DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Grades K 12 District Improvement Plan REVISED … · DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Grades K-12 Lancaster City Schools 345 E. Mulberry Street Lancaster, Ohio

1 Lancaster City Schools 3/8/2012

DISTRICT

IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Grades K-12

Lancaster City Schools 345 E. Mulberry Street

Lancaster, Ohio 43130

May 2011


DISTRICT LEADERSHIP TEAM

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Implementing district wide school improvement efforts is a difficult and daunting task. Lancaster City Schools has been participating in such

efforts through the framework of a process called the Ohio Improvement Process (OIP).

This document is the organizational framework that represents the District Improvement Process (DIP) for Lancaster City Schoo ls. Appreciation is

extended to the staff and community representatives listed below for their service to this committee and their assistance in creating this document.

Rick Bates Jenny O’Hare Melody Stoneburner

Robin Cathers Greg Paulmann Allyson Strong

Nathan Conrad Steve Poston Lisa Thompson

Denise Cordle Idelle Sagan Patty Turner

Terri Garrett Vernia Shaffer Allyson Strong

David Hoffman Jeromey Sheets Rob Walker

Donna McCance John Smith Beth Wigton

Dain Michelson Carol Spires Mark Yoho


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Math Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area ____ Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cost____________ GOAL 1: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub-groups in math as measured by the OAA/OGT.

STRATEGIES, INDICATORS AND PROGRESS MEASURES

STRATEGY 1A: By setting learning targets and using common formative assessment teachers will implement the state math standards.

BASELINE MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE

ADULT IMPLEMENTATION INDICATOR

MAY 2011 DEC 2011 ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

MAY 2012 ACTUAL RESULTS

DEC 2012 ACTUAL RESULTS

100% of standards calendars/

pacing charts, aligned to the

Ohio academic content stand-

ards, will be created for math in

K-12.

100% for K-5 100% for 6-8

80% for 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% of math teachers will im-

plement common formative

assessments to provide feed-

back.

0% K-5 50% 6-8

90% 9-12

0% K-5 50% 6-8

90% 9-12

92.9% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12

15% K-5 75% 6-8

90% 9-12

90% K-5 90% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8

100% 9-12


STUDENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR


MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



100% of students will demonstrate mastery (75%) of math standards on short cycle

assessments.

Grades: 1: 80.6% 2: 70.4% 3: 57.6% 4: 40.0% 5: 26.3%

Grades: 1: N/A 2: N/A 3: 44.7% 4: 48.5% 5: 17.7%

Grades: 1: N/A 2: N/A 3: 44.7% 4: 48.5% 5: 17.7%

Grades: 1: 85.1% 2: 57.7% 3: 63.7% 4: 30.6% 5: 25.8%

Grades: 1: 85.1% 2: 57.7% 3: 63.7% 4: 30.6% 5: 25.8% :

Grades: 1: 82.5% 2: 73.4% 3: 61.9% 4: 43.3% 5: 33.7%

Grades: 1: 2: 3: 4: 5:

Grades: 1: N/A 2: N/A 3: 50.2% 4: 53.7% 5: 25.9%

Grades: 1: 2: 3: 4: 5:

100% of students will

demonstrate mastery (75%) of math standards on short cycle assessments.

Grades: 6: 43% 7: 13% 8: 38% 9: 21% 10: 13% 11: 0% 12: 0%

Grades:

6: 40% 7: 26% 8: 46% 9: 55%

10: 43% 11: 48% 12:

Grades:

6: 40% 7: 26% 8: 46% 9: 55%

10: 43% 11: 48% 12:

Grades: 6: 32.7% 7: 22.5% 8: 59.7% 9: 25.5% 10: 42.2% 11: 29.1% 12:

Grades: 6: 32.7% 7: 22.5% 8: 59.7% 9: 25.5% 10: 42.2% 11: 29.1% 12:

Grades: 6: 48.7% 7: 21.7% 8: 44.2% 9: 28.9% 10: 21.7% 11: 12:

Grades: 6: 7: 8: 9 10: 11: 12:

Grades: 6: 46.0% 7: 33.4% 8: 51.4% 9: 59.5% 10: 48.7% 11: 53.2% 12: 63.1%

Grades: 6: 7: 8: 9 10: 11: 12:

100% of SWD will demonstrate mastery (75%) of math standards on short cycle assessments.

Grades: 1. 43.3% 2. 20.8%

3. 31.9% 4. 1.67% 5. 0.00% 6. 2.0%

7. 3.0% 8. 8.1% 9. 8.7% 10: 0.0%

11: 22.2% 12:

Grades: 1. 43.3% 2. 20.8%

3. 31.9% 4. 1.67% 5. 0.00% 6. 2.0%

7. 3.0% 8. 8.1% 9. 8.7% 10: 0.0%

11: 22.2% 12:


ACTION STEPS Monitoring Evi-

dence/Data

Sources

Person(s)

Responsible/

Group(s)

Implementation Timeline Resources Needed:

Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov Dec-Feb

Mar-

May

Create or revise standards calendars for math

grades K-12.

Completed

standards

calendars

Instructional

Services X X X X

Time

Personnel

Curriculum materials

Teacher / Staff will begin each lesson by communi-

cating a learning target to students. Walk-through

Building

administrators

Teacher

Staff

X X X X Walk-through

Provide professional development for district initia-

tives, such as: Marzano high-yield strategies; form-

ative assessment; TBT; use of data to guide inter-

vention; instructional strategies, core curriculum

implementation, teacher evaluation, etc.

District-wide

professional development

plan

Instructional

Services

Building

administrators

Teacher

leadership

X X X X

Time

Consultants

Conferences

Coaches

Materials

Curriculum rate

Subs

Implement co-teaching across the district. Provide

professional development and support across the

district.

Agendas

Lesson plans

District PD

plan

Student

Services

Curriculum and

Instruction

X X X X

Time

Consultants

Conferences

Coaches

Materials

Curriculum rate

Subs

TBT’s will create/select and use Common Forma-

tive Assessments.

Common

assessments

Reports to

BLT

TBT

BLT X X X

Common Formative

Assessments

Common planning

time

An elementary math plan will be developed by teachers to enhance mathematics instruction.

Completed

math plan

Teachers

Elementary

curriculum

coordinator

X X X

Subs

Curriculum rate

Materials


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Math Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area __________ Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Opera-

tional/Cross-content-____________ GOAL 1: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub-groups in math as measured by the OAA/OGT.


STRATEGY 1B: Use district common short cycle (summative) assessments on math standards to monitor student achievement.


ADULT IMPLEMENTATION INDICATOR MAY 2011 DEC 2011

ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS


DEC 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

1. 100% of building administrators and

teachers will analyze identified areas of

need and inform instructional practice

using the Data Day Reflection sheet.

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

STUDENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MAY 2011 DEC 2011 ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



1. 100% of students will display mas-tery (75%) of math standards on short

cycle assessments.

Grades:

1: 80.6%

2: 70.4%

3: 57.6%

4: 36.9%

5: 26.3%

6: 43%

7: 13%

8: 38%

9: 21%

10: 13%

11: 0%

12: 0%

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 44.7%

4: 48.5%

5: 17.7%

6: 40%

7: 26%

8: 46%

9: 55%

10: 43%

11: 48%

12: 59%

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 44.7%

4: 48.5%

5: 17.7%

6: 40%

7: 26%

8: 46%

9: 55%

10: 43%

11: 48%

12: 59%

Grades:

1: 85.1%

2: 57.7%

3: 63.7%

4: 30.6%

5: 25.8%

6: 32.7%

7: 22.5%

8: 59.7%

9: 26.5%

10: 42.2%

11: 29.1%

12:

Grades:

1: 85.1%

2: 57.7%

3: 63.7%

4: 30.6%

5: 25.8%

6: 32.7%

7: 22.5%

8: 59.7%

9: 26.5%

10: 42.2%

11: 29.1%

12:

Grades:

1: 82.5%

2: 73.4%

3: 61.9%

4: 43.3%

5: 33.7%

6: 48.7%

7: 21.7%

8: 44.2%

9: 28.9%

10: 21.7%

11: %

12: %

Grades:

1:

2:

3:

4:

5:

6:

7:

8:

9:

10:

11:

12:

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 50.2%

4: 53.7%

5: 25.9%

6: 46.0%

7: 33.4%

8: 51.4%

9: 59.5%

10: 48.7%

11: 53.2%

12: 63.1%

Grades:

1:

2:

3:

4:

5:

6:

7:

8:

9:

10:

11:

12:


ACTION STEPS

Monitoring

Evidence/

Data

Sources

Person(s)

Responsi-

ble/ Group

(s)


Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

Communicate the purpose, uses, scheduling and reporting of

short cycle assessments to all stakeholders.

News-

letters

Memos

Agendas

Instruction-

al Services

Building

principals

X X

Research-based

information on Short Cycle

Assessments

Teachers and administrators will use short-cycle assessment data

to analyze and aggregate subgroup data in order provide action

plans on the Data Day reflection form.

Agendas

Data

tools

Instruc-

tional Ser-vices

Building

principals

Teacher

leaders

X X X

Collaboration time

Money

Content

specialists

PD Plan

Provide teachers and administrators time to collaboratively

discuss and analyze short cycle assessment data.

Staff

meetings

Agendas

Building

principals X X X Collaboration time

Continue to develop and adapt short cycle assessments.

Completed

assess-

ments

Instruction-

al Services X X X

Collaboration time

Indicator

resources

Sample

assessments


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Math Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area ____ Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cost____________

GOAL 1: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub-groups in math as measured by the OAA/OGT.


STRATEGY 1C: A PROCESS OF RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS MATH SKILL DEFICITS.




MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



All buildings in the district will

incorporate a building RTI plan.

0%

9%

9%

9%

9%

0%



MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

MAY 2012 ACTUAL RESULTS DEC 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

100% of students receiving inter-

ventions will demonstrate pro-

gress in their area of deficit as a

result of targeted interventions.

0% 0%

NO

STUDENT

DATA

0% 0% 0%


ACTION STEPS Monitoring

Evidence/Data

Sources

Person(s) Responsible/

Group(s)


Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

The district RTI committee will be re-established to de-velop a common RTI process.

District RTI team

School

psych,

Administra-

tors

Guidance

counselors

Teachers

from various positions

X X X

Team members

Meeting times

Sub coverage

Training

Best practices from pilot schools will be compiled. Screener

Progress

monitoring tools

Cedar

Heights/Thomas

Ewing teams

District RTI

team

X X X Team members

Building RTI teams

Sub coverage

Provide professional development to teachers/staff re-garding RTI.

PD Administrators

Teachers X X

Time

Money

Presenters

Universal screening measure will be identified/

developed along with a method of progress monitoring.

Screeners

Progress

monitoring tools

District RTI

team X

Money

Time

Commitment

Additional research based interventions will be investi-

gated in order to expand the options available. New intervention

strategies

District RTI

team

Administrators

Teachers

X X

Money

Time

Commitment


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area Reading____ Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cost____________ GOAL 2: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub-groups in Reading as measured by the OAA/OGT.


STRATEGY 2A: By setting learning targets and using common formative assessments teachers will implement the state reading (ELA) standards.



ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



100% of standards calendars/pacing

guides, aligned to the Ohio academic

content standards, will be created for

reading (E/LA) in K-12.

100% for K-5

90% for 6-8

80% for 9-12

100% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% of reading teachers will imple-

ment Common Formative Assess-

ments to provide feedback to TBT’s.

0% K-5

50% 6-8

90% 9-12

0% K-5

50% 6-8

90% 9-12

89.5% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12

15% K-5

75% 6-8

90% 9-12

90% K-5

90% 6-8

100% 9-12

100% K-5

100% 6-8

100% 9-12


STUDENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MAY 2011

DEC 2011

ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS


DEC 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

1. 100% of students will demonstrate

mastery (75%) of reading (ELA)

standards on short cycle assess-

ments.

Grades:

1: 75.7%

2: 57.4%

3: 69.4%

4: 51.7%

5: 36.8%

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 54.8%

4: 32.6%

5: 37.3%

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 54.8%

4: 32.6%

5: 37.3%

Grades:

1: 91.9%

2: 70.0%

3: 68.4%

4: 54.3%

5: 42.6%

Grades:

1: 91.9%

2: 70.0%

3: 68.4%

4: 54.3%

5: 42.6%

Grades:

1: 78.1%

2: 61.7%

3: 72.5%

4: 56.5%

5: 43.1%

Grades:

1:

2:

3:

4:

5:

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 59.3%

4: 39.3%

5: 43.6%

Grades:

1:

2:

3:

4:

5:

2. 100% of students will demonstrate mastery (75%) of reading (ELA)

standards on short cycle assess-ments.

Grades:

6: 19%

7: 46%

8: 40%

9: 40%

10: 41%

11: 0%

12: 0%

Grades:

6: 55% 7: 64% 8: 52%

9: 74% 10: 36% 11: 48% 12: 59%

Grades:

6: 55% 7: 64% 8: 52%

9: 74% 10: 36% 11: 48% 12: 59%

Grades:

6: 44.2%

7: 96.9%

8: 53.3%

9: 62.1%

10: 52.3%

11: 54.3%

12: 11.11%

Grades:

6: 44.2%

7: 96.9%

8: 53.3%

9: 62.1%

10: 52.3%

11: 54.3%

12: 11.11%

Grades:

6: 27.1%

7: 51.4%

8: 46.0%

9: 46.0%

10: 46.9%

11: %

12: %

Grades:

6:

7:

8:

9:

10:

11:

12:

Grades:

6: 59.5%

7: 67.6%

8: 56.8%

9: 76.7%

10: 42.2%

11: 53.2%

12: 63.1%

Grades:

6:

7:

8:

9:

10:

11:

12:

100% of SWD will demonstrate mastery (75%) of reading (ELA)

standards on short cycle assess-ments.

Grades: 1; 61.1% 2: 25.8%

3: 30.9% 4: 20.0% 5: 13.6% 6: 22.2% 7: 4.3% 8: 10.0%

9: 17% 10:14.3% 11: 5.0% 12: 0.0%

Grades: 1; 61.1% 2: 25.8%

3: 30.9% 4: 20.0% 5: 13.6% 6: 22.2% 7: 4.3% 8: 10.0%

9: 17% 10:14.3% 11: 5.0% 12: 0.0%


ACTION STEPS

Monitoring Evi-

dence/Data

Sources

Person(s) Re-

sponsible/

Group(s)

Implementation Timeline Resources Need-ed:

Budget/Material/

Technology

June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

Create or revise standards calendars for reading grades K-12. Completed

standards calendars

Instructional

Services X X X X

Time

Personnel

Curriculum

materials

Teacher / Staff will begin each lesson by communicating a

learning target to students. Walk-through

Building

administrators

Teacher

Staff

X X X X

Walk-through

Provide professional development for district initiatives such

as: Marzano high-yield strategies; formative assessment;

TBT; use of data to guide intervention; instructional strategies,

implementation of core curriculum, teacher evaluation, etc.

District-wide

professional development

plan

Instructional

Services

Building Ad-

ministrators

Teacher

leadership

X X X X

Time

Consultants

Materials

Coaches

Curriculum rate

Subs

Conferences

Implement co-teaching across district. Provide professional

development and support across the district.

Agenda

Lesson plans

District PD

plan

Student

Services

Curriculum

and Instruc-tion

X X X X

Co-teaching

materials

Training

Meeting time

Curriculum rate

Consultants

Conferences

TBT will create/select and use formative assessments.

Common

Assess- ments

Reports to

BLT

TBT

BLT X X X

Common Formative

Assessments

Common planning

time


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area _ Reading _________ Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cross-content-____________

GOAL 2: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub-groups in Reading as measured by the OAA/

OGT.


STRATEGY 2B: Use district common short cycle (summative) assessments focused on Reading standards to monitor student achievement.




MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



1. 100% of building administrators

and teachers will analyze identified

areas of need and inform instruction-

al practice using the Data Day Re-

flection sheet.

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100% 6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%

K-5 100%

6-8 100%

9-12 100%



MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



1. 100% of students will display mastery (75%) of reading ELA stand-

ards on short cycle assessments.

Grades:

1: 75.7%

2: 57.4% 3: 69.4% 4: 51.7% 5: 36.8%

6: 19% 7: 46% 8: 40% 9: 40%

10: 41% 11: 0 12: 0

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 54.8%

4: 32.6%

5: 37.3%

6: 55%

7: 64% 8: 52% 9: 74% 10: 36%

11: 48% 12: 59%

Grades:

1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 54.8%

4: 32.6%

5: 37.3%

6: 55%

7: 64% 8: 52% 9: 74% 10: 36%

11: 48% 12: 59%

Grades:

1: 91.9%

2: 70.0% 3: 68.4% 4: 54.3% 5: 42.6%

6: 44.2% 7: 52.5% 8: 53.3% 9: 62.1%

10: 52.3% 11: 54.3% 12: 11.11%

Grades:

1: 91.9%

2: 70.0% 3: 68.4% 4: 54.3% 5: 42.6%

6: 44.2% 7: 52.5% 8: 53.3% 9: 62.1%

10: 52.3% 11: 54.3% 12: 11.11%

Grades: 1: 78.1%

2: 61.7%

3: 72.5% 4: 56.5% 5: 43.1% 6: 27.1%

7: 51.4% 8: 46.0% 9: 46.0% 10: 46.9%

11: 12:

Grades: 1: 2:

3: 4: 5: 6:

7: 8: 9: 10:

11: 12:

Grades: 1: N/A

2: N/A

3: 59.3% 4: 39.3% 5: 43.6% 6: 59.5%

7: 67.6% 8: 56.8% 9: 76.7% 10: 42.4%

11: 53.2% 12: 63.1%

Grades:

1: 2:

3: 4: 5: 6:

7: 8: 9: 10:

11: 12:


ACTION STEPS

Monitoring

Evidence/

Data

Sources

Person(s)

Responsi-

ble/ Group(s)


Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

Communicate the purpose, uses, scheduling and reporting of

short cycle assessments to all stakeholders.

Newslet-

ters

Memos

Agendas

Instruc-

tional Services

Building

principals

X X

Research-based

information on Short Cycle As-sessments

Teachers and administrators will use short-cycle assessment data

to analyze and aggregate subgroup data in order provide action

plans on the Data Day reflection form.

Agendas

Data tools

Instruc-

tional Services

Building

principals

Teacher

leaders

X X X

Collaboration time

Money

Content

specialists

PD Plan

Provide teachers and administrators time to collaboratively

discuss and analyze short cycle assessment data

Staff

meetings

Agendas

Building

principals

TBT

X X X Collaboration time

Continue to develop and adapt short cycle assessments.

Complet-

ed as-

sessments

Instruc-

tional Services

X X X

Collaboration time

Indicator resources

Sample assess-

ments


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area Reading ____ Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cost____________ GOAL 2: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub -groups in Reading as measured by the OAA/OGT.


STRATEGY 2C: A PROCESS OF RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO ADDRESS READING SKILL DEFICITS.




MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



All buildings in the district will incor-

porate a building RTI plan.

9% Pilot

2 Buildings Thomas Ewing Cedar Heights

9%

Collected

data did not align

9%

9%

100%



MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS



1. 100% of students receiving in-

terventions will demonstrate pro-

gress in their area of deficit as a

result of targeted interventions.

K-5 0% 6-10 85% 11-12 0%

K-5 0% 6-10 85% 11-12 0%

Collected data did not align

K-5 0% 6-10 85% 11-12 0%

K-5 0%

6-10 85% 11-12 0%

K-5 85% 6-10 85% 11-12 0%


ACTION STEPS

Monitoring Evi-

dence/Data

Sources

Person(s)

Responsible/

Group(s)


Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

The district RTI committee will be re-established to develop a common RTI process.

District RTI

team

School

psych

Administra-tors

Guidance counselors

Teachers from various positions

X X X

Team members

Meeting times

Sub coverage

Training

Best practices from pilot schools will be compiled. Screeners

Progress monitoring tools

Cedar Heights/Thomas Ewing teams

District RTI

X X X

Team members

Building RTI teams

Sub coverage

Provide professional development to teachers/staff regarding RTI.

PD

Administra- tors

Teachers

X X Time

Money

Presenters

Universal screening measure will be identified/

developed along with a method of progress monitoring.

Screeners

Progress moni-

toring tools

District RTI X Money

Time

Commitment

Additional research-based interventions will be investi-

gated in order to expand the options available.

New interven-tion strategies

DRT

Administra-tors

Teachers

X X Time

Money

Commitment


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area _Reading Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cross-content-____________

GOAL 2:: By 2014-2015 the district will meet or exceed Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements for all student sub-groups in Reading as measured by the OAA/

OGT.


STRATEGY 2D: Design and implement the aligned K-12 Lancaster City Schools Literacy Plan.


ADULT IMPLEMENTATION INDICATOR MAY 2011 DEC 2011 ACTUAL

RESULTS MARCH

2012 ACTUAL

RESULTS MAY 2012

ACTUAL

RESULTS DEC 2012

ACTUAL

RESULTS

1. 100% of teachers K-12 will use com-

ponents of the District Literacy Plan as a

framework for reading instruction in all

content areas.

100% K-5 0% 6-12

100% K-5 0% 6-12

100% K-5 25% 6-12

100% K-5 50% 6-12

100% K-5 100% 6-12

STUDENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MAY 2011 DEC 2011 ACTUAL

RESULTS MARCH

2012 ACTUAL

RESULTS MAY 2012

ACTUAL

RESULTS DEC 2012

ACTUAL

RESULTS

1. 100% of students in grades K-5 will increase their reading level by at least one grade level each school year.

80% K-5

80% K-5

90%K-5

95% K-5

100% K-5

2. 100% of students in grades 6-12 will score 75% or better on quarterly Language Arts Assessments. (Short Cycle)

Grades: 6: 19% 7: 46% 8: 40% 9: 40% 10: 41% 11: 0% 12: 0%

Grades: 6: 55% 7: 64% 8: 52% 9: 74% 10: 36% 11: 48% 12: 59%

Grades: 6: 55% 7: 64% 8: 52% 9: 74% 10: 36% 11: 48% 12: 59%

Grades 6: 44.2%

7: 52.5% 8: 53.3% 9: 10:

11: 12:

Grades: 6: 44.2%

7: 52.5% 8: 53.3% 9: 10:

11: 12:

Grades: 6: 27.1% 7: 51.4% 8: 46.0% 9: 46.0% 10: 46.9% 11: % 12: %

Grades: 6: 7: 8: 9: 10: 11: 12:

Grades: 6: 59.5% 7: 67.6% 8: 56.8% 9: 76.7% 10: 42.4% 11: 53.2% 12: 63.1%

Grades: 6: 7: 8: 9: 10: 11: 12:


ACTION STEPS

Monitoring Evi-

dence/Data

Sources

Person(s)

Responsible/

Group(s)

Implementation Timeline Resources Needed: Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

Teachers in grades K-5 will complete the District Literacy Plan Tracking sheet for each student.

Completed

tracking sheet

DLT

BLT

Building

administra-tor

X X X

Time

Office material

District Literacy

Plan

Tracking sheet

Assessment time-

line

Complete, publish, and distribute the District Literacy Plan grades 6-12.

Literacy Plan

Instructional

Services

Department

chairs

X X X X

Collaboration time

Literacy research

Professional materi-

als

Provide professional development to teachers in grades 6-12

regarding how to implement the District Literacy Plan.

PD agendas

Instructional

Services

Building

administrators

X X X X

PD money

Collaboration time

Office materials

Resources

Provide professional development for teachers and administra-tors K-12 regarding research based reading comprehension strategies (metacognition, schema, inferring, questioning, deter-mining importance, visualizing, synthesizing).

Agendas

Teacher

leadership

Building

administrators

Instructional

Services

X X X

PD money

Collaboration time

Office materials

Resources

Explicitly teach reading comprehension strategies (metacognition, schema, inferring, questioning, determining im-

portance, visualizing, synthesizing).

Walk-

through

Building

administra-tors

Teacher

X X X X Resource materi-

als

Teachers 6-8 will administer and report reading levels 3 times a

year as measured with a reading assessment / universal

screener.

Data Day

response forms

TBT agendas

BLT

TBT

IAT

RTI Teams

X X X

Money

Collaboration time

Knowledgeable

personnel

Vocabulary Acquisition, Writing, and Reading Comprehension

Strategies will support instruction in all content areas.

Walk-

through form

Building

administra-tors

Teacher

X X X Resource material


SMART GOALS

Goal 1: Student Performance Content Area : Goal 2: Student Performance Content Area : Goal 3: Expectations & Conditions ____Expectation________ _ Goal 4: Operational/Cross-content: . GOAL 3: Increase attendance by adding .2% annually or meet/exceed a 97% attendance rate. The high school graduation rate will meet or exceed the state graduation indicator level of 90%.


STRATEGY 3A: Provide additional support to at risk students and families to improve attendance by .2% annually or meet /exceed 97% and meet/exceed graduation rate . Of 90%. BASELINE MEAS-

URE

PROGRESS MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE PROGRESS MEASURE


ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012 ACTUAL RESULTS



1. 100% of staff will implement a building designed attendance plan

0% K-5 0% 6-8 0% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8 100% 9-12

K-5 100% 6-8 100%

9-12 100%

100% K-5 100% 6-8 100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8 100% 9-12

100% K-5 100% 6-8 100% 9-12

STUDENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MAY 2011 DEC 2011

ACTUAL RESULTS

MARCH 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

MAY 2012 ACTUAL RESULTS DEC 2012

ACTUAL RESULTS

1. Reduce the percentage of students who miss more than 12 days of school.

0% K-5 0% 6-8 0% 9-12

K-5 6-8 9-12

K-5 18.6% 6-8 31.6% 9-12 42%

K-5 6-8 9-12

K-5 6-8 9-12

K-5 6-8 9-12


ACTION STEPS

Monitoring Evi-

dence/Data

Sources

Person(s) Respon-

sible/ Group(s)

Implementation Timeline Resources Needed: Budget/Material/

Technology June -

Aug

Sept-

Nov

Dec-

Feb

Mar-

May

K-6 classrooms will implement the Second Step program.

Lesson plans

Observations

Posters

Teacher

Principal

Mental health

counselor

X X X X Second Step kits

Posters

Grades 7th classrooms will implement Red Flags program &

8th classrooms will implement Project Alert.

Lesson plans

Observations

Teacher

Principal

Mental health

counselor

X X X X Project Alert kits

Grade 9 classrooms will implement Booster lessons for Project

Alert.

Lesson plans

Observations

Teacher

Principal

Mental health

counselor

X X X X Project Alert kits

All buildings will develop and implement an attendance

improvement plan.

Completed

plan

Principal

Staff

Mental health

counselors

X X X Attendance data

Time

Secondary buildings will develop and implement a plan to in-

crease the graduation rate of students with disabilities.

Completed

plan

Principal

Staff

Mental health

counselors

X X X Attendance data-

SWD students

Time

Documents

DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Grades K 12 District Improvement Plan REVISED … · DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Grades K-12 Lancaster City Schools 345 E. Mulberry Street Lancaster, Ohio