10
1 Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné, Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné, Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

  • Upload
    sera

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné, Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard. DSGE’S IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Backward looking macroeconometric models (Keynes, Hicks, IS-LM) from data to theory Lucas’ critique on deep structural parameters (1976) and rational expectations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

1

Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné, Maffezzoli and Marcellino),

by O. Pierrard

Page 2: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

2

DSGE’S IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Backward looking macroeconometric models (Keynes, Hicks, IS-LM) from data to theory

Lucas’ critique on deep structural parameters (1976) and rational expectations

Forward looking micro founded models (Kydland and Prescott, 1982) from theory to data

Last generation of New-Keynesian models (or DSGE models) -> LSM by Fontagné, Maffezzoli and Marcellino

Page 3: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

3

POTENTIAL UTILIZATIONS

Short run forecasts ??? Need of heterogeneity, need to escape from steady state in case of crises. Difficult with DSGE models.

Understanding of shock transmission channels

Medium and/or long run forecasts

Page 4: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

4

LSM

Impressive work at the frontier of research

Utilisation to explain potential effects of policies and medium/long run forecasts: great!

Essential if we want to be serious about policy implementation and recommendation

Nice: assets, goods market, open economy

Exogenous but probably difficult to endogenise: commuters’ behaviour

Discussion: demography and labour market

Page 5: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

5

DEMOGRAPHY

Blanchard (1985) OLG approach: households have constant probability to die

Advantage: simplicity (easy aggregation)

and ‘households have finite lives’ : yes but…

Strong implications for demography

Difficult to study demography and/or retirement related questions

Page 6: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

6

DEMOGRAPHY (ctd)Death probability (expected life: 83 y)

0,00

0,10

0,20

0,30

0,40

0,50

0,60

0,70

0,80

0,90

<5 10-14 20-24 30-34 40-44 50-54 60-64 70-74 80-84 90-94

Average BE-FR(2003)

LSM

Page 7: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

7

DEMOGRAPHY (ctd)Implied population (for 1000 births)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Average BE-FR(2003)

LSM

Page 8: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

8

LABOUR MARKET

Wage formation mechanism not benchmark

With some simulations (mainly productivity shocks), strong effect on wages which leaves employment almost unaffected (also in QUEST)

Potential implication (at least with productivity shocks): volatile and procyclical wages, rigid and acyclical employment

Real data (1984-2006, CKL 2008) :

corr(x,y) DE EA US

empl. 0.81 0.76 0.85

wages 0.31 0.56 -0.03

(x)/(y) DE EA US

empl. 0.90 0.85 1.19

wages 0.90 0.64 0.87

Page 9: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

9

LABOUR MARKET (ctd)

Alternative approach: Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides (search unemployment)

Simulations: LSM vs. DMP

TFP (+1%) GDP w Nr Nc

LSM +1.5% +1.5% -0.1% -0.1%

DMP +2% +1.5% +0.6% +0.6%

EP (+1%) GDP w Nr Nc

LSM +0.9% +0.8% +0% +0%

DMP +1.4% +1.0% +0.4% +0.4%

Page 10: Discussion on the LSM (Fontagné,  Maffezzoli and Marcellino), by O. Pierrard

10

DEMOGRAPHY AND LABOUR MARKETActivity rate (2006, Eurostat)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64

LU

EA13