Upload
others
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN SIKKIM
GOVERNMENT OF SIKKIM
Vinod SharmaVice Chair, Sikkim SDMA
Sikkim
Earthquakes• 10.79% land is liable to severe
earthquakes (intensity MSK IX or more)
• 17.49% land is liable to MSK VIII (similar to Latur/Uttarkashi)
• 30.79% land is liable to MSK VII (similar to Jabalpur earthquake)
Biggest quakes in Andamans, Kuchh, Himachal, Kashmir, Bihar and the North
Eastern States)
Sikkim State Disaster management Authority
State Disaster Management Act
State Plan for Disaster Management
District Disaster Management Plans for all four districts
Panchayat level Disaster Management Plans (in preparation)
Departmental Plans
Mainstreaming DRR in every sector
School Safety Programme
NDMA supported School Safety Programme
State launched state-wide school safety programme
Disaster Education
Awareness
Earthquake safety Day- 18 September
Disaster Risk Reduction in teacher’s training programme
Books and material translated in local language- Nepali
CCA ,SDGs and DRR
Efforts are being made to integrate Climate Change Adaptation, SDGs and Disaster Risk Reduction in the state
Department of Science and Technology and Disaster Management working together
Convergence of State Climate Plan and DM plan is in progress
Sendai Framework
State organized State level workshop on Sendai Framework just after India signed the document in 2015
Sikkim reconstruction and rehabilitation is the best example of ‘Built Back Better’
Building Back Better
ORGANIC SIKKIM TO DISASTER RESILIENT SIKKIM
Aiming for a reconstruction process that builds back a) safe, b) sustainable, and c) culturally suitable homes, infrastructure and communities
Build Back Better Approach
Risk Reduction
CommunityRecovery
Implementation
Structural Designs
Land-use Planning
Social Recovery
Economic Recovery
Stakeholders Legislation and
Regulation
Community Consultation
Monitoring and
Evaluation
Key Features
Innovative public service delivery
Earthquake resistant features
Operational framework
Implementation models
Training of staff
Transparency safeguards
Monitoring and evaluation
Align with sustainability (1st Organic State)
Web based Management Information System (MIS)
Implementation Model
Mason Training Handbook
Post Disaster Lessons
• Risk Identification - Damage Assessment
• Resilient Construction - Safe construction practices & Earthquake resistant features
• Implementation models - Owner Driven and Contractor Driven
• Preparedness - Institutional Capacity Building, engineers, masons training and Operational Framework
Key Considerations from learning
• Safety • Resilience • Sustainability • Cultural appropriateness • Sense of ownership • Ease of construction
Material and Design Options Matrix
Material and Design Options Matrix
The matrix provides the specifications and costs of each element of the house, and provides a basic set of specifications with the cost estimate derived from this set of specifications.
A beneficiary can use this matrix to arrive at the preferred set of specifications, as shown in an example above, within her targeted budget through a process of choices and trade-offs.
Some Pointers
In-situ rehabilitation preferred; relocation being last resort
Safety from all future hazards, including climate change impacts
Sustainability through appropriate materials and technologies
Cultural appropriateness in design
Owner driven approach
Monitoring through local bodies but using smart systems and software
“Ask not, what the disaster did to you;
instead, ask how far you have reached to face the next disaster better.”