11
Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska

Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska

Thomas TantonT2 & AssociatesJune 17, 2010

Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Page 2: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

SummarySummary

• Technologies for DG and CHP– Types of Prime Movers– Sizes and Costs– Applications– Efficiency Improvements

• Fuels of Local Nature

• Infrastructure Benefits

Page 3: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

What is Combined Heat and Power?What is Combined Heat and Power?

Page 4: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Prime MoversPrime Movers

• Reciprocating engines (5 kW-7 MW) 

• Combustion turbines (500 kW-25 MW) 

• Microturbines(25-500 kW) 

• Backpressure Steam Turbines (50 kW and up)

• Fuel cells (1 kW-10 MW)

Page 5: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Reciprocating EnginesReciprocating Engines• Currently Typical Village

Application– Familiarity and Maint.

Knowledge Infrastructure– ‘Easily’ Converted to

Capture Heat– ‘Easily’ Converted to

Alternative Fuel (e.g. biogas or biodiesel)

• Can Be Noisy• Depending on Size

~$2500-5000/kw• Often Used in Alaska to

“firm” wind• Fast but Not Immediate

Response• Moderate Thermal to

Electric

Page 6: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

TurbinesTurbines

• Range in Size from ~250kW to multi-megawatt

• High quality heat for recovery

• Approx. $1800-5000/kW: bigger cheaper

• ~50% simple cycle efficiency

Page 7: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Fuel CellsFuel Cells

• Highest Available Efficiency (~65% elec. only)

• $4000-10,000/kw• Depending on Cell Type

Low Levels of High Quality Heat

• Need for Trained Personnel

• Silent • Power Conditioning

Weak Link

Page 8: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Materials Recovery Facility (MRF)

Recycled Goods

Post-Recycling Residuals

Municipal & Industrial

Solid Waste (MSW)

Gate Receive/Reject:

Green Waste, HHW,

White Goods & Metals

One Example of Local Sourced FuelsOne Example of Local Sourced Fuels

1

Rejected Loads: Refuse /Return

Final Land Disposal

Woody WasteC&D

MRF Sorting

Lines

Clean Organics

Compost & Mulch

Bio-Fuel

CommoditiesMarkets

6

ADC7

9

10

11

5

Emissions: Air & Water

19

Sanitary Landfill(SLF)

Extraction

8

2

3

412

16

17

18

Flare

Energy MarketsGeneration13

14

Loss15

20

21

22

23

24

Energy Input

Page 9: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Alaska OpportunitiesAlaska Opportunities

• Biomass and Fish Processing waste prevalent

• Some of the easiest to gasify for use in any prime mover (fuel cells req. cleanup more than others)

• With CCHP, fish processers can be more self sufficient wrt energy

Page 10: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

Infrastructure BenefitsInfrastructure Benefits

• DE can ensure greater power quality, reduce vulnerability of the grid, and increase self sufficiency.

• Reduce Infrastructure costs—less TL

• Reduce Infrastructure Vulnerability

• Retrofit Existing village engines to district heat

Page 11: Distributed Generation and CCCHP for Alaska Thomas Tanton T 2 & Associates June 17, 2010 Business of Clean Energy in Alaska

SummarySummary

• Use of Expanded and Retrofit Distributed CCHP Provides Dramatic Efficiency Improvements and Improved Vulnerability

• Many Villages would Benefit from Retrofitting to District Heat

• Alaska’s biomass and fishery industry provide excellent feedstocks for expanded DG