Upload
others
View
3
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Karl-Winnacker-Institut
Direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide with
CO2 as solvent in a membrane micro reactor
A. Pashkova1, U. Krtschil2, C. Hofmann2, V. Hessel2, D. Kirschneck3, W. Linhart3
1 Karl-Winnacker-Institut, DECHEMA e.V2 Institut für Mikrotechnik Mainz GmbH
3 Microinnova Engineering GmbH
10th December 2009Osnabrück
Technical Chemistry
Outline
Motivation
Hydrogen peroxide direct synthesis: a brief
overview of concepts
Project idea, goals, partners and responsibilities
Catalyst preparation
Double membrane micro reactor
Experimental set-up
First test measurements
Summary and outlook
Technical Chemistry
H2O2 – efficient and environmentally friendly
Annual global consumption of H2O2 is ca 3·106
t/y[1]
Expected growth (just for the
HPPO-Process)
is ca 2·105 t/y[1]
[1] C. Brasse und B. Jaeger, Elements 17 (2006) 4-7[2] J.Fierro et al., Angew. Chemie 118 (2006) 7116-7139[3] S. Schlag et al.„Hydrogen peroxide“, Report, SRI Consulting (2009)
Applications in Europe [2]World consumption [3]
+ “Green” chemical, the only by-product is water
+ Higher activity and selectivity than molecular oxygen
H2O2 benefits
– Relative high manufacturing price 0.53-0.80 € /kg
– Complicated industrial synthesis according to the “Anthraquinone Process”:
• expensive and complex solvent system • waste of solvent due to side reactions• energy intensive separation and concentration steps• economically viable only for large scale production
units (>40 kt/a)
H2O2 limitations
Technical Chemistry
Direct synthesis of H2O2: a brief overview of concepts
+ Separate H2 and O2 supply ⇒ improved safety– Dense Pd layer ⇒ limited mass transfer of H2
– Complicated membrane preparation
Dense palladium - membrane
V. Choudhary et al., Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 1776S. Abate et al., Catalysis Today 104 (2005) 323*L. Wang et al., Applied Catalysis B 79 (2008) 157
Productivity*: 9,5 [gH2O2 m-2 h-1]
Support: tubular ceramic membranes (Al2O3/TiO2 etc.)
Safety: Wide explosion range of H2/O2mixtures (4-94 vol.%)
Activity: Low reactant concentrations dueto low solubility of H2 and O2 ⇒ high
pressure; organic solvents; additives
Selectivity:water is thermodynamically more stable
Pd or PdX (X = Au, Pt) supported catalyst
*C. Samanta, Appl. Catal. A 350 (2008) 133 Productivity*: 43,5 [gH2O2 gPd
-1 h-1]
Support: inorganic powder (Al2O3/TiO2 /zeolites etc.)Porous palladium - membrane: catalytic
membrane contactor
Pashkova A. et al., Chem. Eng. J. 139 (2008) 165
+ Separated H2 and O2 supply ⇒ improved safety
+ Highly dispersed Pd nanoparticles (no dense Pd layer ⇒ increased productivity
? Moderate mass transfer limitations
Productivity:43,2 [gH2O2 gPd
-1 h-1] / 206 [gH2O2 m-2 h-1]
Liquid
Gas
Gas
Membrane length
Mem
bran
e ra
dius
Gas/liquidcontact
Liquid
Active material(e.g. Pd; Pd/X)
H2O2
(H2O)
thickness: 5 – 50 µmpore-Ø: 100 nm
thickness: 10 – 100 µmpore-Ø: 0,2 – 0,8 µm
Support
Intermediatelayer(s)
thickness: 1 – 3 mmpore-Ø: 3 µm
1 – 10 µm
Gas (overpressure)
Surface Layer/Catalytic zone
H2
O2
Technical Chemistry
Project ideaLimitations of the membrane contactor concept
Limited H2 transport only by diffusion from the centre of the channel (din = 7 mm) to the catalytic zone (channel wall) in the conditions of laminar flow
Use of organic solvents (methanol, ethanol) and presence of additives (acid, halide) may not be favourable for a lot of H2O2 applications
CO2 as mediumnon toxic, non flammable easy separable from theproducts by simple expansion of the reaction mixtureenhanced transport propertiesof the reactants
Aqueous solutions preferred ⇒search for alternative solvents
Use of membranesenhanced process safety –separate supply of H2 and O2direct supply and even distribution of H2 und O2along the micro channel
Keep the benefits of a membrane
Aim of the projectTo develop a compact and efficient continuous process for “on site” production of aqueous hydrogen peroxide solutions, based on the direct oxidation of H2 with O2 in liquid or supercritical CO2 over Pd
supported catalysts in a special micro structured double membrane reactor
Micro reaction technologyenhanced heat- and mass-transfer and reduced limitations on reaction kineticsimproved process safetyrelative simple scale-up(numbering up)
Smaller channel sizes are preferred
Technical Chemistry
Project partners and responsibilities
Milestones19 Months: Collect positive results from the laboratory experiments (with
catalyst activity and selectivity relevant for a technical process) 24 Months: Choose one preferable H2O2 application 29 Months: Finish with the scale-up und design of the prototype
support for the automation of the experimental set-up techno economical analysis of the process
MicroinnovaEngineering GmbH
catalyst preparation design and manufacture of the double membrane micro reactorfor the laboratory experiments scale-up and design of a prototype reactor
IMM Mainz GmbH
design, construction and putting into operation of the experimental set-up proof of concept at a laboratory scalecatalyst screening experiments and characterisationprocess simulation demonstration of a prototype process (scale-up)
KWI/DECHEMA e.V.(coordinator)
Technical Chemistry
Catalyst preparation / IMM
air80 mgPd(NH3)4(NO3)21% Pd/TiO24
N287 mgPd(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O35
air94 mgPd(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O31
N287 mgPd(NH3)4(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O36
air78 mgPd(NO3)21% Pd/TiO23
air82 mgPd(NH3)4(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O32
Calcinationatmosphere
Catalyst mass
Pd precursorCatalyst
One test micro reactor = one catalyst typeChannel geometry (l, w, h): 150 x 0,5 x 0,6 mmNumber of channels per plate: 20After coating two plates are welded togetherMaximal pressure: 150 bar; Maximal temperature: 50°CVolume flow: 5 to 20 ml min-1
Aim of the catalyst screening experimentsTo identify the most suitable catalyst for the direct synthesis reaction in an earlier project phase.
thickness of one coating layer is 50 – 60 µm
can be varied through multiple coatings
Wash coating procedure
catalyst powder
support material
Al2O3, TiO2
precursorPd(NH3)4(NO3)2,Pd(NO3)2
catalyst suspension
stabilizerAcetic acid
binderPVA
coating of the channels
drying and calcination
impregnation
450°C, 6 hoursin air or N2
Pd content0,5; 1; 2%
Technical Chemistry
Double membrane micro reactor / IMM
Reactor components and dimensions
Plates: 316 L ssO-Rings: Viton
Channel dimensions (l,w,h) ca 500 x 0,5 x 2 mm
Reactor dimensions (l,w,h) ca 600 x 60 x 60 x mm
Reactor volume 2 x ca 10 ml
Weight: ca 20 kg
Possible membrane materialsmicro sieves polymer membranes planar porous ceramics
CatalystsSupported Pd or PdX (X = Au, Pt) in the form of wall coating or a packed bed
membrane(O2)
O2
O2
H2
reactionmedium
catalyst
membrane(H2)
gasdistributor
coolingchannel
spacing frame (optional)
catalyst plate/ CO2channels
spacing frame (optional)
H2 membraneH2 supply
O2 supply
cooling
cooling
O2 membrane
Technical Chemistry
H2O2, H2O(CO2, O2)
CO2
(O2/H2)
expansionvalve I
preheater
liq.
gassepa
rato
rCO2 tank
CO2
pump
cooling
N2
O2
MFCfilter
H2
PI
expansionvalve II
rotameter
Gas analysis
filter
filter
check valve
check valvePI
microreactor
MFC
MFC
MFC
PM -101 PE - 103
pressure module expansion module
reactive module
gas supply
Experimental set-up / KWI designed and constructed together with NWA analytische Messgeräte GmbH, Lörrach/Dsuitable for experiments with both liquid and supercritical CO2
P = 60 to 200 bar; T = -10 to + 50°C; F(CO2) = 50 to 350 nL h-1 = 100 to 700 g h-1
Technical Chemistry
H2O2 direct synthesis experiment in liquid CO2 / KWI
Gas supplyMFC(N2) = 30 ml min-1 = 8,72x10-2 mol min-1
MFC(O2) = 20 ml min-1= 5,81x10-2 mol min-1
MFC(H2) = 10 ml min-1= 2,91x10-2 mol min-1
H2/O2/N2/CO2 = 7,1/14,2/21,3/57,4 %
System parametersT1(heater) = 20°CP1(system) = 69 barT2(exp.valve I) = 80°CP2(separator) = 16,9 bar
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 700
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
CO
2 gas flow [L m
in-1]
Pre
ssur
e [b
ar]
Time [min]
P1 System
0
2
4
6
8
10
CO2 Flow /gas/
P2 Separator
F(CO2-g) = 5,7 L min-1
F(CO2-l) = 14 ml min-1
Catalyst 5: 1%Pd/Al2O3, 87 mg
Inactive catalystExperiments with conventional solvent (MeOH) required
Decomposition inside the set-upTry to separate the products before the expansion (cooling trap?)Find a suitable chemical reaction for online H2O2 consumption (e.g. “in
situ” H2O2 generation for an oxidation process)
+ stable operation
- no H2O2 or H2O in the separator after one hour
Technical Chemistry
H2O2 direct synthesis with conventional solvent / KWI
N2
O2
MFCfilter
H2
filter
filter
check valve
check valve
microreactor
MFC
MFC
MFCPI
saturator
H2/O2/N2
expansionvalve
MeOH/H2O2/H2O
air
N2
air
air
Calcination atmosphere
1,35,7Pd(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O3
63,58
14,9
10,32
Productivity[gH2O2 gPd
-1 h-1]
9,4
10,1
9,7
Selectivity[%]
Pd(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O3
Pd(NO3)21% Pd/TiO2
Pd(NH3)4(NO3)21% Pd/Al2O3
Pd precursorCatalyst
Experimental conditionsSolvent MeOH without additives (acid and bromide)Psystem = 60 barH2/O2/N2 = 5/32/63 vol %
Single pass experiments
+ active catalysts for the direct synthesis of H2O2 with a conventional solvent
- low selectivity probably due to the lack of additives ⇒ catalyst modification with halide during preparation
- low productivity due to low Pd amount ⇒ multiple coating
Results summary
Technical Chemistry
H2O2/CO2 interactions
H2O2 solubility in CO2T = 40°C; P = 80 – 160 barVery low solubility: from 1,46x10-4 g/g CO2 for 80 bar to 1,37x10-4 g/g CO2 for 160 bar
VTP, Ruhr Universität Bochum
No data was found on solubility of H2O2 in CO2 (liquid/supercritical)
Carbagas
Experiments in a high pressure view cellFirma NWA/Prof. Krez , Center for Isolation of Natural Substances, Maribor,Slovenia
Phase observationsfor 4 – 6 % H2O2/H2O; T = 30°C; 40°C; P = 50 – 170 barCO2 is always upper phase
H2O2 Extraction with scCO2 from aqueous solutionFor 4 – 6 % H2O2/H2OT = 30/40°CP = 50 – 170 barS/F = 2,0 – 4,7 kg CO2/kg Feed
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800
1
2
3
4
5
6
S/F = 2 kg CO2/kg Feed; 30°C S/F = 4,7 kg CO2/kg Feed; 40°C
H2O
2 [Gew
. %]
Druck [bar]
H2O2 /CO2 behaviour
+ beneficial for product separation
- unfavourable concerning the homogeneity in the
reaction channel
Technical Chemistry
Summary and outlook
Summary
completed and put into operation the
experimental set-up; recompression of the CO2
still has to be implemented
successfully prepared catalysts (micro reactors)
for screening experiments
Identified promising catalytic system Pd/TiO2 in
a conventional solvent
gathered first knowledge about the behaviour
of the system H2O2/scCO2
Outlook
catalyst optimisation: higher Pd loadings;
modification with halide groups
catalyst characterisation: BET, porosity,
Pd particle size, Pd dispersion
further experiments with CO2 as solvent
and optimisation of the experimental set-up
Technical Chemistry
Acknowledgements
Prof. Roland Dittmeyer*Laurent Bortolotto
Wolfgang RüthHorst Fiege
Technical chemistry group at KWI
* now at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Thank you for the attention !
Time for discussion ....
Financial support Project partner