Upload
zeeshan-hussain
View
108
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CURCUMIN AND PYRUVATE KINASE
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPO SE:
Previous studies have identified Curcumin as having anticancer and anti-inflammatory effects, as well as,
being a kinase inhibitor. In contrast, we found stimulation of pyruvate kinase activity with Curcumin.
EXPERI MENTAL APPROAC H:
Homogenised rat l iver used in pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase coupled enzyme assay both
with and without the presence of Curcumin.
KEY RESULTS:
Curcumin was found to have a stimulatory effect on pyruvate kinase in most of the assays but in some it
was seen as an inhibitory effect this may have been a fluke or the age of the samples may have affected
the results.
CONCLUSI ONS AND I MPLI CATI ONS:
Initial hypothesis rejected, Curcumin could stil l have anticancer effects via the metabolic pathway but
possibly by increasing the pyruvate produced to activate pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase.
I NTRODUCTI ON
Pyruvate kinase (PK) is a an enzyme involved in glycolysis, with phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)
being the substrate and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) the co-factor, which catalyses the
transfer of a phosphoryl group from the PEP to the ADP to generate one pyruvate and one
adenosine triphosphate (ATP) molecule. Belonging to the pyruvate kinase family there are four
forms of pyruvate kinase in humans depending on the metabolic requirements of the tissue –
M1, M2, L and R, M standing for muscle, L for liver and R for red blood cell , which are encoded
by two separate genes (PK-M AND PK-LR) and expressed in a tissue specific manner (Zanella et
al., 2007). The PK-LR gene, located on chromosome 1 (1q21) codes for the L form of pyruvate
kinase which is found in the liver. In mammalian cells PK activity may be regulated by two
mechanisms; one at the level of gene expression and the second through allosteric regulation.
The enzymes substrate, PEP, and fructose 1, 6-bisphosphate act as enhancers of its activity by
causing a conformational change by changing the orientation of the tetramers by 29 degrees
to change the enzyme from its T – tense – state to the R – relaxed – state (Valentine et al.,
2000).PK is the final enzyme in the glycolysis pathway and is regarded as being critical in the
regulation of glycolysis because of its inhibition by ATP and Acetyl-CoA. PK is thought to have a
large role in cancer metabolism, particularly the PKM2 isomer, it is currently being considered
for rigorous research for various types of cancers.
Scientific interest in medicinal plants has increased considerably over the last decade, making
many efforts to find out if there really is a beneficial effect from the secondary metabolite
phytochemicals derived from these plants and if so how they work. Curcumin
(Diferuloylmethane) a derivative of turmeric, is one of the best studied natural
phytochemicals. Turmeric is derived from the Curcuma longa plant and is used commonly in
Asia for flavouring, food preservation, as a dye, as well as, being used for health care. . Recent
research from the western science has also found beneficial effects on health. These range
from the skin (Nguyen & Friedman, 2013), gastrointestinal systems (Cao et al., 2013), liver
disorders and even cancer (Rivera-Espinoza & Muriel, 2009). Curcumin has been shown to
have an inhibitory effect on a range of proteins from kinases (Liu et al., 1993) (Mahmmoud,
2006) to transcription factors (Choi et al., 2006). Fluorescence emission tests have shown that
the pyrazole ring on Curcumin and the hydroxyl and carboxyl groups present form hydrogen
bonds with the protein residues on the various proteins (Das et al., 2011).
In this study the effects of adding Curcumin to a pyruvate kinase assay were observed, which
showed a stimulatory effect, this being in disagreement with other similar studies showing
inhibitory effects of Curcumin on a range of kinase enzymes (Liu et al., 1993) from protein
kinase C to pyruvate kinase (Das et al., 2011) (Mahmmoud, 2006) )Wong et al., 2008).
Essentially the data from this study disagree with the proposed idea that Curcumin can inhibit
the activity of pyruvate kinase and may therefore have a possible basis in cancer treatment.
MATERI ALS AND METHODS
RAT LI VER HOMOGENI SATI ON
The pH 7.5 homogenisation buffer contained 50 mM tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Tris
HCl), 0.25 M Sucrose, 1.0 mM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.15 mM potassium
chloride and 1 mM of Dithiothreitol (DTT).
The whole liver was quickly removed from the rat and divided by four, this was then whilst
constantly being kept on ice to prevent any decaying of the tissue. The four different
homogenates produced were used as counterweights for the centrifuge. First centrifuge was
carried out at 4000xg for 10 mins. The supernatant fluid was collected then centrifuged again
at 13000xg for 15 minutes. The second supernatant fluid was collected and frozen to be used
for the enzymatic assay.
BRADFORD REAGENT.
The concentration of the protein in the supernatant was measured using the method of
Bradford (1976) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) used as the standard
PYRUVATE KI NASE ASSAY
The assay was performed essentially as described by Worthington Biochemical Corporation.
The assay was altered slightly bringing the final volume down to 1ml from 3ml. The assay
medium contained 0.05 M Imidazole⋅HCl buffer, pH 7.6, containing 0.12 M potassium chloride
and 0.062 M magnesium sulphate, 45 mM Adenosine diphosphate, 45 mM
Phosphoenolpyruvate, 6.6 mM NADH, and diluted lactate dehydrogenase at a concentration of
1300-1400 units/ml in the imidazole buffer. These solution were then used to make the
following preparations
To prepare the Curcumin solution a 2.7 mM solution was produced using 10ml ethanol and
10mg pure Curcumin
RESULTS
DATA COMPARI SON FROM AVERAGE DATA OF ALL FOUR WEEKS
Table 1 - Average Moles per min produced from all four weeks
PEP (mM) No Curcumin (M/min) Curcumin (M/min)
2.64 0.041 0.069
3.96 0.051 0.094
5.28 0.061 0.109
6.6 0.068 0.132
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 2 - Km and Vmax for the average data of all four weeks
No Curcumin Curcumin
Km (µM) 0.1242 0.3262
Vmax (mM/min) 37.45 68.00
An average was calculated from both sets of all four weeks’ worth of data and used to produce
a Michaelis-Menten and a Lineweaver-Burk plot. The data were normally distributed (P=0.956)
and a paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare the effects of no Curcumin and
Curcumin. There was a significant difference in the production of pyruvate for no Curcumin
(M=0.055, SD=0.011) and Curcumin (M=0.101, SD=0.026) conditions; t (3) =-6.165, p = 0.009.
These results suggest that Curcumin does have a statistically significant effect on pyruvate
kinase activity.
ANOVA OF THE FOUR WEEKS OF NO CURCUMI N D ATA
Table 3 - Moles per min produced from all four weeks - control
PEP (mM) Week 1 (M/min) Week 2 (M/min) Week 3 (M/min) Week 4 (M/min)
2.64 0.036 0.035 0.038 0.056
3.96 0.037 0.035 0.040 0.093
5.28 0.049 0.049 0.041 0.106
6.6 0.061 0.056 0.048 0.108
A one-way between subjects ANOVA was conducted to compare the effect of time on the
substrate produced by pyruvate kinase, a time of one week between each sample. There was a
significant effect of time on substrate produced (F (3, 12) = 10.466, p = 0.001). Tukey post-hoc
comparisons of the four sets of results indicates that the fourth week results (M = 0.090,
SD=0.024) gave significantly different moles per min than the data from the other three weeks,
week 1 (M=0.045, SD= 0.011), week 2 (M=0.043, SD=0.010, week 3 (M=0.041, SD=0.004). The
comparison between the other three weeks were not statistically significant (P=>0.05)
ANOVA OF THE FOUR WEEKS OF CURCUMI N DATA
Table 4 - Moles per min produced from all four weeks - Curcumin
PEP (mM) Week 1 (M/min) Week 2 (M/min) Week 3 (M/min) Week 4 (M/min)
2.64 0.135 0.046 0.046 0.050
3.96 0.143 0.127 0.049 0.056
5.28 0.165 0.132 0.056 0.084
6.6 0.193 0.142 0.096 0.096
A one-way between subjects ANOVA was conducted to compare the effect of time on the
substrate produced by pyruvate kinase, a time of one week between each sample. There was a
significant effect of time on substrate produced (F (3, 12) = 8.583, p = 0.003). Tukey post-hoc
comparisons of the four sets of results indicates that the first week results (M = 0.159,
SD=0.026) gave significantly different moles per min than the data from weeks three and four,
week 3 (M=0.061, SD=0.023, week 4 (M=0.071, SD=0.002). The comparison between the other
three weeks were not statistically significant (P=>0.05)
DATA COMPARI SON FROM ONLY WEEK 4 DATA
Table 5 - Moles per min produced from week four supernatant
PEP (mM) No Curcumin (M/min) Curcumin (M/min)
2.64 0.056 0.050
3.96 0.093 0.056
5.28 0.106 0.084
6.6 0.108 0.096
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 6 - Km and Vmax for the data from week 4 only
No Curcumin Curcumin
Km (µM) 0.2335 0.4019
Vmax (mM/min) 47.28 143.3
The results from week 4 were used to produce a Michaelis-Menten and a Lineweaver-Burk
plot. The data were normally distributed (P=0.766) and a paired-samples t-test was conducted
to compare the effects of no Curcumin and Curcumin. There was no significant difference in
the production of pyruvate for no Curcumin (M=0.090, SD=0.024) and Curcumin (M=0.071,
SD=0.022) conditions; t (3) =2.841, p = 0.066. These results suggest that Curcumin does not
have a statistically significant effect on pyruvate kinase activity
DI SCUSSI ON
By using a tried and tested pyruvate kinase assay evidence has been provided to show that
Curcumin does have an interaction with the enzyme but this particular experiment suggests
that Curcumin leads to an increase in the activity of the enzyme and therefore the activity of
glycolysis. When looking at figure 1 and 2, which show an average of all 4 weeks’ worth of
results, it can be seen that in the presence of Curcumin a stimulatory effect can be seen with
the rate of reaction almost doubling at the higher concentration of PEP (control M= 0.068,
Curcumin M= 0.132) and these results were seen to be significantly different based on a paired
t test. It is also seen that the Km and Vmax increase in the presence of Curcumin as seen in
table 1. However, when the results from the most recent supernatant sample , week 4, were
looked at an inhibitory effect could be seen across the board, from the lowest PEP
concentration (control M=0056. Curcumin M=0.050) through to the highest (control M=0.108
Curcumin M=0.096), however, these results were not seen to be significantly different when a
t test was carried out. The age of the samples which range from a month old to a week old
seem to have a statistically significant effect on the rate of reaction as seen from the results of
the ANOVA and the Tukeys post hoc test which indicate that the results from week 4 are
statistically different to the results of weeks 1, 2 and 3. Due to the results of the ANOVA it was
deemed important to carry out the Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk plot just for week
4 which can be seen in figure 5 and 7 and 6 and 8 respectively. For week 4 it can be seen that
the inhibitory effect of Curcumin can be seen throughout the different concentrations as
opposed to just at high concentrations as seen in the 4 week average on the direct results, but
the graphs again show an increase in Km and Vmax as can be seen in table 6.
The main issue with the results from this experiment was that there were no repeats carried
out, although the four different weeks can in essence be regarded as repeats they were
essentially from different livers and therefore could have a different concentration of protein
in the enzyme so it can’t really be seen as a repeat, the idea to do repeats was there but
because of the issue with oxidisation of the NADH it wasn’t possible to do these and make the
results more reliable and judge their accuracy based on their similarity.
This decrease in the activity of pyruvate kinase in week 4 in comparison to week 1 could be
explained by the findings of Katunuma et al. (1972) of a class of group specific proteinases
which attack enzymes via proteolysis, hydrolysing the peptide bonds which link the amino
acids of the protein together. These proteinases if functional below the temperature at which
the samples were frozen could account for the loss of activity. It is also possible that a more
simple reason maybe the cause of this change in activity, the alteration of the water
environment could have caused an irreversible conformational change in the protein leading
to a loss of activity (Cryer and Bartley, 1974). To test the significance of this idea in the future it
is suggested that a test with a fresh sample be carried out also.
The use of ethanol could also have influenced the results. The effect of alcohol on the liver is
well documented so it would be important to consider the effects of it when it is used in an
experiment. Ethanol is a small molecule which may interact with different proteins and not
necessarily with alcohol dehydrogenase. In rats it was shown to change the expression levels
of 646 different genes within 3 hours of admission (Li et al., 2010). In general, glycolysis is
thought to be inhibited indirectly during alcohol consumption. The metabolism of ethanol is
such that the end product is Acetyl-CoA as can be seen in figure 9. This results in most of the
Acetyl-CoA entering the citric acid cycle to be derived from ethanol rather than glucose. It is
thought that Acetyl-CoA is a pyruvate kinase inhibitor and this therefore may have had a role
in the inhibition seen in the lower PEP/higher Curcumin concentration in the results seen in
the average and across the board in just week 4. To see if this is true it would be apt to repeat
the test using just ethanol and no Curcumin to see if these results correlate.
Figure 9
The effects of Curcumin have been found to be remarkably similar to the drug dichloroacetate
(DCA) but without the harmful side effects which accompany the drug such as nerve, kidney
and liver damage, as well as, impaired heart and immune function (bonnet et al., 2007)(Wong
et al., 2008). There are major changes in the way cancer cells produce energy for themselves in
comparison to normal healthy cells. Normal cells use mitochondria which carry out oxidative
phosphorylation, which, as the name suggests, require oxygen, giving rise to a maximum of 36
molecules of ATP. Cancer cells on the other hand utilise just glycolysis, rendering the
mitochondria useless, and produce just two molecules of ATP. This is called the Warburg
effect, as described by Otto Warburg in 1956. In cancer cells, the enzyme pyruvate
dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) is more active than in normal cells because of the high presence
of ATP, it uses this ATP to phosphorylate the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase , a complex of
three enzyme which convert pyruvate to Acetyl-CoA with the help of coenzyme A and NAD.
Curcumin and DCA are found to inhibit PDK as opposed to activate it, allowing for pyruvate to
be converted to Acetyl-CoA and continue down the oxidative phosphorylation pathway and
allowing the mitochondria to work effectively. DCA activating the enzyme directly and
Curcumin, indirectly, by behaving as an activator for pyruvate kinase and increasing the
Ethanol
Acetaldehyde
Acetic Acid
Acetyl-CoA
Alcohol Dehydrogenase
Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenase
Acetyl CoA synthase-1
production of pyruvate which is one of the inhibitory molecule for PDK. The mitochondria is
seen as the primary regulator of apoptosis. Many pro-apoptotic signals gather at the
mitochondria and are stored there, being prevented to leave by the membrane permeability of
the mitochondria. The pro-apoptotic molecules released from the mitochondria include:
cytochrome c, caspase, the second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC), apoptosis-
inducing factor (AIF) and endonuclease G (Gulbins et al., 2003). In the last two decades it has
been found that the mitochondria from cancer cells are resistant against the induction of
mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation (MOMP), a process which mediates the
intrinsic pathway of apoptosis (Green and Kroemer, 2004.) This is most likely just because the
mitochondria are inactive in cancer cells, if they can be reactivated it is possible that they
could carry out the programmed cell death as they should and therefore kill the cancer cells.
This warrants further research into the indirect effects of Curcumin on the enzyme PDK in
cancer cells as opposed to normal cells to see if the ideas suggested above do have any
scientific significance.
In the future because this assay is expensive to run it might be worth trying it in a micro titre
plate, but this leads to the other issue that the actual reaction occurs very quickly , so unless a
way can be thought of to counteract the issue of the speed, the cost may just have to be
absorbed for the assay. It is also worth trying a run without Curcumin present to see if ethanol
itself has an effect on the reaction.
CONCLUSI ON
The experiment didn’t agree with the original hypothesis that Curcumin has an inhibitory
effect on pyruvate kinase and therefore cancer, on the contrary it worked as an activator for
the enzyme. It did shed light on the activation being more important in the prevention of
cancer by possibly inducing apoptosis by activating the mitochondria rather than using
inhibition to starve the cancer cells.
BI BLI OGRAPHY
Bonnet S, Archer SL, Allalunis-Turner J,
Haromy A, Beaulieu C, Thompson R, Lee
CT, Lopaschuk GD, Puttagunta L, Bonnet S,
Harry G, Hashimoto K, Porter CJ, Andrade
MA, Thebaud B, Michelakis ED. 2007. A
Mitochondria-K+ Channel Axis Is
Suppressed in Cancer and Its Normalization
Promotes Apoptosis and Inhibits Cancer
Growth. Cancer cell, 11 (1), 37-51
Bradford, MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive
for the quantitation of microgram
quantities of protein utilizing the principle
of protein-dye binding. Analytical
Biochemistry 72, 248-254.
Cao A, Li Q, Yin P, Dong Y, Shi H, Wang L, Ji
G, Xie J, Wu D, 2013, Curcumin induces
apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma AGS
cells and colon carcinoma HT-29 cells
through mitochondrial dysfunction and
endoplasmic reticulum stress. Apoptosis.
18(11), 1391-402.
Choi H, Chun YS, Kim SW, Kim MS, Park JW.
2006. Curcumin inhibits hypoxia-inducible
factor-1 by degrading aryl hydrocarbon
receptor nuclear translocator: A
mechanism of tumor growth inhibition.
Mol Pharmacol 70: 1664–1671.
Cryer A, Bartley W. 1974. The effect of
storage on enzyme activities in tissues.
Biochem J. 144(3): 433–434.
Das J, Pany S, Panchal S, Majhi A, Rahman
GM. 2011. Binding of isoxazole and
pyrazole derivatives of Curcumin with the
activator binding domain of novel protein
kinase C. Bioorganic & Medicinal
Chemistry. 19(21), 6192-6202
Green DR, Kroemer G. 2004. The
pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell
death. Science. 305(5684), 626-9.
Gulbins E, Dreschers S, Bock J. 2003. Role
of mitochondria in apoptosis. Experimental
Physiology, 88, 85-90.
Katunuma N, Katsunuma T, Kominami E,
Sazuki K, Hamaguchi Y, Chichibu K,
Kobayashi K, Shiotaui T. 1972. Advanced
Enzyme Regulation, Biochem J, 11, 37-51
Li J, Bardag-Gorce F, Oliva J, Dedes J,
French BA, French SW. 2010. Gene
expression modifications in the liver
caused by binge drinking and S-
adenosylmethionine feeding. The role of
epigenetic changes, Genes Nut, 5, 169-179.
Liu JY, Lin SJ, Lin JK. 1993. Inhibitory effects
of curcumin on protein kinase C activity
induced by 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-
13- acetate in NIH 3T3 cells. Carcinogenesis
14: 857–861.
Mahmmoud YA. 2006. Modulation of
protein kinase C by curcumin; inhibition
and activation switched by calcium ions. J
Pharmacol. 150(2), 200–208.
Nguyen TA, Friedman AJ, 2013, Curcumin:
a novel treatment for skin-related
disorders. J Drugs Dermatol, 12(10), 1131-
7.
Rivera-Espinoza Y, Muriel P, 2009,
Pharmacological actions of curcumin in
liver diseases or damage. Liver Int. 29(10),
1457-66.
Valentini G, Chiarelli L, Fortin R, Speranza
ML, Galizzi A, Mattevi A. 2000. The
Allosteric Regulation of Pyruvate Kinase. J.
Biol. Chem.275, 18145-18152
Warburg O. 1956. On the origin of cancer
cells. Science, 123, 309–314
Wong JYY, Huggins GS, Debidda M, Munshi
NC, Vivo ID.2008. Dichloroacetate induces
apoptosis in endometrial cancer cells.
Gynecologic Oncology. 10, 1-9
Zanella A, Bianchi P, Fermo E. 2007.
Pyruvate kinase deficiency.
haematologica/the hematology journal.
92(06), 721-723.
x 1 = 3.77x104 = 0.038 moles/min
APPENDI X
Interpreting the graph for reaction rate
A= ε.C.L
0.2345 = 6.22X103 x C x L
C = 0.2345
6.22X103
Δ A = 0.34
87mm = 87s Δ A/min = 0.34x60
87
Change in absorption per min
Δ a/min = 0.2345
Making up the final solution
ADP
Final Conc 45mm
Final Vol – 0.033 µl
45mM = 45mMoles/L =45µmoles/ml
Conc of stock should be 45µmoles/33µl = 45mmoles/ml
33ml enough for 100 assays
Too much!
6 cuvettes x 0.033 = 0.198ml
Round up to 2 ml