Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 1
Design of steel-bridgesOverview of key content of EN 1993-Eurocode 3
Illustration of basic element designg
G. Hanswille, W. Hensen, M. Feldmann, G. Sedlacek
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 2
LIST OF CONTENTS
1. The European Standard Family and Steel bridges1. The European Standard Family and Steel bridges 2. Load assumptions for steel bridges 3. Modelling of steel bridges 4. Specification of bearings5. Choice of steel 6 D i f b id l t6. Design of bridge elements
6.1. Stability rules 6 2 Fatigue rules6.2. Fatigue rules 6.3. Rope structures
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 3
CROSS SECTION OF A BOX GIRDER BRIDGE WITH AN ORTHOTROPIC DECK
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 5
NAVIGATION THROUGH STANDARDS
actionsEN 1990
Safety aspects
Load combination EN 1991-1-1
EN 1991-2
Self-weight
Traffic actionsactions G/Q-values
y p
EN 1990-A2EN 1991-1-4
EN 1991-1-5
Wind actions
Thermal actions
EN 1993 1 1 f
design
EN 1993-1-1 Imperfections EN 1993-2
EN 1993-1-8
EN 1993-1-11
General
Connections
Ropes
EN 1993-1-5EN 1993-1-5
EN 1993 1 9 Fatigue
Stability of plates
Seismic designEN 1998-3 EN 1337
p
BearingsEN 1993-1-9 Fatigue
MaterialsEN 10025 Prefabrication EN 1090-2
executionWelding
Corrosion protectionEN 1090-2
EN 1090-2 Site work
Tolerances EN 1090-2
EN 1337
productCE-markingEN 1090-2 Inspection EN 1090-2product conformity
CE marking
TraceabilityEN 1337-6
EN 1090 2 Inspection
Maintenance EN 1337-10
EN 1090 2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 6
SURVEY OF THE EUROCODES
EN 1990Eurocode: Basis of Design
Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures1-1 Self weight
EN 1991Eurocode 2: Concrete structuresEurocode 3: Steel structures
EN 1992 to EN 1996
1 1 Self weight1-2 Fire Actions1-3 Snow1-4 Wind1-5 Thermal Actions
Eurocode 3: Steel structuresEurocode 4: Composite structuresEurocode 5: Timber structureEurocode 6: Masonry structures
1 5 Thermal Actions1-6 Construction Loads1-7 Accidential Actions2 Traffic on bridges3 Loads from cranes EN 1997 and EN 19983 Loads from cranes4 Silo loads
EN 1997 and EN 1998Eurocode 7: Geotechnical DesignEurocode 8: Design in seismic areas
EN 1999EN 1999Eurocode 9: Aluminium structures
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 7
1. THE EUROPEAN STANDARD FAMILY AND STEEL BRIDGES
hENproduct standards EN 1090 Part 2
EN 1090 – Part 1 „Delivery Conditions for prefabricated steel components“
Eurocode: EN 1990 – „Basis of structural design“product standards for steel materials,
semi- finished products etc.
EN 1090 – Part 2 „Execution of
steel structures “Eurocode 1: EN 1991 – „Actions on structures“
Eurocode 3: EN 1993 – „Design rules for steel structures“
em fo
r re
s HSS up to S7001.12
ard
syst
el s
truct
uS
tand
ast
ee
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 8
1. THE EUROPEAN STANDARD FAMILY AND STEEL BRIDGES
actions Safety aspects
Load combination Self-weight
Traffic actions
G/Q-valuesWind actions
Thermal actions
Imperfections G ldesigner
design
Imperfections General
Connections
RopesFatigue
Stability of plates
Seismic design BearingsFatigue
tiMaterials Prefabrication
executionWelding
Corrosion protectionSite work
Tolerances
productCE-marking Inspection
contractorproduct
conformity g
Traceability
p
Maintenance
Tasks for designer and contractor
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 9
1. THE EUROPEAN STANDARD FAMILY AND STEEL BRIDGES
1-5 Plate buckling1-5 Plate buckling
EN 1993-Part 1-1 General rulesEN 1993-Part 1-1 General rules
1-5 Plate buckling
EN 1993-Part 1-1 General rules
1-9 Fatigue1-9 Fatigue
1-8 Connections1-8 Connections
1-9 Fatigue
1-8 Connections
1-11 Rope structures1-11 Rope structures
1-10 Choice of material1-10 Choice of material
1-11 Rope structures
1-10 Choice of material
EN 1993-Part 2 Steel bridgesEN 1993-Part 2 Steel bridgesEN 1993-Part 2 Steel bridges
A C R d ti f th t i l tA C R d ti f th t i l t
Annex B Requirements for expansion jointsAnnex B Requirements for expansion joints
Annex A Requirements for bearingsAnnex A Requirements for bearings
A C R d ti f th t i l t
Annex B Requirements for expansion joints
Annex A Requirements for bearings
Annex C Recommendations for orthotropic platesAnnex C Recommendations for orthotropic platesAnnex C Recommendations for orthotropic plates
Design rules for steel bridges in Eurocode 3
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 10
1. THE EUROPEAN STANDARD FAMILY AND STEEL BRIDGES
Limit State ConceptULS Ed RdSLS Ed CdSLS Ed CdFatigue E c
Choice of materialb d f t h ibased on fracture mechanics (EN 1993-1-10)
Stability of members and platesSi l l f bi dSingle -value for combined actions,FEM-methods(EN 1993-1-1) (EN 1993-1-5)
Fatigue assessments unlessrecommended details are used
(EN 1993-2) (EN 1993-1-9)
Basic features of design rules for bridges
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 11
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
900 kN
500 kN
2 kN275 kN
11,0 m11,0 m
Load-model LM1
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 12
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
1000 kN12
600 kN
300 kN
6
3
11,0 m
3
Load-model LM1 (draft German NA)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 13
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Statistical distribution of characteristics of vehicle
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 14
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Modelling of vehicles and surfaces
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 15
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Modelling of bridges
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 16
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Load-model and simulations
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 17
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Dynamic effectsDynamic effects
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 18
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
K 210 K 138
Reference bridges for reliability analysis
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 19
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Definition of target -value
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 20
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
P r o b a b i l i s t i c d e s i g n E C 1 - P a r t 2 L o a d M o d e l
L MMWQre q u ire d
W
GG
req uy
Q dM
WfM
1 0,1M
GG
M
Q d
w h e re L MQQQ d
MM
3 5,1G
L MQ
Q d
Q M
M
Definition of Q-value
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 21
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Q-values from LM1
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 22
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Effect of modification: aQ1q1K = 9 8 kN/m²Effect of modification: aQ2q2K = 2,5 5 kN/m²
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 23
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Forecast of freight-volume
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 24
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Development of permits for heavy vehicles
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 25
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Results of WIM-measurements in NL
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 26
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Fatigue load model specified in EN 1991 480 kN
Traffic Category Number of heavy vehicles N 1: 2-Lane Highways with a high rate of
heavy vehicles 2 • 106 / a
Number of expected trucks per year for a single lane
heavy vehicles2: Highways and roads with a medium
rate of heavy vehicles 0,5 • 106 / a
3: Main roads with a low rate of heavy vehicles 0,125 • 106 / a
4: Country roads with a low rate of heavy vehicles 0,05 • 106 / aheavy vehicles
Fatigue loading model FLM 3
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 27
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGESes
M ffa tF f /m ax
c
with es
s ra
nge s a fe ty fa c to r
fo r fa t ig u e s tre n g th
re fe re n c e fa t ig u e s tre n g tha t 2 1 0 c y c le s6
ssm
ent w
litud
e st
re
d a m a g e e q u iv a le n c e fa c to rre p re s e n t in g th e s p e c tru m
m a x im u m s tre s s ra n g e fro mE C 1 -2 lo a d m o d e l
crack size a critical crack size acrit
gue
asse
sta
nt a
mpl
s a fe ty fa c to rfo r fa tig u e lo a d
d a m a g e e q u iv a le n tim p a c t fa c to r
detectable crack size a
pt fo
r fat
igle
nt c
onst
timesize a0
Ff = 1,00Mf = 1,00 – 1,15 for damage toleranceMf = 1,25 – 1,35 for safe life method
Inspection interval
Con
cep
equi
val
Assessment method for FLM 3
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 28
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Fatigue details – welded attachments and stiffeners
EN 1993-1-9 - Fatigue resistance
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 29
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Required moment of inertia from ULS and fatigue design for detail category 71
α = 1 ,0 U L S2 m
/m]
α = 0 ,8
U L S
F a tig u e
ista
nce
W/L
[cm
2M
omen
t of R
esi
S p a n L [m ]
Span limits for fatigue design
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 30
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Joint for hangerAlternatives for joints of hangers:
ti i d j i toptimised joint:• continuously increasing stiffness (K90)
low curvature from bending• end of hanger with hole and inclined cut
l t t d f h f low stresses at end of hanger for K50
• ratio of inclined cut and connecting plate avoiding of stress peak at end of
hhanger
Recommendations for durable detailing
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 31
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Hanger connection for arch bridges
1
2
3
4
Substitution of fatigue checks for critical details
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 32
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Standard orthotropic steel deck with continuous stringers with cope holes in the web of the cross beam
Substitution of fatigue checks by structural detailing rulesrules
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 33
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Structural detailing for deck plate
connection of deck plate to troughsp g75
12HV HV HV
14
300 300 300
design life load model 4without layer < 10 years
asphalticsealingPmB 45
30 - 50 years für t = 12 mm
PmB 45thermosetting
resinPmB 25
70 - 90 years
Recommended details of orthotropic deck
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 34
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Structural detailing for cross beams
h
75
12T
tSteg
T
25> 0,15 hT hQTr
Steg
tLtrough = 6 mmtweb = 10 - 16 mm; verification of net web section requiredhcrossbeam 700 mmcrossbeam
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 35
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Potential positions of cracks in the asphalt layer
Durability of asphalt layer
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 36
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Steel bridges – serviceability limit state
Requirements for the minimum stiffness of stringers gi
rder
s
5
q gdepending on the distance between crossbeams
betw
een
cros
s g
a [m
] 4
AB
dist
ance
b
0
3
1000 5000 15000 2000010000 second moment of area IB of the stringers including deckplate [m4]
Condition for curve A 1 1,20m
IB
2
1 heavy traffic lane 2 web of main girder or
longitudinal girder
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 37
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Verification to
Plate buckling
longitudinal edge xDefinition of a plated
Verification to web breathing
longitudinal edge
el w
idth
e ed
ge
x
b 21
Definition of a plated element
sub- panel
stiff
ened
pan
e
tran
sver
se
b G
aG a1 a4 a3 a2
stiffened panel length y
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 38
2. LOAD ASSUMPTIONS FOR STEEL BRIDGES
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 39
3. MODELLING OF STEEL BRIDGES
Shear lag effectb
==+
GS
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 40
3. MODELLING OF STEEL BRIDGES
Subdivision of a moment-distribution to elements with standard shape
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 41
3. MODELLING OF STEEL BRIDGES
-factor for shear lag
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 42
3. MODELLING OF STEEL BRIDGES
Differences in modelling
Modelling for ULS Modelling for fatigue
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 43
3. MODELLING OF STEEL BRIDGES
Differences in modelling
Fatigue effects on web stiffenersModelling for ULS
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 44
3. MODELLING OF STEEL BRIDGES
Differences in modelling
Frame and distorsional effectsModelling for ULS
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 45
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Design principles for individual bearings
- Permission of movements minimizing the reaction forces - No tensile forces
N i ifi t di t ib ti f f t th b i- No significant redistribution of forces to other bearingsfrom accomodation to installation tolerances
- Specification of installation conditions with detailspof construction sequence and time variable conditions
- Measure to avoid unforeseen deformation of the bearings(non uniform contact)(non uniform contact)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 46
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Construction documents
Bearing plan (drawing of the bearing system) Bearing installation drawing (structural details) Bearing schedule (characteristic values from eachBearing schedule (characteristic values from each
action, design values from combination of action)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 47
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
sliding rolling deforming
displace-ment
rotation
Functional principles of bearings
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 48
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 49
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 50
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
No. Action Eurocode
R f t t t T DIN EN 1991 1 5 2004 07
Actions for permanent and transient design situations
Reference to temperature T0 DIN EN 1991-1-5:2004-07
1.11.21.3
1.4
Self-weightDead loads Prestressing
Creep concrete
DIN EN 1991-1-7:2007-02DIN EN 1991-1-7:2007-02DIN EN 1992-1:2005-10 andDIN EN 1994-2:2006-07DIN EN 1992-1:2005-10
1.5 Shrinkage of concrete DIN EN 1992-1:2005-10
2.12.22.32.42.5
Traffic loadsSpecial vehicles Centrifugal forcesNosing forces Brake and acceleration forces
DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05
2.62.72.82.92.102.112 12
Footpath loading Wind on structure without traffic Wind on structure with trafficRange uniform temperature Vertical temperature difference Horizontal temperature differenceSoil Settlements
DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-4:2005-07DIN EN 1991-4:2005-07DIN EN 1991-1-5:2004-07, 6.1.3 and 6.1.5DIN EN 1991-1-5:2004-07, 6.1.4 and 6.1.5DIN EN 1991-1-5:2004-07, 6.1.4 and 6.2DIN EN 1997 1:2009 092.12
2.132.142.152.16
2.17
Soil SettlementsBearing resistance/friction forces Replacement of bearing Pressure and suction from traffic Wind during erection
Construction loads
DIN EN 1997-1:2009-09DIN EN 1337, Part 2 to 8DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-2:2004-05DIN EN 1991-4:2005-07 andDIN EN 1991-1-6:2005-09DIN EN 1991-1-6:2005-09
2.18 Accidental actions DIN EN 1991-1-7:2007-02
For transient design situations reduction of variable actions due to limited duration EN 1991-2, 4.5.3. For steelbridges also actions from installation of hot asphalt according to technical project specifications.
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 51
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Actions in accidental design situations
• Specifications according to EN 1991-2
• Limitation of bridge movements by structural measuresLimitation of bridge movements by structural measures,e.g. stop devices at abutments
Actions in seismic design situations
Specifications according to EN 1998-1 and EN 1998-2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 52
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Determination of design values of movements and bearing forces Principles
C bi i di EN 1990 6 5 3 2 (2) i h i l f di Combination according to EN 1990, 6.5.3.2 (2) with partial factors according toEN 1990, A.2 and particular rules for climatic temperature effects
Movements due to creep and shrinkage by multiplying mean values inMovements due to creep and shrinkage by multiplying mean values inEN 1992-2 and EN 1994-2 by a factor of 1.35
Verification of static equilibrium (uplift of bearings) and anchoring devicesb l i 0 05 G iby applying 0.05 GK spanwise
Consideration of deformations of foundation, piers and bearings in themodelling of the structure, see EN 1991-2, 6.5.4.2g
Use of 2nd order theory for accounting for deformations of piers after installation of bearings if required by EN 1992-1-1, 5.8.2 (6).For calculation of pier deformations k = 0 5 may be applied to geometricFor calculation of pier deformations ky = 0,5 may be applied to geometricmember imperfections in EN 1992-1-1, 5.2.
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 53
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Determination of design values of movements and bearing forces
Maximum and minimum constant temperature component: Climatic temperature effects
Ted min = T0 - F TN con - T0Ted, min T0 F TN,con T0Ted, max = T0 + F TN,exp + T0
additional safety elementcharact. Values EN 1991-1-5, 6.1.3.3
partial factor F = 1,35partial factor F 1,35
reference temperature during installation of the bearings, e.g. +10°C
Table E.4: Recommended values for T0
T [°C]Case Installation of bearing
T0 [°C]
steel bridges composite bridges concrete bridges
1 Installation with measured Temperature and with correctionResetting with bridge set at T0
0 0 0
2 Installation with estimated T0 and without correction by 10 10 102 0resetting with bridge set T0
10 10 10
3Installation with estimated temperature T0 and without correction by resetting and also one ore more changes in position of the fixed bearing
25 20 20
Td = Ted max - Ted minTd Ted,max Ted,minFor non-linear behaviour stepwise determination
Td = F TN
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 54
4. SPECIFICATION FOR BEARINGS
Reaction forces at fixed points resulting form resistance of the bearing system For sliding bearings:
kiiQikiQkG QQG 01
kGr
kiiQikiQkGakQH G
QQGQF
dinf,
01sup,1
Forces from l ti d
other variable actionsvertical actions of traffic load
self weight, dead loadsacceleration and braking
self weight, dead loadscoefficient of friction according EN 1337-1, 62.For PTFE sliding bearings max = 0,03
For elastomeric bearings
inf,,infinf
sup,,supsup1
dq
dqkQH AG
AGQF
d
Shear deformations of the bearingsforces from acceleration and braking
i l l f h d l
Shear deformations of the bearings according EN 1337-3
plan shear area of bearings
nominal values of shear modulus Gsup = 1,05 N/mm2
Ginf = 0,75 N/mm2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 55
Choice of materialChoice of material 5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Assumption for a0
102faa
63c
initial crack
fatigue loading
4
faa 0d
a0
ad
design crack
initial crack
Safety assessment based on fracture mechanics
Kappl d Kmat dappl,d mat,d
Kmat,d (T27J, TEd)
Kappl,d (member shape, ad, 1·Ed)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 56
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Toughness-temperature - Load-strain-diagram
Design situations in the upper-shelf region B and the transition region A of the toughness-temperature diagram
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 57
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Assessment scheme
K*appl,d Kmat,d TEd TRdTransformationSafety assessment based on temperature
TEd = Tmin + Tr + T + TR [T + Tpl ] TRd = T100
TEd TRd ResistanceAction side
Assessment scheme
Ed min r R [ pl ] Rd 100
• Influence of material toughnessT100 = T27J – 18 [°C]
• lowest air temperature in combination with Ed:
Tmin = -25 °Cmin• radiation loss:
Tr = - 5 °C• influence of stress, crack imperfection
and member shape and dimension:
]C[70
1025b
20kK
ln52T
41eff
6R
appl
• additive safety element:TR = +7 °C (with = 3,8)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 58
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Choice of material to EN 1993-1-10
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 59
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
National quality tests
AUBI-test according to SEP 1390 (1996)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 60
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
trend analysis for the AUBI correlation
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 61
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Choice of material given in Table 3.1 of EN 1993-2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 62
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Example: Thick plates for the composite “Elbebridge Vockerode“ (EN 1993-1-10)
Bridge system and construction
Cross section
SpanUpper chord
Support Support
Plate thickness for S355 J2G3
Upper chord
Bottom plates
75 75 115 135 115 85 85 60 60 60 115 140 145 140 115 60 60 60 85 85 115 135 115 75 75145
Construction at supports125,28
p
40
30 70 30 7070 95 45 70 95 45
40
50 70 50
4070
40
Construction at supports
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 63
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Bridge St. Kilian
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 64
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Bridge St. Kilian
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 65
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Cast node for the bridge St. Kilian
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 66
5. CHOICE OF MATERIAL
Cast node for the bridge St. Kilian
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 68
6. DESIGN OF BRIDGE-ELEMENTS6.1 STABILITY RULES
Ed
Common design rules for column, lateral torsional, plate and shell buckling
lk
Ed Ed
skEd Ed
r
tEd EdEd/2
a
b
column buckling lat. tors. buckl. plate buckling shell buckling
crit
kult
crit
k
critdcrit
kdkult
RR
RERE ,,
Ed/2
0,60
0,80
1,00
1,20
a0
ab
cd
0 60
0,80
1,00
1,20
ab
cd
EN 1993-1-1 EN 1993-1-1
0 6
0,8
1,0
1,2
[-]
a0
EN 1993-1-5
0 6
0,8
1,0
1,2
χ
EN 1993-1-6critcritcritdcrit
0,00
0,20
0,40
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3_
0,00
0,20
0,40
0,60
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3_
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0_p [-]
p
b
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0λ
M
kult
M
kd 1RE
,
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 69
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Column buckling
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 70
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Column buckling curves
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 71
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Selection of buckling curves
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 72
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Test evaluation – weak axis buckling
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 73
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Test evaluation – weak axis buckling
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 74
6.1 STABILITY RULES
M-values according to EN 1990 – Annex D
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 75
6.1 STABILITY RULES
European buckling curve 2nd order theory with imperfection
d
!
d RE
N
k
!
d RE
lN
crit
dpld N
N ,
dd ,
crit
pl
NN
,
plk N,R
M
pldd
NR
Consequences:EE Option 1:
M
kd
RR
dMd EE .
M
critdcrit
NN
,
0,1M
Option 1:
Option 2:
Option 3:
2
2
0 1
1
M
d ee
Option 4:
Equivalence of buckling curves and 2nd order theory
Md
M *Option 5:
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 76
6.1 STABILITY RULES
d d d
dg
M-values for 2nd order analysis
0,5 0,685 0,870 0,477 0,661 0,895 1,03
1,0 1,136 0,597 0,953 1,082 0,627 1,05
1 5 1 846 0 342 1 43 1 734 0 369 1 081,5 1,846 0,342 1,43 1,734 0,369 1,08
2,0 2,806 0,209 1,906 2,605 0,228 1,09
3,0 5,476 0,10 2,859 5,039 0,109 1,09
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 77
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Imperfections for members with various boundary conditions
EIC
NEdNEd
a1
x
NEdNEd
x
2x
x
crit
Ed
Edd0e
critmax,crit
critd0ini
NNeM
e
xsinN1
1NeM
xsine
EdEdd0e
d0ini
max,crit2crit
Ed
EIN1
N1
crit
Ed
Use of buckling mode as imperfection
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 78
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example for a column on elastic supportsExample for a column on elastic supports
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 79
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Column buckling Lateral torsional buckling
1MM
NN EdEd 1
MM
NN
Fl
FlEdy
Fl
FlEd ,
MN RkyRkpl ,, MN FlRky
FlRkpl ,,
1M
1
1eMN
MM
MM
EdzFl
Rky
Flcrit
critz
Edz
Rkz
Edz
,
*
,,
,
,
,1
NN1
1M
eNNN
EdRk,y
*Ed
Rk,pl
Ed
M critz,Ncrit
FlRk,pl
FlRk,y
M*
NM
2,0e
Rk,pl
Rk,yN
*
NM
2,0e
11
12,0
*
22
2
MM
M
Fl
MMM
1
1
12,0 2NN
NNN
1 MMFl
22
1
2 220150 ,,
Equivalence of flexural and lateral torsional buckling
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 80
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Comparison of LTB-curves
1,0
LT
Lateral torsional buckling for GIT=oo
Lateral torsional buckling for a beamHEB 200
B b
Bc a
0 0
Bc b
0,00,0 1,0 2,0LT
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 81
6.1 STABILITY RULES
kkult E
R,1. Input parameters:
Procedure for lateral torsional buckling assessments using the buckling curves:
dE
d
critcrit E
R
critt
kult
,
crit
*crit*
2. Modification of imperfection factor:critt
*crit DIG
2* 20150
where is determined without effect of
3. Use of flexural buckling curve:
2,015,0
4 Assessment for design point x
22
1
1, M
kult
4. Assessment for design point xd
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 82
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Comparison of laterial torsional buckling curves
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 83
6.1 STABILITY RULES
check:
crit
kult
,
,*
check:
Determination of design point xd
1,
M
kult
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 84
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Portal frame
1068
knee‐pointLateral support
3 4240∙12
8000
1
2 5
6
240∙15
0
556∙5
240∙12
240∙12
S 355 J2 G3
0
1 6
7
550∙5
240∙15
24420
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 85
6.1 STABILITY RULES
1 55Moment distribution [kNm]
ult,k,min=1,55
ult,k (xd)=1,94
Distribution of compression forces [kN]
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 86
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Modal out-of-plane deformation crit=1.85
xd
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 87
6.1 STABILITY RULES
1. Calculation with extreme value ult,k,min 2. Calculation design point xd
55.1, kult 94.1, kult
85.1crit
84.1* crit
,
915.085.155.1
408.049.085.154.1*
*
crit
crit
05.185.194.1
crit
064.12.015.0 2* LT
50.0622.02
12
225.1LT
50.059.0 22
00.188.010.1
55,1622.0
M
ult
contact splice sufficient
00.104.110.1
94.159.0,
M
kult
contact splice sufficient
M M
Check of out-of-plane stability
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 88
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Composite bridge
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 89
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Cross-section of the composite bridge
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 90
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Moment distribution critical for out-of-plane stability of main girders
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 91
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: cross-beam at supports
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 92
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: intermediate cross-beam all 7,50 m
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 93
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: crit-values and modal out-of-plane deformations
critical area
critical area
critical area
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 94
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Input for ult,k-values
295330
250
180
critical areas
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 95
6.1 STABILITY RULES
in field at point P1 at support (point P1)
Checks for lateral-torsional buckling
in field at point P1 at support (point P1)
83,1180330
k,ult 184,1250295
k,ult
8576,8crit
45,08576,883,1
489,17crit
26,0489,17
184,1
37,8*crit
72,076,086,837,8*
,
20,15* crit
66,076,0491720,15*
69,0
82,0
49,17554,0
96,0
00,137,110,1
89,182,0
M
k,ult
00,103,110,1
184,196,0
M
k,ult
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 96
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Column-like behaviour:
Column buckling and plate buckling
imposed loadson loaded edge
resulting displacements iat loaded edge
Plate-like behaviour:
resulting loadson loaded edge
imposed displacement on loaded edge
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 97
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: Torsional buckling according to EN 1993-1-1
33
9
33 tbCM
tbIM 34
3
Column:
M 3
12;sin EG
exA
x
byAw sinPlate:
2
2
M
MM
cr i
IGECN
Ncrit
12e b
0 ai
ANcrit
cr
Acrit
cr
161
112 2
22
2
2
2
2 bb
tE
16
112 2
2
2
2
2
2 bb
tE
k
eb 429,0
2
k
eb 429,09,0
2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 98
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Torsional buckling column-like behaviour plate-like behaviour
compression compressioncompressionstress
compressionstrain
AN
N EAN
N
response responseresponse strain
response stress
f1
bending
geometric strain effect:
NN yM f1
2
222
1
2
4
crit
critcritogeom
NN
NN
NN
bs
les
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 99
6.1 STABILITY RULES
~2
1k
column buckling plate buckling
yf1 yf1
yfk bendingbending
yf
yf
compression
bending
compression
11
120
*
20*
1
1
bsd 20
bsd 70
assumption: assumption:
11
12.0*
2.00 7.00
1
1
11
12.0 ****
1
* 1
11
12.0 2*
2* 2.015.0
22
2
2.015.0 *
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 100
6.1 STABILITY RULES
*
Column buckling curve and plate buckling curve
,,
EulerWinter 2
22.0
21
7.00*
Column buckling
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 101
6.1 STABILITY RULES
x
Stress- and strain-controlled plate buckling
x
imperfectx
x xx E perfect
imperfect
imperfectxx E
x
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 102
6.1 STABILITY RULES
4 b
Modification of imperfection factor
22
*
1
1
ab
ab
crit
crit
crit *
crit
column plateba
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 103
6.1 STABILITY RULES
crit
crit
*
Interaction between column buckling and plate buckling *
crit
platecolumn
column buckling
Winter
ccc 2
10;1,
,
ccr
pcr
*,
,
crit
crit
ccr
pcr
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 104
6.1 STABILITY RULES
“Hybrid cross-section” due to different stress-limits
yield plateau
resulting force
yield plateau
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 105
6.1 STABILITY RULES
”Yielding effect” in hybrid cross-sections
Method 1
Method 2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 106
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Method 1
”Yielding effect” in bending
Method 2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 107
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Extension of method 2
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 108
Choice of materialChoice of material 6.1 STABILITY RULES
Methods in bridge design
Method 1
Use of effective cross-section
Method 2
Use of stress-limit
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 109
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Method 1
l t b kli f t t
Method 2
l b l l t b kliplate buckling for stress components global plate buckling
Ed x
critEdEdzEdxEd ,,, ,,
xcrit ,
glob
zzcrit ,
z
,crit
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 110
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Method 1 Method 2
Plate-buckling coefficients
Method 1 Method 2
,
for rigidend post
w
13.0*
l kl
p p
x
x
crit
ultx
,
,
z
crit
ultz
,
,
globalcrit
kultglob
,
,
zcrit ,
xcrit
ult
,
,
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 111
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Cross-section assessment
Method 1: Effective cross-section for x
0,1f yd
xEd1
ykff 11
Rd
ykyd
ff
1,1Rd
Reduction factor
(for )
0,1
3553,02p
p
Slenderness
Effective web
1b
bb wceff 0
Effective flange
fefft bb ,
Pi,x
ykp
f
Critical stress
effeffeffeff bbbb 6,04,0 2,1,
11112,01
16k2
43,0k 1Critical stress
ePi,x k 22
2st
2
e 1b12tE
11 für für
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 112
6.1 STABILITY RULES
rigid end flexible endt
Method 1: Resistance to shear
flexible end post
post post
cr
ykw
f
3
rigid end post
reduction factor
3
fthV yd
wwwRd,bw
EdV
w
83,0w 1.0 1.0
081830 /830 /83,0
Rd,bw
Ed3 V
V08,183,0 w w/83,0 w/83,0
08,1w w7,037,1 w/83,0
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 113
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Method 1 Method 2
Assessment for plate buckling
1k,ultglob
Method 1 Method 2Interaction
1M
,g
interaction
1
Ed
11211
12
3,
,1
3
1
Rdpl
Rdf
Rd
Ed
y
MM
VVf
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 114
6.1 STABILITY RULES
German National Annex
Method 1 only applicable to girders without longitudinalstiffners
The use of Method 1 should be supplemented by The use of Method 1 should be supplemented bychecking global buckling with Method 2 forcharacteristic load level andkE 10,1M
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 115
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Example: cross-section check for a composite bridge
Cross-section at support Cross-section at midspan
stresses
MNm25,107M Ed
MN47,7VEd
stresses
1095,98th
w
w
< 345 MPa
stresses
192151w
w
thMNm1,56M Ed
MN0,1VEd
< 295 MPa
MN31117M
stresses :
78,5k
51598 wh 80,5k
stresses :
MNm31,117M Rd,f
MN14,8V Rd,bw
515,98 wt
MPa6,112cr
33,1w
675,0w
MNm6,135M Rd,pl
MN44,4V Rd,bw
5,044,40,1
3
4,51151w
w
th
MPa2,48w
03,2w 50,0w
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 116
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Panel plate buckling check with method 2=83 Mpa
94,03.187
176
13,325608000
MPae 6.19
23k MPacr 8.4506.1923 55,2crit
6k MPacr 6.1176.196 42,1crit
888.01141
411
21
2,
2,
2
,
critcritcritcrcrit
127.1critf
56.13 2
2,
kk EE
ykult
f
18,1crit
k,ult
15.180.013.015.0
00.103.110.1
56.173.0,
M
kultw
73.012
w
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 117
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Verification of stiffened web plate for launching, Bridge Oehde
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 118
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Stiffened web panel and loading
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 119
6.1 STABILITY RULES
Use of method 2 for stress-assessment
kNmM 3,44max MPa24022068152
kNmM 83,2max MPa24024017664
Stiffener :
Webplate:
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 121
6. DESIGN OF BRIDGE-ELEMENTS6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Standardized Wöhler- curve for welded details
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 122
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
EinDD
Damage equivalence
Ri
Eii N
DD
63
3EiEI n 63 102C
Damage equivalence:
Ei3EiEi
3e nn
3
1
Ei
Ei3Ei
en
n
Ein
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 123
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Reservoir-counting method
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 124
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Case 1
Various design situations
Case 2
M difi d
Case 3
Modified Wöhler curvefor using theMiner-rule
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 125
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Representations of fatigue spectrum
spectrum for design
after vibrations
cut off
cut off
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 126
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Distribution of weights of heavy vehicles
total weight type 1 total weight type 2total weight type 1 total weight type 2
total weight type 3 total weight type 4
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 127
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Load-models for fatigue checks of road bridges
FLM 3Main structure
Detailed FLM 4
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 128
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Safety-plan for damage tolerant design
153 41
105102 6
3
6
3
Mf
D
EjEjFf
Mf
c
EiEiFf nnD
inspection intervals
41
111
5
nMfFf 145
MfFf
n0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
ff MfFf
0.1 MfFf 314 nff
15.1 MfFf
35.1 MfFf
1115.14
5 n
0135.14
5 n
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 129
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Mean value m
Characteristic value: m – 1 645 Characteristic value: m – 1,645
Design value:
C t l f ti 15122 5Control of actions
No control of actions
15,122 5 MfN
35,150,45,4 5 MfN
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 130
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Assessment proceduresc
EFf
2
Use of -values
Crossing of FLM3
MfEFf 2
4321
minmax2 E
g
stress history
ti th d
effects of other lanes
counting method
Miner-rule
design life
other lanes2E
span length
traffic composition
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 131
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
1 value from simulations with Auxerre traffic
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 132
6.2 FATIGUE RULES
Example: Fatigue assessment for a composite bridge = 1.947 = 1.947
= 1.90 = 1.715 = 1.90
31.3
23.61
22
stress ranges (max – min) at lower flangest ess a ges (max min) at o e a ge
Transverse weld from stiffener:12 Butt weld of flange:
MPaE 805.593.319.12
MPaE 778.446.269.12
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 134
6. DESIGN OF BRIDGE-ELEMENTS6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Rope-structures - Stayed cable bridges
Definition
• Any prestress is generated by preloadingy p g y p g
• Preloading is a process to impose• forces or• deformations
• The effects of preloading may be i ti f t ( t )• variations of stresses (prestress)
• variations of deformations• other variations of permanent stage
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 135
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
1a) Prestressing by internal 1b) Prestressing of trusses by
Examples for preloading processes
1a) Prestressing by internaltendons
1b) Prestressing of trusses bycables in hollow sections
1c) Prestressing by externaltendons
1d) Prestressing of jointssubjected to tension or friction
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 136
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
2) Prestressing by propping 4) Prestressing by imposed deformation
Examples for preloading processes
d
steel
d
steel
cast of concrete cast of concrete
composite composite
phase 1 phase 2 phase 1
3) Prestressing by sequence of casting concrete
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 137
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
5a) Prestressing of 5b) Prestressing of
Examples for preloading processes
) gcable structures
) garches by string-elements
b ow -st rin g
5c) Prestressing of guyedmasts
5d) Prestressing of cablestayed structures
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 138
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Principles
f• It is possible to define the preloading or prestressingprocess by all necessary steps including controls
• It is not possible to define “prestress” as an effect of prestressingor preloading in a general way, that covers all cases
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 139
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Example for the applicability of “prestress”
stress before prestresses: 0,0 lq
stress immediately after prestressing:
prestress:
lq ,0
00000 llll p es ess 0,0,0,0,0 lqlqllq
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 140
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURESof
ca
bilit
y o
n-ap
plic
r the
non
mpl
e fo
rst
ress
”E
xam
“pre
s
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 141
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Conclusion
“P” in EN 1990
a) preloading or prestressing process leading to a structural shape or behaviour as required
b) prestress in specific cases where defined
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 142
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Treatment of preloading and prestressing processes in the construction phase
Target: attainment of the required structural formand distribution of effects of (G+P)
Conclusion: calculation with characteristic values, linearmaterial law: stress limitations and prestressing of cables.
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 143
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Treatment of preloading and prestressing processes in the construction phase
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 144
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Treatment of preloading and prestressing processes in the service phase
Target: ULS verification on the basis of:• permanent actions G(G+P)pe a e ac o s G(G )• permanent from resulting from (G+P)• imperfections of the form• variable actions {Q + Q }• variable actions Q{QK1 + 0QQ2}
C l i C l l ti ith th t f i t dConclusion: Calculation with the permanent form associated with the effect from G(G+P)
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 145
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Treatment of preloading and prestressing processes in the service phase
Dissemination of information for training – Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 146
6.3 ROPE STRUCTURES
Treatment at counterflexure points
Treatment at counterflexure points, or where the action effects from (G+P) are limited (e g by decompression):effects from (G+P) are limited (e.g. by decompression):
G = G, where 0,05 0,10
applied to influence surfaces.