51
Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Distributive stewardshipDraft 3 1 December 1999

Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Page 2: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

SoL (The Society for Organizational Learning) is a global learningcommunity dedicated to fostering knowledge generation and knowledgediffusion for fundamental institutional change.

Our vision is to nurture organizations worthy of people's highestaspirations and fullest commitment.

The purpose of SoL is to discover, integrate and implement theories andpractices for their interdependent development of people, their networks,and their institutions.

The SoL global community is united through its purpose, its principles andby shared theories, concepts and practices on learning how to learn and onlearning how to share (i.e. on leading, learning, and working together.)

Purpose and vision

Page 3: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Guiding Principles In pursuit of its purpose the members of SoL believe that:

o All human being are born with innate, lifelong desire and ability to learn, which should be enhanced by all organizations. (Drive to Learn) o People learn best from and with one another, and participation in learning communities is vital to their effectiveness, well being and happiness in any work setting. (Learning is Social)o The capacities and accomplishments of organizations are inseparable from and dependent on the capacities of the learning communities which they foster. (Learning Communities )o It is essential that organizations evolve to be in greater harmony with human nature and with the natural world. (Aligning with Nature )

Page 4: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

o Organizations must develop individual and collective capabilities tounderstand complex, interdependent issues; engage in reflective, generativeconversation; and nurture personal and shared aspirations. (Core Learning Capabilities )o Learning communities that connect multiple organizations cansignificantly enhance the capabilities for profound individual andorganizational change. (Cross-Organizational Collaboration )

The Society for Organizational Learning

Guiding Principles (continued)

Page 5: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Guiding Principles (continued) THEREFORE, SoL and its Members intend, and will use their best efforts to:

o Make no decision and perform no function at a higher level than can beaccomplished at a more local level. (Subsidiarity )o Conduct all deliberations and make all decisions by bodies and methods which reasonably represent all relevant and affected parties. (Inclusiveness )o Advance the Purpose in accordance with these Principles in ways which enhance the capacity of the community as a whole, as well as that of each Member. (Shared Responsibility )o Transcend institutional and intellectual boundaries and roles that limit or diminish learning. (Openness )

Page 6: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

o Continually conceive, implement and practice governance concepts andprocesses which encourage adaptability, diversity, flexibility andinnovation. (Adaptive Governance)o Use research generated by the community in way that most benefits society. (Intellectual Output )o Open and fairly acknowledge intellectual contribution to Theories,Methods and Practices, both from within and from outside the community. (Acknowledgment )o Contribute to and/or participate in research, capacity building and practice,striving for the highest standards of quality. (Participation and Quality)

The Society for Organizational Learning

Guiding Principles (continued)

Page 7: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Organizing Principles

Organizing Principles (from Visa as a starting guiding reference)

These principles are part of the foundation for the formation of Visa,conceptualized by its founder, Dee Hock. These principles were alsoinstrumental ingredient in the transformation from OLC to SoL. Dee is nowputting them to work in his Chaordic Alliance.

1. It must be equitably owned by all participants. No member should haveintrinsic preferential position. All advantages must result fromindividual ability and initiative.

2. Power and function must be distributed to the maximum degree. Nofunction should be performed by any part of the whole that could reasonablybe done by any more peripheral part, and no power vested in any part thatmight reasonably be exercised by any lesser part.

Page 8: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

3. Governance must be distributive. No individual, institution, and nocombination of either or both should be able to dominate deliberations orcontrol decisions.

4. It must be infinitely malleable yet extremely durable. It should becapable of constant, self-generated, modification of form or functionwithout sacrificing its essential nature or embodied principle.

5. It must embrace diversity and change. It must attract people andinstitutions comfortable with such conditions and provide an environment inwhich they could flourish

The Society for Organizational Learning

Organizing Principles

Page 9: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

Page 10: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Page 11: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Page 12: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society,keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching andeducation to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and byprogressive measures, national and international, to secure their universaland effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of MemberStates themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Page 13: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Society for Organizational Learning fractals

m1m3

m2

m4m5

Society for Organizational fractals are social networks of consensual coordinations of actions on the principles of the Society.

Guiding principlesIn pursuit of this Purpose the members of SoL believe that,

Drive to Learn

Learning is Social

Learning Communities

Aligning with Nature

Core Learning Capabilities

Cross-Organizational Collaboration

Page 14: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The SoL Network

The Society for Organizational is a dynamic network of fractals. The SoL Network involves knowledge creation, distribution and utilization on the purpose and principles of the Society.

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F1

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F2

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F3

Page 15: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL’s quality processThe SoL network self-produces knowledge aimed at improving the quality of the local fractals and the SoL Network. The process of continuous quality improvement generates SoL’s standards.

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F1

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F2

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F3

Page 16: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL Stewardship Network and peer learning relations

The SoL stewardship network is conserved through the process of peer learning relations. Members of local fractals visit other fractals to learn about progress on SoL’s principles and practices. These peer relations are based on inquiry and support and generate the living standards. F2

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F1

m1m3

m2

m4m5

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F3

m3m5

m4

m4

m5

m3

Page 17: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL Stewardship Community

The SoL stewardship fractal is a voluntary social network of local members aimed at conserving and improving the local fractals and the SoL Network. Fractal members do this through their consensual coordination of actions concerning the purpose and principles and practices of SoL.

m4

m3

m5

Page 18: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL Stewardship Circle

The SoL Stewardship Circle is a network with a purpose of conserving the SoL Network through the maintenance of the living standards. The SoL Stewardship Circle is comprised of local “doers” and makes recommendations to the SoL Service Office about constitutional amendments, living standards, annual meetings and resource allocation.

The SoL stewards meet in a stewardship conference. This open space conference would allow them to discuss best practices, emerging standards, schedule peer visits and finally to elect a small number of peers to serve on the Stewardship Circle. The following slide shoes this relationship.

Page 19: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL Stewardship Circle

m4

m3m5

F2

m1 m3m2

m4m5

F1

m1 m3m2

m4m5m1 m3m2

m4m5

F3m3

m5

m4

m4

m5

m3

Stewardship conference

Page 20: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL Service Offices

The SoL Service Offices is a network of SoL members that serves the SoL Network through the management of the constitution, financial resources, quality standards and annual meetings.

The members of the SoL Service Offices have no individual nor collective power. Instead they serve the Stewardship Circle and the network of local fractals. They are nominated by the Stewardship Circle and ratified by the fractals during the annual meeting.

The following slide shows the SoL Network.

Page 21: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

SoL Network

m4

m3m5

F2

m1 m3m2

m4m5

F1

m1 m3m2

m4m5m1 m3m2

m4m5

F3m3

m5

m4

m4

m5

m3

Stewardship conference

m5

m1

m5

m1

SoL Service Offices Stewardship circle

Annual meeting

Dialogue

Page 22: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Bordeaux work session….

In Bordeaux we revised the distributive stewardship option. Two work teams reflections follow.

Page 23: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Bordeaux first work team

The first work team added new definitions….

Peer review is now defined as Participatory Reflection this is a process of shared reflection by two or more fractal members. They reflect on both the local fractal and the SoL Network. Their shared exchange enables the growth of SoL through reflective action.

Membership is now conceived as commitment and engagement that creates a mutual sense of belonging.

Page 24: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

“Belonging” to the SoL Network

ParticipatoryReflection

ReflectiveAction

EnablingStructure(s)

Stewardship

CommitmentEngagement

Page 25: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Bordeaux second work team

The next work team commented on the need to moderate the effects of change on people and revised the stewardship process and graphic…..

Page 26: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

F2

m1m3m2m4m5

F1m1m3m2

m4m5m1 m3m2

m4m5

F3m3m5

m4

m4

m5m3

Left Brain Right

m5

m1

m5

m1

Board of Trustees or CouncilLegal Mgt & Coordination

Annual Meeting

ElectionAction

3 votes/fractal

m4m3

m5

Stewardship circle

EmergingWisdom

SecretariatDialogue

NomCommittee

Stewardshipconference

Identify and Articulate Common Needs

Page 27: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Appendix

Becoming a SoL fractal…. Slide 28-31

Critical relationships…..Slides 32-34

United Nations Human Rights Articles…. Slides 35-51

Page 28: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The birth of a SoL fractal.

m1m3

m2

m4m5

SoL begins in coffee shops, kitchens, company dining halls, etc., as people (Members m1-m5) come together around concerns about sustaining their company, their families, their natural resources or their communities. The beginning is exciting and collaborative. No one is on the “top”, no one is on the “bottom”. The desire to improve upon business, social and natural domains results in people being “willingly obedient to unenforceable obligations.”

Page 29: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Connecting with the SoL Service Office.

m1m3

m2

m4m5

The local fractal contacts the nearest SoL Service Office with a desire to learn more about SoL and to possibly become a member.

m1

m5

m1

SoL Service Office

m3

The SoL Service Office sends out information and “connects” the local fractal with the nearest SoL Steward.

Page 30: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Strengthening relationships

m1m3

m2

m4m5

For two years the local fractal pays nominal dues to cover visits by a SoL steward and to visit other SoL fractals.

m3

During the two years the local fractal and the stewards support one another resulting in alignment around SoL principles and valued accomplishments.

m1m3

m2

m4m5

F2

Page 31: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Becoming a SoL fractal

Upon completion of the 2 year development relationship the local fractal becomes a SoL fractal and enters into the formal SoL relationship as described earlier in this document.

Page 32: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Critical relationships

Peer review……The peer review process is a learning process resulting in a reciprocal judgment. The review consists of sharing local values, activities and accomplishments with a SoL steward. The SoL steward shares SoL Network principles, activities and accomplishments with the local fractal. This results in a reciprocal judgment regarding whether or not the local fractal is aligned with the principles of the SoL Network When alignment occurs the local fractal and the SoL Network begin a process of collaboration.

Page 33: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Critical relationships

Stewardship……The stewardship relation provides the glue that bonds the SoL network. Stewards are SoL members with: (1) a history of practice exemplifying SoL’s principles in their local fractal, (2) a desire to serve the SoL Network, (3) a capacity to travel to visit other SoL fractals and (4) a capacity to coordinate and collaborate with other stewards to improve the quality of the SoL Network. The process of coordination and collaboration creates the Stewardship Circle.

Page 34: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

Critical relationships

SoL Service Offices……The SoL Service Office exists only at the members request. It’s only function is to connect the SoL Network through communication processes. It has no authority nor owns any property

Page 35: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 1.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Page 36: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Article 3.

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Page 37: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 6.

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Page 38: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Article 9.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

Page 39: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Page 40: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 13.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Page 41: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 15.

(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

Page 42: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Page 43: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Page 44: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Article 21.

(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Page 45: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 22.

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

Page 46: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Page 47: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Article 25.

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Page 48: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Article 26.

(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

Page 49: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

Page 50: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)Article 28.

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

Page 51: Distributive stewardship Draft 3 1 December 1999 Prepared by: Dennis Sandow

The Society for Organizational Learning

Ethical Principles (continued)

(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.