend. 93 98 0 0 93 100 0 100 90 93 0 0 86 94 67 100 73 74 0 0 89 94 50 50

Appeared in Exam 102 127 0 0 28 32 0 1 108 152 0 0 18 31 2 2 105 101 0 0 25 32 1 1

% 93 98 0 0 93 100 0 100 90 93 0 0 86 94 67 100 73 74 0 0 89 94 50 50

Above 60% 31 43 0 0 6 15 0 1 31 43 0 0 10 16 2 1 43 51 0 0 10 20 0 0

% 30 34 0 0 21 47 0 100 29 28 0 0 56 52 100 50 41 50 0 0 40 63 0 0

Below 60% 71 84 0 0 22 17 0 0 77 109 0 0 8 15 0 1 62 50 0 0 15 12 1 1

% 70 56 0 0 79 53 0 0 61 72 0 0 44 48 0 50 59 50 0 0 60 37 100 100

Enrolled for 10 th 26 17 0 0 13 16 0 0 84 119 0 0 22 29 0 3 83 98 0 0 21 25 1 0

Avg. % Attend. 100 100 0 0 100 100 0 0 95 94 0 0 95 97 0 0 80 83 0 0 90 100 100 0

% 100 100 0 0 100 100 0 0 95 94 0 0 95 97 0 0 80 83 0 0 90 100 100 0

Appeared in Exam 26 17 0 0 13 16 0 0 80 112 0 0 21 28 0 0 66 81 0 0 19 25 1 0

% 100 100 0 0 100 100 0 0 95 94 0 0 95 97 0 0 80 83 0 0 90 100 100 0

Above 60% 11 5 0 0 3 15 9 6 28 52 0 0 10 20 0 0 22 22 0 0 6 14 0 0

% 42 29 0 0 23 94 0 0 33 44 0 0 45 69 0 0 27 22 0 0 29 56 0 0

Below 60% 15 12 0 0 10 1 0 0 52 60 0 0 11 8 0 0 44 59 0 0 13 11 1 0

% 58 71 0 0 77 6 0 0 67 66 0 0 55 31 0 0 73 88 0 0 71 44 100 0

33

3. Details of specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students along with the assistance provided there under? c

There are no specific schemes available in the State for special category students other than one mentioned below.

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

0 100 200 300 400 500



2011-‐12 2012-‐13 2013-‐14

Category wise profile of students in Thanjavur District

Percentage scored below 60%

Percentage scored above 60%

Enrolled for 10 th

Percentage scored below 60%

Percentage scored above 60%

Enrolled for 9th

SC

1. Girls’ Incentive Scheme

To prevent drop outs of SC girl students, the IX th standard unmarried SC girls of age, less

than 16 years are provided with a fixed deposit certificate for Rs. 3000

2.

3.

ST

1. 1. Girls’ Incentive Scheme

To prevent drop outs of ST girl students, the IXth standard unmarried ST girls

of age, less than 16 years are provided with a fixed deposit certificate for Rs.

3000

4.

34

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Category-wise (SC/ST/Minority/CWSN) dropout students in past one year i.e .2012-13

II. Girls Education:

At School/DPO and SPO level

Gender Gap

1. Gender gap in enrollment, attendance, learning achievement and reasons thereof.

Enrollment, Attendance, Achievement level

Class

Class 9 Class 10

Boys % Girls % Total % Gap % Boys % Girls % Total Gap %

Enrollment 661 59.07 458 40.03 1119 100 693 54.27 575 62.70 336 100 917 584 45.73 Attendance on visit day 561 58.44 403 41.66 960 100 718 53.94 538 60.93 330 100 883 613 46.1

Appeared in Exam 661 59.07 458 39.03 1119 100 693 54.27 575 62.70 336 100 917 584 45.73 Learning Achievement (Quarterly/half yearly/yearly)

Above 60%

360 70.04 236 29.06 514 100 656 38.86 156 20.05 161 100 778 1032 61.14

% 54.46 58.47 51.53 36.64 45.93 100 47.06 37.84 27.13 22.13 47.92 100 56.71 71.17 62.84

Below 60%

301 49.75 222 50.25 605 100 738 63.84 419 70.54 175 100 594 418 36.16

% 45.54 41.53 48.47 63.36 54.07 100 52.94 62.16 72.87 77.87 52.08 100 43.29 28.83 37.16 Gender gap = (GX1000/B) G=No. of Girls B=No. of Boysfgjk;’[8

Minority 1. There are no schemes available in Tamil Nadu government specific to Minority community

2.

Girls

1.

2

3.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

35

Comments: In class 9, an average of 54.46% boys have secured above 60% and average of 51.53% girls have

scored below 60%. In class 10, average of 27.13% boys have secured marks above 60% and 72.87% boys scored

below 60%. Similarly, 47.92% of Girls have scored above 60% in class 10 and an average of 52.08% has scored

below 60%.

Reasons for gaps in enrollment (if)

Reasons Respondent /districts %

a Socio Cultural/Reasons 0 0%

b Economic Reasons 60 100%

c Linguistic Reasons 0 0%

Total 60 schools -

Comments:

There is no specific reason highlighted by any teachers or head mistress for the gap in achievement level of boys and

girls. It was stated as a general opinion that the impact of poor economic status reflects more on Girl children. The

Girl children also support the parents in house hold activities and also they were given lesser priority in terms of

education when compared to boys. During the discussion the teachers expressed these views regarding education of

girl children.

0 20 40 60 80

Boys Girls Boys Girls

9th 9th 10th 10th

54.46 51.53

27.13 47.92

45.54 48.47

72.87 52.08

Achievement level of Boys and Girls in Class IX and X

Above 60%

Below 60%

36

Reasons for absenteeism (Gap in attendance)

Reasons Respondents (School/district)

%

A Health (own or family members) 3 15% B Social cultural issues 0 0% C Sibling Care 0 0%

D Household responsibilities 0 0% E Family issues / Gone to relatives 0 0% F Earning for livelihood 13 65%

G Migration 3 15% H Any other 1 5%

Total 20 100%

Comments: The major reasons for absenteeism are earning for livelihood where as 65% of drop out is due to this

factor, next being the migration factor while 15% have left schools, and another 15% children were report various

health problems for dropping schools.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Percentage

Reasons for Absenteeism

A Health (own or family members)

B Social cultural issues

C Sibling Care

D Household responsibilices

E Family issues / Gone to relacves

F Earning for livelihood

G Migracon

H Any other

37

2. Efforts made to address the gender gap attitudinal and physical.

Barriers No. of Schools % Efforts made to address barriers

(a) Physical barriers 0 0% - (b) Attitudinal 0 0% - (c) Linguistic barriers 0 0% - (d) Economic barriers 0 0% -

Comments:

3. Any reduction in enrollment, attendance, learning achievement, and reasons thereof

(b) (i) Reduction in enrollment and reasons thereof.

Social

Group

SC ST MINORITY OBC & GEN TOTAL CWSN

Year B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T

2011-12 136 146 282 0 0 0 43 48 91 0 1 1

2012-13 204 283 487 0 0 0 43 62 105 3 5 8

Gap

2012-13 204 283 487 0 0 0 43 62 105 3 5 8

2013-14 226 234 460 0 0 0 49 59 108 1413 969 2382 1233 792 2025 3 2 5

Gap 136 146 282 0 0 0 43 48 91 0 1 1

38

(b)(ii) Reduction in attendance and reasons thereof.

Social

Group



2011-12 96

99 195 0 0 0 97 100 197 0 50 50

2012-13 93

93 186 0 0 0 91 95 186 33 50 83

2012-13 93

93 186 0 0 0 91 95 186 33 50 83

2013-14 76

78 154 0 0 0 90 97 187 1122 720 1842 1061 714 1775 75 25 100

0 100 200 300 400 500

B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T

SC ST MINORITY OBC & GEN

TOTAL CWSN

ReducFon Level 2011-‐12 & 2012-‐13

2011-‐12

2012-‐13

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500


SC ST MINORITY OBC & GEN

TOTAL CWSN

ReducFon Level 2012-‐13 & 2013-‐14

2012-‐13

2013-‐14

39

(b)(iii) Reduction in achievement level and reasons thereof*.

Social

Group



2011-12 42 48 90 0 0 0 9 30 39 9 7 16

2012-13 59 95 155 0 0 0 20 36 56 2 1 3

2012-13 59 95 155 0 0 0 20 36 56 2 1 3

2013-14 65 73 138 0 0 0 16 34 50 565 436 1001 516 397 913 0 0 0

Comments: There are no specific reasons or efforts taken to address the issue of gender gap.

5. Any efforts being made for the counseling of parents to handle the problem of girls. If not why?

No. of Schools

Counseling of parents done Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments:

6. Impact of separate hostel and other physical facilities and availability of security on enrollment, attendance

and learning achievement of girls.

i. Number of Schools having facility of separate girls’ hostel in campus or in nearby area.

ii. Number of girls residing in girls’ hostel in sample Schools.

iii. Any physical barrier faced by hostellers in their access to School

______________________________________________________________________________

Comments:


At School level:

1. Guidance and Counseling Cell been constituted by the School or not. If yes, the available student counselor

ratio:

0

0

40

No. of Schools

Guidance & Counselling Cell Constituted Yes No

3 17 % 15% 85%

Avg. SCR 1:50

SCR: Student Counselor Ratio

Comments: It has been reported that only 3 schools have constituted Guidance and Counseling cell but however

there is no active counseling taking part in these cells as well. The remaining 17 schools (85%) have not constituted

a counseling cell. There is no proper training provided to the teachers in counseling the students. Student Counselor

Ratio is 1:50 in the 3 schools where counseling cell is constituted.

2. Number of Students being assisted by the cell.

Total Enrollment of Class IX, X in sampled Schools in

district

No. of students assisted by the Cell in total sampled Schools in district

%

- - -

Comments: There is no active counseling assistance happening in the government schools of Thanjavur district.

The schools are not properly equipped and there is no professional training given to the teachers to handle

counseling for students.

3. The frequent problem areas of the students for which guidance and counseling is being sought.

S.No. Problem areas Responses % 1 Selection of optional subjects after sec. 2 To opt scout/guide/NCC 3 In choosing career 4 Seeking information about entrance exams

to various professional streams

No data available

5. Quality

I. Enabling Conditions : At School level

Availability of following enabling conditions

S. Physical Aspects Total Number of rooms

Number of equipped rooms

%

No. 1 Natural light 250 236 94%

41

2 Ventilation 250 236 94% 3 Black Board appropriately located in

classroom 250 210 84%

4 Bulb/Tube light /CFL 250 251 100% 5 Fan 220 214 97% 6 Teaching aids 210 20 10%

Comments: Natural light is available in 94% rooms of 20 sampled schools, like wise ventilation exists in 94%

rooms. Blackboards are appropriately located in 84% rooms. Availability of bulbs/tubelights/CFL exists in 100%

rooms in sampled 20 schools. Fan is available in 97% rooms. The teaching aids are available only 20 class rooms

(10%).

The physical aspects are at the satisfactory level in almost all the schools.

42

1(b) Availability & workability of following material/equipments –

S. No.

Name of Material/Equipment Availability in Number of Schools

Functional in Number of Schools

Number % Number % 1 Teaching aids 20 100% 20 100% 2 Desk-chairs/stools for students (Adequate) 20 100% 19 100% 3 Integrated science lab with equipments and

material 20 100% 20 100%

4 Math kit 20 100% 20 100% 5 Science kit 20 100% 20 100% 6 Computer lab with computers and supportive

devices and internet connection 20 100% 18 80%

7 Art and Craft room 0 0 0 0 8 Library with age appropriate books and seating

arrangement 0 0% 0 0%

9 TV 0 0% 0 0% 10 Separate Activity room for girls 0 0% 0 0% 11 Audio Equipments 0 0% 0 0% 12 Video Equipments 0 0% 0 0% 13 LCD Projector 0 0% 0 0% 14 Overhead projector 0 0% 0 0% 15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 20 100% 20 100% 16 Fire Extinguisher 20 100% 20 100% 17 Auditorium 0 0% 0 0% 18 Staff room 0 0% 0 0% 19 Indoor games room 0 0% 0% 0% 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 0 0 0 0 21 Counselor room 0 0% 0 0% 22 First-aid room 0 0% 0 0%

Comments:

2. The number of days, the School functioned during the last academic year? Give reasons for the closure, if

any of the School remains closed for long gaps during last year. Suggestions to avoid repetition of such instances

• No. of Schools remained closed

• Average No. of days, School(s) remained closed in last year

An average of 156 days closed in Thanjavur district including Saturdays, Sundays and Government

holidays.

• Reasons for the closure

1.

2.

3.

0

210 days

43

3. Number of teachers present in the School (Male & Female, vacancies against sanctioned posts.(In total sampled Schools in district)

Sanctioned Posts (subject-wise)

Number of teachers placed

Total % Number of teachers present in School on

visit day

Vacancies against

sanctioned posts

%

M F M F

192 70 105 175 91% 65 101 17 9% Comments:

The total number of teachers for class 9th and 10th placed in 20 schools comes to 170 against 192 sanctioned posts,

the number of posts lying vacant is 17 (9%). 95% teachers were found present on the day of field visit across 20

schools.

3. In case of teacher’s vacancy, the alternative arrangements being made by the head of the institution to complete

the course curriculum.

Comments: The course curriculum is completed through available teachers as they take additional classes.

Extra classes are also taken during Saturdays and on other public holidays in the schools where they have

teacher vacancies.

5. Availability of teachers for each class and for teaching science, mathematics and language.

Number of Schools

Sufficient teachers available to teach Science Math Language

20 20 19 % 100% 100% 95%

Comments:

6. Number of teachers possessing professional training qualifications (subject-wise) as mandated and number of untrained teachers.

No. of School

No. of trained teachers No. of untrained teachers in sampled Schools

20 0 0 % 100% 0% 0

Comments:

7. Practice of truancy, i.e. absenteeism/class bunking by students/teachers being reported in the School, if so,

the reasons thereof, steps taken by the School management to curb the practice.

44

Class bunking/Truancy % No. of Schools

Yes No Student 0 0 0%

Teachers 0 0 0% Comments:

8. Policy of teacher recruitment, deployment, training, remuneration and career advancement (At State

level)

Tamil Nadu Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) conducted by Teacher Recruitment Board (TRB) for the recruitment of

teachers for Tamil Nadu Government Schools; they conduct Teachers Eligibility Test for the selection of teachers

for Class I to XII.

II. Teaching Learning Process

1. Maintenance of teacher’s diary including curriculum delivery and lesson Plan etc. by teachers &

countersigned by the Head of the institution regularly.

No. of Schools

Teachers diary maintained Counter sign

Yes No Yes No

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%

Observation & Comments

2. Availability of timetable prescribed by the School and followed by the teachers.

No. of Schools

Prescribed time table available Time table followed by teachers Yes No Yes No 20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0% Comments:

3. Are discussions and group team works encouraged as a methodology of teaching for involvement of

Students/students in teaching learning process?

No. of School

Discussion and group team work encouraged Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

45

4. a-c Classroom management with reference to seating arrangement of Students.

No. of Schools

Students made to sit in small groups

Students of disadvantaged groups

and Students with disabilities sit

separately or on back benches

Students have role in classroom management

Yes No Yes No Yes No 0 20 0 20 20 0

% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% Groups

made of Different

Same class

No. of Schools

0 20

% 0% 100% Comments: all schools sit separate boys and girls

5. on site academic support by resource teachers in year 2012-13

Average frequency of visits of resource teachers /Schools

Average time spent by resource teacher/School

Nature of support provided

1. Resource teachers are appointed for 3 months in case if there are slow learners in the school 2. Resource teachers extend their support only to class 9 and not for class 10

3. Comments: A periodical visit of resource teacher is required both class 9 and 10 since the slow learners if

monitored closely and supported there will be more changes. It needs consideration.

6. Special Teaching for Learning Enhancement:-

Number of Schools, which arranged zero periods, extra classes etc. for academically weaker students –

No. of Schools who arranged zero period, extra class Yes No

20 0 % 100% 0%

Extra classes ran Throughout year Only for one month before exam 20 % 100%

46

Average days of zero period in a weak

Results thereof 1. Students are showing interest in learning the subject in out of classroom sessions 2. Improvement in the exam scores 3.

7. Method/s of Assessment & Evaluation being followed in the School/classroom.

Method/s Response % Continuous and Comprehensive Assessment

Good 100%

Comments: The teachers are encouraged to use Continuous and Comprehensive Assessment method, however they

fell there is no proper training provided to teachers in evaluating the students.

8. Participation level of the CWSN in classroom processes and efforts made to optimize it.

No. of Schools with CWSN % 20

Participation level in class five schools All CWSN participate actively 5 100% Few CWSN participate 0 0% No participation 0 0%

Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class 1 2 3 4

Comments: In all the 5 schools, the CWSN participate actively. They feel very normal and there is no teasing or

bullying by peers.

9. Nature of peer interaction with CWSN.

Peer Interaction Number of Schools % Neutral 20 100% Taunting 0 0% Teasing 0 0% Bullying 0 0% Comments: There is no taunting teasing or bullying by peers in any of the schools where CWSN is present. The

children are neutral and the children also support CWSN in educational and other activities.

47

10. Individualized Educational Plan (IEPs) prepared for CWSN.

No. of Schools with CWSN

IEP

Prepared Not prepared

0 5

% 0 100%

Comments: IEP is available in the school only for the classes I to VIII and not available for classes IX and X.

11. Availability of adequate facilities for seating CWSN –

%

Total No. of sampled Schools

No. of Schools with CWSN in samples

20 5

No. of

Schools

No. of Schools with CWSN seating facilities Yes No

0 5 % 0% 100%

Comments: There are no special seating facilities arranged for CWSN in any of the 5 schools.

12. Extent and nature of use of ICT devices for teaching and learning of the CWSN.

Equipments

No. of Schools having Facilities

No. of Schools with CWSN having these facilities

No. of Schools making use of ICT

%

LCD Projector 0 0 0 0% Overhead projector 0 0 0 0% Computer & Accessories with net connection

0 0 0 0%

Others 0 0 0 0%

Comments:

There are no ICT devices used for teaching and learning of CWSN in any of the school at high school level. The

computer lab is used only by the higher secondary classes 11th and 12th in case if the students have opted for

computer science as their elective subject.

The teachers were also not trained on handling ICT devices. The class rooms are not properly equipped with ICT

devices for class 9 and 10 in Thanjavur district.

48

III. Teachers’ Training

1. Provisions for Training of Teachers

S. No.

Provisions for In-service training Schedule Duration

1 Induction training (Science, Maths, English, `Social Science, Hindi & Sanskrit)

For newly recruited teachers

10 days training programme based on NCF. 2005, content, pedagogy and classroom activities.

2 In-service training –need based 5 days’ training programme in workshop mode in Maths, English, Social Science and Science

From July to December (50% of existing teachers from each district to be covered)

5 days

3 Orientation programme for Head Master/ Principal

As per SPO calendar 3 days

4 Training for newly recruited Head Masters As per SPO calendar 10 days 5 Management training for Head Masters/

Principals From Aug. to January 14 days

6 Workshop for Development of different modules for training


7 Training of Resource Persons for H.M.’s training

As per SPO calendar

8 Block head-quarters and girls hostels As per SPO calendar 2 hrs. daily after School for 15 days

9 Development and Life skills for girls As per SPO calendar 5 days 10 Sensitization programme (legal (literacy

workshop) As per SPO calendar 1 days

11 1(a) Targeted annual Plan prepared by the State for in-service teachers’ training to improve quality and skills – Yes Comments: The above table gives the information about the training provided to the teachers under RMSA as per

the SPO calendar.

49

2. Inclusion of trainings for dealing with CWSN, in training programme

Details of in-service training in subjects received by teachers -

No. of Schools whose teachers received training under RMSA

% S.No. Subjects Number of teachers,

received training under RMSA

Average teachers per School who received training

Average Duration

1 Science 11 0 7 days 2 Maths 9 0 7 days 3 English 7 0 7 days 4 Social Science 23 0 7 days 5 Sanskrit 0 0 0 6 Hindi 0 0 0

Total 0 0 0 Inclusion of training

to deal with CWSN 0 0 0

Comments:

There is very few teachers received training under RMSA in Thanjavur district. 11 teachers have received training in

Science subject, 9 teachers in Maths, 7 teachers in English and 23 teachers in social science subject. Almost all the

training had lasted for 7 days. There was no training session conducted for Inclusion of CWSN.

2 (i)

Need of various trainings expressed by teachers S.

No. Name of Training Number of Schools

expressed the need Frequency Duration

1 Subject based training 20 Annual 4 days 2 Orientation Programme 20 Annual 5 days 3 Innovations’ training 20 Annual 5 days 4 Training for Development of life

skills 20 Annual 5 days

5 Computer training 20 Annual 11 days 6 Scout Masters’ training 0 Annual 7 Disaster Management Training 0 Annual 11 days 8 CWSN 0 9 Any other (mention) - - -

Comments: In almost all the sampled schools, teachers expressed that they are in need of periodical subject based

training, various orientation programmes, Innovations training, training for development of life skills and computer

training.

4. Impact of training on the confidence level of the teacher in handling a class with CWSN :

There had been no training provided to teachers on handling CWSN. In most of the cases, the CWSN who complete

VIIIth standard do not continue their education further. It could be due to several reasons but at the school level

50

there is no special effort taken by the management to continue the education of CWSN. The number vastly reduced

in migration of VIII to IX th standard.

4. Physical availability of adequate and good quality facilities for inservice training with reference to – Facilities Adequate % Inadequate %

Space 20 100% 0 0 Projection 20 100% 0 0 Tools/Modules 20 100% 0 0% Equipments (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.)

20 100% 0 100%

Comments: There are no modules or tools available for in-service training in any of the schools

5. Whether training modules are need based or not?

No. of Schools Yes No

0 20

% 0% 100%

Comments: There are no training modules available

6. Impact: Use of new technologies like Computer Assisted Learning (CAL), LCD Projector etc. for

imparting lessons in the classroom by teachers.

Total No. of teachers received training No. of teachers using CAL, LCD, etc. teaching

%

192 0 0%

Comments: There are no teachers in 9th and 10th standard use Computer Aided teaching in Thanjavur District.

There is a computer lab available in all the schools. CAL centers are used by Primary students and higher secondary

children only if they have opted for computer science as elective subject.

51

7. Trainers/Resource persons from following institutions who imparted trainings –

N = (No. of Schools) whose teachers received training from RMSA

S.No. Institutes Number of Respondents % of respondents

1 Secondary Schools 20 100% 2 Higher Secondary Schools 20 100% 3 DIET 20 100% 4 College/University 20 100% 5 SIERT 0 0% 6 IASE 0 0% 7 CTE 8 NIC 9 Any other institution (mention)

10 Total

52

Comments: In almost all the schools teachers have been provided with training on various subjects under RMSA.

The resource persons/trainers are from secondary schools, higher secondary schools, DIET and few training sessions

were conducted by college / university professors.

8. Any other issue related with teachers’ training of secondary education.

1. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:

6. CIVIL WORKS

I. General Information At School Level

(1-2)

S.N. Name of School Year of establishment

Year of construction

Remarks

1 GHS,Mohamed Bunder - 2011 The work good but now stopped because insufficient fund, First Floor Lintel Level

2 GHS inthalur 2011 The work good but now stopped because insufficient fund, First Floor Roof laid Gound Floor completed

3 GHS Naduvoor 2011 Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works, Finishing Level

4 GHS Mudukadu 2011 Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Work, Finishing Level

5 GHS Sillathur (North) 2011 First Floor Brick Work Roof Concrete Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works Toilet Facilities White and Colour washing, First Floor Roof Level

Comments: In Thanjavur district, 5 schools had civil work. The civil works were started in the year 2011 but left

incomplete due to lack of funds.

53

RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA ABHIYAN, THANJAVUR DISTRICT

New School Construction 2009 - 2010 as on 19.02.2014

S.

N

o

Name of

School

Date of

Commenceme

nt

Administrati

ve

Sanctioned

Amount

Expenditur

e sofar

Stage Balance

work to be

done

Remarks

1 GHS,

Kollankar

ai

15.03.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Completed Weathering

Course &

Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

Toilet

Facilities

2 GHS,

Panaveli

05.03.2012 50,50,000 5050000.00 First Floor

Roof laid

GoundFlo

or

completed

Weathering

Course &

Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

Plastering

and White

and Colour

washing

54

3 GHS,

Indalur

26.01.2011 50,50,000

+ 612000

(Furniture)

----------------

5662000

----------------

5604000.00 First Floor

Roof laid

GoundFlo

or

completed

Weathering

Course

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

White and

Colour

washing

4 GHS,

Mohamed

Bunder

23.07.2012 50,50,000 4281732.00 First Floor

Lintel

Level

Inner &

Outer

Plastering

Weathering

Course Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

Toilet

Facilities

White and

Colour

washing

5 GHS,

Sillathur

(North)

10.07.2011 50,50,000 4565804.00 First Floor

Roof

Level

First Floor

Brick Work

Roof

Concrete

55

Weathering

Course Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

Toilet

Facilities

White and

Colour

washing

6 GHS,

Thaligai

Viduthi

26.02.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Completed Weathering

Course Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

Opened

by

Honorabl

e CM

7 GHS,

Naduvoor

07.03.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Finishing

Level

Weathering

Course Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

8 GHS,

Mudukadu

05.02.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Finishing

Level

Weathering

Course Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works

56

Total 41062000.00 39701536.0

0

3. Availability of class rooms for Class IX & X (Std. Size 20’x24’)

Class Sections Available no. of rooms % Deficit % 9 2 2 100% 0 0%

10 2 2 100% 0 0% *List of sampled Schools with deficit of classrooms is attached

Comments: There are two sections in each class 9th and 10th and available number of rooms are 2 for each class.

There are no deficit of class rooms in any of the schools in Thanjavur district.

57

4. Area of the School

No. of Schools having

School Campus School Building Open Space Play Ground Other

18 2 1 0

% 100% 100% 0% 0% Total area (sq.ft)of sampled Schools

12600, 12600 No No No

Avg. (sq.ft) Area 12600 No data No data No data List of Schools with specified details is attached

II. Design

1. Type of Building –

No. of Schools

Pucca Semi Pucca Kutcha Rented 2 0 0 0

% 100% 100% List of Schools with specified details is attached

Comments:

2. Physical Condition of building -

No. of Schools

Cracks Damp Seepages Damages in Plaster

None

0 0 0 0 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

List of Schools with physical condition of building attached

Comments:

3. Any local innovative approaches in School building design

Yes % No %

No. of Schools 0 0% 2

Kind of Innovation No such innovative practices witnessed by the monitoring team

4. Availability of Natural Light & Cross ventilation; if not, reasons thereof, and the steps taken by School authorities to rectify it.

No. of Schools

Natural light

Cross ventilation If no, Reasons Steps taken to rectifies

Yes No Yes No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

2 0 2 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%

58

5. Lighting Facility in Classrooms

No. of Schools

Arrangement of lighting facility Yes No

0 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools

Functional Not functional Yes No

0 2 % 0% 0%

If not functioned, Reasons 1. under going on constriction

2.

3. 4.

Steps taken 1. under going on constriction

2. 3. 4.

Supply of electricity

No. of Schools

Continuous Intermittent

20 0

% 100% 0%

Average duration of availability

6. Availability and usability of following provision of alternative electric power supply -

Generator Inverter Gobar Gas

Plant

Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other

No. of Schools Availability 0 0 0 0 0 0

% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

No. of School In working condition

Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

% Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

No. of School Usability Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

% Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil NiL

59

7. (a-b) Library Design - Availability of the Following -

No. of Schools

Sufficient Seating

Space

Proper Light Ventilation Regular Pest Control

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

1 1 0 0 2 0 0 2

% 5% 5% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 10%

Comments:

8. (a-d) Laboratory Design

Laboratory Number of Schools (a) Adequate space for Physics, Chemistry,

Biology and other subjects Yes % No %

2 0 (b) Proper height (3 ft.) of Lab. Table 2 0 (c) (i) Cross Ventilation 2 0

(ii) Exhaust Fan 2 0 (d) Availability of Running Water 0 0

The construction of laboratory has not been completed in all the 5 schools. The remaining 15 schools do not have a

laboratory.

60

61

9. Facilities for Physically Challenged:

(a) Availability of Ramps to access the following

S.No. Ramps to Number of Schools Yes % No %

(i) Entrance of School 18 90% 2 10% (ii) Drinking Water Facility 0 0% 0 0% (iii) Toilet Facility 0 0% 0 0% (iv) Science lab 0 0% 20 100% (v) Computer Lab 0 0% 20 100% (vi) Mathematic Lab 0 0% 20 100% (vii) Library 0 0% 20 100% (viii) Auditorium - - - - (ix) Play Ground - - - -

62

(b) Availability of benches of different height in classrooms –

Bench Availability

Number of Schools

Yes No

19 1 % 95% 5%

There are benches available in schools but not of different height in classrooms

(c) Ramp’s Condition

Comments: The ramp has been constructed under SSA scheme and not under RMSA scheme. All the schools had

ramp facility.

Number of Schools with ramps

Adequate Slope

Yes No

20 0

% 100% 0%

Hand rails available 20 0

% 100% 100%

63

10. Drinking Water Facility

(a) Source of drinking water

Source Number of Schools %

Supply water Panchayat / Corporation Water 20 schools

100%

Tube well 0 0%

Dug Well 0 0%

Hand Pump 0 0%

Other

No source 0 0%

Availability of sufficient water across all the seasons

No. of Schools Water Available

Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

Comments:

(b) Water Storage Facility & its condition & cleaning schedule

Type of Facility

No. of

Schools

Condition Cleaning Schedule

No. of Schools

%

Good &

Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly

Open Tank 0 0 0 Fortnightly 0 0

% Monthly

Covered tank 0 0 0 Six Monthly 19

% 75% 75% 0% Not Definite

ground tank 1 0 0 1 5% % 0% 0% 0%

Overhead tank 19 19 0 19 % 95% 15% 95% 95%

64

(c) Quality of drinking water

No. of Schools

Quality

Satisfactory Not satisfactory

20 0

% 100% 0%

(i) Measures taken by Schools authority to ensure clean drinking water -

Number of Schools

Aqua guard R/o Water Filter Other None 0 0 0 0 0

% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

(ii) Measures adopted for treatment & testing of water –

Number of Schools with treatment of

water

Bleaching Powder

Chlorine Alum Powder

None Testing of water done

Yes No

0 0 0 0 0 20

% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

Comments:

There are no measures adopted for treatment & testing of water

(d) Availability of sufficient numbers of drinking water taps -

No. of Schools

Availability of Water taps Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% 11. Sanitation Facility –

(a) Availability of adequate numbers of urinals/lavatories students, teachers and others

Users Facility of urinals/lavatories available in Schools

Adequate Number % Inadequate Number % Boys 20 100% 0 0% Girls 20 100% 0 0% CWSN 2 10% 18 90% Teachers 20 100% 0 0% Other workers *List of sampled Schools with shortcomings is attached

65

(b) Maintenance/Cleanliness of toilets and supply of water

No. of Schools

Maintenance Cleanliness Supply of running water

Yes No Yes No Yes No

18 2 2 18 20 0

% 90% 10% 10% 90% 100% 0%

Comments:

There is proper maintenance of toilets in most of the schools. But having only upper primary level

66

(c) Availability of Separate Toilets for Girls –

No. of Schools

Separate toilet availability Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% Safer location of Girls’ toilets

No. of Schools

Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

Availability of Napkins & Dustbins

No. of Schools

Sanitary Napkins Dustbins Yes No Yes No

0 20 0 20 % 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments: Napkins & Dustbins are not available in any of the schools in Thanjavur district, but having only at

upper primary level and there is no these facility for high school level due to no separate building for high school

(d) Provision in toilets for physically challenged students -

No. of Schools

Availability of Provision Yes No

2 18 % 10% 90%

(e) Lavatories’ single pits/double pits attached with septic tank and cleaning of septic tank

No. of Schools

Connectivity of lavatories with Single Pit/Double Pit Lavatories with Septic Tank

Regular cleaning of septic tank

Yes No Yes No 2 18 2 18

% 10% 90% 10% 90% Comments:

There is no any vacancy for scavenger at high school level but they have vacancy at school level not filled by

government

67

12. Drainage System

(a-c) Availability of drainage facility

No. of Schools

Drainage System available Yes No

0 20

% 100% 0% Type of Drains

Under ground Pucca Covered

Pucca & Open

Kutcha & Open

No. of Schools

0 0 0 0 20

% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Structural Condition

Good Bad Damaged Regular Cleaning of drains done in Schools

No. of Schools

0 20 0 0

% 0% 100% 0% 0% Any instance of Water Logging

No. of Schools

Yes No 0 20

% 0% 100% No. of Schools

If, yes, location of Water Logging Wrecked Drains

Entrance Gate

Open Space

Playground Near Toilets

Outside Classrooms/Lab/Lib/Kitchen

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Comments: There is no instance of water logging in any of the schools.

68

13. (a-c) Waste Water treatment/discharge/disposal of solid waste

No. of Schools

Waste Water Treatment & Discharge Arrangement Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools

If yes, Type of drainage system Septic Tank Municipal

drain Open field Any other

0 0 0 0 20 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

No. of Schools

Availability of waste Collection facility Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools

If yes, Adequate No. of dustbins Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools

If yes, Condition of dustbins Usable Not usable

0 20 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools

Availability of facility for treatment of waste Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools

Facility for composting of organic waste Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments:

There is no waste water treatment/discharge /disposal of solid waste management in any of the schools.

69

14. (A-b) Water & Energy Conservation

Number of Schools

Availability of Water Conservation Measures No Yes 20

0 % 0%

Number of

Schools

Availability of Rain water harvesting system Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

Number of

Schools

Condition of Rainwater harvesting system Working Not Working

0 20 % 0% 100%

Number of

Schools

Stored water consumable Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

Number of Schools

Lighting facility available Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% Type Ordinary bulb Ordinary tube CFL None

Number of Schools

0 20 0 0

% 0% 100% 0% 0%

Number of Schools

Teacher’s School management’s awareness about use of renewable sources of energy Yes No

0 20

% 0% 100%

Type of source

Gobar gas Plant Solar energy Wind energy

No. of Schools using

0 0 0

% 0% 0% 0% Comments:

70

15. (i) (a-b) Safety aspect of Building Design

No. of Schools Govt. Building Rented 20 0

% 100% 0% (Condition) Good 17

% 60% Bad 3 % 40%

No. of Schools with special structural facility to cope with natural hazards and 16 schools run under middle school building there is no separate building to high school

Flood 1 % 0%

Cyclone 0 % 0%

Earthquake 0 % 0%

Type of building in no. of Schools Ground floor 20

% 100% Double storied 0

% 0% Triple storied 0

% 0% Alternative exit gates for emergency evacuation in double/triple storied building (no. of Schools)

One gate 20 % 100%

Two gates 0 % 0%

Three gates 0 % 0%

Stare-case width sufficient

0

% 0% Not sufficient 0

% 0% Comments: All the schools have only one gate and there are no alternative exit gates for emergency evacuation.

71

15 (ii) (c-e)

Disaster Preparedness Plan Available Emergency Evacuation Plan No. of

Schools Yes No Yes No

4 16 4 16 % 0% 100% 0% 100%

Awareness about disaster among No. of

Schools Students Teachers

0 0 % 0% 0%

Received training to handle disaster No. of


0 0 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools

Fire extinguishers available in HM room Kitchen Laboratory

0 0 % 0% 0%

No. of

Schools

In working condition In working condition Yes No Yes No 20 0 0 20

% 100% 0% 0% 100% Trained to handle fire extinguisher

No. of Schools

Teachers Students Yes No Yes No

0 20 0 20 % 0% 100% 0 100%

Availability of Contact Numbers of No. of

Schools Ambulance Fire brigade Nearest hospital


% 0% 100% 0 100% 0 100% Display of Numbers

0 20 0 20 0 20

% 0% 100% 0 0% 0 100% Comments:

Disaster Preparedness Plan is not available in any of the schools, also there is no Emergency Evacuation Plan, there

is no Awareness about disaster among teachers and students. Teachers have not received training to handle disaster

to teachers, Fire extinguishers are available in HM room only and all are in working condition. In most of the

schools, teachers were not given proper training to handle or operate fire extinguishers.

72

III. Schools with ongoing construction activity

1. (a-d) sufficient measures being taken by School authorities to ensure that it does not hamper academic

activities vitiate air, water, land quality etc. in School.

No. of Schools

Ongoing construction activities Yes No

5 15

% 25% 75% Type New School building Strengthening of

existing School Repair works

No. of Schools

0 5 0 0

% 0% 25% 0 0

Measures being taken by School authorities

a. Measures being taken to ensure

No. of Schools

Academic activities not hampered due to

construction

Construction activity does not vitiate quality of

Noise pollution in permissible limit

Air Water Land Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 % 0% 100

% 0% 100

% 0% 100

% 0% 100

% 0% 100%

b. Construction material stored appropriately No. of

Schools Yes No

4 0 % 20% 0%

c. Temporary fencing of construction area done No. of

Schools Yes No

0 4 % 0% 20%

73

2. (a-b) Procurement aspects

No. of School

s

Same contractor whom the work was

awarded is doing work

(a)

Stage of construction work Construction work

being done according to layout Plan

Yes Sublette to

other

Foundation level

Plinth

level/

DPC

Lintel

Roof

level

Flooring/plastering

Finishing level

Yes No

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 % 100

% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100

% 0%

74

2(c-g)

h. Number of visits per School of Technical persons and authentication done or instructions given on construction site –

No. of

Schoo

ls

Community

members

through

SMDC

involved in

procureme

nt process

Sub

Committee

(Constructi

on

Committee

)

Constituted

A/c Books

Civil Work

(Constructi

on)

maintained/

updated

MB for

Civil

Work

Maintaine

d

Payment

made to

contracto

r in

accordan

ce with

MB

Material

stocked

is in line

with

stock

register

Cheque

issue

register

maintain

ed

Quality up to the mark Physical

existence of

constructio

n material

matches

with entry

made in

stock

register

Constructi

on

Material

Constructi

on work

Yes No Ye

s

No Yes No Yes No Yes N

o

Yes N

o


5 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0

% 100

%

0% 0% 100% 100

%

0% 100

%

0% 100

%

0

%

100

%

0

%

100

%

0

%

100

%

0% 100

%

0

%

100

%

0%

100% 0%

75

Total Number of Schools with ongoing civil work in district –

Construction

level

No. of

Schools

Number

of visits

Average No.

of visit/School

No. of

Authentications

made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions

given in No. of

Schools

Recorded Not

recorded

Foundation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Plinth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lintel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Roof level 4 10 2 0 0 0 0 0

Flooring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Finishing 4 12 3 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: -

S. No

Name of School Date of Commencement

Administrative Sanctioned

Amount

Expenditure so far

Stage Balance work to be done Remarks

1 GHS, Kollankarai 15.03.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Completed Weathering Course & Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works

Toilet Facilities

2 GHS, Panaveli 05.03.2012 50,50,000 5050000.00 First Floor Roof laid Ground

Floor completed

Weathering Course & Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works Plastering and White and Color

washing

8

76

3 GHS, Indalur 26.01.2011 50,50,000 + 612000 (Furniture) -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ 5662000

-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐

5604000.00 First Floor Roof laid GoundFloor

completed

Weathering Course Electrification Plumbing Works White and Colour washing

4 GHS, Mohamed Bunder

23.07.2012 50,50,000 4281732.00 First Floor Lintel Level

Inner & Outer Plastering Weathering Course Tiles

Electrification Plumbing Works Toilet Facilities White and

Colour washing

5 GHS, Sillathur (North) 10.07.2011 50,50,000 4565804.00 First Floor Roof Level

First Floor Brick Work Roof Concrete Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works Toilet Facilities White

and Colour washing

6 GHS, Thaligai Viduthi 26.02.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Completed Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works

Opened by Honble CM

7 GHS, Naduvoor 07.03.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Finishing Level Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works

8 GHS, Mudukadu 05.02.2011 50,50,000 5050000.00 Finishing Level Weathering Course Tiles Electrification Plumbing Works

Total 41062000.00 39701536.00

(i) System of fund flow from District to the accounts of SMDC

Mode of transfer Cheque Draft E-transfer

Dates of receipt of fund

No. of Schools 0 0 4 2011 onwards % 0% 0% 100% 0%

Comments: (j) Any good practices in civil works which can be replicated in other places/in other States.

No good practices in civil works observed during the monitoring team visit and all works stop right now because

fund.

S. No

Name of School

Date of Commenceme

nt

Administrative Sanctioned

Amount

Expenditure sofar

Stage Balance work to be

done

Remarks

4 GHS,

Mohame

d Bunder

23.07.2012 50,50,000 4281732.00 First

Floor

Lintel

Level

Inner &

Outer

Plastering

Weathering

Course Tiles

Electrificatio

n Plumbing

Works Toilet

Facilities

White and

Colour

washing

3 GHS, Indalur

26.01.2011 50,50,000 + 612000 (Furniture)

---------------- 5662000

----------------

5604000.00 First Floor

Roof laid Ground Floor

completed

Weathering Course

Electrification Plumbing

Works White and Colour

washing

______________________________________________________________________________

Comments: Good in civil works observed during the monitoring team visit and all works stopped right now because not

sufficient fund

78

7. Community Mobilization / Participation -

Total number of SMDC members in sampled Schools of the District

1. (a-c) Familiarity of SMDC members with their roles as notified by the State Government –

No. of

Schools

Level

Familiarity with their roles

% SEMIS

DCF

% School Report Car

d

% SDMC Register

% Guidelines of School Development Plan

% No. of Schools

Training

received by

SMDC Membe

rs

Printed copy of guidelin

es of SMDC made

available to

members

Better

Yes

No Yes

No

Good

Average

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

% 20

0 20

0

Not familiar

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: school report card prepared by SSA both SSA and RMSA but RMSA data entirely wrong, RMSA gave

training to SMDC but not effectively

2. (I) Frequency of SMDC meetings held, issues discussed thereof and average attendance of the SMDC members-

No. of Schools

Meetings held Average Attendance of

SMDC members Monthly Quarterly Six

monthly Annually Whenever

needed Never 100%

0 20 0 0 0 0 % 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Issues discussed –

1. Civil work 2. Perspective plan 3. Mainly grants Comments: 2(ii) Description of SMDC members –

Members Number Average no of members per School

Average Attendance in recent meeting

Total members 100 5 100% Women members 10 0.10 100% SC/ST members 7 0.07 0% Selected members 0 0 0%

5 members

79

Nominated members 0 0 0% Comments:

1. (I) Roles of SMDC members in monitoring attendance of teachers and students –

No of Schools

Monitoring Attendance of Monitoring Academic Progress of Students Teachers Students


% 0% 100% 0 100% 0 100%

3(ii) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities

No.

of S

choo

ls

Leve

l of P

artic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M I

mpl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r RM

SA

%

SAG

Util

izat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istri

butio

n

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

tribu

tion

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f tea

cher

s

%

Run

ning

of d

ay to

day

act

iviti

es o

rgan

isin

g Sc

hool

&

cultu

ral e

vent

s

%

Hel

p in

pro

vidi

ng S

choo

l fac

ilitie

s

%

Filli

ng o

f DC

F

%

Good 20 0 4 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 0 0

Average 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 100%

Bad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Comments:

4. Participation of SMDC members in preparation of AWP&B –

No. of Schools

Preparation of AWP & B Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

80

5. Training received by SMDC members and duration thereof –

No. of Schools

SMDC members received training

Total No. of SDMC

members

No. of members who received

training

Average of training duration

in days

Yes No 30 30 20 0 2 day

% 100% 0% 100 100% 100% Comments:

6. Schedule of trainings, received by SMDC members, name agency who conducted the trainings, and perception of SMDC members about trainings.

Month and year of

training held

Trainings conducted by

Responses about perception of SMDC members regarding trainings Topic, Content, Methodology

projection 1. DIET

No. of Schools

Good & Useful

Average Not Good 2014 2. School

HM 3.

4. 20 100% 5.

Comments:

8. MIS (Management Information System) at SPO, DPO and School level

1. Preparation of Master List of all Schools including private in District/State

Name of District visited

Thanjavur …………..

Master List of government and Pvt. Schools Prepared If master list not prepared reasons

thereof

Yes No 1. 100% 0% 2.

Name of State Tamil Nadu

3.

Total No. of govt. Schools

No. of govt. Schools of

which list is prepared

% Total No. of pvt.

Schools

No. of pvt. Schools of


% 4.

District 5. State

Comments:

81

2. Distribution of DCF for the current year to all Schools in the District

No. of School DCF distributed to all DPOs from SPO Yes No

% 20 0

No. of School DCF distributed all Schools from DPO Yes NO

% 20 0 Comments: DCF distributed all Schools from DPO but not current year 3. Training received by teachers / head Master / Principal for filling up of DCF in sampled Schools and district

At district level At School level

Total No. of govt. & Pvt. Schools in district

400

No. of sampled Schools

Training received by teachers of sampled Schools

No. of teachers who received DCF training

400 yes no

Average No. of teachers who received DCF training

20 0

20 100% 0%

The training received was on how to fill up the DCF forms. Yes 400

Reasons for not receiving training

5. Availability of Copy of filled up DCF with School for record and reference

(At School level) No. of Schools

Copy of filled up DCF available Reasons of Non-availability of o/c of DCF

Yes No 1. 20 0 2.

% 100% 0% 3.

82

6-7 School report card and sample checks

Data entry done School report card generated

Sample checking being done


School report card distributed to no. of Schools Finding of sample check

0% 0% 0%

Data entry done School report cards

Sample checking School report cards distributors all School

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Name of district

20 0 20 0 0 20 20 0

Name of State

Overall finding of sampled checking yes 8. Has the data been submitted to State level as per time schedule?

1. Yes 2. No

9. At which level the data is being analyzed and disseminated?

At the district level, in RMSA office the data is being analyzed and disseminated but not in school.

10. Awareness of School authorities regarding importance of data collected under MIS and if so, are they using it

Awareness about data’s information Use of data being made

No. of Schools Yes No Yes No 20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%

11. Is SEMIS/ UDISE data used for Planning and budgeting?

1. Yes 2. No

12. Is the back up of the data supplied under SEMIS/UDISE properly maintained?

1. Yes 2. No

1

2

1

83

9. Financial Management (At School, DPO & SPO level) –

1. Nature of financial records and their maintenance and Bank reconciliation –

No. of

Schools

Records maintained & updated on daily basis Bank reconciliation done on monthly basis Cash Book


% 100% 0% 0 0 DPO 100% 0% 0 0

0 100% 0% 0 0

2. Mode of transfer of funds to the SMDC from State/District level –

From DPO to SMDC

Mode of Transfer

Cheque Draft E-transfer

No. of Schools 0 0 20

% 0 0 100%

From SPO to DPO 0 0 20

Comments: All financial transactions are done through banks only

3(i) Type of funds/grants received by the sampled Schools and details thereof (financial year 2012-13) –

S.NO. Type of funds/grants No. of Schools As recorded in cash book Amount

Received Total Month of receipt

1. School Annual Grant (SAG)

20 50000 per school

50000 19/03/2013

2. Minor Repair Grant 0 0

3. New School Building

Grant (Major grant) 4 50 lakhs 50 lakhs

per school 04/18/12

4. Additional classroom

/lab etc. construction grant

5. Major repair grant

6. Educational tour grant

7. others

At District Level

84

3(ii). Type of funds /grants allocated by the district to Schools

S.No. Name of grant allocated No. of Schools Month of allocation

1 School Annual Grant All the

Government and

Government aided

schools in

Thanjavur district

19/03/2013

2 Minor Repair Grant All the

Government and

Government aided

schools except 33

RMSA school in

Thanjavur district

3 Civil Work 50 lakhs has been

distributed to 5

schools but the

civil work is

incomplete due to

insufficient funds

85

At State Level

3(iii). Type of funds /grants allocated by the State to district

S.No. Name of grant allocated No. of districts Month of allocation 1 School Annual Grant No info No info 2 Minor Repair Grant No info No info 3 Civil Work No info No info 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 4. System for drawl and payment of fund from SMDC account –

No. of Schools Cash Cheque Both 0 20 0

% 0% 100% 0% Comments:

5. Sharing of proposal for expenditure and expenditure Statements with community

No. of Schools

Sharing of If yes, details of objections Proposal for

expenditure Expenditure Statements

Any objection raised by community about any

transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No 1.

0 20 0 20 0 20 2. % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 3.

4. Comments :

6. Audit of SDMCs

All SDMCs in State/District are covered by audit 1. Yes 2.No

No. of Schools

Audit carried out YES NO 20 0

% 100% 0% D.P.O.

No. of Schools

If yes, Audit carried out by Education Deptt. A.G. C.A. Social Audit None

- - - 20 - % - - - 100%

Comments:

86

7. Social Auditing

Display of financial Information on notice board/wall of the School/office for the purpose of social audit-

No. of Schools

Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered

Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% D.P.O.

Comments:

8. Any instance of community mobilizing resources for the School.

No. of Schools

Instance of community mobilizing resources Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

If yes, details thereof

9(i). Status of utilization certification and period for which it has been

Submitted from SMDC to DPO

S. No. Name of School Month of submission of

UC

Financial year for which UC is

submitted

1 April, 2013 2012-13

2

3

4

5

87

9(ii). Status of utilization certificates submitted by SMDCs to DPO (At District Level)

Total No. of Schools

No. of SMDCs from which U.C. is

received

% Period for which U.C. submitted

No. of Schools

400 400 2011-12 400

2012-13 400

Comments: At the district level 400 schools have submitted the utilization certificate in the 2011-12 and also in

the academic year 2012-13.

9(iii) Status of utilization certificates submitted to SPO from DPOs (from 1st April 2012 to 31st March, 2013) (At

State Level)

No. of sampled

DPOs

Name of Funds /Grants

No. of DPOS to

which fund released

Amount of fund

released

Date of release

Amount for which

U.C. received

Amount for which U.C. has not been received

School Annual Grant

Minor repair

work

Major repair

work

Civil work Education Tour Comments: Data not furnished by the State

10. Process of settlement of advance and collection of utilization certificate by SPO and DPO.

(i) Process of settlement of advance and collection of utilization certificate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(ii) Communication to SMDCs after the settlement of advance has been done by DPO.

1. Yes 2. No

Mode of conveying SMDCs about settlement of advance

11. Financial Statement for SDMC/DPO/SPO (From 1 April 12 to ………….. (date /month of visit).

(i)

88

Name of Unit

A Opening Balance as

on 1st April, 2013

B Funds

received

C=A+B Total Fund available till………

D Expenditure

E=C+D Closing balance including cash in hand as on

……..

Balance in bank

passbook as on

…………… SMDC DPO SPO Comments: Data unavailable.

11 (ii) Detail of expenditure of funds by SMDC in sampled (from 15 April till date) district.

S.N. Name of School SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil work

Receipt Spent Unspent balance



Receipt Spent

1 GHS, Pillayarpatti

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

2 GHS, Vanarangudi

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

3 GHS, Mohamed Bunder

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000 5000000

4 GHS, Indalur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000 5000000

5 GHS, Naduvoor

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000 5000000

6 GHS, Sadayarkoil

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

7 GHS, Kattathi Unjiyaviduthi

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

8 GHS, Sillathur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000 5000000

9 GHS, Neerathanallur

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

10 GHS, Cholapuram West

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

11 GHS, Vanniyadi

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

12 GHS, Annappanpettai

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

13 GHS, Arunthavapuram

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

14 GHS, Vannakudi

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

15 GHS, Thukkachi

50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 16

GHS, Aralur 50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

17

GHS, Chitridaiyanallur 50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

18

GHS, Sengamangalam 50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

19

GHS, Vattathikottai 50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

20

GHS, Muthukadu 50000 50000 0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000 5000000

89

10. SCHOOL ANNUAL GRANT –

1 (i) Month of receiving School Annual Grant for the financial year 2012-13 in sampled Schools and status of utilization of funds.

S.N. Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools % 1 March, 2013 20 100 2 3 4 5 Total 2 (i) status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme- S.N. Name of School Sanctioned

amount Month of

receipt Expenditure till

date % of

expenditure 1 50000 19/03/21013 50000 100% 2 3 4 5 2(ii) Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant

Details/No. of Schools

Which were not sanctioned

SAGs

Which were sanctioned but did

not receive SAGs

Which received but did not

spend

2(iii) Utilization of SAG as per norms

SAG funds utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms in number of Schools

If not utilized as per norms, give reasons

Yes % No % 1. 20 100 20 100 0 1. Comments: data available

11. Minor Repair Grant

1. Receipt of Minor Repair Grant – (For Financial Year 2012-13)

S.N. Name of School Sanctioned amount

Month of receipt

Expenditure till date

% of expenditure

1 2 3 4 Total

90

2(i) Utilization of minor repair grant on repair and white-wash of the School building –

Number of Schools Number % Total No. of Schools who received minor repair grant No 0 Number of Schools utilized the grant on repair and white wash

No 0

Number of Schools who did not utilized fund as per norms No 0 Comments: No data available

2 (ii) Utilization of minor repair grants as per norms

Minor Repair Grant utilized on works

Number of Schools

%

Funds utilized as per norms If not utilized as per norms, give reasons Yes % No %

1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 8. 8. 9. 9. 10. 10 Comments: No split up available

91

12 INNOVATIONS – At SPO/DPO level

In Thanjavur district, promotion of sports activities is widely seen. The high school students are encouraged to participate in games, competitions and sports. The winners are recognized at the district level and they are given special prizes. Every year in SSLC examination, top 10 SC students are identified at the district level in Thanjavur and they are honored with special cash prizes.

1. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the current financial year (At district level)

S. No.

Name of Innovative Proposals Amount of funds sanctioned/released

Stage of Implementation

Comments :

At the district level there are no innovative proposals submitted during the financial year April 2012 to March 2013.

The state project office has recently issued a proposal to all the district level project offices to undertake innovative

projects to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of scheme. The district CEO assured that innovative proposals

will be undertaken during the next academic year.

2. Details of innovative proposals undertaken during the financial year 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013 (At State level)

3 (a) If not, the mentions reasons thereof

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism for implementation of innovation proposals.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

92

(c) The objectives of innovation proposals being met in districts

(a) At district level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) At State Level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) Identified any successful elements in innovation proposals, to be scaled up under RMSA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

13. INFORMATION ABOUT MMER At DPO and SPO level

1(i). The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in DPO under RMSA and the number in position. Thanjavur District

Name of District________________________________ S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position % Vacant %

1 CEO, District Programme Coordinator

1 1 100% 0 0%

2 Assistant District Programme Coordinator (ADPC)

1 1 100% 0 0%

3 Educational District Coordinators (EDCs)

2 2 100% 0 0%

4 Civil Engineers 2 1 50% 1 50% 5 Tally Managers 3 3 100% 0 0% 6 Data Entry Operators 2 2 100% 0 0% 7 Office Assistant (On

special request) 1 1 100% 0 0%

8

9 10

Total 12 12 100% 0 0% 1(ii) the total number of staff sanctioned category wise in SPO under RMSA and the number in position.

93

S. N. Name of Post Sanctioned In position % Vacant % 1 Project Director 1 1 100% 0 0% 2 JD (Administration) 1 1 100% 0 0%

3 JD (Training) 1 1 100% 0 0% 4 JD (Civil) 1 1 100% 0 0% 5 JD (District level

Coordination 1 1 100% 0 0%

6 Chief Accounts Officer

1 1 100% 0 0%

7 PG Teachers 3 3 100% 0 0% 8 BT level coordinators 2 2 100% 0 0%

9 Superintendents 1 1 100% 0 0% 10 Assistants 2 2 100% 0 0% 11 Tally Managers 1 1 100% 0 0% 12 Data Entry Operators 4 4 100% 0 0%

13 Personal Assistants for Director and JD

2 2 100% 0 0%

14 15

Total 21 21 100% 0 0% 1(iii) Action taken to fill up vacancies

There are no vacancies at district level

At district level ……………………………………………………………………………………….

At State level There are no vacancies at state level ………………………………………………………………………….

2 Personnel working on deputation/contract and their nature of engagement

No. of Personnel on deputation No. of Personnel on contract At DPO SPO At DPO SPO

NIL NIL NIL NIL Nature of engagement

At DPO At SPO At DPO At SPO

94

3. Component-wise personnel at State and District level

S.N. Component wise personnel Position in Place Working at State

level Working at district level

1 Finance 2 Civil Work 3 Quality 4 Equity 5 Gender 6 Pedagogy 7 Planning 8 Training

Total 3(i) If component wise personnels are not in place the alternative arrangements made

……………………………………………………..…………………………………………

Comments:

4 If the administrative staff is not in place alternative arrangement adopted

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Comments:

5 Clarity amongst officials and staff about the objectives, targets and goals of the programme and their role in the management structure.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Comments:

95

II. MONITORING STRATEGY

1. (i) Use of monitoring tools/mechanism (reports, visits etc.) to ensure effective implementation of the scheme

………………………………………………….………………………………………

1(ii) Steps taken by DPO & SPO to ensure effective implementation of RMSA

……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………

1(iii) Details of visits made by officials of SPO and DPO to district/Schools along with time schedule (from 1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013)

At SPO level

S. No.

Post of Officer No. of Visits made

No. of district/ School visited

Time schedule

Average No. of visits per district

1. SPD 2. Additional

Director Project

3 Others

At DPO Level

S. No.


No. of School visited

Time schedule

Average No. of visits pre School

1 DPC 2 ADPC 3 APC 4 Others Total

Comments: No data available

2. Details of guidelines laid down for monitoring.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

96

Comments:

III Management Systems –At District and State level.

Information about Academic Institutions (Details of SCERT & IASE/CTEs/DIETs)

1(i) Availability of Physical Infrastructural Facilities

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

1(ii) Facilities available in SCERT/SIERT

Staff Sanctioned In position Vacant %

1(iii) Availability of physical Infrastructural Facilities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:

1. Other essential facilities

97

In DIET In IASE/CTEs In SCERT/SIERT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments: IV. INFORMATION ABOUT STATE DATABASE At SPO level updated by DPO.

1. (i) School mapping completed or not in respect of the visited district/s

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1(ii) If not completed, then the basis used for developing the annual/perspective Plan for access

Planning is based on the school report card, UDISE records, etc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1(iii) Mechanism other than GIS mapping adopted by the State

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:

2. The database mechanism (MIS) at district level is in place or not

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No

2(i) If not, then name of other sources used for the Plan preparation at district level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:

98

3. Major issues in collection and compilation of data at district and State level

S. N. District level issues State level issues 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Comments: No major issues V RESEARCH (At district and State level)

There is no detailed information available regarding research at district and state level.

1. Details of research projects undertaken during the year (1st April, 2012 to 31st March, 2013) –

At District Level

S.No. Title of research project Purpose Major findings 1 There is no research and evaluation

carried out at the district level at present.

2

3

4

5

At State Level

S.No. Title of research project Purpose Major findings

1 At state level, MoU has been signed with NUEPA to conduct Annual Plan Action Research on RMSA Implementation in TN. Salem and Theni districts have been taken as pilot district to conduct this

99

research.

2

3

4

5

2. Research Advisory Committee being formed or not

(a) At State level ………………………………………………………………………………………….

(b) At District level ……………………………………………………………………………………….

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. (i) Identification of the kinds of research need was felt and at what level?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Action Research is being conducted or not, if yes it is conducted by the teachers or external agencies for finding out solutions to users pertaining to pedagogy and quality –

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4(i) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at district level –

Areas of research

Problem No. of Action Research

conducted in district

Solution Conducted by (Teachers /external agencies)

Pedagogy

100

Quality

4(ii) If Yes, Details of action research carried out at State level –

Areas of research




Pedagogy

Quality

14. Any other issues relevant to RMSA implementation

MI may give a maximum 2 page note, on any other issues, relevant to RMSA implementation, not covered above.

101

DISTRICT THIRUVARUR

102

INDEX

S. No. Particulars Page no. 1. Planning & Implementation

4. At School level 5. At District level 6. At State level

104-109

2. Access V. Physical Access

VI. Social Access VII. Open Schooling

VIII. OoSC

109-120

3. Equity III. General Information IV. Girls Education

121-128

4. Guidance & Counselling At school level

128-130

5. Quality IV. Enabling conditions V. Teaching learning process

VI. Teachers’ training

130-139

6. Civil works IV. General Information V. Design

VI. Schools with ongoing construction activity

140-158

7. Community Mobilization/Participation At school level

158-162

8. MIS (Management Information System) At School, DPO, SPO level

162-165

9. Financial Management At SMDC, DPO, SPO level

166-175

10. School annual grant (SAG) At SMDC, DPO, SPO level

176-177

11. Minor Repair Grant At SMDC, DPO, SPO level

177-178

12. Innovations At DPO, SPO level

178-182

13. MMER (Management /Monitoring/Evaluation and Research) VI. Staffing pattern

AtDPO, SPO level VII. Monitoring strategy at DPO, SPO level

VIII. Management systems DIET, SCERT, DEO Office

IX. State Database X. Research

182-188

14. Any other issues 188-188

103

MONITORING OF RMSA IMPLEMENTATION IN THIRUVARUR DISTRICT


At School Level


No. of Schools


% 100% 0% If not reasons thereof Comments: Perspective plan has been developed in 100% schools in Thiruvarur district. The perspective plan is






No. of Schools


0 20 - % 0% 100%





No. of Schools


Yes No

0 20

% 0% 100%


The planning strategy is common to all the students and not specific for disadvantaged groups. In the Perspective plan reports of few schools they have mentioned a statement that there are plans for disadvantaged groups. But there are no specific development plans conceived or mentioned in the plan document.

104

No. of Schools



S. No.


% Reasons thereof

1 Water & Sanitation 20 100% There is no tribal community in Thiruvarur district. There is no direct involvement of Rural and Urban development departments in school development. However, these departments work at the habitation level which indirectly contributes for school development. There is no coordination with PWD for any projects at the school level









No. of Schools


Yes No Yes No

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%





105


%


attendance 20 100%




20 100%




in Civil work in all 20 schools, organizing cultural, sports, events and functions, Mid day meal to some extent and


In case of civil work, the newly upgraded schools are not getting the maintenance grant.


No. of Schools


20 0 % 100% 0%


Schools %




0 0%


3 15%

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. 20 100% 7 Distribution of free text books 20 100% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 20 100% 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan 20 100%

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 0 0%

106

11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure

0 0%


20 100%








accounts.





Number of Schools


15 5 0 0 % 100% 0% 0% 0%

Comments: The meetings of general body of school management and development committee have been held

quarterly in all the schools.


Comments:

Thiruvarur 2. At District level – Name of District ………………………………………………………….


(2. Yes 2. No)

107

k. Water & Sanitation

l. Social Welfare

m. Tribal Development

n. Minority department

o. Rural Development

p. Urban Development

q. Medical Health & Family

r. welfare

s. PWD

t. Transportation (Roadways)





Comments



At State level








1

2

0

1

2

2

1

1

2

-

2

108



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments


2 1. Yes 2. No


2. ACCESS



S.N. Categories Number of Schools % 1 EBB 1 5% 2 Urban 2 10% 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 3 15% 4 Higher Gender gap 1 5% 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 3 15% 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 1 5% 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC 1 5% 8 Low academic achievements 1 5% 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants 0 0%

10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections 1 5% 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 2 10% 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area 2 10% 13 Ongoing civil work 2 10% 14 School with girls hostel 1 5% 15 None


The schools were selected in almost all the categories except few of the above mentioned list. There was only one

Economically Backward Blocks (EBB) denoted in Thiruvarur district. They were two schools from urban area, 3

schools with minimum 3 CWSN (15%), 3 schools with higher proportion of SC/ST/Minority students (15%),

schools situated in with large number of out of school children (15%), 1 school with low academic achievements

(5%), 2 schools from remote area (10%), 2 schools from flood natural calamity prone area (10%), 2 schools with

ongoing civil work (10%). There was one school with girls’ hostel in Thiruvarur district.

109




110

Comments: There are 3 schools in storm surge prone area and 1 school in contaminated ground water area and 8

schools in sensitive area on busy national /state highway that may pose threat to the students.



PS 0 0% 0 0% UPS 20 100% 0 0% Total 20 100% 0 0%





S. N. Distance of School from habitation Number of students % 1 0-1 km. 763 35% 2 1-2 km. 426 20% 3 2-3 km. 237 11% 4 3-5 km. 210 10% 5 More than 5 km. 539 25%

Total 2175 100% Comments: 10. In the total survey of 20 schools in Thiruvarur district, most of the children have access to upper primary

schools. There were 763 students (35%) reside within 0-1 km distance, 426 children (20% )from the distance of

1-2 km, 237 children (11%) from 2-3 km distance, 210 students (10%) from 3-5 km distance. 539 students

(25%) come from distance more than 5 km.


pass.


children.


No. of Schools

Yes No

6 14 % 30% 70%

If yes mention them

There is state highway near GHS Pazhayavalam There is a national highway at GHS Thiruthuraipoondi

111

There is a big pond in front of the school campus being a threat to children of ADWHS Amoor

Comments: There are very few natural or man-made barriers seen in Thiruvarur district such as National / State

Highways, Railway crossing and River.

6. Name and Distance of the nearest secondary School (Govt. /Pvt.) from the habitation the School is located




5 6 7 2 20 % 25% 30% 35% 10% 100%


Comments: From the sampled schools, 5 schools have the proximity of reaching Higher secondary school at a

distance within 1 km (25%), 6 schools can access secondary school at a distance of 1-3 km (30%) where as 7

schools are situated with the nearest higher secondary school at a distance of 3-5 km. Only two high schools have

their nearest secondary school at a distance more than 5 km

7. Any special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for the benefit of

students.



Comments:

Students are commuting to school in public transport only and they are distributed with free travel bus pass. No other

special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for students.

II Social Access




112

Category 14-16 Age


SC

ST

Minority

General

Total







abundance and they live with poor economic condition.


No. of Schools


% 100% 0%


Comments:

113


SC

ST

Minority

Others

Total

CWSN


E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P

IX

183

212

170

164

353

376

6 6 0 0 6 6 26

13

32

21

58

34

627

539

424

381

1051

916

661

561

458

403

1119

960

2 3 2 1 4 4

X 174

76

134

123

308

199

0 0 0 0 0 0 16

8 24

12

40

20

552

529

311

318

870

862

575

538

336

330

917

883

7 1 0 0 7 1

Total

357

288

304

287

661

575

6 6 0 0 6 6 42

21

56

33

98

54

1179

1068

735

699

1921

1778

1236

1099

794

733

2036

1843

9 4 2 1 11

5

% 29

26

38

39

32

31

0 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 7 5 5 3 95

97

93

95

94

96

100

100

100

100

100

100

1 0 0 0 1 0

114


(based on BPL Card)

Cla

ss

SC

ST

Min

ority

Gen

& O

ther

s

Tota

l

Tota

l

CW

SN

Boy

s

G

Tot

al

B

G

Tot

al

B

G

Tot

al

B

G

Tot

al

B

G

Tot

al

B

G

Tot

al

E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P E P

9

1

6

1

6

2

1

2

1

3

7

3

7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1

1

12 1

2

23 2

3

27 27

33 33

60 60

0 0 0 0 0 0

10

1

8

1

8

1

4

1

4

3

2

3

2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 6 10 1

0

22 22

20 20

42 42

0 0 0 0 0 0

Tota

l

3

4

3

4

3

5

3

5

6

9

6

9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0

0 0 15 1

5

18 1

8

33 3

3

49 49

53 53

102

102

0 0 0 0 0 0

%

3

4

3

4

3

5

3

5

6

9

6

9

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1

5

18 1

8

33 3

3

49 49

53 53

102

102

0 0 0 0 0 0

*Data not available


Comments:

There is no major variation in the pattern of attendance in respect of SC 69, ST, Minority, Girl Students 18 and Students19 from BPL background.


1. Yes 2. No 2

115



No. of Schools




100%




There are no discriminatory practices seen inside the school campus anywhere in Thiruvarur district.








Tricycle 1 5%

Escort 0 0%

Other (Specify)

In all the 20 schools (100%) visited by the MI, there were proper ramps with hand rails. The western toilet was found only in 5 schools out of 20. There was no special furniture provided in the class room for the CWSN to sit. Only in 1 school Tricycle is available and in no other school it was found. There are no escorts available in any schools of Thiruvarur district.

116

III. Open Schooling


3. At State level


2. Whether the State open School has its own district regional centers and study centers?

1. Yes 2. No


________________________________________________________________________


________________________________________________________________________


________________________________________________________________________

Comments:

4. Advocacy programme for out of School Students for bringing them back to the School

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

Comments:


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Comments:


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Comments:

117




OoSC Drop out age group of 14-16 years - Thiruvarur District

Category Class Enrolled Boys

Boys drop out

% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

Total Drop Out

%

SC IX 123 23 19% 117 7 6% 240 30 13%

SC X 113 13 12% 106 13 12% 219 26 12%

ST IX 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

ST X 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

Minority IX 10 1 10% 2 0 0% 12 1 8%

Minority X 8 0 0% 1 0 0% 9 0 0%

Gen & OBC

IX 109 9 8% 85 5 6% 194 14 7%

Gen & OBC

X 120 10 8% 76 4 5% 196 14 7%

Total IX 242 24 10% 204 9 4% 446 33 7%

Total X 241 13 5% 183 14 8% 424 27 6%

CWSN IX 2 2 100% 1 1 100% 3 3 100%

CWSN X 1 1 100% 1 1 100% 2 2 100%

IX X IX X IX X IX X

SC SC ST ST Minority Minority Gen & OBC

Gen & OBC

240 219

0 0 12 9

194 196

30 26 0 0 1 0 14 12

OoSC Drop out age group of 14-‐16 years -‐ Thiruvarur District

Enrolled Drop out

118



The SC community drop outs comprise 13% in class IX and 12% in class X.


In Gender perspective, dropout rate of boys looks to be little high when compared to Girls 10% of boys and 4% of

Girls are drop outs in class IX. 5% of Boys and 8% of Girls are drop outs in class X.


The dropout rate is 7% is class IX and 6% in class X.

Reasons for dropout


• Child labor

• Poor health condition


Efforts made –


Class-9 Class-10

No. of drop

out students

No. of drop out

brought back to

School

% No. of drop

out students


back to School

%

33 0 0% 27 0 0%

Comments: In class 9 the total number of school dropout is 33 and in class 10 it is 27. None of the drop out students

was brought back to school.






119







0 20

% 0% 100%

Comments: In Thiruvarur district no schools have issued Transfer Certificate to the students who migrate. The

schools respond that they couldn’t find out the students who have dropped out. Most of them are seasonal migrants

and no information could be retrieved.


No. of Schools



1

2







NIOS 0 0 SIOS 0 0

120


record)


Programme

Appeared in Exam



10 Total


3. Equity


At School Level



2011-‐12 2012-‐13 2013-‐14




Enrolled for 9th

94 120

0 0 32 42 0 1 113

98

0 0 121

133

3 2 143

136

0 0 28

34

1 1

Avg. % of Attend.

95%

98%

0 0 98 100

0 100

92

95

0 0 89 94 67 100

73

74

0 0 89

94

5 4

Appeared in Exam

92 112

0 0 30 38 0 1 111

91

0 0 118

127

2 2 116

119

0 0 18

30

1 1

% 98%

93%

0%

0%

94%

90%

0%

0%

98%

93%

0%

0%

98%

95%

67%

100%

81%

88%

0%

0%

64%

88%

100%

100%

Above 60%

65 89 0 0 22 26 0 1 75

83

0 0 85 85 2 1 43

51

0 0 9 14

0 0

% 71%

79%

0%

0%

73%

68%

0%

100%

68%

91%

0%

0%

72%

67%

100%

50%

37%

43%

0%

0%

50%

47%

0%

0%

Below 60%

27 23 0 0 8 12 0 0 36

8 0 0 33 42 0 1 73

68

0 0 9 16

1 1

% 29%

21%

0%

0%

27%

32%

0%

0%

32

9%

0%

0%

28%

33%

0%

50%

63

57

0%

0%

50

53

100

100

121

% % % % % % %

Enrolled for 10 th

32 22 0 0 13 16 0 0 82

112

0 0 20 19 0 3 83

98

0 0 20

26

1 0

Avg. % Attend.

100%

100%

0 0 100

100

0 0 95

94

0 0 95 97 0 0 80

83

0 0 90

100

100

0

% 100%

100%

0 0 100

100

0 0 95

94

0 0 95 97 0 0 80

83

0 0 90

100

100

0

Appeared in Exam

28 19 0 0 13 16 0 0 80

109

0 0 21 28 0 0 66

81

0 0 18

25

1 0

% 88%

86%

0%

0%

100%

100%

0%

0%

98%

97%

0%

0%

105%

147%

0%

0%

80%

83%

0%

0%

90%

96%

100%

0%

Above 60%

15 9 0 0 8 15 0 0 28

52

0 0 10 20 0 0 22

22

0 0 6 14

0 0

% 54%

47%

0%

0%

62%

94%

0%

0%

35%

48%

0%

0%

48%

71%

0%

0%

33%

27%

0%

0%

33%

56%

0%

0%

Below 60%

13 10 0 0 5 1 0 0 52

57

0 0 11 8 0 0 44

59

0 0 12

11

1 0

% 46%

53%

0%

0 77%

6%

0 0 65%

54%

0 0 52%

29%

0 0 67%

73%

0 0 68%

44%

0 0

6. Details of specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students along

with the assistance provided there under?


Name of schemes

SC

2. Girls’ Incentive Scheme

1. To prevent drop outs of SC girl students, the IX th standard unmarried SC girls of

age, less than 16 years are provided with a fixed deposit certificate for Rs. 3000

2.

3.

122

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes

Name of schemes




Gender Gap



ST




3000

4.


2.

Girls

1.

2

3.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

123

Class 9 Class 10 Class Boys % Girls % Total Gap % Boys % Girls % Total Gap %

Enrollment 708 55% 590 45% 1298 833 167 734 49% 765 51% 1499 1042 42

Attendance on visit day 650 54% 555 46% 1203 854 637 50% 635 50% 1272 997 -‐

Appeared in Exam 708 55% 590 45% 1298 833 167 734 49% 765 51% 1499 1042 42

Learning Achievement

(Quarterly/half yearly/yearly)

Above 60%

304 46% 358 54% 662 -‐ -‐ 237 35% 435 65% 672 -‐ -‐

% 43% -‐ 61% -‐ 51% -‐ -‐ 32% -‐ 57% -‐ 45% -‐ -‐

Below 60%

404 -‐ 232 -‐ 636 -‐ -‐ 497 60% 330 40% 827 -‐ -‐

% 57% -‐ 39% -‐ 49% -‐ -‐ 68% -‐ 43% -‐ 55% -‐ -‐

Gender gap = (GX1000/B) G=No. of Girls B=No. of Boys

Comments: In class IX, an average of 43% boys and 61% girls have scored above 60% marks. 57% boys and 39%

girls have secured below 60% marks. In class X, average of 32% boys and 57% girls scored above 60% marks.

Similarly, 68% boys and 43% girls have scored below 60% marks in Class X.



a Socio Cultural/Reasons 0 0%

b Economic Reasons 60 100%


Total 60 schools -



0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

IX Boys IX Girls X Boys X Girls Above 60% 43% 61% 32% 57%

Below 60% 57% 39% 68% 43%

Axis Title

Learning Achievement of Class IX and X -‐ Thiruvarur District

124



girl children.



%

A Health (own or family members) 4 20%

B Social cultural issues 1 5%

C Sibling Care 0 0%

D Household responsibilities 0 0%

E Family issues / Gone to relatives 0 0%

F Earning for livelihood 10 50%

G Migration 5 25%

H Any other 0 0%

Total 20 100%

125


factor, next being the migration factor while 25% have left schools, and another 20% children were report various

health problems for dropping schools. In one school, the girl child has left because of social and cultural an issue

which is 5% in Thiruvarur district.




Comments:



Social

Group



2011-12

2012-13

Gap

2012-13

2013-14

Gap

No data available in the district.

0%

20%

40%

60%

1

Reasons for Long Absenteeism -‐ Thiruvarur District

Health (own or family members)

Social cultural issues

Sibling Care

Household responsibiliZes

Family issues / Gone to relaZves

126


Social

Group


Year G T B G T

2011-12

2012-13

2012-13

2013-14



Social

Group



2011-12

2012-13

2012-13

2013-14


Comments: There is no data available in the district with regard to reduction in enrollment, attendance and

achievement levels. There are no special efforts made in case of gender gap.


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments:



127

iv. Number of Schools having facility of separate girls’ hostel in campus or in nearby area.

v. Number of girls residing in girls’ hostel in sample Schools.

vi. Any physical barrier faced by hostellers in their access to School

______________________________________________________________________________


There is no Guidance and Counseling Cell constituted in any of the schools visited in Thiruvarur district.

At School level:


ratio:

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Total 0 100


Comments: The Guidance and Counseling cell has not been constituted in any of the schools visited by MI in

Thiruvarur district. The HMs reported that they had been given one day training on guidance and counseling cell.

However, the teachers are not professionally trained to counsel the children.



district


%

- - -

Comments: There is no active counseling assistance happening in the government schools of Thiruvarur district.



0

0

128




No data available

5. Quality

II. Enabling Conditions : At School level




%

No. 1 Natural light 200 198 99% 2 Ventilation 200 198 99% 3 Black Board appropriately located in




rooms. Blackboards are appropriately located in 95% rooms. Availability of bulbs/tube lights/CFL exists in 89%

rooms in sampled 20 schools. Fan is available in 98% rooms. The teaching aids are available in 90% schools.



S. No.




material 20 100% 0



7 Art and Craft room 0 0% 0 0% 8 Library with age appropriate books and seating


129

9 TV 0 0% 0 0% 10 Separate Activity room for girls 0 0% 0 0% 11 Audio Equipments 0 0% 0 0% 12 Video Equipments 0 0% 0 0% 13 LCD Projector 0 0% 0 0% 14 Overhead projector 0 0% 0 0% 15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 20 100% 20 100% 16 Fire Extinguisher 20 100% 20 100% 17 Auditorium 0 0% 0 0% 18 Staff room 20 100% 20 100% 19 Indoor games room 0 0% 0% 0% 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 21 Counselor room 0 0% 0 0% 22 First-aid room 0 0% 0 0%

Comments:





An average of 156 days closed in Thiruvarur district including Saturdays, Sundays and Government

holidays.


1.

2.

3.

Comments:





visit day

Vacancies against

sanctioned posts

%

M F M F

190 89 83 172 86% 87 81 18 9%

0

210 days

130



schools.



Comments: The course curriculum is completed through available teachers as they take additional classes. Extra

classes are also taken during Saturdays and on other public holidays in the schools where they have teacher

vacancies.


Number of Schools


20 20 20 % 100% 100% 100%

Comments: There are sufficient teachers available to teach subjects like Science, Math and Language in Thiruvarur

district.


No. of School


20 0 0 % 100% 0% 0

Comments: All the teachers are possessing professional training qualifications subject wise in sampled schools.





Teachers 0 0 0% Comments: No such instance had been documented or happening in any of the visited schools. The teachers are

attending the school regularly.

131


level)



for Class I to XII.




No. of Schools


Yes No Yes No

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%


The Teacher’s diary is maintained in all the 20 schools and the HM makes countersign every week.


No. of Schools


% 100% 0% 100% 0% Comments: There is a prescribed time table available in all the 20 schools and time table is being followed by all

the teachers without fail. It is being verified by the HM frequently in Thiruvarur district.



No. of School


% 100% 0% Comments: In case of class IX and X, there is no discussion are group team works encouraged in the class room

activities. The teachers justify that they have a tight schedule to complete the syllabus for each term and there is no

time slot for conducting group discussions or team work.

132


No. of Schools







% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% Groups

made of Different

Same class

No. of Schools

0 20

% 0% 100% Comments: In case of class IX and X, there are no such activities for the students to sit in small groups. The

students who belong to same class are seated as a group and no groups from different age groups are made to sit

together. No disadvantaged groups are treated indifferently and disabled children are not made to sit separately or on

back benches. They are treated equally in the class room.





1. Resource teachers are appointed for 3 months in case if there are slow learners in the school 2. Resource teachers extend their support only to class 9 and not for class 10 3.

Comments: A periodical visit of resource teacher is required both class 9 and 10 since the slow learners if




No. of Schools who arranged zero period, extra class

Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

133

Extra classes ran Throughout year Only for one month before exam 20 % 100%



Comments:



Good 100%




No. of Schools with CWSN % 6 30%

Participation level in class All CWSN participate actively 6 100% Few CWSN participate 0 0% No participation 0 0%

Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class 1 There are no efforts made to optimize participation in class IX and X. But the Primary level CWSN are

handled by resource teachers often. The same teachers extend their support to these high school children. There is no separate staff appointed for Upper primary.

2 3 4


bullying by peers.

134






6

IEP


0 6

% 0 100%



%



20 6 100% 30%

No. of

Schools


0 6 % 0% 100%


135


Equipments




%


0 0 0 0%

Others 0 0 0 0%

Comments:





devices for class 9 and 10 in Thiruvarur district.



S. No.







5 days








As per SPO calendar




11

136

1(a) Targeted annual Plan prepared by the State for in-service teachers’ training to improve quality and skills – Yes

Comments: The above table gives the information about the training provided to the teachers under RMSA as per

the SPO calendar.







Average Duration




Comments:

There is very few teachers received training under RMSA in Thiruvarur district. 15 teachers have received training

in Science subject, 19 teachers in Maths, 20 teachers in English and 13 teachers in social science subject. Almost all

the training had lasted for 7 days. There was no training session conducted for Inclusion of CWSN.

2 (i)







137



training.






4. Physical availability of adequate and good quality facilities for in-service training with reference to – Facilities Adequate % Inadequate %

Space 20 100% 0 0% Projection 20 100% 0 0% Tools/Modules 20 100% 0 0% Equipments (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.)

20 100% 0 0%



20 0

% 100% 0%

Comments:




%

57 0 0%

Comments: There are no teachers in 9th and 10th standard use Computer Aided teaching in Thiruvarur District.

There is a computer lab available in all the schools. CAL centers are used by Primary students and higher secondary

children only if they have opted for computer science as elective subject.

138




1 Secondary Schools 1 5% 2 Higher Secondary Schools 0 3 DIET 1 5% 4 College/University 0 5 SIERT 0 6 IASE 0 7 CTE 0 8 NIC 0 9 Any other institution (mention) 0

10 Total 2 Comments: In almost all the schools teachers have been provided with training on various subjects under RMSA.



The secondary grade teachers are not given teachers’ training. The higher secondary teachers and sometimes HMs give the training. Very rarely DIET staff conducts the training.

2. There are no sufficient practical sessions conducted for computer training. The teachers are not getting hands on experience to use computers and devices.


1. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

139

6. CIVIL WORKS

In Thiruvarur district, 2 schools had civil work.

S.N. Name of School Year of establishment Year of construction Remarks 1 Palayakottai 2009-10 2009-10 Final stage 2 Pazhayavalam 2009-10 2009-10 Final stage 3. Availability of class rooms for Class IX & X (Std. Size 20’x24’)




There is no deficit of class rooms in any of the schools in Thiruvarur district.




20 20 15 0


5000sq. ft each school

No data No data No data

Avg. (sq.ft) Area 5000 sq.ft No data No data No data II. Design


No. of Schools


% 100% 0% 0% 0% List of Schools with specified details is attached

Comments: All the 20 schools in Thiruvarur district are running in a pucca school building. However, most of the

class rooms belong to primary or higher secondary classes. Though the schools are upgraded by RMSA they do not

have class rooms allocated for upper primary. There is no separate fund released for construction of class rooms in

many schools except the two schools where civil work is at finishing stage.

140


No. of Schools


None

0 0 0 0 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Comments: There are no damages, cracks, damp, and seepages in any of the school building.


Yes % No %



Comments:


No. of Schools

Natural light


Yes No Yes No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%

Comments:


No. of Schools

Arrangement of lighting facility Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

No. of Schools

Functional Not functional Yes No 18 2

% 0% 0% If not functioned, Reasons

1. The lighting is dysfunctional due to construction activities.

2.

3. 4.

Steps taken 1.

141

2.

3. 4.


No. of Schools


20 0

% 100% 0%


Comments:



Plant

Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other


% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%






Comments: There is no alternative electric power supply in any of the schools in Thiruvarur district.


No. of Schools

Sufficient Seating

Space



2 18 0 18 2 18 00 20

% 10% 90% 10% 90% 10% 90% 0% 100%

Comments: There is no proper library setting available in any of the schools.

142



Biology and other subjects Yes % No % 20 100% 0 0%

(b) Proper height (3 ft.) of Lab. Table 20 100% 0 0% (c) (i) Cross Ventilation 20 100% 0 0%

(ii) Exhaust Fan 20 100% 0 0% (d) Availability of Running Water 15 75% 0 25%

Comments:

The construction of laboratory has not been completed in two of the schools. The availability of running water was

available in 75% schools. The laboratory though available in the higher secondary schools it is not being used by

upper primary children. These children do not have lab activities in their curriculum. The lab is used only XIth

standard students if they have opted for science subjects.

The lab materials are also supplied every year with the same quantity irrespective of the left over materials. The

RMSA district office makes the payment for lab materials directly to the private company that supplies lab

resources. The materials are supplied to all the schools. So, the materials are kept unused in most of the schools as

there is overstock and non-usage. This issue has to be addressed by the district RMSA officials.

143





Comments: The ramps are available only at the school entrance and in front of few class rooms. There are no ramps available for the above mentioned places. However, these places are approachable by physically challenged students. There is no separate library building available in most of the schools.

144


Bench Availability

Number of Schools

Yes No

19 1 % 95% 5%

There are benches available in schools but not of different height in classrooms.



ramp facility. In few schools there are no handrails available.




Supply water Panchayat / Corporation Water 100%

Tube well 11 55%

Dug Well 0 0%

Hand Pump 2 10%

Other -

No source 0 0%



Yes No


Adequate Slope

Yes No

20 0

% 100% 0%

Hand rails available 20 0

% 100% 100%

145

20 0 % 100% 0%

Comments: There are water resources available in all the 20 schools. The water is supplied by Panchayat or Municipality. The water is stored in a syntax container and used across.


Type of Facility

No. of

Schools


No. of Schools

%

Good &

Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly


% Monthly 20 100%

Covered tank 11 0 0 Six Monthly

% 55% 100% 0% Not Definite

ground tank 10 0 1 5% % 10% 10% 0%

Overhead tank 7 0 19 % 35% 35% 95% 95%


No. of Schools

Quality


20 0

% 100% 0%


Number of Schools


% 10% 0% 25% 0% 0%

146

(ii) Measures adopted for treatment & testing of water –


water

Bleaching Powder



Yes No

0 5 0 0 0 20

% 0% 25% 0% 0% 0% 100%

Comments: The water is being chlorinated by the panchayat/municipal authorities. Despite of it, 5 schools in

Thiruvarur district is using chlorine periodically to ensure cleaning of water. However, the testing of water has not

been done in any of the schools in Thiruvarur district.



No. of Schools


% 100% 0% Comments:

11. Sanitation Facility –




Comments: There are no special arrangements made for CWSN with respect to toilet facilities. The number of

CWSN in upper primary is very minimal when compared to primary schools.

147


No. of Schools



18 2 2 18 20 0

% 90% 10% 10% 90% 100% 0%

Comments:

There is proper maintenance of toilets in most of the schools. In Thiruvarur district, running water was available in all the toilets but there is no cleanliness.


No. of Schools



Yes No

148

No. of Schools 20 0 % 100% 0%


No. of Schools


0 20 0 20 % 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments: Napkins & Dustbins are not available in any of the schools in Thiruvarur district, but having only at



No. of Schools


5 15 % 25% 75%


No. of Schools




% 10% 90% 10% 90% Comments:


government

12. Drainage System


No. of Schools

Drainage System available Yes No 20 0



Pucca & Open

Kutcha & Open

No. of Schools

20 0 0 0 0

% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Structural Condition


No. of 20 0 0 0

149

Schools % 100% 0% 0% 0%

Any instance of Water Logging No. of

Schools Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


Entrance Gate

Open Space



0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


150


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools



0 0 0 0 20 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments:


151


Number of Schools


0 % 0%

Number of

Schools

Availability of Rain water harvesting system Yes No

5 15 % 25% 75%

Number of

Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Number of

Schools

Stored water consumable Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

Number of Schools



Number of Schools

0 20 0 0

% 0% 100% 0% 0%

Number of Schools


0 20

% 0% 100%

Type of source



0 0 0

% 0% 0% 0% Comments: There is no awareness created among the school authorities regarding the renewable sources of energy. Other sources of energy like Gobar gas or Solar or Wind energy are not used.



% 100% 0%

152

(Condition) Good 17 % 60%

Bad 3 % 40%


Flood 1 % 0%

Cyclone 0 % 0%

Earthquake 0 % 0%





One gate 18 % 90%

Two gates 2 % 10%

Three gates 0 % 0%


0


% 0% Comments: There is only one main entrance gate in 18 schools and 2 gates was found only in 2 of the schools.

15 (ii) (c-e)



0 20 0 20 % 100% 0% 100% 0%

Awareness about disaster among No. of


0 0 % 0% 0%

Received training to handle disaster No. of Students Teachers

153

Schools 0 0 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools

The Fire extinguishers are available in HM room and not available in Kitchen or Laboratory.

Kitchen Laboratory 0 0

% 0% 0%

No. of Schools



No. of Schools


0 20 0 20 % 0% 100% 0 100%





0 20 0 20 0 20

% 0% 100% 0 0% 0 100% Comments:





154




No. of Schools


2 18



No. of Schools

2 0 0 0

% 10% 0 0 0



No. of Schools


construction




2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 % 100% 0% 100

% 0% 100% 0% 100

% 0% 100% 0%


Schools Yes No

2 0 % 100% 0%


Schools Yes No

0 2 % 0% 100%

Comments:

155


No. of Schools


awarded is doing work (a)

Stage of construction work Construction work being

done according to layout Plan

Yes Sublette to other

Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering Finishing level

Yes No

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0%

156

2(c-g)

h. Number of visits per School of Technical persons and authentication done or instructions given on construction site –

No. of

Schoo

ls

Community

members

through

SMDC

involved in

procureme

nt process

Sub

Committee

(Constructi

on

Committee)

Constituted

A/c Books

Civil Work

(Constructi

on)

maintained/

updated

MB for

Civil

Work

Maintaine

d

Payment

made to

contracto

r in

accordan

ce with

MB

Material

stocked

is in line

with

stock

register

Cheque

issue

register

maintain

ed

Quality up to the mark Physical

existence of

constructio

n material

matches

with entry

made in

stock

register

Constructi

on

Material

Constructi

on work

Yes No Yes No Yes No Ye

s

No Yes N

o

Yes N

o


2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0

% 100

%

0% 0% 100% 0 100 0 100

%

100

%

0

%

100

%

0

%

0 10

0

100 0 100

%

0

%

100

%

0%

100% 0%

157


Construction

level

No. of

Schools

Number

of visits

Average No.

of visit/School

No. of

Authentications

made

Average No. of

Authentication

Instructions

given in No. of

Schools

Recorded Not

recorded

Foundation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Plinth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lintel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Roof level 5 16 4 0 0 0 0 0

Flooring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Finishing 4 20 5 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: - The engineers visit the site at each level and in five schools and average of 5 times and in 4 schools which are at finishing level they have visited 5

times on an average

9

158




No. of School

Level Familiarity with

their roles

% SEMIS DCF

% School Report Card

% SDMC Registe

r

% Guidelines of School

Development Plan

%

Training received by

SMDC Members

Printed copy of guidelines of SMDC made available to

5 members

159

s No. of Schools

members Better Ye

s No Ye

s No

Good 20

100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 0 20 0

Average

Not familiar

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: The school report card is being prepared by SSA authorities and not by RMSA. Training has been conducted by RMSA but not effective. There are

only minimum roles assigned to SMDC members. The printed copy of guidelines is available with all SMDC members. The SMDC activities and roles need to

be strengthened and in the meetings only the budget and civil work allocation is being discussed. The other school development plans and execution has to be

discussed.


No. of Schools

Meetings held Average Attendance of SMDC members

Monthly Quarterly Six monthly Annually Whenever needed Never 100% 0 15 5 0 0 0

% 0% 75% 25% 0% 0% 0% Issues discussed –

1. Civil work 2. Perspective plan 3. Mainly grants 2(ii) Description of SMDC members –



Total members 100 5 100% Women members 10 1 100%

160

SC/ST members 4 0.2 100% Selected members 100 5 100% Nominated members 0 0 0% Comments: There is an average of 5 members in SMDC in each school. There are 100 members in the 20 schools visited by the MI. There were only 10

members totally and it comes to an average of 1 women member in each school. Few schools did not have women representation. But there were 2 to 3 women

members in some of the schools. There is very minimum representation of SC/ST members in SMDC. There were 4 members in Thiruvarur district.


No of Schools



% 0% 100% 0 100% 0 100% 3(ii) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities

No.

of S

choo

ls

Leve

l of P

artic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M I

mpl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r RM

SA

%

SAG

Util

izat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istri

butio

n

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

tribu

tion

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f tea

cher

s

%

Run

ning

of d

ay to

day

act

iviti

es o

rgan

isin

g Sc

hool

& c

ultu

ral e

vent

s

%

Hel

p in

pro

vidi

ng S

choo

l fac

ilitie

s

%

Filli

ng o

f DC

F

%

Good 20 0 4 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 0 0

Average 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 100%

Bad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%


161

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments: The SMDC members are not involved in the preparation of AWP&B. Instead, the HM who is also one of the members of SMDC prepare the

AWP&B. Later, the Budget is being discussed in the SMDC meetings and get approved.


No. of Schools

SMDC members received training Total No. of SDMC members

No. of members who received training

Average of training duration in days

Yes No 30 30 20 0 2 days

% 100% 0% 100 100% 100%


Month and year of training

held

Trainings conducted by Responses about perception of SMDC members regarding trainings Topic, Content, Methodology projection

1. DIET No. of Schools

Good & Useful Average Not Good 2014 2. School HM

162

20 20 0 0

Comments: The SMDC training is conducted by DIET or School HM. The respondents stated that it was Good and Useful in all the 20 schools.



Name of District visited Thiruvarur …………..

Master List of government and Pvt. Schools Prepared If master list not prepared reasons thereof

Yes No 1. 100% 0% 2.

Name of State Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu 3. Total No. of

govt. Schools No. of govt. Schools

of which list is prepared

% Total No. of pvt. Schools

No. of pvt. Schools of which list is

prepared

% 4.

District 5. State

Comments: Data not available in the schools.



% 20 0

No. of School DCF distributed all Schools from DPO

Yes NO % 20 0

Comments: DCF distributed all Schools from DPO but not for the current academic year.

163

3. Training received by teachers / head Master / Principal for filling up of DCF in sampled Schools and district


Total No. of govt. & Pvt. Schools in district 120



No. of teachers who received DCF training 357 yes no


34 20 0

20 100% 0%

In the training, it was taught to fill up the DCF forms. The scope and significance of filling up DCF forms has not been emphasized.


164

8. Status of receiving of DCF duly filled up from all Schools in the district for the current year i.e. 2013-14 (At district level)

Total no. of Schools in the

district

No. of Schools to which DCF distributed through nodal Schools

No. of Schools from which filled up DCF received

No. of Schools from which filled DCF not received

Reasons for not delay

Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

71

59 130 71 59 130 0 0 0

Govt.

Pvt.

%

Comments: All the schools in Thiruvarur district has been distributed with DCF forms. 5. Availability of Copy of filled up DCF with School for record and reference

(At School level) No. of Schools

Copy of filled up DCF available Reasons of Non-availability of o/c of DCF Yes No 1. 20 0 2.

% 100% 0% 3. Comments: All the schools have the copy of filled in DCF 6-7 School report card and sample checks

Data entry done School report card generated Sample checking being done Yes No Yes No Yes No

0 20 20 0 0 20 School report card distributed to no. of Schools Finding of sample check

20 0% 0% 0%

Comments: The sample check has not been done due to minimum staff available unlike SSA. Sample checks are done by the SSA field staff and occasionally RMSA officials do the sample check.

165

Data entry done School report cards Sample checking School report cards distributors all

School Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No

Name of district 20 0 20 0 0 20 20 0 Name of State Overall finding of sampled checking yes

8. Has the data been submitted to State level as per time schedule?

1. Yes 2. No






% 100% 0% 100% 0%


1. Yes 2. No


1. Yes 2. No



1

2

1

166

No. of

Schools



% 100% 0% 0 0 DPO 100% 0% 0 0

0 100% 0% 0 0 Comments: all head master says that SG and MRG should given to June onwards till right now late payment and to consume timely credit sc high in the district all schools under RMSA and education rank 6th place


From DPO to SMDC

Mode of Transfer



% 0 0 100%



167





20 50000/school 20 Not available

2. Minor Repair Grant 20 25000/school 20

3. New School Building Grant (Major grant)

2 50,000,00 50,000,00 Not available

4. Additional classroom /lab etc. construction grant



7. others

8

9.

168

At District Level



1 School Annual Grant All the Government and

Government aided schools

in Thiruvarur district

March

2 Minor Repair Grant All the Government and

Government aided schools

except 11 RMSA school in

Thiruvarur district


distributed to 2 schools but

the civil work is incomplete

due to insufficient funds

169

At State Level





% 0% 100% 0% Comments:


No. of Schools

Sharing of If yes, details of objections Proposal for expenditure

Expenditure Statements Any objection raised by community about any transaction

Yes No Yes No Yes No 1. 0 20 0 20 0 20 2.

% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 3. 4.

170

6. Audit of SMDCs

All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 1. Yes 2.No

No. of Schools

Audit carried out YES NO

0 20 % 0% 20%

D.P.O.

No. of Schools


- - - - % - - -

Comments: SMDC audit is not being done on a periodic basis. None of the school has been audited by either education department or AG or CA. Jan Vaachan is

also not happening in any of the school. Social audit has never happened in Thiruvarur district.

7. Social Auditing


No. of Schools

Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered Yes No

0 20

% 0% 100% D.P.O.

Comments: Social audit is not being done in Thiruvarur district.

2

171


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

If yes, details thereof Comments: There are no instances at Thiruvarur district of mobilizing resources from community.

172




UC


submitted

1 April, 2014 2013-14

2

3

4

5




received


No. of Schools

No data available

173

9(iii) Status of utilization certificates submitted to SPO from DPOs (from 1st April 2012 to 31st March, 2013) (At State Level)

No. of sampled

DPOs


No. of DPOS to

which fund released

Amount of fund

released

Date of release

Amount for which

U.C. received


School Annual Grant

Minor repair

work

Major repair

work




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. Yes 2. No



174

(i)

Name of Unit


on 1st April, 2013

B Funds

received


D Expenditure


……..

Balance in bank

passbook as on



Grant funds S.N

. Name of School SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil work Educational tour

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance

Receipt

Spent Unspent

balance

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance


Receipt

Spent Unspent

balance

1 GHS,KOOTHANUR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

2 GHSS, ERAVANCHERY

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

3 GHS,SELLUR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

4 GHS, ATHIKADAI

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

5 GHS, MAZHAVARAYANALLUR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

6 GHS ,PALAYAKOTTAI

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000

5000000

0

7 ADWHS,SAVALAKARAN

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

8 GHSS, IDUMBAVANAM

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

9 GHSS, POONTHOTTAM

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

10 GHS,SANNANALLUR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

11 GHS, MAPPILAIKUPPAM

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 0

175

12 GHS EDAKEELAIYUR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

13 ADWHS ABISEKAKATTALAI

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

14 GGHSS THIRUTHURAIPOONDI

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

15 GHS , PALAYAVALAM

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0 5000000

5000000

16 GHS, MANGUDI

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

17 GHS, VADAKARAI

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

18 ADWHS AMOOR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

19 GHSS,ARITHUVARAMANGALAM

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

20 GHS, MUNIYUR

50000 50000

0 25000 25000 0 0 0 0

10. SCHOOL ANNUAL GRANT –


S.N. Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools % 1 No data 20 100 2 3 4 5 Total 2 (i) status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme- S.N. Name of School Sanctioned

amount Month of


date % of

expenditure 1 2 3 4 5 2(ii) Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant



SAGs


not receive SAGs


spend



Number of Schools

%



Yes % No % 1. 20 100 20 100 0 1. Comments: data available




Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 2 3 4 Total

177



No 0




Number of Schools

%



178


In Thiruvarur district, promotion of sports activities is widely seen. The high school students are encouraged to participate in games, competitions and sports. The winners are recognized at the district level and they are given special prizes. Every year in SSLC examination, top 10 SC students are identified at the district level in Thiruvarur and they are honored with special cash prizes.


S. No.



Comments :





179


S. No.

Name of District Name of Innovative Proposals

Amount of funds sanctioned/released



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(c) At district level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) At State Level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


180

1(i). The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in DPO under RMSA and the number in position. Thiruvarur District



1 1 100% 0 0%


1 1 100% 0 0%


2 2 100% 0 0%



8 9

10 Total 12 12 100% 0 0%

1(ii) the total number of staff sanctioned category wise in SPO under RMSA and the number in position.





1 1 100% 0 0%



181


2 2 100% 0 0%

14 15





Comments





Comments:

182




1 Finance 2 Civil Work 3 Quality 4 Equity 5 Gender 6 Pedagogy 7 Planning 8 Training


……………………………………………………..…………………………………………

Comments:


……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Comments:


……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Comments:



………………………………………………….………………………………………


183

……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………


At SPO level

S. No.



Time schedule



Director Project

3 Others

At DPO Level

S. No.



Time schedule





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:




184

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:

185



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments: IV. INFORMATION ABOUT STATE DATABASE At SPO level updated by DPO.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

186

Comments:






At District Level



2

3

4

5

At State Level


1 At state level, MoU has been signed with NUEPA to conduct Annual Plan Action Research on RMSA Implementation in TN. Salem and

187

Theni districts have been taken as pilot district to conduct this research.

2

3

4

5


(a) At State level ………………………………………………………………………………………….


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Areas of research




Pedagogy

188

Quality


Areas of research




Pedagogy

Quality



189

DISTRICT NAGAPATTINAM

190

MONITORING OF RMSA IMPLEMENTATION IN NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT


At School Level


No. of Schools


% 100% 0% If not reasons thereof Comments: Perspective plan has been developed in 100% schools in Nagapattinam district. The perspective plan is






No. of Schools


0 20 - % 0% 100%





No. of Schools


Yes No

8 12

% 40% 60%


The planning strategy is common to all the students and not specific for disadvantaged groups. In the Perspective plan reports of few schools they have mentioned a statement that there are plans for disadvantaged groups. But there are no specific development plans conceived or mentioned in the plan document.

191

No. of Schools



S. No.


% Reasons thereof

1 Water & Sanitation 20 100% There is no tribal community in Nagapattinam district. There is no direct involvement of Rural and Urban development departments in school development. However, these departments work at the habitation level which indirectly contributes for school development. There is no coordination with PWD for any projects at the school level









No. of Schools


Yes No Yes No

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%





192


%


attendance 20 100%




20 100%




in Civil work in all 20 schools, organizing cultural, sports, events and functions, Mid day meal to some extent and


In case of civil work, the newly upgraded schools are not getting the maintenance grant.


No. of Schools


20 0 % 100% 0%


Schools %




0 0%


3 15%

6 Paying attention to improvement in regular teaching learning activities. 20 100% 7 Distribution of free text books 20 100% 8 Availability of scholarships on time to students 20 100% 9 Preparing three years’ perspective Plan 20 100%

10 Proper use of funds i.e. SAG & other grants as per norms 0 0%

193

11 Monitoring of minor & major repair work and maintenance of physical infrastructure

0 0%


20 100%








accounts.





Number of Schools


2 18 0 0 % 10% 90% 0% 0%

Comments: The meetings of general body of school management and development committee have been held half

yearly in all the schools except two schools. In these schools, civil work had been done and hence SMDC meeting

conducted quarterly in Nagapattinam district.


Comments:

Nagapattinam 2. At District level – Name of District ………………………………………………………….


(1. Yes 2. No)

194

u. Water & Sanitation

v. Social Welfare

w. Tribal Development

x. Minority department

y. Rural Development

z. Urban Development

aa. Medical Health & Family

bb. welfare

cc. PWD

dd. Transportation (Roadways)





Comments



At State level







1

2

0

1

2

2

1

1

2

-

2

195




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments


2 1. Yes 2. No


2. ACCESS



S.N. Categories Number of Schools % 1 EBB 2 10% 2 Urban 2 10% 3 CWSN (Minimum 3 CWSN) 3 15% 4 Higher Gender gap 3 15% 5 SC/ST/Minority students abundance 4 20% 6 Low retention rate/Higher dropout rate 0 0% 7 Schools situated in habitation with large number of OoSC 2 10% 8 Low academic achievements 2 10% 9 Schools situated in habitation of seasonal migrants 0 0%

10 Urban Schools with most students of deprived sections 0 0% 11 Forest/Mountain/Remote/Desert area 0 0% 12 Flood/natural calamity prone area 0 0% 13 Ongoing civil work 2 10% 14 School with girls hostel 0 0% 15 None 0 0%


The schools were selected in almost all the categories except few of the above mentioned list. There were two

Economically Backward Blocks (EBB) denoted in Nagapattinam district. They were two schools from urban area, 3

schools with minimum 3 CWSN (15%), 4 schools with higher proportion of SC/ST/Minority students (20%), 2

schools situated in with large number of out of school children (10%), 2 schools with low academic achievements

(10%), 2 schools with ongoing civil work (10%).

196




Comments: There are 3 schools in storm surge prone area and 1 school in contaminated ground water area and 8

schools in sensitive area on busy national /state highway that may pose threat to the students.



PS 0 0% 0 0% UPS 20 100% 0 0% Total 20 100% 0 0%





S. N. Distance of School from habitation Number of students % 1 0-1 km. 671 51% 2 1-2 km. 323 24% 3 2-3 km. 191 14% 4 3-5 km. 104 8% 5 More than 5 km. 35 3%

Total 1324 100% .

197

Comments: 13. In the total survey of 20 schools in Nagapattinam district, most of the children have access to upper primary

schools. There were 671 students (51%) reside within 0-1 km distance, 323 children (24% ) from the distance of

1-2 km, 191 children (14%) from 2-3 km distance, 104 students (8%) from 3-5 km distance. 35 students (3%)

come from distance more than 5 km.


pass.


children.


No. of Schools

Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

If yes mention them

Comments: There was no major man-made or natural barriers in Nagapattinam district.

6. Name and Distance of the nearest secondary School (Govt. /Pvt.) from the habitation the School is located




0 10 4 6 20 % 0% 50% 20% 30% 100%


Comments: From the sampled schools, there are no schools having the proximity of reaching Higher secondary

school at a distance within 1 km, 10 schools can access secondary school at a distance of 1-3 km (50%) where as 4

schools are situated with the nearest higher secondary school at a distance of 3-5 km. 6 schools have their nearest

secondary school at a distance more than 5 km.

198

7.Any special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for the benefit of

students.



Comments: Students are commuting to school in public transport only and they are distributed with free travel bus

pass. No other special arrangement like transportation facility or residential facility made available for

students.

II Social Access




Category 14-16 Age


SC

ST

Minority

General

Total







abundance and they live with poor economic condition. There are minority children in 3 schools (15%) in


199


No. of Schools


% 100% 0%


Comments:


Group IX X Total

SC Boys Enrolled 373 333 706 Boys Present 328 295 623 Girls Enrolled 250 238 488 Girls Present 192 198 390 Total Enrolled 623 571 1194 Total Present 520 493 1013

ST Boys Enrolled 4 0 4 Boys Present 3 0 3 Girls Enrolled 2 0 2 Girls Present 2 0 2

Total Enrolled 6 0 Total Present 5 0 5

Minority Boys Enrolled 8 17 25 Boys Present 6 13 19 Girls Enrolled 18 15 33 Girls Present 12 10 22 Total Enrolled 26 32 58 Total Present 18 23 41

Gen & Others Boys Enrolled 522 580 1102 Boys Present 498 545 1043 Girls Enrolled 272 332 604 Girls Present 258 301 559 Total Enrolled 794 912 1706 Total Present 756 846 1602

Total Boys Enrolled 915 947 1862 Boys Present 835 853 1688

200

Girls Enrolled 814 917 1731 Girls Present 724 810 1534 Total Enrolled 1729 1864 3593 Total Present 1559 1663 3222

CWSN Boys Enrolled 6 2 8 Boys Present 6 2 0 Girls Enrolled 2 0 0 Girls Present 2 0 2 Total Enrolled 8 2 0 Total Present 8 2 0


(based on BPL Card)

Data not available



1. Yes 2. No

Comments:



No. of Schools




100%



2

201


There are no discriminatory practices seen inside the school campus anywhere in Nagapattinam district.








Tricycle 0 0%

Escort 0 0%

Other (Specify)

In all the 20 schools (100%) visited by the MI, there were proper ramps with hand rails. The western toilet was found only in 3 schools out of 20 (15%). There was no special furniture provided in the class room for the CWSN to sit. There are no other facilities available in any of the high schools for CWSN.

III. Open Schooling


3. At State level


2. Whether the State open School has its own district regional centers and study centers?

1. Yes 2. No


________________________________________________________________________


________________________________________________________________________

202


________________________________________________________________________

Comments:

4. Advocacy programme for out of School Students for bringing them back to the School

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

Comments:


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Comments:


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

Comments:




OoSC Drop out age group of 14-16 years - Nagapattinam District

Category Class Enrolled Boys

Boys drop out

% Enrolled Girls

Girls drop out

% Total Enrolled

Total Drop Out

%

SC IX 116 15 13% 99 13 13% 215 28 13%

SC X 120 18 15% 78 12 28% 198 30 15%

ST IX 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 1 1 100%

ST X 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0 0%

Minority IX 30 3 10% 5 1 20% 35 4 11%

Minority X 23 4 17% 12 4 33% 35 8 23%

203

Gen & OBC

IX 89 8 9% 46 5 11% 135 13 10%

Gen & OBC

X 76 10 13% 58 4 7% 134 14 10%

Total IX 235 26 11% 151 20 13% 386 46 12%

Total X 219 32 15% 148 30 20% 367 62 14%

CWSN IX 19 4 21% 1 1 100% 20 5 25%

CWSN X 9 2 22% 0 0 0% 9 2 22%



The SC community drop outs comprise 13% in class IX and 20% in class X. Minority drop out rate comes to 11% in

class IX and 15% in class X. In total, there are 12% drop outs in class IX and 14% in class X.


In Gender perspective, dropout rate of boys looks to be little high when compared to Girls 10% of boys and 4% of

Girls are drop outs in class IX. 11% of Boys and 13% of Girls are drop outs in class X.


The dropout rate is 12% in class IX and 14% in class X.

0

50

100

150

200

250

SC -‐ IX SC -‐ X ST -‐ IX ST -‐ X Minority-‐ IX

Minority -‐ X

Gen & OBC-‐ IX

Gen & OBC -‐ X

Total Enrolled 215 198 1 0 35 35 135 134

Total Drop Out 28 30 1 0 4 8 13 14

Axis Title

OoSC Drop out age group of 14-‐16 years -‐ Nagapa@nam District

204

Reasons for dropout


• Child labor

• Poor health condition


Efforts made –


Class-9 Class-10

No. of drop

out students

No. of drop out

brought back to

School

% No. of drop

out students


back to School

%

46 0 0% 52 0 0%

Comments: In class 9 the total number of school dropout is 46 and in class 10 it is 52. None of the drop out students

was brought back to school.












0 20

% 0% 100%

205

Comments: In Nagapattinam district no schools have issued Transfer Certificate to the students who migrate. The

schools respond that they couldn’t find out the students who have dropped out. Most of them are seasonal migrants

and no information could be retrieved.


No. of Schools



1

2







NIOS 0 0 SIOS 0 0


record)


Programme

Appeared in Exam



10 Total


206

3. Equity


At School Level



2011-‐12 2012-‐13 2013-‐14




Enrolled for 9th

110

100

2 1 30

5 19

1 115

101

0 1 28

6 12

2 116

99 0 1 30

5 19 1

Avg. % of Attend.

96%

89%

99%

94%

90%

91%

92%

90%

96%

89%

0%

0%

90%

94%

91%

100%

96%

89%

0 0% 90%

94%

91%

100%

Appeared in Exam

106

89

2 1 26

3 16

1 107

88

0 0 21

5 8 2 109

84 0 0 22

4 15 1

% 96%

89%

100%

100%

87%

60%

84%

100%

93%

87%

0%

0%

75%

83%

67%

100%

94%

85%

0%

0% 73%

80%

79%

100%

Above 60%

49

54

0 0 11

1 5 0 42

54

0 0 9 3 4 1 39

60 0 0 12

2 6 1

% 46%

61%

0%

0%

42%

33%

31%

0%

39%

61%

0%

0%

43%

60%

50%

50%

36%

43%

0%

0% 50%

47%

0%

0%

Below 60%

57

35

2 1 15

2 11

1 65

34

0 0 12

2 4 1 70

24 0 0 10

2 9 0

% 54%

39%

100%

100%

58%

67%

69%

100%

61%

39%

0%

0%

57%

40%

50%

50%

64%

57%

0%

0% 50%

53%

100%

100%

Enrolled for 10 th

134

86

0 0 32

13

8 3 117

82

0 0 32

15

8 2 120

78 0 0 23

12 9 2

Avg. % Attend.

94%

89%

0 0 92%

89%

93%

91%

94%

89%

0%

0%

90%

88%

91%

96%

94%

89%

0 0 90%

88%

91%

96%

Appeared in Exam

122

77

0 0 30

12

7 2 109

79

0 0 26

9 6 2 117

75 0 0 19

8 7 2

% 91%

96%

0%

0%

83%

67%

78%

100%

93%

96%

0%

0%

81%

60%

75%

100%

98%

96%

0%

0% 83%

67%

78%

100%

207

Above 60%

94

68

0 0 14

9 2 1 79

46

0 0 18

3 2 1 68

66 0 0 6 4 3 1

% 77%

88%

0%

0%

47%

75%

29%

50%

72%

58%

0%

0%

69%

33%

33%

50%

58%

88%

0%

0% 32%

50%

43%

50%

Below 60%

28

9 0 0 16

3 5 1 30

33

0 0 8 6 4 1 49

9 0 0 13

4 4 1

% 23%

12%

0%

0%

53%

25%

71%

50%

28%

42%

0%

0%

31%

67%

67%

50%

42%

12%

0%

0% 68%

50%

57%

50%

Details of specific schemes available in the State for ensuring enrollment of special category Students along with

the assistance provided there under?


Name of schemes

Name of schemes

SC

(2. Girls’ Incentive Scheme

2. To prevent drop outs of SC girl students, the IX th standard unmarried SC girls of

age, less than 16 years are provided with a fixed deposit certificate for Rs. 3000

2.

3.

ST




3000

4.

208

Name of schemes

Name of schemes




Gender Gap



Class 9 Class 10

Class Boys % Girls % Total Gap % Boys % Girls % Total Gap %

Enrollment 165 61% 106 39% 271 642 152 62% 92 38% 244 605

Attendance on visit day 162 62% 99 38% 261 149 62% 90 38% 239 -‐

Appeared in Exam 146 62% 89 38% 235 610 143 63% 85 37% 228 594

Learning Achievement

(Quarterly/half yearly/yearly)

Above 60% 57 48% 63 53% 120 -‐ -‐ 77 52% 71 48% 148 -‐ -‐

% 39% 71% -‐ 51% -‐ -‐ 54% -‐ 84% -‐ 65% -‐ -‐

Below 60% 89 26 -‐ 115 -‐ -‐ 66 60% 14 80 -‐ -‐

% 61% 29% 49% 46% 16% 35%

Gender gap = (GX1000/B) G=No. of Girls B=No. of Boys


2.

Girls

1.

2

3.

CWSN

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6.

7. 8. 9.

209



a Socio Cultural/Reasons 0%

b Economic Reasons 100%


Total -





girl children.



%

A Health (own or family members) 0 0%

B Social cultural issues 0 0%

C Sibling Care 0 0%

D Household responsibilities 0 0%

E Family issues / Gone to relatives 0 0%

F Earning for livelihood 14 70%

G Migration 6 30

H Any other 0 0%

Total 20 100%


factor, next being the migration factor while 30% have left schools.

210




Comments:



Social

Group



2011-12

2012-13

Gap

2012-13

2013-14

Gap



Social

Group


Year G T B G T

2011-12

2012-13

2012-13

2013-14



Social SC ST MINORITY OBC & GEN TOTAL CWSN

211

Group


2011-12

2012-13

2012-13

2013-14


Comments: There is no data available in the district with regard to reduction in enrollment, attendance and

achievement levels. There are no special efforts made in case of gender gap.


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments: No, there is no counseling cell constituted in Nagapattinam district.



vii. Number of Schools having facility of separate girls’ hostel in campus or in nearby area.

viii. Number of girls residing in girls’ hostel in sample Schools.

ix. Any physical barrier faced by hostellers in their access to School

______________________________________________________________________________

0

0

212


There is no Guidance and Counseling Cell constituted in any of the schools visited in Nagapattinam district.

At School level:


ratio:

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Total 0 100


213

Comments: The Guidance and Counseling cell has not been constituted in any of the schools visited by MI in

Nagapattinam district. The HMs reported that they had been given one day training on guidance and counseling cell.

However, the teachers are not professionally trained to counsel the children.



district


%

- - -

Comments: There is no active counseling assistance happening in the government schools of Nagapattinam district.






No data available

214

5. Quality

III. Enabling Conditions : At School level




%

No. 1 Natural light 200 200 100% 2 Ventilation 200 200 100% 3 Black Board appropriately located in




rooms. Blackboards are appropriately located in 99% rooms. Availability of bulbs/tube lights/CFL exists in 100%

rooms in sampled 20 schools. Fan is available in 98% rooms. The teaching aids are available in 75% schools.



S. No.




material 20 100% 0



7 Art and Craft room 0 0% 0 0% 8 Library with age appropriate books and seating


9 TV 20 100% 5 20% 10 Separate Activity room for girls 0 0% 0 0% 11 Audio Equipments 0 0% 0 0% 12 Video Equipments 0 0% 0 0% 13 LCD Projector 0 0% 0 0% 14 Overhead projector 0 0% 0 0% 15 Purified/ Safe Drinking Water 20 100% 20 100% 16 Fire Extinguisher 20 100% 20 100% 17 Auditorium 0 0% 0 0% 18 Staff room 20 100% 20 100%

215

19 Indoor games room 0 0% 0% 0% 20 N.S.S./NCC/Scout & Guides room 21 Counselor room 0 0% 0 0% 22 First-aid room 0 0% 0 0%

Comments:





An average of 154 days closed in Nagapattinam district including Saturdays, Sundays and Government

holidays.


1. Additional days of closure in Nagapattinam district are due to cyclone.

0

210 days

216

2.

3.

Comments:





visit day

Vacancies against

sanctioned posts

%

M F M F

152 68 75 143 97% 65 72 9 6% Comments:



schools.



Comments: The course curriculum is completed through available teachers as they take additional classes. Extra

classes are also taken during Saturdays and on other public holidays in the schools where they have teacher

vacancies.


Number of Schools


20 20 20 % 100% 100% 100%

Comments: There are sufficient teachers available to teach subjects like Science, Math and Language in



No. of School


20 0 0 % 100% 0% 0

Comments: All the teachers are possessing professional training qualifications subject wise in sampled schools.

217





Teachers 0 0 0% Comments: No such instance had been documented or happening in any of the visited schools. The teachers are

attending the school regularly.


level)



for Class I to XII.




No. of Schools


Yes No Yes No

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%


218

The Teacher’s diary is maintained in all the 20 schools and the HM makes countersign every week.


No. of Schools


% 100% 0% 100% 0% Comments: There is a prescribed time table available in all the 20 schools and time table is being followed by all

the teachers without fail. It is being verified by the HM frequently in Nagapattinam district.



No. of School


% 100% 0%

219

Comments: In case of class IX and X, there is no discussion are group team works encouraged in the class room

activities. The teachers justify that they have a tight schedule to complete the syllabus for each term and there is no

time slot for conducting group discussions or team work.


No. of Schools







% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100% 0% Groups

made of Different

Same class

No. of Schools

0 20

% 0% 100% Comments: In case of class IX and X, there are no such activities for the students to sit in small groups. The

students who belong to same class are seated as a group and no groups from different age groups are made to sit

together. No disadvantaged groups are treated indifferently and disabled children are not made to sit separately or on

back benches. They are treated equally in the class room.





4. Resource teachers are appointed for 3 months in case if there are slow learners in the school 5. Resource teachers extend their support only to class 9 and not for class 10 6.

Comments: A periodical visit of resource teacher is required both class 9 and 10 since the slow learners if




220

No. of Schools who arranged zero period, extra class

Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0% Extra classes ran

Throughout year Only for one month before exam 20 % 100%



Comments:



Good 100%




No. of Schools with CWSN % 5 25%

Participation level in class All CWSN participate actively 5 100% Few CWSN participate 0 0% No participation 0 0%

Efforts made to optimize participation of CWSN in class 1 There are no efforts made to optimize participation in class IX and X. But the Primary level CWSN are

handled by resource teachers often. The same teachers extend their support to these high school children. There is no separate staff appointed for Upper primary.

2 3 4


bullying by peers.

221






5

IEP


0 6

% 0 100%



%



20 5 100% 25%

No. of

Schools


0 5 % 0% 100%


222


Equipments




%


0 0 0 0%

Others 0 0 0 0%

Comments:





devices for class 9 and 10 in Nagapattinam district.



S. No.







5 days








As per SPO calendar




223

1(a) Targeted annual Plan prepared by the State for in-service teachers’ training to improve quality and skills – Yes

Comments: The above table gives the information about the training provided to the teachers under RMSA as per

the SPO calendar.







Average Duration




Comments:

There is very few teachers received training under RMSA in Nagapattinam district. 14 teachers have received

training in Science subject, 10 teachers in Maths, 12 teachers in English and 8 teachers in social science subject.

Almost all the training had lasted for 7 days. There was no training session conducted for Inclusion of CWSN.

2 (i)







224



training.






4. Physical availability of adequate and good quality facilities for in-service training with reference to – Facilities Adequate % Inadequate %

Space 20 100% 0 0% Projection 20 100% 0 0% Tools/Modules 20 100% 0 0% Equipments (LCD, Projector, Computer etc.)

20 100% 0 0%



20 0

% 100% 0%

Comments:




%

44 0 0%

Comments: 44 teachers had been given training on using CAL, LCD, etc. But, there are no teachers in 9th and 10th

standard use Computer Aided teaching in Nagapattinam District. There is a computer lab available in all the schools.

CAL centers are used by Primary students and higher secondary children only if they have opted for computer

science as elective subject.



225


1 Secondary Schools 1 5% 2 Higher Secondary Schools 0 3 DIET 1 5% 4 College/University 0 5 SIERT 0 6 IASE 0 7 CTE 0 8 NIC 0 9 Any other institution (mention) 0

10 Total 2 Comments: In almost all the schools teachers have been provided with training on various subjects under RMSA.



The secondary grade teachers are not given teachers’ training. The higher secondary teachers and sometimes HMs give the training. Very rarely DIET staff conducts the training.

2. There are no sufficient practical sessions conducted for computer training. The teachers are not getting hands on experience to use computers and devices.


1. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. ------------no----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. CIVIL WORKS

In Nagapattinam district, 2 schools had civil work.

S.N. Name of School Year of establishment Year of construction Remarks 1 Agaraperunthottam 2009-10 2012-13 Completed 2 Vellapallam Meenavar

Colony 2009-10 2014 On-going

3. Availability of class rooms for Class IX & X (Std. Size 20’x24’)



226


There is no deficit of class rooms in any of the schools in Nagapattinam district.




20 20 18 0


5000sq. ft each school

No data No data No data

Avg. (sq.ft) Area 5000 sq.ft No data No data No data II. Design


No. of Schools


% 100% 0% 0% 0% List of Schools with specified details is attached

Comments: All the 20 schools in Nagapattinam district are running in a pucca school building. However, most of the

class rooms belong to primary or higher secondary classes. Though the schools are upgraded by RMSA they do not

have class rooms allocated for upper primary. There is no separate fund released for construction of class rooms in

many schools except the two schools where civil work is at finishing stage.


No. of Schools


None

0 0 0 0 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


Comments: There are no damages, cracks, damp, and seepages in any of the school building.


Yes % No %



Comments:


227

No. of Schools

Natural light


Yes No Yes No 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

20 0 20 0

% 100% 0% 100% 0%

Comments:


No. of Schools

Arrangement of lighting facility Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

No. of Schools

Functional Not functional Yes No 18 2

% 0% 0% If not functioned, Reasons

1. The lighting is dysfunctional due to construction activities.

2.

3. 4.

Steps taken 1.

2.

3. 4.


No. of Schools


20 0

% 100% 0%


Comments:

228



Plant

Solar Panels

Wind Electricity

Other


% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%






Comments: There is no alternative electric power supply in any of the schools in Nagapattinam district.


No. of Schools

Sufficient Seating

Space



0 20 0 20 0 20 0 2

% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments: There is no proper library setting available in any of the schools. The books are found in cupboard and

the children are not encouraged to read books. It will be good if there is a separate period allocated in the time table

for Library hour. The books are not being read by the children in Nagapattinam



Biology and other subjects Yes % No % 20 100% 0 0%

(b) Proper height (3 ft.) of Lab. Table 20 100% 0 0% (c) (i) Cross Ventilation 20 100% 0 0%

(ii) Exhaust Fan 20 100% 0 0% (d) Availability of Running Water 20 100% 0 0%

229

The construction of laboratory has not been completed in two of the schools. The availability of running water was

available in 100% schools. The laboratory though available in the higher secondary schools it is not being used by

upper primary children. The lab is used only XIth standard students and occasionally by class X students.

The lab materials are also supplied every year with the same quantity irrespective of the left over materials. The

RMSA district office makes the payment for lab materials directly to the private company that supplies lab

resources. The materials are supplied to all the schools. So, the materials are kept unused in most of the schools as

there is overstock and non-usage. This issue has to be addressed by the district RMSA officials.

230





Comments: The ramps are available only at the school entrance and in front of few class rooms. There are no ramps available for the above mentioned places. However, these places are approachable by physically challenged students. There is no separate library building available in most of the schools.

231


Bench Availability

Number of Schools

Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

There are benches available in schools but not of different height in classrooms.



ramp facility. In few schools there are no handrails available.




Supply water Panchayat / Corporation Water 100%

Tube well 20 100%

Dug Well 0 0%

Hand Pump 1 5%

Other -

No source 0 0%



Yes No


Adequate Slope

Yes No

20 0

% 100% 0%

Hand rails available 19 95%

% 100% 100%

232

20 0 % 100% 0%

Comments: There are water resources available in all the 20 schools. The water is supplied by Panchayat or Municipality. The water is stored in a syntax container and used across.


Type of Facility

No. of

Schools


No. of Schools

%

Good &

Usable

Damaged not usable

Weekly


% Monthly 20 100%

Covered tank 0 0 0 Six Monthly

% 0 0% 0% Not Definite

ground tank 0 0 0 % 0%

Overhead tank 20 0 0 % 100% 0% 0% 95%


No. of Schools

Quality


20 0

% 100% 0%


Number of Schools


% 10% 0% 25% 0% 0% (ii) Measures adopted for treatment & testing of water –


water

Bleaching Powder



Yes No

0 3 0 0 0 20

% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 100%

233

Comments: The water is being chlorinated by the panchayat/municipal authorities. Despite of it, 3 schools in

Nagapattinam district is using chlorine periodically to ensure cleaning of water. However, the testing of water has

not been done in any of the schools in Nagapattinam district.



No. of Schools


% 100% 0% Comments:

11. Sanitation Facility –




Comments: There are no special arrangements made for CWSN with respect to toilet facilities. The number of

CWSN in upper primary is very minimal when compared to primary schools. There is one separate toilet available

for teachers in all the schools at Nagapattinam district.


No. of Schools



18 2 2 18 20 0

% 90% 10% 10% 90% 100% 0%

Comments:

There is proper maintenance of toilets in most of the schools. In Nagapattinam district, running water was available in all the toilets but there is no cleanliness.

234


No. of Schools



No. of Schools

Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%


No. of Schools


0 20 0 20 % 0% 100% 0% 100%

Comments: Napkins & Dustbins are not available in any of the schools in Nagapattinam district, but having only at



No. of Schools


7 13 % 35% 65%


No. of Schools




% 100% 0% 100% 0% Comments:


government

12. Drainage System


No. of Schools

Drainage System available Yes No 20 0



Pucca & Open

Kutcha & Open

No. of 20 0 0 0 0

235

Schools % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Structural Condition


No. of Schools

20 0 0 0

% 100% 0% 0% 0% Any instance of Water Logging

No. of Schools

Yes No 0 20

% 0% 100% No. of Schools


Entrance Gate

Open Space



0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


236


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools



0 0 0 0 20 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments:


237


Number of Schools


0 % 0%

Number of

Schools

Availability of Rain water harvesting system Yes No 20 0

% 100% 0%

Number of Schools


5 15 % 25% 75%

Number of

Schools

Stored water consumable Yes No

0 20 % 0% 100%

Number of

Schools



Number of Schools

0 20 0 0

% 0% 100% 0% 0%

Number of Schools


0 20

% 0% 100%

Type of source



0 0 0

% 0% 0% 0% Comments: There is no awareness created among the school authorities regarding the renewable sources of energy. Other sources of energy like Gobar gas or Solar or Wind energy are not used.

There is rain water harvesting plant in almost all the schools but however the stored water through this is not being used.

238



% 100% 0% (Condition) Good 18

% 90% Bad 2 % 10%


Flood 0 % 0%

Cyclone 0 % 0%

Earthquake 0 % 0%





One gate 20 % 100%

Two gates 0 % 0%

Three gates 0 % 0%


0


% 0% Comments: There is only one main entrance gate in all the 20 schools in Nagapattinam district. Though there are

two gates available in few schools it is not in usable condition. They keep it locked and use only single gate.

239

15 (ii) (c-e)



0 20 0 20 % 100% 0% 100% 0%

No. of


0 0 % 0% 0%

Received training to handle disaster No. of


0 0 % 0% 0%

No. of Schools

The Fire extinguishers are available in HM room and not available in Kitchen or Laboratory.

Kitchen Laboratory 0 0

% 0% 0%

No. of Schools



No. of Schools


0 20 0 20 % 0% 100% 0 100%





0 20 0 20 0 20

% 0% 100% 0 0% 0 100% Comments:





240




No. of Schools


2 18



No. of Schools

2 0 0 0

% 10% 0 0 0



No. of Schools


construction




2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 % 100% 0% 100

% 0% 100% 0% 100

% 0% 100% 0%


Schools Yes No

2 0 % 100% 0%


Schools Yes No

0 2 % 0% 100%

Comments:

241


No. of Schools


awarded is doing work (a)

Stage of construction work Construction work being

done according to layout Plan

Yes Sublette to other

Foundation level

Plinth level/ DPC

Lintel Roof level

Flooring/plastering Finishing level

Yes No

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0%

2(c-g)

h. Number of visits per School of Technical persons and authentication done or instructions given on

construction site –

No.

of

Sc

ho

ols

Comm

unity

membe

rs

throug

h

SMDC

involve

d in

procure

ment

process

Sub

Commi

ttee

(Constr

uction

Commi

ttee)

Constit

uted

A/c

Books

Civil

Work

(Constr

uction)

maintai

ned/

updated

MB

for

Civil

Work

Maint

ained

Paym

ent

made

to

contra

ctor in

accor

dance

with

MB

Mater

ial

stocke

d is in

line

with

stock

regist

er

Chequ

e issue

registe

r

maint

ained

Quality up to

the mark

Physica

l

existenc

e of

constru

ction

materia

l

matche

s with

entry

made in

stock

register

Constr

uction

Materi

al

Constr

uction

work

Y

es

No Y

es

No Ye

s

No Y

es

N

o

Y

es

N

o

Y

es

N

o

Y

es

N

o

Y

es

N

o

Ye

s

N

o

Y

es

No

2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0

% 10

0

%

0

%

0

%

10

0%

0 10

0

0 10

0

%

10

0

%

0

%

10

0

%

0

%

0 1

0

0

10

0

0 10

0

%

0

%

10

0

%

0%

100% 0%

243


Construct

ion level

No. of

Schoo

ls

Numb

er of

visits

Average

No. of

visit/Sch

ool

No. of

Authenticati

ons made

Average

No. of

Authenticat

ion

Instructi

ons given

in No. of

Schools

Record

ed

Not

record

ed

Foundatio

n

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Plinth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lintel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Roof level 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Flooring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Finishing 2 20 10 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: - The engineers visit the site at each level and in five schools and average of 10 times and in 2 schools

which are at finishing level they have visited 10 times on an average




No. of

Schools

Level

Familiarity with their roles

% SEMIS DCF

% School Report Car

d

% SDMC

Register

% Guidelines of

School Develop

ment Plan

% No. of Schools

Training received

by SMDC

Members

Printed copy of guidelines

of SMDC made

available to members

Better

Yes

No Yes

No

Good

20

100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

20 100%

20

0 20

0

Average

Not familiar

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: The school report card is being prepared by SSA authorities and not by RMSA. Training has been

conducted by RMSA but not effective. There are only minimum roles assigned to SMDC members. The printed

copy of guidelines is available with all SMDC members. The SMDC activities and roles need to be strengthened and

5 members

2

244

in the meetings only the budget and civil work allocation is being discussed. The other school development plans

and execution has to be discussed.


No. of Schools

Meetings held Average Attendance of

SMDC members Monthly Quarterly Six

monthly Annually Whenever

needed Never 100%

0 2 18 0 0 0 % 0% 90% 10% 0% 0% 0%

Issues discussed –

1. Civil work 2. Perspective plan 3. Mainly grants 2(ii) Description of SMDC members –



Total members 100 5 100% Women members 10 1 100% SC/ST members 4 0.2 100% Selected members 100 5 100% Nominated members 0 0 0% Comments: There is an average of 5 members in SMDC in each school. There are 100 members in the 20 schools

visited by the MI. There were only 10 members totally and it comes to an average of 1 women member in each

school. Few schools did not have women representation. But there were 2 to 3 women members in some of the

schools. There is very minimum representation of SC/ST members in SMDC. There were 4 members in



No of Schools



% 0% 100% 0 100% 0 100% 3(ii) Level of participation of SMDC members in helping School authorities to conduct following activities

245

No.

of S

choo

ls

Leve

l of P

artic

ipat

ion

RM

SA &

MD

M I

mpl

emen

tatio

n

%

Con

stru

ctio

n w

ork

unde

r RM

SA

%

SAG

Util

izat

ion

%

Free

Tex

t Boo

ks d

istri

butio

n

%

Scho

lars

hips

dis

tribu

tion

%

Prep

arin

g A

WP

& B

%

Stud

ents

Enr

ollm

ent,

Atte

ndan

ce

%

Reg

ular

ity o

f tea

cher

s

%

Run

ning

of d

ay to

day

act

iviti

es o

rgan

isin

g Sc

hool

& c

ultu

ral e

vent

s

%

Hel

p in

pro

vidi

ng S

choo

l fac

ilitie

s

%

Filli

ng o

f DC

F

%

Good 20 0 4 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 0 0

Average 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 100%

Bad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%

Comments: The SMDC members are not involved in the preparation of AWP&B. Instead, the HM who is also one

of the members of SMDC prepare the AWP&B. Later, the Budget is being discussed in the SMDC meetings and get

approved.


No. of Schools

SMDC members received training

Total No. of SDMC

members

No. of members who received

training

Average of training duration

in days

Yes No 30 30 20 0 2 days

% 100% 0% 100 100% 100%

246


Month and year of training held

Trainings conducted by Responses about perception of SMDC members regarding trainings Topic, Content, Methodology

projection 3. DIET

No. of Schools

Good & Useful

Average Not Good 2014 4. School HM

20 20 0 0

Comments: The SMDC training is conducted by DIET or School HM. The respondents stated that it was Good and Useful in all the 20 schools.



Name of District visited

Nagapattinam …………..

Master List of government and Pvt. Schools Prepared If master list not prepared reasons

thereof

Yes No 1. 100% 0% 2.

Name of State Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu 3.

Total No. of govt. Schools

No. of govt. Schools of


% Total No. of pvt.

Schools

No. of pvt. Schools of


% 4.

District 5. State

Comments: Data not available in the schools.



% 20 0

No. of School DCF distributed all Schools from DPO Yes NO

% 20 0 Comments: DCF distributed all Schools from DPO but not for the current academic year.

247

3. Training received by teachers / head Master / Principal for filling up of DCF in sampled Schools and district


Total No. of govt. & Pvt. Schools in district

98



No. of teachers who received DCF training

121 yes no


12 20 0

20 100% 0%

In the training, it was taught to fill up the DCF forms. The scope and significance of filling up DCF forms has not been emphasized.


12. Status of receiving of DCF duly filled up from all Schools in the district for the current year i.e. 2013-14 (At district level)

Total no. of Schools in the district

No. of Schools to which DCF distributed through nodal Schools

No. of Schools from which filled up DCF

received

No. of Schools from which filled DCF

not received

Reasons for not delay

Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total Govt. Pvt. Total 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

68

30 98 68 30 98 0 0 0

Govt.

Pvt.

%

Comments: All the schools in Nagapattinam district has been distributed with DCF forms.

248

5. Availability of Copy of filled up DCF with School for record and reference (At School level)

No. of Schools

Copy of filled up DCF available Reasons of Non-availability of o/c of DCF

Yes No 1. 20 0 2.

% 100% 0% 3. Comments: All the schools have the copy of filled in DCF 6-7 School report card and sample checks

Data entry done School report card generated

Sample checking being done


School report card distributed to no. of Schools Finding of sample check

20 0% 0% 0%

Comments: The sample check has not been done due to minimum staff available unlike SSA. Sample checks are done by the SSA field staff and occasionally RMSA officials do the sample check.

Data entry done School report cards

Sample checking School report cards distributors all School

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Name of district

20 0 20 0 0 20 20 0

Name of State

Overall finding of sampled checking yes

8. Has the data been submitted to State level as per time schedule?

1. Yes 2. No






% 100% 0% 100% 0%

1

249


1. Yes 2. No


1. Yes 2. No



No. of

Schools



% 100% 0% 0 0 DPO 100% 0% 0 0

0 100% 0% 0 0 Comments: all head master says that SG and MRG should given to June onwards till right now late payment and to consume timely credit sc high in the district all schools under RMSA and education rank 6th place


From DPO to SMDC

Mode of Transfer



% 0 0 100%







20 50000/school 20 Not available

2. Minor Repair Grant 20 25000/school 20

3. New School Building Grant (Major grant)

2 50,000,00 50,000,00 Not available

4. Additional classroom /lab etc. construction grant


2

1

250


7. others

8

9.

At District Level



1 School Annual Grant All the

Government and

Government aided

schools in

Nagapattinam

district

March

2 Minor Repair Grant Minor Repair

Grant has not been

distributed to 8

schools in

Nagapattinam

district


distributed to 2

schools but the

civil work is

incomplete due to

insufficient funds

251

At State Level





% 0% 100% 0% Comments:


No. of Schools

Sharing of If yes, details of objections Proposal for

expenditure Expenditure Statements

Any objection raised by community about any

transaction Yes No Yes No Yes No 1.

0 20 0 20 0 20 2. % 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 3.

4. Comments :

6. Audit of SMDCs

All SMDCs in State/District are covered by audit 1. Yes 2.No

No. of Schools

Audit carried out YES NO

0 20 % 0% 20%

D.P.O.

No. of Schools


- - - - % - - -

2

252

Comments: SMDC audit is not being done on a periodic basis. None of the school has been audited by either

education department or AG or CA. Jan Vaachan is also not happening in any of the school. Social audit has never

happened in Nagapattinam district.

7. Social Auditing


No. of Schools

Display of financial information (receipts & payments) and timely entered

Yes No 0 20

% 0% 100% D.P.O.

Comments: Social audit is not being done in Nagapattinam district.


No. of Schools


0 20 % 0% 100%




UC


submitted

1 April, 2014 2013-14

2

3

4

5




received


No. of Schools

253

No data available

9(iii) Status of utilization certificates submitted to SPO from DPOs (from 1st April 2012 to 31st March, 2013) (At

State Level)

No. of sampled

DPOs


No. of DPOS to

which fund released

Amount of fund

released

Date of release

Amount for which

U.C. received


School Annual Grant

Minor repair

work

Major repair

work




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. Yes 2. No



(i)

254

Name of Unit


on 1st April, 2013

B Funds

received


D Expenditure


……..

Balance in bank

passbook as on



Grant funds

S.N.

Name of School

SAG Minor Repair Major repair grant Civil work Educational tour

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance

Receipt

Spent

Unspent

balance

1 GHS, Thirupoondi North

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

2 GHS, Vezhuthamavadi West

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

3 GHS, Sattiyakudi

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

4 GHS, Kilvelur

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

5 GHS, Kodakkaramoolai

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

6 GHS, Thandavankulam

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0 0

7 GHS, Mappadukai

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

8 GHS, Kalankudi

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

9 GHS, Nagoor

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

10 GHS, Pappakoil

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

11 GHS, Vaithiyanathapuram

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0 0

12 GHS, Chinnangudi

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

13 GHS, Agaraperunthottam

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0 5000000

5000000

14 GHS, Thiruvali

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

15 GHS, Vellapallam Meenavar Colony

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0 5000000

5000000

255

16 GHS, Naluvethapathi

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

17 GHS,

Panangudi Samathuvapuram

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

18 GHS

Thittacheri 50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

19 GHS, Nagakudiyan

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

20 GHS,

Kadinalvayal

50000

50000

0 25000

25000

0 0 0 0

SCHOOL ANNUAL GRANT –


S.N. Month of receipt of SAG Number of Schools % 1 No data 20 100 2 3 4 5 Total 2 (i) status of utilization of funds with % and expenditure done as per norms of the scheme- S.N. Name of School Sanctioned

amount Month of


date % of

expenditure 1 2 3 4 5 2(ii) Status of Utilization of School Annual Grant



SAGs


not receive SAGs


spend



Number of Schools

%



Yes % No %

256

1. 20 100 20 100 0 1. Comments: data available




Month of receipt


% of expenditure

1 2 3 4 Total



No 0




Number of Schools

%



257


In Nagapattinam district, promotion of sports activities is widely seen. The high school students are encouraged to participate in games, competitions and sports. The winners are recognized at the district level and they are given special prizes. Every year in SSLC examination, top 10 SC students are identified at the district level in Nagapattinam and they are honored with special cash prizes.


S. No.



Comments :






258

S. No.

Name of District Name of Innovative Proposals

Amount of funds sanctioned/released



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(e) At district level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(f) At State Level

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1(i). The total number of staff sanctioned category wise in DPO under RMSA and the number in position. Nagapattinam District

259



1 1 100% 0 0%


1 1 100% 0 0%


2 2 100% 0 0%



8 9

10 Total 12 12 100% 0 0%

1(ii) the total number of staff sanctioned category wise in SPO under RMSA and the number in position.





1 1 100% 0 0%




2 2 100% 0 0%

14 15

260





Comments





Comments:




1 Finance 2 Civil Work 3 Quality 4 Equity 5 Gender 6 Pedagogy

261

7 Planning 8 Training


……………………………………………………..…………………………………………

Comments:


……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Comments:


……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Comments:



………………………………………………….………………………………………


……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………


At SPO level

262

S. No.



Time schedule



Director Project

3 Others

At DPO Level

S. No.



Time schedule





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------



263


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Comments:

264

IV. INFORMATION ABOUT STATE DATABASE At SPO level updated by DPO.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/ No


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments:





265


At District Level



2

3

4

5

At State Level


1 At state level, MoU has been signed with NUEPA to conduct Annual Plan Action Research on RMSA Implementation in TN. Salem and Theni districts have been taken as pilot district to conduct this research.

2

3

4

5


(a) At State level ………………………………………………………………………………………….


266

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes/No

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Areas of research




Pedagogy

Quality


Areas of research




Pedagogy

267



268

RMSA Monitoring @ Thanjavur District -‐ Selected Schools

Sl.No Dise Code District Name

Block Name School Name

1 33210202110 Thanjavur Thanjavur Rural GHS, Pillayarpatti 2 33210300603 Thanjavur Thiruvaiyaru GHS, Vanarangudi 3 33210302405 Thanjavur Thiruvaiyaru GHS, Mohamed Bunder 4 33210400704 Thanjavur Budalur GHS, Indalur 5 33210502905 Thanjavur Orathanadu GHS, Naduvoor 6 33210504410 Thanjavur Orathanadu GHS, Sadayarkoil 7 33210602203 Thanjavur Thiruvonam GHS, Kattathi

Unjiyaviduthi 8 33210602902 Thanjavur Thiruvonam GHS, Sillathur 9 33210702604 Thanjavur Kumbakonam GHS, Neerathanallur 10 33210704902 Thanjavur Kumbakonam GHS, Cholapuram West 11 33210801905 Thanjavur Papanasam GHS, Vanniyadi 12 33210900307 Thanjavur Ammapettai GHS, Annappanpettai 13 33210900506 Thanjavur Ammapettai GHS, Arunthavapuram 14 33211001304 Thanjavur Papanasam GHS, Vannakudi 15 33211004403 Thanjavur Thiruvidaimarudur GHS, Thukkachi 16 33211100103 Thanjavur Thiruppanandal GHS, Aralur 17 33211103803 Thanjavur Thiruppanandal GHS, Chitridaiyanallur 18 33211402502 Thanjavur Peravurani GHS, Sengamangalam 19 33211403504 Thanjavur Peravurani GHS, Vattathikottai 20 33211505102 Thanjavur Sethubavachatram GHS, Muthukadu

269

RASHTRIYA MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA ABHIYAN THIRUVARUR DISTRICT

GOVERNMENT SCHOOL LIST (2013-‐14) S. No.

BLOCK NAME U-‐DISE CODE

NAME OF THE SCHOOL

1 KODAVASAL 33200201202 GHS,KOOTHANUR 2 KODAVASAL 33200201503 GHSS, ERAVANCHERY 3 KORADACHERY 33200302102 GHS,SELLUR 4 KORADACHERY 33200302803 GHS, ATHIKADAI 5 KOTTUR 33200802102 GHS, MAZHAVARAYANALLUR 6 KOTTUR 33200802702 GHS ,PALAYAKOTTAI 7 MANNARGUDI 33200603902 ADWHS,SAVALAKARAN 8 MUTHUPETTAI 33201000402 GHSS, IDUMBAVANAM 9 NANNILAM 33200402805 GHSS, POONTHOTTAM 10 NANNILAM 33200405318 GHS,SANNANALLUR 11 NANNILAM 33200404505 GHS, MAPPILAIKUPPAM 12 NEEDAMANGALAM 33200700903 GHS EDAKEELAIYUR 13 THIRUTHURAIPOONDI 33200903306 ADWHS ABISEKAKATTALAI 14 THIRUTHURAIPOONDI 33200903314 GGHSS THIRUTHURAIPOONDI 15 TIRUVARUR 33200501802 GHS , PALAYAVALAM 16 TIRUVARUR 33200501403 GHS, MANGUDI 17 TIRUVARUR 33200503702 GHS, VADAKARAI 18 TIRUVARUR 33200500504 ADWHS AMOOR 19 VALANGAIMAN 33200101002 GHSS,ARITHUVARAMANGALAM 20 VALANGAIMAN 33200102402 GHS, MUNIYUR

270

RMSA MONITORING -‐ SCHOOL LIST -‐ NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT

Sl.No Block Name School Name 1 Keezhaiyur GHS, Thirupoondi North 2 Keezhaiyur GHS, Vezhuthamavadi West 3 Kilvelur GHS, Sattiyakudi 4 Kilvelur GHS, Kilvelur 5 Kollidam GHS, Kodakkaramoolai 6 Kollidam GHS, Thandavankulam 7 Mayiladuthurai GHS, Mappadukai 8 Mayiladuthurai GHS, Kalankudi 9 Nagapattinam GHS, Nagoor 10 Nagapattinam GHS, Pappakoil 11 Sembanar Koil GHS, Vaithiyanathapuram 12 Sembanar Koil GHS, Chinnangudi 13 Sirkali GHS, Agaraperunthottam 14 Sirkali GHS, Thiruvali 15 Thalaiyaru GHS, Vellapallam Meenavar Colony 16 Thalaiyaru GHS, Naluvethapathi 17 Thirumarugal GHS, Panangudi Samathuvapuram 18 Thirumarugal GHS Thittacheri 19 Vedaranyam GHS, Nagakudiyan 20 Vedaranyam GHS, Kadinalvayal

Documents

DISTRICTS$COVERED$ THANJAVUR$ …rmsaindia.gov.in/administrator/components/com_monitoring/...6!! Consolidated Report/Executive Summary of RMSA Monitoring for the districts Thanjavur,