18
Event sponsored by Affinnova All copyright owned by The Future Place and the presenters of the material For more informa=on about Affinnova visit h>p://www. affinnova.com/ For more informa=on about NewMR events visit newmr.org Advanced Quant Techniques July 14, 2011 MBC, as Easy As ABC? An introduc:on to Menu Based Conjoint Dirk Huisman, SKIM

Dirk huisman advanced quant - 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Event  sponsored  by  Affinnova  All  copyright  owned  by  The  Future  Place  and  the  presenters  of  the  material  For  more  informa=on  about  Affinnova  visit  h>p://www.  affinnova.com/  

For  more  informa=on  about  NewMR  events  visit  newmr.org  

Advanced  Quant  Techniques  July  14,  2011  

MBC,  as  Easy  As  ABC?  An  introduc:on  to  Menu  Based  Conjoint  

Dirk  Huisman,  SKIM  

Page 2: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Dirk Huisman Chairman | SKIM

expect  great  answers  

MBC, as Easy As ABC? An introduction to Menu Based Conjoint  

Page 3: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

What is Menu-Based Conjoint?

An exercise that replicates a specific kind of choice situation by allowing consumers (respondents) to specify their desired product by selecting single features or bundled group of features. Menu-based conjoint is the family name showing the relation with other variations to conjoint analysis, a class of discrete choice models. You may also call it a build-your-own product exercise.

Page 4: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

In “traditional” CBC a consumer choses among full profiles

Page 5: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Traditional CBC is most suitable for “complete” products without optional features

•  Consumers do intuitively choose one out of several pre-defined concepts and repeat the “shopping trip”.

•  Methodology has been validated and results are calibrated to fully mimic reality

but

•  This does not mimic many real life choice situations:

Page 6: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Capturing real life in a fast food restaurant looks as easy as ABC Building your own product is as easy as ordering a meal at Burger King Mmmh, today I

feel for a Whopper. I mean, the

menu, with fries and Coke ..and I could go

large, it’s only $1 more!

Surprise me, they have cookies!

OK, then I’ll not take the menu, just a whopper, and a

cookie And who cares I am about to consume

2500 calories. It’s a balance day.

Page 7: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Choice situations where combining items matters, require Menu Based Conjoint

•  Menu optimization in fast food/branded restaurant chains

•  Converging TLC markets / services: bundling •  BYO computers (e.g. Dell) •  Optional features pricing optimization in automotive

market •  Add-on services in the financial and insurance

services industry •  Mix and Match situations like in apparel

Page 8: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Whopper    $3.50                California    W.  $  4.50  

Omega3    $3.75                Chicken  Deli  $  3.50  

Cheddar    $0.50              American  cheese                                                                                          $  0.75  

Crispy  Onions    $1.50  

Bacon    $1.50  

Curly  fries  $1.25  

French  fries  $1.05  

✔   ✔  

✔  

✔  Supersize  +  $

0.25  

✔  

Total  price  $  8.50    

Mimicking reality in the choice task is not complex

Page 9: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Or why don’t we build our own computer, as if we’re Dell?

Page 10: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

MBC sound like a great idea. Why didn’t we do it earlier?

•  Computational barriers are relieved •  Hundreds of ways you can configure your product •  Computationally not feasible to take all of them into

account •  Lack of rules to meaningfully aggregate and generalize

individual ideal points

•  Recent developments make it easier (not easy) •  New interest in the methodology, better estimates •  Papers and methodological conferences •  Commercially available software to analyze

Page 11: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

•  Realistic choice tasks, representative for a different class of choice situations

•  Enables predictions about many items

•  Valuable insights into aspects not captured by CBC •  Most-often chosen combination, explicitly allowing

for interaction effects between items •  Cross-effects price sensitivity and cannibalization

effects •  Menu pricing and discounts

MBC is new. Is it better?

Page 12: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

%  =mes  a  single  burger  is  purchased  

Cookie  Price   Price  discount  for  a  menu  Forecast how a price change for one or more of the menu items impacts revenues

Menu  

%  =mes  cookies  are  included  in  an  order  

MBC results: valuable new insights

Estimate interaction effects between menu items, suggesting cannibalization dynamics

Page 13: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

0%  

5%  

10%  

15%  

20%  

25%  

Tofu  burger  +  Vitamin  water  

+  pecan  cookie  

Tofu  burger  +  Vitamin  water  

+  fries  

Tofu  burger  +  Soda  +  fries  

Tofu  burger  +  Soda  +  salad  

Tofu  burger  +  Soda  +  muesly  

yogurt  

Tofu  burger  +  Vitamin  water  

+  fries  

Tofu  burger  +  Fruit  juice  +  

fries  

Most chosen combinations of drink and sides when a Tofu burger is chosen

Most notably how menu items perform in conjunction

Observation of the most common combinations suggests the creation of a new menu based on Tofu burger and Vitamin water

Page 14: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Challenges are primarily due to the “infancy” of the approach

•  Analysis approach under development •  Different methods for analyzing different approaches to MBC

and BYO are known •  But we lack a golden standard or precise guidelines; the

final decision is left to the “experience” of the methodologist •  Computationally intensive

•  Survey challenges •  Respondent fatigue in a situation of repetitive tasks needed

for collecting sufficient data point •  Large sample sizes necessary for validity and precision

Page 15: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

Q & A

Dirk  Huisman  SKIM  

Sue  York  The  Future  Place  

Page 16: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

For further information: Technical papers about MBC: Bakken, David G. and Megan Kaiser Bond (2004), “Estimating Preferences for Product Bundles vs. a la carte Choices”, Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, pp 123-134. Cohen, Steven H. and John C. Liechty (2007), “Have it Your Way: Menu-based conjoint analysis helps marketers understand mass customization”, Marketing Research Magazine, Fall 2007, pp 28-34. Liechty, John, Venkatram Ramaswamy, and Steven H. Cohen (2001), “Choice Menus for Mass Customization: An Experimenal Approach for Analyzing Customer Demand with an Application to a Web-Based Information Service”, Journal of Marketing Research, May 2001, pp 183-196. Rogers, Greg and Tim Renken (2003), “Validation and Calibration of Choice-Based Conjoint for Pricing Research,” Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, pp 209-215. Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Gershenfeld (1998), “Multi-featured Products and Services: Analysing Pricing and Bundling Strategies”, Journal of Forecasting, 17. Conklin. M., B. Paris, T. Boehnlien-Kearby, C. Johnson, K. Juhl, A. Zanetti-Polzi, K. Gustafson, B. Palmer, (2007) “Menu Based Choice Models”, ART Forum. Bryan K. Orme,,(2010) “Menu-Based Choice Modeling Using Traditional Tools”, Sawtooth Software, RESEARCH PAPER SERIES

Page 17: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

contact us or follow us online!

SKIM

Dirk Huisman | Chairman [email protected] | +31 102823561

twi>er.com/  skimgroup  

facebook.com/  skimgroup  

linkedin.com/  company/skim  

youtube.com/  skimvideos  skimgroup.com  

Page 18: Dirk huisman   advanced quant - 2011

Dirk Huisman, SKIM, The Netherlands NewMR Advanced Quant Techniques, July 14, 2011

contact us or follow us online!

SKIM | Locations New York, USA Juan Andrés Tello [email protected] +1 201 963 8430 Rotterdam, NL Mini Kalivianakis [email protected] +31 10 282 3535

twi>er.com/  skimgroup  

facebook.com/  skimgroup  

linkedin.com/  company/skim  

youtube.com/  skimvideos  skimgroup.com  

Geneva, Switzerland Vicky Nef [email protected] +41 22 747 7519 London, UK Debora Corfield [email protected] +44 203 178 6910