36
Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context of calcium ion channels, which were described using both 1. continuum (Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations ), and 2. particle approaches (Brownian dynamics ). What are the problems faced by each approach when applied to a narrow channel (diameter < 1 nm)? (See the web page for papers using each approach)

Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport

• Particle vs continuum description of transport processes.

We will discuss this question in the context of calcium ion

channels, which were described using both

1. continuum (Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations), and

2. particle approaches (Brownian dynamics). 

What are the problems faced by each approach when applied to

a narrow channel (diameter < 1 nm)?

(See the web page for papers using each approach)

Page 2: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Diffusion Equations and Applications (Nelson, chap. 4)

Diffusion of particles can be described at many different levels

depending on the context:

• Continuum description (Fick’s laws)

Both the particles and the environment are described by

continuous densities. Appropriate for many particles.

• Particles in a continuum environment (Brownian dynamics)

Motion of particles are traced in a continuum environment using the

Langevin equation. Appropriate for few particles.

• Particles in a molecular environment (molecular dynamics)

Both the particles and the environment are described at the atomic

level using Newton’s eq’n. Necessary for microscopic systems.

Page 3: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Continuum description of diffusion

We need to derive a differential equation for this purpose.

Divide a box of particles into small cubic bins of size L

x-L x x+L

j: flux of particles (number of particles per unit area per unit time)

c: concentration of particles (number of particles per unit volume)

Random walk in 1D; half of particles in each bin move to the left and

half to the right.

j+

j

Page 4: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Right, left and total fluxes at x are given by

Taylor expanding the concentrations for small L gives

Generalise to 3D:

Flux direction: particles move from high concentration to low concentration

)2/()2/(2

)2/(,

)2/( 21

21

LxcLxctL

jjj

tA

ALLxcj

tA

ALLxcj

law sFick',2

2)(

2)(

2

2

dxdc

Ddxdct

L

dxdcL

xcdxdcL

xctL

j

cDj

Page 5: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Conservation laws:

Total number of particles is conserved.

If there is a net flow of particles inside a bin, j j

the concentration inside must increase by

the same amount.

x-L/2 x x+L/2

Generalise to 3D:

j

dtdc

dxdj

dtdc

dxdjL

xjdxdjL

xjLtc

tALxjLxjALtxcttxc

2

)(2

)(

)2/()2/(),(),(

c(x,t)

(similar to charge conservation)

Page 6: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Integrate the conservation equation over a closed volume V with N part’s

(Divergence theorem)

(rate of change of N = total flux

out)

We can use the conservation equation to eliminate flux from Fick’s eq’n.

Generalise to 3D: (analogy with the Schroedinger Eq.)

dtdN

dadVcdtd

dVdVdtdc

SV

VV

nj

j

2

2

2

2

,dx

cdD

dtdc

dx

cdD

dxdj

dxdc

Dj

cDdtdc 2

Fick’s 2nd law

Diffusion eq.

Page 7: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Once the initial conditions are specified, the diffusion equation can be

solved numerically using a computer.

Special cases:

1. Equilibrium: c(x)=const. j = 0, c is uniform and constant

2. Steady-state diffusion: c(x) = c0 for x < 0 and c(x) = cL for x >L

No time dependence,

LxcxL

ccc L

00

0 for

L

ccDjcL

Dj

cbc

bxDj

cdxdc

Dj

LL

000 ,

,

const. jdxdj

dtdc

,0,0

Page 8: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Uniform Steady-state Time dependent

Time dependent cases:

if c is at a maximum. Hence c will decrease in time.

2nd law of thermodynamics: entropy in a closed system increases.

02

2

dx

cdD

dt

dc

Page 9: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Solution of the diffusion equation

Separation of variables: c(x,t) = X(x)T(t)

Time solution:

Reject the + sign because it diverges as t

Space solution:

Superposing, we obtain for the general solution:

22

2

2

2

2

2 11k

dtdT

DTdx

XdXdx

XdDT

dtdT

Xdx

cdD

dtdc

dkeekftxc ikxDtk 2

)(),(

DtkeTDTkdtdT 22

ikxeXXkdx

Xd 22

2

Page 10: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

The function f(k) is determined from the initial conditions via inverse FT

Special case: pulse solution, c(x,0) = (x)

Substitute

dkDtix

Dtke

dkeetxc

Dtx

ikxDtk

24

2exp

2

21

),(

2

2

dxexckfdkekfxc ikxikx )0,(21

)()()0,(

DtdkduDt

ixDtku ,

2

21

)(21

)(

kfdkex ikx

Page 11: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

The Gaussian integral gives so that

which is the Gaussian distribution with

This is for 1 particle. For N particles multiply c(x,t) by N.

Generalization to 3D (for N particles)

With time, particles spread and the concentration dist. becomes flatter.

Pulse solution provides a good description for the diffusive motion of

molecules released from vesicles in cells (e.g. neurotransmitters).

DtxeDt

txc 42

41

),(

22 2 xDt

2242/3

63,)4(

),(2

rDteDt

Ntc Dtr

r

Page 12: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Applications of diffusion in biology

1. Solute transport across membranes

Steady-state diffusion in pores

where Ps is the permeability of the membrane

Cells have a small volume compared to outside, hence any imbalance

in cin and cout will not last long

e.g. for alcohol, ≈0.2 s (D≈109 m2/s, L≈5x109 m, R ≈105 m, =104)

cPccLD

j sL )( 0

ssts

inoutsoutins

outinoutsin

PRAPVectccV

APc

dt

d

ccAPccdt

dVAj

dt

dN

constcccPjVctN

3/,)0()(

)()(

.),(,)(

Page 13: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

2. Charge transport across membranes (ion channels)

Born energy;

Hence water filled pores are needed to transport ions across membranes

Macroscopic observation: Ohm’s law I = V/R works well in ion channels

For a cylindrical pore with length L and area A, we have

Microscopics:

Drift velocity

Flux (number)

EEARLjRELAjRVI

LVEAIj

cc

c

)(

,

kTr

qU

watmemBB 140

80

1

2

1

2

56011

4

1 2

0

)(

)2(2

kTDcEkTqDqE

ccvj

tmqE

tmqE

v

d

d

Page 14: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Combine Ohm’s and Fick’s laws

Given the charge dist. = qc, we solve the Poisson eq. for the potential

For consistency the Poisson and Nernst-Planck eq’s. need to be solved

simultaneously (PNP equations)

0

2

ckT

qcD

dx

dc

dx

d

kT

qcDj

dxdEdx

dcc

kT

qEDj

j

Nernst-Planck equation

Generalization to 3D

Page 15: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Solutions in 1D:

1. Equilibrium (j = 0)

Integrate [0, L],

At room temperature, kT = 1/40 eV, hence kT/e = 25 mV

A typical 10-fold difference in concentrations leads to V = 58 mV

Note that if cell membranes were equally permeable to all ion types,

there would be no potential or concentration difference. Nernst potential

arises because they are selectively permeable to ions.

0

00

)(0

ln

ln

)(1

0

c

c

ze

kTV

kT

Vq

kT

q

c

c

ecxcdx

d

kT

q

dx

dc

c

L

LL

kTq

Nernst potential

Boltzmann dist.

Page 16: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

2. Steady state (j = const.)

No known integrals of exp. of a function other than linear! (uniform E field)

Let, LVxxVL )(,,00

L kTq

kTqkTqL

L kTqL kTq

kTqkTq

dxe

ececDj

dxcedx

dDdxej

cedx

dDe

dx

dc

dx

d

kT

qcDj

L

0

0

00

0

100

kTVqL LkTVxqL kTq eqV

LkTdxedxe

Page 17: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Substituting in the flux gives

For qV/kT << 1, we can linearize the GHK eq.

To find the concentration, integrate [0, x] instead of [0, L]

10

kTVq

kTVqL

e

cec

kTLDqV

j

LLL c

L

V

kT

qDcc

L

D

kTqV

ckTqVc

kTL

DqVj

)(1)1(

)1(0

0

11

)(

)(

)(00

)(

00

kTxqkTVq

kTVqLkTxq

kTqx kTq

ee

ceccexc

cexcDdxej

GHK eq. (Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz)

Page 18: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Results of PNP calculations in

a cylindrical channel:

A. Symmetric solutions with 300 mM

NaCl on both sides. I-V curve follows

Ohm’s law

B. Asymmetric solutions with

c0 = 500 mM and cL = 100 mM

V = 100 mV (V = 0, central line)

Solid lines: GHK eq.

Circles: NP eq’s. with uniform E

Diamonds: self-consistent PNP eq’s.

Na

Cl

Page 19: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Particle description of diffusion (Brownian dynamics)

The continuum description is fine when many particles are involved.

But when there are only a few particles, their interactions with each other

and boundaries are not properly described.

In that situation, a particle based approach is more reliable. The rest of

the system is still treated as continuum with dielectric constants.

Examples:

• transport of ions in electrolyte solutions (water is in continuum)

• protein folding and protein-protein interactions (water is in continuum)

• ion channels (water, protein and lipid are in continuum)

To include the effect of the atoms in the continuum, modify the Newton’s

eq. of motion by adding frictional and random forces:

)(2

2

mFRdtdx

mdt

xdmLangevin equation:

Page 20: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

1.050023

21 2

v

vkTmv and m/s

tt etet

1)()( 00

vrvv

vv

vr

dtd

mdt

dm

2

2

Generalization to 3D:

Frictional forces:

Friction dissipates the kinetic energy of a particle, slowing it down.

Consider the simplest case of a free particle in a viscous medium

Solution with the initial values of

In liquids frictional forces are quite large, e.g. in water 5x1013 s-1

0)0(,)0( 0 rvv

FRrr dtd

mdt

dm

2

2

From

Page 21: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

0)()0( tRv ji

zyxiRi ,,,0

2. Uncorrelated with prior velocities

Random forces:

Frictional forces would dissipate the kinetic energy of a particle rapidly.

To maintain the average energy of the particle at 1.5 kT, we need to

kick it with a random force at regular intervals.

This mimics the collision of the particle with the surrounding particles,

which are taken as continuum and hence not explicitly represented.

Properties of random forces:

1. Must have zero mean (white)

3. Uncorrelated with prior forces

(Markovian assumption)

ijji tkTmtRR )(2)()0(

Page 22: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem:

Because the frictional and random forces have the same origin,

they are related

dttRRkT

m

)()0(2

1

)()0( tRR

In liquids the decay time is very short, hence one can approximate

the correlation function with a delta function

t

)(2)()0( tkTmtRR

Page 23: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

tkTm

Ri 22

kTmvkT

mNvg ii 2exp

2)( 2

22

22exp

2

1)( ii

i

i RRR

Rw

Random forces have a Gaussian probability distribution

This follows from the fact that the velocities have a Gaussian distribution

In order to preserve this distribution, the random forces must be

distributed likewise.

Page 24: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

tx

x

xx

emkT

xx

xRm

xxmkT

xxdtd

xm

Rxxxxx

dtd

xm

Rxxxx

m

Rxx

1

01

)( 2

0,0,0,0

0,0

222

zyx

zyx

R

F

A simple example: force-free particle (F = 0)

Ensemble average

Integrate

Since

But because

Consider the x direction

Page 25: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

kTDmDtx

tmkT

xt

tmkT

xt

2

21

1

2

2

22

t

t

etmkT

x

emkT

xdtd

xxxdtd

112

12

2

2

2

2

Einstein relation

Using

gives

Consider the limits

1. Ballistic limit:

2. Diffusion limit:

Fick’s law

Page 26: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

tttvtxttx

tm

tRtFettvttv

zyxiRFm

vv

iii

iitii

iiii

)2/()()(

)()()2/()2/(

,,),(1

Integration algorithms

More complicated because one has to integrate over the random force.

The simplest is a leap-frog algorithm

This algorithm is alright for short time steps, i.e. a few fs (10-15 s)

Longer time steps are possible but one needs to use a more accurate

(higher order) integration algorithm.

Page 27: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Statistical analysis of trajectory data

A typical simulation consists of two stages:

1. Equilibration

2. Production run

The trajectory data generated during the production run is used in

statistical analysis of the system:

• Thermodynamic average and standard deviation (fluctuations)

• Pair distribution functions (structural information)

• Time correlation functions (dynamical information)

Ergodic theorem: ensemble average = time average

Page 28: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Validity of the continuum theories in nano-pores

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

= 2 = 80

Induced charges

at the water-protein

interface

Image force on an ion

In continuum theories, dielectric self-energy is not properly accounted for

When an ion is pushed in to the channel, an image force pushes it out

water protein

Page 29: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

A simple test of PNP equations in a cylindrical channel

Control study:

Set artificially εε = 80 = 80 in the protein. No induced charges on the

boundary, hence no discrepancy between the two methods

regardless of the channel radius. (C=300 mM, V=100 mV)

r = 4 Å

Na +

Cl -

Gnorm=G/r2

Page 30: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

r = 4 Å

In the realistic case (εε = 2 = 2 in the protein), ions do not enter the

channel in BD due to the dielectric self-energy barrier.

Only in large pores (r > 10 Å), validity of PNP is restored.

(C=300 mM, V=100 mV)

Gnorm=G/r2

Page 31: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Comparison of PNP and BD concentrations in r=4 Å channel

BD

PNP

C=300 mMV=100 mV

C=400 mMV=0

Page 32: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

+++++

+++

+++

+

+++ -+

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

++

++-

Physical picture

Discrete ions in BDNarrow pore Large pore

Continuous ion densities in PNP have the same picture

regardless of the pore size

Page 33: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Action potential

Problem of signal transmission in salt water

Diffusion wouldn’t work: <x2>=2Dt, D~10-9 m2/s, t~ years!

Solution: change the membrane potential in axons, and propagate the

resulting potential spike.

Page 34: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Ion channels & action potential

• Na+ concentration is high outside cells and low inside.

• Vice versa for K+ ions. Membrane potential, Vmem = 60 mV.

• When Na channels open, Na+, ions rush in, Vmem collapses.

• The potential drop triggers K channels open, K+ ions move out,

and Vmem is restored.

Out

In

Page 35: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

Synapses & neuron communication

Page 36: Discussion topic for week 2 : Membrane transport Particle vs continuum description of transport processes. We will discuss this question in the context

BD description of calcium channel (video)

50 Å

5.6 Å8 Å4 dipoles

4 glutamateresidues

Model inspired by the KcsA potassium channel, modified to accommodate

experiments and molecular models.

Selectivity filter is characterised by the mutation data and permeant ions

OutsideInside