Upload
helen-farmer
View
220
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dissertation Presentation
Thomas Cox RNDoctoral Candidate
Virginia Commonwealth University
School of NursingApril 7, 2004
http://www.standarderrors.org/
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Who Am I and What Did I Do?
NurseSocial Worker
Mathematician/Statistician
Dissertation research: “Risk Induced Professional Caregiver Despair: A Unitary Appreciative Inquiry” – Unitary Appreciative Inquiry with eight RNs into the impact of capitation contracts, managed care, DRGs on registered nurses working in acute care hospitals in the Mid-Atlantic area.
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
What Will I Cover Today?
Background and Research Themes
Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk
Study Design, Recruitment, & Interviews
General Findings
Nursing Surplus (NS)
Implications
Questions - Answers
Future Directions
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
My Background
Nursing
Social Work
Health and Social Services Planning
Statistics/Biostatistics
Program Evaluation
Education
Actuarial Science and Risk Theory
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Persistent ThemesClients’ rights to receive mandated services
Who are clients?State hospital patientsNursing clientsStudents
Ability of caregivers to give high quality care
Who are professional caregivers?NursesMDsSocial workersTeachers…
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
The Rights of Clients to Receive ServicesTHE BEGINNINGS
Experiences
Suffolk County Dept of Social Services and VISTA
Providing services to clients
Quasi-legal advocacy for clients
Reflection, Conceptualization and Theory Generation:Cox, TH (1976). Denial of services in public agencies: A white collar crime. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Sociological Research Symposium of the Alpha Kappa Delta Sociological Honor Society (Eds. Hickey PD, Nelson LD, Schwartzbaum AM, Westerberg NR & Williams JS) pp 401-8, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
The Rights of Clients to Receive ServicesExperiences
CSH & VCUHS
Sharing experiences with numerous RNs, Admins, AHPs
Dissertation research
Reflection, Conceptualization and Theory Generation:Cox, T. September 2002: Professional caregiver insurance risk and average cost based reimbursement plans: Implications for nursing. Advancing Nursing Practice Excellence: State of the Science, Washington, D.C.
Cox, T. April, 2004: Risk induced professional caregiver despair: A unitary appreciative inquiry.
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
If Nightingale were here now…
Would Nightingale think that “profit sharing”, “risk sharing”, “capitation contracts”, and “DRGs” were good ways to fund nursing services and manage hospitals and health care services?
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
If Nightingale were here now…
Would Nightingale think that “profit sharing”, “risk sharing”, “capitation contracts”, and “DRGs” were good ways to fund nursing services and manage hospitals and health care services?
I don’t think so…
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Why are?There so many HCO consolidationsCalifornia MDs retreating from CCsPts feeling abandonedRNs working mandatory OTThere fewer supplies on unitsPt care standards different w/in same hospitalHCOs profitable when RNs think care is poorSo many temp staff on nursing unitsSo many people uninsured/uninsurableThere shortages of RNs & satisfying RN roles
RNs crying/despairing
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk
Myth: Carving up aggregated insurance policies and redistributing them to health providers will adequately fund health services
Perpetual Motion Machines Require “No Friction”
What are insurance risk transfers: CCs, DRGs, HMOs, MCOs
Insurance risk transfers also occur in budgeted nursing units
PCIR transfers turn MDs & RNs into insurance claims personnel
At average levels of funding – half of patient’s needs will not be met
Insurance analogy new insights into nursing management
We must address and deal with PCIR because nurses do
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
How Insurance Transfers Reduce Resources
The Normal CurveCentral Limit Theorem and the Law of Large Numbers
Inverse relationship of sampling theory – the smaller the collection of insureds the less precise the estimated costs
If insurer distributes insureds to 20 providers – they each have much higher probability of high losses or profits
To protect themselves from loss – providers must target service costs below those assumed in insurer’s premiums
The situation gets worse when we get down to 20-30 clients on the nursing unit or 2 – 8 clients for one RN
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Comparison of VariabilityLarge Sample v Small Sample
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
0 .0 5
0 .1
0 .1 5
0 .2
0 .2 5
0 .3
0 .3 5
0 .4
0 .4 5
Variability Comparison - Small v Large Sample
Large
Small
Large Sample SD
Pro
ba
bil
ity
De
nsi
ty F
un
cti
on
Comparison of VariabilityCaregiver v Insurer
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
0
0 .0 5
0 .1
0 .1 5
0 .2
0 .2 5
0 .3
0 .3 5
0 .4
0 .4 5
Variability Comparison - Insurer v Caregiver
Insurer
Caregiver
Insurers SD
Pro
ba
bil
ity
De
nsi
ty F
un
cti
on
Table 1Risk and Relative Risk of Losses on Portfolios for Health Care Providers versusInsurers When 5% of the Insurer Portfolio is Transferred to a Health Care Provider
0.85 0.5000 0.5000 1.00000.87 0.3446 0.4644 1.34800.89 0.2119 0.4290 2.02500.91 0.1151 0.3942 3.42600.93 0.0548 0.3603 6.57400.95 0.0228 0.3274 14.38900.97 0.0082 0.2958 36.07800.99 0.0026 0.2656 103.95501.00 0.0013 0.2512 186.0540
Assumptions:
Loss ratios distributed as N(0.85, 0.05)
5% of Insurer portfolio is randomly distributed to provider
Insurer Loss for Full Portfolio
Insurer Risk of Greater Loss:
Provider Risk of Greater Loss:
Relative Risk of Provider Loss v. Insurer Loss
Table 1Risk and Relative Risk of Losses on Portfolios for Health Care Providers versusInsurers When 5% of the Insurer Portfolio is Transferred to a Health Care Provider
0.85 0.5000 0.5000 1.00001.00 0.0013 0.2512 186.0540
Assumptions:
Loss ratios distributed as N(0.85, 0.05)
5% of Insurer portfolio is randomly distributed to provider
Insurer Loss for Full Portfolio
Insurer Risk of Greater Loss:
Provider Risk of Greater Loss:
Relative Risk of Provider Loss v. Insurer Loss
Specific Research Objectives
Understanding the lives of professional caregivers experiencing risk induced professional caregiver despair through their individual and collective voices;
Discovering experiences, perceptions, and expressions of professional caregivers about possible strategies they believe would generally improve their professional lives.
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
MethodUnitary appreciative inquiry – Cowling
Praxis method within Rogers’s science of unitary human beings
Action Research
Collaborative, cooperative, appreciative inquiry (Cooperrider & Srivastva and Heron & Reason)
Research ‘with’ participants rather than ‘on’ participants
Interview participants & collaborate to develop appreciative profiles
Appreciative profiles are narrative interpretations of the experiences perceptions, and expressions of participants
Four specific forms of knowledge: experiential, presentational, propositional, and practical
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Recruitment & Description of Participants
15 inquiries and 8 RN participants employed at acute care hospitals in the Mid-Atlantic area
Self-describe as experiencing risk-induced professional caregiver despair
Flyers, word of mouth, referrals from participants and colleagues, website, LSs, presentations
Meet 1+ times
Interview lengths of 25 mins – 3+ hours + phone calls & email exchanges to clarify experiences and work on appreciative profiles
7 Females - 1 Male RN
OR, Psych, Transplant/Oncology, Maternity/Peds, Med-Surg, Agency RN
Time employed in Nursing: 1+ - 22 yrs; Ave Age:45 (Range 37-51)Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Findings
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Carol
20+ years experience in OR settings
Married with two children
Shared information quite unexpected by the researcher
Revealed that resource shortages, poor staffing, and deficient equipment and supplies affected employees and clients alike
New, multi-facility contract for acquisition of supplies from a company several hours distant was having a negative effect on the quality and availability of supplies contributed heavily to this researcher’s development of the theory of professional caregiver insurance risk and nursing surplus
Inadequate surgical equipment and supplies and non-functional protective drapes
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
DeborahEntered nursing in her 30s - Oncology nurse, married, FNP student
Increasingly concerned about declining standards of care, reduced #s of oncology certified nurses at work, use of non-oncology trained nurses, and rise of an overly punitive employment environment
Candide: satire by Voltaire (1960/1759). Dr. Pangloss suggests that the world is the best it can be despite the horrible experiences of Candide that suggest otherwise. She feels that people around her, particularly administrators act as though the standard of nursing care is the best it could be
This philosophy prevails in her nursing unit despite the fact that supplies are scarce, equipment is misused or unavailable, staffing is inadequate, nurse’s legitimate concerns are ignored, clients and nurses safety is compromised in favor of cutting costs, and that the care of her clients is routinely compromised
Recycled pillows and patient mix issues Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Gloria
Associate degree oncology and transplant nurse
RN for more than ten years
One of the most compelling stories related by any participant, and among the most vivid and memorable experiences of the researcher
Contributed important understandings about inadequate supplies and staffing, and declining care
Profoundly influenced the researcher’s work on professional caregiver insurance risk and risk induced professional caregiver despair
Inadequate supply schedules, failures in central pool staffing, impact of temp and agency personnel…
Most important contribution – disparities between staffing, supply, and administrative support between different units in the same organization
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Findings – Cross-Case Themes
Scarcity of material resources and equipment; Staffing quality and quantity – float, temp, agency; Compromised client care and physical plant environmental quality; Relationships with and support from other units in the hospital; Mixed populations of clients;Support from and responsiveness of nursing managers and nursing execs;Workflow and documentation concerns;Dealing with insurance companies and the claims management role;Financial information at the bedside and PCIR;Use of national or regional data as benchmarks for individual hospitals;Documentation and monitoring the status of nursing surplus;Client advocacy in the PCIR environment;Pre-qualification and the nursing ethics of differential care
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Impaired Insurers and Nursing UnitsInsurers stay viable when they have redundant resources & other regulations limit them from operating with inadequate resources
But insurers do go bankrupt…
How are experiences nurses face like insurers headed to insolvency?
Increased acuity on units (Lax underwriting standards)
Decreased staffing/resources (Inadequate Surplus)
Greater mix of clients (Inappropriate class plans)
Reduced length of stay (Short-term, high-risk policies)
Inadequate assessment of needs (Understated reserves)
Loss of experienced staff (Solid assets Junk bonds)
Temporary staff (Volatile assets)
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Questions - Answers
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Nursing Surplus IssuesInsurance companies monitor and report solvency continuously
(Current liquid assets – Estimated liabilities) > 0
Because risk transfers to health providers reduce money available for services – health providers become cost-conscious - interfering with quality, efficiency, nursing surplus & nursing ethics/values:
Local medical supply service Distant supply facilitiesWell-maintained unit supplies Central storage
Regular staffing schedules q 4-hour, transient workersTime to maintain unit Inadequate time to meet basic needsOperating critical service Product line/Manufacturing opsRNs indifferent to cost RNs balance financial/clinical ethicsPublic health capability Inadequate emergency resources
RNs able to plan shift activities q 4 shifting changes patients
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Nursing Surplus AdequacyHow often should a nursing unit be able to meet greater than average demand?
25%, 50%, 75%, 90%, 95%…?
Nurses need redundant: supplies, equipment, medical, professional & housekeeping staff to meet unexpected demands – the usual
Evaluate NS for each shift and unit – not the organization:Mix of staff and patientsEquipment and supplies on the unitFit of patients assigned to staff/unitSpecific skills and abilities of RNsRN status – overtime, end of week, start of weekAbility of organization to shift resources on demand
Is each shift/unit adequately resourced or only ‘on average’?
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Nursing Surplus InadequacyRNs reported inadequate resources, q 4-hour staffing, inappropriate clients, unfamiliar staff, & dangerous conditions
Nursing surplus diminished when resources are inadequate, personnel are not familiar with patients’ needs, equipment, policies & resources, and RNs cannot count on supplies or co-workers
Organizations increase Nursing surplus when:
RNs’ needs are the optimization focusPatients are assigned to RNs able to care for themServices & resources are seamlessly availablePolicies/procedures are rational, efficient & realisticManagers & executives manage variability
Insurers cannot sustain operations without surplus and nursing units cannot deliver quality care with inadequate nursing surplus
Thinking of nursing units ‘as’ insurers highlights vulnerabilitiesCopyright 2004 Thomas Cox
NNN, MIS and NS
Assess nursing surplus: What was done, needs to be done, what resources are available/missing, how to fix it…
NNN/MIS - What RNs did/should have done, what the result was – how nursing surplus was used and will be used
NNN/MIS – forecast what should happen next – assess staffing and resources in real time – are resources adequate now – if not – fix it!
NNN, Nursing surplus & MIS tie what was & what needs to be with the ability of RNs & units to meet the routine AND unexpected
Accountability/visibility: Expose care impediments due to persistent, hidden, and correctable situations
NNN, MIS & nursing surplus may reduce the burden on managers and executives to take unpopular stands – data speaks for itself
Nursing surplus is an ‘objective’ statement of capacity to ‘care’Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
The Future IDevelop MIS designed for RN’s needs – monitoring, maintaining, and building nursing surplus
Support RNs management of clinical & insurance risks - timely & accurate analyses assessing past, present & future nursing surplus
MIS design determines the character, utility, quality, quantity, & availability of critical nursing surplus management data
New tools for projecting costs and demands RNs need to win budget skirmishes and avoid standing alone
How to incorporate national data in projecting local experience?
New training needs for RNs in rapidly changing environments?
How well do RNs and health care organizations fulfil their insurance claims functions?How well do RNs balance the conflicting demands of the dual role?Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
The Future IIImpact of PCIR on:
People of race/colorGenderPeople with disabilitiesSevere and persistent mental illnessChronic v acute illnessRural v Urban settingsInsurance mechanisms and insurabilityElderly populationsCommunity v hospital careFunding of nursing services, nursing, and nurses
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
The Future IIINursing practice models – opportunities and hazards:
Clinical Nurse Leaders
Will nurses take the opportunity to create lower cost, higher quality alternatives to the current health care system?
What skills will they need?What opportunities will exist?How will they alter nursing practice?How will they manage nursing services more effectively?
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
Sobering ThoughtsWhen RNs, NPs, and MDs function in dual roles as clinical decision makers and insurance claims agents it eventually comes down to a health care professional addressing these questions:
For the client I am serving right now, will I put my job on the line as an advocate for more and higher quality care if my employer may bear the costs?
Can I separate out the right of this client to receive service and recognize that some clients require far greater care than average and that my treatment of this client will affect my treatment of my next client?
The strength of insurance claims management is that insurance claims personnel have no conflicted loyalties, do not know the client, and are handling many claims every day – not true when health care providers enter the insurance business. Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox
http://www.standarderrors.org/
Copyright 2004 Thomas Cox