Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

  • Upload
    oxfam

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    1/12

    Disaster Risk Reduction inDrought Cycle Management: A Learning CompanionOxfam Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate ChangeAdaptation Resources

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    2/12

    1. About this Companion

    This Companion aims to support Oxam sta to integrate

    disaster risk reduction (DRR) into programmes where

    drought is a signicant hazard. In East Arica, this work

    is commonly called drought cycle management (DCM).

    For more on this approach, please see the Oxam DCM

    bries available on the Intranet and rom [email protected].

    uk. I you need denitions and more inormation on key

    terminology used in DRR, please see the rst Companionin this series:An Introduction to Disaster Risk Reduction.

    2. What is drought cycle management?

    Droughts have traditionally been viewed as one-o

    disasters requiring an emergency response. Typically,

    emergency responses ocused on the delivery o ood

    aid and lie-saving humanitarian support including

    rehabilitating boreholes, emergency vaccination

    campaigns and so on. Following a drought, agencies

    tended to move onto rehabilitation programmes, such

    as restocking, and then back to normal development

    activities in various sectors such as health and education.However, given the requency o droughts in many regions,

    development work is increasingly disrupted and oten

    undermined by the shit to emergency response.

    Learning Objectives

    After reading this Companion, you should:

    knowwhatDCMisandhowitcanbeusedfor

    programming in dry land areas;

    understandtherangeofinterventionsthatare

    appropriatefordifferentstagesofthedroughtcycle;

    understandtheimportanceofpromotingriskreductioninyourworkondroughtcycle

    management;

    knowhowDRRrelatestoOxfamsOne

    ProgrammeApproachandhowitcanbe

    integratedacrossdepartmentsinprogramming

    for dry land areas;

    understandtheimportanceofinformation

    managementsystemsinDCMandhowto

    developthem;

    understandtheimportanceofadvocacyin

    applyingDRRapproacheswithindroughtcycle

    management; and

    knowwheretogotolearnmore.

    11

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    3/12

    2

    Oxfams DCM learning: Wajir Pastoral

    Development Programme, Kenya

    The periods when the Wajir Pastoral Development

    Programme is not involved with drought response

    or recovery are ew and ar between. From 1996

    to date, a response- and/or recovery-related

    programme has been ongoing in Wajir, in relation

    to either drought or food and interspersed withconfict and human health issues (excluding a short

    respite in 20023). Concentrating on development

    and mitigation activities has, thereore, been very

    dicult. This reinorces the notion that we cannot

    look at the drought cycle in discrete phases; rather,

    we must nd ways to increase DRR eorts at all

    stages but particularly as part o our response

    and recovery eorts.

    During the late 1980s and 1990s, drought became

    increasingly accepted as a normal occurrence in pastoral/

    dryland areas and not a rare or intrinsically disastrous event.

    The DCM model emerged rom this thinking and improved

    programmes that recognised the cyclical nature o drought.

    The DCM model acts as a guide to development agencies

    supporting pastoral communities in planning or and

    responding to droughts. By putting the drought cycle asthe central reerence point, it ensures that appropriate

    interventions are implemented beore, during and

    ater droughts. This ultimately reduces the risks and

    consequences o drought.

    Below: Pastoralists in Wajir migrating in search of new pasture. Photo: Brendan Cox/Oxfam

    2

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    4/12

    Itprovidesacommonframeworkagainstwhich

    humanitarian, development and advocacy work can be

    aligned to reinorce each other.

    ItisanexcellenttoolformainstreamingDRRactivitiesin

    the pastoral/dryland livelihood context, as the DCM model

    reduces the prominence o traditional relie activities,

    and emphasises the need or disaster mitigation and

    preparedness activities.

    Themulti-sectoralnatureofthemodelisverycompatiblewith a livelihoods approach to addressing pastoral

    development. By considering the multi-aceted ways in

    which drought aects pastoralists lives, it is easier to

    consider cross-sectoral linkages.

    3

    3. Why integrate the drought cycle management

    model into programming for dryland areas?

    The DCM model conceptualises drought as a cycle

    o our warning phases: normal, alert, emergency,

    and recovery. There are clear advantages in viewing

    drought as a cyclical process rather than an isolated

    event preceded and ollowed by normal development

    activity. Some o the benets o integrating the model into

    programming are as ollows:

    Themodelimprovesthetimeliness,appropriateness,and

    ultimately, the eectiveness o work by ensuring that activities

    are matched to the current stage o the drought cycle.

    MITIGATION

    PREPAREDNESS

    RECONSTRU

    CTION

    RELIEFASSISTANCE

    NormalA

    lertAlarm

    Emergency

    Recovery

    Information

    Community Development

    Contingency Planning

    Capacity Building

    Infrastructural Development

    Animal health interventions

    Human health interventions

    Emergency water supply systems

    Supplementary feeding of

    vulnerable groups

    Strategic stockpiling

    of cereals and grains

    Rehabilitation of

    critical boreholes

    Livestock Marketing

    Animal health

    Human health

    Supplementary

    feeding of livestock

    Restocking

    Rehabilitation of

    dams

    Capacity building

    Infrastructural

    development

    Food for work

    Cash for workNatual Resource

    Mangement

    Interventions

    The Original Drought Cycle Management Model. The DCM Model is widely understood within Eastern Arica and

    provides many benets to mangers and experts. Users o the model recognise that representing drought (and

    associated responses) as our distinct phases is a simplication. But the DCM model remains a well-accepted concept

    that ts well with programmers and pastoralists own understanding o the drought cycle.

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    5/12

    4

    4. Why use disaster risk reduction approaches

    alongside drought cycle management?

    Climate change adaptation and DRR are corporate

    priorities or Oxam, because Oxam recognises that it

    will be unable to ull its mission to overcome poverty and

    suering unless i can address the impact o disasters

    and climate change on peoples livelihoods.

    Many arid and semi-arid land areas are already eelingthe impact o climate change as it increases the severity

    and unpredictability o droughts and foods. In addition,

    high levels o poverty among pastoral populations and the

    deteriorating terms o trade have meant that communities

    in the drylands are increasingly vulnerable and at risk rom

    food, confict, livestock and human disease, and landslides.

    The DCM model ollows a simple logic easily understood

    and accepted by both pastoralists and sta in drought-

    prone areas. While Oxam has committed to integrate the

    DCM model into all pastoral programmes, the ailure to

    implement this commitment means that relie interventions

    can be late and inappropriate or example, when ood

    relie arrives months ater malnutrition rates have peaked.

    In addition, while the DCM approach has a specic

    ocus on vulnerability to drought, it is oten only applied

    in preparedness response and recovery, rather than to

    address the underlying causes o vulnerability and risk.

    Thereore, many programme managers are unable to

    determine whether, in the long-term, their programme

    reduces vulnerability to drought. For example, in Wajir,

    Oxam ound that the installation o new boreholes

    to provide water or livestock resulted in a shit in

    traditional herding patterns. This caused overgrazing and

    degradation o pastures normally used at the end o the

    dry season, thus urther undermining pastoralists ability

    to cope during a prolonged dry season or drought.

    5. How to integrate disaster risk reduction in

    drought cycle management programming

    DRR is not a radically new concept, but it is a valuable

    way o analysing humanitarian, development and

    advocacy programmes to improve their quality and

    eectiveness in targeting the most vulnerable people.

    Taking a DRR approach does not mean that you have

    to establish new or distinct projects, since risk is mosteectively reduced when DRR principles are internalised

    into wider programming. DRR should be considered at each

    stage o the programme cycle. Please see the Companion:

    An Introduction to Disaster Risk Reduction or more on this.

    To support programme sta to use the DCM model in

    practice, Oxam has identied the ollowing issues that

    should be considered when attempting to build a greater

    risk reduction ocus into a more comprehensive DCM

    approach:

    5.1 Identication: assessing and analysing levels of

    risk

    Risk is made up o the interaction between hazards,

    vulnerabilities and capacities. Generally, it is understood

    in the ollowing ormula:

    Risk = Hazard x Vulnerability

    Capacity

    Thereore, assessments o risk require analysis o

    hazards, vulnerabilities and capacities.

    There are a variety o dierent methodologies or

    analysing risk. Some o these are described in more

    detail in the CompanionAn introduction to Disaster Risk

    Reduction.

    Men who sold sick livestock as part of an Oxfam de-stocking programme. This was part of a range of measures to minimise the impact of the

    failure of the short rains in 2008. Photo: Jane Beesley/Oxfam

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    6/12

    5

    However, whichever methodology is used, the essential

    outputs o this process should include an understanding

    o:

    therangeandrelativeimportanceofhazardsaffecting

    the target population;

    thepriorityrisksexpressedbythecommunity;

    thegroupsmostlikelytobeseverelyaffected;

    whysomegroupsaremoreaffectedthanothers

    (including a capacity analysis o all stakeholders,especially the community itsel);

    whysomegroupsarelessabletocopethanothers;

    howOxfamscurrentprogrammesneedtochangeto

    reduce disaster impact and increase communities

    capacity to deal with hazards;

    theadditionalactivitiesrequiredtoreducerisksand

    vulnerability and build communities capacity to cope and

    respond;

    whichactivitiescanbecarriedoutbyOxfamandwhich

    by others; and

    anactionplan(forexample,acommunity-baseddisaster

    management plan CBDM).

    5.2 Design: drought-proong programme planning

    A key aspect o integrating DCM into programmes in arid

    and semi-arid land areas is learning to drought-proo

    programme work. This means that all programme teams

    need to consider how all interventions will continue or

    be modied in the (very likely) event o a drought. As a

    minimum this will entail ensuring that:

    projectproposalsincludeoptionsforarangeofactivities

    at dierent stages o the drought cycle;budgetsincludecontingencyamountsforadditional

    or expanded activities that may be required during the

    drought;

    projectstaff havetheskillsandtrainingrequiredto

    implement both development and humanitarian activities

    as circumstances dictate; and

    informationfromspecialisedexternalorinternalearly

    warning systems is incorporated into programme

    decision-making, even where the programmes ocus

    is not working directly on response to hazards. For

    example, an education project will still need early

    warning inormation about drought or foods to implementcontingency plans accordingly.

    Working within the drought cycle supporting livestock markets in Turkana, Kenya

    Oxfamslong-standingTurkanaprogrammeinKenyaidentiedastrategicneedtoimproveaccesstolivestock

    markets.Fundingwassecuredtosupportthedevelopmentoflocallivestockmarketingassociations(LMAs),

    constructfournewlivestockmarkets,anddeveloplinkswithlivestocktradersfromoutsidethearea.The

    objectivewastoensurethatlocalstakeholdersinthelivestocksectorwereactivelyinvolvedinmajorlivestock

    interventionsandinmakinglivestockmarketswork.

    Theprojectfacedmanydifculties,asChristopherEkuwom,OxfamsLivestockProjectOfcerinTurkana

    explains:Aswewerecompletingtheconstructionofthemarketsitbecameclearthatadroughtwas

    developing.Thismeantwehadtodelaytheopeningofthemarketsassomuchlivestockhadlefttheareain

    searchofpasture.ThedroughtalsoforcedOxfamtoshiftitspriorities.Wereallocatedthefundingtoundertake

    emergencyde-stocking.Justwhenthedroughtendedandmarketconditionsreturnedtonormal,theareawas

    hitbyanoutbreakofPPR(goatplague).Thismeantlivestockwerequarantined,soagainthemarketswere

    unabletooperate.Soagainwereallocatedprojectfundingtoundertakeanemergencyvaccinationcampaign.

    Butthistime,theLMAswerestrongerandplayedakeypartintheemergencyresponse,collaboratingwellwith

    localstructures.Finally,OxfamandtheLMAsmanagedtoopenthemarketsassoonasthequarantinewas

    lifted.TheactivityofLMAsthroughtheemergencyperiodwaskeyforkeepingthemvibrantandforbeingabletoswitchbacktodevelopmentactivitiesassoonastheconditionspermitted.

    TheLMAsarenowrecognisedaskeystakeholdersintheareaandhavegainedfurtherlegitimacyfrom

    pastoralists.Thishasgivenpastoralistsaccesstoinformationandaleveloforganisationabsentbefore.The

    fourmarketsrunbyLMAsaimedtolinkproducerstohigher-valueterminalmarketsinLodwarandbigger

    centres.Despitethedelaystotheiropening,thesaleyardsarenowvaluableassetsandareinregularuse,

    raisingsalesincomeforpastoralists.

    TheprojectwasnotinitiallyconceivedwithDRRinmind.However,severaldisastersstruckduringtheproject

    thatforcedOxfamtomodifyprojectstoincorporateaDRRapproachthathasultimatelyreducedthedisaster

    risktothetargetpopulation.Thisexamplehighlightshowimportantstructuralproblems,suchasalackof

    markets,canbeaddressedinawaythatadaptstothedifferentstagesofthedroughtcycleandsupportsnotonlycommunitiesresiliencetorecurrentdroughtsandotherhazardsbutalsotheirabilitytorespond.

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    7/12

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    8/12

    9

    5.3 Implementation: DRR in practice

    Preparedness

    Establishmentandcapacitybuildingofdisaster

    management committees and other structures

    Developmentofcontingencyplansbyallstakeholders

    Supportingdevelopmentof earlywarninginformation

    policy

    Livelihoods

    Facilitatinglivestockde-stockingbeforeconditionand

    prices decline

    Restockinginrecoveryperiods,butidentifying

    appropriate breeds or crop varieties

    Improvingaccesstomarkets

    Foodorcashforworkideallygearedtowardsrisk

    reduction

    Cashorsocialtransferprogrammesthatcontinueuntil

    other income sources are established

    Financialservices:savings,credit,insurance

    Advocacyonkeypolicyissuese.g.landuseplanning,environmental protection

    WASH

    Maximisingthenumberandreliabilityofwatersources,

    e.g. rehabilitating boreholes, construction o water

    catchment systems, training water user associations

    Ensureconsistentpromotionofhygieneandsanitation

    that continues ater emergency response and is

    appropriate to pastoral liestyles.

    Health and education

    HIVpreventionactivitiesLobbyingforservicesforpeopleaffectedbyHIV

    Lobbyforcontinuedimmunisationcampaigns

    Provisionofmobileoralternativeeducationsystems

    5.4 Implementation: incorporating advocacy

    Marginalisation is a primary actor in the vulnerability o

    pastoral and other drought-aected populations. This

    is because communities such as pastoralists generally

    lack the means to hold the powerul to account, so too

    oten their rights are not addressed relative to the rest

    o the population. Too many governments only ocus

    on drought-aected populations during the emergency

    stage when welare indicators or the media spotlight

    highlight a crisis. The DCM model is a useul means to

    ensure that authorities consider communities rights at all

    stages o the drought cycle. This involves ensuring that

    humanitarian, development and campaign programming

    all aim to:

    helppastoraliststobuildordeveloptheirown

    organisations, through which they can represent

    themselves and their values, and come to understand,

    articulate and claim their rights; and

    workwithotherstoinuencethoseinpowertobecome

    more responsive to pastoralists needs and concerns.

    Harvesting sorghum in Mali. The seeds for drought resistantsorghum were provided by Oxfam. Photo: Dave Clark/Oxfam

    7

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    9/12

    Pastoralists engaging with politicians in Wajir

    Withanilliteracyrateofabout80percent(WajirDistrictDevelopmentPlan,20028),pastoralistsinWajirare

    poorlyinformedandnotwellrepresentedinkeydecision-makingforums.

    Despitesomeadvancesinpro-pastoralistpolicy,thereisstillawidespreadlackofrmcommitmentstodevelop

    thepastoralareasaccordingtothewishesandaspirationsofpastoralcommunities.Forexample,service

    provisionineducation,health,veterinaryservices,trade,andwater,andoverallresourceallocationfailto

    considerpastoralistsvulnerabilityandwayoflife.

    Until2007,theWajirprogrammefocusedonsupportingmembershiporganisations(suchaspastoral

    associationsandwomenssavingsgroups),civilsocietyorganisations,andthedistrictgovernment(Pastoral

    SteeringCommittee).However,asignicanttrendinWajiroverthepastvetotenyearshasbeenthegrowing

    strengthofclanpoliticsandthegrowinginuenceofthepoliticalclass(MPs,councillorsandothers).Partof

    thereasonforthiswastheincreasedavailabilityofdevolvedfundsandthediversionofresponsibilityforthese

    fundsfromlineministriestoelectedrepresentatives.Unfortunately,whiletheseactorshavesignicantpowerfor

    good,inmanyinstancestheywereunderminingtheeffortsoftheotherthreegroups.

    Strategiescurrentlybeingemployedtosupportpastoraliststohaveagreatervoiceandinuenceoverpolitical

    decision-makinginclude:

    1. Strengthening constituency advocacy groups and pastoral associations, by:

    increasingtheirawarenessonarangeofissues,includingbasicrights,devolvedfundsandtheirmanagement,

    policydevelopment,andthedistrictplanningprocess;

    encouragingdebateaboutthequalityofleadership,bothwithincommunityorganisationsandinthedistrictasa

    whole(includingattentiontoissuesofequityandexclusionfromagenderandgenerationalpointofview);and

    strengtheningnegotiationandrepresentationskills,tohelppeoplemaketheircaseandpresenttheirarguments.

    2. Engaging directly with political leaders, for example by:

    organisingregulareventsatwhichcommunitiesandleaderscanmeetanddebate;

    briengpoliticalleadersaboutdevelopmentactivitiesandpriorities;and

    involvingpoliticalleadersinprogrammeactivities(suchasevaluations).

    3. Encouraging transparency in the use of district resources, for example by:

    documentingtheimpactofdevolvedfundsanddisseminatingthisinformationwidely;

    doingthesamewithrespecttoNGOandpastoralistassociationfunds,inordertosetanexample;and

    encouragingmoretransparentsystemsofmanagementfordevolvedfunds.

    Women dancing at the Museum

    Centre in Ololosokwan,

    Tanzania. The centre was

    developed by the villagewomens groups with support

    from the village government.Because of the project, the

    village government also gave

    women rights over land, anovel concept in Masai society.

    Photo: Geoff Sayer/Oxfam.

    8

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    10/12

    11

    5.5 Monitoring and evaluation: improving information

    management systems

    Good inormation is central to DCM programming, both

    to identiy the drought cycle stage and to review and

    assess the appropriateness o interventions. The ollowing

    recommendations will ensure the quality o inormation

    management systems:

    Improve external context monitoring. Moving rom aproject-based monitoring and evaluation system to a

    comprehensive inormation management system helps

    programme sta to understand how the external context

    aects their programming activities. For example,

    this might include collecting data to show changes in

    community wealth status (wealth ranking), access to and

    usage o productive assets, inrastructure and resources

    (resource mapping), and changes in policies or laws.

    Collecttherightinformation. Most programmes already

    collect too much inormation. Programmes must

    examine what decisions they need to infuence and

    what inormation is required to do this. Only collect theinormation needed. The table below highlights potential

    components and intervals or gathering data.

    EnsureinformationsystemsaredrivenbyafewSMART

    indicators. A single strategy with shared goals and

    objectives is a key element o the One Programme

    Approach. Progress in achieving these goals and

    objectives should be measured using a minimum number

    o agreed targets and indicators. The indicators should

    clearly relate to the programme logic and should include

    reerence to vulnerability and coping capacity. Having

    similar indicators which require dierent data or settingtoo many indicators make it less likely that data will be

    gathered and that monitoring and evaluation will give the

    inormation needed to inorm decision-making.

    Increasethecapacitytouse,analyseandrespondto

    information. Oten, it is not the quantity o inormation

    that is usually a problem, but the critical gap is oten in

    the quality and use o this inormation. The purpose o

    collecting data should be to inorm programme decision-

    making, and it is vital to ensure that systems are in place

    to make this happen.

    Createalearningorganisation.Recording and sharing

    inormation between sta within programmes andbetween dierent area or country programmes is

    essential.

    Baseline context

    assessment

    Repeat context

    monitoring

    Early warning

    Emergency needs

    assessment

    Project monitoring

    Project impactevaluations

    Programme

    monitoring reviews

    Documentation or

    advocacy

    Inrequent (e.g. every

    ve years or when

    context changes

    Periodic (annual to

    every three years)

    Continuous (at regular

    intervals)

    As required (annual)

    Continuous

    Periodic (annual orbi-annual)

    Periodic (every six

    months)

    As required

    No standard ormat, but could use PCVA, RVPA, or HEA. 1 See the

    LearningCompaniononDRRAnalysisformoreinformationonthese

    tools and methods.

    This provides a regular update to the baseline context assessment.

    Frequency depends on the size o the survey.

    Should be led by government bodies, with agencies working to improve

    the quality o inormation and analysis not duplicating eorts.

    Undertaken during alert/emergency phases as required. Should be

    used to ne tune existing contingency plans.

    Project monitoring should ocus on tracking process indicators (e.g.

    activities and outputs). Sector-specic surveys can add to overall

    context monitoring and be used to assess wider impacts (nutrition,

    water quality, KAP2 survey etc.).

    These ocus on data collected at outcome and impact level and

    usually provide recommendations which can be incorporated into

    uture project planning.

    These are critical opportunities to analyse the inormation collected

    through monitoring in order to review progress against indicators, the

    outcomes o evaluations or impact assessments in order to identiy

    opportunities to improve programme quality.

    A good inormation management system should provide data which

    strengthens lobbying and advocacy eorts.

    Component of a comprehensive information system

    5.6 DRR and the One Programme Approach

    Activities to eectively manage drought risk and

    response all under the remit o both Humanitarian and

    Development departments. This oten makes it dicult to

    implement DCM programming e ectively, as almost all

    9

    programmes tend to organise themselves into separate

    departments with distinct work plans, projects, and

    resources. By ollowing the principles o Oxams One

    Programme Approach, some o the problems

    encountered can be overcome.

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    11/12

    10

    Key questions to consider when implementing a OneProgramme Approach include:

    Doestheprogrammehaveacommonvisionandstrategy

    that is widely accepted by both Humanitarian and

    Development department sta?

    Domanagementstructuresandsystemsreinforceor

    undermine the One Programme Approach?

    Arerolesandresponsibilitiesclearbetweendepartments,

    eld and head oces, and individuals?

    Aregoodleadersinplacethatwilltakeresponsibilityfor

    leading delivery and change?

    7. Further readingMany o the documents listed below are available on

    the Oxam Intranet or online. I you are having diculty

    locating a resource, please email [email protected] to

    request a copy.

    BartonD,MortonJandHendyC(2001)Lessonsfor

    DroughtContingencyPlanninginthePastoralLivestock

    Sector: an Overview. In: Morton J (ed.) Pastoralism,

    Drought and Planning: Lessons from Northern Kenya and

    Elsewhere. National Resources Institute, Chatham

    HECA (2008) Drought Cycle Management: Concepts

    and practical guidance in integrating drought cycle

    management into pastoral programming in the Horn and

    East Africa a series o bries or practitioners

    IIRR/AcaciaConsultantsLtd./Cordaid(2004)Drought

    Cycle Management a toolkit for the drylands for the

    Greater Horn

    Useful websites

    www.aridland.go.ke

    www.droughtnet.org

    www.livestock-emergencies.net

    www.nri.org/work/pastoralists.htmwww.oxam.org.uk/resources/learning/pastoralism

    www.proventionconsortium.org

    www.undp.org/drylands

    The HECA Regional Pastoralist Programme is the primary

    source of expertise in DCM for Oxfam. You can contact

    Helen Bushell at [email protected]. For more advice

    on integrating DRR into your programme, please contact

    your regional Food Security, Livelihoods or DRR Advisor or

    the PPT Adaptation and Risk Reduction team in Oxford

    [email protected].

    Men sitting atop the earthen bank of Nalapatui water pan, which was created with Oxfam support. Nalapatui pan allows the Turkana herding

    groups to exploit dry season grazing on the western border of the district without crossing into Uganda for water. Photo:Crispin Hughes/Oxfam.

    6. Summary of key learning from this

    companion

    DCMprovidesacommonframeworktoalign

    humanitarian,developmentandadvocacywork

    andimprovestheeffectivenessofinterventions

    byensuringthatactivitiesarematchedtothe

    currentstageofthedroughtcycle.

    DCMcanbecombinedwithDRRapproaches

    toensurethatprogrammesarereducing

    vulnerabilitytodroughtandotherhazards.This

    shouldincludehazardsthatwillbecomemore

    frequentorwidespreadduetoclimatechange.

    Planningshouldtakeintoaccountthedrought

    cycleandconsiderhowallinterventionscanbe

    adaptedfordifferentconditions.

    Informationmanagementsystemsthatcapture

    datarelatingtotheexternalcontextand

    communitiesvulnerabilitiesandcapacitiesare

    essentialtoinformprogrammedecision-making.

    Advocacytoensurethatgovernmentsrespond

    appropriatelytotheneedsofcommunitiesatall

    stagesofthedroughtcycleisacrucialpartofa

    DRRapproach.

    1 Participatory Capacity and Vulnerability Assessment (PCVA), Risk Vulnerability and Poverty Assessment (RVPA) and Household Economy Analysis (HEA). Theassessment should provide inormation that can be used to set and track overall programme indicators.

    2 Knowledge, Attitude and Practice

  • 8/6/2019 Disaster Risk Reduction in Drought Cycle Management: A learning companion

    12/12

    Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation arecorporateprioritiesforOxfamGB.TheLearningCompanionsareaseto articles, which provide accessible and practical guidance to Oxam sta wishing to integrate DRR and Climate Change adaptation

    approaches into programming. To nd out about other resources on Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation, and to give us

    your eedback on these resources, please contact the Programme Resource Centre. Email: [email protected]

    Pastoralists herd their cattle ready or vaccination at the launch o the Oxam supported Cattle Vacination Campaign in the Gao region, Mali.

    Photo: Dave Clark/Oxam

    OxfamisaregisteredcharityinEnglandandWalesNo202918andScotlandSCO039042.Inhouse4087