Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Economic Report
of the President
Transmitted to the Congress
February 1983
TOGETHER WITH
THE ANNUAL REPORTOF THE
COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1983
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, D.C. 20402
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CONTENTS
Page
ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT 1
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC AD-VISERS* 9
CHAPTER 1. FROM RECESSION TO RECOVERY AND GROWTH 17
CHAPTER 2. T H E DUAL PROBLEMS OF STRUCTURAL AND CYCLICAL
UNEMPLOYMENT 29
CHAPTER 3. T H E UNITED STATES IN THE WORLD ECONOMY:
STRAINS ON THE SYSTEM 51
CHAPTER 4. INCREASING CAPITAL FORMATION 77
CHAPTER 5. T H E BURDEN OF ECONOMIC REGULATION 96
CHAPTER 6. REVIEW OF 1982 AND THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK 124
APPENDIX A. REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF
THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS DURING 1982 147
APPENDIX B. STATISTICAL TABLES RELATING TO INCOME, EM-
PLOYMENT, AND PRODUCTION , 157
*For a detailed table of contents of the Council's Report, see page IS.
(Ill)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ECONOMIC REPORT
OF THE PRESIDENT
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
To the Congress of the United States:
Two years ago, I came to Washington with a deep personal com-mitment to change America's economic future. For more than adecade, the economy had suffered from low productivity growth anda rising rate of inflation. Government spending absorbed an increas-ing share of national income. A shortsighted view of economic prior-ities was destroying our prospects for long-term prosperity.
The economic program that I proposed shortly after I took officeemphasized economic growth and a return to price stability. My taxproposals were designed to encourage private initiative and to stimu-late saving and productive investment. I have supported and encour-aged the Federal Reserve Board in its pursuit of price stabilitythrough sound monetary policy. My Administration has slowed thegrowth of Federal regulation, strengthening the forces of competitionin a number of economic sectors. And I have worked with the Con-gress to enact legislation that has reversed or limited the growth ofgovernment programs that have become too large or outlasted theirusefulness.
Although the full effect of these changes in government policy willtake time to develop, some of the benefits have already become ap-parent. The rate of consumer price inflation between December 1981and December 1982 was only 3.9 percent, about one-third of the ratein the year before I took office. Interest rates are now lower thanwhen I took office, and have fallen rapidly during the last 6 months.
The Administration will propose many additional measures overthe next several years to strengthen economic incentives, reduce bur-densome regulations, increase capital formation, and raise our stand-ard of living. It is easy to lose sight of these long-term goals in ayear, like 1982, when the economy was in an extended recession. Iam deeply troubled by the current level of unemployment in theUnited States and by the suffering and anxiety that it entails for mil-lions of Americans. The unemployment that many of our citizens areexperiencing is a consequence of the disinflation that must necessar-ily follow the accelerating inflation of the last decade. Allowing theupward trend of inflation to continue would have risked even greaterincreases in unemployment in the future. In spite of the present highunemployment rate and the accompanying hardships, it is essentialthat we maintain the gains against inflation that we have recently
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
achieved at substantial cost. Continuing success in restraining infla-tion will provide a stronger foundation for economic recovery in1983 and beyond.
Reducing Unemployment
The Federal Government can play an important role in reducingunemployment. I believe, however, that the government should focusits attention on those groups that will continue to face high unem-ployment rates even after the recovery has begun. By helping themto develop their job-related skills, we will foster productive careers inthe private sector rather than dead-end jobs. This emphasis on train-ing and private sector employment is the focus of the Jobs TrainingPartnership Act that I supported and signed into law in 1982. I amproposing additional steps this year to strengthen Federal trainingand retraining programs and to help the structurally unemployedfind lasting jobs.
It is understandable that many well-meaning members of the Con-gress have responded to the current high unemployment rate by pro-posing various public works and employment programs. However, Iam convinced that such programs would only shift unemploymentfrom one industry to another at the cost of increasing the Federalbudget deficit.
Although programs to help the structurally unemployed are impor-tant, only a balanced and lasting recovery can achieve a substantialreduction in unemployment. There are now over four million moreunemployed people than there were at the peak of the last businesscycle. Nine million new workers are expected to join the labor forceby 1988. Only a healthy and growing economy can provide the morethan 13 million jobs needed to achieve a progressively lower level ofunemployment over the next 5 years.
The Prospects for Economic Recovery
There are now signs that an economic recovery will begin soon. ByDecember 1982 the index of leading economic indicators had risen in7 of the last 8 months. Housing starts have risen substantially overthe last year, and by December 1982 were 39 percent higher than 12months earlier. Inventory levels have fallen sharply, so that increasedsales should translate quickly into increased production and employ-ment. Both long-term and short-term interest rates have fallen sub-stantially. The Administration's economic forecast predicts that thegross national product will begin to rise in the first quarter of 1983and will then rise more quickly as the year continues. Most privateforecasters also predict a recovery in 1983.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Monetary policy will play a critical role in achieving a sound andsustainable economic recovery. If the monetary aggregates grow tooslowly, the economy will lack the level of financial resources neededfor continued economic growth. But if these aggregates are allowedto expand too rapidly, an increase in inflation and a short-lived re-covery will result. I recognize the difficulties that the Federal Reservehas faced and will continue to face in guiding the growth of themoney supply at a time when major regulatory changes have made itdifficult to rely on old guidelines. I expect that in 1983 the FederalReserve will expand the money supply at a moderate rate consistentwith both a sustained recovery and continued progress against infla-tion.
Investment and Economic Growth
An economic recovery beginning in 1983 should bring not only areduction in unemployment but also an increase in business invest-ment over the next several years. A higher level of investment is animportant ingredient in raising productivity and economic growth.The Accelerated Cost Recovery System that I proposed and that theCongress enacted in 1981 was designed to encourage a substantialexpansion of business investment above the relatively low levels ofthe 1970s. Since that time the adverse effects of the recession haveoutweighed the positive effects of the new tax rules. As the economyturns from recession to recovery, however, incentives to invest willbecome more powerful. But business investment may not grow rapid-ly unless measures proposed by the Administration to reduce poten-tially large Federal budget deficits are enacted.
Federal borrowing competes with private investment for availablesavings. If the government continues to borrow large amounts to fi-nance its deficit, the real interest rate will remain high and discour-age private investment. This process of "crowding out" will tend todepress private investment in the years ahead unless the budget defi-cit is progressively reduced.
Fiscal Year 1984 Budget Proposals
It is important to distinguish the cyclical part of the budget deficitfrom the structural part, which would remain even at the peak of thebusiness cycle. Approximately one-half of the 1983 budget deficit isdue to the depressed state of the economy. With earnings and profitsreduced, tax receipts have significantly decreased, and expenditureshave increased. As the economy recovers, the cyclical part of the defi-cit will shrink. But cyclical recovery alone will not bring the deficitdown to an acceptable size.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
In the budget I am now submitting to the Congress, I am propos-ing the dramatic steps needed to reduce Federal budget deficits infuture years. My budget proposals are designed to reduce the deficitby dealing directly with the rapid growth of the domestic spendingprograms (apart from interest payments) of the Federal Government.In 1970 these programs accounted for 10 percent of the gross na-tional product and 48 percent of Federal spending. By 1980 theseprograms had grown to 14 percent of gross national product and 63percent of the budget. I remain committed to the idea that we canreduce budget deficits without increasing the burden on the poor,without weakening our national defense, and without destroying eco-nomic incentives by counterproductive tax increases.
Rapid congressional enactment of the budget would provide clearand credible evidence that the Federal Government intends not toplace heavy burdens on the capital markets in future years. Such re-assurance should hasten the decline in interest rates, especially long-term interest rates on bonds and residential mortgages, and improveprospects for the recovery of the housing, automobile, and capital in-vestment sectors of the economy.
I recognize the special importance of protecting the social securityand medicare programs for aged retirees and their dependents.These programs now face very serious financial problems. The bi-partisan National Commission on Social Security Reform has recentlyrecommended a series of measures, which I have endorsed, to elimi-nate the cumulative deficiency of $150 billion to $200 billion project-ed for the social security system in the years 1983 through 1989. It iscritically important at this time to make changes in the social securityprograms that will protect their solvency and financial viability forthe years to come.
The Remaining Burden of Federal Economic Regulation
For many decades, the Federal Government has regulated the priceand entry conditions affecting several sectors of the American econo-my. Much of this regulation is no longer appropriate to the condi-tions of the contemporary economy. Over time, most of this regula-tion—by restraining competition and the development of new serv-ices and technologies—has not served the interests of either consum-ers or producers. Since deregulation of some markets began severalyears ago, the experience has been almost uniformly encouraging.My Administration has supported these step-by-step efforts to re-duce these regulations in markets that would otherwise be competi-tive. It is now time to consider broad measures to eliminate many ofthese economic regulations especially as they affect the natural gas,transportation, communications, and financial markets.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Interest Rates and the U.S. Trade Deficit
The very high levels of real interest rates over the last several yearsare a principal cause of the sharp rise in the exchange value of thedollar relative to foreign currencies. This rise has reduced the abilityof American exporters to compete in foreign markets and increasedthe competitiveness of imports in the domestic market. Largely as aresult, the U.S. merchandise trade balance showed a substantial defi-cit in 1982.
Our current trade deficit is a reminder of the importance of inter-national trade to the American economy. The export share of U.S.gross national product has more than doubled over the last threedecades. American workers, businesses, and farmers suffer when for-eign governments prevent American products from entering theirmarkets, thus reducing U.S. export levels. While the United Statesmay be forced to respond to the trade distorting practices of foreigngovernments through the use of strategic measures, such practices donot warrant indiscriminate protectionist actions, such as domesticcontent rules for automobiles sold in the United States. Widespreadprotectionist policies would hurt American consumers by raisingprices of the products they buy, and by removing some of the pres-sures for cost control and quality improvement that result from inter-national competition. Moreover, protectionism at home could hurtthe workers, farmers, and firms in the United States that producegoods and services for export, since it would almost inevitably leadto increased protectionism by governments abroad. I am committedto a policy of preventing the enactment of protectionist measures inthe United States, and I will continue working to persuade the othernations of the world to eliminate trade distorting practices thatthreaten the viability of the international trading system upon whichworld prosperity depends.
Trade in goods and services is only one aspect of our economicrelations with the rest of the world. The international flow of capitalinto the United States and from the United States to other countriesis also of great importance. The United States should play a primaryrole in preserving the vitality of the international capital market.Severe strains on that market developed in 1982 as several nationsfound it difficult to service their overseas debt obligations. In 1982,the Federal Government worked closely with debtor and creditor na-tions and the major international lending agencies to prevent a dis-ruption in the functioning of world capital markets. Now, with the co-operation of a wide variety of creditors, countries with especiallysevere debt-servicing difficulties are establishing economic and finan-cial programs that will permit them to meet their international obli-gations.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Years Ahead
We are now at a critical juncture for the American economy. Therecession has led to strong pressures from some members of theCongress and from others to abandon our commitment to a policythat is aimed at long-term economic growth, capital accumulation,and price stability. There are many who urge new governmentspending programs and forcing the Federal Reserve to raise mone-tary growth rates to levels that would rekindle inflation.
I am convinced that such policies would prove detrimental to thelong-run interests of the American people. Our economy, despite therecession, is extraordinarily resilient and is now on the road to ahealthy recovery. It is essential in the year ahead that the Administra-tion and the Congress work together, take a long-term perspective,and pursue economic policies that lead to sustained economic growthand to greater prosperity for all Americans.
(j ^ CTVAJULAA^ \ C J L ^ M J ^ K ^
February 2, 1983
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
THE ANNUAL REPORT
OF THE
COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS,
Washington, D.C., January 31, 1983.MR. PRESIDENT:
The Council of Economic Advisers herewith submits its 1983Annual Report in accordance with the provisions of the EmploymentAct of 1946 as amended by the Full Employment and BalancedGrowth Act of 1978.
Sincerely,
N\ CutterMartin Feldstein
CHAIRMAN
William A. Niskanen
11
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER 1. FROM RECESSION TO RECOVERY AND GROWTH 17
Legacies of the 1970s . 18Rising Unemployment 18Declining Productivity Growth 18Rising Inflation 19
The Recession 20The Decline in Velocity 21
The Economic Recovery 23Implementing a Stable Monetary Policy 23The Budget Deficit 26
CHAPTER 2. THE DUAL PROBLEMS OF STRUCTURAL AND CYCLICAL
UNEMPLOYMENT 29
The Recent Recession 29The Composition of Cyclical and Structural Unemploy-
ment 31Demographic Composition 31Reasons for Unemployment 33The Dynamics of Unemployment 35
Combating Cyclical Unemployment 37The Limits of Macroeconomic Policy 37Public Works Employment Programs 39
Combating Structural Unemployment 41The Problem of Youth Unemployment 42Policies to Reduce Youth Unemployment 44Long-Term Unemployment and Structural Change 45The Effects of Unemployment Compensation 47
Conclusions 49CHAPTER 3. THE UNITED STATES IN THE WORLD ECONOMY:
STRAINS ON THE SYSTEM 51
Long-Run Trends in U.S. Competitiveness: Perceptionsand Realities 52
Aggregate Performance of the United States andOther Developed Countries 52
The Changing Structure of the U.S. Balance of Pay-ments 53
The Issue of U.S. Trade with Japan 56
13
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Page
The Problem of Uncompetitive Sectors 58Challenges to U.S. Trade Policy 60
Exchange Rates and the Balance of Payments 61Causes of the Dollar's Strength 61An Undervalued Yen? 65Effects of a Strong Dollar on U.S. Trade 66Responses to the Strong Dollar 67
Macroeconomic Problems in Europe 70The International Debt Problem 72
Debt-Financed Growth in the 1970s 72Causes of the Liquidity Problem 73Implications of the Debt Problem 74
CHAPTER 4. INCREASING CAPITAL FORMATION 77The Historical Record 78An International Perspective 80The Importance of Capital Formation 82Measuring National Saving 85Budget Deficits and Saving 86Tax Rules and Personal Saving 87Financial Regulation and Private Saving 89The Role of International Capital Flows 90The Allocation of Capital 91Tax Policy and Investment 92Conclusions 95
CHAPTER 5. THE BURDEN OF ECONOMIC REGULATION 96A Brief History of Economic Regulation 96
The Traditional Rationale for Economic Regulation.... 98Problems of Economic Regulation 100Energy Policy 102
Steps Toward a Market-Oriented Oil Policy 102Natural Gas Pricing and Allocation 102Emergency Preparedness 106
Transportation and Communications 108Effects of Aviation Deregulation 109Effects of Partial Deregulation in Surface Transporta-
tion 110Further Deregulation of Surface Transportation 112Common Carrier Telecommunications 114Broadcasting 115
Deregulation of Financial Markets 115Depository Institutions 116Stock Exchanges 119Opportunities for Further Deregulation in the Finan-
cial Industry 121
14Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Page
Conclusions 122CHAPTER 6. REVIEW OF 1982 AND THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK 124
Overview of 1982 124Major Sectors of Aggregate Demand 126
Personal Consumption Expenditures 127Residential Investment 128Business Fixed Investment 129Inventory Investment 130The Farm Economy 130Foreign Trade 132Government Purchases of Goods and Services 132
Labor Market Developments 133Wages, Productivity, and Prices.. 134Credit Markets 136
Interest Rates 137Monetary Developments 139
Prospects for 1983 142Prospects and Policies Beyond 1983 143
APPENDIXES
A. Report to the President on the Activities of the Councilof Economic Advisers During 1982 147
B. Statistical Tables Relating to Income, Employment andProduction 157
List of Tables and ChartsTables
2-1. Median Family Income by Unemployment and FamilyStatus, 1981 30
2-2. Educational and Labor Market Activities of Youth Aged16 to 19, by Sex, October 1981 42
3-1. Structure of the U.S. Balance of Payments, as Percent ofGNP, 1960-80 55
3-2. Trade Balances by Commodity Group as Percent ofGDP, United States, Japan, and the European Eco-nomic Community, 1980 57
3-3. Trade Balances by Region as Percent of GDP, UnitedStates and Japan, 1980 58
3-4. U.S. Trade Balances by Sector as Percent of GDP,1972-79 58
3-5. Real Appreciation of the Dollar Against Major Curren-cies to August 1982 66
3-6. Economic Performance by Major Industrial Countries,1973-82 71
3-7. Employment and Unemployment in the European Eco-nomic Community, 1973-80 72
15Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
List of Tables and Charts—ContinuedTables
4-1. Alternative Measures of Capital Formation, 1951-82 794-2. Comparison of Capital Formation in Six OECD Coun-
tries, 1971-80 814-3. Net Saving as Percent of GNP, 1951-81 854-4. Investment Incentives under Different Tax Laws 936-1. Growth in Major Sectors of Real GNP, 1978-82 1276-2. Real Household Income, Consumption, Saving, and
Residential Investment, 1978-82 1286-3. Labor Market Developments, 1978-82 1336-4. Changes in Wages and Compensation, 1978-82 1346-5. Productivity, Costs, and Prices in the Nonfarm Business
Sector, 1978-82 1356-6. Price Changes, 1978-82 1366-7. Funds Raised by the Nonfinancial Sector of the Econo-
my, 1978-82 1366-8. Components of Ml and M2, 1978-82 1416-9. Economic Outlook for 1983 143
6-10. Projections of Economic Goals, 1983-88 144Charts
2-1. Distribution of Unemployment by Age and Sex 322-2. Distribution of Unemployment by Family Status 332-3. Distribution of Unemployment by Race 342-4. Distribution of Unemployment by Reason 352-5. Distribution of Unemployment by Duration 363-1. Structural Changes in the Current Account Balance 553-2. Composition of Trade, 1980 573-3. Real Exchange Rates of Major Currencies Against the
Dollar 633-4. International Real Short-Term Interest Rate Differen-
tials 644-1. Measures of Capital Formation 804-2. International Comparison of Investment and Productiv-
ity Growth, 1971-80 824-3. Three-Month Treasury Bill Rate and Regulation Q,
Maximum Rate on Savings Accounts 906-1. Interest Rates 1256-2. Index of Leading Indicators and Real GNP 1266-3. Debt Burden Ratio 1296-4. Real Inventory/Sales Ratio and Industrial Production 1316-5. Nominal and Real 3-Month Treasury Bill Yield 138
16
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CHAPTER 1
From Recession to Recovery andGrowth
THE MAJOR ECONOMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF 1982 was a dra-matic reduction of inflation to its lowest rate in a decade. The 4.6percent increase in the gross national product (GNP) implicit pricedeflator between the fourth quarters of 1981 and 1982 was less thanhalf the 10.2 percent rate of increase between the fourth quarters of1979 and 1980. This decline in inflation has moderated the earlierwidespread fears that inflation would accelerate. While some of thisimprovement in inflation was transitory, reflecting such special fac-tors as the appreciation of the exchange value of the dollar, the larg-est share was almost certainly due to a decline in the underlying rateof inflation. The reduced rate of inflation is a major step toward theAdministration's goals of full employment, healthy economic growth,and price stability.
The progress made in reducing inflation, however, was accompa-nied by a painful slowdown of the economy. Beginning in July 1981,the Nation suffered the second of two back-to-back recessions thatbrought the unemployment rate to 10.8 percent in December 1982.At that time, approximately 5 million more people were unemployedthan in January 1980, when the first of the two recessions began.
The increase in long-term unemployment poses a particularlysevere problem. In January 1980, about 550,000 people had beenunemployed for more than 6 months. In December 1982 there weremore than four times as many. Long-term unemployment is particu-larly serious in that it causes substantial financial hardship and is as-sociated with a loss of job skills that may reduce future income sig-nificantly.
Some temporary decline in real economic activity was probably un-avoidable in the process of reversing the upward trend of inflation.The United States entered the 1980s with a high rate of inflation andwith widespread public expectations that the rate would remain high,and perhaps increase. As high inflation persisted, it became embed-ded in the plans and contracts of firms and workers, and lowering itinvolved a painful process. The decline of real GNP since early 1981
17Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
was in large part the price the United States paid for failing to con-trol inflation in the late 1970s.
LEGACIES OF THE 1970s
In the 1960s, many economists believed that the Federal Govern-ment could keep unemployment down permanently by accepting ahigher rate of inflation. Steady rises in productivity and living stand-ards were taken for granted. During the 1970s these views proved tobe incorrect. By the closing years of the 1970s, both the unemploy-ment rate and the inflation rate were higher than they had been inthe 1960s, and the rate of productivity growth was lower.
Why did unemployment, productivity growth, and inflation allworsen in the 1970s? These developments occurred in part becauseof factors outside the government's control, such as changes in thesize and composition of the work force and rising world energyprices. But the economy also suffered from long-standing govern-ment policies that exacerbated inflation and distorted the incentivesto work, save, and invest.
RISING UNEMPLOYMENT
Total employment grew rapidly in the 1970s but so did the rate ofunemployment. The civilian labor force participation rate rose from60.4 percent of the population in 1970 to 63.8 percent in 1980. Theunemployment rate averaged 5.4 percent in the first half of the1970s, greater than the 4.8 percent average of the 1960s. The reces-sion of 1975 took the unemployment rate to a monthly high of 9.0percent. Unemployment then declined to a monthly low of 5.6 per-cent in 1979, only to begin rising again to a peak of 7.8 percent inJuly 1980.
In addition to cyclical fluctuations in the economy, a number ofstructural factors contributed to the rise in the unemployment rateover the decade. These included the changing demographic structureof the labor force, the increased number of workers dislocated bychanges in technology and international competitiveness, and thework registration requirements in a number of government welfareprograms.
A more detailed analysis of unemployment and the labor marketconsequences of macroeconomic policy is presented in Chapter 2.
DECLINING PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
From 1960 to 1970, real output per hour in the private sector roseat an annual rate of 3.0 percent; from 1970 to 1980 it rose at a rateof only 1.4 percent. Labor productivity growth would probably have
18
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
slowed somewhat in the 1970s regardless of the policies adopted.The sharp increases in the price of oil caused by supply disruptionsin 1974 and 1979 reduced productivity growth as firms substitutedcapital and labor for energy. Furthermore, as the post-World War IIbaby-boom generation entered the labor force and the percentage ofworking-age women seeking employment rose, the proportion of lessexperienced workers increased, further depressing productivity.
The slowdown in productivity growth was, however, exacerbatedby a decline in rates of capital formation. Net investment in fixedbusiness capital fell from 3.5 percent of GNP in the 1960s to 3.0 per-cent in the 1970s, and the rate of growth of capital per worker felleven more sharply, from 3.2 percent per year in the 1960s to only1.3 percent in the 1970s. The interaction of the tax system with infla-tion played an important role in reducing the rate of capital forma-tion.
Another cause of slow productivity growth was an increase in gov-ernment regulation. In some sectors of the economy, Federal regula-tions directly reduced labor productivity; in others, they diverted cap-ital investment away from the improvement of productivity into thesatisfaction of regulatory requirements. Some of these regulationsserved useful purposes, but some imposed economic costs that ex-ceeded their economic benefits.
The tax changes proposed by the Administration and enacted bythe Congress in 1981 and 1982 were designed to lead to fastergrowth and higher productivity by stimulating saving, investment,and individual effort. In addition, the Administration's policy of re-ducing government regulation is intended to enhance the efficiencyof individual markets and thereby increase total production.
RISING INFLATION
Of all the economic problems that this Administration inheritedwhen it came to office in 1981, the most urgent was the problem ofrising prices. Double-digit inflation had created serious economic dis-tortions. An equally serious concern was that the trend rate of infla-tion was rising over time.
From 1960 to 1970, the GNP deflator rose at an average rate of3.0 percent per year. Between 1970 and 1973, the average rate of in-flation by this measure was 5.3 percent. Then, aggravated by thesharp jump in world oil prices and other special factors, inflationreached 10.2 percent during 1974, but by 1976 it was down to 4.7percent. In the next 4 years, which included the second oil priceshock in 1979, inflation increased continually until it reached 10.2percent again in 1980.
19
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Over short periods of time a variety of factors influence the rate ofinflation. One important factor in the 1970s was supply-determinedchanges in commodity prices resulting from fluctuations in harvestsand disruptions in the supply of foreign oil. Another important factorwas the increasing level of expected inflation. Once the expectationof continuing inflation has become firmly entrenched, prices andwages may continue to rise even in the face of declining demand, andthe cost of reducing inflation may increase.
These factors, however, only affect the rate of inflation for a limit-ed time. The popular axiom that attributes inflation to "too muchmoney chasing too few goods" reflects a basic truth: it is difficult toimagine a sustained inflation that is not supported by excessivemoney growth. Over long periods of time, an additional percentagepoint in the rate of growth of the money stock will tend to producean additional percentage point of growth of nominal GNP, that is,GNP measured at current prices. If the rate of real GNP growth doesnot change, the entire increase in nominal GNP growth will take theform of increased inflation. Although the relations between moneygrowth, nominal GNP growth, and inflation are considerably morevariable over shorter periods than they are in the long run, theimpact of money growth on nominal income and inflation remainspowerful even in the short run.
THE RECESSION
The substantial decline in the rate of growth of the Ml measure ofmoney that occurred between the end of 1980 and the end of 1981was a principal contributor to the decline in nominal income growthin 1982, a decline compounded by a marked change in the velocity ofmoney. Part of the slowdown in nominal GNP growth took the formof lower inflation, and part of it took the form of a decline in realeconomic activity.
The adverse short-run effect of a slowdown in nominal GNP onreal economic activity is a basic feature of our economy that reflectsthe stickiness of wages and prices in most markets. If prices andwages were perfectly flexible, reduced nominal GNP growth wouldtranslate immediately and painlessly into reduced inflation. However,not all wages and prices are flexible. When expectations of future in-flation are deeply embedded, prices and wages may continue to risefor some time despite excess supplies of goods and labor. A changein inflationary expectations, together with the direct pressures exert-ed by excess supplies, eventually causes prices and wages to adjust tonew market-clearing levels. But until that occurs a slowdown in nomi-
20
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
nal GNP growth is reflected in a slowing of real growth as well as ina slowing of inflation.
The severity of the recession in 1982 reflected a combination ofcircumstances which caused a very sharp decline in nominal GNPgrowth between 1981 and 1982. Between the fourth quarter of 1980and the fourth quarter of 1981, nominal GNP grew at a rate of 9.6percent; in contrast, nominal GNP rose only 3.3 percent last year.About one-third of the 6.3 percentage point drop in nominal GNPgrowth between 1981 and 1982 was reflected in a 1.9 percentagepoint decline in the real GNP growth rate—from an increase of 0.7percent in 1981 to a decline of 1.2 percent in 1982. The reduction ininflation accounted for the remaining two-thirds of the drop in nomi-nal GNP.
Although some slowdown in nominal GNP growth and in inflationin 1982 was a predictable effect of tighter monetary policies, the verysharp decline actually experienced did not reflect a decrease in thegrowth of the monetary aggregates. Rather the exceptional severityof the slowdown in nominal GNP growth can be traced to a combina-tion of factors that led to an unusually sharp decline in the velocityof money, that is, in the ratio of GNP to the money stock.
THE DECLINE IN VELOCITY
The 1982 decline in the velocity of money—as measured by the ve-locity of either the Ml or M2 monetary aggregates—was historicallyatypical. Between 1961 and 1981, Ml velocity rose at an averageannual rate of 3.2 percent, while the velocity of M2 remained essen-tially constant, rising at an average annual rate of 0.2 percent. Incontrast, in 1982 the velocity of Ml fell 4.9 percent and M2 velocityfell 6.0 percent on a fourth quarter to fourth quarter basis. By eithermeasure, the growth of nominal GNP was well below the rate thatwould have prevailed if the Ml or M2 measures of velocity hadgrown at their average historic rates. These velocity declines were thelargest since 1959, the earliest year for which the Federal Reservehas published data on the monetary aggregates under the definitionscurrently in use.
If these velocity shifts had not occurred, the rise in nominal GNPin 1982 would have been between 10 and 12 percent. While it is un-certain how this hypothetical change would have been distributed be-tween real activity and inflation, it is likely that real GNP would haveincreased enough to have ended the recession sometime before thefinal quarter of 1982.
Although the cause of the large velocity shift that occurred in 1982is not fully understood, it is likely that major changes in asset de-mands of individuals and businesses played an important role. More
21
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
precisely, an increase in the demand for Ml or M2 at any incomelevel decreases the corresponding velocity of money. Such shifts mayoccur because of regulatory changes that provide new financial op-portunities—like the introduction of nationwide interest-bearing ne-gotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts—or because ofchanges in asset preferences—like the increased demand for moneymarket mutual funds instead of long-term securities.
The uncertain cause of the recent decline in velocity is characteris-tic of the problems that the Federal Reserve has encountered in ap-plying the new monetary control procedures that it adopted in Octo-ber 1979. Changes in banking regulations and the development ofnew financial instruments by the private sector have compelled theFederal Reserve to make frequent revisions to the definitions of themonetary aggregates and reassessments of their economic impacts. In1980 a complete revision of the definitions of the monetary aggre-gates was introduced. In the next year, a "shift adjusted" Ml-B wasdefined in an effort to adjust for shifts from savings deposits toNOW accounts. Most recently, in 1982 and early 1983, definitionalchanges in Ml and M2 were required to deal with the advent of thenew money market deposit account—which was added to M2—andthe new super NOW account—which was added to Ml.
The Federal Reserve was aware throughout 1981 and 1982 that therelationship between the monetary aggregates and economic activitywas in a state of flux, and that future velocity trends were uncertain.While sustained but unanticipated shifts in velocity growth can beidentified in hindsight, it is nearly impossible to know at the timethey occur whether unusual quarter-to-quarter changes in velocitywill continue or reverse themselves. The presumption, on the basisof past experience, is that most velocity changes are temporary.Thus, increasing the rate of money growth in response to temporarydeclines in velocity runs the risk of providing excessive liquidity andincreasing inflation, while a failure to recognize a continuing shift inliquidity preference or velocity runs the risk of providing inadequateliquidity and reducing real GNP. Given the circumstances of 1982,the somewhat greater growth in the monetary aggregates than initial-ly intended by the Federal Reserve appeared to be an appropriateway to balance those risks.
ECONOMIC RECOVERY
The Administration believes that the American economy will soonrecover from the recession that began in July 1981. The forecast pre-sented in Chapter 6 projects that economic recovery will begin in1983, marking the start of a long period of sustained growth with low
22
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
inflation. More specifically, the Administration forecasts that realGNP will rise 3.1 percent from the fourth quarter of 1982 to thefourth quarter of 1983, and that nominal GNP will rise 8.8 percent.Realization of the economic forecast and steady noninflationarygrowth in subsequent years will depend upon the implementation ofappropriate monetary and fiscal policies.
IMPLEMENTING A STABLE MONETARY POLICY
The Administration has repeatedly indicated that the fundamentalguiding principle of monetary policy in an inflationary economyshould be a gradual reduction in the rate of growth of the moneystock until the rate is consistent with price stability. This principle isconsistent with the general approach enunciated in recent years bythe independent Federal Reserve.
The basic challenge for monetary policy at present is to balancethe principle of stable money growth with the need to take accountof changing asset preferences that may alter the velocity of money.While maintaining the approach of setting specified target ranges formoney growth, the Federal Reserve will also need to use its judg-ment to adjust money growth rates and the corresponding targets toreflect lasting changes in asset demands.
The extent to which a policy of predetermined money growth ratesis appropriate depends on the stability and predictability of the veloc-ity of money. Strictly speaking, inflexible monetary growth rates areappropriate only if the trend in income velocity is constant or haspurely random disturbances. The advisability of a strict policy ruledepends on the degree of predictability of velocity disturbances. Themore predictable velocity disturbances are, the more they can beoffset by countervailing shifts in the money stock. The less predict-able they are, the more likely it is that any attempt at countervailingshifts in the money stock will add to the overall volatility of nominalGNP.
The task of making appropriate adjustments to the monetary tar-gets is enormously difficult. An excessive increase in the money stockwill cause a period of increased inflation while an insufficient in-crease in the money stock will not provide adequate liquidity for theneeds of an expanding economy. Eventually such deviations are self-correcting, but only after a period of accelerating inflation or weakeconomic performance.
One possible way to avoid such periods is to use the obseryed be-havior of nominal GNP to guide a gradual recalibration of the mone-tary growth targets, recognizing that there are uncertain lags betweenmoney stock changes and the resulting changes in nominal GNP.Basing the recalibration of monetary targets on nominal GNP is con-
23Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
sistent with the basic principle of pursuing a stable monetary policy.Indeed, it is the relatively stable long-run relationship between themonetary aggregates and nominal GNP that justifies the Federal Re-serve's policy of setting targets for the growth of Ml and M2. Thisimplies that caution in revising these targets is appropriate. The prin-ciple of targeting money growth rates is not an end in itself but onlya means of achieving control of nominal GNP.
Disadvantages of Interest Rate Targeting
From World War II until the mid-1970s the Federal Reserve, likemost central banks, conducted monetary policy by focusing on inter-est rates and money market conditions. Over the 1970s, increasingemphasis was given to targeting monetary aggregates. More recently,under new procedures first adopted in October 1979, the FederalReserve has given greater emphasis to keeping the growth of themonetary aggregates within pre-announced target ranges, eventhough it was recognized that this could result in greater variations ininterest rates.
Since 1979 both long-term and short-term interest rates haveproven more variable than in the past. Many critics attribute thischange to the increased emphasis on monetary targets and the levelof bank reserves as the operational basis for monetary policy. Al-though some have argued that the Federal Reserve should dropmonetary targeting in favor of targeting interest rates, the Adminis-tration believes strongly that targeting interest rates, either nominalor real, would prove to be a serious error.
The nominal rate of interest is a very unreliable indicator of thethrust of monetary policy. The financial variable important to bor-rowers and lenders is not the nominal interest rate but a real interestrate determined by subtracting the rate of inflation from the nominalinterest rate. Borrowers and lenders take into account the fact thatthe dollars repaid when a loan matures do not have the same pur-chasing power as the dollars originally borrowed. When inflation isexpected, lenders insist that the nominal rate of interest include apremium to compensate them for the declining purchasing power ofthe dollar, and borrowers are willing to pay such a premium.
Although the real interest rate is more closely linked to borrowingand lending decisions than the nominal interest rate, the real interestrate is also not an appropriate target for monetary policy. There areseveral basic reasons for rejecting the policy of real interest rate tar-geting.
First, real interest rate targeting might well lead to an inflationarymonetary policy. Any given real interest rate is compatible with awide range of inflation rates. For example, a real interest rate of 2percent could occur with a 5 percent nominal rate and a 3 percent
24
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
inflation rate, or with a 12 percent nominal rate and a 10 percent in-flation rate. Thus, achieving a real interest rate target would provideno assurance of price stability.
Second, the real interest rate that governs economic behavior isthe difference between the nominal interest rate and the expected rateof inflation. Since expectations of inflation are not observable, themonetary authorities cannot as a practical matter measure or targetthe expected real interest rate.
A third reason why real interest rate targeting is not feasible is thatthe relevant interest rate is not merely the real rate but the real net-of-tax interest rate. Because net-of-tax rates of interest vary amongindividuals and businesses in different tax positions, there is no wayfor the monetary authorities to determine the relevant average realnet-of-tax interest rate in financial markets. Compounding the prob-lem further, different rates of inflation can result in very differentnet-of-tax real interest rates corresponding to the same pretax realinterest rate, even for a particular taxpayer. For example, a taxpayerwith a marginal tax rate of 40 percent earns a real net-of-tax returnof 1 percent if he receives a nominal rate of 10 percent and there is 5percent inflation; that same taxpayer earns a real net-of-tax return of— 2 percent if he receives the same real return of 5 percent but thereis zero inflation. Similarly, the real interest rate and the real net-of-tax interest rate can easily move in opposite directions when the in-flation rate changes.
There is a final and even more fundamental reason for rejectingreal interest rate targeting. Even if the expected real interest ratewere measurable, there would remain the virtually impossible task ofdetermining what level of that interest rate is actually compatiblewith noninflationary growth. The problem of identifying the equilib-rium interest rate is made even more difficult by the interaction oftax rules and inflation.Monetary Rules and Discretion
There is no simple solution to the problem of guiding monetarypolicy in a time of rapid institutional change. Interest rate targeting,as shown above, is not a desirable approach. Instead, the monetaryauthorities should be guided by the principle of keeping moneygrowth within a prespecified target range while adjusting those tar-gets when a careful consideration of the evidence indicates that sus-tained shifts in asset demands have occurred.
The combination of monetary rules and discretion must be appliedwith great care and judgment. The observance of rules must notbecome a doctrinaire attachment to arbitrary standards, and the exer-cise of discretion must not degenerate into unprincipled fine tuning.Instead, the monetary rules must be understood as a way of achiev-
25Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ing an appropriate long-run path for the economy. The exercise ofdiscretion in recalibrating monetary targets must be subject to thediscipline that such revisions are ultimately compatible with the de-sired long-run path of nominal GNP. With rules and discretion bal-anced in this way, monetary policy can support a sound recovery thatleads to sustained and noninflationary growth.
THE BUDGET DEFICIT
The Federal budget deficit has become a major problem for theAmerican economy. Without the savings proposed by the Administra-tion in its budget plan for the years 1984 through 1988, the UnitedStates is forecasted to experience a series of deficits that would con-sume more than 6 percent of GNP in each of the next 6 years. Al-though budget deficits have been a nearly constant feature of our Na-tion's economic life for the past two decades, the prospective budgetdeficits that would result if no legislative actions were taken toreduce them would be far larger than those previously experiencedin the postwar period. The economic effects of such deficits arebeyond our previous experience.
The fiscal 1983 deficit is partially a result of the recession. Any re-cession reduces tax collections and increases outlays for unemploy-ment benefits, retirement benefits, and certain other activities. A rea-sonable approximation is that the change in economic output associ-ated with a percentage point change in the unemployment rate wouldraise the fiscal 1983 deficit by about $25 billion. The Administrationforecasts that the unemployment rate for fiscal 1983 will average 10.7percent. If the unemployment rate were 6.5 percent instead, thebudget deficit would be about half the $208 billion now forecast forfiscal 1983. The cyclical component represents a similarly large shareof the fiscal 1984 deficit.
Economic recovery and growth in the years ahead will reduce thecyclical component of the deficit. The Administration's forecast pro-jects a decline in the unemployment rate by 4 percentage points be-tween fiscal 1983 and fiscal 1988, leaving only a negligible cyclicalcomponent in the fiscal 1988 budget. Unless the Administration'sproposals are enacted, a current services budget deficit of $300 bil-lion is forecasted to materialize.
To see the origin of these large deficits, it is useful to compare thecomponents of the 1988 current services budget with the same com-ponents for 1970. Between those years, taxes decline very slightly asa percentage of GNP, from 19.9 percent in 1970 to 18.9 percent in1988. The defense share of GNP remains unchanged at 8.1 percentof GNP in both years. By contrast, nondefense activities excluding in-terest rise from 10.6 percent of GNP in 1970 to 13.6 percent in
26Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988, an increase of about one-fourth. In addition, the accumulationof previous deficits raise the net interest component of the budgetdeficit from 1.5 percent of GNP to 3.4 percent of GNP.
Deficits and Long-Term Growth
A succession of large budget deficits is likely to reduce substantial-ly the rate of capital formation. The government's borrowing to fi-nance such deficits would compete directly with borrowing by privatebusinesses and households. With a limited amount of savings availa-ble for borrowing, high budget deficits would cause interest rates torise until private demand for funds was reduced to the amount thatremained after the government's borrowing needs were satisfied.
The magnitude of the potential crowding out of private investmentis immense. During the past two decades, the net saving of house-holds and businesses totaled only about 7 percent of GNP. Prospec-tive deficits of more than 6 percent of GNP would represent virtuallyall of current net saving. Even though existing saving would be aug-mented by borrowing from abroad and by some increase in the pri-vate saving rate, the reduced rate of capital formation would be verysubstantial.
A lower rate of capital formation would have adverse consequencesbecause the accumulation of capital is a key determinant of future in-creases in productivity and economic growth and therefore of higherreal wages and standards of living. Further reductions in the rate ofcapital formation would be particularly unfortunate because, as Chap-ter 4 discusses in detail, the U.S. rate of capital formation has beenundesirably low for several decades. In the years since 1960, net pri-vate investment has averaged only 6 percent of GNP, significantlyless than the rate in most major industrial countries. Moreover, sincehalf of this 6 percent has gone into housing, only about 3 percent ofGNP has been available for productivity-increasing investments inplant and equipment. Deficits of the level implied by the currentservices budget could reduce the rate of net investment in plant andequipment enough to preclude any increase in the amount of capitalper worker. If this occurred, the process of increasing capital intensi-ty would cease to contribute to rising productivity and real wages.
Deficits and the Recovery
The adverse effects of large budget deficits are not limited to thedistant future. The deficits that would occur without the budget ac-tions proposed by the Administration could seriously affect thedegree to which various economic sectors share in the benefits of re-covery from the current recession. The crowding out of private in-vestment which would accompany large deficits could depress thelevel of output in the construction industries, the steel industry, the
27
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
machinery and equipment industries, and industries that produceother durable goods.
In addition, large budget deficits raise the exchange value of thedollar relative to foreign currencies by attracting foreign capital tothe United States. This weakens the competitive position of U.S. ex-ports in the world economy and hurts those domestic industries thatcompete with imports from abroad. The nature and magnitude ofthis effect are discussed in Chapter 3 of this Report.
A "lopsided" recovery in which some sectors remained relativelydepressed might prove more fragile than a recovery which wasbroadly based. An increase in economic activity limited to some sec-tors and regions might result in greater upward pressure on pricesand wages at any given level of total output and employment thanwould be the case if there were balanced expansion among indus-tries. In addition, an unbalanced recovery would produce more infla-tion and less real growth, regardless of the rate of expansion ofnominal GNP.
The prospect of large budget deficits in the second half of thisdecade may also have an adverse effect on the prospects for recoveryin 1983. If the financial markets respond to expected future deficitsby keeping real long-term interest rates higher in 1983 than theywould otherwise be, the level of spending in 1983 on interest-sensi-tive purchases may remain depressed. Clear evidence of the willing-ness of the Administration and the Congress to reduce Federalbudget deficits substantially in the second half of the 1980s can playan important part in ensuring a healthy and balanced economic re-covery in the more immediate future.
28
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CHAPTER 2
The Dual Problems of Structural andCyclical Unemployment
UNEMPLOYMENT IS THE MOST SERIOUS ECONOMICPROBLEM now facing the United States. By December 1982 thenumber of unemployed had risen by more than 4 million since thebeginning of the recession in July 1981. The unemployment rate washigher in December 1982 than at any point since the Depression,with over 12 million persons counted as unemployed. Even after theeconomy recovers from the recent recession, it is likely that the un-employment rate will reach a plateau between 6 and 7 percent.
This chapter analyzes the two major types of unemployment: cycli-cal and structural. The high level of cyclical unemployment now pre-vailing in the United States is a major problem, but it should provetransitory. Only a healthy and sustained recovery from the recent re-cession can effectively diminish cyclical unemployment. Even afterfull recovery, however, a serious structural unemployment problemwill remain unless measures are taken to improve the functioning oflabor markets. Reducing structural unemployment will require attack-ing the special problems of young people and the long-term adultunemployed.
This chapter begins by describing the dimensions of the cyclicaland structural unemployment problems. It then examines the poten-tial of public employment programs and macroeconomic policies tolower cyclical unemployment. Finally, policies for reducing structuralunemployment are considered.
THE RECENT RECESSION
The unemployment rate in December 1982 stood at 10.8 percentof the civilian labor force. Since the recent period of economic slack thatbegan in January 1980, the unemployment rate has risen by 4.5 per-centage points. During the recent recession, which began in July1981, the unemployment rate rose by 3.6 percentage points.Historical experience suggests that the unemployment rate tends toincrease for several months after the level of production bottoms out
29Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
and it is possible that the unemployment rate will reach 11 percent atsome point during 1983.
Beyond those officially counted as unemployed, the recent reces-sion has prevented many Americans from working as much as theywould like. In December 1982 there were over two million personsinvoluntarily working part time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics alsoreported that there were over 1.8 million discouraged workers in De-cember. These are individuals who have given up looking for workbecause they believe they cannot find jobs.
Unemployment is often linked to economic hardship. While manyof the unemployed receive unemployment insurance and live in fami-lies that have other members who work, many unemployed individ-uals and their families suffer economic distress. Table 2-1 presentsinformation on the incomes of families in which the husband, wife, orhead of household experienced unemployment during 1981. (Datafor 1982 are not yet available.) Three types of families are distin-guished: (1) families in which both husband and wife worked, (2)families in which only the husband or male head worked, and (3)families in which only the wife or female head worked. For all of thefamily types, unemployment experienced by husband, wife, or headof household significantly lowered median family income. For exam-ple, single-earner families in which the husband (or male head) wasnever unemployed had a median income in 1981 of $25,000. In con-trast, the median income of similar families in which the male headexperienced 1 to 26 weeks of unemployment was $16,500. Familiesin which the male head was unemployed for more than 26 weeks hada median family income of $10,200.
TABLE 2-1.—Median family income by unemployment and family status, 1981 (current dollars)
Family status
Unemployment status of husband, wife,or head of household
Personnever
unemployed
Personunemployed
less than26 weeks
Personunemployedmore than26 weeks
Husband and wife both work
Only husband or male head works..
Only wife or female head works
$31,600
25,000
18,900
$23,000
16,500
15,200
$17,900
10,200
11,200
Source.- Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The financial losses of the unemployed are not the only costs of aprolonged economic decline. Considerable anxiety and emotionaldistress is experienced by those who have lost their jobs or who fearthat they might lose their jobs in an economy with a decliningnumber of employment opportunities. Protracted unemployment is
30
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
frequently associated with poor heafyh, psychological problems, andgradual erosion of job-related skills.
THE COMPOSITION OF CYCLICAL AND STRUCTURALUNEMPLOYMENT
The unemployment problem can be divided into two components,cyclical and structural unemployment. The term cyclical unemploymentis used to refer to the unemployment associated with cyclical down-turns in aggregate economic activity. The incremental unemploymentassociated with the recent recession would fall into this category. Theterm structural unemployment is used to refer to the unemployment thatremains even after cyclical recoveries in aggregate economic activity.
In large part, structural unemployment is a natural concomitant ofa dynamic economy with constantly changing patterns of demand.Labor markets are in constant flux, with people entering and leavingthe labor force, losing or quitting old jobs, and looking for and ac-quiring new jobs. Some amount of structural unemployment is aninevitable aspect of a large modern industrial economy such as ours. Itis important to realize that although expansionary macroeconomicpolicies cannot reduce structural unemployment permanently, certainmicroeconomic policy interventions can affect the ease and speed ofthe process that matches workers with jobs.
Some insight into the differences between cyclical and structuralunemployment can be obtained by comparing the characteristics ofthe unemployed in 1982 and in a period of low cyclical unemploy-ment. Since the unemployment rate in 1978 was 6.1 percent, close tomost observers' estimates of full employment, data from that yearwill be used to illustrate the characteristics of structural unemploy-ment. The next two sections examine the composition of the unem-ployed population in 1978 and 1982 in terms of demographic com-position and reasons for unemployment. A third section analyzes thedynamics of unemployment.
DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION
Chart 2-1 provides information on the demographic compositionof the unemployed population in 1978 and in 1982. The chart showsthat young people under age 24 account for a substantial fraction ofunemployment both when the economy is weak and when it isstrong. Persons under 24 accounted for 49 percent of total unem-ployment during 1978 and 41 percent of unemployment in 1982.The decline in the share of youth unemployment reflected the largeincrease in unemployment among adult males in cyclically sensitivesectors of the economy, such as manufacturing.
31Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 2 -1
Distribution of Unemployment by Age and Sex
ADULT MALES25 AND OVER
25.2% ADULT MALES25 AND OVER
34.5%
ADULT FEMALES,25 AND OVER
24.6%
1978 1982
NOTE.—DATA RELATE TO PERSONS 16 YEARS AND OVER.
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
A pattern that appears in Chart 2-2 is the cyclical sensitivity of un-employment among those who provide the primary financial supportfor a family. The share of unemployment among husbands, wives,and family heads in families without a working spouse rose from 20percent in 1978 to 24 percent in 1982. Because unemployment un-doubtedly imposes its greatest hardship when it hits a worker uponwhom others depend for their sole support, this increase is particu-larly distressing.
A continuing tragedy in both good and bad times is the very highrates of unemployment of blacks and other minorities. This group ac-counts for a share of unemployment that is greatly disproportionateto its share of the labor force. While blacks and other minoritiescomprised 13 percent of the labor force in 1982, they comprised ap-proximately 23 percent of the unemployed. Chart 2-3, shows that therecent recession raised the unemployment rate of blacks and otherminorities proportionally less than that of the rest of the population.
However, black and other minority unemployment rates increasedsharply during the recession and continue to greatly exceed those ofthe entire population. The unemployment rate for black and otherminority adult males was 16.2 percent in 1982, compared to 7.8 per-cent for white males. For black and other minority teenagers the un-employment rate was 43.9 percent, compared to 20.4 percent forwhite teenagers.
32Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 2-2
Distribution of Unemployment by Family StatusHUSBANDS,
SPOUSE WORKING7.8%
HUSBANDS.SPOUSE WORKING
11.5%
1978 1982
'HUSBANDS AND WIVES WHOSE SPOUSE DOES NOT WORK AND PERSONS WHO MAINTAINFAMILIES.
NOTE.^DATA RELATE TO PERSONS 16 YEARS AND OVER.
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
REASONS FOR UNEMPLOYMENT
Analyzing the problem of unemployment requires understandingthe process by which people become unemployed. The unemployedare often described in stereotyped terms as the victims of permanentlayoffs by firms that are either partially or fully shutting down. Evenduring the recent recession, however, this characterization applied toless than half of the unemployed.
As part of the monthly Current Population Survey, the unem-ployed are asked a number of questions designed to elicit the reasonsfor their unemployment. The answers to these questions permit abreakdown of the unemployed into five groups: (1) persons laid offwho can expect to return to the same job; (2) persons who have lostjobs to which they cannot expect to return; (3) persons who havequit their jobs; (4) reentrants who are returning to the labor forceafter a spell of neither working nor looking for work; and (5) newentrants who have never worked at a full-time job before but are nowseeking employment.
Chart 2-4 shows that the distribution of the unemployed amongthese categories is very sensitive to cyclical conditions. The share ofpersons who have lost their jobs, either temporarily or permanently,
33Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 2-3
Distribution of Unemployment by Race
1978 1982
NOTE.—DATA RELATE TO PERSONS 16 YEARS AND OVER.
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
is particularly sensitive, rising from 42 percent in 1978 to 59 percentin 1982. Over this period the number of job losers on temporarylayoff tripled and the number of permanent job losers more thandoubled. The decline in alternative employment opportunities result-ed in a decline in the share of unemployment traceable to workersleaving their jobs voluntarily during the recession—from 14 percentin 1978 to 8 percent in 1982. Finally, because the number of laborforce entrants and reentrants is relatively constant, their share intotal unemployment declined somewhat during the recession.
The data on reasons for unemployment indicate a major differencebetween cyclical and structural unemployment. Almost 90 percent ofthe increase in unemployment during cyclical downturns involves in-creases in job losses and layoffs, as firms respond to declines indemand for their products. On the other hand, almost 60 percent ofstructural unemployment is comprised of voluntary job leavers, laborforce entrants, and reentrants. The remainder are job losers. As de-scribed below, the very different causes of cyclical and structural un-employment suggest that different policy responses are appropriate.
34Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 2-4
Distribution of Unemployment By Reason
1978 1982
NOTE.—DATA RELATE TO PERSONS 16 YEARS AND OVER.
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
THE DYNAMICS OF UNEMPLOYMENT
An essential feature of the unemployment problem is its dynamiccharacter. The appropriate design of policies to reduce unemploy-ment depends on whether most of the unemployed are out of workfor a long time and must wait for an economic upturn to find jobs orwhether they are a group whose membership changes rapidly, evenduring recessions.
The principal source of information on the duration of unemploy-ment is the monthly Current Population Survey, which asks personswho report themselves as unemployed to report how long they havebeen unemployed. Chart 2-5 presents information on the duration ofunemployment in 1978 and 1982. The clearest difference betweencyclical and structural unemployment emerges in the incidence oflong-term unemployment. In 1982 the number of unemployed indi-viduals who reported that they had been out of work for 6 or moremonths was almost three times the corresponding number in 1978,when the economy was operating without significant cyclical unem-ployment.
While the incidence of long-term unemployment increases sharplyduring recessions, it is important to recognize that many of the un-
35
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 2-5
Distribution of Unemployment by Duration
1978 1982
NOTE.—DATA RELATE TO PERSONS 16 YEARS AND OVER.
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
employed find jobs or withdraw from the labor force relatively quick-ly. Of all the persons who became unemployed in September 1982,over 45 percent were no longer unemployed by October, and over65 percent were no longer unemployed by November. However, evi-dence on the duration of unemployment is not purely indicative ofthe ease or difficulty with which persons find jobs since almost halfthe unemployed leave the labor force without finding jobs.
While most persons who become unemployed look for work onlybriefly, this group does not comprise a large part of the unemploy-ment problem. It is long-term unemployment that is of special con-cern. A recent study found that in 1978, more than 40 percent oftotal unemployment was due to the 15 percent of the unemployedpopulation who were out of work a total of 6 months or longerduring the year. This concentration of long-term unemploymentamong a relatively small group of the unemployed is particularly pro-nounced during cyclical downturns. Data on this subject are not yetavailable for 1982. During 1975, however, when the unemploymentrate was 8.5 percent, an estimated 52 percent of unemployment wasdue to the 22 percent of the unemployed population who were out ofwork more than 6 months.
36Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
These findings suggest several conclusions. First, even during re-cessions, most persons who become unemployed either find jobs orleave the labor force relatively quickly. Second, the unemploymentproblem is most serious for those who are unemployed for pro-longed stretches. Third, the incidence of long-term unemployment isvery sensitive to cyclical conditions, which suggests that it will dimin-ish as the economy recovers. Even after a recovery is well underway,however, a sizable fraction of total unemployment will involve pro-tracted joblessness. The needs of the long-term unemployed deservespecial recognition in the designing of policies to attack structuralunemployment.
COMBATING CYCLICAL UNEMPLOYMENT
High rates of cyclical unemployment, which the American economyis now experiencing, are largely a consequence of fluctuations in ag-gregate demand caused by macroeconomic policies and shocks to theeconomy. As described in Chapter 1, the historical experience of theUnited States and other countries suggests that disinflation is gener-ally associated with lost output and increased unemployment. Duringperiods of disinflation and recession, the measures available toreduce the pain of the transition from accelerating inflation to pricestability are limited. Greater fiscal or monetary stimulus might in-crease employment, but only at the risk of igniting inflation. Chapter1 describes the principles that the Administration feels govern soundmacroeconomic policies.
THE LIMITS OF MACROECONOMIC POLICY
The only way to reduce current high levels of cyclical unemploy-ment is for the United States to achieve a sound recovery from therecent recession. Avoiding future recurrences of high cyclical unem-ployment requires avoiding an expansion so rapid as to lead to rapid-ly increasing inflation. Historical experience suggests that the changein the rate of inflation depends both on the rate at which economicactivity is expanding and on the level of economic slack. If the slackin the economy declines too rapidly, or capacity utilization is held attoo high a level, inflation will tend to increase. The lower limit onunemployment below which inflation will tend to increase is referredto as the inflation threshold unemployment rate.
While it is not easy to pinpoint the inflation threshold unemploy-ment rate precisely, it probably lies between 6 and 7 percent. Econo-metric studies of historical data suggest that when unemployment isclose to 6 percent, the rate of inflation tends to accelerate. For exam-ple, during 1978 when the unemployment rate was 6.1 percent, infla-
37Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
tion as measured by percentage changes in the gross national prod-uct (GNP) deflator rose to 7.4 percent from 5.8 percent in 1977. Aneven larger increase occurred in 1979 when the unemployment rateaveraged 5.8 percent.
The Effect of Demographic Factors
There are a number of reasons to believe that the inflation thresh-old unemployment rate increased during the 1960s and 1970s. Manyeconomists believe that demographic factors may have contributed tothe increase. Persons with little labor market experience tend to havehigh rates of unemployment as they move from job to job in aneffort to obtain a desirable career position. In the last 15 years, thechildren of the baby boom have reached maturity thus raising sub-stantially the share of inexperienced workers in the labor force. Inaddition, women with little recent labor market experience have en-tered the labor force at an unprecedented rate during the last 15years. It has been estimated that if the labor force had the same de-mographic composition today as it had in 1958, the unemploymentrate would have been about three-quarters of a percentage pointlower in 1982. The share of young people in the labor force will de-cline sharply over the next decade due to a dramatic reduction in thebirth rate throughout the late 1960s and the 1970s. This providesgrounds for cautious optimism that the inflation threshold unemploy-ment rate will decline.
Social Insurance Programs
Other factors which have increased the inflation threshold unem-ployment rate in recent years are less likely to be reversed in thenext decade. These include the effects of social programs. While pro-viding important financial support to their recipients, these programsalso have both behavioral and reporting effects on the measured un-employment rate.
Behavioral effects of social insurance programs such as unemploy-ment insurance include the encouragement of firms to lay off work-ers and the inducement of persons to prolong their spells of unem-ployment. These effects are discussed in more detail below. Report-ing effects occur when programs induce persons to change reportingof their labor force status, without changing their behavior. For ex-ample, some experts believe that the Federal Supplemental Benefitsprogram instituted during the 1975 recession caused persons whootherwise would have withdrawn from the labor force to report thatthey were unemployed because of job search requirements. There issome evidence to suggest that the work registration requirements inthe food stamp and AFDC programs have had a similar effect.
38
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Wage Rigidity
A number of studies show that wages and prices are much morerigid now than prior to World War II, and that rigidity has increasedwithin the post-War period. Increased wage rigidity is likely to raisethe economy's inflation threshold level of unemployment, since lessflexible wages increase the inevitable unemployment associated withthe sectoral shocks which buffet the economy.
The reasons for this change are not well understood. A side effectof the provision of a "safety net" program is that employees maybecome more resistant to wage reductions, leading to increases inwage and price rigidity. To the extent that the two-earner family is aform of private "safety net" against the financial losses of unemploy-ment, the recent growth in the number of two-earner families mayalso have contributed to increasing wage rigidity in the United Statesover time.
Increasing Structural Change
A final factor that may have contributed to a rising inflation thresh-old unemployment rate is the increasing rapidity of structural changein the economy. This acceleration, which is in part caused by theeconomy's increasing sensitivity to events in the world economy, isevidenced by increasing dispersion across industries and localities inrates of unemployment. Because transfers of human and physical re-sources are costly and take time, increased unemployment is a con-comitant of structural change.
While the separate impacts of these factors—changing demograph-ic composition, larger social insurance programs, increased wage ri-gidity, and increased structural change—are difficult to quantify, it isreasonable to conclude that together they may have significantly in-creased the inflation threshold unemployment rate. Expansionary ma-croeconomic policies are unlikely to reverse the effects of thesechanges.
PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS
Direct provision of public works jobs by the government is a politi-cally popular response to cyclical unemployment during recessions.Available evidence suggests, however, that public works programsadopted in past recessions proved counterproductive, and that the in-herent capability of public works programs to combat cyclical unem-ployment is limited.
The Timing of Public Works Expenditures
Public employment programs that produce useful goods or servicesgenerally take time to plan and implement. Therefore, such pro-grams often have their greatest effects on public employment long
39
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
after an economic recovery has begun. For this reason, public em-ployment programs have sometimes exacerbated rather than mitigat-ed cyclical fluctuations in aggregate demand. A study of the Acceler-ated Public Works program enacted in September 1962 by the Con-gress to combat the high unemployment rate of the early 1960sfound that the number of jobs created by the program peaked inJune 1964, 37 months after the bottom of the recession. More recentexperience also confirms that lags in implementation are long. Arecent study by the Office of Management and Budget found that 90percent of the outlays for local public works projects designed tostimulate recovery from the 1974-75 recession occurred more than2J6 years after the trough of the recession. The lags in implementingpublic works programs result in their having destabilizing effects,since a large share of the resulting spending occurs during periods ofeconomic expansion.
The Effect of Federal Funding of Public Works on State Expenditures
Even when spending for these programs begins immediately afterthey are enacted, many public works projects do not yield a net in-crease in employment. Because of the long planning and implemen-tation lags, most of the projects available for immediate funding arethose that were planned before the recession began. Thus, Federalexpenditures on these projects often substitute for outlays that wouldhave taken place anyway.
A major effect of Federal public works expenditures may be toalter the timing of public works projects. The expectation of newpublic works programs may induce State and local governments todelay making outlays during the early stages of economic downturnsin the hope that they will receive Federal funds for projects they have"on the shelf/' The importance of this possibility is suggested by ex-periences with the Local Public Works Capital Development and In-vestment Act of 1976 and the Public Works Employment Act of1977, programs intended to spur recovery from the 1975 recession.Three characteristics of these programs may have created incentivesfor local governments to delay their own discretionary spending untilthey could see whether the Federal Government would pay theirentire bill: (1) projects were financed fully by the Federal Govern-ment; (2) grants were limited to quick-starting projects; and (3) therewas considerable uncertainty and lengthy delays in the process ofawarding money to State and local governments. One study foundthat State and local public works expenditures fell substantially inmid-1976 and decreased further between 1976 and 1977. It suggest-ed that this may have occurred because States and local governmentsdelayed projects in anticipation of funds becoming available underthe 1976 and 1977 public works programs. The study also suggested
40Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
that these measures may have caused the postponement of as muchas $22 billion in total government spending.
Crowding Out of Private Sector Employment
Another reason for discounting the efficacy of public works meas-ures is their adverse side effects on private employment. If publicworks outlays are financed by additional taxes, the income andspending of consumers are reduced, decreasing the number of jobsin the private economy. Alternatively, insofar as public works outlaysare financed by borrowing from the public, interest rates are raised,crowding out some forms of private spending and reducing privateemployment. The higher interest rates resulting from increased Fed-eral borrowing also discourage capital investments that help createfuture employment.
Benefits to Workers
An additional reason to discount the efficacy of accelerated publicworks projects is their limited value to participants. Most jobs incountercyclical public works projects are of extremely short durationand are unlikely to provide participants with lasting job skills. Underthe Public Works Impact Program, initiated in fiscal year 1972, theaverage duration of employment amounted to only 4.1 weeks. Almost60 percent of all employees worked 2 weeks or less. Data for thelocal public works programs initiated in 1976 and 1977 and de-scribed above, indicate that the average job lasted only 3.5 weeks.
Although public works programs are motivated by a desire to pro-vide jobs for the unemployed, very few jobs are actually filled by un-employed workers. Under the Public Works Impact Program, only 27percent of all jobs were filled by the previously unemployed. Underthe more recent public works programs of 1976 and 1977, it hasbeen estimated that only 12 percent of all jobs were filled by previ-ously unemployed workers.
COMBATING STRUCTURAL UNEMPLOYMENT
The preceding analysis suggests that it would be imprudent to usemacroeconomic policies to reduce the unemployment rate below itsinflation threshold level of 6 to 7 percent. Such an effort would in-crease inflation, and ultimately prove counterproductive as increasedinflation was followed by recession. This does not mean that unem-ployment rates in the 6 to 7 percent range are either inevitable ordesirable. The inflation threshold level of unemployment can be re-duced by policies that consider the special problems of two groups ofworkers: (1) young people, and (2) adults experiencing long-term un-employment. It can also be reduced by reforms of the unemployment
41
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
insurance system, which, while providing valuable insurance, may in-crease the incidence of unemployment.
THE PROBLEM OF YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT
At times of low cyclical unemployment, about half the unemployedare young people between the ages of 16 and 24. Close to one-fourthof all the unemployed are teenagers aged 16 to 19. While unemploy-ment clearly imposes hardships on youths, it has very different eco-nomic impacts than it does for adults. Many unemployed youths arein school and looking for part-time work. Most of this group, andmany other young people who have left school, are not economicallyindependent, but rather live at home and rely on their parents forfinancial support. Many other young people experience only brief pe-riods of unemployment as they move from one job to the next.
Table 2-2 provides information on the labor market activities ofyoung men and women aged 16 to 19 in October 1981, when theteenage unemployment rate was 24.1 percent. Data for 1982 are notyet available. As the table reveals, only 5 percent of all teenagerswere out of school and measured as unemployed (because they werelooking for work). A striking feature of the youth labor market is thelarge fraction of young people who are out of school but are neitherworking nor looking for work. Over 30 percent of female and 14 per-cent of male out-of-school teenagers were not in the labor force. Thefactors underlying this labor force withdrawal by young people arenot well understood. In some cases, young people may withdrawfrom the labor force because they are discouraged about their pros-pects for finding suitable employment. In other cases, labor forcewithdrawal may reflect a desire for leisure.
The observations about the dynamic character of unemploymentmade elsewhere in this chapter are especially true of young people.
TABLE 2-2.—Educational and labor market activities of youth aged 16 to 19, by sex, October 1981
Item Number(thousands)
Percent ofsubgroup
Percent ofpopulation
Number(thousands)
Percent ofsubgroup
Percent ofpopulation
Males Females
Total population
Enrolled in school..,
EmployedUnemployedNot in labor forceUnemployment rate (percent)..
Not enrolled in schoolEmployedUnemployedNot in labor forceUnemployment rate (percent)..
8,036
5,683
2,024424
3,23517.3
2,3531,585
434334
21.5
100.0
35.67.5
56.9
100.067.418.414.2
100.0
70.7
25.25.3
40.3
29.319.75.44.2
8,059
5,526
1,829429
3,26819.0
2,5331,340
417776
23.7
100.0
33.17.8
59.1
100.052.916.530.6
31.416.65.29.6
100.0
68.6
22.75.3
40.6
Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
42Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Most young people find jobs or leave the labor force fairly quickly. Itwas recently estimated that of those male teenagers who become un-employed in a given month only 42 percent remain unemployed inthe next month.
Youth unemployment is nevertheless a critical economic problem.A large part of the youth unemployment problem is traceable to thesmall group of teenagers who experience extensive unemployment.More than 52 percent of all unemployment experienced by teenagemales aged 16 to 19 in 1981 was due to the 4.4 percent of the maleteenage population of this group who were out of work for morethan 6 months during that year.
Evidence also suggests that certain teenagers who suffer extensiveunemployment earn lower wages later in life. The direction of causa-tion is very difficult to establish since persons with low skills maysimply fare poorly both early and late in life. However, the best evi-dence available suggests that poor labor market experiences early inlife cause reduced wages during adulthood. This suggests the impor-tance of developing policies to improve employment opportunitiesfor the long-term unemployed and to reduce job turnover.
Training, Unemployment, and the Minimum Wage
A major problem in the youth labor market is the dearth of*'career-oriented" employment opportunities. While people who par-ticipate in post-secondary schooling are generally subsidized by thepublic sector, public support of equivalent magnitude has not beenavailable for the post-high school training of youth who choose toenter the labor force after high school.
Employers may find it very difficult to offer such training becauseof the constraints imposed by minimum wage legislation. These lawsdiscourage employers from hiring unskilled workers at very lowwages and compensating them further by providing training. Thismay help explain very high job turnover among youths as they moverapidly in and out of "dead-end" jobs. Another consequence of mini-mum wage laws is that they prevent some young people from acquir-ing the training that would permit them to find steady, well-payingemployment as adults. Statistical studies provide evidence that mini-mum wages significantly depress the accumulation of valuable skillsand .resulting growth in earnings among youths who are paid theminimum wage. There is also evidence that the negative effects ofthe minimum wage on employment and training are concentrated
43Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
disproportionately among youths with the fewest labor market skills.Thus, although the stated purpose of the minimum wage is to reducepoverty, experience suggests that it may actually decrease the lifetimeearnings of some of the poor and thereby increase income inequality.
POLICIES TO REDUCE YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT
Almost all observers agree that mitigating the problems of instabil-ity and high unemployment in the youth labor market requires in-creasing the availability of career-oriented employment and training.This can be accomplished through public support of training, mini-mum wage reforms, and employment tax credits.
The Job Training Partnership Act
The Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) of 1982 represents amajor Federal initiative to reduce structural unemployment amongyouth and adults. The JTPA departs from previous Federal employ-ment training programs by establishing a formal partnership betweenprivate industry, the public sector, and vocational training institutionsfor the purposes of planning, designing, and providing federally fi-nanced training. Federal resources are targeted to individuals identi-fied as most in need: economically disadvantaged youth, low-skilledand chronically unemployed adults, and skilled workers who have lostjobs in declining industries and regions. The problems faced by thelatter group are discussed more fully later in this chapter.
The JTPA is intended to fill an important niche in the national em-ployment and training system by serving individuals who are unableto make use of job training provided by more traditional institutions:high schools, vocational-technical schools, community colleges, uni-versities, and employers. Federally funded training programs such asJTPA provide a second chance to youth and adults experiencingtrouble in the labor market. The JTPA is administered at the Stateand local level. This allows training programs to be tailored to theparticular needs of workers and employers in local labor markets.
Minimum Wage Reforms
The Administration will propose a summertime differential mini-mum wage for young people under the age of 22. Between May 1and September 30 of each year the minimum wage for this groupwould be reduced to $2.50 from $3.35. This measure would encour-age firms to hire young people, just out of school, and give them theexperience needed to compete effectively in the labor market. It willalso encourage employers to provide youth who remain in schoolwith valuable work experience during the summer months.
The Targeted Jobs Tax Credit
An alternative policy avenue for encouraging employment andtraining of young people is to provide tax credits or wage subsidies
44Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
to employers who hire youths. Tax credits are currently provided tofirms that employ economically disadvantaged youths, aged 18 to 24,under the Targeted Jobs Tax Credit program. The credits are alsotargeted to welfare recipients, and economically disadvantaged Viet-nam veterans, cooperative education students, handicapped persons,and ex-convicts.
The tax credit lasts for up to 2 full years. In the first year it isequal to 50 percent of an individual's earnings, up to a maximumcredit of $3,000. In the second year it is equal to 25 percent of earn-ings, up to a maximum credit of $1,500. Participation in the programhas been limited since its inception in 1979. This is an apparent con-sequence of administrative problems encountered by the agencies re-sponsible for determining program eligibility (especially the Job Serv-ice), reluctance on the part of eligible recipients to use the tax creditas a self-marketing tool, and employers' reluctance to let governmentprograms influence hiring decisions.
Recent legislation added a second component to the tax credit pro-gram by providing a tax credit for summer employment targeted ateconomically disadvantaged youths aged 16 and 17. The tax creditfor this group is quite large, equaling 85 percent of wages, up to atotal summer income of $3,000. The summer Targeted Jobs TaxCredit program, in effect, allows employers to hire eligible youths,who are paid the minimum wage for a net cost to the firms of 50cents an hour. The program will be in place for the first time duringthe summer of 1983.
A virtue of measures which subsidize employment and on-the-jobtraining for youth is that they counteract the large bias toward formalschooling over on-the-job training inherent in current policies. Inpart because of large public subsidies to higher education during thelast two decades, the percentage of young people, aged 18 to 24, en-rolled in higher education rose very sharply from 26 percent in 1963to 41 percent in 1975. This shift toward increased formal schoolingwas accompanied by a decline in the relative wages of college gradu-ates and high school graduates. The ratio of the average annual in-comes of college graduates to that of high school graduates, aged 25and over, fell from 1.53 in 1968 to 1.38 in 1978.LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT AND STRUCTURAL CHANGE
An especially visible and serious component of the unemploymentproblem is composed of adults suffering protracted unemployment.At present, most long-term unemployment is a consequence of therecession and the resulting reduction in the demand for labor. But asdiscussed earlier in the chapter, long-term unemployment will remaina significant problem even after the economy recovers.
45Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Structural Change and Economic Adjustment
A large part of long-term unemployment among adults can betraced to structural changes in the economy. An increasingly impor-tant source of structural change is the growing interdependence ofthe U.S. economy with that of the rest of the world. The share ofexport and import-competing industries in GNP has increased overthe last several decades, and many industries have consequently feltthe cold winds of economic change. By December 1982 the unem-ployment rate had reached 23.2 percent in the motor vehicle industryand 29.2 percent in the primary metals industry. Other industries, in-cluding mining, construction, and lumber, have also contracted rap-idly, leaving behind a significant number of long-term unemployed.These figures reflect both changes resulting from foreign competi-tion and the sharp declines in the demand for manufactured goodscaused by the recent recession. The gradual decline of the dollar inforeign exchange markets to historically prevailing levels, a drop inreal interest rates, and general economic recovery would contributeto easing the problems of troubled industries, as explained in Chap-ter 3. However, most observers believe that foreign competition willpresent persistent problems in some domestic industries even in thelong run.
In a number of these industries, significant adjustments will needto take place. If foreign firms can continue to produce goods at lowercosts than U.S. firms, either domestic production will contract, forc-ing workers to leave the affected industries, or workers will have toaccept constant or even declining real wages. The former option isparticularly painful in industries like automobiles and steel, whereworkers have become accustomed to high standards of living. Be-cause wages in these industries are substantially greater than wagesin other manufacturing industries, workers find it difficult to locatesuitable alternative jobs.
Programs which inhibit the transition of workers from declining in-dustries to growing industries would raise the level of structural un-employment in the economy. Included in this group are programswhich would provide financial assistance to industries without provid-ing incentives for employee relocation or wage and price flexibility.In a dynamic economy subject to the pressures of domestic and for-eign competition, our economic health depends critically on the abili-ty of workers and firms to respond quickly to changing economicconditions.Policies to Alleviate Long-term Unemployment
The centerpiece of Federal policy to alleviate long-term unemploy-ment is Title III of the new Job Training Partnership Act discussedearlier in the chapter. Title III established State-administered pro-grams of employment and training assistance for dislocated workers,
46Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
defined broadly to include individuals who have become unemployedas a result of plant closures, laid-off workers who are unlikely toreturn to their previous industry or occupation, and individuals expe-riencing long-term unemployment in occupations with limited em-ployment opportunities. Matching grants are provided to States onthe basis of their unemployment conditions. Title III authorizesStates to establish a wide variety of employment and training activi-ties, including job search assistance, job training, relocation assist-ance, and employment counseling. Individuals receiving Title III as-sistance may also receive unemployment compensation, if they areeligible.
The Administration in its 1984 budget has introduced two new ap-proaches to the problem of reducing long-term unemployment. First,it has proposed that Federal unemployment laws be amended topermit States to use a portion of the unemployment insurance taxesthey collect to support retraining and job search assistance for theirunemployed workers. Second, the Administration has proposed thatthe Federal Supplemental Compensation program be replaced whenit expires with a new temporary program that provides incentives forwork as well as compensation for long-term unemployment. As an al-ternative to added weeks of unemployment compensation, this pro-gram would give recipients the option of receiving assistance in se-curing work through a system of tax credits to employers. This willgive employers a significant incentive to hire the long-term unem-ployed.
THE EFFECTS OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
For more than 40 years, unemployment compensation has givenvaluable support to millions of unemployed workers and has pro-vided an important source of security to millions more who are em-ployed. Along with these beneficial consequences, however, the pres-ent structure of the unemployment insurance system has altered theincentives faced by employers in hiring and firing decisions and theincentives of unemployed workers to accept new employment oppor-tunities. As a result, unemployment compensation seems to have in-creased the incidence and duration of unemployment.
The current system of unemployment compensation produces twodistinct but related adverse incentive effects. First, for those who areunemployed it reduces the cost of unemployment, providing an in-centive for longer durations of unemployment. Second, currentmethods of financing unemployment insurance increase the incidenceof unemployment by increasing the size of seasonal and cyclical fluc-uations in unemployment and by making temporary jobs morecommon.
47Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Incentives to Prolong Unemployment
Payments to the unemployed clearly raise the level of householdexpenditures that can be maintained when one or more family mem-bers are not working. Such payments reduce the economic pressureto find work immediately, encouraging a longer period of job searchduring which the unemployed worker hopes to find a more attractivejob than might otherwise be found. For some workers unemploymentinsurance replaces more than 70 percent of after-tax wages duringperiods of unemployment. Economic research indicates that there isa positive relationship between duration of job search and the levelof unemployment benefits.
Workers who take longer to find jobs because of unemploymentcompensation are in no sense "loafing" or "cheating." An unem-ployed person who does not expect to be recalled by his previousemployer can expect, on average, to find a better job the longer andmore carefully he looks. Unemployment insurance, by reducing thecost of additional weeks without work, encourages unemployed work-ers to continue searching for better employment opportunities.
Incentives for More Unstable Employment
A second avenue through which the unemployment insurancesystem, as currently financed, tends to increase the economy's rate ofstructural unemployment is by increasing seasonal and cyclical fluctu-ations in the demand for labor and the relative number of short-lived, casual jobs.
The effect of unemployment compensation is to offset the marketforces that would otherwise decrease, at least somewhat, the amountof unstable employment in the economy. Insofar as unemploymentcompensation provides a subsidy to unstable employment practices,it reduces the wage differential required to attract workers to season-al, cyclical, and temporary jobs. And because employers pay a rela-tively small premium for unstable employment practices under cur-rent methods of financing unemployment insurance, they have littleincentive to reduce this instability.
The current subsidy to unstable employment patterns would be re-duced if unemployment insurance were financed through a morecompletely experience-rated employer tax that more accurately re-flected the expected level of unemployment benefits to a firm's laid-off workers in the future. The theory of experience rating is clear: ifan employer pays the full cost of the unemployment benefits that hisformer employees receive, he will not have an incentive to make ex-cessive use of unstable employment practices. Recent statistical re-search demonstrates that there is, in fact, a strong positive relation-
48
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ship between incomplete experience rating and employment instabil-ity.
Most States use experience rating to some extent, in that some em-ployers contribute to the State unemployment compensation fundpartially on the basis of the unemployment experience of their ownemployees. The degree of experience rating is highly imperfect,however, for two reasons.
First, a significant share of benefits paid are not directly charged tofirms, but rather, are spread across all the firms in a State. These in-clude benefits paid to job leavers, benefits to employees of firms nolonger doing business in a State, and allowances for dependents. Ex-tended benefits, which are available in high unemployment States toworkers who have exhausted their regular unemployment insurance,are also not directly charged to employers.
Second, employer contributions are limited by minimum and maxi-mum tax rates. Firms stuck at the maximum or minimum tax rateswill find that their tax rates do not change even if the unemploymentexperience of their workers is altered. As a consequence they face re-duced economic incentives to smooth employment fluctuations.
One measure of the extent of experience rating is the proportionof benefits received that are not effectively charged to theformer employer. A value of 100 percent represents perfect experi-ence rating. A recent study of nine States over the period 1971-1978found that on average, less than 60 percent of total benefits were ex-perience rated, by this definition. The degee of experience rating fellto 47.5 percent during the 1975 recession and reached a high of 62.6percent in 1978, a year with relatively low unemployment.
The problem of imperfect experience rating has been partially rem-edied by a provision of the Tax Equity and Fiscal ResponsibilityAct of 1982 which raised the federally proscribed lower bound onState maximum unemployment insurance tax rates from 2.7 percentto 5.4 percent of employers' taxable payroll. Because of this change,fewer firms are likely to face the maximum tax rate.
CONCLUSIONS
The dual problems of cyclical and structural unemployment areboth extremely serious. Increased unemployment during cyclicaldownturns, and the high levels of unemployment that prevail evenafter the economy recovers, impose large costs on the unemployedand the economy as a whole. Fortunately, both can be ameliorated byprudent public policy. Sound macroeconomic policies will avoid re-currences of the rising inflation of the 1970s and subsequent in-
49Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
creases in cyclical unemployment. Policies directed at young peopleand the long-term unemployed, and reform of the unemployment in-surance system, can significantly reduce the level of structural unem-ployment.
50
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CHAPTER 3
The United States in the WorldEconomy: Strains on the System
DURING THE 1970s the world's market economies became moreintegrated with each other than ever before. Exports and imports asa share of gross national product (GNP) reached record levels formost industrial countries, while international lending and direct for-eign investment grew even faster than world trade. This closer link-age of economies was mutually beneficial. It allowed producers ineach country to take greater advantage of their country's special re-sources and knowledge, and to take advantage of economies of scale.At the same time, it allowed each country to consume a wider varietyof products, at lower costs, than it could produce itself.
Underlying the growth in world trade and investment was a pro-gressive reduction of barriers to trade. The postwar period wasmarked by a series of agreements to liberalize trade: both multilater-al, like the Kennedy Round, and bilateral, like the Canada-U.S. autopact.
In spite of its huge benefits, however, this liberalized tradingsystem is now in serious danger. Within the United States, demandsfor protection against imports and for export subsidies have grownas a combination of structural changes, sectoral problems, and short-run macroeconomic developments has led to a perception that weare becoming uncompetitive in world markets. In Europe, a growingstructural unemployment problem, aggravated by the recession, hasincreased protectionist pressures. In the developing countries a fi-nancial crisis threatens the integration of capital markets and is push-ing many countries back toward the exchange controls and import re-strictions they had begun to dismantle.
These problems must not be allowed to disrupt world trade. If thesystem comes apart—if the world's nations allow themselves to becaught up in a spiral of retaliatory trade restrictions—a long timemay pass before the pieces are put back together.
This chapter reviews the strains on the international economicsystem and the policies by which the United States is attempting toovercome them. It is divided into four sections. The first section dis-cusses long-term changes in U.S. competitiveness. The correction of
51Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
widespread misconceptions about the competitive position of theUnited States is essential if we are to get through the difficult periodahead without making major policy mistakes. The second section ofthe chapter is devoted to financial developments and their effects ontrade, especially the appreciation of the dollar and its likely effects onthe U.S. trade balance. Two final sections examine macroeconomicand financial problems in Europe and the developing countries.
LONG-RUN TRENDS IN U.S. COMPETITIVENESS:PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES
Concern over the international competitiveness of the UnitedStates is as high as it has ever been. It is argued with increasing fre-quency that U.S. business has steadily lost ground in the internation-al marketplace. This alleged poor performance is often attributedboth to failures of management in the United States and to the sup-port given to foreign businesses by their home governments. Feedingthe perception of declining competitiveness is the persistent U.S.deficit in merchandise trade, especially the imbalance in trade withJapan.
Changes in U.S. trade performance must, however, be put into thecontext of changes in the U.S. role in the world economy. This widerapproach reveals that much of the concern about long-run competi-tiveness is based on misperceptions. Although the recent apprecia-tion of the dollar has created a temporary loss of competitiveness,the United States has not experienced a persistent loss of ability tosell its products on international markets; in fact, in the 1970s theUnited States held its own in terms of output, exports, and employ-ment. Changes in the relationship of the United States to the worldeconomy, however, have made the United States look less competi-tive by some traditional measures.
AGGREGATE PERFORMANCE OF THE UNITED STATES AND OTHERDEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Discussion of U.S. competitiveness often gives the misleading im-pression that the United States has consistently performed poorly rel-ative to other industrial countries. The U.S. share of world trade andworld GNP did in fact decline throughout the 1950s and 1960s, re-flecting the recovery of the rest of the world from World War II, to-gether with the narrowing of the huge and unsustainable U.S. tech-nological lead. In the 1970s, however, this long decline leveled off.
• From 1973 to 1980, real gross domestic product (GDP) in theUnited States grew at an annual rate of 2.3 percent, compared
52
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
with 2.6 percent in the other Organization for Economic Coop-eration and Development (OECD) countries.
• From 1973 to 1980 the U.S. share of OECD exports remainednearly constant, declining from 17.6 to 17.2 percent.
• Over the same period, employment in the United States grew at2.1 percent a year, compared with only 0.5 percent in the rest ofthe OECD countries.
The United States, in part as a side effect of its relatively rapidgrowth in employment, did do poorly by comparison in one respect,productivity growth. Output per worker grew at only 0.2 percent inthe United States, compared with 2.2 percent a year in the rest of theOECD countries. Productivity is, of course, crucial to living stand-ards; ultimately, the level of consumption per capita depends on thelevel of output per worker. But there is no necessary relation be-tween productivity and competition in international markets. Slowgrowth in productivity only hampers a country's international com-petitiveness if it is not offset by correspondingly slow growth in realwages. If U.S. workers, for example, were to receive real wage in-creases equal to those granted in other countries while their produc-tivity failed to increase at a comparable rate, U.S. industry would finditself increasingly uncompetitive. The fact is, however, that this didnot occur, as the comparative experience of the United States andthe European Economic Community illustrates. From 1973 to 1980output per manufacturing worker in the European Economic Com-munity rose at an annual rate of 2.7 percent, but real compensationrose at an annual rate of 4.1 percent. By contrast, output per workerin the United States rose 1.1 percent annually, while real compensa-tion rose only 1.8 percent annually. In fact, until the recent rise inthe dollar's exchange rate, it was workers in the European EconomicCommunity, rather than those in the United States, who were prob-ably pricing themselves out of the world market in spite of their rela-tively good productivity performance.
The overall performance of the United States, then, does not sug-gest a long-term problem of competitiveness. The shift from persist-ent trade surplus to persistent deficit which occurred over the lastdecade is, however, often misinterpreted as a sign of an inability tocompete. In fact, changes in the structure of the U.S. balance of pay-ments are more the result of changes in the U.S. saving and invest-ment position than of slow productivity growth.
THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF THE U.S. BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
In the 1950s and early 1960s the United States normally had atrade surplus and invested heavily in other countries. In the yearsafter 1973, however, the United States normally had a trade deficit,
53Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
and annual investment by foreigners in the United States began toapproach annual U.S. investment abroad. The shift in the U.S. tradebalance was closely connected with the shift in investment flows.
Taken as a whole, U.S. international transactions always balance.Any force tending to increase or decrease the balance in one catego-ry of transactions sets in motion a process leading to exactly offset-ting changes in balances in other categories. For example, an in-crease in foreign demand for U.S. exports tends directly to improvethe trade balance, but this improvement leads to a rise in the dollar'sexchange rate against foreign currencies. The exchange-rate appre-ciation in turn leads to increases in imports, a worsened balance onservices, and so on. Similarly, an increased desire by foreign resi-dents to invest in the United States is reflected in an increase in thecapital account but leads to an appreciation of the dollar and an off-setting decline in other parts of the balance of payments.
The shift in the U.S. trade balance from persistent surplus topersistent deficit was largely an offset to changes in the U.S. capitalaccount. In the 1950s and the first half of the 1960s, rates of returnon capital were lower and wage rates were higher in the UnitedStates than in other industrial countries. Since the United States suf-fered no war damage, its capital stock was intact, and the diffusion ofU.S. technology abroad created a demand for new capital investmentin the recipient countries. The result was that returns to investmentwere higher abroad than in the United States, and the United Stateswas a heavy net foreign investor. The counterpart to this foreign in-vestment was a persistent surplus on current transactions, includingmerchandise trade.
By the 1970s the other industrial countries had narrowed or elimi-nated these differences in capital and labor costs. The result was thatthe demand for new capital abroad was no longer a great deal largerthan it was in the United States. At the same time, the supply of sav-ings in the United States was restricted by a low national saving rate(the lowest among the major industrial countries). Thus the UnitedStates ceased to be a major net exporter of capital, and the currentaccount of the balance of payments moved from surplus to roughbalance. Meanwhile, the U.S. balance on items other than merchan-dise trade improved: the deficit in military transactions fell, the sur-plus in services rose, and, in particular, the accumulation of past for-eign investments began to yield increasing income. This meant that abalanced current account was associated with a deficit in merchandisetrade.
Table 3-1 and Chart 3-1 show how the structure of the U.S. cur-rent account has changed, measuring its components as percentagesofGNP.
54Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE 3-1 .—Structure ofthe U.S. balance of payments, as percent of GNP, 1960-80
Type of balance
Merchandise trade
Investment income
Military transactions
Travel and services
Remittances
Current account
Percent of GNP
1960-66
0.86
.74
.41
.04
- . 4 4
.70
1974-80
- 0 . 8 0
1.06
- . 0 3
.12
- . 3 0
.06
Change,percentage
points
- 1 . 6 6
.32
.38
.16
.15
- . 6 4
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Chart 3 -1
Structural Changes in the Current Account Balance
PERCENT OF GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
1.5
1.0
.5
- . 5
-1.0
-1.5
INVESTMENTINCOME
1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982
NOTE.—DATA ARE 16-QUARTER WEIGHTED CENTERED MOVING AVERAGES.
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
55Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
THE ISSUE OF U.S. TRADE WITH JAPAN
The perception of diminished U.S. competitiveness stems not onlyfrom the U.S. trade deficit but from an impression that U.S. tradeperformance compares poorly with that of other countries, especiallythat of Japan. Japan runs a huge surplus in its manufactures trade,while the United States runs only a small one, and Japan also has alarge surplus in its bilateral trade with the United States. These factsare often attributed to Japanese trade restrictions. Japan does main-tain restrictions which seriously hurt U.S. businesses. Trade restric-tions, however, do not in the long run improve the Japanese tradebalance; as discussed more fully below, they lead to offsetting in-creases in other imports or declines in exports. The main explanationof Japan's surplus in manufactures trade and in trade with the UnitedStates is that Japan, with few natural resources, incurs huge deficitsin its trade in primary products, especially oil, and with primary pro-ducers, especially the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC). The surpluses in the rest of Japan's trade offset these defi-cits.
Table 3-2 and Chart 3-2 show the differences in the structure ofthe Japanese, European, and U.S. trade accounts. They show clearlyhow the huge Japanese surplus in manufactures offsets large deficitsin primary products.
Corresponding to the Japanese sectoral deficit in primary products,especially oil, is a regional deficit with OPEC. Japan makes up for itsdeficit with OPEC by running surpluses in its trade with other re-gions. The extent of this regional imbalance—and its contrast withthe U.S. position—is shown in Table 3-3. The point here is similarto that already made with respect to the overall U.S. trade balance:looking at Japanese-U.S. trade in isolation is misleading. The Japa-nese surplus in trade with the United States is largely a response tothe rise of OPEC.
Although Japanese trade policy does not play a central role incausing the bilateral trade imbalance with the United States, Japaneseimport restrictions remain a major source of friction. Japan maintainsa variety of nontariff barriers against imports. These include importquotas for a number of agricultural products and "red tape" barriersagainst manufactured goods, such as stringent inspection require-ments applied against imported goods but not against Japanese prod-ucts. These trade restrictions probably do not lead to a larger overallJapanese trade surplus. If they were removed, the yen would depreci-ate and increased Japanese imports in the currently protected sectorswould be offset by reduced deficits or increased surpluses elsewhere.Japanese trade restrictions do, however, distort the composition ofU.S. trade with Japan, imposing serious costs on some U.S. produc-
56
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE 3-2.—Trade balances by commodity group as percent of GDP, United States, Japan, and the
European Economic Community, 1980
[Percent of GDP]
Commodity group UnitedStates
- 1 . 4 5
- 1 . 9 3
.40
.54
- 2 . 8 7
.48
- . 4 2
.90
Japan
- 0 . 9 9
- 1 0 . 1 1
- 1 . 2 6
- 2 . 1 5
- 6 . 7 1
9.12
3.09
6.02
EuropeanEconomic
Community
- 2 . 2 3
- 5 . 4 1
- . 4 1
- 1 . 2 3
- 3 . 7 7
3.18
.88
2.30
Total..
Primary products
Food, beverages, and tobacco
Crude materials excluding petroleum..
Mineral fuels
Manufactures
Machinery and transport equipment....
Other manufactured goods
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Chart 3-2
Composition of Trade, 1980
PERCENT OF GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
10| | TOTAL
PRIMARYGOODS
MANUFACTURES
V . ' . •'•' v>
. " .:
i—IH- 5
- 1 0
UNITED STATES EUROPEAN JAPANECONOMIC COMMUNITY
SOURCE: ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT.
57Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ers. As the fastest growing and second largest market economy,Japan has a responsibility to help sustain the open trading system. Amajor trade liberalization by Japan would do much to relieve the po-litical strains on that system, while the failure of Japan to make morethan token concessions would intensify them.
TABLE 3-3.—Trade balances by region as percent of GDP, United States and Japan, 1980
[Percent of GDP]
UnitedStates Japan
Industrial countries
Oil-exporting countries..
Non-oil developing countries..,
0.23
= 1.45
.52
1.92
-3.20
1.46
Source: International Monetary Fund.
THE PROBLEM OF UNCOMPETITIVE SECTORS
Analysis of the overall U.S. trade deficit and the bilateral deficitwith Japan suggests that worries about U.S. competitiveness arebased in part on a misunderstanding of the situation. There is noquestion, however, that increased foreign competition has forcedsome sectors of the U.S. economy to contract.
This is partly a consequence of the fact that trade has becomemore important to the U.S. economy. Specialization by nations is thereason for international trade. If the United States is to expand itstrade, the U.S. economy must become more specialized. This meansthat some sectors will grow and others will shrink. During the 1970sthe United States developed increasing surpluses in areas in which italready enjoyed a comparative advantage and developed increasingdeficits in sectors in which it was at a disadvantage. Some illustrativenumbers are given in Table 3-4.
TABLE 3-4.—U.S. trade balances by sector as percent of GDP, 1972-79
[Percent of GDP]
Item 1972 1979
U.S. comparative advantage:
Research-intensive manufactures.,
Resource-intensive products, other than fuels..
Invisibles (services and investment income)....
U.S. comparative disadvantage:
Nonresearch-intensive manufactures..
Fuels
0.93
.06
.40
-1 .27
- . 2 7
1.63
.67
1.44
-1 .44
=2.41
Sources: International Monetary Fund, National Science Board, and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Specialization of this kind is desirable both for the United Statesand for its trading partners. Specialization and trade raise the effi-ciency of the world economy as a whole by allowing each country to
58Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
concentrate on doing what it does relatively well, and by allowing in-creased economies of scale. But greater specialization can leave thoseinvolved in the contracting sectors worse off, at least temporarily. At-tempts to prevent adjustment through trade barriers or subsidies,however, impose severe costs on unprotected sectors.
Some sectoral reallocation of resources, then, is a normal conse-quence of the increasing U.S. integration into the world economy.This is not the whole story, however. Some sectors of the U.S. econ-omy are confronted by a problem that is not simply the result ofmarket forces. Broadly speaking, these sectors fall into two groups.In one group are sectors where firms or their workers, accustomed tohaving substantial market power, now find that they have pricedthemselves out of the world market. In the other group are sectorswhich are hurt by foreign protectionism or export subsidies.
Market Power and Competitiveness
The "problem" of diminished market power in some sectors actu-ally derives from a desirable aspect of trade: the fact that trade in-creases competition. One of the major benefits of an increasinglyopen U.S. economy is that it reduces the problems of monopoly andmarket power, thus increasing efficiency and helping consumers. Butthe transition to more competitive markets can prove painful. Whenan industry accustomed to having domestic market power encountersinternational competition, it must accept a reduction in the premiumin prices and wages it previously commanded over other sectors ofthe economy. Both firms and workers may be reluctant to accept thisimplication of increased competition, and idle capacity and unem-ployment may result. Prices and wages in some U.S. heavy industriesare probably too high to be sustainable in an integrated world econo-my.
Policies of Foreign Governments
A different problem is posed when foreign governments engage inprotective or export promotion measures that harm U.S. producers.U.S. trade negotiators have emphasized four particular areas of con-cern:
1. Agriculture: Japan and the European Economic Community havehigh protective barriers against U.S. agricultural products. Further,the European Economic Community now engages in massive subsi-dized export of agricultural products to dispose of the surpluses cre-ated by its price-support program. These measures depress worldprices of agricultural products, imposing substantial costs on U.S.producers in a sector where the United States holds a clear compara-tive advantage.
59Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2. High technology: In recent years, many countries have come toview the high-technology industries as vehicles for economic growthand have sought to promote them through a complex mix of poli-cies—outright subsidies, export credit subsidies, research subsidies,preferential procurement by State-owned enterprises, and so on. TheUnited States holds a comparative advantage in high-technologyproducts, and the U.S. export market share has remained roughlyconstant since 1973. Nevertheless, there is concern that in some spe-cific areas, especially aircraft, foreign subsidies are threatening theposition of U.S. producers.
3. Services: The United States has developed an increasingly strongnet export position in services. Services, however, have never beenrecognized as being under the rules of the international tradingsystem, and trade in services is limited by a maze of foreign govern-ment regulations.
4. Investment: Many countries impose "investment performance re-quirements'* on foreign investors in exchange for the right to investor to receive investment incentives. Many of those performance re-quirements are trade-related, requiring foreign companies to exportmore, reach a specified level of local content, or reduce imports.
CHALLENGES TO U.S. TRADE POLICY
The next few years are critical for the international trading system.Accumulating structural problems have combined with short-run ma-croeconomic stresses to produce a resurgence of protectionist pres-sures. The Administration's aim, nonetheless, is to preserve andextend the benefits of freer trade. To do this will require resistingprotectionist pressures at home while continuing to urge foreign gov-ernments to eliminate their more objectionable trade-distorting poli-cies.
Responding to Foreign Actions
The practices of foreign governments pose extremely difficultissues for U.S. trade policy. The United States customarily seeks toinduce other nations to move in the direction of freer trade. The di-lemma is how to do this without imposing costs on ourselves thatexceed the benefits from changes in other countries* policies.
Trade-distorting measures, whether they take the form of protec-tion against imports or the promotion of exports, hurt the countrywhich adopts them as well as other countries, even when they are aresponse to foreign trade-distorting practices. If foreign governmentslimit imports from the United States and we respond in kind, the ini-tial results will be further reductions in economic efficiency at homeand higher domestic prices. If foreign governments subsidize ex-ports, depressing world prices for U.S. products, a countersubsidy by
60Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
the United States will depress prices still further. The belief that de-partures from free trade are automatically called for if other coun-tries do not play by the rules is a fallacy.
Intervention in international trade by the U.S. Government, eventhough costly to the U.S. economy in the short run, may, however,be justified if it serves the strategic purpose of increasing the cost ofinterventionist policies by foreign governments. Thus, there is a po-tential role for carefully targeted measures, explicitly temporary,aimed at convincing other countries to reduce their trade distortions.
There are obvious risks in such a course of action. Instead of in-ducing other countries to move toward freer trade, U.S. pressuremight set off a cycle of retaliation which would leave everyone worseoff. There are also domestic political risks. Trade measures intendedto be temporary may end up permanent and institutionalized. Theneed to balance the strategic objective of reducing foreign trade bar-riers against the harm which might be caused by U.S. retaliatorymeasures explains the U.S policy of negotiating for freer trade whileholding open the possibility of more direct action as a last resort.
Responding to Problem Industries
The problems of industries which have recently lost their tradition-al market power also pose a serious policy dilemma. There is strongpressure to give these industries at least temporary relief from im-ports, in the hope that lower wage and price increases and improvedproductivity will eventually make them competitive again. On theother hand, protection reduces the incentives for both firms andworkers to make these changes. Furthermore, protectionist measures,however temporary they are supposed to be, tend to become perma-nent. The limitation of protection for these problem industries is acentral goal of U.S. economic policy.
EXCHANGE RATES AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
During 1982 the dollar rose against other major currencies to itshighest level since the beginning of floating exchange rates in 1973.The strength of the dollar provided some benefits to the U.S. econo-my by reducing import prices and thus accelerating progress againstinflation. On the other hand, the strong dollar caused severe prob-lems by decreasing the cost competitiveness of exported U.S. goods.
CAUSES OF THE DOLLAR'S STRENGTH
Exchange-rate movements are not well understood. Econometricmodels of exchange-rate determination proposed in the past decadehave not shown any consistent ability to track past exchange-ratemovements, let alone predict future changes. Nevertheless, careful
61Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
analysis can narrow the range of plausible explanations of the dol-lar's rise.
The recent appreciation of the dollar, unlike many earlier ex-change-rate movements, did not simply reflect contemporaneouschanges in relative price levels. The well-known theory of purchasingpower parity suggests that the rate of change in the exchange rateshould equal the difference between the foreign and domestic infla-tion rates. Over the very long run, or in situations of very large dif-ferences in inflation rates, the purchasing power parity theory hasproved to be a useful guide. But the theory has little or no power toexplain the recent rise of the dollar. Price increases over the past 2years in Germany and Japan, for instance, were lower than in theUnited States. Yet the dollar appreciated dramatically during thatperiod against both the mark and the yen. Stated differently, the riseof the dollar was not simply a nominal but also a real appreciation, asillustrated in Chart 3-3.
Large exchange-rate movements may also occur because of shiftsin world demand for a country's exports or changes in a country'sdemand for imports. An example of such an event was Great Brit-ain's discovery of oil in the North Sea, which has played at least somerole in the high level of Great Britain's real exchange rate relative toother European currencies.
No comparable event accounts for the appreciation of the dollar,although U.S. oil imports have declined sharply. The rise of thedollar was not initially accompanied by a deterioration of the tradebalance, a fact which might seem to suggest that there was an in-crease in demand for U.S. goods. The initial lack of deterioration,however, stemmed from lags in the effect of the exchange rate on thetrade balance rather than from a shift in either export or importdemand, and the U.S. trade deficit grew rapidly in the second half of1982.
What the rise of the dollar seems clearly to reflect is a rise not inthe demand for U.S. goods, but in the demand for U.S. assets. Thereasons for the increased attractiveness of investment in the UnitedStates are somewhat controversial, but the effects are not. In order tobuy U.S. assets, foreigners must first acquire dollars. The increaseddemand for dollars drives up the exchange rate.
One important factor in the increased demand for U.S. assets wasthat real interest rates in the United States were high relative to realinterest rates elsewhere. Real interest rates are not directly measur-able, since they equal the nominal rate minus expected inflation. Butsome rough measure is attainable by computing the nominal rateminus actual inflation. Chart 3-4 shows the differential in real interestrates, computed in this way between the United States and other
62Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 3-3
Real Exchange Rates Of Major CurrenciesAgainst The Dollar
1973-80=100
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
%\
\
-
—
-
-
1 i
t/
r
• / "7
I I I 1
\
1*
**
- *
1 1 1 i
JV
,1
v\ YEN
\ \
\ \ ,
l\MARK
*• *
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
S \\FRANC
i • . 1 . .
\\
...A*
• i i i i
—
-
7/
^ ̂ /. /-**• *i i i i
1980 1981 1982
NOTE.—CONSUMER PRICES USED AS DEFLATOR.
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.
industrial countries. The chart suggests that the real interest rate inthe United States was substantially higher than foreign rates in recentyears.
But events in the fall of 1982 cast some doubt on whether real in-terest rates alone can explain the dollar's strength. As U.S. short-term interest rates fell sharply, the differential between short-term in-terest rates in the United States and other countries was greatly re-duced. Yet the dollar continued to rise. The explanation for this maylie in the difference between short- and long-term rates. Most ex-change-rate models suggest that long-term real rates, and not short-term ones, are what affect the real exchange rate. A notable featureof the U.S. financial scene in the fall of 1982 was that long-term rates
63
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 3-4
International Real Short-Term Interest RateDifferentials
PERCENTAGE POINTS
6
4 -
2 -
1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982
NOTE.—DATA ARE U.S. RATE MINUS AVERAGE OF RATES FOR MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIESWEIGHTED BY GNP, ADJUSTED FOR DIFFERENCES IN CONSUMER PRICE INFLATION.
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.
did not fall nearly as much as short-term rates. At the same time,long-run inflation expectations may have declined, so that it is un-clear how much long-term real interest rates actually fell.
Many observers believe that other factors besides real interest rateshelp explain the dollar's strength. In particular, the unsettled state ofthe world economy—particularly the problems in Europe and LatinAmerica described later in this chapter—may have created a desireon the part of investors for a safe haven for their funds. The UnitedStates, according to this argument, is still regarded as the most politi-cally and economically stable of the market economies and hasbecome a financial refuge in troubled times. While the importance ofthis factor is hard to assess, the worldwide search for financialsecurity may partially explain this country's rising capital account sur-plus and its growing current account deficit.
64Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
AN UNDERVALUED YEN?
The explanations of the strong dollar discussed so far leave out aview which has received considerable attention—that the strength ofthe dollar reflects deliberate undervaluation of their currencies byour competitors, especially Japan. This view is important enough inits implications for U.S. international economic policy to deserve sep-arate treatment.
Arguments that the yen is undervalued are of two types, which arebasically independent of one another. One argument is that the Japa-nese government has persistently kept the yen undervalued. Theother is that the Japanese have only recently engineered a decline inthe yen to gain competitive advantage. Neither of these views appearscorrect in light of the actual behavior of Japan's balance of paymentsand exchange rate.
If the first allegation—that the yen has been persistently underval-ued—was correct, Japan would run persistent current account sur-pluses in excess of what seems justified. We would also expect Japanto have experienced exceptionally rapid growth in its foreign ex-change reserves. Neither of these was the case:
• From the beginning of floating exchange rates in 1973 through1981, Japan had an average surplus in its current account of only0.15 percent of GNP. This was not much more than the U.S.figure for the same period (0.11 percent), considerably less thanthat of Germany (0.47 percent), and much less than the U.S. sur-plus of the early 1960s (0.70 percent).
• From the beginning of floating exchange rates in 1973 to thethird quarter of 1982, Japan's reserves minus gold grew at anannual rate of 4.8 percent, far less than the 9.7 percent rate ofreserve growth for all non-OPEC countries.
These facts contradict the view that the yen was persistently under-valued. There remains the possibility that the yen's weakness duringmuch of 1982 was excessive in some sense. A natural question iswhether, after adjustment for purchasing power parity, the yen fellmore against the dollar than other currencies. The answer to thisquestion depends on the base period used for comparison. For mostbase periods, however, the real depreciation of the yen against thedollar appears smaller than that of the French franc and the Germanmark. Table 3-5 shows an illustrative set of numbers. As the tableshows, only for a few base periods does the yen appear more "under-valued" than the other two currencies.
The actual behavior of the Japanese balance of payments and ex-change rate thus do not support the view that there is any special un-dervaluation of the yen—that is, they suggest that exchange-rate
65Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE S-5.—Real appreciation of the dollar against major currencies to August 1982
[Percent change from base year to August 1982 ' ]
19711972 . ...
19731974
19751976
19771978
19791980
1981
Base year French franc
-1 .011.8
27 921.4
39 529.6
29.443.0
50 851.6
21.1
German mark
-2 .19.5
31.431.0
33.728.8
35.950.1
53.844.2
11.3
Japanese yen
=-25.3= 13.1
2.06.4
7.310.9
24.3253.1
36.825.9
a22.9
1 Percent change in the price of the dollar In each currency, adjusted for differences in consumer price inflation.'Indicates a base year relative to which the August 1982 exchange rate of the yen looks lower than that of the other
currencies.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
movements over the last several years stemmed from a strong dollarrather than a weak yen. An examination of Japanese policy by theU.S. Treasury supports this conclusion. This study found that Japanhas attempted to isolate its domestic capital market from world capi-tal markets, but that this has tended to limit capital outflow ratherthan inflow, supporting rather than weakening the yen. Japanese cap-ital controls have been relaxed in recent years, a move which theUnited States supports even though the result will be a weaker yenand an increase in Japan's current account surplus. In the 1980s,Japan may well become more of a capital exporter than it was in the1970s, and thus have larger current account surpluses. These sur-pluses, if they materialize, will result from Japan's high domesticsaving rate, which gives Japan a natural role as an exporter of capitalto the rest of the world.
To show that there is no special yen issue is not to deny that asubstantial deterioration has occurred in the relative cost position ofU.S. firms. This deterioration was actually larger relative to otherindustrial countries, but since Japan is the United States' most impor-tant competitor, the depreciation of the yen worries U.S. firms more.There is no special yen issue, but the strong dollar does pose genu-ine problems.EFFECTS OF A STRONG DOLLAR ON U.S. TRADE
The rise of the dollar was associated with a large rise in the pro-duction costs of U.S. firms relative to those of foreign competitors.To take one measure, unit labor costs in U.S. manufacturing rose 32percent relative to those of a weighted average of other industrialcountries from their low point in the third quarter of 1980 to thesecond quarter of 1982. This rise in relative costs has at least tempo-
66Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
rarily reduced the international competitiveness of U.S. industry dra-matically. Other U.S. exporting and import-competing sectors, espe-cially agriculture, have also been squeezed.
Despite this deterioration in competitive position, it was only in thethird quarter of 1982 that the U.S. trade deficit began to show a sig-nificant increase. This delay was in line with previous experience ofthe effect of exchange rates on trade. The full effect of changes inexchange rates on the volume of exports and imports is felt onlyafter some time has passed, because some trade takes place undercontracts signed in advance and because customers do not alwayschange suppliers immediately when relative prices change. The short-term effect of a rise in the dollar is to reduce import prices, whichactually tends to improve the trade balance. Although the negative ef-fects eventually dominate, some econometric estimates suggest thatthe full negative effect is not felt for more than 2 years.
As the effects of the strong dollar are increasingly reflected in U.S.trade, the trade deficit will widen. Economic developments elsewherein the world will also contribute to a widening trade deficit. The re-cession in other industrial countries will depress the demand for U.S.exports, and financial constraints in developing countries will leadthem to import less. Both developments will have negative conse-quences for U.S. exports. Record trade and current account deficitsin 1983 will almost surely result.
Whether the trade and current account deficits persist will largelydepend on U.S. macroeconomic policies, particularly on the fiscalside. If large budget deficits are allowed to continue to depress theU.S. national saving rate, real interest rates may rise again, sustainingor even increasing the high real exchange rate of the dollar. In thiscase the trade deficit could remain high for several years.
A large and sustained trade deficit would result in an economic re-covery which would be "lopsided" in the sense that exporting andimport-competing sectors would not share in the gains. Should thisoccur, government, business, and labor officials must bear in mindthat even though protectionist foreign trade practices distort thecomposition of world trade and reduce economic efficiency both inthe United States and abroad, large trade deficits are not the resultof unfair foreign competition. Large projected U.S. trade deficits area result of macroeconomic forces, particularly large budget deficits.The main sources of the U.S. trade deficit are to be found not inParis or in Tokyo, but in Washington.
RESPONSES TO THE STRONG DOLLAR
The temporary adverse effects of a strong dollar create pressure todo something for the exporting and import-competing sectors. Three
67
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
kinds of policies might be used: microeconomic intervention in theform of protection or export subsidies, direct intervention in the for-eign exchange market, and changes in monetary and fiscal policy.
Protection and Export Promotion
The negative effect of the strong dollar on the competitiveness ofmany U.S. firms has fueled pressures for an interventionist tradepolicy. These pressures must be resisted. Protecting import-compet-ing industries or subsidizing exports is not just a harmful long-runpolicy. With a floating exchange rate, such policies would fail to im-prove the trade balance or create employment even in the short run.
The exchange rate always moves to clear the market. An increasein exports or a reduction in imports would lead to an increaseddemand for or reduced supply of dollars on the world market, raisingthe exchange rate. This would lead to a further loss of competitive-ness in the sectors not protected or promoted. An export subsidy foragricultural products would worsen the situation of the auto industry,an import quota on steel would hurt the competitiveness of the air-craft industry, and so on. Although these indirect effects may seem ofdoubtful importance in the real world, they are not. That govern-ments cannot simultaneously protect everyone is a basic principle ofinternational trade.
Instead of creating additional employment and output, the distor-tion of trade through protectionist policies or export promotionwould probably reduce them. Market-distorting policies reduce theefficiency of the economy. Thus, a turn to protectionism could createa "supply-side" shock that might have the same kind of stagflationaryeffects as an oil price increase. The effects would prove still worse if,as is likely, U.S. actions were to provoke foreign retaliation.
Although protectionism and export subsidies provide no answer tothe problems caused by a strong dollar, the pressure to use them isincreasing. Many of the exporting sectors, which make up the tradi-tional constituency for freer trade, appear to have become convincedby the strength of the dollar and the resulting loss of U.S. competi-tiveness that a more interventionist policy is needed.Exchange-Market Intervention
Since March 1981 the United States has abstained as much as pos-sible from direct intervention in the foreign exchange market. Thisunwillingness to intervene is based on doubts about whether ex-change-market intervention is effective or desirable. As long as theFederal Reserve continues to pursue a policy of targeting monetaryaggregates, any U.S. intervention on the foreign exchange marketmust be sterilized—that is, offset by other transactions on domestic fi-
68Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
nancial markets. These transactions are likely to wipe out most of theeffect of the initial exchange-market intervention.
The process of sterilization is straightforward. If the U.S. Govern-ment attempted to drive up the price of foreign exchange andweaken the dollar by buying foreign securities, the Federal Reservewould issue dollars to pay for the foreign assets. In order to preventthese dollars from increasing the U.S. money stock, however, theFederal Reserve would then have to withdraw an equal number ofdollars from the market by selling Treasury bills. The only net resultwould be that the world's supply of dollar-denominated assets wouldincrease, while its supply of assets denominated in other currencieswould fall.
The increase in the level of dollar-denominated assets would prob-ably have little effect on the exchange rate because of the sheer sizeof world financial markets. The world market in dollar-denominatedsecurities includes not only the dollar assets actually owned abroad—foreign deposits in U.S. banks, foreign holdings of Treasury bills,Eurodollar deposits, and the like—but also all those dollar assetswhich are potentially tradeable. Thus, the total pool of international-ly mobile dollar assets is probably in the trillions of dollars. Thismakes it questionable whether even very large interventions in theexchange market can have much effect on the exchange rate.
Macroeconomic Policies
Although the government cannot significantly affect exchange ratesthrough direct intervention, monetary and fiscal policies do indirectlyaffect the exchange rate. A feasible strategy for bringing the dollardown would involve looser monetary policies and tighter fiscal poli-cies. Both of these changes would tend to lower real interest rates (atleast in the short run), making capital movement into the UnitedStates less attractive and thus driving down the value of the dollar.
Despite its unfortunate effects on the U.S. balance of trade, howev-er, monetary restraint is the prime weapon in the fight against infla-tion. Disinflation, as we have learned, unfortunately involves substan-tial costs. Under fixed exchange rates the heaviest costs of monetarycontraction and disinflation fell on the interest-sensitive sectors ofthe economy, such as construction and consumer durables. Withfloating exchange rates, however, much of the burden also falls onexporting and import-competing sectors, which are injured by therise in the value of the dollar.
A tighter fiscal policy would also lower real interest rates and leadto a lower dollar. Under fixed exchange rates, budget deficits crowd-ed out domestic investment. With a floating exchange rate theycrowd out exporting and import-competing products as well. A re-
69Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
duction in deficits would lead—with some lag—to an improvement inthe trade balance as well as higher investment.
The strength of the dollar has put considerable strain on the re-solve of the United States to remain committed to free trade. Thisstrain is not unique to the international sector. The recession andhigh interest rates have also put a strain on the resolve to let othertypes of markets, from housing to labor markets, operate freely. Ifthere is special reason for concern about the international side, it isbecause of the danger that mistakes in U.S. policy could set off aspiral of retaliation among all the major trading nations.
The competitiveness of U.S. business as a whole—as opposed tothat of particular sectors—and the balance of payments are mac-roeconomic phenomena. Microeconomic interventions cannot curemacroeconomic problems; they can only make one sector better offby hurting other sectors even more. The most effective strategy theUnited States can pursue for its exporting and import-competing sec-tors is to get its overall economic house in order—above all, bybringing budget deficits and real interest rates under control.
MACROECONOMIC PROBLEMS IN EUROPE
More than 90 percent of the output of the industrial countries, andmore than 70 percent of the output of the world's market economies,is produced by the United States, Japan, and the European EconomicCommunity. Table 3-6 shows some comparative figures for thethree. The most striking feature of the table is the favorable perform-ance of Japan by all measures. The United States and the EuropeanEconomic Community look rather similar in their less favorable per-formances. They experienced nearly the same growth rates before1979, have suffered nearly equal decelerations of growth since then,and had roughly the same unemployment rate in 1981. The U.S. in-flation rate was lower than that in Europe, but the United States alsoshowed lower productivity growth.
Behind the similarity of U.S. and European experience, however,lies a major difference. The U.S. economy, whatever its other difficul-ties, has provided employment opportunities for a rapidly growinglabor force. The current high unemployment rate is a cyclical prob-lem, not the result of a persistent failure of employment to expand.In Europe, by contrast, employment was virtually stationary over thelast decade, and unemployment has risen in every year since 1973.This is a worrisome aspect of the European situation.
For a given rate of unemployment, the strains on society are prob-ably greater if employment is stagnant than if it is growing. Growingemployment means that more new jobs are always opening up, offer-
70Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE 3-6.—Economic performance by major industrial countries, 1973-82
[Percent]
Item edes
2.3
.2
-.2
6.8
7.6
Four largeEuropean
countries'
2.2
2.2
.1
10.2
7.4
Japan
3.7
3.0
2.3
2.4
2.3
Growth rate in:
Real gross domestic product (GDP), 1973-80..
Real GOP per employed person, 1973-80
Real GDP, 1980:l-1981:IV
Level:
Consumer price inflation, year ending 1982:11..
Unemployment rate, 1981
'France, Germany, Italy, and United Kingdom.Sources: International Monetary Fund and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
ing job losers a chance for reemployment and new entrants to thelabor market a chance to get their first job. If employment is station-ary, workers who have lost their jobs may stay unemployed for a longtime, and young people may never find jobs. The results of near-zeroemployment growth are painfully visible in Europe, where long-termunemployment (more than 6 months) is several times higher than inthe United States, and where the share of youth unemployment inthe total pool of unemployed has risen steadily since 1973.
How did the problem arise? The causes of structural unemploy-ment are always controversial, but a key element in the Europeanemployment problem was probably rapid increases in real labor costsin the first half of the 1970s in the face of declining productivitygrowth and rising oil prices. These increases in labor costs—whichstemmed at least in part from increases in social insurance pay-ments—squeezed profitability. Firms closed their marginal plants andinvested in increasingly capital-intensive techniques, which helped tosustain the rate of productivity growth but also led to employmentstagnation.
The unemployment problem in Europe is not caused solely by ex-cessive labor costs. The periods of rapid increase in European unem-ployment, in 1973-76 and since 1979, came during business cyclecontractions (Table 3-7). The most recent rise in unemployment isprobably mostly due to restrictive monetary and fiscal policies adopt-ed by the European countries following the oil price shock of 1979.These policies were adopted out of concern that the rise in importprices resulting from that shock—and, later, the further rise inimport prices resulting from the appreciation of the dollar—wouldlead to an uncontrollable inflationary spiral. Thus, recent develop-ments in the European economy are to some extent similar in charac-ter to those in the United States, which have also resulted largely
71Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
from disinflationary policies. The European situation is more serious,however, because the current recession comes on top of a steadilygrowing structural unemployment problem.
TABLE 3-7.—Employment and unemployment in the European Economic Community, 1973-80
[Percent]
19731974
19751976
19771978
19791980
Year Increase inemployment
1.1.1
- 1 . 1- . 1
.4
.6
.8
.2
Unemploymentrate
2.83.0
424.9
5 25.3
5.35.7
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The United States has a major stake in the success of the Europeancountries in dealing with their macroeconomic problems. The stake isnot simply due to the fact that the major European countries are alsoallies of the United States, nor is it simply due to the fact that rough-ly one-quarter of U.S. exports go to Western Europe. More than this,Europe is a key part of the world economy, with an aggregate GNPas large as that of the United States itself. If European countriesremain mired in economic stagnation and turn toward increased pro-tectionism as a consequence, little chance will remain of saving theopen trading system.
THE INTERNATIONAL DEBT PROBLEM
Different problems from those facing the United States and Europeafflict the economies of the developing nations. The problems ofthese economies have accumulated over the last several years and areproducts of both domestic policy mistakes and external develop-ments, such as oil price increases, the recession in industrial coun-tries, and high real interest rates. In the summer and fall of 1982 theproblems came to a head in the form of a sharp reduction in interna-tional lending to the developing countries.
DEBT-FINANCED GROWTH IN THE 1970s
Until recently, the growth of such middle income developing coun-tries as Brazil, South Korea, and Taiwan was widely viewed as one ofthe great success stories of the 1970s. Particularly notable was theirsuccess in expanding exports of manufactured goods. While thegrowth of these exports did give rise to some adjustment problems inindustrial countries, the successes of some middle income countries
72Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
were undoubtedly a highly favorable development for the UnitedStates. Such success provided a dramatic demonstration to othercountries of the potential of market-oriented economic policies.
An important aspect of growth in the developing world, however,was heavy borrowing from foreign sources. There is nothing inher-ently wrong in external borrowing to finance growth. Some of thedeveloped countries, including the United States, relied heavily onforeign capital during earlier periods of industrialization. But somedeveloping nations borrowed too much, investing in projects ofdoubtful productivity. When overly optimistic expectations aboutexport earnings and interest rates turned out to have been wrong,these countries found themselves in serious financial difficulty.
From 1973 to 1981 the medium- and long-term external debt ofnon-oil developing countries rose at an annual rate of more than 20percent. Lenders might have viewed this rate of increase as morealarming than they did, were it not for several factors which appearedto indicate that the eventual repayment of the debt would not imposea severe burden on borrowing countries. These factors included:
• A rapid growth in the ability of these countries to service their debt Ex-ports of the non-oil developing countries grew at an annual rateof 18 percent.
• Very low real interest rates. From 1973 to 1979 Eurodollar rates inLondon, which set the basis for most international lending, aver-aged 8.5 percent, while U.S. wholesale prices rose at an annualrate of 9.8 percent. Even allowing for the fact that third-worldborrowers paid small spreads over the Euromarket rate, the realinterest rates they paid were still negative.
• Special factors which appeared to ensure rising export earnings in thefuture. The most important of these was oil reserves, which wereessentially treated as an asset against which countries couldsafely borrow.
CAUSES OF THE LIQUIDITY PROBLEM
Excessive borrowing by some developing countries made an even-tual financial problem inevitable. The proximate factor whichbrought the era of debt-financed growth to a halt was, however, asharp deterioration in the world economy. The rise in oil prices in1979 was a blow to many debtor countries, and further strains result-ed from disinflation in the United States and other industrial coun-tries. The factors which led to a loss of lender confidence in the de-veloping countries included:
• The effects of the world recession on export demand. The rapid exportgrowth of the 1970s came to an abrupt end in the early 1980s.Exports of the non-oil developing countries actually fell by 7.5
73Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
percent from the first half of 1981 to the first half of 1982. Ex-porters of primary products were hit particularly hard: real com-modity prices fell by 25 percent from the fourth quarter of 1980to the second quarter of 1982.
• High real interest rates. In 1981 and the first half of 1982, Euro-market interest rates averaged 16 percent, while wholesale pricesin the United States rose at an annual rate of only 4.5 percent.
• The appreciation of the dollar. Since most international debt is de-nominated in dollars, while commodity prices tend to follow aweighted average of industrial country currencies, the effect ofthe rise in the value of the dollar was a sudden increase in thesize of developing country debt relative to prospective exportearnings.
The result of these developments was that banks, which had beenwilling to lend large amounts to developing countries throughout the1970s, lost confidence that the loans would be promptly repaid. Thedebtor countries were highly vulnerable to such a loss of confidence.Much of their debt was of short maturity, so that a large fraction oftheir debt required refinancing each year. Argentina, Brazil, andMexico, for example, must make annual payments of principal andinterest which exceed their total exports of goods and services.During the 1970s these large financing needs did not pose a prob-lem, since countries were able to roll over their debt as it came due.In the summer and fall of 1982, however, banks became reluctant tomake new loans and roll over old ones, first to Mexico and then toother countries. The result was a quick exhaustion of the foreign ex-change reserves of the major debtors.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEBT PROBLEM
The debt situation of the developing countries poses two problemsfor the world economy. Although quite unlikely, failure to resolve thedebt situation in an orderly way could lead to major financial marketdisruptions. More likely—indeed, it has already happened to a con-siderable extent—is a situation of forced austerity in debtor coun-tries, with adverse effects on world trade and output.
Risks to Financial Markets
The threat of a financial disruption arises from the possibility thatdebtor countries will be unable to live within their new financial con-straints. The unwillingness of banks to lend as much as in the recentpast means that debtor countries will need to cut their imports orexpand their exports. In the case of the most heavily indebted coun-tries, this will almost certainly mean achieving substantial trade sur-pluses in spite of depressed demand for their exports. The concern
74Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
of lenders that some debtors will not be able to achieve the requiredadjustment is precisely what makes them reluctant to lend.
Fortunately, a serious financial disruption is unlikely. The debtorcountries and the banks which are their major creditors share astrong interest in an orderly resolution of the debt problem. For thedebtor countries, maintaining good financial standing is essential ifthey are to maintain access both to world capital markets and to theirexport markets. At the same time, banks realize that demanding toorapid a repayment from debtor countries could prove counterpro-ductive, and they are probably willing to provide enough financing sothat debtor countries can more easily handle the financial squeeze. Al-though banks find themselves in somewhat of a "prisoner's dilemma"situation, in which no one bank will want to lend if it believes thatthe loans will only go to repay other banks, this problem should notprove insoluble. The banking community should be able to work withthe International Monetary Fund (IMF) in negotiating agreementswhich balance an adequate degree of new lending to the debtorcountries with realistic economic adjustment plans. To aid in thisprocess, the Administration and representatives of other industrialnations recently agreed in principle to an enlargement of the IMF'sresources.
Perhaps the most important safeguard against a financial crisis isthe ability of the governments and central banks of the majorindustrial countries to provide a safety net for the international finan-cial system. Central banks act as lenders of last resort for commercialbanks, providing effective protection against banking panics. At thesame time, industrial country governments have demonstrated theirwillingness to help provide temporary financing for developing coun-tries in order to bridge the interval until agreements can be reachedwith the IMF. (The IMF recently concluded agreements with Mexico,Argentina, and Brazil.)Effects on World Trade
Although a serious disruption of the international financial systemis unlikely, for all of the reasons cited, serious problems still exist.Even under optimistic assumptions, those developing countries withhigh ratios of debt to exports will be forced to improve their tradebalances substantially in order to pay the interest on their debt.Much of this trade balance improvement will probably come throughreductions in imports, involving painful reductions in output and realwages in the debtor countries. This will also depress demand for theproducts of industrial countries—particularly the United States,which has especially close trading relations with some of the majorLatin American debtors. The debt problem of the developing coun-tries may worsen the U.S. trade balance by $10 to $20 billion and
75
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
reduce U.S. GNP by one-half percentage point or more from thelevel it would otherwise reach.
The Outlook for Debtor Nations
The problems of the developing countries are not insoluble. Ifgrowth in the world economy resumes and real interest rates fall tohistorical levels, the debt burden of even the most heavily indebtedcountries will become much more manageable. Mexico and Brazil,among the most heavily indebted countries, both have debts wellbelow half their GNPs. At a historically typical real interest rate of 2percent, the real burden of debt service would fall to less than 1 per-cent of GNP—a fully manageable level in a growing economy.
The key to recovery from the debt problem, however, lies in in-creased exports from the debtor countries. Import restrictions by thedeveloping countries can only accomplish so much in improving theirtrade balances. Imports have already fallen considerably in high debtcountries in the last year, leaving limited room for further cuts. Asgrowth resumes among the debtor countries, they will tend to importmore, and will need to export more to pay for the imports. They willnot be able to do this if the industrial countries, including the UnitedStates, institute new protectionist measures. Yet as developing coun-tries attempt to increase their exports, strong political pressures willdevelop in the industrial countries to stop them. Leaders in theindustrial countries must realize that shutting out imports from thedeveloping world will not only incur the usual costs of protection—higher prices to consumers and jobs lost in unprotected sectors—butalso will threaten the basic stability of the world financial system.
76Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CHAPTER 4
Increasing Capital Formation
ATTAINING AN ADEQUATE RATE OF CAPITAL FORMATIONin the United States is a crucial challenge for economic policy duringthe 1980s. Devoting a larger share of national output to investmentwould help restore rapid productivity growth and rising living stand-ards. During the past two decades, fiscal, monetary, and regulatorypolicies contributed to the low rate of net investment in plant andequipment; the share of gross national product (GNP) devoted tocapital formation was below the levels achieved by most other indus-trialized nations.
The Administration and the Congress have instituted a set of taxand regulatory policies designed to increase the share of output de-voted to capital formation. The noninflationary monetary policies fol-lowed by the Federal Reserve, with the Administration's support,should also contribute in the long run to increased capital formationand improved efficiency in the allocation of the capital stock. Thischapter examines the linkages between economic policy and capitalformation, and discusses the rationale for the Administration's initia-tives in this area.
Many forms of investment contribute to productivity growth. Re-search and development expenditures provide the basis for the tech-nological change that is a wellspring of productivity growth. Anothermajor source of productivity growth is investment in education andtraining that promotes the accumulation of valuable human capital.Public sector infrastructure investments may also have an importantrole to play. This chapter, however, focuses on nonresidential plantand equipment investment. Past public policies probably discriminat-ed most heavily against this form of investment. Plant and equipmentinvestment is also more amenable to quantitative analysis than otherforms of capital investment because of the difficulties involved inmeasuring intangible capital.
By late 1982, investment and capacity utilization rates in theUnited States had fallen to very low levels. Even after the recoveryfrom the recession begins, capacity utilization will increase onlygradually, and it will take time for new policies to increase the shareof national output devoted to saving and investment. Hence, levels of
77Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
investment may prove disappointing over the next several years de-spite the beneficial long-run impact of policies recently put in place.This should not cause us to lose sight of the importance of soundlong-run policy and the need to increase net capital formation in theyears and decades ahead.
THE HISTORICAL RECORD
Although gross private domestic investment, which includes resi-dential and inventory investment, accounted for 16.1 percent of GNPbetween 1971 and 1980, gross investment in structures and equip-ment averaged only 10.8 percent of GNP during this period. Of thisgross structure and equipment investment, more than two-thirds wasdevoted to replacing depreciated capital, leaving only 3.0 percent ofGNP for new structures and equipment.
It is useful to place the patterns of investment in the United Statesduring the last decade in historical and geographic perspective. Table4-1 displays the behavior of alternative measures of capital accumula-tion. The data show that the rate of net nonresidential fixed invest-ment as a fraction of GNP declined by 27.5 percent between the late1960s and the late 1970s. The share of output devoted to net nonre-sidential fixed investment in the late 1970s was slightly lower thanthe average rate during the entire 1950-80 period.
Some analysts, examining only the data on gross investment, haveconcluded that investment performance was satisfactory during the1970s. This procedure ignores the fact that depreciation as a share ofGNP was greater during this period than in the 1960s because of ageneral shift in net investment from long-lived assets, such as struc-tures, toward assets with shorter lives, and because of a higher ratioof capital to GNP. The appropriate focus in examining data on in-vestment is the total stock of capital. Therefore, net investment,which measures the change in the total capital stock, is the most ap-propriate indicator of the adequacy of capital formation.
An alternative way to evaluate changes in the level of capital for-mation is to examine trends in the capital-labor ratio. Measures ofcapital per hour and capital per worker, displayed in Table 4-1 andChart 4-1, both show a large decline in the growth rate of the capitalstock relative to the growth in the supply of labor. Capital per hourincreased at only a 0.9 percent annual rate between 1976 and 1980,compared to a 3.5 percent rate during the 1951-75 interval. Al-though this dramatic decline was in part due to the low rate of netinvestment during the late 1970s, it was primarily a consequence ofthe rapid growth of the labor force. To maintain the pre-1975growth in the capital-labor ratio, a sharp increase in the post-1975
78Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
rate of net investment was required, instead of the decline which ac-tually occurred.
TABLE 4-1.—Alternative measures of capital formation, 1951-82
[Percent]
Period
Net private domesticinvestment as percent of
GNP
Totalinvestment
Nonresiden-tial fixed
investment
Growth rate of net capitalstock '
Per worker2 Per hour 2
1951-551956-60
1961-65....1966-70....
1971-751976-80
1951-80
1981..19823
7.26.1
6.77.1
6.46.0
6.6
4.82.1
3.1
3.54.1
2.44.9
2.6.9
3.0
4.5(*)
'Real net private nonresidential fixed capital stock at year-end.2All persons in private business sector. Year-end obtained by averaging fourth quarter value with value for first quarter of
subsequent year.3 Preliminary.'Not available.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis), Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics), and
Council of Economic Advisers.
Properly measured, the decline in the growth rate of the capitalstock is understated by the net investment figures in Table 4-1. Theenergy price shocks of 1973 and 1979 hastened the obsolescence of avariety of past investments, which implies that actual depreciationwas greater than the official statistics suggest. One estimate placedthe premature obsolescence of capital during the late 1970s at anaverage of 0.5 percent of GNP per year. Other studies have obtainedmuch larger estimates using data on the market valuation of capital.In addition, it is important to recall that much of the investment ofthe 1970s took place in the energy-producing sector. The share ofGNP devoted to net fixed nonresidential investment outside theenergy sector averaged only 1.8 percent between 1975 and 1980.
Unfortunately, the combined effects of the recent economic reces-sion and large Federal budget deficits will hold down the rate of cap-ital formation, as currently forecasted, over the next several years.Between 1981 and 1985, net investment in plant and equipment mayprove disappointing even by the standard of the late 1970s. The cap-ital-labor ratio will grow only slowly and may even decline. While thelow forecasted rate of net investment over the next several years isdue primarily to cyclical conditions, it does not negate the impor-tance of developing permanent policies to encourage capital forma-tion. In light of the depth of the recent recession, it is reasonable toexpect that investment performance probably would have proven
79
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 4 - 1
Measures of Capital Formation
PERCENT
INVESTMENT AS , ' *•PERCENT OF GNP1 ' *
I I I I I I I I I I I I
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980
1 NET PRIVATE NONRESIDENTIAL FIXED INVESTMENT AS PERCENT OF GNP; FIVE-YEARCENTERED MOVING AVERAGES.2 PERCENT CHANGE IN REAL NET PRIVATE NONRESIDENTIAL FIXED CAPITAL STOCK PERWORKER IN THE BUSINESS SECTOR; FIVE-YEAR CENTERED MOVING AVERAGES.
SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, AND COUNCIL OF ECONOMICADVISERS.
worse if the Congress and the Administration had not enacted taxmeasures to spur capital formation. These laws, and the proposals in-corporated in the President's fiscal 1984 budget, are designed toraise the share of net investment to a high level by historical stand-ards in the late 1980s or before.
AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Table 4-2 shows that the United States falls behind other majorindustrial nations in several key measures of net capital formation.The share of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) devoted to net fixedinvestment during the last decade was only 34 percent of the compa-
80Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
rable share in Japan and 56 percent of the comparable share in WestGermany. No other major industrial nation devotes as small a frac-tion of total output to new investment as does the United States.
TABLE 4-2.—Comparison of capital formation in six OECD countries, 1971-80
[Percent]
Country
Investment as percent of GDP
Grossinvestment
Gross fixedinvestment
Net fixedinvestment
Growth rateof output
per hour inmanu-
facturing
France
Germany
Italy
Japan
United Kingdom..
United States
24.2
23.7
22.4
34.0
19.2
19.1
22.9
22.8
20.1
32.9
18.7
18.4
12.2
11.8
10.7
19.5
8.1
6.6
4.8
4.9
4.9
7.4
2.9
2.5
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
It is instructive to compare the growth rates of productivity fordifferent countries with their shares of output devoted to new invest-ment. Although productivity growth and investment rates are simul-taneously determined by a multitude of factors, it is striking that astrong positive relationship emerges. As shown in Chart 4-2, Japanhas both the highest investment share and the highest growth rate ofproductivity, while the United States has the worst investment per-formance and the lowest growth rate of productivity.
While the reasons for these large international differences in ratesof capital formation are not precisely understood, some evidencesuggests that the roots may lie in different public policies. AfterWorld War II, rebuilding of the capital stock was a primary goal ofeconomic policy in continental Europe and Japan. Governments inthose countries encouraged saving and investment and disregardedthe early Keynesian fear that oversaving could reduce aggregatedemand and depress real economic activity.
In contrast, officials in the United States feared a postwar relapseinto depression and avoided policies which would encourage saving.For example, some economists advocated sustained budget deficits asa means of absorbing excess private savings.
It is now clear—on the basis of four decades of economic experi-ence since the end of the Great Depression—that fears of secularstagnation caused by a high and rising saving rate are unwarranted.The much greater risk is that productivity growth in the UnitedStates will continue to stagnate at low levels, and that Americanworkers will have to accept a lower growth rate in their standard of
81Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 4-2
International Comparisonof Investment and Productivity Growth,
1971-80PERCENT OF GDP GROWTH RATE
20
15
10
NET FIXED INVESTMENTAS PERCENT OF GDP
(LEFT SCALE)
GROWTH RATE OFMANUFACTURINGOUTPUT PER HOUR
(RIGHT SCALE)
• • • : • • : - :
UNITEDSTATES
UNITEDKINGDOM
ITALY GERMANY FRANCE
SOURCE: ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT.
JAPAN
living than their foreign counterparts. Otherwise, American goodscould cease to be competitive on world markets.
THE IMPORTANCE OF CAPITAL FORMATION
The case for increasing the rate of capital formation ultimatelyrests on three justifications. First, increased capital formation can re-verse part of the productivity slowdown that the United States hassuffered during the last decade. Second, government policies havediscriminated in favor of consumption and against saving and invest-ment. Third, as a result of tax policies, the pretax return to capitalinvestment exceeds the after-tax return that any individuals are ableto capture privately, leading to an inappropriately low level of capitalformation.
82Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
During the 1970s, productivity growth in the United States deceler-ated rapidly. Between 1948 and 1967 the growth rate of productivity(as measured by output per hour in the private business economy)was 3.1 percent, compared to 2.3 percent between 1967 and 1973and only 0.8 percent between 1973 and 198 L
The consequences of reduced productivity growth for our standardof living over the long run are greater than those of any other cur-rent economic problem. In 1981 the American economy producedapproximately $12,780 worth of output per capita. Had productivitygrowth continued at the 1948-67 rate during the 14 years subse-quent to 1967, output per capita would have reached $16,128 in1981, 26 percent higher than the actual value. As a standard of com-parison, the recent recession reduced per capita output by only 4percent between the third quarter of 1981 and the fourth quarter of1982, less than one-fifth the reduction attributable to the productivityshortfall. As time passes, the consequences of reduced productivitygrowth are compounded. Increasing the productivity growth rate by2 percentage points annually would more than double our materialstandard of living by 2020, compared to the level it would reach oth-erwise.
The productivity slowdown is not reliably attributable to any singlecause or combination of causes. Various analysts have suggested thathigher energy prices, regulatory changes, reduced research and de-velopment spending, reduced opportunities for technical innovation,the changing composition of the labor force, and changing worker at-titudes, as well as reduced capital formation, are responsible for theproductivity slowdown. An accurate accounting of the sources of theslowdown is probably impossible in light of the multitude of compet-ing explanations and the statistical difficulties associated with distin-guishing between their relative effects precisely.
Many of the possible causes of the productivity slowdown are prob-ably not reversible through public policy. There is relatively little theFederal Government could have done to offset the negative effect ofsharp increases in oil prices or, for that matter, to influence changingcultural attitudes toward work. Changing the rate of capital forma-tion, however, is a principal way in which Federal economic policycan affect productivity growth.
Increasing the rate of capital formation will raise productivitygrowth in several ways. More rapid capital formation results, on aver-age, in workers having more equipment at their disposal. In addition,increases in investment reduce the average age of the capital stock,permitting physical assets to embody more recent technological inno-vations. Technological development and the level of capital forma-tion are intertwined, because the development of more efficient and
83Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
sophisticated capital goods occurs when the demand for new capitalgoods increases.
The legacy of past policies, which have artificially depressed savingand investment, provides a second reason for increasing the rate ofcapital formation. As described below, this discrimination againstcapital formation has taken many forms, including tax policy, mone-tary policy and recurring Federal budget deficits. Although thereexist instances of market failure, a market economy can generally beexpected to allocate resources in an efficient way. When public poli-cies systematically discriminate against one type of spending, howev-er, there is a strong presumption that too little of it will take place.
A related and final justification for increased capital formationcomes from a comparison of the total pretax return to investmentwith the return received by private investors. Estimates suggest thatthe total pretax return to investment in corporate capital, as meas-ured by its pretax marginal product, is about 11 percent. This meansthat $1.00 invested today yields society $1.11 next year, or alterna-tively a permanent yield of 11 cents. While the total pretax returnfluctuates from year to year with cyclical conditions, studies havetended to find that it has stayed within the range of 8 to 15 percentthroughout the postwar period.
In contrast, private investors have earned much smaller rates ofreturn over the last several decades, with many investors earningnegative real after-tax returns over much of that period. Even leavingaside the effects of personal taxes, the real return on short-term debtinstruments averaged less than 1 percent during the 1950-81 inter-val. While equity investments have yielded a higher average return,they carry with them a large amount of risk. The average real returnon common stock before personal taxes was 6 percent over the1950-81 period, but investors lost money in real terms in 12 of thoseyears and over periods as long as 17 years.
This large spread between the total and private returns to invest-ment is a consequence of the tax system, which extracts a portion ofthe total return to investment before it reaches private investors.Capital market returns are reduced because the corporate income taxreduces the return that corporations can pay out to investors. As aconsequence of this tax-induced divergence between the private andtotal return to investment, too little investment takes place. This sug-gests the desirability of measures both to reduce tax distortions andto increase incentives to save and invest.
84Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
MEASURING NATIONAL SAVING
Domestic saving is an important determinant of a nation's level ofinvestment. Economic output is either invested in capital assets,which help produce future output, or consumed privately or publicly.Only by forgoing consumption does it become possible for a nationto invest in a sustained way. While funds from abroad are available tofinance some investment, experience suggests that most matureeconomies have financed investment through domestic saving. In-creasing the rate of capital formation in the United States without in-creasing obligations to foreigners therefore probably requires in-creased national saving.
Table 4-3 provides information on net national saving as reportedin the national income and product accounts. On average, from 1951to 1981, the United States saved 6.7 percent of total output beyondthat necessary to replace depreciated capital. Private saving, compris-ing personal saving and corporate retained earnings, totaled 7.3 per-cent of GNP. Federal Government dissaving through budget deficitsaveraged 0.9 percent of GNP, while the sum of State and local gov-ernment surpluses averaged 0.3 percent of GNP.
TABLE 4-3.—Net saving as percent of GNP, 1951-81
[Percent]
Period
1951-551956-60
1961-651966-70
1971-751976-80
1981
1951-81
Total
6.76,9
7.47.5
6.45.8
5.0
6.7
Not adjusted for inflation
Federal
- 0 . 3.0
- . 4.6
- 1 . 8- 1 . 9
- 2 . 0
- . 9
State andlocal
- 0 . 1- . 2
.0
.1
.61.2
1.1
.3
Private >
7.27.1
7.88.0
7.66.5
5,9
7.3
Adjusted for inflation 3
Federal
0.91.1
.2
.6
- . 3
.0
.4
State andlocal
- 0 . 1- . 1
.2
.4
1.11.6
1.5
.6
Private
5.95.9
7.06.5
5.64.4
3.6
5.8
'Private saving less capital consumption allowances with capital consumption adjustment.2Adjusted by GNP implicit price deflator.
Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and Councilof Economic Advisers.
While the total saving rate can be measured unambiguously, thereare serious conceptual problems in measuring its various componentsduring an inflationary period. Inflation erodes the real value of thenational debt. Interest rates incorporate inflation premiums andthese premiums compensate lenders for the fact that they are repaidin cheaper dollars. Thus, they do not really represent income to bor-rowers or costs to lenders. This principle is recognized by the Finan-cial Accounting Standards Board and is often applied in the privatesector. Table 4-3 therefore also presents a breakdown between pri-
85Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
vate, Federal, and State and local government saving that is ad-justed for the effects of inflation.
BUDGET DEFICITS AND SAVING
Unacceptably large Federal budget deficits are likely in the nextseveral years unless legislative changes are made. These deficitscould significantly reduce investment during the economic recovery.Increased public consumption with no reduction in private consump-tion leaves fewer resources available for investment. When the Feder-al Government must compete with private borrowers for savings, realinterest rates are bid up, discouraging investment.
Federal dissaving would not represent a serious problem if it auto-matically called forth more private saving. While increased deficits donot induce an equal increase in private saving, they also do notcrowd out investment expenditure dollar for dollar. Increases in thereal rate of return caused by Federal deficits raise the yield savers re-ceive and may call forth some additional private saving. Higher realinterest rates also discourage spending on consumer durables, hous-ing, and construction by State and local governments. Finally, bycontributing to increases in real interest rates, budget deficits en-courage capital inflows from abroad. These factors imply that deficitsdo not completely crowd out private investment; rather, a reasonableestimate is that funds available for private investment are reduced byperhaps one-half to three-fourths of the budget deficit.
The possibility that Federal budget deficits crowd out private in-vestment takes on greater importance in light of the large deficitsthat will occur over the next 5 years unless actions are taken. Thefiscal 1982 budget deficit of $110.7 billion absorbed 3.65 percent ofGNP. Projections now suggest the 1983 deficit will equal $207.7 bil-lion or 6.5 percent of GNP. Unless significant actions are taken, defi-cits of this magnitude or larger may continue even as the economyrecovers from the recent recession. If such deficits materialize, theconsequences for capital formation could prove very serious unless adramatic increase in private saving also takes place. A budget deficitof 5 percent of GNP would likely reduce net investment by anamount equal to about one-half its historical level, relative to a bal-anced budget. With large deficits, significant improvements in laborproductivity and the quality and quantity of housing would be lesslikely in the years ahead.
86Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TAX RULES AND PERSONAL SAVING
Many economists believe that tax rules in the United States en-courage consumer borrowing and discourage private saving. Duringthe 1970s the combination of tax rules and inflation produced a dra-matic decline in the private return to saving and a large reduction inthe cost of borrowing.
During the 1960s, nominal interest rates on 3-month Treasury billsaveraged 4.0 percent, and the consumer price inflation rate averaged2.3 percent. On a pretax basis, this left savers with an average realreturn of 1.7 percent. For a saver in the 30 percent marginal taxbracket, the real after-tax return was only 0.5 percent.
The return to saving fell significantly below this level during the1970s. While the average inflation rate rose to 7.1 percent, the aver-age interest rate increased to only 6.3 percent. This caused a declinein the real interest rate measured on a pretax basis and a larger de-cline in the average after-tax rate (for a person in the 30 percentbracket) from 0.5 percent to —2.7 percent.
The return to saving has fallen because of corporate taxes as wellas individual taxes. Corporate income taxes decrease the returns cor-porations can afford to pay to the holders of their securities. As de-scribed below, these tax burdens also increased substantially duringthe 1970s, In addition, corporate taxes reduce the amount of fundsthat corporations can retain for reinvestment.
At the same time that tax rules have reduced the return on savings,they have encouraged dissaving through borrowing. Because consum-er interest payments are tax deductible, taxpayers who itemize theirdeductions are encouraged to use credit to finance their purchases ofconsumer durables and other goods. As inflation increased duringthe 1970s, the real after-tax cost of borrowing declined and eventual-ly became negative. Indeed, in the first quarter of 1980 the real after-tax cost of borrowing for a taxpayer in the 30 percent bracket was—1.2 percent. The encouragement of borrowing to finance purchasesof durable goods probably reduced the aggregate saving rate sub-stantially during the 1970s.
The tax reforms supported by the President in 1981and enactedby the Congress were designed to increase saving. Reductions inmarginal tax rates raise the after-tax return to saving and the after-tax cost of borrowing. The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 willreduce the marginal tax rate facing a median income family in 1984from 28 percent, which would have occurred under pre-1981 law, to22 percent. The act immediately reduced the marginal tax rate onhigh income taxpayers, who account for a large fraction of personalsaving, from 70 to 50 percent.
87Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 also contained severalother provisions directed specifically at encouraging private saving.The Individual Retirement Account (IRA) provisions in the tax codewere extended to cover the entire working population. Working indi-viduals are now permitted to make a yearly tax deductible contribu-tion of $2,000 to finance consumption during retirement. Taxes areonly paid when the funds plus accumulated interest are withdrawnfrom the IRA. Private estimates suggest a substantial response to thislegislation, with about $10 billion placed in IRAs during 1982. A cru-cial issue in evaluating the efficiency of IRAs is their effectiveness inraising saving incentives on the margin. Some critics have arguedthat IRAs do not provide an incremental incentive for saving becausecontributors can simply transfer funds from other sources without in-creasing total savings. While this occurs to some extent, it is certainlynot universal and will decrease in the future as contributors exhausttheir funds available from other sources. The fragmentary evidenceavailable from private sources suggests that more than half of all IRAcontributors contribute less than the maximum amount allowable, in-dicating that they do face increased saving incentives on the margin.
The 1981 tax legislation also provided for an interest exclusionstarting in 1985, allowing individuals to exclude 15 percent of theirnet interest income up to a limit of $3,000. This will also raise thereturn to savings and spur capital formation. Extending the exclusionto dividends as well as interest payments would reduce the tax biasfavoring debt over equity as a source of corporate finance.
The 1981 tax act also raised the return to saving by reducing thetop marginal rate on capital gains from 28 percent to 20 percent.This reform partially compensates for the serious distorting effect ofinflation on the measurement of capital gains. Because of inflation,an owner of an asset that experiences no real appreciation will never-theless become liable, at the time of sale, for taxes on the nominalappreciation of the asset. Complete elimination of this distortionwould require indexation for inflation in the measurement of capitalgains.
In recent years support has grown among economists and othertax experts for moving the tax system toward taxation of consump-tion and away from taxation of income. This change might entail ex-panding the existing exclusions of interest and dividend income andthose mechanisms, such as IRAs, which permit tax-deferred accumu-lation of savings. It might also involve limiting the deduction of in-terest expenses for consumer borrowing. Movement toward taxationof consumption is supported by some advocates on the grounds thattaxing individuals on what they take from the economy is "more fair"than taxing what they contribute to the economy. A tax system based
88Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
on consumption taxation might also prove easier to administer thanthe current system because it would eliminate many of the problemsinvolved in measuring certain types of capital income.
FINANCIAL REGULATION AND PRIVATE SAVING
An additional set of public policies that has probably discouragedprivate saving over the last several decades is the regulation of finan-cial institutions. As Chart 4-3 shows, small savers holding savings ac-counts subject to Regulation Q,have received below market rates ofinterest, and holders of checking accounts have received even lowerrates of interest. These low returns are largely consequences of regu-lations limiting the interest rates financial institutions may pay oncustomer deposits. As late as 1980, the spread between Treasury billrates and the yield on savings deposits subject to Regulation Q wasas great as 8 percent.
The adverse effects of financial regulations on personal savinghave probably lessened considerably in recent years, due to both pri-vate and public actions. In the private sector, the development andexplosive growth of money market funds has made it possible formost high and middle income savers to receive market rates of inter-est. Legislation adopted in 1982 with Administration support has al-lowed commercial banks and thrift institutions to offer financial in-struments with competitive interest rates to a wide range of deposi-tors.
The Administration has strongly supported removal of the manyunnecessary regulations that have impeded competition in the finan-cial services industry. As discussed in more detail in Chapter 5, theDepository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of1980 and the Depository Institutions Act of 1982 have played impor-tant roles in beginning this process of deregulation. Banks and thriftinstitutions can now offer insured accounts that are competitive withmoney market funds in terms of both the interest rates they pay andthe services they provide, thereby increasing incentives for saving.
A related development has occurred in the Federal Government'spolicies regarding U.S. Savings Bonds. Savings bonds have historical-ly paid low rates of return. In 1980, 10-year Treasury bonds paid11.5 percent, while Series EE Savings Bonds paid an annual yield ofonly 7 percent from issue to maturity 11 years later. Because of legis-lation recently proposed by the President and passed by the Con-gress, the return on savings bonds is now based on market rates. Be-tween November 1, 1982, and April 30, 1983, for example, U.S. Sav-ings Bonds will earn 11.09 percent if they are held at least 5 years.Apart from making saving more attractive to savings bond purchas-
89
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 4-3
Three-Month Treasury Bill Rate andRegulation Q Maximum Rate on Savings Accounts
PERCENT PER YEAR
16
14
12
10
MAXIMUM RATE ONSAVINGS ACCOUNTS
\
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970
SOURCE: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.
1975 1 9 8 0
ers> the new rates on Series EE bonds are desirable on equitygrounds because small savers can now obtain yields close to those re-ceived by their higher income counterparts.
THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL FLOWS
It is likely that budget deficits, tax policies, and ceilings on bankinterest rates have contributed to the lower net saving rates whichthe United States has experienced in recent years. In theory, howev-er, this low level of saving need not have strictly limited the level offunds available for investment. Funds from abroad can also financeinvestment in the United States. The link between domestic invest-ment and domestic saving is not absolute.
90Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Nevertheless, a number of economic studies cast doubt on theproposition that the United States could offset low domestic savingrates through sustained borrowing from abroad. These studies havefound a consistently high correlation between rates of domestic in-vestment and domestic saving in the major industrialized countries.While the reasons for these results are not well understood, they mayreflect the high information costs and serious monitoring difficultiesassociated with holding foreign investments. Whatever the exactreason for the historically high correlation between domestic savingand investment, it suggests that increasing the rate of investment inthe United States significantly will probably require policy measureswhich increase domestic saving.
Insofar as savings from abroad are available for investment in theUnited States, it is not clear that they provide a desirable substitutefor domestic saving. Throughout most of the postwar period, theUnited States was a net exporter of capital. However, the UnitedStates has recently experienced a large surplus in its capital accountand incurred a large offsetting deficit in its current account. This hasentailed large merchandise trade deficits, with deleterious impacts onU.S. export industries and those domestic industries which competewith imports.
THE ALLOCATION OF CAPITAL
With only a relatively small fraction of GNP available to finance in-vestment, and with large budget deficits looming over the next fewyears, the allocation of capital in the United States among alternativeuses takes on added importance. In addition to holding down therate of national saving, previous fiscal and monetary policies havetended to alter the allocation of capital investment, favoring housing,consumer durables, and State and local construction at the expenseof business investment. Inflation, caused by overly expansionarymonetary policies, and taxes interact to affect the incentives ondifferent kinds of investments. While a sound economic recovery willboost saving sufficiently to provide for increases in all forms of in-vestment, eliminating tax-induced distortions in the allocation of cap-ital would also aid in regaining a rapidly rising standard of living.
It is useful to examine how the tax structure has very different ef-fects on alternative forms of investment. The income from invest-ments by corporations is taxed at both the individual and the corpo-rate level. Corporate profits are taxed as they are earned. Whenthese profits are received by shareholders in the form of either divi-dends or capital gains, they are taxed again. By contrast, the implicitreturns from most other forms of investment remain untaxed. The
91Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
services to investors in owner-occupied housing and consumer dura-bles are largely untaxed.
The bias in our tax system against corporate capital investment wasexacerbated during the 1970s by the effects of inflation. Corpora-tions are permitted to take depreciation allowances based on historicrather than replacement costs for tax purposes. Thus, as the rate ofinflation increases, the real value of depreciation allowances de-creases, and the tax burden as a share of real profits rises. Anothersource of inflation-induced corporate tax increases is that inflationcauses "phantom" gains in the value of inventories, raising taxes forfirms using the first-in, first-out method of inventory valuation. Onestudy estimated that the tax law's use of historic costs rather than re-placement costs for depreciation purposes raised corporate tax pay-ments by $19.1 billion in 1977, and raised tax burdens for corpora-tions using first-in, first-out inventory accounting by $7.0 billion. Al-though these tax increases were partially offset because corporationsdeduct nominal rather than real interest payments in calculating theirtaxable income, the gains at the corporate level from the deductibilityof nominal interest are offset to some extent by losses from taxationof the inflation component of interest rates at the individual level.
The effects of the interaction of taxes and inflation reached dra-matic proportions during the 1970s. Increased taxation led to largemarket revaluations of corporate and noncorporate capital assets.The "q ratio," which measures the market value of capital in thenonfinancial corporate sector relative to its reproduction cost, fellfrom 1.09 in 1970 to .67 in 1980. The price of single-family nonfarmdwellings relative to the price of consumption goods rose by 29 per-cent during the same period. During the last 2 years of falling infla-tion, however, the q ratio rose to about .80 in the fourth quarter of1982, and the relative price of single-family nonfarm dwellings fell by5.3 percent.
The supply of different types of capital goods ultimately dependson their relative prices. The observation that reductions in inflationare associated with changes in the relative prices of different capitalgoods suggests that the reductions in inflation are likely to cause areallocation of capital toward plant and equipment investment andaway from investments in consumer durables and housing. Theseshifts simply reflect the reduced magnitude of the biases caused byour current tax system in periods of inflation.
TAX POLICY AND INVESTMENT
In 1981 the Congress instituted the accelerated cost recoverysystem as part of the Economic Recovery Tax Act. This tax legisla-
92Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
tion permitted businesses to depreciate most purchases of equipmentaccording to an accelerated 5-year schedule. It also permitted busi-nesses to depreciate structures over 15 years using a 175 percent de-clining balance schedule. The Economic Recovery Tax Act preservedthe investment tax credit on equipment and called for further accel-erations in depreciation schedules in 1985 and 1986.
The 1982 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act altered the pro-visions of the Economic Recovery Tax Act by instituting a half-basisadjustment for investment tax credits in calculating depreciation andby eliminating the. planned further accelerations in depreciationschedules. Table 4-4 shows the present value of the depreciation de-ductions and investment tax credits received by a corporation underthe old accelerated depreciation system, Economic Recovery Tax Act(ERTA) rules and Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA)rules. The present value is calculated for a variety of hypotheticalcombinations of discount and inflation rates.
TABLE 4-4.—Investment incentives 1 under different tax laws
[5-year property]
Real interest rate
1 percent
4 percent
7 percent.....
10 percent
Tax law
Pre-ERTA 2
ERTATEFRA
Pre-ERTA 2.ERTATEFRA
Pre-ERTA 2.ERTATEFRA
Pre-ERTA 2
ERTATEFRA
Inflation rate (percent)
4
.495
.516
.495
.462
.492
.472
.435
.471
.452
.412
.452
.435
6
.473
.500
.480
.444
.478
.459
.419
.458
.440
.397
.440
.423
8
.454
.486
.466
.427
.465
.446
.404
.446
.428
,384,429.412
10
.436
.472
.454
.412
.452
.435
.390
.434
.418
.372
.418
.402
'Present value of depreciation deductions and investment tax credits per dollar of Investment.2 Assumes depreciation over 9.5 years using double-declining balance switching to sum of years digits.Source: Council of Economic Advisers.
Three qualitative conclusions emerge from these calculations. First,current tax laws provide significantly more stimulus to most catego-ries of investment than did the pre-1981 law. Second, the reductionin inflation that has occurred during the past 2 years has also in-creased substantially the value of the depreciation allowances. Third,even with a relatively short 5-year cost recovery period, the value ofthe investment incentives remains quite sensitive to the anticipatedrate of inflation.
In considering the economic effects of tax policies on investment,it is crucial to distinguish between measures which apply only to newinvestment, such as accelerated depreciation and the investment taxcredit, and measures which reduce the tax burden on all kinds of
93
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
capital income, such as corporate rate reductions. These two types ofinvestment incentives produce very different economic effects. Meas-ures which apply only to new investments affect only marginal invest-ment decisions; no tax benefit is conferred on the owners of existingcapital. Therefore, in the short term more investment is stimulatedper dollar of immediate revenue loss than would prove the case if thetax benefit were conferred on all capital. The tax legislation enactedin 1981 relied on tax incentives for new investments.
Incentives for new investment are viewed by some observers asbenefiting primarily large wealthholders, but the reality may bedifferent. Since measures like the accelerated cost recovery systemreduce the effective cost of purchasing new capital goods, they arelikely to reduce the value of the old capital goods with which theycompete. For example, a subsidy for the purchase of new cars willreduce the value of used cars. Likewise, reduced taxation of new in-vestment may temporarily reduce the level of stock market prices,which in part reflects the market's valuation of existing capital. Thus,investment incentives like those recently enacted, while raising therate of return on new investments, may actually hurt holders of exist-ing wealth. Workers should benefit as greater capital accumulationraises their productivity and wages. The effect on the distribution ofincome is ambiguous* and might even prove progressive.
Beginning with the enactment of the accelerated depreciation pro-visions in 1954, policy has tended to rely on investment incentivesthat stimulate new investment and do not benefit existing invest-ments. This continued reliance on measures that benefit new capitalat the expense of existing capital carries a subtle but real risk. As in-vestors come to anticipate this pattern of public policy, they may takeinto account expected future changes in tax laws as they make invest-ment decisions. This might have an unintended effect. Investors whoexpect capital losses are less likely to invest. Stated differently, if theeffective purchase price of new capital goods is expected to declinebecause of tax reforms, there will be a tendency to defer investments.This suggests that in designing future reforms it may be desirable toconsider reducing taxes on existing as well as new capital.
While current tax law provides significantly more stimulus to in-vestment than did earlier law, there is room for further reform. Thevalue of depreciation allowances is still dependent on the rate of in-flation, increasing the uncertainty of investment decisions. The accel-eration of depreciation allowances has substantially reduced theburden of the corporate income tax, but investment in plant andequipment is still discouraged by taxes on dividends and capitalgains.
94Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
A final problem under current tax law is the treatment of corporatelosses. Because of low profits due to cyclical conditions, or large de-preciation write-offs, many corporations do not have taxable incomein some years, reducing the efficacy of investment incentives duringthose periods.
CONCLUSIONS
The tax programs put in place in the last 2 years should play animportant role in increasing capital formation in the United States.Yet, much more can be done to ensure a rapidly growing standard ofliving in coming years. It is crucial that we take action to reduce largeFederal deficits and to further stimulate private saving and invest-ment.
In considering the issue of capital formation, policymakers shouldtake a long view. The reasons for increasing capital formation pri-marily involve long-run growth rather than current economic condi-tions. We should not allow the poor performance of investmentduring a period of recession and high deficits to blind us to the im-portance of policies that can help us achieve sustained and rapid eco-nomic growth in the years to come.
95Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CHAPTER 5
The Burden of Economic RegulationFOR MANY DECADES, the Federal Government has regulated the
prices and the conditions for entry in certain sectors of the U.S.economy. This type of regulation, often called "economic regula-tion,*' was broadly applied to the transportation, communications,and financial sectors of the economy. Whatever historical purposeswere served by economic regulation, there is an increasing consensusthat much of this Federal regulation no longer serves the interests ofthe contemporary economy. Indeed, over the last several years a sub-stantial part of this economic regulation has been relaxed or elimi-nated.
A second form of regulation, "social regulation," is addressed tosituations where unregulated activity may pose significant threats topublic health, safety, or the environment. Although there is an in-creasing consensus that economic regulation should be substantiallyreduced, no such consensus exists concerning social regulation. Also,unlike economic regulation, the magnitude of social regulation hasgrown rapidly since the mid-1960s with the passage of extensive en-vironmental and safety legislation.
Economic regulation has diminished in recent years due to a vari-ety of deregulation measures. Substantial evidence is now availableconcerning the performance of industries that have experienced fullor partial deregulation. This chapter summarizes the history of Fed-eral economic regulation, its rationale, its impacts, and the effects ofrecent laws designed to ease economic regulation. The chapter alsoidentifies some opportunities for further deregulation. Special atten-tion is given to the economic regulation of energy, transportation,communications, and financial markets.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF ECONOMIC REGULATION
The first broad body of Federal economic regulation was estab-lished in 1887, when the Congress created the Interstate CommerceCommission (ICC) to resolve the increasing controversies betweenthe railroads and shippers. Most of the regulation of other sectors,except for energy, was established by the end of the 1930s and re-
96Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
fleeted efforts to deal with problems similar to those that led to thecreation of the ICC. The agencies created in the 1930s tended to op-erate in much the same way as the ICC, and the outcome was muchthe same.
Economic regulation often evolved from a dispute among several groups. Forexample, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was cre-ated to resolve disputes among users of the broadcast spectrum. TheCivil Aeronautics Board (CAB) was created to resolve a disputeamong several Federal agencies concerning the administration of air-mail contracts.
Congress delegated direct resolution of these disputes to an independent agencywith very general authority. The typical "public convenience and necessi-ty" standard cited in the enabling legislation provides no direct guid-ance about how the regulatory agencies should resolve disputes. Theindependent commissions are essentially quasi-judicial institutionsthat have developed their own bodies of administrative law.
The initial regulations of the independent agencies often served the interests ofthe regulated industry. For example, some scholars contend that theICC, by initially reinforcing the railroad cartels, caused higher aver-age prices and reduced the variance of prices. For a long time, boththe CAB and the FCC restricted entry to the number of firms operat-ing at the time these commissions were created.
The initial regulation led to more regulation that served to protect the inter-ests of the initially regulated firms. For example , ICC regulat ion was ex-tended to trucks, buses, freight-forwarders, and barges, thus restrain-ing the developing competition to the railroads. FCC regulation wasextended to cable television, protecting broadcasters using the fre-quency spectrum.
Over the long run, many economic regulations have not served the interests ofeither producers or consumers. The development of excess capacity, rela-tively high wages, restraints on technological improvements and op-erating practices, and competition outside the regulated environmentled to the lower-than-average rates of return in many of the regulat-ed industries. Consumers have often been adversely affected byhigher prices and restrictions on service.
One other pattern of economic regulation was introduced in the1930s. A belief that the depression was caused by excessive competi-tion provided a rationale for many laws and regulations that directlyrestricted entry, output, and competition. The broadest such law, theNational Industrial Recovery Act, was declared unconstitutional;other similar legislation, such as the Agricultural Adjustment Act of1938, is still in force. One might argue that the several regulatorycommissions and laws approved in the 1930s achieved their intended
97
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
effect of raising prices. A later generation questioned whether thiseffect was desirable.
THE TRADITIONAL RATIONALE FOR ECONOMIC REGULATION
The two traditional justifications for economic regulation havebeen to preserve the potential economic efficiencies associated withnatural monopoly in some industries and to eliminate the inefficien-cies thought to be associated with excessive competition in others.
Natural Monopoly
A natural monopoly exists when the entire relevant demand for agood or service can be satisfied at the least total cost by a single firm.At the local level it is probably wasteful to have duplicate distributionsystems to provide telephone, electric, gas, and water services.Among industries regulated at the Federal level, major gas pipelinesand high-voltage electric lines are often considered natural monopo-lies. Long-distance telephone transmission may also be a natural mo-nopoly in areas of low density. Railroads are a potential natural mo-nopoly only for that declining share of rail traffic for which the ship-per does not have an effective choice of carrier or mode of transport.
Such industries present a dilemma. Competition may result in un-necessarily high production costs through duplication of facilities, butan unregulated monopoly may not act in the public interest. Withoutregulation, a monopoly would probably set prices too high and pro-duce too little, with consumers willing to pay more for additionaloutput than the cost of supplying that output. A typical solution tothis dilemma is maximum price regulation. The primary objective ofprice regulation is to set the monopoly's price as close as possible toincremental cost while still assuring the monopoly a market rate ofreturn on its investment.
The growth of demand or the introduction of substitutes for aproduct can often transform a natural monopoly into what—in theabsence of regulation—could become an effectively competitive in-dustry. Oil pipelines, for example, are often assumed to be naturalmonopolies. However, these pipelines now face competition fromother pipelines and other modes of transportation. Regrettably, priceregulation often continues long after it is efficient, restricting theemergence of a competitive market. The history of the railroads pro-vides a compelling illustration. In many parts of the country rail lineswere few and far between in the 19th century. But as the market fortransportation services grew, and as technology developed, auto-mobiles, buses, and airplanes provided increasing competition forpassenger traffic, and trucks, barges, and pipelines provided increas-ing competition for freight. The natural monopoly justification for
98
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
regulation was probably not applicable in most rail markets by themiddle of the 20th century.
Even in markets where elements of natural monopoly still exist,government intervention will not necessarily produce a more efficientuse of resources. Increasingly, analysts are coming to recognize that,just as there are market imperfections, there are also government im-perfections that must be considered in making public policy choices.The relevant tradeoffs are not between imperfect markets and flaw-less government regulation, but rather between markets with imper-fections and regulation which is imprecise and sometimes counter-productive.
Excessive Competition
The second traditional justification for economic regulation is thatunfettered markets result in excessive competition. This justification wasused for regulating railroads in the late 19th century and other in-dustries in the 1930s. A common element in early discussions of ex-cessive competition was that without regulation, unrestrained rivalryamong firms would result in losses for some or all of them and thatadequate production of an otherwise viable product would prove un-sustainable. This argument, which was often rather vague, failed tonote that business losses are not a sufficient basis for government in-tervention. Losses and business failures are a normal part of the op-eration of competitive markets; they act to eliminate inefficient firmsand to shift production to meet changes in consumer demands.
While the concept of excessive competition was not generally welldefined, it has now come to refer to at least four possible sources ofmarket imperfection: natural monopoly, cyclical demand with imper-fect capital markets, predatory pricing, and suboptimal product qual-ity.
As explained earlier, where natural monopoly conditions exist,competition among several firms can lead to higher costs because ofwasteful duplication.
A second interpretation of excessive competition is based on theargument that certain industries, particularly those with cyclicaldemand and heavy fixed investment, are prone to excessive pricefluctuations. According to this argument, firms are forced to closedown during recessions and then unnecessarily incur large start-upcosts during recovery because of alleged imperfections in capitalmarkets. These wasteful shutdown and start-up costs are avoidable, itis argued, if government regulation sets minimum prices or allowsfirms to do so.
A third definition of excessive competition focuses on the conceptof predatory pricing. Unregulated competition in some markets is al-leged to result in monopolization by a firm that engages in predatory
99
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
pricing—setting prices below cost in order to drive out competitors.To succeed, a predator must outlast its rivals and barriers must existto prevent the entry of new competitors once the predator raisesprices. Regulation to prevent firms from charging excessively lowprices is intended to prevent such predatory practices and hence thehigher monopolistic prices that would prevail once the predator haseliminated its competitors. No consensus exists among economiststhat such predatory tactics are effective. Indeed, many economists be-lieve that apparently "predatory" behavior, if ever successful, is amanifestation of cost advantages or an enhanced ability to bear risk.
A fourth interpretation concerns the alleged tendency of certaincompetitive markets to produce goods or services of inadequate qual-ity, safety, or reliability if consumers are imperfectly informed aboutthose characteristics. For example, it has been argued that undercompetitive pressure banks might choose excessively risky invest-ments in order to offer their customers high rates of interest on de-posits. Similarly, some have claimed that airlines may skimp on safetyin a highly competitive market. Even if such claims were true, it doesnot follow that restricting competition will necessarily improve qual-ity or safety. Moreover, there are more direct ways of addressingthese potential market defects, such as Federal Aviation Administra-tion airplane safety inspections and Federal Deposit Insurance Cor-poration guarantees.
PROBLEMS OF ECONOMIC REGULATION
Most economists agree that the regulation of price and entry inmarkets that would otherwise be competitive is inefficient. Regulationof transportation, for example, has generally resulted in higherprices, higher production costs, and slower technological growth.Regulation of oil and gas prices has occasionally kept prices too low,causing shortages and inefficient choices among competing fuels.
Deregulation usually leads to a reduction in cost to the marginaluser, whether the discarded regulations established maximum orminimum prices. A price kept below the market price by regulationhas the effect of creating a system of nonprice rationing in which ex-cluded consumers are forced to pay higher prices for substitutes. Theelimination of maximum price ceilings may lead to higher averageprices but lower prices to the marginal consumer. Exceptions to thisconclusion are where natural monopoly conditions exist or whereregulations lead to some cross-subsidy among consumers.
In some cases, price regulation leads to an excessively high level ofsome service characteristic, because firms are prevented from com-peting on price. Because of price regulation of airlines by the Civil
100
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Aeronautics Board, for example, the airlines competed primarilythrough frequency of flights, which led to low load factors and con-siderable excess capacity.
Direct economic inefficiencies are not the only costs of rate andentry regulation in inherently competitive industries. Some additionalresources are used to lobby politicians and regulators for favorableregulatory actions. The greater the benefits to groups created by reg-ulation, the more such groups have an incentive to spend to blockderegulation. The magnitude of the benefits defended are often sub-stantial. Trucking firms have sold operating rights, initially grantedthem by the ICC, for over $20 million, and the broadcast rights ofindividual television stations have sold for substantially more.
The argument that full deregulation is the appropriate policy forindustries with competitive market structures applies strictly only inthe long run. To minimize the risk of adverse short-run conse-quences from deregulation, most deregulatory initiatives have calledfor either partial deregulation or a gradual transition to full deregula-tion. The Civil Aeronautics Board was not immediately abolished bythe Congress, and it retained some temporary domestic authoritythrough 1982. The Staggers Rail Act provided railroads with greaterprice flexibility but did not provide for eventual elimination of allprice and entry controls. The Natural Gas Policy Act provides foronly partial deregulation of natural gas prices.
It is not clear how much information about the long-run benefitsof deregulation can be obtained by observing the process of gradualor partial deregulation. For example, minimum price regulation maycause excess capacity in an industry. When deregulation occurs, somefirms in the industry may go bankrupt. This may lead some to con-sider deregulation a failure and to propose re-regulation. Once theexcess capacity is eliminated, however, the industry may operateprofitably without any regulation.
Economists can offer one important piece of advice on partial de-regulation: relaxing price restrictions without also relaxing entry re-strictions may cause problems, such as developed in the air freightmarket. Eliminating minimum price constraints while barring entrymay result in predation. Eliminating maxium price restrictions with-out allowing free entry may result in monopoly pricing.
Competitive economic forces, while powerful, are not the onlymeans available to consumers of products from deregulated indus-tries to defend themselves. Antitrust policies may also be used toprotect consumers against the abuses regulation is sometimesclaimed to prevent. The antitrust laws prohibit anticompetitive be-havior. Since regulated industries have often enjoyed broad exemp-tions from the antitrust laws, a review of the antitrust policies per-
101Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
taining to these industries should accompany the deregulation proc-ess. At the same time, however, it is important to avoid misusing theantitrust laws to maintain inappropriate types of regulation.
ENERGY POLICY
The pricing and allocation of energy resources was a frequentfocus of public policies over the last decade. Many of these policiesreduced the long-run supply of these important resources. In the lastfew years, several measures have been taken to remove the inefficien-cies and uncertainty caused by these policies.
STEPS TOWARD A MARKET-ORIENTED OIL POLICY
In January 1981, President Reagan ended the petroleum price andallocation controls that were previously scheduled to expire in Sep-tember 1981. Oil prices were first directly controlled as part of thegeneral system of wage and price guidelines imposed in 1971. Thedata on subsequent production, drilling, consumption, imports, andthe energy/gross national product (GNP) ratio suggest that oil pricederegulation has had many beneficial effects.
Despite the disincentives provided by the "windfall profits"(excise) tax on crude oil, the data suggest that decontrol has reversedthe steady decline in production (exclusive of Alaska) observedduring the period of price controls. As of October 1982, there wereseven consecutive monthly production increases over year-earlierlevels, a series of increases not observed in the United States for 10years. Reported oil well completions in 1982 were 49 percent higherthan in 1980, despite the recent decline in real oil prices.
Since full decontrol, U.S. consumption has decreased by almost 11percent. While part of this decline is due to the recession, a majorcause is the continuing adjustment to the price increases of the1970s. Since decontrol, the energy/GNP ratio has declined by over 5percent and imports (net of additions to the Strategic Petroleum Re-serve) have declined by about 34 percent. The elimination of the reg-ulatory framework for petroleum prices removed the artificial incen-tives to import crude oil and residual fuel oil. The weakening of oilprices has contributed to a stronger dollar and, thus, to lower priceson all imported products.
NATURAL GAS PRICING AND ALLOCATION
Following the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Phillips Petroleum Co.v. Wisconsin, the wellhead prices of natural gas sold in interstate com-merce were regulated by the Federal Power Commission (FPC). Sinceintrastate gas prices were not subject to regulation, a two-market
102
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
system resulted. Price controls, when effective, led to shortages inthe interstate market both because the interstate pipelines could notcompete effectively against intrastate pipelines for gas supplies, andbecause artificially low prices encouraged consumers to demandmore natural gas than they would have otherwise.
Rising oil prices in the 1970s triggered occasional gas shortages ininterstate markets. Industrial use of gas was curtailed during periodsof shortages, and many potential users of gas, both at the industrialand residential level, were proscribed from using gas. The abnormal-ly cold winter of 1977 produced a severe interstate gas shortage, re-sulting in numerous factory shutdowns, thousands of layoffs, andother serious problems. It was evident by the mid-1970s that the ex-isting system of wellhead price controls produced serious inefficien-cies causing the underproduction of gas for the interstate market andthe misallocation of gas between the interstate and intrastate marketsand among different users within the interstate markets.
The Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978
The natural gas regulatory environment was changed substantiallyby passage of the Natural Gas Policy Act (NGPA) in 1978. This actwas intended to encourage production by deregulating the prices ofnewly discovered gas while restraining the growth of average gasprices through permanent controls on the price of older gas. TheFederal Energy Regulatory Commission replaced the Federal PowerCommission, and price controls were extended to gas sold in intra-state markets. Over twenty regulated categories of gas were created,each with its own initial ceiling price and rules for price escalationover time.
The NGPA provides for the phased deregulation of the wellheadprice of most gas discovered after 1977, which should account for 40to 60 percent of all gas in January 1985, while a smaller volume ofgas is scheduled for deregulation in July 1987. A small amount ofhigh-cost new gas was deregulated under the NGPA in 1979. Mostgas to be deregulated in 1985 or 1987 is fixed until those dates at aprice, in inflation-adjusted dollars, leading to the oil equivalent pricelevel existing in 1978. The NGPA also includes "incremental pricing"provisions intended to allocate high-priced gas to industrial users,thus preserving lower prices for other users. Along with the NGPA,the Congress passed the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act; thislaw authorizes nonprice rationing of gas to counter the problems in-herent in continued price controls.
As with many efforts to regulate prices, the NGPA has created nu-merous problems. Instead of producing the lowest cost gas suppliesfirst and moving successively to higher cost sources, producers areinduced by the different price categories to produce high-cost gas
103Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
first in many cases, and generally to shift production efforts awayfrom cost-minimizing alternatives. The initial boom in the productionof deep gas illustrated this effect.
Further problems arise from the control of the prices of new gasuntil those prices are decontrolled in 1985 and 1987. Since oil priceshave risen substantially since 1978, partial decontrol will generate acontinued increase in delivered gas prices in 1985 as consumers bidup gas prices to levels equivalent with those of close substitutes suchas oil. Although real gas prices have risen and real oil prices havefallen in the last year, average real domestic wellhead prices of gaswill rise by about 28 percent between 1983 and 1985 if there is nochange in the NGPA according to a preliminary Department ofEnergy estimate.
The price of decontrolled gas is averaged with the price of con-trolled gas in determining the price to gas users and the demand forgas is affected by prices for fuel substitutes. This is reflected in pre-liminary Department of Energy estimates which indicate that theaverage 1985 prices of gas under the NGPA are not likely to differgreatly from those that would evolve under full decontrol. Under thepartial decontrol authorized by NGPA, the prices of decontrolled gasare bid up somewhat above the levels that would be observed in afully decontrolled market. Indeed, even now decontrolled deep gas isbeing sold at the wellhead for over $7.00 per million cubic feet. Thepreliminary Department of Energy estimates suggest that the average1985 price under full decontrol will be $3.78 per million cubic feet(both in 1982 dollars).
The higher prices to be paid for decontrolled gas in 1985 andthereafter suggest that the average gas consumer will not benefitfrom the remaining controls, and that the primary beneficiaries willbe the producers of decontrolled gas. Under the NGPA, however,different groups of consumers will fare differently. Pipelines withaccess to substantial quantities of price-controlled gas will be able tobid deregulated gas away from other pipelines. This is because thehigher prices on decontrolled gas can be averaged with the lowerprices paid for gas still subject to controls.
This means, for some period, that consumers in different regionsmay face different average prices, and that some gas will be reallocat-ed artifically because of differential access to controlled gas. In par-ticular, the intrastate pipelines will have relatively little access to con-trolled gas, and so some amount of gas will shift out of the intrastatemarket into the interstate market. Interstate pipelines also will vary intheir ability to bid for decontrolled gas, depending on their access tocontrolled gas and the actions of local regulatory authorities. In sum-mary, in addition to the waste in gas production caused by the
104Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NGPA, both controlled and decontrolled gas will be allocated ineffi-ciently among pipelines. The preliminary Department of Energy esti-mate of the present value of the efficiency gain that would accrue tothe economy from full gas decontrol in 1983, relative to the partialderegulation authorized by the NGPA, is about $4.2 billion (in 1982dollars).
The prospect of a price increase in 1985 may provide an impetustoward extension of the NGPA price controls beyond 1985. Such anextension would sustain the inefficiencies experienced as a result ofthe NGPA. The preliminary Department of Energy estimate of thepresent value of the efficiency gain of full decontrol in 1983, relativeto extension to 1995 of price controls now imposed by the NGPA, isabout $27 billion (in 1982 dollars). Because gas production would bereduced by extension of controls, oil consumption would probablyincrease. The preliminary Department of Energy estimate is that ex-tension of gas price controls would increase oil import levels byabout 288,000 barrels per day between 1983 and 1995.
Reported gas well completions in 1982 increased 21 percent over1980, while under full decontrol, reported oil well completions in-creased by 49 percent in the same period. Total proved gas reserves(excluding Prudhoe Bay) declined over one-third during the 1970s.The extension of controls thus would have very serious implicationsfor future domestic gas reserves.
Recent Natural Gas Price Developments
Natural gas prices have risen sharply in recent months because gascontrolled at relatively low prices is gradually becoming a smallercomponent of total production and because some contracts fixingvery low prices have expired. Moreover, the NGPA allows price in-creases for some gas beyond a simple inflation adjustment. While itappears that gas prices in some regions have reached short-termmarket clearing levels, that is not true for other regions. On average,gas prices are still apparently below market clearing levels—hence,the expected price increase in 1985 under the path outlined by theNGPA.
Some observers have noted that pipelines are buying expensive gaswhile gas subject to lower price ceilings remains unsold. They haveconcluded from this that gas markets are "irrational," and that fullprice decontrol would not work effectively. This analysis is question-able. Under "take-or-pay" contracts, pipelines agree to pay for agiven volume of gas whether or not they resell ("take") it. Sinceprice controls have prevented pipelines from competing for gas onthe basis of price, they compete on the basis of contract terms. In-creased "take-or-pay" contractual requirements are one form of suchnonprice competition. This behavior is a rational response to the ar-
105Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
tificial constraints imposed by price controls and the general expecta-tion of future shortages. In essence, increased "take-or-pay*' require-ments are a way for pipelines (and implicitly their customers) to buyinsurance against future shortages. Pipelines with high levels of"take-or-pay" commitments must now take and pay for relatively ex-pensive gas, even though "cheaper** gas is available. This is "irra-tional" only in hindsight since surpluses of gas exist. If shortages haddeveloped instead, the use of "take-or-pay*' commitments would lookquite rational and "farsighted."
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Conditions in the world oil market and preceptions about the ef-fects of supply disruptions have both changed substantially in the lastseveral years. Trends in world oil production and consumption aresimilar to those of the United States. World (non-Communist) con-sumption fell from 51.5 million barrels per day (mmbd) in 1978 to45.5 mmbd in 1982. Production outside of the Organization of Petro-leum Exporting Countries (including Communist nations) increasedfrom 30.3 mmbd in 1978 to 34.3 mmbd in 1982 (for the first 10months). Furthermore, excess production capacity in OPEC has in-creased to at least 8.5 mmbd. It is likely that a future oil supply dis-ruption, should one occur, would have smaller proportionate priceeffects than those caused by disruptions during the 1970's. Both theincreasing geographic diversification of production and the presenceof substantial excess production capacity would mitigate the effect offuture disruptions.
The threat to use oil production as a political weapon may be lesseffective then was previously perceived. It is very difficult to "target*'individual nations with such a weapon because the international oiltransport industry has substantial capacity to transfer oil among na-tions. This is why the United States and the Netherlands, despitetheir status as the intended targets of the 1973 embargo, faced thesame prices for imported oil as other oil-importing nations. Gasolinelines in the United States were caused by the U.S. regulations. Equal-ly important, oil producers cannot impose large penalties uponothers without imposing substantial revenue losses upon themselves.
The policies of this Administration reflect the view that prepara-tion for disruptions in energy supplies can best take place throughthe operation of market forces, and that price adjustments presentthe most effective mechanism for dealing with such disruptions whenthey occur. Minimizing the aggregate adverse effects of energysupply disruptions is most efficiently accomplished by allowing pricesto allocate available supplies to their most productive uses and by en-couraging market forces to increase production of substitute fuels.
106Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Price and allocation controls only redistribute some of the adverse ef-fects of the disruption away from politically favored groups, thereforemaking matters worse for other groups. In the aggregate, price andallocation controls would exacerbate the adverse effects of the dis-ruption.
Standby controls, even if never implemented, are harmful becausethey increase the perceived likelihood that controls will be imposedand thereby deter private preparedness. This is why the Presidentvetoed the standby controls legislation in March 1982.
Present policies also reflect a recognition that firms may have in-sufficient incentives to prepare for energy supply disruptions, in sub-stantial part because of past government policy. Previous price andallocation controls had the effect of penalizing those who had pre-pared for disruptions and subsidizing those who had not. Because ofgovernmental responses to energy supply disruptions in the past, andthe recent congressional proposal to establish standby price and allo-cation controls, firms must regard as substantial the likelihood thatcontrols would be imposed once again, despite this Administration'sfirm commitment to avoid such policies. This expectation discour-ages both those who expect to benefit from controls and those whoexpect to have their supplies appropriated from preparing sufficientlyfor a disruption beforehand.
In recognition of this perverse effect of past policy, the Administra-tion is striving to build up crude oil stocks in the Strategic PetroleumReserve (SPR) at an efficient rate. Built up to only slightly more than100 million barrels from 1977 until early 1981, the SPR now containsover 290 million barrels and is growing steadily toward.the plannedlevel of 750 million barrels. The SPR is intended to supplement, notsubstitute for, private sector stocks; accordingly, it would be usedonly in the event of a severe disruption. Once a decision was made touse SPR crude oil, it would be sold at market-clearing prices towhomever wished to purchase it. The Strategic Petroleum ReservePlan submitted to the Congress in December 1982 contains a provi-sion allowing the Secretary of Energy to reserve for special groupsfaced with extraordinary circumstances up to 10 percent of a givenperiod's drawdown; oil allocated under this provision would bepriced at the level established in the most recent competitive auctionof SPR crude oil. This provision is not intended as a subsidy for par-ticular groups. The policy of this Administration to fill the SPR at asteady rate will move energy security preparedness in the UnitedStates toward a more optimal level. To the extent that the availabilityof SPR crude oil, combined with other energy policies and programs,enables future Administrations to resist pressures for price and allo-
107Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
cation controls during a disruption, the SPR may enhance privatesector preparation as well.
Except to the extent that use of foreign energy supplies is in-creased artificially by price controls and other adverse policies, it isnot the policy of this Administration to reduce dependence on for-eign energy suppliers beyond the level determined by market forces.In a world with relatively free trade and substantial capacity for real-location of supplies, the allocative effects of a change in oil prices(other than those operating through the exchange rate) are inde-pendent of whether a given nation's use of foreign supplies is greator small. A disruption would raise prices and thus reallocate all avail-able supplies whether foreign or domestic. Thus, a nation totally self-sufficient in energy supplies still would face the same oil prices as anation totally dependent on foreign sources. It is the policy of thisAdministration to facilitate free trade while preparing for future con-tingencies through primary reliance on market adjustments and judi-cious use of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATIONS
The transportation and communications industries serve vital link-age functions in our Nation's economy. Until recently, these indus-tries were broadly subject to traditional rate and entry regulation.
Regulation of most transportation sectors is probably not efficientunder contemporary market conditions. Most transportation markets,due to the mobility of most of the capital assets of the firms in thosemarkets, are highly contestable. That is, with nearly costless entryand exit, new firms can enter markets which have excessive pricesand can take advantage of the profitable opportunities that they pro-vide. Thus, even with significant economies of scale in a transporta-tion market, the threat of entry by new rivals should result in near-competitive pricing of transportation services. Additionally, mosttransportation firms face significant intermodal competition. Theyare also disciplined indirectly in some cases by competitive condi-tions in the national or international markets in which the commod-ities they transport are sold. The only segments of the interstatetransportation system for which regulation on a natural monopolybasis may be justifiable are the major gas pipelines, long-dis-tance electric transmission lines, and those sections of the rail systemwhere shippers do not have an effective choice of carrier or mode oftransport.
Telecommunications, due to a high rate of technological develop-ment, is one of the most rapidly changing sectors of the U.S. econo-my. The Federal Government plays an active role in the telecommu-
108Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
nications industries through the regulation of common carriers andbroadcasters. Several important steps toward deregulation of theseindustries were initiated in 1982. The government can enhance thedevelopment of these industries through continued deregulation.
EFFECTS OF AVIATION DEREGULATION
Until the late 1970s the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) regulatedthe airline industry extensively. It allocated interstate routes amongthe airlines and controlled airline fares on those routes. Through itscontrol of air routes, the CAB restrained entry into the airline indus-try. From its inception in 1938 until the late 1970s, the CAB did notallow any new airline to enter the interstate trunk market. Largely asa consequence, air fares were higher on most interstate routes than ifprice competition and freedom of entry were permitted. This was re-flected by the differences in fares between intrastate city-pairs thatwere not subject to CAB regulation, such as Los Angeles-San Fran-cisco, and comparable interstate city-pairs that were. The latter oftenhad fares that were as much as 60 percent higher than the former.
In 1977 the CAB began to ease restrictions on fares and entry. In1978 the Congress affirmed and extended the CAB's measures bypassing the Airline Deregulation Act. This act provided for the grad-ual deregulation of the airlines, with the termination of CAB domes-tic route authority in 1981, the termination of CAB domestic pricingauthority in 1983, and the elimination of the CAB itself in 1985. Sub-sequent steps were taken to increase potential competition in interna-tional aviation. In July 1982 the U.S. Government entered a multilat-eral agreement with several European governments that permitsgreater flexibility in airline fares for trans-Atlantic flights than waspreviously allowed.
While rising aviation fuel costs, the weak economy, and the 1981air traffic controllers strike complicate assessment of the effects ofgradual deregulation, route and fare competition have increased sub-stantially since 1977. From 1978 to 1981, the number of U.S. certifi-cated airlines more than doubled (from 36 to 86). The market shareof the major trunk airlines declined from 87.3 to 80.4 percent in thepast 3 years while, during this same period, the market share of thelocal, intrastate, and new airlines increased from 11.5 to 16.4 per-cent. Aircraft departures from large, medium, small, and nonhub air-ports increased substantially over the 2 years immediately followingairline deregulation. The percentage of domestic markets with fouror more carriers grew from 13 in May 1978 to 73 in May 1981. InApril 1982, 77 percent of the domestic coach traffic of the major air-lines moved on discount fares, compared to 46 percent in April1978. And while operating expenses per available seat mile rose by
109
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
73 percent from 1976 to 1981, airline revenue per available seat milerose by only 58 percent in this same period.
Deregulation has also led to increases in operating efficiency. Air-line labor cost increases have slowed and have actually declined rela-tive to inflation. The established airlines have been forced to controltheir labor costs in order to compete effectively with the new en-trants, many of which pay substantially lower wages. Load factors(the ratio of revenue passenger miles to available seat miles) rosefrom an average of less than 55 percent between 1973 and 1977 tomore than 59 percent between 1978 and 1982. Airlines are nowusing a wider variety of airplanes to serve their diverse markets.Small markets are more likely to be served by smaller airplanes.
There is little need to fear monopoly in airline markets when theCAB expires. Several studies have demonstrated that no system-wideeconomies of scale exist. Since airplanes are easily transferable fromone market to another, airline markets are readily con testable. Theprospect of potential entry by rival carriers creates pressures forclose-to-competitive fares even in markets served by only one airline.
Deregulation of airlines has established a competitive and more ef-ficient airline industry. As air travel in the United States increasesover this decade and as the busiest airports become even more con-gested, the new competitive structure may be challenged. Allowingcompetition and the full transferability of the right to land and takeoff at these airports may be necessary to sustain this competitivestructure. Additionally, the maintenance and future development of asafe and effective national airway system is important to ensure thatconsumers are well served.
EFFECTS OF PARTIAL DEREGULATION IN SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
The traditional rate and entry regulation of the trucking, freight-forwarder, intercity bus, barge, and maritime industries is now largelyout of date. Many studies have demonstrated the absence of signifi-cant economies of scale in these industries, weakening the "naturalmonopoly" rationale for entry restrictions. The high degree of capi-tal mobility in these industries implies that individual city-pair andport-pair markets are highly contestable. The existence of intermodalsources of competition and competitive international output marketsfor transported commodities further reduces any misallocations re-sulting from monoply behavior. Additionally, the high rate of techno-logical development in the transportation sector renders many regu-lations inapplicable. The experience since the recent deregulation ofairlines and the partial deregulation of surface transportation indi-cates that a competitive industry structure would not reduce the fi-nancial viability of firms in these industries.
110
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Several major pieces of legislation were enacted in the last fewyears to reduce the degree of regulation in the surface transportationindustries, including the Railroad Revitalization and RegulatoryReform Act of 1976, the Motor Carrier Act of 1980, the StaggersRail Act of 1980, and the Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982.
The effects of the partial deregulation of trucking—initiated by theInterstate Commerce Commission and affirmed by the Motor CarrierAct of 1980—have proven very encouraging. Published trucking ratesare now subject to large and widely available discounts. Shippersappear to be overwhelmingly satisfied with the rates, service options,and competition for their business. Service to small communities hasnot deteriorated, as was originally predicted by the opponents of de-regulation, and most shippers in small communities also appear tosupport deregulation. Both the number of new firms and failing firmshave increased substantially, the latter due in part to the recession.Concerns have been expressed over the last year that the InterstateCommerce Commission may be slowing the deregulatory process.For example, the percentage of applications for grants of operatingauthority approved by the ICC declined slightly in both fiscal yearssince the passage of the Motor Carrier Act. On net, however, theICC has facilitated increased competition in the trucking industry.The chaos predicted by the opponents of deregulation has not mate-rialized, even during a sustained recession. The experience to dateclearly supports the case for more general deregulation of surfacetransport.
The experience since the partial deregulation of railroads is simi-lar. Although direct evidence on rail rates is not available, thenumber of contracts negotiated between rail carriers and shippers (ameasure of the operating flexibility granted by the Staggers Rail Act)increased from 580 in fiscal 1980 to 2907 in fiscal 1982. Railroadshave increased their share of total freight traffic and have substantial-ly increased their shipments of some commodities, such as fruits andvegetables, that were previously carried almost exclusively by trucks.Railroad profits remained essentially steady despite the sustained re-cession.
While recent partial deregulation of the surface transportation in-dustries has increased the competitiveness of these industries, the op-portunity remains for significant gains from further deregulation.There seems to be little danger that further deregulation would en-hance the monopoly power of carriers. The high degree of capitalmobility in the trucking, bus, barge, and maritime industries shouldprevent monopoly pricing over a sustained period, even where thereis only one carrier on a route.
I l lDigitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
FURTHER DEREGULATION OF SURFACE TRANSPORTATION
For many decades, both carriers and shippers have made decisionsbased on expectations that the general regulatory system would con-tinue. As a consequence, the transition to deregulation can be dis-ruptive. The major conceptual problems of further deregulation in-volve the following four issues: (1) the antitrust status of the rate bu-reaus, (2) the vulnerability of shippers who do not have an effectivechoice of carrier or mode, (3) the restrictions on multimodal owner-ship, and (4) the restrictions on route abandonment.
As suggested below, these problems especially affect the prospectsfor further deregulation of the railroads.
Antitrust Status of Rate Bureaus
For many years the regional rate bureaus (composed of transporta-tion firms) have performed the normal functions of a trade associ-ation and have provided the forum for multilateral agreements onboth single-line and interline rates. These rate bureaus were exempt-ed from the antitrust laws, and their proposed rates were generallyendorsed by the ICC. The Motor Carrier Act of 1980 removed theantitrust immunity of the truck rate bureaus for single-line rates be-ginning in mid-1984, and established the Motor Carrier RatemakingStudy Commission to study whether the antitrust immunity for multi-lateral agreements on interline rates should be maintained. In testi-mony to this commission, the Administration supported eliminationof the antitrust immunity of the truck rate bureaus. Members of thecommission, which was scheduled to complete its study by the end of1982, were equally divided on this issue at that time. Additionally,following the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of1976, the ICC restricted the authority of the rail rate bureaus to ad-dress single-line rates and restricted the carriers that could partici-pate in an agreement on interline rates.
There remains a legitimate dispute about whether the rail rate bu-reaus should retain antitrust immunity when setting interline rates.The general view of economists is that further deregulation shouldbe accompanied by the elimination of antitrust immunity. This ap-proach would prevent the adverse effects of a carrier cartel andpermit interline agreements to be treated as a joint venture. Someclarification of the application of the Sherman Act would also be ap-propriate to provide a stable legal environment for these interlineagreements. The contrary view is that the antitrust immunity shouldbe maintained as long as no carrier is bound by any bureau rates towhich it did not agree. A multilateral agreement on interline ratesmay have substantially lower transactions costs on small shipmentsthan the alternative pattern of bilateral joint ventures, and any at-
112Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
tempt to set cartel rates would be disciplined by the freedom of anycarrier to set other rates. (This issue is less important for trucks, be-cause interline traffic is now less than 15 percent of total truck traffic,and complete freedom of routes would further reduce such interlinetraffic. Interline rail traffic, however, is 48 percent of total rail traffic,and it is more important to maintain a process that economizes onthe contracting costs for small interline shipments.) The alternativemay be an undesirable situation in which rail carriers refuse small in-terline shipments, use trucks for shipments to points beyond theirroutes, or face an artificial incentive for mergers.
The "Captive Shipper Problem"
The "captive shipper problem'* is what initially led to rail rate reg-ulation. This problem was substantially reduced by the developmentof alternative carriers and modes but has not been eliminated. Twodimensions of this problem, however, have sometimes been misun-derstood. This relation is a bilateral monopoly. Both the rail carrierand the shipper have substantial bargaining power, and it is not clearthat this relation leads to rates that are generally "too high." Second,this relation does not lead to any long-term misallocation of re-sources as long as the price of the shipped commodity is determinedin a competitive market. In any case, the sum of the rents on rail andshipper property is constant. This inherent tension suggests that it isimportant to avoid any effective restraint on the common ownershipof rail carriers and major shippers. One alternative may be to requirejoint track use by competing carriers. Another alternative would beto index the rate bands now authorized for, say, another decade andto terminate these bands at that time. Unless this problem is re-solved, however, some form of maximum rate regulation is likely tobe maintained in the rail industry.
Restrictions on Multimodal Ownership
There no longer appears to be any case for restrictions on multi-modal ownership. It is especially important to allow rail carriers toown trucking operations to facilitate container and piggyback traffic.A change in the law would be required to allow rail carriers to ownbarge lines. A change in the law would also be required to allowfreight-forwarders to own trucks, even though trucking companiesare now allowed to own freight-forwarders. The Bus RegulatoryReform Act of 1982 provides a substantially streamlined process forapproving intermodal mergers not prohibited by law.
Restrictions on Route Abandonment
The primary problem of the railroads is excess route capacity, aproblem that reflects a combination of increased truck competitionand ICC restrictions on route abandonment. Some studies have indi-
113Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
cated that less than half of the existing rail mileage generates enoughtraffic to cover total costs. The Staggers Rail Act provides for moreflexible procedures to resolve disputes on route abandonment.Recent highway legislation, by increasing allowable truck size, is ex-pected to make trucks more competitive with railroads in moving lowdensity freight. A better resolution of the route abandonment issue isprobably necessary for a healthy railroad industry and an efficientdistribution of freight traffic across modes.
In summary, pending a resolution of these four issues as theyaffect railroads, it is probably appropriate to focus any near-term leg-islative proposals on the other modes of surface transport and for theICC to pursue selective rail deregulation within its existing authority.Additionally, the government should continue, through the appropri-ate application of user fees, to ensure that each mode of transportbears the entire costs of its operations when utilizing public facilities.
COMMON CARRIER TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Economies of scale provided the original rationale for makinglong-distance telecommunications a regulated monopoly. But rapidtechnological change has reduced the industry's natural monopolycharacteristics and has paved the way for a more competitive industrystructure. The growth of the market for telecommunications, duelargely to the convergence of data processing and telecommunica-tions technology, has further reduced the natural monopoly charac-teristics of the industry. These rapid developments in both demandand supply conditions have probably made the inherited regulatoryframework inappropriate.
Major legal changes were made recently to allow increased compe-tition. In 1982 a U.S. district judge gave final approval to a settle-ment between the American Telephone and Telegraph Company(AT&T) and the Department of Justice, transforming long-distancetelecommunications services into a competitive market with a greaternumber of companies and less regulation.
In conjunction with other deregulatory steps by the Federal Com-munications Commission, the settlement is expected to have majorbenefits for both the telecommunications industry and its customers.Equal access to local facilities, which is the cornerstone of the settle-ment, should allow competition to act as an adequate substitute forregulation of interstate services. While the transition to equal accesswill take a few years, individual telephone customers will have pro-gressively increased opportunities to make their own arrangementswith AT&T's competitors in long-distance services. Meanwhile,AT&T will be allowed to develop its data processing subsidiary,American Bell Inc. While AT&T is prohibited from offering home
114Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
computer information and advertising services via its long-distancelines for 7 years, it is likely to become a vigorous competitor in otherfields, such as cellular mobile radio technology. It is also likely toface increasing competition in these areas.
In 1982 an appeals court affirmed the Federal CommunicationCommission's power to deregulate where technological changemakes regulation outmoded. Developments in data processing andtransmission have tended to make many Federal and State regula-tions unnecessary, inappropriate, or unworkable.
BROADCASTING
The FCC regulates the radio and television industries through issu-ance and renewal of broadcast licenses. It promulgates guidelines onthe amount of news and public affairs programming that stationsmust broadcast, the maximum number of commercials permissible inany time period, the recording of broadcast materials, and the ascer-tainment and fulfillment of community needs. As a result, broadcast-ers are prevented in some cases from carrying programming that lis-teners and viewers would prefer.
The original purpose of FCC regulation was to allocate broadcastspectrum space. The FCC allocated these valuable spectrum rights inexchange for commitments on program content. Whatever the meritsof this argument 50 years ago, it may be appropriate to review thisform of regulation to reflect the rapidly developing competition fromcable television, pay television, and direct satellite transmission.
Recently, the FCC has made several moves toward deregulation. In1981 the Commission deregulated most commercial radio broadcast-ing and attempted, subject to legal challenge, to simplify the applica-tion renewal process. The FCC is in the process of repeating thisderegulatory initiative for the television industry. It will soon attemptto amend the renewal process by eliminating the following criteriafor renewal: nonentertainment content, ascertainment of communityneeds, advertising concentration, and recording. The last Congressalso considered bills to repeal many requirements, such as the "rea-sonable access/' "equal time," and "fairness" doctrines that arecostly to broadcasters and unevenly applied to the mass media.These steps would partially remove the government from the deter-mination of broadcast content.
DEREGULATION OF FINANCIAL MARKETS
The financial service sector has been among the most heavily regu-lated areas of the economy. Price regulation, entry restrictions, andportfolio regulation were pervasive in both the banking and securities
115Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
industries. Substantial and numerous innovations in the financial sec-tors in the last decade largely preceded and were later facilitated byrecent partial deregulation.
DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS
The present structure of regulatory restraints on commercial banksand other depository institutions was imposed primarily in responseto the collapse of the banking system in the 1930s. A common inter-pretation of the events at that time is that the banking collapse wasthe result of an unsound banking structure which caused too muchcompetition. Competition among banks was thought to force theminto paying high interest rates for deposits, which in turn led them toseek out high-yielding but risky—and ultimately unsound—invest-ments in the stock, bond, and real estate markets.
Legislative remedies in the Banking Acts of 1933 and 1935, andvarious revisions of the Federal Reserve Act, focused on limitingprice competition between banks, separating banking from securitiesmarket activity, supervising banking and financial markets moreclosely, and restoring public confidence in the financial system.
Reflecting a general concern about excessive competition, the pay-ment of interest on demand deposits was prohibited by law. In addi-tion, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit InsuranceCorporation were given the power to place interest rate ceilings onthe passbook and time deposits of commercial banks. Interest rateceilings were extended to the deposits of mutual savings banks andsavings and loan associations in 1966.
The type and quality of assets held by banks were closely moni-tored. Commercial banks were not permitted to hold securities of aspeculative nature in their portfolios, and thrift institutions were sub-ject to even greater limits on their asset acquisition powers. In addi-tion, most securities activities were divorced from commercial bank-ing by the Glass-Steagall sections of the Banking Act of 1933, andentry into banking became more closely controlled. To maintain theconfidence of the public in the banking system, deposits were insuredby the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Sav-ings and Loan Insurance Corporation. With the introduction of de-posit insurance, the other regulations served mainly to limit the ex-posure of the insurance funds rather than to protect depositors. Nev-ertheless, recent studies suggest that the web of regulatory restraintswas generally greater than required for this purpose.
Moreover, this extensive regulatory framework for financial institu-tions has adapted slowly to the economic changes of the last two dec-ades. High inflation rates and consequent high nominal interestrates, combined with reduced transactions costs from the application
116Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
of computer technology to the payments system, have created seriousdistortions in financial markets. As market interest rates rose aboveRegulation Q, ceilings, inflows of funds to depository institutionswere curtailed, and new nonregulated instruments (especially moneymarket mutual funds) were created. The allocation of savings to var-ious sectors of the capital market—particularly housing vis-a-vis othersectors—was altered, and small and less informed savers suffered de-clines in the real rate of return on their savings. In addition, Regula-tion Q, generated a considerable amount of nonprice competition be-tween financial institutions, such as an excessive number of branchoffices, with resulting adverse effects on efficiency. Interest rate ceil-ings on selected deposits were removed progressively beginning in1978.
The Administration continues to support the removal of unneces-sary and excessive regulatory constraints on depository institutions.It is now widely asserted that the length and severity of the bankingcollapse of the 1930s was not the result of overly risky bank portfo-lios. Rather, many economists argue that these failures became wide-spread, initially, because of the reluctance of the Federal ReserveSystem to engage in aggressive open market operations to counterthe conversion of deposits to currency and, later, because of the Fed-eral Reserve's failure to assure adequate liquidity to banks experienc-ing runs on their deposits. As banks scrambled to liquidate theirassets to meet the demands of their depositors for currency, theirasset values fell, thus creating insolvencies. The provision of ade-quate liquidity by a lender of last resort has long been recognized asa primary responsibility of the Federal Reserve System.
Partial deregulation of depository institutions is now proceedingunder provisions of the Depository Institutions Deregulation andMonetary Control Act of 1980 and the Garn-St Germain DepositoryInstitutions Act of 1982. Under the 1980 act, interest rate ceilings ontime and savings deposits are to be phased out over a period of 6years. The same law permits depository institutions to offer negotia-ble order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts and preempted certainState usury ceilings. This act also created the Depository InstitutionsDeregulation Committee (DIDC) to administer the phaseout of inter-est rate ceilings at banks and thrifts.
In March 1982, the DIDC adopted a deregulation schedule thatphases out interest rate ceilings, beginning with longer term time de-posits. With the deregulation schedule in place, the focus of theDIDC turned to short-term deposit instruments. Prevailing high in-terest rates had caused a continued erosion of low-cost deposits atbanks and thrifts, as depositors sought market rates elsewhere, par-ticularly through money market mutual funds. The DIDC addressed
117Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
this problem by authorizing, effective May 1, 1982, a 91-day time de-posit with a $7,500 minimum denomination indexed to the 91-dayTreasury bill rate, and establishing, effective September 1, 1982, a 7-to 31-day deposit account with a $20,000 minimum denomination,also indexed to the 91-day Treasury bill rate.
Following the directions given by the Garn-St Germain Act, theDIDC authorized, effective December 14, 1982, a new money marketdeposit account that can be offered by commercial banks, savings andloan associations, and mutual savings banks. In addition, the DIDGauthorized a new super NOW account, effective January 5, 1983. Nei-ther account is subject to interest rate ceilings when account balancesexceed $2,500. The DIDC also reduced to $2,500 the minimum de-nomination required on the 6-montfi money market deposits, the 91-day time deposits, and the 7- to 31-day time deposits.
The introduction of NOW accounts nationwide in 1981, the au-thorization of the new money market accounts at banks and thrifts,and the general phasing out of interest rate restrictions substantiallyincrease the ability of depository institutions to compete for funds.Simultaneously, various actions have been taken to allow thrift insti-tutions greater flexibility in the investment of funds. The Deregula-tion and Monetary Control Act expands the asset powers of savingand loan associations and mutual savings banks to include consumer,corporate, and business loans. This will lead to more diversified port-folios for these institutions. In addition, new regulations issued bythe Comptroller of the Currency in 1981 and the Federal HomeLoan Bank Board in 1982 permit depository institutions to offer vari-able rate mortgages. Finally, the Garn-St Germain Act provides forFederal preemption of State laws and judicial decisions that restrictthe enforcement of due-on-sale clauses in real property loans.
The Garn-St Germain Act also deals with the problems of the sav-ings and loan institutions discussed above. It provides capital assist-ance to depository institutions that have suffered earnings and capitallosses resulting from regulatory restraints on their assets and liabil-ities. The assisted institutions issue capital investments, called "networth certificates," which the insuring agencies purchase with prom-issory notes. This increase in net worth reduces the likelihood of in-solvencies arising from losses created by holdings of old, fixed-ratemortgages. As market rates of interest fall, and the earnings of thesedepository institutions improve, the net worth certificates will be re-tired.
Legislation following the banking collapse of the 1930s tended toprevent competition among financial institutions and created a com-plex and often counterproductive labyrinth of financial regulations.Recent legislation and regulatory changes have begun to reverse this
118
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
trend by widening the sources and uses of funds available to deposi-tory institutions, and by allowing for a far larger measure of pricecompetition in the financial services industry. These actions shouldcontribute to a stronger and more responsive financial system.
STOCK EXCHANGES
Much of the regulation of the Nation's stock exchanges began inthe 1930s, largely in response to the crisis in the financial marketscreated by the Great Depression. This regulation was broad and di-verse, and included mandatory and systematic disclosure of corporaterecords as well as rule-setting authority over stock exchanges. Overthe last several years, much of this regulation has been relaxed.
Commission Rates
Prior to 1968, commissions paid to members of stock exchangeswere fixed by those stock exchanges and approved by the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (SEC). After 1968, however, the fixedcommission schedule was slowly dismantled in favor of negotiatedcommissions. Beginning in May 1975, commission rates on all secu-rity transactions were negotiated.
Negotiated commission rates were the product of a market-inducedbreakdown of the fixed-rate commission structure. From 1961 to1966 the dollar volume and market share of the regional stock ex-changes increased dramatically because of the fixed-rate system. Re-gional stock exchanges allowed customers dealing on those ex-changes to "give up" or have transferred a portion of their fixedcommission to a third party who supplied other services. The NewYork Stock Exchange (NYSE) stipulated that customers of that ex-change could only give up commissions to other members of theNYSE. This constraint that the NYSE imposed on its customers en-couraged many of those customers to turn to the regional exchanges,where competition had effectively driven down the cost of exchangeservices.
Faced with a declining share of stock transactions, the NYSE askedthe SEC to force regional exchanges to eliminate the rules that wereaffording them a competitive advantage. Commenting on the NYSEproposal, the Department of Justice suggested that the broader issueof possible elimination of the fixed-rate commission structure shouldbe examined. In defense of the fixed-rate commission structure, aNYSE study suggested that "destructive competition," reflected in adecline in the quality of broker services, could result from the ab-sence of fixed commission rates.
Despite the objections of the NYSE, the Congress passed the Secu-rities Acts Amendments of 1975. These reconfirmed that nonmembercommission rates were fully negotiable and made exchange floor
119Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
rates fully negotiable by May 1976. The deregulation of fixed com-mission rates illustrates the efficiency gains that follow deregulation.Since the total deregulation of commission rates, average commis-sions charged to customers have decreased. Services which were pre-viously provided jointly whether customers used them or not, arenow substantially unbundled.
Financial Disclosure
The Securities Exchange Act of 1933 required financial disclosurefor corporations seeking to raise capital through the issuance of newsecurities. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 required periodic fi-nancial disclosure for corporations with publicly traded securities.One of the motivations for this original legislation was a belief thatcorporations must be forced to disclose financial information inorder to protect the interests of investors. In recent years there hasbeen concern that these requirements have precluded new securityissues thus inhibiting the efficiency of the capital market. Additional-ly, a growing body of scholarship has questioned whether these re-quirements have served the interests of investors. Recently, some ofthese stringent disclosure requirements were ended for certain typesof corporations. Specifically, corporations with less than $3 million inassets and 500 stockholders are now exempt from the filing require-ments of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The SEC has also recently allowed, on an experimental basis, somefirms issuing new securities to use "shelf registration'* forms, thuseliminating the requirement to file for each new security issue. Theinitiation of shelf registration is expected to reduce the costs of rais-ing equity capital, allowing firms to manage their risk more efficientlyby entering the capital markets more often.
Industry Structure
Before 1980, stocks listed on stock exchanges could not be tradedby members of those stock exchanges in any other markets. This bar-rier to entry was partially lifted in June 1980, when the SEC ap-proved Rule 19c-3. This rule allows members of stock exchanges totrade securities in other markets that were listed on those stock ex-changes after May 1979.
Stock exchange members are now also allowed to execute trades inthe "19c-3 securities" in markets other than the stock exchanges.The market share of non-19c-3 stocks on the Over-the-Counter(OTG) markets is considerably less than the OTC market share for19c-3 securities. This larger market share for the OTC in 19c-3 se-curities suggests that, for some exchange members, it is more effi-cient to execute orders on the OTC rather than on the stock ex-
120Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
changes. That is, members can arbitrage price differentials that mayexist between the OTC market and the exchanges.
Futures Markets
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has alsobeen very active in deregulation. In January 1982, the CFTC elimi-nated the 03 report, which had obligated large traders in future con-tracts to report their market positions daily to the CFTC. This actionreduced the filing costs of these large traders by around 50 percent.In an effort to lessen the burden of Federal regulation on the futuresindustry, the CFTC's new legislation eases the disclosure, registra-tion, and rule approval process.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR FURTHER DEREGULATION IN THE FINANCIAL
INDUSTRY
While the financial and securities markets of today operate relative-ly unencumbered by unnecessary regulations, owing to the deregula-tory advances discussed above, several opportunities for further de-regulation remain.
Geographic Restrictions in Banking
Federal laws, such as the McFadden Act of 1927 and the DouglasAmendment to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, continue toimpose geographic restrictions on commercial banking activities. Theformer law subjects the branching activities of national banks to thelimits imposed by the States; the latter law prohibits bank holdingcompanies from engaging in interstate banking unless given specificState authorization to do so. Although these prohibitions may reducethe concentration of financial resources on a national scale, they mayalso increase market concentration and lessen competition in localbanking markets.
Moreover, these restrictions are effective only insofar as they affectthe taking of retail deposits. Loan production offices, Edge Act cor-porations, personal finance companies, mortgage lending companies,and bank holding companies have long been the means used bybanks to conduct wholesale and retail business on an interstate basis.With the emergence of automatic teller machine networks, the elec-tronic revolution is incorporating even retail deposit-taking intolarge-scale operations. This process would be enhanced by exempt-ing automatic teller machines from the existing restrictions on the es-tablishment of branch offices. It is time to reconsider these geo-graphic restrictions because they are probably not in the best inter-ests of consumers or the more efficient financial institutions.
121Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Portfolio Restrictions in Banking
The prohibitions of the Glass-Steagall Act have been eroded inrecent years as both banking organizations and securities firms haveattempted, either directly or indirectly, to enter each others' tradi-tional lines of business. Moreover, Glass-Steagall now makes no im-portant contribution to the protection of the public against bank fail-ure or undue concentrations of economic power. Other governmentmeasures, such as Federal deposit insurance and broadened andstrengthened Federal supervision, appear to have been more effectivein that role. The Administration has proposed an amendment to theGlass-Steagall Act that would authorize bank holding company sub-sidiaries to conduct two new activities immediately: (1) to underwriteand deal in municipal revenue bonds, and (2) to sponsor and under-write shares of mutual funds. The Garn-St Germain Act authorizes anew account at banks and thrifts that is directly competitive withmoney market mutual funds. However, the act does not provide forthe operation and sale of shares in mutual funds or the underwritingof municipal revenue bonds. Moreover, the act also extends the long-standing protection of insurance companies against bank competi-tion.
Margin Requirements
Margin requirements presently exist in the stock, options, and fu-tures markets. In futures trading, the margin is a performance bondintended to protect other participants from the consequences of afailure to make good on a contractual obligation. Each futures ex-change determines the margin without Federal regulation or over-sight. In stock and options exchanges, the Federal Reserve Boardsets initial margin requirements, and the exchanges set maintenancemargins subject to SEC oversight. Margin practices in the stock andoptions markets may be less efficient than in futures markets, sinceregulation constrains decisionmaking by participants. It is now appro-priate to review these regulations.
CONCLUSIONS
Federal regulation of price and entry are products of an earlier era,when both economic conditions and perceptions of economic prob-lems were very different than they are today. Federal regulation ofrailroads began nearly a century ago, when there was no significantcompetition from other transport modes and political debate reflect-ed strong populist sentiment. Most other Federal economic regula-tions date from the 1930s, when the severe economic problems, nowbelieved to be due to a collapse in aggregate demand, were per-
122Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ceived to be a consequence of excessive competition. The presentstructure of Federal regulation of the energy markets dates from the1970s and primarily reflects an attempt to protect consumers fromthe effects of the large increase in oil prices originating abroad.
These policies may or may not have been appropriate to theperiod in which they were initiated. But both conditions and percep-tions are now very different. Increasing demand and changing tech-nology have substantially reduced the initial monopoly power ofmany regulated firms. Our perceptions have also changed, largely inresponse to developing conditions during the long history of regula-tion and the encouraging developments during the more recentperiod of partial deregulation. There is now a more general percep-tion that the developments in regulated markets have largely outrunthe present structure of economic regulation.
As we approach the 100th anniversary of the first broad body ofFederal economic regulation, it is time for a comprehensive review ofwhether this form of regulation serves the interests of the contempo-rary economy. A resolution of this issue would then permit greaterattention to the different and more complex issues affecting therecent Federal regulation of health, safety, and environmental condi-tions.
123Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CHAPTER 6
Review of 1982 and theEconomic Outlook
FOR THE U.S. ECONOMY, 1982 was a year of painful transitiontoward price stability. The momentum of high inflation, built up overthe last 15 years, was broken and inflation was reduced to its lowestrate in a decade. Success in reducing inflation, however, was accom-panied by a recession that began in mid-1981 and lingered through1982. A drop in real exports, along with inventory adjustments, ac-counted for the decline in U.S. production. Despite the recession,final sales to domestic purchasers increased. Expenditures for someinterest-sensitive goods, such as housing and consumer durablegoods, registered their first rise in recent years.
Economic developments in 1982 clearly set the stage for a recoveryin 1983. The sizable slowdown in inflation contributed to the sharpdrop in interest rates in the summer of 1982. The inventory cyclethat held down production in 1982 is expected to turn around some-time in 1983. This development, combined with recovery in housingand durable consumer goods and continuing gains in defense spend-ing, is expected to bring a moderate sustainable economic recovery.Prospects are good that this recovery can be maintained through the1980s without reigniting inflationary pressures.
OVERVIEW OF 1982
Real gross national product (GNP) in 1982 was no higher than in1979. After a surge of economic growth in 1978, the economy stalledin 1979. Cyclically volatile types of spending, such as auto sales andhousing starts, had peaked in 1978. Since 1978 the output of goodsand services in the United States has followed a saw-tooth pattern ofalternating periods of growth and decline. The recessions of 1980and 1981-82 bracketed the shortest economic expansion in 50 years.Employment in 1982 was below its 1979 level.
Production and employment remained sluggish for 4 years whilesupplies of labor and capital continued to grow, so that by the end of1982 the unemployment rate rose to nearly 11 percent—its highestlevel since the early 1940s—and the capacity utilization rate fell to its
124Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
lowest point in the post-World War II period. With this high level ofunused economic capacity, inflationary pressures subsided.
The inflation rate fell dramatically in 1982 to its lowest level in adecade. The upward trend in inflation from 1976 through 1980strengthened the Federal Reserve's determination to slow the growthin the monetary aggregates and contributed to high interest rates foran extended period. By mid-1982, when evidence of progress againstinflation and continued weakness in economic activity became clear,interest rates began to fall sharply. The ensuing decline reduced in-terest rates to their lowest levels in more than 2 years, as illustratedin Chart 6-1.
Chart 6-1
PERCENT PER YEAR
22
Interest Rates
20
18
16
14
PRIME RATE
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982
SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY AND BOARD OF GOVERNORSOF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.
The decline in interest rates brought much-needed relief to the in-terest-sensitive, cyclical sectors of the economy. By the end of 1982,clear progress toward recovery had been made, as reflected in con-tinuing gains in the composite index of leading indicators of econom-ic activity, as shown in Chart 6-2.
125
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 6-2
Index of Leading Indicators and Real GNP
1967-100145
140
135
130
125
120
BILLIONS OF 1972 DOLLARS
1,520
REALGNP(RIGHT SCALE}
mm tINDEX OF LEADING
INDICATORS(LEFT SCALE)
1,500
1,480
1,460
1,440
1,420
1,400
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n1981 19821978 1979 1980
SOURCE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
MAJOR SECTORS OF AGGREGATE DEMAND
Real output declined 1.2 percent from the fourth quarter of 1981to the fourth quarter of 1982. This was the fourth consecutive year oflittle change in economic activity (Table 6-1). Businesses liquidatedinventories in 1982, in contrast to the previous year when inventorylevels increased. Another important factor in the decline was a sharpdrop in U.S. exports that reflected both the strong dollar and theworldwide recession. Real final sales to domestic purchasers in-creased 1.3 percent in 1982, the largest increase in 3 years. Gains inpersonal consumption expenditures, residential investment, and Fed-eral purchases dominated a large decline in business capital spend-
126
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ing. Partly in response to the drop in interest rates, residential invest-ment increased for the first time in 5 years, and consumer purchasesof durable goods increased for the first time since 1978. State andlocal government purchases of goods and services were virtually un-changed over the year.
T A B L E 6-L—Growth in major sectors of real GNP, 1978-82
[Change^ fourth quarter to fourth quarter and 5-year average]
Component 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 * 5-yearaverage'
Percent change:
Real gross national product
Personal consumption expendituresConsumer durables
Business fixed investmentResidential fixed investmentGovernment purchases of goods and services
FederalDefense
State and local
Real final sales
Real final sales to domestic purchasers 3
Change in billions of 1972 dollars:
Change in business .inventoriesNet exports of goods and services
'Preliminary.2 Based on annual data.9 Final sales less exports plus imports.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
5.8
4.45.7
12.8—22.3
2.63.4
5.44.7
5.111.2
1.4
2.1- 2 . 5
3.5-8.3
1.3
1.03.01.4
2.61.7
-17.514.9
-0.7
.3-4.6
- 2 . 6-.12.7
.7
1.42.1
.3
- . 4- . 5
- 3 . 91.4
0.7
4.7-19 .4
2.9
10.79.3
- 1 . 7
.0
.6
11.0- 9 . 1
- 1 . 2
2.66.5
- 8 . 44.52.6
6.66.8
.1
.31.3
-22 .5-15.4
1,5
2.1.1
3.3-8.0
1.6
2.93.8
.7
1.81.7
-4.41.7
PERSONAL CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
Despite declines in production, employment, and real wage andsalary income, real disposable (after-tax) personal income increasedin 1982, due in part to the reduction in personal income tax ratesand an increase in transfer payments. The average effective Federalpersonal income tax rate fell from 12.5 percent to 11.4 percent be-tween the third quarters of 1981 and 1982. Real personal consump-tion expenditures increased 2.6 percent in 1982 to reach their high-est share of real GNP since 1949. Although real personal saving de-clined from its high level at the end of 1981, the personal saving ratein 1982 was higher than in any year since 1976, as shown in Table6-2.
Consumer purchases of durable goods increased 6.5 percent inreal terms in 1982, the first increase since 1978. The turnaround oc-curred early in the year, when auto sales rebounded from the de-pressed level of late 1981. Sales then languished until late in theyear, when they again climbed, due in part to the decline in interestrates that produced lower financing costs. Nevertheless, domestic
127
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE 6-2.—Real household income, consumption, saving, and residential investment, 1978-82
[Percent change, fourth quarter to fourth quarter and 5-year average]
Item 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 » 5-yearaverage 1*
Income by type:
Labor Income3.....Other income *Net transfer payments'..,
Personal Income
Less.- Federal tax paymentsOther tax and nontax payments*
Disposable personal income
4.78.9
- 3 . 0
4.9
10.95.4
4.0
1.23.54.3
2.0
5.61.8
1.5
- 0 . 4- 1 . 013.1
0.98.8
2.5
1.83.6
2.6
-1 .9
1 U
= 5.53.5
.6
1.64.63.9
2.4
3.63.1
2.3
Personal consumption expenditures...
Personal saving
Personal saving rate T
4.4
-5.3
61
2.1
-11 .4
5.9
.3
9.3
5.8
.3
39.8
6.4
2.6
-22.7
6.5
2.1
4.1
6.1
Housing starts 8
Single family
Muftifamily
Mobile home shipments'
Residential investment....
-1 .7
-3.32.3
- 7 . 5
- . 2
-23.1
-29.2=7.9
-9 .8
-8 .3
-4 .3
-5.2-2 .5
- 6 . 7
-12.7
-42.3
-45.0-37.3
-13.1
-19.4
44.5
48.038.9
12.1
4.5
-11.6
-14.4- 5 . 3
- 2 . 8
=8.0
'Preliminary.'Based on annual data.3Wage and salary disbursements and other labor income.•Proprietors' income, rental income, personal dividend income, and personal interest income."Transfer payments less personal contributions for social insurance.'State and local tax and nontax payments plus Federal nontax payments.7 Annual average.•Units.Note.—Income items, consumption, and saving deflated by the personal consumption deflator; residential investment deflated
by the residential deflator.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census) and Council of Economic Advisers.
auto sales in 1982 for the entire year were lower than in any yearsince the early 1960s.
The extended period of weakness in durable goods sales accompa-nied a reduction in the burden of consumer debt. Consumer install-ment debt repayments relative to disposable personal income fellsteadily from their 1978 peak to reach, by the third quarter of 1982,their lowest level since 1964, as illustrated in Chart 6-3. Total house-hold debt has also fallen sharply relative to households' net worth.
RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT
As indicated in Table 6-2,1982 showed the first rise in housing activityin 5 years. By the fourth quarter of 1982, housing starts rose to 1.25million at an annual rate, up nearly 45 percent from their trough of865,000 units in the fourth quarter of 1981. Starts averaged less than onemillion units until mid-1982 as interest rates on mortgage commitmentsstayed around 17 percent. In August, mortgage interest rates beganto fall, dropping below 14 percent by year-end. This drop encour-
128
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 6-3
RATIO (PERCENT)
15.0
14.5 -
14.0 -
Ratio of Consumer InstallmentCredit to Personal Income
13.5 "
1977 1978 1979 1980 1981
SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS,
1982
aged the sale of houses, reduced the inventory of unsold new housesrelative to current sales, and spurred new construction.
For the first time in recent years, house prices increased at aslower rate than general inflation. Moreover, the conventional meas-ures of house price increases, which rose less than 3 percent, maywell have overstated the 1982 rise because increased builder andseller financing at below market rates is not fully captured in theprice data. Lower interest costs and more moderate house price in-creases helped to hold down mortgage payments and, thus, mayfavor a recovery in housing investment.
BUSINESS FIXED INVESTMENT
Real business fixed investment peaked in the last quarter of 1981,having grown at a 5.2 percent annual rate from 1977 to 1981. From
129
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
its 1981 peak to the last quarter of 1982, real business fixed invest-ment dropped 8.4 percent.
The 1982 decline in capital spending was broadly based, affectingeven sectors that had fared well in previous years. Industrial andcommercial construction declined about 1 percent in real terms fromthe fourth quarter of 1981 to the fourth quarter of 1982 havinggrown at an annual rate of more than 10 percent from 1977 to 1981.Computer, communications, and instrumentation equipment invest-ment fell about 4 percent in 1982, a sharp contrast to over 9 percentannual rate of real growth from 1977 to 1981.
In the energy area, real investment in coal mine development con-tinued to rise strongly in 1982. Real investment in oil field explora-tion and development dropped 15 percent between the fourth quar-ters of 1981 and 1982 as weak oil prices impaired cash flow in thepetroleum industry. Reflecting the weakness in overall economicgrowth, investment in transportation equipment—autos, trucks, air-craft, ships, boats, and railroad equipment—continued to decline in1982.
Business capital spending is likely to lag behind the recovery in theeconomy. Contracts and orders for new plant and equipment de-clined about 12 percent in real terms between the last quarters of1981 and 1982. In addition, a Department of Commerce survey ofbusiness spending plans indicated that real nonfarm investment willdecline about 5.2 percent in 1983.
INVENTORY INVESTMENT
Sluggish sales and high carrying costs encouraged businessto pare inventories in 1982. A sharp drop in final sales in late1981 triggered a swing to inventory liquidation in the first half of1982. Even the more moderate sales forecasts for the second half of1982 proved overly optimistic, and inventory-sales ratios climbed,prompting further cutbacks in production, employment, and inven-tories (Chart 6-4). Toward the end of the year, inventories werebrought more in line with sales. Auto inventories, which accountedfor about one-third of inventory liquidation in the final quarter of1982, were especially lean, as the industry's aggressive pricing andmarketing efforts helped to increase sales.
THE FARM ECONOMY
Total income per farm family in 1982 fell about 11 percent in realterms. Over two-thirds of farm family earnings came from off-farmsources as income from farm sources declined.
Net farm nominal income from farm operations declined from $25billion in 1981 to about $19 billion in 1982. Relatively tight meat
130
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Chart 6 -4
RATIO
1.85
1.80 -
1.75 -
1.70 -
1.65 —
1.60
1.55
Real Inventory/Sales Ratioand Industrial Production
•••t
tm»mm
\
\A\A
I I I !
#0
»#
**
TV
/
ll 1
•#9
#*
AT,A A/
A / U *rVy ¥
1 1 1 i l l I I 1 i l l
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION,MANUFACTURING
(RIGHT SCALE) .
• * • / ^ 1 1 f•A •-' -MA /A •' if v\ /f 1 1 t 1 /1 1 A • 1* 1 /L Wl • fa 1 /!• 1 • 1 ' II
• I • 1/1 • 1 • / • IfI • \l / • II • V / •1 • \ / •I • '\ / '1 • »\ / •1 • • \ <«' •
I • • \ / 'I • • \ / ' .*A / *-' Vrv\/ \ < \ .V REAL INVENTORY/SALES RATIO, • * «
¥ MANUFACTURING AND TRADE(LEFT SCALE)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1ll II 1 1 1 1
A
—
•
1967=100160
- 155
— 150
- 145
— 140
,- 135
1301978 1979 1980 1981 1982
SOURCES. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND BOARD OF GOVERNORSOF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.
supplies and low feed prices in 1982 contributed to larger profit mar-gins for most livestock producers. Many crop farmers, on the otherhand, were hard hit by lower prices and increased production costs.Large domestic crops were only one of several factors contributing tolower prices. Livestock production declined, and domestic use offeedgrains and meals increased slowly. The value of agricultural ex-ports in fiscal 1982 fell about 11 percent, primarily because of lowerprices and reduced shipments of corn and grain sorghum. The weakexport market reflected the world recession, a strong dollar, and anincrease in world grain stocks. The U.S. share of world grain stocksis expected to continue its rapid growth of recent years and to reachover 50 percent in the 1982-83 crop year.
131
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Lower crop prices, high mortgage rates, and lower inflation werethe major factors leading to a decline in land values. Farm liabilitiescontinued to increase and farmers' debt-to-asset ratio is estimated tohave increased to about 20 percent, a significant rise from the 15 to17 percent range typical of the late 1960s and 1970s.
U.S. agricultural policies have once again become a major factor indetermining farm prices and incomes. Federal budget outlays forcommodity price support and related programs soared to $12 billionin fiscal 1982 from $4 billion in the previous fiscal year. A programof voluntary acreage controls, including payments to those who re-strict production in the 1983-84 crop year, was adopted in 1982 andsupplemented by the addition of the "payment-in-kind" option inearly 1983.
Food prices rose about 4 percent in 1982, with marketing costsrising at more than twice the rate of the farm value component offood prices.
FOREIGN TRADE
A reduction in U.S. trade was a key factor in the decline in aggre-gate demand in 1982. The main causes of the decline in net exportswere the strength of the dollar and the worldwide recession. In De-cember 1982 the trade-weighted value of the dollar was about 40percent above its low point in 1980. Because exchange-rate apprecia-tion lowers import prices and affects trade volume with a substantiallag, it initially tends to improve the trade balance. By the second halfof 1982, however, the reduced cost competitiveness of U.S. firmsbegan to overwhelm the short-term positive factors.
A secondary cause of the deteriorating trade balance was the inter-national debt problem. Some heavily indebted developing countries,especially in Latin America, experienced difficulty in attracting capitalinflows and were forced to cut imports sharply in 1982. Because sev-eral of the major high-debt developing countries have close tradingties with the United States, a large proportion of the import cutscame out of U.S. exports.
Cyclical factors had conflicting effects on the trade balance in1982. On one side, the recession in the United States tended toreduce import demand, so that import volume fell more than 4 per-cent. On the other side, the recession in other industrial countriescontributed to the 13 percent decline in real U.S. exports.
GOVERNMENT PURCHASES OF GOODS AND SERVICES
Real Federal, State, and local government purchases of goods andservices increased 2.6 percent from the fourth quarter of 1981 to thefourth quarter of 1982. Much of the increase was attributable to a 6.8
132
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
percent increase in real defense purchases. Federal nondefense pur-chases rose in real terms, due to a large increase in real purchases ofagricultural commodities by the Commodity Credit Corporation.State and local government purchases were virtually flat.
LABOR MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
Along with output, employment declined 1 percent in 1982, asshown in Table 6-3. At the end of the year, employment was 1.7million persons below the peak level reached in the second quarterof 1981. The reduction in employment predominantly occurredamong production workers and other blue-collar employees. Sales,clerical, and service workers' employment did not peak until Septem-ber 1982.
TABLE 6-3.—Labor market developments, 1978-82
[Fourth quarter of indicated year]
Component 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982
Percent change from year earlier1
Change in civilian employment....
Males 20 years and overFemales 20 years and over..Both sexes 16-19 years
WhiteBlack and other...
Unemployment rate3.
Males 20 years and overFemales 20 years and over..Both sexes 16-19 years
WhiteBlack and other..,
Participation rate4.....
Males 20 years and overFemales 20 years and over..Both sexes 16-19 years
WhiteBlack and other..
3.8
2.75.62.7
3.37.3
2.3
1.54.0
- . 8
2.23.3
- 0 . 2
- . 61.6
- 6 . 6
- . 1- . 6
0.6
.22.8
- 8 . 9
.6- . 1
- 1 . 0
- 1 . 5.7
- 8 . 0
- 1 . 2.4
Percent 2
5.9
4.15.8
16.4
5.111.5
63.5
79.850.158.2
63.662.4
5.9
4.45.7
16.3
5.211.2
63.8
79.651.057.9
64.062.3
7.4
6.26.7
18.3
6.513.7
63.7
79.251.556.3
64.061.8
8.3
7.17.2
21.2
7.315.3
63.8
78.852.354.6
64.261.4
10.7
10.09.0
24.3
9.518.6
64.1
78.852.954.1
64.562.0
11978 data adjusted to reflect changes in sample and estimation procedures, which increased employment and labor force by250,000 in January 1978.
2 Seasonally adjusted.3 Unemployed as percent of civilian labor force.
* Civilian labor force as percent of civilian noninstitutional population.
Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years and over.
Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Generally speaking, the older the age cohort, the lower the unem-ployment rate. For example, the unemployment rate for the 55 andover age group was 5.7 percent in the final quarter of 1982. Youngworkers experienced the highest unemployment rate. Employment ofthe 16 to 19 year age group has dropped in every year since 1979.This decline was far faster than the decline in the number of persons
133
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
in this age group. Women workers now have somewhat lower unem-ployment rates than men, a reversal of the historical relation.
The labor force participation rate—the ratio of the labor force tothe population over 16 years of age—has experienced a modestupward drift as women workers continue to join the labor force. Thegrowth in adult women's labor force participation has been strong inthe past. Declining participation has occurred among workers lessthan 20 years of age and among workers, especially males, over 55—who are likely to have an income cushion provided by social security,private pension plans, and savings.
WAGES, PRODUCTIVITY, AND PRICES
In response to slack labor markets and lower rates of price infla-tion, wage increases slowed substantially in 1982. As shown in Table6-4, the rate of increase in several measures of wages and compensa-tion declined about 2 percentage points from 1981. The 5.9 percentincrease in the hourly earnings index for private nonfarm workerswas the smallest since 1973. As measured by the employment costindex, wages and salaries of private industry workers increased 6.9percent between the third quarters of 1981 and 1982. The decelera-tion was about the same for union and nonunion workers. A surveyof major collective bargaining settlements reached in private industryshowed that in the first 9 months of 1982 the agreements providedwage adjustments that averaged 3.8 percent in the first contract year,exclusive of cost-of-living adjustments, compared with 8.3 percentwhen the same parties last bargained. Total labor compensation inthe nonfarm business sector increased 6.7 percent, compared with
TABLE 6-4.—Changes in wages and compensation, 1978-82
[Percent change, fourth quarter to fourth quarter and 5-year average]
Measure
8.4
7.7
8.07.6
9.0.0
1979
8.0
8.7
9.08.5
9.4- 2 . 9
1980
9.6
9.0
10.98.0
10.6- 1 . 7
1981
8.4
8.8
9.68.5
8.8
1982*
5.9
•6.9
5 7.46 6.6
6.62.0
5-yearaverage1*
8.2
8.1
8.87.8
9.C
Adjusted hourly earnings index3.
Employment cost index *
Union workersNonunion workers.
Nonfarm business sector:*
Compensation per hourReal compensation per hour..
'Preliminary.* Based on annual data.'Private nonfarm employees.4Wages and salaries, private nonfarm industry workers.•Third quarter 1981 to third quarter 1982.'All persons.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis), Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics), and
Council of Economic Advisers.
134
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8.8 percent in 1981. These declines in wage inflation provide a basisfor expecting that recent reductions in price inflation may be sus-tained.
Real compensation per hour rose 2.0 percent in 1982 as pay in-creased more rapidly than consumer prices. This was the first rise inthis series since early 1978 and suggests that the historic trend ofrising real wages and family incomes may resume.
Even though output declined for the third straight year, as shownin Table 6-5, labor productivity in the nonfarm business sector expe-rienced its first substantial improvement since 1977. Lower rates ofincrease in hourly compensation and higher productivity growth to-gether resulted in labor costs per unit of output increasing only 4.6percent. This was less than half the rate of increase recorded in1980, when labor productivity was weaker and hourly compensationrose at double-digit rates. The 4.6 percent increase in unit laborcosts was associated with a rise of 4.3 percent in the nonfarm busi-ness sector price deflator.
TABLE 6-5.—Productivity, costs, and prices in the nonfarm business sector, 1978-82
[Percent change, fourth quarter to fourth quarter and 5-year average]
Item 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 > 5-yearaverage 1 2
Output
Output per hour
Compensation per hour..
Unit tabor cost
Implicit price deflator
5.6
.3
9.0
8.6
8.2
0.2
- 1 . 9
9.4
11.6
8.5
- 0 . 6
.3
10.6
10.2
10.7
- 0 . 2
- . 1
8.8
8.9
9.6
- 1 . 7
1.9
6.6
4.6
4.3
1.2
.0
9.0
9.0
8.3
1 Preliminary.2 Based on annual data.Note.—Data relate to alt persons.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
By all other measures as well, the rate of inflation declined signifi-cantly in 1982, as shown in Table 6-6. After increasing at double-digit rates in 1980 and by nearly 9 percent in 1981, the broadestmeasures of inflation—the GNP fixed-weight price index and theGNP implicit price deflator—increased nearly 5 percent in 1982. Theall-urban consumer price index increased 4.5 percent, the slowestrate since 1972. Even when food and energy prices, which were espe-cially weak, are excluded, consumer prices increased about 5 percent.
Beginning in 1983, the homeownership component of the consum-er price index for all-urban consumers will be computed on a rentalequivalence basis. On this conceptual basis, consumer prices in-creased about 5 percent in 1982.
Producer prices of finished goods increased only 3.6 percent in1982, about the same as in 1972 and 1976. Price increases for bothconsumer finished goods and capital equipment showed a markeddeceleration.
135Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T A B L E 6 -6 .—/V i re changes, 1978-82
[Percent change, fourth quarter to fourth quarter and 5-year average]
Item 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982' 5-yearaverage l
GNP price measures:
Fixed-weighted index..Implicit deflator
Consumer prices:'
All itemsAll items less food and energy...
Producer prices—finished goods:
Total..Consumer goodsCapital equipment..
8.98.5
9.08.5
8.79.07.8
9.38.2
12.710.7
12.713.98.8
10.310.2
12.612.2
12.412.611.7
8.98.9
9.610.2
7.26.89.1
5.04.6
4.55.2
3.63.44.2
8.68.2
9.89.4
9.19.28.7
1 Preliminary.1 Based on annual data.8 All urban consumers.Source: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis) and Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics).
CREDIT MARKETS
During the first three quarters of 1982 the total amount of fundsraised in U.S. credit markets averaged slightly more, at an annualrate, than the volume raised in 1981. As shown in Table 6-7, overthe last 5 years the volume of funds raised by the nonfinancial sectorhas dropped from 18.6 percent to 13.6 percent of nominal GNP, areturn to the cyclical lows recorded in 1974 and 1975.
TABLE 6-7.—Funds raised by the nonfinancial sector of the economy, 1978-82
[Billions of dollars, except as noted]
Sector 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 •
Total funds raised
Households
Business........
Federal Government
State and local government...
Foreign
Funds raised as percent of GNP....
401.7
169.3
126.3
53.7
19.1
33.2
18.6
402.0
176.5
146.9
37.4
20.2
21.0
16.6
397.1
117.5
143.9
79.2
27.3
29.3
15.1
406.9
120.4
149.5
87.4
22,3
27.3
13.9
413.7
87.0
139.1
139.1
37.2
11.1
13.6
'Average of first three quarters at seasonally adjusted annual rate.Note.—Detail may not add to total due to rounding.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis) and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Different sectors of the credit market experienced widely differenttrends in 1982. High interest rates1 in the first half of the year andsluggish disposable income contributed to reduced borrowing for
136
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
housing. Borrowing by the nonfinancial business sector also declinedduring the first three quarters of 1982. However, the easing of creditconditions in late summer encouraged an expansion in net corporatebond issues; the funds raised were used in part to pay off short-termdebt.
Combined borrowing of State and local governments and the Fed-eral Government rose approximately 60 percent in the first threequarters of 1982 from 1981 levels, as the growth of tax receiptsslowed sharply relative to expenditures. For fiscal 1982, U.S. Treas-ury borrowing totaled $135.0 billion, of which $23.4 billion was usedfor making direct loans. Federally guaranteed loans declined sharplyfrom 1981 levels, but borrowing by federally sponsored enterprisessurged. Total Federal and federally assisted borrowing climbed to48.9 percent of the funds raised in U.S. credit markets, surpassingthe previous peacetime peak of 41 percent reached in 1976.
INTEREST RATES
As shown in Chart 6-1, interest rates rose in the first part of 1982but began to, decline sharply in the summer. The decline in interestrates partly reflected diminishing inflationary expectations that tendto be built into nominal interest rates.
The yield on 3-month Treasury bills, which had averaged justunder 11 percent late in 1981, held in the 12 to 13 percent rangeuntil mid-1982 and then fell to less than 8 percent in the closingmonths of the year. The prime rate charged by commercial banksbegan the year at 15% percent, climbed to 17 percent in February,and then in July began a steady fall to 11^ percent by December.The corporate Aaa bond rate, which peaked at 1534 percent in Febru-ary, fell below 12 percent by November.
The expected real after-tax interest rate is the correct measure ofthe cost of credit to borrowers and lenders. It is approximately equalto the after-tax nominal interest rate less the anticipated rate of infla-tion. For example, with a 12 percent nominal interest rate, the after-tax cost of credit to a borrower in the 30 percent marginal tax brack-et is 8.4 percent. If a 5 percent inflation rate is anticipated, the ex-pected real after-tax cost of credit is 3.2 percent.
Because the tax brackets of borrowers differ widely and the expect-ed rate of inflation cannot be observed directly, the realized realpretax interest rate—-approximated by the nominal interest rate lessthe actual rate of inflation—is a more convenient measure of the costof credit. The nominal 3-month Treasury bill rate and the corre-sponding realized real pretax rate are shown in Chart 6-5 for theperiod since 1955. The real pretax Treasury bill rate was abnormallylow in 1972-73 and 1976-77, tending to increase aggregate demand.
137
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
It then moved to relatively high levels from 1980 through the firsthalf of 1982, tending to reduce aggregate demand. By the end of1982, however, the real pretax Treasury bill rate had fallen to aboutthe same level as its highs in the 1950s and 1960s.
Chart 6-5
Nominal and Real 3-Month Treasury Bill Yield
PERCENT
15 -
10 ~
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980
'CONVERTED TO EFFECTIVE ANNUAL YIELD FROM DISCOUNT BASIS.
^EQUALS NOMINAL YIELD LESS ACTUAL RATE OF INFLATION, DEFINED BY PERSONALCONSUMPTION DEFLATOR, OVER THE PERIOD TO MATURITY. DEFLATOR FOR FIRSTQUARTER 1983 FORECAST BY COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS.
SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVESYSTEM, AND COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS.
The sharp run-up and subsequent decline in real pretax ratesduring the 1980-82 period probably reflect in part the adjustment ofcredit markets to the decontrol of interest rates. During the late1970s variable interest rate time and savings accounts were intro-duced by depository institutions, and the process of financial innova-tion speeded up the movement of funds out of regulated, fixed-rateaccounts. In addition, the consumer has recently become a more vig-
138
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
orous competitor for credit as usury laws have been eliminated. As aresult, the financial system now relies less on nonprice rationing ofcredit and may exhibit higher interest rates when credit is tight.
Even though real short-term rates have returned more nearly tothe levels of the 1950s and 1960s, the equilibrium level of both long-and short-term rates may now be somewhat higher than before. Tothe extent that the accelerated cost recovery system in the EconomicRecovery Tax Act of 1981 reduced the tax on earnings of deprecia-ble property, it raised the real interest rate that business borrowersare willing to pay. In addition, large budget deficits in many coun-tries have lowered national saving rates, tending to lead to higherreal interest rates worldwide.
At the end of-1982, long-term interest rates were considerablyhigher than short-term interest rates, perhaps reflecting the concernthat-the inflation rate may be higher in the future than at present. Tothe extent that these inflationary expectations decline, further de-clines in nominal long-term interest rates can be anticipated.
MONETARY DEVELOPMENTS
The Administration's economic program includes support for apolicy of gradual reduction in the rate of monetary growth in orderto bring down inflation. Consistent with this policy, the Federal Re-serve reduced the Ml target growth rate range from 3.5 to 6 percentin 1981 to 2.5 to 5.5 percent in 1982. The target range for M2growth was kept at 6 to 9 percent.
In its February 1982 review of the tentative target ranges for 1982,established in July 1981, the Federal Open Market Committee recog-nized that the rapid increase of Ml in December 1981 and January1982 had already placed it well above the top of its target range.
Judging that the rapid money growth was temporary and that nobasic change in the relation between the monetary aggregates andnominal GNP had occurred, the committee reaffirmed the tentativetargets for 1982.
Consequently, the Federal Reserve slowed the growth of nonbor-rowed reserves during the first half of the year, with a view to gradu-ally bringing Ml and M2 back into their target ranges. By June, Mlwas within its target range, while M2 remained somewhat above thetop of its range. Because Ml had shown virtually no growth sinceJanuary, resumption of growth implied a step-up in the provision ofbank reserves. After midyear, continued weakness in the economy,and a more ample supply of reserves and money contributed to asharp drop in short-term interest rates. The 3-month Treasury billrate fell from about 12 percent in July to 9 percent in August. Aseries of reductions in the Federal Reserve's discount rate followed,
139
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
maintaining its alignment with short-term market rates and prevent-ing sharp changes in the incentive for banks to borrow from the Fed-eral Reserve.
Starting in August, Ml growth began to speed up. By the fourthquarter of 1982, Ml had risen 8.5 percent above its level in thefourth quarter of 1981, well above the upper end of the 1982 targetrange. Over the same period, M2 increased 9.8 percent, slightly morethan the top of its target range. These increases in the monetary ag-gregates occurred against the background of an economy that wasstill in recession.
Part of the strength in Ml may be attributable to the effects of alarge volume of All-Savers Certificates maturing in the fourth quarterof 1982, as the maturing funds moved through checking accounts orwere temporarily "parked" there. Federal Reserve analysis suggestedthat an additional factor was an unusual demand for liquidity. Muchof the increase in Ml was in interest-bearing negotiable order ofwithdrawal (NOW) accounts, which provide elements of both savingsand transactions accounts. From the fourth quarter of 1981 to thefourth quarter of 1982, checkable deposits other than demand depos-its grew about 35 percent. With market interest rates falling, theseinterest-bearing deposits, such as NOW accounts, provided a safeand convenient store of liquidity at a time of economic and financialuncertainty. Increased liquidity demand may also account for theabove-target growth of M2.
As discussed in Chapter 1, the behavior of the "income velocity"measures—the ratios of GNP to the various monetary aggregates—was unusual in 1982. The velocity of Ml rose 3.2 percent a year onaverage over the 20 years ending in 1981, but in 1982 it declined 4.9percent. While a tendency toward slower velocity is not unusual inthe midst of a recession when interest rates generally are falling, theonly other fourth quarter to fourth quarter decline in Ml velocitysince the beginning of the current series in 1959 was a 0.1 percentfall in 1967. The velocity of M2, which historically has been relativelytrendless, declined 6.0 percent in 1982; the largest previous declinewas 3.8 percent in 1976. Without some accommodation of monetarygrowth—particularly for M1 —to this drop in velocity, monetarypolicy would have been more restrictive than had been"intendedwhen the 1982 targets were established.
The number, size, and rapidity of recent changes in the financialsector may well have affected the behavior of velocity. As indicated inTable 6-8, checkable deposits other than ordinary demand depositsaccounted for only 2.3 percent of Ml in December 1978. In Decem-ber 1980, just before NOW accounts were authorized nationally,other checkable deposits were 6.5 percent of Ml, but by December
140
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1982 their share had risen to over 21 percent. Because these interest-bearing deposits may be regarded by their holders in part as savingsrather than solely as transactions balances, the reported growth ofMl in 1981 and 1982 probably overstates the growth in transactionsbalances.
TABLE 6-8.—Components of Ml and M2, 1978-82[Averages of daily figures; billions of dollars; seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Item
Currency
Plus* Demand deposits%
Other checkable deposits
Equals- Ml
Plus* Savings deposits3
Small time deposits
Overnight repurchase agreements (RPs) and overnight Eurodollars *...
Money market mutual fund balances (excluding institution ac-counts) *
Equals- M2 9
December
1978
97 4
257 4
84
363 2
479 9
533 9
24.0
71
1,403.9
1979
1061
265 9
16 9
389 0
4217
652 6
26.3
34 4
1,518.9
1980
1161
2714
26 9
414 5
398.9
751.7
35.0
61.9
1,656.2
1981
1231
240 7
77 0
440 9
343 6
854 7
38.1
1512
1,822.7
1982 »
132 6
244 6
1013
478 5
400 3
904 2
45.6
177 5
1,999.1
1 Preliminary.includes travelers checks.'Includes Money Market Deposit Account introduced December 14, 1982.4 Not seasonally adjusted.BM2 will differ from the sum of components by a consolidation adjustment that represents the estimated amount of demand
deposits and vault cash held by thrift institutions to service time and savings deposits.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
In general, the demand for any particular monetary aggregate—and hence its income velocity—depends in part on the difference be-tween market rates of interest and the rates earned on the deposits inthat aggregate. Consequently, the increased portion of Ml depositsthat pay interest and the decline in market interest rates have com-bined to lower Ml velocity.
The rapid growth of general purpose and broker/dealer moneymarket mutual fund balances, which are included in M2 but not inMl, has tended to raise Ml velocity and to lower M2 velocity. FromDecember 1980 to December 1982 these money market mutual fundbalances grew from $61.9 billion to $177.5 billion, which exceededthe growth in other checkable deposits by $41.2 billion. Althoughmost money market mutual fund balances are subject to transfer bycheck, the average turnover of these accounts has been relatively low.
Interpretation of the macroeconomic significance of changes in themonetary aggregates became more difficult in late 1982 when theDepository Institutions Deregulation Committee authorized two newaccounts. In mid-December, banks and thrift institutions introduced aMoney Market Deposit Account with limited transactions capabilitiesand no interest rate ceiling. Within about 2 weeks, these accounts
141
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
had attracted an astonishing $87 billion. The Depository InstitutionsDeregulation Committee also authorized a new super NOW accounteffective January 1983, with no transactions limitations and no inter-est rate ceilings, having the same $2,500 minimum balance as theMoney Market Deposit Account.
Financial deregulation and innovation favorably affect the efficien-cy of the U.S. financial system but also complicate the implementa-tion of monetary policy. Large asset reallocations caused by changesin the financial and regulatory system can have large and unpredict-able effects on Ml and M2 and on their relations to nominal GNP. Inlight of the particular difficulties with regard to Ml, the FederalOpen Market Committee has voted to place greater emphasis on M2and M3 for an indefinite period. However, the broad framework oftargeting the monetary aggregates has been retained, as have the re-serve operating procedures, for implementing it.
PROSPECTS FOR 1983
Assuming that the Administration's 1984 budget proposals are en-acted and that the monetary aggregates grow within the Federal Re-serve's target ranges, the prospects for a moderate, sustainable eco-nomic recovery beginning early in 1983 are good (Table 6-9). As wastrue in the early stages of previous recoveries, the unemploymentrate is likely to stabilize for several months before a downward trendbecomes evident. A pattern of reduced inflation in 1982 is expectedto continue in 1983. The sharp rise in the Federal budget deficit re-flects reduced receipts because of lower inflation, as well as the ef-fects of the 1981-82 recession.
The expectation of economic recovery is based on the view thatcontinuing strength in household and defense spending will bring aturnaround in the inventory cycle. Cuts in production and increasesin sales brought business inventories more in line with sales by theend of 1982. Future sales gains are thus likely to be met by increasesin production, income, and employment, enhancing sales further.Once even a moderate but sustained increase in sales is underway,this sequence of events may lead to a temporary surge of above-aver-age economic growth.
Increases in sales will come primarily from households whoseincome will be bolstered by the third stage of the personal incometax cut, whose debt burden has declined sharply relative to incomeand assets, and whose financial assets, in many cases, appreciated inrallies in the stock and bond markets. With continued moderate in-creases in food and oil prices, more income will become available forother consumer purchases. Because outlays on durable consumer
142
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE 6-9.—Economic outlook for 1983
Item 1982 *21
-1.2
2.S-8.44.56.6
.1
4.6
6.6
1.9
10.7
n
1983forecast
3.1
2.7
27*i1.2
- 2 . 0
5.6
6.0
2.2
10.4
1.5
Percent change (fourth quarter to fourth quarter):
Real gross national product
Personal consumption expenditures.,Nonresidential fixed investmentResidential investmentFederal purchasesState and local purchases
6NP implicit price deflator
Compensation per hour2
Output per hour2
Level in fourth quarter:3
Unemployment rate (percent) *
Housing starts (millions of units, annual rate)....
Preliminary.2Nonfarm business, all persons.3Seasonally adjusted.4Actual rate for 1982 is percent of civilian labor force; forecast rate for 1983 is percent of total labor force including persons
in the Armed Forces stationed in the United States.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census), Department of Labor (Bureau of
Labor Statistics), and Council of Economic Advisers.
goods and houses have been depressed for the last 4 years, consum-ers are expected to devote increases in their income, and perhapssome of the recent gains in their financial wealth, to replenishingtheir holdings of durable goods. The sharp easing of credit termsand lower house price increases have already encouraged morehouseholds to consider buying houses. This uptrend is expected tointensify in 1983. New house purchases are invariably followed by apickup in expenditures for furniture, appliances, and other housing-related goods.
The pace of the recovery in 1983 will probably be moderate by his-torical standards. Low capacity utilization rates and the need to re-build corporate liquidity will restrain capital spending. The world-wide recession and the lagged effect of the appreciation of the dollarwill curtail the growth of exports. Continued reductions in the non-defense public sector will limit it as a source of increased aggregatedemand.
PROSPECTS AND POLICIES BEYOND 1983
Economic prospects for the rest of the 1980s depend greatly onthe economic policies that are followed. The Administration believesthat the four-point program it has pursued—reducing the growth ofFederal outlays, taxes, regulation, and the money supply—constitutesthe best approach for attaining and maintaining the economic goalsset forth in the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978.
143
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act calls for annualnumerical goals for several key economic indicators over a 5-yearperiod. The projections provided in Table 6-10 show gradual, steadyprogress toward our economic goals. These figures illustrate the Ad-ministration's belief, explained in Chapter 1, that policies based onconsistent, long-term objectives can simultaneously achieve full em-ployment, price stability, and sustained growth in real income. Amajor cause of our present economic ills was the inclination in thepast to pursue one economic goal single-mindedly, without adequateattention to the longer run consequences for other economic objec-tives. This Administration remains determined to avoid the errors ofpast policies.
TABLE 6-10.—Projections of economic goals, 1983-88
[Calendar years, except as noted]
Item 1983 1984 1985 1986 19871988
Level
Employment (millions)1
"Jnemployment rate (percent) a.:ederal budget outlays as percent of GNP (fiscal year basis).
101.5
10.7
25.2
104.2
9.9
24.3
107.0
8.9
24.1
109.6
8.1
23.9
112.3
7.3
23.5
Percent change
Consumer prices3
Real GNP
Real compensation per hour *
Output per hour *
4.9
1.4
1.2
2.1
4.6
3.9
.8
1.9
4.6
4.0
1.1
1.6
4.6
4.0
1.4
1.7
4.5
4.0
1.6
1.6
114.9
6.5
23.0
4.4
4.0
1.6
1.7
1 Labor force series includes persons in the Armed Forces stationed in the United States.3 Unemployed as percent of total labor force. See footnote 1.3Wage earners and clerical workers.•Nonfarm business, all persons.Source: Council of Economic Advisers.
A major prerequisite for achieving our economic goals is control ofinflation. Marked progress toward this end has been made in the last2 years. With continued moderate growth in the monetary aggre-gates, increased reliance on the private sector, and increased domes-tic and international economic competition, the prospects for sustain-ing and extending the progress against inflation are now quite favor-able.
An important factor in achieving and sustaining high real economicgrowth is a high level of capital formation. Chapter 4 of this volume,which fulfills the legislative requirement for an annual InvestmentPolicy Report, explains that lower inflation and the recently enactedtax incentives for saving and investment are the important first stepsin fostering capital accumulation. Controlling the Federal deficit isnow the single most important method of encouraging more capitalformation.
144
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
A critical element in achieving healthy economic growth is maintaininga liberal worldwide trading system. As explained in detail in Chapter 3,the world's economies are now more integrated than ever before. Thissystem has recently experienced severe strains. It is of utmost importancethat these challenges be met in a manner consistent with an open,growing, balanced network of international trade.
Just as an open worldwide trading system is crucial for the freeworld economies, a competitive free market system unfettered by un-necessary government regulation is essential for a strong domesticeconomy. As Chapter 5 points out, substantial progress toward re-duction of traditional price and entry regulation has been made inrecent years, but further opportunities for deregulation exist.
The year 1983 is expected to be the first of many years of sus-tained economic growth. Continued economic growth is the only wayto sustain progress in reducing unemployment. But macroeconomicpolicies alone cannot reduce structural unemployment and achieve anacceptable level of employment. Chapter 2 describes some of themacroeconomic policies that, along with a sustained recovery, arenecessary to achieve noninflationary full employment. These policies aredesigned". . . to foster and promote free competitive enterprise . . ."as mandated in the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act.
One major remaining threat to a sustainable, balanced recovery isthe danger that large Federal budget deficits would preclude the con-tinuing declines in real interest rates that are necessary for healthygrowth in all sectors of the economy. The Administration's 1984budget provides a plan which can lead to a steady decline in budgetdeficits and thus, ultimately, to a balanced Federal budget.
145
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Appendix A
REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON THE ACTIVITIES
OF THE
COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS DURING 1982
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS,
Washington, D.C., December 31, 1982.MR. PRESIDENT:
The Council of Economic Advisers submits this report on its activi-ties during the calendar year 1982 in accordance with the require-ments of the Congress, as set forth in section 10(d) of the Employ-ment Act of 1946 as amended by the Full Employment and BalancedGrowth Act of 1978.
Sincerely,MARTIN FELDSTEIN, Chairman
WILLIAM A. NISKANEN
WILLIAM POOLE
149
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Council Members and their dates of service are listed below:
Name
Edwin 6. NourseLeon H. Keyserling
John D. Clark
Roy BloughRobert C TurnerArthur F. BurnsNeilH. JacobyWalter W. StewartRaymond J. Saulnier
Joseph S. DavisPaul W McCrackenKarl BrandtHenry C. WallichWalter W. HellerJames TobinKermit GordonGardner Ackley
John P. LewisOtto EcksteinArthur M Okun
James S. DuesenberryMerton J. PeckWarren L SmithPaul W. McCrackenHendrikS. HouthakkerHerbert Stein
Ezra SolomonMarina v.N. WhitmanGary L SeeversWilliam J FellnerAlan GreenspanPaul W. MacAvoyBurton G MalkielCharles L. SchultzeWilliam D. NordhausLyle E GramleyGeorge C. EadsStephen M. GoldfeldMurray L WeidenbaumJerry L. JordanWilliam A. NiskanenMartin FeldsteinWilliam Poole
Position
ChairmanVice ChairmanActing ChairmanChairmanMemberVice ChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMember .MemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMember . .ChairmanMemberMemberMemberMemberChairmanMemberMemberChairmanMember
Oath of office date
August 9 ,1946August 9, 1946November 2. 1949May 10, 1950August 9. 1946May 10,1950June 29, 1950September8, 1952March 19, 1953September 15,1953December 2,1953April 4, 1955December 3,1956May 2,1955December 3,1956November 1, 1958May 7, 1959January 29, 1961January 29, 1961January 29, 1961August 3, 1962November 16, 1964May 17, 1963September 2, 1964November 16, 1964February 15, 1968February 2 ,1966February 15, 1968July 1, 1968February 4 ,1969February 4 ,1969February 4, 1969January 1,1972September 9, 1971March 13,1972July 23, 1973October 31, 1973September 4, 1974June 13, 1975July 22, 1975January 22, 1977March 18, 1977March 18,1977June 6, 1979August 20, 1980February 27, 1981July 14,1981June 12, 1981October 14, 1982December 10, 1982
Separation date
November 1, 1949.
January 20, 1953.
February 11,1953.August 20, 1952.January 20,1953.December 1,1956.February 9, 1955.April 29, 1955.
January 20 ,1961.October 31, 1958.January 31,1959.January 20 ,1961.January 20,1961.November 15, 1964.July 31, 1962.December 27,1962.
February 15, 1968.August 31, 1964.February 1,1966.
January 20. 1969.June 30, 1968.January 20, 1969.January 20, 1969.December 31, 1971.July 15, 1971.
August 31, 1974.March 26,1973.August 15, 1973.April 15, 1975.February 25,1975.January 20,1977.November 15,1976.January 20, 1977.January 20, 1981.February 4, 1979.May 27, 1980.January 20 ,1981.January 20 ,1981 .August 25, 1982.July 31, 1982.
150
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Report to the President on the Activities of theCouncil of Economic Advisers during 1982
The Employment Act of 1946 (P.L. 304-79th Congress), as amend-ed, provides the statutory base for the activities of the Council ofEconomic Advisers. The Council, through the Chairman, providesadvice to the President on a wide range of domestic and internationaleconomic policy issues.
Martin Feldstein became Chairman on October 14, 1982, succeed-ing Murray L. Weidenbaum, who returned to Washington University(St. Louis). The Chairman is on leave from Harvard University,where he is a Professor of Economics. On July 31, 1982, Jerry L.Jordan resigned to return to the University of New Mexico, where heis a Professor of Economics at the Anderson Schools of Management.On December 10, 1982, William Poole became a Member of theCouncil. Mr. Poole is on leave from Brown University where he is aProfessor of Economics. William A. Niskanen continued to serve as aMember.
MACROECONOMIC POLICIES
As is its tradition, during 1982 the Council devoted much of itstime to assisting the President in the formulation of broad economicpolicy objectives and the programs to carry them out. The develop-ment of economic assumptions and monitoring of current develop-ments, under Council Member Jordan and subsequently CouncilMember Poole, were an area of major interest. Monetary policy de-velopments received especially close attention.
Council Member Jordan and later Council Member Poole chairedthe interagency subcabinet "Troika" forecasting group, consisting ofrepresentatives from the Department of the Treasury and the Officeof Management and Budget, with participation by the Department ofCommerce. The Chairman of the Council continued his responsibili-ty for presenting to the President the economic assumptions devel-oped with the Office of Management and Budget and the Depart-ment of the Treasury.
Council Members chaired or participated in numerous CabinetCouncil working groups dealing with such issues as economic statis-tics, Federal credit programs, alternatives to Federal regulation, andFederal housing programs.
151
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The Chairman actively participated during the early months of theyear, and then during the late fall budget cycle, in Cabinet level reviewsof agency budget requests and appeals.
MICROECONOMIC POLICIES
A wide variety of microeconomic issues received Council attentionduring the year. Council Member Niskanen chaired Cabinet Councilworking groups dealing with employee pension legislation and alter-natives to Federal regulation. Trade issues were an area of continu-ing attention.
The Council assisted in the preparation of agency guidelines forimplementing Executive Order 12291 dealing with Executive Officereview of agency regulatory proposals, and worked closely with theOffice of Management and Budget on selected regulatory issues.
PUBLIC INFORMATION
The Council's Annual Report is the principal medium through whichthe Council informs the public of its work and its views. It is also animportant vehicle for presenting and explaining the Administration'sdomestic and international economic policies. Distribution of theReport in recent years has averaged about 50,000 copies. The Councilalso assumes primary responsibility for the monthly Economic Indica-tors, a publication prepared by the Council's Statistical Office, underthe supervision of Catherine H. Furlong. The Joint Economic Com-mittee issues the Indicators, which has a distribution of approximately10,000 copies. Information is also provided to members of the publicthrough speeches and other public appearances by the Chairman,Members, and staff economists of the Council.
ORGANIZATION AND STAFF OF THE COUNCIL
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN
The Chairman is responsible for communicating the Council'sviews to the President. This function is carried out through directconsultation with the President and through written memoranda andreports on economic developments and on particular programs andproposals. The Chairman exercises ultimate responsibility for direct-ing the work of the professional staff. He represents the Council atmeetings of the full Cabinet and the various Cabinet Councils, andthe Trade Policy Committee.
COUNCIL MEMBERS
The two Council Members are responsible for all subject mattercovered by the Council, including direct supervision of the work ofthe professional staff. Members represent the Council at a wide vari-
152
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ety of interagency and international meetings and assume major re-sponsibility for selecting issues for Council attention.
In practice, the small size of the Council permits the Chairman andCouncil Members to work as a team in most circumstances. Therewas, however, an informal division of subject matter among them in1982. Mr. Jordan and subsequently Mr. Poole, assumed primary re-sponsibility for domestic and international macroeconomic analysis,economic projections, and monetary and financial issues. Mr. Nis-kanen is primarily responsible for microeconomic and sectoral analy-sis, international trade questions, and regulatory issues.
PROFESSIONAL STAFF
At the end of 1982 the professional staff consisted of the SpecialAssistant to the Chairman, who also acts as staff director, the SeniorStatistician, a domestic policy economist, an international policyeconomist, 12 senior staff economists, 3 staff economists, and 6junior staff economists.
The professional staff and their special fields at the end of 1982were:Eric I. Hemel Special Assistant to the ChairmanLawrence H. Summers Domestic Policy EconomistPaul R. Krugman , International Policy Economist
Senior Staff Economists
Lincoln F. Anderson Economic ForecastingGeoffrey O. Carliner International TradeDaniel J. Frisch Taxation and Social Insurance ProgramsDavid R. Henderson Health Policy and Social Insurance ProgramsThomas J. Kniesner Labor and Employment PolicyEvan R. Kwerel Regulatory Policies and Natural ResourcesThomas S. McCaleb Taxation and Public FinanceStephen K. McNees Macroeconomic PolicyGlenn L. Nelson Agricultural PolicyAdrian W. Throop Monetary Policy and Financial RegulationRobert S- Villanueva Current Economic Conditions, Housing, and
Economic ForecastingBenjamin Zycher Energy Policy and Regulation
Statistician
Catherine H. Furlong Senior Statistician
Staff Economists
Lawrence B. Lindsey Taxation and Public FinanceN. Gregory Mankiw Macroeconomic Policy and Public FinanceRobert H. Meyer Labor and Employment Policy
153
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Junior Staff Economists
Christopher B. Ballinger World Trade and International FinanceJohn H. Cochrane Macroeconomic Analysis and ForecastingJohn S. Earle Public Finance and Labor PolicyThomas W. Gilligan Transportation and Regulatory PolicyDavid S. Reitman Social Insurance Programs and General
Budget PolicyDan C. Roberts Financial Institutions and Macroeconomic
Policy
Catherine H. Furlong, Senior Statistician, continued to be incharge of the Council's Statistical Office. Mrs. Furlong has primaryresponsibility for managing the Council's statistical informationsystem. She supervises the publication of Economic Indicators and thepreparation of all statistical matter in the Economic Report. She alsooversees the verification of statistics in memoranda, testimony, andspeeches. Natalie V. Rentfro, Linda A. Reilly, and Barbara L. Sibelassist Mrs. Furlong.
Serving as consultants during the year were Stephen H. Brooks(consultant), Jose A. Gomez-Ibanez (Harvard University), and RobertA. Leone (Harvard University).
In preparing the Economic Report the Council relied upon the edi-torial services of John Phillip Sawicki.
SUPPORTING STAFF
The Administrative Office of the Council of Economic Advisersprovides general support for the Council's activities. Serving in theAdministrative Office were Elizabeth A. Kaminski, Staff Assistant tothe Council, and Catherine Fibich, Administrative Assistant.
Members of the secretarial staff for the Chairman and CouncilMembers during 1982 were Patricia A. Lee, Susan A. Lindsey, Geor-gia A. O'Connor, and Alice H. Williams. Secretaries for the profes-sional staff were Carolyn L. Bazarnick, Bessie M. Lafakis, RosemaryM. Rogers, Margaret L. Snyder, and Lillie M. Sturniolo.
DEPARTURES
The Council's professional staff are in most cases on leave of ab-sence from universities, other government agencies, or research insti-tutions. Their tenure with the Council is usually limited to 1 or 2years. Senior staff economists who resigned during the year and theirsubsequent affiliations were James B. Burnham (The World Bank),William D. Dobson (Purdue University), Michele U. Fratianni (Indi-ana University), Steven H. Hanke (Johns Hopkins University), Laur-
154
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ence J. Kotlikoff (Yale University), Michael J. McKee (Department ofthe Treasury), David C. Munro (General Motors), Susan C. Nelson(Department of the Treasury), Allen M. Parkman (University of NewMexico), Paul H. Rubin (Baruch College), and Elinor Y. Sachse (con-sultant).
Junior economists who resigned in 1982 were Robert G. Murphy(Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Chris P. Varvares (Washing-ton University, St. Louis), and F. Katharine Warne (Yale University).
155Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Appendix B
STATISTICAL TABLES RELATING TO INCOME,EMPLOYMENT, AND PRODUCTION
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
C O N T E N T S
NATIONAL INCOME OR EXPENDITURE:Page
B-l. Gross national product, 1929-82 163B-2. Gross national product in 1972 dollars, 1929-82 164B-3. Implicit price deflators for gross national product, 1929-82 166B-4. Fixed-weighted price indexes for gross national product, 1972
weights, 1959-82 168B-5. Changes in gross national product and GNP price measures, 1929-
82 169B-6. Gross national product by major type of product, 1929-82 170B-7. Gross national product by major type of product in 1972 dollars,
1929-82 171B-8. Gross national product by sector, 1929-82 172B-9. Gross national product by sector in 1972 dollars, 1929-82 173B-10. Gross national product by industry, 1947-81 174B-l 1. Gross national product by industry in 1972 dollars, 1947-81 175B-12. Gross domestic product of nonfinancial corporate business, 1929-
82 176B-l3. Output, costs, and profits of nonfinancial corporate business,
1948-82 177B-14. Personal consumption expenditures, 1929-82 178B-15. Gross private domestic investment, 1929-82 180B-I6. Gross and net private domestic investment, 1929-82 181B-17. Inventories and final sales of business, 1946-82 182B-18. Inventories and final sales of business in 1972 dollars, 1947-82 183B-l9. Relation of gross national product, net national product, and na-
tional income, 1929-82 184B-20. Relation of national income and personal income, 1929-82 185B-21. National income by type of income, 1929-82 186B-22. Sources of personal income, 1929-82 188B-23. Disposition of personal income, 1929-82 190B-24. Total and per capita disposable personal income and personal con-
sumption expenditures in current and 1972 dollars, 1929-82 191B-25. Gross saving and investment, 1929-82 192B-26. Saving by individuals, 1946-82 193B-27. Number and median income (in 1981 dollars) of families and per-
sons, and poverty status, by race, selected years, 1947-81 194
POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, WAGES, AND PRODUCTIVITY:B-28. Population by age groups, 1929-82 195B-29. Noninstitutional population and the labor force, 1929-82 196B-30. Civilian employment and unemployment by sex and age, 1947-82.. 198B-31. Selected employment and unemployment data, 1948-82 199B-32. Civilian labor force participation rate by demographic characteris-
tic, 1954-82 200
159
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
B-S3. Civilian unemployment rate by demographic characteristic,1948-82 201
B-34. Unemployment by duration, 1947-82 202B-35. Unemployment by reason, 1967-82 203B-36. Unemployment insurance programs, selected data, 1946-82 204B-37. Wage and salary workers in nonagricultural establishment, 1929-
82 205B-38. Average weekly hours and hourly earnings in selected private non-
agricultural industries, 1947-82 206B-39. Average weekly earnings in selected private nonagricultural indus-
tries, 1947-82 207B-40. Productivity and related data, business sector, 1947-82 208B-41. Changes in productivity and related data, business sector, 1948-82. 209
PRODUCTION AND BUSINESS ACTIVITY:B-42. Industrial production indexes, major industry divisions, 1929-82.... 210B-43. Industrial production indexes market groupings 1947-82 211B-44. Industrial production indexes, selected manufactures, 1947-82 212B-45. Capacity utilization rate in manufacturing, 1948-82 213B-46. New construction activity, 1929-82 214B-47. New housing units started and authorized 1959-82 216B-48. Nonfarm business expenditures for new plant and equipment
1947-83 217B-49. Sales and inventories in manufacturing and trade, 1947-82 218B-50. Manufacturers' shipments and inventories, 1947-82 219B-51. Manufacturers' new and unfilled orders, 1947-82 220
PRICES:B-52. Consumer price indexes, major expenditure classes, 1929-82 221B-53. Consumer price indexes, selected expenditure classes, 1939-82 222B-54. Consumer price indexes, commodities, services, and special
groups, 1939-82.. 224B-55. Changes in consumer price indexes, commodities and services,
1948-82 225B-56. Changes in special consumer price indexes, 1958-82 226B-57. Producer price indexes by stage of processing, 1947-82 227B-58. Producer price indexes by stage of processing, special groups,
1974-82 229B-59. Producer price indexes by major commodity groups, 1940-82 230B-60. Changes in producer price indexes for finished goods, 1950-82 232
MONEY STOCK, CREDIT, AND FINANCE:B-61. Money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-82 233B-62. Components of money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-82... 234B-63. Commercial bank loans and investments, 1939-82 235B-64. Total funds raised in credit markets by nonfinancial sectors, 1974-
82 236B-65. Federal Reserve Bank credit and member bank reserves, 1929-82... 238B-66. Aggregate reserves of depository institutions and monetary base,
1959-82 239B-67. Bond yields and interest rates, 1929-82 240B-68. Consumer credit outstanding and net change, 1950-82 242B-69. Consumer installment credit extended and liquidated, 1950-82 243
160
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
B-70. Mortgage debt outstanding by type of property and of financing,1939-82 244
B-71. Mortgage debt outstanding by holder, 1939-82 245
GOVERNMENT FINANCE:B-72. Federal budget receipts, outlays, and debt, fiscal years 1973-84 246B-73. Federal budget receipts and outlays, off-budget outlays, and debt,
fiscal years 1929-84 248B-74. Relation of Federal Government receipts and expenditures in the
national income and product accounts to the unified budget,fiscal years 1982-84 249
B-75. Government receipts and expenditures, national income and prod-uct accounts, 1929-82 250
B-76. Federal Government receipts and expenditures, national incomeand product accounts, 1958-84 251
B-77. State and local government receipts and expenditures, nationalincome and product accounts, 1946-82 252
B-78. State and local government revenues and expenditures, selectedfiscal years, 1927-81 253
B-79. Interest-bearing public debt securities by kind of obligation, 1967-82 254
B-80. Estimated ownership of public debt securities, 1967-82 255B-81. Maturity distribution average length and of marketable interest-
bearing public debt securities held by private investors, 1967-82, 256
CORPORATE PROFITS AND FINANCE:B-82. Corporate profits with inventory valuation and capital consumption
adjustments, 1929-82 257B-83. Corporate profits by industry, 1929-82 258B-84. Corporate profits of manufacturing industries, 1929-82 259B-85. Sales, profits, and stockholders' equity, all manufacturing corpora-
tions, 1950-82 260B-86. Relation of profits after taxes to stockholders' equity and to sales,
all manufacturing corporations, 1947-82 261B-87. Relation of profits after taxes to stockholders' equity and to sales,
all manufacturing corporations, by industry group, 1981-82 262B-88. Determinants of business fixed investment, 1955-82 263B-89. Sources and uses of funds, nonfarm nonfinancial corporate busi-
ness, 1946-82 264B-90. Current assets and liabilities of U.S. corporations, 1939-82 265B-91. State and municipal and corporate securities offered, 1934-82 266B-92. Common stock prices and yields, 1949-82 267B-93. Business formation and business failures, 1929-82 268
AGRICULTURE:B-94. Farm income, 1929-82 269B-95. Farm output and productivity indexes, 1929-82 270B-96. Farm input use, selected inputs, 1929-82 271B-97. Indexes of prices received and prices paid by farmers, 1940-82 272B-98. U.S. exports and imports of agricultural commodities, 1940-82 273B-99. Balance sheet of the farming sector, 1929-83 274
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICS:B-100. Exchange rates, 1967-82 275B-101. U.S. international transactions, 1946-82 276
161
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
B-102. U.S. merchandise exports and imports by principal end-use catego-ry, 1965-82 278
B-103. U.S. merchandise exports and imports by area, 1973-82 279B-104. U.S. merchandise exports and imports by commodity groups, 1960-
82 280B-105. International investment position of the United States at year-end,
selected years, 1970-81 281B-106. World trade: Exports and imports, 1965, 1970, 1975, and 1979-82 282B-107. World trade balance and current account balances, 1965, 1970,
1975, and 1979-82 283B-108. International reserves, selected years, 1952-82 284B-109. Growth rates in real gross national product, 1960-82 285B-110. Industrial production and consumer prices, major industrial coun-
tries, 1960-82 286B— 111. Unemployment rate, and hourly compensation, major industrial
countries, 1960-82 287
General Notes
Detail in these tables may not add to totals because of rounding.Unless otherwise noted, all dollar figures are in current dollars.Symbols used:
p Preliminary,Not available (also, not applicable).
162
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
NATIONAL INCOME OR EXPENDITURE
TABLE B-l.—Gross national product, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarterGross
nationalproduct
Per-sonalcon-
sump-tion
expend-itures
Grossprivate
do-mesticinvest-ment
Netexports
Net exports of goodsand services
Exports Imports
Government purchases of goods andservices
Total
Federal
TotalNa-
tional de-fense
Non-de-
fense
Stateandlocal
Finalsales
Percent changefrom preceding
period l
Grossnation-
alprod-uct
Finalsales
1929....
1933....
1939....
1940....1941....1942....1943....1944....1945....1946....1947....1948....1949....
1950....1951....1952....1953....1954....1955....1956....1957....1958....1959....
I960....19611962....1963....1964....1965....1966....196719681969
19701971....197219731974....1975....19761977....19781979
198019811982"..
1980:III.IllIV
1981:
III"111IV
1982:IIIIllIV...
103.4
55.8
90.9
100.0125.0158.5192.1210.6212.4209.8233.1259.5258.3
286.5330.8348.0366.8366.8400.0421.7444.0449.7487.9
506.5524.6565.0596.7637.7691.1756.0799.6873.4944.0
992.71,077.61,185.91,326.41,434.21,549.21,718.01,918.32,163.92,417.8
2,633.12,937.73,057.5
2,575.92,573.42,643.72,739.4
2,864.92,901.82,980.93,003.2
2,995.53,045.23,088.2
77.3
45.8
67.0
71.080.888.699.4
108.2119.5143.8161.7174.7178.1
192.0207.1217.1229.7235.8253.7266.0280.4289.5310.8
324.9335.0355.2374.6400.5430.4465.1490.3536.9581.8
621.7672.2737.1812.0888.1976.4
1,084.31,204.41,346.51,507.2
1,667.21,843.21,972.0
1,618.71,622.21,682.01,745.8
1,799.91,819.4
1,884.5
1,919.41,947.81,986.3
3,101.3 2,034.6
16.2
1.4
9.3
13.117.99.95.87.2
10.630.734.045.935.3
53.859.252.153.352.768.471.069.261.978.1
75.974.885.490.997.4
113.5125.7122.8133.3149.3
144.2166.4195.0229.8228.7206.1257.9324.1386.6423.0
402.3471.5421.9
424.0391.0384.1410.3
455J475.5486.0468.9
414.8431.5443.3397.9
1.1
1.2
1.81.5
- L 9- 1 . 7
~7.*811.96.96.5
2.24.43.21.32.53.05.37.33.31.4
5.56.66.47.6
10.18.86.56.34.34.2
6.74.1
.714.213.426.813.8
- 4 . 0- 1 . 113.225.226.116.5
14.024.239.023.5
31.223.725.923.5
31.334.9
6.9- 6 . 9
7.0
2.4
4.6
5.46.15.04.65.57.4
15.120.217.516.3
14.419.719.118.018.721.025.028.124.224.8
28.929.931.834.238.841.144.647.352.457.5
65.768.877.5
109.6146.2154.9170.9182.7218.7281.4
339.2367.3349.7
335.7337.3337.2346.7
365.4368.9367.2367.9
359.9365.8349.5323.7
5.9
2.0
3.4
3.64.74.86.57.27.97.38.3
10.59.8
12.215.315.916.716.218.019.820.821.023.4
23.423.325.426.628.832.338.141.048.153.3
59.064.776.795.4
132.8128.1157.1186.7219.8268.1
314.0341.3333.2
321.7313.1298.2323.2
334.2345.1341.3344.4
328.6330.9342.5330.6
8.8
8.2
13.5
14.224.959.888.997.082.827.525.532.038.4
38.560.175.682.575.875.079.487.195.097.6
100.3108.2118.0123.7129.8138.4158.7180.2199.0208.8
220.1234.9253.1270.4304.1339.9362.1393.8431.9474.4
538.4596.9647.1
519.2536.0538.5559.8
578.1583.2600.2626.3
630.1630.9651.7675.7
1.4
2.1
5.2
6.116.952.081.389.474.617.612.716.720.4
18.738.352.457.547.944.545.950.053.953.9
53.757.463.764.665.267.378.890.998.097.6
95J96.2
101.7102.0111.0122.7129.2143.4153.6168.3
197.2228.9257.3
189.6198.8193.3207.0
217.0218.2230.0250.5
249.7244.3259.0276.1
1.2
2.213.749.479.787.473.514.89.0
10.713.2
14.033.545.848.641.138.440.244.045.645.6
44.547.051.150.349.049.460.371.576.976.3
73.670.273.172.877.083.086.092.8
100.3111.8
131.4153.7178.5
126.8130.0130.5138.1
143.1150.5154.4166.9
166.2176.2182.7188.9
3.9
3.93.22.61.62.01.12.83.76.07.2
4.74.86.58.96.86.05.75.98.38.3
9.310.412.714.316.217.818.519.521.221.2
22.226.028.529.133.939.743.250.653.356.5
65.875.278.8
62.868.862.868.9
73.967.775.783.6
83.568.276.387.2
7.4
6.1
8.3
8.18.07.87.57.68.29.9
12.815.318.0
19.821.823.225.027.830.633.537.141.143.7
46.550.854.359.064.671.179.889.3
101.0111.2
124.4138.7151.4168.5193.1217.2232.9250.4278.3306.0
341.2368.0389.8
329.6337.2345.2352.8
361.1365.0370.1375.7
380.4386.6392.7399.6
101.7
57.4
90.5
97.8120.6156.7192.8211.6213.5203.5233.5254.8261.4
279.7320.5344.8366.3368.4394.1417.0442.6451.2482.2
503.6522.2558.8590.7632.1681.2741.9789.3865.5934.2
989.51,070.01,175.71,307.91,420.11,556.11,706.21,895.32,137.42,403.5
2,643.12,917.33,078.9
2,576.62,573.92,664.82,757.1
2,852.72,877.22,949.12,989.9
3,031.13,061.43,083.53,139.8
6.6
- 4 . 2
7.0
10.025.026.721.3
9.6.9
- 1 . 211.111.3
10.915.55.25.4
.09.05.45.31.38.5
3.83.67.75.66.98.49.45.89.28.1
5.28.6
10.111.88.18.0
10.911.712.811.7
8.911.64.1
12.2- . 411.415.3
19.65.3
11.43.0
- 1 . 06.85.81.7
- 5 . 6
5.3
8.123.230.023.0
9.8.9
- 4 . 714.89.12.6
7.014.67.66.2
.67.05.86.11.96.9
4.43.77.05.77.07.88.96.49.77.9
5.98.19.9
11.28.69.69.6
11.112.812.4
10.010.45.5
11.8- . 414.914.6
14.63.5
10.45.7
5.64.12.97.5
'Changes are based on unrounded data and therefore may differ slightly from changes computed from data shown here.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
163
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-2.—Gross national product in 1972 dollars, 1929-82
[Billions of 1972 dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
Grossnationalproduct
1929
1933
1939
19401941194219431944194519461947194819491950195119521953195419551956195719581959
19601961196219631964198519661967196819691970197119721973197419751978197719781979198019811982".1980:
IIIIllIV
1981:IIIIllIV
1982:IIIIllIV"
315.7
222.1
319.8344.1400.4461.7531.6569.1560.4478.3470.3489.8492.2
534.8579.4600.8623.6616.1657.56/1.6683.8680.9721.7
737.2756.6800.3832.5876.4929.3984.8
1,011.41,058.11,087.61,085.61,122.41,185.91,254.31,246.31,231.61,298.21,369.71,438.61,479.4
1,474.01,502.61,475.5
1,494.91,457.81,463.81,479.4
1,507.81,502.21,510.41,490.1
1,470.71,478.41,481.11,471.7
Personalconsumptionexpenditures
Total Durablegoods
215.1
170.5
219.8
229.9243.6241.1248.2255.2270.9301.0305.8312,2319.3
337.3341.6350.1363.4370.0394.1405.4413.8418.0440.4
452.0461.4482.0500.5528.0557.5585.7602.7634.4657.9672.1696.8737.1767.9762.8779.4823.1864.3903.2927.6930.5947.6957.1
937.0915.8928.0941.0
951.1944.6951.4943.4
949.1955.0956.3968.0
durable Services
20.9
10.7
18.6
21.224.215.714.013.014.425.430.132.535.5
42.639.138.042.142.551.148.848.645.350.7
51.449.354.759.764.872.678.479.588.391.8
89.198.2
111.1121.3112.3112.7126.6138.0146.8147.2137.1140.0138.7
145.4128.9134.6139.5
145.3138.6142.2134.1
137.5138.3136.4142.8
Non-lurablgoods
98.1
82.9
115.1
119.9127.6129.9134.0139.4150.3158.9154.8155.0157.4
161.8165.3171.2175.7177.0185.4191.6194.9196.8205.0
208.2211.9218.5223.0233.3244.0255.5259.5270.5277.3
283.7288.7300.6307.4302.5307.5321.9333.4344.4353.1355.8362.4365.2
357.8352.7353.7359.0
361.6361.7363.0363.1
362.2364.5365.9368.2
96.1
76.9
86.1
88.891.895.5
100.2102.8106.3116.7120.9124.7126.5
132.9137.2140.9145.6150.5157.6165.0170.3175.9184.8
192.4200.2208.8217.8229.8240.9251.8263.7275.6288.8
299.3309.9325.3339.2348.0359.3374.7393.0412.0427.3437.6445.2453.2
433.9434.3439.7442.5
444.2444.3446.2446.2
449.5452.2454.0457.0
Gross private domestic investment
Total
55.8
8.4
33.6
44.555.829.518.119.727.770.970.082.165.4
93.593.983.085.383.1
103.8102.697.087.5
108.0
104.7103.9117.6125.1133.0151.9163.0154.9161.6171.4
158.5173.9195.0217.5195.5154.8184.5214.2236.7236.3208.4225.8196.9
222.7201.9199.2209.6
221.6229.5233.4218.9
195.4202.3206.3183.6
Fixed investment
Total
51.2
13.2
32.0
38.343.824.318.022.031.458.770.276.669.8
83.080.278.783.885.396.196.895.589.3
100.9
101.2100.9109.7117.5125.9140.1146.2142.7152.6160.4
154.8165.8184.8200.4183.9161.5176.7200.9220.7229.1213.3216.9205.4
225.3204.4207.8215.9
219.2217.4216.9214.1
210.8206.7202.9201.3
Nonresidential
Total
37.5
10.4
20.9
25.830.417.614.018.727.642.148.951.146.0
50.052.952.156.355.461.365.466.259.363.6
66.966.772.075.182.797.4
108.0105.6109.5116.8
113.8112.2121.0138.1135,7119.3125.6140.3158.3169.9
166.1172.0165.4
171.9162.4163.8166.4
169.7170.1173.9174.2
172.0166.7163.4159.6
Struc-tures
Produc-ers'
durableequip-ment
21.1
5.0
8.7
10.012.06.84.25.58.3
18.917.418.417.9
19.220.720.622.623.625.428.328.426.827.4
29.530.231.631.934.440,643.442.042.845.0
43.942.844.147.443.638.339.540.444.649.1
48.551.653.2
51.148.547.147.5
49.551.052.553.3
53.553.753.052.7
16.4
5.5
12.1
15.818.510.99.8
13.219.223.231.532.628.1
30.832.231.533.731.835.937.037.832.536.2
37.436.540.443.148.356.864.563.666.871.8
69.969.376.990.792.181.186.199.9
113.7120.8117.6120.4112.2
120.8113.9116.7118.9
120.1119.1121.4120.9
118.5113.0110.4106.9
Residential
Total
13.7
2.8
11.1
12.513.36.74.03.43.8
16.621.325.623.8
33.027.326.627.529.934.831.529.230.037.4
34.234.337.742.543.142.738.237.143.143.6
41.053.763.862.348.242.251.260.762.459.147.244.940.0
53.442.044.049,5
49.647.342.939.9
38.940.139.541.7
Non-farm
struc-tures
13.0
2.5
10.4
11.612.36.03.53.03.4
15.319.723.822.1
31.325.725.126.128.533.530.027.828.635.9
32.932,836.340.941.541.236.635.441.341.7
39.251.661.559.945.339.848.757.959.556.344.342.137.1
49.939.441.546.6
47.044.639.936.7
36.037.036.638.8
Farmstruc-tures
Produc-ers'
durableequip-ment
0.6
Changein
busi-ness
inven-tories
0.1
.1
.2
.1
.0
.0
.1
.2
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.4
.4
.4
.5
.6
.5
.5
.6
.6
.7
.7
.8
.8
.91.1
1.11.31.51.71.71.61.71.81.92.02.02.01.9
2.12.02.02.0
2.02.02.02.0
1.91.91.91.9
4.6
=4.9
1.6
6.212.05.2
~2!3~3.fi12.2
.25.5
-4 .4
10.613.74.31.5
-2 .27.75.81.5
= 1.87.0
3.53.07.87.57.1
11.816.81119.0
11.1
3.88.1
10.217.211.6
-6 .77.8
13.316.07.3
-5 .09.08.5
2.6--2.5- 8 . 5-6 .2
2.412.116.54.8
= 15.44.43.4
= 17.7
See next page for continuation of table.
164
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-2.—Gross national product in 2972 dollars, 1929-82—Continued
[Billions of 1972 dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
19401941194219431944 ..19451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
196019611962 ...1963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982p
1980:IIIIIIIV
1981:1IIIIIIV
1982:|
IIIIV *
Net exports of goods andservices
Netexports
3.7
.4
3.4
4.43.2
- . 6- 5 9- 6 . 2- 3 . 713.218 910,810.7
5910.17.94.8697.3
10111.8562.7
778.57594
12.81016.55.41.9.9
3.916.7
15.527.832.225.422.024 037.2
50.642.030.3
50 553.253.145.6
48 244.239.236.5
36.935.727.521.1
Exports
16.7
9.1
14.3
15.516.411.49.8
10.513.827.332 226.325.8
23 628.627.926.627.830.735.338.033.233.8
38439.341.844 850.351.754.456.761.265.0
70.571.077.597.3
108.5103.5110.1112.9126.7146.2
159.2158.5147.5
164 4161.2155.9155.1
159 3159.7157.8156.9
151.7154.4147.5136.4
Imports
12.9
8.6
10.9
U. l13.212.015 716.817.514.013 315.515.2
17 718.520.021.820 923.425 226.127 631.1
30 730.934 335 437.541647.951.359.364.1
66.669 376.781.880.771.484.790.9
102 7109.0
108.6116.4117.2
113 9108.0102.8109.6
111 1115.5118.7120.4
114.7118.7120.0115.3
Government purchases of goods andservices
Total
41.0
42.9
63.0
65.397.8
191.62713300.4265.493.175 784.796.8
981133.7159.8170.1156.0152.3153.5161.2169.8170.6
172 8182.9193.2197 6202.6209 8229.7248.5260.2257.4
251.12501253.1253.3260.3265.2265.2269.2274.6278.3
284.6287.1291.2
284 7286.9283.4283.2
286 8283.9286.4291.3
289.2285.3291.1299.0
Federal
Total
7.0
10.9
22.8
26.761,0
157.4239 6269.7233.758.236.342.849.2
47 382.2
107.2114.796188.286 890.693 491.4
90 495.3
102 81018100.2100 3112.6125.1128.1121.8
110.6103 7101.795.996.697.496.8
100.4100 3102.1
106.5110.4116.1
106 4109.1105.5104.8
107 9107.0110.7116.0
114.4110.3116.2123.7
Nation-al
de-fense
73.168.366.966.464.965.465 767.4
70.173.578.7
70 370.470.069.6
71072.974.376.1
74.578.280.681.3
Non-de-
fense
=
28.527.629.731.031.835.034,734.8
36.436.837.4
36.138.735.535.2
36 934.136.539.9
39.832.135.542.4
Stateandlocal
33.9
32.0
40.3
38 636.834 331730.731.734.939441.947.5
50 851.552.755.359 964.166 770.676.479.2
82 487.590.495 8
102.4109 5117.1123.4132.1135.6
140.5146 4151.4157.4163.6167.8168.4168.8174.3176.2
178.1176.7175.0
178 3177.8177.9178.4
179 0176.9175.7175.3
174.9175.0174.9175.4
Finalsales
311.0
227.0
318.2
337.9388.4456.55315571.4564.0466.1470 6484.3496.6
524 2565.6596.5622.1618.2649.8665.8682.2682.7714.7
733 7753.7792.4825 0869.3917.5968.0999,2
1,049,11,076.6
1,081.81,114.31,175.71,237.11,234.71,238.41,290.41,356.41,422.61,472.2
1,479.01,493.71,484.0
1,497 51,460.31,472.31,485.7
1505 41,490.11,493.91,485.3
1,486.11,482.71,477.81,489.3
Percent changefrom preceding
period1
Grossnation-
alprod-uct
6.6
- 2 . 2
7.8
7.616.315.31517.1
-1 .5-14.7- 1 7
4.1.5
878.33.73.8
- 1 . 26.72.11.8
- . 46.0
2.22.65.84.05.36.06.02.74.62.8
- . 23.45.75.8
- . 6- 1 . 2
5.45.55.02.8
- . 41.9
- 1 . 8
1.5- 9 . 6
1.64.3
7.9- 1 . 5
2.2- 5 . 3
- 5 . 12.1
.7-2 .5
Finalsales
- 3 . 1
6.3
6.214.917 516 475
- 1 . 3- 1 7 4
102.92.5
567.95.54.3
- 65.1252.5
4.7
272.75.1415.4555.53.25.02.6
.5305.55.2
- . 2.3
4.25.14.93.5
.51.0
- . 6
16- 9 . 6
3.33.7
54-4 .0
1.0- 2 . 3
-.9- 1 . 3
3.2
1 Changes are based on unrounded data and therefore may differ slightly from changes computed from data shown here.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
165Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-3.—Implicit price deflators for gross national product, 1929-82
[Index numbers, 1972. 100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year orquarter
192919331939 ..19401941 .1942194319441945194619471948 .. .....194919501951195219531954 .19551956 .19571958 .1959I9601961196219631964 .196519661967 .1968196919701971197219731974 .19751976 .197719781979 .198019811982 P
1980:
IIIllIV
1981:|||IIIIV
1982:1||HIIV P
Grossnational
product»
32.7625.1328.4329.06312334.32361437.0137 9143.8849.5552.9852.4953.5657.0957 9258.8259.5560.8462.7964.9366.0467.6068.7069.3370.6171.6772.7774.3676.7679.0682.5486.7991.4596.01
100.00105.75115 08125.79132.34140.05150.42163,42178.64195.51207.23
172.31176.52180.60185.16
190 01193.17197.36201.55
203.68205.98208.51210.73
Personal consumption expenditures
Total
35.926.930.530.933 236.740142.444147.852.956055.856.960.662 063.263.764.465.667.869.270.671.972.673.774.875.977.279.481.484.688.492.596 5
100.0105.71164125.31317139.3149.1162.5179.2194.5206.0
172.8177.1181.2185.5
189 2192.6196.4199.8
202.2204.0207.7210.2
Durablegoods
44.232.535.936.740 043.746 751.355562167.870 370.572.276 376 777.275.075677.780 981.383.883.884.385.486.287.186.886.788.291.193.395.799 0
100.01017108 2117.3123 9129.2136 4145.0156.3167 5174.9
151.9154.4158 0161.1
163 0166.2169.7171.3
173 0174.0176.1176.3
Non-durablegoods
38.426.830.530.933 639.143 746.247 852.158.762 360.360.765.866 566.366.666.367.369.471.071.472.673.373.974.975.877.380.181.985.389.493.696 6
100.0108 51234132.5137 2143.6153 4169.9188.4202.7208.9
181.9186.2190.5195.1
199 3201.7204.2205.6
206 8207.1210.0211.4
Services
31.626.129.229.530 832.434 236.137 338.841.744 446.047.449.952 655.457.258460.162 264.166.067.969.070.471.772.774.276.478.781.986.0
90.595 6
100.0104 7113 0121.61296139.31500162.3178.8196 3213.3
172.2176.5180.9185.4
189 6193.4198.6203.6
207 4210.6215.3219.8
Total
28.322.427.728.530 733.535 737.037 241.349.053.754.956.760.962 363.163.665.068.571.171.071.872.171.872.272.372.974.076.378.882.287.091.195.7
100.0105.5116 7131.9139 2149.8163 2178.5193.3208.0215.8
188.5191.5195.1198.3
202 3207.4209.4212.9
213 6216.6216.2216.8
Gross private domestic investmentl
f'ixed investment
Nonresidential
Total
28.322.928.229.131033.935 936.836 740.046.951.553.054.559.160161.261.762.967.371.070.972.272.572.072.573.173.874.776.979.582.886.791.396 2
100.0103 81154132.2138 6146.3157 2170.8186.12013210.1
181.0184.9187.9190.8
194 5200.7203.0206.8
207 6211.3210.7210.9
Structures
24.319.223.023.424 928.432 433.833 936.644.048.848.449.355.156 357.456.557.662.464.963.964.263.763.363.664.164.966.469.272.275.881.588.294 5
100.0107.7128 2144.8149 0159.41764200.2227.72515266.4
216.9224.9232.7237.2
2415249.1252.7261.9
264 5267.6266.7266.7
Pro-ducers'
dur-able
equip-ment
33.426.232.032.834.937.337.338.037.942.848.653.056.057.861.762.663.865.566.671.175,576.678.379.479.379.479.780.180.682.184.387,289.993.297 2
100.01018109 3126.21339141.0149 7158.8169.0179.8183.4
165.8167.9169 9172.3
1751179.9181.4182.5
1819184.6183.8183.5
Total
28.220.726.627.430 032.434 938.140844.653.758.158.760.064.466 466.967.168.771.071.471.271.171.471.371.570.971.272.374.677.080.787.790.594.8
100.0109.1120 3131.0140.7158.0178.3200.5218.5233.6239.3
212.5217.2221.8223.4
229 0231.7235.8239.2
240 5238.6238.8239.4
Residential
Non-farmstruc-tures
27.819.826.327.229 731.834.337.340.043.953.057.558.159.563.865.866.366.668.270.570.970.770.670.970.971.170.570.872.074.376780.587.590.394.7
100.0109.4120.8131.6141.3159.0179.8202.7221.7237.1242.8
215.2220.6225.2226.4
232 2234.9239.4243.3
244.3242.1242.3242.7
Farmstruc-tures
28.619.523.423.626 630.735 740.842 946.652.857.358.059.463.865 766.266.568.370.670.970.870.771.170.771.270.670.972.274.276.780.687.590.695.0
100.0109.2120.5131.9140.7157.0180.0202.7218.8236.9242.6
214.7219.1221.2224.3
227 3233.4237.9242.7
243.8242.0241.9242.9
Pro-ducers'
dur-able
equip-ment
77.258.861.159.663 871.371.475.084.695.2
105.61U.5107.9107.4114.9114.6114.2112.4109.1104.3103.4101.9101.8100.899.096.895.394.392.190.891.093.595.797.899.3
100.0100.6106.8116.9122.7126.7132.6140.3149.2159.4168.3
145.2148.0150.8153.0
155.4158.3161.3162.8
165.7168.1169.4170.0
See next page for continuation of table.
166
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-3.—Implicit price deflators for gross national product, 1929-82—Continued
[Index numbers, 1972=100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:I .,IIIIIIV
1981:
IIIIIIV
1982:
IIIll ...IV P
Exports andimports of goods
and services1
Exports
42.2
26.5
32.1
34.937.343.646.851.953.655.462.866.563.1
61.068.868 667.567.268.571.074.073173.5
75.276176.076377.279.481983 585.588.5
93.297.0
100.0112.7134 8149 6155.3161.9172.6192.5
213.1231.8237.1
204 2209.2216.3223.5
229 3230.9232.6234.5
237 3236 8236 9237.4
Imports
45.5
23.6
31.0
32.835.440 041.342 744.951.862.367.864.6
68.882.679 976.777.277.178.479.676175.2
76.175 574.275 276.877.779 479 981.183.2
88.693 3
100.0116.7164 6179 6185.6205.5214.1246.1
289.3293.1284.3
282 5289.8290.1294.9
3007298.7287.7286.1
286 4278 8285 4286.7
Government purchases of goods and services
Total
21.5
19.2
21.4
21725.531232.832 331.229 633.637.739.7
39.245.047 348.548.649.251.754.056057.2
58.059161.162 664.166.069 172 576.581.1
87.793 9
100.0106 7116 8128 2136.6146.3157.3170.4
189.2207.9222.3
182 4186.8190.0197.7
2015205.5209.5215.0
217 8221 1223 9226.0
Federal
Total
20.5
194
22.7
22 727.833 034.033131.930 235.039 041.4
39.646.648 950.149.950.452.955.157 759.0
59.460 262.063 565167.170 072 776.580.1
86.692 7
100.0106 3114 9126 0133.5142.8153.1164.8
185.2207.4221.6
178 2182.2183.3197.5
2012204.0207.8216.0
218 3221 6223 0223.3
Nationaldefense
ioo.o106.6115.1124 9132.4141.9152.7166.0
187.4209.0226.9
180 3184.6186.5198.4
2017206.4207.9219.5
223 0225 2226 5232.4
Non-defense
100.0105.6114.2128 2135.7144.6153.8162.5
181.0204.2210.4
1741177.9176.8195.7
200 3198.9207.4209.4
209 6212 6214 9205.9
Stateandlocal
21.8
19.1
20.7
20 921.722 823.724 825.828 532.436 437.8
38.942.344145.246.547.650.252.653 855.1
56.558 060.161663.164.968 272 476.482.0
88.694 7
100.0107.0118.0129 4138.3148.4159.7173.7
191.6208.2222.7
184 8189.6194.0197.8
2017206.3210.7214.3
217 5220 9224 5227.9
Finalsales
32.7
25.3
28.4
29 031.034 336.337 037.943 749.652 652.6
53.356.757 858.959.660.662.664.966167.5
68.669 370 571672.774.276 679 082.586.8
91.596 0
100.0105.7115.0125 7132.2139.7150.3163.3
178.7195.3207.5
1721176.3181.0185.6
189 5193.1197.4201.3
204 0206 5208 7210.8
Percent changefrom preceding
period2
GNPimplicitprice
deflator
0.0
- 2 . 1
- . 8
227.5995.3242.4
15 712.969
- . 9
2.16.6141.61.22.23.23.4172.4
1.69
1.8151.52.232304.45.1
5.4504.25.88.89.35.25.87.48.6
9.39.46.0
10.510.19.6
10.5
10 96.89.08.8
4.34.6504.3
Finalsales
implicitprice
deflator
-2 .6
- . 9
187.2
1065.6212.2
15 313.760
.1
1.36.2201.91.21.83.33.6192.1
1.7101815152.132314.45.2
5.4504.15.78.8935.25.77.58.7
9.59.36.2
10.110.111.210.5
877.89.38.1
5450434.2
1 Separate deflators are not calculated for gross private domestic investment, change in business inventories, and net exports ofgoods and services.2 Changes are based on unrounded data and therefore may differ slightly from changes computed from data shown here. Quarterlychanges are at annual rates.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
167
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-4.—Fixed-weighted price indexes for gross national product, 1972 weights, 1959-82
[Index numbers, 1972=100, except as noted; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or quarter
1959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982"
1980:
IIIIIIV
1981:I
IllIV
1982:|
IllIV**
Grossnationalproduct
69.8
70.871672.473.274.1
75 377579 883 187.3
91896 2
100 0106 0115.9
126.4133 7142.2153 3167.8
184.4202 0214.6
177 8182.1186 3191.3
195.9199 9204,2208.4
210 8213.0216.0218.8
Personalcon-
sumptionexpendi-
tures
73.1
74.174 875.576.377.2
78 280182 085088.7
92 796 6
100 01061117.1
126 3133 0141.21516166.3
184.82021213.8
178 2182.7187 0191.5
196.6200 2203.9207.5
209 9211.6215.4218.4
Gross private domesticinvestment1
Fixed investment
Total
74.4
74.774 474.274.074.3
75 277 079 382587.3
91295 8
100 0105 8117.9
132.3140 215L8167 0185.4
204.1220 9231.1
1971202.5207 5210.2
215.0219 0223.2226.8
229 2230.4232.0233.0
Nonresi-dential
74.1
74.574 374.474.775.3
76 177 980 383 387.0
91696 3
100 0104 0116 5
132 91399148 5160 9177.2
196.0213 5225.7
188 7194.2199 2202.8
20712117215.6219.3
222 0225.0227.4228.7
Residen-tial
74.9
74.974 773.972.672.6
73 575 377 581087.8
90.694 9
100.0109.2120.5
131.2140 8158.0178.4200.8
219.5235.0241.3
213.2218.4223.0224.3
229.9233 0237.5241.2
242 7240.7240.7241.1
Exports andimports of goods
and services1
Exports
73.4
75.076.076.076.377.1
79 481883 385 588.5
93.197 0
100.0112 6137.4
151.8156 9164.0174.9197.2
218.6239.3245.7
210 4214.3221.2229.1
235.4238 4241.1242.5
245.6246.3245.2245.5
Imports
75.0
76.075 273.774.776.3
77 178 879 380.783.0
88.493.3
100.0116.7161.5
175.1178 7195.0210.1244.5
303.7319.0315.5
2910300.6309.8314.6
322.6323 4316.3314.0
3191313.6313.6315.3
Government purchases of goods and services
Total
56.9
58.359 561.362.864.4
66 269 272 476.481.3
87.994.0
100.0106.9117.9
129.2137.3147.0158.4173.2
193.8212.2226.2
186.6191.4195.1202.1
206.0210 3213.6219.3
222 4224.5227.2231.0
Federal
Total
58.5
59.660 561.763.365.3
67169.671575.779.8
86.792.9
100.0106.7117.0
128.0135.4145.0155.4169.5
192.7214.7230.1
184.9189.5191.9203.9
208.1212 2214.5223.9
2271228.4230.1234.9
Nationaldefense
100.0106.9117.5
127.9135.6145.5156.5171.7
196.5219.7236.4
188.2193.7196.1208.2
211.6217 4219.6230.1
2334234.6236.3241.4
Non-defense
100.01061115.6
128.3135.0143.6152.6164.0
182.8201.7214.0
176.4178.7181.4192.7
199.11988201.6207.9
2110212.6214.2218.2
Stateandlocal
55.8
57.458.961,062.563.9
65668.873176 982.3
88.794 8
100.0107.0118.4
130.0138.5148.4160.4175.7
194.6210.6223.6
187.7192.7197.2200.9
204.62090212.9216.1
219 2221.9225.2228.3
Percentchangefrom
ingperiod,gross
nationalproductfixed-
weight-ed priceindex*
1.5111.21.11.2
172930415.0
5.2484.0609.4
9.15.86.37.89.5
9.99.66.2
10.510.09.4
11.2
10.08.48.98.5
4.84.15.95.2
1 Separate deflators are not calculated for gross private domestic investment, change in business inventories, and net exports ofgoods and services.
* Quarterly changes are at annual rates.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
168
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-5.—Changes in GNP and GNP price measures, 1929-82
[Percent change from preceding period; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Period
1929
19331939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979 .
198019811982 *
1980:|||IIIIV
1981:
IIIIIIV
1982:
||IIIIV P
Gross national product
Currentdollars
6.6
- 4 . 2
7.0
10 025.026 721.39.6
.912
11.1113-.510915.5525.4.0
905.4531.38.5
3.83.67.75.66.9
8.4945.89.28.1
5.28.6
10111.88.1
8.010 911712.811.7
8911.64.1
12 2_ 411.415.3
19 653
1143.0
1.068581.7
Con-stant
(1972)dollars
6.6
-2 .2
7.8
7616 315 315.17.1
- 1 5- 1 4 7-1.7
41
8783373812672118
- .46.0
222.6584.05.3
6.0602.7462.8
- . 2345758
6- 1 2
54555028
41.9
-1.8
15961.643
791522
-5 .3
- 5 121
725
Implicitprice
deflator
0.0
-2.1
- . 8
2.27.59.95.32.4
2.415.712.96.9
- .92.16.6141.61.2
2.23.23.41.72.4
1.6.9
1.81.51.5
2.23.23.04.45.1
5.45.0425.88.8
9.3525.87.48.6939.46.0
10.51019.6
10.5
10.968908.8
4.34.65.04.3
Chainpriceindex
1.61.21.41.31.4
1.93.13.04.35.0
5.34.94.16.09.1
9.25.76.17.68.99.09.46.4
9.0969.7
11.0
9.38.2928.4
5.04.66.05.2
Fixed*weight-ed price
index(1972
weights)
1.51.11.21.11.2
1.7293.04.15.0
5.24.8406.09.4
9.1586.37.895999.66.2
10 510 09.4
11.2
10 084898.5
4.84.15.95.2
Personal consumption expenditure
Currentdollars
- 5 . 7
4.6
6013.897
12.28.8
10.520.312.58.01.9787.9485.82.7
764.95.43.27.4
4.53.16.05.56.9
7.58.15.49.58.4
6.98.196
10.29.4
9.911011.111.811.9
10.610.67.0
10.79
15.616.1
13.04.4
1133.4
7.66.18.1
10.1
Con-stant
(1972)dollars
-2.0
5.3
465.9
-1 .02.92.8
6.211.11.62.12.3561.3253.81.8
6.52.92.11.05.4
2.62.14.53.85.5
5.65.12.95.33.7
2.23.75.84.2
- . 7
2.25.65.04.52.7
.31.81.0
- .7-8.7
5.45.7
4.4-2.7
2.9-3 .3
2.52.5.6
5.0
Implicitprice
deflator
- 3 . 8
- . 7
137.4
10.89.05.8
4.18.3
10.75.8
206.5231.9.9
1.01.93.32.21.9
1.91.01.51.61.4
1.82.92.44.04.5
4.64.33.75.7
10.1
7.65.15.87.09.0
10.38.65.9
11.510.59.69.8
8.37.38.27.0
5.03.57.54.9
Chainpriceindex
1.71.1111.41.2
1.52.72.53.84.5
4.64.3366.1
10.4
7.7536.07.39.3
10 79.16.0
12.61019.8
10.0
10.37.4807.2
5.23.67.15.6
s
Fixed-weight-ed price
index(1972
weights)
1.5.99
1.21.1
1.32.42.43.64.4
4.54.2356.1
10.4
7.8536.27.49.7
11.29.35.8
13.410 49.8
10.1
10.97.7767.1
4.83.27.35.7
Note.—Changes are based on unrounded data and may differ slightly from changes computed from data shown elsewhere in thesetables.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
169Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-6.—Gross national product by major type of product, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
1929
1933
1939
194019411942194319441945..1946194719481949
19501951..1952195319541955195619571958 ..............1959
1960 .19611962..1963196419651966..19671968..1969
197019711972..1973197419751976197719781979
19801981..1982 ".
1980;
||IllIV
1981:
||IllIV
1982:
||'IllIV ".
Grossnationalproduct
103.4
55.8
90.9
100.0125.0158 5192.12106212.4209.82331259.5258.3
286.5330 8348.0366.8366 8400.0421.7444 0449.7487.9
506 5524.6565 0596.7637.7691.1756 0799.6873 4944.0
992.71,077.61185 9U26.41,434 21,549.21,718.01,918.3216392/17.8
2,633.12,937 73,057.5
2,575.92,573.42 643 72J39.4
2,864.92 90182 980 93,003.2
2,995.53 045 23 088 23ilO1.3
Finalsales
101.7
57.4
90.5
97.8120.6156.7192.82116213.5203.5233.5254.8261.4
279.7320.5344.8366.3368 4394.1417.0442.6451.2482.2
5036522.2558.8590.7632.1681.2741.9789.3865.5934.2
989.51,070.01175.71,307.91,420.11,556,11,706.21,895.32137 42;403.5
2,643,12917.33iO78.9
2,576.62,573.92 664 82,757.1
2,852.72 877 22 94912,989.9
3,031.13 06143'083 53[l39.8
Inven-tory
change
1.7
-1 .6
.4
2.24.518
- . 6= 10-1 .0
6.4
4.7= 3.1
6.810.33.1.4
- 156.04.713
-1 .55.7
302.3636.05.69.9
14110.3799.8
3.27.7
10 218.514.1
=6.911.823.026 514.3
= 10.020 5
=21.4
- . 7= .4212
-17.7
12.224 631813.2
=35.6- 1 6 247=38.5
Total
Total
56.1
27.0
49.0
56.072.593 7
120.4132 3128.9125.3139.8154.4147.7
162.4189.5194.6203.11961214.5223.3232 3228.2248.5
254 2257.4278 5290.3309.8338.4375 0389.44213450.2
459.9485.3529 6604.1646 7694.0771.1855.09586
1,065.6
1,141.91,289 21,280.6
1,125.21,114.5114041,187.4
1,265.3127611317 01,298.4
1,269.41,283 11295 5l|274.5
Finalsales
54.4
28.6
48.6
53.868.091.9
121.0133.3129.9118.9140.3149.7150.8
155.6179.2191.5202.7197 6208.5218.6231.0229.7242.9
2513255.0272.2284.3304.2328.5360.9379.1413.4440.4
456.6477.75194585.6632.5700.9759.3832.09321
1,051.3
1,151.91,268.71,302.0
1,125.81,114.911616l>05.1
1,253.1125141*285 11,285.2
1,305.01 299.3l'29O71J313.0
Inven-tory
change
1.7
= 1,6
.4
2.24.51.8
= .6-1 .0-1 .0
6.4
1.7=3.1
6.810.33.1.4
-1 .56.04.71.3
-1 .55.7
3.02.36.36.05.69.9
14.110.37.99.8
3.27.7
10.218.514.1
=6.911.823.026.514.3
= 10.020.5
-21.4
= .7— 4
= 2 U= 17.7
12.224.631.813.2
-35.6= 16.2
4.7= 38.5
Goods
Durable goods
Finalsales
16.1
5.4
12.4
15.423.834.554.258.550.131.844.448.050.0
56.266.472.577.873.981.485.991.384.490.8
93.392.7
102.9109.4118.9131.6147.0153.5167.9178.5
179.2187.1207.4237.6250.7279.4312.5354.9402.1454.3
482.5519.4510.7
488.1461.4481.2499.2
519.8519.7527.5510.5
513.2512.6506.8510.3
Inven-tory
change
1.4
=.5
.3
1.23.11.0.0
= .6-1 .3
5.31.41.0
-1 .8
3.66.11.21.5
-2 .53.42.1
=2.83.1
1.6=.13̂ 42.74.06.7
10.25.54.76.4
= .12.87.2
13.112.0
-8 .47.7
10.419.110.5
= 5.28.7
= 15.5
-11.8= .5
-13.14.6
2.218.519 8
-5 .6
=30.96.6
10.1-34.7
Nondurable goods
Finalsales
38.3
23.2
36.2
38.444.257.466.874.879.887.195.9
101.7100.9
99.4112.8119.0124.9123.7127.1132.7139.6145.3152.1
158.0162.4169.3174.9185.3196.9213.9225.6245.5261,9
277.5290.6312.0348.0381.8421.5446.7477.2530.1597.0
669.4749.4791.3
637.7653,5680.4705.9
733.3731.7757.6774.7
791.8786.7783.9802.7
lnven»tory
change
0.3
= 1.1
.1
1.01.4
- .6
.21.1
= 1.93.7
= 1.3
3.24.22.0
- 1 . 11.02.62.6
.81.32.5
1.32.42.83.31.63.23.94.93.13.4
3.34.83.05.32.21.54.212.67.33.8
=4.811.7
=5.9
11.1.0
8.1=22.3
10.06.1
12.018.9
=4.8-9 .6=-5.4-3 .8
Services
35,9
25.9
34.4
35.740.850.863.072.377.068.871.677.282.2
88.5103.5113.9121.6126.2136.1146.2158.7167.7179.8
193.8207.0222.0237.1255.0273.3299.0326.5358.2391.9
429.9472.0519.0571.5636.1705.2779.3867.2972.2
1,089.7
1,225.51,364.31.492.1
1,174.71,207.21,243.31,277.0
1,313.51,340.21,382.11,421.5
1,444.41,476.71,509.51,537.6
Struc-tures
11.4
2.9
7.5
8.311.814.08.76.16.5
15.721.728.028.4
35.637.839.442.044.549.552.253,053.859.5
58.560.264.569.372.979.382.083.694.0
101.8
102.9120.3137.3150.8151.4150.0167.6196.1233.1262.5
265.7284.2284.9
276.0251.8259.9275.1
286.1285.6281.9283.3
281.7285.3283.2289.2
Autooutput
7"28.8
11.9
15.413.312.016.114.721.216.919.414.419.4
21.317.822.525.225.931.230.428.035.134.9
28.739.141.646.239.240.755.965.169.568.0
59.869.265.7
63.151.956.867.5
66.173.778.758.3
53.569.975,264.3
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
170Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-7.—Gross national product by major type of product in 1972 dollars, 1929-82
[Billions of 1972 dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
Grossnationalproduct
Finalsales
Inven-tory
change
Goods
Total
Total Finalsales
Inven-tory
change
Durable goods
Finalsales
Inven-tory
change
Nondurable goods
Finalsales
Inven-tory
change
Services Struc-tures
Autooutput
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
19601961196219631964196519661967.19681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979 ........
198019811982 >
1980:
\\"""ZZIIIIV
1981:IIIIllIV
1982:IIIIllIV P.
315.7
222.1
319.8
344.1400.4461.7531.6569.1560.4478.3470.3489.8492.2
534.8579.4600.8623.6616.1657.5671.6683.8680.9721.7
737.2756.6800.3832.5876.4929.3984.8
1,011.41,058.11,087.6
1,085.61,122.41,185.91,254.31,246.31,231.61,298.21,369.71,438.61,479.4
1,474.01,502.61,475.5
1,494.91,457.81,463.81,479.4
1,507.81,502.21,510.41,490.1
1,470.71,478.41,481.11,471.7
311.0
227.0
318.2
337.9388.4456.5531.5571.4564.0466.1470.6484.3496.6
524.2565.6596.5622.1618.2649.8665.8682.2682.7714.7
733.7753.7792.4825.0869.3917.5968.0999.2
1,049.11,076.6
1,081.81,114.31,175.71,237.11,234.71,238.41,290.41,356.41,422.61,472.2
1,479.01,493.71,484.0
1,497.51,460.31,472.31,485.7
1,505.41,490.11,493.91,485.3
1,486.11,482.71,477.81,489.3
4.6
-4 .9
1.6
6.212.05.2
.1- 2 . 3-3 .612.2- . 25.5
-4 .4
10.613.74.31.5
-2.27.75.81.5
- 1 . 87.0
3.53.07.87.57.1
11.816.812.29.0
11.1
3.88.1
10.217.211.6
- 6 . 77.8
13.316.07.3
- 5 . 09.0
- 8 . 5
- 2 . 6- 2 . 5- 8 . 5- 6 . 2
2.412.116.54.8
-15.4-4 .4
3.4-17.7
144.3
97.5
154.3
171.7198.6221.4263.3287.3278.5238.3237.7244.8240.3
261.5283.7292.1306.8292.7316.7320.9321.7311.6332.5
335.8338.0361.3372.2393.8422.6456.4463.4483.1496.0
486.9497.2529.6572.3562.5547.4587.2628.1662.0677.7
667.9689.5661.1
682.5658.2659.5671.6
692.8689.8697.2678.0
661.8663.2665.1654.5
139.7
102.3
152.7
165.5186.6216.2263.3289.6282.2226.2237.9239.4244.7
250.9270.0287.8305.3294.9309.0315.1320.2313.4325.5
332.3335.0353.5364.7386.7410.8439.6451.2474.1484.9
483.2489.1519.4555.1550.9554.2579.4614.8645.9670.4
672.9680.5669.6
685.1660.7668.0677.8
690.4677.7680.7673.2
677.2667.5661.7672.1
4.6
- 4 . 9
1.6
6.212.05.2
-2.3-3 .612.2- . 25.5
- 4 . 4
10.613.74.31.5
- 2 . 27.75.81.5
- 1 . 87.0
3.53.07.87.57.1
11.816.812.29.0
11.1
3.88.1
10.217.211.6
- 6 . 77.8
13.316.07.3
-5 .09.0
- 8 . 5
- 2 . 6- 2 . 5- 8 . 5- 6 . 2
2.412.116.54.8
-15.4-4 .4
3.4-17.7
40.4
17.5
35.5
43.157.875.7
118.8135.9121.260.375.577.378.3
86.198.2
107.9116.2109.0117.2117.8119.4109.2113.6
115.6114.7125.7132.5143.0157.2174.0178.3187.4193.0
187.5188.7207.4236.1234.1230.2242.7264.7285.4299.1
290.8289.3273.3
304.2279.8286.9292.4
298.9290.5290.2277.6
278.7274.9269.2270.6
3.5
- 2 . 1
.7
3.48.23.5
- 1 . 8- 3 . 710.81.41.6
- 2 . 9
5.59.01.72.3
- 3 . 74.52.9
.9- 3 . 4
3.9
2.0- . 14.23.45.18.2
12.36.65.47.2
.03.07.2
12.79.4
- 6 . 45.46.9
11.86.2
- 2 . 63.8
- 6 . 5
- 4 . 7- 1 . 2- 6 . 2
1.8
.19.18.6
- 2 . 5
-13.7- 2 . 6
4.8-14.7
99.3
84.9
117.2
122.4128.7140.5144.4153.7161,0165.8162.4162.1166.4
164.8171.8179.9189.1185.9191.9197.2200.8204.3211.9
216.6220.3227.8232.2243.7253.6265.6272.9286.7291.9
295.7300.4312.0319.0316.8324.0336.7350.1360.5371.3
382.1391.2396.3
380.8380.9381.1385.5
391.5387.2390.5395.6
398.5392.6392.5401.5
1.1
- 2 . 8
2.83.81.7
- . 6- . 5
U- 1 . 6
3.8- 1 . 5
5.14.72.6
- . 81.53.22.9
.61.63.1
1.63.03.74.21.93.64.55.63.63.9
3.75.13.04.52.2
~2A6.34.31.1
- 2 . 45.1
- 2 . 0
2.2- 1 . 3- 2 . 4- 8 . 0
2.33.07.97.3
- 1 . 7- 1 . 7- 1 , 5- 2 . 9
127.4
110.7
135.2
139.9158.5193.9242.0263.7263.0200.8188.1192.5198.3
207.4231.3243.2247.5249.1260.1270.2282.4287.6299.4
312.5326.9341.5356.2374.0390.7412.6434.1453.0469.2
482.4497.8519.0542.8562.8575.9595.0617.3644.7670.7
687.1695.6701.3
684.2686.0690.0688.2
693.1693.2697.5698.6
697.0702.2703.6702.3
43.9
14.0
30.3
32.543.346.326.218.118.839.144.652.453.6
65.964.365.569.374.380.780.579.781.789.8
89.091.797.4
104.1108.6116.0115.9113.9122.0122.5
116.3127.3137.3139.1121.0108.3116.0124.4131.9131.0
118.9117.6113.1
128.3113.6114.3119.6
121.9119.2115.7113,4
111.9113.0112.5114.9
12.313.918.0
23.019.317.122.621.629.823.024.518.623.2
25.321.226.028.729.435.734.831.838.537.4
29.838.941.646.437.135.745.350.750.347.0
38.741.537.6
42.033.836.742.2
41.644.545.634.4
31.339.742.337.1
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
171Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-8.—Gross national product by sector, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
19401941...19421943194419451946194719481949...
1950...19511952...195319541955 ..19561957...19581959..
1960..19611962...1963196419651966196719681969
197019711972... , ..197319741975..197619771978.1979
1980..19811982 p.
1980:
IIIIIIV
1981:1IIIllIV....
1982:I
IllIV P
Grossnationalproduct
1034
55.8
90.9
100.0125 0158.5192.1210.6212 4209.82331259.5258.3
286 5330.8348 0366 8366.8400 0421.7444 0449.7487.9
506 5524.6565 0596.7637 7691.1756 0799.6873 4944.0
992 71,077.61185 91,326.41434 21,549.21,718.01,918.32,163.92,417.8
2,633.12,937.73.057.5
2,575.92,573.42,643.72,739.4
2,864.92,901.82,980.93,003,2
2,995.53,045.23 088 23,101.3
Gross domestic product
Total1
102.6
55.5
90.5
99.6124.5157.9191.6210.1212.0209.0231.8257.9256.9
284.8328.7345.7364.6364.5397.3418.5440.5446.6484.6
5029520.7560.5591.8632.3685.2750.3793.7866.7937.1
98541,068.51,175.01,310.41,414.41,531.91,697.51,894.92,134.32,375.2
2,587.02,888.53,011.9
2,527.22,526.62,597.82,696.5
2.817.92,855.22,931.22,949.8
2,949.62,995.73,041.63,060.5
Business *
Total
95.4
49.1
80.6
89.4112.6139.9162.8174.2172.8183.8210 0234.9231.5
257 5294.4307.3324 9323.9354 0372.1390 8393.1428.3
442 0455.7490 6517.25516598.4652.6685.17454803.2
837 3907.1998 6
1,118.71206 41,301.71,447.31,624.01,837.22,052.1
2,228.82,492.42,582.5
2,183.32,173.72,237.22,321.1
2,433.42,463.92 533.92,538.6
2,530.62,570.12,610.02,619.3
Nonfarm1
84.7
43.8
72.9
81.8103.1127.7149.3156.2152.7164.4188 2213.1212.2
236 3268.3283 4302 3302.3333 9355.7373 7372.2410.6
424 2435.74681495.0532 2577.76284663.3725 0782.1
8131875.4963 4
1,068.01155 01,247.31,396.31,574.21,781.01,982.1
2,159.52,418.52,507.6
2,106.42.108.62,168.02,255.2
2,357.52,394.62 454 72,467.4
2,465.12,494.42 530.22,540.6
Farm
9.74.6
6.3
6.48.9
13.015.315.316.018.820.223.318.8
20.022.922.220.319.718.818.618.420.719.0
20 220.220 420.519 321.922.822.122.625.1
25 827.631949.947 748.945.948.458.771.6
65.475.874.8
66.361.267.066.9
70.873.980.178.4
72.974.876.175.2
Statis-tical
discrep-ancy
1.1
.7
1.4
1.1.6
- . 8- 1 . 8
2.74.1
.51.5
- 1 . 6.6
133.21.7232.013
-2 .1- 1 2
.213
24- .1211.7
1- 1 . 2
1.4.3
- 2 . 1-3 .9
154.13 3
.8375.55.11.4
-2 .6- 1 . 5
3.91.9.1
10.53.82.2
-1 .0
5.1- 4 . 6= .8
- 7 . 2
- 7 . 5.8
3.63.6
House-holdsandinsti-
tutions
2.S
1.7
2.3
2.42.52.93.23.74.14.55.15.65.9
6.46.97.27.88.19.19.8
10.511.412.3
13 814.415.516.617.819.221.123.426.129.4
32.335.438.642.145.850.655.660.567.875.6
85.496.4
106.7
81.584.086.589.7
92.995.297.1
100.3
103.3105.3107.9110.4
Governmen
Total
4.3
4.7
7.6
7.89.4
15.125.632.235.220.816 717.419.4
20.927.431.231932.534.236.639142.144.0
47150.554 358.062.967.676.585.195.2
104.5
115 8126.0137 8149.6162 2179.6194.6210.3229.3247.4
272.82997322.7
262.4269.0274.0285.8
291.6296.2300.1310.9
315.8320.3323.8330.8
Federal
0.9
1.2
3.4
3.55.0
10.620.927.229.814.69.48.9
10.0
10.716.218.918.617.818.419.019.620.520.9
21.722.624.125.227.028.332.435.639.341.9
44.846.850.151.954.959.062.466.371.775.7
82.992.399.8
79.881.481.688.7
89.990.591.097.9
98.698.999.1
102.4
2
Stateandlocal
3.5
3.5
4.2
4.34.44.54.74.95.46.27.38.59.4
10.111.212.313 314.715.817.619 621.623.1
25.527.930.232.935.939.344.149.555.962.6
71179.387.797.7
107.3120.6132.3144.0157.6171.8
189.9207.4222.9
182.7187.6192.4197.0
201.7205.6209.2213.0
217.1221.4224.7228.4
Restof theworld
0.8
.3
.5
.4
•5
.5
.4
.81.21.61.4
1.62.12.3222.32.83.23.53.03.3
3.63.94.64.95.55.95.65.96.76.9
7.39.2
10.916.019.817.320.523.529.642.6
46.149.245.7
48.746.845.942.9
47.146.649.753.3
45.849.546.640.8
Percent
frompreced-
period,gross
nationalproduct3
6.6
=4.2
7.0
10.025.026.721.3
9.6.9
-=1.211.111.3= .5
10.915.55.254
.0905.45.31.38.5
3.83.67.75.66.98.49.45.89.28.1
5.28.6
10.111.88.18.0
10.911.712.811.7
8.911.64.1
12.2
15.3
19.65.3
11.43.0
- 1 . 06.85.81.7
1 Includes compensation of employees in government enterprises.8 Compensation of government employees.3 Changes are based on unrounded data and therefore may differ slightly from changes computed from data shown here.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
172
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-9.—Gross national product by sector in 1972 dollars, 1929-82
[Billions of 1972 dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarterPrrxeeUfOSS
nationalproduct
315.7
222.1
319.8
344.1400.4461.7531.6569.1560.4478.3470.3489.8492.2
534.8579.4600.8623.6616.1657.5671.6683.8680.9721.7
737.2756.6800.3832.5876.4929.3984.8
1,011.41,058.11,087.6
1,085.61,122.41,185.91,254.31,246.31,231.61,298.21,369.71,438.61,479.4
1,474.01,502.61,475.5
1,494.91,457.81,463.81,479.4
1,507.81,502.21,510.41,490.1
1,470.71,478.41,481.11,471.7
Gross domestic product
Total
313.2
220.9
318.2
342.8398.7460.1530.3567.7559.3476.4467.8486.8489.4
531.8575.6596.9619.8612.1653.0666.5678.3676.2716.8
732.0751.0793.8825.6868.9921.4977.5
1,003.91,050.01,079.7
1,077.61,112.81,175.01,239.21.229.01,217.81.282.61,352.81,418.71,453.2
1,447.91,477.21,453.2
1,466.41,431.01,438.11,456.0
1,482.81,477.81,485.01,463.3
1,448.01,454.11,458.61,452.2
Businessl
Totall
271.5
180.0
261.0
282.7327.6361.8385.6403.6397.9385.5393.8412.0409.8
448.7478.0492.8515.6508.5547.0557.4566.1561.7600.0
610.1625.1663.2691.6730.3777.7824.0842.0882.1907.1
904.8938.6998.6
1,060.71,047.41,032.41,095.41,163.71,224.31,255.6
1,246.71,274.31,249.7
1,266.61,230.01,236.21,254.0
1,279.71,274.81,282.41,260.2
1,244.41,250.51,255.41,248.4
Nonfarm1
244.7
152.5
231.3
254.6299.8335.3362.1370.1362.8358.6367.0389.0383.4
419.4447.2463.7484.3477.0516.0531.5539.5532.0574.0
584.2596.3631.5659.7701.3749.6794.1812.8855.6881.9
875.4901.7963.4
1,028.41,012.4
994.51,059.51,129.51,193.51,222.4
1,210.31,236.81,210.1
1,224.91,192.61,200.91,222.6
1,242.91,240.91,241.91,221.5
1,210.01,212.21,214.41,204.0
Farm
23.6
24.9
25.2
24.526.228.627.727.125.625.824.025.825.6
27.025.826.427.728.429.328.928.229.327.8
29.228.928.829.628.829.828.229.529.029.5
31.132.631.931.631.833.632.133.132.634.2
34.238.439.6
35.635.334.032.0
34.136.340.942.3
38.138.039.342.8
Statisti-raiC3I
discrep-ancy
3.1
2.6
4.6
3.61.6
- 2 . 1- 4 . 2
6.49.41.12.9
- 2 . 8.8
2.45.02.63.63.11.8
- 3 . 0- 1 . 7
.3- 1 . 9
- 3 . 3- .22.92.3.2
- 1 . 61.7
- .3- 2 . 5- 4 . 4
- 1 . 74.23.3.7
3.24.43.81.0
-1.8-1.0
2.2- . 9
.0
6.12.11.2
- .5
2.7- 2 . 4- .4
- 3 . 6
- 3 . 7.4
1.71.7
Urn teanouse-holds
andinsti-
tutions
15.6
12.2
15.1
16.115.916.415.215.115.015.116.016.717.3
18.318.718.619.319.421.422.523.124.224J
26.627.028.128.929.830.932.634.335.437.0
36.737.638.639.439.340.540.941.543.344.6
45.846.948.1
45.345.446.046.4
46.846.746.747.4
47.847.948.048.6
Government2
Total
26.2
28.8
42.1
44.055.281.9
129.4149.1146.475.958.058.162.3
64.779.085.585.084.184.686.789.190.392.2
95.398.9
102.5105.2108.8112.7120.8127.7132.4135.7
136.1136.7137.8139.1142.3144.9146.3147.7151.2153.0
155.4156.0155.4
154.4155.6155.9155.7
156.3156.2155.9155.8
155.7155.7155.2155.1
Federal
5.2
6.6
16.9
18.629.656.7
105.0125.2121.849.729.829.231.3
32.746.251.649.647.245.945.645.844.544.5
45.246.248.348.248.548.753.057.258.058.2
55.252.550.148.248.548.448.548.649.349.0
49.549.749.8
49.049.849.849.4
49.649.749.849.8
49.849.849.849.9
Stateandlocal
21.0
22.1
25.2
25.425.625.224.523.924.626.228.229.031.0
32.032,833.935.436.938.641.043.345.847.7
50.152754.357.060.464.067.970.574.477.4
80.984.287.790.893.896.597.899.1
101.9104.1
105.9106.3105.6
105.4105.8106.1106.3
106.8106.5106.1106.0
106.0105.9105.4105.3
Restof theworld
2.4
1.3
1.6
1.41.71.51.31.41.11.82.53.02.7
3.03.73.93.74.04.55.15.54.64.9
5.25.76.56.97.57.97.47.58.27.9
8.09.5
10.915.117.313.815.616.919.926.3
26.125.422.2
28.626.825.723.4
25.024.425.426.7
22.724.222.519.5
Percentchangefrom
preced-ing
period,gross
nationalproduct3
6.6
- 2 . 2
7.8
7.616.315.315.17.1
- 1 . 5-14 .7
- 1 . 74.1.5
8.78.33.73.8
- 1 . 26.72.11.8
- .46.0
2.22.65.84.05.36.06.02.74.62.8
- .23.45.75.8
- .6- 1 . 2
5.45.55.02.8
- .41.9
-1.8
1.5-9.6
1.64.3
7.9-1.5
2.2-5.3
- 5 . 12.1
.7- 2 . 5
1929
1933
1939
194019411942194319441945194619471948....1949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959....
196019611962....1963196419651966....196719681969....
197019711972....1973....197419751976....1977 ....1978....1979....
1980....1981....1982 »..
1980:IIIIllIV
1981:
if.'.'."'.IllIV
1982:
if.'."'.!IllI V . .
1 Includes compensation of employees in government enterprises.2 Compensation of government employees.3 Changes are based on unrounded data and therefore may differ slightly from changes computed from data shown here.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
173
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-10.—Gross national product by industry, 1947-81
[Billions of dollars]
Year
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
Grossnation-alprod-uct
233.1259.5258.3
286.5330.8348.0366.8366.8
400.0421.7444.0449.7487.9
506.5524.6565.0596.7637.7
691.1756.0799.6873.4944.0
992.71,077.61,185.91,326.41,434.2
1,549.21,718.01,918.32,163.92,417.8
2,633.12,937.7
AnrirnlAgricul-ture,forestry,
andfisheries
20.824.019.5
20.823.823.121.320.7
19.919.719.521.920.2
21.421.521.922.021.0
23.824.824.225.027.8
28.630.835.453.852.2
53.351.254.666.079.6
74.185.6
Mining
6.89.48.1
9.310.210.110.610.9
12.413.413.512.412.3
12.612.712.813.113.4
13.514.214.615.316.1
17.617.419.021.732.2
38.843.047.452.066.8
94.1127.2
fVincon-
struction
9.111.511.5
13.015.416.617.117.2
18.520.621.421.022.8
23.224.025.727.429.8
32.835.937.541.346.3
48.953.659.466.369.2
69.976.686.6
102.1115.7
121.2127.2
Gross domestic product
Manufacturing
Total
66.274.772.1
83.798.7
103.0112.1106.4
120.9126.8131.4123.8141.3
143.8144.4157.9167.4179.4
197.7216.6222.3242.8256.7
252.2265.6292.5326.1340.7
358.2410.4464.8518.7563.2
581.2644.0
Dura-ble
goods
33.538.137.1
45.855.458.965.960.8
70.673.777.769.781.2
82.181.391.597.6
105.3
118.0130.4133.6146.0154.5
146.2153.9173.2195.9201.3
207.6240.0277.7316.7344.3
347.8388.4
Non-durablegoods
32.736.535.0
37.943.344.146.245.6
50.353.253.754.160.0
61.763.166.469.874.2
79.786.388.796.8
102.2
105.9111.7119,3130.2139.4
150.6170.4187.1202.0218.9
233.4255.6
Trans*portationand
publicutilities
20.523.123.4
25.729.231.032.932.6
35.638.340.240.443.7
45.847.450.253.056.3
60.565.368.674.080.0
85.793.8
104.3114.3122.9
135.7152.6170.9193.3209.6
232.4261.9
Ulhnlownoie-sale
andretailtrade
44.248.448.0
51.356.458.559.860.8
66.270.473.975.281.9
84.286.392.196.1
104.7
112.6121.5130.1144.4157.0
166.5181.4199.5221.5241.5
266.2291.4322.3362.3401.5
425.7472.7
Fi-nance,insur-ance,andreal
estate
23.226.228.6
31.935.238.742.846.5
50.053.557.662.467.3
71.675.480.685.391.0
98.0105.9114.2123.8133.6
142.4156.4169.8184.9202.0
216.2238.6275.5317.4358.3
405.2448.2
Services
20.221.922.6
24.025.927.529.430.5
34.037.340.242.346.3
49.252.356.160.065.3
70.878.486.194.2
105.3
114.4123.6136.5153.1167.5
186.2208.2234.3265.9302.4
342.5386.9
Govern-mentand
govern-mententer-prises
19.320.222.5
23.830.835.336.436.9
38.540.744.047.150.0
53.456.761.165.971.2
76.786.496.3
108.1118.2
130.5141,8155.4167.8182.7
202.0220.4237.2259.1279.6
306.8336.7
Statisti-Cdl
discrep-ancy
1.51.6.6
1.33.2
.1.72.32.0
1.3- 2 . 1= 1.2
.2- 1 . 3
- 2 . 4= .12.11.7.1
= 1.21.4
— 3- 2 ! l- 3 . 9
= 1.54.13.3.8
3.7
5.55.11.4
=2,6= 1.5
3.9- 1 . 9
Daetnestof the
world
1.21.61.4
1.62.12.32.22.3
2,83.23.53.03.3
3.63.94.64.95.5
5.95.65.96.76.9
7.39.2
10.916.019.8
17.320.523.529.642.6
46.149.2
Note.—The industry classification is on an establishment basts and is based on the 1972 Standard Industrial Classification.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
174Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-ll.—Gross national product by industry in 1972 dollars, 1947-81
[Billions of 1972 dollars]
YearGross
nationalproduct
Gross domestic product
Agri-culture,forest-ry, andfisher-
ies
Min-ing
Con-struc-tion
Manufacturing
TotalDura-
blegoods
Non-durable
Trans-por-
tationand
publicutil-ities
Whole-saleand
retailtrade
Fi-nance,insur-ance,andreat
estate
Serv-ices
Govern-mentand
govern-mententer-prises
Sta-tis-ticaldis-
crep-ancy
Resid-ual '
Restof theworld
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
470.3489.8492.2
534.8579.4600.8623.6616.1
657.5671.6683.8680.9721.7
737.2756.6800.3832.5876.4
929.3984.8
1,011.41,058.11,087.6
1,085.61,122.41,185.91,254.31,246.3
1,231.61,298.21,369.71,438.61,479.4
1,474.01,502.6
26.328.228.0
29.328.429.230.531.3
32.131.731.132.230.6
32.131.831.732.531.8
32.831.332.632.132.7
34.435.935.435.335.8
37.135.836.937.038.9
39.143.4
10.811.39.9
11.112.111.912.211.8
13.213.913.812.713.3
13.513.613.914.515.1
15.716.517.017.618.2
18.918.419.019.219.2
18.919.119.520.120.8
21.622.3
22.926.526.5
29.332.533.834.836.0
38.240.940.942.145.5
46.146.748.449.952.2
54.454.653.456.955.8
53.457.959.460.153.3
48.352.855.058.858.2
53.352.0
114.9121.4115.1
131.1146.0150.8161.1149.6
165.7166.9167.7153.3171.2
171.8172.0186.7202.2216.7
236.7254.9254.3268.2277.2
261.2266.8292.5325.3311.7
289.6317.4339.2357.2367.0
351.2359.2
68.572.066.3
78.189.994.3
102.691.7
103.4102.5102.988.8
100.9
101.099.5
110.0119.5129.8
144.6157.3157.4165.5170.3
155.2156.4173.2194.2186.3
168.8187.2202.9217.4223.4
210.0215.3
46.449.448.8
53.056.156.558.557.9
62.364.464.864.570.3
70.872.576.782.886.8
92.097.696.9
102.7106.8
106.0110.4119.3131.1125.3
120.8130.1136.3139.8143.6
141.2143.9
42.342.139.2
41.245.545.546.645.8
49.752.153.251.955.4
57.558.661.565.068.1
73.479.481.688.292.6
94.997.9
104.3110.6111.9
113.5118.6125.1134.2140.0
140.8142.1
75.978.079.8
87.588.391.093.994.5
103.1106.2107.9107.8115.4
117.5118.7126.3131.1139.1
148.2156.3160.1169.9173.6
176,4185.5199.5211.1207.0
209.7220.2231.0244.6250.7
243.3250.4
54.756.659.8
63.966.770.973.977.3
81.885.889.893.498.5
102.7107.3113.3116.8122.1
128.5133.9139.4145.7152.9
155.8162.6169.8177.2184.5
187.9194.8207.2217.8229.4
237.9243.6
55.957.557.6
59.760.861.662.762.9
67.670.974.176.280.8
83.586.690.394.098.8
103.1109.0115.0118.8124.0
126.7128.4136.5144.8147.9
148.5154.7164.3174.2183.0
189.0196.7
68.769.273.3
75.690.096.996.395.2
95.797.8
100.4101.7104.0
107.7111.6115.5118.7123.1
127.8136.9144.1148.9152.5
152.9153.9155.4157.2161.2
164.3165.7167.5171.7174.3
177.3178.1
2.45.02.63.63.1
1.8- 3 . 0- 1 . 7
.3- 1 . 9
- 3 . 3- . 22,92.3
-1 .61.7
- l i s- 4 . 4
- 1 . 74.23.3
4.43.81.0
- 1 . 8- 1 . 0
2.2- . 9
- 7 . 4-1 .2
- . 6
.8
.22.64.14.6
4.23.4
.94.54.0
3.14.43.2
- 1 . 51.7
2.33.06.76.24.6
4.71.2
.0- 2 . 5- 6 . 5
- 4 . 2- . 26.04.9
- 8 . 1
- 7 . 7- 9 . 7
2.53.02.7
3.03.73.93.74.0
4.55.15.54.64.9
5.25.76.56.97.5
7.97.47.58.27.9
8.09.5
10.915.117.3
13.815.616.919.926.3
26.125.4
1 Equals GNP in constant dollars measured as the sum of incomes less GNP in constant dollars measured as the sum of gross productby industry.
Note.—-The industry classification is on an establishment basis and is based on the 1972 Standard Industrial Classification.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
175Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T A B L E B-12.—Gross domestic product of nonfinancial corporate business, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
192919331939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982"
1980:
ll"Z!Z!I l l
IV1981:
1
nZZZIIIIV
1 9 8 2 :1IIIllIV "
GrossHnmacdomes-
ticproduct
ofnon-
financialcorpo-rate
business
50.124.443.7
50.465.682.998.7
102.195.399.3
120.0137.3133.5
151.9174.5182.3195.0191.9216.7231.6242.3236.3266.0
277.0285.0311.3331.8358.4393.6431.5454.1500.2544.1
563.7609.9678.0759.4818.9890.0
1,001.31,128.41,276.21,416.8
1,537.71.732.31,779.3
1,501.11,499 71,543.61,606.5
1,683.31,715.01,763.61,767.2
1,756.61,771.01,794.4
Capitalconsump-
tionallow-anceswith
capitalconsump-
tionadjust-ment
5.54.34.84.95.46.16.26.36.57.69.3
10.911.7
12.614.615.816.817.919.121.823.824.825.8
26.827.528.429.430.832.735.638.942.647.1
52.257.362.667.979.594.9
104.8115.7130.9149.6
172.0195.8213.7
162.7169.3175.4180.8
186.3192.6199.1205.1
207.8212.1216.0219.0
Total
44.520,239.0
45.460.276.892,495.888.891.8
110.7126.4121.8
139.3159.9166.6178.2174.0197.6209.8218.5211.6240.2
250.2257.5283.0302.3327.6360.9395.9415.2457.6497.0
511.4552.6615.5691.6739.4795.1896.5
1,012.71,145.31,267.3
1,365.71,536.51,565.6
1,338.41,330.51,368.21,425.7
1,497.01,522.41,564.51,562.0
1,548.81,559.01,578.4
Indi-rectbusi-nesstax,
etc.1
3.43.85.15.56.46.87.38.18.9
10.111.212.112.6
14.115.216.818.217.419.220.822.422.825.4
28.330.133.035.638.441.142.945.851.558.0
63.470.576.783.789.797.1
105.3112.6122.0130.5
148.6178.3182.0
138.4143.5151.3161.0
172.9179.0179.9181.3
176.3181.2184.2186.4
Total
41.216.333.9
40.053.870.085.287.779.981.699.6
114.3109.2
125.2144.7149.7160.0156.6178.4189.0196.1188.8214.8
221.9227.3249.9266.8289.3319.8353.0369.5406.1439.1
448.1482.1538.7607.9649.7697.9791.2900.1
1,023.31,136.7
1,217.11,358.21,383.6
1,200.01,186.91,216.91,264.7
1,324.01,343.41,384.51,380.8
1.372.41,377.81,394.2
Compen-sation
ofemploy-
ees
32.316.728.2
31.239.851.062.265.161.967.279.187.885.3
94.7110.2118.3128.7126.5138.5151.4159.1155.9171.6
181.1185.1199.8210.7226.3246.1273.5291.9322.8358.5
378.4402.0447.0506.2556.5581.1654.4738.5844.3958.1
1,041.71,150.11,189.2
1,020.61,023.61,043.21,079.6
1,118.61,140.01,167.01,174.5
1,181.61,190.41,195.81,188.8
Net domestic product
Domestic income
Corporate profits with inventory valuation and capitalconsumption adjustments
Total
7.5-2 .1
4.27.4
12.717.721.821.617.113.819.725.622.9
29.633.430.230.028.638.335.934.930.240.1
37.438.345.651.257.767.772.268.873.367.5
52.762.172.778.663.686.1
107.3129.5142.1134.7
123.0145.6121.9
129.6112.8121.8127.7
150.4142.1151.8138.2
120.3114.8125.3
Profits
Profitsbefore
tax
8.4.6
6.1B.B
16.420.123.622.217.822.029.131.824.9
38.539.133.834.932.142.041.839.833.743.1
39.739.544.248.955.465.270.366.372.969.4
56.865.476.696.0
105.3107.3135.0156.5178.4191.8
183.0186.6136.5
201.6157.4181.3191.6
202.5181.8191.5170.5
134.8131.3139.8
Prof-itstax
liabili-ty
1.2.5
1.42.77.5
11.213.812.610.28.6
10.811.89.3
16.921.217.818.515.620.220.119.116.220.7
19.219.520.622.824.027.229.527.733.433.1
27.029.833.640.042.041.252.659.666.969.2
64.863.340.6
74.353.563.667.8
71.561.465.554.8
38.937.142.1
Profits after tax
Total
7.3.1
4.76.19.08.99,89.67.6
13.418.320.015.6
21.617.916.016.416.421.821.820.717.522.4
20.520.123.526.231.438.040.838.639.536.2
29.835.643.056.063.366.182.396.8
111.5122.5
118.2123.395.9
127.3103.9117.7123.8
131.0120.4126.0115.7
95.894.297.6
Divi-dends
5.12.03.33.53.93.73.94.14.14.85.56.06.07.57.17.17.37.48.59.09.39.3
10.0
10.610.611.412.613.715.616.817.519.119.1
18.518.520.121.121.425.730.131.937.739.8
42.452.961.0
38.342.743.544.9
49.451.254.456J
58.059.762.663.8
Undis-tributedprofits
2.2-1 .9
1.42.65.05.25.85.63.58.6
12.814.09.6
14.110.88.89.19.0
13.412.711.48.2
12.4
9.99.5
12.213.517.722.424.021.220.417.1
11.317.122.935.041.940.452.264.973.882.8
75.870.334.9
89.061.274.278.9
81.669.271.658.9
37.834.535.0
Inven-tory
valua-tion
adjust-ment
0.5- 2 . 1-.7=.2
-2 .5- 1 . 2
— 8-'.Z- .6
- 5 . 3= 5.9- 2 . 2
1.9-5 .0- 1 . 2' 1.0- 1 . 0= .3
-1 .7-2 .7- 1 . 5- .3-=.3
- .2.3.0.1
=.5- 1 . 2- 2 . 1- 1 . 6-3 .7-5 .9
- 6 . 6-4 .6-6 .6
=20.0=40.0-11.6-=14.7= 16.2-24.0-43.1
-43.0-24.6"9.4
-57.2-28.2-41.1-45 .5
-35 .5-22 .8-23.0-17.1
- 4 . 4-=9.4
= 10.3-13.4
Capitalconsump-
tionadjust-ment
= 1.4= .6
= 1.1
- 1 . 2- 1 . 3= 1.2- .9- .3= .2
=3.03 5
=3.9
=3.9=4.6- 4 . 5-3 .9- 3 . 2- 2 . 0=3.2=3.4- 3 . 2-2 .7
=2.1- 1 . 5
1.42.32.93.73.94.04.04.02.41.32.72.6
=1.8-9 .7
-13 .0= 10.8-12.3= 13.9
-17.0= 16.3- 5 . 2
-14 .8™ 16.3-18 .4= 18.4
-16 .6-16.9= 16.7= 15.1
-10.0= 7.1=4.2
.5
Netinter-est
1.41.71,51.41.31.31.11.01.0.7.8.9
1.0.9
1.11.21.31.51.61.72.22.73.13.53.94.54.85.36.17.48.7
10.113.1
17.018.019.123.029.630.829.532.136.943,9
52.462.572.5
49.850.551.857.5
55.061.265.768.1
70.572.673.173.8
1 Indirect business tax and nontax liability plus business transfer payments less subsidies.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
176
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-13.—Output, costs, and profits of nonfinancial corporate business, 1948-82
[Quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
19481949
195019511952..19531954
19551956195719581959.
19601961196219631964
19651966..196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982*.
1980:
IIIllIV
1981:
IIIIIIV
1982:
\\ZZZZ.Ill
Gross domestic
nonfinancialcorporate
business (billionsof dollars)
Currentdollars
137 3133.5
151.9174 5182.3195.0191.9
216.723L6242.3236.3266.0
277.0285.0311.33318358.4
393.64315454.1500.2544.1
563.7609.9678.0759.4818.9
890.0100131,128.41,276.21,416.8
1,537.71,732.31,779.3
1,501.11,499.71,543.61,606.5
1683 3l>15.01,763.61,767.2
1,756.61,771.01,794.4
1972dollars
229 7219.9
247.52702275.2292.0283.4
315.1324.1328.3313.4347.4
358.4367.2399.74263455.6
495.2530.7543.0578.9604.0
599.6626.8678.0731.9708.2
694.2745.5795.8846.3876.1
860.3881.3856.4
874.1847.3852.5867.4
883 0884.2887.5870.4
858.8857.9859.3
Current-dollar cost and profit per unit of output (dollars)1
Totalcostand
profit2
0.598.607
.614646.663.668.677
.688
.715
.738
.754
.766
.773
.776
.779778.787
.795
.813
.836
.864
.901
.940
.9731.0001.0381.156
1.2821.3431.4181.5081.617
1.7871.9662.078
1.7171.7701.8111.852
1.9061.9401.9872.030
2.0452.0642.088
Capitalconsump-
tionallow-anceswith
capitalconsump-
tionadjust-ment
0 047.053
.051054.057.058.063
.061
.067
.073
.079
.074
.075
.075
.071069.068
.066
.067
.072
.074
.078
.087
.091
.092
.093
.112
.137141
.145
.155
.171
.200
.222
.250
.186
.200
.206
.208
211,218.224.236
.242
.247
.251
Indi-rectbusi-nesstax,
etc.3
0 053.057
.057056.061.062.061
.061
.064
.068
.073
.073
.079
.082
.083083.084
.083
.081
.084
.089
.096
.106
.113
.113
.114
.127
.140141
.141
.144
.149
.173
.202
.213
.158
.169
.178
.186
196.202.203.208
.205
.211
.214
Compen-sation
ofemploy-
ees
0 382.388
.383408.430.441.446
.439
.467
.484
.497
.494
.505
.504
.500494.497
.497
.515
.538
.558
.594
.631
.641
.659
.692
.786
.837878
.928
.9981.094
1.2111.3051.389
1.1681.2081.2241.245
12671.2891.3151.349
1.3761.3881.392
Corporate profits withinventory valuation and
capital consumptionadjustments
Total
0112.104
.120124
.110
.103
.101
.122
.111
.106
.097
.116
.104
.104
.114120
.127
.137
.136
.127
.127
.112
.088
.099
.107
.107
.090
.124144
.163
.168
.154
.143
.165
.142
.148
.133
.143
.147
170.161.171.159
.140
.134
.146
Profitstax
liability
0 051.042
.068079.065.063.055
.064
.062
.058
.052
.060
.054
.053
.052053.053
.055056.051.058.055
.045
.047
.049
.055
.059
.059071.075.079.079
.075
.072
.047
.085
.063
.075
.078
081.069.074.063
.045
.043
.049
Profitsaftertax4
0 060.062
051045045.040.046
057.049048.045.056
.051
.051
.062067.074
.082080.076.069.057
.043
.052
.058
.053
.030
.065073.088.089.075
.068
.093
.095
.063
.070
.068
.069
089.091.097.096
.095
.091
.097
Netinterest
0 004.004
.004004.004.004.005
.005
.005
.007
.009
.009
.010
.011
.011Oil.012
.012
.014
.016
.017
.022
.028
.029
.028
.031
.042
.044040.040.044.050
.061
.071
.085
.057
.060
.061
.066
.062
.069
.074
.078
.082
.085
.085
Outputper hour
of allemploy-
ees(1972
dollars)
5.2065.433
5.5365.7275 9976 2486.469
6.6736.7766.8477.0747.092
7.1157.4507.6647.8497.555
7.7748 0028.1448.2178.202
8.1698.311
8.1648.0898.1928.235
8 3288.3208.3248.273
8.2798.3348.429
Compen-sation
per hourof all
employ-ees
(dollars)
2.5892.684
2.7972.8872.9983 0893.213
3.3163.4923.6803.9454.209
4.4914.7785.0525.4295.937
6.5077.0247.5588.1998.970
9.89110.846
9.5339.771
10.02410.249
10 55110.72710.94711.163
11.39111.56411.730
1 Output is measured by gross domestic product of nonfinancial corporate business in 1972 dollars.2 This is equal to the deflator for gross domestic product of nonfinancial corporate business with the decimal point shifted two
places to the left.3 Indirect business tax and nontax liability plus business transfer payments less subsidies.4 With inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis) and Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics).
177Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-14.—Personal consumption expenditures, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:I
tilIV
1981:
IIIIIIV
1982:
IIIIIIV P
consump-tion
expendi-tures
77.3
45.8
67.0
71.080.888.6994
108 2119 5143 8161 7174 7178 1
192 0207 L217 L229 1235 8253 7266 0280 4289 53108
324 9335 0355.2374 6400 54304465. L490 3536 95818
621.?672 2737 1812 0888 1976.4
1 084.31,204.41 346.51,507.2
1667 21,843.21,972.0
1618 71622 21682 01,745.8
1,799.91819 41,868.81,884.5
1919.41947 81,986.32,034.6
Durablegoods
9.2
3.5
6.7
7.89.76.96.56.780
15.820422.925.0
30829.829.132.531.838 637.939.336.842.4
43.141.646.751.456.463 068.070.180 585.7
85.297.2
111.1123.31215132.2156 8178.2200 2213.4
214 3234.6242.7
220 8199 0212 7224.7
236 9230 4241.2229.6
237.9240.7240.3251.7
Nondura-ble goods
37.7
22.3
35.1
37.042.950.858.664.371982.790.996.694.9
98 2108.8113.9116.5118.0122.9128.9135.2139.8146.4
1511155.3161.6167.1176.9188 6204.7212.6230 6247.8
265.7278.8300.6333 4373 4407.34417478.8528 2600.0
670.4734.5762.7
650 6656 7673 7700.5
720 6729 6741.3746.5
7491755 0768.4778.3
Services
30.3
20.1
25.2
26.228.231.034.337.139.645.350.455.358.2
63 068.574.080.686.192.199.2
105.9112.8121.9
130.7138.1147 0156.1167.1178 7192.4207.6225 8248.2
270.8296.2325.3355 2393 2437.0485 7547.46180693.7
782 5874.1966.6
747 3766 6795 6820.6
842 4859 4886.3908.3
932.49521977.6
1,004.5
Durable goods
Motorvehicles
and parts
3.3
1.1
2.3
2.83.5
.7
.8
.8104.16.68.0
10.6
13 712.211.313.913.017.815.817.214.818.9
19.717.821.524.426.130 030.430.136 338.7
36.245.452.457.150 455.872 684.895.796.6
89.798.6
106.2
97.979 288193.7
102194 2
104.093.9
103.2103 3104.3114.1
Furnitureand
householdequip-ment
4.7
1.9
3.4
3.84.84.63.93.8458.4
10.611.511.3
13.714.014.014.614.616.217.116.916.617.8
17.717.918.920.322.824 727.729.532 334.1
35.237.241.747.150 653.559165.772.881.8
86.393.492.7
85 583 486 090.4
93193 393.893.3
91.093 292.794.0
Other
1.2
.5
1.0
1.11.31.61.92.12.53.2333.43.2
333.63.94.14.24.65.05.25.45.8
5.85.86.36.77.68.39.9
10.511813.0
13.914.616.919.220 522.925.227.731.735.1
38.342.643.7
37.536 438 640.6
41.742 943.442.4
43.744.243.343.6
Nondurable goods
Food
19.5
11.5
19.1
20.223.428.433.236.740647.452 354.252.5
53960.463.464.465.467.269.973.676.479.1
81.183.285.587.892.798.9
106.6109.6118 7127.5
138.9144.2154.9172.1193.7213.6230.6249.8275.9311.6
343.7375.3397.8
333.9336 4346 4358.0
368.83721378.0382.3
387.9395 0401.3406.8
Clothingand
shoes
9.4
4.6
7.1
7.58.8
11.013.414.616 518.218 820.119.3
19 621.221.922.122.123.124.124.324.726.1
26.727.428.729.531.933.536.638.242.145.5
46.850.655.461.464.869.675.382.692.499.1
104.7114.6118.6
103.0102 2104 8108.9
112.3114 0115.9116.0
117.5118 4119.1119.5
See next page for continuation of table.
178Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-14.—Personal consumption expenditures, 1929-82—Continued
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:|IIMlIV
1981:1IIIIIIV
1982:1IIIllIV
Nondurable goods-cont'd
Gasolineand oil
1.8
1.5
2.2
2.32.62.11.31.41.83.44.04.85.3
5.56.16.87.4788.69.4
10.210.611.3
12.012.012.612.913.514.716.017.018.620.7
22 423.925.428.636.640.444.048.151.266.6
87.096.893.9
82.086.187.092.8
95.296.797.797.5
95.391.394.294.9
Fuel oiland coal
1.6
1.2
1.4
1.51.7192.0202.22.53.03.43.1
3.43.53.43.4353.83.94.14.24.0
383.73.74.0414.44.74.84.74.5
444.5506.27.78.29.8
10 711.916.1
19.019.717.6
18.818.619.319.2
20.019.919.919.2
17.317.318 417.6
Other
5.4
3.5
5.3
5.66.4758.796
10.811.312.814.114.7
15.817.618.319.319 220.321.623.024.025.9
27 529.031.132.834 637.240.943.046.549.6
53 255.559 865.070.575.582.187 696.9
106.6
116.0128.2134.8
112.9113.4116.2121.6
124.3127.0129.8131.5
131.1133.1135 4139.6
Services
Housing 1
11.7
8.1
9.4
9.710.411.211.812.312.814.216.017.919.6
21.724.327.029.832.234.336.739.342.045.0
48.151.254.758.061465.569.574.179.887.0
93 9102.7112.5123.8137.4149.8166.51859209.6236.0
266.0295.3324.7
254.8261.6269.6278.1
284.4291.3298.7307.0
314.5320.4328.2335.5
Household operation
Total
4.0
2.8
3.8
4.04.34 85.2596.46.87.58.18.5
9.510.411.112.012 614.015.216.217.318.5
20121.022.223.424 826.328.030.032.235.0
37 741.045 249.655.263.371.681190.199.3
111.7128.9144.1
105.1108.9114.7118.2
120.7125.2132.8136.9
141.4140.7145.0149.3
Electricityand gas
1.2
1.1
1.4
1.51.5161.7181.92.12.32.62.9
3.33.74.14.5505.56.16.57.17.6
838.89.49.9
10 410.911.512.213.114.2
15 417.018 820.524.029.232.938 542.947.8
56.666.875.2
50.954.859.261.4
61.964.669.471.2
75.172.675 277.8
Other
2.9
1.7
2.4
2.62.7323.5414.54.75.15.45.6
6.26.77.07.5768.59.29.7
10.210.9
11812.212.813.614 415.416.517.819.220.8
22 224.026 429.131.234.138.742 647.251.5
55.162.168.9
54.254.155.556.8
58.860.763.565.7
66.368.169.971.5
Transpor-tation
2.6
1.5
2.0
2.12.4273.4374.05.05.35.85.9
6.26.77.17.8798.28.69.09.3
10.1
10 711.211.712.212 813.715.016.217.619.5
22 025.127 528.830.933.238.646.451.256.3
62.965.470.3
61.261.664.164.6
66.264.365.565.7
66.969.571.573.4
Other
Total
12.0
7.7
10.0
10.311.212 213.915 216.419.421.723.624.1
25.627.028.831.033 335.638.741.444.348.3
51754.858.362.568173.379.987.296.2
106.8
117 2127.41401153.0169.8190.7209.0234.1267.1302.0
341.9384.4427.6
326.2334.5347.2359.8
371.1378.5389.3398.7
409.6421.5432.9446.4
Medicalcare
2.2
1.5
2.1
2.22.4262.9333.64.55.56.36.4
6.97.38.08.997
10.311.012.013.114.3
15 416.418.019.522 323.926.028.431.436.5
41045.951457.464.573.783.396.5
108.4124.1
143.5170.9194.7
134.7140.6145.9152.9
159.7166.9175.6181.5
186.4192.1197 9202.4
1 Includes imputed rental value of owner-occupied housing.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
179Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-15.—Gross private domestic investment, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929.
1933.
1939.
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950 . .195119521953195419551956.19571958.1959
1960.196119621963196419651966.196719681969
1970.1971197219731974197519761977.1978.1979
198019811 9 8 2 "
1980:(||IIIIV
1981:
||IIIIV
1982:IIIIII.IV P
Grossprivate
domesticinvest-ment
16.2
1.4
9.3
13.117 99.9587.2
10 630.734 045.935.3
53.859.252.153.352 768.471069.261.978.1
75 974.885 490.997 4
113.5125 7122.8133.3149.3
144 2166.4195.0229 8228.72061257.93241386 6423.0
402.3471.5421.9
424 03910384.1410.3
455 7475 5486.0468.9
414 8431.5443.3397.9
Fixed investment
Total
14.5
3.0
8.8
10.91348.1648.1
11724.334 441.138.4
47.048.949.052 954 362.466367.963 472.5
72 972 579 284.9917
103.71116112.5125 4139.5
1410158.8184 82113214 5213 0246.030103601408.8
412.4451.1443 3
424 63914405.3428.0
443 5450 9454.2455.7
450 4447.7438 6436.4
Nonresidential
Total
10.6
2.4
5.9
7.5946.05.06.9
10.116.923 026.324.4
27.331.331.334.534 238.544 047.042 045.9
48 548.052 254.861072.783183.9907
101.3
103 9107.91210143 3156.6157 7174.1205 22489290.2
309.2346.1347.5
3112300 2307.8317.5
330 03413353.0360.2
357 0352.2344.2336.6
Struc-tures
5.1
1.0
2.0
2.33.01.91.41.92.86.97.79.08.7
9.511.411.612.913 414.617.718.417.217.6
18 819.120.120.522 427.030.130.332.436.7
38740.544.151055.955458.864.478 798.3
110.5129.7141.7
110 91091109.5112.6
119 6127 0132.7139.6
1414143.6141.3140.4
Pro-ducers'
dur-able
equip-ment
5.5
1.4
3.9
5.2644.13.75.0739.9
15.317.315.7
17.819.919.721.520 823.926328.624 928.3
29 728.932134.438 745.853 053.758 264.6
65 267.476992 3
100.7102 3115.3140 81702191.9
198.6216.4205.8
200 21912198.2204.9
210 4214 3220.2220.6
215 6208.6203.0196.2
Residential
Total
3.9
.6
2.9
3.44.02.21.41.31.57.4
11.414.913.9
19.817.617.718.420123.922.320.921.426.6
24 524.527.030.130.730.928.528.634.838.2
37150.963.868 057.955.372.095.8
1112118.6
103.2104.995.8
113.591297.6
110.5
113 6109 5101.295.5
93 495.594.399.8
Non-farmstruc-tures
3.6
.5
2.7
3.23.61.91.21.11.46.7
10413.712.8
18.616.416.517.319 022.821.219.720.325.3
23 323.225.828.929 429.627.127.233.336.5
35.448.961.565 654.852.468.892.0
107 0114.0
98.399.790.1
107 486 993.5
105.4
1091104 795.689.4
87 989.688.794.1
Farmstruc-tures
0.2
.0
.1
.2
.2
.2
.1
.5
.7
.9
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
.7
.6
.7
.7
.7
.7
.6
.6
.7
.6
.7
!6
.6
7.7
1.31.01.11.51.71.7
1.92.12.5
3.1141.02.0
1.3162.42.9
242.82.42.4
Pro-ducers'
dur-able
equip-ment
0.1
.0
.1
.1
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.3
.3
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
.6
.5
.5
.5
.6
.6
7.7.9
1.0
1.11.31.51.71.81.92.12.32.52.9
3.03.23.2
3.02.93.03.1
3.23.23.23.2
3.13.23.23.2
Change in
inventories
Total
1.7
- 1 . 6
.4
2.24.51.8
=.6-1 .0-1 .0
6.4= .54.7
- 3 . 1
6.810.33.1
.4- 1 . 5
6.04.71.3
- 1 . 55.7
3.02.36.36.05.69.9
14.110.37.99.8
3.27.7
10.218.514.1
- 6 . 911.823.026.514.3
= 10.020.5
-21.4
= .7= 4
-21.2= 17.7
12.224 631.813.2
=35.6-16.2
4.7-38.5
Non-farm
1.8
~ 1.4
.3
1.940.7
= 6= .6- 66.4133.0
=2.2
6.09.12.11.1
= • 2 15.55.1.8
=2.357
272,05.55.26.28.9
14.39.67.897
3.16.49.6
15.216.0
™ 10.513.921.925.4
8.6
=5.715.0
=21.6
740
-15.4= 12.3
10 019 324.66.0
=36 0= 15.0
3739.0
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
180Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-16.—Gross and net private domestic investment, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars]
Year
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
19501951195219531954195519561957.. . .1958.. . .1959...
196019611962196319641965..196619671968 . . ..1969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 p
Grossprivatedomes-
ticinvest-ment
16.2
1.4
9.3
13.117.99.9587.2
10 630.734 045.935.3
53.859.252.153.352 768.471.069.261.978.1
75.974.885.490.997.4
113.5125.7122.8133.3149.3
144 2166.4195.0229.8228 7206.1257.9324.1386.6423.0
402 3471.5421.9
Less:
con-sumption
allow-anceswith
capitalcon-
sumptionadjust-ment
9.7
7.4
8.7
9.110.011.211.511.712.214.017.320.221.8
23.527.229.331.032 734.838.741.743.544.9
46.347.549.050.652.956.060.765.972.180.0
88196.5
106.4116.5136 0159.3175.0195.2222.5256.0
293 2330.1356.8
Total
6.5
-6 .0
.6
4.17.9
- 1 . 3- 5 7- 4 . 6- 1 616.616 625.613.5
30.332.022.822.420 033.632.327.518.433.2
29.627.336.540.344.557.565.057.061.269.3
56 269.988.6
113 392 746.882.8
128.9164.1167.0
1091141.465.1
Total
4.8
45
.1
1.93.430
- 5 . 036
-.610.317.120.916.6
23.521.719.721.921627.627.626.119.927.5
26.724.930.234.438.947.650.946.653.359.5
52 962.378.494 878 553.771.0
105.9137.7152.7
119.1121.086.5
fIquals: Net private domestic investment
fYet fixed investment
Nonresidential
Total
3.1
- 3 . 5
6
.72.0
-2 .5- 3 . 5-1 .7
136.6
10211.38.1
9.610.79.1
10.891
11.913.914.38.1
10.6
12.310.914.015.319.728.935.431.933.638.1
33 931.137.051949 230.334.350.773.689.0
77 382.960.9
Struc-tures
1.7
16
10
7- .317
- 2 . 6201.22.42.12.72.3
2.93.93.84.85.15.97.97.96.46.4
7.37.37.97.89.1
12.914.813.814.516.6
16 315.616.620.718 913.114.116.023.333.7
36.045.949.5
Pro-ducers'durableequip-ment
1.4
18
.3
1.422
7_ 9
.3244.2828.65.8
6.76.75.36.0406.06.06.41.84.2
5.03.66.17.5
10.616.020.618.219.121.5
17 615.520.431230 317.320.234.750.455.3
41.337.011.5
Residential
Total
1.7
10
.8
1.215
- . 6- 1 . 6- 1 . 9- 1 8
3.76.89.78.5
13.911.010.611.112.515.713.711.811.816.9
14.414.016.219.019.118.715.514.719.821.3
19.031.241.342.929.323.436.855.264.063.7
41.838.125.6
Non-farmstruc-tures
1.7
9
.8
1.114
- . 5- 1 4-1 .7- 1 6
3.4649.17.9
13.410.610.310.812 215.613.411.711.616.7
14.313.916.118.818.918.615.314.519.621.0
18 930.940.942.528 423.136.554.563.363.2
41.437.725.1
Farmstruc-tures
- 0 . 1
- . 1
- . 0
.00
- . 1_ l- . 1_ 2
3.4.4
.3
.3
.3
2.0.1.1.1.1
- . 0.1.0,0.0
- . 0.0.0
- . 1
- . 0
- . 2- . 2- . 2- .4
.2- .2- . 2
.1
.1- .2
- .2- .1
.2
Pro-ducers'durableequip-ment
0.0
- . 0
.0
.0
o- .0
- . 1- 1
.12.2.1
.2
.1
,\,1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
'.2
A
A
'.6.7.7.5
.6
.6
.6
.5
.2
Change
busi-ness
inven-tories
1.7
- 1 . 6
.4
2.2451.8
6- 1 . 0
106.4
4.7- 3 . 1
6.810.33.1
A- 1 , 5
6.04.71.3
- 1 . 55.7
3.02.36.36.05.69.9
14.110.37.99.8
3.27.7
10.218.514.1
-6 .911,823.026.514.3
-10.020.5
-21.4
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
181
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-17.—Inventories and final sales of business, 1946-82
[Billions of dollars, except as noted; seasonally adjusted]
Year and quarter
Fourth quarter:1946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:
IIIllIV
1981:•I
IIIIV
1982:|||111IV P
Inventories1
Total
72.082.687.278.7
98 0110.5109 2110.1107.6
114 8124.0127 6127.3132.0
136 0137.9144 6150.4156.2
170.5187.4199.4213.5234.6
244.0260.8288 7357.7434.4
439.4473 6519.5602 3705.0
776.0822.4806.1
724.1737 2757.3776.0
791.6804.2814.3822.4
809.7812.5816.0806.1
Farm
22 725.122 919.8
26128.326024.623.8
22 522.924 325.624.4
25 625.927 327.626.5
29.929629.530633.3
32.336.745 666.662.4
64 560659.973981.9
86.981880.6
79.081186.286.9
85.986.581.581.8
84.586.483.580.6
Total
49.357.564.359.0
71982.283.185.583.9
92.2101.0103.3101.7107.6
1104112.1117 3122.7129.7
140.6157.8169.91829201.3
211.6224.12431291.2372.0
374.94130459.6528 3623.1
689.1740 5725.5
645.16561671.1689.1
705.7717.7732.8740.5
725.2726.1732.5725.5
Manu-facturing
26 729.332.528.9
35 243.444 446.444.3
48 854.554853.255.7
56 657.760 962.966.4
71.581788.7952
104.8
108.4109.9116 8141.1189.6
189 8207 5224.7254 2306.6
342.6366 4346.9
321.03281333.2342.6
352.6357.2365.1366.4
358.1352.7351.3346.9
Honfarm
Whole-sale
trade
10.110.511.711.8
13.814.614.815.015.3
16.617.918.218.320.0
204, 20.9
21.523.124.4
26.329.932.434.337.7
41.744.949460.276.9
77.386 998.7
114 6135.7
153.0163.0162.1
140.5144 0148.5153.0
156.5158.1159.5163.0
158.4160.8161.9162.1
Retailtrade
11.413.115.114.0
17 518.017.718.318.5
20.921.722.922.923.9
25 324.926 327.629.0
31.934.635.339042.8
44.350.555 764.874.1
74 682 993.7
1090121.0
127.7140 7141.8
121.3122 4126.1127J
129.0134.2139.1140.7
137.6140.2145.6141.8
Other
3.54.65.04.3
5.46.16.25.85.9
6.06.97.37.38.0
8.18.78.69.29.9
10.911.613.514.416.0
17.318.821225.031.3
33.335742.550.659.8
65.770.574.8
62.261563.465.7
67.668.369.170.5
71.172.473.774.8
Finalsales •
16018.319.619.5
21724.626,127.227.5
29.731.432.733.735.6
36938.841143.746.2
51.054.157.663 367.4
70.877.285 894.5
102.0
113.61241138.9159 5176.9
194.92104221.5
182.01812188.2194.9
201.8203.3208.5210.4
213.8215.5217.1221.5
Inventory—finalsales ratio
Total
4,504.514.444.03
4.534.494.184.053.91
3.863.953.903.773.71
3.693.553 523.443.38
3.343.463.463.373.48
3.453.383.373.794.26
3.873.823.743.783.99
3.983.913.64
3.984.074.023.98
3.923.963.913.91
3.793.773.763.64
Non-farm3
3 083.143 273.02
3 323.343183.153.05
3103.223163.013.02
2992.892 852.812.81
2.762.922.952 892.99
2.992.902833.083.65
3.303 333.313.313.52
3.543.523.28
3.543 623.573.54
3.503.533.513.52
3.393.373.373.28
1 End of quarter.8 Quarterly totals at monthly rates. Business final sales equals final sales less gross product of households and institutions,
government, and rest of the world, and includes a small amount of final sales by farms.3 Ratio based on total business final sales, which includes a small amount of final sales by farms.Note.—The industry classification of inventories is on an establishment basis and is based on the 1972 Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) beginning 1948 and on the 1942 SIC prior to 1948.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
182
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-18.—Inventories and final sales of business in 1972 dollars, 1947-82
[Billions of 1972 dollars, except as noted; seasonally adjusted]
Year and quarter
Fourth quarter:194719481949
19501951195219531954
195519561957..19581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
197019711972..19731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:
11IMIV
1981:
NHIIV
1982:
ItIllIV
Inventories'
Total
116.11216117.2
127.71414145.7147.2145.0
152 8158.61601158.3165.3
168.8171.8179.7187.2194.3
206.1222.92351244.1255.1
258 9267.0277 2294.4306.0
299 2307 0320.3336 3343.6
338 6347.6339.1
342 9342.3340.2338 6
339 2342.3346.4347.6
343.7342 6343 5339.1
Farm
25.726 726.2
27.529130.430 231.1
3 1 530.731432.432.4
32.833.234.535 735.1
36.236.036 837.037.3
37 739.239 842.141.8
43 041140.840 843.2
41143.243.3
43 042.441.7411
41241.742.443 2
43.343.143343.3
Total
90.594 891.0
100.2112 3115.4117.1114.0
1212127.8128.7125.9132.9
136.1138.6145.2151.5159.2
169.9186.8198 3207.0217.8
2212227.8237 4252.3264.2
256 3265 9279.5295 5300.4
297 5304.4295.7
299.9299.9298.4297.5
298 0300.6304.0304.4
300.5299.5300.2295.7
f
Manu-facturing
47.448 846.2
49.360 062.764560.9
64369.168 766.169.1
69.971.775.678 282.0
87.097.2
1041108.4112.8
112 9111.8114 41218130.9
12711309134.1139 8145.0
145 9148.4141.0
146.6147.4146.3145.9
146 9147.5149.41484
146.4144.6143.3141.0
tonfarm
Whole-satetrade
16.017 217.2
19.219 720.120320.6
22122.822 522.524.6
25.125.726.628429.9
31.635.337 838.941.244045.947 950.454.1
52 255559.763 564.7
65 066.565.7
64.664.965.065.0
64665.165.466 5
65.365.866.165.7
Retailtrade
18.320319.8
23.023 023.023.623.7
26.526.827.827.528.7
30.329.831.633.034.5
37.440.040.043.045.9
46.151.254.658.858.3
55.858 863.167.366.1
63.066.165.4
64.263.763.563.0
62.864.665.966.1
65.165.467.265.4
Other
8.7867.8
8.79.59.68.78.8
8.49.29.89.8
10.5
10.711.411.412.012.8
13.814.316.316.817.9
18.219.020.521.420.9
21.120.822.624.924.6
23.623.423.6
24.523.823.623.6
23.623.423.323.4
23.623.723.723.6
Finalsales2
33.234 434.6
36.939 841.643.043.1
45 646.547.148.149.7
50.753.155.358 360.9
66.167.570173.874.775.278.984.787.285.0
88.192.297.6
103.0105.4
105.0104.6105.5
105.8102.7103.7105.0
106.4105.2105.5104.6
105.0104.6104.3105.5
Inventory—finalsales ratio
Total
3.503 533.38
3.463 553.513423.36
3 353.413403.293.33
3.333.243.253 213.19
3.123.303 363.313.413443.383.273.383.60
3.403.333.283.273.26
3.223.323.21
3.243.333.283.22
3.193.253.283.32
3.273.283.293.21
Non-farm3
2.732 762.63
2.722 822.782 722.64
2 662.752 732.622.68
2.682 612.622 602.61
2.572.772 832.812.92
2 942.892 802.893.11
2.912.882.862.872.85
2.832.912.80
2.842.922.882.83
2.802.862.882.91
2.862.862.882.80
1 End of quarter.2 Quarterly totals at monthly rates. Business final sales equals final sales less gross product of households and institutions,government, and rest of world, and includes a small amount of final sales by farms.3 Ratio based on total business final sales, which includes a small amount of final sales by farms.
NOte.—The industry classification of inventories is on an establishment basis and is based on the 1972 Standard IndustrialClassification {SIC) beginning 1948 and on the 1942 SIC prior to 1948.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
183
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-19.—Relation of gross national product, net national product, and national income, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
194019411942194319441945 . . . . .19461947 ,19481949
19501951195219531954 „„1955195S . . .195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
197019711972197319741975 . .1976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:
IIIllIV
1981:
ItIIIIV
1982:IIIIllIV "
Grossnationalproduct
103.4
55.8
90.9
100.0125.0158.5192.1210.6212.4209.8233.1259 5258.3
286.53308348.0366.8366.8400.0421.7444.0449.7487.9
506 5524.6565 0596.7637.7691.1756 0799.6873 4944.0
992 71,077.61185.91,326.41,434.21 549.21,718.01,918.32,163.92,417.8
2 633.12,937.73,057.5
2,575.92 573 42*643 72J39.4
2 864.92 901.82,980.93,003.2
2,995.53,045.23 088.23J01.3
Less:Capital
consump-tion
allowanceswith
capitalconsump-
tionadjustment
9.7
7.4
8.7
9.110.011.211.511.712.214.017.320.221.8
23.527.229.331.032.734.838.741.743.544.9
46 347.549 050.652.956.060 765.972.180.0
88196.5
106.4116.5136.0159.3175.0195.2222.5256.0
293.2330.1356.8
278.4289,2298 6306.6
315.4325 0335.2344.8
348.7353.9359.4365.0
Equals:Net
nationalproduct
93.7
48.4
82.2
91.0115.0147.3180.7198.9200.2195.8215.7239.3236.5
263.0303.6318.7335.8334.1365.3383.0402.3406.2443.0
460 2477.05161546.1584.8635.06953733.7801.3864.0
904 7981.1
1 079.51,209.91,298.21 389.91,543.01,723.21,941.42,161.7
2 339 92,607.62,700.8
2,297.52 284 32 345 02,432.9
2 549.52 576 82,645.82,658.4
2,646.72,691.22,728.92,736.3
Indirectbusinesstax andnontaxliability
7.1
7.1
9.4
10.111.311.812.814.215.517.118.420.121.3
23.425.311129.729.632.235.137.538.741.8
45 448.051654.658.862.665 370.278986.6
94 3103.7111.5120.9129.1140.1151.7165.7178.2189.6
213.0251.3258.8
200.1206.7216 3228.9
244.6252 0253.3255.3
250.2256.7261.7266.5
Less:
Busi-ness
transferpay-
ments
0.6
.7
.5
.4
.5
.55.5.5.5.6.7.8
.8
.91.01.21.11.2141.51.61.8
202.0212.42.72.8303.1343.9
414.44.95.55.87.47.98.69.3
10.3
11412.413.7
11.011311511.8
12 012 212.512.8
13.113.513.814.3
Statis-tical
discrep-ancy
1.1
.7
1.4
1.1.6
=.8-=1.8
2.74.1.5
1.5=1.6
.6
1.33.21.72.32.01.3
= 2.1= 1.2
.2= 1.3
- 2 . 4• = . 12.11.7.1
= 1.21.4
= .3- 2 . 1=3.9
•-1.54.13.3
.83.75.55.11.4
= 2.6- 1 . 5
3.9- 1 . 9
.1
10.53.82.2
- 1 . 0
5.14.6
- . 8=7.2
- 7 . 5.8
3.6
PIUS:Subsidies
lesscurrentsurplus
ofgovern-
mententer-prises
-0 .2
--.0
.4
.4
.1
.1
.6
.7
.9-.2
- .1= .3
.1= .1- .3- .5
- ,0
.71.1
.41.71.81.11.71.62.51.61.41.9
2.92.63.83.41.12.41.03.13.73.4
5.56.68.3
3.84.77.46.0
5.87.26.57.0
6.04.95.8
16.5
Equals:Nationalincome
84.8
39.9
71.4
79.7102.7135.9169.3182.1180.7178.6194.9219.9213.6
237.6274.1287.9302.1301.1330.5349.4365.2366.9400.8
415.7428.8462.0488.5524.9572.4628.1662.2722.5779.3
810.7871.5963.6
1,086.21,160.71,239.41,379.21,550.51,760.31,966.7
2,117.12,352.52,436.5
2,079.72,067.22,122.32,199.2
2,293.72 324.42[387.32,404.5
2,396.92,425.22,455.6
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
184
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-20.—Relation of national income and personal income, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter Nationalincome
Less:
Corporateprofits
withinventoryvaluation
andcapital
consump-tion
adjust-ments
Netinterest
Contribu-tions for
socialinsurance
Wageaccruals
lessdisburse-
ments
Plus:
Govern-ment
transferpayments
topersons
Personalinterestincome
Personaldividendincome
Businesstransfer
payments
Equals:
Personalincome
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 P
1980:
\\ZZIIIIV
1981:
IIIIV
1982:IIIIllIV "...
84.8
39.9
71.4
79.7102.7135.9169.3182.1180.7178.6194.9219.9213.6
237.6274.1287.9302.1301.1330.5349.4365.2366.9400.8
415.7428.8462.0488.5524.9572.4628.1662.2722.5779.3
810.7871.5963.6
1,086.21,160.71,239.41,379.21,550.51,760.31,966.7
2,117.12,352.52,436.5
2,079.72,067.22,122.32,199.2
2,293.72,324.42,387.32,404.5
2,396.92,425.22,455.6
9.0
-1.7
5.3
8.614.119.323.523.619.016.622.329.427.1
33.938.736.136.335.245.543.743.338.549.6
47.648.656.662.169.280.085.182.489.185.1
71.483.296.6108.394.9110.5138.1167.3192.4194.8
181.6190.6161.1
195.3172.2177.8181.2
200.3185.1193.1183.9
157.1155.4166.2
4.7
4.1
3.6
3.33.33.12.72.42.21.82.32.42.7
3.03.54.04.45.35.96.67.99.6
10.3
11.413.014.716.418.321.024.427.630.034.8
41.446.551.260.276.184.587.2
102.5121.7153.8
187.7235.7265.3
175.7181.6190.4203.0
217.6231.6244.0249.5
258.7267.5268.1267.0
0.2
2.1
2.32.83.54.55.26.16.15.85.45.9
7.18.59.09.1
10.111.512.914.915.218.0
21.121.924.327.328.730.038.843.447.955.0
58.664.674.292.4
104.3110.9126.0140.6161.8186.9
204.0238.1253.7
199.4200.5204.6211.3
232.5236.2240.3243.5
250.8253.0255.2255.8
0.0 0.9
1.5
2.5
2.72.62.72.53.15.6
10.811.210.611.7
14.411.612.112.915.116.217.320.124.325.2
27.030.831.633.434.837.641.649.556.462.8
76.190.099.8
114.0135.4170.9186.4199.3214.6240.0
285.8323.9360.8
263.2271.9301.8306.5
310.8314.8332.3337.9
341.4351.7367.2382.9
6.9
5.5
5.4
5.35.35.25.15.25.96.67.68.18.7
9.710.511.212.513.714.916.718.820.322.5
25.026.429.032.235.639.744.448.353.461.1
69.474.880.993.9
112.4123.2132.5152.8179.4218.7
263.4329.0371.8
249.1258.0266.4280.2
304.7320.6339.6351.0
359.7372.0378.2377.2
5.8
2.0
3.8
4.04.44.34.44.64.65.66.37.07.2
8.88.58.58.89.1
10.311.111.511.312.2
12.913.314.415.517.319.119.420.221.922.4
22.222.624.126.529.129.936.539.645.350.8
55.962.567.0
54.155.756.557.4
59.261.564.165.2
65.866.167.268.8
.8
.91.01.21.11.21.41.51.61.8
2.02.02.12.42.72.83.03.13.43.9
4.14.44.95.55.87.47.98.69.3
10.3
11.412.413.7
11.011.311.511.8
12.012.212.512.8
13.113.513.814.3
85.0
47.0
72.4
77.995.4
122.6150.8164.5170.0177.6190.1209.0206.4
227.2254.9271.8287.7289.6310.3332.6351.0361.1384,4
402.3417.8443.6466.2499.25407588.2630.0690.6754.7
811.1868.4951.4
1,065.21,168.61,265.01,391.21,540.41,732.71,951.2
2,160.42,415.82,569.7
2,086.82,109.62,185.32,260.0
2,330.02,380.62,458.22,494.6
2,510.52,55272,592.52.623.2
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
185
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-21.—National income by type of income, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
192919331939
19401941.19421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 P
1980:
||IllIV
1981:
IIIllIV
1982:1.
IllI V
Nationalincome1
84 839 971.4
79 7102.7135 9169.31821180 7178 6194 9219.9213.6237.6274.1287.93021301.1330.5349.4365 2366.9400.8
4157428.8462.0488.5524.9572.4628.1662.2722.5779.3
810.7871.5963 6
1,086.21,160 71,239.41,379 21,550.51,76031,9667
2,117.12,352.52,436.5
2.079 72,067.22,122.32,199.2
2,293.72,324.42,387.32,404.5
2,396.92,425.22,455.6
Compensationof employees
Total
51.129 548.1
52164.885 3
109.51212123.11181129.2141.4141.3
154.8181.0195.7209 6208.4224.9243.5256 5258.2279.6
294 9303.6325.1342.9368.0396.5439.3471.4519.9572.9
612.0652.2718 0801.3877 5931.4
1,036 31,152.11,30111,458.1
1,598.61,767.61,855.9
1,555 21,571.71,604.91,662.8
1,718.01.750.01,789.11,813.4
1,830.81,850.71,868.31,873.7
Wagesand
salaries
50.529 046.0
49962.182,1
105.8116 7117.5112 0123.1135.5134.7
147.0171.3185.3198.5196.82117228.3239 3240.5258.9
2719279.5298,0313.4336.1362.0398.4427.0469.65157
548.7581.5635 2702.6765 2806.4889 9983.2
1106 51,237.4
1,356.11,494.01,560.1
1319 51,332.11,361.01,411.7
1,452.81,479.41,512.61,531.1
1,541.51,558.61,570.01,572.3
Supple-ments
towages
andsal-
aries 2
0.65
2.1
2327323.8455.6606.15.96.6
7.89,7
10.411011.613.215.217 217.720.6
23 024.127129.531.834.540.944.450.357.2
63.270.782 8987
112 3125.0146 4168.9194 62207
242.5273.6295.8
235 7239.6243.9251.0
265.2270.6276.5282.3
289.3294.1298.3301.4
Proprietors' income with inventory valuation and capital consumptionadjustments
Total
15.059
11.8
13 017.524.229.130431.836 735.940.936.4
38.743.243.441.841.242.943.945 347.747.6
47 248.649 950.552.556.960.561.264.067.0
66.269.476993.888,790.0941
103.9118,5132.1
116.3124.7120.1
122 7108.9115.5118.0
123.4123.8127.5124.1
116.4117.3118.4128.1
Farm
Total
6.12.54.4
4.46.4
10.112.012.012.414.915.117.612.8
13.716.115.113.1
n'i11.2n.i13.210.9
11712.112 312.010.813.114.112.612714.6
14.315.018732.826 524.619.119.126 331.9
19.424.018.6
22.115.920.319.2
21.622.527.124.6
17.817.416.622.6
Propri-etors'
in-come3
6.32.64.5
4.56.5
10.312.212.212.715.215.718.213.5
14.416.916.013.913.312.212.112.114.111.9
12.612.913.012.811.513.814.913.513715.7
15.616.420434.629.028.022.823.331.337.8
26.431.826.8
28.722.927.526.5
29.130.335.132.8
26.025.524730.8
Capitalconsump-
tionadjust-ment
0.2- .0
- .1- .2- .2
=.3- .3- .3=.5- . 6- . 7
= 7- . 8- . 8- . 8
- .9- .9- .9
= 1.0
- . 9- . 8- . 8- 7- . 7- . 7
- . 9- 1 . 0- 1 . 2
- 1 . 3- 1 . 4- 1 . 6-1 .8-2 .5-3 .4-3 .7- 4 . 3- 5 . 0- 5 . 9
- 7 . 0- 7 . 9-8 .1
-6 .6- 7 . 0- 7 . 2- 7 . 3
- 7 . 5- 7 . 8- 8 . 0- 8 . 2
- 8 . 2- 8 . 1- 8 . 1- 8 . 2
Total
8.9337.4
8.611.114.117.118.419.421.820.823.323.6
25.027.228.228628731.432.734.234.5367
35.536.537.638.541743.846.448.651.352.5
51.954.458.161.062.265.475.084.892.2
100.2
96.91007101.4
100.593.095.198.8
101.8101.2100.499.5
98.699.9
101.7105.5
Nonfarm
Propri-etors'
In-come4
8.8397.6
8611714.417.118.319.323.321.823.122.2
25.126.426.927 627.630.531.833.133.235.3
34.235.336.437.240.242.745.347.550.651.9
51754.558.162.365.867.477.186.894.9
103.2
99.9100.394.6
104.995.198.2
101.4
103.2100.999.397.7
93.894.594.4957
Inven-tory
valua-tion
adjust-ment
015
•= 2
» 0= .6= 4=.2= 1=.1
-1.7-1.5
-1.1- . 3
= 2=.0
= 3=.1= .0
.0
.0= .0= .0=.1
l ! 2- . 2
=.'5
= .'6
=2.0- 3 7- 1 . 2- 1 . 2= 1.2=2.0= 2.9
-=3.1- 1 . 6
4.3=2.0- 3 . 1=3.0
- 2 . 5- 1 . 4- 1 . 2- 1 . 2
.0= 1.0
-A
Capitalconsump-
tionadjust-ment
=01o
- . 0
o.01.2,2.22.5.6.9
1.01.01.11,21.21.21.41.41.41.4
1.31.21.21.41.51.31.31.31.11.1
.8
.4
.8
.6,1
= 8- .9
-.7= .1
.1
7.3
.0- . 2
.0
.5
1.21.82,33.0
476.47.9
10.3
1 National income is the total net income earned in production, ft differs from gross national product mainly in that it excludesdepreciation charges and other allowances for business and institutional consumption of durable capital goods and indirect businesstaxes. See Table B 19.
2 Employer contributions for social insurance and to private pension, health, and welfare funds; workmen's compensation; directors'fees; and a few other minor items.
See next page for continuation of table.
186Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-21.—National income by type of income, 1929-82—Continued
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
192919331939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959..
I9601961196219631964196519661967 *.'.'."19681969
19701971197219731974 ..v19751976197719781979
198019811982"
1980:
||IIIIV
1981:
IIIll(V
1982:I||IllIV*
Rental income of personswith capital consumption
adjustment
Total
4.92.22.6
2.73.14 04.4454.65.55.35.76.1
7.17.78.8
10.011.011.311.612.212.913.6
14.515.015.816.517.118.018.719.719 519.6
19.720.221022.623.523.023.524.826.627.9
32.933.934.1
30.832.733.834.2
34 434.033.633.6
33.934.234.633.9
Rentalincome
ofpersons
5.72.33.1
333.9505.6596.2737.7858.9
10.011012.213414.414 815.215916.717.4
18.018.419119.720.221.222.323.624 025.2
25.827129 032.135.336 839.244.050.056 2
65.369.470.8
61.864.866.967.5
68 768.969.570 5
71.070.770.970.9
Capitalcon-
sumptionadjust-ment
- 0 . 8- . 1- . 6
- . 6- . 8
- 1 . 0- 1 . 2-1 .4- 1 . 6- 1 . 8- 2 . 5- 2 . 8- 2 . 8
- 2 . 9- 3 3- 3 . 4- 3 4- 3 . 3- 3 5- 3 . 6- 3 . 6-3 .8- 3 . 8
- 3 . 5- 3 . 4- 3 4- 3 . 2- 3 . 2- 3 . 3- 3 . 6- 3 . 9- 4 5- 5 . 6
- 6 . 1- 6 . 9- 8 0- 9 . 5
-11.8- 1 3 8-15.6-19 .1-23 .4- 2 8 3
-32.4-35 .5-36.7
-31 .0-32 .1-33 .1-33.3
-34.3-34.9-35.9-36.9
-37 .1-36.4-36.3-37.0
Corporate profits with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments
Total
9.0175.3
8614.119 323.523 619.016 622.329427.1
33.938 736.136 335.245 543.743 338.549.6
47.648 656 662.169.280.085.182.489185.1
71.483 296 6
108.394.9
110 5138.1167.3192.4194 8
181.6190.6161.1
195.3172.2177.8181.2
200 3185.1193.1183.9
157.1155.4166.2
Profits with inventory valuation adjustment and withoutcapital consumption adjustment
Total
10.5- 1 . 2
6.5
9.815.420.524.524.019.319.625.933.431.1
37.943.340.640.238.447.546.946.641.652.3
49.750.055159.766.076.080.978.184 980.8
68.982.094 0
105.696.7
120.6151.6178.5205.1209.6
199.4207.5166.0
211.0189.4197.0200.4
217.6202.6210.3199.4
167.2162.2170.0
Profits
Profitsbeforetaxes
10.01.07.2
10 017.921725.324.219.824.831.835 629.2
42.944 539.641238.749.249.648.141.952.6
49.849.755 059.666.577.283.079.788 586.7
75.486.6
100 6125.6136.71321166.3194.7229.1252.7
242.4232.1175.4
268.2217.6238.1245.9
253.1225.4233.3216.5
171.6171.7180.3
Profitstax
liability
1.4
U
2.87.6
11.414.112.910.79.1
11.312.410.2
17.922.619.420.317.622.022.021.419.023.6
22.722.824 026.228.030.933.732.539.239.5
34.237.541.649.051.650.663.872.783.287.6
84.781.258.8
95.373.382.287.8
91.579.282.471.6
56.755.360.9
Profits after tax
Total
8.6
57
7.210.310.311.211.39.1
15.720.523 219.0
25.021.920.220 921.127.227.626.722.928.9
27.126.931133.438.546.349.447.249447.2
41.349.058 976.685.181.5
102.5122.0145.9165.1
157.8150.9116.6
172.9144.3155.9158.1
161.6146.2150.8144.9
115.0116.3119.4
Divi-dends
5.82.03.8
4.04.44.34.44.64.65.66.37.07.2
8.88.58.58.89.1
10.311.111.511.312.2
12.913.314.415.517.319.119.420.222.022.5
22.522.924.427.029.930.837.440.847.052.7
58.165.170.3
56757.858,759.6
61.564.066.868.1
68.869.370.572.4
Undis-tributedprofits
2.8- 1 . 6
2.0
325.8606.7674.5
10 214.216211.8
16.213.411.812.111.916.916.615.211.616.7
14.313.616 617.921.227.229.927.027.324.7
18.826.134.549.655.250.765.181.298.9
112.4
99.785.846.3
116.786.497.398.5
100.182.284.076.9
46.147.048.8
Inven-tory
valua-tion
adjust-ment
0.5- 2 . 1
- . 7
- . 2- 2 . 5- 1 2- .8
- . 6- 5 . 3-5 .9- 2 . 2
1.9
- 5 . 0- 1 . 2
1.0- 1 . 0
- 1 7-2 .7- 1 . 5- .3
- .2
.0
.1
~\2- 2 . 1- 1 . 6-3 .7- 5 . 9
-6 .6- 4 . 6- 6 . 6
-20.0-40.0-11.6-147-16.2-24.0-43.1
-43 .0-24.6- 9 . 4
-57.2-28.2-41.1-45.5
-35 .5-22.8-23.0-17.1
- 4 . 4- 9 . 4
-10.3-13 .4
Capitalcon-
sumptionadjust-ment
-1 .4- . 6
-1 .1
- 1 2- 1 . 3
12- 1 . 0
- 3- . 2
- 3 0-3 .6
40- 3 . 9
40- 4 6- 4 . 5- 3 9-3 .2- 2 0- 3 . 2- 3 . 4- 3 . 2- 2 . 7
- 2 . 0- 1 . 4
1.52.53.14.04.24.34.34.3
2.51.32.72.7
- 1 . 8-10.1-13.5-11 .3-12.7-14.8
-17.8-16.8- 4 . 9
-15.7-17.2-19.3-19.2
-17.3-17.5-17.1-15.5
-10.1- 6 . 9- 3 . 8
1.2
Netinterest
474.13.6
333.3312.7242.2182.3242.7
3.03.54.04.45.35.96.67.99.6
10.3
11.413.014.716.418.321.024.427.630.034.8
41.446.551.260.276.184.587.2
102.51217153.8
187.72357265.3
175.7181.6190.4203.0
217.6231.6244.C249.5
2587267.5268.1267.0
3 With inventory valuation adjustment and without capital consumption adjustment.4 Without inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
187Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-22.~$ourees of personal income, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960 . .. .196119621963196419651966196719681969
19701971 .. .19721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982"
1980:IIIHIIV
1981:1||IIIIV
1982:1||IIIIV P
Personalincome
85.0
47.0
72.4
77.995.4
122.6150.8164.5170.0177.6190.1209.0206.4
227.2254.9271.8287.7289.6310.3332.6351.0361.1384.4
402.3417.8443.6466.2499.2540.7588 2630.0690.6754.7
811.1868.4951.4
1,065.21168 61,265.01,391.21,540.41,732,71,951.2
2,160.42,415.82,569.7
2 086 82]lO9.62,185.32,260.0
2,330.02,380.62,458.22,494.6
2 510.52*552 72^592.52,623.2
Wage and salary disbursements1
Total
50.5
29.0
46.0
49 962.1821
105.6116.9117.5112.0123.1135.5134.8
147.01713185.41986196.82117228.3239 3240.5258.9
2719279.5298 0313 4336.1362 0398 4427.0469 6515.7
548.7580 9635.2702 7765 7806.48899983.2
1,106 31,237.6
1,356.11,493.91,560.1
1319 71,332.11,360.51,412.2
1452 81479 41,512.31,531.2
154161556 61,570.01,572.3
Commodity-producingindustries
Total
21.5
9.8
17.4
19.727.539.149.050.445.946.054.261.157.8
64.876.382.089.685.793.1
100.6104.2100.0109.6
1131113.7121.8126 9135.4146.01610168.3183.4199.6
203.0208.3227.3254.3274 7275.0307.3343.6389.4438.4
468.0510.8509.9
462 7458.6465.6485.1
499.2507 2519.3517.7
514.3513 6510.2501.4
Manu-facturing
16.1
7.8
13.6
15 621.730.940.942.938.236.542.547.144.6
50.359 364.171267.573 879.482 478.686.8
89 789.896 7
100 6107.1115 5128 0134.1145 8157.5
158.2160 3175.4196 22114211.0237 4266.0299.2333.9
354.4386.4382.6
350 3347.0352.8367.7
377 0386 9392.9388.7
3851385 6383.8375.8
Distrib-utiveindus-tries
15.6
8.8
13.3
14.216.318.020.122.724.831.035.237.537.7
39.844.346.949.750.153.457.760.560.864.8
68.269.372.876 381.487.294 4
100.9110.0120.8
130.3139.4152.1168.3184 6195.6216.6239.5270.7303.4
330.5361.4375.7
323 2324.9331.9341.9
352.1358 7366.5368.3
371.4375 4378.4377.4
Serviceindus-tries
8.4
5.2
7.1
7.58.19.09.9
10.911.914.316.117.918.5
19.821.523.124.926.128.631.3.33.635.638.5
41.444.147.250.254.458.964.771.379.689.7
98.3106.7118.2131.3145.6159.7177.4197.7226.6259.7
297.4338.6372.3
2834292.0301.4313.1
325.2333.7342.8352.8
359.5367.6377.8384.3
Govern-mentand
govern-mententer-prises
5.0
5.2
8.2
8510.216.026.633.034.920.717.519.020.8
22.629.233.334.434.936.638.841.044.146.0
49.252.456.360064.969.978 386.496.6
105.5
117.1126.5137.5148.7160.9176.1188.7202.4219.5236.2
260.2283.1302.3
250 4256.6261.6272.2
276 2279 8283.8292.4
296.5300 0303.5309.1
Otherlabor
income1
0.5
.4
.6
.6
.91.11.51.82.02.42.72.9
3.74.65.25.96.17.08.09.09.4
10.6
11.211.813.014.015.717.819.921.725.228.5
32.536.743.048.855.864.575.989.4
102.5114.9
127.2140.4153.8
123 2125.9128.4131.5
135.3138.4142.2145.8
149.1152 5155.5157.9
Proprietorwith invaluati
capconsuradjust
Farm
6.1
2,'5
4.4
4.46.4
10.112.012.012.414.915.117.612.8
13.716.115.113.112.511.511.211.113.210.9
11.712.112.312.010.813.114.112.612.714.6
14.315.018.732.826.524.619.119.126.331.9
19.424.018.6
22.115.920.319.2
21.622.527.124.6
17.817.416.622.6
s' income
sn andtalnptionmpntc
Nonfarm
8.9
3.3
7.4
8.611.114.117.118.419.421.820.823.323.6
25.027.228.228.628.731.432.734.234.536.7
35.536.537.638.541.743.846.448.651.352.5
51.954.458.161.062.265.475.084.892.2
100.2
96.9100.7101.4
100.593.095.198.8
101.8101.2100.499.5
98.699.9
101J105.5
1 The total of wage and salary disbursements and other labor income differs from compensation of employees in Tabfe 8-21 in that itexcludes employer contributions for social insurance and the excess of wage accruals over wage disbursements.
See next page for continuation of table.
188Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-22.—Sources of personal income, 1929-82—Continued
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946 ..194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982 '
1980:I||HIIV
1981:
IIIllIV
1982:|||IllIV P
Rental
ofpersons
withcapital
con-sumptionadjust-ment
4.9
2.2
2.6
273.14.0444.54.6555.3576.1
7.1778.8
10.011.011311612.212 913.6
14.515015.816.517.118.018 719.719 519.619 720 221.022 623 523.023.524 826 627.932.933.9341
30.832.733 834 2
34.434.033.633.6
33 934.234.633.9
Personaldividendincome
5.8
2.0
3.8
404.44.34.44.64.65.66.37.07.2
8.88.58.58.89.1
10.311111.511.312.2
12.913.314.415.517.319.119.420.221.922.4
22.222 624.126.529.129.936.539.645.350.855.962.567.0
54.155.756.557.4
59.261.564.165.2
65.866.167.268.8
Personalinterestincome
6.9
5.5
5.4
535.35.25.15.25.96.67.68.18.7
9.710.511.212.513.714.916 718.820 322.5
25.026429.032.235.639.744 448.353.461.169 474 880.993 9
112.4123.2132.5152.81794218.7263.4329.0371.8
249.1258.0266.4280.2
304.7320.6339.6351.0
359 7372.0378.2377.2
Transfer payments
Total
1.5
2.1
3.0
313.13.13.03.66.2
11311.711312.5
15.212.613.114.116.217.518 721.625 927.0
28.932 833.835.837.440.444 752.659 866.7
80194 4
104.7119 5141.2178.3194.3207.9223 8250.3297.2336.3374.5
274.2283.2313.4318.2
322.8327.0344.8350.7
354.6365.2381.0397.2
Old-age,survivors,disability,
andhealthinsur-ance
benefits
0.0
0.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
1.01.92.23.03.64.9577.385
10.2
11.112.614.315.216.018.120 825.530.232.9
38.544.549.660.470.181.492.9
104.9116.2131.8154.2182.0204.5
142.1144.7163.4166.4
171.0173.7190.6192.8
194.7197.5209.2216.6
Govern-mentunem-
ploymentinsur-ance
benefits
0.4
5.4.4.1.1.4
1.1.8.9
1.9
1.5.9
1.11.02.21.5151.9412.8
3.04.33.13.02.72.3192.22.12.24.0585.74.46.8
17.615.812.79.79.8
16.115.424.9
11.815.918.718.0
15.715.114.116.7
18.723.525.531.8
Veteransbenefits
0.6
.6
.5
5
.5
1.03.0707.0595.3
7.74.64.34.14.24.4444.5474.6
4.6504.74.84.74.9495.6596.77.7889.7
10.411.814.514.413.813.914.415.016.116.3
14.814.614.915.7
16.015.916.016.4
16.316.116.316.6
Govern-ment
employ-ee
retire-ment
benefits
0.1
.2
.3
3.3
'AA.5.7
.7
.9
1.01.11.21.41.51.7192.22.52.8
3.13.43.74.24.75.26.16.97.68.7
10.211.813.816.019.011126.129.032.736.943.049.254.0
40.142.343.446.0
47.249.149.650.8
51.554.454.955.3
Aid tofamilies
withdepend-
entchildren(AFDC)
Other
0.8
1.4
1.7
171.81.81.82.02.021
.34.5
.6
.6
.5
.5
.6
.66.78.9
1.01.11.31.41.51.7192.32.83.54.86.26.97.27.99.2
10.110.610.711.012.413.413.1
11.712.112.813.0
13.113.413.513.4
13.213.213.013.1
2.52.93.3
3.53.63.84.14.14.34.54.95.35.8
6.26.46.77.37.88.39.2
10.211.112.515.017.419.021.125.632.835.136.940.746.356.660.361.6
53.653.560.259.1
59.859.861.060.6
60.160.662.163.8
Less:Personalcontribu-tions for
socialinsurance
0.1
.2
.6
7.8
1.21.82.22.3202.12.22.2
2.93.43.84.04.65.2586.76.97.9
9.39.7
10.311.812.613.317.820.622.926.227.930.734.542.647.950.455.561.169.881.188.7
104.9111.7
86.986.989.1.91.8
102.5104.1106.1107.0
110.6111.4112.4112.4
Nonfarmpersonalincome2
15991719188 2190.4
210.2235 4253.12713273.9295 5318 0336.6344 4369.8
386.7401.6427.1449.7483.7522.6568.9611.9672.1733.9790.0846.5925.3
1,023.71,131.81,229.11,359.31,506.51,689.71,899.32,117.32,364.12,518.9
2,042.22,070.32,140.92.216.C
2,282.52,330.92,402.62,440.3
2,461.62,503.22,543.32,567.6
2 Personal income exclusive of farm proprietors' income, farm wages, farm other labor income, and farm net interestNote.—The industry classification of wage and salary disbursements and proprietors' income is on an establishment basis and is
based on the 1972 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) beginning 1948 and on the 1942 SIC prior to 1948.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
189Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-23.—Disposition of personal income, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars, except as noted; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
194019411942194319441945 ,.,1946194719481949
195019511952 ....'.'.....'.* .*1953 . ..195419551956195719581959
I960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1980:IItHIIV
1981:|||HIIV
1982:1||III\M P
Personalincome
85.0
47.0
72.4
77.9954
122.6150 8164.5170.0177 6190.1209 0206.4
227.2254.9271.8287 7289.6310 3332.6351.0361.1384.4
402.3417 8443.6466 2499.2540.7588.2630.0690.6754.7
811.1868.4951.4
1,065.21,168.61,265.01,391.21,540.41,732.71,951.2
2,160.42,415.82,569.7
2,086.82,109.62,185.32,260.0
2,330.02,380.62,458.22,494.6
2,510.52,552.72,592.52,623.2
Less:Personaltax andnontax
payments
26
14
24
2.6335.9
17 818.920 818 721421018.5
20.628.934.035 532.535439.742 442.146.0
50 452156860 358.664.974.582197.2
115.7
115.8116 7141.0150.7170.2168.9196.82264258.7301.0
336.3386.7397.2
319.9328 6339.7357.1
371.2384.23981393.2
393.4401.2394.4399.7
Equals:Dispos-
ablepersonalincome
82.4
45.6
70.0
75.392 2
116.6133 0145.61491158 9168.7188 0187.9
206.6226.0237.7252 2257.1275 0292.9308 6319.0338.4
352 0365838684059440.6475.8513.7547 9593.4638.9
695.37518810.3914.5998.3
1,096.11,194.41,314 01,474.01,650.2
1,824.12,029.12,172.5
1,766.91,78101,845.51,902.9
1,958.71,996.52,060 02,101.4
2,117.12,151.52,198.12,223.5
Less: Personal outlays
Total
79.1
46.5
67.8
72.081.889.4
100.1109.0120.4145 2163.51769180.4
194.7210.0220.4233 7240.1258 5271.6286 4295.4317.3
332.3342 7363.5384 0411.0442.1477.7503 6551.5598.3
639.56911757.7835.5913.2
1,001.81,111.91,236 01,384.61,553.51,717.91,898.92,031.4
1,669.11,672 41,732.51,797.6
1,852.81,874.51,925.71,942.7
1,977.92,007.22,046.12,094.6
Personalcon-
sumptionexpendi-
tures
77.3
45.8
67.0
71.080.888.699.4
108.2119.5143.8161.7174.7178.1
192.0207.1217.1229.7235.8253.7266.0280.4289.5310.8
324.93350355.2374 6400.5430.4465.1490.3536.9581.8
621.7672 2737.1812.0888.1976.4
1,084.31 204.41,346.51,507.2
1,667.21,843.21,972.0
1,618.71622 21,682.21,745.8
1,799.91,819.41,868.81,884.5
1,919.41,947.81,986.32,034.6
Interestpaid byconsum-ers tobusi-ness
1.5
.5
.7
.8
.9
ij
.71.01.41.7
2.32.52.93.63.84.45.15.55.66.1
7.0737.8889.9
U.I12.012.513.815.6
16.717.719.522.324.124.426.730.737.445.5
49.955.158.6
49.649.449.750.8
52.454.456.257.5
57.858.459.059.1
Per-sonal
transferpay-
mentsto
for-eigners
(net)
0.3
.2
.2
.2
.1
.2
.4
.5
.7J,7.5
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5,4.5.5.4.4
.4
.4
.5
.6
.6
.7
.7
.9
.8
.9
1.11.11.11.31.0.9.9.9.8.8
.8
.6
.9
.7
.7
.8
.9
,5.8
.7
.8
.9
.8
.9
Equals:Personalsaving
3.3
-0 .9
2.2
3.410.327.232.936.628.713 75.2
11.17.5
11.916.117.418.517.016.421.322.323.621.1
19.723 023.321929.633.736.044.341.940.6
55.860.752.679.085.194.382.578 089.496.7
106.2130.2141.1
97 9108 6113.1105.3
105 9122.0134 4158.6
139.1144.3152.0128.9
Percent of dispopersonal incor
Personal outlays
Total
96.0
102.0
96.9
95.588.876.775.374.880.891.496.994.196.0
94.292.992.792.793.494.092.792.892.693.8
94.493.794.094.693.392.993.091.992.993.6
92.091.993.591.491.591.493.194.193.994194.293.693.5
94 593993.994.5
94.693.993 592.5
93.493.393.194.2
PersonalConsump-
tionexpend-itures
93.8
100.5
95.6
94.287.676.074.774.380.190.595.993.094.8
92.991.691.391.191.792.390.890.990.791.8
92.391.691.892.390.990.590.589.590.591.1
89.489.491.088.889.089.190.891.791.391.3
91.490.890.8
91691191.191.7
91991.190 789.7
90.790.590.491.5
sable
Personalsaving
4.0
=2.0
3.1
4.511.223.324.725.219.28.63.15.94.0
5.87.17.37.36.66.07.37.27.46.2
5.66.36.05.46.77.17.08.17.16.4
8.08.16.58.68.58.66.95.96.15.9
5.86.46.5
5.5616.15.5
546.1657.5
6.66.76.95.8
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
190Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-24.—Total and per capita disposable personal income and personal consumption expenditures in
current and 1972 dollars, 1929-82
[Quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates, except as noted]
Year or quarter
Disposable personal income
Total (billions ofdollars)
Currentdollars
1972dollars
Per capita(dollars)
Currentdollars
1972dollars
Personal consumption expenditures
Total (billions ofdollars)
Currentdollars
1972dollars
Per capita(dollars)
Currentdollars
1972dollars
Popula-tion
(thou-sands) l
1929...,
1933...,
1939....
1940....1941...,1942....1943...1944....1945....1946....1947....1948....1949...,
1950...,1951...,1952...,1953....1954...,1955...,1956...,1957...,1958....1959...,
I960...,1961...,1962...,1963....1964....1965...,1966....1967...,1968...1969....
1970...1971...1972...1973...1974...1975...,1976...1977...1978...1979...
1980...,1981...,1982 ",
1980:IIIIII ....IV
1981:IIIIll...,IV
1982:I
i!Z
82.4
45.6
70.0
75.392.2
116.6133.0145.6149.1158.9168.7188.0187.9
206.6226.0237.7252.2257.1275.0292.9308.6319.0338.4
352.0365.8386.8405.9440.6475.8513.7547.9593.4638.9
695.3751.8810.3914.5998.3
1,096.11,194.41,314.01,474.01,650.2
1,824.12,029.12,172.5
1,766.91,781.01,845.51,902.9
1,958.71,996.52,060.02,101.4
2,117.12,151.52,198.12,223.5
229.5
169.6
229.8
244.0277.9317.5332.1343.6338.1332.7318.8335.8336.8
362.8372.6383.2399.1403.2426.8446.2455.5460.7479.7
676
363
534
570691865973
1,0521,0661,1241,1701,2821,259
1,3621,4651,5151,5811,5831,6641,7411,8021,8321,911
489.7503.8524.9542.3580.8616.3646.8673.5701.3722.5
751.6779.2810.3864.7857.5874.9906.8942.9988.8
1,015.7
1,9471,9912,0732,1442,2962,4482,6132,7572,9563,152
3,3903,6203,8604,3154,6675,0755,4775,9656,6217,331
1,018.01,043.11,054.5
1,022.81,005.51,018.21,025.7
1,035.01,036.61,048.81,051.9
1,046.91,054.81,058.31,057.9
8,0128,8279,362
7,7937,8348,0958,325
8,5518,6988,9519,107
9,1559,2859,4619,546
1,883
1,349
1,754
1,8472,0832,3542,4292,4832,4162,3532,2122,2902,257
2,3922,4152,4412,5012,4832,5822,6532,6602,6452,709
2,7092,7422,8132,8653,0263,1713,2903,3893,4933,564
3,6653,7523,8604,0804,0094,0514,1584,2804,4414,512
4,4724,5384,544
4,5114,4234,4664,487
4,5194,5164,5574,559
4,5274,5524,5554,542
77.3
45.8
67.0
71.080.888.699.4
108.2119.5143.8161.7174.7178.1
192.0207.1217.1229.7235.8253.7266.0280.4289.5310.8
324.9335.0355.2374.6400.5430.4465.1490.3536.9581.8
621.7672.2737.1812.0888.1976.4
1,084.31,204.41,346.51,507.2
1,667.21,843.21,972.0
1,618.71,622.21,682.01,745.8
1,799.91,819.41,868.81,884.5
1,919.41,947.81,986.32,034.6
215.1
170.5
219.8
229.9243.6241.1248.2255.2270.9301.0305.8312.2319.3
337.3341.6350.1363.4370.0394.1405.4413.8418.0440.4
452.0461.4482.0500.5528.0557.5585.7602.7634.4657.9
672.1696.8737.1767.9762.8779.4823.1864.3903.2927.6
930.5947.6957.1
937.0915.8928.0941.0
951.1944.6951.4943.4
949.1955.0956.3968.0
634
364
511
537605657727781854
1,0171,1221,1921,194
1,2661,3421,3831,4391,4521,5351,5811,6371,6621,755
1,7971,8231,9041,9792,0872,2142,3662,4672,6742,870
3,0313,2373,5113,8314,1524,5214,9725,4686,0486,695
7,3238,0188,498
7,1407,1367,3787,638
7,8587,9268,1208,167
8,3008,4068,5508,735
1,765
1,356
1,678
1,7401,8261,7881,8151,8441,9362,1292,1222,1292,140
2,2242,2142,2302,2772,2782,3842,4102,4162,4002,487
2,5012,5112,5832,6442,7512,8682,9793,0323,1603,245
3,2773,3553,5113,6233,5663,6093,7743,9244,0574,121
4,0874,1234,125
4,1334,0294,0714,117
4,1524,1154,1344,088
4,1044,1214,1164,156
121,878
125,690
131,028
132,122133,402134,860136,739138,397139,928141,389144,126146,631149,188
151,684154,287156,954159,565162,391165,275168,221171,274174,141177,073
180,760183,742186,590189,300191,927194,347196,599198,752200,745202,736
205,089207,692209,924211,939213,898215,981218,086220,289222,629225,106
227,654229,872232,050
226,727227,332227,978228,579
229,053229,539230,145230,751
231,246231,724232,320232,910
1 Population of the United States including Armed Forces overseas; includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1960. Annual data are forJuly 1 through 1958 and are averages of quarterly data beginning 1960. Quarterly data are average for the period. Data beginning 1970reflect results of the 1980 census of population.
Source: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census).
191Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-25.—Gross saving and investment, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
19291933193919401941194219431944194519461947194819491950195119521953...1954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969197019711972197319741975197619771978197919801981...1982 p,1980:
|||IIIIV
1981:
(IIllIV
1982:I||IllIV P
Gross saving
Total
15.9.9
8.813.518.610 7542.45.2
35.141.749.835.650 756.951.049.850.967.575.975.262.678.381.178.786.793.6
104.0120.2127.3125 7136.0153.6148.9161.6186.6235.5227 8218.9257.9309.1374.8422.7406.2477.5413.9
410.8395.8404.4414.0
461.4482.4490.0476.3
428.8441.5422.4
Gross private saving
Total
14.92.2
11.014.222.442.049 654.344.729.627.341.439.042 750.854.856.758.164.470.774.375.379.978.083.090.592.9
106.3119.7128.6139 9142.0143.6158.6180.3189.2227.7234 5282.7294 4326.9374.0407.3438.3504.7529.9
420.2438.8449.2445.1
468.7488.9513.4547.7
519.4529.0546.1
Personalsaving
33- . 92.23.4
10.327 232936.628.713.7
5.211.17.5
11916.117 418.517.016.421.322.323.621.119.723.023.321.929 633.736.044 341.940.655.860 752,679.085194.382 578.089 496.7
106 2130.2141.1
97.9108.6113.1105.3
105.9122.0134.4158.6
1391144 3152.0128.9
Grossbusinesssaving'
1163.18.8
10.812.114 816 717.616.015.922.130 231.530 734.837.438.241147.949.452.051758.758.360.067.271.076 786.092.795 6
100.0103.0102.8119 7136.6148.71494188.42119248.9284 6310.63321374.5388.8
322.3330.2336.1339.8
362.8367.0379.0389.1
380 3384 7394.1
Governr
and pr
Total
10- 1 . 4=2.2
7=3.8
= 3 1 4—44 1- 5 1 . 8- 3 9 . 5
5414.484
-3 .4
806.1
- 3 8- 6 . 9- 7 1
3.152.9
= 12 6- 1 . 6
3.1- 4 . 3-3 .8
- 2 3.5
- 1 . 3— 142
- 6 . 09.9
= 10.6= 19 4- 3 . 3
7.8- 4 7
-63 .8- 3 6 5-17.8
814.3
- 3 3 2=28.2
= 116.1
-10.6-44.2-45.9= 32.2
- 8 . 3- 7 . 6
-24.5-72.5
=90 7—87 5
= 123.7
nent surplus or), national income3duct accounts
Federal
1.2- 1 . 3- 2 . 2
- 1 . 3=5.1
=33.1=46.6-54.5=42.1
3.513.48.3
- 2 . 6
9.26.5
- 3 . 7- 7 . 1-6 .0
4.46.12.3
= 10.3- 1 . 1
3.0= 3.9=4.2
- 1 3
- l ! 8= 132
-6 .08.4
"12.4-?2.0= 16.8= 5.6115
-69.3- 5 3 1-45.9-29 .5-16.1
- 6 1 4=60.0
= 147.9
-39.7=67.5-73.1-65.2
-39.7-40 .5= 58.0
= 101.7
— 1184= 1196-156.0
Stateandtocal
— 2= .1
.0
.61.31.8252.72.61.91.0,1
- 1 . 2= .4- . 0
-1 .113
- .9- 1 . 4- 2 . 4
- . 4
.1= .4
.5
10= .0
11.1
1.5
1.926
13.513.4685.5
16 628.030 330.4
28231.731.9
29.123.327.133.0
31.332.933.529.1
21132132.3
Capita)grants
receivedby theunitedStates(net)2
ZZZ
0.9.7.7.0
4 20.00.00
1.1121.1
.0
1.21.21.21.2
1.11.11.11.1
00
.0
.0
Gross investment
Total
17 01.6
10.3
14.719.298375.29.3
35.643.248.336.2
52.060.152.752.152.968.873.874.062.877.0
78.778.688.895.3
104 2119.0128.7125 4133.9149.7
147.4165 7189.9236.32315224.4263 0310.4372 3421.2
410 2475.6414.0
421.3399.6406.6413.0
466.5477.8489.1469.0
4213442 3426.0366.3
Grossprivate
domesticinvest-ment
16.21.49.3
13.117.99.9587.2
10.630.734.045.935.3
53.859.252.153.352.768.471.069.261.978.1
75.974.885.490.997.4
113.5125.7122.8133.3149.3
144.2166.4195.0229.8228.7206.1257.9324.1386.6423.0
402.3471.5421.9
424.0391.0384.1410.3
455.7475.5486.0468.9
414 84315443.3397.9
Netforeigninvest-ment *
0.8.2
1.0
1.51.3
=.121
- 2 . 0- 1 . 3
4.99.32.4
.9
- 1 . 8.9.6
=1.3
.42.84.8
.9- 1 . 2
2.83.83.44.46.85.43.02.6.6.4
3.2= 7516.52.9
18.35.1
= 13.6= 14.3
-1 .8
7.84.1
=7.9
=2.68.6
22.52.8
10.82.33.1
6510 8
= 17.3=31.7
Statis-tical
discrep-ancy
1.1
\A1.1.6
=.8182,74.1
.51.5
- 1 . 6.6
1.33.21.72.32.01.3
- 2 . 1- 1 . 2
.2- 1 . 3=2.4
l.'l1.7
121.4
=2.1= 3.9- 1 . 5
4.13.3
.8375.55.11.4
=2.6= 1.53.9
- 1 . 9
10.53.82.2
- 1 . 0
5.1=4.6
g7 2
758
3.6
1 Undistributed corporate profits with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments, corporate and noncorporate capitalconsumption allowances with capital consumption adjustment, and private wage accruals less disbursements.2 Allocations of special drawing rights (SDRs), except as noted in footnote 4.3 Net exports of goods and services less net transfers to foreigners and interest paid by government to foreigners plus capital grantsreceived by the United States, net.4 In February 1974, the U.S. Government paid to India $2,010 million in rupees under provisions of the Agricultural TradeDevelopment and Assistance Act. This transaction is being treated as capital grants paid to foreigners, i.e., a $2.0 billion entry incapital grants received by the United States, net.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
192
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-26.—Saving by individuals, 1946-821
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1946194719481949
19501951195219531954
1955 .1956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721973.1974
19751976197719781979
19801981
1980:I
IllIV
1981:1II..IllIV
1982:
II..Ill
Total
24.620.124.320.9
30 634.731.332.528.2
34.137.236.534.138.0
36 735 942.046.756.8
65 072.877.080.571.5
86.495 6
109.3132 0128.3
153 0165.1167 2200.6208.1
250.5283.1
242.9237.0263 62584
256 0257.0320 4299.1
300.5290.2335.9
Increase in financial assets
Total
18.813.29.19.9
13 719.123.222.822.2
28 030.228,631.637.4
32 135 440.146.655.7
58 857.969.875.665.2
81.51021131.5148 5147.3
174 3210.5233 8274 4296.1
337.5355.2
347.9270 536143701
328 7365 4387 6339.0
333 7357 7393.3
Check-able
depos-itsandcur-
rency
5.6
- 2 . 9- 2 . 0
264.61.61.02.2
1.21.8
- . 43.81.0
10_ 9
- 1 . 24.25.3
762.49.9
11.1- 2 . 5
8.912 213.914.17.4
6915.720122.622,4
6.525.8
8.1-11.1
41 1- 1 1 9
55 0
5942.7
32.8- 3 . 9
1.7
Timeandsav-ingsde-
posits
6.33.42.22.6
244.77.88.19.1
869.4
11.913.911.0
12 018 326.126.226.1
27 819.035.331.19.1
43.667 774.463 655.7
83 4107.5107 5100 378.5
125.665.6
96.881.8
120 0203 7
25 292 884 360.1
131.4102 494.7
Moneymar-ket
fundshares
2.4
13- . 0
269
34.4
29.2107.5
61.3
5.1-11 .9
148 459.9
137.384.3
41?86.5
Securities
Govern-ment
securi-ties2
- 1 . 51.61.31.8
_ 1- . 62.52.51.0
5.83.92.3
- 2 . 510.1
2.21.41.3
.64.8
3.711.3
- 1 . 25.2
25.9
- 5 . 4= 12 2
2.724.228.3
25 011.718 233.655.5
40.557.3
65.7- 6 . 640.162.7
51103.2
83.737.0
42.6105.2
68.9
Cor-porateequi-ties3
1.11.11.0
.7
.71.81.61.0
.8
1.02.01.51.5
- . 6.3
- 2 . 1- 2 . 6
—2
- 2 . 17
- 4 . 775
- 2 . 8
-1 .7- 5 . 5- 5 . 1
- . 6
- 3 . 8-4 .6
3.5
-15.9
2.1-31.6
.6R9
1.5
15 529.0
-55.0-26.8
n n44
-12.5
Othersecuri-ties*
- 0 . 9- . 8
.0- . 4
- . 7.3.0.3
— 9
.81.21.01.1
— 3
2.4,1.1
1.4.4
1.32.45.27.9
10.0
6.9654.9
11.16.8
448.647
12.518.4
7.0- 6 . 4
.42.4
13.312.1
- 1 1 3- 7 . 4
-21.914.9
-19.9-30.7
3.0
Insur-anceand
pensionre-
serves5
5.35.45.35.6
6.96.37.77.97.8
8.59.59.5
10.411.9
11.512.112.713.916.1
16.919.218.619.821.5
23.927.429.433.036.2
43 552.467.473.868.2
89.698.7
80.795.8
100.181.9
84.6103.5113.393.6
90.6112.0104.4
Otherfinan-
cialas-
sets6
2.82.42.21.6
191.92.02.12.1
2 12.52.83.53.3
3.6433.22.93.2
3.74.46.78.14.0
5.458
11.483
11.1
13 619.219229.834.6
36.938.3
34.3
42.2V\
37 24?fi40133.2
?9fi
46.6
Net investment7
Owner-occu-pied
homes
3.66.79.18.4
11.811.711.312.312.7
16.715.613.212.316.3
14.812.713.514.315.0
14.513.511.715.716.3
13.620.728.031.025.2
23 536.152.363.967.9
48.743.8
59.849.340.845.6
49.048.442.435.7
27.129.629.5
Con-sumerdura-bles
6.19.09.8
10.6
14 811.38.6
10.17.1
12 28.57.73.67.3
7.0438.5
11.815.0
20 223.121.127.026.3
20.026 634.640.428.4
26 540.049 6
52.5
32.438.2
46.4185
VO
45 7
4? 829.0
35 737 735.2
Non-cor-
poratebusi-nessas-
sets8
2.31.86.91.8
684.52.31.01.9
291.22.72.65.0
3.64.77.59.89.2
13.310.810.210.012.7
11.517.520.626.610.6
5.83.3
15.2
26.3
8.727.9
14.7
60139
25.33? 9?9fi
5,978
Less: t
Mort-gagedebton
non-farm
homes
3.64.74.64.4
676.66.27.68.7
12 211.28.99.5
12.8
11.712 214.116.217.5
17 013.812.516.918.6
14.126 241.446.538.0
40661.4911
111 ^121.3
98.381.4
123.783 794 4914
91.699 577 8
66 8SIR51.1
Jet increase indebt
Con-sumercredit
3.13.73.23.2
481.65.34.21.5
723.92.9
.58.0
4.42.56.38.99.8
10 66.55.7
11.510.8
5.414.719.8
9.9
9.625.440.248 845.4
4.925.3
21.8
141
26.53??34?8.3
fi.6
8.2
Otherdebt8 8
- 0 . 42.22.82.2
503.72.71.95.5
643.23.86.07.2
4.9657.2
10.710.8
14 312.217.619.219.4
20.730 344.243 835.4
26 937.952 459.368.0
73.775.2
80.445.763.9
104.7
74.793.270.162.8
28.565.462.8
1 Saving by households, personal trust funds, nonprofit institutions, farms, and other noncorporate business.2 Consists of U.S. savings bonds, other U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government agency securities and sponsored agency securities,mortgage pool securities, and State and local obligations.
3 Includes mutual fund shares.4 Corporate and foreign bonds and open market paper.s Private life insurance reserves, private insured and noninsured pension reserves, and government insurance and pension reserves.6 Consists of security credit, mortgages, accident and health insurance reserves, and nonlife insurance claims for households and ofconsumer credit, equity in sponsored agencies, and nonlife insurance claims for noncorporate business.
7 Purchases of physical assets less depreciation.8 Includes data for corporate farms.9 Other debt consists of security credit, policy loans, and noncorporate business debt.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
193
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-27.—Number and median income (in 1981 dollars) of families and persons, and poverty status,
by race, selected years, 1947-81
Year
ALL RACES1947195019551960196119621963196419651966 3
19671968196919701971197219731974 »19751976197719781979*19801981WHITE19701971197219731974 3
19751976197719781979*19801981BLACK19701971197219731974 •19751976197719781979*19801981
Number(mil-
lions)
37 239.942 9
45.546 447147.548 048.549.250.150 851652 253.354.455.155 756.256 757.257.859 660.3610
46 547.648 548949 449 950150 550952.252 753.3
4.95.25.35.45.55.65.85.85.96.26.36.4
Medianincome
$12,34112,53915,006
17,25917,43517,90718,56319,26220,05421,10821,60922,56623,40223,11123,09724,16624,66323,79523,18323,89824,02724,59124,54223,20422,388
23,97523,96625,10725,77724,72824,11024,82325,12425,60625,61024,17623,517
14,70714,46214,92214,87714,76514,83514,76614,35215,16614,50213,98913,266
Families >
Below poverty level
Total
Num-hprDel
(mil-lions)
8.28.48.17.67.26.75.85.75.05.05.35.35.14.84.95.55.35.35.35.56.26.9
3.73.83.43.23.43.83.63.53.53.64.24.7
1.51.51.51.51.51.51.61.61.61.71.82.0
Rate
18.118.117.215.915.013.911.811.410.09.7
10.110.09.38.88.89.79.49.39.19.2
10.311.2
8.07.97.16.66.87.77.17.06.96.98.08.8
29.528.829.028.126.927.127.928.227.527.828.930.8
Female householder
Number(mil-lions)
2.02.02.02.01.81.91.71.81.81.82.02.12.22.22.32.42.52.62.72.63.03.3
1.11.21.11.21.31.41.41.41.41.41.61.8
.8
.91.01.01.01.01.11.21.21.21.31.4
Rate
42.442.142.940.436.438.433.133.332.332.732.533.932.732.232.132.533.031.731.430.432.734.6
25.026.524.324.524.825.925.224.023.522.325.727.4
54.353.553.352.752.250.152.251.050.649.449.452.9
Personsbelow
poverty level
Num-ber
/millions)
39.939.638.636.436.133.228.527.825.424.125.425.624.523.023.425.925.024.724.526.129.331.8
17.517.816.215.115.717.816.716.416.317.219.721.6
7.57.47.77.47.27.57.67.77.68.18.69.2
Rate
22.221.921.019.519.017.314.714.212.812.112.612.511.911.111.212.311.811.611.411.713.014.0
9.99.99.08.48.69.79.18.98.7
19.010.211.1
33.532.533.331.430.331.331.131.330.631.032.534.2
Median income of persons 14 yearsold and over with income *
M
Allpersons
$9,0809,710
11,405
12,53012,73513,14513,40013,62614,47914,87015,12615,63315,95015,62315,50216,19616,48715,58814,96015,05915,19315,24414,75913,83013,473
16,42116,25216,98717,30016,32915,71515,87615,91315,96615,41814,71014,296
9,7379,692
10,28910,46410,1189,3959,5599,4439,5659,5448,8408,501
ales
Year-round
full-timeworkers
$14,405
16,68817,21717,51718,03118,42619,01919,49119,85520,42721,50421,51121,62822,90923,47022,43021,85622,14222,61722,39121,90121,16220,692
22,12722,23723,73624,15022,86722,36122,80223,08022,80722,53421,76621,178
15,07215,20516,02916,27616,38316,64116,33115,91217,46816,24015,31414,984
Ferr
Allper-sons
54,1413,6013,804
3,8733,8884,0354,0764,2494,3844,5904,9065,2785,2895,2405,4085,6505,7225,6845,7205,7135,9155,6715,4535,4305,458
5,3075,4975,6875,7775,7495,7795,7616,0055,7395,5045,4605,519
4,8324,8175,3135,2155,1905,2505,4295,1855,1685,0095,0554,903
ales
Year-roundfull-time
work-ers
(9,289
10,12210,15710,39410,56310,87811,00011,28311,43511,94212,59512,74212,80313,15913,27813,23113,04413,28013,22813,44013,19512,79312,457
12,96712,95113,41813,50313,34313,07413,38213,31213,56713,31112,91712,665
0,6241,4351,4791,4512,3142,4912,5112,4422,5742,1972,0471,438
1 The term "family" refers to a group of two or more persons related by blood, marriage, or adoption and residing together; all suchpersons are considered members 01 the same family. Beginning 1979 based on householder concept and restricted to primary families.3 Beginning 1979, data are for persons 15 years and over.
'Based on revised methodology; comparable with succeeding years.* Based on 1980 census population controls; comparable with succeeding years.
Note.—The poverty level is based on the poverty index adopted by a Federal interagency committee in 1969. That index reflecteddifferent consumption requirements for families based on size and composition, sex and age of family householder, and farm-nonfarmresidence. Minor revisions implemented in 1981 eliminated variations in the poverty thresholds based on two of these variables, farm-nonfarm residence and sex of householder. The poverty thresholds are updated every year to reflect changes in the consumer price indexFor further details see "Current Population Reports," Series P 60, No. 133.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
194
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, WAGES, AND PRODUCTIVITY
TABLE B-28.—Population by age groups, 1929-82
[Thousands of persons]
July l TotalAge (years)
Under 5 5-15 16-19 20-24 25-44 45-64 65 andover
1929
1933
1939
19401941194219431944
19451946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
121,767
125,579
130,880
132,122133,402134,860136,739138,397
139,928141,389144,126146,631149,188
152,271154,878157,553160,184163,026
165,931168,903171,984174,882177,830
180,671183,691186,538189,242191,889
194,303196,560198,712200,706202,677
205,052207,661209,896211,909213,854
215,973218,035220,239222,585225,055
227,658229,807231,990
11,734
10,612
10,418
16,41017,33317,31217,63818,057
18,56619,00319,49419,88720,175
20,34120,52220,46920,34220,165
19,82419,20818,56317,91317,376
17,16617,24417,10116,85116;487
16,12115,61715,56415,73516,063
16,44816,939
26,800
26,897
25,179
10,57910,85011,30112,01612,524
12,97913,24414,40614,91915,607
24,81124,51624,23124,09323,949
23,90724,10324,46825,20925,852
26,72127,27928,89430,22731,480
32,68233,99435,27236,44537,368
38,49439,76541,20541,62642,297
42,93843,70244,24444,62244,840
44,81644,59144,20343,58242,989
42,50842,09941,29840,42839,552
38,81438,040
9,127
9,302
9,822
9,8959,8409,7309,6079,561
9,3619,1199,0978,9528,788
8,5428,4468,4148,4608,637
8,7448,9169,1959,543
10,215
10,68311,02511,18012,00712,736
13,51614,31114,20014,45214,800
15,28915,68816,03916,44616,769
17,01717,19417,27617,28817,242
17,13116,679
10,694
11,152
11,519
11,68011,55211,35011,06210,832
10,71410,61610,60310,75610,969
11,13411,48311,95912,71413,269
13,74614,05015,24815,78616,480
17,20218,15918,15318,52118,975
19,52719,98620,49920,94621,297
21,60521,938
35,862
37,319
39,354
11,69011,80711,95512,06412,062
12,03612,00411,81411,79411,700
39,86840,38340,86141,42042,016
42,52143,02743,65744,28844,916
45,67246,10346,49546,78647,001
47,19447,37947,44047,33747,192
47,14047,08447,01346,99446,958
46,91247,00147,19447,72148,064
48,47348,93650,48251,74953,051
54,30255,85257,56159,40061,379
63,46565,487
21,076
22,933
25,823
26,24926,71827,19627,67128,138
28,63029,06429,49829,93130,405
30,84931,36231,88432,39432,942
33,50634,05734,59135,10935,663
36,20336,72237,25537,78238,338
38,91639,53440,19340,84641,437
41,99942,48242,89843,23543,522
43,80144,00844,15044,28644,390
44,48744,471
6,474
7,363
8,764
9,0319,2889,5849,86710,147
10,49410,82811,18511,53811,921
12,39712,80313,20313,61714,076
14,52514,93815,38815,80616,248
16,67517,08917,45717,77818,127
18,45118,75519,07119,36519,680
20,10720,56121,02021,52522,061
22,69623,27823,89224,50225,134
25,70826,253
1 Not available.Note.—Includes Armed Forces overseas beginning 1940. Includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1950.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
195Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-29-—Noninstitutional population and the labor force, 1929-82
[Monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Year or month
Noninsti-tutionalpopula-tion »
ArmedForcesl
Civilian labor force
Total
Employment
Total Agri-cultural
Nonagri-cultural
Unem-ployment
ment rate(percent
of civilianlabor
force)
Civilian labor forceparticipation rate2
Total Males Females
1929..
1933..
1939,.
1940..1941..1942..1943..1944..
1945..1946..1947..
1947....1948....1949....
1950....1951....1952....19533..1954....
1955....1956....1957....1958....1959....
I9603
19611962819631964
1965...1966...1967...1968...1969...
1970197119723....19733....1974
19751976197719783....1979
1980..1981..1982..
Thousands of persons 14 years of age and over Percent
100,380101,520102,610103,660104,630
105,530106,520107,608
103,418104,527105,611
106,645107,721108,823110,601111,671
112,732113,811115,065116,363117,881
119,759121,343122,981125,154127,224
129,236131,180133,319135,562137,841
140,272143,033146,574149,423152,349
153.333158,294161,166164,027166,951
169,848172,272174,451
260
250
370
5401,6203,9709,02011,410
11,4403,4501,590
49,180
51,590
55,230
55,64055,91056,41055,54054,630
53,86057,52060,168
47,630
38,760
45,750
47,52050,35053,75054,47053,960
52,82055,25057,812
10,450
10,090
9,610
9,5409,1009,2509,0808,950
8,5808,3208,256
37,180
28,670
36,140
37,98041,25044,50045,39045,010
44,24046,93049,557
Thousands of persons 16 years of age and over
1,5911,4561,616
1,6493,0983,5933,5473,350
3,0482,8562,7992,6362,551
2,5142,5722,8272,7372,738
2,7223,1223,4463,5343,506
3,1882,8162t4492,3262,229
2,1802,1442,1332,1172,088
2,1022,1422,179
59,35060,62161,286
62,20862,01762,13863,01563,643
65,02366,55266,92967,63968,369
69,62870,45970,61471,83373,091
74,45575,77077,34778,73780,734
82,77184,38287,03489,42991,949
93,77596,15899,009
102,251104,962
106,940108,670110,204
57,03858,34357,651
58,91859,96160,25061,17960,109
62,17063,79964,07163,03664,630
65,77865,74666,70267,76269,305
71,08872,89574,37275,92077,902
78,67879,36782,15385,06486,794
85,84688,75292,01796,04898,824
99,303100,39799,526
7,8907,6297,658
7,1606,7266,5006,2606,205
6,4506,2835,9475,5865,565
5,4585,2004,9444,6874,523
4,3613,9793,8443,8173,606
3,4633,3943,4843,4703,515
3,4083,3313,2833,3873,347
3,3643,3683,401
49,14850,71449,993
51,75853,23553,74954,91953,904
55,72257,51458,12357,45059,065
82,43885,42188,73492,66195,477
95,93897,03096,125
1,550
12,830
9,480
8,1205,5602,6601,070
670
1,0402,2702,356
2,3112,2763,637
3,2882,0551,8831,8343,532
2,8522,7502,8594,6023,740
60,31860,54661,75963,07664,782
66,72668,91570,52772,10374,296
75,21575,97278,66981,59483,279
3,8524,7143,9114,0703,786
3,3662,8752,9752,8172,832
4,0935,0164,8824,3655,156
7,9297,4066,9916,2026,137
7,6378,273
10,678
3.2
24.9
17.2
14.69.94.71.91.2
1.93.93.9
3.93.85.9
5.33.33.02.95.5
4.44.14.36.85.5
5.56.75.55.75.2
4.53.83.83.63.5
4.95.95.64.95.6
8.57.77.16.15.8
7.17.69.7
55.756.057.258.758.6
57.255.856.8
58.358.858.9
59.259.359.058.958.8
59.360.059.659.559.3
59.459.358.858.758.7
58.959.259.659.660.1
60.460.260.460.861.3
61.261.662.363.263.7
63.863.964.0
83.784.385.686.487.0
84.882.684.0
86.486.686.4
86.586.386.085.5
85.385.584.884.283.7
83.382.982.081.481.0
80.780.480.480.179.8
79.779.178.978.878.7
77.977.577.777.977.8
77.477.076.6
See next page for continuation of table.
196Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-29.—Noninstitutional population and the labor force, 1929-82—Continued
[Monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Year or monthNoninsti-tutionalpopula-tion1
ArmedForcesl
Civilian labor force
TotalEmployment
Total Agri-cultural
Nonagri-cultural
Unem-ployment
Unemploy-ment rate(percent
of civilianlabor
force)
Civilian labor forceparticipation rate2
Total Males Females
Thousands of persons 16 years of age and over Percent
1980:JanFebMar
May".'.".'.'"".".'.June
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune
MyAugSeptOctNovDec
168,625168,846169,073169,289169,494169,735
170,030170,217170,419170,624170,814171,007
171,229171,400171,581171,770171,956172,172
172,385172,559172,758172,966173,155173,330
173,495173,657173,843174,020174,201174,364
174,544174,707174,889175,069175,238175,380
2,0812,0862,0902,0922,0882,092
2,0992,1142,1212,1212,1192,124
2,1252,1212,1282,1292,1272,131
2,1392,1602,1652,1582,1582,164
2,1592,1682,1752,1762,1752,173
2,1802,1962,1982,1882,1802,182
106,546106,637106,394106,552106,892106,832
107,169107,116107,148107,438107,596107,446
108,012108,175108,471108,866109,101108,440
108,602108,762108,375109,028109,254109,066
109,034109,364109,478109,740110,378110,147
110,416110,614110,858110,752111,042111,129
99,87299,96399,67799,20498,92298,769
98,81698,82999,10499,32799,56799,650
99,964100,143100,504101,006100,968100,393
100,748100,709100,104100,355100,22999,677
99,68899,69599,59799,48499,99499,681
99,58899,68399,54399,17699,13699,093
3,3133,3873,4123,3183,3853,309
3,3313,2473,4483,3623,3873,486
3,4203,3403,3563,5193,3713,360
3,3203,3963,3583,3743,3893,219
3,3793,3673,3673,3563,4463,371
3,4453,4293,3633,4133,4663,411
96,55996,57696,26595,88695,53795,460
95,48595,58295,65695,96596,18096,164
96,54496,80397,14897,48797,59797,033
97,42897,31396,74696,98196,84096,458
96,30996,32896,23096,12896,54896,310
96,14396,25496,18095,76395,67095,682
6,6746,6746,7177,3487,9708,063
8,3538,2878,0448,1118,0297,796
8,0488,0327,9677.8608,1338,047
7,8548,0538,2718,6739,0259,389
9,3469,6699,881
10,25610,38410,466
10,82810,93111,31511,57011,90612,036
6.36.36.36.97.57.5
7.87.77.57.57.57.3
7.57.47.37.27.57.4
7.27.47.68.08.38.6
8.68.89.09.39.49.5
9.89.9
10.210.510.710.8
64.063.963.763.763.963.7
63.863.763.763.863.863.6
63.963.964.064.264.263.8
63.863.863.563.863.963.7
63.663.863.863.964.264.0
64.164.164.264.164.264.2
77.777.877.577.477.677.5
77.577.377.377.377.377.0
77.377.277.377.477.476.7
76.876.976.776.776.876.7
76.576.676.576.677.076.5
76.576.676.876.776.876.6
51.651.551.351.451.551.4
51.551.551.451.651.651.6
51.852.052.152.352.4521
52.152.151.752.252.352.0
52.152.352.352.452.752.7
52.952.952.852.752.853.0
1 Not seasonally adjusted.2 Civilian labor force as percent of civilian noninstitutional population.3 Not strictly comparable with earlier data due to population adjustments as follows: Beginning 1953, introduction of 1950 census
data added about 600,000 to population and about 350,000 to labor force, total employment, and agricultural employment. Beginning1960, inclusion of Alaska and Hawaii added about 500,000 to population, about 300,000 to labor force, and about 240,000 tononagricultural employment. Beginning 1962, introduction of 1960 census data reduced population by about 50,000 and labor force andemployment by about 200,000. Beginning 1972, introduction of 1970 census data added about 800,000 to civilian noninstitutionalpopulation ana about 333,000 to labor force and employment. A subsequent adjustment based on 1970 census in March 1973 added60,000 to labor force and to employment. Beginning 1978, changes in sampling and estimation procedures introduced into thehousehold survey added about 250,000 to labor force and to employment. Unemployment levels and rates were not significantlyaffected.
Note.—Labor force data in Tables B-29 through B-35 are based on household interviews and relate to the calendar week includingthe 12th Of the month. For definitions of terms, area samples used, historic comparability of the data, comparability with other series,etc., see "Employment and Earnings."
Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
197Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-30.—Civilian employment and unemployment by sex and age, 1947-82
[Thousands of persons 16 years of age and over; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year ormonth
Civilian employment
Total
Males
Total 16-19years
20yearsandover
Females
Total 16-19years
20yearsandover
Unemployment
Total
Males
Total 16-19years
20yearsandover
Females
Total 16-1920
yearsandover
194719481949
1950195119521953K..1954
19551956195719581959
I9601.,.,19611962»....19631964
19651966196719681969197019711972»...1973 >...1974
1975197619771978 »....1979
198019811982
1981:JanFebMar...,
May...,June..,
July....Aug....
fSzNov...,Dec...,
1982:JanFebMar....
fcJune..,July....Aug..Sept.Oct...Nov..Dec..
57,03858,34357,651
58,91859,96160,25061,17960,109
62,17063,79964,07163,03664,630
65,77865,74666,70267,76269,30571,08872,89574,37275,92077,90278,67879,36782,15385,06486,794
85,84688,75292,01796,04898,824
99,303100,39799,526
99,964100,143100,504101,006100,968100,393
100,748100,709100,104100,355100,22999,677
99,68899,69599,59799,48499,99499,68199,58899,68399,54399,17699,13699,093
40,99541,72540,925
41,57841,78041,68242,43041,619
42,62143,37943,35742,42343,466
43,90443,65644,17744,65745,474
46,34046,91947,47948,11448,81848,99049,39050,89652,34953,024
51,85753,13854,72856,47957,607
57,18657,39756,271
57,35757,33757,55757,83757,73957,314
57,61457,54057,40457,25757,06256,746
56,66756,67056,49956,44456,72456,249
56,12756,15956,07255,93255,89255,809
2,2182,3442,124
2,1862,1562,1072,1361,985
2,0952,1642,1152,0122,198
2,3612,3152,3622,4062,587
2,9183,2533,1863,2553,4303,4093,4783,7654,0394,103
3,8393,9474,1744,3364,300
4,0853,8153,379
3,9683,9333,9163,9813,8923,736
3,7863,7963,7583,7503,6833,578
3,5683,5403,4733,4203,5343,306
3,2223,3273,2963,2833,3033,275
38,77639,38238,803
39,39439,62639,57840,29639,634
40,52641,21641,23940,41141,267
41,54341,34241,81542,25142,886
43,42243,66844,29444,85945,38845,58145,91247,13048,31048,922
48,01849,19050,55552,14353,308
53,10153,58252,891
53,38953,40453,64153,85653,84753,578
53,82853,74453,64653!50753,37953,168
53,09953,13053,02653,02453,19052,943
52,90552,83252,77652,64952,58952,534
16,04516,61716,723
17,34018,18118,56818,74918,490
19,55120,41920,71420,61321,164
21,87422,09022,52523,10523,831
24,74825,97626,89327,80729,08429,68829,97631,25732,71533,769
33,98935,61537,28939,56941,217
42,11743,00043,256
42,60742,80642,94743,16943,22943,079
43,13443,16942,70043,09843,16742,931
43,02143,02543,09843,04043,27043,432
43,46143,52443,47143,24443,24443,284
1,6911,6821,588
1,5171,6111,6121,5841,490
1,5471,6541,6631,5701,640
1,7681,7931,8331,8491,929
2,1182,4682,4962,5262,6872,7352,7302,9803,2313,345
3,2633,3893,5143,7343,783
3,6253,4113,170
3,5583,5383,5143,5453,5043,383
3,4133,4433.3443,2633,2473,194
3,2043,2003,2153,2133,2063,178
3,1503,1563,1853,1323,1213,069
14,35414,93615,137
15,82416,57016,95817,16417,000
18,00218,76719,05219,04319,524
20,10520,29620,69321,25721,903
22,63023,51024,39725,28126,397
26,95227,24628,27629,48430,424
30,72632,22633,77535,83637,434
38,49239,59040,086
39,04939,26839,43339,62439,72539,696
39,72139,72639,35639,83539,92039,737
39,81739,82539,88339,82740,06440,254
40,31140,36840,28640,11240,12340,215
2,3112,2763,637
3,2882,0551,8831,8343,532
2,8522,7502,8594,6023,740
3,8524,7143,9114,0703,786
3,3662,8752,9752,8172,8324,0935,0164,8824,3655,156
7,9297,4066,9916,2026,137
7,6378,273
10,678
8,0488,0327,9677,8608,1338,047
7,8548,0538,2718,6739,0259,389
9,3469,6699,881
10,25610,38410,466
10,82810,93111,31511,57611,90612,036
1,6921,5592,572
2,2391,2211,1851,2022,344
1,8541,7111,8413,0982,420
2,4862,9972,4232,4722,2051,9141,5511,5081,4191,4032,2382,7892,6592,2752>14
4,4424,0363,6673,1423,120
4,2674^776,179
4,4774,4484,3974,30044954,439
4,2264,4444,4994,7645,0525,396
5,3815,4865,6625,8565,9216,076
6,2346,3456,7036,8447,0067,046
270256353
318191205184310
274269300416398
426479408501487
479432448426440599693711653757
966939874813811
913962
1,090
958947955947
883
$949
1,0261,029
1,019
L0861,1031,0601,0841,1131,1251,1301,1411,137
1,4221,3052,219
1,9221,029
9801,0192,035
1,5801,4421,5412,6812,022
2,0602,5182,0161,9711,718
1,4351,1201,060
993963
1,6382,0971,9481,6241,957
3,4763,0982,7942,3282,308
3,3533,6155,089
3,4793,5003,4393,3533.5403,492
3,3433.5133,5593,8154,0264,367
4,3624,4514,6074,7704,8185,016
5,1505,2325,5785,7145,8655,909
619717
1,065
1,049834698632
1,188
9981,0391,0181,5041,320
1,3661,7171,4881,5981.581
1,4521,3241,4681,3971.429
1,8552,2272,2222,0892,441
3,4863,3693,3243,0613,018
3,3703,6964,499
3,5713,5443,5703,5603,6383:608
3,6283,6093,7723,9093,9733,993
3,9654,1834,2194,4004,4634,390
4,5944,5864,6124,7324,9004,990
144153223
195145140123191
176209197262256
286349313383385
395405391412413506568598583665
802780789769743
755800
762778805800792778
761760819866868819
856897817872895825
922915902908911919
475564841
854689559510997
823832821
1,2421,063
1,0801,3681,1751,2161,195
1,056921
1,078985
1,015
1,3491,6581,6251,5071,777
2,6842,5882,53522922,276
2,6152,8953,613
2,8092,7662,7652,7602,8462,830
2,8672,8492,9533,0433,1053,174
3,1093,2863,4023,5283,5683,565
3,6723,6713,7103,8243,9894,071
1 See footnote 3, Table B-29.Note.—See Note, Table B-29.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
198
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-31.—Selected employment and unemployment data, 1948-82
[Percent; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year ormonth
19481949
19501951....1952195319541955 "".19561957 .19581959
1960 .196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:Jan....Feb....Mar...
June..
July...Aug...Sept..Oct....Nov...Dec...
1982:Jan....Feb....Mar...
May!"June..
July...Aug...Sept..Oct....Nov...Dec...
Civilian employment as percent of population1
Total
55854.6
55 255.755.455.353 855.156.155 754.254.8
54 954.254 254.154 555.055 655.856.056.5
56.155.556.056.957.055.356.157.158.659.2
58.558.357.1
58.458.458.658.858.758.3
58.458.457.958.057.957.5
57.557.457.357.257.457.2
57.157.156.956.656.656.5
Bothsexes16-19
years
45543.0
43 844.944.143.940141.342.741137.638.1
39.037.537 635.835 837.740740.440.642.1
41.240.442.644.845.042.343.245.147.447.7
45.843.740.8
45.044.844.645.344.643.0
43.644.043.242.842.441.5
41.641.541.341.141.840.4
39.840.640.740.440.640.1
Males20
yearsandover
83 981.6
81.981.680.880.678.880.080.880278.079.0
78.777.677 477.377 777.977 677.477.176.9
76.175.375.876.375.772.973.273.774.574.7
72.972.370.2
72.672.672.873.072.872.4
72.672.472.171.871.571.2
71.070.970.770.670.770.3
70.169.969.869.569.369.1
Fe-males
20yearsandover
30.730.6
31.632.633.032.932 333.834.935.034.635.1
35.735.535836.236937.638 639^340.041.1
41.240.841.342.242.742.343.544.746.547.6
48.048.548.3
48.248.448.648.748.848.7
48.648.648.048.548.648.3
48.348.348.348.148.348.5
48.548.548.448.148.048.1
White
54.054354.855 455.755.956.5
56.255.756.457.357.555.956.857.959.360.0
59.459.358.2
59.359.559.559.859.759.4
59.559.559.059.158.958.6
58.558.558.458.358.558.3
58.258.258.157.757.757.6
Blackand
other
55.256156.857 256.956.656.7
55.553.853.254.053.350.451.051.553.754.0
52.451.449.8
52.151.652.052.552.051.2
51.350.951.151.051.050.6
50.550.350.149.750.149.7
49.849.749.649.549.349.3
Unemployment rate2
Allwork-
ers
3.85.9
5.33.33.02.95.54.44.14.36.85.5
5.56.7555.7524.5383.83.63.5
4.95.95.64.95.68.57.77.16.15.8
7.17.69.7
7.57.47.37.27.57.4
7.27.47.68.08.38.6
8.68.89.09.39.49.5
9.89.9
10.210.510.710.8
By sex and age
Bothsexes18-19
years
9213.4
12.28.28.57.6
12.611.011.111615.914.6
14 716.814 717.216 214.812 812.912.712.2
15.316.916.214.516.019.919.017.816.416.1
17.819.623.2
19.019.119.218.819.119.5
18.618.919.920.621.521.4
21.722.321.922.822.922.5
23.923.823.824.124.224.5
Males20
yearsandover
3.25.4
4.72.52.42.5493.83.43.66.24.7
4.75.74.64.5393.2252!32.22.1
3.54.44.03.33.86.85.95.24.34.2
5.96.38.8
6.16.26.05.96.26.1
5.86.16.26.77.07.6
7.67.78.08.38.38.7
8.99.09.69.8
10.010.1
Fe-males
20yearsandover
3.65.3
514.03.22.955444.24.16.15.2
5.16.3545'.4524.5384.23.83.7
4.85.75.44.95.58.07.47.06.05.7
6.46.88.3
6.76.66.66.56.76.7
6.76.77.07.17.27.4
7.27.67.98.18.28.1
8.38.38.48.79.09.2
By selected groups
Experi-encedwageand
salarywork-
ers
436.8
6.03.73.43.26.2484.44.67.35.7
5.76.8565.6504.3353.63.43.3
4.85.75.34.55.38.27.36.65.65.5
6.97.39.3
7.17.17.06.87.27.0
6.97.07.37.67.98.4
8.28.58.79.19.29.2
9.49.49.8
10.110.510.7
Mar-riedmen,
spousepres-ent »
3.5
461.51.41.7402.62.32.85.13.6
3.74.6363.4282.4191.81.61.5
2.63.22.82.32.75.14.23.62.82.8
4.24.36.5
4.24.24.23.84.04.2
4.04.04.34.75.05.6
5.35.45.66.06.16.4
6.66.87.27.57.67.8
Wom-en
whomain-tain
fami-lies
4.94.44.4
5.47.37.27.17.0
10.010.19.48.58.3
9.210.411.7
10.39.99.89.9
10.410.5
11.210.210.610.710.810.3
10.410.410.811.511.912.1
12.011.712.411.312.513.2
Full-time
work-ers*
5.4
502.62.5
523.83.7407.2
6.7
5.5494.235343.13.1
4.55.55.14.45.18.17.36.65.65.3
6.97.39.6
7.27.27.16.97.17.1
6.97.07.37.78.08.5
8.48.58.99.19.29.4
9.69.7
10.210.510.610.8
Blue-col-lar
work-ers5
428.0
7.23.93.6347.25.85.16.2
10.27.6
7.89.2747.3635.3424.44.13.9
6.27.46.55.46.7
11.79.48.16.97.0
10.010.34.2
10.110.210.09.69.99.8
9.69.7
10.210.911.612.6
12.412.513.013.513.614.0
14.414.415.515.816.216.3
1 Civilian employment as percent of total noninstitutional population.2 Unemployment as percent of civilian labor force in group specified.3 Data for 1949 and 1951-54 are for April; 1950, for March.* Data for 1949-61 are for May.8 Includes craft and kindred workers, operatives, and nonfarm laborers. Data for 1948-57 are based on data for January, April, July,
and October.Note—Data relate to persons 16 years of age and over. See footnote 3 and Note, Table B-29.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
199Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-32.—Civilian labor force participation rate by demographic characteristic, 1954-82
[Percent;1 monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
1954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969 ,
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:JanFebMarApr!&:::::::JuneJulyAug ........SeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar
ftJune :*:"
Auc .....Sept
<3 :NovDec
Allcivil-ian
work-ers
58.8
59.360059.659 559.3
59.459 358.858 758.7
58.959 259.659 660.1
60.460.260.460.861.3
61.261.662 363.263.7
63.863.964.0
63.963.964.064.264.263.8
63.863.863.563 863.963.7
63.663.863 863.964,264.0
64.164164.264.164.264.2
White
Total
58.2
58.759.459.158958.7
58.858 858.358.258.2
58.458.759.259359.9
60.260.160.460.861.4
61.561.862 563.363.9
64.164.364.3
64.364.364.464.564.764.2
64.264.263.964 264.264.2
64.064.164164.364.664.4
64.464.464.664.464.564.6
Males
Total
85.6
85.485 684.884 383.8
83.483082.181581.1
80.880680.780480.2
80.079.679.679.479.4
78778.478 578.678.6
78.277,977.4
78.178.278 278.378.477.7
77 777.777.577 677.777.7
77.377 477 477.577.977.3
77 277 477.777.677.677.5
16-19years
57.6
58.660.459.256 555.9
55.954 553.853.152.7
54.155.956.355956.8
57.557.960.162.062.9
61.962,364 065.064.8
63.762.460.0
63.664.063 663.662.961.1
61.161.862.062 262.461.0
61.160 960 360.662.458.7
57.959 759.459.460.059.6
20yearsandover
87.8
87.587 686.986686.3
86.085 784.984 484.2
83.983683.583 283.0
82.882.382 081.681.4
80 780.380 280.180.1
79.879 579.2
79.779.779879.980.079.5
79 579.479 279 279.279.4
79.079279179.279.579.2
79 279179.579.479.479.3
Females
Total
33.3
34.535.735.735.836.0
36.536936.737.237.5
38.139.240.140 741.8
42.642.643.244.145.2
45946.948049.450.5
51.251,952.4
51.751.851851.952.251.8
52 051.951551952.051.8
51.952 052 052.352.552.5
52 852 752.752.452.652.8
16-19years
40.6
40.743142.240139.6
40.340 639.838 737.8
39.242 642.543 044.6
45.645.448150.151.7
51552.854556.757.4
56.255455.0
56.056.556 256.456.254.4
55156.055154254.653.8
54.654954 455.755.454.6
55055 055.355.255.154.6
20yearsandover
32.7
34.035.135.235 535.6
36.236 636.537.037.5
38.038.839.840441.5
42.242.342.743.544.4
45 346.247 348.749.8
50.651552.2
51.251.351451.551.951.6
51751.551151751.851.7
51.651751851.952.252.4
52 652 552.452.152.452.6
Black and other
Total
64.3
64.264 964.464 864.3
64 564163.263 063.1
62.963062.862 262.1
61.860.960 260.560.3
59659.860462.262.2
61.761361.6
61.360.861661.961.561.1
60 861.161261561.561.4
61.261261461.161.761.3
61661861.962.061.862.1
Males
Total
85.2
85,085,184,384 083.4
83.082 280.880.280.0
79.679.078,577 676.9
76.574.973.974.073.5
71.971.271672.672.5
71.570 671.0
71.070.170670.971.070.0
69 970.970870770.570.7
70.470 470 470.770.870.7
71271171.471.471.571.5
16-19years
61.2
60.861.558.857.355.5
57.655.853.551.549.9
51.351.451.149.749.6
47.444.746.046.347.2
42.942.343.645.444.0
43.541.740.6
45.341.741.244.943.940.5
40.840.839.339 240.741.6
39.941.740.938.741.137.7
39.341.441.742.041.340.7
20yearsandover
87,1
87.887.887.087186.7
86.285 584.283.984.1
83.783.382.982 281.4
81.480.078.678.678.0
76 876.176277.177.1
75.975.075.4
74.974.575174.975.274.5
74.475.575.575 575.074.9
74.974 674.875.475.275.6
75.975 575.875.875.976.0
Total
46.1
46.147.347,248.047.7
48.248 348.048.148.5
48.649.349.549.349.8
49.549.248.849.349.3
49.450.451.253.553.7
53.653.653.9
53.353.054.154.453.653.7
53.353.053.453.954.153.7
53.653.654.053.254.253.6
53.854.254.154.253.754.3
Females
16-19years
31.0
32.736333.231928.2
32.932 833.132 631.7
29.533 535.234 834.6
34.131.232.334.434.1
35.633.633638.037.8
35.934.534.5
36.032.335 937.734.634.8
32,431.333.237 435.032.9
33.534 633.431,934,131,5
34 936936.435.635.335.8
20yearsandover
47.7
47 S48.44ft fi49 849.8
49.950149.649950.7
51.151.6S1fi51452.0
51.851.851.251.451.5
51.452.853.655.655.8
55.9%\56.3
55.555.756.456.556.056.1
55.955.855.956056.556.4
56.156.056.555.856.756.4
56156 256.256.455.956.5
1 Civilian labor force as percent of civilian noninstitutional population in group specified.Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years of age and over.See footnote 3 and Note, Table B-29.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
200
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-33.—Civilian unemployment rate by demographic characteristic, 1948-82
[Percent;1 monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
19481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:Jan
MarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSept
o5 :NovDec
Allcivil-ian
work-ers
3.859
533330295.5
4.4414.3685.5
5.56755575.2
4.5383.8363.5
4.9595.64.95.6
857.7716.15.8
7.1769.7
7.5747372757.4
7274768.08.38.6
86889.09.39495
9.899
10 210 510 710.8
White
Total
3.556
493.1282.75.0
3.9363.8614.8
5.0604.9504.6
4.13.43.43.23.1
4.5545.14.35.0
787.0625.25.1
6.3678.6
6.66,56.464666.4
6.36 366fi97.37.6
76777.98.38484
8.78.79.193969.7
Males
Total
3.456
472.625254.8
3.7343.6614.6
485746474.1
3.6282.7262.5
4.0494.5384.4
726.4554.64.5
61658.8
6464636 1656.3
5962646.87.27.8
76778.08.48586
8.99.19598
10 010.1
16-19years
13.4
11.310 511.515 714.0
14.015 713.715 914.7
12.910.510.710110.0
13.715114.212.313.5
18 317.315 013.513.9
16.217 921.7
17.418 017 917 017 617.8
16.716 717 817.919.720.2
20 620 420.421.920.9212
22.522.522.223.022 622.8
20yearsandover
4.4
3.33.03.25.54.1
4.25.14.03.93.4
2.92.22.12.01.9
3.24.03.63.03.5
6.25.44.73.73.6
5.3567.8
5.55.45.45.25.55.3
5.15.35.45.96.26.8
6.66.77.07.37.57.7
7.98.08.68.89.19.2
Females
Total
3.857
534.2333.15.5
4.3424.3625.3
5.3655.5585.5
5.04.34.64.34.2
5.46.35.95.36.1
867.9736.25.9
6.5698.3
6.96.76.6676.96.7
6.86.5707.17.47.4
7.5777.88.18.28.1
8.38.38.58.79.09.2
16-19years
10.4
9.19.79.5
12 712.0
12.714.812.815.114.9
14.012.111.512.111.5
13.415.114.213.014.5
17.416.415.914.414.0
14.816 619.0
15.516.015.916.216.616.3
16.315.717.217.518.317.7
18.119.017.918.818.718.0
19.118.919.119.919.820.4
20yearsandover
5.1
3.9373.8564.7
4.6574.7484.6
4.03.33.83.43.4
4.45.34.94.35.1
756.8625.25.0
5.6597.3
6.05.7565.65.95.7
5.85.66.06.16.36.4
6.4666.87.17.27.1
7.37.27.57.68.08.1
Black and other
Total
5.989
905.3544.59.9
8.78.37.9
12 610.7
10.212.410.910.89.6
8.17.37.46.76.4
8.29.9
10.09.09.9
13.813.113.111.911.3
13.114.217.3
13.113.213.613.213.614.2
13714814.615?15?15.7
15.516.016.61fi8171171
17.417718118418*)18.8
Males
Total
5.89.6
9.44.95.24.8
10.3
8.87.98.3
13.711.5
10.712.810.910 58.9
7.46.36.05.65.3
7.39.18.97.79.2
13.612.712.311.010.4
13.214.118.2
13.213.012.712.913.614.4
13.814.914.214 815.516.2
16.116.417.317.317.618.2
18.018.519.519.919.720.3
16-19years
14.4
13.415.018.426 825.2
24.026 822.027 324.3
23.321.323.922.121.4
25.028.829.726.931.5
35.235.136.634.031.3
34.437.544.0
39.636.332.936.834.138.1
37.044.535.739.138.437.7
34.939.044.042.844.148.1
45.345.445.843.848.046.7
20yearsandover
9.9
8.47.47.6
12 710.5
9.611.710.09.27.7
6.04.94.33.93.7
5.67.36.95.86.9
11.610.610.08.78.5
11.312.116.2
10.711.011.010.711.712.4
11.912.412.5
13.614.4
14.614.615.115.315.516.0
15.916.317.318.017.418.2
Females
Total
6179
846.1574.19.2
8.5897.3
1089.4
9.411911.011210.7
9.2879.18.37.8
9.310.911.410.610.8
13.913.613.913.012.3
13.114.316.4
13.013.414.513.613.514.0
13 fi14 7
15 614815.1
14911S15.8lfi?164160
16.7169Ififi18817?17.2
16=19years
20.6
19.222 820.228 427.7
24.829 230.234 731.6
31.731.329.628.727.6
34.535.438.434.434.5
38.338.839.638.135.6
36.538.343.8
33.134.842.235.533.337.4
33.241.238.846.141.441.4
42.641.841.042.045.743.1
47.749.743.342.343.142.7
20yearsandover
8.4
7.77864958.3
8310 6
9490
7.56671635.8
6.9878.88?8.5
11 511 311710.610.2
11 1
14 3
11411.8
117
1??
1??
13313,0
13.1
13414.014414 314?
14.414 314414915?15.3
1 Unemployment as percent of civilian labor force in group specified.Note.—See footnote 3 and Note, Table B-29.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
201
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-34.—Unemployment by duration, 1947-82
[Monthly data seasonally adjusted1]
Year or month
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOclNovDec
1982:JanFebMar
fcJuneJulyAugIt.:::NovDec
Totalunem-ploy-ment
Duration of unemployment
Less than5 weeks
5-14weeks
15=26weeks
27 weeksand over
Thousands of persons 16 years of age and over
2,3112,2763,637
3,2882,0551,8831,8343,532
2,8522,7502,8594,6023,740
3,8524,7143,9114,0703,786
3,3662,8752,9752,8172,832
4,0935,0164,8824,3655,156
7,9297,4066,9916,2026,137
7,6378,273
10,678
8,0488,0327,9677,8608,1338,047
7,8548,0538,2718,6739,0259,389
9,3469,6699,881
10,25610,38410,466
10,82810,93111,31511,57611,90612,036
1,2101,3001>56
1,4501,1771,1351,1421,605
1,3351,4121,4081,7531,585
1,7191,8061,6631,7511,697
1,6281,5731,6341,5941,629
2,1392,2452,2422,2242,604
2,9402,8442,9192,8652,950
3,2953,4493883
3,2783,2843,2783,1673,3823,342
3,3173,3413,5153,6963,8204,040
3,8303,8073,8313,9303,8713,605
3,9593,9334,0043,9303,9634,019
704669
1,194
1,055574516482
1,116
815805891
1,3961,114
1,1761,3761,1341,2311,117
983779893810827
1,2901,5851,4721,3141,597
2,4842,1962,1321,9231,946
2,4702,5393,311
2,3322,3902,4222,4452,5792,390
2,3712,4932,5442,6772,8473,028
3,0793,0683,0983,2553,2813,398
3,2493,3463,5493,5113,5493,460
234193428
425166148132495
366301321785469
503728534535491
404287271256242
428668601483574
1,3031,018913766706
1,0521,1221,708
1,1231,0961,0561,0951,0631,146
1,0851,0651,1301,1691,2181,224
1,2091,4791,6051,5821,6331,683
1,7801,8081,8301,9512,1912,125
164116256
3571378478
317
336232239667571
454804585553482
351239177156133
235519566343381
1,2031,3481,028648535
8201,1621,776
1,2721,2431,2181,1331,1581,131
1,0761,1481,1111,1231,1401,183
1,1931,2711,3571,4981,6341,834
1,7891,8292,0262,2162,3332,607
1 Because of independent seasonal adjustment of the various series, detail will not add to totals.Note.=See footnote 3 and Note, Table B-29.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
202
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-35.—Unemployment by reason, 1967-82
[Monthly data seasonally adjusted1]
Year or month
Totalunem-ploy-ment
Job losers Job leavers Reentrants Newentrants
Thousands of persons
1967....19681969....
1970....1971197219731974....
1975....19761977....19781979....
1980....19811982
1982:Jan..Feb..Mar..
May".June.
July..Aug..Sept.Oct..Nov..Dec.
1967....1968....1969....
19701971....197219731974....
1975....1976....19771978....1979....
1980....19811982
1982:Jan..Feb..Mar..Apr..May.June.
July..Aug..Sept.Oct..Nov..Dec.
2,9752,8172,832
4,0935,0164,8824,3655,156
7,9297,4066,9916,2026,137
7,6378,27310,678
9,3469,6699,88110,25610,38410,466
10,82810,93111,31511,57611,90612,036
1,2291,0701,017
1,8112,3232,1081,6942,242
4,3863,6793,1662,5852,635
3,9474,2676,268
5,2435,2465,6285,8895,9386,181
6,3236,4466,9797,3257,3697,295
438431436
550590641683768
827903909874880
891923840
842942885901864826
819814786803794826
945909965
1,2281,4721,4561,3401,463
1,8921,9281,9631,8571,806
1,9272,1022,384
2,1332,2722,2612,3422,3932,378
2,4782,4402,4372,3222,5462,629
396407413
504630677649681
823895953885817
872981
1,185
1,0551,0961,0611,0961,1591,091
1,2301,3041,3031,2961,2441,288
Percent of civilian tabor force
3.83.63.5
4.95.95.64.95.6
8.57.77.16.15.8
7.17.69.7
8.68.89.09.39.49.5
9.89.9
10.210.510.710.8
1.61.31.2
2.22.82.41.92.4
4.73.83.22.52.5
3.73.95.7
4.84.85.15.45.45.6
5.75.86.36.66.66.6
0.6.5.5
.7
.7
.7
.8
.8
.9
.9
.9
.9
.8
1.21.21.2
1.51.71.71.51.6
2.02.02.01.81.7
1.81.92.2
2.02.12.12.12.22.2
2.22.22.22.12.32.4
0.5.5.5
.6
.7
.8
.7
.7
.9
.91.0.9.8
.91.1
1.01.01.01.01.11.0
1.11.21.21.21.11.2
1 Because of independent seasonal adjustment of the various series, detail will not add to totals.
Note.—Data relate to persons 16 years of age and over.See footnote 3 and Note, Table B-29.
Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
203
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLB B-36.—Unemployment insurance programs, selected data, 1946-82
Year or month
All programs
Coveredemploy-ment1
Insuredunemploy-
ment(weeklyaver-
age) • •
Totalbenefits
paid(millions
ofdollars)2 *
State programs
Insuredunem-
ploymentInitialclaims
Exhaus-tions5
Insuredunemploy-ment aspercent
ofcoveredemploy-
ment
Benefits paid
Total(millions
ofdollars)*
Averageweeklycheck
(dollars)s
1946194719481949
19501951195219531954195519561957195819591960196119621963196419651966196719681969
19701971197219731974197519761977197819791980
1981 •>...1981:JanFebMar...,
flfay"..June..
July...Aug...
Nov
Dec1982:Jan,.Feb..Mar..
fcJune..JulyAugSeptOcfNovDec
Thousands Weekly average; thousands
31,85633,87634,64633,098
34,30836,33437,00638,07236,62240,01842,75143,43644,41145,72846,33446,26647,77648,43449,63751,58054,73956,34257,97759,999
59,52659,37566,45869,89772,45171,03773,45976,419
92,06292,65993,300
2,8041,7931,4462,474
1,6051,0001,0691,0672,0511,3991,3231.5712,7731,8602,0712,9941,946
71,9731,7531,4501,1291,2701,1871,177
2,0702,6082,1921,7932,5584,9373,8463,3082,6452,5923,8373,410
4,6214,2643,9483,4533,1112,949
3,0122,8742,6802,7533,2283,935
4,6814,7234,8924,7604,3874,328
4,4954,3984,2824,3914,635
2,878.51,785.51,328.72,269.81,467.6
862.91,043.51,050.62,291.61,560.21,540.61,913.04,290.62,854.33,022.84,358.13,145.13,025.92,749.22,360.41,890.92,221.52,191.02,298.6
4,209.36,154.05,491.14,517.36,933.9
16,802.412,344.810,998.99,006.99,401.3
16,175.415,283.5
1,740.91,567.81,663.71,453.31,192.71,191.3
1,187.71,098.41,088.21,064.41,146.21,666.9
1,835.11,904.52,295.22,141.11,871.92,003.9
1,929.22,033.02,003.71,927.32,044.5
1,295997980
1,9731,513
9691,044
9901,8701,2651,2151,4462,5101,684
1,9082,2901,783
71,8061,6051,3281,0611,2051,1111,101
1,8052,1501,8481,6322,2623,9862,9912,6552,3592,434
3,3503,048
**3,0692,9882,9762,9262,8822,824
2,8012,8672,9413,1273,4003,613
3,5773,5823,7753,9823,9724,011
3,9884,1364,3794,6154,6354,428
189187200340
236208215218304226227270369277
331350302
7 298268232203226201200
296295261247363478386375346388488460
425424420402401413
411436472511542560
563529574573579560
539617654659618546
4.33.13.06.24.62.82.92.85.23.53.23.66.44.4
4.85.64.44.33.83.02.32.52.22.13.44.13.52.73.56.04.63.93.32.9
3,93.5**3.53.43.43.43.33.2
3.23.33.43.63.94.1
4.14.14.34.64.54.6
4.64.75.05.35.35.1
1,094.9775.1789.9
1,736.01,373.1
840.4998.2962.2
2,026.91,350.31,380.71,733.93,512.72,279.02,726.73,422.72,675.42,774.72,522.12,166.01,771.32,092.32,031.62,127.9
3,848.54,957.04,471.04,007.65,974.9
11,754.78,974.58,357.27,717.28,612.9
13,761.113,257.8
1,419.61,315.31,394.71,226.71,006.21,009.8
1,062.01,006.61,001.2
997.81,080.81,592.5
1,764.21,783.42,072.61,849.91,573.41,692.2
1,679.41,746.21,710.61,646.61,810.3
18.5017.8319.0320.48
20.7621.0922.7923.5824.9325.0427.0228.1730.5830.4132.8733.8034.5635.2735.9237.1939.7541.2543.4346.17
50.3454.0256.7659.0064.2570.2375.1678.7983.6789.6798.95
106.54
103.67104.48105.74105.98105.47104.59
103.56106.02107.39108.92110.51112.89
114.83117.05117.10117.61118.08118.64"
117.28118.97120.78122.75123.22
"Monthly data are seasonally adjusted.1 Includes persons under the State, UCFE (Federal employee, effective January 1955). and RRB (Railroad Retirement Board) programs.
Beginning October 1958, also includes the UCX program (unemployment compensation for ex-servicemen).'Includes State. UCFE, RR, UCX, UCV (unemployment compensation for veterans, October 1952 January 1960), and SRA
(Servicemen's Readjustment Act, September 1944-September 1951) programs. Also includes Federal and State extended benefitprograms. Does not include FSB (Federal supplemental benefits), SLlA (special unemployment assistance), and Federal supplementalcompensation programs.
9 Covered workers who have completed at least 1 week of unemployment.4 Annual data are net amounts and monthly data are gross amounts.* Individuals receiving final payments in benefit year.6 For total unemployment only.7 Programs include Puerto Rican sugarcane workers for initial claims and insured unemployment beginning July 1963.H Latest data available for all programs combined. Workers covered by State programs account for about 97 percent of wage and
salary earners.Source: Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
204Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-37.— Wage and salary workers in nonagricultural establishments, 1929-82
[Thousands of persons; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year ormonth
192919331939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982*
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar
fc:June
JulyAugSeptOctNov*Dec"
Totalwageand
salaryworkers
31,32423,69930,603
32,36136,53940,10642,43441,86440,37441,65243,85744,86643,754
45,19747,81948,79350,20248,99050,64152,36952,85351,32453,268
54,18953,99955,54956,65358,28360,76563,90165,80367,89770,384
70,88071,21473,67576,79078,26576,94579,38282,47186,69789,823
90,40691,10589,619
90,90990,91391,01491,09991,13191,286
91,39691,32291.36391,22490,99690,642
90,46090,45990,30490,08390,16689,839
89,53589,31289,26788,86088,68488,518
Manufacturing
Total
10 7027,397
10,278
10,98513,19215,28017,60217,32815,52414,70315,54515,58214,441
15,24116,39316,63217,54916,31416,88217,24317,17415,94516,675
16,79616,32616,85316,99517,27418,06219,21419,44719,78120,167
19,36718,62319,15120,15420,07718,32318,99719,68220,50521,040
20,28520,17318,849
20,17120,14820,19720,27520,33220,334
20,37920,31120,26720,09719,90319,676
19,51719,45419,31919,16919,11518,930
18,81318,67218,57218,32518,18318,134
Durablegoods
4,715
5,3636,9688,823
11,08410,8569,0747,7428,3858,3267,489
8,0949,0899,349
10,1109,1299,5419,8339,8558,8299,373
9,4599,0709,4809,6169,816
10,40511,28211,43911,62611,895
11,20810,63611,04911,89111,92510,68811,07711,59712,27412,760
12.18712,11711,114
12,12012,09712,14312,20112,23712,246
12,26612,22812,18412,05911,90111,724
11,62211,57511,49011,37511,33211,203
11,13310,99310.90010,66610,55510,533
I
Non-durablegoods
5.564
5,6226,2256,4586,5186,4726,4506,9627,1597,2566,953
7,1477,3047,2847,4387,1857,3417,4117,3217,1167,303
7,3377,2567,3737,3807,4587,6567,9308,0078,1558,272
8,1587,9878,1028,2628,1527,6357,9208,0868,2318,280
8,0988,0567,735
8,0518,0518,0548,0748,0958,088
8,1138,0838,0838,0388,0027,952
7,8957,8797,8297,7947,7837,727
7,6807,6797,6727,6597,6287,601
Mining
1087744854925957992925892836862955994930901929898866791792822828751732712672650635634632627613606619623609628642697752779813851958
1,0271,1321,122
1,1021,1131,124
978985
1,137
1,1641,1801,1921,1951,2021,206
1,2011,2031,1971,1821,1521,124
1,1001,0861,0751,0581,0511,036
Construc-tion
1,512824
1,165
1,3111,8142,1981,5871,1081,1471,6832,0092,1982,194
2,3642,6372,6682,6592,6462,8393,0392,9622,8173,004
2,9262,8592,9483,0103,0973,2323,3173,2483,3503,575
3,5883,7043,8894,0974,0203,5253,5763,8514,2294,463
4,3464,1763,912
4,3154,2404,2674,2814,2234,185
4,1754,1464,1244,1014,0714,026
3,9663,9743,9343,9383,9883,940
3,9273,8993,8833,8563,8483,818
Transpor-tationand
publicutilities
3 9162,6722,936
3,0383,2743,4603,6473,8293,9064,0614,1664,1894,001
4,0344,2264,2484,2904,0844,1414,2444,2413,9764,011
4,0043,9033,9063,9033,9514,0364,1584,2684,3184,442
4,5154,4764,5414,6564,7254,5424,5824,7134,9235,136
5,1465,1575,057
5,1395,1455,1535,1635,1585,162
5,1685,1685,1815,1625,1505,128
5,1255,1155,1005,0945,1015,078
5,0445,0255,0315,0074,9944,979
Whole-saleand
retailtrade
6,1234,7556,426
6,7507,2107,1186,9827,0587,3148,3768,9559,2729,264
9,3869,742
10,00410,24710,23510,53510,85810,88610,75011,127
11,39111,33711,56611,77812,16012,71613,24513,60614,09914,705
15,04015,35215,94916,60716,98717,06017,75518,51619,54220,192
20,31020,55120,547
20,38020,42220,43820,50820,54320,590
20,62020,65020,66020,65420,62320,524
20,63020,67020,65520,58420,65220,595
20,61520,55020,49220,44120,39020,297
finance,insur-ance,andreal
estate
149412801,447
1,4851,5251,5091,4811,4611,4811,6751,7281,8001,828
1,8881,9562,0352,1112,2002,2982,3892,4382,4812,549
2,6292,6882,7542,8302,9112,9773,0583,1853,3373,512
3,6453,7723,9084,0464,1484,1654,2714,4674,7244,975
5,1605,3015,350
5,2525,2645,2705,2865,2955,302
5,3115,3195,3285,3255,3245,331
5,3265,3265,3365,3355,3425,352
5,3595,3605,3675,3575,3625,376
Services
3 4252,8613,502
3,6653,9054,0664,1304,1454,2224,6975,0255,1815,240
5,3575,5475,6995,8355,9696,2406,4976,7086,7657,087
7,3787,6207,9828,2778,6609,0369,498
10,04510,56711,169
11,54811,79712,27612,85713,44113,89214,55115,30316,25217,112
17,89018,59219,000
18,35218,38218,41418,48018,51718,556
18,61518,65418,70718,77318,81518,834
18,83118,86718,90418,92918,96318,988
19,04219,04819,08419,07419,12519,143
Government
Federal
533565905996
1,3402,2132,9052,9282,8082,2541,8921,8631,908
1,9282,3022,4202,3052,1882,1872,2092,2172,1912,233
2,2702,2792,3402,3582,3482,3782,5642,7192,7372,758
2,7312,6962,6842,6632,7242,7482,7332,7272,7532,773
2,8662,7722,733
2,7982,7892,7802,7742,7762,777
2,7752,7692,7642,7572,7492,756
2,7412,7372,7362,7302,7282,739
2,7372,7392,7342,7232,7262,728
Stateandlocaf
2,5322 6013,090
3,2063,3203,2703,1753,1163,1373,3413,5823,7873,948
4,0984,0874,1884,3404,5634,7275,0695,3995,6485,850
6,0836,3156,5506,8687,2487,6968,2208,6729,1029,437
9,82310,18510,64911,06811,44611,93712,13812,39912,91913,174
13,37513,25313,051
13,40013,41013,37113,35413,30213,243
13,18913,12513,14013,16013,15913,161
13,12313,11313,12313,12213,12513,093
12,89812,93313,02913,01913,00513,007
Note.—Data in Tables B-37 through B-39 are baser! on reports from employing establishments and relate to full* and part-time wageand salary workers in nonagricultural establishments who worked during or received pay for any part of the pay period which includesthe 12th of the month. Not comparable with labor force data {Tables B-29 through B-35), which include proprietors, self-employedpersons, domestic servants, and unpaid family workers; which count persons as employed when they are not at work because ofindustrial disputes, bad weather, etc., even if they are not paid for the time off; and which are based on a sample of the working-agepopulation. For description and details of the various establishment data, see "Employment and Earnings."Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
205Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-38.—Average weekly hours and hourly earnings in selected private nonagrieultural industries,
1947-82
[For production or nonsupervisory workers; monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Year ormonth
Average weekly hours
Totalprivate
non-agricul-tural >
Manufac-turing
Con-struction
Whole-saleand
retailtrade
Average gross hourly earnings,current dollars
Totalprivate
non-agricul-tural x
Manufac-turing
Con-struction
Whole-saleand
retailtrade
Adjusted hourly earnings, totalprivate nonagricultura!2
Index,1977^100
Currentdollars
1977dollars3
Percent changefrom a year
earlier4
Currentdollars
1947194819491950195119521953195419551956195719581959
19601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982"....1981:JanFebMar
tz.June....JulyAugNov."!.'.'Dec
1982:JanFebMar
May'."."June....
JulyAugSept....OctNov...Dec "...
40.340.039.439.839.939.939.639.139.639.338.838.539.0
38.638.638.738.838.738.838.638.037.837.737.136.937.036.936.536.136.136.035.835.735.335.234.8
35.635.235.335.435.435.235.335.235.035.135.135.0
34.435.034.934.935.034.9
34.934.834.834.734.734.6
40.440.039.140.540.640.740.539.640.740.439.839.240.339.739.840.440.540.741.241.440.640.740.6
39.839.940.540.740.0
39.540.140.340.440.239.739.838.9
40.439.739.940.140.240.140.039.939.439.539.339.1
37.639.439.039.039.139.239.239.038.838.838.938.9
38.238.137.737.438.138.937.937.237.137.537.036.837.0
36.736.937.037.337.237.437.637.737.337.937.337.236.536.836.636.436.836.536.837.0
37.036.936.7
38.636.337.237.237.036.537.036.835.336.837.437.0
35.237.136.936.937.536.837.237.036.436.336.436.5
40.540.440.540.540.540.039.539.539.439.138.738.638.838.638.338.238.137.937.737.136.636.135.7
35.335.134.934.634.2
33.933.733.332.932.6
32.232.231.9
32.332.232.232.332.232.132.232.232.132.032.132.0
31.732.031.931.832.031.931.931.932.131.931.831.8
$1,1311.2251.275
1.3351.451.521.611.651.711.801.891.952.022.092.142.222.282.362.462.562.682.853.043.233.453.703.944.244.534.865.255.696.16
6.667.257.67
7.007.057.107.147.197.237.277.347.377.407.457.46
7.527.537.547.597.657.67
7.717.747.727.777.787.83
$1,2161.3271.3761.4391.561.641.741.78
1.851.952.042.102.19
2.262.322.392.452.53
2.612.712.823.013.19
3.353.573.824.094.42
4.835.225.686.176.70
7.277.998.50
7.697.757.817.907.947.998.038.098.148.168.208.20
8.388.348.378.448.488.52
8.568.578.568.568.618.62
$1,5401.7121.792
1.8632.022.132.282.38
2.452.572.712.822.93
3.073.203.313.413.55
3.703.894.114.414.79
5.245.696.066.416.81
7.317.718.108.669.27
9.9410.8011.55
10.4010.4710.5310.5710.6410.7310.8210.9010.9511.0611.1411.22
11.5211.3411.3911.4311.5411.51
11.5611.5811.5611.7111.6011.82
$0,9401.0101.060
1.1001.181.231.301.35
1.401.471.541.601.66
1.711.761.831.891.97
2.042.142.252.412.56
2.722.883.053.233.483.733.974.284.675.06
5.485.936.22
5.725.785.825.855.895.915.945.986.036.036.066.08
6.096.106.126.166.206.22
6.236.266.256.326.346.35
21.623.424.5
25.427.328.730.331.332.434.035.737.238.539.841.042.443.644.8
46.448.450.853.957.5
61.365.769.874.180.0
86.792.9
100.0108.1116.8
127.3138.9148.4
133.7134.8135.7136.6137.6138.4
139.1140.5141.4142.0143.0143.5
144.9145.0145.4146.3147.7148.1
148.9149.9150.1150.8151.1151.9
58.558.962.3
64.063.665.568.770.5
73.375.976.978.080.081.483.085.086.387.5
89.090.392.294.095.095.798.3
101.2101.198.3
97.699.0
100.0100.597.4
93.592.693.3
92.892.792.793.093.092.9
92.292.592.192.192.392.3
92.992.893.393.793.793.1
93.093.293.293.293.394.0
8.34.73.77.55.15.63.3
3.54.95.04.23.5
3.43.03.42.82.83.64.35.06.16.7
6.67.26.26.28.0
8.47.27.68.18.0
9.09.16.8
9.99.99.49.59.48.9
3.89.39.38.68.48.2
8.37.57.27.27.37.1
7.16.66.16.25.65.9
1 Also includes other private industry groups shown in Table B-37.2 Adjusted for overtime (in manufacturing only) and for interindustry employment shifts.3 Current-dollar earnings index divided by the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers on a 1977=100base.
4 Monthly data are computed from indexes to two decimal places and are based on data not seasonally adjusted.Note.—See Note, Table B-37.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
206
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-39.—Average weekly earnings in selected private nonagricultural industries, 1947-82
[For production or nonsupervisory workers; monthly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Year or month
194719481949
19501951195219531954
1955.1956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721973. .. .1974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMay .. . .June;. '. Z I I . .JulyAugSeptoct :Nov.Dec
Average gross weekly earnings
Total privatenonagricultural *
Currentdollars
$45 5849 0050.24
53.1357.8660 6563.7664.52
67 7270.7473 3375.0878.78
806782.6085.9188 4691.33
95 4598.82
101.84107.73114.61
119.83127 31136.90145 39154.76
163 53175 45189.00203 70219.91
23510255.20266.92
249 20248.1625063252 76254.53254.50
25663258 37257.95259.74261.50261.10
258 69263 55263.15264.89267.75267.68
269 08269 35268.66269.62269.97270.92
1977dollars2
$123 52123.43127.84
133.83134.87138 47144.58145.32
153.21157.90158.04157.40163.78
164.97167.21172.16175.17178.38
183.21184.37184.83187.68189.44
186.94190 58198.41198.35190.12
184.16186 85189.00189.31183.41
172.74170.13167.87
172.94170.56171.3117218171.98170.92170.18170 09168.05168.44168.82167.91
165.93168 62168.90169.69169.89168.14
167.97167.61166.87166.53166.75167.75
Manufac-turing
(currentdollars)
$491353 0853.80
58.2863.3466 7570.4770.49
75 3078.78811982.3288.26
89 7292.3496.5699.23
102.97
107.53112.19114.49122.51129.51
133.33142 44154.71166 46176.80190 79209 32228.90249 27269.34
288 62318.00330.65
310 68307.68311.62316 79319.19320.4032120322 79320.72322.32322.26320.62
315 09328 60326.43329.16331.57333.98335.55334.23332.13332.13334.93335.32
Construc-tion
(currentdollars)
$58 83652367.56
69.6876.96828686.4188.54
90.9096.38
100 27103.78108.41
112 67118.08122.47127.19132.06
138.38146.26154.95164.49181.54
195.4521167221.19235 89249.25266.08283 73295.65318.69342.99
367 78398.52423.89
401.44380.06391.72393 20393.68391.65400.34401 12386.54407.01416.64415.14
405.50420.71420.29421.77432.75423.57
430.03428.46420.78425.07422.24431.43
Wholesaleand retail
trade(currentdollars)
$38 0740 8042.93
44.5547.7949 2051.3553.33
551657.4859 6061.7664.41
66 0167.4169.91720174.66
76 9179.3982.3587.0091.39
96.0210109106.4511176119.02
126 45133 79142.52153 64164.96
176 46190.95198.42
184 76186.12187.40188 96189.66189.71191.27192 56193.56192.96194.53194.56
193.05195.20195.23195.89198.40198.42198.74199.69200.63201.61201.61201.93
Percent change froma year earlier, total
privatenonagricultural3
Currentdollars
752.5
5.88.9485.11.2
504.5372.44.9
242.44.0303.2
453.53.15.86.4
4.6627.56.26.45.7737.77.88.0
6.98.54.6
9.59.19.29.59.99.2
10.09.68.47.97.36.1
3.76.24.84.55.24.94.74.34.03.53.23.8
1977dollars
013.6
4.7.8
274.4
.5
543.1
1__ £,
U7
143.0171.8
27.6.2
1.5.9
-1 .3194.1
- 0-4 .1
= 3 1151.2.2
- 3 . 1
= 58- 1 . 5-1 .3
-2 .0-2 .1-1 .2
- 4.1
- . 3- . 7
- 1 . 1-2 .2-2 .0-1 .8-2 .4
=4.1-1 .1-1 .6-1 .7-1 .2-1 .9-1 .4-1 .4- .9
-1 .4-1 .2- .1
1 Also includes other private industry groups shown in Table B-37.2 Earnings in current dollars divided by the consumer price index on a 1977=100 base.3 Based on data not seasonally adjusted.Note.-See Note, Table B-37.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
207
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-40.—Productivity and related data, business sector, 1947-82
[1977=100; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year orquarter
Output per hourof all persons
Busi-ness
sector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
Output1
nesssector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
Hours of allpersons2
Busi-ness
sector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
Compensation perhour3
nesssector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
Real compensationper hour4
Busi-ness
sector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
Unit labor cost
nesssector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
Implicit pricedeflator*
nesssector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
1947.19481949
19501951195219531954
19551956.195719581959
19601961196219631964
1965196619671968.1969
19701971197219731974
19751976.197719781979
198019811982
1980:IIIIllIV
1981:
II.'.""IllI V
1982:I
43.746.046.7
50.451.853.555.256.1
58.358.960,462.364.3
65.267.369.972.575.6
78.380.782.585.385.5
86.289.292.494.792.5
94.597.6100.0100.699.6
98.9100.7101.0
99.398.238.999.3
100.7100.7101.0100.2
100.0100.3101.2102,2
49.952.053.1
56.357.258.659.560.4
62.862.964.065.567.7
68.370.372.875.178.1
80.582.584.086.886.5
86.889.793.095.392.9
94.797.8100.0100.699.3
98.599.9100.0
98.797.698.49C.2
100.4100.0100.099.1
99.299.4
100.3
100.9
35.037.236.5
39.842.143.545.444.6
48.149.349.849.052.6
53.554.457.459.963.5
67.871.573.176.879.0
78.480.786.191.8
88.293.8
100.0105.5107.8
106.2108.9106.4
107.9104.7105.3107.0
109.1109.1109.6107.8
106.3106.4106.7
106.0
34.036.035.3
38.641.142.544.343.4
47.048.348.948.051.8
52.553.556.659.162.8
67.271.272.776.678.8
78.080.385.891.789.8
87.893.7
100.0105.7108.0
106.3108.6105.9
107.9104.6105.3107.3
109.2109.0109.1107.1
106.0106.1106.3
105.3
80.280.778.1
78.981.381.482.279.5
82.583.782.578.881.9
82.080.882.182.683.9
86.688.688.690.192.5
91.090.593.296.897.3
93.396.0
100.0104.9108.2
107.4108.2105.3
108.7106.6106.5107.7
108.3108.3108.5107.5
106.3106.1105.4
103.7
68.169.266.6
68.771.972.674.571.9
74.976.876.473.276.5
77.076.177.878.780.5
83.586.386.588.291.1
89.889.592.396.296.7
92.795.8
100.0105.0108.7
108.0108.7105.9
109.3107.2107.0108.2
108.8109.0109.1108.1
106.8106.7106.0
104.3
17.018.418.7
20.022.023.424.925.7
26.428.129.931.232.6
33.935.236.838.240.2
41.744.647.050.754.2
58.262.066.171.378.0
85.592.9
100.0108.6119.1
131.4144.1154.6
126.7130.0133.1136.1
140.0142.5145.6148.2
150.9153.4155.7
158.0
18.520.120.6
21.823.825.126.527.3
28.330.031.732.934.2
35.736.838.339.641.4
42.845.447.951.554.8
58.762.566.771.778.5
86.093.0
100.0108.6118.8
130.9143.6154.0
126.2129.3132.6135.7
139.5142.0145.1147.7
150.4152.7155.1
157.4
46.146.447.6
50.551.353.456.458.0
59.662.664.465.567.7
69.571.373.775.578.4
80.183.385.388.389.6
90.892.895.797.395.9
96.398.9
100.0100.999.4
96.796.097.0
97.096.496.996.2
96.296.495.795.6
96.597.196.8
97.5
50.150.552.5
55.055.457.259.961.6
64.066.868.268.971.1
73.074.676.778.480.9
82.284.786.989.690.6
91.593.596.697.896.4
96.899.0
100.0100.999.2
96.395.796.7
96.696.096.595.9
96.096.095.495.3
96.396.696.4
97.2
38.940.040.1
39.742.543.845.145.9
45.247.749.550.250.7
52.052.352.752.653.1
53.355.356.959.463.4
67.569.571.575.384.4
90.595.1
100.0108.0119.5
132.9143.1153.0
127.6132.3134.7137.0
139.0141.5144.2147.9
150.9152.9153.8
154.5
37.038.638.9
38.841.542.844.445.2
45.047.649.550.250.5
52.252.452.652.753.0
53.255.057.059.363.4
67.669.771.775.384.5
90.895.1
100.0108.0119.6
133.0143.8153.9
127.8132.5134.7136.8
139.0141.9145.1149.0
151.6153.5154.7
155.9
38.140.840.3
41.044.044.544.945.3
46.047.549.249.850.8
51.651.852.653.253.7
54.756.457.960.263.2
66.069.071.375.382.4
90.594.7
100.0107.5117.2
128.3140.4148.2
123.7126.9129.9132.8
136.5138.8141.9144.6
146.0147.5149.1
150.4
36.639.139.4
40.142.843.544.445.0
46.047.649.349.750.9
51.651.952.753.353.9
54.856.358.160.463.3
66.369.371.374.081.6
90.094.6
100.0107.1116.5
128.3140.8149.0
123.6127.2129.9132.7
136.5138.9142.3145.5
146.6148.1149.8
151.7
1 Output refers to gross domestic product originating in the sector in 1972 dollars.2 Hours of all persons engaged in the sector, including hours of proprietors and unpaid family workers. Estimates based primarily onestablishment data.
3 Wages and salaries of employees plus employers' contributions for social insurance and private benefit plans. Also includes anestimate of wages, salaries, ana supplemental payments for the self-employed.
4 Hourly compensation divided by the consumer price index.8 Current dollar gross domestic product divided by constant dollar gross domestic product.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
208
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-41.—Changes in productivity and related data, business sector, 1948-82
[Percent change from preceding period; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year
Output per houro1 all persons
sector
Konfarmbusiness
sector
Output1
sector
Nonfarmlusirtesssector
Hours of all
sector
Nonfarmbusinesssector
Compensation per
sector
Nofifarmbusinesssector
Real compensationper hour*
sector
Nonfarmbusiness
Unit labor cost
Nonfarmbusinesssector
Implicit pricedeflator^
Businesssector
Nonfarmbusiness
sector
19481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 P
1980:I
in"'."'.'.";;;;iV
1981:itintiv
1982:
IIIllIV
5.31.5
7.92.83.23.21.6
4.01.02.53.13.2
1.53.33.83.74.3
3.53.12.23.3
.2
.83.63.52.6
- 2 . 4
2.23.32.4
.6- . 9
- . 71.8.4
.6-4.3
2.62.0
5.6.0
1.1-2.9
-1.01.43.64.1
4.32.0
6.01.72.31.71.4
3.9.3
1.72.43.4
.82.93.63.23.9
3.12.51.93.3
- . 3
.33.33.72.4
- 2 . 5
2.03.22.2
.6- 1 . 3
- . 91.4.2
- . 4- 4 . 6
3.43.1
4.9- 1 . 3
- . 3- 3 . 5
.6
.83.42.7
6.1- 1 . 9
9.15.83.34.3
- 1 . 8
7.92.61.0
- 1 . 67.3
1.61.75.54.36.0
6.85.52.25.12.9
- . 83.06.66.6
- 2 . 0
- 2 . 06.46.65.52.3
- 1 . 52.5
- 2 . 3
-11 .42.16.8
7.9- . 11.9
- 6 . 4
- 5 . 5.6
1.1- 2 . 5
6.0- 1 . 9
9.46.53.44.2
- 2 . 0
8.22.81.2
- 1 . 97.9
1.51.85.84.46.4
6.95.92.15.32.9
- 1 . 02.96.96.8
- 2 . 1
- 2 . 26.76.75.72.2
- 1 . 52.2
- 2 . 5
- . 2-11 .6
2.77.8
7.2- . 8
.3- 7 . 1
- 4 . 2.6.7
- 3 . 8
0.7- 3 . 3
1.12.9
.11.0
- 3 . 3
3.81.5
- 1 . 5- 4 . 5
3.9
.2- 1 . 5
1.6.6
1.6
3.22.3
.01.72.6
- 1 . 6- . 53.03.9
.4
- 4 . 13.04.14.93.2
- . 7.7
- 2 . 6
- . 4- 7 . 4— 54.7
2.1- . 1
- 3 . 6
- 4 . 5- . 8
- 2 . 4- 6 . 4
1.6- 3 . 8
3.14.61.02.5
- 3 . 4
4.12.5
- . 5- 4 . 2
4.4
.6- 1 . 1
2.21.12.4
3.73.4
.32.03.2
- 1 . 3- . 43.14.3
.5
- 4 . 13.44.45.03.5
- . 7.7
- 2 . 6
.2- 7 . 4
- . 74.6
2.2.5.6
- 3 . 7
- 4 . 7- . 1
- 2 . 7- 6 . 3
8.51.6
7.19.86.46.43.2
2.56.56.54.44.3
4.23.84.63.75.2
3.97.05.37.87.0
7.36.66.58.09.4
9.68.67.78.69.7
10.49.67.3
12.510.710.19.4
11.77.59.07.4
7.36.96.16.0
8.62.9
5.88.85.55.63.2
3.66.05.73.84.0
4.33.24.03.54.5
3.46.05.57.56.5
7.06.66.77.69.4
9.68.17.58.69.3
10.29.77.3
11.910.210.49.8
11.87.19.07.3
7.76.16.66.0
0.72.6
6.01.74.15.72.8
2.84.92.91.63.5
2.62.73.42.53.8
2.24.02.43.51.5
1.32.23.11.6
- 1 . 4
.52.61.2.9
=1.4
- 2 . 8— 71.1
.2
.5- 2 . 6- . 4
3.92.2
-1.43.3
0.83.9
4.8.7
3.24.82.7
3.94.42.21.03.2
2.72.12.82.23.2
1.73.02.63.21.1
1.02.23.31.3
- 1 . 4
.42.21.0.9
- 1 . 7
- 2 . 9- . 71.1
-3.9-2.6
2.5-2.8
.4
.1- 2 . 6- . 5
4.31.4
- . 93.3
3.0.1
- . 86.93.03.11.6
1.45.53.91.31.0
2.7.5.7.0
.33.83.04.46.7
6.42.92.95.3
12,1
7.35.15.18.0
10.7
11.27.76.9
11.815.77.37.2
5.77.57.8
10.6
8.45.52.41.8
4.1.9
- . 26.93.13.91.7
- . 35.73.91.4.6
3.5.3.4.2
.33.53.54.16.8
6.63.22.95.0
12.2
7.54.75.28.0
10.7
11.28.17.1
12.415.56.86.5
6.6
9.311.2
7.15.23.13.2
7.0-1.0
1.67.41.1.9
1.0
1.63.33.51.32.0
1.4.6
1.51.11.0
1.93.02.74.04.9
4.54.43.45.59.5
9.84.75.67.59.0
9.49.55.5
11.210.810.09.3
11.66.69.38.0
3.84.34.43.5
6.8.9
1.76.61.82.01.4
2.23.53.6
.92.3
1.5.6
1.51.21.2
1.62.83.24.04.7
4.84.53.03.8
10.2
10.35.05.77.18.8
10.29.75.9
13.212.28.68.9
12.17.1
10.29.2
3.34.04.95.1
1 Output refers to gross domestic product originating in the sector in 1972 dollars.2 Hours of all persons engaged in the sector, including hours of proprietors and unpaid family workers. Estimates based primarily on
establishment data.3 Wages and salaries of employees plus employers' contributions for social insurance and private benefit plans. Also includes an
estimate of wages, salaries, and supplemental payments for the self-employed.* Hourly compensation divided by the consumer price index.5 Current dollar gross domestic product divided by constant dollar gross domestic product.
Note.—Data relate to all persons engaged in the sector. Percent changes are based on original data and therefore may differ slightlyfrom percent changes based on indexes in Table B-40.
Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
209
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PRODUCTION AND BUSINESS ACTIVITY
TABLE B-42.—Industrial production indexes, major industry divisions, 1929-82
[1967-100; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
1967 proportion
192919331939
19401941 ,„„19421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953 ,195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 *
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune....
JulyAm; ,Sept"
mZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.NovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune ..
JulyAugsept : ::.: ::: :::::..OctNov"Dec "
Totalindustrialproduction
100.00
21.613.721.7
25.031.636.344.047.440.735.039.441.138.8
44.948.750.654.851.958.561.161.957.964.8
66 266.772.276.581.789.897.8
100.0106.3111.1
107.8109 6119.7129 8129.3117 8130.5138 2146.1152.5
147.0151.0138.6
1514151.81521151.9152.7152.9
153.9153 61516149.1146.3143.4
140.7142.9141.7140.2139.2138.7
138 8138.4137.3135.8134.8134.7
Total
87.95
22.814.021.5
25.432.437.847.050.942.635.339.440.938.7
45.048.650.655.251.558.260.561.257.064.2
65.465.671.575.881.089.797.9
100.0106.4111.0
106.4108 2118.9129.8129.41163130.3138.4146.8153.6
146.7150.4137.6
1511151.21516152.0152.8152.4
153.2153.21511148.0145.0142.0
138.5140.9140.1138.7137.9137.7
1381138.0137.1135.0134.0133.9
Manufacturing
Dura-ble
51.98
22 59.1
17.7
23 531.439954.259.945.231.637.739.335.7
43.548.951.958751.859.261.161.653.961.9
62 961.868673.178 389.0
N 989100.0106.5110.6
102.3102 4113.71271125.7109 3122.3130 0139.7146.4
136.7140.5124.7
1410140.81421142.5143.5143.2
143 6143 4140 9137.8134.4131.3
127.1129.3128.2126 71261125.5
125 9124.9123.5120.5119.3119.3
Non-durable
35.97
23 219.926.1
27 533.334 637.138.638.539.741.342.742.0
46.748.349.251,251.657.260.161.161.667.7
69.371.575.880.085.290.996.7
100.0106.2111.5
112.31166126.5133.8134.6126.4141.8150.5156.9164.0
161.2164.8156.1
165 6166.2165 3165.9166.4165.8
167.1167 31659162.8160.3157.4
155.1157.8157.3156.1155 0155.3
155 7156.9156.7156.0155.2155.1
Mining
6.36
43.130.642.1
46.849.751.352.556.255.154.261.364.457.1
63.870 069.471269.977.982.082.175.378.7
80.380.883.186.489.993.298.2
100.0104.2108.3
112.2109 8113.1114.7115,3112.8114.2118.2124.0125.5
132.7142.2126.1
140 4143.1143 2135.2135.4141.7
146.5146 01450145.3143.3142.6
144.5142.4138.1134.1128.9123.5
120.1116.9114.7116.4115.9118.0
iitili
ties
5.69
746.7
10.7
11.813.314.916.517.517.818.620.122.423.9
27.231033.736 539.343.948.251.553.959.3
63.467.072.077.083.688.795.5
100.0108.4117.3
124.5130 5139.4145.4143.7146.0151.7156.5161.4166.0
168.3169.1169.0
167 6166.4167 8167.6170,7172.7
173.1171.9167 8168.1168.9168.2
171.8170.4170.0171.0170.9169.4
167 7168.5167.5167.8167.1165.5
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
210
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-43-—Industrial production indexes, market groupings, 1947-82
[1967=100; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
1967 proportion
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 P
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOct '"•NovDec
1982:JanFebMarApr
STayJune .:.::....
JulyAugSept
oc?.:::::::::::::::::::::::Nov.Deep
Totalindustrialproduction
100.00
39.441.138.8
44.948.750.654.851.9
58.561.161.957.964.8
66 266.772 276.581.7
89.897.81000106.3111.1
107 8109.6119.7129 8129.3
117.8130.5138 2146.1152.5
147 0151.0138.6
151.41518152.1151.9152 7152.9
153.9153.6151.6149 1146.3143.4
140 7142 9141.7140.2139.2138.7
138.8138 4137 3135.8134.8134.7
Final products
Total
47.82
38.640.038.8
43.747 250.754151.3
55.458.660.357.663.2
65 365.871475.579.7
87 695.91000106.2109.6
1053106.3115.7124 4125.1
118.2127.6135 9142.2147.2
145 3149.5141.3
147 8148 2149.0149.91513151.4
152.1151.5150.01489147.2146.3
142 81441143.3142.6142.2142.1
142.51412140 0138.6137.7138.1
Consumer goods1
Total
27.68
42.443.743.4
49.649.150.253.252.9
59.061.262.662.168.1
70 772.277181.385.9
92.697.3100.0105.9109.8
109.0114.7124.4131.5128.9
124.0137.1145 3149.1150.8
145 4147.9142.6
146 9147 8148.3148.9150.7150.3
150.7149.6147.8146.5144.0142.0
139.6141.8141.5142.1143.6144.8
145.8144.1143.4142.2141.1141.4
Auto-motiveproducts
2.83
45.347.447.0
59.152347.159 555.4
73.660.663.550.563.3
72 566.180187.791.9
113 3112.81000119.4118.1
98.8124.4141.4153 0132.8
125.8155.7175 6179.9167.7
132 8137.9129.6
130 4133 9139.2142.91518153.1
147.6137.6139.1132 8121.7119.2
109 2117 5125.0129.9138.9143.0
149J135.5135 5124.0121.4129.8
Homegoods
5.06
37.539.136.2
49.943.043.048.644.9
53.055.754.551.459.0
59.461.366.571.878.4
88.997.9100.0106.4113.2
110.2115.6129.5142.5136.8
118.8134.1141.9147.7149.2
138 9142.0129.3
145.6145 2146.1145.0144.8145.0
145.8145.3141.1138.2134.1125.4
126.3130.6129.9131.1129.1129.9
130.413141289128.6126.9125.9
Equipment •
Total
20.14
30.632.228.7
31.143 351.956349.3
50.455.357.551.556.5
58157.363 767.571.4
80 794.0100 0106.5109.3
100194.7103.8114 5120.0
110.2114.6123 0132.8142.2
145 2151.8139.4
1491148 7150.0151.41521153.0
154.1154.0152.91521151.5152.1
147.2147.3145.9143.4140.4138.4
138.0137.3135.2133.5133.0133.6
Busi-ness
12.63
38.039.534.5
37.045.251.253.346.8
50.858.861.151.557.9
59.457.762.765.873.7
84.497.7100.0105.5112.5
107.0104.1118.0134.2142.4
128.2135.4147.8160.3171.3
173 2181.1157.3
177.7177.5179.3181.0182.0183.6
184.8184.4182.7180.5179.0179.0
172.2171.6169.0164.9159.9156.7
154.9153.9150.5146.4144.6144.1
Inter-mediateproducts
12.89
41.944.342.0
48.851350.954 554.3
61.764.464.463.069.5
70 071.475 779.985.2
90.696.2100.0106.3112.9
112.9116.7126.5137.2135.3
123.1137.2145.1154.1160.5
1519154.4143.4
157.5157 7157.1156.3156.1154.9
156.2156.8154.6151.4148.7145.9
143.4146.3145.2143.7142.6141.9
142.8144.7143.7142.4141.9141.0
Materials3
Total
39.29
39.541.237.6
45.049 850.556151.8
61.362.862.856.565.2
66.166.272176.782.9
92.4100.7100.0106.5112.5
109.2111.3122.3133.9132.4
115.5131.71386148.3156.4
147 6151.6133.8
153 8154 3154.4152.9153.4154.0
155.3155.2152.5148.5144.6139.0
137.2140.4138.5136.2134.3133.5
133.0132.8132.0130.3128.9128.4
Dura-ble
goods
20.35
38.339.435.3
44.450 551.660 352.0
63.763 963.853 764.0
64 863.370475181.9
93 8103.3100 0106 2112.1
103 8104.9117 7134 6132.7
109.1128.01361149.0157.8
143 0149.1125.3
1500150 6152.2151.8152.8152.4
153.6154.3150.4145.6141.0134.0
129.7132.4130.7128.1126.6126.6
126.0125.1123.0119.3118.0117.3
Non-durablegoods
10.47
Z'.'Z
45.9
52.554 954.754.462.1
63 265.871375.682.2
90 397.51000108.8115.7
1154120.2132.9142 2142.6
126.6147.8155.6165.6175.9
1715174.6157.3
180.2179.9177.5179.3179.0176.9
176.5175.4175.5170.6164.7158.3
156.8164.2162.0160.3156.6153.5
152.3154.5158.5157.7155.5155.5
1 Also includes clothing and consumer staples, not shown separately.2 Also includes defense and space equipment, not shown separately.3 Also includes energy materials, not shown separately.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
211
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-44.—Industrial production indexes, selected manufactures, 1947-82
[1967; -100; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
1967 proportion
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982 p.1981:
JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct.NovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAucSeptOct..;;:::::Nov " ....Dec*
Primarymetals
Total
6.57
63.365.855.469.775 869.278 563.5
82.582.078 562.372.7
72 471.176 382.392.8
1021108.41000104.3113.8
106.6100.2112.1126.7123.196.4
109.7111 1119.9121.3
102.3107.975.8
114.1114 5114.9110.61119107.4109.4113.1108.6102.396.689.6
89.788 583.076.475.272.8
72.972.973 270 067165.9
Ironandsteel
4.21
70.1
93.291.588 266.576.5
11174.277 384.395.9
105 2108.4100 0103.2112.6
104 796.1
1071122.3119.895.8
104.8103 8113.2113.2
92.499.8
108 71084108.0103.4105 698.599.7
105.199.292.287.279.2
79 678 573.065.162.458.0
58.157 456 4541514
Fabri-catedmetalprod-ucts
5.93
49.950.845.8
56.159958.566 059.4
67.868.870 663.371.071169.475477.882.6
90897.2
100 0105.6107.9
102 4103.51121124.7124.2
109.9123.91310141.6148.5
134.1136.4114.8
135 8137 6139.2139.5138 4139.3140.11400136.8133.8130.2126.1
120 71214121.1119.1115.8115.0115 5114 3112 3108 5107 4106.5
Durable manufactures
Non-elec-trical
machin-ery
9.15
39.039.233.4
37.547 751.954 046.1
50.658.057 948.656.7
56955.462166.375.6
85 098.8
100 0101.8109.3
104 4100.2116 0133.7140.1
125.1134.51436153.6163.7162.8171.2148.6
167 3168 3169.2169.71721174.1176.71764173.9169.7167.9167.4
160 9160 0157.3153.7150.0147.4
1471147 2144 9140 5138 0135.8
Electri-cal
machin-ery
8.05
22.223.021.6
29.629.834.039.034.7
39.943.142.839.247.6
51.654.862.964.768.4
81.797.9
100.0105.5111.9
108.1107.7122.2143.1143.8116.5134.8145 4159.4175.0172.8178.4169.2
177.6174 9177.4178.8179.9180.1
180.9182.6180.0179.6175.7170.7
168.2172 9172.6172.2170.9170.8
170.3169.7167.0165.7164 9164.5
Transportationequipment
Total
9.27
31.834.834.9
41.846.654.268.059.2
68.066.070.755.863.2
65.461.571.178.080.0
95.1102.0100.0111.1108.4
89.597.9
108.2118.3108.7
97.4111.1122 2132.5135.4
116.9116.1104.9
117.41161119.5121.3123.7123.4119.8115.4114.2110.6106.1103.7
96 6102 0104.4105.9110.0111.6112.7107 0105.3100 8100 0103.7
MotorV earfd e S
parts
4.50
60.581.265.869.051.066.274.765.579.888.390.7
115.9113.9100.0120.3116.592.3
118.6135.8148.8128.2111.1142.01611169.9159.9
119.0122.3109.8
120.0119 9127.1130.7136 4137.5
130.5123.1120.4113.8105.5100.4
90 498 6
105.6110.7119.8124.0
127.2116.7113.5103 01017108.8
Lumberand
prod-ucts
1.64
58.961.354.1
65.765.564.768.468.0
75.975.068869.979.3
74778.282.586.392.7
96.3100.0100.0105.5107.9
105.6113.8120.8126.0116.2
107.6123.2131.2136.3136.9
119.3119.1
127.4126 2125.6126.3126 2122.5
122.9119.1113.2109.6104.7104.8
99 2104 9103.5106.2110.6112.2
116.9120 31199117 2119 4
Nondurable manufactures
Apparelprod-ucts
3.31
57.860.359.7
64.363.166.367.266.4
73.375.074.972.880.1
81.782.285.589.192.2
97.499.9
100.0102.9106.7
101.4104.7109.4117.3114.3
107.6125.7134.2134.2134.4127.0120.4
123.81216120.2121.6122 6121.1122.6122.6122.5117.8113.8114.1
Printingand
publish-ing
4.72
43.345.446.648.949.749.752.054.1
59.563.265 463.968.2
71.071.373.977.882.687.994.6
100.0103.2107.4107.0107.1112.7118.2118.2
113.3122.5127 6131.5136.9
139.6144.2144.3
143.9144 8142.7141.61413143.1144.4146.1145.9145.6143.4145.3
145 6146 4145.9144.2143.8142.6143 9145 3144 3142 61426144 0
Chem-icalsand
prod-ucts
7.74
19.721.321.0
26.229 731.133.634,1
39.842.745246.654.3
56.459.265.771.878.8
87 895.7
1000109.5118.4
120.4125.9143.6154.5159.4
147.2170.9185 7197.4211.8207.1215.6
2189219 8218.5219.8220 6218.4
221.5219.2216.3208.8204.6199.8
196 72013200.3198.6193.6193.2
1941195 6196 4193 7192 8
Foods
8.75
55.855.255.957.959 060.261462.7
66.370.171172.976.5
78.680.983486.490.4
92496.0
1000102.6106.1
108.9112.8116,8120.9124.0
123.4133.0138 8142,7147.5
149.6152.1
1519152 5152.4151.9152 2151.3151.6151.9150.7151.4153.0152.8
15111517150.8149.7150.5151.0
1510150 7149 0150 6
Source.* Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
212Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-45.—Capacity utilization rate in manufacturing, 1948-82
[Percent; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or quarter
19481949
1950..1951195219531954 ..
195519561957. ..19581959
I9601961 . .19621963 .1964
1965196619671968.. . .1969
1970 .. ..1971197219731974
197519761977 ..19781979
198019811982"
1978:jIIIIIIV
1979:
||IIIIV
1980:
11HIIV . .
1981:I
HI ...IV ..
1982:
IIIII ..IV p
FRB series >
Totalmanufac-
turing
82.574.2
82.885 885.489280.3
87.186.483 775.281.9
80.277 481.683.585.6
89.691.186.987.186.2
79.378.483.587.683.8
72.979.581984.485.7
79.178.569.8
82.083 985 286.4
86.985985 384.4
83.477.975.979.1
79.979.879.374.8
71.670.369.767.6
Primaryprocess-
ing
87.276.2
88.590 284.989 480.6
92.189.784 775.483.4
79.877 981.683.887.8
91.191.485.787.788.5
82 982.388.292.587.8
73.781.984 086.988.1
78.578.466.4
84.086 387 989.5
89.088 288 386.9
85.576.473.179.3
81.380.379.472.7
69.166.366.164.3
Advancedprocess-
ing
80 073.3
79 883 485 989 380.1
84.384.583175.181.1
80.411181783.484.6
88.991.287.686 885.0
77 476.381.085.081.5
72.578.280883.084.3
79.478.571.6
80.982 783 784.6
85.784783 783.0
82.578.777.478 8
79.179.679.275.9
73.272.571.669.2
Commerce series2
Totalmanufac-
turing
8686848585
8180838683
7781838483
7876
84848384
84838281
80767678
78787672
727169
Durablegoods
8887838484
7878828582
7681848483
7775
84858385
85848280
80747578
77777470
706865
Non-durablegoods
8586858686
8383858684
7982828382
7978
83828283
83828282
81787878
79807875
757674
Primary-processed
goods
8988878687
8382858985
7682838484
7776
83848485
85848383
81757478
78787671
706666
Advanced-processed
goods
8585838484
7980828482
77818384827876
84848284
84838180
80767778
78787673
737471
1 For description of the series, see "Federal Reserve Measures of Capacity and Capacity Utilization," February 1978.2 Quarterly data are for last month in quarter. Annual data are averages of the four indexes, except for 1965 (December index) and1966-67 (averages of June and December indexes). For description of the series, see "Survey of Current Business," July 1974.
Sources: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis).
213Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-46.—Neiv construction activity, 1929-82
[Value put in place, billions of dollars; monthly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or month
1929
1933
1939
19401941194219431944
19451946
New series
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
Totalnew
construc-tion
10.8
2.9
8.2
8.712 014.1835.3
5.814.3
20.026126.7
33.635.436.839141.4
46.547.649150,055.4
54.756 460.264 868.0
74 176.878.587 594.3
95.2110.3124.4138 4139.2
135 9151.1173.8205.6230.4
230.7238.2
Private construction
Total
8.3
1.2
4.4
5.16.23.42.02.2
3.412.1
16.721420.5
26.726.226.027 929.7
34.834.935134.639.3
38.939.342.345.547.7
52.052.852.959 966.3
67.180.494.2
105 9100.9
951112.0135.7159.7181.6
175.7185.2
Residentialbuildings'
Total2
3.6
.5
2.7
3.0351.7
9.8
1.36.2
9.913112.4
18.115.915.816 618.2
21.920.219 019.824.3
23.023125.227 928.0
27 925.725.630633.2
31.943.354.359 750.4
46 560.581.093.499.0
87.386.6
housingunits
3.0
.3
2.3
2.63.01.4,7.6
.74.8
7.810.510.0
15.613.212.913.414.9
18.216.114.715.419.2
17.317.119.421.721.8
21.719.419.024 025.9
24.335.144.950 140.6
34 447.365.775.878.6
63.162.7
Nonresidential buildings and otherconstruction1
Total
4.7
.8
1.7
2.12.71.71.11.4
2.15.8
6.9828.0
8.610.310.211311.5
12.914.716114.815.1
15.916 217.217 619.7
24 127.127.329 333.1
35.337.240.046 250.5
48 651.454.766.282.6
88.498.7
Com-mercial 3
1.1
.1
.3
.3
.4
.2
.0
.1
.21.2
1.0141.2
1.41.51.1182.2
3.23.6363.63.9
4.2475.15.05.4
789.4
9.811.613.515 515.9
12 812.814.818.624.9
29.934.2
Indus-trial
0.9
.2
.3
.4
.8
.32
.2
.61.7
1.7141.0
1.12.12.3222.0
2.43.1362.42.1
2.9282.82S3.6
606.8
6.55.44.7627.9
807.27.7
11.015.0
13.817.0
Other*
2.6
.5
1.2
1.31.51.2.9
1.1
1.33.0
4.2555.9
6.16.76.8737.2
7.38.0908.89.0
8.98.79.29.7
10.7
15 516.9
19.020.121.824 526.7
27 831.532.236.742.7
44.747.4
Public construction
Total
2.5
1.6
3.8
3.65.8
10.76.33.1
2.42.2
3.3476.3
6.99.3
10.811211.7
11.712.714115.516.1
15.917117.919.420.4
22124.025.527 628.0
28.129.930.232 538.3
40 939.138.245.948.8
55.153.0
Federal
0.2
.5
.8
1.2389.3562.5
1.7.9
8121.5
1.63.042413.4
2.82.7303.43.7
3.6393.9403.9
404.035343.3
3.34.04.4495.3
637.07.38.48.6
19.710.0
State andlocal5
2.3
1.1
3.1
2.42.01.3.7.6
.71.4
2.5354.8
5.26.36.6718.3
8.910.011.112.112.3
12.213.314.015.416.5
18 020.022.124 224.6
24.825.925.827 633.0
34 632.130.937.540.2
45.442.9
See next page for continuation of table.
214
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-46.—New construction activity, 1929-82—Continued
[Value put in place, billions of dollars; monthly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or monthTotalnew
construc-tion
Private construction
Total
Residentialbuildings1
Total2New
housingunits
Nonresidential buildings and otherconstruction >
Total Com-mercial3
Indus-trial Other*
Public construction
Total Federal State andlocal6
1981:JanFeb....Mar....Apr....May....June...
July....Aug...,Sept...OctNov....Dec...,
1982:JanFeb....Mar...,Apr...May...June...July...,Aug...Sept..,OctNov.
255.4250.7249.4247.6240.9237.5
238.1235.9233.5230.8230.0228.8
225.1222.6224.6226.1228.7231.6
227.6228.1228.1229.1237.2
193.7191.7190.6192.1189.3185.9
186.9185.2182.4180.0178.1176.6
175.5173.0173.6175.1179.9182.7
178.7176.6177.0177.7184.4
99.596.995.895.192.389.1
87.084.180.478.276.275.8
73.769.270.072.375.575.3
73.472.171.574.178.4
73.972.472.172.269.566.8
64.160.857.153.450.449.4
51.049.251.049.651.049.8
51.552.353.152.354.2
94.294.894.897.097.096.8
99.9101.1102.0101.8102.0100.7
101.8103.9103.6102.8104.5107.4
105.3104.5105.6103.6106.0
32.833.033.634.333.533.6
34.234.334.934.635.736.4
36.236.838.438.436.838.0
37.536.137.135.737.1
15.814.915.316.415.916.7
17.818.718.518.518.416.6
17.117.216.615.917.118.4
16.416.716.617.117.2
45.546.945.946.447.646.5
47.948.248.648.647.947.7
48.549.848.648.550.650.9
51.451.751.850.951.7
61.759.058.955.451.751.7
51.250.751.150.851.952.2
49.649.651.051.048.848.9
48.951.451.151.352.8
10.710.99.8
10.310.110.1
10.19.2
10.19.89.69.8
9.29.6
10.09.89.69.5
9.910.210.510.410.6
51.048.149,145.141.541.6
41.041.441.041.042.342.4
40.440.041.041.139.239.4
39.041.240.640.942.2
1 Beginning I960, farm residential buildings included in residential buildings; prior to 1960, included in nonresidential buildings andother construction.
2 Total includes additions and alterations and nonhousekeeping units, not shown separately.3 Office buildings, warehouses, stores, restaurants, garages, etc.4 Religious, educational, hospital and institutional, miscellaneous nonresidential, farm (see also footnote 1), public utilities, and all
other private.6 Includes Federal grants-in-aid for State and local projects.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
215Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-47.—New bousing units started and authorized, 1959-82
[Thousands of units]
Year or month
New housing units started
Private and public1
Total(farm andnonfarm)
Nonfarm
Private (farm and nonfarm)»
TotalType of structure
1 unit 2 to 4units
5 unitsor more
New private housing units authorized2
Total
Type of structure
1 unit 2 to 4units
5 unitsor more
1959
196019611962..,.1963..,.1964....
1965....1966....1967....1968....1969....
1970....1971....197219731974
1975....197619771978....1979
19801981....1982"..
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec P.....
1,553.7
1,296.11,365.01,492.51,634.91,561.0
1,509.71,195.81,321.91,545.41,499.5
1,469.02,084.52,378.52,057.51,352.5
1,171.41,547.62,001.72,036.11,760.0
1,312.61,100.31,070.4
85,272.5
108.9124.0110.6107.0
101.087.390.988.264.959.7
47.652.078.785.199.291.8
107.297.2
108.3111.7111.981.7
1,531.3
1,274.01,336.81,468.71,614.81,534.0
1,487.51,172.81,298.81,521.41,482.3
1,517.0
1,252.21,313.01,462.91,603.21,528.8
1,472.81,164.91,291.61,507.61,466.8
1,433.62,052.22,356.62,045.31,337.7
1,160.41,537.51,987.12,020.31,745.1
1,292.21,084.21,060.6
1,5851,2941,3181,3011,1721,046
1,040946899854860882
885945931882
1,066908
1,1931,0331,1291,1261,4041,222
1,234.0
994.7974.3991.4
1,012.4970.5
963.7778.6843.9899.4810.6
812.91,151.01,309.21,132.0
892.21,162.41,450.91,433.31,194.1
852.2705.4661.0
283.0
257.4338.7471.5590.8
108.4 450.0
86.661.171.680.985.0
84.8120.3141.3118.368.1
64.085.9
121.7125.0122.0
109.591.180.7
422.5325.1376.1527.3571.2
535.9780.9906.2795.0381.6
204.3289.2414.4462.0429.0
330.5287.7319.0
1,208.3
998.01,064.21,186.61,334.71,285.8
1,239.8971.9
1,141.01,353.41,323.7
1,351.51,924.62,218.91,819.51,074.4
939.21,296.21,690.01,800.51,551.8
1,190.6985.5992.5
938.3
746.1722.8716.2750.2720.1
709.9563.2650.6694.7625.9
646.8906.1
1,033.1882.1643.8
675.5893.6
1,126.11,182.6
981.5
710.4564.3540.0
77.1
64.667.687.1
118.9100.8
84.861.073.084.385.2
88.1132.9148.6117.064.3
63.993.1
121.3130.6125.4
114.5101.888.6
Seasonally adjusted annual rates
192.9
187,4273.8383.3465.6464.9
445.1347.7417.5574.4612.7
616.7885.7
1,037.2820.5366.2
199.8309.5442.7487.3444.8
365.7319.4363.9
974835863868776705
696614623507554550
592568621566631621
628645677701883800
1391141089710589
887662788174
708467648683
1028892647986
472345347336291252
256256214269225258
223293243252349204
463300360361442336
1,2361,1961,1721,1861,178986
941878835738743797
803792851879944929
1,062888
1,0031,1721,1921,291
712699686682659573
543505456400413454
450436460450488516
500497561651729732
139115113123112109
989181857888
6875817610291
8583968696111
385382373381407304
300282298253252255
285281310353354322
477308346435367448
1 Units in structures built by private developers for sale upon completion to local public housing authorities under the Department ofHousing and Urban Development "Turnkey" program are classified as private housing. Military housing starts, including those financedwith mortgages insured by FHA under Section 803 of the National Housing Act, are included in publicly owned starts and excluded fromtotal private starts.
2 Authorized by issuance of local building permit: in 16,000 permit-issuing places beginning 1978; in 14,000 places for 1972 77; in13,000 places for 1967=71; in 12,000 places for 1963-66; <
» Not available separately beginning January 1970.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
and in 10,000 places prior to 1963.
216
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-48.—Nonfarm business expenditures for new plant and equipment, 1947-83
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
194719481949..
195019511952...19531954
19551956195719581959
I960196119S219631964..
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 31983 3
1981:
||IIIIV
1982:
IIIII
1983:IsII3
Total
218025.4623.54
25.3230.83315933.5833.13
36 5844.7648.1242.1744.78
48 6347.82512853.2561.66
70 4382.2283 4288.4599.52
105 61108.53120 25137.70156.98
157.7117145198.0823124270.46
295.63321.49319.99315.69
312 24316 73328 25327.83
327 72323.22315.79315.21
31640320.00
Plant
8.4510.3510.20
10.9413.0813.1413.8214.09
15 9719.3420.9419.4119.89
20.9421.1222.1222.2324.96
27 2432.2132 2235.5140.54
44 2446.6049 3556.6664.29
65.21712080.3192 70105.73
117.55133.46
128.5713105136 40136.67
139 49137.95135.14
Pnuintquip-ment
133515.1113.34
14 3717.74184519.7619.03
20 6025.4227.1922.7624.89
27 7026.70291631.0336.70
431950.01512052.9458.99
6136619370 8981.0492.69
92 50100 25117.77138 54164.73
178.08188 04
183 67185 6819185191.17
188 23185.28180.65
Plant and equipment
Manufacturing
Total
8.739.257.32
7.7311.0712.1212.4312.00
12 5016.3317.5012.9813.76
16.3615.5316.0317.2721.23
254131.3732 2532.3436.27
36 9933.6035 4242.3753.21
54.9259 9569.2279 7298.68
115.81126.79122.67119.52
124 50125 4913011126.91
12832123.77119.46120.50
12143123.42
Dura-ble
goods
3393.542.67
3 225.125 755.715.49
5 878.198.596.216.72
8 287.437 818.6410.98
13 4917.2317 8317.9319.97
19 8016 7818 2222.7527.44
26 3328 4734.04404351.07
58.91618457.9557.35
6124631062 5860.78
60 8459.0357.1455.80
57 9058.30
Non-durablegoods
5345.714.64
4.515.956376.726.51
6 628.158.916.777.04
8.088.108.228.6310.25
119214.1514 4214.4016.31
171916.8217 2019.6225.76
28.59314735.1839 2947.61
56.9064.9564.7262.18
63 2762 4067 5366.14
67 4864.7462.3264.70
63 5465.12
Total
13.0716.2116.22
17.5919.7619.4721.1621.13
24.0828.4330.6229.1931.02
32.2832.2935.2535.9940.43
45.0250.8451.1856.1163.25
68 6274.9384 8295.33103.78
102.79111.50128.87151.52171.77
179.81194.70197.32196.16
187.74191.24198.13200.92
199.40199.46196.33194.71
194.97196.58
Min-ing
0 69.93.88
841.111211.251.29
1311.641.691.431.35
1.291.261411.261.33
1361.421381.441.77
2 022.672 883.314.62
6.107449.24102111.38
13.5116.8616.0516.45
16 20168017 5516.81
17.6016.5614.6315.56
16.1817.33
Nonmanufacturing
Transpor-tation
2 212.662.30
2 383.052 992.972.42
2 603.073.352.343.17
3.192.823.263.364.46
5 466.436346.797.04
6955.936 727.418.23
8.688.899.4010.6812.35
12.0912.0511.8011.92
11.7411.7011.6113.12
11.9912.3211.2811.82
10.6311.66
Publicutili-ties
1.642.673.28
3.423.753.964.614.23
4 264.785.955.745.46
5.405.205.125.335.80
6.497.829.3310.5211.70
13.0314.7016.2617.9719.83
19.9822.3726.7929.9533.96
35.4438.4041.6239.98
36.0537.8439.5539.74
40.1241.4043.3841.66
40.7640.30
Tradeandserv-ices1
6136.927.13
8 378.838058.949.59
114913.6413.6814.1115.40
161516.53182718.5720.38
221324.6923 0225.3128.31
29 7734.20400045.5347.79
46.2349.3056.5468.6679.26
81.7986.3386.4286.86
83.4385.8887.5588.33
87.8088.8587.3182.01
85.8785.87
Com-munication
andother2
2 403.042.63
2 583.033 253.383.60
4 425 305.965.585.63
6 256.487197.478.46
9 5810.49111112.0614.43
16 8517.43189621.1223.30
21.8023.5126.9032.0234.83
36.9941.0641.4340.96
40.3239.0241.8942.92
41.8940.3339.7343.65
41.5341.43
1 Wholesale and retail trade; finance, insurance, and real estate; and personal, business, and professional services.2 "Other" consists of construction; social services and membership organizations; and forestry, fisheries, and agricultural services.3 Planned capital expenditures reported by business in late October-December 1982, corrected for biases.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
217
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-49.—Sales and inventories in manufacturing and trade 1947-82
[Amounts in millions of dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
Total manufacturing andtrade
Sales1 Inven-tories* Ratio3
Manufacturing
Sales1 Inven-tories2 Ratio3
Merchant wholesalers
Sales1 Inven-tories2 Ratio3
Retail trade
Sales1 Inven-tories2
1947...1948...1949...
1950...1951...1952...1953...1954...
1955...1956...1957...1958...1959...
1960...1961...1962...1963...1964...
1965...1966...1967...1968...1969...
1970...1971...1972...1973...1974...
19751976197719781979
19801981
1981:Jan..Feb..Mar..
ftay...June....
JulyAugSeptOcfNovDec
1982:JanFebMar....
June...
July..Aug..
SfcNov...
35,26033,788
38,59643,35644,84047,98746,443
51,69454,06355,87954,20159,729
60,82761,15965,66268,99573,682
80,28387,18790,34898,104
105,003
107,448116,017130,030153,412177,625
182,230204,277229,623259,046294,573
321,504350,622
347,858348,653350,281352,855353,698356,524
355,236354,520353,725346,605344,943341,330
334,579340,571342,121339,835349,096346,126
344,603339,464339,470332,537335,938
52,50749,497
59,82270,24272,37776,12273,175
79,51687,30489,05287,09392,129
94,71395,594101,063105,480111,503
120,907136,790144,796155,697169,343
177,556187,766201,950233,237285,807
288,375318,544351,176397,090444,132
482,570519,394
485,396490,291492,399494,177497,812501,531
504,744510,099515,349518,241521,574519,394
516,256513,906513,054515,074510,517512,981
513,387514,554515,399514,224508,553
1.421.53
1.361.551.581.581.60
1.471.551.591.601.50
1.561.541.501.491.47
1.451.471.561.541.55
1.621.581.491.411.45
1.571.481.461.441.43
1.451.43
1.401.411.411.401.411.41
1.421.441.461.501.511.52
1.541.511.501.521.461.48
1.491.521.521.551.51
15,51317,31616,126
18,63421,71422,52924,84323,355
26,48027,74028,73627,24730,286
30,87930,92333,35735,05837,331
40,99544,87046,48750,22853,501
52,80555,90663,02372,93784,794
86,59598,802113,201126,953143,935
154,249166,217
163,902164,676165,936167,649168,073170,951
170,333169,274168,156163,957161,442159,614
155,023158,142157,517156,114160,828161,519
161,382158,619159,278152,473152,343
25,89728,54326,321
31,07839,30641,13643,94841,612
45,06950,64251,87150,24152,945
53,78054,88558,18660,04663,409
68,18577,95284,66490,61898,202
101,651102,658108,238124,628157,792
159,934175,193189,334210,679241,034
264,016283,152
266,798269,146271,062272,060274,196274,616
276,983279,102282,209284,386285,784283,152
281,155281,688280,065278,985276,449275,115
274,914274,302272,474271,710269,297
1.581.571.75
1.481.661.781.761.81
1.621.731.801.841.70
1.751.741.701.691.64
1.601.621.761.741.77
1.901.831.671.581.65
1.841.691.611.571.57
1.661.66
1.631.631.631.621.631.61
1.631.651.681.731.771.77
1.811.781.781.791.721.70
1.701.731.711.781.77
6,514
7,6958,5978,7829,0528,993
9,89310,51310,47510,25711,491
11,65611,98812,67413,38214,529
15,61116,98719,44820,84622,609
23,94326,25729,58438,01447,748
46,62350,69455,98765,03676,109
87,93197,839
99,85298,77698,21798,94499,26498,274
97,61197,28597,74696,23596,76895,144
94,23695,01097,36195,42797,42796,565
93,77692,34390,86689,77490,982
7,9577,706
9,2849,88610,21010,68610,637
11,67813,26012,73012,73913,879
14,12014,48814,93616,04817,000
18,31720,76524,83326,13428,624
32,03835,04538,63345,37256,948
56,69764,07872,31183,89193,870
104,441110,549
104,233105,027105,189105,149105,425106,904
105,768107,656108,764108,491110,173110,549
110,971108,823109,657112,913111,701113,515
113,534113,101113,852113,886112,669
1.131.19
1.071.161.121.171.18
1.131.191.231.241.15
1.221.201.161.151.14
1.151.151.241.231.22
1.271.271.241.111.07
1.211.191.211.211.18
1.131.09
1.041.061.071.061.061.09
1.081.111.111.131.141.16
1.181.151.131.181.151.18
1.211.221.251.271.24
10,20011,13511,149
12,26813,04613,52914,09114,095
15,32115,81116,66716,69617,951
18,29418,24919,63020,55621,823
23,67725,33024,41327,03028,893
30,70033,85337,42242,46245,082
49,01254,78160,43567,05774,529
79,32586,566
84,10485,20186,12886,26386,36187,299
87,29287,96187,82386,41386,73386,572
85,32087,41887,24288,29490,84188,042
89,44588,50289,32690,29092,613
14,24116,00715,470
19,46021,05021,03121,48820,926
22,76923,40224,45124,11325,305
26,81326,22127,94129,38631,094
34,40538,07335,29938,94542,517
43,86750,06355,07963,23771,067
71,74479,27389,530
102,520109,228
114,114125,693
114,365116,118116,148116,968118,191120,010
121,993123,341124,376125,364125,618125,693
124,131123,395123,332123,175122,367124,351
124,939127,151129,073128,628126,587
1 Monthly average for year and total for month.2 Seasonally adjusted, end of period.3 Inventory/sales ratio. For annual periods, ratio of weighted average inventories to average monthly sales; for monthly data, ratio* of
inventories at end of month to sales for month.Note.—Earlier data are not strictly comparable with data beginning 1958 for manufacturing and beginning 1967 for wholesale and
retail trade.The inventory figures in this table do not agree with the estimates of change in business inventories included in the gross national
product since these figures cover only manufacturing and trade rather than all business, and show inventories in terms of current bookvalue without adjustment for revaluation.
Source: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of the Census).
218Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-50.—Manufacturers' shipments and inventories, 1947-82
[Millions of dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year ormonth
Shipments1
Total
Dura-ble
goodsindus-tries
Non-durable
indus-tries
Inventories2
Total
Durable goods industries
TotalMate-
rials andsupplies
Workin
proc-Finishedgoods
Nondurable goods industries
TotalMate-
rials andsupplies
Workin
proc-ess
Finishedgoods
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721.9731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
1981:JanFebMar
May!'"!June....
JulyAugSept....OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar
May!!"!June....
JulyAugSept...,OctNov...
15,51317,31616,126
18,63421,71422,52924,84323,355
26,48027,74028,73627,24730,286
30,87930,92333,35735,05837,331
40,99544,87046,48750,22853,501
52,80555,90663,02372,93784,794
86,59598,802113,201126,953143,935
154,249166,217
163,902164,676165,936167,649168,073170,951
170,333169,274168,156163,957161,442159,614
155,023158,142157,517156,114160,828161,519
161,382158,619159,278152,473152,343
6,6947,5797,191
8,84510,49311,31313,34911,828
14,07114,71515,23713,56315,609
15,88315,61617,26218,28019,637
22,22124,64925,26727,65929,437
28,18829,95434,02439,68644,228
43,65650,68959,26767,84876,060
77,54083,417
81,43682,17683,51084,78485,43986,891
85,73985,22384,67181,26580,27979,133
75,55177,97678,12477,13679,51878,888
79,03677,24876,56272,34272,708
8,8199,7388,935
9,78911,22111,21611,49411,527
12,40913,02513,49913,68414,677
14,99615,30716,09516,77817,694
18,77420,22021,22022,57024,064
24,61725,95229,00033,25040,567
42,93948,11353,93459,10467,875
76,70882,800
82,46682,50082,42682,86482,63484,060
84,59484,05183,48582,69281,16380,481
79,47280,16779,39478,97881,31082,631
82,34681,37182,71680,13179,635
25,89728,54326,321
31,07839,30641,13643,94841,612
45,06950,64251,87150,24152,945
53,78054,88558,18660,04663,409
68,18577,95284,66490,61898,202
101,651102,658108,238124,628157,792
159,934175,193189,334210,679241,034
264,016283,152
266,798269,146271,062272,060274,196274,616
276,983279,102282,209284,386285,784283,152
281,155281,688280,065278,985276,449275,115
274,914274,302272,474271,710269,297
13,06114,66213,060
15,53920,99123,73125,87823,710
26,40530,44731,72830,25832,077
32,37132,54434,63235,86638,506
42,25749,92055,00558,87564,739
66,78066,28970,25081,398101,739
102,874112,581121,737138,045160,601
174,674188,429
176,632177,725178,374179,301180,010181,125
183,229185,022187,686189,461190,222188,429
187,054187,121186,063185,916184,870184,289
183,798183,550182,793181,843179,324
8,9667,894
9,19410,41710,60810,03210,776
10,35310,27910,81011,06811,970
13,32515,48916,45517,37618,693
19,18219,75920,86026,02835,151
33,92037,54840,35045,33452,805
55,31058,461
56,40956,75456,38256,75756,39457,017
58,01658,12158,90859,11759,21658,461
58,18457,99956,89756,94755,99655,643
55,78155,19154,70354,27953,624
10,7209,721
10,75612,31712,83712,38713,063
12,77213,20314,15914,87116,191
18,07521,93925,00527,33630,408
29,84828,65030,78835,54542,603
43,36946,34550,62558,69469,212
76,85182,814
78,33778,66279,15979,73380,43580,362
81,04181,63582,62183,58884,05882,814
82,21182,09781,72981,56281,28481,304
80,21680,45880,37980,56779,995
6,2066,040
6,3487,5658,1257,8398,239
9,2459,0639,6629,925
10,344
10,85412,49113,54714,16315,639
17,75117,88018,60119,82323,985
25,58628,69030,76334,01838,585
42,51347,153
41,88742,30942,83542,81243,18043,744
44,17245,26646,15846,75646,94647,153
46,65947,02647,43547,40847,59047,342
47,80147,90147,71146,99745,705
12,83613,88113,261
15,53918,31517,40518,07017,902
18,66420,19520,14319,98320,868
21,40922,34123,55424,18024,903
25,92828,03229,65931,74333,463
34,87136,36837,98843,23056,053
57,06062,61267,59872,63480,433
89,34194,723
90,16691,42192,68892,75994,18693,492
93,75494,08094,52394,92595,56194,723
94,10094,56794,00293,07091,57990,826
91,11690,75289,68189,86789,973
8,3178,167
8,5568,9718,7758,6629,080
9,0829,4939,8139,978
10,131
10,44811,15511,71512,28912,724
13,15013,68314,67618,13223,699
23,54225,83327,39729,35432,479
36,20838,015
36,82037,05036,97437,20637,30537,074
37,53137,44737,60637,72037,83438,015
37,96137,89937,31737,48637,17236,714
36,78936,44835,80035,63735,814
2,4722,440
2,5712,7212,8642,8282,944
2,9463,1103,2963,4063,511
3,8064,2044,4214,8485,122
5,2745,6655,9826,7078,175
8,8379,933
10,98911,91313,710
15,65616,196
15,81816,12616,19416,26316,50916,161
16,17416,25116,21315,91216,17416,196
15,95915,79215,62915,60115,43815,555
15,51915,52915,19214,85714,793
7,4097,415
7,6668,6228,6248,4918,845
9,3809,738
10,44410,79611,261
11,67412,67313,52314,60615,617
16,44817,01917,33018,39124,179
24,68126,84629,21231,36734,244
37,47840,511
37,52838,24539,52139,29040,37240,257
40,04840,38240,70541,29341,55540,511
40,17940,87741,05739,98338,96938,557
38,80838,77538,68939,37339,366
1 Monthly average for year and total for month.2 Book value, seasonally adjusted, end of period.Note.—Data beginning 1958 are not strictly comparable with earlier data.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
219Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-51.—Manufacturers' new and unfilled orders, 1947-82
[Amounts in millions of dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or month
New orders1
Total
Durable goodsindustries
Total
Capitalgoodsindus-tries,non-
defense
Non-durablegoods
industries
Unfilled orders'
TotalDurablegoods
industries
Non-durablegoods
industries
Unfitted orders—shipmentsratio3
TotalDurablegoods
industries
194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964
196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811981:
Jan....Feb....Mar...
May...June..
July...Aug...Sept..Oct....Nov...Dec...
1982:Jan....Feb....Mar...
fcJune..July...Aug...Sept..Oct....N o v .
15,25617,69315,61420,11023,90723,20423,58622,33527,46528,36827,55927,00230,72430,23531,10433,43635,52438,357
42,10046,40247,05650,68753,95052,03855,98364,16776,25987,26885,14999,543
115,027131,664147,354
155,738166,015
164,976165,375166,240169,422170,281171,022
172,089168,797167,728159,558159,460156,660
154,519155,984157,198154,995156,791157,058
158,588154,380156,166149,696150,362
6,3888,1266,633
10,16512,84112,06112,14710,768
14,99615,36514,11113,29016,00315,30315,75917,37418,70920,652
23,27826,17725,82528,11629,87127,38829,99835,06442,93046,85342,01951,39861,07672,41079,394
79,06083,272
82,52882,69983,86286,41087,39686,911
87,58284,81984,45677,19378,59276,421
75,06176,30977,85976,19475,71074,550
76,44672,98273,266
70,607
6,9037,6606,7387,4448,62210,97112,673
11,01112,79915,27619,44423,203
23,44924,061
25,06321,85724,45625,68724,48824,039
24,65524,86724,31222,52824,36922,130
21,71721,56022,17422,60820,33219,278
20,32218,89320,27320,18320,173
8,8689,5668,9819,94511,06611,14311,43911,56612,46913,00313,44813,71214,72014,93215,34516,06116,81517,705
18,82320,22521,23122,57124,079
24,65025,98629,10433,33040,41543,13048,14553,95159,25467,960
76,67882,743
82,44782,67782,37883,01382,88584,111
84,50783,97983,27282,36580,86880,239
79,45879,67679,33978,80381,08182,508
82,14281,39882,90080,09879,755
34,47330,73624,04541,45667,26675,85761,17848,26660,00467,37553,18347,37052,732
45,08047,40748,57754,32766,882
80,07198,401104,547109,926115,422
106,158107,147121,061161,256, 191,102173,829182,499204,880261,941303,178
320,977318,621
322,053322,749323,054324,826327,033327,105
328,861328,384327,955323,556321,574318,621
318,114315,957315,639314,521310,482306,032
303,235299,001295,883293,107291,128
28,57926,61919,62235,43563,39472,68058,63745,250
56,24163,88050,35244,55949,37342,51444,37545,96551,27063,691
76,29894,575100,576105,950111,250101,566102,119114,725153,876185,560165,930174,211196,417251,663291,883
310,051308,370
311,146311,666312,018313,642315,597315,618
317,462317,057316,841312,769311,082308,370
307,877306,211305,947305,004301,194296,866
294,272290,011286,706283,960281,861
5,8944,1174,4236,0213,8723,1772,5413,016
3,7633,4952,8312,8113,359
2,5663,0322,6123,0573,1913,7733,8263,9713,9764,1724,5925,0276,3367,380515427,8988,2888,46310,27811,295
10,92610,251
10,90711,08411,03611,18411,43611,487
11,39911,32711,11410,78710,49210,251
10,2379,7469,6929,5189,2889,166
8,9638,9909,1779,1479,267
3.423.633.873.353.093.012.782.632.692.803.103.333.813.703.853.753.653.383.313.914.19
3.803.343.303.623.89
3.793.77
3.803.773.713.703.703.66
3.683.683.703.763.763.77
3.903.783.763.863.713.69
3.673.693.633.773.72
4.124.274.554.003.693.543.373.133.243.373.723.954.554.404.654.504.394,063.904.635.034.573.993.924.264.63
4.534.59
4.564.534.454.444.434.37
4.424.424.464.554.564.59
4.764.624.614.714.524.51
4.494.554.464.664.61
1 Monthly average for year and total for month.3 Seasonally adjusted, end of period.3 Ratio of unfilled orders at end of period to shipments for period; excludes industries with no unfilled orders. Annual figures relate
to seasonally adjusted data for December.Note.—Data beginning 1958 are not strictly comparable with earlier data.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
220Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PRICES
TABLE B-52.—Consumer price indexes, major expenditure classes, 1929-82
[1967^100]
Year or month
19291933 ..19391940194119421943194419451946194719481949195019511952. .1953195419551956195719581959I96019611962196319641965196619671968... .19691970197119721973.,.197419751976197719781979...198019811982..!1981:
JanFebMar ....AprMayJune 1ZJulvAugilZZSeptOctNov..Dec
1982:JanFebMar
JuneJulyAugSept
NovDec
Allitems
51.338.841.642.044148.851852.753.958.566.972.171.472.177.879.580.180.580.281484.386.687.388.789.690691.792 994.597 2
100.0104.2109.8116.31213125.3133.1147.7161.2170.5181.5195.4217.4246.8272.4289.1
260.5263.2265.1266.8269.0271.3274.4276.5279.3279.9280.7281.5
282.5283.4283.1284.3287.1290.6292.2292.8293.3294.1293.6292.4
Food andbeverages
Total*
100.0103 6108.8114.7118 3123.2139.5158.7172.1177.4188.0206 3228.5248.0267.3278.2
2614263.7265.0265.7265.4266.5268.9270.1270.7270.3269.9270.5
273.6275.8275.6276.5278.1280.2280.8279.9280.1279.6279.1279.1
Food
48.330.634.635.238 445.150349.650.758.170.676.673.574.582.884.383.082.881.682 284.988.587.188.089.189991.292 494.499.1
100.0103.6108.9114.9118.4123.5141.4161.7175.4180.8192.22114234.5254.6274.6285.7
268.6270.8272.2272.9272.5273.6276.2277.4278.0277.6277.1277.8
281.0283.3283.0283.9285.5287.8288.5287.4287.6287.0286.4286.5
Housing
Total2
52.252.453 756.256 858.159.160.665.269.870.972.877.278.780.881.782.383 686.287.788.690.290.991792.793 894.997 2
100.0104.0110.4118.2123 4128.1133.7148.8164.5174.6186.5202 8227.6263.3293.5314.7
279.1280.9282.6284.8288.5292.2297.0299.7303.7303.5304.2305.2
306.1307.3306.7309.4313.8317.5319.2320.1319.7320.7319.0316.3
Rent,resi-
dential
76 054.156.056257 258.558 558.658859.261165.168 070473.276280.383 284.385987.589.190.491.792.994 095.095996.998 2
100.0102 4105.7110.11152119.2124.3130.6137 3144.7153.5164 0176.0191.6208.2224.0
200 9201.9203.0204.2205.9206.8207.8210.3211.9213.6215.0216.5
217.8218.6219.6220.1221.8222.6224.8226.0226.9228.9230.2230.8
Homeowner-ship
75.076.377.078381.783.584.486.386.987 989.090892.796.3
100.0105.7116.0128.5133.7140.1146.7163.2181.7191.7204.9227,2262.4314.0352.7376.8
335.8335.8336.8339.3345.0350.4358.0361.8367.8366.7367.2367.8
367.5368.7365.7370.6377.4382.8384.5385.9383.0382.8379.5372.9
Fuel andother
utilities3
83.083.585.187.389.991.793.895.997.197 398.298.498.398.8
100.0101.3103.6107.6115.0120.1126.9150.2167.8182.7202.2216.0239.3278.6319.2350.8
296.7304.5308.4310.5314.9320.2325.1327.8331.1330.1329.8331.8
336.2337.1339.3339.2345.4352.2354.7356.3359.5363.4362.2364.1
Appareland
upkeep
48 536.942.442 844852.354 658.561567.578.283.380179.086.185.384.684 584.185 887.387.588.289.690.490 991.992 793.7961
100.0105.4111.5116.1119 8122.3126.8136.2142.3147.6154.2159 6166.6178.4186.9191.8
181.1182.0185.1186.4186.4185.8184.7187.4190.7191.5191.3190.5
187.3188.0191.1191.9191.5190.8189.7191.8194.9195.5195.4193.6
Trans-portation
43.042.744 248.147 947.947.850.355.561.866.468.272.577.379.578.377.478.883.386.089.689.690.692.593.094.395.997.2
100.0103.2107.2112.7118.6119.9123.8137.7150.6165.5177.2185.5212.0249.7280.0291.5
264.7270.9273.5275.3277.8279.9282.6283.7285.2287.2289.1289.8
289.9288.0285.1282.9285.6292.8296.1296.2295.3295.5295.8294.8
Medicalcare
36.736.837 038.039 941.142144.448151.152 753 756.359 361.463464.867 269.973.276.479.181.483 585.687 389.593.4
100.0106.1113.4120.6128.4132.5137.7150.5168.6184.7202.4219.4239.7265.9294.5328.7
279.5282.6284.7287.0289.0291.5295.6299.3301.7304.8308.2310.2
313.4316.2318.8321.7323.8326.4330.0333.3336.0338.7342.2344.3
Enter-tainment
100.0105.7111.0116.7122.9126.5130.0139.8152.2159.8167.7176.6188.5205.3221.4235.8
214.4216.7218.2219.2220.3220.8221.1222.3224.0225.5226.8227.3
229.2231.2232.8233.9234.4235.6236,6237.4238.3240.3239.9240.1
Othergoodsand
services
100.0105.2110.4116.8122.4127.5132.5142.0153.9162.7172.2183.3196.7214.5235.7259.9
226.2227.4228.7229.9232.2233.4234.4235.6243.0245.2245.9246.7
248.4250.3252.2253.8255.0255.8257.2258.3266.6271.2273.8276.6
Ener-gy4
90.190.391.894 294 494 795 094696 397.8
100.0101.5104.2107.0111.2114.3123.5159.7176.6189.3207.3220.4275.9361.1410.0416.1
381.7401.1409.3409.8411.3414.0415.7416.1417.1414.9414.1414.6
416.4413.0406.1395.7402.1418.6424.5424.5424.2425.0422.6419.9
1 Includes alcoholic beverages, not shown separately.* Includes other items not shown separately. Series beginning 1967 not comparable with series for earlier years.• Fuel oil, coal, and bottled gas; gas (piped) and electricity; and other utilities and public services.4 Fuel oil, coal, and bottled gas; gas (piped) and electricity; and motor fuel, motor oi l coolant, etc.Note.—Data beginning 1978 are for all urban consumers; earlier data are for urban wage earners and clerical workers.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
221Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-53.—Consumer price indexes, selected expenditure classes, 1939-82
[1967-100]
Year or month
19391940194119421943194419451946194719481949195019511952195319541955195619571958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979
1980198119821981;JanFebMar
t :::JuneJulyAug
S51 :-:::NovDec
1982:JanFebMarApr«&.::JuneJulyAucSeptOctNov.....Dec
Food and beverage
Total1
100.01036108.8114 7118.3123.2139 5158.71721177 4188.0206 3228.52480267.3278.2
261.4263 7265.0265.7265 4266.5268.9270.1270.7270 32699270.5
273.6275.8275.6276.5278.1280.2280.8279.92801279 62791279.1
>
Food
Total
34 635 238445150349650 758170 676 673 574 582 884 383.082 881.682.284.988 587 188.089189.991.292 494 49911000103 6108.9114 9118.4123 51414161.71754180 8192 22114234.5254 6274.6285.7
268.62708272 2272.9272 5273.6276.2277.4278.0277 62771277.8
281.0283.3283.0283 9285.5287.8288.5287.4287 6287 0286 4286.5
Athome
73 579 876777 686387.886.285.884.184.487.291088 889.690 491.092.293 295.5100 3100.0103 2108.2113 7116.4121.61414162.4175.8179 5190.2210 2232.9251.5269.9279.2
265.6267.3268.6268.7267 7268.7271.6272.8273.227212710271.7
275.3278.0277.1277.9279.8282.6282.8280.8280.6279.4278 3277.8
Awayfromhome
68.970.170.872.274.977.279 381.483.285.487.388.990.995.1100.0105.2lll.G119.9126.1131.1141.4159.4174.3186.1200.3218.4242.9267.0291.0306.5
280.9284.7286.1288.2289 3290.6292.4293.7294.82962297 2297.7
299.8301.2302.4303 6304.8305.9307.6308.7309.8310 73114312.6
Homeownersliip
Total
75.076.377.078.381.783.584486.386.987.989.090 892.796 3100.0105.7116.0128.5133.7140.1146 7163.2181.71917204.9227.2262.4314.0352.7376.8
335.8335.8336.8339.3345 0350.4358.0361.8367.8366 7367 2367.8
367.5368.7365.7370.6377.4382.8384.5385.9383.0382.8379.5372.9
Homepur-chase
86.587.187.387.690.091.391391.892.393.294.295 797.098 6100.0102 8109.5118 3124.8130.0132 7142.7160.3168 4179.5196.7223.1254.3267.7281.6
266.2263.0261.1260.7263 0266.6271.4272.6274.5272 5270 2270.5
269.3270.4269.2272.3279.3285.6287.7287.9286.8289.9290.4290.9
Financ-ing,taxes,andinsur-ance
100.01083123.7142 3143.5150.8160 6181.1201.9212 8227.2257.8308.9396.0472.5511.4
435.2437.1441.1447.1458 3467.2480.0488.3501.85018505 6506.3
506.0507.2500.9508.4516.2521.8524.3527.3519.9514.3504.8486.2
Mainte-nanceandrepair
71.272.474.177.280.581.883.284.685.986.587.789.591.395.2100.0106.1115.0124.0133.7140.7151.0171.6187.6199.6214.7233.0256.4285.7314.4334.1
296.8302.8306.1309.3312.9315.5319.3320.5321.6320.8322.8324.1
326.7328.2327.2331.6334.5336.1334.7335.9338.4339.4339.0337.8
Total
83.083.585.187.389.991.793.895.997.197.398.298.498.398.8100.0101.3103.6107.6115.0120.1126.9150.2167.8182.7202,2216.0239.3278.6319.2350.8
296.7304.5308.4310.5314.9320.2325.1327.8331.1330.1329.8331.8
336.2337.1339.3339.2345.4352.2354.7356.3359.5363.4362.2364.1
Fuel and other utilities
Household fuels
Total
100.0101.4103.4107.9115.3120.1128.4160.7183.8202.3228.6247.4286.4349,4407.0446.2
375.4387.4393.7396.5403.3411.7417.2419.5422.4419.0417 6420.0
426.9427.6430.5428.2438.0448.4452.0454.0458.5464.5461.9464.0
Fuel
coal,andbot-tledgas
37.138.240.543.145.247.148.051.358.468.670.372.776.578.081.581.282.385.990.388.789.8
89.291.091.593.292.794.697.0100.0103.1105.6110.1117.5118.5136.0214.6235.3250.8283.4298.3403.1556.0675.9667.9
625.9675.6693.4690.6685.8682.0677.9674.6673.4672.7676.1682.5
686.0683.1664.0641.3644.6656.6659.9659.9662.8677.2691.3688.5
Gas(piped)andelec-tricity
82.982.181.481.080.680.379.677.477.179.181.081.281.582.684.285.387.588.489.392.494.798.699.499.499.499.499.499.6100.0100.9102.8107.3114.7120.5126.4145.8169.6189.0213.4232.6257.8301.8345.9393.8
318.5322 9326.7330.6339.6350.2357.6360.8364.5360.6358.3359.9
367.4368.7375.9377.8389.0398.9402.1404.4409.2413.4407.6410.6
Otherutili-tiesand
publicserv-ices
100.0101.2104.0107.4114.7120.6124.1130.31371145.4152.0158.3159.5165.2181.0200.2
171.9173.6174.0175.1176.2177.1180.61837187.4189.4190.7191.9
192.7193.9195.0197.7198.9200.4201.4202.4203.6204.5205.1206.6
See next page for continuation of table.
222
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-53.—Consumer price indexes, selected expenditure classes, 1939-82—Continued
[1967=100]
Year or month
1939194019411942194319441945194619471948 ....19491950195119521953 ...195419551956195719581959196019611962196319641965196619671968 ....196919701971197219731974197519761977 .197819791980198119821981:JanFebMarAormr»jur&iir: ::::::::::::::JulyAusSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprNBWJune
JulyAuo ...
Sept :OctNovDec
Transportation
Total
43.042.744.248.147.947.947.850.355.561.866.468.272.577.379.578.377.478.883.386 089.6
89.690.692.593.094.395.997.2100.0103 2107.2
112 7118.6119.9123.8137.7150.6165.5177 2185.5212.0249 7280 0291.5
264.72709273 5275 3277.8279.9
282.6283 7285 2287 2289.1289.8
289 92880285.1282.9285 6292.8
296.1296.2295.3295 5295 8294.8
Private transportation
Total
44.2
43.645.952.351.451.451.354.361.568.272.3
72.575.880.882.480.378.980.184.787 491.1
90.691.393.093.494.796.397.5100.01030106.5
1111116.6117.5121.5136.6149.8164.61766185.0212.3
249 2277 5287.5
262.9269 4271.7273 4276.0277.9
279.6280 52819283 9285.8286.5
286 6284 5281.3278.8281.5288.9
292.3292.4291.129112914290.4
Newcars
43.2
43.346.6
69.275682.8
83.487.494.995894.390 993.59841015105.9
104.5104 5104.1103.5103.2100999.1100.0102 8104.4
107 6112.01110111.1117 5127.6135 71429153.8166.0
179 3190 2197.6
185 3184 8182 91861190.9192.2
192 519191913192 5195.3197.0
197 4195 5194.4196 0197 5198.1
198.6198 7197 7197 7199 0200.1
Usedcars
89.2*75.971.869.177.480 289.5
83.686994.896.0100.199497.0100.0(3)
103.1
104 3110.2110 5117.6122 6146.4167,9182 8186.5201.02081256 9296.4
234.0234 3235 42391245.2252.9
260 3266 9272 8278 2281.4281.9
280.5279 7280.9285.12914298.2
302.4304.4304.6306 7310 5312.6
Motorfuel ̂
49.0
48.150.553.454.054.253.854.962.270.472.3
71.873.975.880.382.583.686.590.088 889.9
92.591.491.991.891.494 997.0100.01014104.7
105 6106.3107.6118.1159 9170.8177.9188 2196.3265.6
3691410 9389.4
385.2410.8420 7419 3416.5414.4
412.9411.7
2411 1409 9409.5408.4
4061399 2384.1366.9370.6392.4
400.2398.4394.2390.73883381.7
Auto-mobilemainte-nanceandrepair
43.1
43.044.948.849.450.050.452.056.459.661.1
62.367.068.672.374.876.579.582.483 785.5
87.289.390.491.692.894.596.2100.0105 5112.2
120.6129.2135.1142.2156.8176.6189.7203 7220.6242.6
268 3293 6315.8
282.7285.4287.7289 0290.8291.9
293.5295.5298.73013302.8304.1
305.5307 7310.2311.9313.6316.0
318.0319.2320.6321.9322.3323.1
Other
103.41097
119.2128.4129.1127.8132.4141.2163.1177.3184.6198.6
222 62413257.8
232.4234.2234.7236.3238.9241.0
242.9243.0244.2247 5249.5250.6
253.3253 4254.5255.1255.7258.7
260.8260.8260.0261.4260.7259.6
Publictranspor-tation
33.133.133.133.333.433.533.534.436.040.745.248.954.057.561.365.567.470.011176178.3
81.084.687.488.590.191.995.2100.0104.6112.7
128.5137.7143.4144.8148.0158.6174.2182.4187.8200.3
251.6312 0346.0
286.4288.1293.9297.2297.7303.9
323.1326.5329.1330.8333.2333.8
334.9336.8336.7339.3342.1345.6
347.2348.1353.3356.3356.0355.6
Medical car
Total
36.7
36.837.038039.941142.144 448.151152.7
53.756359.361463.464 867.269973 276.4
79.181.483.585.687.389.593.4100.01061113.4
1206128.4132 5137.71505168.6184.7202 4219.4239.7
265 9294 5328.7
279.5282.6284.7287 0289.0291.5
295.6299.3301.7304 8308.2310.2
313.4316 2318.8321.7323.8326.4
330.0333.3336.0338.7342.2344.3
Medicalcarecom-
modities
71.1
70.871.473 073.574 374.876 281.886187.4
88.591091.892693.794 796.799 3102 8104.4
104.5103.3101.7100.8100.5100.2100.5100.0100 2101.3
1036105.4105.6105.9109 6118.8126.01341143.5153.8
1681186 5205.7
176.7179.2180.7182.4184.7186.3
187.7189.4190.8192.1193.1194.9
195.9197.7200.0202.4204.1205.6
206.5208.2209.9211.6212.9213.7
Medi-calcareserv-ices
32.5
32.532.733 735.436 937.940143.546 448.1
49.251755.057 058.760 462.865568772.0
74.977.780.282.684.687.392.0100.0107.3116.0
124 2133.3138.2144.3159.1179.1197.1216 7235.4258.3
287 4318 2356.0
302.1305.2307.5309.8311.7314.4
319.2323.4326.1329.7333.7335.7
339.4342.4345.1348.0350.2353.0
357.3361.0364.0366.9371.0373.4
1 Includes alcoholic beverages, not shown separately.2 Includes direct pricing of diesel fuel and gasohol beginning September 1981.3 Not available.Note.—Data beginning 1978 are for all urban consumers; earlier data are for urban wage earners and clerical workers.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-54.—Consumer price indexes, commodities, services, and special groups, 1939-82
[1967-100]
Year ormonth
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I96019611962196319641965 ....1966196719681969 „
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNov .Dec
1982:JanFebMar
June
JulyAugSeptOct.NovD€C
Allitems
41.6
42044.148851.852 753.958 566.972171.4
72177.879 580180580 281.484 386.687.3
88.789.690.691.792.994.597.2
100 0104.2109.8
116.3121.3125.3133.1147.7161.2170 5181.5195.4217.4
246.8272.4289.1
2605283.2265.1266.8269.0271.3
274.4276.5279.3279 9280.7281.5
282.528342831284.3287.1290.6
292,2292.8293.3294.1293.6292.4
Commodities
Allcom-
modities
40.2
40 643.349.654.054.756.362 475.080478.3
78885.987 086.785985.185.988.690.690.7
91.592.092.893.694.695.798.2
100.0103.7108.4
113.5117.4120.9129.9145.5158.4165.2174.7187.1208.4
233.9253.6263.8
245.4248.3249.8250.8251.9253.2
255.0256.2257.7257.9258.0258.4
258.8259.5258.8258.9261.5265.1
266.5266.4266.6267.5267.8267.7
Food
34.6
35238.445150.349650.758170.676 673.5
74 582.884 383.082881.682.284.988.587.188.089.189.991.292.494.499.1
100.0103.6108.9
114.9118.4123.5141.4161.7175.41808192.2211.4234.5
254.6274.6285.7
268.6270.8272.2272.9272.5273.6
276.2277.4278,0277 6277.1277.8
281.0283 3283 0283.9285.5287.8
288.5287.4287.6287.0286.4286.5
Commodities less food
All
47.7
48 050.456.058.461.664.168476.882.781.5
81.487.588 388.587 586.987.890.591.592.7
93.193.494.194.895.696.297.5
100.0103.7108.1
112.5116.8119.4123.5136.6149.11566165.1174.7195.1
222.0241.2250.9
232.4
238.0239.6241.1
242.6243.8245.5245.9246.2246.5
245.9246 0245.2245.0247.8251,9
253.5253.8253.9255.4256.0255.8
Durable
48.5
48151.458460.365 970.974180.386,287.4
88495.196495.793 391.591.594 495.997.3
96.796.697.697.998.898.498.5
100 0103.1107.0
111.8116.5118.9121.9130.6145.5154 3163.2173.9191.1
210.4227.1241.1
2210220.3219.8221.1223.9226.6
229.6230.9232.6232 9233.2233.7
233.4233 72335235.8239.8243.2
244.7244.6244.1246.0246.6247.3
Non-durable
44.3
44 746.751653.856 658.662972.277 876.3
76282.082483.183 583 585.387688.289.3
90791.291.892.793.594.897.0
1000104.1108.8
113.1117.0119.8124.8140.9151.7158 3166.5174.3198.7
235.2257.5261.6
2453253.2257.5258.1258.2258.0
257.5258.4260.3260 7261.1261.1
260.22601258 4255.0256.2261.2
263.0263.6264.6265.7266.1264.7
Services
Allservices
43.5
43 644.245646.447 548.249151.154 356.9
58.761.864567.369 570.972.775.678.580.8
83.585.286.888.590.292.295.8
100 0105.2112.5
121.6128.4133.3139.1152.1166.6180 4194.3210.9234.2
270.3305.7333.3
287,7290.1292.5295.4299.6303.5
308.8312.2317.3318 6320.6321.8
323.9325 3325 5328.4331.8334.9
337.0338.9339.7340.3338.6335.6
Rent
56.0
56.257.258.558.558.658.859.261.165.168.0
70.473.276 280.383 284 385.987.589.190.491.792.994.095.095.996.998.2
100 0102.4105.7
110.1115.2119.2124.3130.6137.3144 7153.5164.0176.0
191.6208.2224.0
2009201.9203.0204.2205.9206.8
207.8210.3211.92136215.0216.5
217.82186219 6220.1221.8222.6
224.8226.0226.9228.9230.2230.8
Serv-iceslessrent
38.1
38,138,640.342.144.245.146749.051.954.5
56.059.362 264.866768.270.173.376.479.081.983.985.587.389.291.595.3
100.0105.7113.8
123.7130.8135.9141.8156.0171.9186 8201.6219.4244.9
285.1324.3354.2
304.2306.9309.5312.8317.4321.9
328.1331.7337.5338 7340.8342.0
344.2345.7345.7349.1352.8356.5
358.5360.5361.3361.6359.3355.5
Allitemslessfood
47.2
47 348.752153.655 756.959 464.969670.3
71175.777 579.079 579.781.183.885.787.3
88.889.790.892.093.294.596.7
100.0104.4110.1
116.7122.1125.8130.7143.7157.1167 5178.4191.2213.0
244.0270.6288.4
257.6260.4262.3264.2267.0269.5
272.7274.9278.22790280.1280.8
281.42821281 7282.9286.0289.7
291.5292.5292.9294.0293.6292.1
Special indexes
Allitemsless
energy
83.986.387.0
83.389.390.491.692.994.397.3
100.0104.4110.3
117.0122.0126.1133.8146.9160.2169.2179.8193.8213.1
238.0261.7279.3
251.2252.5
260.2
263.5265.6268.6269 4270.4271.1
272.1273.4273.6275.7278.3280.7
282.0282.7283.1284.0283.6282.5
Allitemslessfoodand
ener-gy
83 385.287.0
88389.390.591.693.094.396.6
100 0104.6110.7
117.6123.1126.9131.3142.2155.3165 5175.8188.7207.0
232.8257.1276.1
245.7246.8248.1
255.6
259.0261.3264.82659267.2267.9
268.5269.5269.8272.2274.9277.3
278.7279,8280.4281.5281,2279.9
Ener-gy1
90.190.391.8
94.294.494.795.094.696.397.8
100.0101.5104.2
107,0111.2114.3123.5159.7176.6189.3207.3220.4275.9
361.1410.0416.1
381.7401.1409.3409,8411.3414.0
415.7416.1417.1414.9414,1414.6
416.4413.0406.1395.7402.1418.6
424.5424.5424.2425.0422.6419.9
1 fuel oil, coal, and bottled gas; gas (piped) and electricity; and motor fuel, motor oil, coolant, etc.Note.—Data beginning 1978 are for all urban consumers; earlier data are for urban wage earners and clerical workers.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
224
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-55.—Changes in consumer price indexes, commodities and services, 1948-82
[Percent change]
Year or month
194819491950195119521953195419551956195719581959I960. .1961196219631964 .196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982
1981:JanFebMarADrIvTayJune .JulyAusSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar.AprMayJuneJulvAugSeptOctNovDec
Alt items
Dec.to
Dec.1
27185.85.9
.9
.6- . 5
.42.9301.81.51.5
71.2161.21.93.43.04.76.1553.4348.8
12.27.0486.89.0
13.312 48.93.9
Yearto
year
7.8101.07.92.2
.8
.5- . 41.53.62.7
.81.61.01.11.21.31.72.92.94.25.4594.3336.2
11.09.15.86.57.7
11.313 510.46.1
Unad-justed
0.81.0
7.6.8.9
1.18
1.0.2.3.3
4.3
- . 1.4
101.2
6.2.2.3
_ 2- .4
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.81.0.6.4.8.7
1.1.8
1.1.4.5,4
3.2
- . 3
1.01.0
6.3.2.5
3
Commodities
Total
Dec.to
Dec.1
1.7417.75.9
-.6-1 .4_ .42.62.61.3.6
1.1o1.014.8
1.62.52.53.85.5402.934
10.412.76.3336.189
13.01116.03.6
Unad-justed
0.71.2
6.4.4..5,75
.6
!o,2
2.3
~\o101.4
5- . 0
'.3
- .0
Yearto
year
7.2- 2 6
.69.01.3
- . 9- . 9
.93.12.3
.1
.9
.5
.9
.91.11.22.61.83.74.54.73.43.07.4
12.08.94.35.87.1
11.412.28.44.0
Sea-sonally
ad-Justed
0.61.1,4
0
A.8.6
A2.3
.1
- i s19
1.36.0.2.6.3
Food
Dec.to
Dec.1
- 0 . 8- 3 7
9.67.4
- 1 . 1- 1 . 3- 1 . 6- . 93.12.82.2
- . 83.1
= 91.5191.43.43.91.24.37.22.24.347
20.112.26.5
68.0
11.810.210.24.33.1
Yearto
year
8.5401.4
11.11.8
- 1 . 5- . 2
- 1 . 4.7
3.34.2
- 1 . 61.01.3.9
1.41.32.25.0
.93.65.15.53.04.3
14.514.48.53.16.3
10.010.98.67.94.0
Commoditiesless food
Dec.to
Dec1
5.3485.74.6
~.2- 1 . 4
02.52.2.8
1.5- . 3
.6
.71.2
.71.93.13.74.54.82.32.55.0
13.26.25.14.97.7
14.311.56.73.8
Change from preceding
Unad-justed
0.8
5
~XA
1.04.2
- . 1- . 2
12.8
- . 1
.e
.82
- . 4.1
-2.0
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.4.6.3
\\2.7.5
.3
.1
.1
7.6
- . 4.3.8.6.13
.2
.11
Unad-justed
0.61.3
7.4.7.6.65
.2
.1
.1
- 2.0
- . 3- . 11.11.7
6.1.0.6.2
- .1
Yearto
year
7715
- . 17.5.9.2
- 1 . 1_ 71.0311.11.3.43.77.8.6
142.6374.24 13.8223.4
10.69.2505.458
11.713 88.64.0
month
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.712
51
.5
.586.8.4.2.4
10
- . 5- . 5
.91.5
8.2.2.8.3.2
Services
Dec.to
Dec.1
613,63.65.24.64.21.9233.14.52.73.72.7191.7231.82.64.94.06.17.4824.1366.2
11.38.17.37.99.3
13.7\A213.04.3
Yearto
year
63483.2534.4433.3202.5403.82.93.3201.9201.92.2394.45.26.9815.6384.49.39.5837.78.5
11.015.413.19.0
Unad-justed
1.188
1.01.41.31.7111.6.4.6,4
7.4.1.9
1.0.9.6.6.2.2
— 5-.9
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
1.188
1.01.31.117121.5.5.9.5
5
!o.9.9.86.6.1.2
- . 1- .8
Energy 2
Dec.to
Dec.1
- 0 . 74.31.5
- 1 12.1
- 8-22.01.81.41.73.14 53.12.8
16.821.611.66.97.28.0
37.418.111.91.3
Yearto
year
0.21.72.6
2.33
- .41.81.62.21.52.72.73.92.88.0
29.310.67.29.56.3
25.230.913.51.5
Unad-justed
3.15.120
!4.7.41.2
2.1
4- . 8
- 1 . 7= 2.6
1.64.11.40
- . 1.2
- . 6- .6
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
1 Changes from December to December are based on unadjusted indexes.2 Fuel oil, coal, and bottled gas; gas (piped) and electricity; and motor fuel, motor oil, coolant, etc.Note—Data beginning 1978 are for all urban consumers; earlier data are for urban wage earners and clerical workers.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
225
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-56.—Changes in special consumer price indexes, 1938-82
[Percent change]
Year or month
1958195919601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982
1981;JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAug...::::::::::::..Sept .........OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarApr(Jay..: 7JuneJulyAugSeptOct
Dec
All items
Dec.to
Dec.1
181.5157
121612193.430476.15.53.43.48.8
12.27.0486.890
13.3
12.4893.9
Unad-justed
0.810
s.8.9
1.1.8
10
.'3
.3
.4
.3
.4101.2.6.223
= 2= .4
Yearto
Year
27.8
1610111213172.9294.25.45.94,33.36.2
11.09.1586.577
11.3
13.51046.1
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.810.64.87
1.1.8
11.4.5
.3
.2- 3
.2101.0
.6
251
All items lessfood
Dec.to
Dec.1
162.3101.1121.6101.63.33.54.95.76.53.13.05.6
12.27.16.26.38.5
14.0
12.99.94.0
Unad-justed
0.811
71.1.9
1.2.8
12
.4
.2
.2
.2- . 1
1*11.3.6
4— 1= .5
Yearto
Year
2.31.9171.0121.3131.42.33.44.45.56.04.63.03.99.99.36.66.57,2
11.4
14.610.96.6
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.91075.9.8
1.3.8
12
.6
.2
.2-2
101.27.4.151
•=.3
All items lessenergy
Dec.to
Dec.1
191.414.8
121.8131.93.5314.96.45.63.33.58.3
11.56.74.66.89.2
11.1
11.7864.2
Yearto
Year
29.8
1511121.314153.2284.45.76.14.33.46.19.89.1566.37.8
10.0
11.710 06.7
All items lessfood andenergy
Dec.to
Dec.1
182.2
81.5111.812153.3395.16.16.63.13.04.7
11.36.7616.485
11.3
12.1964.5
Yearto
Year
2.32.1151.11.31.21.51.42.43.54.65.86.24.73.13.58.39.26.66.27.39.7
12.510.47.4
Change from preceding month
Unad-justed
0.65.5
.99
1.3.8
11.3.4.3
.4
.5
.89.9.5.2
3- 1
Sea-sonally
justed
Unad-justed
0.54
.81.21.01.3.9
13.4.5.3
.2
.4
.1
.910.9.5.4,2.4
- .1=.5
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.6.4
.61.01.11.41.01.1.5.4
.3
0.8.9.9.6
.0
.4
- .1
All iterfood,<
andpurcha
fina
Dec.to
Dec.1
4.65.25.73,42.94.0
11.16.36.85.56.97.5
9.99.46.0
Unad-justed
0.5.8
.'9
.8
.9
.81.1
7.4
,3,4.67.6.6.4.4.8.6.3
ns lessJnergy,homeseandice1
Yearto
Year
4.54.95.25.0273.37.88.76.86.16,07.3
9.09.57.6
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.6.8.6.87.8
1.0.8.9.8.6.7
.5
.4
.5
.6
.6
.4
.472.5
All items
Dec.to
Dec.1
3.95.24.53.53.38.5
11.16.6516.379
10.8
10.88.55.0
Unad-justed
0.913.8.6.6.6.87.8
.4
.4
.5
.2
71.07.2.5.4.1
Yearto
Year
3.74.4494.33.16.2
10.18.3576.4689.6
11.2956.1
Sea-sonally
ad-justed
0.710.8.4
.5
.8
76
.6
.4
.1
„, 2
1.08.3
64.3
1 Changes from December to December are based on unadjusted indexes.2 All items less food, energy, and home purchase and financing, taxes, and insurance; estimated series.3 An experimental measure using a rental equivalence approach for homeownership costs. Effective with data for January 1983, the
consumer price index for all urban consumers will incorporate a rental equivalence measure.Note.—Data beginning 1978 are for all urban consumers; earlier data are for urban wage earners and clerical workers.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
226
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-57.—Producer price indexes by stage of processing, 1947-82
[1967=100]
Year or month
19471948..1949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721973.1974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 *
1981:JanFebMarAor
Sri™:::: :::::::;:::::"::::::June.
July
SectOctNovDec
1982: >JanFebMarAprMay :..::.: ::.:.:June
July .".Aug......
OctNovDec
Finished goods
Totalfinishedgoods
74.079977.6
79 086.586 085.185.3
85 587.991193.293.0
93.793 794 093.7941
95.798.8100 0102.8106.6
110.3113 7117.2127 9147.5
163 4170.61817195.9217.7
247.0269 8280.6
260.9263 3266 0268.5269.6270 5
2718271 52715274 3274.7275.4
277.9277.9277 3277 3277 8279.9
2817282 328142841284 9285.1
Consumer foods
Total
82.890 483.1
84 795.294389.488.7
86.586.389 394.590.1
92.191792.591.491.9
95.4101.6100 0103.6110.0
113.5115 3121.7146 4166.9
1810180.4189 9207.2226.2
239.5253 6259.3
251.02513252 6251.9252.8253 8
257 6256 3256 2254 0252.7252.9
256.4258.225712600262 3263.4
260.6259 7259 9257 8257 6258.2
Crude
99.4107.1101.3
92.2105.9112.8105.294.7
98.898.797.4103.594.3100.696.197.095.598.2
98.6104.8100.0107.5116.0
116.3115.8121.21607180.8
1812193.9201.0216.8233.1
237.2263.8252.5
257.9265.6279 7279.3263.1258.9
262.7256 9253 5253 8260.0273.9
280.6282.5263.3266.6259.9254.7
241.0239.2227.8232.0235.6247.2
Proc-essed
80.287.680.1
83.493.291.386.787.6
84.484.387.993.189.5
90.790.991.790.790.8
94.9101.0100.0103.0108.9
113.1115.1121.7143 9164.6
1813177.8187 3204.6223.8
237.8250.6257.7
248.4247.92481247.4249.8251.3
255.0254 2254 4252 0249.9249.0
252.1254.0254.5257.3260.3262.0
260.2259.4260.6258.0257.4257.1
Finished goods excluding consumer foods
Total
100.0102.6105.4
109.1113.1115.4120.1139.3
156 2166.1177 7190.7213.3
247.8273.3285.7
262.4265.5268 7272,1273.3274.1
274.7274.6274 72791280.0280.9
283.0282.4281.9281.1281.0283.4
286.7287.9286.6290.8291.9292.0
Consumer goods
Total
79.084.082.2
83.589.588.389.189.4
90.192.394.694.795.9
96.396.296.096.095.9
96.698.1100.0102.1104.6
107.7111.4113.5118.6138.6
1531162.6174 3186.7211.5
250.8276.5287.8
265.1268.5272 5276.1277.0277.7
277.9277.7277 92816282.4283.2
285.2284.9284.0282.3281.8284.8
288.8290.2289.1293.3294.6294.3
Durable
74.679.781.8
82.788.288.989.690.391.294.397.198.499.6
99.298 898.397.898.2
97.998.5100.0102.2104.0
106.9110.8113.3115.4125.9
138 2144.5152.8166.9183.2
206.2218.6226.7
214.9215.1214 0216.6218.1218.2
218.1218.3215 8224 5224.7225.4
226.2224.0223.9224.1225.0225.9
226.7227.5223.2231.1230.8231.5
Non-durable
80.785.882.3
83 690.087 888.688.9
89.491.193.292.694.094.794 794.895.194.895.997.81000102.2105.0
108.3111.7113.6120.5146.8
163 0174.8189.3200.0231.3
283.9319.6333.5
302.7308.4316 0320.4321.0322.0
322.5322.1324 2324 3325.4326.3
329.3330.3328.8325.7324.3328.7
335.3337.2338.4339.7342.4341.4
Capitalequipment
55.460 463.4
64971.272 473.674.576 782.487 589.891.591.791892.292.493.3
94.496.8100 0103.5106.9
112.0116.6119.5123.5141.0
162 5173.4184.6199.2216.5
239.8264.3279.6
254.6
258 1260.8262.5263.8
265.4265.8265 32715273.0274.1
276.2275.0275.8277.2278.1279.2
280.2280.7279.5283.8284.0285.1
finishedconsumergoods
80.586582.5
83 991.890 789.289.1
88.589.892.494.493.6
94.594394.694.194.3
96.199.4100 0102.7106.6
109.9112.9116.6129.2149.3
163.6169.7180.7194.9217.9
248.9271.3280.9
262.5265.0268.2270.6271.5272.3
273.5273.0273.12751275.2275.8
278.3278.6nil277.3217.1280.1
282.1282.8282.0284.2285.2285.1
See next page for continuation of table.
227
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-57.—Producer price indexes by stage of processing, 1947-82—Continued
[1967-100]
Year or month
194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I960196119621963::.:..:1964
1966:::::::::::::::::::196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 l
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSept
NovDec
1982:»Jan .FebMarAprMayJune::;::::::::::::
July
SentOctNovDec.
Intermediate materials, supplies, and components
Total
72.478.375.2
78.688.135.586.086.5
88.192.094.194.395.6
95.695.094.995.295.5
96.899.2
100.0102.3105.8
109.9114.1118.7131.6162.9
180.0189.1201.5215.6243.2
280.3306.0310.4
296.1298.3302.0305.8306.7307.2
308.5310.1309.7309.4309.0309.4
311.0311.1310.6309.9309.8309.9
311.1310.8310.7310.0310.1310.2
Foodsand
feeds3
:::::::::::::
100099.4
102.7
1091111.7118.51684200.2
195.31853190.5203.1226.1
252.6250,3239.6
2709261.3255.6254.9253.1253.2
251.1250.2243.5239.3235 2235.2
238.8239.4237.7240.92450245.1
243.6240.2238 4234 8234.6235.4
Other
70.076174.2
77 787.084 385.385.7
88.392.695.094.896.4
96.895.595.395.095.6
96.998.9
100 0102.5106.1
109 9114.3118.91281159.5
178.61894202.3216.5244.4
282 3310.1315.7
298 0301.0305.4309.5310.7311.2
312.7314.5314.6314.6314 5314.9
316.4316.4316.0315.1314 6314.7
316.1316.0316 0315 5315.7315.7
Materials andcomponents
Formanufac-
turing
72.177 874.5
78188.584 886.286.3
88.492.694.895.296.5
96.595.394.794.995.9
97.499.3
1000102.2105.8
1100112.8117.0127 7162.2
178.7185 4195.4208.7234.4
265 7286.1290.1
279 6280.3281.6284.1285.1285.8
287.9289.8290.2290.2289 5289.3
290.4290.9290.4290.62914289.8
289.2288.7290 2289 5288.9288.7
Forcon-
struction
66.073.173.2
77 084.383 785.185.5
88.993.594.094.096.6
95.994,694.294.595.4
96.298.8
100 0105.0110.8
112,6119.7126.2136 7161.6
176.4188.4203.4224.7247.4
268 3287.6293.5
279 2280.3282.7288.0288.5289.6
290.4290.7290.0290.1290.2291.1
292.0293.0293.3294.0293 7294.5
294.3293.5293.4293 2293.0294.5
Proc-essedfirolc
andlubri-cants
85.596.988.2
89.993.992 893.493.3
93.396.2
101.996.095.6
98.299.499.098.196.0
97.499.2
100097.698.5
105.0115.2118.91315199.1
233.02501282.5295.3364.8
503 0595.4591.8
5519569.8598.3608.5608.7605.7
602.0607.8601.4596.9595.1598.1
604.4596.8593.0579.9570.9581.1
600.7603.8593.2590 2594.3593.6
tainers
66.869.870.1
72.084.579.980.081.5
82.688.692.594.794.2
95.594.795.994.794.0
95.898.4
100 0102.4106.3
111.4116.6121.91292152.2
171.4180 2188.3202.8226.8
254 5276,1285.5
264.6268.2270.9274.3276.4277.2
278.8280.3280.6280.9280.6280.2
282.5285.5286.3287.0287.0286.5
286.3285.4285.5285.1284.7284.6
Supplies
77.581076.3
78 988.888 884.386.3
84.887.188.090.091.2
90.791.893.895.294.3
95.299.4
100 0101.0102.8
1080111.011561406154.5
168.11790188.7198.5218.2
244 5263.8272.2
257 8257.8258.9262.4264.0264.6
266.0266.1
267 2268.3
269.8270.4270,6272.12734273.4
273.1272.6272 5272 3273.0273.2
Crude materials for further processing
Total
101.2110996.0
104 6120.1110 3101.9101.0
97.197.699.8
102.099.4
97.096.597.595.494.5
99.3105.71000101.6108.4
1123115.1127.6174 0196.1
196.9202 7209.2234.4274.3
304 6329.0319.5
328 0336.5334.2336.3334.4335.4
337.3333.0327.4319 9313 9311.5
318.4321.6320.0322.6328 3325.6
323.4319.8316 3312 2313.4312.6
Food-stuffsand
feed-stuffs
111.7120 8100.3
107 6124.5117 2104.9104.9
95.193.197.2
103.096.2
95.193.895.792.990.8
97.1105.9100 0101.3109.3
1120114.2127.5180 0189.4
191.8190,2192.1216.2247.9
259.2257.4247.8
270 7267,1262,1263.5260.6264.3
267.2261.8253.4245.7238 3233.7
242.6248.3247.9254.4262 6259.9
255.5249.6242.9236 3236.3237.0
Total
:;;:::;::;:::
100 0102.2106.8
112.7117.0128.0162 5208.9
206.9228.5245.0272.3330.0
401.0482.3474.0
450.1484.9488.4492.1492.4487.4
487.2485.3486.0479.2476.3478.6
481.5479.3475.2469.9470 2467.7
469.8471.0474.3475 4479.0475.0
Other
Fuel
66.678778.3
77 979.479 982.779.0
78.884.489.290.391.9
92.892.692.193.292.8
93.596.3
100.0102.3106.6
122.6139.0148.7164 5219.4
271.5305.3372.1426.6507.6
615.0751.2866.3
677.4697.7703.6716.673B.4759,2
781.2766.7788.7779.0792.5813.0
812.9824.5839.7851.28648C83.9
901.3906.9926.3919.4955.3949.5
Other
90.6100791.6
104 7120.7104 6100.198.2
103.8107.6106.2102.2105.8
101.4102.5102.0100.7102.4
104.5106.71000102.1106.9
109.8110.7121.91615205.4
188.3206.7212.2233.1284.5
346.1413.7376.9
391.0427.9430,9432.5428.3418.1
413.1413.9410.2404.1397.8396.2
399.53918387.1378.8376 6370.0
369.2369.5369.6372.2369.5366.0
1 Data have been revised through August 1982 to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents. All data aresubject to revision 4 months after original publication.
* Intermediate materials for food manufacturing and feeds.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
228Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-58.—Producer price indexes by stage of processing, special groups, 1974-82
[1967=100]
Year or month
197419751976197719781979
198019811982 2
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:2
JanFeb..MarApr«h» ::JuneJulyAugSeptOctNov...Dec
Finished goods
Total
147.5163 4170.6181.7195.9217.7
247.0269.8280.6
260.9263.3266.0268 5269.6270.5
271.82715271.5274.3274 7275.4
277.9277 9277.3277.3277.8279.9
281.7282.32814284.1284 9285.1
Food
166.9181.0180.4189.9207.2226.2
239.5253.6259.3
251.0251.3252.62519252.8253.8
257.6256.3256.2254.0252.7252.9
256.4258.2257.1260.0262.3263.4
260.6259.72599257.8257.6258.2
Ener-gy
215.2252 4282.3326.7347.7469.9
701.3835.4823.4
758.1790.2838.78539854.2857.3
852.4842 0847.1841.6842 2846.6
842.3832 6814.0775.3758.2789.8
834.7844 3846 6841.7855 3845.9
Excluding food andenergy
Total
133.3148 5156.8166.3178.7194.7
216.4235.1248.5
228.2229.5230.2232 8234.0234.7
235.5236.1235.8240.72416242.3
244.7244 6245.2246.4247.3248.1
248.8249.52480252.7253 0253.7
Capi-tal
equip-ment
141.0162 5173.4184.6199.2216.5
239.8264.3279.6
254.6256.7258.1260 8262.5263.8
265.4265.8265.3271:5273.0274.1
276.2275 0275.8277.2278.1279.2
280.2280.7279 5283.8284 0285.1
Con-sumergoodsexclud-edand
energy
129.1141.0148.1156.6168.0183.3
204.2220.1232.5
214.4215.4215.82183219.3219.7
220.3220.9220.7225.0225.7226.2
228.6229.0229.5230.6231.5232.1
232.6233.3232 0236.7237.0237.4
Intermediate materials, supplies,and components
Total
162.9180 0189.1201.5215.6243.2
280.3306.0310.4 .
296.1298.3302.03058306.7307.2
308.53101309.7309.4309 0309.4
311.03111310.6309.9309.8309.9
311.1310.8310 7310.03101310.2
Foodsand
feeds1
200.2195.3185.3190.5203.1226.1
252.6250.3239.6
270.9261.3255.6254.9253.1253.2
251.1250.2243.5239.3235.2235.2
238.8239.4237.7240.9245.0245.1
243.6240.2238.4234.8234.6235.4
Ener-gy
188.72208236.8267.3280.3348.6
484.9573.6570.9
532.0548.8575.4585 3586.0583.4
580.6585.9579.7575.7574 0576.8
582.6575.7572.2560.2552.0561.4
579.3582.2572 4569.2572.4571.2
Other
156.7174.7185.0196.1210.4234.2
261.8283.4290.1
274.3275.9277.82813282.6283.4
285.5287.0287.7288.2288 2288.4
289.4290.2290.2290.7291.1290.1
289.6289.2290.3290.1290.0290.2
Crude materials for furprocessing
Total
196.1196.9202.7209.2234.4274.3
304.6329.0319.5
328.0336.5334.2336,3334.4335.4
337.3333.0327.4319.9313.9311.5
318.4321.6320.0322.6328.3325.6
323.4319.8316.3312.2313.4312.6
Food-stuffsand
feed-stuffs
189.4191.8190.2192.1216.2247.9
259.2257.4247.8
270.7267.1262.1263.5260.6264.3
267.2261.8253.4245.7238.3233.7
242.6248.3247.9254.4262.6259.9
255.5249.6242.9236.3236.3237.0
Ener-gy
223.02669283.1323.5362.5439.9
586.1783.4801.7
696.0782.67851790 5798,2793.5
793.6786.4795.7786.87912800.6
801.57969788.8778.5784.0792.0
799.4801.7810.0816.7830.2820.1
ther
Other
198.3165.0191.0190.1209.2253.0
269.4266.0238.2
274.1271.1275 5277 9272 7267.5
267.0269.0263.3257.8249 3?4fi?
?%!249 9248.5246.8243.7?34 3
232.9?m233.2?30fi227.5227.6
1 Intermediate materials for food manufacturing and feeds.2 Data have been revised through August 1982 to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents. All data aresubject to revision 4 months after original publication.
Source-. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
229Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-59.—Producer price indexes for major commodity groups, 1940-82
[1967 = 100]
Year or month
194019411942194319441945194619471948194919501951 ...19521953195419551956195719581959 ,I96019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977 . .19781979198019811982 •1981:
Jan ,.FebMar...AprMayJuneJulyAug
OctNovDec
1982: *JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAug , ,SeptOctNovDec
Farm products and processedfoods and feeds
Total
94.3101.589.693.9
106 9102.796 095.791290.693.798.193.593.793.794.793.893.297.1
103 5100.0102 4108.01117113.9122.4159.1177.4184.2183.1188 8206.6229.8244.7251.5248.9
257.9255.1253 5253.8252.9254.3256.8254 2250 3246.0242.5241.0
246.0248.4247.5251.6255 8255.3252.4249.6247.5243.9244.0244.8
Farmproducts
41.450.364.875.075.578.5909
1094117.5101.6106.7124 2117.2106 2104.798 296.999 5
103.997.597.296.398 096.094.698.7
105 9100.0102 5109.11110112.9125.0176.3187 7186.7191.0192 5212.5241.4249.4254 9242.3
264.5262.4260 7263.3259.6260.7263 3257 92511243.1237.4234.6
242.2247.1244.72506256 5252.7246.6240.8234.4229.1230.6232.5
Processedfoods and
feeds
82 988.780.683.492 791.687 488.985.084.987 491.889.489.591.091.992.592 395.5
1012100.0102 2107.31121114 5120.8148.11709182.6178.01861202 6222.5241.2248 7251.5
253.3250.2248 5247.6248.2249.9252 22512248 9246.6244 3243.6
247.1248.1248.125112544255.8254.6253.5253.6251.0250 4250.6
Industrial commodities
Total
44.047 350.751.552.353.058070 876.975.378.086184.184 885.086 990.893 393.695.395.394.894.894.795296.498 5
100.0102 5106.011001141117.9125.9153 8171.5182.41951209.4236.5274.83041312.3
291.5295.7299 6303.5304.7305.1306 2307 2307 4309.0309 3310.0
311.8311.63110309 9309 6310.6312.8313.2312.9314.4315.1315.0
Textileproducts
andapparel
103.6108.198.9
102.7114.6103.4100.898.698.798.798.897,098.499.597.798.698.599.299.8
100.1100.0103.7106.0107.1109.0113.6123.8139.1137.9148.2154.0159.8168.7183.5199.7204.3
193.1193.9195.2197.6199.2200.1201.3202.4202.9204.0203.6203.4
205.0205.6
2054205.4205.0204.1204.2203.8202.6203.5202.4
Hides,skins,
leather,and
relatedproducts
45.248.452.852.752.252.961183.384.279.986.399.180.181.377.677.381.982.082.994.290.891.792.790.090.394.3
103.4100.0103.2108.9110.3114.1131.3143.1145.1148.5167.8179.3200.0252.4248.9260.9263.0
258.2257.7261.2263.5263.7261.6261.1261.3261.7260.0259.8260.7
261.8261.6260.6263.4263.2261.8263.1262.0264.8264.7264.3265.2
Fuels andrelated
products,and
power»
51.454.656.257.859.560.164 476.990.586.287.190.390.192.691.391.294.099.195.395.396.197.296.796.393.795.597.8
100.098.9
100.9106 2115.2118.6134.3208.3245.1265.6302.2322.5408.1574,0694.5693.4
634.6667.5696.5707.2709.0707.6704.9704.3703.5698.1698.1702.5
705.1697.8689.7670.6662.2677.3701.1705.6701.8699.6707.3702.6
Chemicalsand alliedproducts *
52.457.063.364.164.865.270 593.795.987.688.9
101796.597 798.998.599.1
101.2102.0101.6101.8100.799.197.998.399.099.4
100.099.899.9
102 2104.1104.2110.0146.8181.3187.2192.8198.8222,3260.3287.6292.4
274.3277.6280.4286.0288.6290.5291.3293 3293 3292.4292.0291.8
292.9293.6294.6294.3295.0293.3291.6291.6291.4290.4290.5289.3
See next page for continuation of table.
230
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-59.—Producer price indexes for major commodity groups, 1940-82—Continued
Year or month
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964 . . .1965196619671968...1969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
1980198119822
1981:JanFebMarAprIVfayJ u n ' e :
JulyAiigSeotOcitNovDec
1982: 2
JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAug
OctNovDec
Rubberand
plasticproducts
57 161571673.611170.570 870.572 870.5
85.9105.495.589.190.4
102.4103 8103.4103 3102.9
103199.296 396.895 595.997 8
100.01034105.3
108 31091109.31124136.2150 2159.2167 6174 8194.3
217 4232 6241.6
224.8226.4228 4230 82318233.4
23212341235 7237 3238.0238 3
237 3239.3240.824112421242.5
242.0242.6243 3243 0242 6243.0
Lumberand
woodproducts
27.432 735.637.740.641.247.273.484.077.7
89.397.294.494.392.697.198.593.592.498.8
95.391.091.693.595.495.9
100.2100.0113.3125.3
113.6127 3144.3177.2183.6176.9205.6236.3276 0300.4
288.9292.8284.7
296.5294.7294.4299.4298 4298.1
296.5294.5289.3284.3282.1285.4
285.5285.2285.3286.5284.6289.0
288.6284.2283.0279.6279.9284.8
[1967
Pulp,paper,
andallied
products
72.575.772.4
74.388.085.785.585.587.893.695.496.497.3
98.195.296 395.695 496.298.8
100.0101.1104.0
108.21101113.41221151.7170.4179.4186.4195 6219.0
249 2273.8288.6
264.4267.2269.027142721272.9
274.9275.9277 8279 2280.4281.0
285 5286.3287.4288.5289 6289.5
289.1289.3289.2289.2289.6289.5
= 100]
Industrial commodities—Continued
Metalsand
metalproducts
37 838 539.139.039 039.644.354.962.563.0
66.373.873.976.376.982.189 291.090.492.3
92 491.991291.393 896.498 8
100.0102.6108.5
1166118 7123.5132 8171.9185 6195.9209.02271259.3
286.4300 4301.8
294.0294.0296.4298 82991298.4
302.0304.1304 9305 3304.2303.3
304 7304.2302.9303.1302 8299.3
299.5299.2301.8302.13010300.9
Machineryand
equipment
41.442142.842.442.142.246.453.758.261.0
63.170.570.672.273.475.781.887.689.491.3
92.091.992.092.292.893.996.8
100.0103.2106.5
111.4115 5117.9121.7139.4161.4171.0181.7196.1213.9
239.8263.3278.7
253.3255.3257.5259.6260.7262.1
264.8266.2268.1269.3270.4272.0
274.1275.4276.2277.6278.2278.6
279.6279.9280.3280.9281.3281.8
Furnitureand
householddurables
53 857 261.861.463163.267.177.081.682.9
84.791.890.191.992.993.395 898.399.199.3
99.098.497 797.097 496.998.0
100.0102.8104.9
107.5110 0111.4115.2127.9139.7145.6151.51604171.3
187.7198.5206.8
194.0195.2195.8196.4197 4197.3
199.5199.6201.0201.3202.1202.9
203.5204.6205.5206.0206.5207.0
206.8208.1207.7208.4208.3208.6
Non-metallicmineral
products
49150 252 352.453 555.759 366.371673.5
75.480.180.183.385.187.591394.895.897.0
97 297.697 697.197 397.598 4
100.0103.7107.7
112.9122 4126.1130.2153.2174.0186.3200.5222 8248.6
283.0309.5320.2
296.6297.9300.9310.8312.0313.6
314.3314.1313.2313.3313.7313.5
315.6319.0319.9320.2321.2320.9
321.1320.5320.2321.2321.5320.9
Transpor-tationequip-ment:Motor
vehiclesand
equip-ment3
40.443 247.247.247 548.356.064.170.875.7
75.379.484.083.683.886.391295.198.1
100.3
98.898.698.697.898.398.598.6
100.0102.8104.8
108.7114.9118.0119.2129.2144.6153.8163.7176.0190.5
208.8237.6251.3
229.0230.9229.5233.9236.0236.7
237.4238.4232.8247.8248.9249.5
250.8246.8246.8247.2249.2251.1
252.0252.8245.0258.1257.5257.9
Miscella-neous
products
73.576 578.0
79.283 983.485 686.486 587 690.292 092.2
93 093.393 794.595 295.997 7
100.0102.2105.2
109.9112 9114.6119.7133.1147.7153.7164.3184.3208.7
258.8265.7276.6
264.3264.9264.0266.0266.9266.3
263.2262.6267.0268.5267.5267.6
268.3273.5272.7273.2272.2271.5
273.4272.0280.3285.9285.7290.3
1 Prices for some items in this grouping are lagged and refer to 1 month earlier than the index month.2 Data have been revised through August 1982 to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents. All data are
subject to revision 4 months after original publication.3 Index for total transportation equipment is not shown but is available beginning December 1968.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
231Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-60.—Changes in producer price indexes for finished goods, 1950-82
[Percent change]
Year or month
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979198019811982 •
1981:JanFebMar
June
July
SeptOct
Dec:....:::..:::..1982:»
JanFebMarAprMay'::::::::::.::.June
JulyAugsept'::.::OctNovDec
Totalfinishedgoods
Dec.to
Dec.1
10.42.9
= 2 . 2.5
= .1
124.23.2
= .4
1 8- . 5
.1—• 2
3322163.14.82.23.238
11818.3
663.76.99.2
12.811.87.13.5
Unad-justed
1.4.9
1.0.9
.5
o1.0
.9
o_ 20.2.8.6
1.0
Yearto
year
1.89.5
- . 6= 1.0
22.83.62.3
80
=13.4
1732122.83.7
3.53.13191
15.310 84.46.57.8
11.1
13.59.24.0
Sea-son-
3justed
1.2
A.9
.43.2.6
.5— 2„ 1
To.5
- l l.5
Finishedconsumer
foods
Dec.to
Dec.1
13,35.3
-5 .9«2.2-1 .9
293.65.3
4=3.7
52= 1.8
.4
911.4
44.88.2
=2.55.980
22 513.055
- 2 56.9
1177.4
7.51.42.1
Unad-justed
0.7.1.5
- . 3
1.55
=-.0= .9- . 5
.1
1.474
1.1.9
-1 .1
— 8
Yearto
year
1.912.4= . 9
- 5 . 2= . 8
- 2 5- . 23.558
-4.722
.9-1 .2
.5386.5163.66.23.21.656
20 314.0
84— 35.39.19.25.95.92.2
Sea-son-
3justed
0.6- . 1
22.5.81
-2=.7
1.15
- 11.7.6.5
-1 .6
- I s- . 2- . 2
.1
Finished goods excluding consumer foods
Total
Oec.to
Dec.1
2.43.44.32.12 166
21.2726.26.98.3
14.813.38.84.0
Yearto
year
2.62.7
3.53.72041
16.0
1216.37.07.3
11.9
16.210.34.5
Consumergoods
Dec.to
Dec.1
8.2.9
-1 .11.6.3
172.51.7
2.84
= .3
:ii9
1.72.12.02.9
3.92.02074
20.5
67606.78.5
17,514.28.53.9
Yearto
year
1.67.2
- 1 . 3.9
82.42.5
.11.3
4- . 1- . 2
0_ l
.71.61 92.12.43.03.41 945
16.910 56.27.27.1
13.3
18.610.24.1
Capequip
Dec.to
Dec.1
10.33.4
.82.31.1568.34.31.31.0.1.2.3
.9
1.53.93,13.04.64.92.42053
22.6
8.26.47.37.98.8
11.49.24.0
talment
Yearto
year
2.49.71.71.71.2
307.46.22.61.9
2.1.4.2
1.0
1.22.53.33.53.3
4.84.12533
14.215.26.76.57.98.7
10.810.25.8
Percent change from preceding month
Unad-justed
1.61.21.21.3.4.3
.2
.01.6.3.3
.7
= 2- . 3- . 0
.91.2
1.5.4.0
Sea-son-
3justed
1.41.01.21.2.2.6.2
.8
.8
.4
.4
= .1= .4
1111.2
- l o:9.i
Unad-justed
1.61.31.51.3.3.3.1
_ i.1
1.3.3
J- .1- .3—6- . 21.11.4.5
- . 41.5.4
- . 1
Sea-son-allyad-
justed
1.41.11.41.2.0.5.12.5.8.9
.4- .3- 4—.7
1.4.8
.81.1
- . 1
Unad-justed
1.5.8
llo.7.5.6
22.3
.6
.4
.8- .4
.3
13.4.4.2
- . 41.5
.1
.4
Sea-son-allyad-
justed
1.2.9
>
.6
1.0.7.6
.5= .4
.5
.3
.4
.7
.4
.7=.1
.2
.3
.6
Finishedenergygoods
Dec.to
Dec.1
16.411.512.18.5
58.0
27.814.1
Unad-justed
2.24.26.11.8.0.4
.61.2.6
.5
=.5-1 .2-2 .2=4.8-2 .2
4.25.71.2.3
- i l l
Yearto
year
17.311.815.76.4
35.1
49.219.1
- 1 . 4
Sea-son-
3justed
1.93.8S.81.3
- . 8.4
- . 5= 11
=-.11.4.9
- . 9- 1 . 6- 2 . 6= 5 . 2- 3 . 0
4.25.71.2
.4- . 1
-' .7
Finished goodsexcluding food
and energy
Dec.to
Dec.1
6.15.66.38.39.4
10.77.84.7
Unad-justed
1.5.6
Is
.3
.3
.12.1
.'3
1.0= .0
A.3
.3
1.9
Yearto
year
11.45.66.17.59.0
11.18.65.7
Sea-son-allyad-
justed
1.2.5
i l l.4.6.4.6.3
1.0
.2
.7- .1
.3.5.2.6.4.6
— 1
Is
1 Changes from December to December are based on unadjusted indexes.zOata7iave been revised through August 1982 to reflect the availability of late reports and corrections by respondents. All data are
subject to revision 4 months after original publication.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
232
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
MONEY STOCK, CREDIT, AND FINANCE
TABLE B-61.—Money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-82
[Averages of daily figures; billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted]
Year and month
Ml
Sum ofcurrency,demanddeposits,travelers'
checks, andother
checkabledeposits<OCD) *
M2
Ml plusovernight RPs
andEurodollars,
MMMFbalances(genera!
purpose andbroker/
dealer), andsavings andsmalltimedeposits2
M3
NI2 plus largetime deposits,term RPs, andinstitution-only
MMMFbalances
M3 plus otherliquid assets
Percent change from year or 6months earlier3
Ml M2 M3
December:1959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982"
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSept:OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec"
140.9
141.9146.5149.2154.7161.9
169.5173.7185.1199.4205.8
216.5230.6251.9265.8277.4
291.0310.4335.5363.2389.0
414.5440.9478.5
417.9419.4424.4433.3429.2428.4
429.4431.1431.2432.9436.4440.9
448.6447.3448.3452.4451.5451.4
451.3455.2460.5468.4475.0478.5
297.7
312.3335.5362.8393.4425.1
459.5481.3526.6569.4591.3
628.6713.6806.4863.2911.2
1,026.91,171.21,297.71,403.91,518.9
1,656.21,822.71,999.1
1,665.71,678.21,701.11,723.21,732.41,740.9
1,753.71,772.41,778.31,789.51,809.91,822.7
1,841.31,848.11,865.31,880.91,897.71,908.2
1,923.81,946.81,955.01,968.21,987.21,999.1
298.9
314.3339.4369.7404.1440.2
480.7504.9558.6608.4614.1
675.2773.7882.8981.4
1,064.3
1,166.21,305.01,464.61,629.01,779.4
1,963.12,188.12,403.7
1,984.22,001.92,024.02,046.32,065.22,082.1
2,102.52,126.02,138.12,151.12,174.72,188.1
2,204.32,215.12,235.92,258.32,279.52,296.2
2,320.62,356.42,364.22,382.12,401.22,403.7
388.4
403.4430.5465.9503.7540.5
584.5616.5670.1733.9765.2
816.5903.2
1,023.61,143.81,249.8
1,376.61,531.41,724.31,938.92,153.9
2,370.42,642.8
2,397.32,418.22,438.02,455.52,483.12,506.6
2,530.42,559.72,577.22,600.02,629.32,642.8
2,667.92,690.52,717.22,744.22,774.42,799.5
2,831.92,858.2
0.73.21.83.74.7
4.72.56.67.73.2
5.26.59.25.54.4
4.96.78.18.37.1
6.66.48.5
10.37.26.88.85.76.8
5.65.73.2
- . 23.45.9
9.17.78.19.27.04.8
1.23.65.57.2
10.712.4
4.97.48.18.48.1
8.14.79.48.13.8
6.313.513.07.05.6
12.714.110.88,28.2
9.010.19.7
8.67.69.0
10.49.4
10.5
10.811.59.37.89.19.6
10.28.7
10.010.59.99.6
9.211.09.89.59.79.8
5.28.08.99.38.9
9.25.0
10.68.9
.9
9.914.614.111.28.4
9.611.912.211.29.2
10.311.59.9
11.710.811.812.311.912.5
12.312.811.610.510.910.4
9.98.69.4
10.29.9
10.1
10.813.211.811.311.09.6
1 Net of demand deposits due to foreign commercial banks and official institutions.2 M2 will differ from the sum of components shown in Table 8-62 by a consolidation adjustment that represents the estimated
amount of demand deposits and vault cash held by thrift institutions to service time and savings deposits.3 Monthly percent changes are from 6 months earlier at a compound annual rate.
Note.—See Table B-62 for components, except travelers checks not shown separately.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
233Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-62,—Components of money stock measures and liquid assets, 1959-82
[Averages of daily figures; billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Period
December:1959
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982"
1981:JanFeb .MarAprMavJune
JulyAugSept ....OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JutyAugiNovDec"
Cur-rency
28.9
?9 029.6W fi32.534.3
36.3
40 443.446.1
491WIVift61 567.8
73 880 688 697 4
106.1
116?123.1132.6
116?117?117.81191119.4119.7
120.51?0 7121.1121.3121.8123.1
123.8124.6125.1126.31?7 4128.4
128.8I?*)1)
no 5W ?Wfi132.6
De-manddepos-
its1
111.6
112 5116.5118.1121.7127.0
132.5134.6143.9155.1158.8
166.3176.8193.6202.5207.4
2141224.42396253.9262.2
267 2236.4240.2
254.1244 8243.0243.5240.4237.7
236.7236.6234.7235.7235.7236.4
239.3234.5233.0233.02327231.0
230.6231.1232 6236.22383240.2
Othercheck-
ablede-
posits
0.0
0.00
.1
1
2
.4
9?7428.4
16.9
26977.0
101.3
43 253359.566565.266.7
68.169 571.271.674 777.0
81.183.885.888.687087.5
87.490293 096 5
1007101.3
Over-nightrepur-chaseagree-ments(RPs)(net)
NSA
0.0
0.00.0.0
.0
111.62.5
142.5316.87.2
7513717 822122,7
30531.439.5
30 630431.931834.536.5
35.435 332.730.230 431.4
35.735.636.734.635 836.0
36.437 636839 740639.5
Over-nightEuro-
dollars
NSA
0.0
o.0.0.0.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
o.0o.0.0
o.0
102.03.6
456.76.1
52494.6506.56.4
6.9786.95.9656.7
7.57.36.35.8707.0
7.0696562666.1
Moneymarket
mutual fund(MMMF)balances
Gen-eralpur-poseandbro-ker/deal-
erNSA
0.0
n.0
n.0.0
.0nn
.0
.0
nooi
2.1
i??8?971
34.4
819151.2177.5
6S87S?85.4
%n98.8102.9
112.81???130.6137.3144 9151.2
154.9156.1159.4162.1164 6168.9
171.7180 618? 51841186 6177.5
Insti-tutiononly
NSA
0.0
o.0o.0.0
•f).0.0.0
onon
469
319.3
13933.743.1
15017 320.221319.520.1
21.623 326.629.432 033.7
32.530.531.531.532833.7
36.743143 944 845343.1
Sav-ingsde-
posits
146.0
1587175.0194.3213.9234.8
256.5?5?K263.3268.5263.2
259.3?908320 21?S9337.6
387 74*tl7490 4479.9421.7
3989343.6400.3
384 5378 5378.53788373.5366.8
361.03509343.1339.6340 9343.6
348.8348.6350.7350.53509349.9
344.0342 0342 43526362 3400.3
Smalldenom-ination
timede-
posits 2
11.8
12 915.220726.229.9
35.255.9790
101.9121.7
153 6192.0233 9267.6290.0
3409396545415339652.6
7517854.7904.2
76817757782.07841795.8805.5
814.08308839,7849.8856.6854.7
852.3859.4869.9881.6894.1900.9
919.7930.6932.6923.8923 0904.2
Largedenom-ination
timede-
posits2
1.2
203.96.9
10.715.2
21.223.131.037.420.4
45 057.673 2
111.2144.4
1298118.21452194 6221.8
257 9300.3332.6
267.52717269.8267.6278.3285.6
293.1299 8302.3302.2300.6300.3
302.6308.0312.6317.23216328.3
335.8339 6339 3342 53404332.6
Termrepur-chaseagree-ments(RPs)
NSA
0.0
0.00
!c.0
101.52.4
142.5337.18.4
9015.021027 530.2
37 835.433.6
39238136.136 737.738.8
37.233433.833.435 635.4
32.532.531.534.232631.2
29.332130 531333 533.6
TermEuro-
dollars(net)
NSA
0.7
81.41.61.92.4
1.72.12.12.92.7
2.22.73.65.48.0
9.713.118729.942.9
48.466.7
50.252252.152.657.057.9
58.761.061.263.465.566.7
69.973.874.478.583 384.8
84.281.5
Sav-ings
bonds
46.1
45746.546948.149,0
49.6SO?51251.851.7
52 0VH57 660 463.2
67 271776480.379.6
72367.7
71771070.670370.069.7
69.468968.467.967 767.7
67.867.867.767.767 767.8
67.767 6
Short-term
Treas-ury
secu-rities
38.6
36 737.039 840.738.5
40.743?38.746.159.5
49 2W341150 053.6
77.1811899
128.5
1567176.5
161.1163 6161.9157.6158.2160.3
161.8164.1168.1176.0179.9176.5
180.3186.4191.0191.71919194.8
199.9200.5
Bank-ers'
accept-ances
0.5
81.010
n1.2
1.51.61.72.23.2
3.33.53.34.7
10.6
8.48.8
11.821.426.5
31.839.7
32.432.533.334.535.636.4
37.137.337.637.138.139.7
40.2
37338.339.940.3
40.840.2
Com-mercialpaper
3.6
515.2687.79.1
10.214.417822.534.0
34 532.735241.950.1
48051.762979.297.0
981104.2
97.797 096.194.297.1
100.3
100.8102.4103.8104.4103.7104.2
105.5108.4110.3109.71121115.7
118.7112.0
'Demand deposits at all commercial banks other than those due to domestic banks, the U.S. Government, and foreign banks andofficial institutions less cash items in the process of collection and Federal Reserve float.2 Small denomination and large denomination deposits are those issued in amounts of less than $100,000 and more than $100,000,respectively.
Note, NSA indicates data are not seasonally adjusted.Travelers checks are a component of money stock but are not shown here.See also Table B-61.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
234
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-63.—Commercial bank loans and investments, 1939-82
[Billions of dollars]
Year and month
End of month >1939- Dec
1940- Dec1941- Dec1942- Dec1943- Dec1944- Dec
1945- Dec1946- Dec1947: Dec1948: Dec
1948- Dec1949- Dec
1950- Dec1951- Dec.1952: Dec1953- Dec1954: Dec
1955: Dec1956- Dec1957: Dec1958- Dec1959- Dec
I960- Dec1961- Dec1962- Dec1963: Dec1964: Dec
1965: Dec1966- Dec1967: Dec1968: Dec1969- Dec
1970: Dec1971: Dec1972- DecAverage for
month2
1972- Dec1973- Dec1974- Dec
1975- Dec1976: Dec1977: Dec1978- Dec1979- Dec.1980: Dec1981- Dec1982- Dec
1982:JanFebMar
June
JulvAUgSeptOctNovDec
Total loansand
investments
40.7
43950 767.4851
105.5
124 0114 0116.3114.3
Loans
Total
17.2
18 821.719.219.121.6
26131.138.142.5
Commercialand
industrial
Investments
US.Treasurysecurities
16.3
17 821841.459877.6
90674 869.262.6
Othersecurities
7.1
74726.86.16.3
738.19.09.2
Seasonally adjusted
113.0118.7
124.7130 2139.11431153.1
157.61616166.41812188.7
197 4212.82312250.2272.3
300.13161352.0390.2401.7
435.5485.7558.0
572 6647 8713.6
745 2804.6891.5
1,013.51,135.9
1,239.61316 31,412.4
132011332 41342 51,352.51,362.01,368.813761138311,389.41397 51398 51,412.4
41.542.0
51.156.562.866.269.1
80.688.191.595.6
110.5116.7123.6137.3153.7172,9
198.2213.9231.3258.2279.4
292.0320.9378.9
390 5460.5520.1517.4555.0632.5747.0849.9
915.1973.9
1,042.3
974.5985.2995.0
1,002.01,010.81,017.1
1 023.71028 31,033.51,038.11 036.41,042.3
39.4
42143.947 652.158.4
69.578 686.295.9
105.7110.0116.2130.4
137 5165 4196.9
1896190.9210.9245.9291.2
326.8358 0392.4
360.3365.53700373.1378.9383.4
386.7387 9392.5394.8392.0392.4
62.366.461.160.462.262 267.660.357.256.965157.7
59 965.364.761.560.7
57.153.559.460.751.2
57.860.662.6
65 858.553.682.2
100.899.893.894.5
110.0111.0130.9
114.1115.1114.4116.6116.3115.8116.5117.8118.2122.3126.4130.9
9.210.312.413.414.214 716.4
16.816.317.920.520.5
20.823.929.235.038.7
44.848.761.371.371.1
85.7104.2116.5
116.3128.8139.9145.6148.8159.3172.8191.5214.4231.4239.2
231.5232.0233.1234.0234.9235.9
235.9237.1237.6237.2235.8239.2
Loans plusloans soldto bankaffiliates
283.3294.7323.7381.5
393.1464.8524.8
521.8558.7637.1750.7852.9917.8976.7
1,045.2
977.4988.0997.8
1,004.81,013.51,020.11,026.51,031.11,036.41,040.91,039.31,045.2
1 Data are for December 31 call dates.2 Data are prorated averages of Wednesday figures for domestically chartered banks and averages of current and previous month-enddata for foreign-related institutions. Lease financing receivables are included in total loans and investments and in total loans.
—Beginning December 1981, levels have been reduced because of shifts from U.S. banking offices to International Banking« <IB?s).
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Note,Facilities
235Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-64,—Total funds raised in credit markets by nonfinancial sectors, 1974-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Item 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981
Total funds raised by nonfinancial sectors
U.S. Government
Foreign
Private domestic nonfinancial sectors
Corporate equities
Debt instruments
Debt capital instruments
State and local government obligations.Corporate bondsMortgages
HomeMulti-family residentialCommercialFarm
Other debt instruments
Consumer creditBank loans n.e.cOpen-market paperOther
By borrowing sector: Total
State and local governmentsHouseholdsNonfinanciai business
FarmNonfarm noncorporateCorporate
Debt instruments
Equities
Total funds supplied to nonfinancial sectors
Financed directly or indirectly by:
Private domestic nonfinancial sectors
Deposits and currency
Checkable deposits and currencyTime and savings depositsMoney market fund sharesSecurity repurchase agreementsForeign deposits
Credit market instruments
Corporate equities
Foreign funds
At banksCredit and equity instruments ,
U.S. Government-related loans, net „.,U.S. Government cash balancesPrivate insurance and pension reservesOther sources.. ,
See next page for continuation of table.
193.9
11.8
14.8
167.4
4.1163.3
100.6
16.519.764.4
37.36.9
15.15.0
62.7
9.932.6
6.613.5
167.4
15.553.998.0
7.820.269.9
65.94.1
193.9
123.5
73.7
8.565.3
2.4- 2 . 2
- . 2
50.4
- . 6
21.8
10.111.7
19.1- 4 . 633.4
.8
214.4
85.4
11.5
117.5
9.9107.5100.9
16.127.257.6
42.0- . 011.04.6
6.6
9.6-10.5
-2 .610.1
117.5
13.752.151.6
8.512.530.7
20.89.9
214.4
148.1
101.2
15.683.3
1.3.2
50.7
- 3 . 8
2.1
-=-8.710.8
23.22.8
39.7- 1 . 6
273.5
69.0
19.6
184.9
10.5174.3
123.6
15.722.885.1
63.93.9
11.65.7
50.7
25.44.44.0
16.9
184.9
15.289.580.2
10.215.454.5
44.010.5
273.5
173.5
133.4
17.8111.7
= .02.31.7
44,7
- 4 . 6
13.2
- 4 J17.9
20.43.0
47.715.7
334.3
56.8
13.9
263.6
2.7
260.9
169.8
21.921.0
126.994.3
7.118.47.1
91.1
40.226.72.9
21.3
263.6
15.4137.3110.9
12.328.370.4
67.62.7
334.3
184.0
148.5
25.5119.3
.22.2
1.3
39.0
- 3 . 5
43.51.2
42.3
17.6.9
60.727.5
401.7
53.7
33.2
314.8
3 R 9
198.7
28.420.1
150.2
112.19.2
21.77.2
116.2
48.837.1
5.225.1
314.8
19.1169.3126.3
14.632.479.3
79.4- . 1
401.7
219.7
152.3
25.6110.3
6.97.52.0
72.5
= 5.1
46.7
6.340.5
27.23.7
66.637.8
402.0
37.4
21.0
343.6
- 7 . 8351.5216.0
29.822.5
163.7
120.17.8
23.911.8
135.5
45.449.211.129.7
343.6
20.2176.5146.9
21.434.491.2
99.0- 7 . 8
402.0
258.9
151.9
27.282.234.46.61.5
122.9
- 1 5 . 9
22.7
25.6=2.9
31.8.5
60.028.1
397.1
79.2
29.3
288.7
12.9275.8
204.1
35.933.2
135.1
96.78.8
20.29.3
71.7
4.935.4
6.624.9
288.7
27.3117.5143.9
14.433.895.7
82.812.9
397.1
271.1
179.2
14.5127.829.26.5
1.1
89.7
2.1
5.6-23.0
28.6
29.0- 3 . 680.814.2
406.9
87.4
27.3
292.3
-11.5303.7175.0
32.923.9
118.3
78.64.6
25.39.8
128.8
25.351.119.233.1
292.3
22.3120.4149.5
16.440.592.6
104.1-11.5
406.9
291.3
221.0
27.882.9
107.52.5
101.9
-31.6
13.6
- 8 . 822.3
34.2
88.5- 2 0 . 8
236Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-64.—Total funds raised in credit markets by nonfinancial sectors, 1974-82—Continued
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Item1981
I II III IV
1982
I
Total funds raised by nonfinancial sectors
U.S. Government
Foreign
Private domestic nonfinancial sectors
Corporate equities
Debt instruments
Debt capital instruments
State and local government obligations....Corporate bondsMortgages
HomeMulti-family residentialCommercialFarm
Other debt instruments
Consumer creditBank loans n.e.cOpen-market paperOther
By borrowing sector: Total
State and local governmentsHouseholdsNonfinancial business
FarmNonfarm noncorporateCorporate
Debt instruments
Equities
Total funds supplied to nonfinancial sectors
Financed directly or indirectly by:
Private domestic nonfinancial sectors
Deposits and currency
Checkable deposits and currencyTime and savings depositsMoney market fund sharesSecurity repurchase agreementsForeign deposits
Credit market instruments
Corporate equities
Foreign funds
At banksCredit and equity instruments
U.S. Government-related loans, netU.S. Government cash balancesPrivate insurance and pension reserves
. Other sources
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
431.9
111.3
33.6
287.0
5.2281.8
192.7
36.025.0
131.8
93.44.4
25.38.5
89.1
26.522.811.328.5
287.0
27.1135.0125.0
19.237.168.7
63.55.2
431.9
309.3
284.0
69.739.2
148.416.99.7
40.9
-15 .5
21.8
-25 .447.227.214.179.3
-19.7
444.5
52.5
35.7
356.3
- 3 . 4359.7
200.3
34.224.5
141.6
96.95.7
29.49.5
159.4
32.272.610.144.5
356.3
23.1147.1186.1
20.546.5
119.1
122.5- 3 . 4
444.5
278.3
153.2
- 5 . 2108.359.9
- 1 . 6- 8 . 2
154.2
-29.0
55.0
24.031.0
23.3- 2 . 594.7
- 4 . 3
380.8
62.7
18.9
299.2
-24.6323.8
156.9
26.319.5
111.1
72.54.1
23.710.8
166.8
34.266.032.933.8
299.2
14.8128.1156.4
16.140.1
100.2
124.8-24 .6
380.8
285.5
217.5
- 6 . 6103.8137.3
-13 .8- 3 . 2
123.0
-55.0
3.2
11.9- 8 . 7
37.4- 7 . 295.0
-33.0
370.6
123.0
20.9
226.7
-23 .0249.7
150.0
35.026.488.6
51.64.2
22.610.2
99.6
8.343.222.325.9
226.7
24.371.7
130.7
9.638.582.5
105.5-23.0
370.6
291.9
229.2
53.280.284.38.62.8
89.5
-26.8
-25.7
-45.619.9
49.0- 3 . 885.3
-26.1
361.8
94.8
15.5
251.5
- 5 . 3256.8
159.7
38.320.3
101.2
67.26.2
20.57.3
97.1
6.669.912.28.4
251.5
25.682.1
143.8
5.628.0
110.2
115.5- 5 . 3
361.8
242.6
205.3
27.3148.237.6
.3
- 8 . 1
48.3
-11.0
-32 .9-46 .0
13.0
10.023.284.234.7
399.5
101.4
16.5
281.6
5.0276.6
153.6
57.516.779.4
51.83.9
20.13.6
123.0
25.486.6
- 5 . 316.4
281.6
46.997.2
137.4
11.332.893.3
88.35.0
399.5
296.5
149.7
-9 .5112.141.2
1.7
4.1
151.2
- 4 . 4
23.7-16 .3
40.0
10.1-29.6
99.1- . 4
479.7
221.2
1.3
257.2
.0257.2
172.9
54.342.576.2
51.47.1
11.06.6
84.3
8.246.6- . 930.4
257.2
39.281.6
136.5
12.525.998.0
98.0.0
479.7
329.9
204.6
-5 .8123.586.57.6
- 7 . 2
137.8
-12 .5
-40 .8-61.7
20.9
53.242.385.49.7
237Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-65.—Federal Reserve Bank credit and member bank reserves, 1929-82
[Averages of daily figures; millions of dollars]
Year and month
Reserve Bank credit outstanding
Total
U.S.Governmentand Federal
agencysecurities
Member bankborrowings
Total SeasonalOther
Member bank reserves1
Total Required
1929: Dec.1933: Dec.1939: Dec.
1940: Dec.1941: Dec.1942: Dec.1943: Dec.1944: Dec.1945: Dec.1946: Dec.1947: Dec.1948: Dec.1949: Dec.
1950: Dec.1951: Dec.1952: Dec.1953: Dec.1954: Dec.1955: Dec.1956: Dec.1957: Dec.1958: Dec.1959: Dec.
I960: Dec1961: Dec1962: Dec1963: Dec1964: Dec1965: Dec1966: Dec1967: Dec1968: Dec1969: Dec
1970: Dec1971: Dec1972: Dec1973: Dec....1974: Dec1975: Dec1976: Dec1977: Dec1978: Dec1979: Dec
1980: Dec1981: Dec1982: Dec...
1982:Jan..Feb..,Mar..
fcJune..JulyAugSept....OctNovDec P....
1,6432,6692,612
2,3052,4046,03511,91419,61224,74424,74622,85823,97819,012
21,60625,44627,29927,10726,31726,85327,15626,18628,41229,435
29,06031,21733,21836,61039,87343,85346,86451,26856,61064,100
66,70874,25576,85185,64293,96799,651
107,632116,382129,330139,896
143,250151,920159,968
152,297150,554146,815150,361151,333152,140
153,468153,903153,324153,666156,151159,968
4462,4322,510
2,1882,2195,54911,16618,69323,70823,76721,90523,00218,287
20,34523,40924,40025,63924,91724,60224,76523,98226,31227,036
27,24829,09830,54633,72937,12640,88543,76048,89152,52957,500
61,68869,15871,09479,70186,67992,108100,328107,948117,344126,276
127,895137,796146,358
136,657136,050133,635136,649138,809139,814
141,623141,791140,962141,443143,442146,358
801953
35490265334157224134118
142657
1,593441246839688710557906
87149304327243454557238765
1,086
321107
1,0491,29870312762558874
1,473
1,617642699
1,5261,7131,6111,5811,1051,205
510976455579
413213125413482
1165333
75132174167237239
225119102864733
39614299
114180482658654702822729842607
1,1191,3801,3061,0271,1541,4121,7031,4941,5431,493
1,7251,9702,3682,5542,5042,5142,5472,1393,3165,514
4,6994,9904,7084,6436,5857,4167,2427,876
11,11212,147
13,73813,48212,911
14,11412,79111,56912,13111,41911,121
11,17611,60211,38611,76812,13012,911
2,3952,588
11,473
14,04912,81213,15212,74914,16816,02716,51717,26119,99016,291
17,39120,31021,18019,92019,27919,24019,53519,42018,89918,932
19,28320,11820,04020,74621,60922,71923,83025,26027,22128,031
29,26531,32931,35335,06836,94134,98935,13636,47141,57243,972
3 40,09741,91842,172
43,21041,28039,23039,55839,55239,567
39,86440,17739,96340,58741,19942,172
2,347* 1,822
6,462
7,4039,422
10,77611,70112,88414,53615,61716,27519,19315,488
16,36419,48420,45719,22718,57618,64618,88318,84318,38318,450
18,51419,55019,46820,21021,19822,26723,43824,91526,76627,774
28,99331,16431,13434,80636,60234,72734,96436,29741,44743,578
40,06741,60641,354
42,78540,98138,87339,28439,19239,257
39,57339,86639,57940,18340,79741,354
1 Beginning December 1959, part of currency and cash held by member banks allowed as reserves; beginning November 1960 all suchcurrency and cash allowed.
Beginning November 1972, includes reserve deficiencies on which Federal Reserve Banks were allowed to waive penalties for atransition period In connection with bank adaptation to Regulation J as amended effective November 9, 1972. Transition period endedafter second quarter 1974.
Effective November 1975, includes reserve deficiencies on which penalties are waived over a 24-month period when a nonmemberbank merges into an existing member bank, or when a nonmember bank joins the Federal Reserve System.2 Data are for licensed banks only.3 Includes all reserve balances of depository institutions plus vault cash at institutions with required reserve balances plus vault cashequal to required reserves at other institutions.4 Reserve balances with Federal Reserve Banks plus vault cash used to satisfy reserve requirements less required reserves. (Thismeasure of excess reserves is comparable to the old excess reserves concept published historically.)
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
238Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-66.—Aggregate reserves of depository institutions and monetary base, J959-82
[Averages of daily figures; billions of dollars]
Year and month
1959- Dec .
I960- Dec1961- Dec1962- Dec1963- Dec1964- Dec
1965- Dec1966: Decig67- Dec1968- Dec .. .1969- Dec
1970- Dec1971- Dec1972: Dec1973- Dec . .1974- Dec
1975- Dec1976* Dec1977- Dec1978- Dec1979* Dec
1980- Dec1981* Dec1982- Dec"
1981:Jan .FebMar
MavJune
July
SeDtOctNovDec
1982:Jan ....FebMar . .AprMayJune
JulyAucSeDtOctNov0ecp
Adjusted for changes in reserve requirements'
Seasonally adjusted
Reserves of depository institutions
Total*
14.94
15.1315.6716.0416.4617.07
17.7717.8319.5120.7021.01
22.1323.5826.3227 6329.25
29.2929.8631.1732.8234.26
36.4637.9940.91
36 5236.5236 8537.02371837.20
37 2837 3437.7237 6037 6237.99
38.7138 2638 3638 4338.5038.58
38 5238 8039.5739.8840.4640.91
Nonbor-rowed
13.99
15.0615.5415.7816.1316.80
17.3317.3019.2819.9619.89
21.8023.4525.27263328.52
29.1629.8130.6031.9532.79
34.7737.3540.28
351235.2235 8535.6834 9535.17
35 60359236.2736 42369537.35
37.2036 4736 8036 8737.3937.37
37 8338 2938.6339.4039.8440.28
Required
14.43
14.3915.0915.4715.9716.66
17.3517.4919.1420.2820.72
21.8823.3926.0327 3328.99
29.0229.5930.9832.5933.93
35.9537.6740.39
361436.1736 5736.8536 9236.86
36.9437 0537.3137 3337 2737.67
38.3037 9637 99381638.1538.27
38 2138 4939.1839.4740.0640.39
Mone-tary
base3
44.3
44.545.747.149.451.9
54.756.860.564.867.9
72.077.184.290.398.3
104.5112.0121.4132.2142.5
155.0162.7175.1
155.4156.0156.7158.0158.5158.9
159.61600160.6160.81612162.7
164.3164.7165.2166 5167.7168.8
169.2170.1171.9172.8173.7175.1
Not seasonally adjusted
Reserves of depository institutions
Total2
15.22
15.4215.9616.3116.7117.32
18.0618.1619.8220.7221.00
22.1423.6326.3527.8529.59
29.7030.2731.6733.3734.83
37.1138.6641.59
38.0136.2836.2436.8836.8936.68
37.2437.0637.5237.7037 7838.66
40.0438.0537.8038 3338.1938.07
38.4338.5139.3540.0040.6841.59
Nonbor-rowed
14.28
15.3415.8216.0516.3817.06
17.6217.6319.5919.9719.88
21.8123 5125.3026 5528.86
29.5730.2231.1132.5033.35
35.4238.0340.96
36.6234.9735.2435.5434.6634.65
35.56356436.0636.5237.1238.03
38.5236.2636.2436.7637.0736.86
37.7438.0038.4239.5240.0640.96
Required
14.72
14.6715.3715 7416.2216.92
17 6417.82194520.2920.72
21.8923 4526.0627 5529.33
29.4330.00314833.1334.50
36.5938.3441.07
37 6435.9335.9636.7136.6336.35
36.9036 7737.1137.4237 4438.34
39.6237.7537.4438.0637.8337.76
38.1238.2038.9739.5940.2841.07
Mone-tary
base3
45.2
45 546.748150.452.9
55857961865.868.8
73.078285.4917
100.0
106 3114.1123 7134.8145.4
158 0165.8178.4
156 5154.3154 9157.0157.9158.4
160 5160 3160.2160 8162 6165.8
165.3162.9163.3165 6167.1168.2
170.0170 4171.4172.9175.1178.4
Reserve aggregates include required reserves of member banks and Edge Act corporations and other depository institutions.Discontinuities associated with the implementation of the Monetary Control Act, the inclusion of Edge Act corporation reserves, andother changes in Regulation D have been removed. Beginning with the week ended December 23, 1981, reserves aggregates have beenreduced by shifts of resemble liabilities to international banking facilities (IBFS), On the basis of reports of liabilities transferred toIBFS by U.S. commercial banks and U.S. agencies and branches OT foreign banks, it is estimated that required reserves were lowered onaverage by $10 to $20 million in December 1981 and $40 to $70 million in January 1982.
2 Reserve balances with Federal Reserve Banks (which exclude required clearing balances) plus vault cash at institutions with requiredreserve balances plus vault cash equal to required reserves at other institutions.
3 Includes reserve balances and required clearing balances at Federal Reserve Banks in the current week plus vault cash held twoweeks earlier used to satisfy reserve requirements at all depository institutions plus currency outside the U.S. Treasury, Federal ReserveBanks, the vaults of depository institutions, and surplus vault cash at depository institutions.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
239
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-67.—Bond yields and interest rates, 1929-82
[Percent per annum]
Year ormonth
U.S. Treasury securities
(new
3-month 6-month
Constantmaturities2
years years
Corporatebonds
(Moody's)
Aaa Baa
High-grade
munici-pal
bonds(Stand-ard &
Poor's)
Primecom-
mercial
months
Prime ratecharged by
banks *
Discountrate,
Federal
Bank ofNew York*
Federalfundsrate*
1929..
1933..
1939..
1940..1941..1942..1943..1944..
1945..1946..1947..1948..1949..
1950..1951..1952..1953..1954..
1955..1956..195719581959
19601961196219631964
1965..1966..1967..1968..1969..
1970..1971..1972..1973..1974..
1975..1976..1977..1978..1979..
1980..1981..1982..
0.515
.023
.014
.103
.326
.373
.375
.375
.375
.5941.0401.102
1.2181.5521.7661.931.953
1.7532.6583.2671.8393.405
2.9282.3782.7783.1573.549
3.9544.8814.3215.3396.677
6.4584.3484.0717.0417.886
5.8384.9895.2657.221
10.041
11.50614.07710.686
3.832
3.2472.6052.9083.2533.686
4.0555.0824.6305.4706.853
6.5624.5114.4667.1787.926
6.1225.2665.5107.572
10.017
11.37413.81111.084
2.471.63
2.473.193.982.844.46
3.983.543.473.674.03
4.225.235.035.687.02
7.295.655.726.957.82
7.496.776.698.299.72
11.5514.4412.92
2.852.40
2.823.183.653.324.33
4.123.883.954.004.19
4.284.925.075.656.67
7.356.166.216.847.56
7.997.617.428.419.44
11.4613.9113.00
4.73
4.49
3.01
2.842.772.832.732.72
2.622.532.612.822.66
2.622.862.963.202.90
3.063.363.893.794.38
4.414.354.334.264.40
4.495.135.516.187.03
8.047.397.217.448.57
8.838.438.028.739.63
11.9414.1713.79
5.90
7.76
4.96
4.754.334.283.913.61
3.293.053.243.473.42
3.243.413.523.743.51
3.533.884.714.735.05
5.195.085.024.864.83
4.875.676.236.947.81
9.118.568.168.249.50
10.619.758.979.49
10.69
13.6716.0416.11
4.27
4.71
ZM
2.502.102.362.061.86
1.671.642.012.402.21
1.982.002.192.722.37
2.532.933.603.563.95
3.733.463.183.233.22
3.273.823.984.515.81
6.515.705.275.186.09
6.896.495.565.906.39
8.5111.2311.57
5.895.82
5.816.256.466.977.80
8.457.747.607.968.92
9.009.009.029.56
10.78
12.6614.7015.14
5.85
1.73
.59
.56
.53
.66
.69
.73
.75
.811.031.441.49
1.452.16
• 2.332.521.58
2.183.313.812.463.97
3.852.973.263.553.97
4.385.555.105.907.83
7.715.114.738.159.84
6.325.345.617.99
710.91
12.2914.7611.89
5.50-6.00
1.50-4.00
1.50
1.501.501.501.501.50
1.501.50
1.50-1.751.75-2.00
2.00
2.072.563.003.173.05
3.163.774.203.834.48
4.824.504.504.504.50
4.545.635.616.307.96
7.915.725.258.03
10.81
7.866.846.839.06
12.67
15.2718.8714.86
5.16
2.56
1.00
1.001.00
M.00•1.0081.00
•1.00•1.00
1.001.341.50
1.591.751.751.991.60
1.892.773.122.153.36
3.533.003.003.233.55
4.044.504.195.165.87
5.954.884.506.447.83
6.255.505.467.46
10.28
11.7713.4211.02
1.782.733.111.573.30
3.221.962.683.183.50
4.075.114.225.668.20
7.184.664.438.73
10.50
5.825.045.547.93
11.19
13.3616.3812.26
See next page for continuation of table.
240
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-67 .—Bond yields and interest rates, 1929-82—Continued
[Percent per annum]
Year ormonth
1980:JanFebMarApr.;;;;May....June...
July....Aug....Sept...OctNov
...
...
...
Dec
1981:JanFebMar
tzz:June
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar....ApeMay,...June...
July....Aug....Sept...OctNovDec
U.S. Treasury securities
Bills(new
issues)1
3-month
12.03612.81415.52614.0039.1506.995
8.1269.259
10.32111.58013.88815.661
14.72414.90513.47813.63516.29514.557
14.69915.61214.95113.87311.26910.926
12.41213.78012.49312.82112.14812.108
11.9149.0068.1967.7508.0428.013
6-month
11.85112.72115.10013.6189.1497.218
8.1019.443
10.54611.56613.61214.770
13.88314.13412.98313.43415.33413.947
14.40215.54815.05714.01311.53011.471
12.93013.70912.62112.86112.22012.310
12.23610,1059.5398.2998.3196.225
Constantmaturities2
3years
10.8812.8414.0512.029.448.91
9.2710.6311.5712.0113.3113.65
13.0113.6513.5114.0915.0814.29
15.1516.0016.2215.5013.1113.66
14.6414.7314.1314.1813.7714.48
14.0012.6212.0310.629.989.88
10years
10.8012.4112.7511.4710.189.78
10.2511.1011.5111.7512.6812.84
12.5713.1913.1213.6814.1013.47
14.2814.9415.3215.1513.3913.72
14.5914.4313.8613.8713.6214.30
13.9513.0612.3410.9110.5510.54
Corporatebonds
(Moody's)
Aaa
11.0912.3812.9612.0410.9910.58
11.0711.6412.0212.3112.9713.21
12.8113.3513.3313.8814.3213.75
14.3814.8915.4915.4014.2214.23
15.1815.2714.5814.4614.2614.81
14.6113.7112.9412.1211.6811.83
Baa
12.4213.5714.4514.1913.1712.71
12.6513.1513.7014.2314.6415.14
15.0315.3715.3415.5615.9515.80
16.1716.3416.9217.1116.3916.55
17.1017.1816.8216.7816.6416.92
16.8016.3215.6314.7314.3014.14
High-grade
munici-pal
bonds(Stand-ard&
Poor's)
7.218.049.098.407.377.60
8.088.628.959.119.55
10.09
9.6510.0310.1210.5510.7310.56
11.0312.1312.8612.6711.7112.77
13.1612.8112.7212.4511.9912.42
12.1111.1210.619.599.979.91
New-home
mortgageviews
(FHLBB)3
11.8711.9312.6213.0313.6812.66
12.4812.2512.3512.6113.0413.28
13.2613.5414.0214.1514.1014.67
14.7215.2715.2915.6516.3815.87
15.2515.1215.6715.8415.8915.40
15.7015.6814.9814.4113.8113.70
Primecom-
mercialpaper.
months
12.6613.6016.5014.939.298.03
8.299.61
11.0412.3214.7316.49
15.1014.8713.5914.1716.6615.22
16.0916.6215.9314.7211.9612.14
13.3514.2713.4713.6413.0213.79
13.0010.8010.869.218.728.50
Prime ratecharged by
banks(high-low)4
15.25-15.2516.75-15.2519.50-16.7520.00-19.5019.00-14,0014.00-12.00
12.00-11.0011.50-11.0013.00-11.5014.50-13.5017.75-14.5021.50-17.75
21.50-20.0020.00-19.0019.00-17.5018.00-17.0020.50-18.0020.50-20.00
20.50-20.0020.50-20.5020.50-19.5019.50-18.0018.00-16.0015.75-15.75
15.75-15.7517.00-15.7516.50-16.5016.50-16.5016.50-16.5016.50-16.50
16.50-15.5015.50-13.5013.50-13.5013.50-12.0012.00-11.5011.50-11.50
Discountrate,
FederalReserveBank of
New York(high-low)*
12.00-12.0013.00-12.0013.00-13.0013.00-13.0013.00-12.0012.00-11.00
11.00-10.0010.00-10.0011.00-10.0011.00-11.0012.00-11.0013.00-12.00
13.00-13.0013.00-13.0013.00-13.0013.00-13.0014.00-13.0014.00-14.00
14.00-14.0014.00-14.0014.00-14.0014.00-14.0014.00-13.0013.00-12.00
12.00-12.0012.00-12.0012.00-12.0012.00-12.0012.00-12.0012.00-12.00
12.00-11.5011.50-10.0010.00-10.0010.00-9.509.50-9.009.00-8.50
Federalfundsrate5
13.8214.1317.1917.6110.989.47
9.039.61
10.8712.8115.8518.90
19.0815.9314.7015.7218.5219.10
19.0417.8215.8715.0813.3112.37
13.2214.7814.6814.9414.4514.15
12.5910.1210.319.719.208.95
1 Rate on new issues within period; bank-discount basis.3 Yields on the more actively traded issues adjusted to constant maturities by the Treasury Department.'Effective rate (in the primary market) on conventional mortgages, reflecting fees and charges as well as contract rate and
assuming on the average, repayment at end of 10 years. Rates beginning January 1973 not strictly comparable with prior rates.«For monthly data, high and low for the period. Prime rate for 1929-33 and 1947-48 are ranges of the rate in effect during the
period.6 Since July 19, 1975, the daily effective rate is an average of the rates on a given day weighted by the volume of transactions at
these rates. Prior to that date, the daily effective rate was the rate considered most representative of the day's transactions, usuallythe one at which most transactions occurred.
8 From October 30, 1942, to April 24, 1946, a preferential rate of 0.50 percent was in effect for advances secured by Governmentsecurities maturing in 1 year or less.
7 Beginning November 1979, data are for 6-months paper.
Sources: Department of the Treasury, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB),Moody's Investors Service, and Standard & Poor's Corporation.
241Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-68.—Consumer credit outstanding and net change, 1930-82
[Millions of dollars]
Year and month
Amount outstanding (end of month)
Total
Installment credit l
Total Auto-mobile
Revolv-ing 2 Mobile
home8 Other
Nonin-stallmentcredit4
Net change from preceding period
Total
Installmentcredit»
Total Auto-mobile
Nonin-stallmentcredit4
1950: Dec1951: Dec1952: Dec1953: Dec1954: Dec1955: Dec1956: Dec1957: Dec1958: Dec1959: Dec
I960: Dec1961: Dec1962: Dec1963: Dec1964: Dec1965: Dec1966: Dec1967: Dec1968: Dec1969: Dec
1970: Dec1971: Dec1972: Dec1973: Dec1974: Dec1975: Dec1976: Dec1977: Dec1978: Dec...1979: Dec
1980: Dec.1981: Dec
1981:JanFebMar....
%~June...
July...,Aug....Sept...OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar...,AprMay....June...
July....Aug....Sept...OctNov
25,64127,26832,55136,73638,19245,34849,26852,19152,70260,741
65,10467,63573,91782,80592,591
103,207109,749115,430126,949137,742
143,113157,795177,639203,077213,427223,140248,916289,133337,917383,363
388,239413,544
384,847383,232385,685388,857391,077394,531
397,210401,449406,234406,670407,970413,544
409,444406,682406,520408,109409,500412,599
413,366415,140417,624417,422419,768
15,50316,22020,47024,25424,89130,26933,17135,44335,33941,123
45,05146,02750,99457,82965,57273,88179,33983,14891,681101,161
105,528118,255133,173155,108164,594171,996193,525230,564273,645312,024
313,472333,375
310,760309,385311,071313,669315,679318,792
320,656324,161328,187328,652329,053333,375
330,135327,435327,131328,363329,338331,851
332,471333,808335,948334,977336,991
6,0155,9587,6359,6859,747
13,47114,48415,47214,25816,632
18,08317,59919,92422,84225,81729,35530,99231,13134,34836,946
36,32540,51947,86253,77254,26657,24267,70782,911
101,647116,362
116,838126,431
115,778116,195118,049119,076119,582120,400
121,476123,481125,703126,344126,385126,431
125,525125,294125,559126,201127,220128,415
128,359128,281129,085128,619129,594
2,1053,720
5,1288,5289,700
11,70913,68115,01917,18939,27448,30956,937
58,35263,049
57,55656,04755,35655,71655,82056,798
56,76457,28058,31858,45158,92363,049
61,43359,51458,49158,64158,64759,302
59,82460,47560,93260,91761,500
2,4617,2269,52613,58014,64214,43414,57314,94515,23516,838
17,32218,486
17,20217,11317,16217,34217,57617,704
17,76017,95918,12418,30018,38018,486
18,39718,34318,36318,40218,47918,543
18,60118,74118,77818,81418,821
9,48810,26212,83514,56915,14416,79a18,68719,97121,08124,491
26,96828,42831,07034,98739,75544,52648,34752,01755,22860,495
61,61461,98266,08576,04782,00585,30194,05693,434108,454121,887
120,960125,409
120,224120,030120,504121,535122,701123,890
124,656125,441126,042125,557125,365125,409
124,780124,284124,718125,119124,992125,591
125,687126,311127,153126,627127,076
10,13811,04812,08112,48213,30115,07916,09716,74817,36319,618
20,05321,60822,92324,97627,01929,32630,41032,28235,26836,581
37,58539,54044,46647,96948,83351,14455,39158,56964,27171,339
74,76780,169
74,08773,84774,61475,18875,39875,739
76,55477,28878,04778,01878,91780,169
79,30979.24779,38979,74680,16280,748
80,89581,33281,67682,44582,777
4,7891,6275,2834,1851,4567,1563,9202,923
5118,039
4,3632,5316,2828,8889,786
10,6166,5425,681
11,51910,793
5,37114,68219,84425,43810,3509,713
25,77640,21748,78445,446
3,271717
4,2503,784
6375,3782,9022,272-1045,784
3,928976
4,9676,8357,7438,3095,4583,8098,5339,480
4,36712,72714,91821,9359,4867,402
21,52937,03943,08138,379
1,537- 5 7
1,6772,050
623,7241,013
988-1,214
2,374
1,451- 4 8 42,3252,9182,9753,5381,637
1393,2172,598
-6214,1947,3435,910494
2,97610,46515,20418,73614,715
4,876 1,448 47625,305 19,903 9,593
Seasonally adjusteds
1,7041,9623,2083,5182,0782,708
2,7912,5573,430
5841,212
432
1,620-516
5542,0582,0012,279
992-1491,138
542,656
1,2061,8452,9712,7221,5712,031
1,5512,4282,9751,002600-33
44375990
1,1751,3991,349
57066
1,092-3242,523
31831
1,526648
-114149
1,0561,8592,0791,02456468
-121-56-28233959655
61-402505-781,816
1,518910
1,033401819
1,7781,018651615
2,255
4351,5551,3152,0532,0432,3071,0841,8722,9861,313
1,00419554,9263,503864
2,3114,2473,1785,7037,067
3,4285,402
498117237796507677
1,240129455
- 4 1 8612465
1,177-591- 4 3 6
883602930
422- 2 1 5
46378133
1 Installment credit covers most short* and intermediate-term credit extended to individuals through regular business channels,usually to finance the purchase of consumer goods and services or to refinance debts incurred for such purposes, and scheduled to berepaid (or with the option of repayment) in two or more installments. Credit secured by real estate is generally excluded.
a Consists of credit cards at retailers, gasoline companies, and commercial banks, and check credit at commercial banks. Prior to1968, included in "other," except gasoline companies, included in noninstallment credit prior to 1971. Beginning 1977, includes open-end credit at retailers, previously included in other. Also beginning 1977, some retail credit was reclassified from commercial intoconsumer credit.
4 Because of inconsistencies in the data and infrequent benchmarking, series on noninstallment credit is no longer published by theFederal Reserve Board on a regular basis. Data are shown here as a general indication of trends.
o For installment credit, computed as the difference between extensions and liquidations (both seasonally adjusted); see also TableB-69. For noninstallment credit, computed as the change from one month to another in the seasonally adjusted amount outstanding.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
242
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-69.—Consumer installment credit extended and liquidated, 1950-82
[Millions of dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or monthTotal
Ex-tended
Liqui-dated
Automobile
Ex-tended
Liqui-dated
Revolving *
Ex-tended
Liqui-dated
Mobile home2
Ex-tended
Liqui-dated
Other
Ex-tended
Liqui-dated
1950...1951...1952...1953...1954...,1955....1956....1957....1958....1959...,
1960...1961....1962...1963...1964...1965...1966...,1967...,1968....1969...,
1970...,1971...,1972...1973....1974...,1975...,1976...,1977...,1978...,1979...
1980...,1931...,
1981:Jan..,Feb..Mar.,
feJune,July.Aug.SeptOct..Nov.Dec.
1982:Jan..Feb..Mar.Apr..May.JuneJuly.Aug.SeptOct..Nov.
22,13024,58330,61632,57932,26540,26340,88643,10140,95649,134
50,82750,59857,56264,66072,44579,91883,82189,058
101,426109,422
115,007138,046152,275173,035172,765180,083210,740257,600297,668324,777
306,076336,341
27,46628,68229,37029,27128,37729,223
28,29028.32329,40626,83627,37026,656
26,88827,15027,46228,68429,19729,737
27,51427,57928,26828,06231,610
18,86123,86726,35528,79431,62534,88237,89940,75941,29043,395
47,02249,73552,60157,82264,61671,61678,36585,19492,07599,945
110,352127,789136,787152,817163,276172,675189,179222,138254,589286,396
304,628316,447
26,26026,83726,39926,54926,80627,192
26,73925,89526,43125,83426,77026,689
26,44527,07526,47227,50927,79828,388
26,94427,51327,17628,38629,087
8,4458,951
11,61012,74011,74116,73215,57216,55414,28718,008
18,11216,47720,16422,61724,79227,91327,84427,62332,22833,686
30,85736,70643,70249,60646,51452,42063,74375,64187,98193,901
83,45494,404
7,3438,2298,4997,4597,3847,515
8,0598,3969,0007,4908,0737,352
7,4747,2837,1837,8718,4298,182
7,3327,1127,5467,97010,329
6,9069,0089,93210,68911,67913,00814,55915,56715,50115,638
16,66116,96017,84019,69921,81524,38626,20627,48229,01331.090
31,41432,51238,08143,69646,01949,44453,27860,43769,24579,186
82,97784,809
7,3127,3986,9736,8117,4987,366
7,0036,5376,9216,4667,5097,284
7,5957,3397,2117,6387,4707.5277,2717,5147,0418,0488,513
3,4816,182
8,68921,86224,65928,70233,21336,95643,93487,596105,125120,174
128,068140,135
11,53511,73811,62012,38311,87612,658
11,70611,66312,26311,75311,37911,592
11,07011,73012,14312,41612,52813,361
12,55112,49712,46412,34012,489
2,7264,567
7,27820,81823,48526,69931,24335,61641,76481,34896,090111,546
126,653135,438
10.94411,41911,11011,44311,52011,651
11,59011,48611,69211,42911,35811,533
11,26611,88511,83611,91711,99112,85411,93912,35412,25412,23212,382
6122,5215,1217,0615,7884,3264,8595,7125,4126,471
5,0936,028
392405616593620509
445520532475479508
434364411544478459
441581452476484
4781,7542,9754,1844,7204,5364,7205,3415,1264,868
4,6104,867
451492552410372399
386364375353404365
460408396493408392
378440442480444
13,68515,63219,00619,83920,52423,53125,31426,54726,66931,126
32,71534,12137,39842,04347,65352,00555,97761,43565,71769,554
74,84976,95778,79387,66687,25086,38198,20488,65199,150104,231
89,46195,774
8,1968,3108,6358,8368,4978,541
7,7447,6117,1187,4397,204
7,9107,7737,7257,8537,7627,735
7,1907,3897,8067,2768,308
11,95514,85916,42318,10519,94621,87423,34025,19225,78927,757
30,36132,77534,76138,12342,80147,23052,15957,71260,33664,288
71,18872,70572,24678,23881,29483,07989,41775,01284,12890,796
90,38891,333
7,5537,5287,7647,8857,4167,776
7,7607,5087,4437,5867,4997,507
7,1247,4437,0297,4617,9297,615
7,3567,2057,4397,6267,748
1 Consists of credit cards at retailers, gasoline companies, 2nd commercial banks, and check credit at commercial banks. Prior to1968, included in "other," except gasoline companies, included in noninstallment credit prior to 1971. Beginning 1977, includes open-end credit at retailers, previously included in ''other/' Also beginning 1977, some retail credit was reclassified from commercial intoconsumer credit.
2 Not reported separately prior to July 1970.Note.—Installment credit covers most short- and intermediate-term credit extended to individuals through regular business channels,
usually to finance the purchase of consumer goods and services or to refinance debts incurred for such purposes, and scheduled to berepaid (or with the option of repayment) in two or more installments. Credit secured by real estate is generally excluded.
Liquidated credit includes repayments, chargeoffs, 2nd other credit.See also Table 6-68.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
243Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-70.—Mortgage debt outstanding by type of property and of financing, 1939-82
[Billions of dollars]
End of yearor quarter
Allproper-
ties
35.5
36.537.636.735.334.7
35.541.848.956.262.7
72.882.391.4
101.3113.7
129.9144.5156.5171.8190.8
207.5228.0251.4278.5305.9
333.3356.5381.2410.9441.4
474.2526.5603.4681.6744.3
806.1893.0
1,022.61,173.61,337.7
1,471.81,583.5
1,371.11,398.11,435.51,471.8
1,497.61,533.21,561.61,583.5
1,602.81,624.21,635.8
Farmproper-
ties
6.6
6.56.46.05.44.9
4.84.95.15.35.6
6.16.77.2778.2
9.09.8
10.411.112.1
12.813.915.216.818.9
21.223.125.127.429.2
30.332.235.841.346.3
51.156.663.670.882.7
92.0101.7
86.089.090.692.0
94.597.5
100.0101.7
103.6105.5106.7
Nonfarm properties
Total
28.9
30.031.230.829.929.7
30.836.943.950.957.1
66.775.684.293.6
105.4
120.9134.6146.1160.7178.7
194.7214.1236.2261.7287.0
312.1333.4356.1383.5412.2
443.8494.3567.7640.3698.0
755.0836.4958.9
1,102.81,255.1
1,379.81,481.8
1,285.11,309.01,344.91,379.8
1,403.11,435.71,461.61,481.8
1,499.21,518.71,529.1
1- to 4-familyhouses
16.3
17.418.418.217.817.9
18.623.028.233.337.6
45.251.758.566.175.7
88.299.0
107.6117.7130.9
141.9154.6169.3186.4203.4
220.5232.9247.3264.8283.2
298.1328.3372.2415.5451.2
495.0560.7657.8770.6891.1
987.01,060.5
914.3931.6960.7987.0
1,004.01,028.31,047.61,060.5
1,071.91,085.21.092.3
Multi-familyproper-
ties
5.6
5.75.95.85.85.6
5.76.16.67.58.6
10.111.512.312.913.5
14.314.915.316.818.7
20.323.025.829.033.6
37.240.343.947.352.2
60.170.1B2.S93.1
100.0
100.6104.5111.5120.7128.4
137.1141.4
130.0132.4134.6137.1
138.1139.3140.2141.4
142.9143.8144.7
Com-mercialproper-ties1
7.0
6.97.06.76.36.2
6.47.79.1
10.210.8
11.512.513.414.516.3
18.320.723.226.129.2
32.436.541.146.250.0
54.560.164.871.476.9
85.695.9
1127131.7146.9
159.3171.2189.6211.4235.6
255.7279.9
240.9245.1249.6255.7
261.0268.1273.7279.9
284.4289.7292.2
Nonfarm properties by type of mortgage
Government underwritten
Total2
1.8
2.33.03.74.14.2
4.36.39.8
13.617.1
22.126.629.332.136.2
42.947.851.655.259.3
62.365.669.473.477.2
81.284.188.293.4
100.2
109.2120.7131.1135.0140.2
147.0154.1161.7176.4199.0
225.1239.0
207.5211.6218.9225.1
229.1233.6237.0239.0
240.6
1- to 4-family houses
Total
1.8
2.33.0374.14.2
4.36.19.3
12.515.0
18.822.925.428.132.1
38.943.947.250.153.8
56.459.162.265.969.2
73.176.179.984.490.2
97.3105.2113.0116.2121.3
1277133.5141.6153.4172.9
195.2207.6
180.8184.1190.0195.2
198.8202.7205.9207.6
209.0
FHAinsured
1.8
2.33.03.74.14.2
4.1373.85.36.9
8.597
10.812.012.8
14.315.516.519.723.8
26729.532.335.038.3
42.044.847.450.654.5
59.965.768.266.265.1
66.166.568.071.481.0
93.6101.3
86.087.490.693.6
95.798.1
100.0101.3
102.0
VAguar-
anteed
I0.22.45.57.28.1
10.313,214.616.119.3
24.628.430.730.430,0
29.729.629.930.930.9
31.131.332.533.835.7
37.339.544.750.056.2
61.667.073.682.092.0
101.6106,2
94.896799.4
101.6
103.1104.6105.9106.2
107.0
Conventional3
Total
27.1
27.728.227.125.825.5
26.530.634.137.340.0
44.749.154.961.569.3
78.086.894.6
105.5119.4
132.3148.5166.9188.2209.8
231.0249.3267.9290.1312.0
334.6373.5436.5505.3557.8
608.0682.3797.2926.4
1,056.1
1,154.71,242.8
1,077.61,097.41,126.01,1547
1,174.01,202.01,224.61,242.8
1,258.6
1- to 4-familyhouses
14.5
15.115.414.5137137
14.316.918.920.822.6
26.328.933.238.043.6
49.355.160.467.677.0
85.595.5
107.1120.5134.1
147.4156.9167.4180.4193.0
200.8223.1259.2299.2329.9
367.3427.1516.2617.3718.1
791.8852.9
733.4747.5770.7791.8
805.2825.68417852.9
862.9
1939
1940..,..1941194219431944
19451946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
1980:IIIIllIV
1981:|II .."IIIIIV
1982:
in""!!!;
1 Includes negligible amount of farm loans held by savings and loan associations.2 Includes FHA insured multifamily properties, not shown separately.8 Derived figures. Total includes multifamily and commercial properties, not shown separately.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, based on data from various Government and private organizations.
244
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-71-—Mortgage debt outstanding by bolder, 1939-82
[Billions of dollars]
End of yearor quarter
1939
19401941194219431944
19451946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
1980:I.||IllIV
1981:IIIIllIV
1982:
||HI
Total
35.5
36.537.636 735.334.7
35.541.848 956.262.7
72.882 3914
101.3113.7
129 9144.515651718190.8
207 5228.0251.4278 5305.9
333 3356.5381.24109441.4
474 2526 5603.4681.6744 3
806.1893 0
1,022.61,173.61,337.7
1,471.81,583.5
1,371.11,398.11,435 51,471.8
1,497.61,533.21,561.61,583.5
1,602.81,624.21,635.8
Major financial institutions
Total
18.6
19.520.720.720.220.2
21.026.031.837.842.9
51.759.566.975.185.7
99.3111.2119.7131.5145.5
157.6172.6192.5217.1241.0
264.6280.8298.8319.9339.1
355.9394.2450.0505.4542.6
581.2647.5745.0848.2938.6
997.21,040.6
951.2958.8977.5997.2
1,006.91,023.11,033.81,040.6
1,041.51,042.71,028.8
Savingsand loanassocia-
tions
3.8
4.14.64.64.64.8
5.47.18.9
10.311.6
13.715.618.422.026.1
31435.740.045.653.1
60168.878.890.9
101.3
110 3114.4121.8130.8140.2
150.3174.3206.2231.7249.3
278.6323.0381.2432.8475.7
503.2518.4
479.0481.1492.1503.2
507.6515.3518.8518.4
515.9512.7495.4
Mutualsavingsbanks
4.8
4.94.84.64.44.3
4.24.44.95.86.7
8.39.9
11.412.915.0
17.519.721.223.325.0
26.929.132.336.240.6
44.647.350.553.556.1
57.962.067.673.274.9
77,281.688.195.298.9
99.9100.0
99.299.299.399.9
99.7100.010O.O100.0
97.596.394.2
Commer-cial
banks i
4.3
4.64.94.74.54.4
4.87.29.4
10.911.6
13.714.715.916.918.6
21.022.723.325.528.1
28.830.434.539.444.0
49.754.459.065.770.7
73.382.599.3
119.1132.1
136.2151.3179.0214.0245.2
263.0284.5
250.7253.0258.0263.0
266.7273.2279.0284.5
289.4294.0298.3
Lifeinsur-ancecom-
panies
5.7
6.06.46.76.76.7
6.67.28.7
10.812.9
16.119.321.323.326.0
29.433.035.237.139.2
41.844.246.950.555.2
60.064.667.570.072.0
74.475.576.981.486.2
89.291.696.8
106.2118.8
131.1137.7
122.4125.6128.1131.1
132.9134.7136.0137.7
138.8139.5140.8
Other holders
Federaland
relatedagen-cies2
5.0
4.94.74.33.63.0
2.42.01.81.82.3
2.83.54.14.64.8
5.36.27.78.0
10.2
11.512.212.611.812.2
13.517.520.925.131.1
38.346.454.664.882.1
101.0116.6f40.3170.4215.7
256.6289.1
228.6238.2247.1256.6
263.5271.4279.9289.1
301.0315.1333.2
Individ-uals andothers
11.9
12.012.211.711.511.5
12.113.815.316.617.5
18.419.320.421.723.2
25.327.129.132.335.1
38.443.146.349.552.7
55.258.261.465.971.2
79.985.998.9
111.4119.7
123.8128.9137.2155.0183.4
218.1253.8
191.4201.1210.9218.1
227.2238.6247.9253.8
260.3266.4273.8
1 Includes loans held by nondeposit trust companies, but not by bank trust departments.2 Includes former Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and new Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), as well
as Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Administration, Public Housing Administration, Farmers Home Administration, and in earlieryears Reconstruction Finance Corporation, Homeowners Loan Corporation, and Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation. A!so includes GNMAPools and U.S.-sponsored agencies such as new FNMA, Federal Land Banks, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Other U.S.agencies (amounts small or current separate data not readily available) included with "individuals and others.
Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, based on data from various Government and private organizations.
245Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
TABLE B-72.—Federal budget receipts, outlays, and debt, fiscal years 1973-84
[Millions of dollars; fiscal years]
Description
BUDGET RECEIPTS AND OUTLAYS:
Total receipts
Federal fundsTrust funds
Interfund transactions
Total outlays
Federal fundsTrust funds
Interf und transactions
Total surplus or deficit ( - )
Federal funds
Trust funds
OUTSTANDING DEBT, END OF PERIOD:
Gross Federal debt
Held by Government agenciesHeld by the public
Federal Reserve SystemOther
BUDGET RECEIPTSIndividual income taxesCorporation income taxesSocial insurance taxes and contribu-
tionsExcise taxesEstate and gift taxesCustoms dutiesMiscellaneous receipts:
Deposits of earnings by FederalReserve System
AH otherBUDGET OUTLAYS
National defenseInternational affairsGeneral science, space, and technol-, ogyEnergyNatural resources and environmentAgricultureCommerce and housing creditTransportation...Community and regional development..Education, training, employment, and
social servicesHealthIncome securityVeterans benefits and servicesAdministration of justiceGeneral governmentGeneral purpose fiscal assistanceNet interestAllowancesUndistributed offsetting receipts
Composition of undistributed offset-tine receipts:
Employer share, employee retire-ment
Rents and royalties on the OuterContinental Shelf
1973
230,799
161,35790,76621,325
245,647
186,95180,021
-21,325
= 14,849
=25,59310,745
468,426
125,381343,045
75,181267,863
230,799
103,24636,153
63,11516,2604,9173,188
3,495425
245,647
74,5414,066
4,0301.1794,7634,852
9249,0654,595
12,73517,40572,96512,0132,1312,5687351
17,346
-6,882
-2,927
-3,956
1974
263,224
181,219103,138
-21,133
267,912
199,91889,126
= 21,133
-4,688
14,011
486,247
140,194346,053
80,648265,405
263,224
118,95238,620
75,07116,8445,0353,334
4,845523
267,912
-10,068
=3,319
-6,748
1975
279,090
187,505116,683-25,098
324,245
240,081109,261-25,098
-=45,154
-52,5767,422
544,131
147,225396,906
84,993311,913
279,090
122,38640,621
84,53416,5514,6113,676
5,777935
324,245
77,7815,681
3,977837
5,6702,2273,9259,1724,134
12,34420,36484,43713,3862,4623,2436,890
21,449
85,5526,922
3,989
MS1,6595,607
10,3883,738
15,87025,742
108,57616,5972,9423,1337,187
23,244
=6,408
-3,980
-2.428
Actual^
1976
298,060
201.099131,750-34,789
364,473
269,921129,341-=34,789
= 66,413
-68,8222,409
631,866
151,566480,300
94,714385,586
298,060
131,60341,409
90,76916,9635,2164,074
5,4512,576
364,473
89,4305,554
4,3703,1278,124215023,792
13,4354,767
18,73731,503127,39018,4323,3202,9487,235
26,711
^6,904
-4,242
=2,662
Transitionquarter
81,232
54,08531,530-4,383
94,188
65,08833,482-4,383
-12,956
-11,004-=1,952
646,379
148,052498,327
96,702401,625
81,232
38,8018,460
25,2194,4731,4551,212
1,500111
94,188
22,3072,191
1,161794
2,532584
1,3923,3041,340
5,1628,181
32,7973,962859883
2,0926,946
-2,296
=985
-1,311
1977
355,559
241,312150,560= 36,313
400,506
295,756141,063-36,313
=44,948
=54,4449,496
709,138
157,295551,843
105,004446,839
355,559
157,62654,892
106,48517,5487,3275,150
5,908623
400,506
97,5014,819
-6,922
-4,548
-2,374
1978
399,561
270,490165,568=36,498
448,368
331,991152,874-36,498
=48,807
=61,50112,694
780,425
169,477610,948
115,480495,468
399,561
180,98859,952
120,96718,3765,2856,573
6,641778
448,368
105,1865,922
4,6774,172
10,0005,526
9814,6366,348
20,98536,582
137,90018,0383,6003,1699,499
29,877
4,7425,861
10,9257,7313,331
15,44511,070
26,46341,232
146,18018,9743,8023,7069,601
35,435
- 7,242
-4,983
=2,259
See next page for continuation of table.
246Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-72.—Federal budget receipts, outlays, and debt, fiscal years 1973-84—Continued
[Millions of dollars; fiscal years]
DescriptionActual
1979 1980 1981 1982
Estimates
1983 1984
BUDGET RECEIPTS AND OUTLAYS:
Total receipts
Federal fundsTrust fundsInterfund transactions..
Total outlays..
Federal fundsTrust fundsInterf und transactions....
Total surplus or deficit ( - ) . .
Federal funds...Trust funds
OUTSTANDING DEBT, END OF PERIOD:
Gross Federal debt
Held by Government agencies..Held by the public
Federal Reserve System..Other
463,302
316,366186,988-40,052
490,997
362,396168,653-40,052
-27,694
-46,03018,335
833,751
189,162644,589
115,594528,996
517,112
350,856210,930-44,674
576,675
419,220202,129-44,674
-59,563
-68,3648,801
914,317
199,212715,105
120,846594,259
599,272
410,422239,413-50,563
657,204
475,171232,596-50,563
-57,932
-64,7496,817
1,003,941
209,507794,434
124,466669,968
617,766
409,253268,407-59,894
728,375
526,113262,155-59,894
-110,609
-116,8606,252
1,146,987
217,560929,427
134,497794,929
597,494
376,945314,755-94,206
805,202
603,047296,361-94,206
-207,708
-226,10218,393
1,383,744
239,3171,144,427
659,702
404,745330,210-75,253
848,483
610,467313,269
-75,253
-188,781
-205,72116,941
1,606,339
258,9121,347,427
BUDGET RECEIPTS...
Individual income taxesCorporation income taxesSocial insurance taxes and contributionsExcise taxesEstate and gift taxesCustoms dutiesMiscellaneous receipts:
Deposits of earnings by Federal ReserveSystem
Allother
BUDGET OUTLAYS..
National defenseInternational affairsGeneral science, space, and technologyEnergy .\Natural resources and environmentAgricultureCommerce and housing creditTransportationCommunity and regional developmentEducation, training, employment, and social serv-
ices ,HealthIncome securityVeterans benefits and servicesAdministration of justiceGeneral governmentGeneral purpose fiscal assistanceNet interestAllowancesUndistributed offsetting receipts
463,302
217,84165,677
138,93918,7455,4117439
8,327925
490,997
117,6816,0915,0416,856
12,0916,2382,579
17,4599,542
29,68546,962
160,15919,9284,1534,0938,372
42,606
517,112
244,06964,600
157,80324,3296,3897,174
11,767981
576,675
135,85610,7335,7226,313
13,8124,7627,788
21,12010,068
30,76755,220
193,10021,1834,5704,5058,584
52,458
599,272
285,91761,137182,72040,8396,7878,083
12,834956
657,204
159,76511,1306,35910,27713,5255,5723,946
23,3819,394
31,40265,982
225,10122,9884,6964,6146,856
68,726
617,766
297,74449,207
201,49836,3117,9918,854
15,186975
728,375
187,4189,9827,0704,67412,93414,8753,865
20,5607,165
26,30074,017
248,34323,9554,6714,7266,393
84,697
597,494
285,19435,286
210,31337,2576,1148,819
13,4061,105
805,202
214,76911,9397,7594,506
12,08721,0751,928
21,8767,373
26,67682,362
282,47224,4115,2735,7946,38288,936
Composition of undistributed offsetting receipts:Employer share, employee retirementRents and royalties on the Outer Continental
Shelf
- 8 , 5 3 8
-5,271
-3,267
-9,887
-5,787
-4,101
-16,509
-6,371
-10,138
-13,270
-7,020
-6,250
-20,414
-8,214
-11,793
659,702
295,58951,770
242,93740,353
5,9029,137
12,8191,195
848,483
245,30513,2508,2503,3069,832
12,150413
25,1456,951
25,25690,647
282,42225,7245,4915,9936,968
103,180949
-22,750
-9,853
-11,895
Note.—Under provisions of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974,1 . . . , . . . . . . . .fiscal year 1977. Through fiscal year 1976, the fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis. Beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977).the fiscal year is on an October 1-September 30 basis. The period July 1,1976 through September 30, 1976 is a separate fiscal periodknown as the transition quarter.
Refunds of receipts are excluded from receipts and outlays.See "Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 1984" for additional information.Sources: Department of the Treasury and Office of Management and Budget.
247Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-73.—Federal budget receipts and outlays, off-budget outlays, and debt, fiscal years 1929-84
[Billions of dollars]
Fiscal year
1929
1933
1939
19401941194219431944
19451946 . . .194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
I9601961196219631964
1965196B196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976Transition quarter..197719781979
1980198119821983*1984*
Budget
Receipts
3.9
2.0
5.0
6.48.6
14.423.644.3
45.239.338.441.839.4
39.551.666.269.669.7
65.574.580.079 679.2
92 594,499.7
106.6112.7
116 81309148 9153.0186.9
192 81871207.3230.8263.2
279.1298181.2
3556399.6463.3
517.1599.3617.8597 5659.7
Outlays
3.1
4.6
8.8
9.513.635.178.591.3
92.755.234.529.838.8
42.645.567.776.170.9
68.570.576.782.692.1
92 297.8
106.8111.3118.6
118 4134 7157 6178.1183.6
1957210.2230.7245.6267.9
324.2364.594.2
4005448.4491.0
576.7657.2728.4805.2848.5
Surplus ordeficit( ->
.7
=2.6
-3 .9
31-5 .0
-20.8-54.9
47 0
-47.5-15.9
3.912 0
.6
316.1
= 15=6.5-1 .2
= 3 04.13.2
=-2 9-12.9
3=3.4- 7 1
48-5 .9
16- 3 8
87-25.2
3.2
2823 0
-23.4-14.8=4.7
=45.266413.0449
-48.827.7
-59,6-57.9110 6207 7
-188.8
Off-budgetoutlays
0.11.4
8.1731.887
10.412.5
14.221.017.317.014.0
Budgetand off-budget
surplus ordeficit( ->
-14.9=6.1
-53.2=73.7= 14.7= 536= 59.2
40.2
-73.878.9
-127.9=224.8=202.8
Gross Feder.ofpe
Total
U6.9
*22.5
48.2
50.757.579.2
142.6204.1
2601271.0257.1252 0252.6
256.9255.32591266.0270.8
274 4272.8272.42797287.8
290 9292.9303.3310.8316.8
323 2329 53413369.8367.1
3826409.5437.3468.4486.2
544.1631.9646.47091780.4833.8
914.31,003.91,147.01,383.71,606.3
il debt (endrlnA\
Held bythe public
41.4
42.848.267.8
127.8184.8
235.2241.9224.3216 3214.3
219.0214.3214 8218.4224.5
226.6222.2219.4226 4235.0
237.2238.6248.4254.5257.6
2616264.7267 5290.6279.5
284 9304 3323.8343.0346.1
396.9480.3498.35518610.9644.6
715.1794.4929.4
1,144.41,347.4
1 Not strictly comparable with later data.* Estimates.Note.—Under provisions of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the fiscal year for the Federal Government shifted beginning with
fiscal year 1977. Through fiscal year 1976, the fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977),the fiscal year is on an October 1-September 30 basis. The 3-month period from July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976 is aseparate fiscal period known as the transition quarter.
Data for 1929-39 are according to the administrative budget and those beginning 1940 according to the unified budget.Refunds of receipts are excluded from receipts and outlays.See "Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 1984" for additional information.Sources: Department of the Treasury and Office of Management and Budget.
248
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-74.—Relation of Federal Government receipts and expenditures in the national income and
product accounts to the unified budget, fiscal years 1982-84
[Billions of dollars; fiscal years]
Receipts and expenditures 1982
Estimate
1983
RECEIPTSTotal budget receipts....
Government contribution for employee retirement (grossing)..Other netting and grossingAdjustment to accrualsGeographic exclusions ...Other
Federal sector, national income and product accounts, receipts
EXPENDITURESTotal budget outlays
Lending and financial transactionsGovernment contribution for employee retirement (grossing)...Defense timing adjustmentBonuses on Outer Continental Shelf land leases..Geographic exclusionsOther
Federal sector, national income and product accounts, expenditures..
617.8
10.79.3
-18 .2- 1 . 6
.2
618.2
728.4
739.7
597.5
12.211.78.2
- 1 . 7.0
627.9
805.2
829.0
659.7
14.013.9- . 3
-1 . 9.2
685.6
848.5
- 5 . 310.79.3
- 1 . 22.7
- 4 . 6- .3
- 3 . 812.211.7
- 1 . 78.3
- 4 . 81.9
- 3 . 814.013.9
- 2 . 57.9
- 4 . 94.2
877.3
Note.-See Note, Table B-73.See Special Analysis B, "Special Analyses, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 1984" for description of these
categories.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis), Department of the Treasury, and Office of Management and
Budget.
249
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-75.—Government receipts and expenditures, national income and product accounts, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Calendar year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I96019611962 ,1963196419651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982p
1980:1
IllIV
1981:
||IIIIV
1982:
||IllIV
Total government
Receipts
11.3
9.3
15.4
17.725.032.649.251.253.251.056.958955.9
69.085 290.194 689.9
1011109.7116 2115.0129.4
139.5144.8156.7168.5174.0188.3212 3228.22631296.7
302.8322.6368 3413.1455 2470.5538.4605 46819765,1
838.0957.3968.4
814.6809.2842.8885.2
939.8951.5974.3963.6
951.1966.2972 2
Expendi-tures
10.3
10.7
17.6
18.428.864.093.3
103 092.745 642.550559.3
61.079 293.9
101697.098 0
104.51152127.6131.0
136.4149.1160.5167.8176.3187.8213 6242.42691286.8
313.4342.03716405.3460 0534.3574.9623 36811750.8
871.2985.5
1,084.5
825.2853.4888 8917.4
948.1959.1998 7
1,036.1
1,041.81053.71095 91,146.7
Surplus ordeficit
nationalincome
andproductaccounts
1.0
- 1 . 4
-2 .2
=.7=3.8
=31.4=44.1= 51.8= 39.5
5414.484
=3.4
8.061
- 3 . 8- 6 9-7.1315.2
9= 12.6
'••-1.6
3.1=4.3= 3.8
- 2 . 3
-1*3-14.2=60
9.9
= 10.6= 19.4
7.8= 4 7
=63.8=36.5- 4 7 8
814.3
=33.2-28.2116.1
-=10.6=44.2=45 9
32 2
- 8 . 3- 7 . 6
=24 5- 7 2 5
90.7-87.5123 7
Federal Government
Receipts
3.8
2.7
6.7
8.615.422.939.341.042.539.143.243,238.7
50.064367.370 063.772 678.081978.789.8
96.198.1
106.2114.4114.9124.31418150.5174 4196.9
191.9198.6227 5258.6287 8287.3331.8375 24316493.6
540.7628.2614.7
525.7520.2542.4574.6
620.0627.0640.2625.7
609.9617.0613.7
Expendi-tures
2.6
4.0
8.9
10.020.556.185.895.584.635.629.834.941.3
40.857 871.177169.868171.979 688.991.0
93.1101.9110.4114.2118.2123.8143 6163.7180.5188.4
204.3220.6244 3264.2299 3356.6384.842114610509.7
602.1688.2762.6
565.4587.7615.4639.9
659.7667.5698.2727.4
728.3736.6769.7815.9
Surplus ordeficit
nationalincome
andproduct
accounts
1.2
= 1.3
=2.2
= 1.3= 5.1
= 33.146.6
-54.54213.5
13.48.3
=2.6
9.265
-3 .7-7 .1=6,0
4.46.12.3
-10.3= 1.1
3.0=3.9=4.2
= 3.3
= 1.8= 13.2- 6 . 0
8.4
= 12.4=22.0-16.8
=5.6= 11.5=69.3=53.1-45.9- 2 9 5
16.1
=61.4-60.0
-147.9
-39.7-67.5-73.1=65.2
-39.7-40.5
58.0-101.7
-118.4-119.6-156.0
State and localgovernment
Receipts
7.6
7.2
9.6
10.010.410.610.911.111.613.015.417.719.5
21.323425.427.429.031.735.038.542.046.4
49.954.058.563.269.575.184.893.6
107.3120,2
135.4153.0178.3195.0211.4237.7267.8297.7m385.9416.8437.3
374.5376.6389.3403.3
410.0415.2420.3421.5
424.2434.3440.5
Expendi-tures
7.8
7.2
9.6
9.39.18.88.48.59.0
11.114.417.620.2
22.523925.527.330.232.935.939.844.346.9
49.854.458.062.868.5
.75.184.394.7
107.2118.7
133.5150.4164.8181.6204.6232.2251.2269.7297.3321.5
357.8385.0405.4
345.3353.3362.2370.3
378.6382.2386.9392.4
396.5402.2408.2414.9
Surplus ordeficit
nationalincome
andproduct
accounts
- 0 . 2
=,1
.0
.61.31.82.52.72.61.9l.C
= .7
= 1.2= 4= .0
.1
1.3= 9
=1.4=2.4
=.4
.1
.5
1.0=.C
= 1.1
1.5
1.92.6
13.513.46.85.5
16.628.030.330.4
28.231.731.9
29.123.327.133.0
31.332.933.529.1
27.732.132.3
Note.—Federaf grants-fn-aid to State and local governments are reflected in Federal expenditures and State and local receipts. Totalgovernment receipts and expenditures have been adjusted to eliminate this duplication.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
250
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-76.—Federal Government receipts and expenditures, national income and product accounts,
1958-84
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
Fiscal year:2
19581959196019611962196319641965196619671968196919701971197219731974197519761977197819791980198119821983 3
1984 3 ZCalendar year:
19581959I9601961196219631964196519661967196819691970197119721973197419751976197719781979198019811982 p,
1981:
IIIIIIV
1982:IIllIVP
Receipts
Total
78.185494 895.0
104 0110.01156120.0132 7146.0159 9189.8194 8192.4213.4240.727162834314.9365.9414 3480.85251614 7618.2627.9685.6
78 789.896.1981
106.2114 4114 9124 31418150.5174.4196.91919198 6227.5258.6287 8287 33318375.2431.64936540.7628 2614.7
620.0627 0640 2625.7
609.9617.0613 7
Personaltax andnontaxreceipts
36.338.242 543.647 349.650.751.457.564.471.490.294.087.9
100.5107.4122.7127 5137.2166.3186.5222.625012917303.0293.1304.1
36 839.943.644748.651.548 653.961767.579.795.192.690 3
108.2114.7131.3125 8147 3170.1194.9230.6257.52981300.1
286.4297.0307.9300.9
2999305.8295.6299.3
Corpo-rate
profitstax
accruals
17.921422 320.022 723.325 727.130 830.333136.832 931.934.241.243.441852.558.967 376.170070 950.150.559.4
18 022.521.421522.524 626128931430.036.136130 633 536.643.345143 654 661.671.374 270.367 348.1
76.165 668 459.1
46.545.249.8
Indirectbusinesstax andnontax
accruals
11.612.013 213.314.215.015.616.915.515.817.118.619.220.019.920.721.422 224.324.527.229.134 755750.755.259.3
11512.513.413 614.615.316 216.515 616.318.019.019 320 420.021.221.723.923 425.028.129.438.958 550.0
57.561.557.857.2
48.749.850.850.7
Contri-butions
forsocialinsur-ance
12.313.916.718.119.922.123.624.528.935.538.344.248.852.658.971.584.291.9
101.0116.2133.3153.1170.3196 3214.4229.1262.8
12 414.917.618.320.523.124 025.033136.740.746.749.354462.779.589.894.1
106.5118.5137.2159.5174.1204.3216.5
199.9202.8206.1208.4
214.9216.2217.5217.4
Expenditures
Total1
82.891.291398.1
106.2111.7117.2118.5132.7154.9172.2184.6195.5212.9232.7255.7278.2328 8370.7411.2450.4495.6577 0666 5739.7829.0877.3
88 991.093.1
1019110.4114.2118 2123.8143 6163.7180.5188.4204.3220 6244.3264.2299.3356.6384 8421.1461.0509.7602.1688.2762.6
659.7667.5698.2727.4
728.3736.6769.7815.9
Pur-chases
of goodsand
services
51.154.852 955.861.063.765.964.672.486.095.098.097.194.9
100.6101.1104.5117 9125.1139.8150.4164.1189.82181250.1279.0302.5
53 953.953.757 463.764.665 267.378 890.998.097.695.796 2
101.7102.0111.0122.7129.2143.4153.6168.3197.2228.9257.3
217.0218.2230.0250.5
249.7244.3259.0276.1
Transferpayments
Topersons
17.819.920 623.625126.527.428.431.837.242.748.755 067.776.187.2
101.81314153.8166.6178.7197.8234 62734304.8342.2350.9
19 620.121.625 025.627.027 930.333 540.146.050.661372 780.593.3
114.5146.3158.8169.6181.8205.0246.2280.9315.7
268.8271.9289.0294.0
297.2307.0321.8337.0
Toforeign-
ers
1.71.8182.12.12.12.22.22.32.22.12.22.02.32.82.73.0313.03.23.54.14.8576.06.46.5
1.81.81.92.12.22.22.22.2232.22.12.12.22.62.72.63.23.13.23.33.84.25.25.76.1
5.24.86.16.6
6.05.85.67.0
Grants-in-aid to
Stateandlocal
govern-ments
4.76.2696.97.68.39.8
10.912.714.817.819.222.626.832.640.441.648.457.566.374.779.186.790.183.486.990.1
5.66.86.57.28.09.1
10.411.114.415.918.620.324.429.037.540.643.954.661.167.577.380.588.787.783.6
90.290.686.383.6
83.085.082.084.2
Netinter-estpaid
5.45.6686.46.47.1778.28.79.6
10.411.913 514.014.015.719.621725.228.4
40.6SO 666 282.592.4
106.6
5.26.26.86.268
8.084929.8
in14.113.814 4180?0 7
26.8
35?4? 453.171.984.8
66 358374 079.0
79 68? 888 788.2
Subsi-diesless
currentsurplus
ofgovern-
mententer-prises
2.425243.3414.0414.3485.24 14.755
• 7.06.59.276606.26.99.79.9
10 513112.822.120.7
282.12.64 04.23.9454.6554.74.55.26.5637.97.85.56.95.88.29.59.2
11.713.115.1
12,213.713.013.6
12.711.612.623.4
Surplusor
deficit
nationalincome
andproduct
accounts
-4 .7- 5 8
34- 3 . 1- 2 2- 1 . 7- 1 5
1.40
-8 .9- 1 2 3
5.2
-20.5-19.2-14.9
- 6 . 6- 4 5 4-55.8-45.3-36.1-14,8-51.9- 5 1 9
-121.5-201.1-191.7
- 1 0 3- 1 . 1
3.0- 3 . 9- 4 . 2
.3- 3 3
- 1 8-13.2
- 6 . 08.4
-12.4-22.0-16.8- 5 . 6
-11.5-69.3-53.1-45.9-29.5
-61.4-60.0
-147.9
-39.7=-40.5-58.0
-101 .7
-118.4-119.6-156.0
1 Includes an item for the difference between wage accruals and disbursements, not shown separately.2 Under provisions of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the fiscal year for the Federal Government shifted beginning with -fiscalyear 1977. Through fiscal year 1976, the fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), thefiscal year is on an October 1-September 30 basis. The 3-month period from July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976 is a separatefiscal period known as the transition quarter.3 Estimates.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis) and Office of Management and Budget.
251
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-77.—State and local government receipts and expenditures, national income and product accounts,1946-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Calendar yearor quarter
Receipts
TotalPersonaltax andnontax
receipts
Corpo-rate
profitstax
accruals
Indirectbusinesstax andnontax
accruals
Contribu-tions for
socialinsurance
Federalgrants-in-
aid
Expenditures
Total1
Pur-chases
ofgoods
andservices
Trans-fer
pay-ments
toper-sons
Netinterest
paidlessdivi-
dendsreceived
Subsi-diesless
currentsurplus
ofgovern-mententer-prises
1946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
197519761977 ....19781979
198019811982 *
1980:I||
III ;.:IV
1981:• ii ;*" ;;*
IILZI:;iv
1982:ItIllIV*
13.015.417.719.521.323.425.427.429.0
31.735.038.542.046.4
49.954.058.563.269.5
75.184.893.6
107.3120.2
135.4153.0178.3195.0211.4
237.7267.8297.7327.6352.0
385.9416.8437.3
374.5376.6389.3403.3
410.0415.2420.3421.5
424.2434.3440.5
1.51.72.12,4
2.52.83.03.23.5
3.94.55.05.46.1
677.48.28.8
10.0
10.912.814.617.520.6
23.226.432.836.039.0
43.149.656.363.870.4
78.888.697.1
75.577.379.682.7
84.887.290.392.3
93.695.498.8
100.5
1.01.01.01.01,2
1.21.31.51.71.8
2.02.22,53.13.4
3.54.15.05.86.5
7.19.3
11.111.913.4
14.413.9107
15.912.514.215.0
15.413.614.012.5
10.110,211.2
9.310.712.213.3
14.615.917.418.819.9
21.623.825.727.229.3
32.034.437.039.442.6
46.149.754.060.967.6
75.083.391.599.7
107.4
116.2128.3140.7150.0160.2
174.1192.8208.8
168.8170.5176.1181.2
187.1190.4195.5198.0
201.5206.9210.9215.8
0.6.7.8.9
1.11.41.61.72.0
2.12.32.62.83.1
3,43.73.94.24.7
5.05.76.77.28.3
9.210.211.513.014.6
16.819.522.124.727.4
29.933.837.2
28.728.830.631.6
32.533,434.235.1
36.036.937.738.4
1.11.72.02.2
2.32.52.62.82.9
3.13.34.25.66.8
6.57.28.09.1
10.4
11.114.415.918.620.3
24.429.037.540.643.9
54.661.167.577.380.588.787.783.6
85.5»7.688.992.7
90.290.686.383.6
83.085.082.084.2
11.114.417.620.2
22.523.925.527.330.232.935.939.844.346,9
49.854.458.062.868.5
75.184.394.7
107.21187
133.5150.4164.8181.6204.6
232.2251.2269.7297.3321.5
357.8385.0405.4
345.3353.3362.2370.3
378.6382.2386.9392.4
396.5402.2408.2414.9
9.912.815.318.0
19.821.823.225.027.8
30.633.537.141.143.7
46.550.854.359.064.6
71.179.889.3
101.0111.2
124.4138.7151.4168.5193.1
217.2232.9250.4278.3306.0
341.2368.0389.8
329.6337.2345.2352.8
361.1365.0370.1375.7
380.4386.6392.7399.6
1.72.33.03.0
3.63.13.33.53.6
3.83.94.34.85.1
5.45.86.06.46.9
7.38.19.4
10.512.2
14717.319.320.720.9
24.627.629.732.835.0
39.643.045.1
37738.940.541.4
42.042.843.343,9
44.344745.446.0
0.2.1.1.1
.1
.0
.0
.0,1
- . 3- 7- . 9
-1 .1-1 .4
-2 .0-1 .7= 1.9-3 .3-5 .0
-5 .1-4 .5-5 .3-7 .9
-13.8
-16.9-19.5^227
-16.1-16.7-17.3-177
-18.1-19.1-20.1=20.7
=21.5-22.4-23.2=23.8
=-07
- . 9- 1 . 0-1 .1-1 .2-1 .3
-1 .5-1 .6-1 .7-1 .7-2 .0
=2,2=2.3- 2 . 5- 2 . 8- 2 . 8
-3 .0-3 .0-3 ,1-3 .2-3 .3
- 3 . 6- 3 . 7=4.2- 4 . 3
-4 .5-4 .8-5 .1-5 .7-5 .9
-6 .2-6 .5-6 .8
-6.0-6.1-6.2-6.3
=6,4-6.4
6.5=6.6
- 6 . 66 76.7
- 6 8-6,9
1 Includes an item for the difference between wage accruals and disbursements, not shown separately.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
252
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-78.—State and local government revenues and expenditures, selected fiscal years, 1927-81
[Millions of dollars]
Fiscal year l
General revenues by source2
Total Propertytaxes
Salesand
grossre-
ceiptstaxes
Individu-
mcometaxes
Corpo-ration
netincometaxes
Revenuefrom
FederalGovern-
ment
Allother3
General expenditures by function2
Total Education High-ways
Publicwelfare
Altother4
1927
1932193419361938
19401942194419461948
1950195219531954
19551956195719581959
1960196119621963
1962-63 6..1963-64*..1964-65S..
1965-665...1966-67 5..,1967-68 5..1968-69 5..1969-70*..,
1970-716...1971-72"...1972-735...1973-74 5..1974-75 s..
1975-76 5..1976-77 s..1977-78°..1978-79s..1979-80 5...
1980-81s..
7,271
7,2677,6788,3959,228
9,60910,41810,90812,35617,250
20,91125,18127,30729,012
31,07334,66738,16441,21945,306
50,50554,03758,25262,890
62,26968,44374,000
83,03691,197101,264114,550130,756
144,927166,352190,214207,670228,171
256,176285,796315,960343,278382,322423,404
4,730
4,4874,0764,0934,440
4,4304,5374,6044,9866,126
7,3498,6529,3759,967
10,73511,74912,86414,04714,983
16,40518,00219,05420,089
19,83321,24122,583
24,67026,04727,74730,67334,054
37,85242,13345,28347,70551,491
57,00162,53566,42264,94468,49974,969
470
7521,0081,4841,794
1,9822,3512,2892,9864,442
5,1546,3576,9277,276
7,6438,6919,4679,82910,437
11,84912,46313,49414,456
14,44615,76217,118
19,08520,53022,91126,51930,322
33,23337,48842,04746.09849,815
54,54760,59567,59674,24779,92785,971
70
7480153218
224276342422543
788998
1,0651,127
1,2371,5381,7541,7591,994
2,4632,6133,0373,269
3,2673,7914,090
4,7605,8267,3088,90810,812
11,90015,23717,99419.49121,454
24.57529,24533,17636,93242,08046,426
92
7949113165
156272451447592
593846817778
744890984
1,0181,001
1,1801,2661,3081,505
1,5051,6951,929
2,0382,2272,5183,1803,738
3,4244,4165,4256,0156,642
7,2739,17410,73812,12813,32114,143
116
2321,016948800
945858954855
1,861
2,4862,5662,8702,966
3,1313,3353,8434,8656,377
6,9747,1317,8718,722
8,66310,00211,029
13,21415,37017,18119,15321,857
26,14631,25339,25641,82047,034
55,58962,57569,59275,16483,029
90,294
1,793
1,6431,4491,6041,811
1,8722,1232,2692,6613,685
4,5415,7636,2526,897
7,5848,4659,2509,699
10,516
11,63412,56313,48914,850
14,55615,95117,250
19,26921,19723,59826,11829,971
32,37435,82640,21046,54151,735
57,19161,67368,43679,86495,466
.11,599
7,210
7,7657,1817,644.8,757
9,2299,1908,86311,02817,684
22,78726,09827,91030,701
33,72436,71140,37544,85148,887
51,87656,20160,20664,816
63,97769,30274,546
82,84393,350102,411116,728131,332
150,674166,873181,227«8959
2,235
2,3111,8312,1772,491
2,6382,5862,7933,3565,379
7,1778,3189,390
10,557
11,90713,22014,13415,91917,283
18,71920,57422,21623,776
23,72926,28628,563
33,28737,91941,15847,23852,718
59,41364,88669,71475,83387,858
97,216102,805110,758119,448133,211145,784
1,809
1,7411,5091,4251,650
1,5731,4901,2001,6723,036
3,8034,6504,9875,527
6,4526,9537,8168,5679,592
9,4289,844
10,35711,136
11,15011,66412,221
12,77013,93214,48115,41716,427
18,09519,01018,61519.94622,528
23,90723,10524,60928,44033,311
34,603
151
444889827
1,069
1,1561,2251,1331,4092,099
2,9402,7882,9143,060
3,1683,1393,4853,8184,136
4,4044,7205,0845,481
5,4205,7666,315
6,7578,2189,857
12,11014,679
18,22621,07023,58225,08528,155
32,60435,94139,14041,89847,288
54,121
3,015
3,2692,9523,2153,547
3,8623,8893,7374,5917,170
8,86710,34210,61911,557
12,19713,39914,94016,54717,876
19,32521,06322,54924,423
23,67825,58627,447
30,02933,28136,91541,96347,508
54,94061,90769,31678,09692,180
103,004112,537122,476137,731155,277172,941
1 Fiscal years not the same for all governments. See footnote 5.2 Excludes revenues or expenditures of publicly owned utilities and liquor stores, and of insurance-trust activities. Intergovernmentalreceipts and payments between State and local governments are also excluded.3 Includes licenses and other taxes and charges and miscellaneous revenues.4 Includes expenditures for health, hospitals, police, local fire protection, natural resources, sanitation, housing and urban renewal,local parks and recreation, general control, financial administration, interest on general debt, and unallocable expenditures.6 Data for fiscal year ending in the 12-month period through June 30. Data for 1963 and earlier years include local governmentamounts grouped in terms of fiscal years ended during the particular calendar year.
Note.—Data are not available for intervening years.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
253Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-79.—Interest-bearing public debt securities by kind of obligation, 1967-82
[Millions of dollars]
End of yearor month
Totalinterest-bearingpublicdebt
securities
Marketable
Total Treasury Treasurynotes
Treasurybonds'
Nonmarketable
TotalU.S.
savingsbonds
Foreigngovern-mentandpublicseries2
Govern-ment
accountseries
Other*
Fiscal year:196)19681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar
June
JulyAugSept....OtiNovDec
322,286344,401351,729
369,026396,289425,360456,353473,238
532,122619,254697,629766,971819,007
906,402996,495
1,140,883
929,825946,455963,207962,779964,792969,921
972,053978,920996,495999,451
1,011,9361.027,300
1,032,6781,042,1981,059,8151,064,5381,066,4101,078,431
1,083,2961,108,1311,140,8831,136,8261,160,4891,195,496
* 210,672226,592226,107
232,599245,473257,202262,971266,575
315,606392,581443,508485,155506,693
594,506683,209824,422
628,482642,905661,142657,906656,185660,769
666,405673,765683,209689,578704,819720,293
726,542737,532752,620755,833755,688763,995
774,077801,427824,422824,662852,463881,476
58,53564,44068,356
76,15486,67794,648100,061105,019
128,569161,198156,091160,936161,378
199,832223,388277,900
220,423228,972235,315225,849224,514218,786
217,532219,854223,388229,061233,905245,015
250,562254,037256,212254,880256,114256,007
262,009273,066277,900283,923293,531311,820
49,10871,07378,946
93,489104,807113,419117,840128,419
150,257191,758241,692267,865274,242
310,903363,643442,890
321,176324,540336,505341,052338,419348,788
354,005357,603363,643362,649370,794375,332
374,357382,070395,042399,700398,408406,925
411,070427,426442,890438,068454,229465,030
97,41891,07978,805
62,95653,98949,13545,07133,137
36,77939,62645,72456,35571,073
83,77296,178103,631
86,88389,39389,32391,00693,25293,196
94,86896,30896,17897,867100,11999,946
101,623101,426101,366101,253101,166101,063
100,998100,935103,631102,672104,702104,627
111,614117,808125,623
136,426150,816168,158193,382206,663
216,516226,673254,121281,816312,314
311,896313,286316,461
301,343303,550302,065304,873308,608309,152
305,647305,155313,286309,874307,117307,007
306,136304,666307,195308,705310,722314,436
309,218306,704316,461312,164308,026314,020
51,21351,71251,711
51,28153,00355,92159,41861,921
65,48269,73375,41179,79880,440
72,72768,01767,274
71,05770,44370,05769,51869,22968,934
68,71968,35568,01767,71867,73967,837
67,58167,37867,16367,03467,08267,122
67,13267,14867,27467,51467,80167,719
1,5143,7414,070
4,7559,27018,98528,52425,011
23,21621,50021,79921,68028,115
25,15820,49914,641
23,80423,98624,16224,41124,78923,514
21,94321,43120,49920,47120,30919,025
18,92018,38419,64119,44618,39517,457
16,64315,60614,64114,62714,86314,691
56,15559,52666,790
76,32382,784
101,738115,442
124,173130,557140,113153,271176,360
189,848201,052210,462
182,197185,020183,833186,979190,839192,962
191,647192,060201,052198,053195,541196,665
196,393195,722196,707198,538201,290205,954
201,502199,896210,462205,717199,903205,427
2,7312,8283,051
4,0685,7593,6543,7014,289
3,6444,88316,79727,06727,400
24,16423,71824,085
24,28724,10224,01523,96523,75023,741
23,33923,31023,71823,63223,52923,480
23,24323,18223,68423,68723,95523,902
23,94124,05424,08524,30525,45926,183
1 Includes Treasury bonds and minor amounts of Panama Canal and postal savings bonds.3 Nonmarketable certificates of indebtedness, notes, bonds, and bills in the Treasury foreign series of dollar-denominated and foreign-
currency denominated issues.3 Includes depository bonds, retirement plan bonds, Rural Electrification Administration bonds, State and local bonds, and specialissues held only by U.S. Government agencies and trust funds and the Federal home loan banks.
4 Includes $5,610 million in certificates not shown separately.Note.—Through fiscal year 1976, the fiscal year was on a July 1-June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977) the fiscal
year is on an October 1-September 30 basis.Source: Department of the Treasury.
254Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-80.—Estimated ownership of public debt securities, 1967-82
[Par values;' billions of dollars]
End of year or month
Fiscal year:196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979 .. .
198019811982
1981:JanFebMarAprMayJune . .
JulyAugSept ....OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAprMayJune
JulyAug ..sept ..::::;•;OctNovDec
Total2
322.9345.4352.9
370.1397.3426.4457.3474.2
533.2620.4698.8771.5826.5
907.7997.9
1,142.0
- 934.1950.5964.5964.0968.5971.2
973.3980.2997.9
1,005.01,013.31,028.7
1,038.41048.21 061.31 065.71 071.71,079.6
1,089.61,109.21,142.01,142.81,161.71,197.1
Held byGovern-
mentaccounts
71.876.184.8
95.2102.9111.5123.4138.2
145.3149.6155.5167.9187.7
197.7208.1216.4
189.5192.0190.9193.9197.8199.9
198.6199.0208.1204.9202.1203.3
202.82011202.5204.3206 7211.7
206.3206.5216.4211.0203.9209.4
Held byFederalReserveBanks
46.752.254.1
57.765.571.475.080.5
84.794.4
104.7115.3115.5
120.7124.3134.4
117.2118.9119.0119 7118.3120.0
123.4124 5124.3123.0126.5129.9
128 3126 2125 6134 3129 8127.0
133.8132.9134.4132.1137.7139.9
1'ublic debt securities
Held by private investors
Total3
204.4217.0214.0
217.2228.9243.6258.9255.6
303.2376.4438.6488.3523.4
589.2665.4791.2
627.4639.6654.6650.4652.3651.2
651.3656.7665.4677.2684.6694.5
707.3720 8733.3727.1735.2740.9
749.6769.8791.2799.7820.1849.4
Com-mercialbanks4
55.559.755.3
52.661.060.958.853.2
69.092.599.894.492.5
109.7112.2
117.2116.4117.5113.5113.2113.3
114.2115.0112.2111.3110.0109.4
111.41118114.3110.1109.4117.0
110.0
Mutualsavingsbanksand
insur-ancecom-
panies
13.212.511.6
10.410.310.29.68.5
10.616.020.521.221.5
24.326.2
25.525.323.723.725.324.0
25.426.126.224.724.624.3
24.924 125.626.827.227.9
28.2
Corpora-tions6
11.012.011.1
8.57.49.39.8
10.8
13.824.721.218.122.1
25.937.8
30.435.240.040.438.838.7
37.838.037.838.638.337.8
37.937.537.536.538.838.9
39.9
State andlocal
govern-ments6
23.625.126.4
29.025.926.928.828.3
31.739.348.263.866.5
77.086.2
77.380.482.383.685.183.0
86.086.286.288.387.585.6
86.288.288.388.591.891.2
88.7
Indi-viduals7
70.474.277.3
81.875.473.275.980.7
86.896.2
106.5113.9115.5
123.0140.3
134.2136.2138.6138.2139.9139.6
139.5140.2140.3141.0141.6143.7
144.1144.7146.5145.7146.2146.2
146.4
Miscel-laneousinves-
tors3 8
30.733.432.3
35.049.163.276.074.2
91.3107.7142.4176.9205.3
229.3262.7
242.8246.1252.5251.0250.0252.6
248.4251.2262.7273.3282.6293.7
302.8314.5321.1319.5321.8319.7
336.4
1 U.S. savings bonds, series A-F and J, and U.S. savings notes are included at current redemption value.2 As of July 31, 1974, public debt outstanding has been adjusted to exclude the notes of the International Monetary Fund to conform
with the Budget presentation. This adjustment applies to the 1967-82 data in this table.3 For comparability with 1975-82 published data, published data for 1967-74 have been adjusted to exclude notes of the
International Monetary Fund. These adjustments amounted to $3.3 billion in 1967, $2.2 billion in 1968, and $0.8 billion in each year1969 through 1974. These adjustments were necessary in order to add to the total public debt figures as published by the Departmentof the Treasury. The Treasury Survey of Ownership on which private investor group estimates were based was discontinued in July 1982.
4 Includes commercial banks, trust companies, and stock savings banks in the United States and Territories and island possessions;figures exclude securities held in trust departments.
5 Exclusive of banks and insurance companies.8 Includes trust, sinking, and investment funds of State and local governments and their agencies, and of Territories and possessions.7 Includes partnerships and personal trust accounts.6 Includes savings and loan associations, nonprofit institutions, corporate pension trust funds, dealers and brokers, certajn
government deposit accounts and government-sponsored agencies, and investments of foreign balances and international accounts inthe United States.
Note.—Through fiscal year 1976, the fiscal year was on a July 1—June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), thefiscal year is on an October 1—September 30 basis.
Source: Department of the Treasury.
255
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-81.—Maturity distribution and average length of marketable interest-bearing public debt securitiesheld by private investors, 1967-82
End of year or month
Amountout-
standing,privately
held
Maturity class
Withinlyear
I t o 5years
5 to 10years
10 to 20years
20 yearsand over
Average length
Millions of dollars
Fiscal year:196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:JanFebMar
May"!!"!!!June
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
1982:JanFebMar
MayJune
JulyAugSeptOctNovDec
150,321159,671156,008
157,910161,863165,978167,869164,862
210,382279,782326,674356,501380,530
463,717549,863682,043
502,248515,178532,800528,992529,057531,525
533,778540,228549,863558,169569,534580,670
590,139604,671619,030613,576618,699628,997
634,556660,583682,043685,969708,769736,148
56,56166,74669,311
76,44374,80379,50984,04187,150
115,677151,723161,329163,819181.883
220,084256,187314,436
247,958256,007263,208254,533258,101252,489
251,307251,533256,187263,717266,163275,322
284,171290,697295,476289,000290,476293,266
295,118309,446314,436321,081327,565346,321
53,58452,29550,182
57,03558,55757,15754,13950,103
65,85289,151113,319132,993127,574
156,244182,237221,783
156,845160,163167,226167,570167,865172,784
171,504180,669182,237177,834189,570188,422
183,843194,457200,544199,278203,612207,106
206,380217,258221,783218,673235,443239,262
21,05721,85018,078
8,28614,50316,03316,38514,197
15,38524,16933,06733,50032,279
38,80948,74375,749
43,96943,38246,78649,61643,84247,032
50,24245,29748,74352,20147,61550,851
54,37049,12052,61255,32954,36158,425
63,02266,34775,74975,94472,64477,570
6,1536,1106,097
7,8766,3576,3588,7419,930
8,8578,0878,42811,38318,489
25,90132,56933,017
27,24128,69028,66228,58730,29630,268
30,17232,60232,56932,53634,16434,055
34,06935,81935,82235,56535,70135,651
35,58333.09733,01733,06535,75035,677
12,96812,67012,337
8,2727,6456,9224,5643,481
4,6116,652
10,53114,80520,304
22,67930,12737,058
26,23526,93626,91828,68528,95328,952
30,55330,12730,12731,88132,02232,020
33,68634,57834,57634,40434,54934,549
34,45334,43537,05837,20637,36737,318
Years Months
544
33332
22233
343
333333
444444
444444
433333
152
863111
871137
9011
9109101111
010010
010010
01111101110
Note.—All issues classified to final maturity.Through fiscal year 1976, the fiscal year was on a July 1—June 30 basis; beginning October 1976 (fiscal year 1977), the fiscal year
is on an October 1—September 30 basis.Source: Department of the Treasury.
256Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
CORPORATE PROFITS AND FINANCE
TABLE B-82.—Corporate profits with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
19401941194219431944
19451946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
197019711972 .19731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982*
1980:1III l l(V
1981:111tilIV
1982:j||t||
Corporateprofits withinventoryvaluation
and capitalconsumptionadjustments
9.0
- 1 . 7
5.3
8.614.119.323.523.6
19.016 622.329427.1
33.938.736.136.335.2
45 543.743 338.549.6
47 648.656.662169.2
80 085.182 489 185.1
71.483.296.6
108.394.9
110.5138.1167.3192.4194 8
181.6190.6161.1
195 3172.2177.8181.2
200 318511931183.9
157 1155.4166.2
Corporateprofits tax
liability
1.4
.5
1.4
2.87.6
11.414.112.9
10.791
11.312.410.2
17.922.619.420.317.6
22 022.021419.023.6
22 722.824.026 228.0
30 933.732 539 239.5
34.237.541.649.051.6
50.663.872.783.287.6
84.781.258.8
95.373.382.287.8
91.579.282.471.6
56.755.360.9
Profits after tax with inventory valuation andcapital consumption adjustments
Total
7.7
- 2 . 3
3.9
586.57.99.5
10.7
8.475
11.017.016.9
16.016.116.716.017.5
23.421.821.819.526.0
24.925.832.635941.2
49151.449.950.045.6
37.245.755.059.343.3
59.974.394.6
109.1107.2
97.0109.5102.3
100.098.995.693.3
108.9105.9110,7112.3
100.4100.0105.3
Dividends
5.8
2.0
3.8
4 04.4434.44.6
4.65 66.37.07.2
8.88.58.58.89.1
10.311.111.511.312.2
12.913.314.415.517.3
19.119.420.222.022.5
22.522.924.427.029.9
30.837.440.847.052.7
58.165.170.3
56.257.858.759.6
61.564.066.868.1
68.869.370.5
Undistributedprofits with
inventoryvaluation
and capitalconsumptionadjustments
1.9
- 4 . 3
.1
182.1365.06.1
3.8194.7
10 09.7
7.27.68.27.28.4
13110.710.38.2
13.8
12.112.518.220.423.9
30.032.029.727.923.1
14.822.830.532.313.4
29.136.953.762.254.5
38.944.432.1
43.941.036.933.7
47.342.043.944.3
31.630.734.8
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
257Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-83.—Corporate profits by industry, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
1929
1933
1939
194019411942194319441945 ..1946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
19701971197219731974..19751976197719781979
198019811982"
1980:1II.HIIV
1981:1||IllIV
1982:|.||Ill
Corporate profits with inventory valuation adjustment and without capital consumption adjustment
Total
10.5
- 1 . 2
6.5
9.815.420.524.524.019.319.625.933.431.1
37.943.340.640.238.447.546.946.641.652.3
49.750.055.159 766.076.080.978.184.980.8
68.982.094.0
105.696.7
120.6151.6178.5205.1209.6
199.4207.5166.0
211,0189.4197.0200.4
217.6202.6210.3199.4
167.2162.2170.0
Total
10.2
- 1 . 2
6.1
9.615.020.124.123.518.918.924.932.229.9
36.741.538.738.436.445.144,143.539.149.6
46,746.851.555.861.871.576.773.779.774.6
62474.985 392.080.4
107.6137.4163 4185.4179.0
169.1184.6149.6
175.9157.8167.5175.5
193 8181.7189.3173.7
150.3144.1153.7
Total
1.3
.3
.8
1.01.11.21.31.61.72.11.72.63.1
3.13.64.04.54.64.85.05.25.76.8
7.27.07.3686.97.5859.0
10.411.1
12114.115315.915.011.817.123131.030.3
29.222.722.5
31.528.627.229.4
26 822.720 820.4
20.022.224.2
Financial >
FederalRe-
servebanks
0.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.01111
.2
.2
.2
.3,4.4.3.3.5.6.6.7
1.0.8.9
101.11.4172.02.53.1
363.3344.55.75.76.0627.79.6
11.914.515.7
11.612.511.412.2
13 214.215 215.6
16.116.015.8
Other
1.3
.3
.3
.91.01.21.31.61.62.01.62.32.9
3.03.33.74.14.34.54.54.65,16.0
6.26.36.4585.86.2687.07.98.0
8610.711911.49.36.2
11.116 923.320.7
17.28.16.8
19.916.115.817.1
13 68.6554.8
3.96.28.4
Domestic industries
Total
8.9
- 1 . 5
5.3
8.614.018.922.821.917.316.823.229.626.8
33.537.934.733.931.840.339.138.333.542.9
39.539.844.249 054.964.068 264.869.363.5
50260.870076.065.495.8
120.3140 3154.4148.6
140.0162.0127.1
144.4129.2140.3146.1
167 0159.0168 5153.3
130.4121,9129.5
Manufac-turing2
5.2
- .4
3.3
5.59.5
11.813.813.29.79.0
13.617.616.2
20.924.621.722.019926.024.724.019.426.4
23.623.326.029 332.339.341938.541.236.6
26634.140 745.539.052.669.278 386.985.6
74.586.359.8
85.264.770.078.1
90 388.992 273.7
57.756.662.7
Nonfinancial
Trans-portation
andpublic
utilities
1.8
.0
1.0
1,32.03.44.43.92.71.82.23.03.0
4.04.64.95.0475.65.95.85.97.0
7.47.88.493
10.011.011810710.810.3
828.5908.76.1
10.014.517 820.615.9
17.419.1187
16.813.921.517.5
20115.619621.2
18.818,519.2
Whole-safeand
retailtrade
1,0
- .5
7
1.21.42.23.03.23.33.84.65.54.5
5.05.04.83.8385.04.54.44.65.9
4.95.05.8597,58.1829.1
10.410.5
9511,713 413.912.521.322.426 626.927.1
24.633.428.1
19.727.124.427.3
33 032.1330357
31.926.827.4
Other
0.9
= 7
.3
.61.11.51.61.61.52.12.93.63.1
3.63.73.33.1343.64.14.03.63.6
3.63.73.9445.15.6636.56.96.1
596.5698.07.9
11.914.217 620.020.1
23.423.120.6
22723.524.323.3
23622.523 722.7
21.920.020.3
not.+Kesi
of theworld
0.2
.0
.3
.3
.4
.4
.4
.4
.37
1.01.31.1
1.3171.91.8202.42.83.12.527
3.03.23.6394.24.5424.45.26.1
657.186
13.716.313.014,315119.730.6
30.322.816.4
35.131729.624.9
2382Q.B210257
16.918.216.3
1 Consists of the following industries: Banking; credit agencies other than banks; security and commodity brokers, dealers, andservices; insurance carriers; regulated investment companies; small business investment companies; and real estate investment trusts.
' See Table B-84 for industry detail.Note.—The industry classification is on a company basis and is based on the 1972 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) beginning
1948, and on the 1942 SIC prior to 1948.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis,
258Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-84.—Corporate profits of manufacturing industries, 2929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
1929
1933
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
19501951 . . . .19521953195419551956195719581959
19601961196219631964 . .19651966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
1980 . . .19811982"
1980:
||IIIIV
1981:
II .HIIV
1982:ItlMl
Totalmanufac-
turing
5.2
4
3.3
5.595
11.813.813 29.790
13.617.616.2
20.924.621722.019926.024 724.019426.4
23 623.326.029.332.339341.938.541.236.6
26 634.140.745.539.052.669.278.386.985.6
74.586.359.8
85.264.770.078.1
90.388.992.273.7
57 756.662.7
Corporate profits with inventory valuation adjustment and without capital consumption adjustment
Durable goods
Total
2.6
4
1.7
3.1647.28.1744.5245.87.58.1
12.013.211711.910 514.312 813.39 3
13.7
11611.414.016.317.923023.820.922.218.9
10 216.322.424.313.218.930.438.144.337.1
20.728.411.4
25.512.418.226.5
32.135.227.418.9
9112.712.2
Pri-marymetalindus-tries
1.61.5
2.33.1192.5172.9303.0192.3
201.6162.02.5313.62.71.91.4
8
1.62.25.42.92.11.13.53.5
2.94.1
-5 .1
4.72.6,1
42
7.04.74.1.7
- 3 1-6 .5-5 .4
Fabri-catedmetalprod-ucts
.8
1.11.3101.0
91.0111.1
91.1
81.0111.31.4202.42.42.32.0
111.52.12.51.63.03.84.44.95.2
4.44.94.4
5.42.84.35.0
4.76.05.43.4
4.43.84.7
Machin-ery,
exceptelectri-
cal
1.21.3
1.62.3231.9171.72 12.0142.1
181.9232.53.3394.54.14.13.7
292.94.34.62.94.76.38.89.48.9
7.29.35.1
7.27.07.47.2
8.49.29.69.9
8.34.83.7
Electricandelec-tronicequip-ment
.7
.8
1.21.31.51.41.21.11.21.51.31.7
131.31.51.61.72.73.02.92.82.3
1.21.92.83.0
2.13.45.66.55.1
4.45.13.5
5.23.54.34.5
6.24.94.84.3
3.63.73.2
Motorvehicles
andequip-ment
1.42.1
3.12.4242.62.14.12.22.6
.93.0
3 02.54.04.94.7625.13.95.54.7
1.25.05.95.7
1.97.29.48.94.7
- 5 . 0- 1 . 1
1.1
- 3 . 7-10.6
- 4 . 1- 1 . 4
- 2 . 62.6
- 2 . 8- 1 . 8
- 4 . 13.33.2
Other
1.81.7
2.62.8262.62.93.53.23.12.93.5
273.1354.04.45.15.24.95.74.9
2.94.35.76.22.94.37.68.8
11.09.8
6.86.22.3
6.77.16.37.1
8.47.86.32.4
.03.52.7
Nondurable goods
Total
2.6
o17
2.4314.65.7595.26.67.8
10.08.1
8.911.499
10.19.4
11.811910.710012.7
12.011.912.013.114.416.318.117.619.117.7
16.517.818.321.225.833.638.840.242.648.4
53.857.948.4
59.652.351.851.6
58.253.764.854.7
48.643.950.5
Foodand
kindredprod-ucts
1.91.6
1.61.4171.8162.2181.8212.4
222.32.32.72.72.83.23.23.23.0
3.23.52.92.42.88.66.96.86.05.7
6.28.76.5
6.65.54.97.6
10.48.57.78.1
6.76.37.0
Chemi-calsand
alliedprod-ucts
1.71.8
2.32.82.32.22.23.02.82.82.53.5
3.13.23.23.64.04.64.94.35.24.5
3.94.45.26.05.66.58.37.98.37.1
6.78.25.7
7.45.56.67.4
9.47.58.07.8
6.55.85.1
Petro-leumandcoalprod-ucts
2.81.92.32.7232.82.73.03.32.62.12.5
2.52.22.22.12.42.93.23.93.73.2
3.53.53.05.0
10.59.6
12.611.613.820.7
28.026.624.4
31.529.127.723.5
23.523.335.124.7
25.420.425.9
Other
3.72.8
2.74.4363.32.93.64.13.63.34.3
4.24.14.34.65.36.06.86.37.06.9
5.96.47.27.86.68.9
11.013.814.514.8
13.014.411.7
14.112.212.712.9
14.914.414.114.1
10.011.412.5
Note.—The industry classification is on a company basis and is based on the 1972 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) beginning1948, and on the 1942 SIC prior to 1948.
Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
259Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-85.—Sates, profits, and stockholders1 equity, all manufacturing corporations, 1950-82
[Billions of dollars]
Year orquarter
All manufacturing corporations
Sales(net)
Profits
Beforeincometaxes1
Afterincometaxes
Stock-holders'equity*
Durable goods industries
Sales(net)
Profits
Beforeincometaxes'
Afterincometaxes
Stock-holders'equity8
Nondurable goods industries
Sales(net)
Profits
Beforeincometaxes>
Afterincometaxes
Stock-holders'equity"
1950..1951..1952.,1953.,1954,,
1955.,1956.,1957.,19581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721973
1973: IV
New series:1973: IV
1974
1975..1976..1977..1978..1979..
1980..1981..
1979:IIIIII...,IV....
1980:III
IV
1981:
n'Z!IllIV
1982:
"Z
181.9245.0250.2265.9248.5
278.4307.3320.0305.3338.0
345.7356.4389.4412.7443.1
492.2554.2575.4631.9694.6
708,8751.1849.5
1,017.2
275.1
236.6
1,060.6
1,065.21,203.21,328.11,496.41,741.8
1,912.82,144.7
406.6436.4437.5461.2
465.7466.3464.2516.6
520.8549.6539.9534.4
501.0520.1507.1
23.227.422.924.420.9
28.629.828.222.729.7
27.527.531.934.939.6
46.551.847.855.458.1
48.152.963.281.4
21.4
20.6
92.1
79.9104.9115.1132.5154.2
145.8158.5
36.542.638.236.8
39.535.933.237.2
39.045.640.034.0
28.930.927.8
12.911.910.711.311.2
15.116.215.412.716.3
15.215.317.719.523.2
27.530.929.032.133.2
28.631.036.548.1
13.0
13.2
58.7
49.164.570.481.198.7
92.6101.3
22.726.824.724.5
24.822.421.024.4
24.428.925.222.9
19.020.017.8
83.398.3
103.7108.2113.1
120.1131.6141.1147.4157.1
165.4172.6181.4189.7199.8
211.7230.3247.6265.9289.9
306.8320.8343.4374.1
386.4
368.0
395.0
423.4462.7496.7540.5600.5
668.1743.4
576.2592.5609.2624.0
643.9658.1670.5699.7
718.4739.4753.5762.3
756.5764.1774.3
116.8122.0137.9122.8
142.1159.5166.0148.6169.4
173.9175.2195.3209.0226.3
257.0291.7300.6335.5366.5
363.1381.8435.8527.3
140.1
122.7
529.0
521.1589.6657.3760.7865.7
889.1979.5
207.5222.6213.6221.9
219.8218.7212.6238.0
234.1257.2245.1243.0
226.4240.3225.3
12.915.412.914.011.4
16.516.515.811.415.8
14.013.616.818.521.2
26.229.225.730.631.5
23.026.533.643.610.8
10.1
41.1
35.350.757.969.672.4
57.467.2
18.821.616.415.7
15.813.511.916.2
16.720.716.413.4
10.812.78.5
6.76.15.55.85.6
8.18.37.95.88.1
7.06.98.69.5
11.6
14.516.414.616.516.9
12.914.518.424.8
6.3
6.2
24.7
21.430.834.841.845.2
35.641.7
11.413.310.310.1
9.78.27.2
10.4
10.112.710.38.5
6.88.25.3
39.947.249.852.454.958.865.270.572.877.9
82.384.989.193.398.5
105.4115.2125.0135.6147.6
155.1160.4171.4188.7
194.7
185.8
196.0
208.1224.3239.9262.6292.5
317.7350.4
281.9289.3296.5302.1
308.0312.6317.2332.8
339.4349.7354.2358.3
353.0356.5360.1
95.1128.1128.0128.0125.7
136.3147.8154.1156.7168.5
171.8181.2194.1203.6216.8
235.2262.4274.8296.4328.1
345.7369.3413.7489.9
135.0
113.9
531.6
544.1613.7670.8735.7876.1
1,023.71,165.2
199.1213.8223.9239.3
245.9247.6251.6278.6
286.7292.4294.8291.3
274.6279.8281.8
10.312.110,010.49.6
12.113.212.411.313.9
13.513.915.116.418.3
20.322.622.024.826.625.226.529.637.810.6
10.5
51.0
44.654.357.262.981.8
88.491.3
17.721.121.921.2
23.722.421.321.0
22.324.923.520.6
18.118.219.3
6.15.75.25.55.6
7.07.87.56.98.3
8.28.59.2
10.011.6
13.014.614.415.516.4
15.716.518.023.3
6.7
7.0
34.1
27.733.735.539.353.5
56.959.6
11.213.514.414.4
15,114.213,714.0
14.216.214.914.3
12.211.812.5
43.551.153.955.758.2
61.366.470.674.679,2
83.187.792.396.3
101.3
106.3115.1122.6130.3142.3
151.7160.5172.0185.4
191.7
182.1
199.0
215.3238.4256.8277.9308.0
350.4393.0
294.3303.2312.6321.9
335.9345.5353.3366.9
379.1389,7399,4404.0
403.5407.6414.2
1 In the old series, "income taxes" refers to Federal income taxes only, as State and local income taxes had already been deducted.In the new series, no income taxes have been deducted.
1 Annual data are average equity for the year (using four end-of-quarter figures).Note.—Data are not necessarily comparable from one period to another due to changes in accounting procedures, industry
classifications, sampling procedures, etc. For explanatory notes concerning compilation of the series, see "Quarterly Financial Report forManufacturing, Mining, and Trade Corporations, Federal Trade Commission.
Source: Federal Trade Commission.
260
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-86.—Relation of profits after taxes to stockholders' equity and to sales, all manufacturingcorporations, 1947-82
Year or quarter
19471948 ..1949
19501951 „ .19521953 ..1954
1955 .19561957 ..19581959 „
I960 .. .19611962 ..19631964 ..
1965 „19661967 ..19681969 .. .
1970 ..19711972 ..1973
1973- IV
New series:1973: IV
1974 ..
19751976 ..19771978 ..1979
1980 .1981
1979:|11 .HIIV
1980:IIIHIIV ..
1981:
||IllIV ..
1982:1 ,||III
Ratio of profits after income taxes (annualrate) to stockholders' equity—percent *
Allmanufacturingcorporations
15.616.011.6
15.412110.310.59.9
12 612.310 98.6
10.4928.998
10.311.6
13 013.411712.111.5
939.7
10612.8
13.4
14.3
14.9
11613 914.215 016.4
13 913.6
15 718116.315.7
15 413 612.514.0
13.615.613.412.0
10110 59.2
Durablegoods
industries
14.415.712.1
16.913.011.11 U10.3
13.812.811.38.0
10.4
8.58.19.6
10.111.7
13.814.211.712.211.4
8.39.0
10.813.1
12.9
13.3
12.6
10.313 714.516 015.4
11211.9
16.218 414.013.4
12.610 69.1
12.6
12.014.611.69.5
7.79.25.9
Nondurablegoods
industries
16.616.211.2
14.111.29.79.99.6
11.411.810.69.2
10.4
9.89.69.9
10.411.5
12.212.711.811.911.5
10.310.310.512.6
14.0
15.3
17.1
12.914.213.814.217.4
16.315.2
15.317.818.417.9
18.016.415.615.2
15.016.614.914.2
12.111.612.1
Profits after income taxes per dollar ofsales—cents
At!manufacturingcorporations
6.77.05.8
7.1494.34.34.5
545.3484.24.8
444.3454.75.2
5.65.65.05.14.8
404.14.34.7
4.7
5.6
5.5
4.65.45.35.45.7
4.84.7
5.66.15.75.3
5.34.84.54.7
4.75.34.74.3
3.83.93.5
DurableRoods
industries
6.77.16.4
7.7534.54.24.6
575.24.83.94.8
403.9444.55.1
5.75.64.84.94.6
3,53.84.24.7
4.5
5.0
4.7
4.15.25.35.55.2
4.04.3
5.56.04.84.6
4.43.83.44.4
4.34.94.23.5
3.03.42.4
Nondurable" goodsindustries
6.76.85.4
6.5454.14.34.4
5 15.3494.44.9
484.7474.95.4
555.6535.25.0
454.54.44.8
5.0
6.1
6.4
5.1555.35.36.1
5.65.1
5.66.36.46.0
6.15.75.55.0
5.05.55.14.9
4.44.24.4
1 Annual ratios based on average equity for the year (using four end-of-quarter figures). Quarterly ratios based on equity at end ofquarter only.
Note—Based on data in millions of dollars.See Note, Table B-85.Source: Federal Trade Commission.
261
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-87.—Relation of profits after taxes to stockholders' equity and to sales, all manufacturingcorporations, by industry group, 1981-82
Industry
Ratio of profits after income taxes (annualrate) to stockholders' equity—percentl
1981 1982
Profits after income taxes per dollarof sales—cents
1981 1982
All manufacturing corporations....
Durable goods industries ,
Stone, cfay, and glass productsPrimary metal industries
Iron and steelNonferrous metals
Fabricated metal productsMachinery, except electricalElectrical and electronic equip-
ment,.,,...,....,Transportation equipment1
Motor vehicles and equipmentAircraft, guided missiles, and
parts
Instruments and related products...Other durable manufacturing
products
Nondurable goods industries
Food and kindred products. ...Tobacco manufacturesTextile mill productsPaper and allied productsPrinting and publishingChemicals and allied products*...
Industrial chemicals and syn-thetics
Drugs
Petroleum and coal productsRubber and miscellaneous plastics
productsOther nondurable manufacturing
products
13,4
U.6
11.913.9
18.46.3
14.114.1
12.91.9
-6 .9
13.9
17.7
9.8
14.9
13.819.49.99,7
15.613.9
11.916.1
17.4
11.4
14,4
12.0
9.5
5,83.0
9.415.5
12.33.8
- 1 . 6
11.7
14.9
5.9
14.2
14.618.66.5
12,515,513.3
11.418.6
15.4
9.1
15.0
10.1
7.7
- 3 . 7
L8
9.811.8
12.64.3
.0
10.8
13.3
2,4
12.1
12.618.42.66.29.7
13.0
8.920.8
13.9
8.7
7.0
10.5
9.2
4.6- 3 . 4
- 6 . 21,0
9,910.8
12.611.6
11.8
U.6
15.3
8.3
U.6
12.321.34.96.5
13.812.2
7.717.6
U.6
10.4
9.6
9.2
5.9
7.3- 8 . 3
-13.2- . 9
5.17,3
11.44.6
- . 2
12.6
14.7
6.9
12.1
11.920.88.46.1
13.510.7
5.618.9
13.8
9,0
12.0
4.7
4.2
4.64.9
5.92.6
4.26.3
4.5.6
- 2 . 2
4.1
9.4
2.8
3.2U.32.63.95.26.5
5,310.2
6.4
3.3
3.3
4.3
3.5
2.51.2
.03.6
2.96.8
4.31.1
- . 5
3.1
7.9
1.8
4.9
3.310.9
1.75.45.16.7
5.612.4
5.8
2.8
3.3
3.8
3,0
18
3,25.7
4.71.3
.0
3.2
7,6
,8
4.4
3.111.4
.82.83.46.4
4.313.6
5.7
2.7
1.7
3,9
3.4
1.9»1.3
- 2 . 3.4
3.15.2
4.63.2
3.2
3.2
8.3
2.5
4.2
2.912.5
1.42.84.76.0
4.011.8
4.9
3.1
2.4
3.5
2.4
2.9- 3 . 7
- 5 . 5- . 5
1.73.8
4.41.4
- . 1
3.7
7.9
2.1
4.4
2.812.22.52.74.55.3
2.812.3
6.0
2.9
2.7
1 Ratios based on equity at end of quarter.* Includes other industries not shown separately.Source: Federal Trade Commission.
262Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-88.—Determinants of business fixed investment 1955-82
[Percent, except as noted]
Year
1955195619571958...1959
19601961. .19621963....1964
19651966196719681969 .. ..
1970 .1971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982*
Realinvest-ment
aspercentof real
GNP
9.39.79.78.78.8
9.18.89.09.09.4
10 511.010 410.310 7
10.510.010.211.010.9
9.79.7
10.211.011.5
11.311411.2
ityutili-
zation
manu-factur-
ing1
87.186.483.775.281.9
80.277.481.683.585.6
89 691.186 987.186.2
79.378.483.587.683.8
72.979.581.984.485.7
79.178.569.8
Nonfmancial corporations
Cashflow aspercent
ofGNP2
9.38.98.98.69.3
8.98.89.49.7
10.1
10610.310 09.48.6
7.88.38.68.07.0
9.09.39.79.58.9
8.7959.6
Rate of rdepreciab
Beforetax
19.816.815.212.816.4
15.015.117.418.820.2
22121.819.318.916.5
12.813.514.314.311.0
11.912.913.913.712.1
10.511.09.5
eturn one assets3
Aftertax
9.8797.46.58.5
8.08.2
10.311.212.5
14 013.712 411.39.7
7.98.59.18.76.1
7.77.98.78.67.4
6.6777.5
Rate of return onstockholders'
equity*
Beforetax
13.111610.58.4
10.5
9.99.5
11.212.113.3
15 515.213413.812.5
8.89.9
10.512.811.2
8.58.6
10.210.710.2
8.47.7<fl)
Aftertax
6.2545.0395.1
5.04.66.16.77.8
9 69.2828.071
4.75.76.28.37.3
5.24.86.36.86.6
5.551(6)
Ratio ofmarketvalue to
mentcost of
netassets6
1.11211041.01810411.252
1.22213501.28214191.521
1621146614801.5231353
10911.17612581.157
827
.811
.911
.797
.761
.709
.666694.690
1 Federal Reserve Board index.2 Cash flow calculated as after-tax profits plus capitaj consumption allowance plus inventory valuation adjustment.3 Profits plus capital consumption adjustment and inventory valuation adjustment plus net interest paid divided by the stock of
depreciable assets valued at current replacement cost.4 Profits corrected for inflation effects divided by net worth (physical capital component valued at current replacement cost).5 Equity plus interest-bearing debt divided by current replacement cost of net assets.« Not available.
Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis), Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and Council ofEconomic Advisers.
263Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-89.—Sources and uses of funds, nonfarm nonfinancial corporate business, 1946-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year orquarter
Sources
Total Internal'
External
Total
Credit market funds
TotalSecuri-
ties andmort-gages
Loansand
short-term
Other2
Uses
TotalCapita)
expendi-tures 3
Increasein
financialassets
Discrep-ancy
(sourcesless uses)
194619471948..1949
19501951195219531954
1955..195619571958..1959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
1970197119721973,.1974
1975..1976197719781979
1980
1981
1980:
\\'ZIllIV
1981:IIIIllIV
1982:
H'ZIll*.
18.727.028.919.9
42.136.429.927.829.6
52.744.943.441.956.3
48.656.360.168.473.9
91.897.694.7
113.5115.5
102.3125.3151.6192.4190.1
156.9210.8252.2315.4346.3
333.7352.2
363.2263.4326.4381.9
333.6381.2348.9345.0
297.7348.2371.7
8.112.919.119.5
18.020.221.921.723.9
29.529.531.530.336.0
35.436.542.846.551.8
58.562.663.665.064.4
61.873.585.091.785.6
119.7134.2157.4175.7188.8
197.5231.1
192.6197.4199.3200.8
222.4225.4235.2241.4
232.6234.3240.3
10.614.19.7
.4
24.016.28.06.15.7
23.215.411.911.720.2
13.219.817.322.022.1
33.335.031.148.551.1
40.551.866.6
100.7104.4
37.276.694.9
139.7157.5
136.2121.1
170.666.0
127.2181.1
111.3155.8113.7103.6
65.0113.9131.3
6.98.46.53.1
8.110.59.55.76.5
10.212.812.310.512.3
12.112.912.812.514.1
18.523.827.827.732.3
35.337.243.456.769.9
30J54.570.479.391.2
95.792.6
114.762.686.6
118.7
68.7119.1100.282.5
110.293.398.0
3.65.46.74.9
4.26.48.06.06.7
6.47.5
10.410.58.1
7.510.79.48.47.8
7.614.319.115.014.6
26.332.82 M20.726.3
38.738.233.931.925.9
57.523.1
46.158.663.761.7
41.634.83.2
12.7
30.633.159.3
3.33.0
- . 2= 1.8
3.94.11.4
- . 4- . 2
3.75.31.9
- . 04.2
4.62.23.44.06.2
11.09.58.7
12.617.7
9.04.4
16.936.043.6
-8 .016.336.547.46!).3
38.269.6
68.64.0
22.957.1
27.184.397.069.9
79.760.338.7
3.75.83.3
-2.7
15.95.7
- 1 . 5.5
- . 8
13.12.5
- . 41.27.9
1.26.94.69.58.0
14.811.23.3
20.918.8
5.314.623.244.034.5
6.522.124.560.466.3
40.628.5
55.93.4
40.562.4
42.636.713.521.1
-45.220.533.3
16.825.625.318.3
40.437.629.228.027.8
49.140.839.138.551.2
41.451.055.560.464.9
82.791.388.5
106.0115.3
98.7122.7149.1191.9190.1
150.9201.8237.6294.2347.1
317.9314.8
341.2248.7314.2367.5
318.2352.2304.6284.0
225.3304.9328.5
18.117.320.314.8
24.030.224.625.722.9
32.636.834.927.737.0
37.536.743.244.750.1
61.074.772.275.483.7
80.086.099.0
121.5137.9
109.7148.3175.1202.2219.8
220.5260.9
231.3215.6209.9225.2
233.5260.0284.6265.5
241.9248.5264.2
- 1 . 48.45.03.5
16.47.44.62.34.9
16.54.04.2
10.814.2
3.914.212.315,714.8
21.816.616.330.631.6
18.736.750.170.552.2
41.253.562.592.0
127.3
97.453.9
103.933.1
104.3142.3
84.792.220.018.5
-16.656.464.3
1.91.43.61.6
1.7^1.2
.6=.11.8
3.54.14.33.45.0
7.25.34.68.09.0
9.16.46.27.5
.2
3.62.62.4
.5
.0
6.09.0
14.721.2
15.837.4
22.014.712.214.4
15.429.044.261.0
72.343.343.1
1 Undistributed profits (after inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments), capital consumption allowances, and foreignbranch profits, dividends, and subsidiaries' earnings retained abroad.
1 Consists of tax liabilities, trade debt, and direct foreign investment in the United States.3 Plant and equipment, residential structures, inventory investment, and mineral rights from U.S. Government.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
264Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-9Q.~Current assets and liabilities of U.S. corporations, 1939-82
[Billions of dollars]
End of yearor quarter
SEC series:5
1939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I9601961
SEC series:5
196119621963196419651966196719661969
19701971197219731974
FTC-FRB series:7
197419751976197719781979
19801981
1981:1ItIllIV
1982:
It
Current assets
Total
54.5
60.372 983.693 897.297 4
108.1123 6133.0133.1
161.51791186.2190 6194 6224.0237 9244.7255 3277.3
289.0306.8
Cash1
10.8
13.113917.621621.621.722.825.025.326.5
28.130 030.831.133 434.634.834.937.436.3
37.241.1
U.S.Govern-
mentsecurities2
2.2
2.040
10.116420.921115.314114.816.8
19.720719.921.519 223.519118.618 822.8
20.120.0
Notesand
accountsreceiv-able
22.1
24.028 027.326.926.525.930.738.342.443.0
56.861.567.468.573 688.997.7
102.2109.7120.6
129.2139.2
Inven-tories
Othercurrentassets
All corporation
18.0
19.825 627.327 626.826 337.644 648.945.3
55.164 965.867 265 372.880482.281988,4
91.895.2
1.4
1.5141.3131.4241.7161.61.4
1.7212.424314.2596.7759.1
10.611.4
Current liabilities
Total
s*
30.0
32.840 747.351651.745 851.961.564.460.7
79.892 696.198.999 7
121.0130.5133.1136.6153.1
160.4171.2
Notesand
accountspayable
21.9
23.226 426.026 326.825 731.637 639.337.5
48 354 959.359 561776.183 986.690 4
101.0
106.8114.6
Othercurrentliabil-ities
8.1
9.614 321.325324.920120.323 925.023.3
31.637 836.839 438 045.046 646.546 252.0
53.656.6
Networkingcapital
24.5
27.532 336.342145.651.656.262.168.672.4
81.686 590.191894 9
103.0107 4111.6118.7124.2
128.6135.6
Currentratio3
1.817
1.83817911.7671.8181.8802.1272.0832.0102.0652.193
2.02419341.9381.92719521.8511.8231.8381.8691.811
1.8021.792
Nonfinancial corporations6
254.7269.7288 2305.6336 0364.0386 2426.5473.6
492 3529.6599.3697.8790.7
735.4759.0827 4912 7
1043 71,218.2
1.333.51.427.1
1,374.51,388.31,410.91,427.1
1,423.61,419.4
34.837.139 840.542.841.945.548.247.9
50 253.359.066.371.1
73.282.188.297 2
105 5118.0
127.1131.7
126.6126.2125.1131.7
121.3123.4
16.516.816 715.814 413.010311.510.6
7711.010.612.812.3
11.119.023 518 217 317.0
19.317.9
19.219.918.017.9
17.117.4
97.9103.2110 5119.91341146.6155.3173.9197.0
2061221.1248.2288.5322.1
265.8272.1292 9330 3388 0461.1
510.6536.7
528.0533.1542.4536.7
537.8534.4
95.0100 5106 8113.1126 6142.81531166.0186.4
1933200.4225.7263.9313.6
319.5315.9342 5376 94316505.5
543.7587.1
560.2565.3577.0587.1
593.8589.2
10.512.114 416.318119.722 026.931.6
35 043.855.866.471.7
65.969.980.3901
1013116.7
132.7153.6
140.5143.8148.3153.6
153.6155.0
123.7132.4145 5156.6178 8199.4211.3244.1287.8
304 9326.0375.6450.9530.4
453.4451.6495.1557.1669 3807.8
890.9980.0
923.2931.5967.2980.0
985.7982.6
84.488.797 0
104.91215137.5147.1168.8199.2
2113220.5282.9340.3402.3
269.8264.2282.1317 6382 9461.2
515.2562,9
520.3525.9549.5562.9
555.0554.9
39.343.748 551.757.361.964.275.388.6
93 6105.592.7
110.7128.1
183.6187.4213.0239 6286 4346.6
375.7417.1
402.9405.5417.7417.1
430.8427.8
131.0137.3142 7149.0157.2164.6174.9182.4185.7
187.4203.6223.7246.9260.3
282.0307.4332.4355.5374.4410.5
442.6447.1
451.3456.8443.7447.1
437.9436.8
2.0592.0371.9811.9511.8791.8251.8281.7471.646
1.6151.6251.5951.5481.491
1.6221.6811.6711.6381.5591.508
1.4971.456
1.4891.4901.4591.456
1.4441.445
1 Includes time certificates of deposit.2 Includes Federat agency issues.3 Total current assets divided by total current liabilities.4 Excludes banks, savings and loan associations, and insurance companies.5 Based on data from 'Statistics of Income," Department of the Treasury.6 Excludes banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, investment companies, finance companies (personal and
commercial), real estate companies, and security and commodity brokers, dealers, and exchanges.7 Based on data from "Quarterly financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining, and Trade Corporations," Federal Trade Commission. See
"Federal Reserve Bulletin," July 1978, for details regarding the series.Note.—SEC series not available after 1974.Sources: Board of Governors of the federat Reserve System, Federal Trade Commission, and Securities and Exchange Commission.
265Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-91.—State and municipal and corporate securities offered, 1934-82
[Millions of dollars]
Year or quarter
Stateand
municipalsecurities
offeredfor cash(princi-
palamounts)
Corporate securities offered for cash
Totalcorporateofferings
Type of corporate security
stockPreferred
stockBondsand
notes
Industry of corporate issuer
Manufac-turing l
Electric,gas, andwater2
Transpor-tation 3 Communi-
cation Other
1934....
1939....
1940....1941....1942....1943....1944....
1945....1946....1947....1948....1949....
1950....1951....1952....1953....1954....
1955....1956....1957....1958....1959....
1960....1961....1962....1963....1964....1965....1966....1967....1968....1969....
1970....1971....197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982; First 3quarters
1981:
II...,III...IV...
1982:
II...III..
939
1,128
1,238956524435661
7951,1572,3242,6902,907
3,5323,1894,4015,5586,969
5,9775,4466,9587,4497,681
7,2308,3608,55810,10710,544
11,14811,08914,28816,37411,460
17,76224,37022,94122,95322,824
29,32633,84545,06046,21542,261
47,13346,13449,231
9,15913,3619,88213,732
12,77017,62718,834
397
2,164
2,6772,6671,0621,1703,202
6,0116,9006,5777,0786,052
6,3627,7419,5348,8989,516
10,24010,93912,88411,5589,748
10,15413,16510,70512,21113,957
14,78217,38524,01421,26125,997
37,45143,22939,70531,68037,820
53,63253,31454,22948,21253,093
78,89672,50354,587
16,68123,75811,52920,535
15,57215,96023,055
87
1081103456163
397891779614736
8111,2121,3691,3261,213
2,1852,3012,5161,3342,027
1,6643,2941,3141,0112,679
1,4731,9011,9273,8857,6407,0379,485
10,7077,6424,050
7,4148,3058,0477,9378,706
18,99625,107
14,993
5,0119,6475,0935,356
4,6575,8004,536
183167112124369
7581,127762492425
631838564489816
635636411571531
409450422343412
724580881636691
1,3903,6833,3713,3412,273
3,4592,8033,9162,8323,530
3,6351,788
3,497
437267280
5821,1261,789
372
1,979
2,3862,389917990
2,670
4,8554,8825,0365,9734,890
67
604
992848539510
1,0612,0263,7012,7422,2261,414
4,9205,6917,6017,0837,488
7,4208,0029,9579,6537,190
8,0819,4208,969
10,85610,865
1,2003,1224,0392,2542,268
2,9943,6474,2343,5152,073
2,1524,0773,2493,5143,046
12,58514,90421,20616,74017,666
29,02330,06125,62820,70031,497
42,75942,20642,26637,44340,857
56,26545,606
36,097
10,86513,6746,168
14,899
10,3339,034
16,730
5,4147,056
11,0696,9586,346
10,64711,6516,3984,832
10,511
18,65215,49613,75711,06211,563
24,39817,395
9,847
5,5776,0441,8623,912
2,3481,7715,728
133
1,271
1,2031,357
472477
1,422
2,3192,1583,2572,1872,320
2,6492,4552,6753,0293,713
2,4642,5293,9383,8043,258
2,8513,0322,8252,6772,760
2,9343,6664,9355,2936,715
11,00911,72111,31410,26912,836
15,89314,41813,70412,25313,736
15,94014,495
13,127
3,2694,5162,9863,724
4,2694,3724,486
176
186
32436648161609
1,454711286755800
813494992595778
893724824824967
718694567957982
7021,4941,6391,5641,779
1,2531,148860811
1,005
3,6374,6493,2182,6963,297
3,7272,779
1,310
8581,211410300
399280631
902571
399612760882720
1,1321,4191,4621,424717
1,0501,8341,3031,1052,189
9452,0031,9751,7752.172
5,2915,8404,8364,8723,932
4,4663,5624,4433,6404,694
7,4016,158
1,765
1,3542,2941,807703
519556690
21
103
15996
21109
211329293
1,008946
1,3001,0581,0682,1382,037
2,7572,6192,4261,9912,733
3,3833,5272,7613,9574,980
4,7873,1674,3965,6718,985
9,25212,86716,29810,8979,632
10,98315,19419,11318,56519,803
27,42931,676
28,535
5,6239,6934,464
11,896
8,0378,978
11,520
1 Prior to 1948, also includes extractive, radio broadcasting, airline companies, commercial, and miscellaneous company issues.2 Prior to 1948, also includes telephone, street railway, and bus company issues.3 Prior to 1948, includes railroad issues only.Note.—Covers substantially all new issues of State, municipal, and corporate securities offered for cash sale in the United States in
amounts ovsr $100,000 and with terms to maturity of more than 1 year; excludes notes issued exclusively to commercial banks,intercorporate transactions, and issues to be sold over an extended period, such as employee-purchase plans. Closed-end investmentcompany Issues are included beginning 1973.
Sources: Securities and Exchange Commission, "The Commercial and Financial Chronicle," and "The Bond Buyer."
266Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-92.—Common stock prices and yields, 1949-82
Year or month
1949 ..
1950 ..195119521953 ..195419551956 ..195719581959 ..
19601961 ..1962196319641965 ..196619671968 ..1969
1970 ..19711972 .19731974197519761977 .. . .19781979 ..
1980 ..19811982
1981:Jan..FebMarApr..MayJune
JulyAug..Sept.OctNovDec
1982:JanFebMarAor
3»June:::::::;:::::::::::::::.:::::::
July..AugSeptOctNovDec
Common stock prices1
New York Stock Exchange indexes (De
Composite
9 02
10 8713.0813.8113.6716.1921.5424.4023.6724 5630.73
300135.3733 4937 5143 7647.3946.1550.7755.3754.67
45.7254.2260 2957.4243.8445.7354.4653.6953.7058.32
681074.0268.93
762473.5276.4677.6076.2876.80
74.98 <75.2468.3769 40714971.81
67 91661663.8666.9767.0763.10
62 8262 9170 2176.1079.7580.30
Industrial
46.1851.9758.0057.44
48.0357.9265.7363.0848.0850.5260.4457.8658.2364.76
78.7085.4478.18
89.2385.7489.3990.5788.7888.63
86.6486.7278.0778 9380 8681.70
76.8574 7871.5175.5975.9771.59
71.3770 9880 0886.6790.7692.00
Transpor-tation
50.2653.5150.5846.96
32.1444.35501737.7431.8931.1039.57410943.5047.34
60 6172.6160.41
74 4372.7677.0980.6376.7876.71
74.4273.2763 6765 6567 6868.27
62 0459 0955.1957.9156.8453.07
53 4053 98613966.6471.9273.40
;. 31, 1965
Utility
45.4145.4344.1942.80
37.2439.5338.4837.6929.7931.5036,9740 9239.2238.20
37 3538.9139.75
38 5337.5937.8238.3438.2739.23
38.9040.2238.1738 8740 7340.22
39 3038 3238.5739.2039.4037.34
37 20381940 3642.6743.4642.93
= 50)8
Finance
44.4549.8265.8570.49
60.0070.3878.3570.1249.6747.1452.9455.2556.6561.42
64.2573.5271.99
70.0468.4872.8274.5974.6579.79
74.9773.7669.3872.5676 4774.74
70.9970 5069.0871.4469.1663.19
61.5962 8469 6680.5988.6686.22
DowJones
industrialaverage3
179.48
216.31257.64270.76275 97333.94442.72493.01475.71491.66632.12
618.04691.55639.76714.81834.05910.88873.60879.12906.00876.72
753.19884.76950 71923.88759.37802.49974.92894.63820.23844.40
89141932.92884.36
962.13945.50987.18
1,004.86979.52996.27
947.94926.25853.38853 25860 44878.28
853 4183315812.33844.96846.72804.37
818 4183211917 27988.71
1,027.761,033.08
Standard& Poor's
compositeindex
(1941-43=10) 4
15.23
18.4022.3424.5024.7329.6940.4946.6244.3846.2457.38
55.8566.2762.3869.8781.3788.1785.2691.9398.7097.84
83.2298.29
109.20107.4382.8586.16
102.0198.2096.02
103.01
118.78128.05119.71
132.97128.40133.19134.43131.73132.28
129.13129.63118.27119.80122.92123.79
117.28114 50110.84116.31116.35109.70
109.38109 65122 43132.66138.10139.37
Common stock yields(percent)5
Dividend-priceratio6
6.59
6.576.135.805.804.954.084.094.353.973.23
3.472.983.373.173.013.003.403.203.073.24
3.833.142.843.064.474.313.774.625.285.47
5.265.205.81
4.805.004.884.864.985.03
5.185.165.695.655.545.57
5.956.066.285.995.976.28
6.316.325 635.124.924.93
Earnings-priceratio7
15,48
13 9911.829.47
10.268,577.957.557.896.235,78
5.904.625.825.505.325.596.635.735.67.6.08
6.455.415.507.12
11.599.158.90
10.7912.0313.46
12.6611.96
10.72
11.44
13.13
12.53
13.23
12.93
1 Averages of daily closing prices, except New York Stock Exchange data through May 1964 are averages of weekly closing prices.2 Includes all the stocks (more than 1,500) listed on the New York Stock Exchange.3 Includes 30 stocks.4 Includes 500 stocks.5 Standard & Poor's series, based on 500 stocks in the composite index.6 Aggregate cash dividends (based on latest known annual rate) divided by aggregate market value based on Wednesday closing
prices. Monthly data are averages of weekly figures; annual data are averages of monthly figures.7 Quarterly data are ratio of earnings (after taxes) for 4 quarters ending with particular quarter to price index for last day of that
quarter. Annual ratios are averages of quarterly ratios.Note.—All data relate to stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange.Sources: New York Stock Exchange, Dow Jones & Co., Inc., and Standard & Poor's Corporation.
267
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-93.—Business formation and business failures, 1929-82
Year or month
Indexof net
businessformation(1967=
100)
businessincorpor-
ations(number)
Business failures1
Businessfailurerate2
Number of failures
TotalLiability size class
Under$100,000
$100,000and over
Amount of current liabilities(millions of dollars)
TotalLiability size class
Under$100,000
$100,000and over
19291933 s1939"
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
1960196119621963196419651966196719681969
197019711972197319741975...1976197719781979
1980...1981...
104.886.4
90.890.194.592.490.898.295.491.491.198.1
94.591.192.894.798.099.598.9100.0107.6113.5
107.1109.5115.5115.5111.2108.8117.2126.5132.9131.7
121.1113.5
132,916112,89796,34685,640
93,09283,77892,946102,706117,411139,915141,163137,112150,781193,067
182,713181,535182,057186,404197,724203,897200,010206,569233,635274,267
264,209287,577316,601329,358319,149326,345375,766436,170478,019524,565
533,520581,242
103.9100.369.6
63.054.444.616.46.54.25.214.320.434.4
34.330.728.733.242.041.648.051.755.951.8
57.064.460.856.353.253.351.649.038.637.3
43.841.738.336.438.442.634.828.423.927.8
42.161.3
Seasonally adjusted
1981:Jan..,Feb..Mar..,
&
July..,Aug..,Sept,Oct...Nov...Dec,
1982: <Jan...Feb...Mar...
fcJune.July...Aug...Sept.
118.1117.1117.7118.0115.4114.6
113.1113.6111.5107.6108.8106.2
46,03948,58847,97249,41348,99749,172
49,03848,63148,45047,94749,41347,556
43,33047,23446,89946,87646,99545,936
44,52546,98145,552
48.647.847.661.862.060.8
65.953.387.069.465.772.2
22,90919,85914,768
13,61911,8489,4053,2211,222809
1,1293,4745,2509,246
9,1628,0587,6118,862
11,08610,96912,68613,73914,96414,053
15,44517,07515,78214,37413,50113,51413,06112,3649,6369,154
10,74810,3269,5669,3459,915
11,4329,6287,9196,6197,564
11,74216,794
1,1091,1331,2121,5571,4641,408
1,4321,1721,7771,6041,3681,558
8
22,165
14,541
13,40011,6859,2823,1551,176759
1,0033,1034,8538,708
8,7467,6267,0818,07510,226
5,6828,233
559546572736730711
739576879768655762
744979227
219163123664650126371397538
416432530787
10,11311,61512,547L3.49912,707
13,650L5.00613,77212,19211,346L1.34010,83310,1447,8297,192
8,0197,6117,0406,6276,7337,5046,1764,8613,7123,930
8561,0711,1921,4651,346
1,7952,0692,0102,1822,1552,1742,2282,2201,8071,962
2,7292,7152,5262,7183,1823,9283,4523,0582,9073,634
6,0608,561
550587640821734697
596898836713796
8
483.3457.5182.5
166.7136.1100.845.331.730.267.3
204.6234.6308.1248.3259.5283.3394.2462.6449.4562.7615.3728.3692.8
938.61,090.11,213.61,352.61,329.21,321.71,385.71,265.2
941.01,142.1
1,887.81,916.92,000.22,298.63,053.14,380.23,011.33,095.32,656.02,667.4
4,635.16,955.2
341.4789.2485.3536.9428.2408.5
619.5450.4752.3897.9618.8626.7
261.5215.5132.9
119.910O.780.330.214.511.415.763.793.9
161.4
151.2131.6131.9167.5211.4206.4239.8267.1297.6278.9
327.2370.1346.5321.0313.6321.7321.5297.9241.1231.3
269.3271.3258.8235.6256.9298.6257.8208.3164.7179.9
272.5405.8
27.625.728.044.835.132.3
37.727.542.636.730.737.2
221.8242.0
49.7
46.835.420.515.117.118.851.6
140.9140.7146.7
97.1128.0151.4226.6251.2243.0322.9348.2430.7413.9
611.4720.0867.1
1,031.61,015.61,000.01,064.1
967.3699.9910.8
1,618.41,645.61,741.52,063.02,796.34,081.62,753.42,887.02,491.32,487.5
4,362.66,549.3
313.8763.5457.3492.1393.1376.3
581.8422.9709.7861.2588.1589.5
81 Commercial and industrial failures only. Excludes failures of banks and railroads and, beginning 1933, of real estate, insurance,
holding, and financial companies, steamship lines, travel agencies, etc.2 Failure rate per 10,000 listed enterprises.3 Series revised; not strictly comparable with earlier data.4 Not available.Sources: Department of Commerce (Bureau of Economic Analysis) and Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
268Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
AGRICULTURE
TABLE B-94.—Farm income, 1929-82
[Billions of dollars; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates]
Year or quarter
192919331939
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
19501951 ....19521953195419551956195719581959
19601961196219631964196519661967..19681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
1980 . ...19811982"
1980:1||IllIV
1981.1IIIllIV
1982:|| | ...HIIV
Income of farm operators from
Gross farm income
Total1
13.86.9
10.7
11.314.319 923 324.025.429.632 436 530.8
33.138.337.834 434.233.534.034 839 037.9
38 940 542.343.442.346.550 550 551.856,4
58.762 071.098.898.0
1010101.9108.6127 3151.3
150 6166.8163.7
148.6145 2153 2155.4
161.8164 71715168.8
162.0163 0161.6168.1
Cash marketing receipts
Total
11.35.37.9
8.411.115.619.620.521.724.829.630.227.8
28.532.932.531.029.829.530.429.733.533.6
34.235.236.537.537.339.443.442.844.248,2
50.552.761.186.992.488.995.496.2
112.5131.7
139.5143.5142.9
135.3134.3143.6144.8
142.5142.3146 7142.5
143.4144.4143.2140.6
Livestockand
products
6.22.84.5
4.96.59.0
11.511.412.013.816.517.115.4
16.119.618.216.916.316.016.417.419.218.9
19.019.520.220.019.921.925.024.425.528.6
29.530.535.645.841.343.146.347.658.868.6
67.868.569.0
66.764.469.370.8
67.969.471.065.7
67.470.170.468.1
Crops
5.12.53.3
3.54.6658.19.29.7
11.013113112.4
12.413.214.314.113.613.514.012 314.214.7
15315716.317.417.417.518 418.418.719.6
21.022 325.541.151.145 849.048.653 763.1
71775.073.9
68.669 974 374.0
74.672 975 776.8
76.074 372.872.5
Value ofinventorychanges"
- 0 . 1- . 2
.1
.3
.41.1
- . 1- . 4- . 4
.0- 1 . 8
1.7- . 9
.81.2
.9- . 6
.5
.2
~.s.8.0
.4
.3
.6
.6- . 81.0
- . 1.7.1.1
.01.4.9
3.4- 1 . 6
3.4- 2 . 4
1.01.15.6
- 4 . 35.5
- . 2
- 1 . 4- 4 . 2- 6 . 0- 5 . 6
2.55.37.27.0
- 1 . 0- . 5
.0
.5
arming
Produc-tion
expenses
7.74.46.3
6.97.8
10.011.612.313.114.517 018.818.0
19.522.322.821.521.822.222.723.725.827.2
27.428.630.331.631.833.736.538.239.542.1
44,447.252.165.472.075.883.390.2
100.6119.0
130.5141.6144.2
125.7128.7132.0135.4
139.0141.0143.2143.2
143.7144.2144.3144.6
Net farm income
Currentdollars
6.22.64.4
4.56.599
11.711.712.315.115 417.712,8
13.615.915.013.012.411.311.311.113.210.7
11.512.012.111.810.512.914.012.312.314.3
14.214.818.933.426.025.218.718.426.732.4
20.125.119.5
22.916.521.220.0
22.823.728.325.6
18.318.817.323.5
1967dollars3
12.06.6
10.6
10.714.720 222 722.222.825.823 024 517.9
18.920.518.816.215.414.113.813.115.212.3
13 013 313.312.811.313.714.412.311.813.0
12.212.215.125.117.615.611.010.213.614.9
8.29.26.7
9.56.88.57.8
8.68.8
10.29.1
6.56.65.98.0
JCash marketing receipts and inventory changes plus Government payments, other farm cash income, and nonmoney incomefurnished by farms.
2 Physical changes in end-of-period inventory of crop and livestock commodities valued at average prices during the period.3 Income in current dollars divided by the consumer price index (Department of Labor).
Source: Department of Agriculture, except as noted.
269
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-95.—Farm output and productivity indexes, 1929-82
[1977 = 100]
Year
Farm output
Total *
44
42
48
5052585759
5860586362
6163666666
6969677374
7676778079
8279838585
8492919388
100104111
103115117
Crops2
Total8
48
43
49
5152585558
5659566461
5960626261
6363626968
7270717472
7673777980
7786879284
9392100102113
101116120
Feedgrains
38
35
40
4144514749
4751395750
5147504951
5454586466
6962626859
7070797578
71928891749196100108116
97121124
Foodgrains
39
27
36
4045484151
5355646253
4949635751
4850476955
6660565965
6767768074
698177869110810710093108
121143140
Oilcrops
6
5
14
1616232320
2019222726
2626262628
3034333936
3843444646
5355566465
6668748771
8674100105129
99114103
Live-stockandprod-ucts*
50
54
56
5760677269
6866656467
7073747477
7979787983
8286868991
8991949495
9910010199100
9599100101104
106108107
Productivity indicators
r«.mrarmoutputper
unit oftotalInput
45
45.
50
5253585657
5860586360
6061636464
6768687474
7778798281
8583858788
8794949590
9997100102106
100112114
Cropproduc-tionper
acre*
48
43
51
5354595558
5760576460
5959626261
6364657372
7778818381
8583868991
889€999988
9694100105113
99113118
Farm output per
Total
9
9
11
1213141414
1516161819
1920222324
2628293335
3739414547
5253586263
6674788179
8994100109119
112129131
Id 111) WVIP
Crops
10
10
12
1314151516
1618182020
2222242526
2830333837
4142454749
5659636668
7079848780
8991100105118
104121126
hour of
Live-stockandprod-ucts
14
13
14
1415161616
1617171818
1920212223
2425262831
3235374043
4549535559
6468737682
8593100109118
129138137
1929...
1933...
1939...
1940...1941...,1942....1943...,1944...,
1945...,1946...,1947....1948....1949....
1950....1951....1952....1953....1954....
1955....1956....1957....1958....1959....
I960....1961..,.1962....1963....1964....
1965....1966....1967....1968....1969....
1970....1971....1972....1973....1974....
1975...1976....1977....1978....1979....
1980....1981....1982",.
1 Farm output measures the annual volume of net farm production available for eventual human use through sales from farms orconsumption in farm households.1 Gross production.
3 Includes items not included in groups shown.* Computed from variable weights for individual crops produced each year.Source: Department of Agriculture.
270Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-96.—Farm input use, selected inputs, 1929-82
Year
Farm populationApril1
Num-ber
(thou-sands)
Asper-cent
oftotalpopu-
lation2
Farm employment(thousands)3
TotalFam-
ilywork-
ers
Hiredwork-
ers
Cropshar-
vested(mil-
lions ofacres)*
Selected indexes of input use (1977=100)
Total Farmlabor
Farmreal
estate
Me-chanicalpower
andmachin-
ery
culturalchemi-cals8
Feed,seed,andlive-
stockpur-
chases8
1929..
1933..
1939..
1940....1941..,.19421943....1944
1945....1946....1947....1948....1949....
1950..1951..1952..1953..1954..
1955....1956....195719581959
I960..1961..1962..1963..1964..
1965..1966..1967..1968..1969..
1970..1971..1972..1973..1974..
1975..1976..1977..1978..1979..
198019811982 "...
30,580
32,393
30,840
30,54730,11828,91426,18624,815
24,42025,40325,82924,38324,194
23,04821,89021,74819,87419,019
19,07818,71217,65617,12816,592
15,63514,80314,31313,36712,954
12,36311,59510,87510,45410,307
9,7129,4259,6109,4729,264
8,8648,253
'6,1946.5016,241
'6,051'5,790
25.1
25.8
23.5
23.122.621.419.217.9
17.518.017.916.616.2
15.214.213.912.511.7
11.511.110.39.89.3
8.78.17.77.16.7
6.45.95.55.25.1
4.74.54.64.54.3
4.13.8
'2 .8'2.97 2.8
'2 .7'2.5
12,763
12,739
11,338
10,97910,66910,50410,44610,219
10,00010,29510,38210,3639,964
9,9269,5469,1498,8648,651
8,3817,8527,6007,5037,342
7,0576,9196,7006,5186,110
5,6105,2144,9034,7494,596
4f5234,4364,3734,3374,389
4,3424,3744,1553,9573,774
3,7058 3,816
3,700
9,360
9,874
8,611
8,3008,0177,9498,0107,988
7,8818,1068,1158,0267,712
7,5977,3107,0056,7756,570
6,3455,9005,6605,5215,390
5,1725,0294,8734,7384,506
4,1283,8543,6503.5353,419
3,3483,2753,2283,1693,075
3,0262,9972,8592,6892,501
2,4022,4562,405
3,403
2,865
2,727
2,6792,6522,5552,4362,231
2,1192,1892,2672,3372,252
2,3292,2362,1442,0892,081
2,0361,9521,9401,9821,952
1,8851,8901,8271,7801,604
1,4821,3601,2531,2131,176
1,1751,1611,1461,1681,314
1,3171,3771,2961,2681,273
1,3031,3601,295
365
340
331
341344348357362
354352355356360
345344349348346
340324324324324
324302295298298
298294306300290
293305294321328
336337345338349
352366365
100
94
96
9798101102103
1019999100103
102105105104103
1031019998100
9898989898
9696989897
9798989898
9799100101104
103103
469
457
419
417411421416412
386371351342329
310310296285274
264249231222216
207198189183174
156147143138133
126123117115112
1071031009593
9290
106
99
104
106104102101100
101105105106107
108108107107107
107105104103104
102102103103103
102101103102101
10410210110098
9798100100100
101101
82868786
8687879093
9698100104107
105105
9101113
1314151618
1921232424
2627272832
3235384346
4956666973
7581869092
8396100107118
120123
28
26
37
3942444848
5049515256
5862636365
6669687377
7781838385
8689928993
9610210410799
93101100104111
108106
'Farm population as defined by Department of Agriculture and Department of Commerce, i.e., civilian population living on farms inrural areas, regardless of occupation. See also footnote 7.
2 Total population of United States including Armed Forces overseas, as of July 1.3 Includes persons doing farmwork on all farms. These data, published by the Department of Agriculture, differ from those on
agricultural employment by the Department of Labor (see Table B-31) because of differences in the method of approach, in concepts ofemployment, and in time of month for which the data are collected.4Acreage harvested plus acreages in fruits, tree nuts, and farm gardens.5 Fertilizer, lime, and pesticides.
sNonfarm constant dollar value of feed, seed, and livestock purchases.'Based on new definition of a farm. Under old definition of a farm, farm population (in thousands and as percent of total
population) for 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1981 is 7,806 and 3.5; 8,005 and 3.6; 7,553 and 3.4; 7,241 and 3.2; and 6,942 and 3.0,respectively.8 Previous basis for farm employment series has been discontinued. Employment after 1980 is estimated.
Note.—Population includes Alaska and Hawaii beginning 1960.Sources.- Department of Agriculture and Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census).
271Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-97.—Indexes of prices received and prices paid by farmers, 1940-82[1977-100]
Year or month
1940194119421943194419451946194719481949
1950195119521953195419551956195719581959
I96019611962196319641965 .. ..1966196719681969
1970197119721973197419751976197719781979
198019811982"1981:
JanFebMarAprMay......:..:::::::::::::::::JuneJulyAug ,Septoct I.::..:::::::::::::::;.NovDec
1982:JanFebMarApr|£yJune:::::::: ::::::::::::::::JulyAugSeptOctNovDec*
Prices received by farmers
Allfarmprod-ucts
22273542434552606355566663565451505155535253535352545855565960626998105101102100115132134138133
145144143143142142142138133130130128
132133133135139137136133136128129127
Crops
21253443464753615952546162555653545252515152545555535552525052566091117105102100105116125134122
144144145143142138138130120120121122
126123120123125125124119125114118116
Live-stockandprod-ucts
2329364141445060655658706456524947515753535253514954605760676767771049498101100124147144143144
146145141144143147147146145140138133
137142145147151149148147146142140138
Prices paid by farmers
Allcommod-ities,
services,interest,taxes,andwageratesl
18192225262830353836374142404040404243434444454545474949515355586271818995100108123
138150155
147148149150150150150151151150150150
153153154154155156156156156155156155
Production items
Total2
21222628303033394341424747444443434446464646474747485050505254576173839197100108125
138148150
146146147149149150148148148147147145
148148150150150151151151150149149149
Tractorsandself-pro-pelledmachin-ery
394042444749515458688291100109122136152165
142142146146146155155155159159159159
159159161161161167167167168168168168
Fertil-izer
3737414444454550555654575959595857585857575858575757565552484850525692120102100100108134144144
136136145145147147147147147144144143
143143147147146146146146146141141139
Fuelsand
energy
494950505152535457798893100105137188213211
201212216217216215214214214214214214
217215207200202212214213213212213209
Wagerates
781014171920222322222526272727282930323333343536384144485357596369798593100107117127136136
140140140135135135135135135135135135
136136136136136136136136136136136136
Adden-dum:Aver-agefarmreal
estatevalueper
acre3
777891011131414141618181819192122232425262729313335384042434753667586100109125145158157
158
157
1 Includes items used for family living, not shown separately.* Includes other items not shown separately.3 Average for 48 States. Annual data are for March 1 of each year through 1975, for February 1 for 1976 through 1981, and for April 1,
for 1982. Monthly data are for first of month.Source: Department of Agriculture.
272Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-98.—U.S. exports and imports of agricultural commodities, 1940-82
[Billions of dollars]
Year
19401941194219431944
19451946194719481949
1950195119521953 . .1954
19551956195719581959
I960.. ..1961196219631964
19651966196719681969
197019711972.19731974
197519761977 _19781979
19801981
Jan-Nov:19811982.
Exports
Total»
0.5.7
1.22.12.1
2.33.14.03.53.6
294.0342.83.1
3.24.24.53.94.0
4.8505.05.66.3
6.26.96.46.36.0
737.794
17.721.9
21.923 023.629.434.7
41.243.3
39.733.7
Feedgrains
(*4444
.1
.3
2.3
.3
.3
.4
.3
.6
.55.8.8.9
1.11.3
.9
.9
111.0153.54.6
5.2604.95.97.7
9.89.4
8.75.9
Foodgrains2
( ' l.4.7
1.41.51.1
61.111
'.5
.61.01.0.8.9
1.2141.31.51.7
1.41.81.51.41.2
141.31.84.75.4
6.2473.65.56.3
7.99.6
8.97.4
Oil-seedsand
prod-ucts
t*4
4(n
.2
.3
2
2.2.3
.4
.5
.5
.6
.6
.6
'.B1.0
1.21.21.31.3
. 1.3
192.22.44.35.7
4.5516.68.28.9
9.49.6
8.78.3
Cot-ton
0.2.1
.2
.3
4̂
!9
1.01.1
9
[B
.5
l.Q.7.4
1.0.9
'.B
.5
.4
.5
.5
.3
4.6.5.9
1.3
1.0101.51.72.2
2.92.3
2.01.8
To-bacco
.2
.2
.4
.3
'.3
.3
2
.3
.4
.3
.4
.4
.3
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
.6
.5
7.7.8
.99
1.11.41.2
1.31.5
1.31.4
Ani-malsand
prod-ucts
0.1.3.8
1.21.3
.9
.9
.7,5.4
.3
.3A.5
.6
.7
.7
.5
.6
.6
.6
.6
'.B
.8
7.7.8
91.01.11.61.8
1.7242.73.03.8
3.84.2
3.93.6
Total *
1.31.71.31.51.8
1.7232.83.12.9
4.05.24.54.24.0
4.04.04.03.94.1
3.83.73.94.04.1
4.14.54.55.05.0
5.85.86.58.4
10.2
9.311013.414.816.7
17.416.8
15.414.0
Crops,fruits,and
vege-tabfes3
( 4I.1
.1
'.2
.2
,2
.2
.2
.2
'.2
1
.2
.3
.3
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
.6
.7
.8
.8
.8
.91.21.51.7
1.72.0
1.92.2
mports
Ani-malsand
prod-ucts
0.2.3
A.3
.4
.4
.4
.6
.4
.71.1
J.6.5
.5
.4
7.8
.6
.9
.9
.8
.91.21.11.31.4
1.61.51.82.62.2
1.82.32.33.13.9
3.83.5
3.23.3
Cof-fee
0.1.2
!3
.3
'6
'.&
1.11.41.41.51.5
1.41.41.41.21.1
1.01.01.01.01.2
1.11.11.01.2.9
1.21.21.31.71.6
1.72.94.24.04.2
4.22.9
2.62.6
Cocoabeansand
prod-ucts
4
4444
Ki.1
.2
'.3
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.2
2
.3
.2
.2
.3
.5
.61.01.41.2
.9
.9
.9
Agri-culturatrade
balance
- 0 . 8- 1 0- . 1
6.3
.5
.81.2.37
- 1 1-1 .1- 1 1-1 .3- . 9
- . 8.2.6
(4)- 1
1.0131.21.62.3
2.12.41.91.31.1
151.9299.3
117
12.612 010.214.618.0
23.926.6
24.319.7
1 Total includes items not shown separately.2 Rice, wheat, and wheat flour.3 Includes nuts, fruits, and vegetable preparations.Hess than $50 million.Note.—Data derived from official estimates released by the Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce. Agricultural commodities
are defined as (1) nonmarine food products and (2) other products of agriculture which have not passed through complex processes ofmanufacture. Export value, at U.S. port of exportation, is based on the selling price and includes inland freight, insurance, and othercharges to the port. Import value, defined generally as the market value in the foreign country, excludes import duties, ocean freight,and marine insurance.
Source: Department of Agriculture.
273Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-99.—Balance sheet of the farming sector, 1929-83
[Billions of dollars]
Beginning ofyear
Assets
Total Realestate
Live-stock »
Other physical assets
Machin-ery andmotor
vehiclesCropss
House-hold
equip-mentand
furnish-ings
Financial assets
Depos-its
andcur-
rency
U.S.savingsbonds
Invest-ments incooper-atives
Claims
TotalReal
estatedebt
Otherdebt
Propri-etors'
equities
1929... 48.0 6.6 3.2 9.8
1933...
1939...
30.8
34.1
19401941194219431944
19451946194719481949
19501951195219531954
1955..,.1956195719581959....
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
1975 3
197619771978 ..1979
1980..,.1981....1982....1983*.
53.054.862.973.684.0
93.8102.9115.9127.4134.6
134.5154.3170.1167.6164.5
168.9173.6182.8191.3207.6
210.2210.9219.3227.6235.8
243.8260.8274.3288.0302.8
314.9326.0351.8394.8478.6
502.6576.3664.2736.3873.4
1,004.81,091.01.091.81.070.0
33.634.437.541.648.2
53.961.068.573.776.6
77.689.598.5
100.198.7
102.2107.5115.7121.8131.1
137.2138.5144.5150.2158.6
167.5179.2189.1199.7209.2
215.8223.2239.6267.3327.8
359.7418.1496.4554.7655.0
755.9830.0823,8789.1
5.15.37.19.69.7
9.09.7
11.913.314.4
12.917.119.514.811.7
11.210.611.013.917.7
15.215.616.417.315.9
14.517.619.018.820.2
23.523.727.334.142.4
24.529.429.031.951.3
61.460.853.658.3
3.13.34.04.95.4
6.55.45,37.4
10.1
12.214.116.717.418.4
18.719.320.220.121.8
22.722.222.523.523.9
24.826.027.429.831.3
32.334.436.639.344.2
54.764.071.077.085.1
96.7102.8111.4115.3
2.73.03.85.16.1
6.76.37.19.08.6
7.67.98.89.09.1
9.68.38.37.69.3
7.78:08.89.39.8
9.29.7
10.09.6
10.6
10.910.711.814.522.0
23.321.322.124.828.0
33.535.936.537.5
4.24.14.84.84.7
5.25.67.28.18.9
8.49.6
10.19.69.5
9.710.09.69.69.4
9.28.78.98.88.8
8.48.48.38.89.4
9.610.010.811.912.3
11.211.712.113.816.0
17.219.421.722.4
3.23.54.25.46.6
7.99.4
10.29.99.6
9.19.19.49.49.4
9.49.59.49.5
10.0
9.28.78.89.29.2
9.610.010.310.911.5
11.912.413.214.014.9
14.014.514.815.215.5
15.916.216.817.3
0.2.4.5
1.12.2
3.44.24.24.44.6
4.74.74.74.64.7
5.05.25.15,15.2
4.74.64.54.44.2
4.24.13.93.83.8
3.73.63.74.04.1
3.83.93.83.94.2
4.03,83.63.5
0.8.9.9
1.01.1
1.21.41.51.71.9
2.12.32.52.72.9
3.03.23.53.73.9
4.24.54.85.05.4
5.65.96.26.56.8
7.28.0
10.9
11.413,414.915.218.3
20.222.224.426.6
53.054.862.973.684.0
93.8102.9115.9127.4134.6
134.5154.3170.1167.6164.5
168.9173.6182.8191.3207.6
210.2210.9219.3227.6235.8
243.8260.8274.3288.0302.8
314.9326.0351.8394.8478.6
502.6576.3664.2736.3873.4
1,004.81,091.01,091.81,070.0
8.5
6.8
6.66.56.46.05.4
4.94.84.95.15.3
5.66.16.77.27.7
8.29.09.8
10.411.1
12.012.813.915.216.8
18.921.223.125.127.4
29.230.332,235.139.5
44.649.655.263.371.4
85.495.5
105.6110.0
3.44.04.13.93.5
3.43.13.54.16.1
6.97.07.98.99.2
9.59.89.5
10.012.6
12.713.414.616.217.6
17.919.520.922.323.1
23.824.127.429.833.8
37.041.948.759.469.4
80.486.496.1
105.0
43.044.352.563.875.1
85.495.0
107.5118.1123.3
122.1141.3155.5151.5147.6
151.2154.9163.4170.8183.9
185.4184.7190.9196.2201.4
207.0220.1230.2240.6252.3
261.9271.5292.2329.9405.3
421.0484.8560.3613.6732.6
839.0909.0890.1855.0
1 Beginning with 1961, horses and mules are excluded.3 Includes all crops held on farms and crops held off farms by farmers as security for Commodity Credit Corporation loans.9 Beginning 1975, data are for farms included in the new .farm definition, that is, places with sates of $1,000 or more annually.4 Forecast.Note.—Beginning I960, data include Alaska and Hawaii.Source: Department of Agriculture.
274Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICS
TABLE B-100.—Exchange rates, 1967-82
[Cents per unit of foreign currency, except as noted]
Year and month
March 1973
196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:III. ..IllIV
1982:1IIIllIV
March 1973
1967...19681969
19701971 .1972 .19731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:1IIIffIV
1982:
flIll(V
Belgian franc
2.5378
2.01252.00261.9942
2.01392.05982.27162.57612.5713
2.72532.59212.79113.18093.4098
3.42472.70072.1844
2.96332.68992.51572.6465
2.41662.22162.10172.0529
Netherlandsguilder
34.834
27.75927.62627.592
27.65128.65031.15335.97737.267
39.63237.84640.75246.28449.843
50.36940.19137.427
43.86439.56737.05740.500
38.83637.92036.60936.526
Canadiandollar
100.333
92.68992.80192.855
95.80299.021100.93799.977102.257
98.297101.41094.11287.72985.386
85.53083.40881.011
83.78483.42782.54783.918
87.72180.36680.02281.199
Swedish krona
22.582
19.37319.34919.342
19.28219.59221.02222.97022.563
24.14122.95722.38322.13923.323
23.64719.86015.914
21.97620.52018.86618.096
17.43216.92916.22913.660
French franc
22.191
20.32320.19119.302
18.08718.14819.82522.53620.805
23.35420.94220.34422.21823.504
23.69418.48915.199
20.60918.48417.24717.682
16.68615.94914.39614.143
Swiss franc
31.084
23.10423.W923.186
23.19924.32521.19331.70033.688
38.74340.01341.71456.28360.121
59.69751.02549.196
52.81849.09847.75754.726
53.35850.12447.27246.739
German mark
35.548
25.08425.04825.491
27.42428.76831.36437.75838.723
40.72939.73743.07949.86754.561
55.08944.36241.186
48.00843.95841.170. 44.508
42.63042.04840.26839.998
United Kingdompound
247.24
275.04239.35239.01
239.59244.42250.08245.10234.03
222.16180.48174.49191.84212.24
232.58202.43174.80
230.96207.91183.62188.22
184.61177.95172.41164.81
Italian lira
0.17604
.16022
.16042
.15940
.15945
.16174
.17132
.17192
.15372
.15338
.12044
.11328
.11782
.12035
.11694
.08842
.07386
.09995
.08827
.08232
.08352
.07932
.07575
.07169
.06968
Japanese yen
0.38190
.27613
.27735
.27903
.27921
.28779
.32995,36915.34302
.33705
.33741
.37342
.47981
.45834
.44311
.45432
.40151
.48644
.45491
.43172
.44572
.42821
.41003
.38614
.38697
Multilateral trade-weighted value ofthe U.S. dollar (March 1973=100)
Nominal
100.0
12O.0122.1122.4
121.1117.8109.199.1101.4
98.5105.6103.392.488.1
87.4102.9116.6
94.5103.1110.0105.4
109.9114.0119.8122.2
Real1
100.0
98.899.2
93.997.393.184.283.2
84.8100.8111.7
92.3100.3108.0102.7
106.0109.2115.3116.2
•Adjusted by the consumer price index for all urban consumers.Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
275Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-101.—£7.5. international transactions, 1946-82
[Millions of dollars; quarterly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted. Credits ( + )• debits ( }]
Year orquarter
Merchandise12
Exports Imports Net
Investment income3
Receipts Payments Net
Netmilitarytransac-
tions
Nettraveland
transpor-tation
receipts
Otherserv-ices,net a
Balanceon goods
andservices *A
Remit-tances,
pensions,and otherunilateraltransfers'
Balanceon
currentac-
count l *
1946..1947..1948..1949..
1950..1951..1952..1953..1954..
1955..1956..1957..1958..1959..
I960..1961..1962..1963..1964..
1965..1966..1967..1968..1969..
1970..1971..1972..1973..1974..
1975,.1976..1977..1978..1979..
1980....1981....
1980:I
IV
1981:I
IV
1982:
II111*..
11,76416,09713,26512,213
10,20314,24313,44912,41212,929
14,42417,55619,56216,41416,458
19,65020,10820,78122,27225,501
26,46129,31030,66633,62636,414
42,46943,31949,38171,41098,306
107,088114,745120,816142,054184,473
224,237236,254
54,75255,84355,78657,856
60,68360,28457,69457,593
55,78055,17452,480
^5,067^5,973-7,557-6,874
-9,081-11,176-10,838-10,975-10,353
-11,527= 12,803-13,291= 12,952-15,310
= 14,758= 14,537= 16,260-17,048-18,700
=21,510=25,493-26,866-32,991-35,807
- 39,866=45,579-55,797-70,499
-103,649
-98,041=-124,051= 151,689475,813
-211.819
-249,575264,143
-64,431-62,363-59,735=63,046
-64,995-66,831-65,539-66,778
-61,653- 60,869=64,938
6,69710,1245,7085,339
1,1223,0672,61114372,576
2,8974,7536,2713,4621,148
4,8925,5714,5215,2246,801
4,9513,8173,800
635607
2,603-2,260-6,416
911-5,343
9,047-9,306
-30,873-33,759-27,346
-25,338-27,889
-9,679-6,520-3,949-5,190
-4,312-6,547=7,845-9,185
-5,873-5,695
-12,458
7721,1021,9211,831
2,0682,6332,7512,7362,929
3,4063,8374,1803,7904,132
4,6164,9995,6186,1576,824
7,4377,5288,0209,368
10,912
11,74712,70714,76421,80827,587
25,35129,28632,17942,24564,129
72,68685,945
19,94416,01617,84818,877
20,52821,64222,04821,727
20,89022,56221,880
-212- 2 4 5-437=476
- 5 5 9- 5 8 3- 5 5 5- 6 2 4- 5 8 2
- 6 7 6- 7 3 5- 7 9 6- 8 2 5
-1,061
-1,237-1,245-1,324-1,561-1,784
-2,088-2 ,481-2,747-3,378-4,869
-5,516-5,436-6,572-9,655
-12,084
-12,564-13,311-14,217-21,680-32,914
-42,776-52,908
= 10,505-10,268-10,485-11,519
-12,405-13,441-13,865-13,198
-14,029-14,874-14,462
560857
1,4841,355
1,5092,0502,1962,1122,347
2,7303,1023,3842,9653,071
3,3793,7544,2944,5965,040
5,3495,0475,2735,9906,043
6,2317,2718,192
12,15315,503
12,78715,97517,96220,56531,215
29,91033,037
9,4395,7487,3637,358
8,1238,2018,1838,529
6,8617,6887,418
-493-455^799-621
-576-1,270-2,054-2,423-2,460
-2,701-2,788-2,841-3,135=-2,805
-2,752-2,596-2,449-2,304-2,133
-2,122-2,935-3,226-3,143=3,328
-3,354-2,893-3,420-2,070-1,653
-746559
1,528621
-2,035
-2,471-1,541
•=931-514-286-742
=-48758761
-528
167247527
733946374230
-12029883
-238-269
-297-361-189-633-821
-964-978
-1,152-1,309-1,146
-1,280-1,331-1,750-1,548-1,763
-2,038-2,345-3,063-3,158-3,184
-2,792-2,558-3,293-3,125-2,429
-940-231
-436= 216-114-174
-495-139200203
-66-=319-201
310145175208
242254309307305
299447482486573
579594809960
1,041
1,3871,3651,6121,6301,833
2,1802,4952,7663,1843,986
4,5984,7115,2245,9555,690
7,1447,702
1,6441,8081,8101,879
1.8381,9811,9601,924
2,0342,0502.140
7,80711,6176,9426,511
2,1774,3993,1451,1952,499
2,9285,1537,1073,1451,166
5,1326,3466,0257,1679,604
8,2855,9635,7083,5633,393
5,6252,269
= 1,94111,0219,309
22,8939,382
-9,451-9,743
5,095
8,30311,079
37306
4,8243,131
4,6672,9092,559
943
3,1233,9712,574
=2,922=2,625-4,525= 5,638
=4,017= 3,515-2,531-2,481-2,280
-2,498-2,423-2,345=2,361=2,448
-2,308-2,524-2,638=2,754-2,781
-2,854-2,932-3,125-2,952-2,994
-3,294-3,701-3,854-3,881
8 -7 ,186
=4,613-4,998-4,617-5,030-5,561
=6,783-6,608
= 1,837-1,306-1,444-2,195
-1,422-1,510-1,808= 1,870
-2,048-1,740-1,653
4,8858,9922,417
873
-1,840884614
= 1,286219
4302,7304,762
784-1,282
2,8243,8223,3874,4146,823
5,4323,0312,583
611399
2,331-1,433-5,795
7,1402,124
18,2804,384
-14,068-14,773
466
1,5204,471
-1,800-1,000
3,380936
3,2451,399
751-927
1,0752,231
-4,227
1 Excludes military.8 Adjusted from Census data for differences in valuation, coverage, and timing.o Fees and royalties from U.S. direct investments abroad or from foreign direct investments in the United States are excluded from
investment income and included in other services, net.4 In concept balance on goods and services is equal to net exports and imports in the national income and product accounts (and
the sum of balance on current account and allocations of special drawing rights is equal to net foreign investment in the accounts),although the series differ because of different handling of certain items (gold, extraordinary military shipments, etc.), revisions, etc.
6 Includes extraordinary U.S. Government transactions with India.See next page for continuation of table.
276Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-101.—U.S. international transactions, 1946-82—Continued
[Millions of dollars; quarterly data seasonally adjusted, except as noted]
Year orquarter
1946194719481949
19501951195219531954
19551956195719581959
19601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
1980:
IIIIIIV
1981:1IIIllIV
1982:1II| | | p
U.S. assets abroad, net[increase/capital outflow < - ) ]
Total
-4,099-5,538-4,174-7,270-9,560
-5,716-7,321-9.757
-10.977-11,585
-9,337-12,475-14,497-22,874-34,745
-39,703-51,269-34,785-61,130-64.344
-86,026-109,294
-12,916-24,962-19,635-28,512
-22,796-21,566-17,257-47,677
-31,201-37,790-26,364
U.S.officialreserveassets6
- 6 2 33 315
-1,736266
1,758- 3 3415
1,256480
182869
-1,1652,2921,035
2,145607
1,535378171
1,22557053
- 8 7 0-1,179
2,4812,349
158-1,467
- 8 4 9-2,558
- 3 7 5732
-1,133
-8,155-5,175
-3,268502
-1,109-4,279
-4,529- 9 0 5
262
-1,089-1,132
- 7 9 4
OtherU.S.
Govern-ment
assets
-1,100- 9 1 0
-1,085-1,662-1,680
-1,605-1,543-2,423-2,274-2,200
-1,589-1,884-1,568-2,644
«366
-3,474-4,214-3,693-4,660- 3 > 4 3
-5,126-5,137
-1,438-1,143-1,390-1,154
-1,375-1,518-1,257
- 9 8 7
- 9 0 4-1,547-2,418
U.S.privateassets
5,144-5,235
4,623-5,986
8,050
5,336-6,347-7,386-7,833-8,206
10,22912,940
-12,92520,388
-33,643
-35,38044,498
-30,717-57,202
59,469
-72,74698,982
-8,21024,32117,136
-23,079
16,892-19,143-15,996-46,952
-29,20835,111
-23,152
Foreign assets in the U.S., net[increase/capital inflow ( + )]
Total
2,2942,7051,9113,2173,643
7423,6617,3799,928
12,702
6,35922,97021,46118,38834,241
15,67036,51851,31964,03638,460
54,48477,921
7,8658,616
12,64725,356
8,47013,46416,88039,107
25,08029,61916,054
Foreignofficialassets
1,473765
1,2701,9861,660
134- 6 7 23,451- 7 7 4
-1,301
6,90826,87910,4756,026
10,546
7,02717,69336,81633,678
-13,697
15,4424,785
7,4217,6447,5417,678
5,361-2,861-5,835
8,119
-3,1221,9982,102
Otherforeignassets
8211,939
6411,2311,983
6074,3333,928
10,70314,002
- 5 5 0-3,90910,98612,36223,696
8,64318,82614,50330,35852,157
39,04273,136
15,286972
5,10617,677
3,10916,32422,71530,988
28,20227,62113,952
Alloca-tions ofspecialdrawingrights(SDRs)
867717710
1,1*39"
1,1521,093
1,152
1.093
Statisticaldiscrepancy
Total(sum of
the itemswith signreversed)
- 1 0 1 9- 9 8 9
-1,124- 3 6 0- 9 0 7
- 4 5 8629
- 2 0 5438
-1,516
- 2 1 9-9,779-1,879-2,654-1,620
5,75310,367
-2,46511,86625,212
28,87025,809
5,70017,3463,6082,219
9,9886,703- 3 7 49,497
5,0455,940
14,537
Of which:Seasonaladjust-ment
discrep-ancy
- 6 4 3795
-2,7542,605
-=829503
-2,1442,474
- 8 9 9574
-1,973
e Consists of gold, special drawing rights, convertible currencies, and the U.S. reserve position in the International Monetary Fund(ItVlrJ.
Note.—Quarterly data for U.S. official reserve assets and foreign assets in the United States are not seasonally adjusted.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
277Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-102,—U.S. merchandise exports and imports by principal end-use category, 1965-82
[Millions of dollars; quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or quarter
1965 .. .1966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
19801981
1980:1||IllIV
1981:|||IIIIV
1982:III|[|P
Exports
Total
26,46129,31030,66633,62636,414
42,46943,31949,38171,41098,306
107.088114,745120,816142,054184,473
224,237236.254
54,75255.84355,78657.856
60,68360,28457,69457,593
55,78055,17452,480
Agricul-tural
6.3056,9496,4536,2976,096
7,3747,8319,513
17.97822,412
22,24223,38124,33129,90235,594
42,15644,264
10,15910,15910,70611,132
12,57511,1519,947
10,591
10,51010.6738,496
Nonagricultural
Total
20,15622,36124,21327,32930,318
35,09535,48839,86853,43275,894
84,84691,36496,485
112,152148,879
182,081191,990
44,59345,68445,08046,724
48,10849,13347,74747,002
45,27044,50143,984
Capitalgoodsexceptauto-
motive
8,0528,9079,934
11,11112,369
14,65915,37216,91421,99930,878
36,63939,11239,76746,47058,842
74,17881,666
17,07018,45818,96519,685
20,12221,10720,23620,201
19,35419,31018,571
Othergoods
12,10413,45414,27916,21817,949
20,43620,11622,95431,43345,016
48,20752,25256,71865,68290,037
107,903110,324
27,52327,22626,11527,039
27,98628,02627,51126,801
25,91625,19125,413
Imports
Total
21,51025,49326,86632,99135,807
39,86645,57955,79770,499
103,649
98,041124,051151,689175,813211,819
249,575264,143
64,43162,36359,73563,046
64,99566,83165,53966.778
61,65360,86964,938
Petro-leumand
products
2.0342,0782,0912,3842,649
2,9273,6504,6508,415
26,609
27,01734,57344,98342,31260,482
79,41477,579
21,04920,83417,73519,796
20,53320,79818,15818,091
15,65213,41616,453
Nonpetroleurr
Total
19,47623,41524,77530,60733,158
36,93941,92951,14762,08477,040
71,02489,478
106,706133,501151,337
170,161186,564
43,38241,52942,00043,250
44,46246,03447,38248,687
46,00147,45348,485
Indus-trial
suppliesand
materi-als
9,12310,2359,956
12,02711,798
12,41613,79416,30819,63627.819
24.01329,75935,67042,54249,880
55,63260,281
15,33113,62413,16713,510
14,47415,20515,49815,102
14,23013,42213,485
Othergoods
10,35313,18014,81918,58021,360
24,52328,13534,83942,44849,221
47,01159,71971,03690,959
101,457
114,529126.283
28,05127,90528,83329,740
29,98830,82931,88433,585
31,77134,03135,000
Note, - Data are on an international transactions basis and exclude military shipments.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysts.
278Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-103.—U.S. merchandise exports and imports by area, 1973-82
[Millions of dollars]
Item 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981
1982 first3 quartersat annual
rate*
Exports
Industrial countries
CanadaJapanWestern EuropeAustralia, New Zealand,
and South Africa
Other countries, exceptEastern Europe
OPEC2...Other3..
Eastern Europe
Imports
Industrial countries...
CanadaJapanWestern EuropeAustralia, New Zealand,
and South Africa
Other countries, exceptEastern Europe...
OPEC 2...Other'...
71,410
48,529
16,7108,356
21,216
2,247
20,834
3,41417,420
2,047
70,499
48,985
17,6949,665
19,774
1,852
20,913
5,09715,816
98,306
64,487
21,84210,72428,164
3,757
32,082
6,21925,863
1,737
103,649
61,092
22,39212,41424,267
2,019
41,580
17,23424,346
107,088
66,496
23,5379,567
29,884
3,508
37,343
9,95627,387
3,249
98,041
55,973
21,71011,25720,764
2,242
41,334
18,89722,437
114,745
72,335
26,33610,19631,883
3,920
38,287
11,56126,726
4,123
* 124,051
67,488
26,47515,53123,003
2,479
55,379
27,40927,970
120,816
76,970
28,53310,56634,094
3,777
40,951
12,877
28,074
2,895
451,689
79,228
29,64518,56528,226
2,792
70,680
35,77834,902
142,054
87,948
31,22912,96039,546
4,213
50,213
14,84635,367
3,893
'175,813
99,151
33,55224,54136,618
4,440
74,402
33,28641,116
184,473
115,930
38,69017,62954,177
5,434
62,630
14,53748,093
5,913
'211,819
112,600
39,02026,26141,826
5,493
96,137
45,03951,098
224,237
137,152
41,62620,80667,603
7,117
82,942
17,36465,578
4,143
1249,575
127,702
42,69731,21747,255
6,533
119,142
55,60263,540
236,254
141,134
45,25021,79665,090
8,998
90,636
21,09369,543
4,461
•264,143
143,395
47,31637,59852,873
5,608
119,196
49,93469,262
Eastern Europe... 601 977 734 875 1,127 1,508 1,896 1,444 1,552
217,912
130,069
40,09920,83960,952
8,180
83,820
21,10362,717
4,023
-•249,947
145,681
48,86338,77552,955
5,089
103,102
32,43370,669
1,132
1 Preliminary; seasonally adjusted.2 Algeria, Ecuador, Gabon, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela.3 Latin American Republics, other Western Hemisphere, and other countries in Asia and Africa, less members of OPEC.4 Trade with international organizations is included in totals for 1976-82, but not in area detail. This includes imports ofnonmonetary gold from International Monetary Fund in 1976-80; an export of tin to International Tin Council (ITC) in 1981; and animport of tin from ITC in 1982.
Note.—Data are on an international transactions basis and exclude military.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
279Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-104.—U.S. merchandise exports and imports by commodity groups, 1960-82[Millions of dollars; monthly data seasonally adjusted]
Year ormonth
Totaldomes-tic andforeign
exports3
Merchandise exports1
Domestic exports
T o t a l 2 3
Food,
andtobacco
Crudemateri-als andfuels4
Manu-facturedgoods
Merchandise imports
General imports"
Total3
Food,bever-ages,and
tobacco
Crudemateri-als andfuels*
Manufacturedgoods
Total,elf.
value7
Merchandise trade balance
Exportsless
imports,customs
value
Exportsless
imports,f.a.s.
Exportsless
imports,elf.
F.a.s. value8 Customs value
I960..1961..1962..1963..1964..
1965..1966..1967..1968..1969..
1970..1971..1972..1973..1974..
1974*1975*1976*1977*1978*1979*1980
198119821981:
JanFebMar....
June..July...Aug.,.Sept..oeSNov...Dec...
1982:JanFebMar...
tpJune..July...Aug...Sept..OclNov...Dec...,
19,65920,22620,98622,46725,832
26,74229,49031,03034,06337,33242,65943,54949,19970,82397,998
98,092107,652115,223121,232143,681181,860220,630
233,677212,193
18,90219,78821,27819,78618,89919,750
19,28919,03119,55119,16319,15318,885
18,73718,70418,60217,84318,21818,822
18,02717,49817,38716,69815,69316,335
19,45919,98220,71722,18225,479
26,39929,05430,64633,62636,788
42.02542,91148,39969,73096,634
96,679106,161113,549119,024141,142178,633
216,515
228,899207,076
18,53619,46520,84319,37718,52819,340
18,91918,72019,10818,73318,75118,377
18,35018,34118,12717,44117,80718,386
17,63817,17716,65116,31015,31715,902
3,1673,4663,7434,1884,637
4,5195,1864,7104,5924,446
5,0585,0766,56912,93815,233
15,23316,79317,23415,96320,60424,587
30,407
33,20626,977
2,9342,9433,3042,8912,6672,573
2,5492,4702,7722,9202,6752,515
2,2792,4822,6732,5062,4782,4211,8962,1621,9092,1322,0861,943
3,9423,8643,3563,7754,337
4,2734,4044,7264,8655,006
6,6926,4417,091
10,73515,802
15,80215,19716,09518,57920,95728,22233,719
33,02233,518
2,8152,9583,2192,5302,5262,342
2,4302,6622,7952,8632,8722,934
3,0763,4343,1512,8982,9122,797
2,6172,6422,8322,6652,3612,420
12,58312,78413,66814.29716,529
17,43319,21820,84423,81826,785
29,34430,44333,74044,73163,523
15,07314,76116,46417,20718,749
21,42725,61826,88933,22636,043
39,95145,56355,58369,476
101,394
3,3923,4553,6743,8634,022
4,0134,5904,7015,3655,308
6,2306,4047,3799,235
10,701
4,4184,3344,6914,7555,029
5,4405,7185,3676,0316,3916,5427,2688,838
13,44631,842
6,8636,5377,6498,0709,106
11,24414,44615,75620,62423,01125,90730,41437,76745,00156,202
F.a.s. value 8
63,52370,95177,24180,15194,473116,587
143,891
154,283139,716
12,06512,81313,55813,27612,61913,456
13,06012,99112,94712,45812,59012,318
12,46311,87611,82211,42811,83712,563
12,59011,88211,33410,98710,36910,660
102,55998,503123,477150,390174,757209,458
244,871
10,7099,92311,89114,22715,74317,735
32,06432,59641,47453,55451,90171,390
18,551 93,973 125,122
55,22351,08064,77576,554100,317112,226
Customs value
260,982243,952
22,61621,91621,02922,24921,23222,005
20,11423,24221,27423,07722,50819,746
22,82919,09020,34917,38720,55821,310
19,55923,49420,64421,09618,93718,865
18,35017,817
1,7361,5891,6121,4711,6651,472
1,3901,4791,3931,5831,4131,542
1,3401,1541,5291,4351,5691,567
1,3891,6171,5811,6671,4981,469
92,87374,404
8,9769,0997,4718,8787,1468,249
6,5767,7797,4117,6427,4686,174
8,2695,8455,7175,0334,9066,198
6,6457,1685,9686,7115,7706,181
142,475.144,022
11,27810,75011,37911,32511,81611,645
11,62213,36111,97113,12712,82611,414
12,58411,52712,40210,33713,21912,89910,98214,11112,43412,02811,03810,621
28,74535,32038,241
42,42948,34258,86273,573
108,392
110,875105,880132,498160,411186,045222,228
256,984
273^352254,885
23,67922,91721,98323,26622,24823,033
21,07424,39822,31724,19423,56820,699
23,87019,90021,23718,16521,50922,259
20,44924,57821,58022,02419,78319,701
4,5865,4654,5225,2607,083
5,3113,8724,141
8371,289
2,708-2,014-6,384
1,348-3,396
-4,4679,149
-8,254-29,158-31,076-27,599=24,241
27,30531,759
-3,714-2,127
249-2,463-2,333-2,255
- 8 2 5-4,212-1,724-3,914-3,356
- 8 6 1
41,747
4562,3402,4881,5325,9963,2574,3983,2442,529
2,283-1,257
- 9 0 9230
-4,793-9,663
2,752-10,395
-12,7831,772
-17,274-39,179-42,364-40,368
=36,354
=39,675=42,691
-4,777=3,129
-7053,480
-3,349-3,283
-1,784=5,367= 2,766-5,031=4,415-1,814
= 5.134-1,197= 2,635
-322=3,291-3,437
=2,422-7,080-4,192=5,326-4,090-3,366
1 Beginning 1960, data have been adjusted for comparability with the revised commodity classifications effective in 1965.2 Department of Defense shipments of grant-aid military supplies and equipment under the Military Assistance Program are excludedfrom total exports.
9 Total includes commodities and transactions not classified according to kind.4 Includes fats and oils.5 Includes machinery, transportation equipment, chemicals, metals, and other manufactures. Export data for these items include
military grant-aid shipments through 1977 and exclude them thereafter.8 Total arrivals of imported goods other than intransit shipments.7 C.i.f. {cost, insurance, and freight) import value at first port of entry into United States. Data for 1967-73 are estimates.6 F.a.s. (free alongside ship) value basis at U.S. port of exportation for exports and at foreign port of exportation for imports.
Trade in gold is included beginning 1974. Export statistics cover all merchandise shipped from the U.S. customs area, except suppliesfor the US. Armed Forces. Exports include shipments under Agency for International Development and Food for Peace programs as wellas other private relief shipments.
Data for 1980 and 1981 include trade of the U.S. Virgin Islands, except that for 1980 Virgin Islands exports are reflected only in thefigures for domestic and foreign exports combined, total domestic exports, and trade balance.
*Data for 1974=79 for domestic and foreign exports combined, total domestic exports, total general imports, and trade balanceInclude trade of the Virgin Islands.
Source: Department of Commerce (Bureau of the Census and International Trade Administration, Office of Trade Investment andAnalysis, Trade Performance Division).
280Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-105.—International investment position of the United States at year-end, selected years, 1970-81
[Billions of dollars]
Type of investment 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1979 1980 1981
Net international investment position of the United States..U.S. assets abroad
U.S. official reserve assets..GoldSpecial drawing rights (SDRs)Reserve position in the International Monetary
Fund (IMF)Foreign currency reserves
Other U.S. Government assets..U.S. loans and other long-term assetsU.S. short-term assets other than reserves
U.S. private assetsDirect investments abroad (book value)Foreign securitiesClaims on foreigners reported by U.S. banks, not
included elsewhereClaims on unaffiliated foreigners reported by
U.S. nonbanksForeign assets in the United States-
Foreign official assetsU.S. Government securitiesl
Other U.S. Government liabilitiesLiabilities reported by U.S. banks, not included
elsewhereOther official assets
Other foreign assetsDirect investments in the United States (book
value)Liabilities reported by U.S. banks, not included
elsewhereU.S. Treasury securitiesOther U.S. securities2
Liabilities to unaffiliated foreigners reported byU.S. nonbanks
58.6165.5
14.5
11.1.9
1.9.6
32.1
29.72.5
118.8
75.521.0
13.8
8.5
106.8
26.1
17.71.7
6.7.0
80.7
13.3
22.71.2
34.7
8.8
37.1
199.0
13.2
10.52.0
.5
.236.1
34.12.0
149.7
89.927.6
20.7
11.4
161.8
63.2
52.91.6
8.5.2
98.7
14.9
21.21.2
50.7
10.7
58.8
255.7
15.9
11.72.4
1.9.0
38.4
36.32.1
201.5
110.128.2
46.2
17.0
196.9
79.8
58.12.6
18.4.6
117.1
25.1
41.81.7
34.9
13.6
83.8
347.2
18.7
11.62.4
4.4.3
46.044.1
1.9
282.4136.844.2
81.1
20.3
263.4
104.2
72.68.8
17.25.6
159.1
30.8
53.57.0
54.9
13.0
76.2
447.9
18.7
11.71.6
1.04.4
54.252.3
1.9
375.0162.753.4
130.8
28.1
371.6
173.0
128.512.7
23.38.5
198.7
42.5
77.78.9
53.6
16.0
94.9
510.6
19.0
11.22.7
1.33.8
58.456.5
1.9
433.2187.9
56.8
157.0
31.5415.7159.7
106.612.6
30.59.9
256.0
54.5
110.314.258.6
18.4
121.6
606.9
26.8
11.22.6
2.910.1
63.561.9
1.7
516.6
215.662.5
203.9
34.7
485.3
175.8
118.213.1
30.414.1
309.4
68.4
121.116.174.1
29.8
160.3
717.4
30.1
11.24.1
5.19.8
68.5
67.21.3
618.8
227.362.9
293.5
35.0
557.1
180.1
125.113.1
26.315.6
377.1
89.8
164.718.575.3
28.9
1 Includes Treasury and agency issues of securities.2 Corporate and other bonds and corporate stocks.Source: Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
281Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-106.— World trade: Exports and imports, 1965, 1970, 1975, and 1979-82
[Billions of U.S. dollars]
Area and country
Developed countries'.
United StatesCanadaJapan
European Community4
FranceWest GermanyItalyUnited Kingdom..,
Other developed countries..
Developing countries
Oil exporting countries8
Other
Communist countries0..
U.S.S.REastern Europe....China
TOTAL...
Developed countries3..
United States..CanadaJapan
European Community4
FranceWest GermanyItalyUnited Kingdom
Other developed countries..
Developing countries
Oil exporting countries8
Other
Communist countries0..
U.S.S.REastern Europe..China
TOTAL..
1965 1970 1975 1979 1980 1981
130.1
27.58.48.5
65.2
10.217.97.2
13.8
20.5
40.2
10.529.6
23.2
8.211.82.0
193.5
137.5
23.28.78.2
70.5
10.417.67.4
16.1
27.0
43.5
6.437.2
22.5
8.011.61.8
203.5
Exports, f.o.b. *
226.7
43.216.719.3
113.6
18.134.213.219.6
33.7
61.7
17.544.2
34.9
12.818.22.2
323.3
585.7
108.134.155.7
300.6
53.190.234.844.5
87.1
226.5
113.6113.0
90.5
33.445.37.3
902.7
1,085.7
182.058.3
102.3
577.2
100.7171.872.286.4
165.8
452.8
214.3238.5
170.4
64.977.913.5
1,708.9
1.283.9
220.867.7
130.4
665.8
116.0192.977.7
110.1
199.1
608.8
301.2307.6
203.1
76.487.518.9
2,095.8
1.258.9
233.772.6
151.5
612.8
106.4176.175.3
102.7
188.2
606.1
276.4329.6
213.2
79.491.121.4
2,078.2
Imports, c.i.f.7
237.8
42.714.318.9
118.9
19.129.915.022.0
43.1
67.8
9.957.9
34.1
11.718.52.2
339.7
618.1
105.936.257.8
306.4
54.074.938.453.3
111.8
221.6
52.8168.9
100.8
37.151.37.4
940.5
1,182.7
222.257.0
109.8
611.1
107.0159.677.999.6
182.6
408.0
100.1307.8
170.9
58.083.015.7
1,761.6
1,427.1
257.062.8
141.3
729.2
134.9188.099.5
115.8
236.8
540.1
137.2402.9
202.8
$8.593.120.9
2,170.0
1,358.3
273.470.0
142.9
644.2
121.0163.991.1
102.0
227.9
595.2
162.0433.2
211.2
73.297.319.6
2,164.7
1982 l
1,199.7
212.971.1
140.3
599.3
96.4175.777.395.5
176.1
525.9
212.8313.1
215.6
80.990.123.0
1,941.2
1,290.4
261.460.8
132.0
628.1
116.6154.990.5
100.1
208.1
562.4
163.9398,5
209.3
80.189.219.1
2,062.1
1 Preliminary estimates.2 Free-cn-board ship value.3 Includes the OECD countries, South Africa, and non-OECD Europe.4 Includes Belgium-Luxembourg, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, and the Netherlands, not shown separately.6 Includes Algeria, Ecuador, Gabon, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and
Venezuela.•Includes North Korea. Vietnam, Albania, Cuba, Mongolia, and Yugoslavia, not shown separately.'Cost, insurance, and freight value; except Eastern Europe (except Hungary) and U.S.S.R., which are f.o.b (free on board).Sources: International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and Council of Economic Advisers.
282Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-107.— World trade balance and current account balances, 1965, 1970, 1975, and 1979-82
[Billions of U.S. dollars]
Area and country 1965 1970 1975 1979 1980 1981 1982»
Developed countries3
United States....CanadaJapan
European Community4
FranceWest GermanyItalyUnited Kingdom....
Other developed countries
Developing countries
Oil-exporting countries5
Other ..
Communist countries6..
U.S.S.REastern Europe..China
TOTAL7...
Developed countries3..
United States..CanadaJapan
European Community4
FranceWest GermanyItalyUnited Kingdom....
Other developed countries ,
Developing countries
Oil exporting countries5..Other.. *
Communist cour
U.S.S.REastern Europe..China
TOTAL..
- 7 . 4
4.3- . 2
- 5 . 3
- . 2
-2-2.3
- 6 . 4
- 3 . 3
4.2- 7 . 5
.2
'2
-10.0
3.2
5.4-1,1
.4-1 .6
2.2- . 1
- 2 . 9
World trade balance2
-11.2
is
-5 .2
-1 .04.3
-1 .8-2 .4
- 9 . 4
-6 .1
7.6-13.6
.«
1.1
~!o-16.4
-32.5
2.2-2 .1-2 .1
-5 .7
152-3 .6-8 .8
-24.7
4.9
60.8-55.9
-10.3
-3 .7-6 .0
-37.8
-97.1
-40.21.3
-7 .5
-33.9
-6 .312.2
-5 .7-13.2
-16.8
44.8
114.2-69.4
- .5
6.9-5 .1-2 .2
-52.7
-143.2
-36.24.9
-10.9
-63.3
-18.94.9
-21.8-5 .7
-37.7
68.6
164.0-95.4
.3
7.9-5 .6-2 .0
-74.2
-99.4
-39.62.68.6
-31.4
-14.512.2
-15.8
-39.7
10.8
114.4-103.6
2.0
6.2-6 .1
1.8
-86.5
Current account balances8
4.7
2.3
2!o
2.8
- . 1.9.9
2.0
-3 .1
-1 ,8
- .1
- 2 . 7
18.3-4 .7- . 6
2.5
1.64.0
- . 6
-3 .4
-18.2
-16.519.4
-35.9
-11.2
-4 .7-6 .4
- 3 0 . 4
-29.8
-A2-8 .7
- 8 . 7
5.2-6 .1
5.4-1 .7
-7 .7
-18.3
27.9-46.2
-4 .9
3.8-7 .6-1 .1
- 5 3 . 0
- 7 0 . 6
1.5- . 9
-10.7
- 3 7 . 3
- 3 . 6-16.4
- 9 . 8
6.9
-23.2
-1 .372.1
-73.4
- 3 . 0
3.5-5 .5-1 .0
- 7 4 . 9
-40.1
4.2-4 .4
5.1
-14.2
-3 .0-7 .1-8 .512.4
- 3 0 . 7
- 2 5 . 0
56.5-81.5
2.7
2.7-3 .5
3.5
- 6 2 . 4
-90.7
- 4 8 . 510.38.3
- 2 8 . 8
-20.220.8
-13.2
-4 .6
-32.0
-36.548.9
- 8 5 . 4
6.3
.8
.83.9
-120.9
- 4 3 . 8
-8 .81.06.5
-17.0
-11.5
-"sis4,5
-25.5
-61.02.0
-63.0
6.7
3.1- 2 . 0
5.6
-98.1
1 Preliminary estimates.2 Exports f.o.b. (free-on-board ship value) less imports c.i.f. (cost, insurance, and freight).3 Includes the OECD countries. South Africa, and non-OECO Europe.4 Includes Belgium-Luxembourg, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, and the Netherlands, not shown separately.* Includes Afgeria, Ecuador, Gabon, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and
Venezuela.• Includes North Korea, Vietnam, Albania, Cuba, Mongolia, and Yugoslavia, not shown separately.7 Asymmetries arise in global payments aggregations because of discrepancies in coverage, classification, timing, and valuation in the
recording of transactions by the countries involved.8 OECD basis.Sources: International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and Council of Economic Advisers.
283
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-108.—International reserves, selected years, 1952-82
[Millions of SDRs; end of period]
Area and country
All countries *.
Industrial countries3
United States....CanadaAustraliaJapanNew Zealand
AustriaBelgiumDenmark...FinlandFrance
GermanyIcelandIrelandItalyNetherlands
NorwaySpainSwedenSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom..
Oil-exporting countries..
AlgeriaIndonesiaIranIraqKuwait
LibyaNigeriaOmanQatarSaudi Arabia..
United Arab Emirates..Venezuela
Non-oil developing countries..
AfricaAsiaEuropeMiddle EastWestern Hemisphere..
1952
a 49,391
38,582
24,7141,944
9201,101
183
1161,133
150132686
9608
318722953
164134504
1,6671,956
1,699
31417713150
500
443
8,576
1,2023,407
966825
2,175
1962
62,851
52,535
17,2202,5611,1682,021
251
1,0811,753
256237
4,049
6,95832
3594,0681,943
3041,045
8022,9193,308
2,030
18610821119397
96289
268
583
8,171
1,6352,5501,346
9401,700
1972
147,443
110,282
12,1125,5725,65616,916
767
2,5053,564787664
9,224
21,90878
1,0385,6054,407
1,2204,6181,4536,9615,201
10,071
454531885720335
2,69434614956
2,303
1,595
26,132
3,1686,6406,4282,4027,494
1979
306,995
180,775
15,1702,9511,359
15,667344
3,8325,3072,5141,204
16,212
43,225125
1,69316,1497,301
3,24110,5502,88015,39115,626
56,318
2,2143,093
11,682
2,268
4,9024,235
445228
14,790
1,1075,958
68,703
4,28623,2057,4007,442
26,370
1980
358,706
211,490
21,4793,1591,603
20,164277
4,8797,3302,7121,501
24,301
40,976138
2,25520,47710,669
4,7839,8132,893
15,19016,851
73,601
3,1534,311
3,169
10,3728,049
692286
18,536
1,6005,579
71,776
4,44424,9478,0608,311
26,014
1981
375,793
212,732
25,5023,7551,713
25,083580
5,2795,4512,2461.319
21,991
40,892199
2,29019,6319,562
5,4149,7943,30614,92513,757
81,428
3,3704,416
3,583
7,8603,371988339
27,855
2,7757,415
75,303
4,17527,4418,1599,001
26.527
1982
Novem-ber
364,589
207,396
30,4153,3965,539
22,150523
5,1575,0862,0041,254
15,230
43,580132
2,15114,60510,056
6,808* 7,675
3,49915,44812,770
76,989
2,5113,041
5,263
6,2391,128
• 1,049
26,929
* 2,9576,721
73,035
4,21832,628
6,9728,753
20,464
1 Includes Taiwan, not shown in area detail.8 Includes Cuba.3 Includes Luxembourg.4 Data are for October 1982.Note.—International reserves is comprised of monetary authorities' holdings of gold, special drawing rights (SDRs), reserve positions
in the International Monetary Fund, and foreign exchange. Data exclude U.S.S.R., other Eastern European countries, and Cuba (after1960).
U.S. dollars per SDR (end of period) are: 1952 and 1962—1.00000; 1972—1.08571; 1977—1.21471; 1978—1.30279; 1979—1.31733; 1980=1.27541; 1981-1.6396; and November 1982-1.07953.
Source: International Monetary Fund, "International financial Statistics,"
284
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-109.—Growth rates in real gross national product, 1960-82
[Percent change]
Area and country1960-73annualaverage
1974-81annualaverage
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 iU.S. dollarvalue in
1981(billions)2
Developed countries3..
United States..Canada
European Community 4
FranceWest Germany....ItalyUnited Kingdom..
Other developed countries..
Developing countries
Oil exporting countries8
Other
Communist countries7..
U.S.S.REastern Europe..China
TOTAL..
5.1
4.15.6
10.4
4.7
5.84.75.23.1
5.1
5.8
5.2
5.24.16.5
5.2
2.7
2.72.64.4
1.9
2.52.22.1
.9
1.9
4.4
3.74.6
2.7
2.31.85.9
2.9
4.1
4.83.75.1
3.1
3.73.62.73.3
2.1
4.3
6.73.3
4.2
3.43.0
12.3
3.8
3.5
3.23.05.6
3.4
3.54.34.91.4
-1.7
4.1
3.24.51.6
1.36.9
2.8
1.2
- . 2.0
4.2
1.3
1.61.84.0
-1 .7
4.0
4.52.05.6
1.9
1.5.4
6.9
1.8
1.4
2.03.02.9
- . 4
.3- . 3- . 2- . 8
5.2
2.7
- . 53.1
1.2
1.8-1 .0
3.0
1.8
- . 5
- 1 . 8- 5 . 0
2.5
.3
1.5- 1 . 3
.8
.5
1.2
1.4
1.6
2
7,020
2,926280
1,150
2,420
577687299502
245
1,965
5401,425
2,740
1,587671328
11,725
1 Preliminary estimates.2 Estimates based on conversion at average rates of exchange for 1980, except for those of the Communist countries, which wereconverted at U.S. purchasing power equivalents.
3 Includes the OECD countries, South Africa, and non-OECD Europe.4 Includes Belgium-Luxembourg, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, and the Netherlands, not shown separately.• Not available .6 Includes Algeria, Ecuador, Gabon, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and
Venezuela.7 Includes North Korea, Vietnam, Albania, Cuba, Mongolia, and Yugoslavia, not shown separately.Sources: Department of Commerce, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and
Council of Economic Advisers.
285Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-110.—Industrial production and consumer prices, major industrial countries, 1960-82
[1967-100]
Year or quarter
I9601961 • ...196219631964
19651966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982 p
1981:IIIIllIV
1982:|IIHI .IV »
UnitedStates
66.266.772.276.581.7
89.897.8
100.0106.3111.1
107.8109.6119 7129.8129.3
117.8130.5138.2146.1152.5
147.0151.0138.6
151.8152.5153.0146.3
141.8139 4138.2135.1
Canada
63.165.671.275.782.6
89.796.2
100.0106.4113.7
115.3121.5130.7144.6149.2
140.3148.5152.2157.8167.4
164.6167.3
167.8172.8168.1160.7
156.1151.9147.7
Japan
43.051.255.461.771.4
74.283.8
100.0115.2133.4
151.8155.7167.0190.5183.1
163.9182.0189.7201.1217.7
232.5239.5
235.4236.1241.1245.9
243.6239 7243.5
EuropeanCommu-
nity1France
Industrial production2
74.778.181.384.891.0
94.798.4
100.0107.4117.6
123.3126.1131.7141.4142.3
132.8142.6145.9149.7156.8
155.6152.3
151.5152.1152.1151.8
151.9151.5148.6
7073788690
9398
100104114
120128135145148
139149152155163
160157
158160161161
158159151
WestGermany
78.482.886.188.996.6
102.1103.0100.0109.2123.2
131.1133.6138.7147.7145.1
137.1149.1152.0154.1161.8
162.3159.9
162160161160
162159154
Italy
59.265.571.978.479.2
82.893.3
100.0106.4110.5
117.6117.5122.7134.6140.6
127.6143.5145.1147.9157.6
166.5162.7
157.7160.1152.3159.8
161.0158.6146.6
UnitedKingdom
84.484.385,188.195.0
97.799.2
100.0106.7110.3
110.9110.6113.2123.0120.0
114.3117.4122.9126.9132.2
123.6118.8
117.8118.5118.6120.0
119.2119.8119.8
Consumer prices
i9601961196219631964
1965....1966....1967....19681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:I
IV
1982:
ll'ZIIIIIV
88.789.690.691.792.9
94.597.2
100.0104.2109.8
116.3121.3125.3133.1147.7
161.2170.5181.5195.4217.4
246.8272.4289.1
262.9269.0276.7280.7
283.0287.3292.8293.4
85.986.787.789.290.9
93.196.5
100.0104.0108.8
112.4115.6121.2130.3144.5
160.1172.1185.9202.5221.0
243.5273.9303.4
262.0270.2278.2285.0
292.2301.2307.6312.6
68.371.876.782.585.8
91.696.3
100.0105.3110.9
119.3126.5132.3147.9184.0
205.8224.9243.0252.3261.3
282.2296.2
291.4296.3296.9300.1
30O.3303.5304.8
77.081.184.587.690.8
94.297.5
100.0103.7108.0
113.3120.3127.6138.3156.4
176.7195.2214.7229.9250.7
281.6314.1
300.7310.4317.8326.3
333.9344.3348.2
3 78.03 80.6
85.489.592.5
94.897.4
100.0104.5111.3
117.1123.5131.1140.7160.0
178.9196.1214.5233.9259.1
294.2332.7
315.7326.1338.9349.9
359.8371.0376.0
82.984.887.489.992.0
95.098.4
100.0101.6103.5
107.1112.7119.0127.2136.1
144.2150.4155.9160.2166.8
175.9186.3
182.2185.5187.8190.0
192.7195.4197.6
74.175.779.285.190.1
94.296.4
100.0101.4104.1
109.2114.4121.0134.0159.7
186.8218.1255.2286.2328.5
398.0472.4
448.4468.0482.1504.9
523.7539.6562.7
79.081.685.186.889.6
93.997.6
100.0104.8110.3
117.4128.5137.7150.2174.3
216.5252.4292.4316.6359.0
423.6473.9514.7
450.4472.3480.5492.3
500.5516.6518.9522.7
1 Consists of Belgium-Luxembourg, Denmark, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and West Germany Industrialproduction prior to July 1981 excludes data for Greece, which joined the EC in 1981.8 All data exclude construction. Quarterly data are seasonally adjusted.
» Data for 1960 and 1961 are for Paris only.Sources: Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration, Office of Trade Investment and Analysis, Trade Performance
Division) and Department of labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics).
286Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
TABLE B-lll.—Unemployment rate, and hourly compensation, major industrial countries, 1960-82
[Quarterly data seasonally adjusted]
Year or quarter
I9601961196219631964
19651966196719681969
197019711972 . ..19731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
1981:
II „IllIV
1982:|||IIIIV
I9601961196219631964
1965 .. .1966196719681969
19701971197219731974
19751976197719781979
198019811982
UnitedStates Canada Japan France West
Germany Italy UnitedKingdom
Unemployment rate (percent)1
5.56.75.55.75.2
4.53.83.83.63.5
4.95.95.64.95.6
8.57.77.16.15.8
7.17.69.7
7.47.47.48.3
8.89.4
10.010.7
36.737.739.140.342.0
42 844.847.050.453.9
57.661.164.469.076.3
85.492.3
100.0108.3118.9
132 8146.4158.8
707.15.95.54.7
3.93.43.84.54.4
5.76.2625.55.3
6.97.1818.47.5
7.57.6
11.0
7.37.27.68.4
8610.212.112.7
29.929428.729.430.6
32134.637.340.043.0
47.853.158.163 475.0
82.497.1
100.099.4
106.6
116 4126.1
171.51.31.31.2
1.21.41.31.21.1
1.21.3141.31.4
192.0202.32,1
2.02.2
2.22.42.22.2
232.42.4
161.4131.21.3
141.81.82.42.2
2.42.7282.72.9
424.6505.46.1
6.57.7
7.07.77.97.9
838.68.7
Hourly compensation (1
6.6778.89.8
11.0
12 413.615.317.921.3
25.430.340.155 067.1
77.182.3
100.0136.1138.5
142 6157.0
16.217 819.621.723.3
25126.728.932.632.3
33.938.046.260 066.2
88.590.6
100.01231148.2
174 2158.3
11.6.6
A
.3
131.1.6
'.B.7
1.6
3.53.53.53.43.0
3.04.2
3.53.94.44.9
5.35.86.2
977 = 100)2
10.512.313.914.9 -16.1
17.619.020.121.323.6
29.534.742.056.967.1
79.483.5
100.0125.6147.5
161.7139.9
383.2282.42.6
353.83.43.43.3
3.13.1363.42.8
323.6363.73.9
3.94.24.6
3.94.34.14.5
4.64.64.54.5
11.913.115.518.320.4
21822.825.427.130.7
36.843.152.366.474.0
95.089.5
100.0119.1143.1
164.8152.4
2 11.9273.32.4
212.2323.23.0
3.139423.23.1
466.0646.35.7
7311.3
10.311.111.512.5
12.812.913.0
24.926.828.329.531.6
34 737.638.235.638.8
44.351.860.065.578.2
96.591.8
100.0128.1168.5
228.2230.8
'Unemployment rates, approximating U.S. concepts. Data for United Kingdom exclude Northern Ireland. Quarterly data for France.West Germany, and United Kingdom should be viewed as less precise indicators of unemployment under U.S. concepts than the annualdata. Beginning 1977, changes in the Italian survey resulted in a large increase in persons enumerated as unemployed. However, manyalso reported that they had not actively sought work in the past 30 days. Such persons have been provisionally excluded forcomparability with U.S. concepts; their inclusion would more than double the rates shown for Italy.
2 Hourly compensation in manufacturing, U.S. dollar basis. Data relate to all employed persons (wage and salary earners and the self-employed) in the United States and Canada, and to all employees (wage and salary earners) in the other countries. For France andUnited Kingdom compensation adjusted to include changes in employment taxes that are not compensation to employees, but are laborcosts to employers.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
287Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis